System Performance Summary for FY 2016/17 Fixed Route
|
|
- Melissa Turner
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 System Performance Summary for FY 216/17 This report summarizes the unaudited oational formance of Marin Transit local transit services for FY 216/17, and compares these results to the District s route level formance goals identified in the Short-Range Transit Plan. The report provides a detailed route level assessment of all Marin Transit services oating in FY 216/17. On June 12, 216, Marin Transit implemented a major service change with a 19% increase in local fixed-route service levels and a restructuring of routes throughout the County. This FY 216/17 report includes data from a full year of the new service plan. There were a few additional changes to transit services during FY 216/17, including the following: In July 216, the District launched a new general public dial-a-ride service between Point Reyes Station and Novato. The service provides curb-to-curb pick-up and drop-off, and only oates on the second Monday of each month. The closure of Hwy 1 in early 217 delayed the start of the Muir Woods Shuttle season, which typically begins in April. The Shuttle season began on May 13, resulting in 12 fewer days of service. A number of recent changes to Marin Transit s contracts and agreements have had an impact on the District s financials. These include the following: The District completed a procurement for paratransit services in 215. The new contract went into effect on January 1, 216, and provides significantly lower rates for paratransit and dial-a-ride services. This report provides data from the first full year of the new contract. Effective February 1, 217, the District increased the subsidy paid to Catch-A-Ride service providers for oating wheelchair accessible vehicles to further incentivize the availability of accessible vehicles for Catch-A-Ride trips. For FY 216/17, Marin Transit updated the methodology for calculating revenue hours for demand response services to be more consistent with the National Transit Database definitions. These include local paratransit and the Novato Dial-A-Ride. This change has reduced the amount of time that is considered as part of revenue hours. Overall, Marin Transit provided over 3.2 million unlinked passenger trips in FY 216/17 with over 235, revenue hours of service. Compared to FY 215/16, these numbers represent a decrease in unlinked passenger trips (-3.5%) and an increase in revenue hours (+8.2%). Growth in service was primarily on local fixed-route services due to the June 216 changes. Some of this growth was partially offset by decreases in hours on local paratransit and Route 122. The system-wide productivity rate was 13.6 riders hour, about 1.8% lower than FY 216/17. revenues increased slightly (+.6%). Due to higher oating costs, passenger subsidy increased by 12.7% to a system-wide average of $6.78 passenger. Fixed Route Fixed Route oations carried over 2.9 million unlinked passenger trips in FY 216/17 with 178,52 revenue hours. These totals represent 91% of the District s total trips and 76% of revenue hours. Compared to FY 215/16, unlinked passenger trips on fixed route services decreased by 3.5% and revenue hours increased by 13.6%. Overall productivity was 16.4 passengers hour, approximately 15.% lower than the 19.3 mark last fiscal year. Compared to FY 215/16, almost all fixed-route typologies exienced a decrease in overall ridership. These include: Local Basic (-12.%), Local Connector (-12.7%), Supplemental (-3.2%), and Partnership (-2.5%). However, some services exienced a modest increase in ridership compared to last year, including Local Trunkline (+7.7%), the Muir Woods Shuttle (+4.4%), and Rural (+4.8%). 1
2 Total passenger revenue decreased slightly (-1.1%) in FY 216/17 compared to last year. Increases in oating costs resulted in a decrease in overall farebox recovery from 19.9% last year to 17.6% in FY 216/17. Only the Local Trunkline and Recreational (Muir Woods Shuttle) typologies exienced an overall increase in both passenger revenue and farebox recovery. Yellow Bus In FY 216/17, yellow bus service for the Ross Valley School District carried over 136, unlinked passenger trips, a decrease of 1.3% compared to last year, and oated 1,245 revenue hours. These totals represent 4% of the District s total ridership and 1% of revenue hours. revenues increased 15.% due to higher pass prices. This boost in revenues did not keep pace with the rise in oating costs, and overall farebox recovery decreased from 57.1% last year to 54.8% in FY 216/17. Demand Response Demand Response programs carried 124,325 unlinked passenger trips in FY 216/17, and provided 55,191 revenue hours of service. These totals represent 4% of the District s total trips and 24% of revenue hours. Compared to FY 215/16, unlinked passenger trips on demand response services decreased by 3.9% (-5,96 trips) and revenue hours decreased by 6.1%. The more significant reduction in revenue hours compared to passengers is likely due to the new method for calculating those hours. Overall productivity was 2.3 passengers hour, slightly higher than last fiscal year. Ridership on local paratransit and the Novato Dial-A-Ride decreased in FY 216/17 compared to the prior year. Rural Dial-A- Ride, exienced growth in ridership, mainly because these services were only recently introduced. These include the Dillon Beach/Tomales and Point Reyes Station Dial-A-Ride. revenues for demand response services dropped slightly (-1.5%) compared to last year. However, lower oating costs due to the new contract rate resulted in reductions in subsidies and an increase in farebox recovery. Other Services Other Marin Access Mobility Management services include the Volunteer Driver and Catch-A-Ride programs. In FY 216/17, these programs provided 3,547 unlinked passenger trips, about 1% of the District s total trips. Compared to the prior fiscal year, ridership decreased by 7.7% mostly due to the Catch-A-Ride program. However, passenger revenues increased by 9.%, primarily on the Catch-A-Ride program. This increase may have been due to riders taking longer trips. Performance Goals The Short-Range Transit Plan identifies fifteen different goals and associated metrics that staff use to evaluate system formance. Performance goals at the route level are measured in both productivity (unlinked passengers hour and trip) and cost effectiveness (subsidy unlinked passenger trip). These measures follow the service typologies updated in the most recent Short Range Transit Plan. Table 1 below summarizes route level formance goals by typology. Marin Transit has not identified productivity or cost-effectiveness goals for the Yellow Bus or Partnership service typologies. Table 2 provides a detailed summary of annual FY 216/17 formance data by program, route, and service typology. 2
3 Table 1: Productivity and Subsidy Goals by Service Typology Service Typology Routes Unlinked Trips (at or above) Trip (at or below) Local Trunkline 35, 36, 71X 25 $3. Regular Local 17, 22, 23, 23X, 29, 49 2 $5. Local Connector 219, 228, 233, 245, 251, $8. Supplemental 113, 115, 117, 119, 125, 139, 145, 151, trip $3. Rural 61, 68 4 $12. Recreational 66 (Muir Woods Shuttle) 25 $3. Demand Response Local DAR, Novato DAR, Dillon Beach/Tomales DAR, Point Reyes DAR 2 $3. Using the productivity goals identified in Table 1, all the service typology groups except for Local Basic met their unlinked passengers hour goal overall. Twelve individual routes and two demand response services did not meet their productivity targets. These include: Routes 17, 22, 23, 23X, 29, 49, 71X, 115, 125, 139, 219, 228, the Dillon Beach/Tomales Dial-A-Ride, and the Point Reyes Dial-A-Ride. In the previous fiscal year, ten routes did not meet this target. Figure 1 provides FY 216/17 productivity levels and respective productivity goals by service typology and at the route level. Route 35 was the most productive fixed-route service, carrying an average of 28.6 passengers hour. Route 151 (Hamilton San Jose MS Novato HS - San Marin HS) was the best forming supplemental school route with 42.8 passengers trip, and met its subsidy target at $1.5 passenger. Route 228 had the highest growth in productivity (+29.1%) due to the addition of weekday service in June 216. In terms of cost effectiveness, the Supplemental School, Rural, and Recreational services collectively met their goals. In total, 17 individual routes and two demand response services did not meet their subsidy target (Routes 17, 22, 23, 23X, 29, 35, 36, 49, 71X, 219, 228, 233, 251, 257, 115, 125, 139, Local Paratransit, and Novato Dial-A-Ride). This is an increase from the 13 routes and three demand response services reported for FY 215/16. Figure 2 provides a breakdown of FY 216/17 subsidy levels and respective subsidy goals by service typology and at the individual route level. Ridership Trends In FY 216/17, there was an overall 3.5% decline in fixed-route ridership compared to the previous year despite increases to service levels. One of the major contributors to this decline was the delayed start of the 217 Muir Woods Shuttle season that reduced the amount of service provided by 7.6%. The overall decrease in ridership is relatively consistent with trends among bus oators nationwide and in the Bay Area. According to the National Transit Database, bus ridership declined 6.6% nationwide during FY 216/17 compared to the prior year. Within in the Bay Area, peer agencies exienced ridership declines between 6% and 12%. These include Golden Gate Transit, Sonoma County Transit, SamTrans, and Napa VINE. One of the biggest external factors that may have contributed to this trend is weather. Rainfall in FY 216/17 almost doubled over the prior year. Weather can have a significant impact on travel decisions, affecting whether a son makes a trip, as well as how that son ultimately makes the trip. It can also impact oations and cause detours, major delays, and canceled trips. 3
