Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA)
|
|
- Sabrina Butler
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) Presentations to OCCA (Nov. 19, 2014) and AAIARD (Nov. 21, 2014) Jacqueline Friedland, FCIA, FCAS, FSA, MAAA Chief Actuary, RSA Canada
2 Presentation Outline What is ORSA? Who is involved in ORSA? How are Canadian insurers doing with ORSA? (with permission from Neil Parkinson and KPMG) 2 2
3 What is ORSA? International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS) Insurance Core Principles (ICPs) Statements Standards Guidance material State of ORSA globally (Towers summary) Canada (OSFI Guideline E-19) 3 3
4 What is ORSA? International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS) Insurance Core Principles (ICPs) Statements Standards Guidance material State of ORSA globally (Towers summary) Canada (OSFI Guideline E-19) 4 4
5 ICP 16 Enterprise Risk Management for Solvency Purposes IAIS Statement and Standards ICP 16 Enterprise Risk Management for Solvency Purposes The supervisor establishes enterprise risk management requirements for solvency purposes that require insurers to address all relevant and material risks The supervisor requires the insurer s enterprise risk management framework to provide for the identification and quantification of risk under a sufficiently wide range of outcomes using techniques which are appropriate to the nature, scale and complexity of the risks the insurer bears and adequate for risk and capital management and for solvency purposes The supervisor requires the insurer s measurement of risk to be supported by accurate documentation providing appropriately detailed descriptions and explanations of the risks covered, the measurement approaches used and the key assumptions made The supervisor requires the insurer to have a risk management policy which outlines how all relevant and material categories of risk are managed, both in the insurer s business strategy and its day-to-day operations. 5 5
6 ICP 16 Enterprise Risk Management for Solvency Purposes IAIS Standards 16.4 The supervisor requires the insurer to have a risk management policy which describes the relationship between the insurer s tolerance limits, regulatory capital requirements, economic capital and the processes and methods for monitoring risk The supervisor requires the insurer to have a risk management policy which includes an explicit asset-liability management (ALM) policy which clearly specifies the nature, role and extent of ALM activities and their relationship with product development, pricing functions and investment management The supervisor requires the insurer to have a risk management policy which is reflected in an explicit investment policy which: specifies the nature, role and extent of the insurer s investment activities and how the insurer complies with the regulatory investment requirements established by the supervisor; and establishes explicit risk management procedures within its investment policy with regard to more complex and less transparent classes of asset and investment in markets or instruments that are subject to less governance or regulation. 6 6
7 ICP 16 Enterprise Risk Management for Solvency Purposes IAIS Standards 16.7 The supervisor requires the insurer to have a risk management policy which includes explicit policies in relation to underwriting risk The supervisor requires the insurer to: establish and maintain a risk tolerance statement which sets out its overall quantitative and qualitative risk tolerance levels and defines risk tolerance limits which take into account all relevant and material categories of risk and the relationships between them; make use of risk tolerance levels in its business strategy; and embed its defined risk tolerance limits in its day-to-day operations via its risk management policies and procedures The supervisor requires the insurer s ERM framework to be responsive to changes in its risk profile. 7 7
8 ICP 16 Enterprise Risk Management for Solvency Purposes IAIS Standards The supervisor requires the insurer s ERM framework to incorporate a feedback loop, based on appropriate and good quality information, management processes and objective assessment, which enables it to take the necessary action in a timely manner in response to changes in its risk profile The supervisor requires the insurer to perform its own risk and solvency assessment (ORSA) regularly to assess the adequacy of its risk management and current, and likely future, solvency position The supervisor requires the insurer s Board and senior management to be responsible for the ORSA The supervisor requires the insurer s ORSA to encompass all reasonably foreseeable and relevant material risks including, as a minimum, underwriting, credit, market, operational and liquidity risks and additional risks arising due to membership of a group. The assessment is required to identify the relationship between risk management and the level and quality of financial resources needed and available. 8 8
9 ICP 16 Enterprise Risk Management for Solvency Purposes IAIS Standards The supervisor requires the insurer to: determine, as part of its ORSA, the overall financial resources it needs to manage its business given its own risk tolerance and business plans, and to demonstrate that supervisory requirements are met; base its risk management actions on consideration of its economic capital, regulatory capital requirements, and financial resources, including its ORSA; and assess the quality and adequacy of its capital resources to meet regulatory capital requirements and any additional capital needs The supervisor requires: the insurer, as part of its ORSA, to analyse its ability to continue in business, and the risk management and financial resources required to do so over a longer time horizon than typically used to determine regulatory capital requirements; the insurer s continuity analysis to address a combination of quantitative and qualitative elements in the medium and longer-term business strategy of the insurer and include projections of its future financial position and analysis of its ability to meet future regulatory capital requirements. 9 9
10 ICP 16 Enterprise Risk Management for Solvency Purposes IAIS Standards and ORSA Guidance The supervisor undertakes reviews of an insurer's risk management processes and its financial condition, including the ORSA. Where necessary, the supervisor requires strengthening of the insurer s risk management, solvency assessment and capital management processes * * * * * * * * * ORSA requirements articulated by the IAIS: Every insurer should undertake its own risk and solvency assessment (ORSA) Documentation of the rationale, calculations, and action plans arising from ORSA Insurers to reflect risks in a robust manner ORSA supported by an effective overall ERM framework Risk management policy embedded in an insurer s operations The nature of ORSA would be appropriate to the nature, scale, and complexity of an insurer s risks 10 10
11 Comments about ORSA and IAIS expectations ORSA and ERM are closely linked Risk management has progressed from identification and management of risks to measurement and relating capital to risk Linkage of risk management and capital management Goal not to eliminate risk but manage it within selfimposed limits (risk appetite, risk tolerance) 11 11
12 IAIS Standard ERM Framework 12 12
13 History of ORSA Solvency II European Union Regulatory requirements for ORSA (or similar assessments) are being introduced around the world, including but not limited to: United States by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners effective 2015 South Africa by the Financial Services Board effective 2016 Bermuda by the Bermuda Monetary Authority in effect since 2011 Australia by the Australian Prudential Regulatory Authority in effect since 2013 Singapore by the Monetary Authority of Singapore in effect since
14 Towers Expected Global Implementation Timeframes for ORSA page 21 Country ORSA regime To End Solvency II Interim ORSA Solvency II EIOPA guidance Regional pilots implementation regimes Europe ORSA? - Guidance manual - Model Act Second pilot Implementation U.S. NAIC ORSA -Pilot project Australia APRA ICAAP Guidance Implementation CIRC risk-based solvency ERM First risk report submission Implementation China framework Malaysia BNM ICAAP ICAAP guidelines Implementation Japan FSA ORSA No guidance yet - Consultation - Final Implementation Singapore MAS ORSA requirements - Consultation Guidance Canada OSFI ORSA - Final Implementation Bermuda BMA CISSA Implementation South Africa FSB SAM Implementation 14 14
