PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU. Tail Factors for Loss Development

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU. Tail Factors for Loss Development"

Transcription

1 Exhibit 7 As Filed PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU Tail Factors for Loss Development For a given calendar year, the PCRB collects financial loss development data for the current policy year and the twenty previous individual policy years. A single aggregate line of experience is reported for all older policy years combined. Thus, the 26 vs. 27, 27 vs. 28, 28 vs. 29 and 29 vs. 21 valuations in the tail factor calculation will use policy year 1986 as the earliest separate policy year and an aggregate line of experience for policy years 1985 and prior. The following discussion focuses on data with an earliest available policy year of 1978 for illustrative purposes. The discussion for data starting with later policy years would, however, be analogous. to 1995, the PCRB has computed incurred loss development for maturities older than policy year 1978 (i.e., the pre-1978 tail ) by comparing the total amount of dollar development in incurred losses occurring in a given calendar year to the incurred loss reported for policy year 1978 at the beginning of that same calendar period. As part of the Insurance Department s examination of the Bureau, the actuarial firm retained to perform portions of that review commented that the PCRB s approach effectively assumed that each policy year prior to 1978 had the same amount of ultimate losses as did policy year Since policy year losses have tended to increase from year to year in response to benefit and price changes, changes in employment volume and other features affecting loss trends, this assumption was noted as understating the true tail in the PCRB s loss development analysis. The contractor recommended that for future filings the PCRB add a growth adjustment to its tail factor calculation. In response to this recommendation the PCRB changed its derivation of tail factors for its 12/1/95 filing. That approach, used again for this filing, is applied separately for indemnity and medical loss experience and for each calendar year of experience, and outlined as follows: 1. A starting policy year loss amount based on the average reported incurred loss for policy years was computed. 2. An annual loss inflation factor was selected based on observed changes in incurred losses by policy year for the older policy years having separate experience data reported.

2 3. A historical series of estimated incurred losses by policy year beginning with policy year 1977 was computed using the starting point from #1 and the selected inflation factor from #2. 4. A calendar year loss development factor was selected for policy year 1977 based on observed developments for the oldest years with actual separate experience available. 5. A rate of decline in calendar year loss development factors by policy year was then computed such that when the resulting series of loss development factors was applied to the historical series of estimated incurred losses in #3, the total implied dollar amount of loss development for the calendar year balanced to the observed amount of development on policy years prior to The tail factor applicable to maturities prior to policy year 1978 based on that calendar year of experience was then computed as the cumulative product of the series of loss development factors constructed in #5. In general, this approach produced policy year incurred losses and loss development factors such that measurable development terminated for policy years in the mid- to early 193 s. Because the amount of calendar year development observed for policy years prior to 1978 varied considerably from year to year, some variations in the application of the initial selected loss development factor were necessary (i.e., whether the initial selection was applied to 1,2 or 3 prior policy years before beginning the application of the selected rate of decline in loss development). In addition, the selected rates of decline in loss development factors vary from calendar year to calendar year in order to achieve the desired balance with observed calendar year development. Recognizing the volatility of observed calendar year development for policy years prior to 1978 in the aggregate, the PCRB elected to use an experience period comprising four calendar years of loss development in computing indicated tail factors for this filing. A summary exhibit on page 1 presents results of both the previous and revised approaches to the derivation of tail development factors. Following the summary page, eight exhibits presenting the derivation of indicated tail factors using the procedure outlined above are attached (four for indemnity and four for medical). These exhibits are numbered as pages 2 through 9 respectively.

3 SUMMARY OF LOSS DEVELOPMENT TAIL FACTOR CALCULATIONS INDEMNITY MEDICAL Tail Tail VALUATION MATURITY Factor Factor 9V1 23RD TO ULT V9 23RD TO ULT V8 23RD TO ULT V7 23RD TO ULT AVERAGE OF LATEST 4 VALUATIONS

4 Inputs for Tail Factor Estimation Loss Cost Filing Indemnity: 9v1 Latest 12/31 to 1986 Incurred 4,768,295,55 Next Latest 12/31 to 1986 Incurred 4,766,671,573 1 Policy Yr 1985 Incurred = Average of 1986, 1987, 1988, reduced by PY Deflation ^ 2 CY Development of Yrs 1,623,977 2 PY 1984 & = Subsequent Yr x PY Deflation Next Latest PY 1986 Incurred 721,28, Development Selected Based on Observed 1986, 1987, 1988 # of 1986 Yrs in Data PY 1984 & Development = (Subsequent Yr - 1.) x Selected Decrement + 1. Selected Decrement, Development Factor.75 Selected Average PY Deflation Factor.95 TAIL = 1.41 vs ,623,977 Tail Factor Model Loss Cost Filing INDEMNITY Policy 12/31/1 Year Dollar Policy 12/31/1 Year Dollar 194 * 77,555, # 1976 * 491,545, , * 81,637, # 1977 * 517,416, , * 85,934, # 1978 * 544,649, , * 9,457, # 1979 * 573,315, , * 95,218, # 198 * 63,489, , * 1,229, # 1981 * 635,252, , * 15,54, # 1982 * 668,686, , * 111,57, # 1983 * 73,88, , * 116,92, # 1984 * 74,926, , * 123,55, # 1985 * 779,922, , TH TO ULT. 195 * 129,532, # ,419, RD TO ULT * 136,349, # ,117, * 143,526, # ,3, * 151,8, # ,15,653, Total 1954 * 159,31, # 199 1,183,312, Development: 1955 * 167,41, # ,37,355, ,623, * 176,212, # ,75, * 185,486, # ,167, * 195,249, # ,857, * 25,525, # ,363, * 216,342, # ,947, * 227,728, # ,533, * 239,714, # ,149, * 252,331, # ,297, * 265,611, # 2 682,963, * 279,591, # ,23, * 294,36, # ,924, * 39,796, ,46 1. # ,666, * 326,11, , # ,97, * 343,264, ,6 1. # ,997, * 361,331, , # ,215, * 38,348, ,58 1. # ,147, * 4,367, , # ,198, * 421,439, , # 29 42,16, * 443,62, , # ,595, * 466,968, , #

5 Inputs for Tail Factor Estimation Loss Cost Filing Medical 9v1 Latest 12/31 to 1986 Incurred 1,493,274,537 Next Latest 12/31 to 1986 Incurred 1,479,852,93 1 Policy Yr 1985 Incurred = Average of 1986, 1987, 1988, reduced by PY Deflation ^ 2 CY Development of Yrs 13,421,634 2 PY 1984 & = Subsequent Yr x PY Deflation Next Latest PY 1986 Incurred 318,181, Development Selected Based on Observed 1986, 1987, 1988 # of 1986 Yrs in Data PY 1984 & Development = (Subsequent Yr - 1.) x Selected Decrement + 1. Selected Decrement, Development Factor.75 Selected Average PY Deflation Factor.93 TAIL = vs ,421,634 Tail Factor Model Loss Cost Filing MEDICAL Policy 12/31/1 Year Dollar Policy 12/31/1 Year Dollar 194 * 14,29, # 1976 * 191,276, , * 15,85, # 1977 * 25,673, , * 16,221, # 1978 * 221,154, , * 17,442, # 1979 * 237,8, , * 18,754, # 198 * 255,699, , * 2,166, # 1981 * 274,945, , * 21,684, # 1982 * 295,64, ,38, * 23,316, # 1983 * 317,893, ,976, * 25,71, # 1984 * 341,82, ,828, * 26,958, # 1985 * 367,549, ,43, TH TO ULT. 195 * 28,988, # ,642, RD TO ULT * 31,169, # ,98, * 33,516, # ,333, * 36,38, # ,491, Total 1954 * 38,751, # ,149, Development: 1955 * 41,668, # ,14, ,421, * 44,84, # ,875, * 48,176, # ,276, * 51,83, # ,422, * 55,72, # ,64, * 59,894, # ,823, * 64,43, # ,156, * 69,25, , # ,191, * 74,462, , # ,36, * 8,67, , # 2 537,823, * 86,94, , # ,148, * 92,574, , # ,473, * 99,542, , # ,464, * 17,34, , # ,79, * 115,91, , # 25 66,44, * 123,754, , # 26 66,433, * 133,68, , # ,491, * 143,84, , # ,618, * 153,854, , # 29 51,793, * 165,435, , # ,468, * 177,887, , #

