Member Municipalities of the Centre Area Transportation Authority. Hugh A. Mose, General Manager. DATE: April 14, 2010

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Member Municipalities of the Centre Area Transportation Authority. Hugh A. Mose, General Manager. DATE: April 14, 2010"

Transcription

1

2 TO: FROM: Member Municipalities of the Centre Area Transportation Authority Hugh A. Mose, General Manager DATE: April 14, 2010 SUBJECT: CATA s FY 2010/2011 DRAFT Budget On behalf of the Centre Area Transportation Authority (CATA) Board of Directors, I am pleased to present for your consideration CATA=s FY 2010/2011 DRAFT Budget, as approved by the Board at their March 22, 2010 meeting. After several years in which CATA s funding situation was improving, this year the pendulum is swinging the other way. For the third year in a row our allocation of state funding will be absolutely flat, while our federal transit formula assistance will grow only marginally. As a result we expect to raise fares, and we are requesting a small increase in local shares. Even so, we anticipate having to draw on our reserves (our carryforward of unspent federal transit assistance) in order to balance the Operating Budget. As you might expect given these financial constraints, we will not be able to increase transit service this year, even though transit ridership continues to grow. We will make selected revisions, such as replacing tripper buses with regularly scheduled trips, and serving Stormstown and Graysdale with two separate routes. However, overall the total number of bus-hours will be no more than the number operated in the current year. This DRAFT Budget does include one new supervisory position in Maintenance, where we currently have a sole management person running a 22-person, 24-hour operation. Even though we do not anticipate any increase in CATABUS service, we expect to continue to expand the CATACOMMUTE vanpool program. Although we do not have the resources to initiate regional commuter bus service this year, we will work with the Area Transportation Authority to develop service from the Moshannon Valley, and work within Centre County to secure state and/or federal assistance, as well as the required local match, to support future service from Penns Valley. In the CATARIDE paratransit program we will begin to implement the recommendations coming out of the evaluation of paratransit services offered by CATA and the Centre County Office of Transportation (CCOT). The capital budget anticipates a number of significant projects. Federal funding earmarks, the formula capital component of Act 44, the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) program and other miscellaneous sources of funding will allow CATA to continue its bus fleet restoration program with the rehabilitation of some buses and the replacement of others. We will finish the replacement of the CNG tanks on our 1996 vintage buses, complete the second phase of CATA s technology initiative, and begin the architectural and engineering work associated with the expansion of our Cato Park maintenance facility. i

3 In their annual budget deliberations, the CATA Board of Directors discussed at length the matter of a fare increase and decided that, after eight years, CATA needs to raise its cash fares, pass rates and token prices. The CATABUS base fare is expected to increase from $1.25 to $1.50 with corresponding increases in token prices and OnePass rates. Proposed CATARIDE fares are $2.00 for seniors and $3.00 for persons with disabilities. However, it should be noted that the very large majority of CATA passengers are riding on programs under which fares are prepaid, and these rates have been, and will continue to be, negotiated upward each year. During the years when state funding was not keeping pace with the cost of providing transit service, CATA s local funding partners repeatedly increased local shares. When CATA s funding situation improved, for three years running CATA returned the favor by not seeking an increase. This year, however, we are once again requesting a 5.0% increase in local funding. The proposed local funding for CATA s Operating Budget is $440,785. Of this amount, only $296,545, or less than 2.5% of the budget, is requested from the taxpayers of CATA s participating municipalities; contributions from Penn State and various public/private partnerships comprise the remainder. For the Capital Budget, CATA is requesting $62,400, the same amount as last year. This request is consistent with the approach adopted eight years ago when the COG Finance Committee first suggested a capital reserve account to even out the large year-to-year fluctuations in local shares required for transit capital projects. The $62,400 is substantially more than the required local share for current projects for which local capital funding has not yet been provided. As was anticipated when the Capital Reserve was created, the excess contributions will be held in the account until needed in future years. Individual municipalities local shares are impacted by a number of factors in addition to the requested 5.0% overall increase. For instance, ridership is up on the student housing corridor routes, which tends to drive down their required local share. The reverse is true on many of our neighborhood routes, where ridership has declined with falling gasoline prices. On the other hand, we have had to add service in the student housing areas, which pushes up the local shares of the affected municipalities, while others fall. In addition, separating the G (Stormstown) Route into two routes, one extending out to Halfmoon Township and the other staying within the confines of CATA s member municipalities, has had the unintended consequence of greatly increasing the local share attributable to Patton Township. The local share allocations in this version of the DRAFT Budget have been revised to account for the closure of the Bank of America facility in Ferguson Township. Bank of America has been providing a substantial Public/Private Partnership contribution to Ferguson Township to help support extended service hours on the K (Cato Park) Route. This $11,160 payment benefits not just the Township and the Borough of State College, but through the Regional Factor component of the Miller Formula the other CATA member municipalities as well. While we could not restate the various line items in the Budget to account for the loss of fare revenue due to the closure and the savings associated with a possible reduction in service, we have, with the concurrence of the COG Finance Committee, reallocated local shares as accurately as possible. I and my colleagues on the CATA staff, as well as members of the CATA Board of Directors, will be pleased to meet with the COG Finance Committee, the COG General Forum and the Boards of Supervisors and Councils of the individual municipalities to discuss the details of the FY 2010/2011 DRAFT Budget and address any issues you may have. ii

4 TABLE OF CONTENTS ITEM PAGE General Manager s Memo Table of Contents i - ii iii SECTION I BUDGET SUMMARY AND LOCAL SHARES Introduction 1 Annual Operating Budget COG Format 2-6 Annual Capital Budget 7 Local Share Calculation and Allocation 9-20 SECTION II BACKGROUND INFORMATION CATA Fact Sheet CATA Organizational Structure 22 Ridership by Route Report 23 Trends in Revenue SECTION III FY 2009/2010 RECAP Goals Established by the CATA Board of Directors Other Accomplishments SECTION IV FY 2010/2011 POLICY CONSIDERATIONS Background 31 Revenue Issues New Programs, Services & Activities Service Planning 35 Personnel Issues Summary 36 SECTION V FY 2010/2011 WORK PLAN Goals Set by the Board of Directors 37 Other Programs, Services and Activities SECTION VI OPERATING BUDGET FY 2010/2011 DRAFT Operating Budget (CATA Format) Budget Narrative - Introduction 46 Revenue Detail Expenditure Detail SECTION VII CAPITAL BUDGET Introduction 63 Capital Projects Requiring Local Match 63 Capital Local Share Allocation 64 Capital Budget Narrative SECTION VIII LONG TERM OUTLOOK CATA Strategic Plan Operating Budget: Five-Year Projection Capital Improvement Program Capital Program Five Year Projection 75 Capital Reserve Account 76 iii

5 This page was intentionally left blank.

6 SECTION I BUDGET SUMMARY AND LOCAL SHARES Introduction The following five pages contain a line-item summary of the FY 2010/2011 Draft Operating Budget, presented in the standard COG Format to facilitate review by the COG Finance Committee, elected officials of CATA s member municipalities, and other local officials. Also included is a one-page summary, replicating the COG Format, which identifies those capital items for which CATA is requesting local share of 3% as the required match for state and federal capital assistance. Again this year, as approved by the COG Finance Committee in FY 2007/2008, the local match amount is $62,400, in anticipation of higher capital funding needs in future years, including a planned expansion of the bus storage and maintenance areas of the Cato Park facility, CNG tank replacements and bus acquisitions. Because the total local funding request for capital projects for the current year is below $62,400, the difference of $54,067 is added to the Capital Reserve Account, established a number of years ago to stabilize annual capital funding requirements from year to year. Following the tables is a narrative describing the calculation and allocation of local shares, accompanied by the spreadsheets used to calculate the miles of service in each municipality, estimate a regional factor for each route, and finally allocate the required local share by route among the participating municipalities and Penn State. The complete budget, with an overview of transit funding and narratives explaining each individual line item, can be found in Section VI - Operating Budget. The table below provides a summary of the total and individual local operating and capital contributions requested for FY 2010/2011. FY 2010/2011 Local Shares: Operating and Capital OPERATING CAPITAL TOTAL State College Borough $79,188 $11,210 $90,398 Ferguson Township $75,447 $10,681 $86,128 Patton Township $70,373 $9,962 $80,335 College Township $45,749 $6,477 $52,226 Harris Township $22,439 $3,177 $25,616 Bellefonte Borough $15,430 $2,184 $17,614 Spring Township $15,261 $2,160 $17,421 Benner Township $4,535 $642 $5,177 Halfmoon Township $4,762 $675 $5,437 Penn State University $107,600 $15,232 $122,832 Total Operating and Capital $440,784 $62,400 $503,184 1

