Pueblo Community College and 2010 Colorado Community College System (CCCS) Climate Surveys. Office of Institutional Research.
|
|
- Homer Kelly
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Office of Institutional Research Pueblo Community College 2008 and 2010 Colorado Community College System (CCCS) Climate Surveys Prepared by Dr. Patricia Diawara, Director of Institutional Research, Planning, and Accreditation. August
2 2008 and 2010 CCCS Climate Surveys I. INTRODUCTION Climate surveys are designed to explore a wide variety of work environment factors that are assumed to be a major force in influencing employee productivity and satisfaction. In April 2008 and November 2010, all CCCS faculty and staff were invited to complete an online climate survey developed by the CCCS Human Resources Department. In addition to the traditional demographic questions used to profile respondents, the CCCS climate surveys included more than 60 question items pertaining to one of the following areas of interest: Employee satisfaction and motivation Institutional leadership and governance Communication Relationship with co-workers and supervisors Workload and resources Training and professional development Career advancement opportunities Performance evaluation system Salary and benefits The results from the responding participants provided insight into employees perceptions of their organization and highlighted opportunities for improvement. This report summarizes the findings of the 2008 and 2010 CCCS climate surveys (additional results pertaining to faculty only are presented in Appendix 1). Throughout this report, PCC s results that notably differed (plus or minus 5%) from CCCS s results are highlighted. The color green was used whenever PCC s results were at least five percentage points higher than CCCS s results (please note that higher does not necessarily mean better). The color yellow shows question items for which PCC s results notably fell below CCCS s results. II. MAIN FINDINGS Survey participation: In 2008, 217 PCC employees (65 faculty and 152 APT and classified employees) responded to the CCCS survey. In 2010, only 143 employees (30 faculty and 103 APT and classified employees) completed the survey. This represents a 34% decrease over Overall satisfaction with current employment situation: Between 2008 and 2010, the percentage of PCC employees who reported being either extremely or very satisfied with their current employment drastically dropped (from 71% to 56% among faculty and from 68% to 47% among staff). 2
3 Job satisfaction and employee motivation: In 2010, more than 95% of PCC respondents indicated that they liked their job, found the work they do meaningful, and gained a sense of personal satisfaction and accomplishment from doing their job well. Institutional leadership and governance: As compared to the entire CCCS population, PCC employees were much more satisfied with the leadership provided at their college. In 2010, 93% of PCC faculty and 78% of PCC staff respondents agreed that their college was a well run organization. Additionally, above 90% of PCC faculty responded that their college valued academic excellence and placed student success at the top of its priorities. Communication: In 2010, 85% of PCC faculty and 68% of PCC staff respondents felt that they received the information they needed from senior management as well as from their direct supervisor. Relationships with co-workers: In 2010, 96% of PCC faculty and 85% of PCC staff respondents responded that they enjoyed working with their colleagues. Relationships with supervisors: The degree of mutual respect between faculty and their supervisor was notably higher among PCC respondents than it was among CCCS respondents. In 2010, 89% of PCC faculty and 75% of PCC staff felt that their supervisor treated people fairly. Workload and resources: As compared to the entire CCCS faculty group, PCC faculty expressed a higher level of satisfaction with their workload. While 75% of faculty agreed that their work unity was staffed with the right employees, only 31% agreed that there were enough employees to get the job done. Among staff, only 61% of respondents indicated that job duties were distributed fairly in their work unit. Training: As compared to CCCS, PCC respondents were more satisfied with the training opportunities provided by their college. Career advancement opportunities: In 2010, less than 40% of PCC respondents believed that the college prepared them well for possible advancement opportunities. A minority of respondents (23% of staff and 43% of faculty) felt that promotions and advancement opportunities were determined based upon merit. Performance evaluation system: Approximately 70% of PCC employees responded that the feedback they received during their most recent evaluation was meaningful and helped them improve their work. Salary: Although a minority of PCC respondents (21% of faculty and 34% of staff) felt that their salary was market competitive, overall PCC respondents were more satisfied than CCCS respondents with regard to their salary level. Benefits: In 2010, more than three-quarters of PCC employees expressed their satisfaction with the college leave policies and retirement benefits. Only 48% of PCC faculty and 58% of PCC staff believed that the college health benefits compared well with those offered by other employers in the area. 3
4 III. RESPONSE RATES In 2010, a total of 1,194 CCCS APT and classified employees and 496 CCCS faculty responded to the survey (Table 1). These numbers represent a 48% response rate among CCCS staff and a 44% response rate among CCCS faculty. The 2008 survey yielded a slightly higher number of respondents, with 1,389 staff and 568 faculty. A total of 143 PCC employees participated in the 2010 survey as compared to 217 in Table 1: Number of Respondents by Job Classification Faculty Administrative or Professional/Technical (APT) Classified Staff Total As shown in Table 2, the surveys included representation from all of the community colleges, with a greater number of responses from the largest colleges (FRCC, PPCC, CCD, ACC, RRCC, and PCC). In 2008, PCC respondents accounted for 11% of the total number of respondents. Between 2008 and 2010, PCC s participation decreased by one percentage point among staff and by five percentage points among faculty. Table 2: Representation Rates % change % change Arapahoe Community College (ACC) 13% 6% -7% 8% 6% -2% Colorado Community College System (CCCS) 0% 0% 0% 9% 9% 0% Colorado Northwestern Community College (CNCC) 4% 3% -1% 3% 2% -1% Community College of Aurora (CCA) 3% 5% +2% 4% 5% +1% Community College of Denver (CCD) 5% 22% +17% 11% 11% 0% Front Range Community College Westminster (FRCC) 9% 10% +1% 6% 11% +5% Front Range Community College Boulder/Longmont (FRCC) 3% 2% -1% 2% 3% +1% Front Range Community College Larimer (FRCC) 8% 9% 1% 5% 7% +2% Lamar Community College (LCC) 3% 2% -1% 2% 2% 0% Morgan Community College (MCC) 3% 3% 0% 4% 3% -1% Northeastern Community College (NJC) 5% 4% -1% 4% 3% -1% Otero Junior College (OJC) 2% 4% +2% 2% 3% +1% Pikes Peak Community College (PPCC) 16% 14% -2% 13% 12% -1% Pueblo Community College (PCC) 11% 6% -5% 11% 10% -1% Red Rocks Community College (RRCC) 9% 8% -1% 12% 7% -5% Trinidad State Junior College (TSJC) 6% 3% -3% 5% 5% 0% 4
5 IV. RESPONDENTS DEMOGRAPHICS Highest level of education: Marked differences were observed between PCC and CCCS in regard to the highest level of education achieved by the faculty who responded to the surveys (Table 3). In 2010, only 20% of CCCS faculty had a Bachelor s or Associate s degree, as compared to 45% among PCC faculty. Sixty-five percent of CCCS faculty had a Master s degree, as compared to 52% among PCC faculty. An overwhelming majority of CCCS APT and classified employees who completed the surveys had attained additional education beyond high school. Approximately 75% of CCCS staff respondents had obtained degrees ranging from an Associate s to a Doctorate degree, with 30% possessing a Master s degree in Less than one-fifth of CCCS staff respondents held an Associate s degree while over one-fourth held a Bachelor s degree. The inverse proportion was observed among PCC staff respondents. Table 3: Highest Level of Education What is the highest level of education you have attained? (% of responses) Some High School 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 0% High School Diploma or G.E.D. 0% 0% 0% 0% 6% 4% 5% 4% Apprenticeship or Training in a Skilled Trade 0% 1% 0% 0% 3% 2% 0% 2% Some College 0% 2% 3% 1% 21% 17% 15% 16% Associate s Degree 14% 5% 24% 6% 23% 19% 26% 17% Bachelor's Degree 25% 18% 21% 14% 25% 28% 18% 27% Master's Degree 59% 61% 52% 65% 21% 26% 33% 30% Doctorate 2% 13% 0% 14% 2% 3% 2% 3% Gender: Among faculty, approximately two-thirds of survey respondents were female. Among staff respondents, approximately 70% of the responses came from females (Table 4). Table 4: Gender What is your gender? (% of responses) Female 62% 61% 65% 61% 72% 69% 70% 73% Male 38% 39% 35% 39% 28% 31% 30% 27% Age group: As shown in Table 5, the largest age groups were and These two age groups together totaled at least 60% of the respondents. Additionally, 20% of the PCC faculty who completed the 2010 survey were aged between 60 and 69 years old, as compared to only 13% among CCCS faculty. It is also interesting to note that the proportion of employees that indicated being under the age of 30 was much higher among staff (10%) than it was among faculty (3%). 5
