STATUS In Progress - Programmed FEDERAL Local Fund $0 $0 $0 $13,041 $13, TAP CL STBG $0 $0 $0 $247,789 $247,789
|
|
- Godfrey Rose
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Amendment RTCSNV Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year Projects Listed CL (Ver 10) STATUS In Progress - Programmed FEDERAL Title: Safe Routes to School Coordinator Description: Continue funding of the SRTS Coordinator position and program at the Clark County School District. Project Type: Other Misc. Limits: Not Location Specific AQ: Exempt, Other - Non construction related activities. TCM:No NDOT: District Local Fund $0 $0 $0 $13,041 $13, TAP CL STBG $0 $0 $0 $247,789 $247, Local Fund $0 $0 $0 $13,130 $13, TAP CL STBG $0 $0 $0 $249,473 $249, Local Fund $0 $0 $0 $9,372 $9, TAP CL STBG $0 $0 $0 $178,084 $178,084 <2018 Prior $0 $0 $0 $712,933 $712, $0 $0 $0 $710,889 $710,889 ALL YEARS $0 $0 $0 $1,423,822 $1,423,822 RTCSNV (6017) Clark County School District Previously Approved Version CL (Ver 9) Title: Safe Routes to School Coordinator Description: Continue funding of the SRTS Coordinator position and program at the Clark County School District. Project Type: Other Misc. AQ: Exempt, Other - Non construction related activities. TCM:No NDOT: District 1 Limits: Not Location Specific 2018 Local Fund $0 $0 $0 $13,041 $13, TAP CL STBG $0 $0 $0 $247,789 $247, Local Fund $0 $0 $0 $13,130 $13, TAP CL STBG $0 $0 $0 $249,473 $249,473 <2018 Prior $0 $0 $0 $712,933 $712, $0 $0 $0 $523,433 $523,433 ALL YEARS $0 $0 $0 $1,236,366 $1,236,366 RTCSNV (6017) Clark County School District RTCSNV Project Listing Printed on Wednesday, December 12, 2018 Page 1 of 6
2 Amendment RTCSNV Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year Projects Listed CL (Ver 1) STATUS FEDERAL Title: I 515/ US 95 Reduce and Restripe Lanes Description: Eliminate lanes, add lanes and re-striping southbound roadway Project Type: Rd Improvement Limits: AQ: Non-Exempt TCM:No NDOT: District 1 From Eastern Avenue to Spaghetti Bowl of Distance (mile) 2.31 Milepost begins at ends at State Gas Tax $1,650,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,650, NHPP $0 $0 $9,025,000 $0 $9,025, State Gas Tax $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $30, State Match - Nv $0 $0 $475,000 $0 $475, $1,650,000 $30,000 $9,500,000 $0 $11,180,000 ALL YEARS $1,650,000 $30,000 $9,500,000 $0 $11,180,000 RTCSNV (6250) Nevada DOT RTCSNV Project Listing Printed on Monday, December 10, 2018 Page 2 of 6
3 Amendment RTCSNV Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year Projects Listed CL (Ver 10) STATUS In Progress - Programmed FEDERAL Title: I 515 Auxiliary Lanes and SR 159 Charleston Blvd Improvements Description: Construct intersection improvements at I 515/Charleston and auxiliary lanes Project Type: Rd Interchange/ Intersect Limits: AQ: Non-Exempt TCM:Yes NDOT: District 1 From Charleston Blvd to Eastern Ave of Distance (mile) 1.7 Milepost begins at ends at State Gas Tax $2,550,000 $1,750,000 $0 $0 $4,300, NHPP $0 $0 $16,625,000 $0 $16,625, State Gas Tax $0 $0 $17,500,000 $0 $17,500, State Match - Nv $0 $0 $875,000 $0 $875, $2,550,000 $1,750,000 $35,000,000 $0 $39,300,000 ALL YEARS $2,550,000 $1,750,000 $35,000,000 $0 $39,300,000 RTCSNV (5079) Previously Approved Version CL (Ver 9) Nevada DOT Title: I 515 Auxiliary Lanes and SR 159 Charleston Blvd Improvements Description: Construct intersection improvements at I 515/Charleston and auxiliary lanes Project Type: Rd Interchange/ Intersect AQ: Exempt, All Projects - Intersection channelization projects. TCM:No NDOT: District 1 Limits: From Charleston Blvd to Eastern Ave of Distance (mile) 1.7 Milepost begins at ends at State Gas Tax $2,550,000 $1,750,000 $0 $0 $4,300, $2,550,000 $1,750,000 $0 $0 $4,300,000 ALL YEARS $2,550,000 $1,750,000 $35,000,000 $0 $39,300,000 RTCSNV (5079) Nevada DOT RTCSNV Project Listing Printed on Monday, December 10, 2018 Page 3 of 6
4 Amendment RTCSNV Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year Projects Listed CL (Ver 1) STATUS FEDERAL Title: US 95 Construct Ramps (North West Corridor Package 3D/E) Description: Construct ramps, realigh/widen, and upgrade CC 215 to divided 6 lane freeway Project Type: Rd Interchange/ Intersect Limits: AQ: Non-Exempt TCM:Yes NDOT: District 1 Primary Interchange: US 95, Secondary Interchange: CC Local Fund $0 $0 $9,000,000 $0 $9,000, NDOT Bond FRI2 $0 $0 $42,000,000 $0 $42,000, NHPP $0 $0 $86,450,000 $0 $86,450, State Match - Nv $0 $0 $4,550,000 $0 $4,550, $0 $0 $142,000,000 $0 $142,000,000 ALL YEARS $0 $0 $142,000,000 $0 $142,000,000 RTCSNV (6225) Nevada DOT CL (Ver 1) STATUS STATE Title: I 15 Tropicana Interchange Reconstruct Package 1 Description: Reconstruct Interchange with Harmon HOV ramps from south Project Type: Rd Interchange/ Intersect Limits: AQ: Non-Exempt TCM:No NDOT: District 1 Nearest Crossstreet: Tropicana Avenue 2019 State Fuel Revenue Clark (FRI2) $9,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $9,000, State Gas Tax $0 $13,000,000 $0 $0 $13,000, $9,000,000 $13,000,000 $0 $0 $22,000,000 ALL YEARS $9,000,000 $13,000,000 $120,000,000 $0 $142,000,000 RTCSNV (6248) Nevada DOT RTCSNV Project Listing Printed on Monday, December 10, 2018 Page 4 of 6
5 Amendment RTCSNV Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year Projects Listed CL (Ver 2) STATUS In Progress - Deleted FEDERAL Title: I 15 Hacienda HOV Ramp Description: Project Type: Construct HOV ramps at the Hacienda Ave Rd New Construction Limits: AQ: Non-Exempt TCM:No NDOT: District 1 From I 15 to Hacienda Ave of Distance (mile) 0 Milepost begins at 0 ends at 0 RTCSNV (6226) Nevada DOT Previously Approved Version CL (Ver 1) Title: I 15 Harmon and Hacienda HOV Ramps Description: Construct HOV ramps at the Hacienda Ave, Construct HOV Ramps at Harmon Ave Project Type: Rd New Construction AQ: Non-Exempt TCM:No NDOT: District 1 Limits: From I 15 to Hacienda Ave of Distance (mile) 0 Milepost begins at 0 ends at State Gas Tax $2,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,000, CMAQ - Clark County $0 $0 $5,000,000 $0 $5,000, NHPP $0 $0 $23,500,000 $0 $23,500, State Match - Nv $0 $0 $1,500,000 $0 $1,500, $2,000,000 $0 $30,000,000 $0 $32,000,000 ALL YEARS $2,000,000 $0 $30,000,000 $0 $32,000,000 RTCSNV (6226) Nevada DOT RTCSNV Project Listing Printed on Monday, December 10, 2018 Page 5 of 6