7 AGENCY: Acct. No. ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET COMPARATIVE DETAIL OF REVENUES Centre Area Transportation Authority Prepared 03/16/2010 Budgeted Receipts Actual Receipts Budgeted Receipts Estimated Receipts Account CASH BALANCE N/A N/A N/A 90,000 ** 50,000** Anticipated Receipts DEPARTMENT REVENUES Interest Earnings 18,500 1,782 2,400 2,100 2,100 Subtotal 18,500 1,782 2,400 2,100 2,100 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE FEDERAL GRANTS CMAQ Projects 96,800 83, Transportation Planning Operating Assistance: Annual Apportionment + 2,042,912 2,106,791 2,199,730 2,160,000 2,203,200 Prior Year Carry-In - 500, ,637 2,181,296 2,367,428 2,363,611 Transferred to Capital Program -487, * Total Operating Available: 2,055,455 2,367,428 4,381,026 4,527,428 4,566,811 Total Operating Used: 1,555,455 1,039,363 1,961,368 2,163,817 2,493,885 * Total Operating Not Used: 500, ,328,065 2,419,657 2,363, ,072,926 Subtotal 1,652,255 1,123,240 1,961,368 2,163,817 2,493,885 STATE/SPECIAL GRANTS Senior Citizen Shared Ride 193, , , , ,000 Transportation Planning Operating Assistance 3,378,252 3,378,286 3,378,286 3,378,286 3,378,286 Special Demonstration Grants RideShare Support 33,862 33,862 33,862 33,862 35,555 Subtotal 3,605,114 3,566,448 3,567,148 3,565,148 3,593,841 MUNICIPAL CONTRIBUTIONS Bellefonte Borough 15,323 15,323 15,288 15,288 15,430 Benner Township 4,374 4,374 4,533 4,533 4,535 College Township 46,883 46,883 46,439 46,439 45,749 Ferguson Township 76,854 76,854 76,692 76,692 75,447 Harris Township 20,374 20,374 21,083 21,083 22,439 Halfmoon Township 0 0 4,601 4,601 4,762 Patton Township 63,803 63,803 61,083 61,083 70,373 Penn State University 102, , , , ,600 State College Borough 74,575 74,575 72,500 72,500 79,188 Spring Township 15,133 15,133 15,100 15,100 15,261 Subtotal 419, , , , ,784 *Memo item only where shaded; only actual amount used added in those columns. **As requested by the COG Finance Committee during last years's buget review,an estimate of unrestricted cash balances are shown. Although the amounts are comparatively low, the Authority's cash flow is at its lowest point at the end of the fiscal year, when Reduced Service decreases the amount of passenger revenue and grant payments for the year have already been received and disbursed. 2

8 Prepared 03/16/2010 AGENCY: Acct. No. Centre Area Transportation Authority Account ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET COMPARATIVE DETAIL OF REVENUES Budgeted Receipts Actual Receipts Budgeted Receipts Estimated Receipts Anticipated Receipts MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE Farebox 688, , , ,000 1,035,800 "ONEPASS" 595, , , , ,000 Football Shuttle 48,500 50,108 52,000 59,172 52,000 Paratransit 90,000 74,671 78,500 76,500 82,500 Vanpool 113, , , , ,000 Special Purchase of Service 1,177,500 1,140,777 1,201,900 1,174,800 1,266,000 LOOP Revenue 1,944,300 1,848,555 1,846,900 1,905,500 2,014,000 Charter Service Advertising 16,000 15,382 12,000 20,000 20,000 Vehicle Lease & Rental Miscellaneous 15,100 41,343 4,600 14,400 7,100 Subtotal 4,687,400 4,844,015 4,990,900 5,144,312 5,558,400 TOTAL: 10,383,064 9,955,280 10,941,611 11,295,172 12,089,010 CENTRE REGION COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS 3

9 Prepared 03/16/2010 AGENCY: Acct. No. Centre Area Transportation Authority ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET COMPARATIVE DETAIL OF APPROPRIATIONS AND EXPENDITURES Budgeted Appropriation Actual Expenditure Budgeted Appropriation Estimated Expenditure Anticipated Expenditure Account PERSONNEL Salaries (Staff) 1,195,000 1,205,314 1,295,000 1,293,100 1,405,200 Salaries (Part-Time Interns) 0 1, ,048 7,700 Drivers' Wages 3,322,064 3,326,875 3,607,766 3,835,300 4,084,200 Maintenance Wages 789, , , , ,000 Employee Benefits 2,458,500 2,044,375 2,300,545 2,435,524 2,635,100 Subtotal 7,764,864 7,318,121 8,087,311 8,486,972 9,090,200 OPERATING EXPENSES MAINTENANCE Revenue Vehicle Maintenance 310, , , , ,000 Service Vehicle Maintenance 4,500 3,362 5,500 5,700 5,700 Radio Maintenance 10,100 9,239 10,600 10,000 10,000 Building & Equipment Maintenance 110, , , , ,000 Uniforms & Accessories 18,100 18,414 19,900 19,000 19,000 Contract Maintenance 12,400 3,788 12,400 10,000 12,500 Utilities 150, , , , ,100 Paratransit 18,000 14,855 17,000 24,000 24,500 Vanpool 11,000 18,226 20,000 21,300 22,000 Training 9,600 6,029 12,600 10,000 15,300 Miscellaneous 15,000 26,817 26,000 26,000 26,000 Subtotal 668, , , ,000 1,015,100 TRANSPORTATION Revenue Vehicles - Tires 53,200 51,945 58,500 58,500 63,000 Service Vehicles - Tires 1, , ,560 Revenue Vehicles - Fuel & Lube 684, , , , ,000 Service Vehicles - Fuel & Lube 23,500 18,280 22,000 26,800 29,500 Safety & Training 34,000 11,351 34,000 28,000 35,000 Insurance 157, , , , ,000 Shelters & Signs 5,000 9,148 9,600 6,400 6,800 Paratransit 435, , , , ,100 Vanpool 110, , , , ,000 Uniforms 8,000 5,230 5,500 5,500 2,000 Miscellaneous 12,000 13,126 14,100 17,500 16,400 Subtotal 1,523,000 1,360,356 1,497,100 1,436,500 1,542,360 CENTRE REGIONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS 4

10 Prepared 03/16/2010 AGENCY: Acct. No. Centre Area Transportation Authority Account ADMINISTRATION ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET COMPARATIVE DETAIL OF APPROPRIATIONS AND EXPENDITURES Budgeted Appropriation Actual Expenditures Budgeted Appropriation Estimated Expenditures Anticipated Expenditures Temporary Help 0 7,861 1,000 7,300 0 Insurance 32,300 27,237 29,800 30,900 33,000 Pass Sales & Supplies 10,000 10,301 8,500 13,000 11,500 Professional Services 164, , , , ,000 Advertising 25,000 26,597 24,500 25,500 31,150 Marketing Support 38,000 28,911 31,700 38,000 27,400 Printing 2, ,200 3,400 3,400 Schedule Printing & Design 31,300 23,527 32,000 26,500 27,800 Telephone 18,000 12,432 13,500 14,000 14,300 Office Supplies & Services 23,200 36,726 31,500 40,600 41,500 Dues & Subscriptions 24,000 21,873 26,000 27,000 29,000 Travel & Meetings 31,500 24,485 31,500 31,500 30,300 Interest ,000 3,300 Miscellaneous 9,000 10,313 11,500 20,000 19,000 Paratransit 16,200 14,858 15,000 13,500 14,000 Vanpool 1,500 3,063 3,500 3,500 3,700 Subtotal 426, , , , ,350 TOTAL: 10,383,064 9,955,279 10,941,611 11,295,172 12,089,010 CENTRE REGION COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS 5

11 Prepared 03/24/2010 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET PERSONNEL SCHEDULE AGENCY: Centre Area Transportation Authority 2009/ / / / / / / /2011 Proposed Salary Medical Workers' Disability/Life Unemployment Acct. No. Account Salary* Range FICA Insurance Compensation Retirement Insurance Insurance General Manager $105,248 N.A. - N.A. $8,293 $11,306 $449 $24,933 $614 $0 Assistant General Manager $82,577 $62,477 - $99,963 $6,601 $11,306 $357 $4,228 $340 $0 Director of Administration $85,635 $56,668 - $90,669 $6,680 $11,306 $361 $20,083 $512 $0 Director of Operations $62,920 $51,400 - $82,240 $5,143 $15,868 $278 $5,378 $381 $0 Service Development Manager $71,198 $50,910 - $76,366 $5,826 $0 $315 $6,093 $430 $0 Director of Maintenance $58,427 $50,910 - $76,366 $4,810 $11,306 $260 $5,030 $293 $0 Human Resources Manager $59,904 $48,486 - $72,729 $4,876 $6,853 $264 $5,099 $248 $0 Marketing Manager $59,904 $46,177 - $69,266 $4,769 $15,868 $258 $4,987 $324 $0 Lead Supervisor N.A. $41,884 - $62,826 $3,517 $6,853 $190 $3,678 $150 $0 Operations Supervisor $53,338 $41,884 - $62,826 $4,354 $0 $236 $4,554 $280 $0 Operations Supervisor $51,866 $41,884 - $62,826 $4,266 $6,853 $231 $4,461 $276 $0 Operations Supervisor $50,398 $41,884 - $62,826 $4,041 $11,306 $219 $4,226 $248 $0 Operations Supervisor $48,650 $41,884 - $62,826 $3,884 $6,853 $210 $4,062 $298 $0 Operations Supervisor $45,656 $41,884 - $62,826 $3,761 $6,853 $203 $3,933 $300 $0 Operations Supervisor $44,533 $41,884 - $62,826 $4,250 $11,306 $230 $4, $226 $0 Accounting Manager $52,936 $41,884 - $62,826 $4,297 $6,853 $232 $4,494 $203 $0 Grants Manager $44,533 $41,884 - $62,826 $3,619 $6,853 $196 $3,784 $165 $0 Assistant to the General Manager $44,533 $41,884 - $62,826 $3,719 $6,853 $201 $3,890 $150 $0 Commuter Services Manager $46,800 $39,573 - $55,402 $3,773 $6,853 $205 $3,943 $244 $0 Facilities Manager N.A. $39,573 - $55,402 $3,034 $6,853 $164 $3,173 $140 $0 Transportation Analyst $41,500 $35,894 - $50,251 $3,228 $11,306 $175 $3,376 $195 $0 Purchasing Coordinator $41,350 $35,894 - $50,251 $3,291 $11,306 $178 $3,442 $219 $0 Bookkeeper $33,114 $31,007 - $43,409 $2,778 $0 $150 $2,905 $155 $0 Customer Service Representative $32,302 $29,347 - $38,151 $2,501 $6,853 $135 $2,616 $194 $0 Customer Service Representative $29,266 $29,347 - $38,151 $2,393 $6,853 $129 $2,502 $174 $0 SUBTOTAL $1,246,588 - $107,704 $204,426 $5,826 $139,314 $6,759 $0 Part-Time HR Office Assistant $15.53/Hr. $ $17.57/ Hr. $1,278 $0 $69 $1,336 $0 $0 Part- Time Receptionist $12.75/Hr. $ $17.57/ Hr. $1,021 $0 $55 $1,068 $0 $0 Part-Time Fare Counter $13.07/Hr. $ $15.15/ Hr. $677 $0 $37 $709 $0 $0 Part-Time Interns N.A. $ $11.84/ Hr. $589 $0 $32 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL: $1,246,588 - $111,269 $204,426 $6,019 $142,427 $6,759 $0 *As of 3/19/10 CENTRE REGION COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS 6