6 Table 5: Age Groups What is your age group? (% of responses) Under 30 years 5% 3% 3% 2% 11% 9% 10% 10% years 13% 17% 17% 18% 19% 18% 16% 20% years 22% 30% 33% 31% 26% 28% 30% 26% years 57% 37% 27% 35% 33% 35% 34% 32% years 13% 13% 20% 13% 11% 9% 10% 11% 70 + years 2% 0% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% Ethnicity: In 2010, 84% of CCCS faculty and 77% of CCCS staff who responded to the survey identified themselves as White/Caucasian (Table 6). The ethnic composition of PCC s respondents markedly differed from that of the entire CCCS population. Indeed, PCC s proportion of Hispanic/Latino respondents was at least ten percentage points higher than that observed for the whole CCCS population. Inversely, PCC showed a lower percentage of White/Caucasian respondents. Table 6: Ethnic Composition What is your ethnicity? (% of responses) American Indian/Alaskan Native 0% 1% 0% 0% 2% 1% 3% 1% Asian 0% 1% 0% 1% 1% 2% 0% 1% Black/African American 0% 1% 0% 1% 1% 3% 1% 3% Hispanic/Latino 16% 5% 23% 4% 34% 14% 25% 12% Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% White/Caucasian 81% 90% 63% 84% 60% 77% 64% 78% Two or more races 0% 0% 7% 4% 0% 0% 5% 4% Other 3% 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 3% 1% Length of employment: In 2010, 61% of CCCS faculty who participated in the survey had been working for their current employer for less than ten years (Table 7). At PCC, the faculty s length of employment was nearly evenly split between those who had been working at the college for less than ten years (47%) and those who were hired more than ten years ago (53%). Approximately 65% of PCC and CCCS staff respondents had been employed at their current institution for less than ten years. 6
7 Table 7: Length of Employment How long have you worked at this institution? (% of responses) Less than 2 years 17% 14% 17% 13% 23% 23% 17% 19% 2-4 years 12% 18% 13% 17% 16% 17% 28% 27% 5-9 years 20% 30% 17% 31% 25% 24% 20% 21% years 17% 17% 13% 18% 18% 16% 20% 16% years 19% 12% 33% 12% 11% 11% 11% 9% years 10% 6% 7% 6% 4% 5% 4% 6% years 5% 3% 0% 2% 3% 2% 1% 1% 30 + years 0% 1% 0% 1% 0% 1% 0% 1% Discipline (faculty only): As shown in Table 8, at the System level, the disciplines were split almost half between general education (46%) and career and technical education (CTE) (54%). At PCC, a large majority of faculty who responded to the survey (80%) were from CTE disciplines (2010 data). Table 8: Discipline Please indicate which discipline you teach (% of responses) Career and Technical Education (CTE) 75% 48% 80% 46% General Education 25% 52% 20% 54% Contract term and salary (faculty only): As indicated in Table 9, most respondents (60% to 70%) were 9-month-salaried, followed by 12-month-salaried (17% to 20%) and 10-month-salaried (4% to 19%). In 2008, 81% of the faculty (CCCS and PCC) who participated in the survey reported earning between $35,000 and $54,999 (Table 10). In 2010, only 74% of CCCS faculty and 67% of PCC faculty fell within this salary range. Table 9: Contract Term What is your contract term? (% of responses) Less than 9 Month 2% 2% 0% 3% 9 Month Standard Academic Year 60% 70% 70% 69% 10 Month 19% 5% 10% 4% 11 Month 0% 1% 3% 2% 12 Month 19% 20% 17% 18% Other (please specify) 2% 2% 0% 4% 7
8 Table 10: Salary What is your current base (contract) salary? (% of responses) $20,000 - $29,000 6% 5% 10% 9% $30,000 - $34,999 3% 7% 7% 6% $35,000 - $39,999 17% 21% 10% 17% $40,000 - $44,999 22% 26% 30% 24% $45,000 - $49,999 25% 20% 13% 19% $50,000 - $54,999 17% 14% 13% 15% $55,000 - $59,999 9% 5% 10% 5% $60,000 - $64,999 2% 2% 3% 4% $65,000 - $69,999 0% 1% 3% 1% $70,000 or over 0% 1% 0% 1% V. SURVEY RESULTS Overall satisfaction with current employment situation: Table 11 shows that between 2008 and 2010, the percentage of faculty who reported being either extremely or very satisfied with their current employment drastically dropped (from 61% to 42% among CCCS faculty and from 71% to 56% among PCC faculty). This observation was even more pronounced among APT and classified staff. Indeed, nearly 70% of staff respondents reported being either extremely or very satisfied with their current employment in 2008, as compared to approximately 45% in Between 2008 and 2010, the percentage of extremely dissatisfied respondents increased by at least 10 percentage points among both faculty and staff. Table 11: Overall Satisfaction with Current Employment Situation Overall, how satisfied are you with your current employment situation? (% of responses) Extremely Satisfied 24% 16% 15% 12% 12% 16% 14% 12% Very Satisfied 47% 45% 41% 30% 56% 51% 33% 31% Somewhat Satisfied 28% 35% 33% 34% 30% 28% 31% 33% Extremely Dissatisfied 2% 5% 12% 18% 3% 5% 19% 18% Table 12 lists 11 satisfaction factors and the percentage of respondents who rated them as very important or important. Among the factors that contributed the most to personal job satisfaction were the ability to perform meaningful work, good relationships with coworkers, good working conditions, the appreciation of opinions/suggestions, job security, salary, and effective leadership and supervision. Benefits and training/professional development opportunities were also considered as important satisfaction factors by most of the respondents. The least important satisfaction factors were career advancement opportunities and recognition. Notable differences between CCCS and PCC were observed among faculty. The results of the 2010 survey showed that, as compared to the entire CCCS faculty population, PCC faculty more frequently cited job security, pay, benefits, and leadership/supervision as 8
9 important contributors to job satisfaction. In contrast, training/professional development was only cited by 78% of PCC faculty as compared to 83 % of CCCS faculty. Table 12: Satisfaction factors % of Very Important and Important Ability to Perform Meaningful Work 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% Relationships with Coworkers 95% 95% 93% 94% 95% 94% 96% 93% Working Conditions 98% 97% 100% 97% 98% 97% 95% 96% Opinions/Suggestions are Valued 98% 94% 93% 94% 95% 97% 96% 96% Job Security 91% 89% 100% 95% 97% 94% 96% 95% Pay 91% 87% 93% 88% 97% 98% 97% 96% Leadership/Supervision 93% 89% 93% 84% 95% 94% 95% 94% Benefits 90% 83% 89% 78% 95% 93% 93% 92% Training/Professional Development 98% 87% 78% 83% 92% 90% 87% 88% Career Advancement Opportunities 79% 67% 63% 67% 88% 85% 83% 84% Employee Recognition 77% 65% 70% 66% 73% 75% 75% 76% The CCCS climate surveys asked participants who were planning to leave their current position to indicate what factors influenced their decision (Table 13). Among faculty, the most frequently cited reason was pay and benefits. In 2010, 68% of CCCS faculty and 50% of PCC faculty indicated that dissatisfaction with salary and benefits could lead to their resignation. A significant percentage of faculty respondents (26% among CCCS and 50% among PCC) indicated that other circumstances could influence their decision to leave their current employment. Among staff, the lack of advancement opportunities emerged as the primary reason for quitting. Dissatisfaction with pay and benefits and working conditions were also frequently cited. Results also showed that conflict with supervisor and/or co-workers significantly influenced PCC staff and faculty to consider leaving the college. Table 13: Reasons for Leaving If you are planning to leave your current employment, please indicate the reason(s) why (% of responses). Pay and Benefits 32% 49% 50% 68% 37% 38% 46% 49% Working Conditions 20% 27% 17% 30% 18% 20% 46% 37% Conflict with Supervisor 4% 10% 17% 16% 18% 14% 33% 19% Conflict with Co-workers 4% 5% 17% 5% 8% 6% 21% 12% Dissatisfaction with Job Duties 8% 22% 0% 23% 12% 18% 17% 27% Lack of Advancement ( added in the 2010 survey) 0% 25% 50% 54% Career Change 4% 15% 0% 11% 14% 18% 13% 16% Moving or Relocation 12% 9% 17% 3% 8% 11% 8% 6% Other 44% 37% 50% 26% 41% 40% 8% 29% 9