15 Canada OSFI Guidelines OSFI Guideline E-19 Own Risk and Solvency Assessment Guideline set out in six major sections: Introduction Scope ORSA and enterprise risk management Key elements Interaction of the ORSA with the supervisory review Appendix supplementary risk considerations 15 15
16 Canada OSFI requirements An insurer to perform ORSA on a regular basis so that it continues to provide relevant information for an insurer s management processes; An insurer to clearly and formally document its ORSA in a report to the Board at least annually and more often if circumstances warrant (e.g., when there are changes to the insurer s risk profile or risk appetite); An insurer to perform an effective assessment of its own capital needs, to determine its Internal Targets, and to assess the adequacy of its current and likely future solvency position; The Board and senior management to be responsible for the oversight of the design and implementation of the ORSA as well as regular monitoring and reporting; An insurer s ORSA to encompass all reasonably foreseeable and relevant material risks; An insurer to consider the use of an internal model in order to assess the current financial resources and the calculation of capital requirements; and All insurers to complete their first ORSA by December 31,
17 Canada OSFI s Key Elements of ORSA Comprehensive identification and assessment of risks Relating risk to capital Board oversight and senior management responsibility Monitoring and reporting Internal controls and objective review 17 17
18 ORSA at RSA Embedded as business as usual (BAU) within its operations. Evidence maintained through active risk committees and risk management processes. Risk data and risk assessments integrated into decision-making processes. Utilize a multi-line of defence system to: Inform all levels of management regarding risk appetite and risk exposures; Facilitate an effective controls and assurance environment surrounding risk and reward; Create effective top-down and bottom-up lines of communication to foster an organic risk culture; and Embed effective challenge
19 ORSA is Different from an ORSA Report (slide 1 of 2) ORSA is a process for tailored and strategic analyses linking risk management, capital management, and planning. ORSA is tied to the operational and strategic plans as well as the external environment in which the insurer operates. ORSA requires a comprehensive and multi-functional approach. ORSA considers the entirety of the processes and procedures needed to identify, assess, monitor, manage, and report longterm and short-term risks of the insurer. ORSA is used to determine the capital necessary to ensure overall solvency needs are met at all times and are sufficient to meet business strategy
20 ORSA is Different from an ORSA Report (slide 2 of 2) ORSA encourages an insurer to question its framework of internal systems dedicated to risk management and risk control. ORSA informs all levels of management regarding risk appetite and risk exposures; ORSA facilitates an effective controls and assurance environment surrounding risk and reward; ORSA helps create effective top-down and bottom-up lines of communication to foster an organic risk culture; and ORSA requires effective challenge
21 Materiality & Proportionality Key Concepts for ORSA Materiality is defined in international accounting standards: Information is material if its omission or misstatement could influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of the financial statements. Materiality depends on the size of the item or error judged in the particular circumstances of its omission or misstatement. Thus, materiality provides a threshold or cut-off point rather than being a primary qualitative characteristic which information must have if it is to be useful. Proportionality addresses the extent of analysis and reporting and requires such to be commensurate with the nature, scale, and complexity of the risks assumed by the insurer
22 The ORSA Report at RSA At RSA, we are using the ORSA Report to: To document ORSA for RSA s Canadian insurance operations; To provide education and training about RSA s ORSA to key stakeholders; and To meet Canadian regulatory and RSA Group reporting requirements. The ORSA Report will enable the Board to: Assess the appropriateness of RSA s ORSA including the overall results and the quality and composition of capital; and Confirm the Internal Target for each insurer
23 More about ORSA at RSA (slide 1 of 3) ORSA is big it is comprehensive it hits all areas of the business. At RSA, ORSA includes: System of governance; Strategic and operational planning; Multi-line of defence model; Risk Function and Risk Committees; Risk Management System; and Canada Audit & Risk Committee
24 More about ORSA at RSA (Slide 2 of 3) At RSA, ORSA includes identification and consideration of: Underwriting risk; Reserving risk; Catastrophe risk; Market risk; Operational risk; Pension risk; Emerging risk; and Strategic and reputational risk
25 More about ORSA at RSA (slide 3 of 3) In relating risk to capital, our ORSA includes: Stress and scenario testing; DCAT; Financial modelling to support OSFI s Guideline A-4 Regulatory Capital and Internal Capital Targets; and Internal model. Review of the results of modeling and the decomposition of capital required by risk; and Setting an Internal Target capital
26 Who is involved in ORSA? At consulting firms: Actuaries Advisory consultants Risk management consultants Auditors At insurers, include but are not limited to: Actuarial Risk Finance Legal Reinsurance 26 26
27 Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) ORSA Maturity and Observations on the Canadian Experience Acumen ORSA conference September 24, 2014
28 Canadian Benchmarking Results
29 ORSA Maturity Assessment (Canadian insurers) KPMG LLP, a Canadian limited liability partnership and the Canadian member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. 2
30 Maturity comments by area
31 ORSA summary results Management Area UK Benchmarking Findings (2013) Canadian Benchmarking Findings (2014) Roles and responsibilities In all reports firms referenced the Board playing an active role in steering the ORSA. However, there appeared to be limited evidence of the role performed by Boards in practice. More advanced reports demonstrated the challenge the Board had provided and referenced decisions taken. There was limited discussion of the role of Committees / Senior Management within the ORSA process. More advanced reports reviewed noted the key people involved in the ORSA and their role. Draft reports and project plans typically refer to planned board oversight and approvals, but the actual processes and responsibilities are not yet in operation. Limited, generalized discussion of management roles and oversight KPMG LLP, a Canadian limited liability partnership and the Canadian member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. 4
32 ORSA summary results Management Area UK Benchmarking Findings (2013) Canadian Benchmarking Findings (2014) Process The majority of reports documented the high-level components included within the ORSA process. There is clear development needed in terms of the timing, owners, detail and actual assessment undertaken. Given the ORSA may need to be run on an ad-hoc basis at short notice, the ORSA process needs to demonstrate clearly how the assessment will take place. Several reports aligned the Risk Appetite framework to the triggers for performance of an ad-hoc ORSA. This was considered to be stronger practice and an area of development for other firms. High level documentation of responsibilities and processes. Responsibilities and processes do not as yet seem to be fully thought out, as perhaps might be expected at this stage for a new process. ORSA process is generally not well defined as an operationalized process. Process and timing expectations for revising or updating an ORSA are typically not documented. The conditions that would trigger the revision or update are typically not defined KPMG LLP, a Canadian limited liability partnership and the Canadian member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. 5