12 Prepared 4/5/2010 AGENCY: Centre Area Transportation Authority CAPITAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION ANNUAL CAPITAL BUDGET FY 2010/2011 CAPITAL PROJECT LISTING Total Estimated Project Cost Federal Share (80%) State Share (16 2/3%) Local Share (3.33%) VEHICLES Paratransit Van $100,000 $80,000 $16,667 $3,333 FACILITIES Signs and Shelters $50,000 $40,000 $8,333 $1,667 EQUIPMENT Transit Signal Priority Hardware $100,000 $80,000 $16,667 $3,333 SUBTOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES $250,000 $200,000 $41,667 $8,333 OTHER Addition to Capital Reserve Account N/A N/A N/A $54,067 TOTAL LOCAL CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS $62,400 State College Borough $11,210 Ferguson Township $10,681 Patton Township $9,962 College Township $6,477 Harris Township $3,177 Bellefonte Borough $2,184 Spring Township $2,160 Benner Township $642 Halfmoon Township $675 Penn State University $15,232 7

13 This page was intentionally left blank. 8

14 LOCAL SHARE CALCULATION AND ALLOCATION This section of the budget addresses the Authority s local share request for FY 2010/2011, in the amount of $440,784, a 5% increase over the amount requested and approved for the past several years. However, as noted in previous years, changes in each municipality s share will vary from the individual amounts approved in FY 2009/2010 based on mileage, ridership and other factors used in the Miller formula. Once total local match has been determined, the Authority allocates amounts to each funding partner using a formula which first calculates costs, revenues, and deficit for each route, and then computes federal, state, and local funding needed to finance that deficit. Each route s deficit is then distributed to the municipalities based on mileage operated in each municipality; for certain routes, a second factor allocates a portion of local share on a regional basis. The formula calculates each municipality s share as follows: OVERVIEW For many years, the total local share provided was distributed among member municipalities solely on the portion of total system miles operated in each municipality. Each route s mileage in a particular municipality was determined and then added to calculate the percentage of total system miles in that municipality. The resulting percentages were then used to distribute total local funding. This version of the formula did not account for differing levels of cost recovery on each route due to variations in ridership (productivity); two routes with identical mileage were weighted equally in determining local share even if one covered a higher portion of its costs due to higher ridership. A new formula was developed by Dr. Jim Miller in the early 90's to address this deficiency. It was simplified several years ago, but accomplishes the same result: both the costs of each route and its revenues are used to determine a net route deficit which takes into account differing levels of cost recovery. Federal, state and local subsidies are then allocated to each route to cover the deficit. In FY 1998/1999, the formula was further modified in two ways. First, estimated ridership, mileage, revenue and expense data for the budget year replaced audited data from the most recently completed fiscal year. This change more accurately incorporates the impact of new and/or changed service planned for the budget period. Second, a regional component was added to the standard mileage-based portion of the formula to recognize that certain routes benefit the entire community. The formula was again modified in FY 2001/2002 to set the University s local share at the percentage of total system route mileage operated on the LOOPs and LINKs, to avoid extremely low local share requirements on these heavily-subsidized routes. It is important to note that changes in ridership, cost, and/or mileage data used in the formula impact the percentage of total local share contributed by a given municipality even if total local funding does not change from one year to the next. For example, individual municipal shares will change if ridership on a route changes significantly, even though all other data, such as cost, mileage and total local share do not change from the previous year. 9

15 DETAILS OF THE FORMULA Note: All data items used in the formula (revenue, expenses, mileage, ridership, etc.) are budgeted or estimated values for FY 2010/ Expenses are separated into fixed route and paratransit/vanpool categories and allocated to each route as follows: a) Total annual fixed route costs (excluding paratransit and vanpool service) are divided by total fixed route miles to determine cost per mile of fixed route service. b) Total miles for each route detailed on the separate Revenue Milage Allocation spreadsheet are multiplied by the cost per mile to derive the cost of each fixed route. c) Total paratransit and vanpool expenses are added to the fixed route expense of each route by calculating the percentage of total miles for each fixed route and multiplying that percentage times total paratransit expenses. For example, a route with 14% of total fixed route miles will be allocated 14% of total paratransit and vanpool expenses. d) Fixed route, paratransit and vanpool expenses for each route are added for total route expense. The sum of the total expense for each route equals total budgeted expense. 2. Revenues are broken into different categories, depending on their source, for allocation to each route and then subtracted from each route s expense to determine each route s deficit before any subsidy funding is applied. a) Revenues from apartment complex agreements and other contracts which provide fare-free transit on specified routes are allocated directly to those routes. b) Operating revenues which cannot be directly attributed to specific routes, such as charter revenue, investment income, lottery-funded state senior citizen grants, and miscellaneous revenue, are totaled and allocated to each route based on the percentage of total fixed route miles for each route. For example, a route with 14% of total fixed route miles will be allocated 14% of total non-route revenue. 3. Net Route Expense is the total cost of each route after subtracting the total direct revenue and non-route revenue allocated to each route as noted above. 4. Passenger Revenue includes all receipts from fares, tokens, ONEPASS sales and PSU employee passes sold through the University s Ride for Five program. Total passenger revenue is divided by total fare, token and pass riders to derive a systemwide average revenue per passenger. Total fare, token and pass riders on each route are multiplied by the average revenue per passenger to obtain the passenger revenue for each route. 5. Net Route Deficit is the amount remaining after passenger revenue for each route is subtracted from net route expense. At this point, total expenses and revenues have been allocated to each route and only subsidy funding remains to be assigned to each route to cover the deficit. 10

16 6. Federal and State Subsidy equals total budgeted federal and state operating assistance, state dedicated funding for asset maintenance, and state supplemental funding. a) Federal and state subsidies are allocated to each route by calculating the percentage of total net route deficit for each fixed route and multiplying that percentage times total federal and state subsidy. For example, a route with 14% of the total net route deficit will be allocated 14% of total federal and state subsidies. b) Federal and state subsidies allocated to each route are subtracted from net route deficit for each route to derive the remaining deficit to be funded by local subsidy. 7. Local Subsidy for each route is the amount of deficit remaining after federal and state subsidies have been applied. The attached spreadsheet shows the above calculations for each route; the last column identifies the total local subsidy required for each route. ALLOCATING LOCAL SUBSIDY FOR EACH ROUTE Once the formula has calculated each route s total local subsidy, those amounts are allocated to each municipality and funding partner using route mileage and, for selected routes, a regional factor to account for service which benefits and impacts a wider area than the municipalities in which it operates. a) For routes with no regional impact, mileage is used to allocate local share by calculating the percentage of miles for each route which are operated in each municipality and multiplying that percentage times the total local subsidy for each route. For example, Patton Township will be allocated 14% of the local subsidy required for a route with 14% of its miles in Patton Township. b) The regional impact of each route is assessed using three weighted criteria: non-residential destinations served, connections to other routes, and non-productive mileage. For each route, a subjective assessment assigns a score between 0 and 5 for each of the three criteria; these scores are then multiplied by the weight for each criteria and summed, with the sum then used as the percentage of the route s local subsidy to be allocated regionally. The regional portion of the route is allocated based on the current COG formula for Parks and Recreation services. The process is detailed on the attached spreadsheet Calculation of Regional Factors. c) For routes which operate outside of the Centre Region, such as the X Route, all mileage outside of the Centre Region is considered external and is allocated on a mileage basis to the municipalities, such as Spring Township, Benner Township, Halfmoon Township and Bellefonte Borough, which have contracted with CATA for the service. All mileage on these routes inside the Centre Region is considered to be regional, and allocated based on the COG formula. d) Once the local, regional and external percentages of each route s total local subsidy have been determined, a complex formula is used to apply those percentages to each route s local subsidy amount, as detailed in the spreadsheet titled CATA Local Share Allocation - Local, Regional and External Tiers. Note that any Public/Private Partnership funds collected by a municipality to support service on a particular route are subtracted from that route s local subsidy. 11

17 e) Once local taxpayer support for each route is determined, that amount is allocated to each municipality based on the local, regional and external percentages. The amounts for each route are then summed to determine each municipality s local support for the coming year. These amounts are then added to any Public/Private Partnership monies expected to be collected to give the total local share required from each municipality. This amount is shown in the long box across the bottom of the spreadsheet. These numbers, plus the local share payment made by Penn State, equal CATA s total local share requirement for the year. These totals are in turn shown in the following table. Although details of routing and scheduling for the new fiscal year have not yet been finalized, the mileage and ridership estimates used in the formula are based on the best information currently available and incorporate the most significant features of planned service for the budget year. Municipality 2009/2010 Budget % of total 2010/2011 Proposed % of total Percent Change College Township $46, % $45, % -1.49% Ferguson Township $76, % $75, % -1.62% Harris Township $21, % $22, % 6.43% Patton Township $61, % $70, % 15.21% State College Borough $72, % $79, % 9.22% Bellefonte Borough $15, % $15, % 0.93% Spring Township $15, % $15, % 1.07% Benner Township $4, % $4, % 0.04% Halfmoon Township $4, % $4, % 3.50% Penn State University $102, % $107, % 5.00% TOTAL $419, % $440, % 5.00% 12