4 In FY 216/17, there was a 34% increase in the number of canceled trips. Almost half of these canceled trips occurred in February due to heavy rains that caused flooding and school closures. In June 216, Marin Transit implemented a major service change. One of the main goals of the service restructuring was to reduce the need to transfer by providing faster and more direct connections. While this approach improves the system for riders, it has implications in terms of how ridership is counted and on formance metrics. The number of passengers is measured in terms of unlinked passenger trips. Each time a son boards a bus is counted as a separate trip, regardless of whether that son is transferring from another bus. Reducing the amount of transfers needed to complete a rider s journey reduces the number of unlinked trips. Replacing trips that require a transfer with direct trips to destinations does not change the number of individual riders using the system, which is defined as linked passenger trips. In FY 216/17, there was a 7.5% overall decrease in the number of transfers for passengers using cash to pay their original fare. Some of this decline reflects the systemwide decrease in ridership. The transfer ratio is defined as the number of boarding trips (unlinked passenger trips) divided by the number of originating trips (linked passenger trips). This ratio can be used to evaluate the impact of transfers on ridership independent of other factors. In FY 216/17, the overall transfer ratio dropped 3.8% from 1.36 to When estimating linked passenger trips based on these ratios, the number of individual Marin Transit passengers in FY 216/17 remained relatively constant compared to last year. Demand for Marin Access mobility management programs declined overall 4.7% from FY 215/16 to FY 216/17. Changes in ridership varied from program to program. The largest decline was on Catch-A-Ride, which exienced a 12.9% decrease in ridership. Local paratransit and Novato Dial-A-Ride ridership may have been affected by many of the same external factors as fixed route transit, particularly weather. It is also possible that paratransit clients have started to shift some or all their trips to services that are not provided by Marin Transit. These may include: Non-Emergency Medical Transportation services arranged by managed care organizations; Private transportation providers hired under contract to institutions typically served by paratransit (such as adult day care centers); Trips taken on Uber or Lyft; and Volunteer transportation services that may be supported by Marin Transit in some way but whose ridership is not reported in the District s formance statistics. Furthermore, staff attributed much of the previous growth in the Marin Access program to the Catch-A-Ride program. This program exienced a 47.3% increase in ridership between FY 213/14 and FY 214/15. Towards the end of FY 214/15, On the Move, one of the largest taxi companies in Marin went out of business. To this day, service is limited during hours of peak demand and in certain service areas especially Novato. Therefore, FY 216/17 ridership on Catch-A-Ride may reflect two factors. These include a slowdown in attracting new customers and a reduction in service availability following On the Move s closure. Table 2 summarizes the factors that can influence ridership numbers year-over-year, and qualitatively evaluates their impact. 4
5 Table 2: Factors Impacting Ridership Comparison Factor FY 215/16 FY 216/17 Impact Calendar School Days Weekdays Weekends & Holidays Muir Woods Shuttle Transfer Ratio (ratio of unlinked to linked trips) Service Disruptions Canceled service (trips) Major detour/closure (days) (1) Rainfall (inches) Gas Prices $2.98 $ Unemployment Rate 3.2% 3.2% -- Notes: (1) Data on major detours and closure collected starting January 216. Comparison includes the months of January through June. FY 217/18 Performance Outlook In June 216, Marin Transit implemented a major service change aimed in part to help underforming routes meet established formance standards. Staff has continued to monitor service formance, and has made minor adjustments to improve on-time formance and cancel low-ridership trips. In early 218, staff is planning a comprehensive assessment of service formance since the June 216 service changes. This effort will include data from a recently completed onboard survey from April 217 on passenger origins and destinations and a 1% passenger ridecheck. The ridecheck will provide data on stop-level ridership activity for each route. The assessment will use this analysis to recommend service changes to improve underforming routes. There are several unknowns that may also affect route formance, primarily in terms of oating costs. The District relies on its contractors to either lease or own proty to store and maintain the vehicles needed to oate service. For contractors that do not own suitable proty, finding and leasing these types of facilities in Marin County is challenging and expensive. Recent surveys of current and potential service providers identified securing a facility as the most significant factor in determining their interest in bidding on Marin Transit services, ability to provide the service, and proposed pricing. Marin Transit has been actively working to secure and develop its own oations and maintenance facility. A District-owned facility will eliminate the need for potential service providers to lease proty and lower oating costs. It may also improve efficiency by reducing deadhead, or non-revenue time when vehicles are traveling to and from the yard, and further lower the District s contract rates. In late 217, Marin Transit will release for bid over half of its fixed-route service and there are many uncertainties that may affect the outcome. The tight labor market in Marin County and the greater Bay Area has made it difficult for service providers to hire and retain employees. Potential contractors are required to secure proty in a County with limited real estate opportunities. If the District provides its own facility, there will be more interest among potential bidders and more competitive rates. 5
6 Table 3: System-wide Performance Statistics, FY 216/17 (unaudited) Route s Oating Pass. Trips Per Subsidy Per Farebox s Costs Rev Hr (Trip) Recovery Fixed Route 2,925, ,52 $2,173,419 $3,55, $ % Local Trunkline 1,122,188 44,393 $6,252,94 $1,263, $ % ,869 23,52 $3,234,38 $729, $ % ,178 13,636 $1,91,678 $369, $ % 71X 121,141 7,75 $1,116,954 $164, $ % Local Basic 989,5 65,117 $7,451,946 $1,221, $ % ,998 14,757 $2,76,786 $319, $ % ,758 17,553 $1,619,319 $273, $ % ,15 11,65 $1,58,659 $246, $ % 23X 49,255 3,445 $473,413 $57, $ % 29 4,13 3,77 $59,475 $49, $ % ,236 14,59 $1,264,294 $274, $ % Local Connector 378,985 42,396 $3,873,81 $461, $ % 219 5,449 6,392 $591,224 $64, $ % ,34 1,42 $94,86 $13, $ % ,798 4,363 $399,23 $52,1 9.8 $ % ,766 4,349 $391,596 $56, $ % ,56 9,67 $889,19 $11, $ % ,126 7,643 $697,953 $82, $ % Supplemental 179,947 3,963 $514,38 $11, (28.6) $ % , $42,18 $12, (31.5) $ % , $87,534 $9, (18.5) $ % ,82 64 $81,59 $17, (28.4) $ % , $56,273 $18, (31.3) $ % ,757 6 $72,469 $11, (19.3) $ % 139 6, $33,182 $6, (17.9) $ % , $25,426 $7, (37.2) $ % , $73,842 $18, (42.8) $ % , $41,965 $8, (25.5) $ % Recreational 122,116 4,316 $473,726 $249, $ % ,116 4,316 $473,726 $249, $ % Rural 112,926 16,172 $1,422,683 $122,47 7. $ % 61 36,328 5,492 $475,778 $39, $ % 68 76,598 1,68 $946,95 $82, $ % Partnership 19,86 1,696 $183,943 $121, $ % ,86 1,696 $183,943 $121, $ % Yellow Bus 136,5 1,245 $863,348 $473, (44.8) $ % Hidden Valley 9, $124,763 $32, (26.5) $ % White Hill 127,219 1,65 $738,585 $44, (47.1) $ % Demand Response 124,325 55,191 $4,571,296 $236, $ % Local Paratransit 119,673 53,11 $4,44,928 $226, $ % Novato DAR 4,57 1,856 $15,815 $8, $ % Dillon Beach DAR $12,511 $1, $ % Pt Reyes DAR $3,42 $ $ % Other Services 3,547 - $511,316 $41,956 - $ % Volunteer Driver (1) 16,162 - $152, $ Catch-A-Ride (1) 14,385 - $358,62 $41,956 - $ % Total 3,216, ,489 $26,118,572 $4,32, $ % Notes: Values in red indicate formance that does not meet District 6
7 Figure 1: FY 216/17 s by Route school routes show passengers trip meets goal service standard does not meet goal Local Trunkline Totals X Local Basic Totals X Local Connector Totals Supplemental Totals Recreational Totals 66 Rural Totals Demand Response Totals Local Paratransit Novato DAR Dillon DAR Pt Reyes DAR s 7
8 Figure 2: FY 216/17 by Route $4 $35 $3 does not meet goal service standard meets goal $25 $2 $15 $1 $5 Local Trunkline Totals X Local Basic Totals X Local Connector Totals Supplemental Totals Recreational Totals 66 Rural Totals Demand Response Totals Local Paratransit Novato DAR Dillon DAR Pt Reyes DAR 8