6 Amendment RTCSNV Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Year Projects Listed RTCSNV Project Listing Printed on Monday, December 10, 2018 Page 6 of 6
7 Regional Transportation Plan Project Details (Amendment Clark 19-03) Note: The following information (and the subsequent page) are provided as information for project CL Due to limitations in the Nevada DOT online Electronic State Transportation Improvement Program (ESTIP) system, project details outside of the next four fiscal years cannot be provided in the same report format. RTC Staff have provided these two pages to document this project s details. Nevada DOT Project Name I 11/I 215/I 515/SR 564 Henderson Bowl And Construction Project Description FFY23 Final Design Facility US-95 RTC_ID FFY26 Package 1 Construction From US-95 (interchange) To CC-251 (Interchange) NDOT CM-X FFY28 Package 2 Construction Main Funding Source RTP Old RTC# N/A (new) FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 $0 $0 $0 $0 PROJECT TY FY23-25 FY26-30 FY31-35 FY36-40 Rd Interchange/ Intersection $15,000,000 $200,000,000 $0 $0 NDOT ID (ESTIP) CL Total RTP/HPP $ Notes 12/5/18 included in Access2040 RTP Amendment Two (Amendment Clark 19-03) Funding Detail: FY23: $15M state fund, Design; FY26 $100M Fed & state, Construction; FY28 $100M Fed & state, Construction (Note: costs provided in FY2018 dollars, Year of expenditure total $225,525,000) Note: Fed & state funding includes NDOT-programmed federal funds; NDOT is responsible for ensuring that fiscal constraint for these funds is maintained.
8 Project Report Page 1 of 1 12/9/2018 ALL Transportation Improvement Program, Adoption Projects Listed State TIP ID CL /TIP RTCSNV 21TIP(20-00) Local ID Total Cost $215,000,000 Nevada DOT Contact Richard Splawinski (775) NDOT District 1 County CLARK Project Type Rd Interchange/ Intersection Air Quality Non-Exempt TCM Yes Construction N/A Project Name I 11/I 215/I 515/SR 564 Henderson Bowl And Construction Project Limits At From I 11 To I 215 Description FFY23 Final Design FFY26 Package 1 Construction FFY28 Package 2 Construction Phase Fund Source Prior FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 Future Total Federal & State Funds $200,000,000 $200,000,000 State Fund $15,000, $15,000,000 Total Preliminary Engineering $15,000,000 - $200,000,000 $215,000,000 Total Programmed $15,000,000 - $200,000,000 $215,000,000 Version History State FHWA FTA TIP Document Approval Approval Approval Approval Adoption Pending Pending Pending N/A Current Change Reason SCHEDULE / FUNDING / SCO - New Project Map data Report 2018 a map Google error
9 Finding of Conformity: Access2040, Amendment Clark December 10, 2018 The following Air Quality Conformity tables show the Finding of Conformity for the Access2040 Regional Transportation Plan as adopted on Feb 9, 2017 and after RTP Amendment The Conformity Test Su ary as de eloped utilizing the RTC s 7 Regional Tra el Model, descri ed in Appendices D and E of the Access2040 Regional Transportation Plan, after incorporating the following changes to include new and updated projects from Amendment 19-03: Add: FFY2020 CL : US-95 Ramps (Northwest Corridor Package 3D/E); $142 million (includes $42M FRI2 bond) New Project Modify: FFY2021 CL : I 515 Auxiliary Lanes and SR 159 Charleston Blvd Improvements; $39.3 million Carry-over from FY18 (concurrent w/cl (below)) Add: FFY2021 CL : I 515/ US 95 Reduce and Restripe Lanes; $11,180,000 New (concurrent with CL (above)) Add: FFY2022 CL : I 15 Tropicana Interchange Reconstruct Package 1; $142 million (includes $120M FRI2 bond) New Project Add: FFY25-29 CL : I 11/I 215/I 515/SR 564 Henderson Bowl And Construction; $215 million (FY23: $15M state fund, Design; FY26 $100M Fed & state, Construction; FY28 $100M Fed & state, Construction) Delete: CL : I 15 Hacienda HOV Ramp ($32M deleted) (Note: Amendment Clark also includes an exempt project for the Clark County School District s Safe Routes to School Coordinator.) Modeling and Air Quality Conformity Determination Summary Description These five projects are small connector projects. Four projects fall in the RTC s Travel Demand Model (TDM) Domain areas and PM10/CO maintenance areas. These projects were coded into the RTC s TDM and included in this Conformity Determination. These projects were added or updated to all existing projects already in the TDM networks for all horizon years for the RTP Assumptions: All land use assumptions and projections as input to the TDM are the same for those used for RTP , see Appendices D that is available at ( All TDM and emission model MOVES modeling methodology, model input and assumptions for horizon years (2020, 2030 and 2040), Emission Budgets and Emission Budget Years for PM10 and CO remain the same as those for RTP (See Appendix E, available at for details). TDM and MOVES for horizon years 2020, 2030 and 2040 have been run. Results: As expected, due to the e aluated projects li ited extents, the modeling results show that the impacts from these few connector projects are negligible, eg, the modeling results indicate less than 0.4% difference between 2040 VMTs from this model run and from RTP model run. As a result, there are almost no emission changes due to the few projects added. The following tables show the Conformity Findings for RTP and the new Conformity Findings for this RTP Amendment. Air Quality Conformity Working Group participation: The RTC s Air Quality Confor ity Working Group reviewed these changes, all model updates, and the conformity determination.