10 Job satisfaction and employee motivation: Although almost 20% of CCCS respondents (2010 survey) reported being dissatisfied with their current employment satisfaction, the results showed that more than 95% of them liked their jobs, found the work they do meaningful, and gained a sense of personal satisfaction and accomplishment from doing their job well (Table 14). Approximately 90% of the respondents felt motivated to do a good job while approximately 80% of faculty and 70% of staff felt that their coworkers were motivated to do a good job. Almost all faculty respondents indicated being satisfied with the types of courses they taught and with the level of independence they had in teaching their classes. An overwhelming majority (above 85%) of respondents (both faculty and staff) reported that their work is sufficiently challenging and a source of pride. Although employees seemed to be highly satisfied with their profession, the responses indicated a near split when asked if they ever felt burnt out. In 2010, approximately 70% PCC respondents reported that they rarely thought about quitting, as compared to 63% among the entire System. Table 14: Job Satisfaction and Employee Motivation Overall, I like the work I do. 98% 99% 100% 99% 97% 96% 96% 95% The work I do is meaningful. 97% 100% 100% 100% 99% 98% 97% 96% Doing my job well gives me a sense of personal satisfaction and accomplishment. 98% 99% 100% 99% 99% 97% 98% 97% I feel motivated to do a good job. 92% 91% 89% 90% 90% 88% 89% 87% I feel that my coworkers are motivated to do a good job. 80% 77% 82% 79% 70% 72% 67% 72% My work is sufficiently challenging for me. 92% 96% 100% 98% 92% 89% 88% 87% I am proud to tell others that I work for this college. 93% 86% 96% 87% 87% 85% 89% 86% I seldom feel 'burnt out' by my job. 52% 48% 48% 53% 49% 54% 50% 51% I rarely think about quitting. 63% 32% 73% 63% 63% 63% 70% 63% I am satisfied with the types of courses I am assigned to teach. 98% 95% 100% 95% I am satisfied with the level of independence that I have in how I teach my class. 98% 97% 96% 95% Institutional leadership and governance: As compared to the entire CCCS population, PCC faculty and staff respondents were much more satisfied with the leadership provided at their college (Table 15). In 2010, 93% of PCC faculty and 78% of PCC staff respondents agreed that overall, their college was a well run organization. A large majority (above 85%) of PCC faculty and staff thought that their college was achieving its mission, vision, and goals. Most PCC employees indicated that they knew how to do their part in helping the college fulfill its mission and agreed that their college had a good reputation in the community. 10
11 Table 15: Mission, Vision, and Goals Overall, I believe that my college is a well-run organization. I know the mission, vision and goals that have been set by my college. I believe that the college is achieving its mission, vision and goals. I understand how to do my part in helping the college to achieve its mission, vision and goals. My college has a good reputation in the community. I have trust and confidence in the leadership of the college. 68% 60% 93% 64% 71% 67% 78% 71% 93% 91% 88% 86% 85% 84% 95% 86% 70% 67% 85% 71% 68% 68% 85% 74% 84% 84% 93% 84% 78% 85% 93% 86% 89% 84% 96% 83% 85% 79% 89% 82% 59% 54% 82% 59% 65% 63% 69% 66% My college is headed in the right direction. 60% 62% 89% 65% 69% 68% 75% 71% The CCCS surveys included five question items related to institutional values and culture (Table 16). Important differences were observed between PCC faculty and CCCS faculty. In 2010, over threequarters of PCC faculty indicated that the college cared about its employees and treated them well and fairly, as compared to approximately two-thirds among CCCS faculty. Above 90% of PCC faculty responded that their college valued academic excellence and placed student success at the top of its priorities. The questions I feel the college cares about its employees and employees at this college are treated well and fairly received lower marks among staff respondents, with a level of agreement inferior to 70%. In 2010, 64% of PCC faculty and 67% of PCC staff indicated that the culture and policies of the college supported a healthy work/life balance. Table 16: Values and Culture I feel that the college cares about its employees. Employees at this college are treated well and fairly. The culture and policies of the college support a healthy work/life balance. My college values academic excellence. 75% 81% 93% 82% Students are and student success is a top priority at my college. 69% 65% 85% 65% 59% 62% 69% 65% 70% 61% 78% 60% 56% 60% 64% 61% 48% 47% 64% 51% 60% 60% 67% 61% 87% 81% 96% 84% 11
12 As showed in Table 17, a large majority of faculty (above 80%) agreed that they had a voice in the decision making within their department, felt encouraged to find new and better ways to do their job, and were given an opportunity to participate in the recruiting of new faculty. The results clearly showed a higher satisfaction level among PCC faculty as compared to the entire CCCS faculty group. In 2010, approximately 69% of staff respondents agreed that their opinion seemed to count, while 88% felt encouraged to participate in the continuous improvement of their college. Table 17: Shared Governance My opinion at work seems to count. 68% 68% 75% 66% 69% 72% 67% 69% I feel encouraged to find new and better ways of doing my job and improving processes. I have a voice in decision making within my department. I have opportunity to participate in search and selection processes for new faculty. 77% 79% 86% 80% 89% 82% 88% 80% 87% 87% 96% 83% 82% 80% 81% 80% Communication: In 2010, a majority of PCC faculty and staff who completed the survey (above 85% and 68 %, respectively) felt that they received the information they needed from senior management as well as their direct supervisor (Table 18). Almost 70% of PCC faculty agreed that two-way communication between faculty and administrators was good, as compared to 59% among CCCS. Table 18: Communication I feel like I know what is going on at the college. 59% 60% 75% 66% 60% 64% 68% 65% I get the kind of information that I need from senior management. My supervisor keeps me informed about issues that affect me. At my college, two-way communication between faculty and administrators is good. 62% 58% 75% 62% 64% 62% 73% 65% 85% 78% 82% 81% 81% 77% 79% 77% 60% 55% 68% 59% Relationships with co-workers and supervisors: Table 19 shows that a large percentage (above 70%) of faculty and staff felt that they worked in an environment that supports teamwork. An even larger percentage of respondents (above 80%) indicated that people in their work unit cooperated with one another. In 2010, 85% of PCC staff and 96% of PCC faculty responded that they enjoyed working with their colleagues. Ninety-six percent of PCC faculty respondents indicated that faculty respected one another. 12
13 Table 19: Relationships with Co-Workers I work in an environment that supports team work. People in my work unit cooperate with one another. 77% 71% 85% 71% 80% 74% 76% 73% 89% 84% 93% 83% 80% 83% 78% 82% I enjoy working with my colleagues. 97% 94% 96% 93% 91% 92% 85% 91% At my college, faculty respects one another. 94% 87% 96% 89% As shown in Table 20, a large majority (above 80%) of respondents felt that they are treated respectfully by their supervisor and consequently expressed that they respected their supervisor. Both the 2008 and the 2010 results revealed that the degree of mutual respect between faculty and their supervisor was notably higher at PCC than it was among the entire CCCS faculty population. As compared to CCCS, PCC faculty respondents were more satisfied with the level of support they received from their Dean (10 percentage point difference). In 2010, 89% of PCC faculty respondents and 75% of PCC staff respondents indicated that their supervisor treated people fairly. Table 20: Relationships with Supervisors I respect my supervisor. 92% 87% 89% 83% 85% 85% 82% 85% My supervisor shows respect to his/her staff. 91% 86% 93% 83% 86% 83% 81% 83% My supervisor treats people fairly. 87% 84% 89% 79% 79% 79% 75% 80% I get the support I need from my Dean. 92% 79% 89% 78% I get the support I need from my Department Chair. 78% 81% 80% 80% Workload and resources: Results from the 2010 survey showed that, as compared to the entire CCCS faculty group, a larger percentage of PCC faculty responded that their duties and responsibilities were clear (89%), they had the tools and resources needed to do their job well (86%), their teaching load and administrative responsibilities were reasonable (82% and 75% respectively), the full-time/part-time faculty ratio was appropriate (52%), and resources were equitably distributed among faculty (79%) (Table 21). Although most of the faculty agreed that their work unit was staffed with the right employees (75%), a minority (31%) agreed that there are enough employees to get the job done. Among staff members, 65% of CCCS employees and only 58% of PCC employees expressed that their workload was reasonable. Only 61% of PCC staff members agreed that job duties were distributed fairly in their work unit, as compared to 67% among CCCS staff members. 13