33 ORSA summary results Management Area UK Benchmarking Findings (2013) Canadian Benchmarking Findings (2014) Documentation Few reports contained executive summaries which highlighted clear areas for Board discussion and comment. Given the length of reports this ought to be an area of focus for the future to ensure the core points for decision and understanding are presented. Many reports appeared to have been developed as desk-based exercises rather than as part of a broader process. As a result there was no clear story of how the Risk, Capital and Business plan aligned and sections appeared siloed. Few complete drafts exist as yet. Those that do are incomplete in many respects and do not yet show a clear overall assessment statement in the executive summary or the body of the report. Initial ORSAs do not show evidence that they are part of an operationalized process rather than a desk based exercise. Use of a multi year development roadmap is a leading practice KPMG LLP, a Canadian limited liability partnership and the Canadian member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. 6
34 ORSA summary results Risk Assessment Area UK Benchmarking Findings (2013) Canadian Benchmarking Findings (2014) Risk Strategy and Appetite Although most firms had Risk Appetite statements, there was typically less evidence of more granular limit frameworks with approved tolerances within which the business could manage risk. In several reports Risk Appetites were not clearly aligned to the material risk exposures, suggesting a lack of embedding within the business. This meant the report did not evidence a clear comparison between the Appetite and Risk Profile. Risk appetite statements are fairly rudimentary in most cases, stopping at total enterprise measures focusing on capital preservation and income volatility. RAS not usually linked to how risk profile would be expressed. RAS typically not disaggregated and linked to how risk would be managed at the business unit level, e.g. RAS at a BU level, with linkages to business limits that could be communicated to and acted on by individual managers KPMG LLP, a Canadian limited liability partnership and the Canadian member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. 7
35 ORSA summary results Risk Assessment Area UK Benchmarking Findings (2013) Canadian Benchmarking Findings (2014) Material Risk Assessment When considering the current risk profile, firms tended to focus on financial risks (core ICA risk components), which led to them overlooking other non-financial risks required under the ORSA e.g. conduct and strategic risks. In many reports the risk assessment process did not appear to align to the setting of the overall business plan. Commonly a high level focus on capital preservation and income volatility, together with some zero tolerance limits for reputational and compliance risks. Discussion of strategic risks is limited in most cases. Some distinguish strategic risks based on whether capital can be held. In many cases, it is unclear how the planned ORSA processes will be integrated with business and strategic planning KPMG LLP, a Canadian limited liability partnership and the Canadian member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. 8
36 ORSA summary results Risk Assessment Area UK Benchmarking Findings (2013) Canadian Benchmarking Findings (2014) Emerging Risk Assessment When considering emerging risks, firms tended to concentrate on upcoming regulatory changes e.g. FCA/PRA and EMIR. Reports which evidenced a process for assessing emerging risks often considered these in isolation to other risks and hence did not manage to evidence relevance to the risks faced by the firm. Few reports evidenced well developed processes for the identification and management of emerging risk. Limited treatment of emerging risks, or processes and responsibilities for identifying and monitoring emerging risks KPMG LLP, a Canadian limited liability partnership and the Canadian member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. 9
37 ORSA summary results Capital Area UK Benchmarking Findings (2013) Canadian Benchmarking Findings (2014) Stress and Scenario Testing (SST), Reverse Stress Testing (RST) Few reports demonstrated consideration of Reverse Stress Testing. In those instances where Reverse Stress Testing was considered, focus was given to the scenarios that caused the business to fail rather than the management actions to prevent it. Furthermore, the metrics and calibrations used to define business model failure from those firms that had conducted Reverse Stress Testing exercises varied significantly. Whilst several reports evidenced useful results around stress testing there was limited consideration of management actions and unclear alignment of stresses to the business plan. Common to reference enhanced use of SST in the ORSA, particularly where no EC model is in place, although nature of enhancements are often unclear. In some cases, ORSA plans include more severe stress scenarios, more rigorous use of stochastic modelling for some scenarios. Little or no use or planned use of reverse stress testing observed to date KPMG LLP, a Canadian limited liability partnership and the Canadian member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. 10
38 ORSA summary results Capital Area UK Benchmarking Findings (2013) Canadian Benchmarking Findings (2014) Projection of capital Overall Stress and Scenario Testing and Projection of Capital were noted areas of weakness for firms. Several firms referenced developments ongoing and cited a lack of production capability as the rationale. DCAT and stress testing conducted under previous regulatory requirements provide a reasonable starting point for capital projection. Existence of a working EC model is a minority (approx15-20%) practice. Currently, cycle time limits its use in a production environment. In addition, there is some partial use of EC-like models as a challenge for aspects of the standard capital model. Limited understanding of operational risk and diversification; common to use proposed OSFI QIS models as a proxy KPMG LLP, a Canadian limited liability partnership and the Canadian member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. 11
39 ORSA summary results Capital Area UK Benchmarking Findings (2013) Canadian Benchmarking Findings (2014) Capital Assessment Many firms used their current ICA (individual capital assessment) as a basis to populate the capital section of their report. A clear area of development is to utilise Solvency II numbers and broaden out risk quantification further. Firms with more mature capital sections presented a view on both the quantity and quality of own funds, including the composition and tiering of capital and debt. Few insurers expect to have an operational economic capital model for their 2014 or 2015 ORSA. Some describe their EC model as the standard model reflecting target ratios with some add-ons, but not a truly separate model. Limited discussion of quality of capital and access to new capital observed. Discussion of fungibility of capital also limited, either across legal entities or jurisdictions KPMG LLP, a Canadian limited liability partnership and the Canadian member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. 12
40 ORSA summary results Risk-based Decisions Area UK Benchmarking Findings (2013) Canadian Benchmarking Findings (2014) Risk Management System Many reports contained largely static information on the Risk Management System (RMS) explaining the processes followed and key components. Stronger reports indicated key areas of change within the RMS, whilst static information was consigned to the supporting documentation. Few reports demonstrated a review of the RMS taking place with consideration for changes needed as a result. More mature reports provided a summary of the weaknesses in the RMS which were being addressed. Commonly the description of the risk management system is narrative and static, and does not describe monitoring, current state of controls and net risks. A leading practice would be to develop monitoring and reporting processes that are at a level that is usable in ORSA process and oversight KPMG LLP, a Canadian limited liability partnership and the Canadian member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. 13
41 ORSA summary results Risk-based Decisions Area UK Benchmarking Findings (2013) Canadian Benchmarking Findings (2014) Use in Decision Making Several reports indicated how the ORSA would be used in future decision making processes. However, there was limited evidence of how the results of the Risk and Capital frameworks had been used in business decision making during the course of the year. Mature reports presented decisions for consideration by the Board and were aligned to the latest Business Plan. This demonstrated the role of the Board and key elements of the report for consideration. Embedding of ORSA in business decisions cannot yet be observed but a leading practice would be to discuss this in the ORSA description of risk management processes KPMG LLP, a Canadian limited liability partnership and the Canadian member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. 14
