Capital Improvements Program (CIP)

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Capital Improvements Program (CIP)"

Transcription

1 Capital Improvements Program (CIP) 373

2 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM Introduction In accordance with the Texas Local Government Code and the Charter of the City of Southlake, the proposed FY 2017 to FY 2021 Capital Improvements Program (CIP) is submitted for City Council consideration. FY 2017 CIP Calendar April 2016 CIP Project Forms Due May 2016 technical Committee Review The challenges to retain and/or expand City services in the midst of shrinking resources and increasing costs has put pressure on City government to make its limited capital resources work more efficiently. City administration, elected and appointed officials, and staff have taken several steps to make its capital expenditures more closely reflect its long-range objectives. June 2016 July 2016 August 2016 Final Technical Committee review City Manager Review spdc / Parks Board recommendation City Manager Files City Council Work Session One such step is the connection between the City s capital planning efforts with its budgeting process. September 2016 City Council Work Session The CIP establishes a five year funding schedule for 1st Reading and Public Hearing the purchase, construction, or replacement of physical assets of the City. Capital improvements typically City Council 2nd Reading have a useful life of more than ten years and value and Public Hearing greater than $10,000. The first year of the Capital Improvements Program is called the Capital and is appropriated in the same manner as the annual Operating. s for projects are appropriated on an annual basis. Projects approved for subsequent years are approved for planning purposes only and do not receive expenditure authority until they are part of the Capital. Creating the Capital Improvements Program In May 2016, the CIP Technical Committee comprised of the Assistant City Managers and Department Directors began the process of evaluating CIP project requests. The methodology involved a presentation of each project by a staff member of the requesting department and the use of the CIP project evaluation form. Following presentation by each requesting department, the projects were ranked in the appropriate funding category (i.e. General, Utility, SPDC). The resulting ranked project list was then reviewed by the Technical Committee to ensure that there were no obvious flaws in the ranking system. The Technical Committee then reviewed the dollar amount available in each fund and recommended the projects to be funded in the upcoming fiscal year (FY 2017) and the other four (4) future years (FY 2018 to FY 2021). Once the Technical Committee completed its review, the list was presented to the City Manager who then met with the Technical Committee regarding needed changes or additions. The Technical Committee input revisions and held additional meetings with department heads as needed to ensure the proposed plan is comprehensive. Prior to the City Manager s submission of the Capital, the Southlake Parks Development Corporation (SPDC) and the Parks Board met to review and recommend their respective portions of the budget and five-year plan. 374

3 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM Relationship Between the Capital Improvements Program and the Annual The City s annual budget itemizes and appropriates the funds needed for all municipal purposes during the next fiscal year, and is comprised of two separate budgets - the Operating and the Capital Projects. The Operating includes the day-to-day operational expenses of the City, such as salaries, supplies and expenses for programmatic activities. The Capital Improvements Program includes the anticipated capital project costs for the next five fiscal years. The first year of projects contained in the CIP become the basis for formulating the Capital Projects. Relationship Between the Capital Improvements Program and the City s Planning Process Comprehensive plans are official public documents adopted by local governments as policy guides to making decisions about physical development of the community in the next 20 years. The City of Southlake s current comprehensive plan, the Southlake 2030 Plan, includes a number of citywide plans that prioritize the development of thoroughfares, sidewalks, trails, and parks. The Park, Recreation and Open Space/Community Facilities Plan, the Mobility Plan, the Water Plan, and others, provide recommendations that link the future vision of the community to relatively short-term actions. Recognizing the importance of the link between the Capital Improvements Program and implementation of the master plan, proposed projects are required to demonstrate linkage to one of the City s master plans. By using the Capital Improvements Program process to reinforce the desired master plan priorities, the City s physical future can be better shaped. Additionally, each project sheet and the project matrix identifies, when appropriate, connection to a project identified in the City s comprehensive plan. Relationship Between the Capital Improvements Program and the Biennial Citizen Survey In 2015, the City completed its most recent biennial citizen satisfaction survey. Results of the City s satisfaction survey are put to use in several ways, including playing key roles in the City s comprehensive plan update (Southlake 2030 Plan), in the development of each Department s proposed budget and in the City s performance measures. Survey results are also critical to the development of this year s Capital Projects. Many recurring themes emerged throughout the survey responses, several of which have a direct link with the preparation and execution of the City s CIP. For example, the City surveyed respondents regarding not only the importance they place on City services but also the satisfaction respondents had with those services. The gap between the importance placed on a service and the satisfaction with that service indicates areas where the City is not meeting our customers expectations. The City developed a chart (see next page) listing the top gap issues and has also created a plan to address each issue. Of those top gap issues, all are related to areas that can be addressed through the City s capital programming: manage traffic congestion, provide pedestrian pathways and sidewalks, and provide bicycle facilities on streets and trails. The Benefits of Capital Programming With time, public facilities need major repair, replacement or expansion. Maintaining and upgrading a community s capital stock requires significant financial investment. This investment must be weighed against other community needs and analyzed in light of community goals. The City of Southlake, like many cities, is under pressure to make efficient use of capital resources and must make difficult 375

4 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM Gap Threshold: Any service with a 25% or higher gap is identified for prioritization choices. There are more needs than can be satisfied at once, and the selection of one investment over another may shape the development of the City for years to come. Capital improvements programming is a valuable tool to ensure that choices are made wisely. The City s development goals are implemented, in part, by the careful provision of capital facilities. The benefits of this systematic approach to planning capital projects include the following: Focuses attention on community goals, needs, and capabilities. Through capital improvements programming, capital projects can be brought into line with the City s long-range plans by balancing identified needs with financial capacities. Considered individually, a new park, water system improvements, and street widening may be great ideas; however, each project may look quite different when, in the course of the Capital Improvements Program process, it is forced to compete directly with other projects for limited funds. Optimizes use of the taxpayer s dollar. The Capital Improvements Program helps the City Council and City Manager make sound annual budget decisions. Careful planning of capital improvements helps prevent costly mistakes. In addition, capital planning allows the City to save money in several other ways. For example, investors in municipal bonds tend to look more favorably on communities that have a Capital Improvements Program; if bond financing is selected for a capital improvement project, the City may realize significant savings on interest. 376

5 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM Guides future growth and development. The location and capacity of capital improvements shape the growth and development of the City. City decision makers can use the Capital Improvements Program to develop well thought-out policies to guide future land use and economic development. Encourages efficient government. Interdepartmental coordination of capital improvements programming can reduce scheduling conflicts and ensure that no single function receives more than its fair share of resources. In addition, the CIP can be used to promote innovative management techniques and improve governmental efficiency and effectiveness. Improves the basis for intergovernmental and regional cooperation. Capital improvements programming offers public officials of all governmental units (City of Southlake, Tarrant and Denton Counties, and local school districts) an opportunity to plan the location, timing, and financing of improvements in the interest of the community as a whole. Maintains a sound and stable financial program. Having to make large or frequent unplanned expenditures can endanger the financial well-being of the City. Sharp changes in the tax structure or bonded indebtedness may be avoided when construction projects are planned in advance and scheduled at intervals over a number of years. When there is ample time for planning, the most economical means of financing each project can be selected in advance. Furthermore, a CIP can help the City avoid commitments and debts that would prevent the initiation of other important projects at a later date. Enhances opportunities for participation in federal or state grant programs. Preparing a CIP improves the City s chance of obtaining aid through federal and state programs that provide funds for planning, construction and financing of capital improvements. The CIP is considered a public works shelf that contains projects that can be started quickly by having construction or bid documents ready should any grants become available. Potential ing Sources The FY 2017 Capital contains 38 projects submitted by various City Departments. The total cost of all projects submitted for FY 2017 represents an expenditure of $23,275,000. Although the Strategic Initiative provides cash for pay-as-you-go capital projects, the City may still borrow to build needed infrastructure. A portion of the revenue generated by the property tax rate is allocated to support long-term bond projects through the Debt Service (see the Debt Services Expenditures section for more information). This budget proposes that ten cents of the current tax rate be allocated to support the City s General debt. Fees and special revenue are used to support special purpose debt. A Capital Improvements Program details the projects and costs for a five-year period and identifies future unfunded projects. Debt Service s as well as cash provide the needed money to build these projects. The following is a summary of the funding sources for these projects: cash For FY 2017, the Capital includes cash funding in the amount of $12,200,000. This includes funds transferred from the Strategic Initiative as well as cash from other funding sources such as the Utility, Impact Fee funds, Storm Water Utility, the Hotel Occupancy Tax, the Park Dedication Fee and the Southlake Parks Development Corporation. For FY 2017, the Capital will be 52% (or $12,200,000) cash funded while the remainder will be funded through the issuance of bonds. 377

6 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM Bonds When the City sells bonds, purchasers are, in effect, lending the City money. The money is repaid, with interest, from taxes or fees over the years. The logic behind issuing bonds for capital projects is that the citizens who benefit from the capital improvements over a period of time should help the City pay for them. The City can issue bonds in these forms: General Obligation (G.O.) Bonds Perhaps the most flexible of all capital funding sources, G.O. bonds can be used for the design or construction of any capital project. These bonds are financed through property taxes. In financing through this method, the taxing power of the City is pledged to pay interest and principal to retire the debt. Voter approval is required if the City wants to increase the taxes that it levies and the amount is included in the City s state-imposed debt limits. To minimize the need for property tax increases, the City makes every effort to coordinate new bond issues with the retirement of previous bonds. Certificates of Obligation (C.O.) Bonds Similar to general obligation bonds except the certificates require no voter approval. Combination tax and revenue certificates of obligation are issued for both governmental and business type activities. General obligation bonds, governmental revenue bonds and tax notes pledge the full faith and credit of the City. Combination tax and revenue certificates of obligation are payable from the net revenues of the water and sewer system and general debt service tax. Revenue Bonds Revenue bonds are sold for projects that produce revenues, such as water and sewer system projects. Revenue bonds depend on user charges and other project-related income to cover their costs. Impact on Operating Annual operating costs can include personnel, scheduled repair and maintenance and utilities in the case of buildings. These operating cost estimates are developed by the project managers during the project development process and for those projects in the FY 2017 Capital, estimates are included on each project information sheet and the fund matrix (see following pages in this section). Staff also provides operating cost estimates for projects programmed in the future years (see chart and table at right). To prepare for the future and avoid shortfalls, the City uses the annual operating cost estimates to plan and develop future budgets. The full operating impact of the five-year Capital Improvements Program has been factored into the City s forecasting and multi-year financial plans and will be integrated into future budgets once those projects are completed and in operation. As shown in the chart and table at right, for the current CIP, the bulk of these out-year costs can be attributed to personnel and maintenance related to the Bicentennial Park Improvements and The Marq - Phase 2. The majority of theses costs will be borne by the Community Enhancement and Development Corporation and the Southlake Parks Development Corporation. In future years, the General will absorb operating costs related to roadway landscape maintenance and maintenance of an urban enhancement project. 378

7 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM FY CIP All s Operational Impact Impacted Project Name FY 2017 Maintenance FY 2017 Personnel FY 2018 Maintenance FY 2018 Personnel FY 2019 Maintenance FY 2019 Personnel FY 2020 Maintenance FY 2020 Personnel FY 2021 Maintenance FY 2021 Personnel General Kirkwood Boulevard Improvements and Urban Enhancements FM 1709 at Southlake Marketplace Improvements and Signalization $- $- $- $- $10,000 $- $10,000 $- $10,000 $- $- $- $2,000 $- $2,000 $- $2,000 $- $2,000 $- Community Enhancement and Development Corporation The Marq - Phase 2 $390,000 $435,000 $800,000 $1,000,000 $1,400,000 $1,800,000 $1,500,000 $1,900,000 $1,600,000 $2,000,000 Southlake Parks Development Corporation Bicentennial Park Phase 3 $- $- $50,000 $- $,000 $- $,000 $- $,000 $- S: $390,000 $435,000 $852,000 $1,000,000 $1,512,000 $1,800,000 $1,612,000 $1,900,000 $1,712,000 $2,000,

8 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM Current Capital Project Status For information about current projects, please visit the City s website at FY 2017 Capital and Capital Improvements Plan The following pages in this section contain a listing of the Technical Committee s recommended five-year CIP by fund type. Project status forms have also been included for all projects in the Capital. These sheets provide more detail about each project by listing not only approved funding but how those funds will be spent. 380

9 All s Total Capital Improvements Program - All s Total 381

10 All s Total Total Prior ing FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 Beyond / Unfunded Total General $23,600,000 $5,250,000 $7,325,000 $6,560,000 $8,010,000 $6,670,000 $24,795,000 $82,210,000 Utility $6,520,000 $4,725,000 $4,850,000 $6,300,000 $6,300,000 $6,250,000 $2,200,000 $37,145,000 Roadway Impact Fee $0 $200,000 $650,000 $450,000 $300,000 $1,400,000 $0 $3,000,000 Water Impact Fee $1,450,000 $800,000 $,000 $,000 $,000 $,000 $0 $2,650,000 Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee $1,700,000 $950,000 $,000 $,000 $,000 $,000 $0 $3,050,000 Storm Water Utility System $1,,000 $1,050,000 $2,000,000 $1,850,000 $1,000,000 $11,250,000 $3,900 $18,253,900 Park Dedication $0 $,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $,000 Hotel Occupancy Tax $400,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $0 $1,400,000 Community Enhancement & Development Corporation Southlake Parks Development Corporation $32,291,000 $6,400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $38,691,000 $3,602,000 $3,600,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $69,410,000 $85,612,000 Grand Total All s: $70,663,000 $23,275,000 $18,225,000 $17,560,000 $18,010,000 $27,970,000 $96,408,900 $272,111,900 FY 2017 Capital - Allocation by UTILITY FUND 20% GENERAL FUND 23% ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND 1% WATER IMPACT FEE 3% SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE 4% STORM WATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND 5% SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 15% PARK DEDICATION FUND 0% HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND 1% COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION FUND 28% 382

11 All s Total FY 2017 Capital - Allocation by Project Type WATER 14% STORM WATER 5% SIDEWALKS & TRAILS 0.43% SEWER 12% FACILITIES 30% ROADS 23% PARKS 15% 383

12 Proposed CIP Expenses FY 2018 & Beyond GENERAL FUND UTILITY FUND OTHER (IMPACT FEE FUNDS, PARK DEDICATION, SWUS AND HOT) SPDC All s Total $120,000 $,000 PROJECT FUNDING IN 1,000S OF DOLLARS $80,000 $60,000 $40,000 $2,000 $69,410 $3,900 $2,200 $20,000 $2,000 $2,000 $3,000 $3,050 $2,700 $1,700 $4,850 $6,300 $6,300 $13,050 $6,250 $24,795 $0 $7,325 $6,560 $8,010 $6,670 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 BEYOND ing is represented in thousands of dollars (000s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776,000 Planning and ing for Future Capital Projects As mentioned previously, there is a strong connection between Southlake s current comprehensive plan, Southlake 2030, and the development of the CIP. Each plan includes recommendations that are structured on a tiered implementation schedule (Tier 1: 1-3 years, Tier 2: 4-6 years and Tier 3: 7+ years). As such, departments have identified all capital projects that are included in Southlake 2030 as recommendations and those projects have been programmed not only into the FY 2017 Capital but also throughout the remaining years and beyond category of the CIP. The chart above shows a large amount of funding in the beyond years that can be attributed to both Tier 2 and Tier 3 Southlake 2030 project recommendations related to mobility, storm water and park projects. As future Capital s and plans are developed, projects shown in the beyond category will be moved forward as funds become available. 384

13 General General 385

14 General # Project Name Description GF1 General NEW - SH 114 Improvements (CEDC Companion) The purpose of this item is to establish a project fund for the design and construction of access roads and ramp reversals along SH 114 from West Dove Road to Kirkwood Boulevard. This project will also include intersection improvements at SH 114 and Kirkwood Boulevard which will include signalization as well as the construction of one and possibly two Texas turnarounds. GF2 General NEW - Kirkwood Boulevard Intersection Improvements and Urban Enhancements ing is requested for the design and construction of intersection improvements to include signalization at the intersections of Kirkwood Boulevard with West Dove Road and T.W. King, the TD Ameritrade main entrance. Costs for the T.W. King signal to be shared with TD Ameritrade at 50 percent City participation or $152,500 whichever is less. ing is also requested for streetlights and landscaping enhancements along the Kirkwood Boulevard corridor from SH 114 to Dove Road. GF3 General Street Rehabilitation Required by Pavement Management Application (PMA) General funding is required for city-wide pavement rehabilitation as recommended by the Pavement Management Application (PMA), an infrastructure management software designed by Stantec. The Pavement Management System grades the streets and recommends pavement rehabilitation and prioritizes the needs. The software generates a pavement quality report which is field verified. The Pavement Quality Index Benchmark for the City s roadway infrastructure is 7.8. Currently, the average measured PQI exceeds this threshold and is on average 8.2. In the 2015 Citizen Survey, 99 percent of respondents listed maintaining local streets and roads as important. Total Prior ing FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 Beyond / Unfunded Total FY 2017 Cumulative $450,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,250,000 $2,500,000 $2,750,000 $- $11,950,000 $2,000,000 $- $350,000 $1,150,000 $- $- $- $- $1,500,000 $2,350,000 $10,754,000 $900,000 $900,000 $950,000 $950,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $16,454,000 $3,250,000 Description of Annual Impact on Operating Labor and equipment increase due to preventive and corrective maintenance requirements for signals. Labor and equipment increase due to preventive and corrective maintenance requirements for signals. Robust preventive maintenance program will help avoid capital expenditures for corrective maintenance, maintain mobility and reduce overall complaints regarding road rideability and structural integrity. Project s Impact to Annual Operating $10,000 $10,000 $- Comp Plan Reference Mobiilty Plan Objective Mobility Plan MT7 and MT37 - Tier 3 Mobility Plan- Objective 10.6 SPIN Neigh. 1 1 All 386

15 General # Project Name Description GF4 General Street Rehabilitation Participation Program (Joint Project with Tarrant County) General funding for rehabilitation of arterial streets in partnership with Tarrant County. Southlake funds the cost of materials and Tarrant County provides labor and equipment. This is an annual joint program. In the 2015 Citizen Satisfaction Survey, 99 percent of respondents cited maintaining local streets and roads as important. GF5 General NEW - Pedestrian Safety Project ing is requested to install and maintain LED pedestrian signals crosswalk poles at 5 locations in high pedestrian traffic areas. The project includes installing flashers, pedestrian buttons, and voice activated controls for ADA compliance at: South Carroll Avenue at Continental Boulevard; North Carroll Avenue at Dove Road; North White Chapel Boulevard at Dove Road; Peytonville Avenue at Dove Road; and Byron Nelson Parkway at Continental Boulevard. GF6 General FM 1709 at Southlake Marketplace Improvements and Signalization ing is requested to construct improvements into the Southlake Marketplace plaza located at the southeast corner of FM 1709 and Davis Boulevard. These improvements include closing two existing driveways into Southlake Marketplace along FM 1709, constructing two new wider driveways with deceleration lanes, relocating utilities, installing a signal on FM 1709 and constructing median modifications. GF7 General Zena Rucker Connector from Pecan Creek Offices east to Tower Boulevard ing is requested for engineering design, purchase of land, utility relocations and construction to complete the Zena Rucker Road connector over the creek from the existing terminus at Pecan Creek Offices eastward to Tower Boulevard. Total Prior ing FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 Beyond / Unfunded Total FY 2017 Cumulative $1,950,000 $300,000 $300,000 $310,000 $310,000 $320,000 $320,000 $3,810,000 $3,550,000 $- $200,000 $,000 $- $- $- $- $300,000 $3,750,000 $1,000,000 $200,000 $800,000 $- $- $- $- $2,000,000 $3,950,000 $- $300,000 $600,000 $300,000 $- $- $- $1,200,000 $4,250,000 Description of Annual Impact on Operating Paving costs are already part of PMA based on PQI, therefore, no additional costs are expected to be incurred as PMA funds labor, equipment and materials. Annual maintenance increase for new LED pedestrian signals Operational costs include signal maintenance of non- TxDOT signal components to ensure continued emergency vehicle access functionality. Maintenance of roadway and drainage infrastructure once accepted by City. Project s Impact to Annual Operating $- $12,000 $5,000 $10,000 Comp Plan Reference Mobility Plan- Objective 10.6 Mobility Plan M36 - Tier 1 Mobility Plan- MT23 - Tier 1 Mobility Plan - MT12 - Tier 3 SPIN Neigh. All Various 6,