10 Overall Conformity Test Summary RTP/TIP Amendment December 2018 The following tables show the final analysis of CO and PM10. for this Amendment (Clark 19-03). For easy reference and comparison, this document uses the same section titles, section numbers and the same table numbers as those in the original technical document for RTP Conformity Determination 7. Emission Estimates PM10 Summary NEW Table 24. Net CO Per Day (Dec 2018) in Tons Per Day Modeled CO TCM's Credited in Model n/a n/a n/a n/a Net CO Source: MOVES model results by Regional Transportation Commission staff. December, 2018, TIP Amendment NEW Table 25. PM10 Roadway Analysis for Horizon Years (Dec 2018) RTP Adjusted 2020 AAWDVMT Adjusted 2030 AAWDVMT Adjusted 2040 AAWDVMT PM10 Emission Factors (g/v-m) Paved Road (kg/day) Paved Road (kg/day) Paved Road (kg/day) 2 Paved Road (kg/day) Adjusted 2015 Facility Type AAWDVMT External connectors 269, , , , System Ramps 800, ,826 1,142,026 1,271, ,194 1,399 1,558 Minor Arterials 4,741,738 5,195,425 6,106,551 6,667, ,785 6,338 7,450 8,135 Major Arterials 13,157,876 14,198,162 16,436,613 17,853, ,013 10,805 12,508 13,586 Ramps 1,409,565 1,547,828 1,749,322 1,881, ,727 1,896 2,143 2,305 Interstates 9,014,834 9,474,352 10,652,664 12,410, Freeways 5,069,150 6,623,063 8,707,069 9,859, Beltway 432, , , Collectors 3,048,034 3,089,435 3,609,358 3,599, ,734 3,785 4,421 4,410 Centroid connectors 3,151,626 3,457,213 3,943,491 4,670, ,570 12,691 14,477 17,147 Other Local Roads 72,647 81, ,329 98, HOV Lanes 611,617 1,711,395 2,129,363 1,976, Public Transit Bus 53,000 60,950 71,921 71, Intra-zonal 134, , , , DAILY S 41,967,081 46,971,983 55,154,735 60,929,258 36,091 39,302 45,490 50,473 Convert to US tons per day PM10 (Tons per day) Mobile Source PM10 Budgets for the Las Vegas Valley AAWDVMT=Average Annual Week Day Vehicle Miles Traveled. Regional transportation Commission Staff, Transit Daily Miles was calculated by the RTC Transit Department. December, 2018, TIP Amendment
11 PM10 from Construction and Wind Erosion NEW Table 27. PM10 from Highway Construction and Wind Erosion (Dec 2018) SOURCE Link Lane Link Lane Link Lane Link Lane STRUCTION Construction Miles Horizon Year Total Projects Number of months in Horizon Year Estimated Acreage Factors (tons/acre/mon) PM 10 Construction Emission (tons/day) Best Practices Reduction (%) 68% 68% 68% 68% Net PM 10 (tons/day) WIND EROSION Estimated Acreage Erosion Rate (tons/acre/day) 65% of site Erosion Rate (tons/acre/day) 35% of site PM10 (tons/day) Sections Reduction (%) 71% 71% 71% 71% Net PM 10 (tons/day) Source: Regional Transportation Commission staff. December, 2018, TIP Amendment New Table 28. Total PM10 Mobile Source Per Day for Horizon Years (Dec 2018) SOURCE Paved Road Dust Vehicle Highway Construction Windblown Construction Dust PM 10 Mobile Source BUDGET Source: Regional Transportation Commission Staff emissions are interpolated from 2020 and 2030 emissions. December, 2018, TIP Amendment NEW Table RTP Conformity Test Summary (December 2018) CO (tons/day) PM10 (tons/day) Year Budget Conformity Requirement Budget Conformity Requirement Satisfied Satisfied Satisfied Satisfied Satisfied Satisfied Satisfied Satisfied Satisfied Source: Regional Transportation Commission staff. December, 2018, TIP Amendment
12 Supporting Document Travel Demand Model Input Assumptions and Previous Determinations The following texts and tables present the updates of the travel demand model assumptions for this RTP Amendment and the conformity determinations for CO and PM10 made for the RTP and its amendment. Section A. describes the Travel Demand Model input updates. Section B. presents the determinations for the RTP and Section C. presents the determinations for the plan Amendment made in December For easy reference and comparison, this document uses the same section titles, section numbers and the same table numbers as those in the original technical document for RTP A. Travel Demand Model Assumptions - Land use and Planning Variables (PVs) Updates Table 3. Summary of Planning Variables (for RTP) CATEGORY Year 2015 Year 2020 Year 2030 Year % of % of % of 2015 Population 2,081,786 2,256,535 2,558,324 2,785, % 123% 134% Total_Population 2,096,711 2,271,460 2,573,249 2,800, % 123% 134% Dwelling_Units 820, , ,629 1,042, % 119% 127% Occupied_HH 759, , , , % 122% 131% Total_Emp 900, ,934 1,115,837 1,267, % 124% 141% Hotel_G_Emp 156, , , , % 124% 142% Hotel_NG_Emp 13,273 13,413 13,413 14, % 101% 109% Constru_Emp 48,144 58,946 77,046 96, % 160% 201% Goods_P_Emp 24,476 24,476 25,699 28, % 105% 117% Ware_H_Emp 22,588 25,388 30,088 35, % 133% 156% Food_Dr_Emp 91,787 98, , , % 119% 131% Super_C_Emp 7,938 8,838 9,828 10, % 124% 137% Retail_Emp 117, , , , % 119% 132% Office_G_Emp 25,265 27,315 30,995 34, % 123% 138% Office_P_Emp 142, , , , % 128% 146% Medical_Emp 56,169 62,494 71,819 82, % 128% 146% Other_Emp 128, , , , % 120% 133% School_Emp 35,426 37,926 42,326 47, % 119% 133% Open_S_Emp % 100% 100% NAFB_Emp 12,850 12,550 12,400 11,950 98% 96% 93% MIA_Emp 11,550 13,200 14,600 14, % 126% 126% MIA_Pass 114, , , , % 127% 127% IVPH_Emp 1,650 6,600 IVPH_Pass 13,500 54,200 4