42 ORSA summary results Risk-based Decisions Area UK Benchmarking Findings (2013) Canadian Benchmarking Findings (2014) Alignment to Business Planning Few reports demonstrated a clear alignment to the Business Planning process. ORSAs appeared to be run in isolation, or following the Business Planning process. This limited the challenge that Boards can raise and validity of the ORSA results. Reports incorporating the anticipated changes to the business profile through implementation of the business and the projected Risk Profile associated with this were limited in number but at the stronger end of the spectrum. In many cases, it is unclear how the planned ORSA processes will be integrated with business and strategic planning. A leading practice is to clearly align the development and review of ORSA with these processes, and embed a documented risk assessment in business decisions KPMG LLP, a Canadian limited liability partnership and the Canadian member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. 15
43 Challenges for completing and developing the ORSA
44 Common observed weaknesses and gaps Risk appetite statements Incomplete Tend to be weak on strategic and reputational risks Lack of measurement Poor connectivity to business and strategic planning Risks and internal control assessments Too detailed, and too focused on financial reporting Lack of linkage of net risks to capital needs 2014 KPMG LLP, a Canadian limited liability partnership and the Canadian member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. 17
45 Common observed weaknesses and gaps, cont d Considerable reliance on standard MCT/MCCSR model Limited modelling capabilities Need to develop challenge of MCT/MCCSR model for adequacy Operational risk poorly understood, with limited measurement Need to develop validation and verification of data and models 2014 KPMG LLP, a Canadian limited liability partnership and the Canadian member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. 18
46 Internal capital alternatives maturity spectrum, in the context of ORSA Rudimentary Average Some leading practices Most sophisticated Capital measurement Use of standard MCT/MCCSR, and DCAT to meet annual requirements Standard MCT/MCCSR model + DCAT Better use of stress testing Standard model supplemented by EC and EC lite methods Stress testing Full economic capital model Continuous monitoring EC used in capital allocation Who might use? Very small and simple insurers Small to medium insurers Medium to large insurers Some larger, more complex insurers Pros and cons Simple; can t go below regulatory test anyway Is it own view? Simple; can t go below regulatory test anyway Is it own view? Support for lower Internal Target with OSFI Public disclosure plus Meet expectations of analysts, rating agencies, regulators Better management info Greater effort and cost Support for lower Internal Target with OSFI Public disclosure plus Meet expectations of analysts, rating agencies, regulators Better management info Most effort and cost 2014 KPMG LLP, a Canadian limited liability partnership and the Canadian member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. 19
47 Internal capital alternatives - can you support your choice? Rudimentary Average Some leading practices Most sophisticated Capital measurement Use of standard MCT/MCCSR, and DCAT to meet annual requirements Standard MCT/MCCSR model + DCAT Better use of stress testing Standard model supplemented by EC and EC lite methods Stress testing Full economic capital model Continuous monitoring EC used in capital allocation How would you support for use in an ORSA? Acceptance of regulators should be sought in advance Internal target ratio reflects conservative judgmental assessment of the organization s risk profile Retrospective analysis of past financial results indicates no surprises or problems Qualitative analysis of whether there are indicators of higher risk or risk trending higher Acceptance of regulators should be sought in advance Internal target ratio reflects conservative judgmental assessment of the organization s risk profile Retrospective analysis of past financial results indicates no surprises or problems Qualitative analysis of whether there are indicators of higher risk or risk trending higher Some quantitative challenge of standard model for key risks EC approaches for key risks Internal target ratio reflects assessment of the organization s risks Key risk indicators are used to monitor key risks and risks trends particularly for risks where the standard model is used Model validation and governance where EC models are used Model validation and governance, such as strong internal audit Periodic independent reviews Key risk indicators are used to monitor key risks and risks trends Robust process for identifying and measuring new and emerging risks 2014 KPMG LLP, a Canadian limited liability partnership and the Canadian member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. 20
48 Regulatory capital minimums and internal target ratios Supervisory Target Capital Ratios are set above the minimum regulatory capital requirement (i.e. rather than just 100%, MCCSR - Tier 1 105%, Total 150%; MCT - Total 150%) to cover the risks specified in the capital tests as well as provide a margin for other types of risks not included in the tests Insurers are expected to set Internal Target Capital Ratios in excess of the Supervisory Target, and to operate above their internal targets Stress testing Supervisory judgments Dynamic Capital Adequacy Testing (DCAT) Strategic and business planning Transparency of public disclosures Budgeting and financial projections Risk appetite decisions Economic capital modeling Rating agency assessments Supervisory Target (150%) Difference enough to cover plausible adverse conditions Internal Target (e.g. 190%) Actual capital level 2014 KPMG LLP, a Canadian limited liability partnership and the Canadian member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. 21
49 Regulatory capital minimums and internal target ratios Supervisory Target Capital Ratios are set above the minimum regulatory capital requirement (i.e. rather than just 100%, MCCSR - Tier 1 105%, Total 150%; MCT - Total 150%) to cover the risks specified in the capital tests as well as provide a margin for other types of risks not included in the tests Insurers are expected to set Internal Target Capital Ratios in excess of the Supervisory Target, and to operate above their internal targets Expect ORSA to be central to these discussions in future Stress testing Supervisory judgments Dynamic Capital Adequacy Testing (DCAT) Strategic and business planning Transparency of public disclosures Budgeting and financial projections ORSA Risk appetite decisions Economic capital modeling Rating agency assessments Supervisory Target (150%) Difference enough to cover plausible adverse conditions Internal Target (e.g. 190%) Actual capital level 2014 KPMG LLP, a Canadian limited liability partnership and the Canadian member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. 22
50 Common observed weaknesses and gaps, cont d Improvement in processes for emerging risks needed Insurers generally behind other financial institutions More sophisticated use of scenario and reverse stress testing Consider operational/reputational scenarios Need to develop processes to sustain ORSA - management challenge, validation and verification, and independent reviews Need to develop depth and frequency of board oversight process Most first time respondents will need a development roadmap to outline a plan for closing the gaps shorter time horizon for process and qualitative gaps, and longer (3 years +/-?) for more sophisticated quantitative methods 2014 KPMG LLP, a Canadian limited liability partnership and the Canadian member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. 23
51 Neil Parkinson Partner National Insurance Sector Leader Tel KPMG LLP, the Canadian member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative, a Swiss entity. The KPMG name, logo and cutting through complexity are registered trademarks or trademarks of KPMG International Cooperative (KPMG International).