16 General # Project Name Description GF8 General Municipal Service Center (Utility Companion) ing is requested for the architectural design, engineering design and construction of a future new Municipal Service Center as per the Southlake 2030 Parks & Rec Open Space/ Community Facility Plan. The current facility is inadequate and undersized for the various divisions operating out of the facility including Streets & Drainage, Water, Wastewater, and Environmental Services. An expanded Service Center is required to meet the on-going demands of infrastructure maintenance and to house additional departments that will be relocated to this building in the future. GF9 General FM 1709 Deceleration Lanes at Byron Nelson and Southridge Lakes ing is requested to construct deceleration lanes along FM 1709 at Byron Nelson and Southridge Lakes. This project will also require the relocation of a City 20-inch waterline at the Southridge Lakes location, as well as landscaping modifications. GF10 General NEW - Bank Street / Industrial Blvd. Connector Reconstruction ing is requested to rehabilitate a section of road located behind several properties near Bank Street. The project will include the structural rehabilitation of the sub-grade and the replacement of concrete panels. The property owners will need to dedicate existing private drive as public right of way. GF11 General NEW - Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Citywide Improvements ing is requested for the design and implementation of recommendations found in the City of Southlake s Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan. Under Federal law, municipal governments are required to: Provide accessibility to individuals with disabilities; Correct existing issues inside buildings, in public rights of way, and in public parks; and Maintain ADA compliance annually on existing infrastructure or as needed based on new development and construction. This will be an annual program to maintain Federal ADA compliance and to address ADA concerns in existing City infrastructure: public buildings, on sidewalks, at intersections and in parks. ADA compliance is also being addressed in project GF5 with funding for FY 2017 (see page 397). Total Prior ing FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 Beyond / Unfunded Total FY 2017 Cumulative $3,200,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,250,000 $1,250,000 $- $- $7,700,000 $5,250,000 $250,000 $- $- $500,000 $- $- $- $750,000 $5,250,000 $- $- $275,000 $- $- $- $- $275,000 $5,250,000 $- $- $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $- $800,000 $5,250,000 Description of Annual Impact on Operating Some increase in building maintenance and utilities due to increased footprint. However, newer building is expected to be more energy efficient than existing. Preventive and corrective maintenance associated with roadway upkeep. Preventive and corrective maintenance associated with roadway upkeep. No expected annual impact due to this program funding labor, equipment and materials with the exception of facilities. Project s Impact to Annual Operating $7,500 $5,000 $2,500 $10,000 Comp Plan Reference Parks, Recreation & Open Space/ Community Facilities Plan Mobility Plan- MT42 - Tier 2 Mobility Plan - MT19 - Tier 2 Sustainability Plan SPIN Neigh. 8 6,7,9,10 8 Citywide 388

17 General # Project Name Description GF12 General City-wide Pathway Improvements General funding is required for the construction of sidewalks at various locations recommended by staff via the Pathways Plan and approved by City Council as part of the annual sidewalk priority list. Providing sidewalks for pedestrian safety by keeping foot traffic off City streets is an item identified as a Citywide gap issue. Eighty-seven percent of respondents of the 2015 Citizen Satisfaction Survey listed providing pedestrian pathways as important. GF13 General North White Chapel Boulevard Widening from SH 114 to north property line of Carillon ing is requested for the engineering design, right of way acquisition, testing, and construction of the southbound lanes along North White Chapel Boulevard from SH 114 to the north property line of Carillon. Construction includes excavation, storm sewer, and street paving, as well as five street lights, ten street and handling signs, sod and irrigation for the medians and right of way areas. Per the Carillon 380 Agreement passed on August 17, 2010 as Resolution , the City is committed to one hundred percent participation for the construction of the western southbound lanes of North White Chapel Boulevard. The City shall pay actual construction costs currently estimated at $475,187. The City is also committed to fifty percent participation for the construction of the eastern lanes of North White Chapel Boulevard in an amount not to exceed $320,692. GF14 General North White Chapel Boulevard Widening from the north property line of Carillon to Dove/ White Chapel Roundabout ing is requested for the engineering design, right of way acquisition, testing, and construction to widen North White Chapel Boulevard to four lanes divided with a median from Carillon to the North White Dove roundabout. This segment would complete the widening of North White Chapel Boulevard from SH 114 to Dove Road to its ultimate pavement section. Total Prior ing FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 Beyond / Unfunded Total FY 2017 Cumulative $4,176,000 $- $- $400,000 $400,000 $400,000 $- $5,376,000 $5,250,000 $250,000 $- $- $200,000 $600,000 $- $- $1,050,000 $5,250,000 $350,000 $- $- $200,000 $1,300,000 $- $- $1,850,000 $5,250,000 Description of Annual Impact on Operating Recurring maintenance may result in annual repairs of sidewalk sections that have been completed. Preventive and corrective maintenance associated with roadway upkeep. Preventive and corrective maintenance associated with roadway upkeep. Project s Impact to Annual Operating $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 Comp Plan Reference Pathways Plan #4 - Tier 1 Mobility Plan - #9 - Tier 2 Mobility Plan - MT9 - Tier 2 SPIN Neigh. Citywide

18 General # Project Name Description GF15 General FM 1938 at West Continental Boulevard Intersection Improvements ing is requested for right of way, new traffic signal sign, mast arms, right turn lane, and preliminary engineering alignment study of the intersection of FM 1938 at West Continental Boulevard. The engineering study will identify future right of way needs in order to design and construct future improvements to handle the increased traffic volumes on FM 1938 due to the connection to SH 114 as well as to alleviate current traffic backups during peak hours on west bound Continental Boulevard at FM GF16 General Continental Boulevard and South Peytonville Avenue Intersection Improvements (Roundabout) ing is requested for the engineering design, right of way and construction of a roundabout at the Continental Boulevard and Peytonville Avenue intersection. The funding request includes drainage improvements. ing does not include burying of the utilities. s in the amount of $175,000 are requested for the landscaping, irrigation, electrical work, and art for the roundabout. GF17 General FM 1709 and Pearson Lane Intersection Improvements ing is requested for the engineering design and construction of the intersection improvements at FM 1709 and Pearson Lane. This will be a joint project with the City of Keller per the terms outlined in the interlocal agreement. Southlake s portion will include utility relocations of a 20- inch waterline. Keller will also be responsible for utility relocations on their side of the road and for the right of way acquisition. This project includes the construction of deceleration lanes. Any urban design features for this entryway will be considered for funding from alternate funding sources. GF18 General McPherson Branch Roadway Connector ing is requested for the engineering design and construction of a roadway connector across the McPherson Branch drainage improvements. This roadway connector will run parallel to FM 1709 and connect the existing Kroger and Toys R Us shopping centers. Participation by the property owners will be required. Total Prior ing FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 Beyond / Unfunded Total FY 2017 Cumulative $- $- $- $- $500,000 $500,000 $- $1,000,000 $5,250,000 $- $- $- $- $- $500,000 $1,175,000 $1,675,000 $5,250,000 $490,000 $- $- $- $- $- $1,000,000 $1,490,000 $5,250,000 $- $- $- $- $- $- $500,000 $500,000 $5,250,000 Description of Annual Impact on Operating Preventive and corrective maintenance associated with roadway upkeep. Preventive and corrective maintenance associated with roadway upkeep. Preventive and corrective maintenance associated with roadway upkeep. Preventive and corrective maintenance associated with roadway upkeep. Project s Impact to Annual Operating $5,000 $5,000 $2,500 $1,500 Comp Plan Reference Mobility Plan - MT25 - Tier 3 Mobility Plan- MT3 - Tier 2 Mobility Plan - MT20 - Tier 1 Mobility Plan SPIN Neigh. 10,

19 General # Project Name Description GF19 General Bank Street Connector ing is requested for the design and construction of a roadway connector parallel to FM The roadway connector will allow Bank Street to tie into Commerce Street which has an existing traffic signal at FM This project will also include the installation of a segment of an 8-inch waterline to loop the system. ing is needed for the purchase of the piece of property at 565 Commerce Street in order to construct the connector through this parcel. This project is necessary because the DFW Connector prevents westbound FM 1709 access from Bank Street. Commuters would have to turn right, heading eastbound and then turn around in Grapevine to head west into Southlake. This project is critical for business retention as it will prevent existing businesses on Bank Street from relocating due to inaccessibility. GF20 General South Village Center Roadway Connector from west property line of Kimball Oaks to Southwood Way ing is requested for design and construction of the remainder of the Village Center Connector from the west property line of Kimball Oaks to Southwood Way. GF21 General South Village Center Roadway Connector from Kimball Avenue to Nolen Drive ing is requested for the right of way acquisition, design and construction of a two-lane undivided connector (thirty-seven foot paved surface; sixty foot C2U as identified on the City s Mobility & Thoroughfare Plan) to allow Georgetown Park vehicular access to the traffic signal at Nolen Drive & FM GF22 General Kirkwood Boulevard Connector from Carillon Phase 5 Terminus to the Highland / Kirkwood Intersection ing is requested for the engineering design, and construction of a connector for Kirkwood Boulevard from the Carillon Phase 5 terminus to the Highland/Kirkwood intersection. This project will require the construction of a bridge across the flood plain. Total Prior ing FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 Beyond / Unfunded Total FY 2017 Cumulative $130,000 $- $- $- $- $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $3,130,000 $5,250,000 $- $- $- $- $- $- $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $5,250,000 $- $- $- $- $- $- $750,000 $750,000 $5,250,000 $- $- $- $- $- $- $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $5,250,000 Description of Annual Impact on Operating Annual recurring maintenance and upkeep. Roadway will be included in PMA analysis once completed. Annual recurring maintenance and upkeep. Roadway will be included in PMA analysis once completed. Annual recurring maintenance and upkeep. Roadway will be included in PMA analysis once completed. Annual recurring maintenance and upkeep. Roadway will be included in PMA analysis once completed. Project s Impact to Annual Operating $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 Comp Plan Reference Mobility Plan- MT19 - Tier 2 Mobiilty Plan Objective 3, objective 3.1 Mobility Plan - MT17 - Tier 3 Mobility Plan - MT7 - Tier 3 SPIN Neigh

20 General # Project Name Description Total Prior ing FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 Beyond / Unfunded Total FY 2017 Cumulative GF23 General Brumlow Avenue Widening from Continental Boulevard to SH 26 ing is requested for the future widening of Brumlow Avenue from Continental Boulevard to SH 26 to its ultimate pavement section (4-lanes divided). $600,000 $- $- $- $- $- $3,500,000 $4,,000 $5,250,000 GF24 General North Carroll Avenue Widening from SH 114 to Highland Street Upon connection of Kirkwood Boulevard to North Carroll Avenue, the vehicle trips along North Carroll Avenue near the SH 114 intersection will increase significantly. The widening of these streets or the construction of intersection improvements may be warranted as a result. Therefore, this project has been identified in the CIP. $- $- $- $- $- $- $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $5,250,000 GF25 General South Carroll Avenue Widening from Breeze Way to FM 1709 ing is requested for the widening of Carroll Avenue from Breeze Way to just south of FM 1709 (adjacent to the Shops of Southlake) to its ultimate pavement section (4 lanes divided). $- $- $- $- $- $- $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $5,250,000 GF26 General SH 114 Eastbound Ramp Reversals This project is recommended to be an improvement to local traffic volumes at the intersections of North Carroll Avenue and Kimball Avenue with the eastbound SH 114 frontage road. This project calls for the removal and reconstruction of the exit and entrance ramps to SH 114 main lanes from the eastbound frontage road. By reversing the ramps, traffic volumes from the two above mentioned intersections will be reduced. $- $- $- $- $- $- $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $5,250,000 GF27 General NEW - Lakewood Acres Improvements ing is requested to implement circulation improvements for the Lakewood Acres, Southview, and Foxborough neighborhoods onto major thoroughfares such as FM 1709, SH 114 and North Carroll Avenue. This is a Southlake 2030 Mobility and Thoroughfare Plan item that has multiple years of funding. $- $- $- $- $- $- $2,050,000 $2,050,000 $5,250,000 General Total: $23,600,000 5,250,000 7,325,000 $6,560,000 $8,010,000 $6,670,000 $24,795,000 $82,210,000 $5,250,000 Description of Annual Impact on Operating Annual recurring maintenance and upkeep. Roadway will be included in PMA analysis once completed. Annual recurring maintenance and upkeep. Roadway will be included in PMA analysis once completed. Annual recurring maintenance and upkeep. Roadway will be included in PMA analysis once completed. Ramps may become part of TxDOT maintenance program so City will not have any financial obligations in the out years. Annual recurring maintenance and upkeep. Roadway will be included in PMA analysis once completed. Project s Impact to Annual Operating $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $- $12,000 Comp Plan Reference Mobility Plan - MT14 - Tier 3 Mobiilty Plan Objective 3, objective 3.1 Mobility Plan - MT13 - Tier 3 Mobility Plan - MT13 - Tier 3 Comprehensive Plan Reference SPIN Neigh. 8,9 3 8,9 All SPIN Neighborhood 392

21 General DEPARTMENT: PROJECT LOCATION: Public Works SH 114 Frontage Road City of Southlake FY 2017 CIP Project Status Form NEW-SH 114 Improvements (CEDC Companion) PROJECT TIMELINE: Oct 2016 to Sept 2021 DESCRIPTION: The purpose of this item is to establish a project fund for the design and construction of access roads and ramp reversals along SH 114 from West Dove Road to Kirkwood Boulevard. This project will also include intersection improvements at SH 114 and Kirkwood Boulevard which will include signalization as well as the construction of one and possibly two Texas turnarounds. JUSTIFICATION: Development in the area will make the need for access road and ramps necessary. With commercial development expected to add more vehicles on the road, the installation of access roads and ramp reversals along SH 114 will mitigate the traffic impact expected by allowing alternate access to SH 114. ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: Added vehicle capacity on the roads due to residential and retail development in the area is not properly managed, causing potential traffic issues in the area. New Request Continuation Project Joint Use Mandated / Public Health / Safety Replacement / Major Rehab or Protection of Capital Stock Compliant with 2030 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): Mobility Plan COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: CEDC Community Need / Service Enhancement REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Mobility, Infrastructure Allows for additional commercial development; taxes. FUND: General, CEDC EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN 450 1,500 1,950 LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION 1,500 2,000 2,250 2,500 2,750 11,000 OTHER 450 3,000 2,000 2,250 2,500 2,750 12,950 OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND 450 2,000 2,000 2,250 2,500 2,750 11,950 UTILITY FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SWUS CCPD SPDC PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND CEDC 1,000 1,000 HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND 450 3,000 2,000 2,250 2,500 2,750 12,950 CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND ing is represented in thousands of dollars (000s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776,

22 DEPARTMENT: PROJECT LOCATION: Capital Improvements Program City of Southlake FY 2017 CIP Project Status Form NEW-Kirkwood Boulevard Improvements and Urban Enhancements Project Public Works Kirkwood Boulevard between Dove Road and SH 114 General PROJECT TIMELINE: Oct 2016 to Sept 2018 DESCRIPTION: ing is requested for the design and construction of intersection improvements to include signalization at the intersections of Kirkwood Boulevard with West Dove Road and TW King, the TD Ameritrade main entrance. Costs for the TW King signal to be shared with TD Ameritrade at 50% City participation or $152,500 whichever is less. ing is also requested for streetlights and landscaping enhancements along the Kirkwood Boulevard corridor from SH 114 to Dove Road. JUSTIFICATION: The City acquired the portion of Kirkwood Boulevard from T. W. King Road to Tyler Street as a public street and, as part of the urban enhancements of Kirkwood Boulevard, will need to replace the existing street lights due to either them being broken/inoperable and/or not meeting City standards. The streelights will also need to conform to the ones in the design for the Kirkwood Boulevard widening from Stockton Drive to Tyler Drive project. ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: The lights along Kirkwood Boulevard are mismatched; broken or inoperable street lights create a safety hazard to vehicle traffic. STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Mobility, Infrastructure FUND: General New Request Continuation Project Joint Use Mandated / Public Health / Safety Replacement / Major Rehab or Protection of Capital Stock Community Need / Service Enhancement Compliant with 2030 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): Mobility Plan #7 and #37,Tier 3 COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER ,150 1, ,450 1,500 OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND UTILITY FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SWUS CCPD SPDC PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 350 1,150 1, , SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND 394 ing is represented in thousands of dollars (000s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776,000

23 General DEPARTMENT: PROJECT LOCATION: City of Southlake FY 2017 CIP Project Status Form Street Rehabilitation Required by Pavement Management Application (PMA) Citywide Public Works PROJECT TIMELINE: Oct 2016 to Sept 2021 DESCRIPTION: General funding is required for Citywide pavement rehabilitation as recommended by the Pavement Management Application (PMA), an infrastructure management software designed by Stantec. The Pavement Management System grades the streets and recommends pavement rehabilitation and prioritizes the needs. The software generates a pavement quality report which is field verified. JUSTIFICATION: The Pavement Quality Index Benchmark for the City's roadway infrastructure is 7.8. Currently, the average measured PQI exceeds this threshold and is on average percent of respondents of the 2015 Citizen Satisfaction Survey listed maintaining local streets and roads as important. 87% responded they are satisfied with the job the City is doing to maintain local streets. ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: Not funding the Pavement Management Program could lead to increased roadway deterioration which may result in decreased citizen satisfaction. STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Mobility, Infrastructure FUND: General New Request Continuation Project Joint Use Mandated / Public Health / Safety Replacement / Major Rehab or Protection of Capital Stock Compliant with 2030 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): Mobility Plan COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: Community Need / Service Enhancement EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER 10,754 10, ,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 16,454 16,454 OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND UTILITY FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SWUS CCPD SPDC PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND 10,754 10, , , , CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND ing is represented in thousands of dollars (000s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776,