6 Inputs for Tail Factor Estimation Loss Cost Filing Indemnity: 8v9 Latest 12/31 to 1986 Incurred 4,723,492,361 Next Latest 12/31 to 1986 Incurred 4,72,82,988 1 Policy Yr 1985 Incurred = Average of 1986, 1987, 1988, reduced by PY Deflation ^ 2 CY Development of Yrs 3,49,373 2 PY 1984 & = Subsequent Yr x PY Deflation Next Latest PY 1986 Incurred 716,626, Development Selected Based on Observed 1986, 1987, 1988 # of 1986 Yrs in Data PY 1984 & Development = (Subsequent Yr - 1.) x Selected Decrement + 1. Selected Decrement, Development Factor.75 Selected Average PY Deflation Factor.95 TAIL = 1.51 vs ,49,373 Tail Factor Model Loss Cost Filing INDEMNITY Policy 12/31/9 Year Dollar Policy 12/31/9 Year Dollar 194 * 76,689, # 1975 * 461,751, , * 8,725, # 1976 * 486,54, , * 84,974, # 1977 * 511,636, , * 89,446, # 1978 * 538,564, , * 94,154, # 1979 * 566,99, , * 99,19, # 198 * 596,747, , * 14,326, # 1981 * 628,154, , * 19,816, # 1982 * 661,215, , * 115,596, # 1983 * 696,16, , * 121,68, # 1984 * 732,648, , * 128,85, # 1985 * 771,29, , RD TO ULT * 134,826, # ,39, * 141,922, # ,133, * 149,392, # ,43, * 157,254, # ,125,823, Total 1955 * 165,531, # 199 1,158,349, Development: 1956 * 174,243, # ,1,36, ,49, * 183,414, # ,493, * 193,67, # ,668, * 23,229, # ,497, * 213,925, # ,777, * 225,184, # ,857, * 237,36, # ,524, * 249,512, # ,315, * 262,644, # ,711, * 276,467, , # 2 668,77, * 291,18, , # ,48, * 36,335, , # ,218, * 322,458, ,83 1. # ,11, * 339,429, , # ,977, * 357,294, , # ,699, * 376,99, , # ,929, * 395,894, , # ,348, * 416,73, , # ,835, * 438,663, , # ,7,766 4

7 Inputs for Tail Factor Estimation Loss Cost Filing Medical 8v9 Latest 12/31 to 1986 Incurred 1,461,552,784 Next Latest 12/31 to 1986 Incurred 1,453,271,446 1 Policy Yr 1985 Incurred = Average of 1986, 1987, 1988, reduced by PY Deflation ^ 2 CY Development of Yrs 8,281,338 2 PY 1984 & = Subsequent Yr x PY Deflation Next Latest PY 1986 Incurred 314,873, Development Selected Based on Observed 1986, 1987, 1988 # of 1986 Yrs in Data PY 1984 & Development = (Subsequent Yr - 1.) x Selected Decrement + 1. Selected Decrement, Development Factor.75 Selected Average PY Deflation Factor.93 TAIL = vs ,281,338 Tail Factor Model Loss Cost Filing MEDICAL Policy 12/31/1 Year Dollar Policy 12/31/1 Year Dollar 194 * 13,66, # 1975 * 173,27, , * 14,688, # 1976 * 186,244, , * 15,794, # 1977 * 2,262, , * 16,983, # 1978 * 215,336, , * 18,261, # 1979 * 231,544, , * 19,636, # 198 * 248,972, , * 21,114, # 1981 * 267,712, , * 22,73, # 1982 * 287,862, , * 24,412, # 1983 * 39,529, ,219, * 26,249, # 1984 * 332,827, ,745, * 28,225, # 1985 * 357,879, ,498, RD TO ULT * 3,349, # ,426, * 32,634, # ,441, * 35,9, # ,475, * 37,731, # ,332, Total 1955 * 4,571, # ,785, Development: 1956 * 43,625, # ,548, ,281, * 46,99, # ,491, * 5,44, # ,416, * 54,236, # ,21, * 58,319, # ,45, * 62,78, # ,821, * 67,428, # ,963, * 72,53, # ,88, * 77,961, , # ,41, * 83,829, , # 2 521,32, * 9,138, , # ,31, * 96,923, , # 22 55,82, * 14,218, , # ,16, * 112,63, , # ,482, * 12,498, , # ,551, * 129,568, , # ,963, * 139,32, , # 27 61,937, * 149,86, , # ,22, * 161,82, , # ,23,556 5

8 Inputs for Tail Factor Estimation Loss Cost Filing Indemnity: 7v8 Latest 12/31 to 1986 Incurred 4,823,613,335 Next Latest 12/31 to 1986 Incurred 4,821,729,417 1 Policy Yr 1985 Incurred = Average of 1986, 1987, 1988, reduced by PY Deflation ^ 2 CY Development of Yrs 1,883,918 2 PY 1984 & = Subsequent Yr x PY Deflation Next Latest PY 1986 Incurred 73,672, Development Selected Based on Observed 1986, 1987, 1988 # of 1986 Yrs in Data PY 1984 & Development = (Subsequent Yr - 1.) x Selected Decrement + 1. Selected Decrement, Development Factor.75 Selected Average PY Deflation Factor.95 TAIL = 1.21 vs ,883,918 Tail Factor Model Loss Cost Filing INDEMNITY Policy 12/31/8 Year Dollar Policy 12/31/8 Year Dollar 1941 * 82,544, # 1975 * 472,156, , * 86,889, # 1976 * 497,6, , * 91,462, # 1977 * 523,165, , * 96,275, # 1978 * 55,7, , * 11,343, # 1979 * 579,684, , * 16,676, # 198 * 61,193, , * 112,291, # 1981 * 642,39, , * 118,21, # 1982 * 676,115, , * 124,422, # 1983 * 711,7, , * 13,971, # 1984 * 749,158, , RD TO ULT 1951 * 137,864, # 1985 * 788,587, , ND TO ULT * 145,12, # ,365, * 152,758, # ,47, * 16,798, # ,6,57, * 169,261, # ,164,88, Total 1956 * 178,169, # 199 1,191,295, Development: 1957 * 187,547, # ,49,568, ,883, * 197,418, # ,325, * 27,88, # ,91, * 218,745, # ,821, * 23,258, # ,311, * 242,377, # ,72, * 255,134, # ,718, * 268,562, # ,919, * 282,697, # ,59, * 297,576, # 2 76,572, * 313,238, , # ,847, * 329,724, ,73 1. # ,448, * 347,78, ,39 1. # ,77, * 365,345, , # ,194, * 384,574, ,78 1. # ,64, * 44,815, , # ,426, * 426,121, , # 27 46,887, * 448,548, , # 28 13,532,565 6

9 Inputs for Tail Factor Estimation Loss Cost Filing Medical 7v8 Latest 12/31 to 1986 Incurred 1,489,,219 Next Latest 12/31 to 1986 Incurred 1,474,478,859 1 Policy Yr 1985 Incurred = Average of 1986, 1987, 1988, reduced by PY Deflation ^ 2 CY Development of Yrs 14,521,36 2 PY 1984 & = Subsequent Yr x PY Deflation Next Latest PY 1986 Incurred 32,233, Development Selected Based on Observed 1986, 1987, 1988 # of 1986 Yrs in Data PY 1984 & Development = (Subsequent Yr - 1.) x Selected Decrement + 1. Selected Decrement, Development Factor.75 Selected Average PY Deflation Factor.93 TAIL = vs ,521,36 Tail Factor Model Loss Cost Filing MEDICAL Policy 12/31/8 Year Dollar Policy 12/31/8 Year Dollar 1941 * 15,27, # 1975 * 177,26, , * 16,159, # 1976 * 19,544, , * 17,375, # 1977 * 24,886, , * 18,683, # 1978 * 22,38, , * 2,89, # 1979 * 236,89, , * 21,61, # 198 * 254,721, , * 23,227, # 1981 * 273,893, ,43, * 24,975, # 1982 * 294,59, ,494, * 26,855, # 1983 * 316,676, ,138, * 28,877, # 1984 * 34,512, ,59, RD TO ULT * 31,5, # 1985 * 366,142, ,373, ND TO ULT * 33,387, # ,338, * 35,9, # ,883, * 38,63, # ,782, * 41,58, # ,672, Total 1956 * 44,632, # ,591, Development: 1957 * 47,992, # ,784, ,521, * 51,64, # ,613, * 55,488, # ,25, * 59,665, # ,643, * 64,156, # ,157, * 68,985, , # ,458, * 74,177, ,6 1.1 # ,64, * 79,761, , # ,382, * 85,764, , # ,64, * 92,22, , # 2 556,38, * 99,161, , # ,817, * 16,625, , # ,653, * 114,65, , # 23 53,585, * 123,28, , # ,59, * 132,559, , # ,326, * 142,537, , # ,217, * 153,265, , # ,53, * 164,82, , # ,952,32 7

10 Inputs for Tail Factor Estimation Loss Cost Filing Indemnity: 6v7 Latest 12/31 to 1986 Incurred 4,52,85,294 Next Latest 12/31 to 1986 Incurred 4,521,571,57 1 Policy Yr 1985 Incurred = Average of 1986, 1987, 1988, reduced by PY Deflation ^ 2 CY Development of Yrs -1,485,763 2 PY 1984 & = Subsequent Yr x PY Deflation Next Latest PY 1986 Incurred 691,536, Development Selected Based on Observed 1986, 1987, 1988 # of 1986 Yrs in Data PY 1984 & Development = (Subsequent Yr - 1.) x Selected Decrement + 1. Selected Decrement, Development Factor.75 Selected Average PY Deflation Factor.95 TAIL =.9987 vs ,485,763 Tail Factor Model Loss Cost Filing INDEMNITY Policy 12/31/7 Year Dollar Policy 12/31/7 Year Dollar 194 * 74,566, # 1974 * 426,522, , * 78,491, # 1975 * 448,97, , * 82,622, # 1976 * 472,6, , * 86,97, # 1977 * 497,474, , * 91,548, # 1978 * 523,657, , * 96,366, # 1979 * 551,218, , * 11,438, # 198 * 58,229, , * 16,777, # 1981 * 61,768, , * 112,397, # 1982 * 642,913, , * 118,312, # 1983 * 676,751, , RD TO ULT. 195 * 124,539, # 1984 * 712,369, , ND TO ULT * 131,94, # 1985 * 749,862, , ST TO ULT * 137,994, # ,8, * 145,257, # ,838, * 152,92, # ,98, Total 1955 * 16,949, # ,113,719, Development: 1956 * 169,42, # 199 1,148,748, ,485, * 178,337, # ,16,226, * 187,723, # ,157, * 197,63, # ,597, * 28,4, # ,623, * 218,951, # ,378, * 23,475, # ,287, * 242,65, # ,415, * 255,374, # ,357, * 268,815, # ,535, * 282,963, # 2 7,642, * 297,856, # ,99, * 313,532, , # ,229, * 33,34, , # ,22, * 347,44, , # ,44, * 365,689, ,71 1. # ,223, * 384,936, , # 26 4,31, * 45,196, , # ,763,184 8

11 Inputs for Tail Factor Estimation Loss Cost Filing Medical 6v7 Latest 12/31 to 1986 Incurred 1,372,85,87 Next Latest 12/31 to 1986 Incurred 1,358,187,617 1 Policy Yr 1985 Incurred = Average of 1986, 1987, 1988, reduced by PY Deflation ^ 2 CY Development of Yrs 14,663,253 2 PY 1984 & = Subsequent Yr x PY Deflation Next Latest PY 1986 Incurred 33,61, Development Selected Based on Observed 1986, 1987, 1988 # of 1986 Yrs in Data PY 1984 & Development = (Subsequent Yr - 1.) x Selected Decrement + 1. Selected Decrement, Development Factor.75 Selected Average PY Deflation Factor.93 TAIL = vs ,663,253 Tail Factor Model Loss Cost Filing MEDICAL Policy 12/31/7 Year Dollar Policy 12/31/7 Year Dollar 194 * 13,19, # 1974 * 155,536, , * 14,183, # 1975 * 167,243, , * 15,25, # 1976 * 179,832, , * 16,398, # 1977 * 193,367, , * 17,632, # 1978 * 27,922, , * 18,96, # 1979 * 223,572, , * 2,387, # 198 * 24,4, , * 21,921, # 1981 * 258,495, ,54, * 23,571, # 1982 * 277,951, ,59, * 25,345, # 1983 * 298,872, ,159, RD TO ULT. 195 * 27,253, # 1984 * 321,368, ,89, ND TO ULT * 29,34, # 1985 * 345,557, ,414, ST TO ULT * 31,51, # ,221, * 33,882, # ,533, * 36,432, # ,85, Total 1955 * 39,175, # ,173, Development: 1956 * 42,123, # ,52, ,663, * 45,294, # ,169, * 48,73, # ,592, * 52,369, # ,416, * 56,311, # ,26, * 6,549, # ,711, * 65,17, , # ,625, * 7,7, , # ,63, * 75,277, , # ,96, * 8,943, , # ,666, * 87,35, , # 2 55,53, * 93,586, , # 21 52,594, * 1,63, , # ,812, * 18,25, , # 23 52,53, * 116,349, , # ,612, * 125,17, , # ,322, * 134,523, , # 26 51,174, * 144,649, , # ,314,49 9

PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU. Tail Factors for Loss Development

PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU. Tail Factors for Loss Development Exhibit 7 As Filed PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU Tail Factors for Loss Development For a given calendar year, the PCRB collects financial loss development data for the current policy year and

More information

PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU. Tail Factors for Loss Development

PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU. Tail Factors for Loss Development Exhibit 7 As Filed PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU Tail Factors for Loss Development For a given calendar year, the PCRB collects financial loss development data for the current policy year and

