Solvency Assessment and Management: Stress Testing Task Group Discussion Document 96 (v 3) General Stress Testing Guidance for Insurance Companies
|
|
- Dwain Snow
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Solvency Assessment and Management: Stress Testing Task Group Discussion Document 96 (v 3) General Stress Testing Guidance for Insurance Companies 1 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE The business of insurance is based on dealing with uncertainty. Therefore, an insurer needs to consider a wide range of possible outcomes that may affect its current and expected future financial position. Although insurers are in many jurisdictions required to conduct stress tests 1, little guidance is provided on how insurers may go about conducting such stress tests. Stress testing is an important management tool to be used in setting business strategy, risk management and capital management decisions. This document sets out general guidance on stress testing for insurance companies. The guidance provided in this document should be treated as a general guide in developing stress tests and should not be seen as prescriptive. 2 STRESS TESTING DEFINED Stress testing is a risk management technique used to evaluate the potentially adverse effects on an institution s current and future financial condition, of a set of specified changes in risk factors, corresponding to unexpected but plausible events. Stress testing includes scenario testing and sensitivity testing 2.1 Scenario testing Scenario testing uses a hypothetical future or relevant historical state of the world to define changes in risk factors affecting an insurer. This will normally involve changes in a number of risk factors, as well as the ripple effects and other impacts that follow logically from these changes and related management actions. Scenario testing is typically conducted over the time horizon appropriate for the business and risks being tested. 2.2 Sensitivity testing Sensitivity testing typically involves a change in a single risk factor (or a limited number of risk factors). It is typically conducted over a shorter time horizon, for 1 Mention here the relevant ICP s and ORSA text
2 example an instantaneous shock. Sensitivity testing requires fewer resources than scenario testing and can be used as a simpler technique for assessing the impact of a change in risks when a quick response or when more frequent results is needed. The magnitude of the change considered is often relatively small, and is often used to estimate the impact of a change in assumption or the effect of parameter errors in a model. More severe magnitudes may also be considered to evaluate the impact of a large change in a single risk factor on the insurer. Stress testing should be seen not only as complementary to quantitative capital models, but also as an essential tool in the broader risk management system and Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) framework. Most quantitative capital models require assigning probabilities to particular outcomes based on past experience. Stress testing in contrast does not require probabilities. It is sufficient to specify the events or sequence of events sufficiently detailed such that the impact on the insurer can be understood and quantified. They are therefore useful as a complement to quantitative models to capture risks that are highly uncertain. Stress tests are also intuitive and useful to communicate with senior managers, board of directors and other stakeholders. Stress tests are explanatory as they do not only give a loss number or risk measure, but clearly define the level of financial stress implied by various events. They help foster an appropriate risk culture since they expose decision makers to potentially inconvenient truths. Insurers who adequately utilise stress tests will thus give due consideration to adverse scenarios to all aspects of business strategy and policy setting. Although much of what follows below will refer to scenario testing, sensitivity tests should be equally considered. 3 PURPOSE OF STRESS TESTING As indicated above, stress testing should be embedded in an insurer s overall risk management system. A risk management system is defined under SAM as the totality of strategies, policies and processes employed to identify, assess, monitor, manage and report on the material risks faced by an insurer 2. A stress testing framework as a whole should be actionable, playing an important role in facilitating the development of risk mitigation or contingency plans across a range of stressed conditions. It should feed into the insurer s decision making process, including setting the insurer s risk appetite, setting exposure limits, and evaluating strategic choices in longer term business planning. 3.1 Identifying risks Stress testing should be included in an insurer s risk management activities at various levels, for example, ranging from informing risk mitigation policies at a detailed or portfolio level to adjusting the insurer s business strategy. In particular, it should be used to address institution-wide risks, and consider the concentrations and interactions between risks in stress environments that might otherwise be overlooked. 2 Discussion Document 71 v5
3 This also includes risks that currently might not be considered in the quantitative capital models (be it within an internal model or the standard regulatory capital formula). As stress testing allows for the simulation of shocks which have not previously occurred, it can be used to assess the robustness of models to possible changes in the economic and financial environment. As such it can have a role to play in identifying model risk. Stress tests should help to detect vulnerabilities such as unidentified risk concentrations or potential interactions between types of risk that could threaten the viability of the institution, but may be concealed when relying purely on statistical risk management tools based on historical data. Emerging risks can also be identified, defined and understood through the process of stress testing and scenario analysis. Through brainstorming of future potential but as-yet unidentified scenarios as well as reverse stress-testing, emerging risks may be identified. These can then be assessed and monitored along with the known risk types as part of the overall risk management system. 3.2 Assessing risks Stress testing can be particularly useful to quantify risks. Risks may have insufficient data to build statistical models to quantify. Also, risks may not warrant complex quantitative methods from a nature, scale and complexity perspective. In such cases utilising robust stress tests may be more appropriate. Stress tests should complement risk quantification methodologies that are based on complex, quantitative models using backward looking data and estimated statistical relationships. In particular, stress testing outcomes for a particular portfolio can provide insights about the validity of statistical models. Stress testing can also be used to assess the impacts of customer behaviour arising from options embedded in certain products. 