18 REVENUE MILEAGE - ALLOCATION TO MUNICIPALITIES - FY 2010/2011 4/13/2010 Route Route Description Service Days Service Days Trips Mileage PSU St. College Ferguson College Patton Harris Bellefonte Spring Benner Halfmoon Park Forest Full Weekday A B C F Overlook Hgts. Annual Total Percentage 0.81% 0.00% 38.54% 45.83% 0.00% 15.63% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% University Dr. Full AM Peak Boalsburg PM Peak Mid Day/Evening Weekday Total Saturday Annual Total Percentage 2.97% 0.00% 30.33% 0.00% 16.11% 0.00% 53.55% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Houserville Full Weekday Penn Hills Annual Total Percentage 1.15% 0.00% 23.08% 0.00% 76.92% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Stonebridge Full Weekday Pine Grove Annual Total Percentage 1.92% 0.00% 26.55% 73.45% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Graysdale Full Weekday G H K Annual Total Percentage 1.45% 0.00% 16.90% 8.45% 0.00% 74.65% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Toftrees Full Weekday Colonnade Saturday Annual Total Percentage 6.09% 0.00% 18.29% 0.00% 23.17% 58.54% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% W. College Ave Full Daytime Cato Park Evening Weekday Total Saturday Annual Total Percentage 2.74% 0.00% 37.63% 62.37% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 13

19 REVENUE MILEAGE - ALLOCATION TO MUNICIPALITIES - FY 2010/2011 4/13/2010 Route Route Description Service Days Service Days Trips Mileage PSU St. College Ferguson College Patton Harris Bellefonte Spring Benner Halfmoon Lemont Full Weekday Nittany Mall Saturday M MX N N/V P R Sunday Annual Total Percentage 4.38% 0.00% 28.26% 0.00% 71.74% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Nittany Mall Full Weekday Blfnte / PL Gap Annual Total Percentage 4.48% 0.00% 11.08% 0.00% 36.65% 0.00% 0.00% 13.64% 21.88% 16.76% 0.00% Martin St Full Weekday Aaron Drive Trippers Colonnade Saturday Sunday Full Service Totals Reduced Weekday Saturday Reduced Service Totals Annual Total Percentage 8.52% 0.00% 39.58% 36.85% 0.00% 23.57% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Martin St Full Wkdy O/B Pattee Vairo Blvd. Wkday O/B C&A Annual Total Percentage 3.38% 0.00% 28.05% 41.46% 0.00% 30.49% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Scenery Park Full Weekday Medical Center Wkdy Airport Univ. Pk Airport Saturday Annual Total Percentage 4.65% 0.00% 44.21% 0.00% 44.48% 8.39% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 2.92% 0.00% Waupelani Dr Full Weekday Trippers Saturday Sunday Full Service Totals Reduced Weekday Saturday Reduced Service Totals Annual Total Percentage 7.71% 0.00% % 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

20 REVENUE MILEAGE - ALLOCATION TO MUNICIPALITIES - FY 2010/2011 4/13/2010 Route Route Description Service Days Service Days Trips Mileage PSU St. College Ferguson College Patton Harris Bellefonte Spring Benner Halfmoon Science Pk Rd Full Weekday S UT V W X Haymarket Annual Total Percentage 1.16% 0.00% 43.55% 56.45% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% University Dr. Full Weekday Bellaire Ave Trippers Annual Total Percentage 0.89% 0.00% 89.54% 0.00% 10.46% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Vairo Blvd. Full Weekday Colonnade V Express Trippers Saturday Sunday Full Service Totals Reduced Weekday Saturday Reduced Service Totals Annual Total Percentage 10.24% 0.00% 38.07% 31.37% 0.00% 30.56% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Park Forest Full Weekday Colonnade Trippers Saturday Full Service Totals Reduced Weekday Saturday Reduced Service Totals Annual Total Percentage 5.27% 0.00% 21.34% 39.75% 0.00% 38.91% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Bellefonte Full Weekday Pleasant Gap Saturday Annual Total Percentage 3.11% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 15.03% 0.00% 0.00% 14.51% 39.90% 30.57% 0.00% Halfmoon Full Weekday Z Annual Total Percentage % 0.00% 11.58% 5.79% 0.00% 51.13% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 31.51% 15

21 REVENUE MILEAGE - ALLOCATION TO MUNICIPALITIES - FY 2010/2011 4/13/2010 Route Route Description Service Days Service Days Trips Mileage PSU St. College Ferguson College Patton Harris Bellefonte Spring Benner Halfmoon White LOOP Full Weekday Thurs/Fri Late Night WLP BLP RLK GLK Saturday Sunday Annual Total Percentage 5.79% % 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Blue LOOP Full Weekday Thurs/Fri Late Night Saturday Sunday Full Service Totals Reduced Weekday Reduced Service Totals Annual Total Percentage 11.11% % 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Red LINK Full Weekday Saturday Sunday Full Service Totals Reduced Weekday Reduced Service Totals Annual Total Percentage 8.65% % 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Green LINK Full W/B Trips E/B Trips Annual Total Percentage 1.42% % 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total Mileage Percentage % 26.97% 26.77% 14.24% 10.19% 14.46% 1.59% 1.06% 2.22% 1.84% 0.66% 16

22 MILEAGE/SUBSIDY FORMULA: ALL DATA REPRESENTS FY 2010/2011 ESTIMATES Column: Fixed Plus Less Less Equals Less Equals Less Equals Vehicle Farepaying Route Paratransit & Vanpool Equals Direct Route Non-Route Net Passenger Route Federal/State Local Route Miles Passengers Expense Expense Total Expense Revenue Revenue Expense Revenue Deficit Subsidies Subsidy A 12,240 12,035 $ 91,913 $ 8,923 $ 100,835 $ 0 $ 5,968 $ 94,868 $ 18,141 $ 76,727 $ 71,888 $ 4,840 B 44,658 19,090 $ 335,347 $ 32,554 $ 367,901 $ 1,574 $ 21,773 $ 344,554 $ 28,775 $ 315,780 $ 295,862 $ 19,918 C 17,238 6,640 $ 129,444 $ 12,566 $ 142,010 $ 0 $ 8,404 $ 133,605 $ 10,009 $ 123,597 $ 115,801 $ 7,796 F 28,815 13,280 $ 216,378 $ 21,005 $ 237,383 $ 0 $ 14,049 $ 223,335 $ 20,017 $ 203,317 $ 190,493 $ 12,824 G 21,726 4,150 $ 163,145 $ 15,838 $ 178,983 $ 0 $ 10,592 $ 168,390 $ 6,255 $ 162,135 $ 151,908 $ 10,227 H 91,585 45,650 $ 687,732 $ 66,762 $ 754,494 $ 49,843 $ 44,652 $ 659,999 $ 68,809 $ 591,190 $ 553,901 $ 37,290 K 41,264 30,710 $ 309,860 $ 30,080 $ 339,940 $ 7,056 $ 20,118 $ 312,766 $ 46,290 $ 266,477 $ 249,668 $ 16,808 M 65, ,900 $ 494,610 $ 48,015 $ 542,624 $ 0 $ 32,113 $ 510,511 $ 162,639 $ 347,872 $ 325,929 $ 21,943 MX 67,320 24,900 $ 505,520 $ 49,074 $ 554,594 $ 0 $ 32,822 $ 521,773 $ 37,532 $ 484,241 $ 453,697 $ 30,544 N 128, ,500 $ 961,570 $ 93,346 $ 1,054,916 $ 233,676 $ 62,431 $ 758,808 $ 305,232 $ 453,577 $ 424,967 $ 28,610 NV 50,848 20,790 $ 381,829 $ 37,066 $ 418,895 $ 121,150 $ 24,791 $ 272,955 $ 31,337 $ 241,618 $ 226,378 $ 15,240 P 69,895 29,880 $ 524,857 $ 50,951 $ 575,808 $ 75,130 $ 34,077 $ 466,600 $ 45,039 $ 421,562 $ 394,971 $ 26,590 R 115, ,600 $ 870,115 $ 84,467 $ 954,583 $ 128,960 $ 56,493 $ 769,130 $ 650,558 $ 118,572 $ 111,093 $ 7,479 S 17,391 9,960 $ 130,593 $ 12,677 $ 143,270 $ 0 $ 8,479 $ 134,791 $ 15,013 $ 119,778 $ 112,223 $ 7,555 UT 13,372 1,660 $ 100,413 $ 9,748 $ 110,161 $ 72,636 $ 6,519 $ 31,005 $ 2,502 $ 28,503 $ 26,705 $ 1,798 V 153, ,000 $ 1,156,156 $ 112,235 $ 1,268,392 $ 528,344 $ 75,065 $ 664,983 $ 367,785 $ 297,198 $ 278,452 $ 18,746 W 79,272 63,080 $ 595,271 $ 57,787 $ 653,057 $ 47,632 $ 38,649 $ 566,776 $ 95,082 $ 471,695 $ 441,942 $ 29,752 X 46,754 28,880 $ 351,086 $ 34,082 $ 385,168 $ 0 $ 22,795 $ 362,373 $ 43,531 $ 318,842 $ 298,731 $ 20,111 Z 31,722 5,000 $ 238,207 $ 23,124 $ 261,332 $ 0 $ 15,466 $ 245,866 $ 6,255 $ 239,610 $ 224,497 $ 15,114 WHITE LOOP 87,107 0 $ 654,105 $ 0 $ 654,105 $ 432,681 $ 0 $ 221,424 N.A. $ 221,424 $ 198,308 $ 23,116 BLUE LOOP 166,960 0 $ 1,253,739 $ 0 $ 1,253,739 $ 829,329 $ 0 $ 424,409 N.A. $ 424,409 $ 380,102 $ 44,307 RED LINK 130,021 0 $ 976,356 $ 0 $ 976,356 $ 645,845 $ 0 $ 330,511 N.A. $ 330,511 $ 296,006 $ 34,505 GREEN LINK 21,369 0 $ 160,464 $ 0 $ 160,464 $ 106,144 $ 0 $ 54,321 N.A. $ 54,321 $ 48,649 $ 5,672 TOTAL 1,503,314 1,301,705 $ 11,288,710 $ 800,300 $ 12,089,010 $ 3,280,000 $ 535,255 $ 8,273,755 $ 1,960,800 $ 6,312,955 $ 5,872,171 $ 440,784 NOTES: Column 1: Total miles operated on each route Column 2: OnePass, cash, and token passengers only Column 3: Cost per mile for all fixed route service (excluding paratransit) multiplied by route miles Column 4: Allocation of paratransit expenses to each route by its percentage of total fixed route miles Column 5: Column 3 plus Column 4; column total equals total operating expense Column 6: Purchase of service revenue, such as apartment contracts, attributed directly to appropriate routes Column 7: Allocation of other operating revenues (advertising, etc.) to each route by its percentage of total fixed route miles Column 8: Column 5 minus the sum of Columns 6 and 7 Column 9: Average revenue per OnePass, cash, or token passenger times passengers on each route Column 10: Remainder of each route's expense (deficit) requiring federal, state and local subsidy Column 11: Allocation of total federal and state subsidies to each route by its percentage of total route deficit 17 Column 12: Column 10 minus Column 11