14 Additionally, over three-quarters of PCC faculty respondents indicated that their college was either very effective or effective in providing the classroom and office technology they needed (Table 22). The college s effectiveness in providing administrative support received a lower mark, with only 61% of PCC faculty selecting very effective or effective. Table 21: Workload and Resources My job duties and priorities are clear. 74% 76% 89% 79% 81% 82% 83% 80% I have the tools and resources I need to do my job well. In my work unit, we have the right people to do the work. In my work unit, we have enough people to get the work done. 69% 63% 86% 70% 68% 68% 80% 72% 73% 70% 75% 71% 73% 71% 67% 71% 32% 34% 31% 45% 39% 45% 44% 45% My workload is reasonable. 56% 52% 61% 58% 62% 67% 58% 65% Duties are distributed fairly in my work unit. 77% 61% 74% 64% 64% 66% 61% 67% My teaching load is reasonable. 77% 66% 82% 76% Teaching loads are equitably distributed among faculty. My administrative responsibilities are reasonable. The full-time/part-time faculty ratio in my academic area is appropriate. There is an equitable distribution of resources among faculty in my college. 78% 56% 64% 63% 65% 65% 75% 66% 38% 34% 52% 38% 73% 56% 79% 60% Table 22: Administrative and technological support How effective is your college in providing the following for faculty? (% of Very Effective and Effective) Administrative Support 52% 54% 61% 58% Classroom Technology 73% 63% 82% 71% Office Technology 68% 59% 76% 62% Training and professional development: As compared to CCCS, PCC respondents were more satisfied with the training opportunities provided by their college (Table 23a). As shown in Table 23b, PCC faculty specifically acknowledged the college s effectiveness in providing orientations, mentoring, and professional development opportunities. 14
15 Table 23a: Training and professional development My college gives me the training I need to do my job well. My college provides adequate training and support for part-time, adjunct faculty. Table 23b: Training and professional development How effective is your college in providing the following for faculty? (% of Very Effective and Effective) 72% 65% 80% 69% 70% 66% 75% 65% 48% 38% 64% 49% Orientations 60% 47% 75% 55% Mentoring 86% 48% 82% 42% Professional Development 57% 58% 75% 54% Career advancement opportunities: A minority of CCCS employees responded that their institution offered good career advancement opportunities (Table 24). At PCC, only 36% of faculty and 30% of staff (2010 data) felt optimistic about future opportunities at the college. Less than 40% of PCC respondents believed that the college prepared them well for possible advancement opportunities. The results also revealed a system-wide concern regarding the perceived fairness of the career advancement process. Indeed, a majority of respondents (particularly among staff) felt that promotions and advancement opportunities were not directly related to successful job performance. Table 24: Career Advancement Opportunities I feel I have good career advancement opportunities at my college. The college does a good job of developing employees for job opportunities and advancement in the organization. At my college, employees that work hard and do a good job will have opportunities for promotions and advancement. Promotions in my department and college are determined based upon merit. 47% 45% 36% 43% 38% 40% 30% 36% 50% 37% 39% 36% 31% 34% 38% 34% 48% 38% 44% 38% 38% 37% 33% 32% 48% 35% 43% 37% 19% 31% 23% 28% 15
16 Performance evaluation system: Approximately 70% of the survey participants responded that the feedback they received during their most recent evaluation was meaningful and helped them improve their work (Table 25). A large majority (above 80%) of respondents agreed that their most recent performance evaluation was fair. However, only 35% of CCCS faculty and 50% of PCC faculty agreed that the performance evaluation system and pay-for-performance was applied fairly. Table 25: Performance Evaluation The feedback I received during my most recent performance evaluation was meaningful and has helped me to improve my work. My most recent performance evaluation was fair. I am satisfied that my college's faculty performance evaluation system and pay-forperformance process is fairly applied. 75% 73% 75% 71% 73% 68% 71% 67% 87% 86% 86% 84% 77% 77% 86% 81% 52% 40% 50% 35% Salary and benefits: As shown in Table 26, most of the question items pertaining to salary received less than 50% of favorable answers (i.e. strongly agree or agree). In 2010, only 21% of PCC faculty and 34% of PCC staff felt that their salary was market competitive as compared to other organizations in the same geographical area. However, as compared to the entire CCCS group, PCC employees better understood how pay rates were determined, felt more satisfied with their salary level, and believed that pay policies were administered fairly. Approximately 70% of PCC respondents believed that pay increase should be based primarily on job performance (30% believed that pay increase should be based primarily on length of service). With regard to benefits, the highest percentage of favorable answers was obtained in the areas of leave and retirement (Table 27). In 2010, 79% of PCC faculty and 83% of PCC staff believed that the leave policies compared well with those offered by other employers in the area. More than 75% of PCC employees believed that their retirement benefits were market competitive. However, 43% of PCC faculty and 38% of PCC staff members were concerned about whether or not they would have enough money to maintain their current standard of living when they retire. In 2010, about half of the PCC respondents felt that their health benefits did not compare favorably with other employers. Only half of PCC respondents indicated that their individual monetary contribution was reasonable. 16
17 Table 26: Salary I believe that my salary is market competitive compared to other employers in the area that I could work for doing similar work. 20% 13% 21% 17% 35% 33% 34% 34% I understand how pay rates are determined. 61% 46% 50% 44% 60% 56% 65% 58% I am appropriately paid for the work I do at my college. I believe that our college/system pay policies are administered fairly. I am appropriately paid compared with others doing similar work, with similar levels of education and experience at my college. My salary reflects my performance and contribution to the college. I believe that pay increases should be based primarily on performance. I believe that pay increases should be based primarily on length of service. 33% 24% 32% 20% 43% 46% 49% 43% 46% 28% 50% 31% 41% 41% 50% 41% 46% 41% 44% 38% 41% 43% 38% 40% 34% 25% 33% 19% 37% 40% 37% 36% 64% 64% 68% 72% 64% 71% 73% 75% 26% 43% 29% 38% 28% 27% 28% 26% Table 27: Benefits I believe our leave policies (vacation, sick leave, etc.) compare well with those offered by other employers in the area. I believe our retirement benefits compare well with those offered by other employers in the area. Our retirement benefits give my confidence that I will have enough money when I retire to maintain my current standard of living. I believe our health benefits (medical, dental, vision) compare well with those offered by other employers in the area. The amount of money that I must contribute toward the cost of my benefits is reasonable. 75% 70% 79% 69% 82% 84% 83% 84% 90% 74% 78% 67% 76% 77% 77% 71% 53% 41% 43% 30% 49% 47% 38% 37% 38% 40% 48% 52% 30% 41% 54% 60% 45% 44% 54% 46% 37% 51% 51% 57% 17