3.3 Monitoring risks Regular stress testing using pre-defined stress scenarios can be a useful tool to monitor key risk exposures. The impact of stress scenarios will evolve over time as a result of the changing environment, Regular assessment of previously-defined scenarios can be utilised to gain a deepened understanding of how the impact of such exposures has evolved over time. This includes emerging risks discussed in section Managing risks Once a scenario or stress has been assessed, consideration should be given to any actions or controls which could be put into place now to mitigate the impact of such a scenario. Due consideration should be given to the cost of such controls, and the cost considered in light of the insurer s risk appetite. An integral part of stress testing is the consideration of management actions taken in times of stress. When considering the impact of scenario, it may be possible to reduce the impact by certain decisions or actions. The typical example of such action is the reduction or elimination of non-vested bonuses on with-profit life products. Insurers should however be wary of what management actions are possible in times of stress, and any constraints on such actions. Examples of constraints may include legislative (e.g. policyholder protection rules) and economic
4 (unavailability of additional capital in the market, or terms unfavourable). [add knock on effects on reputation of actions] When such actions assume decision-making by senior management or the board, such decisions should be pre-agreed and formalised as much as possible, for example by writing such actions into policy. The ORSA requires that insurers consider and quantify risks more broadly than those considered in the regulatory capital requirement. One such risk which is not fully catered for in the standard formula is liquidity risk. Stress testing should be a central tool in identifying, measuring and managing liquidity risks. In particular, the insurer s liquidity profile and the adequacy of liquidity buffers should be assessed in both insurer-specific and market-wide stress events. An insurer s ORSA furthermore requires interaction between its risk management system and its capital management activities. Stress testing should form an integral part of insurers internal capital management where rigorous, forward-looking stress testing can identify severe events, including a series of compounding events, or changes in market conditions that could adversely impact the insurer. This should influence the projections of Own Funds made in the ORSA. 4 DEVELOPING STRESS TESTS An insurer should regularly maintain and update its stress testing framework. The effectiveness of the framework, as well as the robustness of individual components, should be assessed regularly and independently. The stress testing framework should deal with types of stress tests and identification of scenarios, assessment of the impact of such stresses and scenarios, mitigating actions assumed in the assessment, and monitoring and reporting of stresses and scenarios. 4.1 Identification of scenarios Stress testing programs should take account of views from across the organisation and should cover a range of perspectives and techniques. Defining appropriate events is as intellectually challenging as developing a quantitative capital model and requires appropriate knowledge and experience. It should employ specialists from fields relevant to the insurer. This includes, but is not limited to, the following persons or functions: the risk function, the actuarial function, senior management, the Board, reinsurers and rating agencies. Academics or specialists from related industry bodies or organisations may also be called upon. Scenarios selection Stress tests should cover a range of risks and business areas, as well as for the business as a whole. An insurer should be able to integrate effectively across the range of its stress testing activities to deliver a complete picture of the risks on the business as a whole. Comprehensive stress testing programs should consider the insurer s most material risks and aim to take into account system-wide interactions and feedback effects (e.g. second order and macroeconomic effects). This means that the identified scenarios should not only consider the initial strain, but also the sequence of effects that can play out over months and years. However, it is
5 difficult, if not impossible, to think through all the possible ramifications of such an event. The purpose of assessing a scenario is less about predicting a future event than it is about getting an insurer to think in advance about certain types of events and to be prepared if a similar (but not necessarily identical) scenario was to occur. It is therefore sufficient that the formulation of the scenario captures the essence of the effects of an initial disruptive event. Where relevant and material, such risks may include: Credit risk (i.e. counterparty and reinsurance risk) Market risk Insurance risk (e.g. mortality, morbidity, claim frequency and severity, persistency and lapse risk) Liquidity risk Operational and legal risk Concentration risk Contagion risk Risk to reputation Securitisation risk New business risk Regulatory risk Inflation risk Scenario selection should be conducted flexibly and imaginatively in order to improve the likelihood of identifying hidden vulnerabilities. A failure of imagination could lead to an underestimation of the likelihood and severity of extreme events and to a false sense of security about an insurer s resilience. The institution should assess the impact of severe shocks and periods of severe and sustained downturns, including its ability to react over the appropriate time horizon for the business and risks being tested. Further, stress tests should identify and respond to potential changes in market conditions that could adversely impact an institution s exposure to risk concentrations. Reverse stress testing A stress testing program should also determine what scenarios could challenge the viability of the insurer (reverse stress tests). Such tests may be useful in uncovering hidden risks and interactions among risks. The primary use of reverse stress tests is as a risk management tool to improve business planning and risk management rather than to inform decisions on appropriate levels of capital. However, reverse stress testing may result indirectly in changes to the levels of capital held by firms. For example, if a firm s reverse stress testing identifies business model vulnerabilities that have not previously been considered, but which the firm expects to survive according to its risk appetite/tolerance, the firm may decide to take mitigating action or hold a different amount of capital. A reverse stress test starts with a specified outcome that challenges the viability of the insurer. One example of such an outcome would be that over a short time period, the insurer incurs a very large loss that challenges its viability. The analysis would then work backwards (reverse engineered) to identify a scenario or combination of scenarios that could bring about such a specified outcome. The reverse stress test