13 UNLV_Main_Emp 3,000 3,150 3,500 3, % 117% 123% UNLV_Main_Enroll 28,375 30,330 33,850 35, % 119% 123% UNLV_NLV_Emp 300 UNLV_NLV_Enroll 2,650 NV_State_College_Emp % 137% 169% NV_State_College_Enroll 3,703 4,336 5,691 7, % 154% 189% School_F18_Enroll 226, , , , % 123% 134% School_F912_Enroll 91,968 99, , , % 123% 134% College_F13_Enroll 32,797 38,669 50,404 62, % 154% 189% College_F13_Emp 2,439 2,568 3,343 4, % 137% 169% Source: Regional Transportation Commission staff. March Land use and Planning Variables (PV) have been updated slightly from the original land use used for the RTP. The updates in housing, population, commercial, office and college enrollment have been made at the requests from local jurisdictions, including City of Henderson, City of North Las Vegas and Nellis Air Force Base. These jurisdictions updated their land use master plans in the past two years. Additional employment numbers for hotels and retails on the Resort and at the Raider Stadium have been added too. The following table shows total increase for different PVs compared with the original PVs use in the RTP. Land Use update: PV changes from Original PV for RTP (2020 and 2040) Field Difference b/t New 2020 PV and Original 2020 PV Difference b/t New 2040 PV and Original 2040 PV Population Total_Population Dwelling_Units Occupied_HH Total_Emp Hotel_G_Emp Hotel_NG_Emp Ware_H_Emp Super_C_Emp Retail_Emp Office_G_Emp Office_P_Emp Other_Emp NAFB_Emp NV_State_College_Enroll Hotel_Rooms V_SPACE
14 RTP-Amendment-Notice-Dec2018-RJ.pdf 1 12/12/18 5:19 PM PUBLIC NOTICE Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada Public Notice of Comment Period on Amendment to Access Regional Transportation Plan The Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada (RTC), the designated Metropolitan Planning Organization () for transportation planning in Clark County, is seeking public comment on the Amendment to Access2040, the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). This amendment adds projects requested by the Nevada Department of Transportation listed below. The RTC has determined that the addition of these projects to the RTP do not adversely impact air quality. New project: US-95 Ramps (northwest) New project: I-515 Auxiliary Lanes and SR-159 Charleston Boulevard Improvements New project: I-515/ US-95 Reduce and Restripe Lanes New project: I-15 Tropicana Interchange New project: I-11/I-215/I-515/SR-564 Henderson Bowl Remove project: I-15 Hacienda HOV Ramp The amendment also extends funding for the Clark County School District s Safe Routes to School (SRTS) program through fiscal year The list of proposed changes will be available at the RTC Administration Building or online at starting Monday, December 17, The 21-day public comment period will end on Monday, January 7, Interested parties are invited to attend the public meeting on Wednesday, January 2, 2019 from 4 to 6 p.m. in Room 108 at the RTC Administration Building to learn more about the RTP Amendment and provide comments. Submit Comments / Questions: via to access2040@rtcsnv.com by telephone at (702) or TDD at (702) fax at (702) ; in person or mail: RTC of Southern Nevada 600 S. Grand Central Parkway #350 Las Vegas, NV 89106
APPENDIX B HIGH PRIORITY INVESTMENT PROGRAM (HPP) ( )
APPENDIX B HIGH PRIORITY INVESTMENT PROGRAM (HPP) (2017-2020) (replaces previous Transportation Improvement Program) ACCESS2040 APPENDIX B HIGH PRIORITY INVESTMENT PROGRAM The High Priority Investment
More information5/3/2016. May 4, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION
May 4, 2016 Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION 1 Item #2 ELECT AN ACTING CHAIR Item #3 APPROVAL OF MINUTES 2 Item #4 OVERVIEW OF TRAC AGENDA Committee Goals Learn about the RTC including its roadway and transit
More informationNASHVILLE AREA MPO TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY
NASHVILLE AREA MPO TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY 2008-2011 Amendment Conformity Report for August 20, 2008 Amendments (Amendment # 2008-028 thru 2008-030) On August 20, 2008 the Executive Board
More informationINVESTING STRATEGICALLY
11 INVESTING STRATEGICALLY Federal transportation legislation (Fixing America s Surface Transportation Act FAST Act) requires that the 2040 RTP be based on a financial plan that demonstrates how the program
More informationAPPENDIX 5 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
APPENDIX 5 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS Background Starting with the Intermodal Surface Transportation Equity Act of 1991, it has been a consistent requirement of federal law and regulation that the projects included
More informationOkaloosa-Walton 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan Amendment
Okaloosa-Walton 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan Amendment Adopted August 22, 2013 This report was financed in part by the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, the Florida
More informationAmendment 1 - OKI 2040 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN
Amendment 1 - OKI 2040 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN January, 2013 Prepared by the Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governments Acknowledgments Title Amendment 1 - OKI 2040 Regional Transportation
More informationTransportation Improvement Program
Transportation Improvement Program Transportation Conformity Check List The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and all amendments must include a conformity report. The conformity report must address
More informationClark County School District 5100 West Sahara Ave. Las Vegas, NV March 23, Dear Administrator:
Clark County School District 5100 West Sahara Ave. Las Vegas, NV 89146 March 23, 2012 Dear Administrator: The Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada (RTC) would like to inform the faculty,
More informationSeries 2016 Highway Improvement and Refunding Revenue Bonds
1 Series 2016 Highway Improvement and Refunding Revenue Bonds November 9, 2015 Robert C. Nellis, CPM Assistant Director, Administration Peter Shellenberger Public Financial Management, Inc. 2 Project NEON