More information

PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU. Tail Factors for Loss Development

PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU. Tail Factors for Loss Development Exhibit 7 As Filed PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU Tail Factors for Loss Development For a given calendar year, the PCRB collects financial loss development data for the current policy year and

More information

PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU. Tail Factors for Loss Development

PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU. Tail Factors for Loss Development Exhibit 7 As Filed PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU Tail Factors for Loss Development For a given calendar year, the PCRB collects financial loss development data for the current policy year and

More information

PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU. Tail Factors for Loss Development

PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU. Tail Factors for Loss Development Exhibit 7 As Filed PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU Tail Factors for Loss Development The PCRB collects financial loss development data for separate policy years beginning with policy year 1978

More information

PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU. Table IV - Unit Statistical Data

PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU. Table IV - Unit Statistical Data Exhibit 20c As Filed PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU Table IV - Unit Statistical Data Pages 1 through 4 contain payroll, premium and loss unit statistical data for the latest five manual years

More information

PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU. Empirical Pennsylvania Loss Distribution

PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU. Empirical Pennsylvania Loss Distribution Exhibit 22 As Filed Corrected-12/17/2015 PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU Empirical Pennsylvania Loss Distribution Pages 1 through 4 of the attached exhibit present a distribution of Pennsylvania

More information

PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU. Empirical Pennsylvania Loss Distribution

PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU. Empirical Pennsylvania Loss Distribution Exhibit 22 As Filed PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU Empirical Pennsylvania Loss Distribution Pages 1 through 4 of the attached exhibit present a distribution of Pennsylvania losses by size of claim.

More information

PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU. Empirical Pennsylvania Loss Distribution

PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU. Empirical Pennsylvania Loss Distribution Exhibit 22 As Filed Corrected-12/1/2016 PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU Empirical Pennsylvania Loss Distribution Pages 1 through 4 of the attached exhibit present a distribution of Pennsylvania

More information

WCIRB Actuarial Committee Meeting

WCIRB Actuarial Committee Meeting W o r k e r s C o m p e n s a t i o n I n s u r a n c e R a t i n g B u r e a u o f C a l i f o r n i a WCIRB Actuarial Committee Meeting Materials Presented at the WCIRB Actuarial Committee Meeting June

More information

The Honorable Teresa D. Miller, Pennsylvania Insurance Commissioner. John R. Pedrick, FCAS, MAAA, Vice President Actuarial Services

The Honorable Teresa D. Miller, Pennsylvania Insurance Commissioner. John R. Pedrick, FCAS, MAAA, Vice President Actuarial Services To: From: The Honorable Teresa D. Miller, Pennsylvania Insurance Commissioner John R. Pedrick, FCAS, MAAA, Vice President Actuarial Services Date: Subject: Workers Compensation Loss Cost Filing April 1,

More information

Administrator Massachusetts Assigned Risk Pool October 4, 2018

Administrator Massachusetts Assigned Risk Pool October 4, 2018 Administrator Massachusetts Assigned Risk Pool October 4, 2018 MASSACHUSETTS WORKERS COMPENSATION ASSIGNED RISK POOL SPECIAL BULLETIN NO. 09-18 2017 VOLUNTARY ASSESSABLE PREMIUM The Calendar Year 2017

More information

CIRCULAR LETTER NO. 2332

CIRCULAR LETTER NO. 2332 March 29, 2018 CIRCULAR LETTER NO. 2332 To All Members and Subscribers of the WCRIBMA: GUIDELINES FOR WORKERS COMPENSATION RATE DEVIATION FILINGS TO BE EFFECTIVE ON OR AFTER JULY 1, 2018 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

More information

Florida Office of Insurance Regulation I-File Workflow System. Filing Number: Request Type: Entire Filing

Florida Office of Insurance Regulation I-File Workflow System. Filing Number: Request Type: Entire Filing Florida Office of Insurance Regulation I-File Workflow System Filing Number: 18-10407 Request Type: Entire Filing NATIONAL COUNCIL ON COMPENSATION INSURANCE, INC. FLORIDA VOLUNTARY MARKET RATES AND RATING

More information

NEW YORK COMPENSATION INSURANCE RATING BOARD Loss Cost Revision

NEW YORK COMPENSATION INSURANCE RATING BOARD Loss Cost Revision NEW YORK COMPENSATION INSURANCE RATING BOARD 2009 Loss Cost Revision Effective October 1, 2009 2009 New York Compensation Insurance Rating Board All rights reserved. No portion of this filing may be reproduced

More information

Attendant Care Study

Attendant Care Study Exhibit 33 As Filed PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU Attendant Care Study Attendant care services provided pursuant to the Medicaid Waiver or Pennsylvania Attendant Care Act (Act No.150 of 1986)

More information

POLICYHOLDER BEHAVIOR IN THE TAIL UL WITH SECONDARY GUARANTEE SURVEY 2012 RESULTS Survey Highlights

POLICYHOLDER BEHAVIOR IN THE TAIL UL WITH SECONDARY GUARANTEE SURVEY 2012 RESULTS Survey Highlights POLICYHOLDER BEHAVIOR IN THE TAIL UL WITH SECONDARY GUARANTEE SURVEY 2012 RESULTS Survey Highlights The latest survey reflects a different response group from those in the prior survey. Some of the changes

More information

Bureau Filing C F-Classification and USL&HW Rating Value Filing Proposed Effective Date April 1, 2011

Bureau Filing C F-Classification and USL&HW Rating Value Filing Proposed Effective Date April 1, 2011 VIA E-MAIL & FIRST CLASS MAIL Acting Insurance Commissioner Insurance Department 1311 Strawberry Square Harrisburg, PA 17120 Attention: Michael McKenney RE: Bureau Filing C-359 - F-Classification and USL&HW

More information

NEW YORK COMPENSATION INSURANCE RATING BOARD Loss Cost Revision

NEW YORK COMPENSATION INSURANCE RATING BOARD Loss Cost Revision NEW YORK COMPENSATION INSURANCE RATING BOARD 2010 Loss Cost Revision Effective October 1, 2010 2010 New York Compensation Insurance Rating Board All rights reserved. No portion of this filing may be reproduced

More information

PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU. Empirical Pennsylvania Loss Distribution

PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU. Empirical Pennsylvania Loss Distribution Exhibit 22 As Filed PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU Empirical Pennsylvania Loss Distribution Pages 1 through 4 of the attached exhibit present a distribution of Pennsylvania losses by size of claim.

More information

PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU. Empirical Pennsylvania Loss Distribution

PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU. Empirical Pennsylvania Loss Distribution Exhibit 22 As Filed PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU Empirical Pennsylvania Loss Distribution Pages 1 through 4 of the attached exhibit present a distribution of Pennsylvania losses by size of claim.

More information

PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU. Empirical Pennsylvania Loss Distribution

PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU. Empirical Pennsylvania Loss Distribution Exhibit 22 As Filed PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU Empirical Pennsylvania Loss Distribution Pages 1 through 4 of the attached exhibit present a distribution of Pennsylvania losses by size of claim.

More information

PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU. Empirical Pennsylvania Loss Distribution

PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU. Empirical Pennsylvania Loss Distribution Exhibit 22 As Filed PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU Empirical Pennsylvania Loss Distribution Pages 1 through 4 of the attached exhibit present a distribution of Pennsylvania losses by size of claim.

More information

EDUCATIONAL NOTE EVALUATION OF THE RUNOFF OF CLAIM LIABILITIES WHEN THE LIABILITIES ARE DISCOUNTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACCEPTED ACTUARIAL PRACTICE

EDUCATIONAL NOTE EVALUATION OF THE RUNOFF OF CLAIM LIABILITIES WHEN THE LIABILITIES ARE DISCOUNTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACCEPTED ACTUARIAL PRACTICE EDUCATIONAL NOTE Educational notes do not constitute standards of practice. They are intended to assist actuaries in applying standards of practice in specific matters. Responsibility for the manner of

More information

Why is health insurance getting more expensive?

Why is health insurance getting more expensive? Why is health insurance getting more expensive? Quantifying the drivers of premium rate increases 15 th February 2018 Simon Lim Page 1 Index 1 Executive Summary 1. This paper investigates the drivers of

More information

RE: PCRB Filing C-369, Loss Cost Filing to Reflect the Impact of the Protz Decision Effective November 1, 2017

RE: PCRB Filing C-369, Loss Cost Filing to Reflect the Impact of the Protz Decision Effective November 1, 2017 August 15, 2017 VIA SERFF The Honorable Teresa D. Miller Insurance Commissioner Commonwealth of Pennsylvania - Insurance Department 1311 Strawberry Square Harrisburg, PA 17120 Attention: Mark Lersch, Director,

More information

January 31, 2014 Page 1 of 12 PENNSYLVANIA AND DELAWARE CALL FOR EXPERIENCE #9

January 31, 2014 Page 1 of 12 PENNSYLVANIA AND DELAWARE CALL FOR EXPERIENCE #9 January 31, 2014 Page 1 of 12 PENNSYLVANIA AND DELAWARE CALL FOR EXPERIENCE #9 GROSS (1ST DOLLAR) LARGE DEDUCTIBLE POLICY YEAR CALL FOR COMPENSATION EXPERIENCE BY STATE VALUED AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 -

More information

State of Florida Office of Insurance Regulation Financial Services Commission

State of Florida Office of Insurance Regulation Financial Services Commission State of Florida Office of Insurance Regulation Actuarial Peer Review and Analysis of the Ratemaking Processes of the National Council on Compensation Insurance, Inc. January 21, 2010 January 21, 2010

More information

Actuarial Memorandum: F-Classification and USL&HW Rating Value Filing

Actuarial Memorandum: F-Classification and USL&HW Rating Value Filing TO: FROM: The Honorable Jessica K. Altman Acting Insurance Commissioner, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania John R. Pedrick, FCAS, MAAA Vice President, Actuarial Services DATE: November 29, 2017 RE: Actuarial

More information

MEDICARE SET-ASIDES AND WORKERS COMPENSATION 2018 UPDATE

MEDICARE SET-ASIDES AND WORKERS COMPENSATION 2018 UPDATE February 2018 By Nedžad Arnautović MEDICARE SET-ASIDES AND WORKERS COMPENSATION 2018 UPDATE INTRODUCTION In September 2014, NCCI published a study on Medicare Set-Asides (MSAs) in workers compensation

More information

Ms. Julia Philips, Chair, Accident and Health Working Group (AHWG) of the NAIC Life and Health Actuarial Task Force

Ms. Julia Philips, Chair, Accident and Health Working Group (AHWG) of the NAIC Life and Health Actuarial Task Force May 20, 2005 To: Ms. Julia Philips, Chair, Accident and Health Working Group (AHWG) of the NAIC Life and Health Actuarial Task Force Mr. Michael Boerner, Chair, Long-Term Care Reserves Subgroup of the

More information

To Members of the Actuarial Committee, WCIRB Members and All Interested Parties:

To Members of the Actuarial Committee, WCIRB Members and All Interested Parties: Actuarial Committee Meeting Agenda Date Time Location Staff Contact April 3, 2018 9:30 AM WCIRB California David M. Bellusci 1221 Broadway, Suite 900 Oakland, CA 1221 Broadway, Suite 900 Oakland, CA 94612

More information

December 31 st, décembre 2015

December 31 st, décembre 2015 December 31 st, 2015 31 décembre 2015 1 2015 Endowment survey Highlights HIGHLIGHTS Total Asset Growth since 2008 ENDOWMENTS 88 % of total assets Median 2015 return 5,0 % Median 2015 10 yrs annualized

More information

U. S. TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE (January 5, 2018)

U. S. TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE (January 5, 2018) U. S. TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE (January 5, 2018) 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0-0.5 3 mo 1 yr 2 yr 3 yr 5 yr 7 yr 10 yr 20 yr+ Over the past 50 years, interest rates have moved more

More information

November 28, 2006 VIA HAND DELIVERY

November 28, 2006 VIA HAND DELIVERY VIA HAND DELIVERY The Honorable M. Diane Koken Insurance Commissioner Insurance Department 1311 Strawberry Square Harrisburg, PA 17120 Attention: Chuck Romberger RE: Proposal C-352 - April 1, 2007 Loss

More information

The LIFO Inventory Training Basics & Audit Guide

The LIFO Inventory Training Basics & Audit Guide The LIFO Inventory Training Basics & Audit Guide Prepared by LIFO-PRO, INC. LIFO Software LIFO Services 920 South 107 th Ave., Suite 301 Omaha, NE 68114 (402) 330-8573 (877) 848-6583 Fax www.lifopro.com

More information

Schedule P Schedule P- Summary. Schedule P- Part 1: Current Valuation. Description Org By Net/Gross Data Fields direct & Current

Schedule P Schedule P- Summary. Schedule P- Part 1: Current Valuation. Description Org By Net/Gross Data Fields direct & Current Schedule P- Summary Part 1 Part 2 Part 3 Part 4 Part5 Part 6 Part 7 Description Org By Net/Gross Data Fields Current premiums: CY Valuation loss & exp: AY and ceded Incurred Losses Paid Losses Bulk Reserves

More information

Attachment C. Bickmore. Self- Insured Workers' Compensation Program Feasibility Study

Attachment C. Bickmore. Self- Insured Workers' Compensation Program Feasibility Study Attachment C Bickmore Wednesday, May 21, 2014 Mr. David Wilson City of West Hollywood 8300 Santa Monica Blvd. West Hollywood, CA 90069 Re: Self- Insured Workers' Compensation Program Feasibility Study

More information

Workers Compensation and the Aging Workforce

Workers Compensation and the Aging Workforce December 2011 by Tanya Restrepo and Harry Shuford Workers Compensation and the Aging Workforce There is widespread concern about the potential adverse impact on workers compensation loss costs as the baby

More information

January 1, 2013 Pure Premium Rate Filing Actuarial and C & R Committee Recommendations

January 1, 2013 Pure Premium Rate Filing Actuarial and C & R Committee Recommendations W o r k e r s C o m p e n s a t i o n I n s u r a n c e R a t i n g B u r e a u o f C a l i f o r n i a January 1, 2013 Pure Premium Rate Filing Actuarial and C & R Committee Recommendations Governing

More information

This PDF is a selection from an out-of-print volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research

This PDF is a selection from an out-of-print volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research This PDF is a selection from an out-of-print volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research Volume Title: Business Cycles, Inflation, and Forecasting, 2nd edition Volume Author/Editor: Geoffrey H.