6 induces insurers to consider scenarios beyond normal business settings that would include events with contagion and systemic implications. As described earlier in the document, a stress testing program should also determine what scenarios could challenge the viability of the insurer (reverse stress tests). A firm s business model is described as being unviable at the point when crystallising risks causes the market to lose confidence in the firm. A consequence of this would be that counterparties and other stakeholders would be unwilling to transact with or provide capital to the firm and, where relevant, that existing counterparties may seek to terminate their contracts. Such a point could be reached well before a firm s regulatory capital is exhausted. Specific consideration should be given to important inter-relations between various risk factors. For a long-term insurer, changes in economic conditions can significantly affect policyholder behaviour such as lapse rates, utilisation of options within an insurance contract, and morbidity and recovery rates. For a short-term insurer, changing economic conditions will not only influence investment income and company expenses, but can also lead to higher claims and loss reserves, particularly in times of inflation. The inter-relations of various factors will depend upon the insurer s products, its investment policy and its approach to managing its business. A critical goal for insurers is to identify situations in which the assumed normal pattern of inter-relationships breaks down due to a change in the business environment. Historical scenarios A historical scenario is based on an observed historical event. A major advantage of a scenario based on a historical event is that it can be more easily communicated since the event has actually occurred. As a further advantage, since such a scenario is based on an observed event, data with regards to its short-, medium-, and long-term impact might be available. In particular, the impact of the event on other risk factors, such as interest rates, equity markets, and inflation can be studied, as can its pre-history, i.e. the history leading up to the event. Clearly, the circumstances surrounding the historical event will be different to the current situation. Therefore, in constructing the scenario, appropriate adjustments need to be applied. In many scenarios, financial values will have to be adjusted for inflation to make the values more consistent with current values. Great care has to be taken when a historical scenario relates to the financial markets. Financial markets are constantly evolving and an event that had little impact in the past might have a big impact now or vice versa. Other examples of factors that require adjustment in historical scenarios include: Changes in population movement Medical advances New technologies Globalised and more closely linked financial markets New asset classes owned by insurers Management behaviour and incentive schemes Different valuation methods and bases used, making historical data not directly comparable to current values
7 Such adjustments cannot realistically consider all differences between the present situation, and that of the historical scenario. The idea is to use historical events as best as possible, given the limitations, to assist in dictating scenarios. Synthetic scenarios In contrast to historical scenarios, synthetic scenarios describe events which have not yet been observed and which thus can be more easily tailored to a specific situation of the insurer. Synthetic scenarios require more assumptions than historical scenarios. For this reason they are subject to more questioning and can be more difficult to communicate and discuss both within the company and with third parties. Formulation of scenarios A scenario needs to be formulated such that the financial impact on the insurer can be calculated. The first step in formulating a scenario is to explain it in a concise, understandable narrative that outlines the initial event and the potential effects cascading from it. The narrative should explain the key assumptions and simplification that have been made. It should focus on the qualitative aspects of the scenario but also include the major quantitative assumptions. The qualitative formulation describes the effects of the initial event over the duration of the scenario. If relevant, this also includes a description of the effects not only of the risk factors, which affect the firm directly (e.g. mortality rates, claims, interest rates, etc.), but also the effects on other market participants. The sequence in which events occur can be of major consequence for the financial impact on the insurer. The qualitative description therefore should not only contain the sequence of effects but also a time-line. This is particularly relevant for scenarios, which evolve over months and years or in which the effects of actions that management would take are to be included in the evaluation of the scenario. Many risk factors which enter into scenarios exhibit dependencies or relationships. When formulating a stress scenario, it is important to incorporate dependencies as they exist in stressful circumstances. Experience has shown that in many situations dependencies under stressed situations are different from dependencies under normal situations. In practice, dependencies under stress will usually not have been observed. It would therefore then be necessary to model them based on informed judgement. It should also be noted that the Solvency Capital Requirement (SCR) calculation under the standard formula of the Solvency Assessment and Management (SAM) regime is a defined stressed scenario. Risks not covered in the regulatory capital formula Certain risks an insurance company faces cannot be appropriately quantified, since their likelihood of occurring is highly uncertain or there is no underlying scientific theory. However, they do have quantifiable consequences that can have strong effects on a firm s financial condition. An example of a risk with a highly uncertain probability of occurrence is reputation risk. The likelihood of financial loss due to loss of reputation depends on the firm s strategy, the behaviour of its senior management, operational risks etc. However, while it is difficult, if not impossible, to give a reasonable close estimate of the probability of this occurring, the financial damage once such a reputational loss
