MN Asphalt Construction & Quality Workshop

Transcription

1 MN Asphalt Construction & Quality Workshop

2 1. Construction Program Outlook 2. Delayed Budget Projects 3. Project Selection Audit 4. MnSHIP 5. New Funding Priorities 6. Corridors of Commerce 7. Balanced letting schedule

3

4

5 A reader-friendly companion document to the STIP. One line = one project. Not a replacement for the STIP. Better communicate MnDOT s trunk highway capital program to the Legislature and general public.

6

7 Construction Outlook Funding by Source (in millions of dollars)

8 Nov 2015 Forecast Nov 2016 Forecast

9 State Road Construction (SRC) Program by STIP Year STATE ROAD CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM FUNDING BY SOURCE AND YEAR ($ MILLIONS) SOURCE TOTAL* Formula Federal Funds ,505 High Priority Projects (Demo) & Other Federal Advance Construction Trunk Highway ,250 TOTAL* 1, ,241 *may not total correctly due to rounding 220

10 Construction Outlook Funding by Source (in millions of dollars)

11 Anticipated Construction Revenue by Year Including Adjustments for Inflation $1,600 $1,400 Capital Revenue for State Road Construction (Millions) $1,200 $1,000 $800 $600 $400 $200 $- Projected Revenue in Year of State Fiscal Year Projected Revenue Adjusted Source: DRAFT OPEN FOR PUBLIC REVIEW Minnesota State Highway Investme

12 MnDOT Construction Cost Index (CCI) Inflation Forecast (Oct Snapshot)

13 Inflation History and Forecast CCI Inflation History & Regression Trend +25% Actual Year-to-Year Linear Trend +20% +15% +10% +5% +0% (5%) (10%) SFY

14 STATE ROAD CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM FUNDING BY DISTRICT/ATP AND YEAR ($ MILLIONS) DISTRICT/ATP TOTAL* SUBTOTAL* ,815 METRO ,238 MISC TOTAL* 1, ,241 *may not total correctly due to rounding

15 Construction Projects in Calendar Years By Program Program Bridge Replacement Number of Projects Cost in Millions Major Construction Reconstruction Recondition Resurface TOTAL 161 1,257

16 Chapter 152 Bridge Projects Projects including I35W Lake Street Kennedy Bridge in East Grand Forks Lake Orono Bridge Winona Bridge Red Wing Bridge Projects Baudette Bridge Oslo Bridge TH 28 Bridge 2019 MN 40 Bridge west of Milan

17 Construction Projects in Next Twenty-four Months Estimate Cost > $15 Million PROJECT TOTAL* 1 MN 1 RECONSTRUCT THE HIGHWAY IN THE EAGLES NEST LAKE AREA 19 DISTRICT ROUTE PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2 US 2 RECONSTRUCT KENNEDY BRIDGE DECK IN EAST GRAND FORKS 18 2 MN 72 REPLACE INTERNATIONAL BRIDGE IN BAUDETTE 16 6 MN 43 WINONA BRIDGE WORK PACKAGE # US 63 REPLACE HWY 63 RED WING BRIDGE MN 22 RECONSTRUCT FROM MAPLETON TO BLUE EARTH CR MN 60 COMPLETE THE 4-LANE FROM WINDOM TO MOUNTAIN LAKE 27 7 US 14 REPLACE BRIDGES OVER MN RIVER AND DME RR IN NEW ULM 39 8 US 12 RAILROAD BYPASS ON WEST SIDE OF WILLMAR. 32 M I 35W CONSTRUCT MNPASS LANE & CONSTRUCT TRANSIT STATION 221 M I 94 RESURFACE AND REPAIR CONCRETE, IMPROVE AND REPAIR SIDEWALK, DRAINAGE, AND REPAIR 53 BRIDGES M I 35 RESURFACE ROAD, REPLACE 3 BRIDGES NEAR FOREST LAKE 51 M I 494 RESURFACE, CONSTRUCT AUXILIARY LANE, & REPAIR BRIDGE 16 M US 169 RESURFACE AND ADD REDUCED CONFLICT INTERSECTION 17 M I 35W CONSTRUCT MNPASS LANE, RESURFACE, & 19 BRIDGES 130 *Includes other state and local shares 43

18

19 MnDOT needs a state appropriation to utilize Federal dollars The transportation funding bill did not pass in The Legislative Advisory Commission may approve using Federal funds between sessions. The LAC did not approve. Results - $105 million worth of projects will not be advertised for letting until after budget authority is received.