More information

To Members of the Actuarial Committee, WCIRB Members and All Interested Parties:

To Members of the Actuarial Committee, WCIRB Members and All Interested Parties: Meeting Agenda Date Time Location Staff Contact August 1, 2018 9:30 AM WCIRB California David M. Bellusci 1221 Broadway, Suite 900 Oakland, CA 1221 Broadway, Suite 900 Oakland, CA 94612 415.777.0777 Fax

More information

Basic Ratemaking CAS Exam 5

Basic Ratemaking CAS Exam 5 Mahlerʼs Guide to Basic Ratemaking CAS Exam 5 prepared by Howard C. Mahler, FCAS Copyright 2012 by Howard C. Mahler. Study Aid 2012-5 Howard Mahler hmahler@mac.com www.howardmahler.com/teaching 2012-CAS5

More information

ACTUARIAL AND CLASSIFICATION & RATING COMMITTEES RECORD OF JOINT MEETING

ACTUARIAL AND CLASSIFICATION & RATING COMMITTEES RECORD OF JOINT MEETING ACTUARIAL AND CLASSIFICATION & RATING COMMITTEES RECORD OF JOINT MEETING A meeting of the Actuarial and Classification & Rating Committees of the Pennsylvania Compensation Rating Bureau was held in the

More information

September 8, Hand Delivered

September 8, Hand Delivered September 8, 2017 Hand Delivered The Honorable Dave Jones Insurance Commissioner California Department of Insurance 45 Fremont Street, 23rd Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-2204 1221 Broadway, Suite 900 Oakland,

More information

November 29, 2011 VIA HAND DELIVERY

November 29, 2011 VIA HAND DELIVERY VIA HAND DELIVERY The Honorable Michael F. Consedine Insurance Commissioner Insurance Department 1311 Strawberry Square Harrisburg, PA 17120 Attention: Mark Lersch, Director Bureau of Property & Casualty

More information

Pricing-related matters in Health Insurance

Pricing-related matters in Health Insurance Institute of Actuaries of India 3rd Capacity Building Seminar on Health Care Insurance Gurgaon, 26 August, 2015 Pricing-related matters in Health Insurance David Muiry, MBBS, FIA, FIAI Chief Commercial

More information

RESEARCH BRIEF September 2018 By Robert Fogelson, Brett King, and Ziv Kimmel

RESEARCH BRIEF September 2018 By Robert Fogelson, Brett King, and Ziv Kimmel September 2018 By Robert Fogelson, Brett King, and Ziv Kimmel A Study of New York State Workers Compensation Motor Vehicle Accident Claims INTRODUCTION The purpose of this study is to provide insight into

More information

How to Have an Impact on Your Comp Costs: Experience Modifiers & Claim Resolution

How to Have an Impact on Your Comp Costs: Experience Modifiers & Claim Resolution How to Have an Impact on Your Comp Costs: Experience Modifiers & Claim Resolution Compares actual losses to the actuarially expected losses Those entities whose actual losses are lower than expected, receive

More information

Termination, Retirement and SMP Experience Study for the Public Service Pension Plan

Termination, Retirement and SMP Experience Study for the Public Service Pension Plan Termination, Retirement and SMP Experience Study for the Public Service Pension Plan June 2015 Risk. Reinsurance. Human Resources Table of Contents Executive Summary... 1 Section 1: Introduction... 2 Section

More information

January 1, 2015 Pure Premium Rate Filing Summary of Actuarial Committee Recommendations

January 1, 2015 Pure Premium Rate Filing Summary of Actuarial Committee Recommendations WCIRB Actuarial Committee Meeting of June 11, 214 W o r k e r s C o m p e n s a t i o n I n s u r a n c e R a t i n g B u r e a u o f C a l i f o r n i a January 1, 215 Pure Premium Rate Filing Summary

More information

Clark. Outside of a few technical sections, this is a very process-oriented paper. Practice problems are key!

Clark. Outside of a few technical sections, this is a very process-oriented paper. Practice problems are key! Opening Thoughts Outside of a few technical sections, this is a very process-oriented paper. Practice problems are key! Outline I. Introduction Objectives in creating a formal model of loss reserving:

More information

Mortality Rates Estimation Using Whittaker-Henderson Graduation Technique

Mortality Rates Estimation Using Whittaker-Henderson Graduation Technique MATIMYÁS MATEMATIKA Journal of the Mathematical Society of the Philippines ISSN 0115-6926 Vol. 39 Special Issue (2016) pp. 7-16 Mortality Rates Estimation Using Whittaker-Henderson Graduation Technique

More information

Revisions to BEA s Estimates of GDP and GDI

Revisions to BEA s Estimates of GDP and GDI Revisions to BEA s Estimates of GDP and GDI Dennis Fixler Presentation at Quarterly Meeting of Council of Professional Association on Federal Statistics (COPAFS) December 7, 2012 Outline Why are there

More information

SCHEDULE P: MEMORIZE ME!!!

SCHEDULE P: MEMORIZE ME!!! SCHEDULE P: MEMORIZE ME!!! NOTE: This skips all the prior years row calculation stuff, since it is covered pretty well by TIA (and I m sure any other manual). What are the cross-checks performed by the

More information

Actuarial Review of the Self-Insured Liability & Property Program

Actuarial Review of the Self-Insured Liability & Property Program Actuarial Review of the Self-Insured Liability & Property Program Outstanding Liabilities as of June 30, 2017 Forecast for Program Year 2017-18 Presented to Santa Clara County Schools Insurance Group March

More information

Mary Jean King, FCAS, FCA, MAAA Consulting Actuary 118 Warfield Road Cherry Hill, NJ P: F:

Mary Jean King, FCAS, FCA, MAAA Consulting Actuary 118 Warfield Road Cherry Hill, NJ P: F: Mary Jean King, FCAS, FCA, MAAA Consulting Actuary 118 Warfield Road Cherry Hill, NJ 08034 P:856.428.5961 F:856.428.5962 mking@bynac.com September 27, 2012 Mr. David H. Lillard, Jr., Tennessee State Treasurer

More information

Actuarial Section. Actuarial Section THE BOTTOM LINE. The average MSEP retirement benefit is $15,609 per year.

Actuarial Section. Actuarial Section THE BOTTOM LINE. The average MSEP retirement benefit is $15,609 per year. Actuarial Section THE BOTTOM LINE The average MSEP retirement benefit is $15,609 per year. Actuarial Section Actuarial Section 89 Actuary s Certification Letter 91 Summary of Actuarial Assumptions 97 Actuarial

More information

Tennessee Workers Compensation Voluntary Loss Cost and Assigned Risk Rate Filing Proposed to be Effective March 1, 2018

Tennessee Workers Compensation Voluntary Loss Cost and Assigned Risk Rate Filing Proposed to be Effective March 1, 2018 Tennessee Workers Compensation Voluntary Loss Cost and Assigned Risk Rate Filing Proposed to be Effective March 1, 2018 Presented to Tennessee Advisory Council on Workers Compensation on September 6, 2017

More information

Ohio Bureau of Workers Compensation Actuarial Committee

Ohio Bureau of Workers Compensation Actuarial Committee Ohio Bureau of Workers Compensation Actuarial Committee Private Employer (PA) Rate Recommendations to be Effective July 1, 2012 Bob Miccolis, FCAS, MAAA Dave Heppen, FCAS, MAAA Deloitte Consulting LLP

More information

PCRB CIRCULAR NO Re: ANNIVERSARY RATING DATE (ARD) ELIMINATION Frequently Asked Questions