Risk & Regulatory Series. ORSA Next Steps
Risk & Regulatory Series ORSA Next Steps Agenda I. The first Canadian ORSAs Benchmarking ORSA maturity Challenges observed in completing and developing the first ORSAs II. Detailed observations, and the
More informationNAIC OWN RISK AND SOLVENCY ASSESSMENT (ORSA) GUIDANCE MANUAL
NAIC OWN RISK AND SOLVENCY ASSESSMENT (ORSA) GUIDANCE MANUAL Created by the NAIC Group Solvency Issues Working Group Of the Solvency Modernization Initiatives (EX) Task Force 2011 National Association
More informationSolvency Assessment and Management: Steering Committee Position Paper 34 1 (v 5) Own Risk and Solvency Assessment
Solvency Assessment and Management: Steering Committee Position Paper 34 1 (v 5) Own Risk and Solvency Assessment EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE The purpose of this document is to present
More informationORSA An international requirement
Prepared by: Padraic O'Malley, Principal, Dublin Eamonn Phelan, Principal, Dublin December 2013 ORSA An international requirement Title Author a [Footer - regular] Month YYYY Title Author b [Footer - regular]
More informationINTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INSURANCE SUPERVISORS
Guidance Paper No. 2.2.x INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INSURANCE SUPERVISORS GUIDANCE PAPER ON ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT FOR CAPITAL ADEQUACY AND SOLVENCY PURPOSES DRAFT, MARCH 2008 This document was prepared
More informationDevelopments & Insights in Singapore RBC 2 and Overview of ORSA across Regions
Developments & Insights in Singapore RBC 2 and Overview of ORSA across Regions 1 Agenda RBC 2 Developments in Singapore Comparison of ORSA Across Jurisdictions RBC2 Developments in Singapore In 2004, the
More informationORSA An International Development
ORSA An International Development 25.02.14 Agenda What is an ORSA? Global reach Comparison of requirements Common challenges Potential solutions Origin of ORSA FSA ICAS Solvency II IAIS ICP16 What is an
More informationINTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INSURANCE SUPERVISORS
Guidance Paper No. 2.2.6 INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INSURANCE SUPERVISORS GUIDANCE PAPER ON ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT FOR CAPITAL ADEQUACY AND SOLVENCY PURPOSES OCTOBER 2007 This document was prepared
More informationGUIDELINE ON ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT
GUIDELINE ON ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT Insurance Authority Table of Contents Page 1. Introduction 1 2. Application 2 3. Overview of Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework and 4 General Requirements
More informationSoutheastern Actuaries Conference 2012 Annual Meeting. Jeffrey S. Schlinsog, CFA, FSA, MAAA
www.pwc.com November 15, 2012 ERM Topics Southeastern Actuaries Conference 2012 Annual Meeting Jeffrey S. Schlinsog, CFA, FSA, MAAA ERM Topics 1. The development and implementation of the ORSA 2. The contents
More informationGuideline. Own Risk and Solvency Assessment. Category: Sound Business and Financial Practices. No: E-19 Date: November 2015
Guideline Subject: Category: Sound Business and Financial Practices No: E-19 Date: November 2015 This guideline sets out OSFI s expectations with respect to the Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA)
More informationActuaries Club of the Southwest
www.pwc.com Actuaries Club of the Southwest 3-2-1-ORSA Drivers of Enterprise Risk Management ( ERM ) Fed 1. Rating Agencies AM Best SRQ ERM Questions & S&P ERM Level III Reviews FASB/IASB 2. IAIS ICP 16
More informationOwn Risk Solvency Assessment (ORSA) Linking Risk Management, Capital Management and Strategic Planning
Own Risk Solvency Assessment (ORSA) Linking Risk Management, Capital Management and Strategic Planning Moderator: David Holland, Risk Director, Ally Insurance SPEAKERS Mary-ellen Coggins, Managing Director,
More informationIAIS: Enterprise Risk Management for Capital Adequacy & Solvency Purposes. George Brady. IAIS Deputy Secretary General
IAIS: Enterprise Risk Management for Capital Adequacy & Solvency Purposes George Brady IAIS Deputy Secretary General Table of Contents 1. Introduction 2. Governance and an Enterprise Risk Management (ERM)
More informationSolvency Assessment and Management: Pillar 2 - Sub Committee ORSA and Use Test Task Group Discussion Document 35 (v 3) Use Test
Solvency Assessment and Management: Pillar 2 - Sub Committee ORSA and Use Test Task Group Discussion Document 35 (v 3) Use Test EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE The purpose of this document
More informationERM and ORSA Assuring a Necessary Level of Risk Control
ERM and ORSA Assuring a Necessary Level of Risk Control Dave Ingram, MAAA, FSA, CERA, FRM, PRM Chair of IAA Enterprise & Financial Risk Committee Executive Vice President, Willis Re September, 2012 1 DISCLAIMER
More informationMAS consults on Enterprise Risk Management ( ERM )
www.pwc.com/sg MAS consults on Enterprise Risk Management ( ERM ) for insurers Following the MAS consultation paper on RBC 2 in August 2012, the expected consultation paper on ERM has now been published
More information1. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE
Solvency Assessment and Management: Pillar I - Sub Committee Capital Requirements Task Group Discussion Document 61 (v 1) SCR standard formula: Operational Risk EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE
More informationInsights. NAIC s ORSA. A Broader Approach to Regulation. NAIC S ORSA Part of a Global Shift to Regulatory Modernization
Insights June 2011 NAIC s ORSA A Broader Approach to Regulation Broad regulatory changes are on the horizon for U.S. insurers. The National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC s) Solvency Modernization
More informationENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT, INTERNAL MODELS AND OPERATIONAL RISK FOR LIFE INSURERS DISCUSSION PAPER DP14-09
ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT, INTERNAL MODELS AND FOR LIFE INSURERS DISCUSSION PAPER DP14-09 This paper is issued by the Insurance and Pensions Authority ( the IPA ), the regulatory authority responsible
More informationThe ORSA opportunity:
The ORSA opportunity: Compliance and business value 12 March 2014 Today s agenda Background and regulatory update ORSA overview Industry perspectives Achieving long-term business value Page 2 Today s agenda
More informationNAIC OWN RISK AND SOLVENCY ASSESSMENT (ORSA) GUIDANCE MANUAL
NAIC OWN RISK AND SOLVENCY ASSESSMENT (ORSA) GUIDANCE MANUAL As of December 2017 The NAIC is the authoritative source for insurance industry information. Our expert solutions support the efforts of regulators,
More informationSession 5: Evolution of ORSA in the US. Moderator: Michael Anthony McComis Jr. MAAA,FCAS
Session 5: Evolution of ORSA in the US Moderator: Michael Anthony McComis Jr. MAAA,FCAS Presenters: S Douglas Caldwell FSA,MAAA,CERA Chad R Runchey FSA,MAAA Elisabetta Russo MAAA SOA Antitrust Disclaimer
More informationAmerican Academy of Actuaries Webinar: The Practice of ERM in the Insurance Industry. Enterprise Risk Management Committee November 19, 2013
American Academy of Actuaries Webinar: The Practice of ERM in the Insurance Industry Enterprise Risk Management Committee November 19, 2013 All Rights Reserved. 1 Presenters Bruce Jones, MAAA, FCAS, CERA
More informationA (personal) view. Philip Whittingham, European Chief Enterprise Risk Officer. 22 March 2010
The role of the risk profession in a Solvency II world A (personal) view Philip Whittingham, European Chief Enterprise Risk Officer XL Group plc 22 March 2010 Session Aims Successful Solvency II implementation
More informationSolvency II Insights for North American Insurers. CAS Centennial Meeting Damon Paisley Bill VonSeggern November 10, 2014
Solvency II Insights for North American Insurers CAS Centennial Meeting Damon Paisley Bill VonSeggern November 10, 2014 Agenda 1 Introduction to Solvency II 2 Pillar I 3 Pillar II and Governance 4 North