23 CALCULATION OF "REGIONAL" FACTORS - FY 2010/2011 April 2, 2010 FACTOR RANGE WEIGHT A B C F G H K M MX N N/V P R S UT V W X Z Non-residential destinations served na na na Connections support other routes na na na Non-productive mileage na na na ROUTE Totals na na na Local Percentage 100% 82% 78% 84% 90% 42% 66% 32% 0% 52% 100% 32% 84% 76% 100% 42% 74% 0% 0% Regional Percentage 0% 18% 22% 16% 10% 58% 34% 68% 47% 48% 0% 66% 16% 24% 0% 58% 26% 15% 68% External Percentage 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 53% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 85% 32% ROUTE AREA SERVED NOTES A Park Forest / Overlook Hgts. Provides commuter level service to exclusively residential areas B University Dr. / Boalsburg Serves University Drive, S. Atherton Street, residental areas of Boalsburg; most trips extend to Tussey Mountain C Houserville / Penn Hills Serves Houserville and Penn Hills; commercial areas served are covered better by other routes; commuter level service only F Stonebridge / Pine Grove Provides commuter level service to Greentree, Pine Grove Mills and western Ferguson Twp. G Vista Woods / Graysdale Provides commuter level service to Vista Woods and Graysdale H Toftrees / Colonnade Serves the Village at Penn State and Toftrees; continues across the Mt. Nittany Bypass to the Colonnade and Patton Forest K W. College Ave. / Cato Park Serves Cato Park, Bristol Court, commercial areas along W. College Avenue; heavy ridership to Bank of America M Lemont / Nittany Mall Serves E. College Avenue, Lemont and Dale Summit; provides connecting service to X Route; heavily used by shoppers MX Mall / Bellefonte / Pleasant Gap Serves E, College Avenue, Lemont and Dale Summit, with continuing service to Bellefonte and Pleasant Gap; mainly commuters N Martin St. / Aaron Dr. / Colonnade Connects apartment complexes on Martin Street and Aaron Drive to campus; also serves Northland Center and the Colonnade N/V Martin St. / Vairo Blvd. Provides additional capacity and frequency between student housing on Vairo Blvd. and Martin Street and campus, downtown P Scenery Pk. / Medical Ctr. / Airport Serves Pugh Street, Foxdale, Scenery Park on the south, Mt. Nittany Medical Center on the north, with selected trips continuing to the Airport R Waupelani Dr. Serves an almost entirely residential area; heavily used by students and other residents of SW Borough S Science Park Rd. / Haymarket Serves employment centers along Science Park Road, residential areas further west, commercial areas along W. College Avenue UT University Dr. / Bellaire Ave. Serves University Drive and Bellaire Avenue; operates during the school year only V Vairo Blvd. / Colonnade Connects apartment complexes on Vairo Blvd to campus; also serves Wal-mart and the Colonnade W Park Forest / Geisinger Serves Northland Center, Circleville Road, Valley Vista Drive, western Park Forest, Vista Woods and Geisinger X Bellefonte / Pleasant Gap Connects Bellefonte with the Mall; alternating trips travel via Pleasant Gap H Halfmoon Provides commuter level service to Stormstown and other areas of Halfmoon Township WLP White LOOP Travels counter-clockwise around campus; uses Beaver Avenue in downtown State College BLP Blue LOOP Travels clockwise around campus; uses College Avenue in downtown State College RLK Red LINK Travels back and forth from the West Campus to Innovation Park via Curtin Rd. and East Park Ave. GLK Green LINK Provides "express" service between preipheral parking lots and the core campus 18

CATA CATA CATA CATA CATA CATA

CATA CATA CATA CATA CATA CATA TO: Member Municipalities of the Centre Area Transportation Authority FROM: Hugh A. Mose, General Manager Louwana Oliva, Assistant General Manager DATE: April 4, 2014 SUBJECT: CATA s FY 2014/15 DRAFT Budget

More information

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I GENERAL INFORMATION 1 SECTION II OPERATING BUDGET 5 CATABUS 10 CATARIDE 18 CATACOMMUTE 24 SECTION III CAPITAL PROGRAM 29

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I GENERAL INFORMATION 1 SECTION II OPERATING BUDGET 5 CATABUS 10 CATARIDE 18 CATACOMMUTE 24 SECTION III CAPITAL PROGRAM 29 TABLE OF CONTENTS ITEM PAGE SECTION I GENERAL INFORMATION 1 SECTION II OPERATING BUDGET 5 CATABUS 10 CATARIDE 18 CATACOMMUTE 24 SECTION III CAPITAL PROGRAM 29 SECTION IV LOCAL MATCH SHARES 32 SECTION I

More information

Public Transportation Department Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results.

Public Transportation Department Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results. Anchorage: Performance. Value. Results. Mission Serve Anchorage residents and visitors by providing public transportation that emphasizes quality, safety, cost effectiveness, and economic vitality. Core

More information

QUALITY TRANSPORTATION SUMMARY

QUALITY TRANSPORTATION SUMMARY QUALITY TRANSPORTATION SUMMARY Quality Transportation Overview... 126 Department of Transportation... 127 Traffic Field Operations... 129 Winston-Salem Transit Authority... 131 Quality Transportation Non-Departmental...

More information

Greater Portland Transit District 114 Valley Street Portland ME 04102

Greater Portland Transit District 114 Valley Street Portland ME 04102 Greater Portland Transit District 114 Valley Street Portland ME 04102 November 1, 2017 [SUBMITTED BY E-MAIL] Nathan Poore Town Manager Town of Falmouth 271 Falmouth Road Falmouth, ME 04105 Re: Preliminary

More information

Public Transportation

Public Transportation Municipal Manager Administration Marketing and Customer Service Program Planning Transit Operations and Maintenance Transit Planning Transit Operations Para Transit Services Vehicle Maintenance Non-Vehicle

More information

Intercity Transit Community Update

Intercity Transit Community Update Intercity Transit Community Update Mission and Vision Mission: Our mission is to provide and promote transportation choices that support an accessible, sustainable, livable, healthy, prosperous community.

More information

Transit Development Plan (FY ) Executive Summary

Transit Development Plan (FY ) Executive Summary Transit Development Plan (FY 2019-2028) Executive Summary December 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 1 System Profile... 2 Public Outreach... 4 Key Findings/Direction... 5 Implementation Plan... 6

More information

Federal Assistance 13% Charges for Services 5% Appropriated Fund Balance.5% Other 3% Administration 6% Building Maintenance 3% Other 2%

Federal Assistance 13% Charges for Services 5% Appropriated Fund Balance.5% Other 3% Administration 6% Building Maintenance 3% Other 2% TRANSIT FUND The Transit Fund is used to account for the operations of the Town s public transit system. Federal Assistance 13% Transit Revenues State Assistance 12% Charges for Services 5% Appropriated

More information

Public Transportation

Public Transportation Municipal Manager Marketing & Customer Service Program Planning Transit Operations & Maintenance Transit Planning Transit Operations Para Transit Services Vehicle Maintenance Non-Vehicle Maintenance PT

More information

Transit Development Plan And 2013 Annual Report. Asotin County PTBA

Transit Development Plan And 2013 Annual Report. Asotin County PTBA Transit Development Plan 2014-2019 And 2013 Annual Report Asotin County PTBA Date of Public Hearing: September 10, 2014 Table of Contents Section I: Organization... 3 Section II: Physical Plant... 4 Section

More information

2004 Operating and Capital Program Financial Plan for Operations, and Capital Plan

2004 Operating and Capital Program Financial Plan for Operations, and Capital Plan PAST AND FUTURE RESPONSIBLE PUBLIC SERVICE 2004 Operating and Capital Program 2004 2006 2006 Financial Plan for Operations, and 2004 2008 2008 Capital Plan A Fresh Approach To Public Transportation Final

More information

Honolulu High-Capacity Transit Corridor Project Alternatives Analysis

Honolulu High-Capacity Transit Corridor Project Alternatives Analysis Alternatives Analysis Financial Feasibility Report November 30, 2006 Prepared for: City and County of Honolulu Prepared by: PB Consult Inc. Under Subcontract to: Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc.

More information

University Link LRT Extension

University Link LRT Extension (November 2007) The Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority, commonly known as Sound Transit, is proposing to implement an extension of the Central Link light rail transit (LRT) Initial Segment

More information

Public Transportation

Public Transportation Municipal Manager Marketing & Customer Service Program Planning Transit Planning Para Transit Services Transit Operations & Maintenance Transit Operations Vehicle Maintenance Non-Vehicle Maintenance PT

More information

Funding Local Public Transportation

Funding Local Public Transportation Funding Local Public Transportation I. Metro A. SORTA, early history In 1969 the Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority was established by Hamilton County with Hamilton County as its jurisdiction. In

More information

QUALITY TRANSPORTATION SUMMARY

QUALITY TRANSPORTATION SUMMARY SUMMARY Transportation systems influence virtually every aspect of community life. They are the means for moving people, goods, and services throughout the community, and they play a significant role in

More information

8. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS

8. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS 8. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS This chapter presents the financial analysis conducted for the Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) selected by the Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County (METRO) for the.

