Capital improvements program (Cip)

Transcription

1 Capital Improvements Program (CIP)

2 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM Introduction In accordance with the Texas Local Government Code and the Charter of the City of Southlake, the FY 219 to FY 223 Capital Improvements Program (CIP) is submitted for City Council consideration. FY 219 CIP Calendar April 218 CIP Project Forms Due The challenges to retain and/or expand City services in the midst of shrinking resources and increasing costs has put pressure on City government to make its limited capital resources work more efficiently. City administration, elected and appointed officials, and staff have taken several steps to make its capital expenditures more closely reflect its long-range objectives. May 218 June 218 July 218 August 218 technical Committee Review Final Technical Committee review City Manager Review spdc / Parks Board recommendation City Manager Files One such step is the connection between the City s City Council Work Session capital planning efforts with its budgeting process. The CIP establishes a five year funding schedule for September 218 City Council Work Session the purchase, construction, or replacement of physical 1st Reading and Public Hearing assets of the City. Capital improvements typically have a useful life of more than ten years and value City Council 2nd Reading greater than $1,. The first year of the Capital and Public Hearing Improvements Program is called the Capital and is appropriated in the same manner as the annual Operating. s for projects are appropriated on an annual basis. Projects approved for subsequent years are approved for planning purposes only and do not receive expenditure authority until they are part of the Capital. Creating the Capital Improvements Program In May 218, the CIP Technical Committee, comprised of the Assistant City Managers and Department Directors, began the process of evaluating CIP project requests. The methodology involved a presentation of each project by a staff member of the requesting department and the use of the CIP project evaluation form. Following presentation by each requesting department, the projects were ranked in the appropriate funding category (i.e. General, Utility, SPDC). The resulting ranked project list was then reviewed by the Technical Committee to ensure that there were no obvious flaws in the ranking system. The Technical Committee then reviewed the dollar amount available in each fund and recommended the projects to be funded in the upcoming fiscal year (FY 218) and the other four (4) future years (FY 22 to FY 223). Once the Technical Committee completed its review, the list was presented to the City Manager who then met with the Technical Committee regarding needed changes or additions. The Technical Committee input revisions and held additional meetings with department heads as needed to ensure the proposed plan is comprehensive. Prior to the City Manager s submission of the Capital, the Southlake Parks Development Corporation (SPDC) and the Parks Board met to review and recommend their respective portions of the budget and five-year plan. 358

3 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM Relationship Between the Capital Improvements Program and the Annual The City s annual budget itemizes and appropriates the funds needed for all municipal purposes during the next fiscal year, and is comprised of two separate budgets - the Operating and the Capital Projects. The Operating includes the day-to-day operational expenses of the City, such as salaries, supplies, and expenses for programmatic activities. The Capital Improvements Program includes the anticipated capital project costs for the next five fiscal years. The first year of projects contained in the CIP become the basis for formulating the Capital Projects. Relationship Between the Capital Improvements Program and the City s Planning Process Comprehensive plans are official public documents adopted by local governments as policy guides to making decisions about the physical development of the community in the next 2 years. The City of Southlake s current comprehensive plan, the Southlake 23 Plan, includes a number of citywide plans that prioritize the development of thoroughfares, sidewalks, trails, and parks. The Park, Recreation and Open Space/ Facilities Plan, the Mobility Plan, the Water Plan, and others, provide recommendations that link the future vision of the community to relatively short-term actions. Recognizing the importance of the link between the Capital Improvements Program and implementation of the master plan, projects are required to demonstrate linkage to one of the City s master plans. By using the Capital Improvements Program process to reinforce the desired master plan priorities, the City s physical future can be better shaped. Additionally, each project sheet and the project matrix identifies, when appropriate, connection to a project identified in the City s comprehensive plan. Relationship Between the Capital Improvements Program and the Biennial Citizen Survey In 217, the City completed its most recent biennial citizen satisfaction survey. Results of the City s satisfaction survey are put to use in several ways, including playing key roles in the City s comprehensive plan update (Southlake 235 Plan), in the development of each Department s proposed budget and in the City s performance measures. Survey results are also critical to the development of this year s Capital Projects. Many recurring themes emerged throughout the survey responses, several of which have a direct link with the preparation and execution of the City s CIP. For example, the City surveyed respondents regarding not only the importance they place on City services but also the satisfaction respondents had with those services. The gap between the importance placed on a service and the satisfaction with that service indicates areas where the City is not meeting our customers expectations. The City developed a chart (see next page) listing the top gap issues and has also created a plan to address each issue. Of those top gap issues, all are related to areas that can be addressed through the City s capital programming: manage traffic congestion, provide pedestrian pathways and sidewalks, and provide bicycle facilities on streets and trails. The Benefits of Capital Programming With time, public facilities need major repair, replacement, or expansion. Maintaining and upgrading a community s capital stock requires significant financial investment. This investment must be weighed against other community needs and analyzed in light of community goals. The City of Southlake, like many cities, is under pressure to make efficient use of capital resources and must make difficult 359

4 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM HOW WELL IS THE CITY PERFORMING IN MEETING THE NEEDS OF SOUTHLAKE RESIDENTS? Gap Threshold: Any service with a 25% or higher gap is identified for prioritization Importance vs. Satisfaction 215 vs. 217 Manage Traffic Congestion 53% 56% Provide Pedestrian Pathways, Sidewalks, And Trails 32% 32% X Provide Animal Control Services X Prepare The City For Emergencies 15% 13% 21% 2% X Indicates significant difference at 95% confidence level when 217 results are compared 215 X Patrol To Ward Off Criminals 13% 19% XProvide Code-Enforcement Services 13% 19% Provide Information On X Bicycle Safety And Education 15% 25% choices. There are more needs than can be satisfied at once, and the selection of one investment over another may shape the development of the City for years to come. Capital improvements programming is a valuable tool to ensure that choices are made wisely. The City s development goals are implemented, in part, by the careful provision of capital facilities. The benefits of this systematic approach to planning capital projects include the following: Focuses attention on community goals, needs, and capabilities. Through capital improvements programming, capital projects can be brought into line with the City s long-range plans by balancing identified needs with financial capacities. Considered individually, a new park, water system improvements, and street widening may be great ideas; however, each project may look quite different when, in the course of the Capital Improvements Program process, it is forced to compete directly with other projects for limited funds. Optimizes use of the taxpayer s dollar. The Capital Improvements Program helps the City Council and City Manager make sound annual budget decisions. Careful planning of capital improvements helps prevent costly mistakes. In addition, capital planning allows the City to save money in several other ways. For example, investors in municipal bonds tend to look more favorably on communities that have a Capital Improvements Program; if bond financing is selected for a capital improvement project, the City may realize significant savings on interest. 36

5 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM Guides future growth and development. The location and capacity of capital improvements shape the growth and development of the City. City decision makers can use the Capital Improvements Program to develop well thought-out policies to guide future land use and economic development. Encourages efficient government. Interdepartmental coordination of capital improvements programming can reduce scheduling conflicts and ensure that no single function receives more than its fair share of resources. In addition, the CIP can be used to promote innovative management techniques and improve governmental efficiency and effectiveness. Improves the basis for intergovernmental and regional cooperation. Capital improvements programming offers public officials of all governmental units (City of Southlake, Tarrant and Denton Counties, and local school districts) an opportunity to plan the location, timing, and financing of improvements in the interest of the community as a whole. Maintains a sound and stable financial program. Having to make large or frequent unplanned expenditures can endanger the financial well-being of the City. Sharp changes in the tax structure or bonded indebtedness may be avoided when construction projects are planned in advance and scheduled at intervals over a number of years. When there is ample time for planning, the most economical means of financing each project can be selected in advance. Furthermore, a CIP can help the City avoid commitments and debts that would prevent the initiation of other important projects at a later date. Enhances opportunities for participation in federal or state grant programs. Preparing a CIP improves the City s chance of obtaining aid through federal and state programs that provide funds for planning, construction, and financing of capital improvements. The CIP is considered a public works shelf that contains projects that can be started quickly by having construction or bid documents ready should any grants become available. Potential ing Sources The FY 219 Capital contains 34 projects submitted by various City Departments. The total cost of all projects submitted for FY 219 represents an expenditure of $17,33,. Although the Strategic Initiative provides cash for pay-as-you-go capital projects, the City may still borrow to build needed infrastructure. A portion of the revenue generated by the property tax rate is allocated to support long-term bond projects through the Debt Service (see the Debt Services Expenditures section for more information). This budget proposes that nine cents of the current tax rate be allocated to support the City s General debt. Fees and special revenue are used to support special purpose debt. A Capital Improvements Program details the projects and costs for a five-year period and identifies future unfunded projects. Debt Service s as well as cash provide the needed money to build these projects. The following is a summary of the funding sources for these projects: cash For FY 219, the Capital includes cash funding in the amount of $17,33,. This includes funds transferred from the Strategic Initiative as well as cash from other funding sources such as the Public Art, Impact Fee funds, Storm Water Utility, the Hotel Occupancy Tax, Enhancement Development Corporation, Utility and the Southlake Parks Development Corporation. For FY 219, the Capital will be 1%, eliminating the need to issue bonds. 361

6 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM Bonds When the City sells bonds, purchasers are, in effect, lending the City money. The money is repaid, with interest, from taxes or fees over the years. The logic behind issuing bonds for capital projects is that the citizens who benefit from the capital improvements over a period of time should help the City pay for them. The City can issue bonds in these forms: General Obligation (G.O.) Bonds Perhaps the most flexible of all capital funding sources, G.O. bonds can be used for the design or construction of any capital project. These bonds are financed through property taxes. In financing through this method, the taxing power of the City is pledged to pay interest and principal to retire the debt. Voter approval is required if the City wants to increase the taxes that it levies and the amount is included in the City s state-imposed debt limits. To minimize the need for property tax increases, the City makes every effort to coordinate new bond issues with the retirement of previous bonds. Certificates of Obligation (C.O.) Bonds Similar to general obligation bonds except the certificates require no voter approval. Combination tax and revenue certificates of obligation are issued for both governmental and business type activities. General obligation bonds, governmental revenue bonds, and tax notes pledge the full faith and credit of the City. Combination tax and revenue certificates of obligation are payable from the net revenues of the water and sewer system and general debt service tax. Revenue Bonds Revenue bonds are sold for projects that produce revenues, such as water and sewer system projects. Revenue bonds depend on user charges and other project-related income to cover their costs. Impact on Operating Annual operating costs can include personnel, scheduled repair and maintenance, and utilities in the case of buildings. These operating cost estimates are developed by the project managers during the project development process and for those projects in the FY 219 Capital, estimates are included on each project information sheet and the fund matrix (see following pages in this section). Staff also provides operating cost estimates for projects programmed in the future years (see chart and table at right). To prepare for the future and avoid shortfalls, the City uses the annual operating cost estimates to plan and develop future budgets. FY CIP All s Operational Impact The full operating impact of the five-year Capital Improvements Program has been factored into the City s forecasting and multi-year financial plans and will be integrated into future budgets once those projects are completed and in operation. As shown in the chart and table at right, for the current CIP, the bulk of these out-year costs can be attributed to personnel and maintenance related to the Southlake Sports Complex and operating costs related to roadway landscape maintenance and maintenance of an urban enhancement project. 362

7 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM Impacted Project Name FY 219 Maintenance FY 219 Personnel FY 22 Maintenance FY 22 Personnel FY 221 Maintenance FY 221 Personnel FY 222 Maintenance FY 222 Personnel FY 223 Maintenance FY 223 Personnel Zena Rucker Connector from Pecan Creek Offices east to Tower Boulevard $ $ $8, $ $8, $ $8, $ $8, $ North White Chapel Boulevard - Emerald to SH 114 $ $ $ $ $4, $ $4, $ $4, $ SH 114 Improvements (CEDC1 Companion) $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ General Public Art Roadway Impact Fee Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee North White Chapel Boulevard Widening from SH 114 to Dove Road including Roundabout Expansion Municipal Service Center (UF1 Companion) Library and Performing Arts facility Street Rehabilitation Participation Program (Joint Project with Tarrant County) Street Rehabilitation Required by Pavement Management Application (PMA) Kirkwood Boulevard Intersection Improvements and Urban Enhancements Southlake Commons Public Art City Roadway Intersection Capacity Improvements (GF12 Companion) System Capacity Improvements (Sewer) - Future Projects $ $ $ $ $ $ $32, $ $32, $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $13, $ $13, $ $13, $ $2, $ $2, $ $2, $ $2, $ $2, $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $1, $ $1, $ $ $12, $ $12, $ $12, $ $12, $ $12, Southlake Parks Development Corporation Southlake Sports Complex $ $ $ $ $13, $ $13, $ $13, $ Central Park Improvements and Pedestrian Bridge $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Drainage Improvements at North Peytonville Avenue near intersection with Raven Bend $ $ $2, $ $2, $ $2, $ $2, $ Replacement of South White Chapel Bridge at Bear Creek $ $ $1, $ $1, $ $1, $ $1, $ W. Highland St. Creek Crossing Drainage Improvements between N. White Chapel Blvd. and Shady Oaks $ $ $1, $ $1, $ $1, $ $1, $ Storm Water Utility System Simmons Court Drainage Improvements/Erosion Control Drainage Improvements at T. W. King Pump Station #2 to Cliff Parks $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $1, $ $1, $ $1, $ NEW - Creekside Drive Drainage Improvements $ $ $ $ $1, $ $1, $ $1, $ Kirkwood Branch at White Chapel Road / South Kirkwood Branch at White Chapel Road $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Florence Road Drainage Improvements $ $ $2, $ $2, $ $2, $ $2, $ 363