8 happens can be expressed numerically. Such damage may affect policyholder behaviour (lapse rates), new business volume, employee turnover or productivity, relations with suppliers, and regulatory actions. All of these effects will have financial consequences. In order to consider the effects of such a risk, one must construct a scenario that describes the situation and its impact on various financial elements of the insurer s operations. 4.2 Evaluation of scenarios The evaluation of a given scenario consists of the quantification of its impact on the insurer s balance sheet. The quantification of the impact depends on the valuation framework. In many cases, it is important to gain insight into the insurer s financial state based on different valuation frameworks, e.g. economic valuation, statutory valuation. If the scenario continues over several years, the evaluation should include the quantification of the effects of the scenario over the entire duration of the event. The main purpose of a scenario framework is not merely to obtain quantitative results, but to gain insight such that the insurer can manage its risk in such a way as to cope with unexpected events. The insurer should not merely quantify the effects of the scenario but should also formulate contingency plans. Impact measure The impact of stress tests is usually evaluated using one or more measures. The particular measures used will depend on the specific purpose of the stress test, the risks and portfolios being analysed and the particular issue under examination. A range of measures may need to be considered to convey an adequate impression of the impact. Typical measures used are: Asset and liability values Level of impaired assets and write-offs Profit and loss Required and available regulatory capital Economic capital Liquidity and funding gaps 4.3 Allowance for management action and other mitigations Stress testing should facilitate the development of risk mitigation or contingency plans across a range of stressed conditions. The performance of risk mitigating techniques, like reinsurance, hedging, netting and the use of collateral, should be challenged and assessed systematically under stressed conditions when markets may not be fully functioning and multiple institutions simultaneously could be pursuing similar risk mitigating strategies. Stress testing should also reflect constraints on management action and should not place undue reliance on the timeliness of mitigating actions. Factors such as company history and philosophy, competitive position and policyholders reasonable expectations can have important effects on the timing of proposed action. 5 STRESS TESTING GOVERNANCE A strong governance structure is required given the importance of the stress testing. Since the stress test development and maintenance processes often imply
9 judgemental and expert decisions (e.g. assumptions to be tested, calibration of the stress, etc.), the independent control functions such as risk management and internal audit should also play a key role in the process. In particular, there should be an independent review (e.g. by internal audit) of the adequacy of the design and effectiveness of the operations of an institution s stress testing programs. The Board and senior management are responsible for and should ask probing questions on stress testing. This challenging is a vital part in ensuring the business derives value from this process and will require Board members and senior management to become knowledgeable in this area. Assessments of effectiveness should be qualitative as well as quantitative, given the importance of judgements and the severity of shocks considered. Areas for assessment should include the effectiveness of the program in meeting its intended purposes, documentation, development work, system implementation, management oversight, data quality and hypotheses and assumptions used. The Board and Senior Management are responsible for ensuring that the stress testing is administered by personnel with the relevant skills and expertise to do so. The Task Group recognises the potential need for a document (internal to the insurer) that describes the principles underpinning the process whereby stress testing is performed. Thus insurers and insurance groups should develop a policy specifically relating to stress testing. This policy should form part of the overall policy suite and governance framework. The stress testing and documentation around stress testing should be performed in such a way that it can be reviewed with reasonable effort by a third party. As an example, internal audit may evaluate it from a process perspective. Thus the documentation should be complete, accurate and present clear audit trails. Documentation should not be overly and unnecessarily complex. Insurers should have written policies and procedures governing the stress testing program. The operation of the program should be appropriately documented. The assumptions and fundamental elements for each stress testing exercise should also be appropriately documented, including the reasoning and judgements underlying the scenarios chosen and the sensitivity of stress testing results to the range and severity of the scenarios. The level of documentation should be based on the nature and purposes of the stress testing.
10 SELECTED REFERENCES The following list includes some of the works referred to in the paper. Financial Services Authority (FSA). Policy Statement 09/20 Stress and Scenario Testing (December 2009). International Association of Actuaries (IAA). Paper on Stress Testing and Scenario Analysis. International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS). Stress Testing by Insurers Guidance Paper (October 2003). Office of Superintendent of Financial Institutions Canada (OSFI). Guideline Stress Testing (December 2009).
Guidance Note: Stress Testing Credit Unions with Assets Greater than $500 million. May Ce document est également disponible en français.
Guidance Note: Stress Testing Credit Unions with Assets Greater than $500 million May 2017 Ce document est également disponible en français. Applicability This Guidance Note is for use by all credit unions
More informationSTRESS TESTING GUIDELINE
c DRAFT STRESS TESTING GUIDELINE November 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preamble... 2 Introduction... 3 Coming into effect and updating... 6 1. Stress testing... 7 A. Concept... 7 B. Approaches underlying stress
More informationGuideline. Own Risk and Solvency Assessment. Category: Sound Business and Financial Practices. No: E-19 Date: November 2015
Guideline Subject: Category: Sound Business and Financial Practices No: E-19 Date: November 2015 This guideline sets out OSFI s expectations with respect to the Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA)
More informationINTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INSURANCE SUPERVISORS
Guidance Paper No. 2.2.x INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INSURANCE SUPERVISORS GUIDANCE PAPER ON ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT FOR CAPITAL ADEQUACY AND SOLVENCY PURPOSES DRAFT, MARCH 2008 This document was prepared
More informationINTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INSURANCE SUPERVISORS
Guidance Paper No. 2.2.6 INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INSURANCE SUPERVISORS GUIDANCE PAPER ON ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT FOR CAPITAL ADEQUACY AND SOLVENCY PURPOSES OCTOBER 2007 This document was prepared
More informationGUIDELINE ON ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT
GUIDELINE ON ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT Insurance Authority Table of Contents Page 1. Introduction 1 2. Application 2 3. Overview of Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework and 4 General Requirements
More informationStatement of Guidance for Licensees seeking approval to use an Internal Capital Model ( ICM ) to calculate the Prescribed Capital Requirement ( PCR )
MAY 2016 Statement of Guidance for Licensees seeking approval to use an Internal Capital Model ( ICM ) to calculate the Prescribed Capital Requirement ( PCR ) 1 Table of Contents 1 STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES...