24 DEPARTMENT: PROJECT LOCATION: Capital Improvements Program City of Southlake FY 2017 CIP Project Status Form Street Rehabilitation Participation Program (Joint Project with Tarrant County) Citywide Public Works General PROJECT TIMELINE: May 2017 to Sept 2021 DESCRIPTION: General funding for rehabilitation of arterial streets in partnership with Tarrant County. Southlake funds the cost of materials and Tarrant County provides labor and equipment. This is an annual joint program. In the 2015 Citizen Satisfaction Survey, 99 percent of respondents cited maintaining local streets and roads as important. JUSTIFICATION: This is a cost savings to the City of Southlake. Southlake funds the cost of materials and Tarrant County provides the labor and equipment. 99% of respondents of the 2015 Citizen Satisfaction Survey cited maintaining local streets and roads as important. ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: The City would lose Tarrant County's cost share participation. STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Infrastructure, Partnership FUND: General New Request Continuation Project Joint Use Mandated / Public Health / Safety Replacement / Major Rehab or Protection of Capital Stock Compliant with 2030 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): Mobility Plan COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: Community Need / Service Enhancement EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER 1,950 1, ,810 3,810 OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND UTILITY FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SWUS CCPD SPDC PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND 1,950 1, , CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND 396 ing is represented in thousands of dollars (000s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776,000

25 General DEPARTMENT: PROJECT LOCATION: Citywide Public Works City of Southlake FY 2017 CIP Project Status Form NEW-Pedestrian Safety Projects PROJECT TIMELINE: Oct 2016 to Sept 2018 DESCRIPTION: ing is requested to install and maintain LED pedestrian signal crosswalk poles at 5 locations in high pedestrian traffic areas. The project includes installing flashers, pedestrian buttons, and voice activated controls for ADA compliance at: South Carroll Avenue and Continental Boulevard; North Carroll Avenue and Dove Road; North White Chapel Boulevard and Dove Road; Peytonville Avenue and Dove Road; and Byron Nelson Parkway and Continental Boulevard. JUSTIFICATION: Each of these locations are in areas with heavy pedestrian traffic. Installing LED pedestrian flashers will promote safety and security for pedestrians and drivers. ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: Pedestrian and driver safety and security may be compromised. STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Mobility, Infrastructure, Safety and Security FUND: General New Request Continuation Project Joint Use Mandated / Public Health / Safety Replacement / Major Rehab or Protection of Capital Stock Compliant with 2030 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): Mobility Plan #36, Tier 1 COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: Community Need / Service Enhancement EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND UTILITY FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SWUS CCPD SPDC PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND ing is represented in thousands of dollars (000s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776,

26 DEPARTMENT: PROJECT LOCATION: Capital Improvements Program City of Southlake FY 2017 CIP Project Status Form FM 1709 at Southlake Marketplace Improvements and Signalization Public Works FM 1709 and Davis Blvd General PROJECT TIMELINE: Oct 2014 to Sept 2018 DESCRIPTION: ing is requested to construct improvements into the Southlake Marketplace plaza located at the southeast corner of FM 1709 and Davis Boulevard. These improvements include closing two existing driveways into Southlake Marketplace along FM 1709, constructing two new wider driveways with deceleration lanes, relocating utilities, installing a signal on FM 1709, and constructing median modifications. JUSTIFICATION: FY 2017 funding request is for utility relocations and TxDOT administrative costs. This project is needed in order to provide better public access to the shopping center which currently has very limited access. This project is contingent upon an agreement with Dunhill Partners and Walmart for cost sharing. ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: Southlake Marketplace business traffic and retail sales may be negatively impacted. STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Mobility, Partnerships FUND: General New Request Continuation Project Joint Use Mandated / Public Health / Safety Replacement / Major Rehab or Protection of Capital Stock Compliant with 2030 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): Mobility Plan #23, Tier 1 COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: Improving access will improve retails sales tax. Community Need / Service Enhancement EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER 900 1, ,800 2,000 OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND UTILITY FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SWUS CCPD SPDC PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND 1,000 1, , CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND 398 ing is represented in thousands of dollars (000s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776,000

27 General DEPARTMENT: PROJECT LOCATION: City of Southlake FY 2017 CIP Project Status Form Zena Rucker Connector from Pecan Creek Offices east to Tower Boulevard Public Works Zena Rucker Rd - Carroll to Byron Nelson; Tower Boulevard PROJECT TIMELINE: Oct 2016 to Sept 2019 DESCRIPTION: ing is requested for engineering design, purchase of land, utility relocations, and construction to complete the Zena Rucker Road connector over the creek from the existing terminus at Pecan Creek Offices eastward to Tower Boulevard. JUSTIFICATION: Development in the area will make the need for a connector road necessary. With retail and residential development expected to add more vehicles on the road, the Zena Rucker extension will be utilized as a potential alternative to FM ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: Added vehicle capacity on the roads due to residential and retail development in the area is not properly managed, causing potential traffic issues in the area. STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Mobility, Infrastructure FUND: General New Request Continuation Project Joint Use Mandated / Public Health / Safety Replacement / Major Rehab or Protection of Capital Stock Compliant with 2030 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): Mobility Plan #12, Tier 3 COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: Community Need / Service Enhancement Allows for additional residential and retail development; taxes. EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER ,150 1,200 OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND UTILITY FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SWUS CCPD SPDC PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION , SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND ing is represented in thousands of dollars (000s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776,

28 DEPARTMENT: PROJECT LOCATION: Public Works 1950 E. Continental Blvd. Capital Improvements Program City of Southlake FY 2017 CIP Project Status Form Municipal Service Center (Utility Companion) General PROJECT TIMELINE: Oct 2014 to Sept 2020 DESCRIPTION: ing is requested for the architectural design, engineering, and construction of a future new Municipal Service Center. The City is currently contracted with an architectural firm to conduct a needs assessment for a future Municipal Service Center. Future funds are requested for the development of a new Municipal Service Center per the 2030 Plan. JUSTIFICATION: The current facility is inadequate and undersized for the various divisions operating out of the facility including Streets & Drainage, Water, Wastewater, and Environmental Services. An expanded service center is required to meet the on-going demands of infrastructure maintenance and to house additional departments that will be relocated to this building in the future. ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: The current building, bay area and parking lot are undersized for the day to day operations of the Municipal Service Center. STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Infrastructure, Performance Management FUND: General, Utility New Request Continuation Project Joint Use Mandated / Public Health / Safety Replacement / Major Rehab or Protection of Capital Stock Community Need / Service Enhancement Compliant with 2030 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): Open Space/Community Facility Plan COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: Utility REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER 250 3,200 3,450 1,400 1,400 2,000 2,000 2,500 2,500 2,500 2, ,600 11,850 OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND UTILITY FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SWUS CCPD SPDC PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND 3, ,450 1, ,400 1,000 1,000 2,000 1,250 1, ,250 1, ,700 4, CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND 400 ing is represented in thousands of dollars (000s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776,000

29 Utility Utility 401

30 Utility # Project Name Description UF1 Utility Fort Worth Northside II 48-inch Water Main Participation Southlake s cost participation in Fort Worth s Northside II 48-inch water main for ultimate build-out maximum demands. Customer cities are required to participate in the cost of future pipelines per the Wholesale Water Purchase Contract as well as additional costs associated with the provision of capacity above the twenty million gallons per day (20MGD). UF2 Utility 8-inch Waterline cross-country from SH 114 to Rainforest Court ing is requested for the engineering design and construction of an 8-inch waterline from SH 114 to Rainforest Court. ing is also needed for several easements. The waterline is required to increase water flow and pressure to the area served and to ensure long term water quality for Water Utility Customers. UF3 Utility 8-inch Sewerline along Shady Oaks from north basin to Fox Hollow ing is re-requested in FY 2017 for the 8-inch sewerline project along Shady Oaks from north basin to Fox Hollow. This project was delayed until the completion of existing and expected construction along two major, north-south thoroughfares so as to not impact traffic and mobility within the City. Existing funds are planned to be moved to another Utility project and the previous total funding for the Shady Oaks sewerline project must be rerequested. UF4 Utility 8-inch Sewerline along North Carroll Avenue from Highland Street to Whispering Lane This project will construct an 8-inch sanitary sewer line along North Carroll Avenue from Highland Street to Whispering Lane. There is an existing 6-inch sewer line (private) that runs under Johnson Elementary that currently serves three properties and is in need of repair. Installation of the 8-inch sewer line will allow the City to abandon the existing line and provide sanitary sewer to an additional five properties along North Carroll Avenue. Total Prior ing FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 Beyond / Unfunded Total FY 2017 Cumulative Description of Annual Impact on Operating Project s Impact to Annual Operating $4,000,000 $350,000 $- $- $- $- $- $4,350,000 $350,000 $- $275,000 $1,800,000 $- $- $- $- $2,075,000 $625,000 Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. $10,000 $- $800,000 $- $- $- $- $- $800,000 $1,425,000 Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. $10,000 $320,000 $150,000 $- $- $- $- $- $470,000 $1,575,000 Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. $10,000 Comp Plan Reference Ft. Worth Water Plan Sustainability Plan Waste Water System Plan - #11 - Tier 3 Waste Water System Plan - WWS20 - Tier 3 SPIN Neigh. All 4 6,

31 Utility # Project Name Description UF5 Utility 8-inch Sewerline along Summer Place Lane from Highland Street to Dove Creek Trail This project will re-construct and upgrade the existing 6-inch sewer line along Summer Place Lane. This sewer line is approximately one thousand linear feet. This project is necessary due to the continued maintenance issues arising from a shallow grade to improper connections from the service line to the main line. UF6 Utility 8-inch Waterline loop system from IHOP to Bank Street ing is requested to loop the system from IHOP to Bank Street to ensure long term preservation of water quality and to extend fire protection for any future developments. UF7 Utility 8-inch Waterline loop system from Bent Wood Lane to Ownby Lane ing is requested to loop the system from Bent Wood Lane to Ownby Lane to ensure long term preservation of water quality and to extend fire protection for any future developments. UF8 Utility 8-inch Waterline loop system from Fox Glen Court to Ravenaux Court to Countryside Court. ing is requested to loop the system from Fox Glen Court to Ravenaux Court to Countryside Court to ensure long term preservation of water quality and to extend fire protection for any future developments. UF9 Utility Neighborhood Sewer Program - Lake Drive ing is requested for engineering design and construction of sewer to serve residential neighborhoods that do not currently have sanitary sewer. For FY 2017, funding is requested to connect neighborhood sewer at Lake Drive to serve six residential properties. UF10 Utility NEW - 8-inch Sewerline along North Carroll Avenue and Casey Court ing is requested to install approximately 150-linear feet of new sewerline along North Carroll Avenue and Casey Court. The sewerline is a new line and will serve residents on Casey Court. UF11 Utility NEW - Water System Improvements - Repairing Interior of T.W. King Ground Storage Tank ing is requested for engineering and repairing the interior of the T.W. King Ground Storage Tank (GST). Total Prior ing FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 Beyond / Unfunded Total FY 2017 Cumulative $250,000 $150,000 $- $- $- $- $- $400,000 $1,725,000 $- $150,000 $- $- $- $- $- $150,000 $1,875,000 $- $150,000 $- $- $- $- $- $150,000 $2,025,000 $- $200,000 $- $- $- $- $- $200,000 $2,225,000 $- $550,000 $- $- $- $- $- $550,000 $2,775,000 $- $150,000 $- $- $- $- $- $150,000 $2,925,000 $- $350,000 $- $- $- $- $- $350,000 $3,275,000 Description of Annual Impact on Operating Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. Expenses should not change due to repairs. Project s Impact to Annual Operating $10,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $10,000 $10,000 $- Comp Plan Reference Waste Water System Plan - WWS20 - Tier 3 Water System Plan #10 - Tier Water System Plan #11 - Tier Water System Plan #12 - Tier Waste Water System Plan - WWS20 - Tier 3 Waste Water System Plan - WWS20 - Tier 3 Sustainability Plan SPIN Neigh

32 Utility # Project Name Description UF12 Utility NEW - Water Quality Improvements - Install Water Mixers in the City s Elevated Storage Tanks ing is requested to install mixers in all of the City s elevated water storage facilities. Installing these mixers will maintain water quality by reducing water stratification and keep water from becoming stagnant during low-consumption periods. Maintaining water quality positively impacts resident health and ensures the City maintains its Superior water rating by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ). UF13 Utility Water System Improvements - Repainting Interior of Pearson Ground Storage Tank #1 and Repainting Exterior of Pearson Ground Storage Tank #2 ing is requested for the repainting of Pearson Ground Storage Tank (GST) #1 interior and Pearson GST #2 exterior. ing in FY 2017 is requested to cover expenses needed to finish painting the exterior of GST #2. UF14 Utility NEW - 8-inch Waterline along Casey Court from North Carroll Avenue to SH 114 ing is requested for the engineering design and construction to upsize an existing 2-inch waterline to an 8-inch waterline on Casey Court from North Carroll Avenue to SH 114. The existing waterline is undersized and needs to be upsized to provide additional capacity, pressure, and to add fire protection for the Casey Court area. Total Prior ing FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 Beyond / Unfunded Total FY 2017 Cumulative $- $350,000 $350,000 $- $- $- $- $700,000 $3,625,000 $1,000,000 $350,000 $- $- $- $- $- $1,350,000 $3,975,000 $- $350,000 $- $- $- $- $- $350,000 $4,325,000 Description of Annual Impact on Operating Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. Expenses should not change due to repairs. Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. Project s Impact to Annual Operating $20,000 $- $10,000 Comp Plan Reference Sustainability Plan Sustainability Plan Sustainability Plan SPIN Neigh. All

33 Utility # Project Name Description UF15 Utility Municipal Service Center (General Companion) ing is requested for the architectural design, engineering design and construction of a future new Municipal Service Center as per the Southlake 2030 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/Community Facility Plan. The current facility is inadequate and undersized for the various divisions operating out of the facility including Streets & Drainage, Water, Wastewater, and Environmental Services. An expanded Service Center is required to meet the on-going demands of infrastructure maintenance and to house additional departments that will be relocated to this building in the future. UF16 Utility 15-inch Sewer Line in Basin N-12 and N-12a (Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Companion) ing is requested for the engineering design and construction to replace the existing 12-inch, 10-inch, and 8-inch Interceptor lines with a 15-inch line and a 10-inch line in Basin N-12 and N-12a along Dove Creek South of SH 114. This sewer line crosses SH 114 to serve the Milner Tract, Methodist Hospital, Summerplace, and Chapel Downs. UF17 Utility Bicentennial Water Tower Perimeter Security Fence and Roadway ing is requested for the engineering design and construction of a security perimeter fence, gate, and roadway for Bicentennial Water Tower. The security perimeter fence will be constructed to match the existing fence on the north property line. This water tower is the only one that is not completely enclosed, and secured. With the improvements to Bicentennial Park and the opening of the Marq, the City anticipates many more visitors to the park. This further increases the need to secure the water tower from access by the public. Total Prior ing FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 Beyond / Unfunded Total FY 2017 Cumulative $250,000 $400,000 $1,000,000 $1,250,000 $1,250,000 $- $- $4,150,000 $4,725,000 $700,000 $- $1,200,000 $- $- $- $- $1,900,000 $4,725,000 $- $- $500,000 $- $- $- $- $500,000 $4,725,000 Description of Annual Impact on Operating Some increase in building maintenance and utilities due to increased footprint. However, newer building is expected to be more energy efficient than existing. Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. Minor increase in preventive and corrective maintenance to maintain fence appearance. Project s Impact to Annual Operating Comp Plan Reference SPIN Neigh. $7,500 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/ Community Facilities Plan 8 $10,000 Waste Water System Plan #14, Tier 1 3 $5,

34 Utility # Project Name Description UF18 Utility 12-inch Waterline along Kirkwood Boulevard (also known as East Highland Street) from North Carroll Avenue to Highland Avenue ing is requested for the engineering design and construction of a 12-inch waterline along Kirkwood Boulevard (formerly Highland Street) from Carroll Avenue to Highland Street. This project scope has changed from the Southlake 2030 Water plan due to the construction of Kirkwood Boulevard and the reconfiguration of the street system. Upsizing to a twelve inch will improve service to the local residents. UF19 Utility 12-inch Waterline along North Peytonville from Concho Court to Southridge Lakes Parkway ing is requested for the engineering design and construction of a 12-inch waterline along North Peytonville Avenue from Concho Court to Southridge Lakes Parkway to increase capacity in the area to compensate for development and growth. UF20 Utility 12-inch Waterline along Shady Oaks Drive from Fox Glen to West Dove Road (Phase II) ing is requested for the engineering design and construction of a 12-inch Waterline along Shady Oaks Drive from Fox Glen to West Dove Road. This project is a companion to 12-inch waterline along Shady Oaks from Highland Street to Fox Glenn (Phase I). Phase II is the continuation to the north from Fox Glenn to West Dove Road. UF21 Utility Water System Improvements -- five MG Ground Storage Tank #2 at T.W. King Pump Station #2 ing is requested for the engineering design and construction of a 5-million gallon ground storage tank and pump at Pump Station #2. Work required to increase water flow and pressure to the north and east portion of the City. UF22 Utility NEW - Sewerline Protection Study ing is requested to implement a Citywide study of sewerlines in or near drainage areas to determine exposure risks due to erosion. The purpose of the study is to develop a proactive plan to protect sewerlines from exposure and degradation due to land erosion. UF23 Utility 1.5 Million Gallon Elevated Storage Tank at the T. W. King Road Site ing is requested for the engineering design and construction of a new 1.5 million gallon elevated storage tank (EST) at the northern T. W. King Road site. Total Prior ing FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 Beyond / Unfunded Total FY 2017 Cumulative $- $- $- $650,000 $400,000 $- $- $1,050,000 $4,725,000 $- $- $- $400,000 $- $- $- $400,000 $4,725,000 $- $- $- $500,000 $650,000 $- $- $1,150,000 $4,725,000 $- $- $- $3,000,000 $4,000,000 $- $- $7,000,000 $4,725,000 $- $- $- $500,000 $- $- $- $500,000 $4,725,000 $- $- $- $- $- $4,000,000 $- $4,000,000 $4,725,000 Description of Annual Impact on Operating Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. Findings may result in additional capital projects. Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. Project s Impact to Annual Operating $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $25,000 $1,500,000 $15,000 Comp Plan Reference Water System Plan - #15 - Tier 2 Water System Plan - #17 - Tier 2 Water System Plan - #18 - Tier 2 Water System Plan - #4 - Tier 1 Sustainability Plan Water System Plan - #6 - Tier 2 SPIN Neigh. 3 5,6 5 All All All 406