More information

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Metro Budget Overview

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Metro Budget Overview Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Metro Budget Overview February 2011 Metro 10,877 Employees (10,974 budgeted) 1,491 Buses 588 Escalators and 237 Elevators 106 Miles of Track 92 Traction Power

More information

CHAPTER 9 FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS

CHAPTER 9 FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS CHAPTER 9 FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS 9.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter presents anticipated costs, revenues, and funding for the Berryessa Extension Project (BEP) Alternative and the Silicon Valley Rapid Transit

More information

INVESTING STRATEGICALLY

INVESTING STRATEGICALLY 11 INVESTING STRATEGICALLY Federal transportation legislation (Fixing America s Surface Transportation Act FAST Act) requires that the 2040 RTP be based on a financial plan that demonstrates how the program

More information

Transit Subsidy. Mission Statement. Mandates

Transit Subsidy. Mission Statement. Mandates Mission Statement The Potomac and Rappahannock Transportation Commission (PRTC) is a multi-jurisdictional agency representing Prince William, Stafford, and Spotsylvania Counties and the Cities of Manassas,

More information

Board of Directors. John J. Case, Chairman. Terrance M. Carr, Director West Central Suburban Cook County

Board of Directors. John J. Case, Chairman. Terrance M. Carr, Director West Central Suburban Cook County Final Program November 2003 Board of Directors John J. Case, Chairman Terrance M. Carr, Director West Central Suburban Cook County James C. Harris, Director South Suburban Cook County Richard A. Kwasneski,

More information

CHAPTER 7: Financial Plan

CHAPTER 7: Financial Plan CHAPTER 7: Financial Plan Report Prepared by: Contents 7 FINANCIAL PLAN... 7-1 7.1 Introduction... 7-1 7.2 Assumptions... 7-1 7.2.1 Operating Revenue Assumptions... 7-2 7.2.2 Operating Cost Assumptions...

More information

System Performance Summary for FY 2016/17 Fixed Route

System Performance Summary for FY 2016/17 Fixed Route System Performance Summary for FY 216/17 This report summarizes the unaudited oational formance of Marin Transit local transit services for FY 216/17, and compares these results to the District s route

More information

GUIDELINES. Proposition A and Proposition C LOCAL RETURN

GUIDELINES. Proposition A and Proposition C LOCAL RETURN GUIDELINES Proposition A and Proposition C LOCAL RETURN PROPOSITION A AND PROPOSITION C DISTRIBUTION Discretionary (Includes for Projects 40% 25% Local Return (allocation to Jurisdictions Based Population)

More information

FY17 FY16 Valley Metro RPTA Sources of Funds FY17 vs FY16

FY17 FY16 Valley Metro RPTA Sources of Funds FY17 vs FY16 FY17 ADOPTED ANNUAL OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET Valley Metro Regional Public Transportation Authority (RPTA) provides public transportation services for Maricopa County located in the metro Phoenix, Arizona.

More information

COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FY 2004/05 VENTURA INTERCITY SERVICE TRANSIT AUTHORITY (VISTA) CONEJO CONNECTION

COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FY 2004/05 VENTURA INTERCITY SERVICE TRANSIT AUTHORITY (VISTA) CONEJO CONNECTION COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FY 2004/05 VENTURA INTERCITY SERVICE TRANSIT AUTHORITY (VISTA) CONEJO CONNECTION This Agreement is made and entered into by the City of Calabasas (Calabasas) and the Ventura County

More information

TEX Rail Fort Worth, Texas Project Development (Rating Assigned November 2012)

TEX Rail Fort Worth, Texas Project Development (Rating Assigned November 2012) TEX Rail Fort Worth, Texas Project Development (Rating Assigned November 2012) Summary Description Proposed Project: Commuter Rail 37.6 Miles, 14 Stations (12 new, two existing) Total Capital Cost ($YOE):

More information

SALEM-KEIZER TRANSIT 555 Court St. NE Suite 5230 Salem, OR

SALEM-KEIZER TRANSIT 555 Court St. NE Suite 5230 Salem, OR SALEM-KEIZER TRANSIT 555 Court St. NE Suite 5230 Salem, OR 97301-3980 503-588-2424 Fax 503-566-3933 www.cherriots.org May 15, 2014 To: From: Subject: Salem Area Mass Transit District Budget Committee Allan

More information

Peer Agency: King County Metro

Peer Agency: King County Metro Peer Agency: King County Metro City: Seattle, WA Fare Policy: Service Type Full Fare Reduced Fare Peak: - 1 Zone $2.75 $1.00* or $1.50** - 2 Zones $3.25 $1.00* or $1.50** Off Peak $2.50 $1.00* or $1.50**

More information

Instruction Manual. For the. National Park Service. Alternative Transportation Systems. Financial Proforma

Instruction Manual. For the. National Park Service. Alternative Transportation Systems. Financial Proforma Instruction Manual For the National Park Service Alternative Transportation Systems Financial Proforma 2007 This Instruction Manual provides step-by-step guidance on completing the National Park Service

More information

Revised 2011 Draft Operating and Capital Budgets

Revised 2011 Draft Operating and Capital Budgets Revised 2011 Draft Operating and Capital Budgets Board Meeting & Public Hearing November 17, 2010 Spokane Transit: Revised 2011 Draft Operating and Capital Budgets 1 Mission We are dedicated to providing

More information

Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority

Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority Single Audit Reports for the Year Ended December 31, 2017 This page intentionally left blank. TABLE OF CONTENTS Audited Financial Statements Statement of

More information

TransHelp Program and Accessible Transportation 2008 Budget Document

TransHelp Program and Accessible Transportation 2008 Budget Document TransHelp and Accessible Transportation 28 Budget Document TransHelp Program and Accessible Transportation 28 Budget Document This report incorporates Part B of the Transportation 28 Budget Document Section

More information

GUIDE TO THE OPERATING BUDGET

GUIDE TO THE OPERATING BUDGET GUIDE TO THE OPERATING BUDGET I. INTRODUCTION Why This Guide? The purpose of this guide is to explain Anchorage's operating budget process and how to read the forms contained in the budget document. Budgets

More information

Public Transportation

Public Transportation Municipal Manager Marketing & Customer Service Program Planning Transit Planning Para Transit Services Transit Operations & Maintenance Transit Operations Vehicle Maintenance Non-Vehicle Maintenance PT

More information

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT, COLORADO AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2015

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT, COLORADO AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2015 AS OF DECEMBER 31, RTD Active Fleet of the District Fixed Route Bus Fleet: Number RTD Owned- Fixed Route Buses 40' Transit Coaches 620 Articulated Buses 110 Intercity Coaches 175 Mall Shuttles 37 30' Transit

More information

TSCC Budget Review TriMet

TSCC Budget Review TriMet TSCC Budget Review 2017-18 TriMet 1. Introduction to the District: The Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District (TriMet) boundary covers about 575 square miles of the urban portions of Multnomah,

More information

Item #4 FEBRUARY 10, 2015 MEETING MINUTES PG. 2 Approve the February 10, 2015 meeting minutes.

Item #4 FEBRUARY 10, 2015 MEETING MINUTES PG. 2 Approve the February 10, 2015 meeting minutes. AGENDA HERITAGE VALLEY TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE (HVTAC) Thursday, March 19, 2015, 1:30 p.m. Santa Paula City Hall, Council Chambers 970 Ventura Street, Santa Paula, CA 93060 Item #1 Item #2 Item #3

More information

Transit Subsidy. Mission Statement. Mandates

Transit Subsidy. Mission Statement. Mandates Mission Statement The Potomac and Rappahannock Transportation Commission (PRTC) is a multi-jurisdictional agency representing Prince William, Stafford, and Spotsylvania Counties and the Cities of Manassas,

More information

Transit Subsidy. Projected FY17 Transit Subsidy

Transit Subsidy. Projected FY17 Transit Subsidy Mission Statement Transit Subsidy The Potomac and Rappahannock Transportation Commission (PRTC) is a multi-jurisdictional agency representing Prince William, Stafford, and Spotsylvania Counties and the

More information

HARBOR TRANSIT MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

HARBOR TRANSIT MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM HARBOR TRANSIT MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2017 Vredeveld Haefner LLC CPAs and Consultants TABLE OF CONTENTS FINANCIAL SECTION PAGE Independent Auditors

More information

MEMORANDUM. Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority Board of Directors. Michael T. Burns General Manager. DATE: August 4, 2008

MEMORANDUM. Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority Board of Directors. Michael T. Burns General Manager. DATE: August 4, 2008 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority Board of Directors Michael T. Burns General Manager DATE: August 4, 2008 SUBJECT: BART Operating Subsidy This memorandum summarizes and

More information

May 31, 2016 Financial Report

May 31, 2016 Financial Report 2016 May 31, 2016 Financial Report Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority 7/13/2016 Table of Contents SUMMARY REPORTS Budgetary Performance - Revenue 2 - Sales Tax Revenue 6 - Operating Expenses

More information

HARBOR TRANSIT MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

HARBOR TRANSIT MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM HARBOR TRANSIT MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2018 Vredeveld Haefner LLC CPAs and Consultants TABLE OF CONTENTS FINANCIAL SECTION PAGE Independent Auditors

More information

Operating Budget. Third Quarter Financial Report (July 2005 March 2006)

Operating Budget. Third Quarter Financial Report (July 2005 March 2006) Third Quarter Financial Report (July 2005 March 2006) INDEX A. Executive Summary...page 2 B. Revenue and Expense Analysis...page 3 C. Budget Variance Reports...page 14 D. Ridership and Performance Measures...page

More information

METROPOLITAN COUNCIL SUMMARY BUDGET-BY FUND TYPE TRANSPORTATION DIVISION 2007

METROPOLITAN COUNCIL SUMMARY BUDGET-BY FUND TYPE TRANSPORTATION DIVISION 2007 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL SUMMARY BUDGET-BY FUND TYPE TRANSPORTATION DIVISION 2007 Governmental Fund Types Special Revenue Funds Proprietary Fund Types Enterprise Fund Transportatio n Planning & TDM Activity

More information

Total Operating Activities for FY17 are $56.9 million, an increase of $5.1M or 9.8% from FY16.

Total Operating Activities for FY17 are $56.9 million, an increase of $5.1M or 9.8% from FY16. FY17 ADOPTED ANNUAL OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET Valley Metro Rail, Inc. (VMR) is a public non-profit corporation whose members are the cities of Chandler, Glendale, Mesa, Phoenix, and Tempe. VMR plans,

More information

METRO. Metro Funding. Associated Master Plan: Comprehensive Master Transportation Plan (MTP) for Arlington. Neighborhood(s):

METRO. Metro Funding. Associated Master Plan: Comprehensive Master Transportation Plan (MTP) for Arlington. Neighborhood(s): METRO METRO METRO 2017 2026 CIP Metro Funding Project Description The Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA/Metro) is a unique federal-state-local partnership formed to provide mass transit

More information

PINELLAS SUNCOAST TRANSIT AUTHORITY KEY BUDGET ASSUMPTIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016

PINELLAS SUNCOAST TRANSIT AUTHORITY KEY BUDGET ASSUMPTIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016 PINELLAS SUNCOAST TRANSIT AUTHORITY KEY BUDGET ASSUMPTIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016 PSTA Budget Forecasting Summary Item Assumption Amount Source 3 Yr. Avg. FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 Revenues FY15

More information

Governor s FY 2016 Revised, FY 2017 and Capital Budget Recommendations House Finance Committee April 13, 2016

Governor s FY 2016 Revised, FY 2017 and Capital Budget Recommendations House Finance Committee April 13, 2016 Governor s FY 2016 Revised, FY 2017 and Capital Budget Recommendations House Finance Committee April 13, 2016 Quasi-public agency Established in 1964 Responsible: Fixed route bus service and Americans

More information

Financial Plan. Section 8 STATUS QUO PLAN STATUS QUO PLAN ASSUMPTIONS STATUS QUO PLAN BUDGET ITEMS

Financial Plan. Section 8 STATUS QUO PLAN STATUS QUO PLAN ASSUMPTIONS STATUS QUO PLAN BUDGET ITEMS Section 8 Financial Plan This final section of the TDP contains the financial information with regard to the improvements described in Section 7, Alternatives. The financial information is divided into

More information

Governor s FY 2019 Revised, FY 2020 and Capital Budget Recommendations House Finance Committee April 9, 2019

Governor s FY 2019 Revised, FY 2020 and Capital Budget Recommendations House Finance Committee April 9, 2019 Governor s FY 2019 Revised, FY 2020 and Capital Budget Recommendations House Finance Committee April 9, 2019 Quasi-public agency Established in 1964 Responsible: Fixed route bus service and Americans with

More information

Cash & Liquidity The chart below highlights CTA s cash position at June 2014 compared to June 2013.

Cash & Liquidity The chart below highlights CTA s cash position at June 2014 compared to June 2013. To: Chicago Transit Authority Board From: Ron DeNard, Chief Financial Officer Re: Financial Results for June 2014 Date: August 13, 2014 I. Summary CTA s financial results are $4.0 million favorable for

More information

Management Committee Meeting date: March 8, 2017 For the Metropolitan Council meeting of March 22, 2017

Management Committee Meeting date: March 8, 2017 For the Metropolitan Council meeting of March 22, 2017 Business Item No. 2017-42 JT Management Committee Meeting date: March 8, 2017 For the Metropolitan Council meeting of March 22, 2017 Subject: 2017 Unified Budget Amendment Carryforward Amendment District(s),

More information

FY 2018 Adopted Wake Transit Work Plan

FY 2018 Adopted Wake Transit Work Plan FY 2018 Adopted Wake Transit Work Plan Fiscal Year (FY 2018) Wake Transit Work Plan Table of Contents FY 2018 Wake Transit Work Plan Introduction 3 FY 2018 Operating Budget & Multi-Year Operating Program

More information

Transit Subsidy. Mission Statement. Mandates

Transit Subsidy. Mission Statement. Mandates Mission Statement The Potomac and Rappahannock Transportation Commission (PRTC) is a multi-jurisdictional agency representing Prince William, Stafford, and Spotsylvania Counties and the Cities of Manassas,

More information

THE SUBURBAN BUS DIVISION OF THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY SERVING NORTHEASTERN ILLINOIS

THE SUBURBAN BUS DIVISION OF THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY SERVING NORTHEASTERN ILLINOIS THE SUBURBAN BUS DIVISION OF THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY SERVING NORTHEASTERN ILLINOIS COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013 2013 Comprehensive Annual Financial

More information

2016 Budget. Lakewood, Washington

2016 Budget. Lakewood, Washington 2016 Budget Lakewood, Washington Mission Statement Pierce Transit improves people s quality of life by providing safe, reliable, innovative and useful transportation services that are locally based and

More information

Chapter 9 Financial Considerations. 9.1 Introduction

Chapter 9 Financial Considerations. 9.1 Introduction 9.1 Introduction Chapter 9 This chapter presents anticipated costs, revenues, and funding for the NEPA BART Extension Alternative. A summary of VTA s financial plan for the BART Extension Alternative is

More information

Governor s FY 2018 Revised, FY 2019 and Capital Budget Recommendations House Finance Committee April 12, 2018

Governor s FY 2018 Revised, FY 2019 and Capital Budget Recommendations House Finance Committee April 12, 2018 Governor s FY 2018 Revised, FY 2019 and Capital Budget Recommendations House Finance Committee April 12, 2018 Quasi-public agency Established in 1964 Responsible: Fixed route bus service and Americans

More information

CHICAGO TRANSIT AUTHORITY CHICAGO, ILLINOIS

CHICAGO TRANSIT AUTHORITY CHICAGO, ILLINOIS CHICAGO, ILLINOIS FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Years Ended (With Independent Auditor s Report Thereon) Chicago, Illinois FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Years Ended TABLE OF CONTENTS Independent

More information

Spokane Transit Authority Adopted 2019 Operating and Capital Budgets. November 15, 2018 Board Meeting Resolution Number:

Spokane Transit Authority Adopted 2019 Operating and Capital Budgets. November 15, 2018 Board Meeting Resolution Number: Spokane Transit Authority Adopted 2019 Operating and Capital Budgets November 15, 2018 Board Meeting Resolution Number: 764-18 Vision Vision/Mission We aspire to be a source of pride for the region. Mission

More information

TRANSPORTATION & WORKS Transit 2006 BUDGET & BUSINESS PLAN. SERVICE: Transit

TRANSPORTATION & WORKS Transit 2006 BUDGET & BUSINESS PLAN. SERVICE: Transit 2006 BUDGET & BUSINESS PLAN SERVICE: TABLE OF CONTENTS TRANSPORTATION AND WORKS TRANSPORTATION AND WORKS... SECTION L Services Overview... L-21 Performance Measures...L-25 Operating Program Listing...

More information

JANUARY FY Monthly Financial and Operational Report. Rhode Island Public Transit Authority

JANUARY FY Monthly Financial and Operational Report. Rhode Island Public Transit Authority JANUARY FY 2019 Monthly Financial and Operational Report Rhode Island Public Transit Authority Financial Summary As of December FY 2019 Budget Actual Variance % Variance Revenues $ 64,896,602 $ 58,000,401

More information

Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority

Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority Single Audit Reports for the Year Ended December 31, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Audited Financial Statements Management s Discussion and Analysis... 1 Independent

More information

OCTOBER FY Monthly Financial and Operational Report. Rhode Island Public Transit Authority

OCTOBER FY Monthly Financial and Operational Report. Rhode Island Public Transit Authority OCTOBER FY 2019 Monthly Financial and Operational Report Rhode Island Public Transit Authority Financial Summary As of September FY 2019 Year to Date Budget Actual Variance % Variance $ 32,562,540 $ 28,304,800

More information

FIVE-YEAR BASELINE SERVICE PLAN & FINANCIAL FORECAST

FIVE-YEAR BASELINE SERVICE PLAN & FINANCIAL FORECAST CHAPTER 7 FIVE-YEAR BASELINE SERVICE PLAN & FINANCIAL FORECAST This plan is financially constrained based on a status quo service level for the following elements over the five year planning period of

More information

Governor s FY 2017 Revised, FY 2018 and Capital Budget Recommendations House Finance Committee April 12, 2017

Governor s FY 2017 Revised, FY 2018 and Capital Budget Recommendations House Finance Committee April 12, 2017 Governor s FY 2017 Revised, FY 2018 and Capital Budget Recommendations House Finance Committee April 12, 2017 Quasi-public agency Established in 1964 Responsible: Fixed route bus service and Americans

More information

GM/CEO s Proposed FY2020 Budget

GM/CEO s Proposed FY2020 Budget Finance and Capital Committee Information Item IV-A November 1, 2018 GM/CEO s Proposed FY2020 Budget Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary Action Information MEAD

More information

TRAVEL REGULATIONS 2. TRAVEL BY INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE NOT STATE EMPLOYEES

TRAVEL REGULATIONS 2. TRAVEL BY INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE NOT STATE EMPLOYEES 1. AUTHORITY FOR TRAVEL TRAVEL REGULATIONS a. In State travel: Needs only be approved by the department head. No authorization forms are necessary. b. Out of state travel: An out of state travel authorization

More information

Chapel Hill Transit Strategic and Financial Sustainability Plan Update

Chapel Hill Transit Strategic and Financial Sustainability Plan Update Chapel Hill Transit Strategic and Financial Sustainability Plan Update ACT January 21, 2015 Today s Agenda Overview of Chapel Hill Transit Performance Overview Funding Overview Key Challenges Overview

More information

Financial Analysis Working Paper 1 Existing Funding Sources Draft: April 2007

Financial Analysis Working Paper 1 Existing Funding Sources Draft: April 2007 Financial Analysis Working Paper 1 Existing Funding Sources Draft: April 2007 Prepared for: By: TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... 1 REVIEW OF FRED AND VRE EXISTING FUNDING SOURCES... 1 Federal Funding...