More informationSolvency Assessment and Management: Pillar 2 - Sub Committee ORSA and Use Test Task Group Discussion Document 35 (v 3) Use Test
Solvency Assessment and Management: Pillar 2 - Sub Committee ORSA and Use Test Task Group Discussion Document 35 (v 3) Use Test EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE The purpose of this document
More informationUse of Internal Models for Determining Required Capital for Segregated Fund Risks (LICAT)
Canada Bureau du surintendant des institutions financières Canada 255 Albert Street 255, rue Albert Ottawa, Canada Ottawa, Canada K1A 0H2 K1A 0H2 Instruction Guide Subject: Capital for Segregated Fund
More informationENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT, INTERNAL MODELS AND OPERATIONAL RISK FOR LIFE INSURERS DISCUSSION PAPER DP14-09
ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT, INTERNAL MODELS AND FOR LIFE INSURERS DISCUSSION PAPER DP14-09 This paper is issued by the Insurance and Pensions Authority ( the IPA ), the regulatory authority responsible
More informationSolvency II Insights for North American Insurers. CAS Centennial Meeting Damon Paisley Bill VonSeggern November 10, 2014
Solvency II Insights for North American Insurers CAS Centennial Meeting Damon Paisley Bill VonSeggern November 10, 2014 Agenda 1 Introduction to Solvency II 2 Pillar I 3 Pillar II and Governance 4 North
More informationRESERVE BANK OF MALAWI
RESERVE BANK OF MALAWI GUIDELINES ON INTERNAL CAPITAL ADEQUACY ASSESSMENT PROCESS (ICAAP) Bank Supervision Department March 2013 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 2 2.0 MANDATE... 2 3.0 RATIONALE...
More informationCAPTIVE BEST PRACTICE GUIDELINES
CAPTIVE BEST PRACTICE GUIDELINES Version 01:01/11 1 Table of Contents 1. Introduction... 3 2. General Governance Requirements... 4 3. Risk Management System... 5 4. Actuarial Function... 7 5. Outsourcing...
More informationORSA An International Development
ORSA An International Development 25.02.14 Agenda What is an ORSA? Global reach Comparison of requirements Common challenges Potential solutions Origin of ORSA FSA ICAS Solvency II IAIS ICP16 What is an
More informationIAIS: Enterprise Risk Management for Capital Adequacy & Solvency Purposes. George Brady. IAIS Deputy Secretary General
IAIS: Enterprise Risk Management for Capital Adequacy & Solvency Purposes George Brady IAIS Deputy Secretary General Table of Contents 1. Introduction 2. Governance and an Enterprise Risk Management (ERM)
More informationNAIC OWN RISK AND SOLVENCY ASSESSMENT (ORSA) GUIDANCE MANUAL
NAIC OWN RISK AND SOLVENCY ASSESSMENT (ORSA) GUIDANCE MANUAL Created by the NAIC Group Solvency Issues Working Group Of the Solvency Modernization Initiatives (EX) Task Force 2011 National Association
More informationBERMUDA MONETARY AUTHORITY GUIDELINES ON STRESS TESTING FOR THE BERMUDA BANKING SECTOR
GUIDELINES ON STRESS TESTING FOR THE BERMUDA BANKING SECTOR TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...2 2. GUIDANCE ON STRESS TESTING AND SCENARIO ANALYSIS...3 3. RISK APPETITE...6 4. MANAGEMENT ACTION...6
More informationINTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INSURANCE SUPERVISORS
Guidance Paper No. 9 INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INSURANCE SUPERVISORS GUIDANCE PAPER ON INVESTMENT RISK MANAGEMENT OCTOBER 2004 This document was prepared by the Investments Subcommittee in consultation
More informationGUIDELINES FOR THE INTERNAL CAPITAL ADEQUACY ASSESSMENT PROCESS FOR LICENSEES
SUPERVISORY AND REGULATORY GUIDELINES: 2016 Issued: 2 August 2016 GUIDELINES FOR THE INTERNAL CAPITAL ADEQUACY ASSESSMENT PROCESS FOR LICENSEES 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 The Central Bank of The Bahamas ( the
More informationPublic Disclosure Authorized. Public Disclosure Authorized. Public Disclosure Authorized. cover_test.indd 1-2 4/24/09 11:55:22
cover_test.indd 1-2 4/24/09 11:55:22 losure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized 1 4/24/09 11:58:20 What is an actuary?... 1 Basic actuarial
More informationProperty & Casualty Dynamic Capital Adequacy Testing and Stress Testing The Canadian Framework
Property & Casualty Dynamic Capital Adequacy Testing and Stress Testing The Canadian Framework Caribbean Actuarial Conference December 5, 2009 Xavier Bénarosch, FCAS, FCIA, CFA, FRM Table of contents Concept
More information2012 Conference: Connecting Theory With Practice" 22 nd Annual CAA Conference Sheraton, Nassau, Bahamas November 14-16, 2012
2012 Conference: Connecting Theory With Practice" 22 nd Annual CAA Conference Sheraton, Nassau, Bahamas November 14-16, 2012 Stress Testing Regional & Canadian Perspectives A Presentation by Stéphane Lévesque
More informationSolvency Assessment and Management: Steering Committee Position Paper 34 1 (v 5) Own Risk and Solvency Assessment
Solvency Assessment and Management: Steering Committee Position Paper 34 1 (v 5) Own Risk and Solvency Assessment EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE The purpose of this document is to present
More informationERM Implementation and the Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA)
ERM Implementation and the Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) Kevin Olberding June 2013 1 Agenda ERM IMPLEMENTATION AND THE OWN RISK AND SOLVENCY ASSESSMENT (ORSA) Evolution of Enterprise Risk Management
More informationGuidance on Liquidity Risk Management
2017 CONTENTS 1. Introduction... 3 2. Minimum Liquidity and Reporting Requirements... 5 3. Additional Liquidity Monitoring... 7 4. Liquidity Management Policy ( LMP )... 8 5. Fundamental principles for
More informationBERMUDA MONETARY AUTHORITY THE INSURANCE CODE OF CONDUCT FEBRUARY 2010