More informationChristina Urias SMI Task Force Chair Director, Arizona Department of Insurance
May 21, 2010 TO: Christina Urias SMI Task Force Chair Director, Arizona Department of Insurance FROM: RE: Mary A. Weiss, Ph.D. Distinguished Scholar, CIPR NAIC Country Solvency Comparisons Materials for
More informationSolvency II Detailed guidance notes for dry run process. March 2010
Solvency II Detailed guidance notes for dry run process March 2010 Introduction The successful implementation of Solvency II at Lloyd s is critical to maintain the competitive position and capital advantages
More informationORSA reports: gaps and opportunities
ORSA reports: gaps and opportunities Market benchmarking of ORSA reports for Singapore general insurers Industry-wide Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) 1 2 Contents 1 Executive summary 2 Our assessment
More information2014 Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) Feedback Pilot Project Observations of the Group Solvency Issues (E) Working Group
2014 Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) Feedback Pilot Project Observations of the Group Solvency Issues (E) Working Group During October 2014 through June 2015, a third ORSA Feedback Pilot Project
More informationSolvency Assessment and Management: Stress Testing Task Group Discussion Document 96 (v 3) General Stress Testing Guidance for Insurance Companies
Solvency Assessment and Management: Stress Testing Task Group Discussion Document 96 (v 3) General Stress Testing Guidance for Insurance Companies 1 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE The business of insurance is
More informationSolvency II goes global
Solvency II goes global 22 June 2012 Solvency II, even before it goes live, is having an impact far beyond the 30 European countries it applies to. Three countries have applied for equivalence with the
More informationRegulation and risk The strategic response to insurance regulatory developments Alex Thomson, May 2013
Regulation and risk The strategic response to insurance regulatory developments Alex Thomson, May 2013!@# Agenda 1. Strategic priorities and regulation 2. Global insurance regulatory developments 3. East
More informationAcademy Presentation to NAIC ORSA Implementation (E) Subgroup
Academy Presentation to NAIC ORSA Implementation (E) Subgroup Tricia Matson, MAAA, FSA Chairperson, Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) and Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) Committee August 10, 2016
More informationINSURANCE CORE PRINCIPLES, STANDARDS, GUIDANCE AND ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
INSURANCE CORE PRINCIPLES, STANDARDS, GUIDANCE AND ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY Revised ICP 8 and the additional ComFrame material in ICP 8 for public consultation (redline version) This public consultation
More informationThe Role of Finance and Accounting as Critical Players in ERM and ORSA
The Role of Finance and Accounting as Critical Players in ERM and ORSA Session Number 404 Jim Stangroom Baker Tilly John Romano Baker Tilly John Holdorf NYCM Insurance Amy Purdy Godleski Columbian Financial
More informationPlease contact your OSFI Relationship Manager with any questions concerning the guidelines or their implementation.
Reference: Guidelines for Federally Regulated Insurers November 11, 2013 To: Federally Regulated Insurers 1 Subject: Own Risk and Solvency Assessment guidance On December 21, 2012, OSFI published draft
More informationSolvency Assessment and Management: Steering Committee Position Paper (v 4) Life SCR - Retrenchment Risk
Solvency Assessment and Management: Steering Committee Position Paper 108 1 (v 4) Life SCR - Retrenchment Risk EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This document discusses the structure and calibration of the proposed Retrenchment
More informationSolvency II Update. Latest developments and industry challenges (Session 10) Réjean Besner
Solvency II Update Latest developments and industry challenges (Session 10) Canadian Institute of Actuaries - Annual Meeting, 29 June 2011 Réjean Besner Content Solvency II framework Solvency II equivalence
More informationInternational Regulatory Developments
International Regulatory Developments An Introduction to Solvency II Simone Brathwaite, FSA, FCIA, CERA Principal Oliver Wyman December 2, 2010 Many bodies driving global regulatory change A simplification
More informationRe: Consultation Paper on Commercial Insurer s Solvency Self Assessment ( CISSA CP )
December 8, 2010 Dear Insurers, Re: Consultation Paper on Commercial Insurer s Solvency Self Assessment ( CISSA CP ) The Bermuda Monetary Authority ( the Authority ) wishes to thank the stakeholders for
More informationExploring the New Era of ORSA Enterprise Risk Management (ERM)/ Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) Committee
Exploring the New Era of ORSA Enterprise Risk Management (ERM)/ Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) Committee Copyright 2015 by the American Academy of Actuaries. All Rights Reserved. Presenters Tricia
More informationSOLVENCY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT (SAM) FRAMEWORK
SOLVENCY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT (SAM) FRAMEWORK Hantie van Heerden Head: Actuarial Insurance Department 5 October 2010 High-level summary of Solvency II Background to SAM Agenda Current Structures Progress
More informationArticle from: Risks & Rewards. August 2014 Issue 64
Article from: Risks & Rewards August 2014 Issue 64 ALM TRANSFORMATION By Eric L. Clapprood, Jeffrey R. Lortie and Kathryn M. Nelson In a world of uncertainty, there are consistently two sure things consultants
More informationOWN RISK AND SOLVENCY ASSESSMENT. ERM Seminar Compliance All Dealing from the same deck now
OWN RISK AND SOLVENCY ASSESSMENT ERM Seminar - 2014 Compliance All Dealing from the same deck now Own and Solvency Assessment! Originated in the UK about 10 years ago Now a global insurance regulatory
More informationERM and Reserve Risk
ERM and Reserve Risk Alietia Caughron, PhD CNA Insurance Casualty Actuarial Society s 2014 Centennial Celebration and Annual Meeting New York City, NY November 11, 2014 Disclaimer The purpose of this presentation
More informationSolvency Assessment and Management: Steering Committee Position Paper 73 1 (v 3) Treatment of new business in SCR
Solvency Assessment and Management: Steering Committee Position Paper 73 1 (v 3) Treatment of new business in SCR EXECUTIVE SUMMARY As for the Solvency II Framework Directive and IAIS guidance, the risk
More informationRisk Appetite for Life Offices IFoA working party
Risk Appetite for Life Offices IFoA working party Gautam Kakar, Chairman 30 October 2015 Members of Working Party: Gautam Kakar Lana Nguyen Shayanthan Pathmanathan Rod Bryn-Hussey Fabio Schiaffini Crystal
More informationVice President and Chief Actuary CLHIA
1 TITLE Presentation Points Steve Additional Easson, Points FCIA, FSA, CFA Additional Points Vice President and Chief Actuary CLHIA 2 TITLE AGENDA Presentation Points 1. Regulatory Additional (and Points
More informationRESERVE BANK OF MALAWI
RESERVE BANK OF MALAWI GUIDELINES ON INTERNAL CAPITAL ADEQUACY ASSESSMENT PROCESS (ICAAP) Bank Supervision Department March 2013 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 2 2.0 MANDATE... 2 3.0 RATIONALE...
More informationINTERNAL CAPITAL ADEQUACY ASSESSMENT PROCESS GUIDELINE. Nepal Rastra Bank Bank Supervision Department. August 2012 (updated July 2013)
INTERNAL CAPITAL ADEQUACY ASSESSMENT PROCESS GUIDELINE Nepal Rastra Bank Bank Supervision Department August 2012 (updated July 2013) Table of Contents Page No. 1. Introduction 1 2. Internal Capital Adequacy
More informationA.M. Best s New Risk Management Standards
A.M. Best s New Risk Management Standards Stephanie Guethlein McElroy, A.M. Best Manager, Rating Criteria and Rating Relations Hubert Mueller, Towers Perrin, Principal March 24, 2008 Introduction A.M.