18 VI. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS Climate surveys are valuable tools for identifying areas of employee satisfaction and dissatisfaction. They give employees a voice in the determination of organizational strengths and opportunities for improvement. By acting on performance barriers identified by employees of all levels, organizations can develop strategies and implement action plans that will create a greater workplace and increase productivity. The campus climate survey developed by CCCS provides a source of comparative data that can help PCC better interpret its own results and set benchmarks for future surveys. The availability of system-wide data represents a significant advantage over the locally-developed climate survey administered on all four PCC campuses in fall PCC needs to encourage participation in the bi-annual CCCS climate surveys. Low response rates damage the credibility of a survey's results and limit the number of statistical analyses that can be performed to extract meaningful information from the data. Inversely, when a survey yields a high response rate, results are more likely to represent the overall target population and the findings are statistically more accurate. The IR Office recommends that PCC takes several steps to increase the response rate of the next CCCS survey. These include i) effectively communicate the importance of this survey to all employees, ii) report the results back to all employees in a timely manner, and iii) use the survey results to develop and implement improvement initiatives that will increase employee satisfaction and productivity. 18
19 Appendix 1 Additional Faculty Survey Results On average, how may hours per week do you spend on classroom teaching? (% of responses) 5-9 hours 18% 13% 15% 18% hours 21% 23% 44% 27% hours 43% 40% 30% 33% More than 20 hours 18% 24% 11% 22% How many total credit hours did you teach in the past academic year? (include fall, spring, summer and overloads) (% of responses) 0-18 hours 16% 15% 18% 22% hours 16% 12% 14% 13% % 20% 18% 17% % 19% 18% 15% % 20% 25% 18% 41 or more hours 7% 15% 7% 15% On average, how many hours per week do you spend on committee work? (% of responses) 1-3 hours 64% 56% 61% 61% 4-6 hours 14% 24% 18% 18% 7-9 hours 3% 5% 4% 5% 10 or more hours 2% 3% 4% 2% None 18% 12% 14% 15% On average, how many hours per week do you spend on instructional preparation/planning? (% of responses) 1-4 hours 3% 5% 11% 10% 5-9 hours 36% 33% 30% 34% hours 42% 31% 22% 30% 15 or more hours 19% 30% 37% 27% 19
20 On average, how many hours per week do you spend outside of the classroom working with student activities/clubs? (% of responses) 1-3 hours 70% 77% 84% 83% 4-6 hours 21% 14% 0% 10% 7-9 hours 4% 3% 5% 3% 10 or more hours 5% 5% 11% 5% On average, how many hours per week do you spend outside of the classroom on student advising/counseling office hours? (% of responses) 1-3 hours 18% 22% 39% 30% 4-6 hours 33% 36% 21% 36% 7-9 hours 21% 19% 7% 14% 10 or more hours 29% 23% 32% 20% On average, how many hours per week do you spend on student grading/assessment? (% of responses) 1-4 hours 32% 23% 21% 19% 5-9 hours 48% 40% 43% 40% hours 15% 23% 25% 25% 15 or more hours 5% 14% 11% 16% On average, how many hours per week do you spend supervising/mentoring adjunct faculty? (% of responses) 1-3 hours 49% 49% 48% 46% 4-6 hours 24% 21% 16% 18% 7-9 hours 3% 4% 8% 4% 10 or more hours 3% 4% 8% 7% None 21% 23% 20% 26% 20
COLORADO COMMUNITY COLLEGE SYSTEM. Financial Statements and Compliance Audit. June 30, 2014 and (With Independent Auditors Reports Thereon)
Financial Statements and Compliance Audit June 30, 2014 and 2013 (With Independent Auditors Reports Thereon) LEGISLATIVE AUDIT COMMITTEE 2014 MEMBERS Senator Lucia Guzman Chair Senator David Balmer Senator
More informationSTATE BOARD FOR COMMUNITY COLLEGES AND OCCUPATIONAL EDUCATION. February 11, Christina Cecil, Executive Director of Human Resources
STATE BOARD FOR COMMUNITY COLLEGES AND OCCUPATIONAL EDUCATION February 11, 2015 TOPIC: PRESENTED BY: Plan Update Christina Cecil, Executive Director of Human Resources RELATIONSHIP TO THE STRATEGIC PLAN:
More informationCumulative Count and Percent CampusClimate
What is your primary job assignment? Full-time Faculty (classroom) Full-time Faculty (non-classroom) 76 77.55 % 76 77.55 % 22 22.45 % 98 100.00 % Where is your primary job assignment? Oceanside Campus
More informationKirk H. Schulz, President. Theresa Elliot-Cheslek, Associate Vice President & Chief HR Officer. DATE: August 11, FY 2017 Exit Survey Summary
TO: FROM: Kirk H. Schulz, President Theresa Elliot-Cheslek, Associate Vice President & Chief HR Officer DATE: August 11, 2017 SUBJECT: FY 2017 Exit Survey Summary In a continued effort to recruit, develop,
More informationCOLORADO COMMUNITY COLLEGE SYSTEM. Financial Statements and Compliance Audit. June 30, 2013 and (With Independent Auditors Reports Thereon)
Financial Statements and Compliance Audit (With Independent Auditors Reports Thereon) LEGISLATIVE AUDIT COMMITTEE 2013 MEMBERS Representative Angela Williams Chair Senator Steve King Vice Chair Senator
More informationGraduate Survey Master's Degree Respondents Orlando Campus
Sample 4 Graduate Survey Master's Degree Respondents Orlando Campus - 2015 Master's Degree Gender Degree Frequency Percent Gender Frequency Percent Business Administration 1 33% Male 4 100% Engineering
More informationContinuing Education Employee Perception Survey. Briefing. Prepared by: SDCCD Office of Institutional Research and Planning September 4, 2009
Continuing Education Employee Perception Survey Spring 2009 Briefing Prepared by: SDCCD September 4, 2009 Introduction 2 Overview & Purpose The three SDCCD colleges and Continuing Education conducted employee
More informationFifth Annual Salary and Employee Satisfaction Survey
Please select your job title. Fifth Annual Salary and Employee Satisfaction Survey 2011 2010 Biochemist 12 1% Biochemist 4 1% Chemical Engineer 11 1% NA NA NA Chemist/Scientist 142 13% Chemist/Scientist
More informationMaster Degree Exit Interview Engineering Management
Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Engineering Management 2015 Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 2 Sample Sample 2015 Population 83 Sample
More informationMaster Degree Exit Interview Electrical Engineering
Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Electrical Engineering 2014 Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 2 Sample Sample 2014 Population 6 Sample
More informationYour Voice 2014, BCLC s Employee Survey Comprehensive Report
Your Voice, BCLC s Employee Survey Comprehensive Report 1 Methodology was the sixth year of conducting Your Voice, the employee engagement survey for All employees are invited to participate with the following
More informationMaster Degree Exit Interview Landscape Architecture
Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Landscape Architecture 2015 Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 2 Sample Sample 2015 Population 11 Sample
More informationMaster Degree Exit Interview Environmental Management
Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Environmental Management 2014 Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 2 Sample Sample 2014 Population 11 Sample
More informationMaster Degree Exit Interview Computer Science
Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Computer Science 2014 Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 2 Sample Sample 2014 Population 11 Sample 8 Percent
More informationTheresa Elliot-Cheslek, Associate Vice President & Chief Human Resource Officer
TO: FROM: Kirk H. Schulz, President Theresa Elliot-Cheslek, Associate Vice President & Chief Human Resource Officer DATE: August 1, 2018 SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 2018 Exit Survey Summary In a continued effort
More informationMaster Degree Exit Interview Computer Science
Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Computer Science 2017 Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 Table of Content Sample Student Information COOP
More informationAHP SALARY REPORT C A N A D A,
AHP SALARY REPORT CANADA, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 3 INTRODUCTION... 4 METHODOLOGY... 4 RESPONDENT PROFILE... 5 ANNUAL SALARY... 10 COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS... 18 EMPLOYEE PERCEPTIONS...