More informationMemphis and Shelby County Division of Planning & Development
Memphis and Shelby County Division of Planning & Development 125 NORTH MAIN STREET, MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE 38103 Tel: (901) 576 7190 Fax: (901) 576 7272 Mark H. Luttrell, Jr. Mayor, Shelby County A C Wharton,
More informationREGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2018 AMENDMENT 1
REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2018 AMENDMENT 1 The preparation of this report has been financed in part through grant[s] from the Federal
More informationTRANSPORTATION-SPECIFIC SALES TAX REVENUE 23% Visitors Generate Roughly 23 Percent of Taxable Retail Sales
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Applied Analysis was retained by the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority ( LVCVA ) to review and analyze the economic impacts associated with its various operations and the overall
More informationNASHVILLE AREA MPO. ADJUSTMENT to The Fiscal Years Transportation Improvement Program. Adjustment Number: TIP Number:
NASHVILLE AREA MPO ADJUSTMENT to The Fiscal Years 20082011 Transportation Improvement Program Adjustment Number: 2009019 TIP Number: 200852034 FROM: TIP# 200852034 Jurisdiction: Hendersonville Project:
More informationWednesday, June 6, 2018
Wednesday, June 6, 2018 Excellence in Program Administration Award 2018 AASHTO Civil Rights Training Symposium Excellence in Program Administration Award Joanna McFadden EEO/DBE Section Head APRIL 2017-2018
More information7.0 Financially Feasible Plan
Livability 2040 Regional Transportation Plan 7-1 7.0 Financially Feasible Plan The Memphis MPO used a performance-based approach to rank projects for Livability 2040 and incorporated state and local priorities
More informationDevelopment of the Cost Feasible Plan
March 15, 2012 TPO Board and Advisory Committee Meetings Development of the Cost Feasible Plan Transportation Outlook 2035 LRTP Update Atkins Development of the Cost Feasible Plan P a g e 1 Development
More informationTEXAS TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
TEXAS TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION VARIOUS Counties MINUTE ORDER Page 1 of 2 DALLAS & FORT WORTH Districts Transportation Code, 228.012 requires the Texas Department of Transportation (department) to create
More informationState Highway Fund Update TRANSPORTATION BOARD NOVEMBER 13, 2017
State Highway Fund Update TRANSPORTATION BOARD NOVEMBER 13, 2017 1 STATE HIGHWAY FUND ESTABLISHED BY NRS 408.235, THE STATE HIGHWAY FUND (SHF) IS A SPECIAL REVENUE FUND ESTABLISHED TO ACCOUNT FOR THE RECEIPT
More informationAmendment 6 - OKI 2030 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN
Amendment 6 - OKI 2030 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN February, 2011 Prepared by the Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governments Acknowledgments Title Amendment 6 - OKI 2030 Regional Transportation
More informationTEXAS TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
TEXAS TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION VARIOUS Counties MINUTE ORDER Page 1 of 2 DALLAS & FORT WORTH Districts Transportation Code, 228.012 requires the Texas Department of Transportation (department) to create
More informationTEXAS TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
TEXAS TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION VARIOUS Counties MINUTE ORDER Page 1 of 2 DALLAS & FORT WORTH Districts Transportation Code, 228.012 requires the Texas Department of Transportation (department) to create
More informationI-64 Capacity Improvements Segment III Initial Financial Plan
I-64 Capacity Improvements Segment III Initial Financial Plan State Project # 0064-965-229/0064-099-229 P101, R201, C501, B638, B639, B640, B641, B642, B643, D609, D610, D611 Federal # NHPP-064-3(498)/
More informationChapter 6: Financial Resources
Chapter 6: Financial Resources Introduction This chapter presents the project cost estimates, revenue assumptions and projected revenues for the Lake~Sumter MPO. The analysis reflects a multi-modal transportation
More informationTransportation Improvement Program
Transportation Improvement Program Transportation Conformity Check List The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and all amendments must include a conformity report. The conformity report must address
More informationNovember 9, Mr. Patrick McKenna, Director Missouri Department of Transportation P.O. Box 270 Jefferson City, Missouri 65102
U.S. Department of Transportation Mr. Patrick McKenna, Director Missouri Department of Transportation P.O. Box 270 Jefferson City, Missouri 65102 Federal Transit Administration Federal Highway Administration
More information1/31/2019. January 31, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION
January 31, 2019 Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION 1 Item #2 APPROVAL OF MINUTES Item #3 TRAC GOALS, FRAMEWORK & AGENDA REVIEW 2 COMMITTEE GOALS Learn about Southern Nevada s mobility challenges, new developments
More informationSTAUNTON-AUGUSTA-WAYNESBORO METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION
STAUNTON-AUGUSTA-WAYNESBORO METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION City of Staunton County of Augusta City of Waynesboro 112 MTANLY PLE STAUNTON, VIRGINIA 24401 PHONE (540) 885-5174 FAX (540) 885-2687 July
More informationMEETING NOTICE AND AGENDA
MEETING NOTICE AND AGENDA CITIES/COUNTY TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE (CTAC) SPECIAL MEETING The CTAC may take action on any item appearing on this agenda. Thursday, March 1, 2007 9:30 to 11:30 a.m.