8 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM Impacted Project Name FY 219 Maintenance FY 219 Personnel FY 22 Maintenance FY 22 Personnel FY 221 Maintenance FY 221 Personnel FY 222 Maintenance FY 222 Personnel FY 223 Maintenance FY 223 Personnel Municipal Service Center (GF5 Companion) $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Water Quality Improvements - Install Residual Control Systems in the City's Ground Storage Reservoirs (3) $ $ $5, $ $5, $ $5, $ $5, $ Sanitary Sewer Evaluation Study (218) Implementations $ $ $1, $ $1, $ $1, $ $1, $ Utility Water System Improvements - Install Inlet Diffuser Systems & Coating Repairs on Pearson Pump Station 1 GSR West & T W King Pump Station GSR $ $ $5, $ $5, $ $5, $ $5, $ 12-inch Water line along SH 114 from E. Highland to the eastern boundary of Methodist Hospital $ $ $ $ $1, $ $1, $ $1, $ 12-inch Water line along Kirkwood Boulevard (also known as East Highland Street) from North Carroll Avenue to Highland Avenue $ $ $ $ $1, $ $1, $ $1, $ Repainting of the Miron Elevated Storage Tank $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 12-inch Water line for Fuel Farm Protection Improvements $ $ $1, $ $1, $ $1, $ $1, $ Water Impact Fee System Capacity Improvements (Water) - Future Projects $1, $ $1, $ $1, $ $1, $ $1, $ Upsize water lines along West Park Circle off of T.W. King $ $ $ $ $8, $ $8, $ $8, $ Enhancement and Development Corporation SH 114 Improvements (GF3 Companion) $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Hotel Occupancy Tax Southlake Visitor Information and Amenity Center $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ S: $12, $12, $74, $12, $35, $12, $347, $12, $347, $12, Current Capital Project Status For information about current projects, please visit the City s website at /CityConstruction. FY 219 Capital and Capital Improvements Plan The following pages in this section contain a listing of the Technical Committee s recommended five-year CIP by fund type. Project status forms have also been included for all projects in the Capital. These sheets provide more detail about each project by listing not only approved funding but how those funds will be spent. 364

9 All s Total Capital Improvements Program - All s Total 365

10 All s Total Total Prior ing FY 219 FY 22 FY 221 FY 222 FY 223 Beyond / Unfunded Total GENERAL FUND $47,957, $8,2, $1,69, $8,86, $4,2, $3,3, $25,6, $18,627, Utility $4,1, $1,73, $4,95, $5,1, $12,4, $75, $3,5, $32,44, Roadway Impact Fee $5, $3, $1, $3, $ $ $ $1,2, Water Impact Fee $2,5, $325, $35, $5, $5, $5, $1, $3,425, Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee $65, $1, $1, $1, $1, $1, $ $1,15, Storm Water Utility System $2,225, $1,265, $2,45, $2,25, $6,55, $3,, $1,775, $28,515, Enhancement & Development Corporation Southlake Parks Development Corporation $2,, $1,, $235, $ $ $ $ $3,235, $1,5, $4,2, $4,, $3,5, $3,3, $ $72,197, $88,697, Hotel Occupancy Tax $8, $2, $2, $2, $2, $2, $ $1,8, Public Art $275, $19, $1, $1, $1, $1, $1, $965, Grand Total All s: $62,57, $17,33, $23,175, $2,37, $26,9, $7,5, $112,272, $27,54, FY 219 Capital - Allocation by UTILITY FUND 1% COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION FUND 6% STORM WATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND 7% SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 24% WATER IMPACT FEE 2% ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND 2% HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX 1% PUBLIC ART 1% SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE 1% GENERAL FUND 46% 366

11 All s Total FY 219 Capital - Allocation by Project Type COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT 1% SEWER 1% STORM WATER 7% WATER 8% ROADS 47% FACILITIES 12% PARKS 24% 367

12 All s Total CIP Expenses FY 219 & Beyond GENERAL FUND UTILITY FUND SPDC OTHER (IMPACT FEE FUNDS, PARK DEDICATION, SWUS, CEDC, PUBLIC ART AND HOT) $12, $1,975 PROJECT FUNDING IN 1,S OF DOLLARS $1, $8, $6, $4, $2, $ $72,197 $3,5 $7, $3,535 $4, $3, $3,3 $3,5 $4,95 $5,1 $25,6 $12,4 $1,69 $8,86 $3,45 $75 $4,2 $3,3 FY 22 FY 22 FY 221 FY 222 BEYOND ing is represented in thousands of dollars (s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776, Planning and ing for Future Capital Projects As mentioned previously, there is a strong connection between Southlake s current comprehensive plan, Southlake 23, and the development of the CIP. Each plan includes recommendations that are structured on a tiered implementation schedule (Tier 1: 1-3 years, Tier 2: 4-6 years and Tier 3: 7+ years). As such, departments have identified all capital projects that are included in Southlake 23 as recommendations and those projects have been programmed not only into the FY 218 Capital but also throughout the remaining years and beyond category of the CIP. The chart above shows a large amount of funding in the beyond years that can be attributed to both Tier 2 and Tier 3 Southlake 23 project recommendations related to mobility, storm water, and park projects. As future Capital s and plans are developed, projects shown in the beyond category will be moved forward as funds become available. 368

13 General General 369

14 General Project # GF1 GF2 GF3 Project Name Description General Zena Rucker Connector from Pecan Creek Offices east to Tower Boulevard ing is requested for right of way, engineering design, and construction activities necessary to complete the Zena Rucker Road connector between Pecan Creek Offices and Tower Boulevard. A portion of this connector, including the Pecan Creek crossing, will be constructed in partnership with a residential development. Additional funds are needed for the remainder of this connection and the design, construction, art and landscaping of a planned roundabout at the intersection of Tower Boulevard and Zena Rucker Road. General North White Chapel Boulevard - Emerald to SH 114 "Additional funding is requested to widen White Chapel Boulevard from Emerald Boulevard to Highland Street and to widen White Chapel Boulevard from Highland Street to SH 114. Emerald Boulevard to Highland Street will be widened to the ultimate 4-lane divided section including grading, drainage, public and franchise utilities, retaining and screening walls and paving. The Highland Street to SH 114 section will include a 4-lane divided section with a roundabout installed at the intersection of White Chapel and Highland. The County participation for this project is $2.1 million. The County will reimburse the City upon completion of the Emerald to Highland section. Estimated Cost for Entire Project, including County participation: $17,7," General SH 114 Improvements (CEDC1 Companion) "ing is requested for the design and construction of at least one Texas turnaround, access roads and ramp reversals from Dove Road to Kirkwood Boulevard and intersection improvements at SH 114 and Kirkwood Boulevard. Additional funding may become available via other partnerships." Total Prior ing FY 219 FY 22 FY 221 FY 222 FY 223 Beyond / Unfunded Total FY 219 Cumulative $8, $1,, $ $ $ $ $ $1,8, $1,, $14,1, $1,, $5, $ $ $ $ $15,6, $2,, $3,95, $2,5, $2,84, $ $ $ $ $9,29, $4,5, Description of Annual Impact on Operating "Landscape and Irrigation ($5,) Preventive and Corrective Maintenance ($2,5)" "Landscape and Irrigation ($35,) Preventive and Corrective Maintenance ($5,)" TxDOT Operation and Maintenance Project's Impact to Annual Operating $7,5 $4, $ Comp. Plan Reference Mobility Plan MT12 - Tier 3 Mobility Plan M8 - Tier SH 114 Corridor Plan-M4- Tier 1 and Mobility Plan MT46 - Tier 1 SPIN Neigh. 9 Various 1 37

15 General Project # GF4 Project Name Description General North White Chapel Boulevard Widening from SH 114 to Dove Road including Roundabout Expansion "ing is requested for right of way, engineering design and construction to widen N. White Chapel Boulevard to four lanes divided with a median from SH 114 to Dove Road and expand current roundabout to dual lane. Previous projects were established to meet the City's obligations under the now defunct Carillon 38 Agreement. The Agreement was approved by City Council on 17 Aug 21. Note: This request is a place holder pending the Metarie and/ or Carillon Parc Development)." Total Prior ing FY 219 FY 22 FY 221 FY 222 FY 223 Beyond / Unfunded Total FY 219 Cumulative $6, $7, $1,8, $1,8, $ $ $ $4,9, $5,2, Description of Annual Impact on Operating Landscape and Irrigation ($2,) Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance ($12,) Project's Impact to Annual Operating $32, Comp. Plan Reference Mobility Plan MT9 - Tier 2 and 235 SH 114 Corridor Plan-LU1 & LU2 Recommendation -Tier 1 SPIN Neigh

16 General Project # GF5 GF6 Project Name Description General Municipal Service Center (UF1 Companion) ing is requested for the architectural and engineering design and construction of a future Municipal Service Center identified in the Southlake 23 Parks & Recreation Open Space/ Facility Plan. Facilities are inadequate and undersized for the various divisions currently operating out of the existing facility including Streets & Drainage, Water, Wastewater, and Environmental Services. An expanded Municipal Service Center is required to meet the on-going demands of infrastructure maintenance and to house other divisions needing additional space. Facility planning is underway and a firmer financial plan will be made. General Library and Performing Arts facility The purpose of this item is to establish a project fund for a combined library and performing arts facility. This facility will be constructed as part of the Carillon Parc development in partnership with the developers. A two-story 6, sq. ft. building will be constructed with a 3, sq. ft. library on the first floor, and a multi-use performing arts spaces will be built on the second floor. Total Prior ing FY 219 FY 22 FY 221 FY 222 FY 223 Beyond / Unfunded Total FY 219 Cumulative $5,2, $1,, $75, $1,15, $1,15, $1,15, $1,15, $11,55, $6,2, $2, $2, $2, $ $ $ $ $6, $6,4, Description of Annual Impact on Operating "Estimated annual operating costs of a new facility is the difference between the operating cost of the existing facility and the operating cost of the new facility. $68,76 - $22,828 = $45,931 The area of the existing facility is approximately 11,9 SF; the area of the proposed facility is 36, SF. The estimated cost per square foot of current services is $1.91 per square foot. Presuming service cost remains constant: Maintenance cost of the existing facility: (11,9 SF)($1.91/ square foot) = $22,828 Maintenance cost of the proposed facility: (36, SF) (1.91/square foot) = $68,76" Annual Operating Costsestimate for janitorial and PMs (unsure of footprint). Expect corrective maintenance to increase in the outyears. Project's Impact to Annual Operating $46, $7,5 Comp. Plan Reference 23 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/ Facilities Plan Facilities Recommendation #4 23 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/ Facilities Plan Facilities Recommendations #2 SPIN Neigh

17 General Project # GF7 GF8 GF9 Project Name Description General Street Rehabilitation Participation Program (Joint Project with Tarrant County) ing is requested to continue the rehabilitation of asphalt streets in partnership with Tarrant County. Tarrant County provides labor and equipment to rehabilitate the subgrade for a number of selected asphalt roads each year while City crews mill, pave, stripe and install curbing. 99% of respondents to the most recent Citizen Survey listed maintaining local streets and roads as important. General Street Rehabilitation Required by Pavement Management Application (PMA) ing is requested to continue the citywide pavement rehabilitation program. This program is based on an annual condition assessment conducted by a third party. This assessment feeds the City's Pavement Quality Index (PQI) which is the foundation for prioritizing pavement rehabilitation projects. The PQI is also an essential element of the City's annual financial audit. General Kirkwood Boulevard Intersection Improvements and Urban Enhancements "ing is requested for the design and construction of improvements at the intersections of Kirkwood Boulevard/W. Dove Road and Kirkwood Boulevard/T.W. King Road. ing is also requested to replace street lights and install landscaping enhancements along the Kirkwood Boulevard corridor from SH 114 to Dove Road. Note: Enhancements along Kirkwood Boulevard from Stockton Drive to Tyler Street are included in the current Kirkwood Boulevard Widening Project previously funded." Total Prior ing FY 219 FY 22 FY 221 FY 222 FY 223 Beyond / Unfunded Total FY 219 Cumulative Description of Annual Impact on Operating Project's Impact to Annual Operating $2,56, $32, $33, $34, $35, $35, $36, $4,61, $6,72, $ $12,554, $1,, $1,1, $1,2, $1,3, $1,4, $1,5, $2,54, $7,72, $ $6, $3, $6, $ $ $ $ $1,5, $8,2, $1K for landscaping and irrigation; $3K for operations and maintenance. $13, Comp. Plan Reference Mobility Plan "Mobility Plan" 235 SH 114 Corridor Plan-LU1 recommendation -Tier 1 and Mobility Plan MT37 - Tier 3 SPIN Neigh. All All 1 373

18 General Project # GF1 GF11 GF12 GF13 Project Name Description General FM 179 Deceleration Lanes at Byron Nelson and Southridge Lakes ing is requested to design and construct deceleration lanes along FM 179 at Byron Nelson Parkway and Southridge Lakes Parkway. This project includes landscaping modifications and the relocation of a 2-inch water line. Will seek potential funding partnership with NCTCOG. General FM 179 and Pearson Lane Intersection Improvements ing is requested for the engineering design and construction of the intersection improvements at FM 179 and Pearson Lane/ Union Church Road. This will be a joint project with the City of Keller. General FM 1938 at West Continental Boulevard Intersection Improvements (RIFF 1 Companion) ing is requested for right of way, new traffic signal, right turn lane and other paving improvements to improve alignment of this intersection based on recommendations of preliminary engineering study of this intersection. These improvements will also help alleviate current traffic backups during peak hours on west bound Continental Boulevard at FM General Continental Boulevard and South Peytonville Avenue Intersection Improvements (Roundabout) (RIFF 2 Companion) ing is requested for right of way, engineering design, construction, art and landscaping of a planned roundabout at the Continental Boulevard and Peytonville Avenue intersection. Total Prior ing FY 219 FY 22 FY 221 FY 222 FY 223 Beyond / Unfunded Total FY 219 Cumulative $25, $ $75, $ $ $ $ $1,, $8,2, $49, $ $ $1,, $ $ $ $1,49, $8,2, $ $ $9, $1,, $ $ $ $1,9, $8,2, $ $ $3, $1,6, $ $ $ $1,9, $8,2, Description of Annual Impact on Operating Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. TxDOT Operation and Maintenance Landscape and Irrigation ($5,) Preventive and corrective maintenance ($1,2) Project's Impact to Annual Operating $5, $2,5 $ $6,2 Comp. Plan Reference Mobility Plan MT42 - Tier 2 Mobility Plan MT2 - Tier 1 Mobility Plan MT25 - Tier 3 Mobility Plan MT3 - Tier 2 SPIN Neigh. 6,7,9,1 11 1,