PCRB CIRCULAR NO Re: ANNIVERSARY RATING DATE (ARD) ELIMINATION Frequently Asked Questions May 10, 2017 PCRB CIRCULAR NO. 1682 To All Members of the PCRB: Re: ANNIVERSARY RATING DATE (ARD) ELIMINATION Frequently Asked Questions Bureau Circular No. 1659 previously announced the elimination of

More information

Pennsylvania Compensation Rating Bureau 2004 Educational Series

Pennsylvania Compensation Rating Bureau 2004 Educational Series 2004 Educational Series PCRB SEMINARS PCRB 101 Basic Operations - 2004 Learn the primary functions of the PCRB Meet key staff members Meeting Dates: PCRB 101 Tuesday, April 27 9:30 AM 1:00 PM Tuesday,

More information

National and Sector ODS Phaseout Plans: Reporting Issues

National and Sector ODS Phaseout Plans: Reporting Issues National and Sector ODS Phaseout Plans: Reporting Issues 9 th Annual Financial Agents Workshop The World Bank Washington, DC March 31-April 1, 2005 Reporting Issues New Cover Sheets Annual Programs Progress

More information

Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar Roll-forward Reserve Estimates September 15, 2014

Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar Roll-forward Reserve Estimates September 15, 2014 www.pwc.com 2014 Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar Roll-forward Reserve Estimates Mechanics Underlying Roll-forward Reserve Estimates 2 Agenda Section 1 Roll-forward Example Section 2 Potential roll-forward

More information

Workers Compensation Exposure Rating Gerald Yeung, FCAS, MAAA Senior Actuary Swiss Re America Holding Corporation

Workers Compensation Exposure Rating Gerald Yeung, FCAS, MAAA Senior Actuary Swiss Re America Holding Corporation Workers Compensation Exposure Rating Gerald Yeung, FCAS, MAAA Senior Actuary Swiss Re America Holding Corporation Table of Contents NCCI Excess Loss Factors 3 WCIRB Loss Elimination Ratios 7 Observations

More information

Ohio Police & Fire. Pension Fund. Investigation of Demographic and Economic Experience. Conduent Human Resource Services. Five-Year Period from

Ohio Police & Fire. Pension Fund. Investigation of Demographic and Economic Experience. Conduent Human Resource Services. Five-Year Period from Conduent Human Resource Services Ohio Police & Fire Pension Fund Investigation of Demographic and Economic Experience Five-Year Period from January 1, 2012 December 31, 2016 October 2017 2135 City Gate

More information

Structured Tools to Help Organize One s Thinking When Performing or Reviewing a Reserve Analysis

Structured Tools to Help Organize One s Thinking When Performing or Reviewing a Reserve Analysis Structured Tools to Help Organize One s Thinking When Performing or Reviewing a Reserve Analysis Jennifer Cheslawski Balester Deloitte Consulting LLP September 17, 2013 Gerry Kirschner AIG Agenda Learning

More information

County of Sonoma. Distributed to JLMBC on December 7, 2011

County of Sonoma. Distributed to JLMBC on December 7, 2011 County of Sonoma Actuarial Valuation and Review of Other Postemployment Benefits (OPEB) as of June 30, 2011 In accordance with GASB Statements No. 43 and No. 45 Copyright 2011 by The Segal Group, Inc.,

More information

Workers Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau of California. July 1, 2015 Pure Premium Rate Filing REG

Workers Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau of California. July 1, 2015 Pure Premium Rate Filing REG Workers Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau of California Workers Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau of California July 1, 2015 Pure Premium Rate Filing REG-2015-00005 Submitted: April 6, 2015 WCIRB

More information

2013 Senior Management Compensation Survey

2013 Senior Management Compensation Survey 2013 Senior Management Compensation Survey Attached are the results of the 2013 River Cities Capital Funds Senior Management Compensation Survey. Twenty-four private-growth companies from the IT and healthcare

More information

INDEMNITY DATA CALL INTRODUCTION

INDEMNITY DATA CALL INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION Page 1 Issued February 8, 2019 INDEMNITY DATA CALL INTRODUCTION A. Overview The New York Indemnity Data Call Implementation Guide is your source for reporting rules and requirements. The guide

More information

A GUIDE TO UNDERSTANDING, COMMUNICATING, AND INFLUENCING ACTUARIAL RESULTS

A GUIDE TO UNDERSTANDING, COMMUNICATING, AND INFLUENCING ACTUARIAL RESULTS A GUIDE TO UNDERSTANDING, COMMUNICATING, AND INFLUENCING ACTUARIAL RESULTS FEBRUARY 9, 2017 Jennifer Price, FCAS, MAAA Amanda Marsh, FCAS, MAAA 2017 Atlanta RIMS Educational Conference Introduction What

More information

November 15, 2012 VIA OVERNIGHT DELIVERY

November 15, 2012 VIA OVERNIGHT DELIVERY November 15, 2012 VIA OVERNIGHT DELIVERY The Honorable Michael F. Consedine Insurance Commissioner Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Insurance Department 1311 Strawberry Square Harrisburg, PA 17120 Attention:

More information

ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 1, City of Plantation Police Officers Retirement System

ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 1, City of Plantation Police Officers Retirement System ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2014 City of Plantation Police Officers Retirement System ANNUAL EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTION IS DETERMINED BY THIS VALUATION FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30,

More information

GIIRR Model Solutions Fall 2015

GIIRR Model Solutions Fall 2015 GIIRR Model Solutions Fall 2015 1. Learning Objectives: 1. The candidate will understand the key considerations for general insurance actuarial analysis. Learning Outcomes: (1k) Estimate written, earned

More information

Introduction to Casualty Actuarial Science

Introduction to Casualty Actuarial Science Introduction to Casualty Actuarial Science Executive Director Email: ken@theinfiniteactuary.com 1 Casualty Actuarial Science Two major areas are measuring 1. Written Premium Risk Pricing 2. Earned Premium

More information

NEW YORK COMPENSATION INSURANCE RATING BOARD General Rate Revision

NEW YORK COMPENSATION INSURANCE RATING BOARD General Rate Revision NEW YORK COMPENSATION INSURANCE RATING BOARD 2007 General Rate Revision Effective October 1, 2007 NEW YORK WORKERS COMPENSATION DERIVATION OF APPROVED OCTOBER 1, 2007 RATE REVISION Original Proposed Rate

More information

% LATE PAYMENTS. days late. IN AUSTRALIA Dun & Bradstreet 2nd Quarter Analysis of businesses. Only 12% of ASX companies pay on time

% LATE PAYMENTS. days late. IN AUSTRALIA Dun & Bradstreet 2nd Quarter Analysis of businesses. Only 12% of ASX companies pay on time The factors that determine who gets paid on time LATE PAYMENTS IN AUSTRALIA Dun & Bradstreet 2nd Quarter Analysis 2017 Concerted efforts by the Small Business Ombudsman Kate Carnell and the Business Council

More information

Impact of Senate Bill No. 863 on Loss Development Patterns Released: August 13, 2013

Impact of Senate Bill No. 863 on Loss Development Patterns Released: August 13, 2013 Workers Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau of California Impact of Senate Bill No. 863 on Loss Development Patterns Released: August 13, 2013 Notice This Impact of Senate Bill No. 863 on Loss Development

More information

When changing any conditions of an investment or loan, the amount or principal will also change.