More informationCoconino Community College 3 rd Annual Employee Opinion Survey
Coconino Community College 3 rd Annual Employee Opinion Telephone Opinion Conducted by Wonderlic Consulting, Inc: March 18, 2002 April 19, 2002. 2002 Notes Three years of comparative date Better use of
More informationMaster Degree Exit Interview Electrical Engineering
Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Electrical Engineering 2016 Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 2 Sample Sample 2016 Population 6 Sample
More informationQ2.1 Please rate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements about the use of time in your school.
Report for TELL Oregon 2018 54.18% responded 90.60% responded 58.44% responded 90.91% responded Time Q2.1 Please rate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements about the use of time
More informationOFC OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL. 3rd Level Subagency Report
Department of the Treasury Response Summary Surveys Completed Department of the Treasury 51,038 Departmental Offices 1,002 UNDER SEC (TERROR&FIN INTELL) 208 88 This 2014 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey
More informationPhased Retirement Policy
(Rev. 8/2/16, 2/7/14, Original 7/10/07) Purpose: SUNY Cortland has developed a voluntary Phased Retirement Program designed to give eligible members of the academic and professional staff an opportunity
More informationSustainability Staffing Survey
Higher Education Sustainability Staffing Survey 2010 Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education Table of Contents I. Introduction... 1 II. Respondent Demographics... 2 III. Institution
More informationAY2018 Senior Survey: College of Business Administration Report Introduction
Introduction Survey Information The Senior Survey is designed to give undergraduate students the opportunity to reflect upon their K-State experiences. This information is used to improve the college experience
More informationima The Association of Accountants and Financial Professionals in Business
ima The Association of Accountants and Financial Professionals in Business IMA Middle East/Africa Salary Survey for 2016 IMA Middle East/Africa Salary Survey for 2016 About IMA IMA, the association of
More informationMaster Degree Exit Interview Manufacturing Engineering
Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Manufacturing Engineering 2016 Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 2 Sample Sample 2016 Population 23 Sample
More informationNational Civic Engagement Survey Spring 2015 Descriptive Statistics
National Civic Engagement Survey Spring 2015 Descriptive Statistics In spring 2015, nine community colleges from across the state were provided a small stipend to participate in the Civic Engagement Survey
More informationMPC Employee Demographics. Presented to the Board of Trustees May 24, 2011
MPC Employee Demographics Presented to the Board of Trustees May 24, 2011 Background Education Code Academic excellence can best be sustained in a climate of acceptance and with the inclusion of persons
More informationTransamerica Small Business Retirement Survey
Transamerica Small Business Retirement Survey Summary of Findings October 16, 2003 Table of Contents Background and Objectives 3 Methodology 4 Key Findings 2003 8 Key Trends - 1998 to 2003 18 Detailed
More informationNORTHWEST AREA FOUNDATION SOCIAL INDICATORS SURVEY
NORTHWEST AREA FOUNDATION SOCIAL INDICATORS SURVEY SEPTEMBER - DECEMBER 2003 Data weighted to states Figure 1: Positive Feelings about Community: Summary i Frequency of Positive Feelings, by State OREGON
More informationMaster Degree Exit Interview Master Computer Engineering
Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Master Computer Engineering Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 2 Sample Population 9 Sample 7 Percent of
More informationFlorida State College at Jacksonville Jacksonville, Florida
Florida State College at Jacksonville Jacksonville, Florida PACE Report Personal Assessment of the College Environment Lead Researchers Laura A. Garland & Grey Reavis Conducted October & November 2017
More informationKENTUCKY BOARD of EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES
KENTUCKY BOARD of EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES Kentucky EMS 216 Attrition Survey 118 James Court, Suite 5 Lexington, KY 455 Phone (859) 256-3565 Fax (859) 256-3128 kbems.kctcs.edu KBEMS 216 ATTRITION SURVEY
More informationViewpoint Results Summary. Bank of England October 2017
Viewpoint 2017 Results Summary Bank of England October 2017 Overview: Understanding how employees feel about working in the Bank is of huge importance to the Governors and senior management. Between 5
More informationAnnual Employee Survey
Pinellas County Sheriff s Office Annual Employee Survey Comparative Analysis 2010-2012 Support Services Information Systems & Analysis Division Methodology & Response Rates An on-line survey was conducted
More informationModernThink. ModernThink Higher Education Insight Survey. ModernThink Higher Education Insight Survey. XYZ University SAMPLE REPORT
ModernThink Higher Education Insight Survey ModernThink Overall Standard (3) Benchmarks Included Benchmarks (3) TBD By GA (Examples Below) ModernThink Higher Education Insight Survey SAMPLE REPORT Positive
More informationima The Association of Accountants and Financial Professionals in Business
ima The Association of Accountants and Financial Professionals in Business IMA United Arab Emirates Salary Survey for 2016 IMA United Arab Emirates Salary Survey for 2016 About IMA IMA, the association
More information2017 Compensation and Benefits Survey - Final Report
2017 Compensation and Benefits Survey - Final Report Prepared For: Alberta Professional Planners Institute Prepared By: Bramm Research Inc. Better Information. Better Solutions www.brammresearch.com May
More information2018 Report. July 2018
2018 Report July 2018 Foreword This year the FCA and FCA Practitioner Panel have, for the second time, carried out a joint survey of regulated firms to monitor the industry s perception of the FCA and
More information2018 Curricular & Co-Curricular Assessment Needs Survey & Interview Report
2018 Curricular & Co-Curricular Assessment Needs Survey & Interview Report Office of Institutional Effectiveness College of Coastal Georgia October 2018 A s s e s s m e n t N e e d s S u r v e y & I n
More informationDepartment of Human Resources Annual Report School Year (October 1, 2008 September 30, 2009)
Albemarle County Public Schools Department of Human Resources Annual Report 2009 2010 School Year (October 1, 2008 September 30, 2009) School Year 2009-2010 Annual Report (October 1, 2008 September 30,
More informationComprehensive Compensation, Classification, and Organizational Design and Structure Study for Portland Public Schools, ME FINAL REPORT
Comprehensive Compensation, Classification, and Organizational Design and Structure Study for Portland Public Schools, ME FINAL REPORT August 13, 2013 EVERGREEN SOLUTIONS, LLC Chapter 1- Introduction In
More informationCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY Civic Engagement Questionnaire
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY Civic Engagement Questionnaire Part A. Background 1. Gender: 2. Class level: 3. Age: O Female O Lower division (Fr/So) 4. Major: O Male O Upper division (Jr/Sr) 5. Campus: O
More informationdialogue LATE CAREER FACULTY PERCEPTIONS: IMPLICATIONS FOR RETIREMENT PLANNING AND POLICYMAKING
research dialogue issue no. 84 june 2005 84 LATE CAREER FACULTY PERCEPTIONS: IMPLICATIONS FOR RETIREMENT PLANNING AND POLICYMAKING tiaa-crefinstitute.org Jerry Berberet, Associated New American Colleges
More informationColorado Higher Education Governing Boards HIGHER EDUCATION FISCAL COORDINATOR. March 16, 2012
Colorado Higher Education Governing Boards HIGHER EDUCATION FISCAL COORDINATOR 1800 Grant St Suite 600 Campus Box 436 DCA Denver, Colorado 80203 PHONE: (303)837-2150 FAX: (303)837-2162 e-mail: Fiftwo.Baldwin@cu.edu
More informationGraduating Student Survey Class of 2018