19 General Project # GF14 GF15 GF16 Project Name Description General City Entry Features "The purpose of this item is to establish a project fund for the construction of entry features at key locations in the City. This project will follow the completion of GF12." General "Citywide Pathway Improvements" ing is requested for right of way, engineering design and construction of sidewalks at various locations throughout the City. Projects are recommended by staff via the Pathways Plan and approved by City Council as part of the annual sidewalk priority list. Providing sidewalks for pedestrian safety by keeping foot traffic off City streets has been identified as a Citywide gap issue. FY 219 projects will be constructed with existing funds. General Bank Street Connector ing is requested for the design and construction of a roadway connector parallel to FM 179. The roadway connector will allow Bank Street to tie into Commerce Street which has an existing traffic signal at FM 179. This project will also include the installation of a segment of an 8-inch water line. ing is needed for the purchase of property at 565 Commerce Street in order to construct the connector through this parcel. This project is necessary because the DFW Connector prevents westbound FM 179 access from Bank Street. Total Prior ing FY 219 FY 22 FY 221 FY 222 FY 223 Beyond / Unfunded Total FY 219 Cumulative $167, $ $ $17, $ $ $34, $677, $8,2, $4,176, $ $3, $35, $35, $35, $4, $5,926, $8,2, $13, $ $ $2, $1,, $ $1,8, $3,13, $8,2, Description of Annual Impact on Operating "Landscape and Irrigation ($1,) (5 Signs at $2, each)" Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. Project's Impact to Annual Operating $1, $1, $2, Comp. Plan Reference Project identified in the Major Corridor Urban Design Plan, the Wayfinding Signage Plan and Southeast Sector Plan recommendation M2. Mobility Plan AT#4 -Tier 1 Mobility Plan MT19 - Tier 2 SPIN Neigh. 8,9.11 Citywide 8 375

20 General Project # GF17 GF18 GF19 GF2 Project Name Description General Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Citywide Improvements ing is requested for the design and implementation of recommendations identified by the City of Southlake's on-going Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan. Under Federal law, municipal governments are required to: provide accessibility to individuals with disabilities; correct existing issues inside buildings, in public rights of way, and in public parks; and maintain ADA compliance annually for existing infrastructure as well as facilities constructed with new development. This will be an annual program to maintain Federal ADA compliance and to address ADA concerns identified in public buildings, along sidewalks, at intersections and in parks located within the City. (Project incorporates the Pedestrian Safety Project funded in fiscal year 217). FY 219 projects will be constructed with existing funds. General South Village Center Roadway Connector from Kimball Avenue to Nolen Drive ing is requested for right of way, engineering design and construction of a 2-lane undivided connector (37-foot paved surface; 6-foot C2U as identified on the City s Mobility & Thoroughfare Plan) to allow Georgetown Park vehicular access to the traffic signal at Nolen Drive & FM 179. General Kirkwood Boulevard Connector from Carillon Phase 5 Terminus to the Highland / Kirkwood Intersection ing is requested for right of way, engineering design and construction of a connector for Kirkwood Boulevard from the Carillon Phase 5 terminus to the Highland Street and Kirkwood Boulevard intersection. This project will require the construction of a bridge across the flood plain. General South Carroll Avenue Widening from Breeze Way to FM 179 ing is requested for the widening of Carroll Avenue from Breeze Way to just south of FM 179 (adjacent to the Shops of Southlake) to its ultimate pavement section (4 lanes divided). Total Prior ing FY 219 FY 22 FY 221 FY 222 FY 223 Beyond / Unfunded Total FY 219 Cumulative $35, $ $5, $5, $5, $5, $5, $6, $8,2, $ $ $ $ $ $ $2,5, $2,5, $8,2, $ $ $ $ $ $ $6,, $6,, $8,2, $ $ $ $ $ $ $5,, $5,, $8,2, Description of Annual Impact on Operating Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. Project's Impact to Annual Operating $8, $5, $1,2 $5, Comp. Plan Reference Mobility Plan (175) AT 13-Tier 1; Mobility Plan (175B)- Intersection Capacity Improvements and Sustainability Plan Mobility Plan MT17 - Tier 3 Mobility Plan MT7 - Tier 3 Mobility Plan MT13 - Tier 3 SPIN Neigh. Citywide 3 3 8,9 376

21 General Project # GF21 GF22 GF23 GF24 Project Name Description General South Village Center Roadway Connector from west property line of Kimball Oaks to Southwood Way ing is requested for design and construction of the remainder of the Village Center Connector from the west property line of Kimball Oaks to Southwood Way. General Brumlow Avenue Widening and bike lane construction from Continental Boulevard to SH 26 ing is requested for the future widening of Brumlow Avenue from Continental Boulevard to SH 26 to its ultimate pavement section (4-lanes divided). Bike lanes will also be constructed to facilitate connectivity to the Cotton Belt Trail. General FM 179 at Southlake Marketplace Improvements and Signalization ing is requested to construct improvements at the Southlake Marketplace plaza located at the southeast corner of FM 179 and Davis Boulevard. These improvements include closing two existing driveways into Southlake Marketplace along FM 179, constructing two wider driveways with deceleration lanes, relocating utilities, installing a signal on FM 179 and constructing median modifications. If partnership with shopping center falls through then project will be re-evaluated. General Bank Street / Industrial Boulevard Connector Reconstruction ing is requested to reconstruct portions of an existing private access road connecting Bank Street to Industrial Boulevard. The project will include the structural rehabilitation of the sub-grade and the replacement of concrete panels. The property owners will need to dedicate this existing access easement as public right of way as a condition of this project. Total Prior ing FY 219 FY 22 FY 221 FY 222 FY 223 Beyond / Unfunded Total FY 219 Cumulative Description of Annual Impact on Operating Project's Impact to Annual Operating $ $ $ $ $ $ $2,5, $2,5, $8,2, Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. $1,2 $6, $ $ $ $ $ $4,, $4,6, $8,2, Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. $2,5 $1,2, $ $ $ $ $ $ $1,2, $8,2, Annual maintenance includes irrigation, landscaping and infrastructure maintenance. $15, $3, $ $27, $ $ $ $ $3, $8,2, Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. $2,5 $47,957, $8,2, $1,69, $8,86, $4,2, $3,3, $25,6, $18,627, $8,2, $222,1 Comp. Plan Reference Mobility Plan Mobility Plan MT14 - Tier 3 Mobility Plan MT23 - Tier 1 Mobility Plan MT19 - Tier 2 SPIN Neigh. 8 8,9 6,

22 General City of Southlake FY 219 CIP Project Status Form Zena Rucker Connector from Pecan Creek Offices east to Tower Boulevard DEPARTMENT: Public Works PROJECT Zena Rucker between Pecan Creek and Tower Boulevard LOCATION: PROJECT TIMELINE: Oct 217 to Sept 219 DESCRIPTION: ing is requested for right of way, engineering design, and construction activities necessary to complete the Zena Rucker Road connector between Pecan Creek Offices and Tower Boulevard. A portion of this connector, including the Pecan Creek crossing, will be constructed in partnership with a residential development. New Request Continuation Project Joint Use JUSTIFICATION: Mandated / Replacement / Major Public Health / Rehab or Protection Safety of Capital Stock Additional funds are needed for the remainder of this connection and the design, construction, art and landscaping of a planned roundabout at the intersection of Tower Boulevard and Zena Rucker Road. Compliant with 23/235 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): Need / Service Enhancement 378 ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: Mobility will continue to be negatively impacted in this region due to current and future development. STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Infrastructure, Mobility FUND: General EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ing is represented in thousands of dollars (s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776, COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER 8 1, OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND CCPD CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND PUBLIC ART FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SPDC SWUS UTILITY FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION , 1, , 8 1, SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND 1, ,8 1,8

23 General DEPARTMENT: Public Works PROJECT N. White Chapel from Emerald to SH 114 LOCATION: City of Southlake FY 219 CIP Project Status Form North White Chapel Boulevard - Emerald to SH 114 PROJECT TIMELINE: Sept 217 to Sept 22 DESCRIPTION: Additional funding is requested to widen White Chapel Boulevard from Emerald Boulevard to Highland Street and to widen White Chapel Boulevard from Highland Street to SH 114. Emerald Boulevard to Highland Street will be widened to the ultimate 4-lane divided section including grading, drainage, public and franchise utilities, retaining and screening walls and paving. The Highland Street to SH 114 section will include a 4-lane divided section with a roundabout installed at the intersection of White Chapel and Highland. The County participation for this project is $2.1 million. The County will reimburse the City upon completion of the Emerald to Highland section. Estimated Cost for Entire Project: $17,7, New Request Continuation Project Joint Use JUSTIFICATION: Mandated / Replacement / Major Public Health / Rehab or Protection Safety of Capital Stock This project is identified in the Mobility Plan and will improve mobility in this region of the City. Compliant with 23/235 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): Need / Service Enhancement ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: Mobility will continue to be a major issue along this corridor. COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: Prior Storm Water Utility STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Infrastructure, Mobility FUND: General, Storm Water Utility System EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ing is represented in thousands of dollars (s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776, REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER 13,6 1, 5 OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND CCPD CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND PUBLIC ART FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SPDC SWUS UTILITY FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 1,3 1,3 1, 1, 11,3 1, 5 12, ,6 1, ,1 1, 5 SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND 15, ,1 5 15,6 379

24 General DEPARTMENT: Public Works PROJECT SH 114 from Dove Road to Kirkwood Boulevard LOCATION: City of Southlake FY 219 CIP Project Status Form SH 114 Improvements (CEDC1 Companion) PROJECT TIMELINE: May 217 to Dec 22 DESCRIPTION: ing is requested for the design and construction of at least one Texas turnaround, access roads and ramp reversals from Dove Road to Kirkwood Boulevard and intersection improvements at SH 114 and Kirkwood Boulevard. Additional funding may become available via other partnerships. New Request Continuation Project Joint Use JUSTIFICATION: Mandated / Replacement / Major Public Health / Rehab or Protection Safety of Capital Stock The need for the proposed improvements are magnified by recent and planned development within this region of the CIty. ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: Mobility will be negatively impacted by significant traffic generated by current and future development within this region. STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Infrastructure, Mobility, Partnership FUND: General, CEDC EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE Compliant with 23/235 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: Need / Service Enhancement PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER 3,95 2,5 2,84 OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND CCPD CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND PUBLIC ART FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SPDC SWUS UTILITY FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION , 2,5 2,84 8,34 3,95 2,5 2,84 2, 1, 235 5,95 3,5 3,75 CEDC1 SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND 9,29 9,29 3,235 12, ing is represented in thousands of dollars (s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776,

25 General DEPARTMENT: Public Works PROJECT SH 114 from Dove Road to Kirkwood Boulevard LOCATION: PROJECT TIMELINE: June 215 to Sept 221 DESCRIPTION: City of Southlake FY 219 CIP Project Status Form North White Chapel Boulevard Widening from SH 114 to Dove Road including Roundabout ing is requested for right of way, engineering design and construction to widen N. White Chapel Boulevard to four lanes divided with a median from SH 114 to Dove Road and expand current roundabout to dual lane. New Request Continuation Project Joint Use JUSTIFICATION: Mandated / Replacement / Major Public Health / Rehab or Protection Safety of Capital Stock The need for the proposed improvements are magnified by planned development within this region of the city. Compliant with 23/235 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): Need / Service Enhancement ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: Mobility will be negatively impacted by significant traffic generated by future development within this region. STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Infrastructure, Mobility FUND: General EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ing is represented in thousands of dollars (s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776, COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER 6 7 1,8 1,8 OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND CCPD CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND PUBLIC ART FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SPDC SWUS UTILITY FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ,8 1,8 4, ,8 1, ,8 1,8 Will increase accessibility to Carillon commercial. SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND 4, ,9 4,9 381

26 General DEPARTMENT: Public Works PROJECT 195 East Continental Boulevard LOCATION: PROJECT TIMELINE: Oct 214 to Sept 223 DESCRIPTION: City of Southlake FY 219 CIP Project Status Form Municipal Service Center (UF1 Companion) ing is requested for the architectural and engineering design and construction of a future Municipal Service Center identified in the Southlake 23 Parks and Recreation Open Space/ Facility Plan. New Request Continuation Project Joint Use JUSTIFICATION: Mandated / Replacement / Major Public Health / Rehab or Protection Safety of Capital Stock Facilities are inadequate and undersized for the various divisions currently operating out of the existing facility including Streets & Drainage, Water, Wastewater, and Environmental Services. An expanded Municipal Service Center is required to meet the on-going demands of infrastructure maintenance and to house other departments needing additional space. ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: The current facility is undersized and unable to house additional divisions. STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Infrastructure, Performance Management FUND: General, Utility EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE Compliant with 23/235 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: Need / Service Enhancement PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER 5,85 1,65 1,4 1,8 1,8 1,8 1,8 OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND CCPD CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND PUBLIC ART FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SPDC SWUS UTILITY FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 5,85 1,65 1,4 1,8 1,8 1,8 1,8 16,1 46 5,2 1, 75 1,15 1,15 1,15 1, ,85 1,65 1,4 1,8 1,8 1,8 1,8 Utility UF1 46 SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND 16, ,55 4,55 16,1 382 ing is represented in thousands of dollars (s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776,

27 General City of Southlake FY 219 CIP Project Status Form Library and Performing Arts Facility DEPARTMENT: Public Works PROJECT Carillon Parc LOCATION: PROJECT TIMELINE: Oct 214 to Sept 223 DESCRIPTION: The purpose of this item is to establish a project fund for a combined library and performing arts facility. This facility will be constructed as part of the Carillon Parc development in partnership with the developers. A two-story 6, sq. ft. building will be constructed with a 3, sq. ft. library on the first floor, and a multi-use performing arts spaces will be built on the second floor. New Request Continuation Project Joint Use JUSTIFICATION: Mandated / Replacement / Major Public Health / Rehab or Protection Need / Service Facilities are inadequate and undersized for the current Library staff and patrons. Safety of Capital Stock Enhancement Compliant with 23/235 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: The current facility is undersized and unable to properly meet resident's expectations. COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Infrastructure, Quality Development FUND: General EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ing is represented in thousands of dollars (s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776, REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND CCPD CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND PUBLIC ART FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SPDC SWUS UTILITY FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND

28 General DEPARTMENT: Public Works PROJECT Various Locations within the City LOCATION: City of Southlake FY 219 CIP Project Status Form Street Rehabilitation Participation Program (Joint Project with Tarrant County) PROJECT TIMELINE: Oct 218 to Sept 219 DESCRIPTION: ing is requested to continue the rehabilitation of asphalt streets in partnership with Tarrant County. Tarrant County provides labor and equipment to rehabilitate the subgrade for a number of selected asphalt roads each year while City crews mill, pave, stripe and install curbing. New Request Continuation Project Joint Use JUSTIFICATION: Mandated / Replacement / Major Public Health / Rehab or Protection Safety of Capital Stock These repairs to asphalt streets are essential maintenance. This program is a cost savings for the City due to the donated services and labor donated by the County. Also 99% of respondents to the most recent Citizen Survey listed maintaining local streets and roads as important. Compliant with 23/235 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): Need / Service Enhancement ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: If the program is discontinued the funding from the County would be forfeited. COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: 384 STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Infrastructure, Partnership FUND: General EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ing is represented in thousands of dollars (s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776, REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER 2, OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND CCPD CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND PUBLIC ART FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SPDC SWUS UTILITY FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 2, ,61 2, , SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND 4,61 4,61 4,61

29 General DEPARTMENT: Public Works PROJECT Various Locations within the City LOCATION: PROJECT TIMELINE: Oct 218 to Sept 219 DESCRIPTION: City of Southlake FY 219 CIP Project Status Form Street Rehabilitation Required by Pavement Management Application (PMA) ing is requested to continue the citywide pavement rehabilitation program. This program is based on an annual condition assessment conducted by a third party. New Request Continuation Project Joint Use JUSTIFICATION: Mandated / Replacement / Major Public Health / Rehab or Protection Safety of Capital Stock This assessment feeds the City's Pavement Quality Index (PQI) which is the foundation for prioritizing pavement rehabilitation projects. The PQI is also an essential element of the City's annual financial audit. Compliant with 23/235 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): Need / Service Enhancement ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: Not funding the Pavement Management Program could lead to increased roadway deterioration. STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Infrastructure, Mobility FUND: General EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ing is represented in thousands of dollars (s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776, COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER 12,554 1, 1,1 1,2 1,3 1,4 1,5 OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND CCPD CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND PUBLIC ART FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SPDC SWUS UTILITY FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 12,554 1, 1,1 1,2 1,3 1,4 1,5 2,54 12,554 1, 1,1 1,2 1,3 1,4 1,5 12,554 1, 1,1 1,2 1,3 1,4 1,5 SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND 2,54 2,54 2,54 385

30 General DEPARTMENT: Public Works PROJECT Kirkwood Bouelvard from Dove to SH 114 LOCATION: PROJECT TIMELINE: Oct 216 to Sept 219 DESCRIPTION: City of Southlake FY 219 CIP Project Status Form Kirkwood Boulevard Intersection Improvements and Urban Enhancements ing is requested for the design and construction of improvements at the intersections of Kirkwood Boulevard/W. Dove Road and Kirkwood Boulevard/T.W. King Road. ing is also requested to replace street lights and install landscaping enhancements along the Kirkwood Boulevard corridor from SH 114 to Dove Road. Note: Enhancements along Kirkwood Boulevard from Stockton Drive to Tyler Street are included in the current Kirkwood Boulevard Widening Project previously funded. New Request Continuation Project Joint Use JUSTIFICATION: Mandated / Replacement / Major Public Health / Rehab or Protection This project will add lighting and replace existing, aging fixtures along this corridor. Safety of Capital Stock Landscaping will also be added to the medians in accordance with the Urban Design Plan. Compliant with 23/235 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): Need / Service Enhancement 386 ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: Continued deterioration of the existing fixtures could result in a safety hazard to the traveling public. STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Infrastructure, Mobility FUND: General EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND CCPD CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND PUBLIC ART FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SPDC SWUS UTILITY FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION , ing is represented in thousands of dollars (s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776, SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND 1, ,5 1,5

31 Utility Utility 387

32 Utility Project # Project Name Description UF1 Utility Municipal Service Center (GF5 Companion) ing is requested for the architectural and engineering design and construction of a future Municipal Service Center identified in the Southlake 23 Parks & Rec Open Space/ Facility Plan. Facilities are inadequate and undersized for the various divisions currently operating out of the existing facility including Streets & Drainage, Water, Wastewater, and Environmental Services. An expanded Municipal Service Center is required to meet the on-going demands of infrastructure maintenance and to house other divisions needing additional space. UF2 Utility NEW - Water Quality Improvements - Install Residual Control Systems in the City's Ground Storage Reservoirs (3) Additional funding is requested to design and install chlorine residual control systems in the City's three existing ground water storage reservoirs (GSRs) located at the Pump Stations. This item is a recommendation of the Freese & Nichols Water Quality Evaluation dated July 217. Southlake purchases its drinking water from the City of Fort Worth through a Wholesale Purchase Agreement, and is at the outreach of their distribution system. It is the responsibility of the City of Southlake, as the water purveyor, to maintain drinking water quality throughout the distribution system to all of Southlake's customers. Installing these control systems will allow the City to sample, monitor, and dose disinfectant to enhance drinking water quality in the event of an emergency or during periods of low demand. This will ensure public health and emergency preparedness, mitigate emergency flushing and unnecessary water loss. Maintaining water quality positively impacts resident health and ensures the City maintains its "Superior" water rating by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ). Total Prior ing FY 219 FY 22 FY 221 FY 222 FY 223 Beyond / Unfunded Total FY 219 Cumulative $65, $65, $65, $65, $65, $65, $65, $4,55, $65, $7, $4, $ $ $ $ $ $1,1, $1,5, Description of Annual Impact on Operating Identified with GF portion. Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. Project's Impact to Annual Operating $ $5, Comp. Plan Reference "Parks, Recreation & Open Space / Facilities Plan - Facilities Recommendation #4" Sustainability Plan SPIN Neigh. 8 All 388

33 Utility Project # Project Name Description UF3 Utility NEW - Sanitary Sewer Evaluation Study (218) Implementations ing is requested for engineering design and construction of implementations identified in the 218 RJN Group, Inc. Sanitary Sewer Condition Assessment Report. These improvements are necessary to reduce Inflow and Infiltration of rain water into the Wastewater Collection System which results in increased wastewater treatment costs with the Trinity River Authority (TRA). UF4 Utility NEW - Water System Improvements - Install Inlet Diffuser Systems & Coating Repairs on Pearson Pump Station 1 GSR West & T W King Pump Station GSR ing is requested for the engineering design and construction of inlet diffuser systems in the Ground Storage Reservoirs to slow the velocity of the water flow into the storage facility. This is required to prevent damage to the tank coating system which protects the integrity of the structure. UF5 Utility 12-inch Water line along SH 114 from E. Highland to the eastern boundary of Methodist Hospital ing is requested for right of way, engineering design and construction of a 12-inch water line along SH 114 from E. Highland Street to the eastern boundary of Methodist Hospital. This project will address a gap in our existing 12-inch line along the SH 114 corridor. This project will improve water quality, service, and fire protection in this region. UF6 Utility 12-inch Water line along Kirkwood Boulevard (also known as East Highland Street) from North Carroll Avenue to Highland Avenue ing is requested for right of way, engineering design and construction of a 12-inch water line along Kirkwood Boulevard from Carroll Avenue to Highland Street to replace existing 6-inch water line segments. This scope has changed from the project identified in the Southlake 23 Water plan due to the construction of Kirkwood Boulevard and reconfiguration of the street(s). Upsizing this line will improve service to the local residents. UF7 Utility Repainting of the Miron Elevated Storage Tank ing is requested to repaint the Miron Elevated Storage Tank (EST). The paint on the water tower is the original paint and is beginning to oxidize. This paint was applied in Total Prior ing FY 219 FY 22 FY 221 FY 222 FY 223 Beyond / Unfunded Total FY 219 Cumulative $ $1, $ $ $ $ $ $1, $1,15, $ $18, $ $ $ $ $ $18, $1,33, $ $5, $2, $ $ $ $ $25, $1,38, $ $2, $85, $ $ $ $ $1,5, $1,58, $ $15, $75, $ $ $ $ $9, $1,73, Description of Annual Impact on Operating Estimated costs for corrective and preventive maitnenance. Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. No additional cost after repainting. Project's Impact to Annual Operating $1, $5, $1, $1, $ Comp. Plan Reference Sustainability Plan Sustainability Plan Water System Plan #9 - WWS9- Tier 2 Water System Plan #15 -WWS9- Tier 2 Sustainability Plan SPIN Neigh. Citywide Citywide

34 Utility Project # Project Name Description UF8 Utility NEW - Water System Improvements MG Ground Storage Tank #2 at T.W. King Pump Station #2 ing is requested for engineering design and construction of a 5. million gallon ground storage tank and pump at T.W. King Pump Station #2. The completion of this project will increase water flow and pressure to the north and east portions of the City. Inflationary and Consumer Price Index increases have been added to funding request to account for cost growth since 212 Water System Analysis cost estimate. UF9 Utility NEW - Repainting of the Florence Elevated Storage Tank ing is requested to repaint the Florence Elevated Storage Tank (EST). The paint on the water tower is from the original construction in 25. Inspection of the interior coating is showing signs of significant cracking and peeling. UF1 Utility 8-inch Water line along Bob Jones Rd to Walnut Brooks ing is requested for right of way, engineering design and construction of an 8-inch water line to connect the dead-end water lines located at Brooks Court and E. Bob Jones Road. This project will create a looped water system, improving water quality and fire protection within this region. This item was not part of Southlake 23 but later identified in the Water Quality Study produced by Freese and Nichols, Inc. UF11 Utility 8-inch Water line from Walnut Grove terminus to E. Bob Jones Dog Park ing is requested for right of way, engineering design and construction of an 8-inch water line to connect the dead-end water lines located at Walnut Grove and the Bob Jones Dog Park. This project will create a looped water system, improving water quality and fire protection within this region. This item was not part of Southlake 23 but later identified in the Water Quality Study produced by Freese and Nichols, Inc. Total Prior ing FY 219 FY 22 FY 221 FY 222 FY 223 Beyond / Unfunded Total FY 219 Cumulative $ $ $2,25, $2,25, $2,5, $ $ $7,, $1,73, $ $ $15, $75, $ $ $ $9, $1,73, $ $ $5, $2, $1,35, $ $ $1,6, $1,73, $ $ $5, $1, $1,35, $ $ $1,5, $1,73, Description of Annual Impact on Operating Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. No additional cost after repainting. Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. Project's Impact to Annual Operating $25, $ $5, $5, Comp. Plan Reference Water System Plan #4-WWS4 - Tier 1 Sustainability Plan Water System Plan #14- WWS1- Tier 2 Sustainability Plan SPIN Neigh. All

35 Utility Project # Project Name Description UF12 Utility Shady Oaks 12-inch Water and 8-inch Sewer Lines (Phase I) Additional funding is requested for the construction of a 12-inch water line along Shady Oaks Drive from Highland Street to W. Dove Road and an 8-inch sewer line along Shady Oaks Drive from Highland Street to Fox Glen. This project received prior funding from the fiscal year 29 Sewer Impact Fees and FY 217 Utility. UF13 Utility 15-inch Sewer line in Basin N-12 and N-12a ing is requested for engineering design and construction to replace existing 12-inch, 1-inch, and 8-inch interceptor lines with 15-inch and 1-inch lines in Basin N-12 and N-12a along Dove Creek south of SH 114. This sewer line crosses SH 114 to serve the Milner Tract, Methodist Hospital, Summerplace, and Chapel Downs. UF14 Utility 12-inch Water line along Shady Oaks Drive from Fox Glen to West Dove Road (Phase II) ing is requested for right of way, engineering design and construction of a 12-inch water line along Shady Oaks Drive from Fox Glen to W. Dove Road. This project is a companion to the 12-inch water line project paralleling Shady Oaks from Highland Street to Fox Glenn (Phase I). Phase II is the continuation to the north from Fox Glenn to W. Dove Road. UF15 Utility 12-inch Water line along East Continental Boulevard to Breeze Way ing is requested for right of way, engineering design and construction of a 12-inch water line along E. Continental Boulevard to Breeze Way. UF16 Utility 12-inch Water line along North Peytonville from Concho Court to Southridge Lakes Parkway ing is requested for right of way, engineering design and construction of a 12-inch water line along N. Peytonville from Concho Court to Southridge Lakes Parkway to increase capacity in this region and to compensate for development and growth. Total Prior ing FY 219 FY 22 FY 221 FY 222 FY 223 Beyond / Unfunded Total FY 219 Cumulative $2,5, $ $ $ $5, $ $ $2,55, $1,73, $7, $ $ $ $1,2, $ $ $1,9, $1,73, $ $ $ $2, $1,5, $ $ $1,25, $1,73, $ $ $ $1, $7, $ $ $8, $1,73, $ $ $ $6, $5, $ $ $56, $1,73, Description of Annual Impact on Operating Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. Project's Impact to Annual Operating $1, $15, $1, $1, $1, Comp. Plan Reference Sustainability Plan Waste Water System Plan #1- WWS14- Tier 1 Water System Plan #18 -WWS9- Tier 2 Water System Plan #21-WWS9 -Tier 2 Water System Plan #19 -WWS9- Tier 2 SPIN Neigh ,6 391