When changing any conditions of an investment or loan, the amount or principal will also change. KEY CONCEPTS When changing any conditions of an investment or loan, the amount or principal will also change. Doubling an interest rate or term more than doubles the total interest This is due to the effects

More information

Chapter 2 Executive Summary: More work past age 60 and later claims for Social Security benefits

Chapter 2 Executive Summary: More work past age 60 and later claims for Social Security benefits LATER RETIREMENT, INEQUALITY IN OLD AGE, AND THE GROWING GAP IN LONGEVITY BETWEEN RICH AND POOR Barry Bosworth, Gary Burtless, Kan Zhang Chapter 2 Executive Summary: More work past age 6 and later claims

More information

Metro Milwaukee Economic Trends August, 2008

Metro Milwaukee Economic Trends August, 2008 Metro Milwaukee Economic Trends August, 2008 Prepared by: Economic Research Division October 7, 2008 www.mmac.org www.mmac.org Metro Milwaukee Economic Trends Page 1 August Economic Trends A weak trend

More information

Supplement No (Redline)

Supplement No (Redline) Supplement No. 450 (Redline) Baltimore Gas and Electric Company Gas 83 1. Gas Efficiency Charge RIDERS Rates for service under the Company s rate schedules are subject to the Charge to recover Eligible

More information

Fiscal Stress Monitoring System Comprehensive Reference Guide

Fiscal Stress Monitoring System Comprehensive Reference Guide Fiscal Stress Monitoring System Comprehensive Reference Guide The Office of the State Comptroller has developed a public fiscal stress monitoring system that provides feedback to counties, cities, towns,

More information

Analysis Based Upon Unit Report Data

Analysis Based Upon Unit Report Data THE RATE LEVEL ADJUSTMENT FACTOR IN WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION RATEMAKING BY MARTIN BONDY Questions have been raised recently concerning the effectiveness and propriety of the Rate Level Adjustment Factor

More information

Summary of Actuarial Results Valuation Methodology and Assumptions Calculation of Net OPEB Obligation... 16

Summary of Actuarial Results Valuation Methodology and Assumptions Calculation of Net OPEB Obligation... 16 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I - MANAGEMENT SUMMARY PAGE Introduction... 1 Summary of Actuarial Results... 2 Change from Prior Valuation... 3 Valuation Methodology and Assumptions... 5 Data... 12 Funding...

More information

How Credible are Capital Spending Surveys as Forecasts?

How Credible are Capital Spending Surveys as Forecasts? 6GONOMIG COMMeNTORY Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland December 1, 1990 How Credible are Capital Spending Surveys as s? by Gerald H. Anderson and John J. Erceg V^apital spending is one of the most volatile

More information

Pension Elements (Age, CS, FAR), and Calculations

Pension Elements (Age, CS, FAR), and Calculations Pension Elements (Age, CS, FAR), and Calculations 1 Presentation Goals To share information with you about... Elements of Pension Age (NRA vs MAS) Calculating your Pension 2 Important Note: The Pension

More information

Risk-Based Capital (RBC) Reserve Risk Charges Improvements to Current Calibration Method

Risk-Based Capital (RBC) Reserve Risk Charges Improvements to Current Calibration Method Risk-Based Capital (RBC) Reserve Risk Charges Improvements to Current Calibration Method Report 7 of the CAS Risk-based Capital (RBC) Research Working Parties Issued by the RBC Dependencies and Calibration

More information

RE: Bureau Filing F-Classification and USL&HW Rating Value Filing Proposed Effective December 1, 2004

RE: Bureau Filing F-Classification and USL&HW Rating Value Filing Proposed Effective December 1, 2004 VIA OVERNIGHT DELIVERY Insurance Commissioner Department of Insurance 841 Silver Lake Boulevard Dover, DE 19904-2465 Attention: Ann Lyon RE: Bureau Filing 0405 - F-Classification and USL&HW Rating Value

More information

Chapter 12: Estimating the Cost of Capital

Chapter 12: Estimating the Cost of Capital Chapter 12: Estimating the Cost of Capital -1 Chapter 12: Estimating the Cost of Capital Fundamental question: Where do we get the numbers to estimate the cost of capital? => How do we implement the CAPM

More information

Re: Comments re: Large Deductible Subgroup Proposal for State Page Reporting

Re: Comments re: Large Deductible Subgroup Proposal for State Page Reporting January 15, 2007 Ms. Sarah McNair-Grove, Chair Workers Compensation Large Deductible Subgroup Casualty Actuarial (C) Task Force National Association of Insurance Commissioners 2301 McGee Street, Suite

More information

January 1, 2019 Pure Premium Rate Filing Summary of Actuarial Committee Recommendations Governing Committee Meeting August 8, 2018

January 1, 2019 Pure Premium Rate Filing Summary of Actuarial Committee Recommendations Governing Committee Meeting August 8, 2018 January 1, 2019 Pure Premium Rate Filing Summary of Actuarial Committee Recommendations Governing Committee Meeting August 8, 2018 Dave Bellusci Executive Vice President & Chief Actuary ANTITRUST NOTICE

More information

Section Random Variables

Section Random Variables Section 6.2 - Random Variables According to the Bureau of the Census, the latest family data pertaining to family size for a small midwestern town, Nomore, is shown in Table 6.. If a family from this town

More information

TOWN OF LANTANA POLICE RELIEF AND PENSION FUND ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2014

TOWN OF LANTANA POLICE RELIEF AND PENSION FUND ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2014 TOWN OF LANTANA POLICE RELIEF AND PENSION FUND ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2014 ANNUAL EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTION FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title

More information

Basic Reserving: Estimating the Liability for Unpaid Claims

Basic Reserving: Estimating the Liability for Unpaid Claims Basic Reserving: Estimating the Liability for Unpaid Claims September 15, 2014 Derek Freihaut, FCAS, MAAA John Wade, ACAS, MAAA Pinnacle Actuarial Resources, Inc. Loss Reserve What is a loss reserve? Amount

More information

Unit Statistical Data Editing and Validation

Unit Statistical Data Editing and Validation Unit Statistical Data Editing and January 30 February 2, 2018 Palm Beach County Convention Center West Palm Beach, FL The Path to Data Excellence Unit Statistical Data Editing and Presented by: Bruce

More information

PSRS/PEERS Update April 2018

PSRS/PEERS Update April 2018 PSRS/PEERS Update April 2018 1 Quick Facts PSRS/PEERS benefit is an important source of financial security for members and retirees. PSRS/PEERS Quick Facts: Over 260,000 active, inactive, retirees and

More information

MISCELLANEOUS PLAN OF THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA (CalPERS ID: ) Annual Valuation Report as of June 30, 2013

MISCELLANEOUS PLAN OF THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA (CalPERS ID: ) Annual Valuation Report as of June 30, 2013 California Public Employees Retirement System Actuarial Office P.O. Box 942701 Sacramento, CA 94229-2701 TTY: (916) 795-3240 (888) 225-7377 phone (916) 795-2744 fax www.calpers.ca.gov October 2014 MISCELLANEOUS

More information

Introduction Summary of Actuarial Results Change from Prior Valuation Valuation Methodology and Assumptions Data...

Introduction Summary of Actuarial Results Change from Prior Valuation Valuation Methodology and Assumptions Data... TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I - MANAGEMENT SUMMARY PAGE Introduction... 1 Summary of Actuarial Results... 2 Change from Prior Valuation... 3 Valuation Methodology and Assumptions... 6 Data... 14 Funding...

More information