9 Attachment A: Route Profiles 17 Sausalito Marin City Mill Valley San Rafael 22 San Rafael Transit Center San Anselmo Marin City 23 Fairfax San Anselmo San Rafael Canal 23X Manor Fairfax San Anselmo San Rafael Canal 29 Canal San Rafael Transit Center Larkspur College of Marin Marin General 35 Canal San Rafael Transit Center Marin Civic Center Northgate Mall Novato 36 Canal San Rafael Transit Center Marin City 49 Novato Ignacio Hamilton Marin Civic Center San Rafael Transit Center 61 West Marin Stagecoach (Sausalito Marin City Mill Valley Stinson Beach Bolinas) 66 Muir Woods Shuttle 68 West Marin Stagecoach (San Rafael Transit Center San Anselmo Pt. Reyes Station Inverness) 71X Novato San Rafael Transit Center Marin City Sausalito 113 Redwood High School Paradise Cay 115 Sausalito Willow Creek Marin City Mill Valley St. Hilary 117 Neil Cummins / Hall Middle School E. Corte Madera Cove School 119 Tiburon Belvedere Redwood High School 122 San Rafael Transit Center San Anselmo College of Marin 125 Lagunitas Sir Francis Drake HS San Anselmo San Rafael 139 Terra Linda High School Lucas Valley 145 Terra Linda High School San Rafael 151 Hamilton Ignacio San Jose Middle School Novato High School San Marin High School 154 Olive San Marin High School Sinaloa Middle School Novato 219 Tiburon Strawberry 228 San Rafael Transit Center Larkspur San Anselmo Fairfax 233 Santa Venetia Marin Civic Center San Rafael Transit Center 245 San Rafael Transit Center Northgate Mall Kaiser Smith Ranch Road 251 San Marin Novato Vintage Oaks IVC Ignacio Hamilton 257 San Rafael Northgate Mall Kaiser Marinwood Hamilton Ignacio IVC Hdn Valley Ross Valley Yellow Bus (Fairfax San Anselmo Hidden Valley ES) White Hill Ross Valley Yellow Bus (San Anselmo Sleepy Hollow Fairfax White Hill MS) 9
10 17 Local Basic Days of Service: Wkdy, Sa, Su Avg Freq (Wkdy Peak): 3 min Avg Freq (Wkdy Non-Peak): 6 min Avg Freq (Wked): 6 min FY 217 : 15% % transfer (to route): 25% % Clip usage: 16% s s Miles Weekday 194,263 16, , ,386 14, Saturday 27,564 2, , ,621 2, Sunday 26,171 2, , ,378 2, Total 247,998 2, ,757 1, ,385 19, Historic Trends FY 216/17 DATA Oating Subsidy Weekday $1,617,18 $134,759 $6,392 $247,41 $2,587 $976 $1,37,67 $114,172 $5,415 Saturday $217,536 $18,128 $4,183 $36,894 $3,75 $71 $18,642 $15,54 $3,474 Sunday $242,142 $2,179 $4,36 $35,826 $2,986 $597 $26,316 $17,193 $3,439 Total $2,76,786 $173,66 $5,69 $319,761 $26,647 $876 $1,757,25 $146,419 $4,814 s Weekday 16.9 $7.5 $ % Saturday 17.9 $6.55 $ % Sunday 15.2 $7.88 $ % Total 16.8 $7.8 $ % s s s Oating Subsidy FY ,136 15,167 $2,18,822 $34,41 $1,768, $5.87 $ % FY ,486 15,33 $2,41,616 $32,337 $1,739, $6.2 $ % FY ,998 14,757 $2,76,786 $319,761 $1,757, $7.8 $ % 35, 3, 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, s 322,826 31, ,892 28, ,998 2, 15, 1, 5, s 14,818 15,167 15,33 14,757 12,42 $2,5, $2,, $1,5, $1,, $5, $2,179,526 $2,18,822 $2,41,616 $2,76,786 $1,717,2 s $14. $12. $1. $8. $6. $4. $2.. $7.8 $5.4 $5.58 $5.87 $6.2 $2 $15 $1 $5 $ $147.9 $139.4 $ $14.73
11 22 Local Basic Days of Service: Wkdy, Sa, Su Avg Freq (Wkdy Peak): 3 min Avg Freq (Wkdy Non-Peak): 6 min Avg Freq (Wked): 6 min FY 217 : 17% % transfer (to route): 1% % Clip usage: 11% s s Miles Weekday 184,918 15, ,244 1, ,319 1, Saturday 16,752 1, , ,232 1, Sunday 14,88 1, , ,729 1, Total 215,758 17, ,553 1, ,28 13, Historic Trends FY 216/17 DATA Oating Subsidy Weekday $1,312,992 $19,416 $5,19 $232,926 $19,411 $921 $1,8,66 $9,6 $4,269 Saturday $142,334 $11,861 $2,737 $21,235 $1,77 $48 $121,99 $1,92 $2,329 Sunday $163,993 $13,666 $2,733 $18,898 $1,575 $315 $145,95 $12,91 $2,418 Total $1,619,319 $134,943 $4,436 $273,59 $22,755 $748 $1,346,26 $112,188 $3,688 s Weekday 13. $5.84 $ % Saturday 1.9 $7.23 $ % Sunday 7.9 $1.3 $ % Total 12.3 $6.24 $ % s s s Oating Subsidy FY ,148 14,777 $2,54,433 $292,215 $1,762, $7.7 $ % FY ,635 14,872 $1,971,172 $259,453 $1,711, $7.3 $ % FY ,758 17,553 $1,619,319 $273,59 $1,346, $6.24 $ % 4, 35, 3, 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, s 366,31 281, , , ,758 2, 15, 1, 5, s 18,61 17,553 15,83 14,777 14,872 $3,, $2,5, $2,, $1,5, $1,, $5, $2,498,169 $2,22,145 $2,54,433 $1,971,172 $1,619,319 s $14. $12. $1. $8. $6. $4. $2.. $6.67 $7.7 $7.3 $5.67 $6.24 $2 $15 $1 $5 $ $147.2 $139.3 $ $92.25
12 23 Local Basic Days of Service: Wkdy, Sa, Su Avg Freq (Wkdy Peak): 6 min Avg Freq (Wkdy Non-Peak): 6 min Avg Freq (Wked): 6 min FY 217 : 16% % transfer (to route): 24% % Clip usage: 12% s s Miles Weekday 145,77 12, , ,277 5, Saturday 28,35 2, , , Sunday 25,138 2, , ,75 1, Total 199,15 16, , ,492 7, Historic Trends FY 216/17 DATA Oating Subsidy Weekday $1,96,892 $91,48 $4,336 $179,427 $14,952 $79 $917,465 $76,455 $3,626 Saturday $195,468 $16,289 $3,759 $35,226 $2,936 $677 $16,242 $13,354 $3,82 Sunday $216,299 $18,25 $3,65 $32,255 $2,688 $538 $184,44 $15,337 $3,67 Total $1,58,659 $125,722 $4,133 $246,98 $2,576 $676 $1,261,751 $15,146 $3,457 s Weekday 18.1 $6.3 $ % Saturday 19.7 $5.66 $ % Sunday 15.8 $7.32 $ % Total 18. $6.34 $ % s s s Oating Subsidy FY ,76 14,168 $1,969,65 $381,111 $1,588, $4.48 $ % FY ,218 13,154 $1,73,216 $38,138 $1,395, $5.2 $ % FY ,15 11,65 $1,58,659 $246,98 $1,261, $6.34 $ % s s 4, 35, 3, 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, 339, ,76 268, ,64 199,15 16, 14, 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, 14,34 14,168 13,154 11,65 8,716 $2,5, $2,, $1,5, $1,, $5, $2,61,985 $1,969,65 $1,73,216 $1,58,659 $1,22,564 s $14. $12. $1. $8. $6. $4. $2.. $6.34 $4.55 $4.94 $4.48 $5.2 $2 $15 $1 $5 $ $ $139.2 $ $136.35
13 23X Local Basic Days of Service: Wkdy Avg Freq (Wkdy Peak): 6 min Avg Freq (Wkdy Non-Peak): - Avg Freq (Wked): - FY 217 : 12% % transfer (to route): 31% % Clip usage: 12% s s Miles Weekday 49,255 4, , ,48 2, Saturday Sunday Total 49,255 4, , ,48 2, Historic Trends FY 216/17 DATA Oating Subsidy Weekday $473,413 $39,451 $1,871 $57,438 $4,787 $227 $415,975 $34,665 $1,644 Saturday $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Sunday $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Total $473,413 $39,451 $1,871 $57,438 $4,787 $227 $415,975 $34,665 $1,644 s Weekday 14.3 $8.45 $ % Saturday - $ - $ - - % Sunday - $ - $ - - % Total 14.3 $8.45 $ % s s s Oating Subsidy FY 215 FY 216 2, $23,33 $2,272 $21, $8.25 $ % FY ,255 3,445 $473,413 $57,438 $415, $8.45 $ % 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, s 49,255 2,548 4, 3,5 3, 2,5 2, 1,5 1, 5 s 3, $5, $4, $3, $2, $1, $473,413 $23,33 s $14. $12. $1. $8. $6. $4. $2.. $8.25 $8.45 $2 $15 $1 $5 $123.3 $137.44
14 29 Local Basic Days of Service: Wkdy Avg Freq (Wkdy Peak): 6 min Avg Freq (Wkdy Non-Peak): - Avg Freq (Wked): - FY 217 : 1% % transfer (to route): 26% % Clip usage: 12% s s Miles Weekday 4,13 3, , ,48 3, Saturday Sunday Total 4,13 3, , ,48 3, Historic Trends FY 216/17 DATA Oating Subsidy Weekday $59,475 $42,456 $2,14 $49,634 $4,136 $196 $459,841 $38,32 $1,818 Saturday $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Sunday $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Total $59,475 $42,456 $2,14 $49,634 $4,136 $196 $459,841 $38,32 $1,818 s Weekday 1.8 $11.47 $ % Saturday - $ - $ - - % Sunday - $ - $ - - % Total 1.8 $11.47 $ % s s s Oating Subsidy FY ,632 1,795 $1,5,887 $232,286 $1,268, $6.23 $ % FY ,786 1,52 $1,378,76 $219,997 $1,158, $6.37 $ % FY 217 4,13 3,77 $59,475 $49,634 $459, $11.47 $ % s s 3, 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, 238,31 225,998 23, ,786 4,13 14, 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, 12,248 1,927 1,795 1,52 3,77 $2,, $1,5, $1,, $5, $1,692,98 $1,67,795 $1,5,887 $1,378,76 $59,475 s $14. $12. $1. $8. $6. $4. $2.. $11.47 $5.95 $5.93 $6.23 $6.37 $2 $15 $1 $5 $ $ $139.4 $ $137.45
15 35 Local Trunkline Days of Service: Wkdy, Sa, Su Avg Freq (Wkdy Peak): 3 min Avg Freq (Wkdy Non-Peak): 3 min Avg Freq (Wked): 3 min FY 217 : 23% % transfer (to route): 17% % Clip usage: 8% s s Miles Weekday 492,328 41,27 1,946 16,99 1, ,421 18, Saturday 84,453 7,38 1,624 2, ,336 3, Sunday 82,88 6,841 1,368 3, ,21 4, Total 658,869 54,96 1,85 23,52 1, ,778 26, Historic Trends FY 216/17 DATA Oating Subsidy Weekday $2,367,217 $197,268 $9,357 $533,19 $44,433 $2,17 $1,834,27 $152,836 $7,249 Saturday $43,729 $33,644 $7,764 $97,853 $8,154 $1,882 $35,876 $25,49 $5,882 Sunday $463,362 $38,614 $7,723 $98,732 $8,228 $1,646 $364,63 $3,386 $6,77 Total $3,234,38 $269,526 $8,861 $729,775 $6,815 $1,999 $2,54,533 $28,711 $6,862 s Weekday 29.1 $3.73 $ % Saturday 29.5 $3.62 $ % Sunday 25. $4.44 $ % Total 28.6 $3.8 $ % s s s Oating Subsidy FY ,489 8,544 $1,187,694 $462,24 $725, $1.52 $ % FY ,718 9,3 $1,22,986 $544,19 $658, $1.39 $ % FY ,869 23,52 $3,234,38 $729,775 $2,54, $3.8 $ % 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, s 669,86 658, , , ,718 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, s 23,52 9,755 8,644 8,544 9,3 $3,5, $3,, $2,5, $2,, $1,5, $1,, $5, $3,234,38 $1,345,711 $1,271,61 $1,187,694 $1,22,986 s $1. $8. $6. $4. $2.. $ $1.2 $1.52 $1.39 $2 $15 $1 $5 $ $147.1 $139.1 $ $14.3
16 36 Local Trunkline Days of Service: Wkdy, Sa, Su Avg Freq (Wkdy Peak): 3 min Avg Freq (Wkdy Non-Peak): 3 min Avg Freq (Wked): 3 min FY 217 : 19% % transfer (to route): 18% % Clip usage: 6% s s Miles Weekday 278,217 23,185 1,1 9, ,318 11, Saturday 33,779 2, , ,259 2, Sunday 3,182 2, , ,2 2, Total 342,178 28, ,636 1, ,579 15, Historic Trends FY 216/17 DATA Oating Subsidy Weekday $1,384,291 $115,358 $5,472 $29,481 $24,27 $1,148 $1,93,81 $91,151 $4,323 Saturday $24,62 $2,5 $4,617 $4,774 $3,398 $784 $199,288 $16,67 $3,832 Sunday $277,325 $23,11 $4,622 $37,877 $3,156 $631 $239,448 $19,954 $3,991 Total $1,91,678 $158,473 $5,21 $369,132 $3,761 $1,11 $1,532,546 $127,712 $4,199 s Weekday 28. $3.93 $ % Saturday 19.7 $5.9 $ % Sunday 15.2 $7.93 $ % Total 25.1 $4.48 $ % s s s Oating Subsidy FY ,347 2,894 $42,355 $11,471 $291, $2.67 $ % FY ,593 3,462 $457,211 $129,715 $327, $2.74 $ % FY ,178 13,636 $1,91,678 $369,132 $1,532, $4.48 $ % 4, 35, 3, 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, s 342,178 16,988 13,673 19, ,593 16, 14, 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, s 13,636 2,878 2,822 2,894 3,462 $2,, $1,5, $1,, $5, $1,91,678 $398,41 $415,238 $42,355 $457,211 s $1. $8. $6. $4. $2.. $4.48 $2.65 $2.93 $2.67 $2.74 $2 $15 $1 $5 $ $ $139.5 $132.5 $139.46