35 Utility # Project Name Description Total Prior ing FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 Beyond / Unfunded Total FY 2017 Cumulative UF24 Utility Repainting of the Miron Elevated Storage Tank ing is requested to repaint the Miron elevated storage tank (EST). The paint on the water tower is the original paint that was painted on in 1999 and is beginning to oxidize. $- $- $- $- $- $1,000,000 $- $1,000,000 $4,725,000 UF25 Utility 12-inch Waterline along Randol Mill Avenue from Morgan Road to Dove Road (Roanoke) ing is requested for the engineering design and construction of a 12-inch waterline along Randol Mill Avenue from Morgan Road to Dove Road (Roanoke). $- $- $- $- $- $550,000 $700,000 $1,250,000 $4,725,000 UF26 Utility 12-inch Waterline along East Continental Boulevard to Breeze Way ing is requested for the engineering design and construction of a 12-inch waterline along East Continental Boulevard to Breeze Way. $- $- $- $- $- $500,000 $- $500,000 $4,725,000 UF27 Utility 8-inch Sewer Line in Basin N-18 along White Chapel Boulevard ing is requested for the engineering design and construction of an 8-inch sanitary sewer line which extends service for future development west along Keystone Drive then south along White Chapel Boulevard. The proposed 8-inch sewer line will provide service to proposed mixed-use areas along SH 114 in basin N-18. $- $- $- $- $- $200,000 $400,000 $600,000 $4,725,000 UF28 Utility 10-inch Sewer Line in West Basin N-12 ing is requested for the engineering design and construction of a 10-inch sanitary sewer line which extends service for future development in the western portion of Basin N-12 north of SH 114 and West of Carroll Avenue. The proposed 10-inch line will provide service to proposed mixed-use areas along SH 114 in basin N-12. $- $- $- $- $- $- $550,000 $550,000 $4,725,000 UF29 Utility 8-inch Sewer Line in Basin N-12A South of SH 114 ing is requested for the engineering design and construction of a 10-inch sanitary sewer line which extends service for future development in the eastern portion of Basin N-12a south of SH 114. The proposed 8-inch line will provide service to proposed mixed-use areas along SH 114 and also serve existing septic users in basin N-12a. $- $- $- $- $- $- $550,000 $550,000 $4,725,000 Utility Total: $6,520,000 $4,725,000 $4,850,000 $6,300,000 $6,300,000 $6,250,000 $2,200,000 $37,145,000 $4,725,000 Description of Annual Impact on Operating No anticipated costs increase as this is preventive maintenance. Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. Project s Impact to Annual Operating $- $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 Comp Plan Reference Sustainability Plan Water System Plan - #19 - Tier #2 Water System Plan - #21 - Tier 2 Waste Water System Plan - #4 - Tier 2 Waste Water System Plan - #5 - Tier 2 Waste Water System Plan -#6 - Tier 2 SPIN Neigh

36 DEPARTMENT: PROJECT LOCATION: Public Works City of Fort Worth Capital Improvements Program City of Southlake FY 2017 CIP Project Status Form Fort Worth Northside II 48-inch Water Main Participation Utility PROJECT TIMELINE: Oct 2014 to Sept 2017 DESCRIPTION: Southlake's cost participation in Fort Worth's Northside II 48-inch water main for ultimate build-out maximum demands. Customer cities are required to participate in the cost of future pipelines per the Wholesale Water Purchase Contract as well as additional costs associated with the provision of capacity above the 20 million gallons per day (20MGD). JUSTIFICATION: This 14MGD capacity increase will be the basis of Southlake's cost participation, and will be (14MGD/60MGD) or 23% of the estimated $15,959,000 cost plus 15% contingency. The City's water system ultimate peak day demand of 34.22MGD is listed in Table 2.2 of the Southlake 2030 Water System Plan. ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: The City of Southlake is contractually obligated to this participation in order to purchase enough water to meet ultimate build out demand for the City. STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Infrastructure, Safety & Security FUND: Utility New Request Continuation Project Joint Use Mandated / Public Health / Safety Replacement / Major Rehab or Protection of Capital Stock Compliant with 2030 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): City of Ft. Worth's Water Plan COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: Community Need / Service Enhancement Will allow City to reach max future build out & higher prop tax. EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER 4,000 4, ,350 4,350 OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND UTILITY FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SWUS CCPD SPDC PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND 4,000 4, , CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND 408 ing is represented in thousands of dollars (000s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776,000

37 Utility DEPARTMENT: PROJECT LOCATION: City of Southlake FY 2017 CIP Project Status Form 8-inch Waterline cross-country from SH 114 to Rainforest Court Public Works SH 114 to Rainforest Court PROJECT TIMELINE: Oct 2016 to Sept 2018 DESCRIPTION: ing is requested for the engineering design and construction of an 8-inch waterline from SH 114 to Rainforest Court. ing is also needed for several easements. The waterline is required to increase water flow and pressure to the area served and to ensure long term water quality for Water Utility Customers. JUSTIFICATION: The site is a bacteriological (BacT) sample point, and in January 2016 reported a failed test; therefore, building a new waterline that will increase pressure and flow will ensure continued levels of acceptable water quality in the area. Construction is planned for FY ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: The failed Bac-T sample test in January 2016 was from this location. Installing a new waterline may prevent future Bac-T sample failures and will improve water flow. STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Infrastructure, Safety and Security FUND: Utility New Request Continuation Project Joint Use Mandated / Public Health / Safety Replacement / Major Rehab or Protection of Capital Stock Compliant with 2030 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): Sustainability Plan COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: Community Need / Service Enhancement EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER ,800 1, ,800 2,075 OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND UTILITY FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SWUS CCPD SPDC PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 275 1,800 2, , SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND ing is represented in thousands of dollars (000s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776,

38 DEPARTMENT: PROJECT LOCATION: Capital Improvements Program City of Southlake FY 2017 CIP Project Status Form 8-inch Sewer Line along Shady Oaks Drive from north basin to Fox Hollow Public Works Shady Oaks Drive from North Basin to Fox Hollow Utility PROJECT TIMELINE: Oct 2009 to Sept 2017 DESCRIPTION: ing is re-requested in FY 2017 for the 8-inch sanitary sewer line project along Shady Oaks Drive from north basin to Fox Hollow. JUSTIFICATION: This project was delayed until the completion of existing and expected construction along two major, north-south thoroughfares so as to not impact traffic and mobility within the City. Existing funds are planned to be moved to another Utility project and the previous total funding for the Shady Oaks sanitary sewer line project must be re-requested. ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: Capacity needs will not be met. STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Infrastructure FUND: Utility New Request Continuation Project Joint Use Mandated / Public Health / Safety Replacement / Major Rehab or Protection of Capital Stock Community Need / Service Enhancement Compliant with 2030 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): Waste Water System Plan #11, Tier 3 COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND UTILITY FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SWUS CCPD SPDC PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND 410 ing is represented in thousands dollars (000s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776,000

39 Utility DEPARTMENT: PROJECT LOCATION: City of Southlake FY 2017 CIP Project Status Form 8-inch Sewer Line along N. Carroll Ave. from Highland St. to Whispering Ln. Public Works Along N. Carroll Ave. from Highland St. to Whispering Ln. PROJECT TIMELINE: Oct 2014 to Sept 2017 DESCRIPTION: This project will construct an 8-inch sanitary sewer line along N. Carroll Ave. from Highland St. to Whispering Lane. There is an existing 6-inch sewer line (private) that runs under Johnson Elementary that currently serves 3 properties and is in need of repair. Installation of the 8-inch sewer line will allow the City to abandon the existing line and provide sanitary sewer to an additional 5 properties along North Carroll Avenue. JUSTIFICATION: ing for the project was originally requested in FY Additional FY 2017 funding is required due to construction materials price inflation and to meet higher projected bid costs. This project is bundled with: 8-inch sewer line along Summer Place Ln. from Highland St. to Dove Creek Trl.; 8-inch sewer line along Market Loop and Commerce St. to Bank St. lift station; and 8-inch sewer line along N. Carroll Ave. and Casey Ct. ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: The existing 6-inch line will continue to deteriorate and no additional properties will have access to public sewer. STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Infrastructure FUND: Utility New Request Continuation Project Joint Use Mandated / Public Health / Safety Replacement / Major Rehab or Protection of Capital Stock Community Need / Service Enhancement Compliant with 2030 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): Waste Water System Plan #20, Tier 3 COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND UTILITY FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SWUS CCPD SPDC PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND ing is represented in thousands of dollars (000s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776,

40 DEPARTMENT: PROJECT LOCATION: Capital Improvements Program City of Southlake FY 2017 CIP Project Status Form 8-inch Sewer Line along Summer Place Ln. from Highland St. to Dove Creek Trl Public Works Along Summer Place Ln. from Highland St. to Dove Creek Trl. Utility PROJECT TIMELINE: Oct 2014 to Sept 2017 DESCRIPTION: This project will re-construct and upgrade the existing 6-inch sewer line along Summer Place Lane. This sewer line is approximately 1,000 linear feet. This project is necessary due to the continued maintenance issues arising from a shallow grade to improper connections from the service line to the main line. JUSTIFICATION: ing for the project was originally requested in FY Additional FY 2017 funding is required due to construction materials price inflation and to meet higher projected bid costs. This project is bundled with: 8-inch sewer line along Summer Place Ln. from Highland St. to Dove Creek Trl.; 8-inch sewer line along Market Loop and Commerce St. to Bank St. lift station; and 8-inch sewer line along N. Carroll Ave. and Casey Ct. ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: Continued maintenance costs associated with the existing sewer line. STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Infrastructure FUND: Utility New Request Continuation Project Joint Use Mandated / Public Health / Safety Replacement / Major Rehab or Protection of Capital Stock Community Need / Service Enhancement Compliant with 2030 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): Waste Water System Plan #20, Tier 3 COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND UTILITY FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SWUS CCPD SPDC PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND 412 ing is represented in thousands of dollars (000s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776,000

41 Utility DEPARTMENT: PROJECT LOCATION: Public Works IHOP to Bank Street City of Southlake FY 2017 CIP Project Status Form 8-inch Water Line Loop System from IHOP to Bank Street PROJECT TIMELINE: Oct 2016 to Sept 2017 DESCRIPTION: ing is requested to loop the system from IHOP to Bank Street to ensure long term preservation of water quality and to extend fire protection for any future developments. JUSTIFICATION: Improve water quality by allowing water to continually move vice dead end. Water circulation is important to maintain disinfection residual. ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: Water quality could possibly degrade. STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Infrastructure FUND: Utility New Request Continuation Project Joint Use Mandated / Public Health / Safety Replacement / Major Rehab or Protection of Capital Stock Compliant with 2030 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): Water System Plan #10, Tier 2 COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: Community Need / Service Enhancement EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND UTILITY FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SWUS CCPD SPDC PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND ing is represented in thousands of dollars (000s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776,

42 DEPARTMENT: PROJECT LOCATION: Capital Improvements Program City of Southlake FY 2017 CIP Project Status Form 8-inch Water Line Loop System from Bent Wood Ln. to Ownby Ln. Public Works Bent Wood Lane to Ownby Lane Utility PROJECT TIMELINE: Oct 2016 to Sept 2017 DESCRIPTION: ing is requested to loop the system from Bent Wood Lane to Ownby Lane to ensure long term preservation of water quality and to extend fire protection for any future developments. JUSTIFICATION: Looping water systems helps preserve water quality by keeping water constantly circulating through the system, as well as ensuring adequate pressure for fire protection to developing areas in the future. ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: Water for fire protection and supply, as well as adequate water pressure to maintain water quality, will not be met as development increases. STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Infrastructure FUND: Utility New Request Continuation Project Joint Use Mandated / Public Health / Safety Replacement / Major Rehab or Protection of Capital Stock Compliant with 2030 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): Water Plan #11, T2 COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: Community Need / Service Enhancement Infrastructure for more development in the area; tax revenue. EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND UTILITY FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SWUS CCPD SPDC PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND 414 ing is represented in thousands of dollars (000s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776,000

43 Utility DEPARTMENT: PROJECT LOCATION: City of Southlake FY 2017 CIP Project Status Form 8-inch Water Line Loop System from Fox Glen/Ravenaux/Countryside Court Public Works Fox Glen Court to Ravenaux Court to Countryside Court PROJECT TIMELINE: Oct 2016 to Sept 2017 DESCRIPTION: ing is requested to loop the system from Fox Glen Court to Ravenaux Court to Countryside Court to ensure long term preservation of water quality and to extend fire protection for any future developments. JUSTIFICATION: Looping water systems help preserve water quality by keeping water constantly circulating through the system, as well as ensuring adequate pressure for fire protection to developing areas in the future. ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: Water for fire protection and supply, as well as adequate water pressure to maintain water quality, will not be met as development increases. STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Infrastructure FUND: Utility New Request Continuation Project Joint Use Mandated / Public Health / Safety Replacement / Major Rehab or Protection of Capital Stock Compliant with 2030 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): Water Plan #12, T2 COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: Community Need / Service Enhancement Infrastructure for more development in the area; tax revenue. EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND UTILITY FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SWUS CCPD SPDC PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND ing is represented in thousands of dollars (000s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776,

44 DEPARTMENT: PROJECT LOCATION: Public Works Lake Drive neighborhood Capital Improvements Program City of Southlake FY 2017 CIP Project Status Form Neighborhood Sewer Program - Lake Drive Utility PROJECT TIMELINE: Oct 2016 to Sept 2017 DESCRIPTION: ing is requested for engineering design and construction of sewer to serve residential neighborhoods that do not currently have sanitary sewer. For FY 2017, funding is requested to connect neighborhood sewer at Lake Drive to serve six residential properties. JUSTIFICATION: Per City Council Resolution No A, the City offers an economic incentive program encouraging property owners to connect to new sanitary sewer improvements funded by the City's Capital Improvement Program. The FY 17 request is to fund the construction of the sewer lines and cover the cost of the tap fee incentive for addresses connecting to City sewer. ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: Properties remain on septic; the City won't meet its obligations to the Neighborhood Sewer Program. STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Infrastructure FUND: Utility New Request Continuation Project Joint Use Mandated / Public Health / Safety Replacement / Major Rehab or Protection of Capital Stock Community Need / Service Enhancement Compliant with 2030 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): Waste Water System Plan #20, Tier 3 COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND UTILITY FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SWUS CCPD SPDC PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND 416 ing is represented in thousands of dollars (000s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776,000

45 Utility DEPARTMENT: PROJECT LOCATION: City of Southlake FY 2017 CIP Project Status Form NEW-8-inch Sewer Line along North Carroll Avenue and Casey Court Public Works Along North Carroll Avenue and Casey Court PROJECT TIMELINE: Oct 2016 to Sept 2017 DESCRIPTION: ing is requested to install approximately 150 linear feet of new sewer line along North Carroll Avenue and Casey Court. The sewer line is a new line and will serve residents on Casey Court. JUSTIFICATION: The installation of the sewer line is also eligible for Neighborhood Sewer Participation and waving of the tap fees. This project is bundled with: 8-inch sewer line along North Carroll Avenue from Highland Street to Whispering Lane; 8-inch sewer line along Summer Place Lane from Highland Street to Dove Creek Trail; and 8-inch sewer line along Market Loop and Commerce to Bank Street Lift Station. ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: Residents are unable to connect to City sewer; capacity needs will not be met as the area continues to develop. STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Infrastructure FUND: Utility New Request Continuation Project Joint Use Mandated / Public Health / Safety Replacement / Major Rehab or Protection of Capital Stock Community Need / Service Enhancement Compliant with 2030 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): Waste Water System Plan #20, Tier 3 COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND UTILITY FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SWUS CCPD SPDC PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND ing is represented in thousands of dollars (000s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776,

46 DEPARTMENT: PROJECT LOCATION: Capital Improvements Program City of Southlake FY 2017 CIP Project Status Form NEW-Repairing Interior of T.W. King Ground Storage Tank Public Works T.W. King Road Utility PROJECT TIMELINE: Oct 2016 to Sept 2017 DESCRIPTION: ing is requested for engineering and to repair the interior of the T.W. King Ground Storage Tank (GST). JUSTIFICATION: The tanks fill pipe has a break at the bottom at floor level. The break in the pipe has been temporarily patched, however an engineering solution and a permanent fix is needed. Failure to address a long-term solution will result in leaks and the inability for the ground storage tank to be used for water storage. ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: The tank could become damaged and incapable of storing water to help meet the City's gallons per day water consumption needs. STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Infrastructure FUND: Utility New Request Continuation Project Joint Use Mandated / Public Health / Safety Replacement / Major Rehab or Protection of Capital Stock Compliant with 2030 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): Sustainability Plan COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: Community Need / Service Enhancement EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND UTILITY FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SWUS CCPD SPDC PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND 418 ing is represented in thousands of dollars (000s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776,000

47 Utility DEPARTMENT: PROJECT LOCATION: City of Southlake FY 2017 CIP Project Status Form NEW-Water Quality Improvements-Install Water Mixers in the City's ESTs Citywide Public Works PROJECT TIMELINE: Oct 2016 to Sept 2018 DESCRIPTION: ing is requested to install mixers in all of the City's elevated water storage facilities. JUSTIFICATION: Installing these mixers will maintain water quality by reducing water stratification and keep water from becoming stagnant during low-consumption periods. Maintaining water quality positively impacts resident health and ensures the City maintains its "superior" water rating by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ). ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: Maintaining water quality becomes dependent on our wholesale providers with little or no ability by the City to correct. STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Safety and Security, Infrastructure FUND: Utility New Request Continuation Project Joint Use Mandated / Public Health / Safety Replacement / Major Rehab or Protection of Capital Stock Compliant with 2030 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): Sustainability Plan COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: Community Need / Service Enhancement EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND UTILITY FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SWUS CCPD SPDC PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND ing is represented in thousands of dollars (000s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776,

48 DEPARTMENT: PROJECT LOCATION: Capital Improvements Program City of Southlake FY 2017 CIP Project Status Form Repainting Interior of Pearson GST #1/Exterior Pearson GST #2 Public Works Pearson GST #1 and #2 Utility PROJECT TIMELINE: Oct 2014 to Sept 2017 DESCRIPTION: ing is requested for the repainting of Pearson Ground Storage Tank (GST) #1 interior and Pearson GST #2 exterior. ing in FY 2017 is requested to cover expenses needed to finish painting the exterior of GST #2. JUSTIFICATION: The exterior of GST #2 has oxidized. The existing coatings are the original coatings that were installed at the time of tank construction in This is the inverse project to the January 2008 painting of the west tank exterior and the east tank interior. ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: Corrosion in the interior of the tank will continue which could lead to water quality issues. STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Infrastructure FUND: Utility New Request Continuation Project Joint Use Mandated / Public Health / Safety Replacement / Major Rehab or Protection of Capital Stock Compliant with 2030 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): Sustainability Plan COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: Community Need / Service Enhancement EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER , ,300 1,350 OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND UTILITY FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SWUS CCPD SPDC PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND 1,000 1, , CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND 420 ing is represented in thousands of dollars (000s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776,000

49 Utility DEPARTMENT: PROJECT LOCATION: City of Southlake FY 2017 CIP Project Status Form NEW-8-inch Water Line along Casey Ct. from N. Carroll Ave. to SH 114 Public Works Casey Court from North Carroll Avenue to SH 114 PROJECT TIMELINE: Oct 2016 to Sept 2017 DESCRIPTION: ing is requested for the engineering design and construction to upsize an existing 2-inch water line to an 8-inch waterline on Casey Court from North Carroll Avenue to SH 114. JUSTIFICATION: The existing water line is undersized and needs to be upsized to provide additional capacity, pressure, and to add fire protection for the Casey Court area. ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: Capacity issues will affect ability to deliver water and the lack of fire protection, due to an undersized line, would have structural impacts in a fire emergency. STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Infrastructure FUND: Utility New Request Continuation Project Joint Use Mandated / Public Health / Safety Replacement / Major Rehab or Protection of Capital Stock Compliant with 2030 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): Sustainability Plan COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: Community Need / Service Enhancement EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND UTILITY FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SWUS CCPD SPDC PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND ing is represented in thousands of dollars (000s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776,

50 DEPARTMENT: PROJECT LOCATION: Public Works 1950 E. Continental Blvd. Capital Improvements Program City of Southlake FY 2017 CIP Project Status Form Municipal Service Center (General Companion) Utility PROJECT TIMELINE: Oct 2014 to Sept 2020 DESCRIPTION: ing is requested for the architectural design, engineering, and construction of a future new Municipal Service Center as per the Southlake 2030 Parks & Rec Open Space/Community Facility Plan. JUSTIFICATION: The current facility is inadequate and undersized for the various divisions operating out of the facility including Streets & Drainage, Water, Wastewater, and Environmental. An expanded Service Center is required to meet the on-going demands of infrastructure maintenance and to house additional departments that will be relocated to this building in the future. ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: The current building, bay area and parking lot are undersized for the day to day operations of the Municipal Service Center. STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Infrastructure, Performance Management FUND: Utiilty, General New Request Continuation Project Joint Use Mandated / Public Health / Safety Replacement / Major Rehab or Protection of Capital Stock Community Need / Service Enhancement Compliant with 2030 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): Open Space/Community Facility Plan COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: General REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER 250 3,200 3,450 1,400 1,400 2,000 2,000 2,500 2,500 2,500 2, ,600 11,850 OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND UTILITY FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SWUS CCPD SPDC PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND 3, ,450 1, ,400 1,000 1,000 2,000 1,250 1, ,250 1, ,700 4, CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND 422 ing is represented in thousands of dollars (000s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776,000

51 Roadway Impact Fee Roadway Impact Fee 423

52 Roadway Impact Fee # Project Name Description RIFF1 Roadway Impact Fee NEW-City Roadway Intersection Capacity Improvements ing is requested to evaluate and improve upon the existing mobility system within the City to create increased capacity at major intersections for better traffic flow and enhanced safety for motorists and pedestrians. RIFF2 Roadway Impact Fee Zena Rucker Connector from Pecan Creek Offices east to Tower Boulevard ing is requested for engineering design, purchase of land, and construction to complete the Zena Rucker Road connector over the creek from the existing terminus at Pecan Creek Offices eastward to Tower Boulevard. RIFF3 Roadway Impact Fee Continental Boulevard and South Peytonville Avenue Intersection Improvements (Roundabout) ing for the design and construction of a roundabout at the Continental Boulevard and Peytonville Avenue intersection. The funding request includes drainage improvements. ing does not include burying of the utilities. s in the amount of $175,000 are requested by Community Services for the landscaping, irrigation, electrical work, and art for the roundabout. Roadway Impact Fee Total: Total Prior ing FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 Beyond / Unfunded Total FY 2017 Cumulative $- $200,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $- $1,400,000 $200,000 $- $- $350,000 $- $- $- $350,000 $200,000 $- $- $- $150,000 $- $1,,000 $1,250,000 $200,000 $- $200,000 $650,000 $450,000 $300,000 $1,400,000 $- $3,000,000 $200,000 Description of Annual Impact on Operating Maintenance of roadway and drainage infrastructure once accepted by City paid from General. Maintenance of roadway and drainage infrastructure once accepted by City. Project s Impact to Annual Operating $- $10,000 Comp Plan Reference Mobility Plan #12, Tier 3 Mobility Plan #25, Tier 3 SPIN Neigh &

53 Roadway Impact Fee DEPARTMENT: PROJECT LOCATION: Public Works City of Southlake FY 2017 CIP Project Status Form NEW-City Roadway Intersection Capacity Improvements Various intersection locations city-wide PROJECT TIMELINE: Oct 2016 to Sept 2018 DESCRIPTION: ing is requested to evaluate and improve upon the existing mobility system within the City to create increased capacity at major intersections for better traffic flow and enhanced safety for motorists and pedestrians. JUSTIFICATION: Traffic is growing in the community as development continues to occur to the west of Southlake. This increases volumes and exceeds capacity thresholds at key intersections throughout the City. By implementing capacity improvements this relieves roadway congestion and addresses the community's number one concern of traffic per the 2015 Citizen Satisfaction Survey. ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: Congestion will continue to grow throughout Southlake potentially impacting businesses and air quality. STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Mobility, Infrastructure FUND: Roadway Impact Fee New Request Continuation Project Joint Use Mandated / Public Health / Safety Replacement / Major Rehab or Protection of Capital Stock Community Need / Service Enhancement Compliant with 2030 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): Mobility Plan - Tier 1 through Tier 3 COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER ,400 OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND UTILITY FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SWUS CCPD SPDC PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION , SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND ing is represented in thousands of dollars (000s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776,

54 Roadway Impact Fee 426

55 Water Impact Fee Water Impact Fee 427

56 Water Impact Fee # Project Name Description Total Prior ing FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 Beyond / Unfunded Total FY 2017 Cumulative WIFF1 Water Impact Fee System Capacity Improvements (Water) - Future Projects s provide staff and Council the ability to reimburse developers for the oversizing of water lines to meet the requirements of the Southlake 2030 Water Plan in cases where the developer is not required to provide the ultimate size of the line to serve the development. $450,000 $,000 $,000 $,000 $,000 $,000 $- $950,000 $,000 WIFF2 Water Impact Fee 12-inch Water line along East Dove Road from Estes Park to Winfield Estates ing is requested for the engineering, design and construction of a 12-inch water line along East Dove Road from Estes Park to Winfield Estates. This line is needed to replace an existing 6-inch water line per the Water Plan. $350,000 $200,000 $- $- $- $- $- $550,000 $300,000 WIFF3 Water Impact Fee 12-inch Water line for Fuel Farm Protection Improvements ing is requested for the engineering and construction of a 12-inch water line to enable the removal of the explorer culvert crossings at SH 26 for fuel farm emergency fire protection. This water line is critical in the event of a possible fire at the fuel farm. $650,000 $500,000 $- $- $- $- $- $1,150,000 $800,000 Water Impact Fee : $1,450,000 $800,000 $,000 $,000 $,000 $,000 $- $2,650,000 $800,000 Description of Annual Impact on Operating No additional since maintenance is already part of line. Project is just upsizing the current line. No additional since maintenance is already part of line. Project is just upsizing the current line. Increase in corrective and preventive maintenance. Project s Impact to Annual Operating $- $- $10,500 Comp Plan Reference Water System Plan #9 to #13 Water System Plan #20, Tier 2 Sustainability Plan SPIN Neigh. City wide

57 Water Impact Fee DEPARTMENT: PROJECT LOCATION: Public Works City wide City of Southlake FY 2017 CIP Project Status Form System Capacity Improvements (Water)-Future Projects PROJECT TIMELINE: Oct 2016 to Sept 2021 DESCRIPTION: s provide staff and Council the ability to reimburse developers for the over sizing of water lines to meet the requirements of the Southlake 2030 Water Plan in cases where the developer is not required to provide the ultimate size of the line to serve the development. JUSTIFICATION: Meeting the requirements of the Southlake 2030 Water Plan to upsize lines and add capacity. Cost sharing strategy provides the City with the flexibility to provide service in a more timely and more economical way. ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: The City will not have the funds necessary to reimburse developers for the over sizing of water lines which increase capacity. STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Infrastructure FUND: WIF New Request Continuation Project Joint Use Mandated / Public Health / Safety Replacement / Major Rehab or Protection of Capital Stock Compliant with 2030 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): Water System Plan #9 to #13 COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: Community Need / Service Enhancement Facilitates further development and collection of related fees. EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND UTILITY FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SWUS CCPD SPDC PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND ing is represented in thousands of dollars (000s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776,

58 DEPARTMENT: PROJECT LOCATION: Capital Improvements Program City of Southlake FY 2017 CIP Project Status Form 12-inch Water line along East Dove from Estes Park to Winfield Estates Public Works Along East Dove Rd. from Estes Park to Winfield Estates Water Impact Fee PROJECT TIMELINE: Oct 2014 to Sept 2017 DESCRIPTION: ing is requested for the engineering, design and construction of a 12-inch water line along East Dove Road from Estes Park to Winfield Estates. This line is needed to replace an existing 6-inch water line per the Water Plan. JUSTIFICATION: The increased capacity is necessary to replace an existing 6-inch water line per the Water Plan. ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: The existing water line is undersized. STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Infrastructure, Safety and Security FUND: WIF New Request Continuation Project Joint Use Mandated / Public Health / Safety Replacement / Major Rehab or Protection of Capital Stock Compliant with 2030 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): Water System Plan #20, Tier 2 COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: Community Need / Service Enhancement EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND UTILITY FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SWUS CCPD SPDC PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND 430 ing is represented in thousands of dollars (000s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776,000

59 Water Impact Fee DEPARTMENT: PROJECT LOCATION: City of Southlake FY 2017 CIP Project Status Form 12-inch Water line for Fuel Farm Fire Protection Improvements Public Works Along SH 26 from Brumlow to Fuel Farm PROJECT TIMELINE: Oct 2015 to Sept 2017 DESCRIPTION: ing is requested for the engineering and construction of a 12-inch water line to enable the removal of the explorer culvert crossings at SH 26 for fuel farm emergency fire protection. This water line is critical in the event of a possible fire at the fuel farm. JUSTIFICATION: This water line is needed to provide emergency fire protection at the fuel farm and along SH 26. Opinion of probable construction cost is $1M+, therefore additional funds are being requested for FY17. ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: Lack of access to water to fight possible fire. STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Infrastructure, Safety and Security FUND: WIF New Request Continuation Project Joint Use Mandated / Public Health / Safety Replacement / Major Rehab or Protection of Capital Stock Compliant with 2030 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): Sustainability Plan COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: Community Need / Service Enhancement EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER ,065 1,150 OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND UTILITY FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SWUS CCPD SPDC PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND , CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND ing is represented in thousands of dollars (000s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776,

60 Water Impact Fee 432

61 Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee 433

62 Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee # Project Name Description Total Prior ing FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 Beyond / Unfunded Total FY 2017 Cumulative SSIF1 Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee System Capacity Improvements (Sewer) - Future Projects s provide staff and Council the ability to reimburse developers for the oversizing of sewer lines to meet requirements of the Southlake 2030 Wastewater Plan in cases where the developer is not required to provide the ultimate size of the line to serve the development. $450,000 $,000 $,000 $,000 $,000 $,000 $- $950,000 $,000 SSIF2 Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee 8-inch Sewer line along Market Loop and Commerce Street to Bank Street Lift Station ing is requested to replace approximately 2,120 feet of existing 6-inch sewer line with an 8-inch sewer line to run along Market Loop, turn and run along Commerce Street, and turn and terminate at the existing Bank Street lift station. Six new manholes will also be required. $550,000 $150,000 $- $- $- $- $- $700,000 $250,000 SSIF3 Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee 15-inch Sewer Line in Basin N-12 and N-12a (Utility Companion) ing is requested for the engineering design and construction to replace the existing 12-inch, 10-inch, and 8-inch Interceptor lines with a 15-inch line and a 10-inch line in Basin N-12 and N-12a along Dove Creek South of SH 114. This sewer line crosses SH 114 to serve the Milner Tract, Forest Park Hospital, Summer Place and Chapel Downs. $700,000 $700,000 $- $- $- $- $- $1,400,000 $950,000 Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee: $1,700,000 $950,000 $,000 $,000 $,000 $,000 $- $3,050,000 $950,000 Description of Annual Impact on Operating Increased budget requirements due to additional infrastructure added by development. Increase in preventive maintenance program due to additional infrastructure and equipment added to City inventory. Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. Project s Impact to Annual Operating $12,000 $17,000 $6,000 Comp Plan Reference Waste Water System Plan #17 to #21 Waste Water System Plan #20, Tier 3 Waste Water System Plan #14, Tier 1 SPIN Neigh. City wide

63 Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee DEPARTMENT: PROJECT LOCATION: Public Works City wide City of Southlake FY 2017 CIP Project Status Form System Capacity Improvements (Sewer)-Future Projects PROJECT TIMELINE: Oct 2016 to Sept 2017 DESCRIPTION: s provide staff and Council the ability to reimburse developers for the oversizing of sewer lines to meet requirements of the Southlake 2030 Wastewater Plan in cases where the developer is not required to provide the ultimate size of the line to serve the development. JUSTIFICATION: Cost sharing strategy provides the City with the flexibility to provide service in a more timely and more economical way. ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: The City will not have the funds necessary to reimburse developers for the over sizing of sanitary sewer lines which increase capacity. STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Infrastructure FUND: SSIF New Request Continuation Project Joint Use Mandated / Public Health / Safety Replacement / Major Rehab or Protection of Capital Stock Community Need / Service Enhancement Compliant with 2030 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): Waste Water System Plan #17 to #21 COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: Facilitates further development and collection of related fees. EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND UTILITY FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SWUS CCPD SPDC PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND ing is represented in thousands of dollars (000s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776,

64 DEPARTMENT: PROJECT LOCATION: Capital Improvements Program City of Southlake FY 2017 CIP Project Status Form Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee 8-inch Sewer Line along Market Loop and Commerce St. to Bank St. Lift Station Public Works Along Market Loop and Commerce St. to Bank St. PROJECT TIMELINE: Oct 2014 to Sept 2017 DESCRIPTION: ing is requested to replace approximately 2,120 feet of existing 6-inch sewer line with an 8-inch sewer line to run along Market Loop, turn and run along Commerce Street, and turn and terminate at the existing Bank Street lift station. Six new manholes will also be required. JUSTIFICATION: This sewer main is very flat and holds solids/debris in the manholes. There are a lot of bellies in this main and consequently, the sewer line requires maintenance and cleaning on a weekly basis. ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: Continued on-going maintenance issues. STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Infrastructure FUND: SSIF New Request Continuation Project Joint Use Mandated / Public Health / Safety Replacement / Major Rehab or Protection of Capital Stock Community Need / Service Enhancement Compliant with 2030 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): Waste Water System Plan #20, Tier 3 COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND UTILITY FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SWUS CCPD SPDC PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND 436 ing is represented in thousands of dollars (000s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776,000

65 Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee DEPARTMENT: PROJECT LOCATION: Public Works City of Southlake FY 2017 CIP Project Status Form Sewer Line (15") in Basin N-12 and N-12a Basin N-12 and N-12a along Dove Creek South of Hwy 114 PROJECT TIMELINE: Oct 2015 to Sept 2017 DESCRIPTION: ing is requested for the engineering design and construction to replace the existing 12-inch, 10-inch, and 8-inch Interceptor lines with a 15-inch line and a 10-inch line in Basin N-12 and N-12a along Dove Creek South of Hwy 114. This sewer line crosses SH114 to serve the Milner Tract, Forest Park Hospital, Summer Place and Chapel Downs. JUSTIFICATION: The model results indicate that there are capacity issues in Basins N-12 and N-12A. The interceptor is operating at or near capacity. The proposed 15-inch sewer line will provide capacity to handle future growth in these basins. ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: Insufficient capacity to meet future needs. STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Infrastructure FUND: SSIF, Utility New Request Continuation Project Joint Use Mandated / Public Health / Safety Replacement / Major Rehab or Protection of Capital Stock Community Need / Service Enhancement Compliant with 2030 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): Waste Water System Plan #14, Tier 1 COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: Utility REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: Impact fees sewer system EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER ,400 OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND UTILITY FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SWUS CCPD SPDC PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND , CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND ing is represented in thousands of dollars (000s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776,

66 Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee 438

67 Storm Water Utility System Storm Water Utility System 439

68 Storm Water Utility System # Project Name Description SWUSF1 Storm Water Utility System NEW-Florence Road Drainage Improvements ing is requested for engineering, design and construction of drainage improvements along Florence Road. SWUSF2 Storm Water Utility System NEW-North Peytonville Avenue Drainage Improvements ing is requested in FY 2017 for the engineering, design and construction to improve drainage along North Peytonville Avenue to the Creek at Post Oaks Road. SWUSF3 Storm Water Utility System NEW-Patterson s Pond Retaining Wall Repair ing is requested for an engineering design structural repair for the Patterson Pond retaining wall. SWUSF4 Storm Water Utility System Kirkwood Branch at White Chapel Road / South Kirkwood Branch at White Chapel Road ing is requested for the design and construction of a new bridge along North White Chapel Boulevard over Kirkwood Creek Branch. This section of roadway flooded in May 2015 due to heavy rainfall and overflow from Lake Grapevine and was closed for approximately seven weeks. SWUSF5 Storm Water Utility System NEW-Simmons Court Drainage Improvements / Erosion Control ing is requested for the design and construction of gabians along Simmons Court in order to stop erosion that is removing the land cover and exposing City Sanitary Sewer Lines. SWUSF6 Storm Water Utility System Dove Creek at North Carroll Avenue ing is requested for the design and construction of drainage improvements. The proposed improvements include the construction of five 10 x 7 box culverts, raise and replace the roadway, clear and grade the channel, and install channel stabilization consisting of interlocking concrete blocks. SWUSF7 Storm Water Utility System Big Bear 6 at East Continental Boulevard ing is requested for the design and construction of drainage improvements. The proposed improvements include the construction of four additional 12 x 8 box culverts, raise and replace the roadway, and clear and grade the channel. SWUSF8 Storm Water Utility System Big Bear 9 at Union Church Road west of Davis Boulevard ing is requested for the design and construction of drainage improvements. The proposed improvements include the construction of four 12 x 10 box culverts, raise and replace roadway, and clear and grade the channel. Total Prior ing FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 Beyond / Unfunded Total FY 2017 Cumulative Description of Annual Impact on Operating Project s Impact to Annual Operating $- $200,000 $- $- $- $- $- $200,000 $200,000 Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance for culvert and swale cleanout. $1,500 $- $450,000 $- $- $- $- $- $450,000 $650,000 Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance for culvert and swale cleanout. $5,500 $- $400,000 $- $- $- $- $- $400,000 $1,050,000 None. $- $1,,000 $- $2,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $3,900 $6,103,900 $1,050,000 None expected. $- $- $- $- $850,000 $- $- $- $850,000 $1,050,000 Anticipated repair should preclude continual maintenance. $- $- $- $- $- $- $1,200,000 $- $1,200,000 $1,050,000 Culvert cleaning and channel regrading. $10,000 $- $- $- $- $- $900,000 $- $900,000 $1,050,000 Culvert cleaning and channel regrading. $10,000 $- $- $- $- $- $650,000 $- $650,000 $1,050,000 Culvert cleaning and channel regrading. $10,000 Comp Plan Reference Sustainability Plan Sustainability Plan Sustainability Plan Storm Water Plan #6, Tier 2 Sustainability Plan Storm Water Plan #4, Tier1 Storm Water Plan #3, Tier 2 Storm Water Plan #4, Tier 2 SPIN Neigh

69 Storm Water Utility System # Project Name Description SWUSF9 Storm Water Utility System Big Bear 8 at West Continental Boulevard ing is requested for the design and construction of drainage improvements. The proposed improvements include the construction of six additional 12 x 8 box culverts, raise and replace the roadway, clear and grade the channel, and install channel stabilization. SWUSF10 Storm Water Utility System South Kirkwood Branch at North White Chapel Boulevard ing is requested for drainage improvements at the South Kirkwood Branch at North White Chapel Boulevard. The proposed improvements include the construction of four 9 x 9 reinforced box culverts (RBC), raising and replacing of roadway and clear and grade channel. This project is needed as detention is not an option and delaying peak would cause other problems downstream. There is also need a bigger crossing and a raised roadway to meet the On Hundred Year water surface elevation downstream. SWUSF11 Storm Water Utility System Dove Creek at East Dove Road ing is requested for the design and construction of drainage improvements at Dove Creek at East Dove Road. The proposed improvements include the construction of fifteen 10 x 7 box culverts, raise and replace the roadway, clear and grade the channel, and install channel stabilization consisting of interlocking concrete blocks. Total Prior ing FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 Beyond / Unfunded Total FY 2017 Cumulative $- $- $- $- $- $3,500,000 $- $3,500,000 $1,050,000 $- $- $- $- $- $500,000 $- $500,000 $1,050,000 $- $- $- $- $- $2,300,000 $- $2,300,000 $1,050,000 Description of Annual Impact on Operating Culvert cleaning and channel regrading. Culvert cleaning and channel regrading. Culvert cleaning and channel regrading. Project s Impact to Annual Operating $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 Comp Plan Reference Storm Water Plan #5, Tier 2 Storm Water Plan #7, Tier 2 Storm Water Plan #8, Tier 2 SPIN Neigh

70 Storm Water Utility System # Project Name Description SWUSF12 Storm Water Utility System South White Chapel Bridge at Bear Creek Replacement ing is requested for the bridge replacement on South White Chapel at Bear Creek. This bridge qualifies for replacement under the Federal Bridge Replacement Program. Based on the results of a scour mitigation study conducted by Halff and Associates, scour remediation efforts have been completed in FY 2015 to extend the life of the structure. However, Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) officials contacted the Public Works Department and expressed concerns with the long term structural integrity of the White Chapel bridge over Bear Creek. They have evaluated the existing bridge structure and found that it qualifies under the guidelines of the program for future replacement. The program provides funds for reconstruction based on the following allocation: Federal, eighty percent; State, ten percent; Local, ten percent. In staff s conversation with representatives of Colleyville, they have tentatively agreed that they will recommend to their Council for consideration to participate fifty percent in the local match. The City s Mobility and Thoroughfare Plan indicates White Chapel Boulevard in the vicinity of the Bear Creek crossing as a two lane undivided arterial roadway. The bridge replacement program allows for the bridge to replace the existing structure with a similar traffic volume capacity as the existing bridge and to allow passage of the same Bear Creek water volume as the existing bridge. Currently, the existing bridge only clears a volume of water from less than the fifty year design storm. The cities will propose designing the new bridge to the one hundred year Storm Water volume. Storm Water Utility System : Total Prior ing FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 Beyond / Unfunded Total FY 2017 Cumulative $- $- $- $- $- $1,200,000 $- $1,200,000 $1,050,000 $1,,000 $1,050,000 $2,000,000 $1,850,000 $1,000,000 $11,250,000 $3,900 $18,253,900 $1,050,000 Description of Annual Impact on Operating Preventive and corrective maintenance costs. Project s Impact to Annual Operating $10,000 Comp Plan Reference Storm Water Plan #7, Tier 3 SPIN Neigh. 9 &

71 Storm Water Utility System DEPARTMENT: PROJECT LOCATION: Public Works Florence Road City of Southlake FY 2017 CIP Project Status Form NEW-Florence Road Drainage Improvements PROJECT TIMELINE: Oct 2016 to Sept 2017 DESCRIPTION: ing is requested for engineering, design and construction of drainage improvements along Florence Road. JUSTIFICATION: Water sheeting on Florence Road is currently an issue after heavy rains. Improving the drainage along Florence Road will mitigate water sheet-flow and improve safety and mobility. ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: Water sheet-flow will continue to be a safety issue and will affect mobility along Florence Road. STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Infrastructure, Safety and Security FUND: SWUS New Request Continuation Project Joint Use Mandated / Public Health / Safety Replacement / Major Rehab or Protection of Capital Stock Compliant with 2030 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): Sustainability Plan COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: Community Need / Service Enhancement EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND UTILITY FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SWUS CCPD SPDC PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND ing is represented in thousands of dollars (000s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776,

72 DEPARTMENT: PROJECT LOCATION: Public Works Capital Improvements Program City of Southlake FY 2017 CIP Project Status Form NEW-North Peytonville Avenue Drainage Improvements From 1330 N. Peytonville Avenue to Post Oaks Creek Storm Water Utility System PROJECT TIMELINE: Oct 2016 to Sept 2017 DESCRIPTION: ing is requested in FY 2017 for the engineering, design and construction to improve drainage along North Peytonville Avenue to the Creek at Post Oaks Road. JUSTIFICATION: Inadequate stormwater drainage along residential properties pose serious public health and safety issues by increasing the likelihood of waterborne and arboviral illnesses. In addition, pooling water due to inadequate drainage can increase the likelihood of damage to public and private property. ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: Potential for public health issues and damage to residential property due to inadequate drainage along this stretch of road. STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Safety and Security FUND: SWUS New Request Continuation Project Joint Use Mandated / Public Health / Safety Replacement / Major Rehab or Protection of Capital Stock Compliant with 2030 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): Sustainability Plan COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: Community Need / Service Enhancement EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND UTILITY FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SWUS CCPD SPDC PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND 444 ing is represented in thousands of dollars (000s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776,000

73 Storm Water Utility System DEPARTMENT: PROJECT LOCATION: Public Works City of Southlake FY 2017 CIP Project Status Form Patterson's Pond off North Kimball Avenue NEW-Patterson's Pond Retaining Wall Repair PROJECT TIMELINE: Oct 2016 to Sept 2017 DESCRIPTION: ing is requested for an engineering design structural repair for the Patterson Pond retaining wall. JUSTIFICATION: The wall is experiencing erosion/scour and undermining associated with wave action from Patterson's Pond and discharge from the box culverts under Kimball Road. The City is responsible for the maintenance of the retaining wall per FEMA regulations and the location of the retaining wall within the FEMA FIRM Zone AE flood hazard area. ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: If no action is taken there is a possibility of the retaining wall failing and flooding of the surrounding properties. STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Infrastructure FUND: SWUS New Request Continuation Project Joint Use Mandated / Public Health / Safety Replacement / Major Rehab or Protection of Capital Stock Compliant with 2030 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): Sustainability Plan COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: Community Need / Service Enhancement EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND UTILITY FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SWUS CCPD SPDC PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND ing is represented in thousands of dollars (000s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776,

74 Storm Water Utility System 446

75 Park Dedication Fee Park Dedication Fee 447

76 Park Dedication Fee # Project Name Description Total Prior ing FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 Beyond / Unfunded Total FY 2017 Cumulative Description of Annual Impact on Operating Project s Impact to Annual Operating PDF1 Park Dedication Park System Trail Segment Completion Construction of trail segments within East Haven Park, Noble Oaks Park and Royal & Annie Smith Park as recommended in the adopted Southlake 2030 Parks, Recreation, Open Space/ Community Facilities (PROS/ CF) Plan. Construction of the trail segments would complete the trail system in each park and provide additional pedestrian mobility. $- $,000 $- $- $- $- $- $,000 $,000 $- Park Dedication Total: $- $,000 $- $- $- $- $- $,000 $,000 Comp Plan Reference Parks, Recreation, Open Space/ Community Facilities Plan SPIN Neigh. Various 448

77 Park Dedication Fee DEPARTMENT: PROJECT LOCATION: Various Community Services City of Southlake FY 2017 CIP Project Status Form Park System Trail Segment Completion PROJECT TIMELINE: 10/01/16 to 09/30/17 DESCRIPTION: Construction of trail segments within East Haven Park, Noble Oaks Park and Royal & Annie Smith Park as recommended in the adopted Southlake 2030 Parks, Recreation, Open Space/Community Facilities (PROS/CF) Plan. Construction of the trail segments would complete the trail system in each park and provide additional pedestrian mobility. JUSTIFICATION: Recommendation of the Southlake 2030 Parks, Recreation, Open Space/Community Facilities (PROS/CF) Plan. In addition, "providing pedestrian pathways, sidewalks and trails was identified as a gap issue in the 2015 Citizen Satisfaction Survey ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: Delay completion of trail segments New Request Continuation Project Joint Use Mandated / Public Health / Safety Replacement / Major Rehab or Protection of Capital Stock Compliant with 2030 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): PROS/CF Plan COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: Community Need / Service Enhancement STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Quality Development and Mobility REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: FUND: Park Dedication EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND UTILITY FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SWUS CCPD SPDC PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND ing is represented in thousands of dollars (000s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776,

78 Park Dedication Fee 450

79 Hotel Occupancy Tax Hotel Occupancy Tax 451

80 Hotel Occupancy Tax # Project Name Description HOT1 Hotel Occupancy Tax Southlake Visitor s Information Center The purpose of this item is to establish a project fund for the construction of a Visitor Information Center that will include public restrooms to be located in Southlake Town Square. Subtotals Hotel Occupancy Tax : Total Prior ing FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 Beyond / Unfunded Total FY 2017 Cumulative Description of Annual Impact on Operating Project s Impact to Annual Operating $400,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $- $1,400,000 $200,000 TBD TBD $400,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $- $1,400,000 $200,000 Comp Plan Reference EDT Goals T.14, T1.5, T1.6 and T1.7 SPIN Neigh. SPIN #8 452

81 Hotel Occupancy Tax DEPARTMENT: PROJECT LOCATION: City of Southlake FY 2017 CIP Project Status Form Economic Development & Tourism Southlake Town Square Southlake Visitor Information Center PROJECT TIMELINE: TBD to TBD DESCRIPTION: The purpose of this item is to establish a project fund for the construction of a Visitor Information Center that will include public restrooms to be located in Southlake Town Square. JUSTIFICATION: The Southlake 2030 Economic Development and Tourism Plan recommends that the City provide a staffed, central location for visitor's that could be considered the City's concierge desk. The plan recommends the visitor center be located in a high-profile location in Southlake Town Square and also recommends the addition of public restroom facilities as a visitor amenity. ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: Lack of visitor amenities in Town Square; Southlake 2030 recommendation not implemented STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Quality Development FUND: Hotel Occupancy Tax New Request Continuation Project Joint Use Mandated / Public Health / Safety Replacement / Major Rehab or Protection of Capital Stock Compliant with 2030 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): EDT Goals T.14, T1.5, T1.6 and T1.7 COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: Revenue may be generated through sales of souvenirs. Community Need / Service Enhancement EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND UTILITY FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SWUS CCPD SPDC PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND , CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND ing is represented in thousands of dollars (000s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776,

82 Hotel Occupancy Tax 454

83 Community Enhancement & Development Corporation Community Enhancement & Development Corporation 455

84 Community Enhancement & Development Corporation # Project Name Description Total Prior ing FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 Beyond / Unfunded Total FY 2017 Cumulative Description of Annual Impact on Operating Project s Impact to Annual Operating CEDC1 Community Enhancement and Development Corporation NEW - SH 114 Improvements (General Companion) The purpose of this item is to establish a project fund for the design and construction of access roads and ramp reversals along SH 114 from West Dove Road to Kirkwood Boulevard. This project will also include intersection improvements at SH 114 and Kirkwood Boulevard which will include signalization as well as the construction of one and possibly two Texas turnarounds. $- $1,000,000 $- $- $- $- $- $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $10,000 CEDC2 Community Enhancement and Development Corporation The Marq Southlake - Phase 2 The purpose of this item is to establish a project fund for the design and development of Phase 2 of The Marq Southlake as per the Southlake 2030 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/Community Facilities Plan. Phase 2 will be approximately 84,000 sq. ft. and include spaces for fitness, performance training, gymnasium, indoor jog/walk track, indoor aquatics, indoor playground, party rooms, child watch and multipurpose classrooms for programs. $32,291,000 $5,400,000 $- $- $- $- $- $37,691,000 $6,400,000 Operational impact includes all operating costs of the facility (personnel and operations) and will be incurred following completion of the project in The amount shown are costs in Year 1. The operational costs will be paid for out of the CEDC fund. $2,911,092 CEDC Total: $32,291,000 $6,400,000 $- $- $- $- $- $38,691,000 $6,400,000 Comp Plan Reference Mobility Plan Southlake 2030 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/ Community Facilities Plan SPIN Neigh

85 Community Enhancement & Development Corporation DEPARTMENT: PROJECT LOCATION: Public Works SH 114 Frontage Road City of Southlake FY 2017 CIP Project Status Form NEW-SH 114 Improvements (General Companion) PROJECT TIMELINE: 2016 to TBD DESCRIPTION: The purpose of this item is to establish a project fund for the design and construction of access roads and ramp reversals along SH 114 from West Dove Road to Kirkwood Boulevard. This project will also include intersection improvements at SH 114 and Kirkwood Boulevard which will include signalization as well as the construction of one and possibly two Texas turnarounds. JUSTIFICATION: Development in the area will make the need for access road and ramps necessary. With commercial development expected to add more vehicles on the road, the installation of access roads and ramp reversals along SH 114 will mitigate the traffic impact expected by allowing alternate access to SH 114. ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: Added vehicle capacity on the roads due to residential and retail development in the area is not properly managed, causing potential traffic issues in the area. New Request Continuation Project Joint Use Mandated / Public Health / Safety Replacement / Major Rehab or Protection of Capital Stock Compliant with 2030 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): Mobility Plan COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: General Community Need / Service Enhancement REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Mobility, Infrastructure Allows for additional commercial development; taxes. FUND: General, CEDC EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN 450 1,500 1,950 LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION 1,500 2,000 2,250 2,500 2,750 11,000 OTHER 450 3,000 2,000 2,250 2,500 2,750 12,950 OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND 450 2,000 2,000 2,250 2,500 2,750 11,950 UTILITY FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SWUS CCPD SPDC PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND CEDC 1,000 1,000 HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND 450 3,000 2,000 2,250 2,500 2,750 12,950 CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND ing is represented in thousands of dollars (000s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776,

86 DEPARTMENT: PROJECT LOCATION: Community Services Bicentennial Park Capital Improvements Program City of Southlake FY 2017 CIP Project Status Form The Marq Southlake Phase 2 Community Enhancement & Development Corporation PROJECT TIMELINE: 09/01/15 to 06/01/18 DESCRIPTION: The purpose of this item is to establish a project fund for the design and development of Phase 2 of The Marq Southlake as per the Southlake 2030 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/Community Facilities Plan. Phase 2 will be approximately 87,000 sq. ft. and include spaces for fitness, performance training, gymnasium, indoor jog/walk track, indoor aquatics, indoor playground, party rooms, child watch and multipurpose classrooms for programs. JUSTIFICATION: The Marq Southlake project was recommended by the Southlake 2030 Parks, Recreation & Open Space / Community Facilities Plan, and approved by the City Council as a priority project for the FY 2016 Community Enhancement and Development Corporation (CEDC) Capital and the FY CEDC CIP. ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: Alternatives would be to not implement the recommendation of the Southlake 2030 Parks, Recreation & Open Space / Community Facilities Plan. STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Infrastructure and Quality Development FUND: CEDC New Request Continuation Project Joint Use Mandated / Public Health / Safety Replacement / Major Rehab or Protection of Capital Stock Community Need / Service Enhancement Compliant with 2030 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): Southlake 2030 PROS/CF Plan COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: The Marq Southlake Phase 1 and Bicentennial Park REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: Facility will generate revenue from fees, programs and sales. EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER 1,787 30,504 32,291 5,400 5,400 1,787 35,904 37,691 OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS ,000 1,800 1,400 1,800 3,200 1,500 1,900 3,400 1,600 2,000 3,600 5,690 7,135 12,825 FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND UTILITY FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SWUS CCPD SPDC PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND 2,000 30,291 32,291 5,400 5,400 2,000 35, CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND 458 ing is represented in thousands of dollars (000s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776,000

87 Southlake Parks Development Corporation Southlake Parks Development Corporation 459

88 Southlake Parks Development Corporation # Project Name Description SPDC1 Southlake Parks Development Corporation Bicentennial Park Phase 3 Design and development of Bicentennial Park Improvements (Phase 3) as per the adopted Southlake 2030 Parks, Recreation & Open Space / Community Facilities (PROS/ CF) Plan. Project scope includes: new tennis building, park restroom, enclosed tennis court(s), trail system completion, synthetic turf field at current in-line hockey court, landscape, turf and irrigation enhancements, and park amenities enhancements. SPDC2 Southlake Parks Development Corporation SPDC Matching s The purpose of this item is to provide for a minimum balance of $200,000 annually within the SPDC Capital in support of the City s SPDC Matching s Program as per the recommendations of the Parks and Recreation Board and SPDC. *Available funding shown in Total Prior ing column. SPDC3 Southlake Parks Development Corporation Southlake Sports Complex Design and development of the Southlake Sports Complex as per the adopted Southlake 2030 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/Community Facilities Plan. The project scope includes: park restrooms and pavilions, existing building improvements, playground, trails, multipurpose sports field improvements, synthetic turf on large field, new park entry feature, parking improvements, park amenities, landscape improvements, irrigation improvements with water well, and expansion of the park maintenance facilities. SPDC4 Southlake Parks Development Corporation Bob Jones Nature Center & Preserve Trails Development Design and development of the Bob Jones Nature Center & Preserve Plan Tier One Improvements as per the Southlake 2030 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/ Community Facilities Plan. The project scope includes: treehouse structure, signage, outdoor classrooms, dirt and decomposed granite trails development, and savannah restoration. Total Prior ing FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 Beyond / Unfunded Total FY 2017 Cumulative Description of Annual Impact on Operating Project s Impact to Annual Operating $3,502,000 $3,500,000 $1,800,000 $- $- $- $- $8,802,000 $3,500,000 Annual Operating Costs $,000 $,000 $,000 $- $- $- $- $- $200,000 $3,600,000 TBD TBD $- $- $1,200,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $3,300,000 $10,500,000 $3,600,000 Annual Operating Costs $130,000 $- $- $- $- $- $- $8,320,000 $8,320,000 $3,600,000 Annual Operating Costs $65,000 Comp Plan Reference Southlake 2030 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/ Community Facilities Plan - Tier 2 Southlake 2030 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/ Community Facilities Plan Southlake 2030 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/ Community Facilities Plan Southlake 2030 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/ Community Facilities Plan SPIN Neigh. 7 All

89 Southlake Parks Development Corporation # Project Name Description SPDC5 Southlake Parks Development Corporation Bob Jones Nature Center & Preserve Nature Trail Expansion Design and development of the Bob Jones Nature Center & Preserve Plan Tier Three Improvements as per the Southlake 2030 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/ Community Facilities Plan. The project scope includes: overlook structures, signage, outdoor classrooms, dirt and decomposed granite trails development, boardwalk and trailhead parking. SPDC6 Southlake Parks Development Corporation Bob Jones Park Improvements Design and development of improvements at Bob Jones Park as per the Southlake 2030 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/Community Facilities Plan. The project scope includes: new pavilion/ restroom, softball complex spectator area improvements, athletic field improvements, additional parking, shade improvements, trails, equestrian area improvements, new north athletic field, conversion of one athletic field to synthetic turf, parking improvements, park maintenance facility improvements, new entry road and entry feature for park and the Bob Jones Nature Center & Preserve, landscape/irrigation improvements, and playground improvements. SPDC7 Southlake Parks Development Corporation North Park Improvements Design and development of improvements at North Park as per the Southlake 2030 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/Community Facilities Plan. The project scope includes: new pavilion, forth athletic field and trail connection to White Chapel Boulevard Total Prior ing FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 Beyond / Unfunded Total FY 2017 Cumulative $- $- $- $- $- $- $2,775,000 $2,775,000 $3,600,000 $- $- $- $- $- $- $20,500,000 $20,500,000 $3,600,000 $- $- $- $- $- $- $1,600,000 $1,600,000 $3,600,000 Description of Annual Impact on Operating Annual Operating Costs Annual Operating Costs Annual Operating Costs Project s Impact to Annual Operating $25,000 $130,000 $15,000 Comp Plan Reference Southlake 2030 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/ Community Facilities Plan Southlake 2030 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/ Community Facilities Plan Southlake 2030 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/ Community Facilities Plan SPIN Neigh

90 Southlake Parks Development Corporation # Project Name Description SPDC8 Southlake Parks Development Corporation Bob Jones Nature Center & Preserve New Building Development Design and development of the Bob Jones Nature Center & Preserve Plan Tier Two Improvements as per the Southlake 2030 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/Community Facilities Plan. The project scope includes: new nature center complex (building, courtyard, water exhibit/ outdoor classroom, educational/ events space), renovated barn, nature playground, signage, outdoor classrooms, dirt and decomposed granite trails development, lake edge mitigation, species diversity propagation, entrance drive, parking, vehicular bridge, and landscape. SPDC9 Southlake Parks Development Corporation Liberty Park at Sheltonwood Improvements Design and development of improvements at Liberty Park at Sheltonwood as per the Southlake 2030 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/ Community Facilities Plan. The project scope includes: convert existing home to community/meeting room space, water well for irrigation, park amenities, sand volleyball, playground, additional parking, completion of trail system, and signage. SPDC10 Southlake Parks Development Corporation Noble Oaks Park Improvements Improvements at Noble Oaks Park as per the Southlake 2030 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/Community Facilities Plan. The project scope includes: completion of trail system and park amenities. SPDC11 Southlake Parks Development Corporation Koalaty Park Improvements Design and development of improvements at Koalaty Park as per the Southlake 2030 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/ Community Facilities Plan. The project scope includes: park restroom, shade structures, sports field lighting, nature trail, park amenities, vehicle drop off, and landscape improvements. Total Prior ing FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 Beyond / Unfunded Total FY 2017 Cumulative $- $- $- $- $- $- $17,500,000 $17,500,000 $3,600,000 $- $- $- $- $- $- $4,360,000 $4,360,000 $3,600,000 $- $- $- $- $- $- $95,000 $95,000 $3,600,000 $- $- $- $- $- $- $2,265,000 $2,265,000 $3,600,000 Description of Annual Impact on Operating Annual Operating Costs Annual Operating Costs Annual Operating Costs Annual Operating Costs Project s Impact to Annual Operating $225,000 $35,000 $1,000 $30,000 Comp Plan Reference Southlake 2030 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/ Community Facilities Plan Southlake 2030 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/ Community Facilities Plan Southlake 2030 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/ Community Facilities Plan Southlake 2030 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/ Community Facilities Plan SPIN Neigh

91 Southlake Parks Development Corporation # Project Name Description SPDC12 Southlake Parks Development Corporation Royal & Annie Smith Park Improvements Design and development of improvements at Royal & Annie Smith Park as per the Southlake 2030 Parks, Recreation & Open Space Plan. The project scope includes: additional parking, playground improvements, water well for irrigation, trail connections, frisbee golf/passive uses, and signage. SPDC13 Southlake Parks Development Corporation Chesapeake Park Improvements Design and development of improvements at Chesapeake Park as per the Southlake 2030 Parks, Recreation & Open Space Plan. The project scope includes: new playground, park restroom, pavilion, tennis or basketball courts, park amenities, trail connections, park signage, water well for irrigation, landscape improvements, and additional parking. SPDC14 Southlake Parks Development Corporation Kirkwood/ Sabre Linear Park Design and development of Kirkwood / Sabre Linear Park as per the Southlake 2030 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/Community Facilities Plan. The project scope includes: trail connectivity from North White Chapel Boulevard to Kirkwood Boulevard SPDC15 Southlake Parks Development Corporation The Cliffs Park Improvements Design and development of improvements at The Cliffs Park as per the Southlake 2030 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/Community Facilities Plan. The project scope includes: multipurpose sports field(s), landscape improvements and screening, trail connectivity, park road and parking, and park amenities. SPDC16 Southlake Parks Development Corporation Oak Pointe Park Improvements Design and development of improvements at Oak Pointe Park as per the Southlake 2030 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/Community Facilities Plan. The project scope includes: trail connectivity to White Chapel Boulevard/ Walnut Grove Elementary School. Total Prior ing FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 Beyond / Unfunded Total FY 2017 Cumulative $- $- $- $- $- $- $660,000 $660,000 $3,600,000 $- $- $- $- $- $- $2,890,000 $2,890,000 $3,600,000 $- $- $- $- $- $- $475,000 $475,000 $3,600,000 $- $- $- $- $- $- $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $3,600,000 $- $- $- $- $- $- $70,000 $70,000 $3,600,000 Description of Annual Impact on Operating Annual Operating Costs Annual Operating Costs Annual Operating Costs Annual Operating Costs Annual Operating Costs Project s Impact to Annual Operating $5,000 $40,000 $5,000 $25,000 $1,000 Comp Plan Reference Southlake 2030 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/ Community Facilities Plan Southlake 2030 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/ Community Facilities Plan Southlake 2030 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/ Community Facilities Plan Southlake 2030 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/ Community Facilities Plan Southlake 2030 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/ Community Facilities Plan SPIN Neigh

92 Southlake Parks Development Corporation # Project Name Description Total Prior ing FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 Beyond / Unfunded Total FY 2017 Cumulative SPDC17 Southlake Parks Development Corporation Safety Town Park Development Design and development of Safety Town Park as per the Southlake 2030 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/ Community Facilities Plan. The project scope includes: miniature Town Square, safety education amenities, park amenities, trails, pavilion, water feature, landscape and irrigation and signage. (Total prior funding was $525,000. City Council approved reallocating $408,471 from the Safety Town project to Bicentennial Park Phase II). $- $- $- $- $- $- $2,600,000 $2,600,000 $3,600,000 SPDC Total: $3,602,000 $3,600,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $69,410,000 $85,612,000 $3,600,000 Description of Annual Impact on Operating Annual Operating Costs Project s Impact to Annual Operating $125,000 Comp Plan Reference Southlake 2030 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/ Community Facilities Plan SPIN Neigh. TBD 464

93 Southlake Parks Development Corporation DEPARTMENT: PROJECT LOCATION: City of Southlake FY 2017 CIP Project Status Form Community Services Department Bicentennial Park Bicentennial Park Phase 3 PROJECT TIMELINE: 04/01/15 to 09/30/19 DESCRIPTION: Design and development of Bicentennial Park Improvements (Phase 3) as per the adopted Southlake 2030 Parks, Recreation & Open Space / Community Facilities (PROS/CF) Plan. Project scope includes: new tennis building, park restroom, enclosed tennis court(s), trail system completion, synthetic turf field at current in-line hockey court, landscape, turf and irrigation enhancements, and park amenities enhancements. JUSTIFICATION: Recommendation of the Southlake 2030 PROS/CF Plan. The Park Board, SPDC and City Council listed Bicentennial Park Improvements as the top park development priority for the FY 2015 SPDC CIP and Capital. ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: Delay implementing the Southlake 2030 PROS/CF Plan recommendation to complete Bicentennial Park. STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Infrastructure and Quality Development FUND: SPDC New Request Continuation Project Joint Use Mandated / Public Health / Safety Replacement / Major Rehab or Protection of Capital Stock Compliant with 2030 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): PROS/CF Plan COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: Companion to Phase 1 and Phase 2 REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: Field Use and tournament fees Community Need / Service Enhancement EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER 643 2,859 3,502 3,500 3,500 1,800 1, ,159 8,802 OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND UTILITY FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SWUS CCPD SPDC PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND 3,502 3,502 3,500 3,500 1,800 1,800 8, CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND ing is represented in thousands of dollars (000s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776,

94 Southlake Parks Development Corporation 466

Capital improvements program (Cip)

Capital improvements program (Cip) Capital Improvements Program (CIP) CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM Introduction In accordance with the Texas Local Government Code and the Charter of the City of Southlake, the FY 219 to FY 223 Capital Improvements

More information

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM (CIP)

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM (CIP) CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM (CIP) A CIP is for the purchase, construction or replacement of the physical assets of the City. This section includes a listing of proposed projects for FY 2014 as well as

More information

DEBT SERVICE FUNDS & DEBT SCHEDULES

DEBT SERVICE FUNDS & DEBT SCHEDULES DEBT SERVICE FUNDS & DEBT SCHEDULES INTEGRITY INNOVATION ACCOUNTABILITY COMMITMENT TO EXCELLENCE TEAMWORK This section provides a summary of the annual principal and interest payments for all outstanding

More information

Debt Service Funds

Debt Service Funds Debt Service Funds & Debt Schedules 327 The City issues general obligation bonds, certificates of obligation, combination tax and revenue certificates of obligation and tax notes to provide for the acquisition

More information

Debt Service FunDS & Debt ScheDuleS

Debt Service FunDS & Debt ScheDuleS Debt Service Funds & Debt Schedules The City issues general obligation bonds, certificates of obligation, combination tax and revenue certificates of obligation and tax notes to provide for the acquisition

More information

SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS

SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS INTEGRITY INNOVATION ACCOUNTABILITY COMMITMENT TO EXCELLENCE TEAMWORK This section provides a detailed spending plan to account for proceeds of specific revenue sources that are legally

More information

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Algoma Township 1 P a g e Table of Contents Title Page 1 Table of Contents 2 Chapter 1 Executive Summary Overview 3 The Capital Improvement Plan 3 Organization 4 Project Prioritization

More information

Special Revenue Funds

Special Revenue Funds Special Revenue Funds 347 City of Southlake Fund structure Chart City of Southlake Budgeted Funds Governmental Funds Proprietary Funds Special Revenue Funds -- Bicentennial Concessions -- Community Enhancement

More information

RECEIVE A REPORT AND APPROVE PROPOSED PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR THE PUBLIC

RECEIVE A REPORT AND APPROVE PROPOSED PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR THE PUBLIC J-17 STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: October 24, 2017 TO: City Council FROM: Russ Thompson, Public Works Director PRESENTER: Russ Thompson, Public Works Director SUBJECT: RECEIVE A REPORT AND APPROVE PROPOSED

More information

City of Des Moines. Citizen Engagement Capital Improvement Program. November 29, 2016

City of Des Moines. Citizen Engagement Capital Improvement Program. November 29, 2016 City of Des Moines Citizen Engagement Capital Improvement Program November 29, 2016 Goals of Citizen Engagement Goal Focus on service levels Department definitions of adequate service and opportunities

More information

TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES

TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES TABLE OF CONTENTS A. GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES... 3 B. SUMMARY... 17 LIST OF TABLES Table IX 1: City of Winter Springs Five-Year Schedule of Capital Improvements (SCI) FY 2013/14-2017/18... 11 Table

More information

Public Works and Development Services

Public Works and Development Services City of Commerce Capital Improvement Program Prioritization Policy Public Works and Development Services SOP 101 Version No. 1.0 Effective 05/19/15 Purpose The City of Commerce s (City) Capital Improvement

More information

Capital Investment Program (CIP) About CIP

Capital Investment Program (CIP) About CIP Capital Investment Program (CIP) About CIP The Capital Investment Program (CIP) is a multi-year program aimed at upgrading and expanding City facilities, buildings, grounds, streets, parks and roads. The

More information

This page intentionally left blank

This page intentionally left blank 197 This page intentionally left blank 198 Capital Improvement Program PROCEDURE Each year the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is prepared from project requests submitted by the various departments.

More information

DRAFT C APITAL I MPROVEMENT P LAN C ITY OF G EORGETOWN, TEXAS S TREETS/ DRAINAGE/AIRPORT F ISCAL Y EAR 201 6

DRAFT C APITAL I MPROVEMENT P LAN C ITY OF G EORGETOWN, TEXAS S TREETS/ DRAINAGE/AIRPORT F ISCAL Y EAR 201 6 C ITY OF G EORGETOWN, TEXAS C APITAL I MPROVEMENT P LAN S TREETS/ DRAINAGE/AIRPORT F ISCAL Y EAR 201 6 Georgetown Transportation Advisory Board April 10, 2015 Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Transportation

More information

Policy CIE The following are the minimum acceptable LOS standards to be utilized in planning for capital improvement needs:

Policy CIE The following are the minimum acceptable LOS standards to be utilized in planning for capital improvement needs: Vision Statement: Provide high quality public facilities that meet and exceed the minimum level of service standards. Goals, Objectives and Policies: Goal CIE-1. The City shall provide for facilities and

More information

Master Development Plan for the TxDOT North Tarrant Express Project, Segments 2-4. Chapter 6: Preliminary Cost Estimates.

Master Development Plan for the TxDOT North Tarrant Express Project, Segments 2-4. Chapter 6: Preliminary Cost Estimates. , Segments 2-4 Chapter 6: Preliminary Cost Estimates Table of Contents 6.1 Details of Facilities... 17 6.2 Pre-Development and Facility Feasibility... 1 6.2.1 Planning... 1 6.2.2 Environmental Mitigation...

More information

Transportation Planning FAQ s

Transportation Planning FAQ s Transportation Planning FAQ s 1. What is the Master Thoroughfare Plan (MTP)? The Master Thoroughfare Plan defines the network of existing and future roads deemed appropriate to accommodate the various

More information

Stephanie Smith, Project EngineerW

Stephanie Smith, Project EngineerW MEMORANDUM v TO: Paul Oehme, Director of Public Works/ City Engineer o FROM: Stephanie Smith, Project EngineerW 7700 Market Boulevard PO Box 147 Chanhassen, MN 55317 Administration Phone: 9522271100 Fax

More information

July 25, Members of City Council City of League City, Texas

July 25, Members of City Council City of League City, Texas Mark Rohr City Manager 300 W Walker League City, TX 77573 Main: 281.554.1000 Direct: 281.554.1005 www.leaguecity.com July 25, 2016 Members of City Council City of League City, Texas Transmitted herewith

More information

COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR PUBLIC WORKS

COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR PUBLIC WORKS COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR PUBLIC WORKS Public Works is comprised of several Departments/Divisions that develop, improve, and maintain the County s basic infrastructure needs related to transportation, storm

More information

Capital Improvement Program

Capital Improvement Program Grand Rapids Charter Township Capital Improvement Program 2014-2020 - 1 - Table of Contents Title Page 1 Table of Contents 2 Chapter 1 Executive Summary Overview 3 The Capital Improvement Program 3 Organization

More information

The City of Owen Sound Asset Management Plan

The City of Owen Sound Asset Management Plan The City of Owen Sound Asset Management Plan December 013 Adopted by Council March 4, 014 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 1 INTRODUCTION....1 Vision.... What is Asset Management?....3 Link to

More information

QUALITY TRANSPORTATION SUMMARY

QUALITY TRANSPORTATION SUMMARY QUALITY TRANSPORTATION SUMMARY Quality Transportation Overview... 126 Department of Transportation... 127 Traffic Field Operations... 129 Winston-Salem Transit Authority... 131 Quality Transportation Non-Departmental...

More information

1. identifies the required capacity of capital improvements to serve existing and future development based on level-of-service (LOS) standards;

1. identifies the required capacity of capital improvements to serve existing and future development based on level-of-service (LOS) standards; DIVISION 4.200 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT SECTION 4.201 INTRODUCTION The purpose of the Capital Improvements Element (CIE) is to tie the capital improvement needs identified in the other elements to

More information

TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL PROGRAM

TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL PROGRAM TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL PROGRAM The transportation capital program for fiscal year 2016 through fiscal year 2020 consists of a variety of transportation construction and maintenance capital projects primarily

More information

LEGEND Bridges Parks Fire Stations Project Locations Libraries Schools A

LEGEND Bridges Parks Fire Stations Project Locations Libraries Schools A LEGEND Bridges Parks Fire Stations Project Locations Libraries Schools A Aid to Construction Fund The Aid to Construction Fund (Water) are funds received from customers for requested water service and

More information

CITY OF SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA. April 27, 2012

CITY OF SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA. April 27, 2012 OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER CALIFORNIA April 27, 2012 CITY HALL 5 th FLOOR 915 I STREET SACRAMENTO, CA 95814-2684 PH 916-808-5704 FAX 916-808-7618 Honorable Mayor and City Council Sacramento, California

More information

Transportation Improvement Program Project Priority Process White Paper

Transportation Improvement Program Project Priority Process White Paper Transportation Improvement Program Project Priority Process White Paper Pierce County Public Works- Office of the County Engineer Division Introduction This paper will document the process used by the

More information

Residential Street Improvement Plan

Residential Street Improvement Plan Residential Street Improvement Plan Introduction Aging infrastructure, including streets, is a nationwide problem and it is one of the biggest challenges facing many cities and counties throughout the

More information

An Evaluation of the Performance Measurement Process of The City of Austin

An Evaluation of the Performance Measurement Process of The City of Austin To: Mayor Steve Adler From: Mike Hebert and Linda Bailey Cc: City Council Members April 22, 2016 Summary An Evaluation of the Performance Measurement Process of The City of Austin Recently, the City Council

More information

Capital Improvement Program Fund

Capital Improvement Program Fund Capital Improvement Program Fund The Capital Improvement Program Fund provides funding for streets, public buildings (both governmental and school facilities), land, and other capital assets. Capital Improvement

More information

INTRODUCTION. Why a CIP? What is a Capital Improvement?