More informationPioneer Valley Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Proposed Amendments January 2017
2017-2021 Pioneer Valley Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Proposed Amendments January 2017 HIGHWAY AMENDMENTS FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR 2017 Part 1A: Federal Aid Target Projects Increase cost of (604033)
More informationDraft. List of Tables. Table of Contents
Table of Contents Executive Summary... 2 1 The Public Participation Plan... 3 2 Planning Process and Need for Public Involvement..3 3 Regulations and Requirements... 4 4 RTC Committees... 6... 7 5 MPO
More information2016 Boston Region MPO Transportation Improvement Program
Adjustment Type Project ID Project Description Funding District Source Information Section 1A / Federal Aid Target Projects Indicates a change in project cost Indicates removed from TIP (cost not reflected
More informationCity of Grand Forks Staff Report
City of Grand Forks Staff Report Committee of the Whole November 28, 2016 City Council December 5, 2016 Agenda Item: Federal Transportation Funding Request Urban Roads Program Submitted by: Engineering
More informationDate: October 13, 2017
Date: October 13, 2017 Subject: From: Five (5) amendments to the Fiscal Year (FY) 2017 20 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), one (1) amendment to the Livability 2040 Regional Transportation Plan
More informationREVISED TECHNICAL PLANNING COMMITTEE AGENDA 1/16/2019; ITEM II.B. Amendment Number Three to the FY Transportation Improvement Program
REVISED TECHNICAL PLANNING COMMITTEE AGENDA 1/16/2019; ITEM II.B. Amendment Number Three to the FY 2019-2022 Transportation Improvement Program AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Ozarks Transportation Organization (Springfield,
More informationCC: Ms. Rhiannon Chambers, State Program Development Office, TDOT Mr. Nate Brugler, Local Programs Development Office, TDOT Ms. Meghan Wilson, Local
CC: Ms. Rhiannon Chambers, State Program Development Office, TDOT Mr. Nate Brugler, Local Programs Development Office, TDOT Ms. Meghan Wilson, Local Programs Development Office, TDOT Ms. Whitney Britt,
More informationBRISTOL TENNESSEE / VIRGINIA URBAN AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION
BRISTOL TENNESSEE / VIRGINIA URBAN AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION Amendment # 2 FY 2017-2020 Transportation Improvement Program Amendment Summary: The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
More informationRIDOA STATEWIDE PLANNING PROGRAM Transportation Planning
RIDOA STATEWIDE PLANNING PROGRAM Transportation Planning Land & Water Conservation Summit March 10, 2012 Statewide Planning Framework Department of Administration Statewide Planning Program State Planning
More informationUniversity Link LRT Extension
(November 2007) The Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority, commonly known as Sound Transit, is proposing to implement an extension of the Central Link light rail transit (LRT) Initial Segment
More informationAppendix O. Transportation Financial Background
Appendix O Transportation Financial Background Appendix Contents Background Consistency with Other Federal, State, and Local Documents Revenue Constrained Financial Assumptions Revenue Sources: Availability
More informationProject NEON Interim Finance Committee Rudy Malfabon Director
Project NEON Interim Finance Committee Rudy Malfabon Director October 22, 2014 1 Project Benefits Safety & Congestion 1,000 crashes per year! Connectivity /Mobility for City Redevelopment Efforts Congestion:
More informationFY2020UPWP Unified Planning Work Program
FY2020UPWP Unified Planning Work Program Budget Book Draftt FY 2020 Unified Planning Work Program Budget Overview The accompanying Budget report provides necessary details regarding the MPO's anticipated
More information2008 UTILITIES STP 2,200,000 1,760, , CONST ES 11,200,000 11,200,000. FY Work Funding Total Fed State Local
NASHVILLE AREA MPO ADJUSTMENT to The Fiscal Years 20082011 Adjustment Number: 2009022 TIP Number: 2004068a FROM: TIP# 2004068a Agency/Jurisdiction: TDOT / Mt. Juliet Project: SR171 / Mt. Juliet Road Termini:
More informationExecutive Summary - Fiscal Year 2016 Valley Metro Rail Preliminary Annual Operating and Capital Budget
Executive Summary - Fiscal Year 2016 Valley Metro Rail Preliminary Annual Operating and Capital Budget Valley Metro Rail, Inc. (VMR) is a public non-profit corporation whose members are the cities of Chandler,
More informationFiscal Year VDOT Annual Budget June 2017
Fiscal Year 2018 VDOT Annual Budget June 2017 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Annual Budget FY 2018 2 Virginia Department of Transportation Table of Contents Overview.. 5 Revenues.. 7 Highway Maintenance
More informationFY19 Budget - Discussion. April 2018
FY19 Budget - Discussion April 2018 FY19 Proposed Budget: $6.6 Billion General Planning & Programs 3% Identify regional mobility needs and solutions Debt Service 6% Obligations from current and past projects
More informationFY February Quarterly Revision. Houston DISTRICT
FY 2013-2016 STIP STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM February Quarterly Revision Houston DISTRICT TRANSIT February 2013 HOUSTON-GALVESTON AREA COUNCIL PO Box 22777 3555 Timmons Ln. Houston,
More informationAPPENDIX I REVENUE PROJECTION AND ASSUMPTIONS
APPENDIX I REVENUE PROJECTION AND ASSUMPTIONS The 2018 StanCOG Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) financial forecasts provide revenue projections for StanCOG member
More informationAppendix G TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL DOCUMENTATION
Appendix G TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL DOCUMENTATION APPENDIX G - TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL DOCUMENTATION 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Memphis Urban Area MPO is developing the Direction 2040 - Long-Range Transportation Plan
More informationCongestion Management Process. Prepared by: Ghyabi & Associates, Inc.
Congestion Management Process Prepared by: Ghyabi & Associates, Inc. August 26, 2015 Congestion Management Process (as adopted by R2CTPO Board) August 26, 2015 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The River to Sea Transportation
More information1/4/2017. January 5, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION
January 5, 2017 Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION 1 Item #2 APPROVAL OF MINUTES Item #3 OVERVIEW OF TRAC AGENDA 2 Committee Goals Learn about the RTC transit system, as well as transit systems of other western
More informationListed below is a breakdown of specific project economic benefits:
Appendix 17 Los Angeles County is requesting that the California Transportation Commission (CTC) secure the other half of the $3.6 billion in needed funding from the $2.7 billion South County portion of
More informationCity County Building, Suite Main Street Knoxville, Tennessee (865)
City County Building, Suite 403 400 Main Street Knoxville, Tennessee 37902 (865) 215-2500 www.knoxtrans.org January 12, 2017 Tennessee Department of Transportation James K. Polk Building, Suite 600 505
More informationFEDERAL FISCAL YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR 2019-2022 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM A regional program of surface transportation improvement projects to enhance the movement of goods and people along the greater Des Moines
More informationRecommendation Summary Clark County Crime Prevention Act of 2016
Recommendation Summary Clark County Crime Prevention Act of 2016 [T]he SNTIC recommends that the Nevada State Legislature authorize the increase of the sales tax rate in Clark County by 0.1 percentage
More informationDecember 27, Mr. Patrick McKenna, Director Missouri Department of Transportation P.O. Box 270 Jefferson City, Missouri 65102
U.S. Department of Transportation Mr. Patrick McKenna, Director Missouri Department of Transportation P.O. Box 270 Jefferson City, Missouri 65102 Federal Transit Administration Federal Highway Administration
More informationWASATCH FRONT REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN FINANCIAL PLAN. Technical Report 47 May 2007 DAVIS MORGAN SALT LAKE TOOELE WEBER
WASATCH FRONT REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN 2007-2030 FINANCIAL PLAN Technical Report 47 May 2007 DAVIS MORGAN SALT LAKE TOOELE WEBER 2030 RTP Financial Plan WASATCH FRONT REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN
More informationApproved STIP Formal Amendments for the Period of 11/01/2018-3/15/2019
3116-151 Hwy 169 from Taconite to Pengilly, Safety Improvements 5409-32 Concrete resurface, raise grade at levee's, install lighting, improve drainage and pedestrian accessibility on Hwy 75 in Halstad
More informationAPPENDIX F FISCAL CONSTRAINT AND FUNDING ASSUMPTIONS ACCESS2040 APPENDIX F (FISCAL CONSTRAINT AND FUNDING ASSUMPTIONS)
APPENDIX F FISCAL CONSTRAINT AND FUNDING ASSUMPTIONS ACCESS2040 APPENDIX F (FISCAL CONSTRAINT AND FUNDING ASSUMPTIONS) Fiscal Constraint Summary Fiscal constraint is a planning tool ACCESS2040 and the
More informationChapter 4: Regional Transportation Finance
4.1 Chapter 4: Regional Transportation Finance 2040 4.2 CONTENTS Chapter 4: Transportation Finance Overview 4.3 Two Funding Scenarios 4.4 Current Revenue Scenario Assumptions 4.5 State Highway Revenues
More informationGLOSSARY. At-Grade Crossing: Intersection of two roadways or a highway and a railroad at the same grade.
Glossary GLOSSARY Advanced Construction (AC): Authorization of Advanced Construction (AC) is a procedure that allows the State to designate a project as eligible for future federal funds while proceeding
More informationReview and Update of Year 2035 Regional Transportation Plan
Review and Update of Year 2035 Regional Transportation Plan #217752 1 Background Every four years, the Year 2035 Plan is reviewed Elements of review Validity of Plan Year 2035 forecasts Transportation
More informationTEXAS METROPOLITAN MOBILITY PLAN: FUNDING NEW OPPORTUNITIES
TEXAS METROPOLITAN MOBILITY PLAN: FUNDING NEW OPPORTUNITIES Public Meetings June 12 and 13, 2006 Michael Morris, P.E. Director of Transportation Michael Burbank, AICP Principal Transportation Planner FOCUS
More informationSOUTHERN BELTWAY US-22 TO I-79 PROJECT 2013 FINANCIAL PLAN. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission Allegheny and Washington Counties, Pennsylvania
SOUTHERN BELTWAY US-22 TO I-79 PROJECT 2013 FINANCIAL PLAN Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission Allegheny and Washington Counties, Pennsylvania January 2013 Table of Contents... 1 Introduction... 2 Project
More information32 nd Street Corridor Improvements
Benefit-Cost Analysis Supplementary Documentation TIGER Discretionary Grant Program 32 nd Corridor Improvements USDOT TIGER BCA Results City of Joplin, MO April 29, 2016 32nd Corridor Improvements Contents...
More informationREGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA
REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA Wednesday, June 6, 2018 at 9:00 am Regional Transportation Commission 1 st Floor Conference Room 1105 Terminal Way, Reno NV
More informationTerre Haute Seelyville West Terre Haute Vigo County. Brazil Harmony Knightsville Clay County
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Terre Haute Seelyville West Terre Haute Vigo County Brazil Harmony Knightsville Clay County SFY 2018 2021 Metropolitan Planning Organization West Central Indiana Economic
More informationSFY 2018 (July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2018) Annual Report
SFY 2018 (July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2018) Annual Report Thurston Regional Planning Council UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM Annual Report for second year of TRPC s UPWP State Fiscal Years 2017-2018 (July 1,
More informationTENTATIVE FIVE YEAR WORK PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS
TENTATIVE FIVE YEAR WORK PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS 2019-2023 MANATEE COUNTY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - DISTRICT ONE MISSION STATEMENT The Department will provide a safe, interconnected statewide
More informationTampa Bay Express Planning Level Traffic and Revenue (T&R) Study
Tampa Bay Express Planning Level Traffic and Revenue (T&R) Study Project Report FPN: 437289-1-22-01 Prepared for: FDOT District 7 February 2017 Table of Contents Executive Summary... E-1 E.1 Project Description...
More informationSacramento Transportation Authority Sacramento Abandoned Vehicle Service Authority. Final Budget. Fiscal Year 2015/16
Sacramento Transportation Authority Sacramento Abandoned Vehicle Service Authority Final Budget Fiscal Year 2015/16 Introduction Message to the Governing Board The Sacramento Transportation Authority (STA)
More information4.A.14-2
4.A.14-1 4.A.14-2 Administration and Projects Committee STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: June 2, 2016 Subject Summary of Issues FY 2016-17 Proposed Budget for the Contra Costa Transportation Authority and Congestion
More informationMarch 21, Mr. Patrick McKenna, Director Missouri Department of Transportation P.O. Box 270 Jefferson City, Missouri 65102
U.S. Department of Transportation Mr. Patrick McKenna, Director Missouri Department of Transportation P.O. Box 270 Jefferson City, Missouri 65102 Federal Transit Administration Federal Highway Administration
More informationProgramed Totals $39,761 $35,676 $75,437 $73,111 $2,326 $0 $17,109 $17,109 $17,109 $0 $0 $14,580 $14,580 $14,580 $0
WCOG Managed WHATCOM COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS 2014 Transportation Improvement Program Amendment #1 (1401) MPO Financial Feasibility Summary Anticipated Federal Funding* & Programmed Expenditures (in Thousands)
More informationFiscal Year th Quarter Report Quarterly Report of Actual Traffic and Revenue For period ending August 31, 2017
Fiscal Year 2017 4 th Quarter Report Quarterly Report of Actual Traffic and Revenue For period ending August 31, 2017 Footer Text Date Table of Contents Section Page Number Notes and Observations 3-4 Significant
More informationSFY 2015 Annual Report
SFY 2015 Annual Report THURSTON REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM For State Fiscal Years 2015-2016 (July 1, 2014 through June 30, 2016) Mid-term Report UPWP ELEMENTS The SFY 2015-2016
More information10-Year Capital Highway Investment Plan DRAFT
This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp 10-Year Capital Highway
More informationFinancial Capacity Analysis
FINANCIAL CAPACITY ANALYSIS Introduction Federal transportation planning rules require that metropolitan area transportation plans include a financial capacity analysis to demonstrate that the plan is
More informationRegional Toll Revenue Annual Financial Report
Regional Toll Revenue Annual Financial Report North Central As of September 30, 2011 Texas Council of Governments NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS REGIONAL TOLL REVENUE FINANCIAL REPORT As of
More informationBLUE RIBBON TASK FORCE TO EVALUATE NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION LONG-RANGE PROJECTS
STATE OF NEVADA BLUE RIBBON TASK FORCE TO EVALUATE NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION LONG-RANGE PROJECTS 2008 2015 December 5, 2006 Task Force Members Phillip C. Peckman Task Force Chairman Leroy Goodman
More informationTRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM REVISION 19 F E D E R A L F I S C A L Y E A R S Expedited Administrative Modifications
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM F E D E R A L F I S C A L Y E A R S 2 0 1 5 2 0 1 8 REVISION 19 Expedited Administrative Modifications TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FEDERAL FISCAL YEARS 2015-2018
More informationINVESTMENT STRATEGIES
3 INVESTMENT STRATEGIES 70 INVESTMENT STRATEGIES 71 A key role of Mobilizing Tomorrow is to outline a strategy for how the region will invest in transportation infrastructure over the next 35 years. This
More informationOzarks Transportation Organization Transportation Improvement Program Amendment 4
FR125 Ozarks Transportation Organization 2014-2017 Transportation Improvement Program Amendment 4 SHUU FARMER EN1401 2014 JACKSON WILLARD FR84 FR129 SHO SH13 FR141 HUNT TIP Project Road FR94 County Line
More informationFY Work Funding Total Fed State Local
NASHVILLE AREA MPO ADJUSTMENT to The Fiscal Years 20082011 Transportation Improvement Program Adjustment Number: 2010024 TIP Number: 2006201 FROM: TIP# 2006201 Jurisdiction: City of Murfreesboro Project:
More informationACTION TRANSMITTAL No
Transportation Advisory Board of the Metropolitan Council of the Twin Cities DATE: December 21, 2017 TO: FROM ACTION TRANSMITTAL No. 2018-07 Technical Advisory Committee TAC Funding and Programming Committee
More informationPENNSYLVANIA S 2017 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM FINANCIAL GUIDANCE
November 20, 2015 Revised December 18, 2015 to reflect FAST Act PENNSYLVANIA S 2017 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM FINANCIAL GUIDANCE This is a collaborative product jointly developed by the Pennsylvania Planning
More informationCONFORMITY DETERMINATION REPORT AMENDMENT #7
CONFORMITY DETERMINATION REPORT AMENDMENT #7 Atlanta Nonattainment and Maintenance Area In Support of: The Atlanta Region s Plan Bartow on the Move GHMPO The contents of this report reflect the views of
More informationOHIO MPO & LARGE CITY CAPITAL PROGRAM SFY 2017 SUMMARY
OHIO MPO & LARGE CITY CAPITAL PROGRAM SFY 2017 SUMMARY Revised 9/19/2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS MPO AND LARGE CITY PROGRAM OVERVIEW... 3 MPO AND LARGE CITY SFY 2017 STBG BUDGET SUMMARY... 4 MPO AND LARGE CITY
More informationDurham MPO Data FHWA Data Base Year Pct Ch
6. Durham A. Regional trends The Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro Metropolitan Planning Organization is responsible for transportation planning in Durham County and eastern portions of nearby Orange County
More informationTransportation Committee
Business Item No. 2013-341 Consent Transportation Committee Meeting date: December 9, 2013 For the Metropolitan Council meeting of January 15, 2014 Subject: 2014-2017 TIP Amendment for North Urban Regional
More informationFY TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FY 2019 2022 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Approved for Public Review and Comment: April 16, 2018 Approved by the Policy Board: May 21, 2018 Table of Contents Permian Basin MPO Membership and Structure...
More informationAppendix. G RTP Revenue Assumptions REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN/SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY
Appendix G RTP Revenue Assumptions REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN/SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY Exhibit G-1 2014 RTP REVENUE FORECAST ASSUMPTIONS LOCAL REVENUES Measure K Sales Tax Renewal Program: Description:
More informationCHAPTER 5 INVESTMENT PLAN
CHAPTER 5 INVESTMENT PLAN This chapter of the 2014 RTP/SCS plan illustrates the transportation investments for the Stanislaus region. Funding for transportation improvements is limited and has generally
More information8. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
8. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS This chapter presents the financial analysis conducted for the Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) selected by the Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County (METRO) for the.
More informationFlorida s Turnpike Enterprise Tentative Five-Year Work Program - FY 2018/19 thru FY 2022/23 Summary of Projects FDOT District One
DISTRICT ONE PROJECT OVERVIEW Florida s Turnpike Enterprise continues to make project investments in District One. In FY 2017 and FY 2018, current Turnpike projects total over $105 million within Okeechobee
More informationNorthern Virginia District State of the District. Helen L. Cuervo, P.E. District Engineer March 15, 2016
Northern Virginia District State of the District Helen L. Cuervo, P.E. District Engineer March 15, 2016 Northern Virginia District Construction Performance Bill Cuttler, P.E. District Construction Engineer
More informationAppendix D Total Project Cost and Year of Expenditure Breakdown
Total Project Cost and Year of Expenditure Breakdown p. D -1 Total Project Cost and Year of Expenditure Breakdown Financial Constraint Methodology using Total Project Cost and Year of Expenditure Dollars
More informationTRANSURBAN 2013 INVESTOR DAY 19 APRIL 2013
TRANSURBAN 2013 INVESTOR DAY 19 APRIL 2013 DISCLAIMER This publication is prepared by the Transurban Group comprising Transurban Holdings Limited (ACN 098 143 429), Transurban Holding Trust (ARSN 098 807
More informationHot Springs Bypass Extension TIGER 2017 Application. Benefit-Cost Analysis Methodology Summary
TIGER 2017 Application Overview This project proposes to extend the Hot Springs Bypass (US 70/US 270) from US 70 to State Highway 7 in Garland County, Arkansas. The 5.5 mile facility will initially consist
More informationAPPENDIX E: ATM MODEL TECH MEMORANDUM. Metropolitan Council Parsons Brinckerhoff
APPENDIX E: ATM MODEL TECH MEMORANDUM Metropolitan Council Parsons Brinckerhoff Metropolitan Highway System Investment Study Evaluation of Active Traffic Management Strategies Prepared by: Parsons Brinckerhoff
More information