36 Utility Project # Project Name Description Total Prior ing FY 219 FY 22 FY 221 FY 222 FY 223 Beyond / Unfunded Total FY 219 Cumulative Description of Annual Impact on Operating Project's Impact to Annual Operating UF17 Utility 8-inch Sewer line in Basin N-18 along White Chapel Boulevard ing is requested for right of way, engineering design and construction of an 8-inch sanitary sewer line to extend service for future development west along Keystone Drive then south along White Chapel Boulevard. The proposed 8-inch sewer line will provide service to planned mixed-use developments along SH 114 in Basin N-18. $ $ $ $25, $45, $ $ $7, $1,73, Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. $5, UF18 Utility 12-inch Water line along Randol Mill Avenue from Morgan Road to Dove Road ing is requested for right of way, engineering design and construction to upsize an existing 8-inch water line to 12-inch along Randol Mill Avenue from Morgan Road to Dove Road. $ $ $ $3, $1,3, $ $ $1,6, $1,73, Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. $1, UF19 Utility Upsize existing 6-inch to 12-inch Water line along East Highland from Blythe Lane to N. Kimball Avenue ing is requested for the engineering design and construction to upsize an existing 6-inch water line to 12-inch along E. Highland Street from Blythe Lane to N. Kimball Avenue. $ $ $ $15, $85, $ $6, $1,6, $1,73, Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. $15, UF2 Utility NEW- Repainting of the Dove Elevated Storage Tank ing is requested to repaint the Dove Elevated Storage Tank (EST). The paint on the water tower was applied in 26. $ $ $ $ $ $1, $8, $9, $1,73, No additional cost after repainting. $ UF21 Utility NEW - Repainting of the Bicentennial Park Storage Tank ing is requested to repaint the Bicentennial Park Elevated Storage Tank (EST). The paint on the water tower was applied in 27. $ $ $ $ $ $ $9, $9, $1,73, No additional cost after repainting. $ UF22 Utility Sewer Line (8-inch) in Basin S-3 South of SH 114 ing is requested for right of way, engineering design and construction of an 8-inch sanitary sewer line to provide service to planned mixed-use developments along SH 114 and also provide service to properties in Basin S-3 currently on septic systems (Lake Wood Acres Subdivision). $ $ $ $ $ $ $55, $55, $1,73, Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. $5, Utility Total: $4,1, $1,73, $4,95, $5,1, $12,4, $75, $3,5, $32,44, $1,73, $165, Comp. Plan Reference Waste Water System Plan #4 -WWS17- Tier 2 Water System Plan #15- WWS9- Tier 2 Water System Plan #15 -WWS9- Tier 2 Sustainability Plan Sustainability Plan Waste Water System Plan #6 -WWS19- Tier 2 SPIN Neigh

37 Utility City of Southlake FY 219 CIP Project Status Form Municipal Service Center (GF5 Companion) DEPARTMENT: Public Works PROJECT LOCATION: 195 East Continental Boulevard PROJECT TIMELINE: Oct 214 to Sept 22 DESCRIPTION: ing is requested for the architectural and engineering design and construction of a future Municipal Service Center identified in the Southlake 23 Parks and Recreation Open Space/ Facility Plan. New Request Continuation Project Joint Use JUSTIFICATION: Facilities are inadequate and undersized for the various divisions currently operating out of the existing facility including Streets and Drainage, Water, Wastewater, and Environmental Services. An expanded Municipal Service Center is required to meet the on-going demands of infrastructure maintenance and to house other departments needing additional space. ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: The current facility is undersized and unable to house additional divisions. Mandated / Public Health / Safety Replacement / Major Rehab or Protection of Capital Stock Compliant with 23/235 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: General GF6 Need / Service Enhancement STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Infrastructure, Performance Management FUND: General, Utility EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND CCPD CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND PUBLIC ART FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SPDC SWUS UTILITY FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT , ,2 5 1,25 1,15 1,15 1,15 1, ,85 1,15 1,9 1,8 1,8 1,8 1,8 46 SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 4, ,55 4,55 16,1 CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND ing is represented in thousands of dollars (s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776, 393

38 Utility City of Southlake FY 219 CIP Project Status Form Water Quality Improvements - Install Residual Control Systems in the City's GSR's DEPARTMENT: Public Works PROJECT LOCATION: 3 Ground Storage Resevoirs PROJECT TIMELINE: Oct 218 to Sept 219 DESCRIPTION: Additional funding is requested to design and install chlorine residual control systems in the City's three existing ground water storage reservoirs (GSRs) located at the Pump Stations. This item is a recommendation of the Freese & Nichols Water Quality Evaluation dated July 217. Southlake purchases its drinking water from the City of Fort Worth through a Wholesale Purchase Agreement, and is at the outreach of their distribution system. It is the responsibility of the City of Southlake, as the water purveyor, to maintain drinking water quality throughout the distribution system to all of Southlake's customers. Installing these control systems will allow the City to sample, monitor, and dose disinfectant to enhance drinking water quality in the event of an emergency or during periods of low demand. New Request Continuation Project Joint Use JUSTIFICATION: This will ensure public health and emergency preparedness, mitigate emergency flushing and unnecessary water loss. Maintaining water quality positively impacts resident health and ensures the City maintains its "Superior" water rating by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ). Mandated / Public Health / Safety Replacement / Major Rehab or Protection of Capital Stock Compliant with 23/235 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): Need / Service Enhancement ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: The City will be at risk to potential public health risks, in the event of an emergency or during periods of low demand. STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Infrastructure, Performance Management FUND: Utility EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER 7 4 OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND CCPD CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND PUBLIC ART FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SPDC SWUS UTILITY FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT 7 4 1, SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 1, ,1 1,1 CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND 394 ing is represented in thousands of dollars (s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776,

39 Utility City of Southlake FY 219 CIP Project Status Form Sanitary Sewer Evaluation Study (218) Implementations DEPARTMENT: Public Works PROJECT LOCATION: Various locations throughout the City PROJECT TIMELINE: Oct 218 to Sept 219 DESCRIPTION: ing is requested for engineering design and construction of implementations identified in the 218 RJN Group, Inc. Sanitary Sewer Condition Assessment Report. New Request Continuation Project Joint Use JUSTIFICATION: These improvements are necessary to reduce Inflow and Infiltration of rain water into the Wastewater Collection System which results in increased wastewater treatment costs with the Trinity River Authority (TRA). Mandated / Public Health / Safety Replacement / Major Rehab or Protection of Capital Stock Compliant with 23/235 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): Need / Service Enhancement ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: The City will continue to experience increased treatment costs with the Trinity River Authority (TRA). STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Infrastructure FUND: Utility EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER 1 OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND CCPD CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND PUBLIC ART FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SPDC SWUS UTILITY FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND ing is represented in thousands of dollars (s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776, 395

40 Utility DEPARTMENT: Public Works PROJECT Pearson & T W King Pump Stations LOCATION: PROJECT TIMELINE: Oct 219 to Sept 22 DESCRIPTION: City of Southlake FY 219 CIP Project Status Form Water System Improvements - Pearson West and TW King GSR's ing is requested for the engineering design and construction of inlet diffuser systems in the Ground Storage Reservoirs (GSRs) to slow the velocity of the water flow into the storage facility. JUSTIFICATION: This is required to prevent damage to the tank coating system which protects the integrity of the structure. New Request Continuation Project Joint Use Mandated / Replacement / Major Public Health / Rehab or Protection Need / Service Safety of Capital Stock Enhancement Compliant with 23/235 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): 396 ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: The current configuration will continue to degrade the structure and coatings over time, potentially resulting in expensive replacement costs. STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Infrastructure FUND: Utility EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ing is represented in thousands of dollars (s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776, COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER 18 OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND CCPD CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND PUBLIC ART FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SPDC SWUS UTILITY FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND

41 Utility City of Southlake FY 219 CIP Project Status Form 12-inch Water line along SH 114 from E. Highland to the boundary of Methodist Hospital DEPARTMENT: Public Works PROJECT LOCATION: SH114 Frontage Rd from E. Highland Street to Methodist Hospital PROJECT TIMELINE: Oct 218 to June 22 DESCRIPTION: ing is requested for right of way, engineering design and construction of a 12-inch water line along SH 114 from E. Highland Street to the eastern boundary of Methodist Hospital. New Request Continuation Project Joint Use JUSTIFICATION: This project will address a gap in our existing 12-inch line along the SH 114 corridor and will improve water quality, service, and fire protection in this region. Mandated / Public Health / Safety Replacement / Major Rehab or Protection of Capital Stock Compliant with 23/235 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): Need / Service Enhancement ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: Service will continue at its current level, without looped system causing potential water quality concerns. STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Infrastructure FUND: Utility EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER 5 2 OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND CCPD CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND PUBLIC ART FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SPDC SWUS UTILITY FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND ing is represented in thousands of dollars (s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776, 397

42 Utility City of Southlake FY 219 CIP Project Status Form 12-inch Water line along Kirkwood Boulevard from North Carroll Avenue to Highland Avenue DEPARTMENT: Public Works PROJECT LOCATION: Kirkwood Boulevard from Carroll Avenue to Highland Street PROJECT TIMELINE: Oct 218 to Sept 22 DESCRIPTION: ing is requested for right of way, engineering design and construction of a 12-inch water line along Kirkwood Boulevard from Carroll Avenue to Highland Street to replace existing 6-inch water line segments. This scope has changed from the project identified in the Southlake 23 Water plan due to the construction of Kirkwood Boulevard and reconfiguration of the street(s). New Request Continuation Project Joint Use JUSTIFICATION: Upsizing this line will improve service to the local residents. ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: Service ability will continue at its current level via substandard facilities. Mandated / Public Health / Safety Replacement / Major Rehab or Protection of Capital Stock Compliant with 23/235 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: Need / Service Enhancement STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Infrastructure FUND: Utility EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER 2 85 OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND CCPD CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND PUBLIC ART FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SPDC SWUS UTILITY FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT , SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 1, ,5 1,5 CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND 398 ing is represented in thousands of dollars (s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776,

43 Utility DEPARTMENT: Public Works PROJECT Miron Elevated Storage Tank Site LOCATION: PROJECT TIMELINE: Oct 218 to Sept 22 DESCRIPTION: City of Southlake FY 219 CIP Project Status Form ing is requested to repaint the Miron Elevated Storage Tank (EST). Repainting of the Miron Elevated Storage Tank JUSTIFICATION: The paint on the water tower is the original paint and is beginning to oxidize. This paint was applied in New Request Continuation Project Joint Use Mandated / Replacement / Major Public Health / Rehab or Protection Need / Service Safety of Capital Stock Enhancement Compliant with 23/235 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: The original paint will continue to oxidize, thus affecting the aesthetics and potentially the operational function of the tower. STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Infrastructure FUND: Utility EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND CCPD CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND PUBLIC ART FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SPDC SWUS UTILITY FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND ing is represented in thousands of dollars (s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776, 399

44 Utility 4

45 Roadway Impact Fee Roadway Impact Fee 41

46 Roadway Impact Fee Project # Project Name Description RIFF1 Roadway Impact Fee NEW - City Roadway Intersection Capacity Improvements (GF12 Companion) ing is requested for right of way, engineering design and construction to expand the existing configuration of the N. White Chapel/Dove roundabout to 2 lane. RIFF2 Roadway Impact Fee NEW - Continental Boulevard and S. Peytonville Avenue Intersection Improvements (GF13 Companion) ing is requested for right of way, engineering design, construction, art and landscaping of a planned roundabout at the Continental Boulevard and Peytonville Avenue intersection. Roadway Impact Fee Total: Total Prior ing FY 219 FY 22 FY 221 FY 222 FY 223 Beyond / Unfunded Total FY 219 Cumulative Description of Annual Impact on Operating Project's Impact to Annual Operating $5, $3, $1, $2, $ $ $ $1,1, $3, Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. $1, $ $ $ $1, $ $ $ $1, $3, Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. $5, $5, $3, $1, $3, $ $ $ $1,2, $3, $15, Comp. Plan Reference SPIN Neigh. Mobility Plan (175B) - Intersection Capacity Improvements All Mobility Plan #25 - Tier 3 1,11 42

47 Roadway Impact Fee DEPARTMENT: Public Works City of Southlake FY 219 CIP Project Status Form City Roadway Intersection Capacity Improvements (GF12 Companion) PROJECT LOCATION: N. White Chapel/Dove roundabout PROJECT TIMELINE: Oct 218 to Sept 222 DESCRIPTION: ing is requested for right of way, engineering design and construction to expand the existing configuration of the N. White Chapel/Dove roundabout to 2 lane. New Request Continuation Project Joint Use JUSTIFICATION: Dual lanes will mitigate traffic in the area, as well as reduce motorist incident risk. Mandated / Public Health / Safety Replacement / Major Rehab or Protection of Capital Stock Compliant with 23/235 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): Need / Service Enhancement ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: Roadway will remain at current capacity, resulting in the continual increase in traffic congestion. STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Infrastructure, Performance Management FUND: General, Roadway Impact Fee EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND CCPD CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND PUBLIC ART FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SPDC SWUS UTILITY FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT , , , 1,2 General GF12 SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 1, ,9 1,1 3, CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ing is represented in thousands of dollars (s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776, SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND 43

48 Roadway Impact Fee 44

49 Water Impact Fee Water Impact Fee 45

50 Water Impact Fee Project # Project Name Description Total Prior ing FY 219 FY 22 FY 221 FY 222 FY 223 Beyond / Unfunded Total FY 219 Cumulative Description of Annual Impact on Operating Project's Impact to Annual Operating WIFF1 Water Impact Fee 12-inch Water line for Fuel Farm Protection Improvements ing is requested for right of way and construction of a 12-inch water line to improve water quality and fire protection in this region. This project will eliminate multiple existing dead end water mains and provide more accessible water supply for emergency response if needed. This project is currently under design and will be constructed in multiple phases. This project received prior funding from the Water Impact Fee in fiscal year 216, 217 and 218. $1,85, $2, $ $ $ $ $ $2,5, $2, Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. $1, WIFF2 Water Impact Fee System Capacity Improvements (Water) - Future Projects ing provides staff and Council with resources to reimburse developers for the oversizing of water lines to meet the requirements of the Southlake 23 Water Plan in cases where the developer is not required to provide the ultimate size of the line to serve proposed developments. $65, $75, $5, $5, $5, $5, $1, $1,25, $275, Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. $1, WIFF3 Water Impact Fee Upsize water lines along West Park Circle off of T.W. King ing is requested for the engineering design and construction of 8-inch water lines along W. Park Circle, off T.W. King Road, to replace existing, substandard 2-inch water lines. Replacement of the existing lines will include the addition of fire hydrants for added protection of existing and future homes. $ $5, $3, $ $ $ $ $35, $325, Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. $7,5 Water Impact Fee Total: $2,5, $325, $35, $5, $5, $5, $1, $3,425, $325, $27,5 Comp. Plan Reference Sustainability Plan Waster System Plan - Various Sustainability Plan SPIN Neigh. 8 All 1 46

51 Water Impact Fee DEPARTMENT: Public Works PROJECT Fuel Farm - SH 26 and Brumlow/Mustang LOCATION: PROJECT TIMELINE: Oct 215 to Sept 219 DESCRIPTION: City of Southlake FY 219 CIP Project Status Form 12-inch Water Line for Fuel Farm Protection Improvements ing is requested for right of way and construction of a 12-inch water line to improve water quality and fire protection in this region. This project is currently under design and will be constructed in multiple phases. This project received prior funding from the Water Impact Fee in FY 216, 217, and 218. New Request Continuation Project Joint Use JUSTIFICATION: Mandated / Replacement / Major Public Health / Rehab or Protection This project will eliminate multiple existing dead end water mains and provide more Safety of Capital Stock accessible water supply for emergency response if needed. Compliant with 23/235 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): Need / Service Enhancement ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: Fire protection for these facilities will remain dependant on existing private systems within the Fuel Farms. STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Safety & Security, Infrastructure FUND: Water Impact Fee EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ing is represented in thousands of dollars (s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776, COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER 1,85 2 OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND CCPD CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND PUBLIC ART FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SPDC SWUS UTILITY FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ,6 2 1, ,85 2 1,85 2 SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND 2, ,5 2,5 47

52 Water Impact Fee DEPARTMENT: Public Works PROJECT Various Locations within the City LOCATION: PROJECT TIMELINE: Oct 218 to Sept 219 DESCRIPTION: City of Southlake FY 219 CIP Project Status Form System Capacity Improvements (Water) - Future Projects ing provides staff and Council with resources to reimburse developers for the oversizing of water lines to meet the requirements of the Southlake 23 Water Plan in cases where the developer is not required to provide the ultimate size of the line to serve proposed developments. 48 New Request Continuation Project Joint Use JUSTIFICATION: Mandated / Replacement / Major Public Health / Rehab or Protection Safety of Capital Stock These funds allow the City to partner with developers to deliver Southlake 23 Plan recommendations in a more timely and more economical way. ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: City will bear full cost of replacing water lines with 23 recommendations as projects are designed and funded. STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Infrastructure, Partnership & Volunteerism FUND: Water Impact Fee EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ing is represented in thousands of dollars (s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776, Compliant with 23/235 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: Need / Service Enhancement PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND CCPD CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND PUBLIC ART FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SPDC SWUS UTILITY FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION , SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND 1, ,25 1,25

53 Water Impact Fee DEPARTMENT: Public Works PROJECT West Park Circle LOCATION: PROJECT TIMELINE: Oct 218 to Sept 22 DESCRIPTION: City of Southlake FY 219 CIP Project Status Form Upsize Water Lines along West Park Circle off of T.W. King ing is requested for the engineering design and construction of 8-inch water lines along W. Park Circle, off T.W. King Road, to replace existing, substandard 2-inch water lines. Replacement of the existing lines will include the addition of fire hydrants for added protection of existing and future homes. New Request Continuation Project Joint Use JUSTIFICATION: Mandated / Replacement / Major Public Health / Rehab or Protection Project will upgrade water service ability and add fire hydrants to the location, Safety of Capital Stock increasing level of service and public safety. Compliant with 23/235 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): Need / Service Enhancement ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: Service will continue to be provided via substandard, 2-inch water lines and no fire hydrants within the subdivision for protection of existing and future homes. STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Safety & Security, Infrastructure FUND: Water Impact Fee EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ing is represented in thousands of dollars (s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776, COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER 5 3 OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND CCPD CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND PUBLIC ART FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SPDC SWUS UTILITY FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND

54 Water Impact Fee 41

55 Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee 411

56 Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Project # Project Name Description SSIF1 Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee System Capacity Improvements (Sewer) - Future Projects ing provides staff and Council with resources to reimburse developers for the oversizing of sanitary sewer lines to meet the requirements of the Southlake 23 Wastewater Plan in cases where the developer is not required to provide the ultimate size of the line to serve proposed developments. Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee Total: Total Prior ing FY 219 FY 22 FY 221 FY 222 FY 223 Beyond / Unfunded Total FY 219 Cumulative Description of Annual Impact on Operating Project's Impact to Annual Operating $65, $1, $1, $1, $1, $1, $ $1,15, $1, Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. $12, $65, $1, $1, $1, $1, $1, $ $1,15, $1, $12, Comp. Plan Reference Waste Water System Plan #17 to #21WWS17 to 21-Tier 2 SPIN Neigh. Citywide 412

57 Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee DEPARTMENT: Public Works PROJECT Various Locations within the City LOCATION: City of Southlake FY 219 CIP Project Status Form System Capacity Improvements (Sewer) - Future Projects PROJECT TIMELINE: Oct 218 to Sept 219 DESCRIPTION: ing provides staff and Council with resources to reimburse developers for the oversizing of sanitary sewer lines to meet the requirements of the Southlake 23 Wastewater Plan in cases where the developer is not required to provide the ultimate size of the line to serve proposed developments. New Request Continuation Project Joint Use JUSTIFICATION: Mandated / Replacement / Major Public Health / Rehab or Protection Safety of Capital Stock These funds allow the City to partner with developers to deliver Southlake 23 Plan recommendations in a more timely and more economical way. ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: City will bear full cost of replacing sewer lines with 23 recommendations as projects are designed and funded. STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Infrastructure, Partnership FUND: Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ing is represented in thousands of dollars (s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776, Compliant with 23/235 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: Need / Service Enhancement PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND CCPD CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND PUBLIC ART FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SPDC SWUS UTILITY FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION , SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND 1, ,15 1,15 413

58 Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee 414

59 Storm Water Utility System Storm Water Utility System 415

60 Storm Water Utility System Project # Project Name Description SWUSF1 Storm Water Utility System Drainage Improvements at North Peytonville Avenue near intersection with Raven Bend ing is requested for the engineering design and construction of drainage improvements near the intersection of N. Peytonville Avenue and Raven Bend Court. Significant runoff across this intersection creates a safety hazard during high intensity rain events. SWUSF2 Storm Water Utility System Replacement of South White Chapel Bridge at Bear Creek ing is requested for engineering and construction services associated with the bridge replacement project at South White Chapel at Bear Creek. TxDOT has notified the City that the bridge replacement project is part of the fiscal year 219 Highway Bridge Program. Participation in this program requires 1% of local funding to pay for design and construction expenses. A rough order of magnitude estimate for design and construction is $1.2 million. SWUSF3 Storm Water Utility System NEW - W. Highland St. Creek Crossing Drainage Improvements between N. White Chapel Blvd. and Shady Oaks ing is requested for engineering and construction of creek crossing improvements to replace the existing, partial steel culvert with a box culvert. This improvement is needed to ensure the integrity of the drainage infrastructure and roadway at the creek crossing. SWUSF4 Storm Water Utility System Simmons Court Drainage Improvements/Erosion Control ing is requested for the design and construction of gabions along Simmons Court in order to stop erosion and correct the exposure of City sanitary sewer lines. Total Prior ing FY 219 FY 22 FY 221 FY 222 FY 223 Beyond / Unfunded Total FY 219 Cumulative $5, $5, $ $ $ $ $ $1, $5, $ $115, $ $ $ $ $ $115, $165, $ $15, $ $ $ $ $ $15, $315, $ $1, $75, $ $ $ $ $85, $415, Description of Annual Impact on Operating Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. Preventive and corrective maintenance costs. Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. Anticipated repair should preclude continual maintenance. Project's Impact to Annual Operating $1,5 $1, $1, $ Comp. Plan Reference Sustainability Plan Storm Water Plan - #7 - Tier 3 Sustainability Plan Sustainability Plan SPIN Neigh. 1 9 & 1 5,

61 Storm Water Utility System Project # Project Name Description SWUSF5 Storm Water Utility System NEW - Drainage Improvements at T. W. King Pump Station #2 to Cliff Parks ing is requested for engineering and construction of drainage improvements on the City's T. W. King Pump Station #2 site. Drainage improvements may include design of a detention facility and release structure to allow for a controlled release of water to the existing pipe under Rancho Laredo Trail to the Cliffs Park. These improvements would eliminate the existing pond on the property that is a mosquito breeding ground and does not have storage capacity. These improvments will include a screening wall and landscaping to lessen the impact to residents of Clariden Ranch. This project is necessary for emergency preparedness and to prevent the possible flooding of residential properties to the south of and below the City's property. This is a companion project to the Water System Improvements MG Ground Storage Tank #2 at T.W. King Pump Station #2. SWUSF6 Storm Water Utility System NEW - Creekside Drive Drainage Improvements ing is requested for the reconstruction of drainage structures on Creekside Drive. The roadway has significant surface damage and requires reconstruction. The stormwater drainage ditches along both sides of the street need to be restored and creek crossings need to be improved as well as reconstruction of driveways and culverts. SWUSF7 Storm Water Utility System Kirkwood Branch at White Chapel Road / South Kirkwood Branch at White Chapel Road ing is requested for the design and construction of a new bridge along North White Chapel Boulevard over Kirkwood Creek Branch. This section of roadway flooded in May 215 due to heavy rainfall and overflow from Lake Grapevine and was closed for approximately 7 weeks. SWUSF8 Storm Water Utility System Florence Road Drainage Improvements ing is requested for engineering, design and construction of drainage improvements along Florence Road. (Sutton Place Only) Total Prior ing FY 219 FY 22 FY 221 FY 222 FY 223 Beyond / Unfunded Total FY 219 Cumulative $ $15, $5, $ $ $ $ $65, $565, $ $15, $7, $ $ $ $ $85, $715, $1,175, $5, $5, $5, $5, $5, $1,775, $14,45, $1,215, $1,, $5, $ $ $ $ $ $1,5, $1,265, Description of Annual Impact on Operating Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. Anticipate preventive and recurring maintenance costs. Increase in preventive and corrective maintenance. Project's Impact to Annual Operating $1, $1, $15, $1,5 Comp. Plan Reference Sustainability Plan Mobility Plan Storm Water Plan - #6 - Tier 2 Sustainability Plan SPIN Neigh

62 Storm Water Utility System Project # Project Name Description SWUSF9 Storm Water Utility System Dove Creek at North Carroll Avenue ing is requested for the design and construction of drainage improvements. The proposed improvements include the construction of five 1 x 7 box culverts, raise and replace the roadway, clear and grade the channel, and install channel stabilization consisting of interlocking concrete blocks. SWUSF1 Storm Water Utility System Big Bear 6 at East Continental Boulevard ing is requested for the design and construction of drainage improvements. The proposed improvements include the construction of four additional 12 x 8 box culverts, raise and replace the roadway, and clear and grade the channel. SWUSF11 Storm Water Utility System Big Bear 9 at Union Church Road west of Davis Boulevard ing is requested for the design and construction of drainage improvements. The proposed improvements include the construction of four 12 x 1 box culverts, raise and replace roadway, and clear and grade the channel. SWUSF12 Storm Water Utility System Big Bear 8 at West Continental Boulevard ing is requested for the design and construction of drainage improvements. The proposed improvements include the construction of six additional 12 x 8 box culverts, raise and replace the roadway, clear and grade the channel, and install channel stabilization. Total Prior ing FY 219 FY 22 FY 221 FY 222 FY 223 Beyond / Unfunded Total FY 219 Cumulative $ $ $ $25, $1,5, $ $ $1,75, $1,265, $ $ $ $125, $1, $ $ $225, $1,265, $ $ $ $8, $ $ $ $8, $1,265, $ $ $ $45, $3,7, $ $ $4,15, $1,265, Description of Annual Impact on Operating Culvert cleaning and channel regrading. Culvert cleaning and channel regrading. Culvert cleaning and channel regrading. Culvert cleaning and channel regrading. Project's Impact to Annual Operating $1, $1, $1, $1, Comp. Plan Reference Storm Water Plan#1 Tier 2 Storm Water Plan - #3 - Tier 2 Storm Water Plan - #4 - Tier 2 Storm Water Plan - #5 - Tier 2 SPIN Neigh

63 Storm Water Utility System Project # Project Name Description SWUSF13 Storm Water Utility System South Kirkwood Branch at North White Chapel Boulevard ing is requested for drainage improvements at the South Kirkwood Branch at North White Chapel Boulevard. The proposed improvements include the construction of four 9 x 9 reinforced box culverts, raising and replacing of the roadway and clear and grade channel. This project is needed as detention is not an option and delaying peak would cause other problems downstream. There is also need for a larger crossing and a raised roadway to meet the 1-Year water surface elevation downstream. SWUSF14 Storm Water Utility System Dove Creek at East Dove Road ing is requested for the design and construction of drainage improvements at Dove Creek at East Dove Road. The proposed improvements include the construction of fifteen 1 x 7 box culverts, raise and replace the roadway, clear and grade the channel, and install channel stabilization consisting of interlocking concrete blocks. Storm Water Utility System Total: Total Prior ing FY 219 FY 22 FY 221 FY 222 FY 223 Beyond / Unfunded Total FY 219 Cumulative Description of Annual Impact on Operating Project's Impact to Annual Operating $ $ $ $125, $5, $ $ $625, $1,265, Culvert cleaning and channel regrading. $1, $ $ $ $ $25, $2,5, $ $2,75, $1,265, Culvert cleaning and channel regrading. $1, $2,225, $1,265, $2,45, $2,25, $6,55, $3,, $1,775, $28,515, $1,265, $118, Comp. Plan Reference Storm Water Plan - #7 - Tier 2 Storm Water Plan - #8 - Tier 2 SPIN Neigh

64 City of Southlake FY 219 CIP Project Status Form DEPARTMENT: Public Works PROJECT Near Intersection of N. Peytonville and Raven Bend LOCATION: PROJECT TIMELINE: Oct 218 to Sept 219 DESCRIPTION: Drainage N. Peytonville near intersection with Raven Bend ing is requested for the engineering design and construction of drainage improvements near the intersection of N. Peytonville Avenue and Raven Bend Court. CIP Storm Water Utility System 42 New Request Continuation Project Joint Use JUSTIFICATION: Mandated / Replacement / Major Public Health / Rehab or Protection Significant runoff across this intersection creates a safety hazard during high intensity Safety of Capital Stock rain events. ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: Runoff will continue crossing the surface of the road which could render this intersection impassable in large rain events and deteriorate the road. STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Safety & Security, Infrastructure, Mobility FUND: Storm Water Utility System EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE Compliant with 23/235 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: Need / Service Enhancement PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER 5 5 OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND CCPD CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND PUBLIC ART FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SPDC SWUS UTILITY FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ing is represented in thousands of dollars (s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776, SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND

65 Storm Water Utility System City of Southlake FY 219 CIP Project Status Form Replacement of South White Chapel Bridge at Bear Creek DEPARTMENT: Public Works PROJECT S White Chapel near border of Southlake and Colleyville LOCATION: PROJECT TIMELINE: Oct 218 to Sept 219 DESCRIPTION: ing is requested for engineering and construction services associated with the bridge replacement project at South White Chapel at Bear Creek. TxDOT has notified the City that the bridge replacement project is part of the fiscal year 219 Highway Bridge Program. New Request Continuation Project Joint Use JUSTIFICATION: Mandated / Replacement / Major Public Health / Rehab or Protection Safety of Capital Stock Participation in this program requires 1% of local funding to pay for design and construction expenses. A rough order of magnitude estimate for design and construction is $1.2 million. Compliant with 23/235 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): Need / Service Enhancement ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: Bridge will continue to deteriorate if not replaced and available TXDOT funds forfeited. COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Safety, Infrastructure, Mobility, Partnership FUND: Storm Water Utility System EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER 115 OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND CCPD CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND PUBLIC ART FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SPDC SWUS UTILITY FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ing is represented in thousands of dollars (s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776, SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND

66 DEPARTMENT: Public Works PROJECT Between N. White Chapel Blvd. and Shady Oaks LOCATION: PROJECT TIMELINE: Oct 218 to Sept 219 DESCRIPTION: City of Southlake FY 219 CIP Project Status Form W. Highland St. Creek Crossing Drainage Improvements ing is requested for engineering and construction of creek crossing improvements to replace the existing, partial steel culvert with a box culvert. CIP Storm Water Utility System New Request Continuation Project Joint Use JUSTIFICATION: Mandated / Replacement / Major Public Health / Rehab or Protection This improvement is needed to ensure the integrity of the drainage infrastructure and Safety of Capital Stock roadway at the creek crossing. Compliant with 23/235 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): Need / Service Enhancement ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: Existing drainage structure will continue to deteriorate and could result in road failing. COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: 422 STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Safety & Security, Infrastructure, Mobility FUND: Storm Water Utility System EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER 15 OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND CCPD CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND PUBLIC ART FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SPDC SWUS UTILITY FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ing is represented in thousands of dollars (s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776, SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND

67 Storm Water Utility System City of Southlake FY 219 CIP Project Status Form DEPARTMENT: Public Works PROJECT Near Intersection of N. Peytonville and Raven Bend LOCATION: PROJECT TIMELINE: Oct 218 to Sept 22 DESCRIPTION: Simmons Court Drainage Improvements/Erosion Control ing is requested for the design and construction of gabions along Simmons Court in order to stop erosion and correct the exposure of City sanitary sewer lines. New Request Continuation Project Joint Use JUSTIFICATION: Mandated / Replacement / Major Public Health / Rehab or Protection Erosion along this creek bank will continue resulting in further exposure of exisiting Safety of Capital Stock sanitary sewer system. Compliant with 23/235 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): Need / Service Enhancement ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: Additional exposure of City facilities will result in more maintenance efforts or potential failure. STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Infrastructure FUND: Storm Water Utility System EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER 1 75 OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND CCPD CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND PUBLIC ART FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SPDC SWUS UTILITY FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ing is represented in thousands of dollars (s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776, SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND

68 City of Southlake FY 219 CIP Project Status Form DEPARTMENT: Public Works PROJECT TW King Road from Pump Station #2 to Cliff Parks LOCATION: PROJECT TIMELINE: Oct 218 to Sept 22 DESCRIPTION: Drainage Improvements at T. W. King Pump Station #2 to Cliff Parks ing is requested for engineering and construction of drainage improvements on the City's T. W. King Pump Station #2 site. Drainage improvements may include design of a detention facility and release structure to allow for a controlled release of water to the existing pipe under Rancho Laredo Trail to the Cliffs Park. These improvements would eliminate the existing pond on the property that is a mosquito breeding ground and does not have storage capacity. These improvements will include a screening wall and landscaping to lessen the impact to residents of Clariden Ranch. CIP Storm Water Utility System 424 New Request Continuation Project Joint Use JUSTIFICATION: Mandated / Replacement / Major Public Health / Rehab or Protection This project is necessary for emergency preparedness and to prevent the possible Safety of Capital Stock flooding of residential properties to the south of and below the City's property. ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: The existing pond will continue to be a health concern and potential for flooding will remain. STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Infrastructure, Safety FUND: Storm Water Utility System EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE Compliant with 23/235 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: Need / Service Enhancement Water System Improvements MG Ground Storage Tank #2 at T.W. King Pump Station #2. REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER 15 5 OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND CCPD CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND PUBLIC ART FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SPDC SWUS UTILITY FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ing is represented in thousands of dollars (s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776, SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND

69 Storm Water Utility System DEPARTMENT: Public Works PROJECT Creekside Drive LOCATION: PROJECT TIMELINE: Oct 218 to Sept 22 DESCRIPTION: City of Southlake FY 219 CIP Project Status Form Creekside Drive Drainage Improvements ing is requested for the reconstruction of drainage structures on Creekside Drive. New Request Continuation Project Joint Use JUSTIFICATION: Mandated / Replacement / Major Public Health / Rehab or Protection Safety of Capital Stock The roadway has significant surface damage and requires reconstruction. The stormwater drainage ditches along both sides of the street need to be restored and creek crossings need to be improved as well as reconstruction of driveways and culverts. Compliant with 23/235 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): Need / Service Enhancement ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: The culverts will continue to deteriorate resulting in additional road failures. COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Infrastructure FUND: Storm Water Utility System EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER 15 7 OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND CCPD CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND PUBLIC ART FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SPDC SWUS UTILITY FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ing is represented in thousands of dollars (s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776, SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND

70 DEPARTMENT: Public Works PROJECT N White Chapel at Kirkwood Creek Branch LOCATION: PROJECT TIMELINE: Sept 215 to Oct 223 DESCRIPTION: City of Southlake FY 219 CIP Project Status Form CIP Storm Water Utility System Kirkwood Branch at White Chapel Road / South Kirkwood Branch at White Chapel Road ing is requested for the design and construction of a new bridge along North White Chapel Boulevard over Kirkwood Creek Branch. New Request Continuation Project Joint Use JUSTIFICATION: Mandated / Replacement / Major Public Health / Rehab or Protection This section of roadway flooded in May 215 due to heavy rainfall and overflow from Safety of Capital Stock Lake Grapevine and was closed for approximately 7 weeks. Compliant with 23/235 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): Need / Service Enhancement 426 ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: This section of N. White Chapel could be subject to future flooding and closure if similar rain events and lake levels, such as those of 215, recur. STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Safety & Security, Infrastructure, Mobility FUND: Storm Water Utility System EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ing is represented in thousands of dollars (s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776, COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER 1, ,775 OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND CCPD CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND PUBLIC ART FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SPDC SWUS UTILITY FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 5 5 1,5 1, ,775 13, , ,775 1, , , SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND 14,45 14,45

71 Storm Water Utility System DEPARTMENT: Public Works PROJECT Florence Road LOCATION: PROJECT TIMELINE: Oct 216 to Sept 219 DESCRIPTION: City of Southlake FY 219 CIP Project Status Form ing is requested for engineering, design and construction of drainage improvements along Florence Road. (Sutton Place Only) Florence Road Drainage Improvements New Request Continuation Project Joint Use JUSTIFICATION: Mandated / Replacement / Major Public Health / Rehab or Protection Runoff currently sheet flows across the surface of Florence Road after heavy rains. Safety of Capital Stock Improving the drainage facilities along and under Florence Road will mitigate this issue and improve safety and mobility. Compliant with 23/235 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): Need / Service Enhancement ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: Runoff will continue to sheet flow across Florence Road which is a safety issue and could negatively impact mobility during heavy rain events. STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Safety & Security, Infrastructure, Mobility FUND: Storm Water Utility System EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ing is represented in thousands of dollars (s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776, COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER 1, 5 OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND CCPD CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND PUBLIC ART FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SPDC SWUS UTILITY FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION , , 5 1, 5 SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND 1, ,5 1,5 427

72 Storm Water Utility System 428

73 Hotel Occupancy Tax Hotel Occupancy Tax 429

74 Hotel Occupancy Tax Project # Project Name Description Total Prior ing FY 219 FY 22 FY 221 FY 222 FY 223 Beyond / Unfunded Total FY 219 Cumulative Description of Annual Impact on Operating Project's Impact to Annual Operating HOT1 Hotel Occupancy Tax Southlake Visitor Information and Amenity Center The purpose of this item is to establish a project fund for the construction of a Visitor Information and Amenity Center that will include public restrooms to be located in Southlake Town Square. $8, $2, $2, $2, $2, $2, $ $1,8, $2, TBD TBD Hotel Occupancy Tax : $6, $2, $2, $2, $2, $2, $ $1,6, $2, TBD Comp. Plan Reference EDT Goals T.14, T1.5, T1.6 and T1.7 SPIN Neigh. SPIN #8 43

75 Hotel Occupancy Tax DEPARTMENT: Economic Development & Tourism PROJECT Southlake Town Square LOCATION: City of Southlake FY 219 CIP Project Status Form Southlake Visitor Information and Amenity Center PROJECT TIMELINE: TBD to TBD DESCRIPTION: The purpose of this item is to establish a project fund for the construction of a Visitor Information Center that will include public restrooms to be located in Southlake Town Square. New Request Continuation Project Joint Use JUSTIFICATION: Mandated / Replacement / Major Public Health / Rehab or Protection Safety of Capital Stock The Southlake 235 Tourism Plan Number T2 recommends enhancing the visitor experience through the provision of visitor amenities. Assessment and development of a strategy for a visitor services center that could offer serviceable amenities for guests. Center could have single or satellite locations and could also include amenities such as public restrooms and serve as a type of "visitor concierge". ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: Lack of visitor amenities in Town Square; Southlake 235 recommendation not implemented STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Quality Development FUND: Hotel Occupancy Tax EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ing is represented in thousands of dollars (s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776, Compliant with 23/235 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: Need / Service Enhancement PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND CCPD CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND PUBLIC ART FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SPDC SWUS UTILITY FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION , Revenue may be generated through sales of souvenirs SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND 1,8 1,8 1,8 431

76 Hotel Occupancy Tax 432

77 Enhancement & Development Corporation Enhancement & Development Corporation 433

78 Enhancement & Development Corporation Project # Project Name Description Total Prior ing FY 219 FY 22 FY 221 FY 222 FY 223 Beyond / Unfunded Total FY 219 Cumulative Description of Annual Impact on Operating Project's Impact to Annual Operating CEDC1 Enhancement and Development Corporation SH 114 Improvements (GF3 Companion) "ing is requested for the design and construction of at least one Texas turnaround, access roads and ramp reversals from Dove Road to Kirkwood Boulevard and intersection improvements at SH 114 and Kirkwood Boulevard. Additional funding may become available via other partnerships." $2,, $1,, $235, $ $ $ $ $3,235, $1,, TxDOT Operation and Maintenance $ CEDC Total: $2,, $1,, $235, $ $ $ $ $3,235, $1,, $ Comp. Plan Reference Mobility Plan (175A) MT46 - Tier 1 SPIN Neigh

79 Enhancement & Development Corporation DEPARTMENT: Public Works PROJECT SH 114 from Dove Road to Kirkwood Boulevard LOCATION: PROJECT TIMELINE: May 217 to Dec 22 DESCRIPTION: City of Southlake FY 219 CIP Project Status Form SH 114 Improvements (GF3 Companion) ing is requested for the design and construction of at least one Texas turnaround, access roads and ramp reversals from Dove Road to Kirkwood Boulevard and intersection improvements at SH 114 and Kirkwood Boulevard. Additional funding may become available via other partnerships. New Request Continuation Project Joint Use JUSTIFICATION: Mandated / Replacement / Major Public Health / Rehab or Protection Safety of Capital Stock The need for the proposed improvements are magnified by recent and planned development within this region of the City. ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: Mobility will be negatively impacted by significant traffic generated by current and future development within this region. STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Infrastructure, Mobility, Partnership FUND: General, CEDC EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ing is represented in thousands of dollars (s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776, Compliant with 23/235 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: Need / Service Enhancement PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER 2, 1, 235 OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND CCPD CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND PUBLIC ART FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SPDC SWUS UTILITY FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 2, 1, 235 3,235 3,95 2,5 2,84 2, 1, 235 5,95 3,5 3,75 GF3 Companion SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND 3,235 9,29 3,235 12,

80 Enhancement & Development Corporation 436

81 Southlake Parks Development Corporation Southlake Parks Development Corporation 437

82 Southlake Parks Development Corporation Project # Project Name Description SPDC1 Southlake Parks Development Corporation Southlake Sports Complex Design and development of Southlake Sports Complex improvements as per the Amended Southlake 23 Parks, Recreation & Open Space / Facilities (PROS/CF) Plan. Scope includes: synthetic turf at large field, building architectural improvements, restroom/pavilion/maintenance/ storage facility, pavilions/shade structures, playground, batting cages, entry feature, trails, field improvements, parking improvements, decel lane, fencing, well, landscape & irrigation enhancements and park amenities. Recent amendments to the PROS/CF Plan also included a recommendation to consider development of a skate park at the complex. SPDC2 Southlake Parks Development Corporation Central Park Improvements and Pedestrian Bridge Design of Central Park and pedestrian bridge improvements as per the Amended Southlake 23 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/ Facilities (PROS/CF) Plan and the preliminary concept plan developed by Kimley Horn in May 218. The city will work with the adjacent property owner (Shops of Southlake), and other stakeholders on the development of a final concept plan that incorporates the conceptualized improvements. In FY 218, funding in the amount of $1, was allocated through the Park Dedication for initial design. SPDC3 Southlake Parks Development Corporation Bob Jones Nature Center & Preserve Trails Development Design and development of the Bob Jones Nature Center & Preserve Plan Tier One Improvements as per the Southlake 23 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/ Facilities Plan. The project scope includes: treehouse structure, signage, outdoor classrooms, dirt and decomposed granite trails development, and savannah restoration. ing for FY 219 is for installation of a treehouse structure and nature playground Total Prior ing FY 219 FY 22 FY 221 FY 222 FY 223 Beyond / Unfunded Total FY 219 Cumulative $7, $4,, $4,, $3,5, $ $ $ $12,2, $4,, $ $2, $ $ $ $ $ $2, $4,2, $ $ $ $ $3,3, $ $5,88, $9,18, $4,2, Description of Annual Impact on Operating Park Maintenance Costs Park Maintenance Costs Park Maintenance Costs Project's Impact to Annual Operating $14, $5, $65, Comp. Plan Reference Southlake 23 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/ Facilities Plan - Tier 2 Southlake 23 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/ Facilities Plan-Tier 3 Southlake 23 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/ Facilities Plan-Tier 3 SPIN Neigh

83 Southlake Parks Development Corporation Project # Project Name Description SPDC4 Southlake Parks Development Corporation SPDC Matching s The purpose of this item is to provide for a minimum balance of $2, annually within the SPDC Capital in support of the City's SPDC Matching s Program as per the recommendations of the Parks and Recreation Board and SPDC. *Available funding shown in "Total Prior ing" column. SPDC5 Southlake Parks Development Corporation Bob Jones Nature Center & Preserve Nature Trail Expansion Design and development of the Bob Jones Nature Center & Preserve Plan Tier Three Improvements as per the Amended Southlake 23 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/ Facilities Plan. The project scope includes: overlook structures, signage, outdoor classrooms, dirt and decomposed granite trails development, boardwalk and trailhead parking. SPDC6 Southlake Parks Development Corporation Bob Jones Park Improvements Design and development of improvements at BJ Park per the Amended Southlake 23 Parks, Recreation and Open Space/ Facilities Plan. The project scope includes improvements to softball complex spectator area, athletic fields, equestrian area, shade, parking, landscaping, playground at softball, and park maintenance facility. The project also includes new pavilion/restroom, trails, parking, North athletic field, turf field, entry road and entry feature for Bob Jones Park and Bob Jones Nature Center and Preserve. Total Prior ing FY 219 FY 22 FY 221 FY 222 FY 223 Beyond / Unfunded Total FY 219 Cumulative Description of Annual Impact on Operating Project's Impact to Annual Operating $4, $ $ $ $ $ $ $4, $4,2, TBD TBD $ $ $ $ $ $ $3,6, $3,6, $4,2, Park Maintenance Costs $25, $4, $ $ $ $ $ $24,43, $24,83, $4,2, Park Maintenance Costs $13, Comp. Plan Reference Southlake 23 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/ Facilities Plan Southlake 23 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/ Facilities Plan-Tier 3 Southlake 23 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/ Facilities Plan-Tier 2 SPIN Neigh. All

84 Southlake Parks Development Corporation Project # Project Name Description SPDC7 Southlake Parks Development Corporation North Park Improvements Design and development of improvements at North Park as per the Amended Southlake 23 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/ Facilities Plan. The project scope includes: new pavilion, fourth athletic field and trail connection to White Chapel Boulevard SPDC8 Southlake Parks Development Corporation Bob Jones Nature Center & Preserve New Building Development Design and development of the Bob Jones Nature Center & Preserve Plan Tier Two Improvements as per the Amended Southlake 23 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/ Facilities Plan. The project scope includes: new nature center complex (building, courtyard, water exhibit/outdoor classroom, educational/ events space), renovated barn, nature playground, signage, outdoor classrooms, dirt and decomposed granite trails development, lake edge mitigation, species diversity propagation, entrance drive, parking, vehicular bridge, and landscape. SPDC9 Southlake Parks Development Corporation Liberty Park at Sheltonwood Improvements Design and development of improvements at Liberty Park at Sheltonwood as per the Amended Southlake 23 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/ Facilities Plan. The project scope includes: water well for irrigation, park amenities, sand volleyball, playground, expand parking, completion of trail system, signage, drainage, utilities, expand existing pond, exercise stations along trail, and pedestrian corridor from parking to center of the park. SPDC1 Southlake Parks Development Corporation Koalaty Park Improvements Design and development of improvements at Koalaty Park as per the Amended Southlake 23 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/ Facilities Plan. The project scope includes: park restroom, shade structures, sports field lighting, nature trail, park amenities, vehicle drop off, and landscape improvements. Total Prior ing FY 219 FY 22 FY 221 FY 222 FY 223 Beyond / Unfunded Total FY 219 Cumulative $ $ $ $ $ $ $1,97, $1,97, $4,2, $ $ $ $ $ $ $25,56, $25,56, $4,2, $ $ $ $ $ $ $3,11, $3,11, $4,2, $ $ $ $ $ $ $2,38, $2,38, $4,2, Description of Annual Impact on Operating Park Maintenance Costs Park Maintenance Costs Park Maintenance Costs Park Maintenance Costs Project's Impact to Annual Operating $15, $225, $2, $3, Comp. Plan Reference Southlake 23 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/ Facilities Plan-Tier 3 Southlake 23 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/ Facilities Plan-Tier 3 Southlake 23 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/ Facilities Plan-Tier 3 Southlake 23 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/ Facilities Plan-Tier 3 SPIN Neigh

85 Southlake Parks Development Corporation Project # Project Name Description Total Prior ing FY 219 FY 22 FY 221 FY 222 FY 223 Beyond / Unfunded Total FY 219 Cumulative Description of Annual Impact on Operating Project's Impact to Annual Operating SPDC11 Southlake Parks Development Corporation Royal & Annie Smith Park Improvements Design and development of improvements at Royal & Annie Smith Park as per the Amended Southlake 23 Parks, Recreation & Open Space Plan. The project scope includes: frisbee golf/ passive uses, and signage. $ $ $ $ $ $ $77, $77, $4,2, Park Maintenance Costs $5, SPDC12 Southlake Parks Development Corporation Chesapeake Park Improvements Design and development of improvements at Chesapeake Park as per the Amended Southlake 23 Parks, Recreation & Open Space Plan. The project scope includes: park restroom, pavilion, tennis or basketball courts, park amenities, trail connections, park signage, water well for irrigation, landscape improvements, and additional parking. $ $ $ $ $ $ $2,98, $2,98, $4,2, Park Maintenance Costs $4, SPDC13 Southlake Parks Development Corporation Kirkwood/ Sabre Linear Park Design and development of Kirkwood / Sabre Linear Park as per the Amended Southlake 23 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/ Facilities Plan. The project scope includes: trail connectivity from North White Chapel Boulevard to Kirkwood Boulevard $ $ $ $ $ $ $52, $52, $4,2, Park Maintenance Costs $5, SPDC14 Southlake Parks Development Corporation The Cliffs Park Improvements Design and development of improvements at The Cliffs Park as per the Amended Southlake 23 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/ Facilities Plan. The project scope includes: multipurpose sports field(s), landscape improvements and screening, trail connectivity, park road and parking, and park amenities. $ $ $ $ $ $ $2,14, $2,14, $4,2, Park Maintenance Costs $25, SPDC15 Southlake Parks Development Corporation Oak Pointe Park Improvements Design and development of improvements at Oak Pointe Park as per the Amended Southlake 23 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/ Facilities Plan. The project scope includes: trail connectivity to White Chapel Boulevard/ Walnut Grove Elementary School. $ $ $ $ $ $ $9, $9, $4,2, Park Maintenance Costs $1, SPDC Total: $1,5, $4,2, $4,, $3,5, $3,3, $ $72,197, $88,697, $4,2, $776, Comp. Plan Reference Southlake 23 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/ Facilities Plan-Tier 3 Southlake 23 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/ Facilities Plan-Tier 3 Southlake 23 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/ Facilities Plan-Tier 3 Southlake 23 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/ Facilities Plan-Tier 3 Southlake 23 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/ Facilities Plan-Tier 3 SPIN Neigh

86 DEPARTMENT: Services PROJECT Southlake Sports Complex LOCATION: PROJECT TIMELINE: 1/1/18 to 9/3/21 DESCRIPTION: CIP Southlake Parks Development Corporation City of Southlake FY 219 CIP Project Status Form Southlake Sports Complex Design and development of Southlake Sports Complex improvements as per the Amended Southlake 23 Parks, Recreation & Open Space / Facilities (PROS/CF) Plan. Scope includes: synthetic turf at large field, building architectural improvements, maint/storage, pavilions/shade structures, restrooms, playground, batting cages, entry feature, trails, field improvements, parking, decel lane, fencing, well, landscape & irrigation enhancements and park amenities. Recent amendments to the PROS/CF Plan also included a recommendation to consider development of a skate park at the complex. 442 New Request Continuation Project Joint Use JUSTIFICATION: Mandated / Replacement / Major Public Health / Rehab or Protection Safety of Capital Stock Recommendation of the Amended Southlake 23 PROS/CF Plan. The Park Board, SPDC and City Council ranked the Southlake Sports Complex Improvements as the #2 park development priority for the FY 215 and subsequent SPDC CIP and Capital s. ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: Delay implementing the Amended Southlake 23 PROS/CF Plan recommendation to complete Southlake Sports Complex Improvements. STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Infrastructure and Quality Development FUND: SPDC EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ing is represented in thousands of dollars (s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776, Compliant with 23/235 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: Need / Service Enhancement PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER 7 4, 4, 3,5 OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND CCPD CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND PUBLIC ART FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SPDC SWUS UTILITY FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 7 7 4, 4, 3,5 11, , 4, 3,5 7 4, 4, 3,5 Field use fees SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND 12, ,2 12,2

87 Southlake Parks Development Corporation City of Southlake FY 219 CIP Project Status Form DEPARTMENT: Services PROJECT Central Park Improvements and Pedestrian Bridge LOCATION: Central Park Improvements & Pedestrian Bridge PROJECT TIMELINE: TBD to TBD DESCRIPTION: Design of Central Park and pedestrian bridge improvements as per the Amended Southlake 23 Parks, Recreation & Open Space/ Facilities (PROS/CF) Plan and the preliminary concept plan developed by Kimley Horn in May 218. The city will work with the adjacent property owner (Shops of Southlake), and other stakeholders on the development of a final concept plan that incorporates the conceptualized improvements. In FY 218, funding in the amount of $1, was allocated through the Park Dedication for initial design. New Request Continuation Project Joint Use JUSTIFICATION: Mandated / Replacement / Major Public Health / Rehab or Protection Need / Service Recommendation of the Amended Southlake 23 PROS/CF Plan. Safety of Capital Stock Enhancement Compliant with 23/235 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: Delay implementing the Amended Southlake 23 PROS/CF Plan recommendation to complete Central Park improvements. STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Infrastructure & Quality Development COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: FUND: SPDC EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER 1 2 OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND CCPD CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND PUBLIC ART FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SPDC SWUS UTILITY FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ing is represented in thousands of dollars (s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776, SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND

88 Southlake Parks Development Corporation 444

89 Public Art Public Art 445

90 Public Art Project # Project Name Description Total Prior ing FY 219 FY 22 FY 221 FY 222 FY 223 Beyond / Unfunded Total FY 219 Cumulative Description of Annual Impact on Operating Project's Impact to Annual Operating Comp. Plan Reference SPIN Neigh. Public Art 1 Public Art Public Art Program The purpose of this item is to establish project fund to implement the Southlake 23 Public Art Plan. $225, $ $1, $1, $1, $1, $1, $725, $ Art Maintenance Costs TBD Southlake 23 Public Art Plan TBD Public Art 2 Public Art Public Art Matching s The purpose of this item is to provide for a minimum balance of $5, annually within the Public Art in support of the City's Public Art Matching s Program as per the recommendations of the Southlake 23 Public Art Plan *Available funding shown in "Total Prior ing" column. $5, $ $ $ $ $ $ $5, $ Art Maintenance Costs TBD Southlake 23 Public Art Plan TBD Public Art 3 Public Art Southlake Commons Public Art The purpose of this item is to establish project funding for the public art initiative associated with the Southlake Commons development as per the Zoning Plan and Site Plan approval dated June 5, 218. $ $19, $ $ $ $ $ $19, $19, Art Maintenance Costs $2, 1 Public Art Total: $275, $19, $1, $1, $1, $1, $1, $965, $19, $2, 446

91 Public Art DEPARTMENT: Services PROJECT Southlake Commons, 179 Entrance LOCATION: City of Southlake FY 219 CIP Project Status Form Southlake Commons Public Art PROJECT TIMELINE: FY 219 to FY22 DESCRIPTION: The purpose of this item is to establish project funding for the public art initiative associated with the Southlake Commons development as per the Zoning Plan and Site Plan approval dated June 5, 218. New Request Continuation Project Joint Use JUSTIFICATION: Mandated / Replacement / Major Public Health / Rehab or Protection Safety of Capital Stock The City Council identified Southlake Commons as a priority for public art during their consideration of the Zoning Plan and Site Plan on June 5, 218. The Council's desire was to develop a public art piece to pay tribute to the history of the property prior to development. Compliant with 23/235 Comprehensive Plan Element? List (incl ref #): Need / Service Enhancement ALTERNATIVES / IMPACTS IF PROJECT IS NOT FUNDED: STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA: Quality Development COMPANION PROJECT? If yes, please explain: REVENUE GENERATING? If yes, please explain: FUND: Public Art EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED PLANNING / FEASIBILITY STUDY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LAND TESTING CONSTRUCTION OTHER 19 OPERATIONAL IMPACT PROJECT ELEMENT PRIOR UNFUNDED MAINTENANCE COSTS PERSONNEL COSTS FUNDING SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE PRIOR UNFUNDED GENERAL FUND CCPD CEDC HOTEL OCCUPANCY TAX FUND PARK DEDICATION FEE FUND PUBLIC ART FUND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE FUND SANITARY SEWER IMPACT FEE SPDC SWUS UTILITY FUND WATER IMPACT FEE FUND CCPD: CRIME CONTROL & PREVENTION DISTRICT CEDC: COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ing is represented in thousands of dollars (s). Example: 3,776 = $3,776, SPDC: SOUTHLAKE PARKS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SWUS: STORMWATER UTILITY SYSTEM FUND

92 Public Art 448