20 ATP Route System Proj num #Year Letting Date 6 MN /23/ MN /27/ US /19/ MN /9/ MN /18/ MN /27/ US /24/ MN /24/ MN /28/ MN /24/ MN /24/ US /23/ MN /24/ MN /16/ MN C /1/ US /28/ US /24/ US /28/ MN M /16/ MN /16/ US /24/ US S /24/ US A /24/ MN /16/ US /24/2017 M I 35W /28/2017 M MN /27/2017 M MN /24/2017 M US /16/2016 M MN /24/2017

21

22 MnDOT should take steps to improve the transparency of its standard project-selection process. Create a programming resources web page. Implement best stakeholder engagement practices and training on the regular program selection process. Score or rank all candidate projects in the special programs. Formalize the role of the 10-year investment plan in the selection process.

23

24 MnDOT should ensure that its Corridors of Commerce scoring criteria are aligned with the statutorily defined criteria and that it applies these criteria consistently. The Legislature should require MnDOT to annually report a detailed description of the selection criteria it used to select projects and a ranking of all eligible projects for the Corridors of Commerce program.

25 Write definitions and scoring methods for all seven statutory prioritization criteria. Identify and write definitions and scoring methods for any MnDOT added criteria (geographic distribution, readiness, conformance with regional plans). Evaluate and score/rank all of the eligible nominated projects. Include all of this information in the next report to the legislature.

26 The Legislature and MnDOT should limit programs or agreements that require the initiation of trunk highway projects less than three years into the future. Develop objective methods of determining the value of readiness. Develop a financial management plan that describes the eventual new projects accomplished with and because of the new funding.

27 MnDOT should develop a transparent long-term planning and prioritization process for expansion projects funded through alternative processes. Formalize the shelf project selection process with objective criteria. Develop a method for selecting and ranking capacity projects from new or specially designated funding sources.

28 MnDOT should track local government spending on trunk highways. Define local investments practical to track and record. Develop and implement a tracking mechanism.

29

30

31 Investments in the state highway system have not kept pace with needed work over the last four years resulting in an increase of $3 billion for deferred maintenance More accurate assessment of the actual cost of program and project delivery including real estate costs and engineering which increases the gap by $2 billion The cost to deliver the program is a function of the size of the program. Because the overall need number has grown, program and project delivery costs have also increased by $1 billion Inflation growth of $3 billion will occur as the years change from to

32

33

34 Illustrate what it is MnDOT would do with additional funds (between $1-5 billion) Use existing plans to inform our needs and strategies Minnesota GO Statewide Multimodal Transportation Plan MnSHIP Transportation Asset Management Plan Transportation Policy Plan Communicate benefits of additional capital investments 34

35 5 billion 65% 35% 3 billion 73% 27% 1 billion 82% 18% 0% 100% Asset Management Critical Strategic Connections Expansion 35

36 Governor s proposal for spending approximately $6 billion in new revenue over 10 years. Specific listing of projects that would be representative of projects funded at the $600 million per year funding level. Without new funding, the numbers of major projects will be limited.

37

38 1. Return on investment 2. Impacts on commerce and economic competitiveness 3. Efficiency in the movement of freight 4. Improvements to traffic safety 5. Connections to trade centers, local systems, and other modes 6. Addresses multiple transportation policy objectives 7. Support among members of the surrounding community

39 Projects being readied. Hwy 14 & 15 intersection New Ulm I-94 St. Michael to Albertville lane addition Hwy 11 Greenbush to Warroad passing lanes Hwy 14 Owatonna to Dodge Center lane addition Hwy 23 New London to Paynesville lane addition Hwy 23 - Paynesville to Richmond lane addition I-35W Minnesota River crossing I-35W Northern suburbs MnPASS Hwy 65 Central Avenue bridge deck I-94 Minneapolis and St. Paul

40

41 Goal of attracting more bidders. Contractors are better able to plan work and make better bids. Construction projects have better workload balance. MnDOT has greater efficiency in processing bid documents. MnDOT is better able to balance financial resources. MnDOT is committed to deliver projects to the public on time.

42

43 Mark Gieseke MnDOT Office of Transportation System Management Phone: