PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU. Tail Factors for Loss Development
|
|
- Abner Burns
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Exhibit 7 As Filed PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU Tail Factors for Loss Development For a given calendar year, the PCRB collects financial loss development data for the current policy year and the twenty previous individual policy years. A single aggregate line of experience is reported for all older policy years combined. Thus, the 25 vs. 26, 26 vs. 27, 27 vs. 28 and 28 vs. 29 valuations in the tail factor calculation will use policy year 1986 as the earliest separate policy year and an aggregate line of experience for policy years 1985 and prior. The following discussion focuses on data with an earliest available policy year of 1978 for illustrative purposes. The discussion for data starting with later policy years would, however, be analogous. to 1995, the PCRB has computed incurred loss development for maturities older than policy year 1978 (i.e., the pre-1978 tail ) by comparing the total amount of dollar development in incurred losses occurring in a given calendar year to the incurred loss reported for policy year 1978 at the beginning of that same calendar period. As part of the Insurance Department s examination of the Bureau, the actuarial firm retained to perform portions of that review commented that the PCRB s approach effectively assumed that each policy year prior to 1978 had the same amount of ultimate losses as did policy year Since policy year losses have tended to increase from year to year in response to benefit and price changes, changes in employment volume and other features affecting loss trends, this assumption was noted as understating the true tail in the PCRB s loss development analysis. The contractor recommended that for future filings the PCRB add a growth adjustment to its tail factor calculation. In response to this recommendation the PCRB changed its derivation of tail factors for its 12/1/95 filing. That approach, used again for this filing, is applied separately for indemnity and medical loss experience and for each calendar year of experience, and outlined as follows: 1. A starting policy year loss amount based on the average reported incurred loss for policy years was computed. 2. An annual loss inflation factor was selected based on observed changes in incurred losses by policy year for the older policy years having separate experience data reported.
2 3. A historical series of estimated incurred losses by policy year beginning with policy year 1977 was computed using the starting point from #1 and the selected inflation factor from #2. 4. A calendar year loss development factor was selected for policy year 1977 based on observed developments for the oldest years with actual separate experience available. 5. A rate of decline in calendar year loss development factors by policy year was then computed such that when the resulting series of loss development factors was applied to the historical series of estimated incurred losses in #3, the total implied dollar amount of loss development for the calendar year balanced to the observed amount of development on policy years prior to The tail factor applicable to maturities prior to policy year 1978 based on that calendar year of experience was then computed as the cumulative product of the series of loss development factors constructed in #5. In general, this approach produced policy year incurred losses and loss development factors such that measurable development terminated for policy years in the mid- to early 193 s. Because the amount of calendar year development observed for policy years prior to 1978 varied considerably from year to year, some variations in the application of the initial selected loss development factor were necessary (i.e., whether the initial selection was applied to 1,2 or 3 prior policy years before beginning the application of the selected rate of decline in loss development). In addition, the selected rates of decline in loss development factors vary from calendar year to calendar year in order to achieve the desired balance with observed calendar year development. Recognizing the volatility of observed calendar year development for policy years prior to 1978 in the aggregate, the PCRB elected to use an experience period comprising four calendar years of loss development in computing indicated tail factors for this filing. A summary exhibit on page 1 presents results of both the previous and revised approaches to the derivation of tail development factors. Following the summary page, eight exhibits presenting the derivation of indicated tail factors using the procedure outlined above are attached (four for indemnity and four for medical). These exhibits are numbered as pages 2 through 9 respectively.
3 SUMMARY OF LOSS DEVELOPMENT TAIL FACTOR CALCULATIONS INDEMNITY MEDICAL Tail Tail VALUATION MATURITY Factor Factor 8V9 22ND TO ULT V8 22ND TO ULT V7 22ND TO ULT V6 22ND TO ULT AVERAGE OF LATEST 4 VALUATIONS
4 Indemnity: 8v9 Latest 12/31 to 1986 Incurred 4,726,386,567 Next Latest 12/31 to 1986 Incurred 4,722,969,189 1 Policy Yr 1985 Incurred = Average of 1986, 1987, 1988, reduced by PY Deflation ^ 2 CY Development of Yrs 3,417,378 2 PY 1984 & = Subsequent Yr x PY Deflation Next Latest PY 1986 Incurred 717,417, Development Selected Based on Observed 1986, 1987, 1988 # of 1986 Yrs in Data PY 1984 & Development = (Subsequent Yr - 1.) x Selected Decrement + 1. Selected Average PY Deflation Factor.95 TAIL = 1.57 vs ,417,378 Tail Factor Model Loss Cost Filing INDEMNITY Policy 12/31/9 Year Dollar Policy 12/31/9 Year Dollar 194 * 76,823, # 1975 * 462,559, , * 8,866, # 1976 * 486,94, , * 85,122, # 1977 * 512,531, , * 89,63, # 1978 * 539,56, , * 94,318, # 1979 * 567,91, , * 99,283, # 198 * 597,79, , * 14,58, # 1981 * 629,253, , * 11,9, # 1982 * 662,372, , * 115,798, # 1983 * 697,233, , * 121,893, # 1984 * 733,93, , * 128,39, # 1985 * 772,558, , RD TO ULT * 135,62, # ,837, ND TO ULT * 142,17, # ,928, * 149,653, # ,295, * 157,529, # ,13,532, Total 1955 * 165,82, # 199 1,166,661, Development: 1956 * 174,548, # ,16,96, ,417, * 183,735, # ,142, * 193,45, # ,57, * 23,584, # ,29, * 214,299, # ,426, * 225,578, # ,769, * 237,451, # ,772, * 249,948, # ,586, * 263,13, # ,435, * 276,951, , # 2 676,123, * 291,527, , # ,12, * 36,871, ,22 1. # ,35, * 323,22, ,9 1. # 23 63,963, * 34,23, , # ,56, * 357,919, , # ,27, * 376,757, , # ,117, * 396,586, , # ,64, * 417,459, , # ,67, * 439,431, , # ,755,227 2
5 Medical 8v9 Latest 12/31 to 1986 Incurred 1,462,197,61 Next Latest 12/31 to 1986 Incurred 1,453,916,273 1 Policy Yr 1985 Incurred = Average of 1986, 1987, 1988, reduced by PY Deflation ^ 2 CY Development of Yrs 8,281,337 2 PY 1984 & = Subsequent Yr x PY Deflation Next Latest PY 1986 Incurred 315,223, Development Selected Based on Observed 1986, 1987, 1988 # of 1986 Yrs in Data PY 1984 & Development = (Subsequent Yr - 1.) x Selected Decrement + 1. Selected Average PY Deflation Factor.93 TAIL = vs ,281,337 Tail Factor Model Loss Cost Filing MEDICAL Policy 12/31/9 Year Dollar Policy 12/31/9 Year Dollar 194 * 13,684, # 1975 * 173,513, , * 14,714, # 1976 * 186,573, , * 15,822, # 1977 * 2,616, , * 17,13, # 1978 * 215,717, , * 18,293, # 1979 * 231,953, , * 19,67, # 198 * 249,412, , * 21,151, # 1981 * 268,185, , * 22,743, # 1982 * 288,371, , * 24,455, # 1983 * 31,77, ,219, * 26,296, # 1984 * 333,416, ,745, * 28,275, # 1985 * 358,512, ,498, RD TO ULT * 3,43, # ,775, ND TO ULT * 32,691, # ,695, * 35,152, # ,67, * 37,798, # ,977, Total 1955 * 4,643, # ,78, Development: 1956 * 43,72, # ,664, ,281, * 46,992, # ,166, * 5,529, # ,316, * 54,332, # ,766, * 58,422, # ,79, * 62,819, # ,766, * 67,547, # ,893, * 72,632, # ,26, * 78,99, , # ,63, * 83,977, , # 2 533,268, * 9,298, , # ,879, * 97,95, , # ,99, * 14,43, , # 23 52,148, * 112,261, , # ,443, * 12,711, , # ,759, * 129,797, , # ,23, * 139,566, , # ,658, * 15,71, , # ,336, * 161,367, , # ,51,56 3
6 Indemnity: 7v8 Latest 12/31 to 1986 Incurred 4,823,613,335 Next Latest 12/31 to 1986 Incurred 4,821,729,417 1 Policy Yr 1985 Incurred = Average of 1986, 1987, 1988, reduced by PY Deflation ^ 2 CY Development of Yrs 1,883,918 2 PY 1984 & = Subsequent Yr x PY Deflation Next Latest PY 1986 Incurred 73,672, Development Selected Based on Observed 1986, 1987, 1988 # of 1986 Yrs in Data PY 1984 & Development = (Subsequent Yr - 1.) x Selected Decrement + 1. Selected Average PY Deflation Factor.95 TAIL = 1.28 vs ,883,918 Tail Factor Model - 21 Loss Cost Filing INDEMNITY Policy 12/31/8 Year Dollar Policy 12/31/8 Year Dollar 1941 * 82,544, # 1975 * 472,156, , * 86,889, # 1976 * 497,6, , * 91,462, # 1977 * 523,165, , * 96,275, # 1978 * 55,7, , * 11,343, # 1979 * 579,684, , * 16,676, # 198 * 61,193, , * 112,291, # 1981 * 642,39, , * 118,21, # 1982 * 676,115, , * 124,422, # 1983 * 711,7, , * 13,971, # 1984 * 749,158, , * 137,864, # 1985 * 788,587, , ND TO ULT * 145,12, # ,365, * 152,758, # ,47, * 16,798, # ,6,57, * 169,261, # ,164,88, Total 1956 * 178,169, # 199 1,191,295, Development: 1957 * 187,547, # ,49,568, ,883, * 197,418, # ,325, * 27,88, # ,91, * 218,745, # ,821, * 23,258, # ,311, * 242,377, # ,72, * 255,134, # ,718, * 268,562, # ,919, * 282,697, # ,59, * 297,576, # 2 76,572, * 313,238, , # ,847, * 329,724, ,73 1. # ,448, * 347,78, ,39 1. # ,77, * 365,345, , # ,194, * 384,574, ,78 1. # ,64, * 44,815, , # ,426, * 426,121, , # 27 46,887, * 448,548, , # 28 13,532,565 4
7 Medical 7v8 Latest 12/31 to 1986 Incurred 1,489,,219 Next Latest 12/31 to 1986 Incurred 1,474,478,859 1 Policy Yr 1985 Incurred = Average of 1986, 1987, 1988, reduced by PY Deflation ^ 2 CY Development of Yrs 14,521,36 2 PY 1984 & = Subsequent Yr x PY Deflation Next Latest PY 1986 Incurred 32,233, Development Selected Based on Observed 1986, 1987, 1988 # of 1986 Yrs in Data PY 1984 & Development = (Subsequent Yr - 1.) x Selected Decrement + 1. Selected Average PY Deflation Factor.93 TAIL = vs ,521,36 Tail Factor Model - 21 Loss Cost Filing MEDICAL Policy 12/31/8 Year Dollar Policy 12/31/8 Year Dollar 1941 * 15,27, # 1975 * 177,26, , * 16,159, # 1976 * 19,544, , * 17,375, # 1977 * 24,886, , * 18,683, # 1978 * 22,38, , * 2,89, # 1979 * 236,89, , * 21,61, # 198 * 254,721, , * 23,227, # 1981 * 273,893, ,43, * 24,975, # 1982 * 294,59, ,494, * 26,855, # 1983 * 316,676, ,138, * 28,877, # 1984 * 34,512, ,59, * 31,5, # 1985 * 366,142, ,373, ND TO ULT * 33,387, # ,338, * 35,9, # ,883, * 38,63, # ,782, * 41,58, # ,672, Total 1956 * 44,632, # ,591, Development: 1957 * 47,992, # ,784, ,521, * 51,64, # ,613, * 55,488, # ,25, * 59,665, # ,643, * 64,156, # ,157, * 68,985, , # ,458, * 74,177, ,6 1.1 # ,64, * 79,761, , # ,382, * 85,764, , # ,64, * 92,22, , # 2 556,38, * 99,161, , # ,817, * 16,625, , # ,653, * 114,65, , # 23 53,585, * 123,28, , # ,59, * 132,559, , # ,326, * 142,537, , # ,217, * 153,265, , # ,53, * 164,82, , # ,952,32 5
8 Indemnity: 6v7 Latest 12/31 to 1986 Incurred 4,52,85,294 Next Latest 12/31 to 1986 Incurred 4,521,571,57 1 Policy Yr 1985 Incurred = Average of 1986, 1987, 1988, reduced by PY Deflation ^ 2 CY Development of Yrs -1,485,763 2 PY 1984 & = Subsequent Yr x PY Deflation Next Latest PY 1986 Incurred 691,536, Development Selected Based on Observed 1986, 1987, 1988 # of 1986 Yrs in Data PY 1984 & Development = (Subsequent Yr - 1.) x Selected Decrement + 1. Selected Average PY Deflation Factor.95 TAIL =.9983 vs ,485,763 Tail Factor Model - 21 Loss Cost Filing INDEMNITY Policy 12/31/7 Year Dollar Policy 12/31/7 Year Dollar 194 * 74,566, # 1974 * 426,522, , * 78,491, # 1975 * 448,97, , * 82,622, # 1976 * 472,6, , * 86,97, # 1977 * 497,474, , * 91,548, # 1978 * 523,657, , * 96,366, # 1979 * 551,218, , * 11,438, # 198 * 58,229, , * 16,777, # 1981 * 61,768, , * 112,397, # 1982 * 642,913, , * 118,312, # 1983 * 676,751, , * 124,539, # 1984 * 712,369, , ND TO ULT * 131,94, # 1985 * 749,862, , ST TO ULT * 137,994, # ,8, * 145,257, # ,838, * 152,92, # ,98, Total 1955 * 16,949, # ,113,719, Development: 1956 * 169,42, # 199 1,148,748, ,485, * 178,337, # ,16,226, * 187,723, # ,157, * 197,63, # ,597, * 28,4, # ,623, * 218,951, # ,378, * 23,475, # ,287, * 242,65, # ,415, * 255,374, # ,357, * 268,815, # ,535, * 282,963, # 2 7,642, * 297,856, # ,99, * 313,532, , # ,229, * 33,34, , # ,22, * 347,44, , # ,44, * 365,689, ,71 1. # ,223, * 384,936, , # 26 4,31, * 45,196, , # ,763,184 6
9 Medical 6v7 Latest 12/31 to 1986 Incurred 1,372,85,87 Next Latest 12/31 to 1986 Incurred 1,358,187,617 1 Policy Yr 1985 Incurred = Average of 1986, 1987, 1988, reduced by PY Deflation ^ 2 CY Development of Yrs 14,663,253 2 PY 1984 & = Subsequent Yr x PY Deflation Next Latest PY 1986 Incurred 33,61, Development Selected Based on Observed 1986, 1987, 1988 # of 1986 Yrs in Data PY 1984 & Development = (Subsequent Yr - 1.) x Selected Decrement + 1. Selected Average PY Deflation Factor.93 TAIL = vs ,663,253 Tail Factor Model - 21 Loss Cost Filing MEDICAL Policy 12/31/7 Year Dollar Policy 12/31/7 Year Dollar 194 * 13,19, # 1974 * 155,536, , * 14,183, # 1975 * 167,243, , * 15,25, # 1976 * 179,832, , * 16,398, # 1977 * 193,367, , * 17,632, # 1978 * 27,922, , * 18,96, # 1979 * 223,572, , * 2,387, # 198 * 24,4, , * 21,921, # 1981 * 258,495, ,54, * 23,571, # 1982 * 277,951, ,59, * 25,345, # 1983 * 298,872, ,159, * 27,253, # 1984 * 321,368, ,89, ND TO ULT * 29,34, # 1985 * 345,557, ,414, ST TO ULT * 31,51, # ,221, * 33,882, # ,533, * 36,432, # ,85, Total 1955 * 39,175, # ,173, Development: 1956 * 42,123, # ,52, ,663, * 45,294, # ,169, * 48,73, # ,592, * 52,369, # ,416, * 56,311, # ,26, * 6,549, # ,711, * 65,17, , # ,625, * 7,7, , # ,63, * 75,277, , # ,96, * 8,943, , # ,666, * 87,35, , # 2 55,53, * 93,586, , # 21 52,594, * 1,63, , # ,812, * 18,25, , # 23 52,53, * 116,349, , # ,612, * 125,17, , # ,322, * 134,523, , # 26 51,174, * 144,649, , # ,314,49 7
10 Indemnity: 5v6 Latest 12/31 to 1986 Incurred 4,54,23,598 Next Latest 12/31 to 1986 Incurred 4,537,284,525 1 Policy Yr 1985 Incurred = Average of 1986, 1987, 1988, reduced by PY Deflation ^ 2 CY Development of Yrs 2,919,73 2 PY 1984 & = Subsequent Yr x PY Deflation Next Latest PY 1986 Incurred 697,28, Development Selected Based on Observed 1986, 1987, 1988 # of 1986 Yrs in Data PY 1984 & Development = (Subsequent Yr - 1.) x Selected Decrement + 1. Selected Average PY Deflation Factor.95 TAIL = 1.25 vs ,919,73 Tail Factor Model - 21 Loss Cost Filing INDEMNITY Policy 12/31/6 Year Dollar Policy 12/31/6 Year Dollar 1939 * 71,78, # 1973 * 46,568, , * 74,819, # 1974 * 427,966, , * 78,757, # 1975 * 45,491, , * 82,92, # 1976 * 474,21, , * 87,265, # 1977 * 499,159, , * 91,858, # 1978 * 525,431, , * 96,692, # 1979 * 553,85, , * 11,782, # 198 * 582,195, , * 17,139, # 1981 * 612,837, , * 112,777, # 1982 * 645,91, , * 118,713, # 1983 * 679,43, , ND TO ULT. 195 * 124,961, # 1984 * 714,782, , ST TO ULT * 131,538, # 1985 * 752,43, , TH TO ULT * 138,461, # ,237, * 145,749, # ,349, Total 1954 * 153,42, # ,476, Development: 1955 * 161,494, # ,117,268, ,919, * 169,994, # 199 1,146,63, * 178,941, # ,16,455, * 188,359, # ,816, * 198,273, # ,68, * 28,78, # ,895, * 219,693, # ,67, * 231,256, # ,262, * 243,427, # ,1, * 256,239, # ,17, * 269,725, # ,12, * 283,922, ,34 1. # 2 698,572, * 298,865, , # 21 66,373, * 314,595, , # ,659, * 331,152, ,75 1. # ,68, * 348,581, , # ,732, * 366,928, , # ,313, * 386,24, , # 26 12,639,55
11 Medical 5v6 Latest 12/31 to 1986 Incurred 1,363,971,912 Next Latest 12/31 to 1986 Incurred 1,343,731,732 1 Policy Yr 1985 Incurred = Average of 1986, 1987, 1988, reduced by PY Deflation ^ 2 CY Development of Yrs 2,24,18 2 PY 1984 & = Subsequent Yr x PY Deflation Next Latest PY 1986 Incurred 31,24, Development Selected Based on Observed 1986, 1987, 1988 # of 1986 Yrs in Data PY 1984 & Development = (Subsequent Yr - 1.) x Selected Decrement + 1. Selected Average PY Deflation Factor.93 TAIL = 1.41 vs ,24,18 Tail Factor Model - 21 Loss Cost Filing MEDICAL Policy 12/31/6 Year Dollar Policy 12/31/6 Year Dollar 1939 * 12,272, # 1973 * 144,719, , * 13,196, # 1974 * 155,612, , * 14,189, # 1975 * 167,324, , * 15,258, # 1976 * 179,919, , * 16,46, # 1977 * 193,461, , * 17,641, # 1978 * 28,23, , * 18,969, # 1979 * 223,68, , * 2,396, # 198 * 24,516, ,17, * 21,932, # 1981 * 258,62, ,457, * 23,583, # 1982 * 278,86, ,85, * 25,358, # 1983 * 299,17, ,982, ND TO ULT. 195 * 27,266, # 1984 * 321,524, ,261, ST TO ULT * 29,319, # 1985 * 345,725, ,83, TH TO ULT * 31,525, # ,487, * 33,898, # ,243, Total 1954 * 36,45, # ,453, Development: 1955 * 39,193, # ,1, ,24, * 42,144, # ,16, * 45,316, # ,918, * 48,727, # ,255, * 52,394, # ,299, * 56,338, # ,175, * 6,578, , # ,668, * 65,138, , # ,697, * 7,41, , # ,81, * 75,313, , # ,182, * 8,982, , # ,763, * 87,77, , # 2 541,121, * 93,631, , # ,35, * 1,679, , # 22 57,163, * 18,257, , # 23 57,944, * 116,45, , # ,938, * 125,167, , # ,941, * 134,588, , # ,41,461
PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU. Tail Factors for Loss Development
Exhibit 7 As Filed PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU Tail Factors for Loss Development For a given calendar year, the PCRB collects financial loss development data for the current policy year and
More informationPENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU. Tail Factors for Loss Development
Exhibit 7 As Filed PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU Tail Factors for Loss Development For a given calendar year, the PCRB collects financial loss development data for the current policy year and
More informationPENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU. Tail Factors for Loss Development
Exhibit 7 As Filed PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU Tail Factors for Loss Development For a given calendar year, the PCRB collects financial loss development data for the current policy year and
More informationPENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU. Tail Factors for Loss Development
Exhibit 7 As Filed PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU Tail Factors for Loss Development For a given calendar year, the PCRB collects financial loss development data for the current policy year and
More informationPENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU. Tail Factors for Loss Development
Exhibit 7 As Filed PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU Tail Factors for Loss Development The PCRB collects financial loss development data for separate policy years beginning with policy year 1978
More informationPENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU. Table IV - Unit Statistical Data
Exhibit 20c As Filed PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU Table IV - Unit Statistical Data Pages 1 through 4 contain payroll, premium and loss unit statistical data for the latest five manual years
More informationPENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU. Empirical Pennsylvania Loss Distribution
Exhibit 22 As Filed Corrected-12/17/2015 PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU Empirical Pennsylvania Loss Distribution Pages 1 through 4 of the attached exhibit present a distribution of Pennsylvania
More informationPENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU. Empirical Pennsylvania Loss Distribution
Exhibit 22 As Filed PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU Empirical Pennsylvania Loss Distribution Pages 1 through 4 of the attached exhibit present a distribution of Pennsylvania losses by size of claim.
More informationPENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU. Empirical Pennsylvania Loss Distribution
Exhibit 22 As Filed Corrected-12/1/2016 PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU Empirical Pennsylvania Loss Distribution Pages 1 through 4 of the attached exhibit present a distribution of Pennsylvania
More informationWCIRB Actuarial Committee Meeting
W o r k e r s C o m p e n s a t i o n I n s u r a n c e R a t i n g B u r e a u o f C a l i f o r n i a WCIRB Actuarial Committee Meeting Materials Presented at the WCIRB Actuarial Committee Meeting June
More informationThe Honorable Teresa D. Miller, Pennsylvania Insurance Commissioner. John R. Pedrick, FCAS, MAAA, Vice President Actuarial Services
To: From: The Honorable Teresa D. Miller, Pennsylvania Insurance Commissioner John R. Pedrick, FCAS, MAAA, Vice President Actuarial Services Date: Subject: Workers Compensation Loss Cost Filing April 1,
More informationAdministrator Massachusetts Assigned Risk Pool October 4, 2018
Administrator Massachusetts Assigned Risk Pool October 4, 2018 MASSACHUSETTS WORKERS COMPENSATION ASSIGNED RISK POOL SPECIAL BULLETIN NO. 09-18 2017 VOLUNTARY ASSESSABLE PREMIUM The Calendar Year 2017
More informationCIRCULAR LETTER NO. 2332
March 29, 2018 CIRCULAR LETTER NO. 2332 To All Members and Subscribers of the WCRIBMA: GUIDELINES FOR WORKERS COMPENSATION RATE DEVIATION FILINGS TO BE EFFECTIVE ON OR AFTER JULY 1, 2018 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
More informationFlorida Office of Insurance Regulation I-File Workflow System. Filing Number: Request Type: Entire Filing
Florida Office of Insurance Regulation I-File Workflow System Filing Number: 18-10407 Request Type: Entire Filing NATIONAL COUNCIL ON COMPENSATION INSURANCE, INC. FLORIDA VOLUNTARY MARKET RATES AND RATING
More informationNEW YORK COMPENSATION INSURANCE RATING BOARD Loss Cost Revision
NEW YORK COMPENSATION INSURANCE RATING BOARD 2009 Loss Cost Revision Effective October 1, 2009 2009 New York Compensation Insurance Rating Board All rights reserved. No portion of this filing may be reproduced
More informationAttendant Care Study
Exhibit 33 As Filed PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU Attendant Care Study Attendant care services provided pursuant to the Medicaid Waiver or Pennsylvania Attendant Care Act (Act No.150 of 1986)
More informationBureau Filing C F-Classification and USL&HW Rating Value Filing Proposed Effective Date April 1, 2011
VIA E-MAIL & FIRST CLASS MAIL Acting Insurance Commissioner Insurance Department 1311 Strawberry Square Harrisburg, PA 17120 Attention: Michael McKenney RE: Bureau Filing C-359 - F-Classification and USL&HW
More informationPOLICYHOLDER BEHAVIOR IN THE TAIL UL WITH SECONDARY GUARANTEE SURVEY 2012 RESULTS Survey Highlights
POLICYHOLDER BEHAVIOR IN THE TAIL UL WITH SECONDARY GUARANTEE SURVEY 2012 RESULTS Survey Highlights The latest survey reflects a different response group from those in the prior survey. Some of the changes
More informationNEW YORK COMPENSATION INSURANCE RATING BOARD Loss Cost Revision
NEW YORK COMPENSATION INSURANCE RATING BOARD 2010 Loss Cost Revision Effective October 1, 2010 2010 New York Compensation Insurance Rating Board All rights reserved. No portion of this filing may be reproduced
More informationPENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU. Empirical Pennsylvania Loss Distribution
Exhibit 22 As Filed PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU Empirical Pennsylvania Loss Distribution Pages 1 through 4 of the attached exhibit present a distribution of Pennsylvania losses by size of claim.
More informationPENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU. Empirical Pennsylvania Loss Distribution
Exhibit 22 As Filed PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU Empirical Pennsylvania Loss Distribution Pages 1 through 4 of the attached exhibit present a distribution of Pennsylvania losses by size of claim.
More informationPENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU. Empirical Pennsylvania Loss Distribution
Exhibit 22 As Filed PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU Empirical Pennsylvania Loss Distribution Pages 1 through 4 of the attached exhibit present a distribution of Pennsylvania losses by size of claim.
More informationPENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU. Empirical Pennsylvania Loss Distribution
Exhibit 22 As Filed PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU Empirical Pennsylvania Loss Distribution Pages 1 through 4 of the attached exhibit present a distribution of Pennsylvania losses by size of claim.
More informationEDUCATIONAL NOTE EVALUATION OF THE RUNOFF OF CLAIM LIABILITIES WHEN THE LIABILITIES ARE DISCOUNTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACCEPTED ACTUARIAL PRACTICE
EDUCATIONAL NOTE Educational notes do not constitute standards of practice. They are intended to assist actuaries in applying standards of practice in specific matters. Responsibility for the manner of
More informationWhy is health insurance getting more expensive?
Why is health insurance getting more expensive? Quantifying the drivers of premium rate increases 15 th February 2018 Simon Lim Page 1 Index 1 Executive Summary 1. This paper investigates the drivers of
More informationRE: PCRB Filing C-369, Loss Cost Filing to Reflect the Impact of the Protz Decision Effective November 1, 2017
August 15, 2017 VIA SERFF The Honorable Teresa D. Miller Insurance Commissioner Commonwealth of Pennsylvania - Insurance Department 1311 Strawberry Square Harrisburg, PA 17120 Attention: Mark Lersch, Director,
More informationJanuary 31, 2014 Page 1 of 12 PENNSYLVANIA AND DELAWARE CALL FOR EXPERIENCE #9
January 31, 2014 Page 1 of 12 PENNSYLVANIA AND DELAWARE CALL FOR EXPERIENCE #9 GROSS (1ST DOLLAR) LARGE DEDUCTIBLE POLICY YEAR CALL FOR COMPENSATION EXPERIENCE BY STATE VALUED AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 -
More informationState of Florida Office of Insurance Regulation Financial Services Commission
State of Florida Office of Insurance Regulation Actuarial Peer Review and Analysis of the Ratemaking Processes of the National Council on Compensation Insurance, Inc. January 21, 2010 January 21, 2010
More informationActuarial Memorandum: F-Classification and USL&HW Rating Value Filing
TO: FROM: The Honorable Jessica K. Altman Acting Insurance Commissioner, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania John R. Pedrick, FCAS, MAAA Vice President, Actuarial Services DATE: November 29, 2017 RE: Actuarial
More informationMEDICARE SET-ASIDES AND WORKERS COMPENSATION 2018 UPDATE
February 2018 By Nedžad Arnautović MEDICARE SET-ASIDES AND WORKERS COMPENSATION 2018 UPDATE INTRODUCTION In September 2014, NCCI published a study on Medicare Set-Asides (MSAs) in workers compensation
More informationTo Members of the Actuarial Committee, WCIRB Members and All Interested Parties:
Actuarial Committee Meeting Agenda Date Time Location Staff Contact April 3, 2018 9:30 AM WCIRB California David M. Bellusci 1221 Broadway, Suite 900 Oakland, CA 1221 Broadway, Suite 900 Oakland, CA 94612
More informationMs. Julia Philips, Chair, Accident and Health Working Group (AHWG) of the NAIC Life and Health Actuarial Task Force
May 20, 2005 To: Ms. Julia Philips, Chair, Accident and Health Working Group (AHWG) of the NAIC Life and Health Actuarial Task Force Mr. Michael Boerner, Chair, Long-Term Care Reserves Subgroup of the
More informationDecember 31 st, décembre 2015
December 31 st, 2015 31 décembre 2015 1 2015 Endowment survey Highlights HIGHLIGHTS Total Asset Growth since 2008 ENDOWMENTS 88 % of total assets Median 2015 return 5,0 % Median 2015 10 yrs annualized
More informationNovember 28, 2006 VIA HAND DELIVERY
VIA HAND DELIVERY The Honorable M. Diane Koken Insurance Commissioner Insurance Department 1311 Strawberry Square Harrisburg, PA 17120 Attention: Chuck Romberger RE: Proposal C-352 - April 1, 2007 Loss
More informationU. S. TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE (January 5, 2018)
U. S. TREASURY INTEREST RATE YIELD CURVE (January 5, 2018) 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0-0.5 3 mo 1 yr 2 yr 3 yr 5 yr 7 yr 10 yr 20 yr+ Over the past 50 years, interest rates have moved more
More informationSchedule P Schedule P- Summary. Schedule P- Part 1: Current Valuation. Description Org By Net/Gross Data Fields direct & Current
Schedule P- Summary Part 1 Part 2 Part 3 Part 4 Part5 Part 6 Part 7 Description Org By Net/Gross Data Fields Current premiums: CY Valuation loss & exp: AY and ceded Incurred Losses Paid Losses Bulk Reserves
More informationThe LIFO Inventory Training Basics & Audit Guide
The LIFO Inventory Training Basics & Audit Guide Prepared by LIFO-PRO, INC. LIFO Software LIFO Services 920 South 107 th Ave., Suite 301 Omaha, NE 68114 (402) 330-8573 (877) 848-6583 Fax www.lifopro.com
More informationWorkers Compensation and the Aging Workforce
December 2011 by Tanya Restrepo and Harry Shuford Workers Compensation and the Aging Workforce There is widespread concern about the potential adverse impact on workers compensation loss costs as the baby
More informationAttachment C. Bickmore. Self- Insured Workers' Compensation Program Feasibility Study
Attachment C Bickmore Wednesday, May 21, 2014 Mr. David Wilson City of West Hollywood 8300 Santa Monica Blvd. West Hollywood, CA 90069 Re: Self- Insured Workers' Compensation Program Feasibility Study
More informationThis PDF is a selection from an out-of-print volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research
This PDF is a selection from an out-of-print volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research Volume Title: Business Cycles, Inflation, and Forecasting, 2nd edition Volume Author/Editor: Geoffrey H.
More informationJanuary 1, 2013 Pure Premium Rate Filing Actuarial and C & R Committee Recommendations
W o r k e r s C o m p e n s a t i o n I n s u r a n c e R a t i n g B u r e a u o f C a l i f o r n i a January 1, 2013 Pure Premium Rate Filing Actuarial and C & R Committee Recommendations Governing
More informationTo Members of the Actuarial Committee, WCIRB Members and All Interested Parties:
Meeting Agenda Date Time Location Staff Contact August 1, 2018 9:30 AM WCIRB California David M. Bellusci 1221 Broadway, Suite 900 Oakland, CA 1221 Broadway, Suite 900 Oakland, CA 94612 415.777.0777 Fax
More informationBasic Ratemaking CAS Exam 5
Mahlerʼs Guide to Basic Ratemaking CAS Exam 5 prepared by Howard C. Mahler, FCAS Copyright 2012 by Howard C. Mahler. Study Aid 2012-5 Howard Mahler hmahler@mac.com www.howardmahler.com/teaching 2012-CAS5
More informationACTUARIAL AND CLASSIFICATION & RATING COMMITTEES RECORD OF JOINT MEETING
ACTUARIAL AND CLASSIFICATION & RATING COMMITTEES RECORD OF JOINT MEETING A meeting of the Actuarial and Classification & Rating Committees of the Pennsylvania Compensation Rating Bureau was held in the
More informationNovember 29, 2011 VIA HAND DELIVERY
VIA HAND DELIVERY The Honorable Michael F. Consedine Insurance Commissioner Insurance Department 1311 Strawberry Square Harrisburg, PA 17120 Attention: Mark Lersch, Director Bureau of Property & Casualty
More informationSeptember 8, Hand Delivered
September 8, 2017 Hand Delivered The Honorable Dave Jones Insurance Commissioner California Department of Insurance 45 Fremont Street, 23rd Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-2204 1221 Broadway, Suite 900 Oakland,
More informationPricing-related matters in Health Insurance
Institute of Actuaries of India 3rd Capacity Building Seminar on Health Care Insurance Gurgaon, 26 August, 2015 Pricing-related matters in Health Insurance David Muiry, MBBS, FIA, FIAI Chief Commercial
More informationRESEARCH BRIEF September 2018 By Robert Fogelson, Brett King, and Ziv Kimmel
September 2018 By Robert Fogelson, Brett King, and Ziv Kimmel A Study of New York State Workers Compensation Motor Vehicle Accident Claims INTRODUCTION The purpose of this study is to provide insight into
More informationHow to Have an Impact on Your Comp Costs: Experience Modifiers & Claim Resolution
How to Have an Impact on Your Comp Costs: Experience Modifiers & Claim Resolution Compares actual losses to the actuarially expected losses Those entities whose actual losses are lower than expected, receive
More informationTermination, Retirement and SMP Experience Study for the Public Service Pension Plan
Termination, Retirement and SMP Experience Study for the Public Service Pension Plan June 2015 Risk. Reinsurance. Human Resources Table of Contents Executive Summary... 1 Section 1: Introduction... 2 Section
More informationJanuary 1, 2015 Pure Premium Rate Filing Summary of Actuarial Committee Recommendations
WCIRB Actuarial Committee Meeting of June 11, 214 W o r k e r s C o m p e n s a t i o n I n s u r a n c e R a t i n g B u r e a u o f C a l i f o r n i a January 1, 215 Pure Premium Rate Filing Summary
More informationClark. Outside of a few technical sections, this is a very process-oriented paper. Practice problems are key!
Opening Thoughts Outside of a few technical sections, this is a very process-oriented paper. Practice problems are key! Outline I. Introduction Objectives in creating a formal model of loss reserving:
More informationRevisions to BEA s Estimates of GDP and GDI
Revisions to BEA s Estimates of GDP and GDI Dennis Fixler Presentation at Quarterly Meeting of Council of Professional Association on Federal Statistics (COPAFS) December 7, 2012 Outline Why are there
More informationMortality Rates Estimation Using Whittaker-Henderson Graduation Technique
MATIMYÁS MATEMATIKA Journal of the Mathematical Society of the Philippines ISSN 0115-6926 Vol. 39 Special Issue (2016) pp. 7-16 Mortality Rates Estimation Using Whittaker-Henderson Graduation Technique
More informationSCHEDULE P: MEMORIZE ME!!!
SCHEDULE P: MEMORIZE ME!!! NOTE: This skips all the prior years row calculation stuff, since it is covered pretty well by TIA (and I m sure any other manual). What are the cross-checks performed by the
More informationActuarial Review of the Self-Insured Liability & Property Program
Actuarial Review of the Self-Insured Liability & Property Program Outstanding Liabilities as of June 30, 2017 Forecast for Program Year 2017-18 Presented to Santa Clara County Schools Insurance Group March
More informationMary Jean King, FCAS, FCA, MAAA Consulting Actuary 118 Warfield Road Cherry Hill, NJ P: F:
Mary Jean King, FCAS, FCA, MAAA Consulting Actuary 118 Warfield Road Cherry Hill, NJ 08034 P:856.428.5961 F:856.428.5962 mking@bynac.com September 27, 2012 Mr. David H. Lillard, Jr., Tennessee State Treasurer
More informationActuarial Section. Actuarial Section THE BOTTOM LINE. The average MSEP retirement benefit is $15,609 per year.
Actuarial Section THE BOTTOM LINE The average MSEP retirement benefit is $15,609 per year. Actuarial Section Actuarial Section 89 Actuary s Certification Letter 91 Summary of Actuarial Assumptions 97 Actuarial
More informationTennessee Workers Compensation Voluntary Loss Cost and Assigned Risk Rate Filing Proposed to be Effective March 1, 2018
Tennessee Workers Compensation Voluntary Loss Cost and Assigned Risk Rate Filing Proposed to be Effective March 1, 2018 Presented to Tennessee Advisory Council on Workers Compensation on September 6, 2017
More informationOhio Bureau of Workers Compensation Actuarial Committee
Ohio Bureau of Workers Compensation Actuarial Committee Private Employer (PA) Rate Recommendations to be Effective July 1, 2012 Bob Miccolis, FCAS, MAAA Dave Heppen, FCAS, MAAA Deloitte Consulting LLP
More informationPCRB CIRCULAR NO Re: ANNIVERSARY RATING DATE (ARD) ELIMINATION Frequently Asked Questions
May 10, 2017 PCRB CIRCULAR NO. 1682 To All Members of the PCRB: Re: ANNIVERSARY RATING DATE (ARD) ELIMINATION Frequently Asked Questions Bureau Circular No. 1659 previously announced the elimination of
More informationPennsylvania Compensation Rating Bureau 2004 Educational Series
2004 Educational Series PCRB SEMINARS PCRB 101 Basic Operations - 2004 Learn the primary functions of the PCRB Meet key staff members Meeting Dates: PCRB 101 Tuesday, April 27 9:30 AM 1:00 PM Tuesday,
More informationNational and Sector ODS Phaseout Plans: Reporting Issues
National and Sector ODS Phaseout Plans: Reporting Issues 9 th Annual Financial Agents Workshop The World Bank Washington, DC March 31-April 1, 2005 Reporting Issues New Cover Sheets Annual Programs Progress
More informationCasualty Loss Reserve Seminar Roll-forward Reserve Estimates September 15, 2014
www.pwc.com 2014 Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar Roll-forward Reserve Estimates Mechanics Underlying Roll-forward Reserve Estimates 2 Agenda Section 1 Roll-forward Example Section 2 Potential roll-forward
More informationOhio Police & Fire. Pension Fund. Investigation of Demographic and Economic Experience. Conduent Human Resource Services. Five-Year Period from
Conduent Human Resource Services Ohio Police & Fire Pension Fund Investigation of Demographic and Economic Experience Five-Year Period from January 1, 2012 December 31, 2016 October 2017 2135 City Gate
More informationWorkers Compensation Exposure Rating Gerald Yeung, FCAS, MAAA Senior Actuary Swiss Re America Holding Corporation
Workers Compensation Exposure Rating Gerald Yeung, FCAS, MAAA Senior Actuary Swiss Re America Holding Corporation Table of Contents NCCI Excess Loss Factors 3 WCIRB Loss Elimination Ratios 7 Observations
More informationStructured Tools to Help Organize One s Thinking When Performing or Reviewing a Reserve Analysis
Structured Tools to Help Organize One s Thinking When Performing or Reviewing a Reserve Analysis Jennifer Cheslawski Balester Deloitte Consulting LLP September 17, 2013 Gerry Kirschner AIG Agenda Learning
More informationCounty of Sonoma. Distributed to JLMBC on December 7, 2011
County of Sonoma Actuarial Valuation and Review of Other Postemployment Benefits (OPEB) as of June 30, 2011 In accordance with GASB Statements No. 43 and No. 45 Copyright 2011 by The Segal Group, Inc.,
More informationWorkers Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau of California. July 1, 2015 Pure Premium Rate Filing REG
Workers Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau of California Workers Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau of California July 1, 2015 Pure Premium Rate Filing REG-2015-00005 Submitted: April 6, 2015 WCIRB
More information2013 Senior Management Compensation Survey
2013 Senior Management Compensation Survey Attached are the results of the 2013 River Cities Capital Funds Senior Management Compensation Survey. Twenty-four private-growth companies from the IT and healthcare
More informationA GUIDE TO UNDERSTANDING, COMMUNICATING, AND INFLUENCING ACTUARIAL RESULTS
A GUIDE TO UNDERSTANDING, COMMUNICATING, AND INFLUENCING ACTUARIAL RESULTS FEBRUARY 9, 2017 Jennifer Price, FCAS, MAAA Amanda Marsh, FCAS, MAAA 2017 Atlanta RIMS Educational Conference Introduction What
More informationINDEMNITY DATA CALL INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION Page 1 Issued February 8, 2019 INDEMNITY DATA CALL INTRODUCTION A. Overview The New York Indemnity Data Call Implementation Guide is your source for reporting rules and requirements. The guide
More informationNovember 15, 2012 VIA OVERNIGHT DELIVERY
November 15, 2012 VIA OVERNIGHT DELIVERY The Honorable Michael F. Consedine Insurance Commissioner Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Insurance Department 1311 Strawberry Square Harrisburg, PA 17120 Attention:
More information% LATE PAYMENTS. days late. IN AUSTRALIA Dun & Bradstreet 2nd Quarter Analysis of businesses. Only 12% of ASX companies pay on time
The factors that determine who gets paid on time LATE PAYMENTS IN AUSTRALIA Dun & Bradstreet 2nd Quarter Analysis 2017 Concerted efforts by the Small Business Ombudsman Kate Carnell and the Business Council
More informationGIIRR Model Solutions Fall 2015
GIIRR Model Solutions Fall 2015 1. Learning Objectives: 1. The candidate will understand the key considerations for general insurance actuarial analysis. Learning Outcomes: (1k) Estimate written, earned
More informationACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 1, City of Plantation Police Officers Retirement System
ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2014 City of Plantation Police Officers Retirement System ANNUAL EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTION IS DETERMINED BY THIS VALUATION FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30,
More informationIntroduction to Casualty Actuarial Science
Introduction to Casualty Actuarial Science Executive Director Email: ken@theinfiniteactuary.com 1 Casualty Actuarial Science Two major areas are measuring 1. Written Premium Risk Pricing 2. Earned Premium
More informationWhen changing any conditions of an investment or loan, the amount or principal will also change.