17 49 Local Basic Days of Service: Wkdy, Sa, Su Avg Freq (Wkdy Peak): 3 min Avg Freq (Wkdy Non-Peak): 6 min Avg Freq (Wked): 6 min FY 217 : 22% % transfer (to route): 9% % Clip usage: 11% s s Miles Weekday 21,564 16, , ,528 11, Saturday 18,489 1, , ,37 1, Sunday 17,183 1, , ,42 1, Total 237,236 19, ,59 1, ,3 14, Historic Trends FY 216/17 DATA Oating Subsidy Weekday $978,93 $81,575 $3,869 $23,134 $19,178 $91 $748,769 $62,397 $2,96 Saturday $131,97 $1,992 $2,537 $22,52 $1,877 $433 $19,387 $9,116 $2,14 Sunday $153,484 $12,79 $2,558 $21,844 $1,82 $364 $131,64 $1,97 $2,194 Total $1,264,294 $15,358 $3,464 $274,498 $22,875 $752 $989,796 $82,483 $2,712 s Weekday 17.8 $3.71 $ % Saturday 12.2 $5.92 $ % Sunday 9.8 $7.66 $ % Total 16.3 $4.17 $ % s s s Oating Subsidy FY ,262 6,349 $882,81 $158,88 $724, $5.2 $ % FY ,48 6,795 $9,84 $146,345 $754, $5.12 $ % FY ,236 14,59 $1,264,294 $274,498 $989, $4.17 $ % 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, s 23, , , ,48 237,236 16, 14, 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, s 14,59 9,814 6,44 6,349 6,795 $1,6, $1,4, $1,2, $1,, $8, $6, $4, $2, $1,362,499 $1,264,294 $948,72 $882,81 $9,84 s $14. $12. $1. $8. $6. $4. $2.. $4.77 $5.7 $5.2 $5.12 $4.17 $2 $15 $1 $5 $ $ $139.5 $ $86.65
18 61 Rural Days of Service: Wkdy, Sa, Su Avg Freq (Wkdy Peak): 8 trips Avg Freq (Wkdy Non-Peak): - Avg Freq (Wked): 16 trips FY 217 : 8% % transfer (to route): 7% % Clip usage: 11% s s Miles Weekday 17,166 1, , ,398 3, Saturday 9, , ,81 1, Sunday 9, , ,457 2, Total 36,328 3,27 1 5, ,665 7, Historic Trends FY 216/17 DATA Oating Subsidy Weekday $229,65 $19,138 $915 $17,691 $1,474 $7 $211,959 $17,663 $844 Saturday $113,378 $9,448 $2,268 $11,622 $969 $232 $11,756 $8,48 $2,35 Sunday $132,75 $11,63 $2,74 $1,646 $887 $166 $122,14 $1,175 $1,98 Total $475,778 $39,648 $1,34 $39,959 $3,33 $19 $435,819 $36,318 $1,194 s Weekday 6.5 $12.35 $ % Saturday 7.5 $1.26 $ % Sunday 6. $13.21 $ % Total 6.6 $12. $ % s s s Oating Subsidy FY ,478 5,379 $417,539 $46,324 $371, $9.4 $ % FY ,276 5,475 $48,987 $48,421 $36, $9.67 $ % FY ,328 5,492 $475,778 $39,959 $435, $12. $ % 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, s 39,478 37,276 36,328 33,386 3,642 5,6 5,5 5,4 5,3 5,2 5,1 5, 4,9 4,8 s 5,475 5,492 5,388 5,379 5,56 $5, $4, $3, $2, $1, $475,778 $388,827 $39,358 $417,539 $48,987 s $14. $12. $1. $8. $6. $4. $2.. $11.36 $12. $1.45 $9.4 $9.67 $2 $15 $1 $5 $72.16 $77.21 $77.62 $74.7 $86.63
19 66 Recreational Days of Service: Wkdy, Sa, Su Avg Freq (Wkdy Peak): 3 min Avg Freq (Wkdy Non-Peak): 3 min Avg Freq (Wked): 1-2 min FY 217 : 53% % transfer (to route): % % Clip usage: % s s Miles Weekday 21,94 7, ,735 3, Saturday 43,799 7,3 1,752 1, ,48 3, Sunday 56,377 6,264 1,446 2, ,212 3, Total 122,116 13,568 1,174 4, ,428 6, Historic Trends FY 216/17 DATA Oating Subsidy Weekday $14,33 $34,678 $2,61 $37,751 $12,584 $944 $66,282 $22,94 $1,657 Saturday $152,661 $25,444 $6,16 $79,948 $13,325 $3,198 $72,713 $12,119 $2,99 Sunday $217,32 $24,115 $5,565 $132,49 $14,672 $3,386 $84,983 $9,443 $2,179 Total $473,726 $52,636 $4,555 $249,748 $27,75 $2,41 $223,978 $24,886 $2,154 s Weekday 27.3 $3.2 $ % Saturday 29.7 $1.66 $ % Sunday 27.6 $1.51 $ % Total 28.3 $1.83 $ % s s s Oating Subsidy FY ,93 3,866 $477,523 $29,514 $268, $2.58 $ % FY ,942 4,673 $531,384 $245,779 $285, $2.44 $ % FY ,116 4,316 $473,726 $249,748 $223, $1.83 $ % 14, 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, s 116, ,116 13,52 13,93 62,624 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, s 4,673 4,316 3,841 3,866 2,941 $6, $5, $4, $3, $2, $1, $538,14 $531,384 $477,523 $473,726 $33, s $5. $4. $3. $2. $1. $3.6 $3.22 $2.58 $2.44 $1.83 $2 $15 $1 $5 $14.7 $ $ $ $
20 68 Rural Days of Service: Wkdy, Sa, Su Avg Freq (Wkdy Peak): 6 min Avg Freq (Wkdy Non-Peak): 12 min Avg Freq (Wked): 6-12 min FY 217 : 9% % transfer (to route): 13% % Clip usage: 12% s s Miles Weekday 59,93 4, , ,167 11, Saturday 8, , ,123 2, Sunday 8, , ,638 2, Total 76,598 6, , ,928 16, Historic Trends FY 216/17 DATA Oating Subsidy Weekday $645,737 $53,811 $2,573 $64,332 $5,361 $256 $581,45 $48,45 $2,316 Saturday $131,882 $1,99 $2,638 $9,26 $772 $185 $122,622 $1,219 $2,452 Sunday $169,286 $14,17 $2,645 $8,856 $738 $138 $16,43 $13,369 $2,57 Total $946,95 $78,99 $2,594 $82,448 $6,871 $226 $864,457 $72,38 $2,368 s Weekday 8.2 $9.71 $ % Saturday 5.6 $14.58 $ % Sunday 4.3 $19.36 $ % Total 7.2 $11.29 $ % s s s Oating Subsidy FY ,866 1,589 $848,35 $8,846 $767, $11.65 $ % FY 216 7,292 1,611 $811,978 $88,88 $723, $1.29 $ % FY ,598 1,68 $946,95 $82,448 $864, $11.29 $ % 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, 48,113 s 65,866 56,988 7,292 76,598 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, s 1,589 1,611 1,68 7,14 7,185 $1,, $8, $6, $4, $2, $848,35 $811,978 $532,879 $571,618 $946,95 s $14. $12. $1. $8. $6. $4. $2.. $11.65 $11.29 $9.79 $1.29 $8.85 $2 $15 $1 $5 $74.64 $79.55 $8.11 $76.52 $88.66
21 71X Local Trunkline Days of Service: Wkdy Avg Freq (Wkdy Peak): 3 min Avg Freq (Wkdy Non-Peak): 6 min Avg Freq (Wked): - FY 217 : 15% % transfer (to route): 26% % Clip usage: 16% s s Miles Weekday 121,141 1, , ,624 14, Saturday Sunday Total 121,141 1, , ,624 14, Historic Trends FY 216/17 DATA Oating Subsidy Weekday $1,116,954 $93,8 $4,415 $164,963 $13,747 $652 $951,991 $79,333 $3,763 Saturday $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Sunday $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Total $1,116,954 $93,8 $4,415 $164,963 $13,747 $652 $951,991 $79,333 $3,763 s Weekday 15.7 $7.86 $ % Saturday - $ - $ - - % Sunday - $ - $ - - % Total 15.7 $7.86 $ % s s s Oating Subsidy FY ,44 7,666 $1,66,58 $37,659 $758, $2.48 $ % FY ,678 7,717 $1,75,263 $3,186 $775, $2.98 $ % FY ,141 7,75 $1,116,954 $164,963 $951, $7.86 $ % 4, 35, 3, 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, s 347,56 341,15 35,44 259, ,141 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, s 9,38 7,578 7,666 7,717 7,75 $1,4, $1,2, $1,, $8, $6, $4, $2, $1,254,262 $1,116,4 $1,66,58 $1,75,263 $1,116,954 s $1. $8. $6. $4. $2.. $7.86 $2.53 $2.22 $2.48 $2.98 $2 $15 $1 $5 $ $ $139.6 $ $144.96
22 113 Supplemental Days of Service: School Days Avg Freq (Wkdy Peak): 3 trips Avg Freq (Wkdy Non-Peak): - Avg Freq (Wked): - FY 217 : 29% % transfer (to route): % % Clip usage: 4% s s Miles Weekday 16,829 1, , Saturday Sunday Total 16,829 1, , Historic Trends FY 216/17 DATA Oating Subsidy Weekday $42,18 $3,835 $23 $12,227 $1,112 $67 $29,953 $2,723 $164 Saturday $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Sunday $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Total $42,18 $3,835 $23 $12,227 $1,112 $67 $29,953 $2,723 $164 s Trip Weekday 31.5 $1.78 $ % Saturday - $ - $ - - % Sunday - $ - $ - - % Total 31.5 $1.78 $ % s s Subsidy Oating Subsidy s Trip FY , $28,599 $1,73 $17, $1.46 $ % FY , $36,924 $12,89 $24, $1.65 $ % FY , $42,18 $12,227 $29, $1.78 $ % 2, 15, 1, 5, s 16,829 15,232 14,61 13,521 12, s $5, $4, $3, $2, $1, $42,18 $36,924 $31,562 $28,599 $2,182 s Trip $8. $7. $6. $5. $4. $3. $2. $1.. $1.46 $1.65 $ $2 $15 $1 $5 $ $ $ $14.5 $132.89
23 115 Supplemental Days of Service: School Days Avg Freq (Wkdy Peak): 5 trips Avg Freq (Wkdy Non-Peak): - Avg Freq (Wked): - FY 217 : 11% % transfer (to route): % % Clip usage: 7% s s Miles Weekday 14,21 1, , Saturday Sunday Total 14,21 1, , Historic Trends FY 216/17 DATA Oating Subsidy Weekday $87,534 $7,958 $444 $9,54 $864 $48 $78,3 $7,94 $396 Saturday $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Sunday $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Total $87,534 $7,958 $444 $9,54 $864 $48 $78,3 $7,94 $396 s Trip Weekday 18.5 $5.57 $ % Saturday - $ - $ - - % Sunday - $ - $ - - % Total 18.5 $5.57 $ % s s Subsidy Oating Subsidy s Trip FY , $131,168 $18,863 $112, $5.23 $ % FY , $82,43 $12,638 $69, $4.26 $ % FY , $87,534 $9,54 $78, $5.57 $ % 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, s 21,488 16,366 13,524 14,21 1, s $14, $12, $1, $8, $6, $4, $2, $131,168 $82,43 $87,534 $56,76 s Trip $8. $7. $6. $5. $4. $3. $2. $1.. $5.23 $5.57 $4.26 $3.62 $2 $15 $1 $5 $ $ $ $122.5
24 117 Supplemental Days of Service: School Days Avg Freq (Wkdy Peak): 6 trips Avg Freq (Wkdy Non-Peak): - Avg Freq (Wked): - FY 217 : 21% % transfer (to route): % % Clip usage: 2% s s Miles Weekday 34,82 3, , Saturday Sunday Total 34,82 3, , Historic Trends FY 216/17 DATA Oating Subsidy Weekday $81,59 $7,41 $453 $17,14 $1,558 $95 $64,369 $5,852 $358 Saturday $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Sunday $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Total $81,59 $7,41 $453 $17,14 $1,558 $95 $64,369 $5,852 $358 s Trip Weekday 28.4 $1.85 $ % Saturday - $ - $ - - % Sunday - $ - $ - - % Total 28.4 $1.85 $ % s s Subsidy Oating Subsidy s Trip FY 215 5,8 59 $77,168 $77,528 ($36) 39.9 (.1) $ % FY , $77,694 $23,478 $54, $1.61 $ % FY ,82 64 $81,59 $17,14 $64, $1.85 $ % 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, s 5,8 35,174 34,496 33,75 34, s $1, $8, $6, $4, $2, $77,168 $77,694 $81,59 $41,176 $41, s Trip $6. $5. $4. $3. $2. $1.. -$1. -$2. $1.61 $1.85 (.12) (.28) (.1) $16 $14 $12 $1 $8 $6 $4 $2 $137.9 $ $ $14.75 $127.32
25 119 Supplemental Days of Service: School Days Avg Freq (Wkdy Peak): 5 trips Avg Freq (Wkdy Non-Peak): - Avg Freq (Wked): - FY 217 : 34% % transfer (to route): % % Clip usage: 5% s s Miles Weekday 27,161 2, , Saturday Sunday Total 27,161 2, , Historic Trends FY 216/17 DATA Oating Subsidy Weekday $56,273 $5,116 $313 $18,859 $1,714 $15 $37,414 $3,41 $28 Saturday $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Sunday $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Total $56,273 $5,116 $313 $18,859 $1,714 $15 $37,414 $3,41 $28 s Trip Weekday 31.3 $1.38 $ % Saturday - $ - $ - - % Sunday - $ - $ - - % Total 31.3 $1.38 $ % s s Subsidy Oating Subsidy s Trip FY , $85,243 $24,699 $6, $2.13 $ % FY 216 3, $68,366 $28,456 $39, $1.29 $ % FY , $56,273 $18,859 $37, $1.38 $ % s s 32, 31, 3, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 3,96 27,987 28,376 27, $1, $8, $6, $4, $2, $85,243 $64,44 $68,366 $56, s Trip $8. $7. $6. $5. $4. $3. $2. $1.. $2.13 $1.75 $1.29 $1.38 $2 $15 $1 $5 $ $ $15.58 $122.51