More information

Overview of Minnesota Highway and Transit Finance. Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee June 22, 2015 and July 13, 2015

Overview of Minnesota Highway and Transit Finance. Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee June 22, 2015 and July 13, 2015 Overview of Minnesota Highway and Transit Finance Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee June 22, 2015 and July 13, 2015 Today s topics MN and Metro Area transportation revenues and expenditures

More information

Title VI Fare Equity Analysis

Title VI Fare Equity Analysis Pioneer Valley Transit Authority Title VI Fare Equity Analysis Prepared by the Pioneer Valley Planning Commission April 12, 2012 PVTA TITLE VI FARE EQUITY ANALYSIS APRIL 12, 2012 1. CONFORMANCE WITH REGULATORY

More information

Whatcom Transportation Authority

Whatcom Transportation Authority Whatcom Transportation Authority Annual Budget 2011 Table of Contents Executive Memorandum... 1 WTA Mission... 2 WTA Vision Destination 2020... 3 Key Objectives... 4 Budget Initiatives... 5 Budget Assumptions...

More information

MiWay Business Plan and 2015 Budget

MiWay Business Plan and 2015 Budget MiWay 2015-2018 Business Plan and 2015 Budget Agenda Existing Core Services Vision and Mission Service Delivery Model Service Level Issues and Trends Service Area Information Accomplishments Benchmarks

More information

Wake County. People love to be connected. In our cyberspace. transit plan CONNECTING PEOPLE, CONNECTING THE COUNTY

Wake County. People love to be connected. In our cyberspace. transit plan CONNECTING PEOPLE, CONNECTING THE COUNTY Wake County transit plan CONNECTING PEOPLE, CONNECTING THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY People love to be connected. In our cyberspace driven world, people can stay connected pretty much all of the time. Connecting

More information

Local Cost Allocation Options

Local Cost Allocation Options Local Cost Allocation Options presented to SCAT Revenue Study Committee August 2010 Agenda Welcome and Introductions SCAT Budget Update Local Cost Allocation Options Review Local and National Case Studies

More information

Sacramento Transportation Authority Sacramento Abandoned Vehicle Service Authority. Final Budget. Fiscal Year 2015/16

Sacramento Transportation Authority Sacramento Abandoned Vehicle Service Authority. Final Budget. Fiscal Year 2015/16 Sacramento Transportation Authority Sacramento Abandoned Vehicle Service Authority Final Budget Fiscal Year 2015/16 Introduction Message to the Governing Board The Sacramento Transportation Authority (STA)

More information

FORT WORTH TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

FORT WORTH TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY FINANCIAL REPORT SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 C O N T E N T S INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT... 1 MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS... 3 Page BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Statements of Net Assets... 8 Statements

More information

Public Transit Services Summary of Submitted 2015 Budget From Rates

Public Transit Services Summary of Submitted 2015 Budget From Rates Public Transit Services Summary of Submitted 2015 From Rates Service Expense 2014 2015 Revised Draft Non Tax Revenue Net Tax Supported Expense Non Tax Revenue Net Tax Supported Increase / (Decrease) Over

More information

Victor Valley Transit Authority

Victor Valley Transit Authority ANNUAL OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 2017 2018 (As approved by the Board of Directors) June 19, 2017 FY 2018 Budget BUDGET NOTES & ASSUMPTIONS Line no. Department Note/Assumption 1 ADA, Fxd

More information

Cash & Liquidity The chart below highlights CTA s cash position at November 2014 compared to November 2013.

Cash & Liquidity The chart below highlights CTA s cash position at November 2014 compared to November 2013. To: Chicago Transit Authority Board From: Ronald E. DeNard, Chief Financial Officer Re: Financial Results for November 2014 Date: January 12, 2015 I. Summary CTA s financial results are $1.9 million unfavorable

More information

PROPOSED AND CAPITAL BUDGETS

PROPOSED AND CAPITAL BUDGETS PROPOSED 2010 OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGETS Adopted December by Board 16, 2009 Resolution Board Meeting #656-09 December 16, 2009 1 Table of Contents Page(s) Executive Summary 3-10 Source and Use of Funds:

More information

VALLEY METRO RPTA FY18 Budget EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

VALLEY METRO RPTA FY18 Budget EXECUTIVE SUMMARY VALLEY METRO RPTA FY18 Budget EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FY18 ADOPTED ANNUAL OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET Valley Metro Regional Public Transportation Authority (RPTA) provides public transportation services for

More information

CAPITAL TRANSIT MISSION STATEMENT FY13 PROPOSED BUDGET $6,707,900 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CORE SERVICES FUNDING SOURCES FOR CAPITAL TRANSIT

CAPITAL TRANSIT MISSION STATEMENT FY13 PROPOSED BUDGET $6,707,900 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CORE SERVICES FUNDING SOURCES FOR CAPITAL TRANSIT MISSION STATEMENT Capital Transit is a service program of the Public Works Department. The Public Works Department s mission is to ensure water and wastewater utilities, waste management, public transportation,

More information

Whatcom Transportation Authority

Whatcom Transportation Authority Whatcom Transportation Authority Annual Budget 12/14/2017 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Whatcom Transportation Authority (WTA) Annual Budget Table of Contents General Manager s Budget Message... 2

More information

Adopted 2018 OPERATING BUDGET Two-Year Financial Plan and Five-Year CAPITAL PROGRAM

Adopted 2018 OPERATING BUDGET Two-Year Financial Plan and Five-Year CAPITAL PROGRAM 2018 Adopted 2018 OPERATING BUDGET Two-Year Financial Plan and Five-Year CAPITAL PROGRAM MOVING YOU Northeastern Illinois December 2017 RTA Board of Directors Kirk Dillard Chairman Anthony K. Anderson

More information

BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE EASTERN SIERRA TRANSIT AUTHORITY

BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE EASTERN SIERRA TRANSIT AUTHORITY BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE EASTERN SIERRA TRANSIT AUTHORITY Regular Meeting Friday September 16, 2016 Town of Mammoth Lakes Council Chambers Minaret Village Shopping Center, Suite Z Mammoth Lakes, California

More information

BOROUGH OF POTTSTOWN URBAN OPERATING ASSISTANCE PROGRAM

BOROUGH OF POTTSTOWN URBAN OPERATING ASSISTANCE PROGRAM BOROUGH OF POTTSTOWN URBAN OPERATING ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Year Ended June 30, 2015 C e r t i fi e d P u b l i c A c c o u n t a n t s a n d B u s i n e

More information

The Potomac and Rappahannock Transportation Commission (PRTC) is a multijurisdictional agency representing Prince William, Stafford and Spotsylvania

The Potomac and Rappahannock Transportation Commission (PRTC) is a multijurisdictional agency representing Prince William, Stafford and Spotsylvania Planning and Development Development Services, Department of Economic Development, Department of Housing and Community Development, Office of Planning Prince William County/ Manassas Convention and Visitors

More information

Regional Transportation Commission Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada. Annual Budget

Regional Transportation Commission Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada. Annual Budget Regional Transportation Commission Reno, Sparks and Washoe County, Nevada Annual Budget for Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2018 ALL FUNDS THREE YEAR COMPARISON OF REVENUES BY SOURCE FINAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL

More information

FY 2019 Draft Wake Transit Work Plan

FY 2019 Draft Wake Transit Work Plan FY 2019 Draft Wake Transit Work Plan Fiscal Year (FY) 2019 Draft Wake Transit Work Plan Table of Contents FY 2019 Wake Transit Work Plan Introduction 2 FY 2019 Operating Budget & Multi-Year Operating Program

More information

The DRAFT Bus and Rail Investment Plan in Orange County

The DRAFT Bus and Rail Investment Plan in Orange County The DRAFT Bus and Rail Investment Plan in Orange County 5/31/2012 The Bus and Rail Investment Plan in Orange County I. INTRODUCTION 3 II. TRANSIT STEPS LEADING UP TO THIS PLAN 4 III. PLAN ELEMENTS 5 A.

More information

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT, COLORADO

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT, COLORADO REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT, COLORADO Series 2004 Lease RTD Active Fleet of the District Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2013 Fixed Route Bus Fleet Number RTD Owned Fixed Route Buses 40' Transit Coaches

More information

Program Evaluation and Audit COUNTY CONTRACTOR ADA COST REVIEW DARTS AND SCOTT COUNTY

Program Evaluation and Audit COUNTY CONTRACTOR ADA COST REVIEW DARTS AND SCOTT COUNTY Program Evaluation and Audit COUNTY CONTRACTOR ADA COST REVIEW DARTS AND SCOTT COUNTY October 27, 2006 Background INTRODUCTION The Metropolitan Council contracts with four County governments (Anoka, Dakota,

More information

Public Authorities by the Numbers: Capital District Transportation Authority

Public Authorities by the Numbers: Capital District Transportation Authority Public Authorities by the Numbers: Capital District Transportation Authority June 2016 Table of Contents I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 1 II. CAPITAL DISTRICT TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY BY THE NUMBERS... 2 Introduction...

More information

Approval of Proposed FY 2019 Annual Budget and 20-Year Financial Plan

Approval of Proposed FY 2019 Annual Budget and 20-Year Financial Plan Approval of Proposed FY 2019 Annual Budget and 20-Year Financial Plan Committee of the Whole September 11, 2018 Joseph G. Costello Senior Vice President, Finance 0 Board Calendar Date Subject July 10 Draft

More information