KEY CONCEPTS When changing any conditions of an investment or loan, the amount or principal will also change. Doubling an interest rate or term more than doubles the total interest This is due to the effects
More informationImpact of Senate Bill No. 863 on Loss Development Patterns Released: August 13, 2013
Workers Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau of California Impact of Senate Bill No. 863 on Loss Development Patterns Released: August 13, 2013 Notice This Impact of Senate Bill No. 863 on Loss Development
More informationNEW YORK COMPENSATION INSURANCE RATING BOARD General Rate Revision
NEW YORK COMPENSATION INSURANCE RATING BOARD 2007 General Rate Revision Effective October 1, 2007 NEW YORK WORKERS COMPENSATION DERIVATION OF APPROVED OCTOBER 1, 2007 RATE REVISION Original Proposed Rate
More informationMetro Milwaukee Economic Trends August, 2008
Metro Milwaukee Economic Trends August, 2008 Prepared by: Economic Research Division October 7, 2008 www.mmac.org www.mmac.org Metro Milwaukee Economic Trends Page 1 August Economic Trends A weak trend
More informationChapter 2 Executive Summary: More work past age 60 and later claims for Social Security benefits
LATER RETIREMENT, INEQUALITY IN OLD AGE, AND THE GROWING GAP IN LONGEVITY BETWEEN RICH AND POOR Barry Bosworth, Gary Burtless, Kan Zhang Chapter 2 Executive Summary: More work past age 6 and later claims
More informationSupplement No (Redline)
Supplement No. 450 (Redline) Baltimore Gas and Electric Company Gas 83 1. Gas Efficiency Charge RIDERS Rates for service under the Company s rate schedules are subject to the Charge to recover Eligible
More informationFiscal Stress Monitoring System Comprehensive Reference Guide
Fiscal Stress Monitoring System Comprehensive Reference Guide The Office of the State Comptroller has developed a public fiscal stress monitoring system that provides feedback to counties, cities, towns,
More informationSummary of Actuarial Results Valuation Methodology and Assumptions Calculation of Net OPEB Obligation... 16
TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I - MANAGEMENT SUMMARY PAGE Introduction... 1 Summary of Actuarial Results... 2 Change from Prior Valuation... 3 Valuation Methodology and Assumptions... 5 Data... 12 Funding...
More informationAnalysis Based Upon Unit Report Data
THE RATE LEVEL ADJUSTMENT FACTOR IN WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION RATEMAKING BY MARTIN BONDY Questions have been raised recently concerning the effectiveness and propriety of the Rate Level Adjustment Factor
More informationHow Credible are Capital Spending Surveys as Forecasts?
6GONOMIG COMMeNTORY Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland December 1, 1990 How Credible are Capital Spending Surveys as s? by Gerald H. Anderson and John J. Erceg V^apital spending is one of the most volatile
More informationPension Elements (Age, CS, FAR), and Calculations
Pension Elements (Age, CS, FAR), and Calculations 1 Presentation Goals To share information with you about... Elements of Pension Age (NRA vs MAS) Calculating your Pension 2 Important Note: The Pension
More informationRisk-Based Capital (RBC) Reserve Risk Charges Improvements to Current Calibration Method
Risk-Based Capital (RBC) Reserve Risk Charges Improvements to Current Calibration Method Report 7 of the CAS Risk-based Capital (RBC) Research Working Parties Issued by the RBC Dependencies and Calibration
More informationRE: Bureau Filing F-Classification and USL&HW Rating Value Filing Proposed Effective December 1, 2004
VIA OVERNIGHT DELIVERY Insurance Commissioner Department of Insurance 841 Silver Lake Boulevard Dover, DE 19904-2465 Attention: Ann Lyon RE: Bureau Filing 0405 - F-Classification and USL&HW Rating Value
More informationRe: Comments re: Large Deductible Subgroup Proposal for State Page Reporting
January 15, 2007 Ms. Sarah McNair-Grove, Chair Workers Compensation Large Deductible Subgroup Casualty Actuarial (C) Task Force National Association of Insurance Commissioners 2301 McGee Street, Suite
More informationSection Random Variables
Section 6.2 - Random Variables According to the Bureau of the Census, the latest family data pertaining to family size for a small midwestern town, Nomore, is shown in Table 6.. If a family from this town
More informationChapter 12: Estimating the Cost of Capital
Chapter 12: Estimating the Cost of Capital -1 Chapter 12: Estimating the Cost of Capital Fundamental question: Where do we get the numbers to estimate the cost of capital? => How do we implement the CAPM
More informationUnit Statistical Data Editing and Validation
Unit Statistical Data Editing and January 30 February 2, 2018 Palm Beach County Convention Center West Palm Beach, FL The Path to Data Excellence Unit Statistical Data Editing and Presented by: Bruce
More informationBasic Reserving: Estimating the Liability for Unpaid Claims
Basic Reserving: Estimating the Liability for Unpaid Claims September 15, 2014 Derek Freihaut, FCAS, MAAA John Wade, ACAS, MAAA Pinnacle Actuarial Resources, Inc. Loss Reserve What is a loss reserve? Amount
More informationJanuary 1, 2019 Pure Premium Rate Filing Summary of Actuarial Committee Recommendations Governing Committee Meeting August 8, 2018
January 1, 2019 Pure Premium Rate Filing Summary of Actuarial Committee Recommendations Governing Committee Meeting August 8, 2018 Dave Bellusci Executive Vice President & Chief Actuary ANTITRUST NOTICE
More informationMISCELLANEOUS PLAN OF THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA (CalPERS ID: ) Annual Valuation Report as of June 30, 2013
California Public Employees Retirement System Actuarial Office P.O. Box 942701 Sacramento, CA 94229-2701 TTY: (916) 795-3240 (888) 225-7377 phone (916) 795-2744 fax www.calpers.ca.gov October 2014 MISCELLANEOUS
More informationIntroduction Summary of Actuarial Results Change from Prior Valuation Valuation Methodology and Assumptions Data...
TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I - MANAGEMENT SUMMARY PAGE Introduction... 1 Summary of Actuarial Results... 2 Change from Prior Valuation... 3 Valuation Methodology and Assumptions... 6 Data... 14 Funding...
More informationAnalysis of Liabilities Of the South Carolina Second Injury Fund. Including
Analysis of Liabilities Of the South Carolina Second Injury Fund Including Analysis of Current Liabilities Analysis of Future Liabilities, and Future Assessment Activity April 30, 2007 Prepared by Martin
More informationTOWN OF LANTANA POLICE RELIEF AND PENSION FUND ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2014
TOWN OF LANTANA POLICE RELIEF AND PENSION FUND ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2014 ANNUAL EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTION FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title
More information