INTRODUCTION. Why a CIP? What is a Capital Improvement? INTRODUCTION The Capital Improvements Program (CIP) is a six-year plan used to identify and coordinate public needs in the City, taking into consideration existing plans, goals and resources. The purpose

More information

1 (b) Reconstruct and rehabilitate state highways to better maintain 2 them and prevent and avoid costly future repairs; 3 (c) Support local

1 (b) Reconstruct and rehabilitate state highways to better maintain 2 them and prevent and avoid costly future repairs; 3 (c) Support local 1 (b) Reconstruct and rehabilitate state highways to better maintain 2 them and prevent and avoid costly future repairs; 3 (c) Support local government efforts to fund local transportation 4 projects that

More information

Pinellas County Capital Improvement Program, FY2011 Through FY2016 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND

Pinellas County Capital Improvement Program, FY2011 Through FY2016 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND Introduction to the Six-Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) The Pinellas County Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is a comprehensive six-year plan of proposed capital projects, intended to identify

More information

ADOPTED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET

ADOPTED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET CITY OF PLACERVILLE ADOPTED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET 2012/2013 1 2 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM POLICY Each year the City faces the challenge of meeting infrastructure and equipment needs with

More information

City of Glendale, Arizona Pavement Management Program

City of Glendale, Arizona Pavement Management Program City of Glendale, Arizona Pavement Management Program Current Year Plan (FY 2014) and Five-Year Plan (FY 2015-2019) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPORT December 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS I BACKGROUND

More information

Memo. To: Mayor Lee Gray Members of Council City Manager Bill Vance. From: Scott Tourville. Project: 2015 CIP Budget Update CC:

Memo. To: Mayor Lee Gray Members of Council City Manager Bill Vance. From: Scott Tourville. Project: 2015 CIP Budget Update CC: To: Mayor Lee Gray Members of Council City Manager Bill Vance Memo From: Scott Tourville Project: 2015 CIP Budget Update CC: C. Schornack S. Spencer File Date: November 21, 2014 RE: Updated 2015 CIP Plan

More information

FY 2017 FY 2021 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Executive Summary

FY 2017 FY 2021 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Executive Summary FY 2017 FY 2021 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Executive Summary The adopted FY 2017 FY 2021 CIP is $235.8 million (including prior year expenditures) and is $28 million higher than the previous CIP

More information

Overview of the 2016 Proposed Budget

Overview of the 2016 Proposed Budget Overview of the 2016 Proposed Budget City of Burnsville November 24, 2015 2016 Budget Process Meeting Dates June 9 July 14 August 11 September 8 October 20 October 27 Discussion Topics Financial Management

More information

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Inventory Analysis

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Inventory Analysis CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Inventory Analysis 2.191 INTRODUCTION The principal purpose of this element is to identify the capital improvements that are needed to implement the comprehensive plan and ensure

More information

EXHIBIT A DONATIONS April 26, 2018

EXHIBIT A DONATIONS April 26, 2018 EXHIBIT A DONATIONS April 26, 2018 1 830 Investors, Ltd. 2 AASA Holdings Humble The donor is donating the design and construction of a traffic signal from SH 99 at Imperial Promenade/Townsen Blvd into

More information

Chapter 6: Financial Resources

Chapter 6: Financial Resources Chapter 6: Financial Resources Introduction This chapter presents the project cost estimates, revenue assumptions and projected revenues for the Lake~Sumter MPO. The analysis reflects a multi-modal transportation

More information

PALM BEACH COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

PALM BEACH COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Palm Beach County (the County) provides the needed and desired urban services to the public. In order to provide these services, the County must furnish and maintain capital facilities and equipment, such

More information

Capital Improvements Plan and Budget. April 10, 2012

Capital Improvements Plan and Budget. April 10, 2012 Capital Improvements Plan and Budget April 10, 2012 1 Sets project priorities for at least a five year period Current CIP shows projects out ten years Serves as a planning tool for capital improvement

More information

INTRODUCTION TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Overview... 3 Capital Improvement Policy... 5 Relationship Between Capital Projects and Operating Budgets... 7 Art in Public Places Program... 8 Categorization of Capital

More information

2. fl Concord REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL/AGENCY BOARD

2. fl Concord REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL/AGENCY BOARD AGENDA ITEM NO. 2. fl Concord REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL/AGENCY BOARD TO THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL: DATE: June 22, 2009 Subiect: ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO. 09-53, APPROVING THE CITY'S REVISED PROPOSITION

More information

City of Portsmouth Portsmouth, New Hampshire Department of Public Works

City of Portsmouth Portsmouth, New Hampshire Department of Public Works RFP# 10-07 City of Portsmouth Portsmouth, New Hampshire Department of Public Works MARKET STREET BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PATH BETWEEN MICHAEL SUCCI DRIVE AND THE NH PORT AUTHORITY REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Sealed

More information

Appendix D Total Project Cost and Year of Expenditure Breakdown

Appendix D Total Project Cost and Year of Expenditure Breakdown Total Project Cost and Year of Expenditure Breakdown p. D -1 Total Project Cost and Year of Expenditure Breakdown Financial Constraint Methodology using Total Project Cost and Year of Expenditure Dollars

More information

Fiscal Responsibility to Further Invest in the Future. Executive Committee Department of Finance May 4, 2017

Fiscal Responsibility to Further Invest in the Future. Executive Committee Department of Finance May 4, 2017 Fiscal Responsibility to Further Invest in the Future Executive Committee Department of Finance May 4, 2017 1 Asset Inventory Denver s Assets Parks and Recreation $1.8B Transportation $4.7B Buildings $1.9B

More information

FY 2016 FY 2020 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Executive Summary

FY 2016 FY 2020 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Executive Summary FY 2016 FY 2020 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Executive Summary The adopted FY 2016 FY 2020 CIP is $205.3 million (including prior year expenditures) and is $2.9 million lower than the previous CIP

More information

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES. Goal 1: [CI] (EFF. 7/16/90)

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES. Goal 1: [CI] (EFF. 7/16/90) CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES Goal 1: [CI] (EFF. 7/16/90) To use sound fiscal policies to provide adequate public facilities concurrent with, or prior to development in order

More information

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS. City of St. Augustine Comprehensive Plan EAR-Based Amendments

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS. City of St. Augustine Comprehensive Plan EAR-Based Amendments CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS City of St. Augustine Comprehensive Plan EAR-Based Amendments CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT CI Goal 1 The City shall manage its financial resources to adequately provide public facilities

More information

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES 2009-2014 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES 2009-2014 Capital Improvement Plan Guidelines and Procedures 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction...2 II. Capital Improvement Plan Development

More information

Ten-Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP)

Ten-Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Ten-Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 1 Introduction to CIP Buildings, infrastructure, technology, and major equipment are the physical foundation for providing services to constituents. Capital planning

More information

INTRODUCTION TO CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAMMING

INTRODUCTION TO CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAMMING INTRODUCTION TO CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAMMING Jerry Hiebert, AICP (Updated by V. Rosales, AICP in 2007) Planners often hear the complaint that their plans sit on shelves gathering dust and are not implemented

More information

Resident Strategic Plan Input Report

Resident Strategic Plan Input Report City of Warrenville, Illinois Strategic/Economic Development Plan DuPage Forest Preserve Warrenville Grove Bridge Report 1 Resident Strategic Plan Input Report Page Intentionally Left Blank for Double-Sided

More information

How to Read the Project Modification Listings - Roadway Section

How to Read the Project Modification Listings - Roadway Section How to Read the Project Modification Listings - Roadway Section Sa m pl e The project listing includes all projects for which Regional Transportation Council action will be requested during this Transportation

More information

CITY OF BURBANK FINANCIAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT

CITY OF BURBANK FINANCIAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT CITY OF BURBANK FINANCIAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT DATE: July 17, 2018 TO: FROM: Ron Davis, City Manager Cindy Giraldo, Financial Services Director SUBJECT: Burbank Infrastructure and Community

More information

City Services Appendix

City Services Appendix Technical vices 1.0 Introduction... 1 1.1 The Capital Facilities Plan... 1 1.2 Utilities Plan... 2 1.3 Key Principles Guiding Bremerton s Capital Investments... 3 1.4 Capital Facilities and Utilities Addressed

More information

MONTE SERENO BETTER STREETS COMMISSION AGENDA 7:00 P.M. Thursday March 8, 2018 Regular Meeting

MONTE SERENO BETTER STREETS COMMISSION AGENDA 7:00 P.M. Thursday March 8, 2018 Regular Meeting MONTE SERENO BETTER STREETS COMMISSION AGENDA 7:00 P.M. Thursday March 8, 2018 Regular Meeting Monte Sereno City Council Chambers 18041 Saratoga-Los Gatos Road, Monte Sereno, CA 95030 MEETING CALLED TO

More information

Year 2014 Engineer s Report regarding the Status of ownership, Working order and Condition of the Public Infrastructure.

Year 2014 Engineer s Report regarding the Status of ownership, Working order and Condition of the Public Infrastructure. Year 2014 Engineer s Report regarding the Status of ownership, Working order and Condition of the Public Infrastructure. Project: MEADOW PINES (AKA COBBLESTONE) PEMBROKE PINES, FL Prepared for: MEADOW

More information

SB 83 Additional Vehicle Registration Fee Expenditure Plan (July 15, 2010)

SB 83 Additional Vehicle Registration Fee Expenditure Plan (July 15, 2010) 1. INTRODUCTION A. SUMMARY In late October, the Governor signed into law SB 83 (Hancock), which authorizes congestion management agencies (CMAs) to impose an annual vehicle registration fee increase of

More information

CITY OF BLUE ASH Interoffice Memo City Manager's Office

CITY OF BLUE ASH Interoffice Memo City Manager's Office TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF BLUE ASH Interoffice Memo City Manager's Office City Council City Manager and Department Directors Agenda Items for the November 9 th Council Meeting DATE: November 7, 2017 COPIES:

More information

Economic Indicators Interest Rates GDP Growth Fuel Costs. Housing & Commercial Growth Building Permits Home Values Top Taxpayer Meetings

Economic Indicators Interest Rates GDP Growth Fuel Costs. Housing & Commercial Growth Building Permits Home Values Top Taxpayer Meetings TRANSMITTAL LETTER The Transmittal Letter is written to the City Council by the City Manager and provides a high-level preview of the City Manager s proposed budget. It contains information including the

More information

Georgetown Planning Department Plan Annual Update: Background

Georgetown Planning Department Plan Annual Update: Background 2030 Plan Annual Update: 2014 Background The 2030 Comprehensive Plan was unanimously adopted by City Council on February 26, 2008. The Plan was an update from Georgetown s 1988 Century Plan. One of the

More information

Self-Supported Municipal Improvement districts

Self-Supported Municipal Improvement districts Self-Supported Municipal Improvement districts Combined Annual Report Downtown Highland Park Ingersoll Sherman Hill June 30, 2012 FAQ s What is a self-supported municipal improvement district or SSMID?

More information

FISCAL YEAR RECOMMENDED BUDGET

FISCAL YEAR RECOMMENDED BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 2017-2018 RECOMMENDED BUDGET JUNE 6, 2017 AGENDA City Manager s Budget Status FY 2017-18 General Fund Recommended Budget FY 2017-18 Recommended Non-General Fund Budget FY 2017-18 Recommended

More information

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO ORDINANCE NO. 4-217 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SEMINOLE, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE CITY OF SEMINOLE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, GOALS OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES OF THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT; REPEALING THE PUBLIC

More information

Integrity Innovation Accountability Commitment to Excellence Teamwork. FY 2019 Proposed Budget

Integrity Innovation Accountability Commitment to Excellence Teamwork. FY 2019 Proposed Budget Integrity Innovation Accountability Commitment to Excellence Teamwork FY 2019 Proposed Budget This budget will raise more revenue from property taxes than last year s budget by an amount of $1,791,712,

More information

Mayor Riggle and Members of City Council R. Thomas Homan, City Manager. SUBJECT: Capital Improvement Program DATE: August 14, 2017

Mayor Riggle and Members of City Council R. Thomas Homan, City Manager. SUBJECT: Capital Improvement Program DATE: August 14, 2017 TO: FROM: Mayor Riggle and Members of City Council R. Thomas Homan, City Manager SUBJECT: 2017-2021 Capital Improvement Program DATE: August 14, 2017 Pursuant to section 79 of the City Charter, submitted

More information

City Council Budget Work Session. City of McKinney August 4, 2017

City Council Budget Work Session. City of McKinney August 4, 2017 City Council Budget Work Session City of McKinney August 4, 2017 Agenda Budget Process & FY18 Overview Property Tax General Fund Revenues & Expenditures Capital Improvements Program Debt Service Water

More information

Public Works Transportation Infrastructure Study. Minneapolis Public Works Transportation Infrastructure Study

Public Works Transportation Infrastructure Study. Minneapolis Public Works Transportation Infrastructure Study Minneapolis Public Works Transportation Background Study Objective Summary of Results Next Steps and Policy Questions Background: Currently, funding availability drives infrastructure investment decisions.

More information

2018 CAPITAL BUDGET CAPITAL PLAN

2018 CAPITAL BUDGET CAPITAL PLAN 2018 CAPITAL BUDGET 2019-2027 CAPITAL PLAN This is administrations recommended 2018 Capital Budget to Red Deer City Council. Final decisions will be made as a part of Councils review changes may occur.

More information

SOUND TRANSIT STAFF REPORT MOTION NO. M D Street-to-M Street Track & Signal Project Preferred Alternative

SOUND TRANSIT STAFF REPORT MOTION NO. M D Street-to-M Street Track & Signal Project Preferred Alternative SOUND TRANSIT STAFF REPORT MOTION NO. M2007-126 D Street-to-M Street Track & Signal Project Preferred Alternative Meeting: Date: Type of Action: Staff Contact: Phone: Board 12/13/07 Discussion/Possible

More information

TOWNSHIP OF UPPER ST. CLAIR LONG-TERM PLAN

TOWNSHIP OF UPPER ST. CLAIR LONG-TERM PLAN FIVE YEAR PROJECTION FIVE YEAR PROJECTION OVERVIEW The Five Year Projection for all Township Funds is a tool in which the Board of Commissioners and Township Staff can monitor potential funding impacts

More information

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Goals, Objectives and Policies CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT GOAL 9.1.: USE SOUND FISCAL POLICIES TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE PUBLIC FACILITIES TO ALL RESIDENTS WITHIN THE CITY. FISCAL POLICIES MUST PROTECT INVESTMENTS

More information

DRAFT UTP November Update - Funding Adjustments Summary EXHIBIT A REVISION DATE 11/7/14. (Amounts in millions) Sum $0

DRAFT UTP November Update - Funding Adjustments Summary EXHIBIT A REVISION DATE 11/7/14. (Amounts in millions) Sum $0 UTP November Update - Funding Adjustments Summary (Amounts in millions) District/Division//TMA Fiscal Year Adjusted Amount Post Public Meeting Adjustments Austin 3 SH 130 Concession FY $6,500,000 3 SH

More information

CIP. February,

CIP. February, 2018-2022 CIP February, 21 2017 Agenda Biennial Budget 2018/2019 Budget Calendar 2018-2022 CIP Process Prioritized List of Projects Biennial Budgeting Strategic Culture in Olathe Strategic Culture in Olathe

More information

Capital Improvements Program. City Council October 14, 2014

Capital Improvements Program. City Council October 14, 2014 Capital Improvements Program City Council October 14, 2014 Neighborhood Attendees ~15 (Paul Kaspar) Presentation Today CIP Advantages/Process Approved CIP Program (FY14 - FY18 CIP) Financial Forecast Projects

More information

How to Read the Project Modification Listings Roadway Section

How to Read the Project Modification Listings Roadway Section How to Read the Project Modification Listings Roadway Section The project listing includes all projects for which Regional Transportation Council action will be requested during this Transportation Improvement

More information

Citizens Guide to the Budget

Citizens Guide to the Budget How to Read the Budget 23 The Allocation Process 24 Budget Process Timeline 26 City Funds 27 Basis of Budgeting 28-21 - How to Read the Budget The Fiscal Year 1999 Final Budget is contained within five

More information

Implementation Project Development and Review 255

Implementation Project Development and Review 255 Introduction 248 Implementation Principles 249 Public Agency Fiduciary Responsibilities 250 Project Development and Review Process 252 Project Development and Review 255 Maintenance 23 Implementation Implementation

More information

IMPLEMENTATION A. INTRODUCTION C H A P T E R

IMPLEMENTATION A. INTRODUCTION C H A P T E R C H A P T E R 11 IMPLEMENTATION A. INTRODUCTION This chapter addresses implementation of the General Plan. The Plan s seven elements include 206 individual actions. 1 Many are already underway or are on-going.

More information

~ FINANCIAL ACTION SUMMARY / Expenditure Required Amount Budgeted/Approved (Over)/Under Approved Amount

~ FINANCIAL ACTION SUMMARY / Expenditure Required Amount Budgeted/Approved (Over)/Under Approved Amount CITYOFWOODINVILLE, WA REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL 17301 133rct Avenue NE, Woodinville, WA 98072 WWW.Cl.WOODINVILLE.WA.US To: Honorable City Council Date: April 5, 2016 By Thomas E Hansen P E., Public Works

More information

Infrastructure Asset Management. Southwest Chula Vista Civic Association April 26, 2007

Infrastructure Asset Management. Southwest Chula Vista Civic Association April 26, 2007 Infrastructure Asset Management Southwest Chula Vista Civic Association April 26, 2007 Chula Vista s Municipal Infrastructure Pavement* Traffic Signals Alleys Streetlights Parking Lots Street Signs Sidewalks*

More information

Submitted by: Jeffrey Egeberg, Secretary, Public Works Commission. Street Repair Policy Update and Permeable Paver Trial Project

Submitted by: Jeffrey Egeberg, Secretary, Public Works Commission. Street Repair Policy Update and Permeable Paver Trial Project Public Works Commission ACTION CALENDAR July 14, 2009 To: From: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Public Works Commission Submitted by: Jeffrey Egeberg, Secretary, Public Works Commission

More information

City of Roanoke Preliminary Operating and Capital Budget FY

City of Roanoke Preliminary Operating and Capital Budget FY City of Roanoke Preliminary Operating and Capital Budget FY 2015-16 Presented by: City Manager Scott Campbell Director of Fiscal and Administrative Services Vicki Rodriquez 108 S. Oak Street, Roanoke TX,

More information

BUDGET POLICES Capital Improvement Program

BUDGET POLICES Capital Improvement Program BUDGET POLICES Capital Improvement Program D-38 City of Mercer Island 2007-2008 Budget Capital Improvement Program Background The City of Mercer Island separates the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) into

More information

8. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Goals, Objectives, and Policies

8. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Goals, Objectives, and Policies 8. Goals, Objectives, and Policies GOAL 8-1: TO USE SOUND FISCAL POLICIES TO PROVIDE PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES CONCURRENT WITH DEVELOPMENT/REDEVELOPMENT IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE AND MAINTAIN ADOPTED STANDARDS

More information

PUBLIC WORKS CIP SUPPORT

PUBLIC WORKS CIP SUPPORT PUBLIC WORKS Public Works is comprised of several Departments/Divisions that develop, improve, and maintain the County s basic infrastructure needs related to transportation, storm water management, and

More information

City of Prince Albert YEAR STRATEGIC PLAN

City of Prince Albert YEAR STRATEGIC PLAN 5 City of Prince Albert YEAR STRATEGIC PLAN 2015-2020 City of Prince Albert Introduction Members of City Council, along with Senior Administration, attended a two-day Strategic Planning Session for the

More information

Rule #1: Procedure for Distribution of Revenues for Transportation Services for Seniors and the Disabled

Rule #1: Procedure for Distribution of Revenues for Transportation Services for Seniors and the Disabled BOARD POLICY NO. 031 TransNet ORDINANCE AND EXPENDITURE PLAN RULES The following rules have been adopted and amended by the SANDAG Board of Directors in its role as the San Diego County Regional Transportation

More information

Agenda. Background Budget / PW General Fund Budget Streets & Infrastructure Citizen Engagement

Agenda. Background Budget / PW General Fund Budget Streets & Infrastructure Citizen Engagement 1 Agenda Background 2013-2014 Budget / PW General Fund Budget Streets & Infrastructure Citizen Engagement Sustainable Transportation Funding Dedicated Revenues Potential Rate Impact Clarification Proposed

More information

Arlington County, Virginia

Arlington County, Virginia Arlington County, Virginia METRO METRO 2015 2024 CIP Metro Funding Project Description The Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA/Metro) is a unique federal-state-local partnership formed

More information

Capital Improvements

Capital Improvements Capital Improvements CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT GOAL 7-1: PROVIDE & MAINTAIN PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES Provide and maintain public facilities and services which protect and promote the public health,

More information

Capital Improvement Projects

Capital Improvement Projects Capital Improvement Projects This section highlights the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects proposed for FY 2017-2018. Capital projects are designed to enhance the City s infrastructure, extend

More information

City of SANTA ANA. Proposed Budget Summary FY

City of SANTA ANA. Proposed Budget Summary FY City of SANTA ANA Proposed Budget Summary FY 2015-2016 June 2, 2015 City Manager s Budget Message will be made available on May 29 th, 2015. This Page Intentionally Left Blank Total Annual Budget FY 2015-2016

More information

INVESTING STRATEGICALLY

INVESTING STRATEGICALLY 11 INVESTING STRATEGICALLY Federal transportation legislation (Fixing America s Surface Transportation Act FAST Act) requires that the 2040 RTP be based on a financial plan that demonstrates how the program

More information

Planning Board Worksession No.6: Transportation and Staging

Planning Board Worksession No.6: Transportation and Staging Planning Board Worksession No.6: Transportation and Staging Prior Worksessions January 27: Focused on transportation analysis and staging recommendations in the Draft Plan. February 9: Reviewed the Executive

More information