More informationPillar 2 for Insurer s:
Pillar 2 for Insurer s: Greater requirements, enhanced value? September 2018 Order of events Presenters: 1. Pillar 2 in context 2. Redefining the standard for Enterprise Risk Management Michael van Vuuren
More informationThe road to Solvency II: The Regulatory View
The road to Solvency II: The Regulatory View Rob Curtis Director, KPMG 1 June 2011 Background to developments The Global Financial Crisis (GFC) highlighted: Regulatory focus at individual firm level and
More informationIntroduction to ORSA. OIC Risk Management Seminar 30 June William Song
Introduction to ORSA OIC Risk Management Seminar 30 June 2016 William Song Part 1 ORSA BACKGROUND 2 Own Risk and Solvency Assessment Aims to assess in a continuous and prospective way, the overall solvency
More informationERM/ORSA Training Thai General Insurance Association (TGIA)
ERM/ORSA Training Thai General Insurance Association (TGIA) 10 October 2017 Agenda Time Topics 8.30-9.00 Registration ORSA for Non-life Insurance Top 10 global business risk in 2017 Weakness and past failures
More informationINSURANCE REGULATION OMNIBUS CONSULTATION A CONSULTATION PAPER ON REVISION OF THE RULES AND GUIDANCE FOR LICENSED INSURERS
INSURANCE REGULATION OMNIBUS CONSULTATION A CONSULTATION PAPER ON REVISION OF THE RULES AND GUIDANCE FOR LICENSED INSURERS Issued 17 April 2018 This Consultation Paper makes proposals in respect of the
More informationERM and the new world of insurance regulation. Where insurers should focus now to find business value
ERM and the new world of insurance regulation Where insurers should focus now to find business value Enterprise risk management is a common denominator Reform efforts have much in common, including enhanced
More informationOwn Risk and Solvency Assessment
Own Risk and Solvency Assessment Acumen Conference 2015 Elaine Hultzer, Insurance Audit & Advisory Partner, Deloitte Sati MacLean, Senior P&C Actuarial Manager, Deloitte June 10 th, 2015 Agenda Introduction
More informationGregg Clifton. CFO Aurigen Reinsurance
Gregg Clifton CFO Aurigen Reinsurance Regulatory Capital When it comes to regulatory capital, is there a discernable clicking sound of a ratchet? More onerous Canadian capital requirements and the inherent
More informationSTRESS TESTING GUIDELINE
c DRAFT STRESS TESTING GUIDELINE November 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preamble... 2 Introduction... 3 Coming into effect and updating... 6 1. Stress testing... 7 A. Concept... 7 B. Approaches underlying stress
More informationStress and Scenario Testing Survey
Stress and Scenario Testing Survey Briallen Cummings Gerard Callaghan Georgina Hemmings KPMG This presentation has been prepared for the Actuaries Institute 017 Actuaries Summit. The Institute Council
More informationUse of Internal Models for Determining Required Capital for Segregated Fund Risks (LICAT)
Canada Bureau du surintendant des institutions financières Canada 255 Albert Street 255, rue Albert Ottawa, Canada Ottawa, Canada K1A 0H2 K1A 0H2 Instruction Guide Subject: Capital for Segregated Fund
More informationInsurance Summit Mr Raymond Tam Executive Director (Policy and Development) Insurance Authority 21 September 2017
Insurance Summit 2017 Mr Raymond Tam Executive Director (Policy and Development) Insurance Authority 21 September 2017 Priority of Policy Initiatives Development of risk-based capital regime Facilitation
More informationDoes the ORSA add value? Challenges and initial achievements. Lukas Ziewer Risk Management Perspectives, 18/11/2014
Does the ORSA add value? Challenges and initial achievements Lukas Ziewer Risk Management Perspectives, 18/11/2014 My three wishes for a prudential regime 1. Capital as a single currency for risk as a
More informationEmerging Trends in Quantitative ERM
Annual 2016 URS User Group Forum Emerging Trends in Quantitative ERM ZZ NAIC ORSA Update Elisabetta Russo, ERM Advisor, FIA, MAAA erusso@naic.org cell: +1 718 286 9450 2 Content Current status of NAIC
More informationCurrent status of Solvency II and challenges down the line. Matthew Edwards 11 October 2011
Current status of Solvency II and challenges down the line Matthew Edwards 11 October 2011 Solvency II Timeline Page 2 15 September 2011 UK Life Solvency II Discussion Forum Regulatory timelines Level
More informationINTERNAL CAPITAL ADEQUACY ASSESSMENT PROCESS MODULE
INTERNAL CAPITAL ADEQUACY ASSESSMENT PROCESS Table of Contents IC-A IC-1 Date Last Changed Introduction IC-A.1 Purpose 07/2018 IC-A.2 Module History 07/2018 General Requirements IC-1.1 Overview 07/2018
More informationOwn Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA)
Questions addressed: The use of ORSA within the existing Risk environment How ORSA is impacting RISK Control? What are the key operational impacts? How ORSA will affect, benefit in Asia? Contact details
More information2012 Conference: Connecting Theory With Practice" 22 nd Annual CAA Conference Sheraton, Nassau, Bahamas November 14-16, 2012
2012 Conference: Connecting Theory With Practice" 22 nd Annual CAA Conference Sheraton, Nassau, Bahamas November 14-16, 2012 Stress Testing Regional & Canadian Perspectives A Presentation by Stéphane Lévesque
More informationSolvency II: Implementation Challenges & Experiences Learned
Solvency II: Implementation Challenges & Experiences Learned Appointed Actuary Symposium Actuarial Society of Hong Kong (ASHK) Jonathan Zhao - Actuarial Services Practice Leader, Asia Pacific 3 November
More informationBERMUDA MONETARY AUTHORITY
BERMUDA MONETARY AUTHORITY CONSULTATION PAPER ON COMMERCIAL INSURER S SOLVENCY SELF ASSESSMENT JUNE 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS 0. INTRODUCTION 2 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 2. BACKGROUND 6 3. INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENTS
More informationAdvanced Methods in Insurance Capital Requirements
Advanced Methods in Insurance Capital Requirements Allan Brender Special Advisor, Capital Division Mexico City, 19 April 2007 Declare Solvency! If only it were that simple! 2 Canadian Financial System
More informationFrom: Director Christina Urias, Chair of the Solvency Modernization Initiative (EX) Task Force
June 7, 2010 To: Lou Felice, Chair of the Capital Adequacy (E) Task Force From: Director Christina Urias, Chair of the Solvency Modernization Initiative (EX) Task Force Subject: SMI's RBC Proposals Dear
More informationGuidance Note System of Governance - Insurance Transition to Governance Requirements established under the Solvency II Directive
Guidance Note Transition to Governance Requirements established under the Solvency II Directive Issued : 31 December 2013 Table of Contents 1.Introduction... 4 2. Detailed Guidelines... 4 General governance
More informationBermuda s Insurance Solvency Framework The Roadmap to Regulatory Equivalence. September
Bermuda s Insurance Solvency Framework The Roadmap to Regulatory Equivalence September 2010 Executive Summary Bermuda Monetary Authority 1 The Bermuda Monetary Authority has made considerable progress
More informationCorporate Governance of Federally-Regulated Financial Institutions
Draft Guideline Subject: -Regulated Financial Institutions Category: Sound Business and Financial Practices Date: I. Purpose and Scope of the Guideline The purpose of this guideline is to set OSFI s expectations
More informationRe: Comments on ORSA Guidance in the Financial Analysis and Financial Condition Examiners Handbooks
May 16, 2014 Mr. Jim Hattaway, Co-Chair Mr. Doug Slape, Co-Chair Risk-Focused Surveillance (E) Working Group National Association of Insurance Commissioners Via email: c/o Becky Meyer (bmeyer@naic.org)
More informationINTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INSURANCE SUPERVISORS
Principles No. 3.4 INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INSURANCE SUPERVISORS PRINCIPLES ON GROUP-WIDE SUPERVISION OCTOBER 2008 This document has been prepared by the Financial Conglomerates Subcommittee (renamed
More informationPwC Assurance Main contacts
PwC Croatia PwC Croatia is a professional services firm providing audit and assurance, valuation, transaction, performance improvement, tax, legal and bookkeeping services. We have more than 160 professionals
More informationInternational Insurance Regulation 101: International Association of Insurance Supervisors
The Academy Capitol Forum: Meet the Experts International Insurance Regulation 101: International Association of Insurance Supervisors George Brady, Deputy Secretary General, IAIS Moderator: Jeffrey S.