Graduating Student Survey Class of 2018 Graduating Student Survey Class of 2018 The Graduating Student Survey was administered May-July 2018 to the class of 2018 via a Web link sent by email in the invitation
More informationWhat do the numbers mean? Our core mission is about educating our students and preparing them for their futures. Our core values of equity,
What do the numbers mean? Our core mission is about educating our students and preparing them for their futures. Our core values of equity, excellence and community drive our district culture, and ensures
More informationWell-Being in Non-Metropolitan Nebraska: Perceptions of the Present and Views of the Future
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Publications from the Center for Applied Rural Innovation (CARI) CARI: Center for Applied Rural Innovation 009 Well-Being
More informationG i l b e r t P u b l i c S c h o o l s S t a f f C l i m a t e S u r v e y A n a l y s i s
G i l b e r t P u b l i c S c h o o l s 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5 S t a f f C l i m a t e S u r v e y A n a l y s i s A C o o p e r a t i v e P r o j e c t b e t w e e n T H E G I L B E R T P U B L I C S C H O O
More informationATSU-ASDOH Graduate Loan Repayment Program Application Funded by UnitedHealth Foundation
ATSU-ASDOH Graduate Loan Repayment Program Application Funded by UnitedHealth Foundation Date: Name Last First Middle Initial Address Street Address City State Zip Code Telephone ( ) - Email Address Graduation
More informationReal Rewards at Nestlé USA
Real Rewards at Nestlé USA Real Rewards at Nestlé As a leading Nutrition, Health and Wellness company, Nestlé s name is instantly recognizable. But what excites new hires and keeps current employees engaged
More informationFULL-TIME PAID POSITIONS ONLY
ALL LOCAL ARTS AGENCIES ALL LOCAL ARTS AGENCIES PUBLIC ART Staff members who report that their primary role or responsibility most closely matches the Public Art category are typically involved in the
More informationAmerican University of Armenia 2016 FRESHMAN STUDENT EXIT SURVEY
American University of Armenia 2016 FRESHMAN STUDENT EXIT SURVEY Prepared by Institutional Research Office Email: iro@aua.am Telephone: (+374) 60 61 25 16 May 2017 2016 Freshman Student Exit Survey 1 Table
More informationHeartland Monitor Poll XXI
National Sample of 1000 AMERICAN ADULTS AGE 18+ (500 on landline, 500 on cell) (Sample Margin of Error for 1,000 Respondents = ±3.1% in 95 out of 100 cases) Conducted October 22 26, 2014 via Landline and
More informationI. INTRODUCTION II. ROLES & RESPONSIBILITIES
Page 1 I. INTRODUCTION The District implements a broad-based comprehensive and integrated planning system that is a foundation for strategic directions and resource allocation decisions. The Superintendent/President
More informationFaculty Campus Climate Survey
Faculty Campus Climate Survey Summary Report June 20, 2017 Dr. Ann McCann Director of Planning & Assessment Faculty Campus Climate Survey The Faculty Campus Climate Survey was conducted in March 2017 to
More informationVolunteer Survey 2017
Volunteer Survey 2017 Volunteer Survey In March 2017 a volunteer survey was sent to 1500 email addresses of current or referred volunteers 519 people completed the survey The following charts are pulled
More informationMBA.COM REGISTRANTS SURVEY 2003 REPORT BY AGE GROUPS BY GRADUATE MANAGEMENT ADMISSION COUNCIL (GMAC )
BY GRADUATE MANAGEMENT ADMISSION COUNCIL (GMAC ) Table of Contents 3 Key Findings 4 Demographic Profile MBA.COM REGISTRANTS SURVEY 2003 6 Stage in Progress toward a Degree 6 Application Stage 6 When Respondents
More informationState of the Workforce 2016
State of the Workforce 2016 The Western Wisconsin Workforce Development Board, Inc. (WDB) was established in 2000 to oversee the strategic direction of the workforce in an eight county area in western
More information2009 Spring Check-In Survey Report
2009 Spring Check-In Survey Report All surveys All surveys: Number of surveys = 500 Number of completed surveys = 123 Percent of surveys completed = 24.60 % Number of people who have asked to be removed
More informationCERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER BOARD OF STANDARDS, INC CONSUMER SURVEY
CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER BOARD OF STANDARDS, INC. 2004 CONSUMER SURVEY CFP BOARD S 2004 CONSUMER SURVEY 1 Table of Contents Introduction.........................................................................2
More informationRedefining University Culture Team 1. Cultural Engagement Survey. Survey Period: March 10 April 1, 2016
Redefining University Culture Team Cultural Engagement Survey Survey Period: March 0 April, 20 Team members contributing to the survey and report include Brian Beavers, Todd Brown, John Calahan, Jessica
More informationReflections in the Mirror: Defined contribution plan participants
Reflections in the Mirror: Defined contribution plan participants offer their perspectives and perceptions around retirement savings 2014 FINDINGS OF NATIONAL PLAN PARTICIPANT SURVEY Non-FDIC Insured May
More informationTranscript Budget Principles. Slide 1: Budget Principles. Slide 2: Student Learning Outcomes
Slide 1: Budget Principles How is this for a bold look? Hopefully this bold and bright red design will help to keep you awake and focused on some of the most important big picture budgeting principles.
More informationCitizens Health Care Working Group. Greenville, Mississippi Listening Sessions. April 18, Final Report
Citizens Health Care Working Group Greenville, Mississippi Listening Sessions Final Report Greenville, Mississippi Listening Sessions Introduction Two listening sessions were held in Greenville, MS, on.
More information2016 uk judicial attitude survey. Report of findings covering salaried judges in England & Wales Courts and UK Tribunals
2016 uk judicial attitude survey Report of findings covering salaried judges in England & Wales Courts and UK s Report prepared by Professor Cheryl Thomas UCL Judicial Institute 7 February 2017 1 Table
More informationVirginia Retirement System
Virginia Retirement System Our Vision To be the trusted leader in the delivery of benefits and services to those we serve. Our Core Values Act with Integrity as we perform our role and represent VRS. Display
More informationCommunity Survey 2014
Community Survey 2014 Brown University Department of Public Safety Prepared by the Office of Institutional Research for the Department of Public Safety Summary of Results The Community Survey was administered
More informationPulse of Southern Maryland Fall 2016 Presidential Outlook
Presidential Outlook Summary Planning, Institutional Effectiveness, and Research Department Presidential Outlook Summary From November 7 10, 2016, student volunteers at the College of Southern Maryland
More informationResults from Census of EXs and Feeder Group Core Public Administration
PWGSC Contract #42001-060452/001/CY-Amd.002 POR Registration #POR 375-06 Contract Award Date: 21/02/2007 Results from Census of s and Group Core Public Administration FINAL REPORT Submitted to: Canada
More informationAlbemarle County Public Schools Department of Human Resources. Annual Report
Albemarle County Public Schools Department of Human Resources Annual Report 2012-2013 Octo ober 1, 2011 Septembe er 30, 2012 School Year 2011-2012 Annual Report October 1, 2011 September 30, 2012 The Albemarle
More informationDecember 2008 Graduate Exit Survey FINDINGS
December 2008 Graduate Exit Survey FINDINGS INSTITUTIONAL PLANNING UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS II SECTION 1: CONTEXT 1 1.1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.2 SURVEY INSTRUMENT 1 1.3 SURVEY
More information2014 ICF Global Consumer Awareness Study Data Tables for Denmark
ICF Consumer Awareness Study Data Tables for Continuing its role in providing the coaching profession and general public with reliable industry research on coaching, ICF commissioned the ICF Consumer Awareness
More informationU N I V E R S I T Y H O U S T O N S T R A T E G I C P L A N
DIRECTION U N I V E R S I T Y O F H O U S T O N L A W C E N T E R S T R A T E G I C P L A N The University of Houston Law Center plays an influential role in the development of law and legal institutions.