Table of Contents 0. Introduction..2 1. Preliminary...3 2. Proportionality principle...3 3. Corporate governance...4 4. Risk management..9 5. Governance mechanism..17 6. Outsourcing...21 7. Market discipline
More informationINTERNAL CAPITAL ADEQUACY ASSESSMENT PROCESS GUIDELINE. Nepal Rastra Bank Bank Supervision Department. August 2012 (updated July 2013)
INTERNAL CAPITAL ADEQUACY ASSESSMENT PROCESS GUIDELINE Nepal Rastra Bank Bank Supervision Department August 2012 (updated July 2013) Table of Contents Page No. 1. Introduction 1 2. Internal Capital Adequacy
More informationPRINCIPLES FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF CONCENTRATION RISK
ANNEX 2G PRINCIPLES FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF CONCENTRATION RISK A. INTRODUCTION 1. Concentration risk is one of the specific risks required to be assessed as part of the Pillar 2 framework - the Supervisory
More informationGuidance Note System of Governance - Insurance Transition to Governance Requirements established under the Solvency II Directive
Guidance Note Transition to Governance Requirements established under the Solvency II Directive Issued : 31 December 2013 Table of Contents 1.Introduction... 4 2. Detailed Guidelines... 4 General governance
More informationSubject SP9 Enterprise Risk Management Specialist Principles Syllabus
Subject SP9 Enterprise Risk Management Specialist Principles Syllabus for the 2019 exams 1 June 2018 Enterprise Risk Management Specialist Principles Aim The aim of the Enterprise Risk Management (ERM)
More informationGuidance Note: Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP) Credit Unions with Total Assets Greater than $1 Billion.
Guidance Note: Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP) Credit Unions with Total Assets Greater than $1 Billion January 2018 Ce document est aussi disponible en français. Applicability This
More informationSolvency Assessment and Management: Steering Committee Position Paper (v 4) Life SCR - Retrenchment Risk
Solvency Assessment and Management: Steering Committee Position Paper 108 1 (v 4) Life SCR - Retrenchment Risk EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This document discusses the structure and calibration of the proposed Retrenchment
More informationLEGAL & GENERAL GROUP PLC risk management supplement
LEGAL & GENERAL GROUP PLC 2017 risk management supplement Supplement contents Within this supplement we set out descriptions of the risks we face, how our risk management framework operates, as well as
More informationWe referred to ICP 20 which deals with public disclosures and is therefore directly comparable to the SFCR.
Solvency Assessment and Management: Steering Committee Position Paper 52 1 (v 4) Solvency Financial Condition Report and Report to Supervisor Detailed Requirements - Risk Profile EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. INTRODUCTION
More informationHow to review an ORSA
How to review an ORSA Patrick Kelliher FIA CERA, Actuarial and Risk Consulting Network Ltd. Done properly, the Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) can be a key tool for insurers to understand the evolution
More informationFinalised guidance. Individual Liquidity Systems Assessment (ILSA) Simplified ILAS BIPRU Firms (ILSA) Simplified ILAS BIPRU Firms.
Financial Services Authority Finalised guidance Individual Liquidity Systems Assessment (ILSA) Simplified ILAS BIPRU Firms April 2011 Individual Liquidity Systems Assessment (ILSA) Simplified ILAS BIPRU
More informationPrudential Standard GOI 3 Risk Management and Internal Controls for Insurers
Prudential Standard GOI 3 Risk Management and Internal Controls for Insurers Objectives and Key Requirements of this Prudential Standard Effective risk management is fundamental to the prudent management
More informationThe Components of a Sound Emerging Risk Management Framework
North American CRO Council The Components of a Sound Emerging Risk Management Framework December 6, 2012 2012 North American CRO Council Incorporated chairperson@crocouncil.org North American CRO Council
More informationDefining the Internal Model for Risk & Capital Management under the Solvency II Directive
14 Defining the Internal Model for Risk & Capital Management under the Solvency II Directive Mark Dougherty is an international Senior Corporate Governance and Risk Management professional and Chartered
More informationBasel Committee on Banking Supervision. Consultative Document. Pillar 2 (Supervisory Review Process)
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Consultative Document Pillar 2 (Supervisory Review Process) Supporting Document to the New Basel Capital Accord Issued for comment by 31 May 2001 January 2001 Table
More informationRisk Concentrations Principles
Risk Concentrations Principles THE JOINT FORUM BASEL COMMITTEE ON BANKING SUPERVISION INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF SECURITIES COMMISSIONS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INSURANCE SUPERVISORS Basel December
More informationEmbedding Stress Testing as Part of an Integrated Risk Management Framework
Life conference and exhibition 2011 Alastair Clarkson and David Hare Embedding Stress Testing as Part of an Integrated Risk Management Framework 20-22 November 2011 2010 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk
More informationREGULATORY GUIDELINE Liquidity Risk Management Principles TABLE OF CONTENTS. I. Introduction II. Purpose and Scope III. Principles...
REGULATORY GUIDELINE Liquidity Risk Management Principles SYSTEM COMMUNICATION NUMBER Guideline 2015-02 ISSUE DATE June 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction... 1 II. Purpose and Scope... 1 III. Principles...