26 122 Partnership Days of Service: Wkdy Avg Freq (Wkdy Peak): - Avg Freq (Wkdy Non-Peak): 3 min Avg Freq (Wked): - FY 217 : 66% % transfer (to route): 9% % Clip usage: 6% s s Miles Weekday 19,86 1, , ,48 1, Saturday Sunday Total 19,86 1, , ,48 1, Historic Trends FY 216/17 DATA Oating Subsidy Weekday $183,943 $18,394 $1,45 $121,7 $12,11 $688 $62,936 $6,294 $358 Saturday $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Sunday $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Total $183,943 $18,394 $1,45 $121,7 $12,11 $688 $62,936 $6,294 $358 s Weekday 11.7 $3.17 $ % Saturday - $ - $ - - % Sunday - $ - $ - - % Total 11.7 $3.17 $ % s s s Oating Subsidy FY 215 FY 216 2,36 2,932 $325,23 $149,686 $175, $8.62 $ % FY ,86 1,696 $183,943 $121,7 $62, $3.17 $ % 25, 2, 15, 1, 5, s 2,36 19,86 3,5 3, 2,5 2, 1,5 1, 5 s 2,932 1,696 $35, $3, $25, $2, $15, $1, $5, $325,23 $183,943 s $1. $8. $6. $4. $2.. $8.62 $3.17 $2 $15 $1 $5 $11.94 $18.44
27 125 Supplemental Days of Service: School Days Avg Freq (Wkdy Peak): 4 trips Avg Freq (Wkdy Non-Peak): - Avg Freq (Wked): - FY 217 : 16% % transfer (to route): 1% % Clip usage: 8% s s Miles Weekday 13,757 1, , Saturday Sunday Total 13,757 1, , Historic Trends FY 216/17 DATA Oating Subsidy Weekday $72,469 $6,588 $43 $11,57 $1,52 $64 $6,899 $5,536 $338 Saturday $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Sunday $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Total $72,469 $6,588 $43 $11,57 $1,52 $64 $6,899 $5,536 $338 s Trip Weekday 19.3 $4.43 $ % Saturday - $ - $ - - % Sunday - $ - $ - - % Total 19.3 $4.43 $ % s s Subsidy Oating Subsidy s Trip FY , $87,15 $11,914 $75, $5.65 $ % FY , $77,991 $12,684 $65, $4.95 $ % FY ,757 6 $72,469 $11,57 $6, $4.43 $ % s s 16, 14, 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, 13,298 13,197 13,757 8,798 7, $1, $8, $6, $4, $2, $87,15 $77,991 $72,469 $13,752 $1, s Trip $8. $7. $6. $5. $4. $3. $2. $1.. $5.65 $4.95 $ $16 $14 $12 $1 $8 $6 $4 $2 $ $ $15.54 $ $12.86
28 139 Supplemental Days of Service: School Days Avg Freq (Wkdy Peak): 2 trips Avg Freq (Wkdy Non-Peak): - Avg Freq (Wked): - FY 217 : 2% % transfer (to route): % % Clip usage: 24% s s Miles Weekday 6, , Saturday Sunday Total 6, , Historic Trends FY 216/17 DATA Oating Subsidy Weekday $33,182 $3,17 $184 $6,635 $63 $37 $26,547 $2,413 $147 Saturday $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Sunday $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Total $33,182 $3,17 $184 $6,635 $63 $37 $26,547 $2,413 $147 s Trip Weekday 17.9 $4.14 $ % Saturday - $ - $ - - % Sunday - $ - $ - - % Total 17.9 $4.14 $ % s s Subsidy Oating Subsidy s Trip FY 215 5, $36,437 $5,258 $31, $5.28 $ % FY 216 6, $43,776 $6,241 $37, $5.87 $ % FY 217 6, $33,182 $6,635 $26, $4.14 $ % 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, s 5,96 6,391 6,414 4,232 4, s $5, $4, $3, $2, $1, $43,776 $36,437 $31,36 $33,182 $27,734 s Trip $8. $7. $6. $5. $4. $3. $2. $1.. $6.28 $5.28 $5.87 $4.27 $4.14 $2 $15 $1 $5 $ $ $ $138.8 $131.1
29 145 Supplemental Days of Service: School Days Avg Freq (Wkdy Peak): 2-3 trips Avg Freq (Wkdy Non-Peak): - Avg Freq (Wked): - FY 217 : 29% % transfer (to route): 5% % Clip usage: 2% s s Miles Weekday 16,46 1, , Saturday Sunday Total 16,46 1, , Historic Trends FY 216/17 DATA Oating Subsidy Weekday $25,426 $2,311 $139 $7,258 $66 $4 $18,168 $1,652 $99 Saturday $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Sunday $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Total $25,426 $2,311 $139 $7,258 $66 $4 $18,168 $1,652 $99 s Trip Weekday 37.2 $1.11 $ % Saturday - $ - $ - - % Sunday - $ - $ - - % Total 37.2 $1.11 $ % s s Subsidy Oating Subsidy s Trip FY 215 6, $13,373 $5,858 $7, $1.9 $ % FY 216 1, $21,672 $6,341 $15, $1.49 $ % FY , $25,426 $7,258 $18, $1.11 $ % s s 2, 15, 1, 5, 6,911 1,268 16, $3, $25, $2, $15, $1, $5, $13,373 $21,672 $25,426 s Trip $8. $7. $6. $5. $4. $3. $2. $1.. $1.9 $1.49 $1.11 $2 $15 $1 $5 $ $ $133.47
30 151 Supplemental Days of Service: School Days Avg Freq (Wkdy Peak): 4-5 trips Avg Freq (Wkdy Non-Peak): - Avg Freq (Wked): - FY 217 : 25% % transfer (to route): 1% % Clip usage: 4% s s Miles Weekday 36,81 3, , Saturday Sunday Total 36,81 3, , Historic Trends FY 216/17 DATA Oating Subsidy Weekday $73,842 $6,713 $41 $18,463 $1,678 $13 $55,379 $5,34 $38 Saturday $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Sunday $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Total $73,842 $6,713 $41 $18,463 $1,678 $13 $55,379 $5,34 $38 s Trip Weekday 42.8 $1.5 $ % Saturday - $ - $ - - % Sunday - $ - $ - - % Total 42.8 $1.5 $ % s s Subsidy Oating Subsidy s Trip FY , $134,174 $34,376 $99, $2.54 $ % FY , $1,712 $25,851 $74, $1.76 $ % FY , $73,842 $18,463 $55, $1.5 $ % 44, 42, 4, 38, 36, 34, 32, s 42,643 39,537 39,39 36,81 1, s $16, $14, $12, $1, $8, $6, $4, $2, $134,174 $95,932 $1,712 $73, s Trip $8. $7. $6. $5. $4. $3. $2. $1.. $2.54 $1.88 $1.76 $1.5 $16 $14 $12 $1 $8 $6 $4 $2 $ $ $ $124.42
31 154 Supplemental Days of Service: School Days Avg Freq (Wkdy Peak): 3 trips Avg Freq (Wkdy Non-Peak): - Avg Freq (Wked): - FY 217 : 21% % transfer (to route): % % Clip usage: 5% s s Miles Weekday 13,738 1, , Saturday Sunday Total 13,738 1, , Historic Trends FY 216/17 DATA Oating Subsidy Weekday $41,965 $3,815 $233 $8,847 $84 $49 $33,118 $3,11 $184 Saturday $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Sunday $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Total $41,965 $3,815 $233 $8,847 $84 $49 $33,118 $3,11 $184 s Trip Weekday 25.5 $2.41 $ % Saturday - $ - $ - - % Sunday - $ - $ - - % Total 25.5 $2.41 $ % s s Subsidy Oating Subsidy s Trip FY , $42,64 $13,174 $29, $1.91 $ % FY , $46,133 $14,66 $31, $1.76 $ % FY , $41,965 $8,847 $33, $2.41 $ % 2, 15, 1, 5, s 17,858 15,376 13,738 12, s $5, $4, $3, $2, $1, $46,133 $42,64 $41,965 $37, s Trip $8. $7. $6. $5. $4. $3. $2. $1.. $2.56 $1.91 $1.76 $2.41 $16 $14 $12 $1 $8 $6 $4 $2 $ $ $128.8 $117.29
32 219 Local Connector Days of Service: Wkdy, Sa, Su Avg Freq (Wkdy Peak): 3 min Avg Freq (Wkdy Non-Peak): 3 min Avg Freq (Wked): 3 min FY 217 : 11% % transfer (to route): 2% % Clip usage: 11% s s Miles Weekday 4,817 3, , ,766 4, Saturday 4, , Sunday 4, ,67 1,51 21 Total 5,449 4, , ,34 6, Historic Trends FY 216/17 DATA Oating Subsidy Weekday $462,388 $38,532 $1,828 $51,411 $4,284 $23 $41,977 $34,248 $1,624 Saturday $59,94 $4,992 $1,152 $6,23 $519 $12 $53,674 $4,473 $1,32 Sunday $68,932 $5,744 $1,149 $6,46 $538 $18 $62,472 $5,26 $1,41 Total $591,224 $49,269 $1,62 $64,11 $5,342 $176 $527,123 $43,927 $1,444 s Weekday 8.1 $1.7 $ % Saturday 7.7 $1.98 $ % Sunday 6.5 $13.17 $ % Total 7.9 $1.45 $ % s s s Oating Subsidy FY 215 6,96 6,585 $569,962 $65,747 $54, $8.28 $ % FY ,61 6,591 $59,663 $73,164 $517, $9.31 $ % FY 217 5,449 6,392 $591,224 $64,11 $527, $1.45 $ % 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, s 6,96 55,543 55,61 5,449 6,8 6,6 6,4 6,2 6, 5,8 5,6 5,4 5,2 s 6,585 6,591 6,392 5,734 $6, $58, $56, $54, $52, $5, $48, $59,663 $591,224 $569,962 $522,978 s $14. $12. $1. $8. $6. $4. $2.. $1.45 $8.51 $8.28 $9.31 $2 $15 $1 $5 $91.21 $86.56 $89.61 $92.5
33 228 Local Connector Days of Service: Wkdy, Sa, Su Avg Freq (Wkdy Peak): 6 min Avg Freq (Wkdy Non-Peak): 6 min Avg Freq (Wked): 6 min FY 217 : 11% % transfer (to route): 17% % Clip usage: 15% s s Miles Weekday 57,316 4, , ,884 5,49 26 Saturday 8, , ,2 1,85 25 Sunday 5, , ,23 1, Total 71,34 5, , ,926 7, Historic Trends FY 216/17 DATA Oating Subsidy Weekday $646,194 $53,85 $2,554 $8,857 $6,738 $32 $565,337 $47,111 $2,235 Saturday $12,25 $1,17 $2,312 $12,568 $1,47 $242 $17,637 $8,97 $2,7 Sunday $138,47 $11,534 $2,37 $1,487 $874 $175 $127,92 $1,66 $2,132 Total $94,86 $75,41 $2,479 $13,912 $8,659 $285 $8,894 $66,741 $2,194 s Weekday 8. $9.86 $ % Saturday 6.2 $13.1 $ % Sunday 3.8 $22.3 $ % Total 7.1 $11.23 $ % s s s Oating Subsidy FY ,287 2,828 $239,879 $18,274 $221, $14.5 $ % FY ,522 3,185 $28,634 $28,92 $252, $14.41 $ % FY ,34 1,42 $94,86 $13,912 $8, $11.23 $ % 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, s 71,34 15,287 17,522 5,854 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, s 1,42 2,828 3, $1,, $8, $6, $4, $2, $94,86 $239,879 $28,634 $85, s $14. $12. $1. $8. $6. $4. $2.. $13.58 $14.5 $14.41 $11.23 $2 $15 $1 $5 $87.79 $84.82 $88.12 $9.1
34 233 Local Connector Days of Service: Wkdy, Sa, Su Avg Freq (Wkdy Peak): 6 min Avg Freq (Wkdy Non-Peak): 6 min Avg Freq (Wked): 6 min FY 217 : 13% % transfer (to route): 16% % Clip usage: 1% s s Miles Weekday 35,589 2, , ,89 3, Saturday 3, , Sunday 3, , Total 42,798 3, , ,364 4, Historic Trends FY 216/17 DATA Oating Subsidy Weekday $32,758 $25,23 $1,197 $42,45 $3,538 $168 $26,38 $21,692 $1,29 Saturday $44,829 $3,736 $862 $5,18 $418 $97 $39,811 $3,318 $766 Sunday $51,616 $4,31 $86 $4,533 $378 $76 $47,83 $3,924 $785 Total $399,23 $33,267 $1,94 $52,1 $4,333 $142 $347,22 $28,934 $951 s Weekday 1.8 $7.31 $ % Saturday 8. $1.18 $ % Sunday 5.8 $14.28 $ % Total 9.8 $8.11 $ % s s s Oating Subsidy FY 215 5,342 4,366 $371,62 $52,526 $319, $6.34 $ % FY ,494 4,384 $388,5 $59,296 $328, $6.64 $ % FY ,798 4,363 $399,23 $52,1 $347, $8.11 $ % s s 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 5,422 5,342 49,494 39,956 42,798 4,5 4,4 4,3 4,2 4,1 4, 3,9 3,8 3,7 4,366 4,384 4,363 4,144 3,981 $41, $4, $39, $38, $37, $36, $35, $34, $33, $32, $399,23 $388,5 $378,792 $371,62 $35,499 s $14. $12. $1. $8. $6. $4. $2.. $7.6 $8.11 $6.61 $6.34 $6.64 $2 $15 $1 $5 $88.5 $91.42 $85.12 $88.51 $91.51