More informationNEBRASKA RURAL POLL. A Research Report. Optimism in Nonmetropolitan Nebraska: Perceptions of Well-Being Nebraska Rural Poll Results
NEBRASKA RURAL POLL A Research Report Optimism in Nonmetropolitan Nebraska: Perceptions of Well-Being 2015 Nebraska Rural Poll Results Rebecca Vogt Cheryl Burkhart-Kriesel Randolph Cantrell Bradley Lubben
More informationBudget Reduction and Efficiency Actions Updated February 3, 2009
Budget Reduction and Efficiency Actions Updated Arizona State University has taken a number of management actions that result in lower cost structures and improved efficiency. These measures have been
More informationKansas Speaks 2012 Statewide Public Opinion Survey
Kansas Speaks 2012 Statewide Public Opinion Survey Prepared For The Citizens of Kansas By The Docking Institute of Public Affairs Fort Hays State University Copyright October 2012 All Rights Reserved Fort
More informationPlanning and Assessment Manual. Institutional Research & Effectiveness
1 Planning and Assessment Manual Institutional Research & Effectiveness Revised October 2014 By Dr. Paul Fowler Director of Institutional Effectiveness 2 What is Institutional Effectiveness? Institutional
More informationPace University 2013 Retirement Option
November 15, 2012 Pace University 2013 Retirement Option Introduction: Before proposing the 2013 retirement option, it is important to present some comments about the current status. On May 15, 2012, Pace
More informationIn-House Counsel Barometer 2009
In-House Counsel Barometer 2009 Table of Contents Study Introduction and Highlights of Findings.......................... 1 Current Economic Climate.........................................6 Being In-House
More informationInformation Services Response Rate: 99%
Information Services Response Rate: 99% New Hire Process (Onboarding) This section is about the new employee experience, including the training and orientation of new employees. (Only asked of employees
More informationTRANSACTIONS OF SOCIETY OF ACTUARIES 1986 VOL. 38 TRANSACTIONS ADDRESS OF THE PRESIDENT, RICHARD S. ROBERTSON
TRANSACTIONS OF SOCIETY OF ACTUARIES 1986 VOL. 38 Vol. XXXVIII 1986 TRANSACTIONS ADDRESS OF THE PRESIDENT, RICHARD S. ROBERTSON THE SAD STATE OF ACTUARIAL EDUCATION IN THE UNITED STATES It is traditional
More informationPlanning and Budgeting Forum Mission Achievement Planning
Planning and Budgeting Forum Mission Achievement Planning September 22, 2014 Denver, Colorado Gordon Jensen Introduction Metropolitan Community College (MCC): One of six community colleges in Nebraska
More informationCommunity Survey 2017
Community Survey 2017 Brown University Department of Public Safety Prepared by the Office of Institutional Research for the Department of Public Safety Summary of Results The Community Survey was administered
More information9 th Annual Budget Forum April 2014
9 th Annual Budget Forum April 2014 Presenters: Helen Benjamin Chancellor Gene Huff Executive Vice Chancellor Jonah Nicholas Associate Vice Chancellor GOALS Information Arzu Smith Director of District
More informationSeek, Test, Treat and Retain for Vulnerable Populations: Data Harmonization Measure
Seek, Test, Treat and Retain for Vulnerable Populations: Data Harmonization Measure DEMOGRAPHICS Demographic Measure Data Harmonization Page 1 Current Age Date of Birth What is your date of birth? MM/DD/YYYY
More informationMILITARY FRIENDLY COMPANIES AWARDS
1 MILITARY FRIENDLY COMPANIES 2018 2017 REVIEW AWARDS DESIGNATION CHANGES AHEAD 2 3?? 4 Military Friendly 2017 Survey Review 5 2017 SURVEY STATS: Updated Methodology 37 PAGES 258 Questions 15 Hrs. Average
More information2009 Computer Networking & Service Tech Summary Report
2. While a student at Dalton State College, I was mainly enrolled: Full-Time 1 33.33 % 1 33.33 % Part-Time 2 66.67 % 3 100.00 % 3. I was currently enrolled in: Computer Networking and Service Technology
More informationPostgraduate Fellowship Compensation Survey. Division of Member Services, Research American College of Healthcare Executives
Postgraduate Fellowship Compensation Survey Division of Member Services, Research American College of Healthcare Executives Survey Report Spring 2016 BACKGROUND In 2002, the American College of Healthcare
More informationAmerican University of Armenia 2018 Freshman Student Exit Survey. Prepared by Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
American University of Armenia 2018 Freshman Student Exit Survey Prepared by Office of Institutional Research and Assessment Email: iro@aua.am May, 2018 Contents Methodology and Background... 3 Instrument
More informationDemographic Trends and the Older Workforce
Demographic Trends and the Older Workforce November 10, 2004 Linda Barrington, Ph.D. The Conference Board www.conference-board.org THE CONFERENCE BOARD Finding solutions together Councils Conferences Symposium
More informationWellbeing at the Victorian Bar survey
1 Wellbeing at the Victorian Bar survey The Wellbeing at the Victorian Bar survey was completed by 856 members, which represents an overall response rate of of total Victorian practising Counsel. Who filled
More informationTechnical Notes for the Shared Responsibility Budget Model, ver for Oregon State University, Corvallis Campus Education and General Budget
Technical Notes for the Shared Responsibility Budget Model, ver. 19.8 for Oregon State University, Corvallis Campus Education and General Budget August 8, 2018 Overview The goals of this shared responsibility
More informationUNC-CH School of Medicine Department of Allied Health Sciences FACULTY COMPENSATION PLAN FY19
UNC-CH School of Medicine Department of Allied Health Sciences FACULTY COMPENSATION PLAN FY19 I. Introduction The Department of Allied Health Sciences (DAHS) is a component of the School of Medicine of
More informationCIMA salary survey 2009 South Africa
CIMA South Africa qualified salary survey 2009 CIMA salary survey 2009 South Africa Foreword 1 Executive summary 2 Main findings 4 Salaries and bonuses.. 4 Years experience. 4 Gender 5 Sector 5 Regions.
More informationThe Multi-Generational Labor Force: Perceptions of Jobs among Millennials, Gen-Xers, and Boomers
The Multi-Generational Labor Force: Perceptions of Jobs among Millennials, Gen-Xers, and Boomers Sarah C. Kerman and Teresa A. Keenan AARP Research January 2017 https://doi.org/10.26419/res.00145.001 Table
More informationCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SIA Civic Engagement Questionnaire
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SIA Civic Engagement Questionnaire Part A. Background 1. Gender: 2. Class level: 3. Age: O Female O Lower division (Fr/So) 4. Major: O Male O Upper division (Jr/Sr) 5. Campus:
More informationCATEGORY 8 PLANNING CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT
INTRODUCTION The College s processes related to Planning Continuous Improvement are very mature. JC s key planning processes are aligned. Clear processes are in place for strategic planning and the College
More informationThe Center for Local, State, and Urban Policy
The Center for Local, State, and Urban Policy Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy >> University of Michigan Michigan Public Policy Survey October 2012 Michigan s local leaders satisfied with union negotiations
More informationTHE ASEAN BUSINESS OUTLOOK SURVEY 2011
THE ASEAN BUSINESS OUTLOOK SURVEY 2011 INDONESIA REPORT Compiled by: The American Chamber of Commerce (AmCham) in Singapore 1 Scotts Road #23-03/04/05 Shaw Centre Singapore 228208 Copyright Standards This
More information