More informationORSA: Prospective Solvency Assessment and Capital Projection Modelling
FEBRUARY 2013 ENTERPRISE RISK SOLUTIONS B&H RESEARCH ESG FEBRUARY 2013 DOCUMENTATION PACK Craig Turnbull FIA Andy Frepp FFA Moody's Analytics Research Contact Us Americas +1.212.553.1658 clientservices@moodys.com
More informationSubject ST9 Enterprise Risk Management Syllabus
Subject ST9 Enterprise Risk Management Syllabus for the 2018 exams 1 June 2017 Aim The aim of the Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Specialist Technical subject is to instil in successful candidates the
More informationORSA An international requirement
Prepared by: Padraic O'Malley, Principal, Dublin Eamonn Phelan, Principal, Dublin December 2013 ORSA An international requirement Title Author a [Footer - regular] Month YYYY Title Author b [Footer - regular]
More information1. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE
Solvency Assessment and Management: Pillar I - Sub Committee Capital Requirements Task Group Discussion Document 61 (v 1) SCR standard formula: Operational Risk EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE
More informationDraft Guideline. Corporate Governance. Category: Sound Business and Financial Practices. I. Purpose and Scope of the Guideline. Date: November 2017
Draft Guideline Subject: Category: Sound Business and Financial Practices Date: November 2017 I. Purpose and Scope of the Guideline This guideline communicates OSFI s expectations with respect to corporate
More informationSolvency and Financial Condition Report 20I6
Solvency and Financial Condition Report 20I6 Contents Contents... 2 Director s Statement... 4 Report of the External Independent Auditor... 5 Summary... 9 Company Information... 9 Purpose of the Solvency
More informationERM and ORSA Assuring a Necessary Level of Risk Control
ERM and ORSA Assuring a Necessary Level of Risk Control Dave Ingram, MAAA, FSA, CERA, FRM, PRM Chair of IAA Enterprise & Financial Risk Committee Executive Vice President, Willis Re September, 2012 1 DISCLAIMER
More informationLIQUIDITY RISK MANAGEMENT MODULE
LIQUIDITY RISK MANAGEMENT MODULE MODULE: LM (Liquidity Risk Management) Table of Contents Date Last Changed LM-A Introduction LM A.1 Purpose 08/2018 LM A.2 Module History 08/2018 LM-1 Governance of Liquidity
More informationSolvency II Detailed guidance notes for dry run process. March 2010
Solvency II Detailed guidance notes for dry run process March 2010 Introduction The successful implementation of Solvency II at Lloyd s is critical to maintain the competitive position and capital advantages
More informationCOMMUNIQUE. Page 1 of 13
COMMUNIQUE 16-COM-001 Feb. 1, 2016 Release of Liquidity Risk Management Guiding Principles The Credit Union Prudential Supervisors Association (CUPSA) has released guiding principles for Liquidity Risk
More informationInsurance Stress Testing
Life conference and exhibition 2010 Stuart King, Head of Life Insurance, Major Retail Groups, FSA Colin Ledlie, Standard Life Insurance Stress Testing 7-9 November 2010 2010 The Actuarial Profession www.actuaries.org.uk
More informationPillar 2 - Supervisory Review Process
B ASEL II F RAMEWORK The Supervisory Review Process (Pillar 2) Rules and Guidelines Revised: February 2018 CAYMAN ISLANDS MONETARY AUTHORITY Cayman Islands Monetary Authority Page 1 Table of Contents Introduction...
More informationCommittee on Payments and Market Infrastructures. Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions
Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions Recovery of financial market infrastructures October 2014 (Revised July 2017) This publication
More informationSolvency Assessment and Management: Steering Committee Position Paper 73 1 (v 3) Treatment of new business in SCR
Solvency Assessment and Management: Steering Committee Position Paper 73 1 (v 3) Treatment of new business in SCR EXECUTIVE SUMMARY As for the Solvency II Framework Directive and IAIS guidance, the risk
More informationTHE INSURANCE BUSINESS (SOLVENCY) RULES 2015
THE INSURANCE BUSINESS (SOLVENCY) RULES 2015 Table of Contents Part 1 Introduction... 2 Part 2 Capital Adequacy... 4 Part 3 MCR... 7 Part 4 PCR... 10 Part 5 - Internal Model... 23 Part 6 Valuation... 34
More informationConsultation Paper on the draft proposal for Guidelines on reporting and public disclosure
EIOPA-CP-14/047 27 November 2014 Consultation Paper on the draft proposal for Guidelines on reporting and public disclosure EIOPA Westhafen Tower, Westhafenplatz 1-60327 Frankfurt Germany - Tel. + 49 69-951119-20;
More informationERM, the New Regulatory Requirements and Quantitative Analyses
ERM, the New Regulatory Requirements and Quantitative Analyses Presenters Lisa Cosentino, Managing Director, SMART DEVINE Kim Piersol, Consulting Actuary, Huggins Actuarial Services, Inc. 2 Objectives
More informationPrudential sourcebook for Banks, Building Societies and Investment Firms. Chapter 12. Liquidity standards
Prudential sourcebook for Banks, Building Societies and Investment Firms Chapter Liquidity standards BIPU : Liquidity standards Section.1 : Application.1 Application.1.1.1.1A Subject to BIPU.1.2, BIPU
More informationIngenious Capital Management Limited: Pillar III Disclosure
CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. Risk Management 3. Capital Resources 4. Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP) 5. Remuneration Policy Disclosure 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Scope of Application Ingenious
More informationFramework for a New Standard Approach to Setting Capital Requirements. Joint Committee of OSFI, AMF, and Assuris
Framework for a New Standard Approach to Setting Capital Requirements Joint Committee of OSFI, AMF, and Assuris Table of Contents Background... 3 Minimum Continuing Capital and Surplus Requirements (MCCSR)...
