FOCUS AREA 6B: Fostering local development

Transcription

1 Rural Development Programmes : Key facts & figures FOCUS AREA 6B: Fostering local development 1. Introduction Focus Area (FA) 6B is designed to foster local development in rural areas. Two measures play a dominant role in this focus area: LEADER (M19) Basic services and village renewal These are complemented by a small number of other measures, which are much less important in size, such as support for Cooperation and Areas with Natural Constraints. The targets are the creation of jobs through the supported projects, to cover 54% of the rural population with Local Development Strategies (LDS), and to benefit 3 % of the rural population with improved services. Rural Development Programmes addressing 110 out of 11 RDPs 1 TARGET % of rural population covered by local development strategies 1, > 75% Examples of expected achievement (EU-8) 50% 75% 5% 50% < 5% 54 % of rural population covered by local development strategies (LDS) 3 % of the rural population benefiting from improved services jobs created in supported projects 11 % of the planned total public expenditure is allocated to 1 RDPs that do not address FA 6B: FR-National Programme, IT-National Programme. Target values in percentage are calculated on the basis of the total rural population covered by the RDPs that activated. 1

2 . Expected achievements Net population benefiting from improved services (Million) This section provides information on the common target indicator defined for the Focus Area and examples of programme-specific target indicators defined by some RDPs to complement the common targets indicators. Target values in percentage are calculated on the basis of the total rural population covered by the RDPs that activated. TARGET - Net population and % of the population benefiting from improved services/infrastructures 100% % 65% 54% 47% 46% 43% 33% 31% 30% 8% 7% 7% 3% 14% 10% 10% 5% 4% 1% 0.1% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 0% 10% % of rural population benefiting from improved services 0 HU LV AT FI CY SE BG DE HR ES FR RO BE LT IT UK PL DK SK GR PT 5% 0% TARGET - No of jobs created in supported projects ES PL IE IT FR PT RO GR FI SE DE UK SK LT CZ BG HU AT DK EE NL LV HR BE SI LU CY MT In addition to the common targets set at EU level, Member States may set programme specific targets which reflect their particular circumstances. Some examples of these indicators are provided below. Examples of programme-specific target indicators ES-Murcia % of rural population benefits from services / improved infrastructure through CLLD projects: % FR-Rhone Alpes No of cooperation activities supported under non-clld local development strategies: 00

3 . Expected achievements.9% 1.9% 0.9% 15.3% 13.6% 11.8% 11.6% 10.% 10.% 9.9% 9.8% 9.8% 9.4% 9.1% 8.7% 8.7% 7.0% 7.0% 6.9% 6.5% 6.4% 6.4% 5.6% 5.5% 5.1% 4.9% 4.3% 3.1% This section provides information on the output indicator. Data provided is aggregated at EU level for those RDPs setting the indicator. Main output indicators EU Total No of beneficiaries trained No of Local Action Groups selected 515 No of operations supported for investments of small scale infrastructure, including investments in renewable energy and energy saving No of operations supported for investments in local basic services for the rural population No of operations supported for studies/investments in rural cultural and natural heritage, including High Nature Value sites Planned total public expenditure on Share (%) of planned total public expenditure allocated to FA 6B FA 6B planned expenditure overview The following graph shows the percentage of planned total public expenditure allocated to per Member State. 5% 11% of the total RD planned public expenditure EUR 17 billion Out of which EAFRD: EUR 11.5 billion 0% RDP with the largest budget for Romania RDP EUR million 15% RDP with the largest % of its budget for FR Guyane RDP 49 % 10% 5% 0% BG DE RO HR PL CY HU LT PT ES FR SK EE SE AT GR IT BE NL MT IE DK UK LV CZ SI FI LU 3

4 4. Intervention logic at EU level In , measures within Rural Development Programmes can contribute to several Priorities and Focus Areas in a flexible manner. The following charts provide an indication of the most commonly used measures to address, as well as an indication of the number of RDPs in which these measures are selected. Planned public expenditure on per measure (% of the FA planned public expenditure) Number of RDPs activating measures on out of 110 addressing FA6B M06-business development M04-Physical investments 0.0% 0.1% M0-Advisory services 0.% M01-Kowledge transfer 0.3% M13-ANC 1.% M16-Cooperation 1.% M07-basic services 41.6% M19-LEADER 55.4% M07-basic services 7 M16-Cooperation 36 M19-LEADER 108 M13-ANC 1 M01-Kowledge transfer 16 M0-Advisory services 8 M04-Physical investments 4 M06-business development Total No of measures selected 8 Average No of measures activated per RDP 5. Example of RDPs intervention logic This section provides two examples of the intervention logic followed by RDPs which illustrate alternative approaches fostering local development. Bulgaria Target & output indicators Percentage of rural population benefiting from improved services/infrastructures Value 33.4 % No of jobs created in supported projects 600 No of operations supported for investments of small scale infrastructure, including investments in renewable energy and energy saving No of operations supported for investments in recreational/tourist infrastructure Total public budget (million EUR) Sweden Target & output indicators Value No of jobs created in supported projects Percentage of rural population benefiting from improved services/infrastructures No of operations supported for investments in local basic services for the rural population No of operations supported for studies/investments in rural cultural and natural heritage, incl HNV sites Total public budget (million EUR) 43.1 % Breakdown of FA budget by measure (%) Measure mill EUR Breakdown of FA budget by measure (%) Measure mill EUR M % M % M M M % M % M % M % M0. 1.7% M M0 6.6 M M M

5 6. Measure mix per Member State The following table shows the weight that each Member State has given to the various measures available in order to achieve the targets set for this Focus Area. Highlighted cells indicate the highest budget share allocation per MS. The last row presents the EU-8 planned total public expenditure for each measure (million EUR). = Highest budget share allocation per MS M01 - Knowledge transfer & information actions M0 - Advisory services M04 - Investments in physical assets M06 Farm & business development M07- Basic Services M13 ANC Planned M16 - Cooperation M19 - LEADER Total expenditure (million EUR) AT 63% 0.05% 37% 100 % 663 BE 3% 8% 59% 100 % 108 BG 80% 0% 100 % 657 CY 54% 46% 100% 7 CZ 100% 100% 154 DE 5% % 47% 100 % DK 100% 100 % 55 EE 100% 100 % 90 ES 0.1% 0.% 1% 1% 87% 100 % 1 75 FI 0.3% 14% 1% 85% 100 % 356 FR 0.1% 0.% 37% % 60% 100 % GR 3% 8% 89% 100 % 497 HR 80% 0% 100% 333 HU 59% 41% 100 % 471 IE 100% 100 % 50 IT 0.5% 0.% 14% % 84% 100 % 1 47 LT 39% 61% 100% 186 LU 100% 100 % 11 LV 100% 100 % 79 MT 0% 80% 100 % 8 NL 100% 100 % 111 PL 58% 4% 100 % PT 0.3% 1% 43% 1% 55% 100 % 469 RO 67% 33% 100% SE 1% % 34% 10% 53% 100% 376 SI 100% 100% 5 SK 47% 53% 100% 198 UK 7% 3% 6% 5% 59% 100 % 417 EU-8 (%) 0.3% 0.% 0.1% 0.0% 4% 1% 1% 55% 100 % EU-8 (mil. EUR)

6 7. Additional information Rural Development Regulation Regulation (EU) Nº 1305/013 of the European Parliament and of the Council on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) [PDF ] RDP Summaries Developed by the ENRD, these summarise the relevant information of all the RDPs approved [here] Priority Summary Developed by the ENRD, these summarise the relevant information of all Priorities [here] Source of information: All data presented in this summary comes from the European Commission-approved Rural Development Programmes (118 RDPs in total). In this fiche, public expenditure means total public expenditure (= EAFRD + Member States matching funds + any national top-ups). Due to rounding, there may be small discrepancies between some figures presented. Data includes programme modifications until March 016. Out of the 118 Rural Development Programmes only the 11 national and regional Programmes have been considered because National Frameworks and National Rural Network Programmes do not allocate budget on Measures. Please note that data and calculations provided do not include M0 (Technical Assistance), or M18 (Complementary payments to Croatia). Icons source: Disclaimer: This document aims to provide an accessible summary of the Rural Development Priority information covering all EU-8 RDPs. The information provided should not be considered a comprehensive account of the original RDP content. Summary version: Version 1 (Based on SFCdata March 016) Last updated: March 016 DRAFT 6