35 245 Local Connector Days of Service: Wkdy, Sa, Su Avg Freq (Wkdy Peak): 6 min Avg Freq (Wkdy Non-Peak): 6 min Avg Freq (Wked): 6 min FY 217 : 15% % transfer (to route): 13% % Clip usage: 13% s s Miles Weekday 41,761 3, , ,76 2, Saturday 4, , Sunday 3, , Total 49,766 4, , ,152 3, Historic Trends FY 216/17 DATA Oating Subsidy Weekday $271,762 $22,647 $1,74 $44,873 $3,739 $177 $226,889 $18,97 $897 Saturday $55,697 $4,641 $1,71 $6,217 $518 $12 $49,48 $4,123 $952 Sunday $64,137 $5,345 $1,69 $5,878 $49 $98 $58,259 $4,855 $971 Total $391,596 $32,633 $1,73 $56,968 $4,747 $156 $334,628 $27,886 $917 s Weekday 13.9 $5.43 $ % Saturday 6.8 $11.73 $ % Sunday 5.3 $15.39 $ % Total 11.4 $6.72 $ % s s s Oating Subsidy FY 215 FY 216 2, $19,695 $3,137 $16, $7.58 $ % FY ,766 4,349 $391,596 $56,968 $334, $6.72 $ % s s 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 2,184 49,766 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 227 4,349 $5, $4, $3, $2, $1, $19,695 $391,596 s $14. $12. $1. $8. $6. $4. $2.. $7.58 $6.72 $2 $15 $1 $5 $86.95 $9.4
36 251 Local Connector Days of Service: Wkdy, Sa, Su Avg Freq (Wkdy Peak): 6 min Avg Freq (Wkdy Non-Peak): 6 min Avg Freq (Wked): 6 min FY 217 : 11% % transfer (to route): 8% % Clip usage: 8% s s Miles Weekday 76,675 6, , ,654 7, Saturday 9, , ,63 1, Sunday 8, , ,497 1, Total 95,56 7, , ,781 11, Historic Trends FY 216/17 DATA Oating Subsidy Weekday $625,542 $52,129 $2,472 $78,6 $6,51 $38 $547,536 $45,628 $2,164 Saturday $122,485 $1,27 $2,355 $12,14 $1,9 $233 $11,381 $9,198 $2,123 Sunday $14,992 $11,749 $2,35 $11,713 $976 $195 $129,279 $1,773 $2,155 Total $889,19 $74,85 $2,436 $11,823 $8,485 $279 $787,196 $65,6 $2,157 s Weekday 11.4 $7.14 $ % Saturday 7.5 $11.9 $ % Sunday 5.8 $14.56 $ % Total 9.9 $8.24 $ % s s s Oating Subsidy FY ,647 9,172 $8,242 $13,81 $697, $7.14 $ % FY ,886 9,226 $831,623 $12,959 $71, $7.19 $ % FY ,56 9,67 $889,19 $11,823 $787, $8.24 $ % 1, 95, 9, 85, s 87,73 97,647 98,886 95,56 1, 9,5 9, 8,5 8, s 8,322 9,172 9,226 9,67 $9, $85, $8, $75, $831,623 $8,242 $772,57 $889,19 8, 7,5 $7, s $14. $12. $1. $8. $6. $4. $2.. $7.97 $7.14 $7.19 $8.24 $2 $15 $1 $5 $92.84 $87.25 $9.14 $92.54
37 257 Local Connector Days of Service: Wkdy Avg Freq (Wkdy Peak): 6 min Avg Freq (Wkdy Non-Peak): 6 min Avg Freq (Wked): - FY 217 : 12% % transfer (to route): 6% % Clip usage: 13% s s Miles Weekday 69,126 5, , ,748 7, Saturday Sunday Total 69,126 5, , ,748 7, Historic Trends FY 216/17 DATA Oating Subsidy Weekday $697,953 $58,163 $2,759 $82,621 $6,885 $327 $615,332 $51,278 $2,432 Saturday $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Sunday $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Total $697,953 $58,163 $2,759 $82,621 $6,885 $327 $615,332 $51,278 $2,432 s Weekday 9. $8.9 $ % Saturday - $ - $ - - % Sunday - $ - $ - - % Total 9. $8.9 $ % s s s Oating Subsidy FY ,984 6,289 $546,363 $73,42 $472, $6.76 $ % FY ,429 6,414 $575,85 $83,288 $492, $6.9 $ % FY ,126 7,643 $697,953 $82,621 $615, $8.9 $ % s s 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 68,515 69,984 71,429 69,126 35,511 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, 7,643 5,965 6,289 6,414 2,99 $8, $7, $6, $5, $4, $3, $2, $1, $697,953 $555,68 $546,363 $575,85 $263,5 s $14. $12. $1. $8. $6. $4. $2.. $8.9 $6.25 $7.21 $6.76 $6.9 $2 $15 $1 $5 $9.57 $93.15 $86.87 $89.77 $91.32
38 Hdn Valley Yellow Bus Days of Service: School Days Avg Freq (Wkdy Peak): 2 trips Avg Freq (Wkdy Non-Peak): - Avg Freq (Wked): - FY 217 : 26% % transfer (to route): - % Clip usage: - s s Miles Weekday 9, , Saturday Sunday Total 9, , Historic Trends FY 216/17 DATA Oating Subsidy Weekday $124,763 $11,342 $693 $32,17 $2,925 $179 $92,593 $8,418 $514 Saturday $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Sunday $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Total $124,763 $11,342 $693 $32,17 $2,925 $179 $92,593 $8,418 $514 s Weekday 51.6 $9.98 $ % Saturday - $ - $ - - % Sunday - $ - $ - - % Total 51.6 $9.98 $ % s s s Oating Subsidy FY 215 FY 216 8, $14,482 $25,658 $114, $13.25 $ % FY 217 9, $124,763 $32,17 $92, $9.98 $ % 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, s 8,669 9, s $16, $14, $12, $1, $8, $6, $4, $2, $14,482 $124,763 s $14. $12. $1. $8. $6. $4. $2.. $13.25 $9.98 $8 $7 $6 $5 $4 $3 $2 $1 $667.6 $693.13
39 White Hill Yellow Bus Days of Service: School Days Avg Freq (Wkdy Peak): 17 trips Avg Freq (Wkdy Non-Peak): - Avg Freq (Wked): - FY 217 : 6% % transfer (to route): - % Clip usage: - s s Miles Weekday 127,219 11, , ,96 1,1 67 Saturday Sunday Total 127,219 11, , ,96 1,1 67 Historic Trends FY 216/17 DATA Oating Subsidy Weekday $738,585 $67,144 $4,13 $44,896 $4,81 $2,449 $297,689 $27,63 $1,654 Saturday $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Sunday $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Total $738,585 $67,144 $4,13 $44,896 $4,81 $2,449 $297,689 $27,63 $1,654 s Weekday $2.34 $ % Saturday - $ - $ - - % Sunday - $ - $ - - % Total $2.34 $ % s s s Oating Subsidy FY 215 FY , $579,937 $385,753 $194, $1.5 $ % FY ,219 1,65 $738,585 $44,896 $297, $2.34 $ % 14, 12, 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, s 129, ,219 1,2 1, s 1,65 87 $8, $7, $6, $5, $4, $3, $2, $1, $738,585 $579, s $14. $12. $1. $8. $6. $4. $2.. $1.5 $2.34 $8 $7 $6 $5 $4 $3 $2 $1 $ $693.25
Addendum #3 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF MARIN TRANSIT SERVICE PACKAGES 1 AND 2 SERVICE. Issued December 18, 2017
Addendum #3 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF MARIN TRANSIT SERVICE PACKAGES 1 AND 2 SERVICE Issued December 18, 217 The following is an addendum to Marin Transit s Request for Proposal for Oation and Maintenance
More informationMARIN COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT. San Rafael, California A Component Unit of the County of Marin, California COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT
San Rafael, California A Component Unit of the County of Marin, California COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT For the Years Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 (A Component Unit of the County of Marin, California)
More informationCorte Madera Sales Tax Community Forum- Measure F
Corte Madera Sales Tax Community Forum- Measure F APRIL 4, 2018 PRESENTED BY: TODD CUSIMANO, TOWN MANAGER PETER BROWN, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR MEETING OVERVIEW 1) Meeting Purpose Provide Background, Transparency
More informationSan Francisco Paratransit
San Francisco Paratransit Addendum #1 SF Paratransit Van Services: SFMTA/DAAS Group Van, & DAAS Shopping Shuttle No. 16-493-001 October 28, 2016 Proposal Submission Deadline: Wednesday, November 9, 2016
More informationRevised Forecasts ABAG/MTC 2016 Methods and Data
November 30, 2016 Revised Forecasts ABAG/MTC 2016 Methods and Data The Basics In 2013, the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) and the Metropolitan Transportation Commission of California (MTC)
More informationCOOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FY 2004/05 VENTURA INTERCITY SERVICE TRANSIT AUTHORITY (VISTA) CONEJO CONNECTION
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FY 2004/05 VENTURA INTERCITY SERVICE TRANSIT AUTHORITY (VISTA) CONEJO CONNECTION This Agreement is made and entered into by the City of Calabasas (Calabasas) and the Ventura County
More informationCaltrain Service Preparing for FY2012 Caltrain Benefits Environment, Economy, Quality of Life
Caltrain Service Preparing for FY2012 Caltrain Benefits Environment, Economy, Quality of Life If traveling via automobile, Caltrain riders would increase regional CO2 emissions by 89,850 metric tons or
More informationMarin Household Hazardous Waste Program. Fiscal Year Report
Marin Household Hazardous Waste Program Fiscal Year 2011-12 Report Introduction Fiscal Year 11-12 saw many changes to the Household Hazardous Waste (HHW) Program. Captain Bradley Mark retired at the end
More informationSAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Agenda Item No: 5.a Meeting Date: June 18, 2018 Department: Public Works SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Prepared by: Bill Guerin, Director of Public Works City Manager Approval: TOPIC: SUBJECT:
More information6085 STATE FARM DRIVE, ROHNERT PARK
6085 STATE FARM DRIVE, ROHNERT PARK FOR SALE High Quality Office/Industrial Building Owner/User or Investment ±65,500 SF BUILDING $7,400,000 EXCLUSIVE AGENT: Ron Reinking Managing Director 707.583.8423
More informationAndrew de Vries ANDREW DE VRIES (415) EXT
Local Market Trends Marin County October 218 677 Portola Drive San Francisco, CA 94127 CalBRE #1681 Home Prices & Sales Up Prices for single-family, re-sale homes rose in September, after slumping in August.
More informationRESOLUTION APPROVING THE TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY OF MARIN S FINAL SALES TAX RENEWAL EXPENDITURE PLAN
J-8 STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: June 26, 2018 TO: FROM: City Council Regan M. Candelario, City Manager 922 Machin Avenue Novato, CA 94945 415/ 899-8900 FAX 415/ 899-8213 www.novato.org SUBJECT: RESOLUTION
More informationCapital Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority Monthly Performance Report (Covering Performance Data Through March and April 2010) Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority 1 Performance Report Contents
More informationPublic Transportation Department Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results.
Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results. Mission Serve Anchorage residents and visitors by providing public transportation that emphasizes quality, safety, cost effectiveness, and economic vitality. Core
More informationONBOARD ORIGIN-DESTINATION STUDY
REPORT ONBOARD ORIGIN-DESTINATION STUDY 12.23.2014 PREPARED FOR: ANCHORAGE METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM (AMATS) 55 Railroad Row White River Junction, VT 05001 802.295.4999 www.rsginc.com SUBMITTED
More informationReview of Marin Sanitary Service s 2018 Rate Application
FINAL REPORT Review of Marin Sanitary Service s 2018 Rate Application SUBMITTED TO: Marin Franchisors Group January 2, 2018 PDF SUBMITTAL This page intentionally left blank. Table of Contents Cover Letter
More informationFunding Local Public Transportation
Funding Local Public Transportation I. Metro A. SORTA, early history In 1969 the Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority was established by Hamilton County with Hamilton County as its jurisdiction. In
More informationStrategic Plan Performance Metrics & Targets
San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Strategic Plan Performance Metrics & Targets Fiscal Year 2019 Fiscal Year 2020 March 2018 SAFETY Goal 1: Create a safer transportation experience for everyone.
More informationProgram Evaluation and Audit COUNTY CONTRACTOR ADA COST REVIEW DARTS AND SCOTT COUNTY
Program Evaluation and Audit COUNTY CONTRACTOR ADA COST REVIEW DARTS AND SCOTT COUNTY October 27, 2006 Background INTRODUCTION The Metropolitan Council contracts with four County governments (Anoka, Dakota,
More informationSOUND TRANSIT STAFF REPORT MOTION NO. M Select a draft Sounder fare structure change and fare increase for public review and comment
SOUND TRANSIT STAFF REPORT MOTION NO. M2007-21 Select a draft Sounder fare structure change and fare increase for public review and comment Meeting: Date: Type of Action: Staff Contact: Phone: Finance
More informationFranchisors of Marin Sanitary Service
Franchisors of Marin Sanitary Service Review of Marin Sanitary Service s 2016 Rate Application December 17, 2015 HF&H Consultants, LLC This page intentionally left blank Managing Tomorrow s Resources Today
More informationOCTOBER FY Monthly Financial and Operational Report. Rhode Island Public Transit Authority
OCTOBER FY 2019 Monthly Financial and Operational Report Rhode Island Public Transit Authority Financial Summary As of September FY 2019 Year to Date Budget Actual Variance % Variance $ 32,562,540 $ 28,304,800
More informationJANUARY FY Monthly Financial and Operational Report. Rhode Island Public Transit Authority
JANUARY FY 2019 Monthly Financial and Operational Report Rhode Island Public Transit Authority Financial Summary As of December FY 2019 Budget Actual Variance % Variance Revenues $ 64,896,602 $ 58,000,401
More informationSolano Transportation Authority Draft Short Range Transit Plan SolTrans
SRTP Public Draft May 17, 2016 Page intentionally left blank SRTP Public Draft May 17, 2016 Arup North America Ltd Short Range Transit Plan DRAFT REPORT Prepared for Solano County Transit 311 Sacramento
More informationFINANCIAL STATEMENTS. Years Ended March 31, 2015 & 2014 with Report of Independent Auditors
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Years Ended March 31, 2015 & 2014 with Report of Independent Auditors TABLE OF CONTENTS Independent Auditors Report 1 Management s Discussion and Analysis 3 Financial Statements: Statements
More informationBROWARD COUNTY TRANSIT DIVISION BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT ON APPLYING AGREED-UPON PROCEDURES SEPTEMBER 30, 2016
Page 1 of 9 BROWARD COUNTY TRANSIT DIVISION BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT ON APPLYING AGREED-UPON PROCEDURES SEPTEMBER 30, 2016 Page 2 of 9 One S.E. Third Avenue 110 East Broward
More informationBART s Business Model
BART s Business Model July 31, 2018 What is Public Transit s Business Model? BART Background Basic Facts Regional rail rapid transit Elected Board of Directors: 9 Comprised of 3 Counties: - Alameda, Contra
More informationCommunity Choice Aggregation Summary Excerpted From: Draft Base Case Feasibility Evaluation Prepared by Navigant Consulting
Community Choice Aggregation Summary Excerpted From: Draft Base Case Feasibility Evaluation Prepared by Navigant Consulting INTRODUCTION The County is a participant in the Local Government Commission Community
More information8. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
8. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS This chapter presents the financial analysis conducted for the Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) selected by the Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County (METRO) for the.
More informationTitle VI Fare Equity Analysis
Pioneer Valley Transit Authority Title VI Fare Equity Analysis Prepared by the Pioneer Valley Planning Commission April 12, 2012 PVTA TITLE VI FARE EQUITY ANALYSIS APRIL 12, 2012 1. CONFORMANCE WITH REGULATORY
More informationTopline Report n=794 Likely November 2018 Voters 19.5-minute. January 25, 2018
TRANSPORATION AUTHORITY OF MARIN 2018 Transportation Revenue Measure Feasibility Survey Topline Report n=794 Likely November 2018 Voters 19.5-minute January 25, 2018 www.godberesearch.com Northern California
More informationTransit Development Plan And 2013 Annual Report. Asotin County PTBA
Transit Development Plan 2014-2019 And 2013 Annual Report Asotin County PTBA Date of Public Hearing: September 10, 2014 Table of Contents Section I: Organization... 3 Section II: Physical Plant... 4 Section
More informationDavid Jeffries, MERA Special Project Manager
MERA STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: June 10, 2014 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Sausalito City Council David Jeffries, MERA Special Project Manager MARIN EMERGENCY RADIO AUTHORITY (MERA) - NEXT GENERATION: REQUEST TO
More informationFY17 FY16 Valley Metro RPTA Sources of Funds FY17 vs FY16
FY17 ADOPTED ANNUAL OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET Valley Metro Regional Public Transportation Authority (RPTA) provides public transportation services for Maricopa County located in the metro Phoenix, Arizona.
More informationFinancial Practices and Reporting Review Committee. Committee Meeting July 15, 2011
Financial Practices and Reporting Review Committee Committee Meeting July 15, 2011 Finance Presentation Metra Financial Practices & Reporting Review Committee July 15, 2011 Presented by Jim Mickus Budget
More informationDART Fare Structure Programs
DART Fare Structure Programs Budget & Finance Committee November 13, 2018 Joseph G. Costello Senior Vice President, Finance 0 Calendar Date Nov 13 Dec 11 Jan 22 Feb 26 Mar 26 Apr 23 May 28 Jun 18 Jul 18
More informationCHAPTER 7: Financial Plan
CHAPTER 7: Financial Plan Report Prepared by: Contents 7 FINANCIAL PLAN... 7-1 7.1 Introduction... 7-1 7.2 Assumptions... 7-1 7.2.1 Operating Revenue Assumptions... 7-2 7.2.2 Operating Cost Assumptions...
More informationVALLEY METRO RPTA FY18 Budget EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
VALLEY METRO RPTA FY18 Budget EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FY18 ADOPTED ANNUAL OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET Valley Metro Regional Public Transportation Authority (RPTA) provides public transportation services for
More information4TH QUARTER 2016 QUARTERLY FINANCIAL AND PERFORMANCE REPORT
4TH QUARTER 2016 QUARTERLY FINANCIAL AND PERFORMANCE REPORT February 2017 0 Quarterly Financial and Performance Report 4th Quarter 2016 4th Quarter 2016 Financial and Performance Report Table of Contents
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS. Letter of Transmittal. i-viii Summary of Operating Fund & Capital Fund Balances... 1
NOVATO SANITARY DISTRICT 2014-16 Final Budget TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I Letter of Transmittal. i-viii Summary of Operating Fund & Capital Fund Balances... 1 SECTION II Operating Budget - Revenue Summary...
More informationItem #4 FEBRUARY 10, 2015 MEETING MINUTES PG. 2 Approve the February 10, 2015 meeting minutes.
AGENDA HERITAGE VALLEY TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE (HVTAC) Thursday, March 19, 2015, 1:30 p.m. Santa Paula City Hall, Council Chambers 970 Ventura Street, Santa Paula, CA 93060 Item #1 Item #2 Item #3
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS. Independent Auditors Report 1. Management s Discussion and Analysis 3. Financial Statements:
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND AUDITORS REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS Independent Auditors Report 1 Management s Discussion and Analysis 3 Financial Statements: Statement of Net Position 7 Statement of Revenues,
More information3 RD QUARTER 2016 QUARTERLY FINANCIAL AND PERFORMANCE REPORT
3 RD QUARTER 2016 QUARTERLY FINANCIAL AND PERFORMANCE REPORT November 2016 0 3 rd Quarter 2016 Financial and Performance Report Table of Contents Executive Summary... 1 Environmental Factors... 3 Ridership...
More information2013 STA Passenger Survey Results. Attachment E Title VI Attachment E
2013 STA Passenger Survey Results Attachment E 1 2014 Title VI Attachment E 2013 STA Passenger Survey Results Overview Spokane Transit Authority (STA) conducted its most recent passenger survey in December
More informationPROPOSED FISCAL YEAR 2011 BUDGET. Testimony of. Richard Sarles, General Manager. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority.
PROPOSED FISCAL YEAR 2011 BUDGET Testimony of Richard Sarles, General Manager Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Before the Council of the District of Columbia Committee on Public Works and
More informationANNUAL AUDIT REPORT APRIL 1, 20 - MARCH 31, 201
R ANNUAL AUDIT REPORT APRIL 1, 20 - MARCH 31, 201 W W W. V E R I F I E D A U D I T. C O M THE CHRONICLE TODAY CHRONICLE PUBLISHING2, INC. 1234 Main St Larkspur, CA 94939 (415) 461-6006; (415) 461-6007
More informationStrategic Performance measures
Strategic Performance measures 2012 RepoRt background In 2007, the RTA worked with CTA, Pace, and Metra as well as other community stakeholders to develop a Regional Transportation Strategic Plan. This
More informationImpact of the Living Wage on Paratransit Services
Impact of the Living Wage on Paratransit Services January 25, 2008 Report No. 08-06 Office of the County Auditor Evan A. Lukic, CPA County Auditor Table of Contents Topic Page Executive Summary... 3 Purpose
More informationInternal Auditor s Report. July 25, The County Council and County Executive of Wicomico County, Maryland:
July 25, 2016 Wicomico County, Maryland OFFICE OF THE INTERNAL AUDITOR P.O. BOX 870 SALISBURY, MARYLAND 21803-0870 410-548-4696 FAX 410-548-7872 Steve Roser, CPA/CIA/CFE Internal Auditor Internal Auditor
More information2013 Triennial Customer Survey Results
2013 Triennial Customer Survey Results Board of Directors May 1, 2014 Objectives Determine who our customers are Demographics Trip purpose Mode of access Frequency of use Reasons for riding Measure whether
More informationMarin Clean Energy Executive Committee Meeting Wednesday, January 21, :00 A.M.