More informationForward Focus. The Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) A regulatory guidepost to the future. Insurance issues and insights from Howard Mills
Forward Focus Fall 2012 Insurance issues and insights from Howard Mills The Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) A regulatory guidepost to the future Contents The Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA),
More informationGuidance paper on the use of internal models for risk and capital management purposes by insurers
Guidance paper on the use of internal models for risk and capital management purposes by insurers October 1, 2008 Stuart Wason Chair, IAA Solvency Sub-Committee Agenda Introduction Global need for guidance
More informationKeeping Pace With Solvency II
Keeping Pace With Solvency II Challenges and Opportunities Facing Insurers By Gerard L Aimable, Colin Murray and Naren Persad Scheduled for 2013, Solvency II will introduce a risk-based regulatory framework
More informationERM Implementation and the Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA)
ERM Implementation and the Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) Kevin Olberding June 2013 1 Agenda ERM IMPLEMENTATION AND THE OWN RISK AND SOLVENCY ASSESSMENT (ORSA) Evolution of Enterprise Risk Management
More informationDefining the Internal Model for Risk & Capital Management under the Solvency II Directive
14 Defining the Internal Model for Risk & Capital Management under the Solvency II Directive Mark Dougherty is an international Senior Corporate Governance and Risk Management professional and Chartered
More informationINTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INSURANCE SUPERVISORS
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INSURANCE SUPERVISORS ISSUES PAPER ON GROUP-WIDE SOLVENCY ASSESSMENT AND SUPERVISION 5 MARCH 2009 This document was prepared jointly by the Solvency and Actuarial Issues Subcommittee
More informationICS Consultation Document - Responses to Comments on Asset Concentration & Credit Risks (Sections )
Public ICS Consultation Document - Responses to Comments on Asset Concentration & Credit Risks (Sections 9.2.4-5) 9 March 2016 1 About this slide deck 1. This is the next tranche of resolutions of ICS
More informationInsurance Regulation Reimagined
Insurance Regulation Reimagined Rob Curtis & Julian Braganza KPMG This presentation has been prepared for the 2016 Financial Services Forum. The Institute Council wishes it to be understood that opinions
More informationInternational Trends in Regulatory Capital & Target Surplus. Caroline Bennet - Trowbridge Deloitte Jennifer Lang - CBA
International Trends in Regulatory Capital & Target Surplus Caroline Bennet - Trowbridge Deloitte Jennifer Lang - CBA Agenda Review of Capital Framework International Trends in Regulatory Capital Target
More informationGeneral questions 1. Are there areas not addressed in the Guidance that should be considered in assessing risk culture?
To: Financial Stability Board (fsb@bis.org) From: Danny Saenz, Co-Chair, NAIC Group Solvency Issues (E) Working Group Date: January 30, 2014 Re: Comments Regarding December 23, 2013 Questions Regarding
More informationPreparing for the New ERM and Solvency Regulatory Requirements
OWN RISK AND SOLVENCY ASSESSMENT Preparing for the New ERM and Solvency Regulatory Requirements A White Paper from Willis Re Analytics Insurance solvency regulation is moving into new territory. Insurer
More information1. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE 2. DEFINITIONS
Solvency Assessment and Management: Steering Committee Position Paper 28 1 (v 6) Treatment of Expected Profits Included in Future Cash flows as a Capital Resource 1. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE An insurance
More information2013 Conference Risk, Recovery & Real Growth" 23rd Annual CAA Conference Secrets Wild Orchid Montego Bay, Jamaica. 4 th to 6 th December 2013
2013 Conference Risk, Recovery & Real Growth" 23rd Annual CAA Conference Secrets Wild Orchid Montego Bay, Jamaica. 4 th to 6 th December 2013 Regulatory developments in life assurance Nick Dumbreck Milliman
More informationOverview of Results of ERM 1 Assessment based on ORSA 2 Reports and ERM Hearings
Overview of Results of ERM 1 Assessment based on ORSA 2 Reports and ERM Hearings 1. Background Based on the equation below, assuming that the amount of capital is constant, insurance companies can improve
More informationGUIDELINES FOR THE INTERNAL CAPITAL ADEQUACY ASSESSMENT PROCESS FOR LICENSEES
SUPERVISORY AND REGULATORY GUIDELINES: 2016 Issued: 2 August 2016 GUIDELINES FOR THE INTERNAL CAPITAL ADEQUACY ASSESSMENT PROCESS FOR LICENSEES 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 The Central Bank of The Bahamas ( the
More informationExposure Draft. Revision to the Standards of Practice to Incorporate Changes to Section 2500 Dynamic Capital Adequacy Testing
Exposure Draft Revision to the Standards of Practice to Incorporate Changes to Section 2500 Dynamic Capital Adequacy Testing Actuarial Standards Board January 2019 Document 219011 Ce document est disponible
More informationSESSION/SÉANCE : PS-1
1 SESSION/SÉANCE : PS-1 (Joint session) The Insurance Company and Operational Risk SPEAKER(S)/CONFÉRENCIER(S) : Elaine Lajeunesse, FCIA, FCSA, CFA Vice President & Chief Risk Officer, Insurance BMO Financial
More informationActuaries and the Regulatory Environment. Role of the Actuary in the Solvency II framework
Actuaries and the Regulatory Environment Role of the Actuary in the Solvency II framework IAA Fund Southeast Europe Actuarial Seminar, Zagreb, 3 October 2011 1 Solvency II primary objectives fundamental
More informationOIC & ORSA. Thanita Anusonadisai Director of Capital and Solvency Standard Department Office of Insurance Commission, Thailand
OIC & ORSA Thanita Anusonadisai Director of Capital and Solvency Standard Department Office of Insurance Commission, Thailand Agenda http://www.oic.or.th Changes in insurance regulatory approach Update
More information