Marin Clean Energy Executive Committee Meeting Wednesday, January 21, 2015 10:00 A.M. Dawn Weisz Chief Executive Officer Kathrin Sears Chair County of Marin Tom Butt Vice Chair City of Richmond Bob McCaskill
More informationOperating Budget. Third Quarter Financial Report (July 2005 March 2006)
Third Quarter Financial Report (July 2005 March 2006) INDEX A. Executive Summary...page 2 B. Revenue and Expense Analysis...page 3 C. Budget Variance Reports...page 14 D. Ridership and Performance Measures...page
More informationPrinceton Senior Shuttle Service
Princeton Senior Shuttle Service By James Mejia Micah Perlin REPORT AS PART OF WWS 527A TRANSPORTATION POLICY ANALYSIS FALL 2003 1.0 Executive Summary The senior population in Princeton is underserved
More informationWashington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Financial Report For the Fiscal Years Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 Table of Contents Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Financial Report For the
More informationFare Policy. Discussion Document November 23, 2015
Fare Policy Discussion Document November 23, 2015 Key legislation regarding fare levels 2013 Session Law Chapter 46 SECTION 6A. Set goal of an increase in the farebox recovery ratio of at least 10 per
More informationBOARD OF DIRECTORS AGENDA ITEM 7
Greater Portland Transit District BOARD OF DIRECTORS AGENDA ITEM 7 DATE January 27, 2016 SUBJECT 2016 Operating Budget PURPOSE Review and approve the proposed 2016 operating budget. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
More informationSuburban Service and Regional ADA Budget Results January 2019
and Regional Results January 2019 Department of Internal Services Issued March 2019 Performance At-A-Glance January 2019 (Millions) $25 $20 $17 $15 $10 $5 $0 ($5) Generated Public Expenses Net Results
More informationTransHelp Program and Accessible Transportation 2008 Budget Document
TransHelp and Accessible Transportation 28 Budget Document TransHelp Program and Accessible Transportation 28 Budget Document This report incorporates Part B of the Transportation 28 Budget Document Section
More informationFY2018 Third Quarter Financial Update
Finance and Committee Information Item IV-A May 10, 2018 Third Quarter Financial Update Page 30 of 53 Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary Action Information
More informationVotran Transit Development Plan (TDP) River To Sea TPO Committees September 2016
Votran Transit Development Plan (TDP) River To Sea TPO Committees September 2016 Agenda What is a TDP? Baseline Conditions Public Involvement Peer and Trend Review Situation Appraisal Goals Proposed Alternatives
More informationPublic Transportation
Municipal Manager Administration Marketing and Customer Service Program Planning Transit Operations and Maintenance Transit Planning Transit Operations Para Transit Services Vehicle Maintenance Non-Vehicle
More informationSubject: Creation of an Eco Pass
To: Board of Directors Date: April, 2014 From: Anne Muzzini, Director of Planning & Marketing Reviewed by: Subject: Creation of an Eco Pass Summary: The concept of creating an Eco Pass has been reviewed
More information1 ST QUARTER 2017 QUARTERLY FINANCIAL AND PERFORMANCE REPORT
1 ST QUARTER 2017 QUARTERLY FINANCIAL AND PERFORMANCE REPORT May 2017 0 1 st Quarter 2017 Financial and Performance Report Table of Contents Executive Summary... 2 Environmental Factors... 4 Ridership...
More informationOperations & Finance Committee Meeting Agenda
Operations & Finance Committee Meeting Agenda Nashville MTA Committee Meetings Music City Central Meeting Room 400 Charlotte Ave., Nashville, TN 37219 Thursday, February 22, 2018 The Operations & Finance
More informationMember Municipalities of the Centre Area Transportation Authority. Hugh A. Mose, General Manager. DATE: April 14, 2010
TO: FROM: Member Municipalities of the Centre Area Transportation Authority Hugh A. Mose, General Manager DATE: April 14, 2010 SUBJECT: CATA s FY 2010/2011 DRAFT Budget On behalf of the Centre Area Transportation
More informationFINANCIAL STATEMENTS. Years Ended March 31, 2017 & 2016 with Report of Independent Auditors. mcecleanenergy.org
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Years Ended March 31, 2017 & 2016 with Report of Independent Auditors mcecleanenergy.org YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2017 AND 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Independent Auditors Report 1 Management
More informationFINANCIAL STATEMENTS. Years Ended March 31, 2016 & 2015 with Independent Auditors' Report
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Years Ended March 31, 2016 & 2015 with Independent Auditors' Report YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2016 AND 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Independent Auditors Report 1 Management s Discussion and
More informationSONOMA MARIN AREA RAIL TRANSIT DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT
SONOMA MARIN AREA RAIL TRANSIT DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2018 Petaluma, California This Page Left Intentionally Blank Comprehensive Annual Financial
More informationCITY OF SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA
Financial Statements and Required and Other Supplementary Information (with Independent Auditor s Reports Thereon) Table of Contents Independent Auditor s Report... 1 Management s Discussion and Analysis
More informationOffice of the City Manager CONSENT CALENDAR May 19, 2009
Office of the City Manager CONSENT CALENDAR May 19, 2009 To: From: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Phil Kamlarz, City Manager Submitted by: Jane Micallef, Acting Housing Director Subject:
More informationPublic Authorities by the Numbers: Capital District Transportation Authority
Public Authorities by the Numbers: Capital District Transportation Authority June 2016 Table of Contents I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 1 II. CAPITAL DISTRICT TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY BY THE NUMBERS... 2 Introduction...
More informationPeer Community Analysis
Chapter VI CHAPTER VI INTRODUCTION This chapter examines how peer communities structure their fares and what types of revenue they have. This chapter also presents some operating statistics for the peer
More informationFINANCIAL STATEMENTS. Years Ended March 31, 2018 & 2017 with Report of Independent Auditors. mcecleanenergy.org
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Years Ended March 31, 2018 & 2017 with Report of Independent Auditors mcecleanenergy.org YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2018 AND 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Independent Auditors Report 1 Management
More informationTAXICAB INDUSTRY REPORT
DRAFT TAXICAB INDUSTRY REPORT RATES OF FARE & GATE FEES City and County of San Francisco Office of the Controller December 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS I - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...2 Key Industry Findings Summary...
More informationMARIN EMERGENCY RADIO AUTHORITY
MARIN EMERGENCY RADIO AUTHORITY c/o Novato Fire Protection District 95 Rowland Way, Novato, CA 94945 PHONE: (415) 878-2690 FAX: (415) 878-2660 WWW.MERAONLINE.ORG DRAFT: 6/7/17 Call to Order and Introductions
More informationMETROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS. Independent Accountants Report on Applying Agreed-Upon Procedures
METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS Independent Accountants Report on Applying Agreed-Upon Procedures Year ended September 30, 2012 KPMG LLP 811 Main Street Houston, TX 77002 Independent
More informationRural Transportation Forum, Walkerton, ON
Rural Transportation Forum, Walkerton, ON Dennis Kar, Dillon Consulting Limited June 16 th, 2014 R u r a l Tr a n s p o r t a t i o n Fo r u m 2 Illustrate different types of coordinated transportation
More informationPublic Transportation
Municipal Manager Marketing & Customer Service Program Planning Transit Operations & Maintenance Transit Planning Transit Operations Para Transit Services Vehicle Maintenance Non-Vehicle Maintenance PT
More informationChapter 9 Financial Considerations. 9.1 Introduction
9.1 Introduction Chapter 9 This chapter presents anticipated costs, revenues, and funding for the NEPA BART Extension Alternative. A summary of VTA s financial plan for the BART Extension Alternative is
More informationREVENUE & RIDERSHIP REPORT OCTOBER 2017
REVENUE & RIDERSHIP REPORT OCTOBER 2017 Monthly passenger revenue 3.5% above last year and 1.4% below budget Monthly ridership 3.4% below budget and 6.3% below last year Year-to-date revenue 3.5% and ridership
More informationMEMORANDUM. Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority Board of Directors. Michael T. Burns General Manager. DATE: August 4, 2008
MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority Board of Directors Michael T. Burns General Manager DATE: August 4, 2008 SUBJECT: BART Operating Subsidy This memorandum summarizes and
More informationFederal Assistance 13% Charges for Services 5% Appropriated Fund Balance.5% Other 3% Administration 6% Building Maintenance 3% Other 2%
TRANSIT FUND The Transit Fund is used to account for the operations of the Town s public transit system. Federal Assistance 13% Transit Revenues State Assistance 12% Charges for Services 5% Appropriated
More informationBUDGETWATCH October 2018 Flash Report
October 2018 Flash Report Overall Latest Condition (reporting on operations through September and subsidies through October): Passenger Revenues were slightly below the Forecast in September, marginally
More information2017 TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN PROGRESS REPORT
LAKE COUNTY TRANSIT DIVISION P.O. Box 7800, Tavares, Florida 32778 2440 U.S. Highway 441/27, Fruitland Park, Florida 34731 Telephone: 352.323.5733; Facsimile: 352.323.5755 www.ridelakexpress.com 2017 TRANSIT
More informationVictor Valley Transit Authority
ANNUAL OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 2016 2017 (As approved by the Board of Directors) June 20, 2016 VICTOR VALLEY TRANSIT AUTHORITY FY 2017 BUDGET OPERATING EXPENSE SUMMARY System FY 2016/17
More informationFY18 Final Results Budget Outlook, FY20-22
FY18 Final Results Budget Outlook, FY20-22 Objectives Provide background necessary for consideration of fiscal pressures that exist prior to electrification Service levels Ridership Member agency funding
More informationSafety and Operations Committee. Information Item III-B. January 24, 2019
Safety and Operations Committee Information Item III-B January 24, 2019 Overnight Maintenance Window and Work Hours Page 54 of 75 Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information
More informationTransit Development Plan (FY ) Executive Summary
Transit Development Plan (FY 2019-2028) Executive Summary December 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 1 System Profile... 2 Public Outreach... 4 Key Findings/Direction... 5 Implementation Plan... 6
More informationTransit Subsidy. Projected FY17 Transit Subsidy
Mission Statement Transit Subsidy The Potomac and Rappahannock Transportation Commission (PRTC) is a multi-jurisdictional agency representing Prince William, Stafford, and Spotsylvania Counties and the
More informationCHAPTER 9 FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS
CHAPTER 9 FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS 9.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter presents anticipated costs, revenues, and funding for the Berryessa Extension Project (BEP) Alternative and the Silicon Valley Rapid Transit
More informationSupervisor Andersen, District 2, Lamorinda Office 3338 Mt. Diablo Blvd. Lafayette, California
OPERATIONS & SCHEDULING COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA Friday, November 8, 2013 8:30 a.m. Supervisor Andersen, District 2, Lamorinda Office 3338 Mt. Diablo Blvd. Lafayette, California The committee may take
More informationWhatcom Transportation Authority
Whatcom Transportation Authority Annual Budget 12/14/2017 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Whatcom Transportation Authority (WTA) Annual Budget Table of Contents General Manager s Budget Message... 2
More informationALAMEDA County Transportation Commission. Alameda County Transportation Commission GUARANTEED RIDE HOME PROGRAM GUIDELINES
ALAMEDA County Transportation Commission Alameda County Transportation Commission GUARANTEED RIDE HOME PROGRAM GUIDELINES Updated April 2017 Contents Introduction 2 Program Basics 3 Program Registration
More informationJ-15. MEETING DATE: March 27, City Council. Regan M. Candelario, City Manager
J-15 MEETING DATE: March 27, 2018 TO: FROM: City Council Regan M. Candelario, City Manager 922 Machin Avenue Novato, CA 94945 (415) 899-8900 FAX (415) 899-8213 www.novato.org SUBJECT: REPORT FROM TRANSPORATION
More informationMARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MARYLAND TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MARYLAND TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION Report of Independent Public Accountants on Applying Agreed-Upon Procedures for Federal Funding Allocation Data (IAS-FFA) For the Year
More informationTotal Operating Activities for FY17 are $56.9 million, an increase of $5.1M or 9.8% from FY16.
FY17 ADOPTED ANNUAL OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET Valley Metro Rail, Inc. (VMR) is a public non-profit corporation whose members are the cities of Chandler, Glendale, Mesa, Phoenix, and Tempe. VMR plans,
More informationCHAPTER 9 FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS
CHAPTER 9 FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS 9.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter presents anticipated costs, revenues, and funding for the BEP and the SVRTP. A summary evaluation of VTA s financial plan for the proposed
More informationCTA 2007 Contingency Plan
CTA 2007 Contingency Plan JUST THE FACTS RTA Directive Unless the RTA Board makes a determination no later than July 1, 2007, that the funds identified as new transit funding are available for 2007 such
More informationLocal Cost Allocation Options
Local Cost Allocation Options presented to SCAT Revenue Study Committee August 2010 Agenda Welcome and Introductions SCAT Budget Update Local Cost Allocation Options Review Local and National Case Studies
More informationSAN MATEO COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT (DISTRICT) 1250 SAN CARLOS AVENUE, SAN CARLOS, CALIFORNIA
SAN MATEO COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT (DISTRICT) 1250 SAN CARLOS AVENUE, SAN CARLOS, CALIFORNIA CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINUTES OF MEETING FEBRUARY 25, 2015 COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Baker, N. Ballator,
More information