More informationDraft for Consultation FICOM ICAAP Guide
Draft for Consultation FICOM ICAAP Guide BC Credit Unions November 2017 www.fic.gov.bc.ca Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 1 FEATURES OF AN EFFECTIVE ICAAP... 2 I. Board and Management Oversight... 2
More informationGuidance on the Actuarial Function MARCH 2018
Guidance on the Actuarial Function MARCH 2018 Disclaimer No responsibility or liability is accepted by the Society of Lloyd s, the Council, or any Committee of Board constituted by the Society of Lloyd
More informationFIL Life Insurance (Ireland) DAC. Solvency and Financial Condition Report as at 30 June 2016
FIL Life Insurance (Ireland) DAC Solvency and Financial Condition Report as at 30 June 2016 1 Contents INTRODUCTION... 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 6 A.1 Business... 8 A.2 Underwriting Performance... 9 A.3 Investment
More informationGUIDANCE NOTE ASSET MANAGEMENT BY AUTHORIZED INSURERS
GN13 GUIDANCE NOTE ON ASSET MANAGEMENT BY AUTHORIZED INSURERS Office of the Commissioner of Insurance June 2004 GN13 Guidance Note on Asset Management By Authorized Insurers Table of Contents Page Preamble...
More informationGuidance for (Re)Insurance Undertakings on the Head of Actuarial Function Role
2016 Guidance for (Re)Insurance Undertakings on the Head of Actuarial Function Role Guidance for (Re)Insurance Undertakings on the Head of Actuarial Function Role 2 Contents 1. Introduction... 3 2. General
More informationIAA Paper on Stress Testing and Scenario Yet Another Draft
1 IAA Paper on Stress Testing and Scenario Yet Another Draft 2013 International Actuarial Association / Association Actuarielle Internationale Table of Contents Executive Summary Introduction Definitions
More informationINTEGRATED RISK MANAGEMENT GUIDELINE
INTEGRATED RISK MANAGEMENT GUIDELINE Initial publication: April 2009 Updated: May 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preamble... ii Scope... iii Coming into effect and updating... iv Introduction... v 1. Integrated
More informationAFM NED Conference Solvency II Business as Usual. Steve Dixon of SDA llp
AFM NED Conference Solvency II Business as Usual Steve Dixon of SDA llp What am I going to talk about Solvency II What are the key components and how do they fit together Risk, capital, pricing, management
More informationBERMUDA MONETARY AUTHORITY DISCUSSION PAPER ON THE OWN RISK AND SOLVENCY ASSESSMENT PROCESS
DISCUSSION PAPER ON THE OWN RISK AND SOLVENCY ASSESSMENT PROCESS Table of Contents FOREWORD... 2 0. PURPOSE AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 3 1. INTRODUCTION... 5 Bermuda Regulatory Developments... 5 Relationship
More informationRegulatory Consultation Paper Round-up
Regulatory Consultation Paper Round-up Both the PRA and EIOPA have issued consultation papers in Q4 2017 - some of the changes may have a significant impact for firms if they are implemented as currently
More informationPREMIER UNDERWRITING HOLDINGS (GIBRALTAR) LIMITED PREMIER INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
PREMIER UNDERWRITING HOLDINGS (GIBRALTAR) LIMITED PREMIER INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED GROUP AND SOLO SOLVENCY AND FINANCIAL CONDITION REPORT As at 31 December 2017 Contents Summary... 6 A Business and Performance...
More informationOverview and context
Michael Eves Overview and context Why Are We Talking About This Now? One facet of a long-term reaction to the financial crisis by many stakeholders: Increasing knowledge of models Decreasing confidence
More informationAn Introduction to Solvency II
An Introduction to Solvency II Peter Withey KPMG Agenda 1. Background to Solvency II 2. Pillar 1: Quantitative Pillar Basic building blocks Assets Technical Reserves Solvency Capital Requirement Internal
More informationInternational Association of Insurance Supervisors. Solvency, Solvency Assessments and Actuarial Issues Subcommittee. Draft Guidance Paper
International Association of Insurance Supervisors Solvency, Solvency Assessments and Actuarial Issues Subcommittee Draft Guidance Paper Stress Testing Contents I. Introduction...2 II. Objectives of Stress
More informationINTERNAL CAPITAL ADEQUACY ASSESSMENT PROCESS MODULE
INTERNAL CAPITAL ADEQUACY ASSESSMENT PROCESS Table of Contents IC-A IC-1 Date Last Changed Introduction IC-A.1 Purpose 07/2018 IC-A.2 Module History 07/2018 General Requirements IC-1.1 Overview 07/2018
More informationBERGRIVIER MUNICIPALITY. Risk Management Risk Appetite Framework
BERGRIVIER MUNICIPALITY Risk Management Risk Appetite Framework APRIL 2018 1 Document review and approval Revision history Version Author Date reviewed 1 2 3 4 5 This document has been reviewed by Version
More informationSolvency and financial condition report 2017
Solvency and financial condition report 2017 The Standard Life Assurance Company 2006 Contents Summary 2 A Business and performance 4 A.1 Business 4 A.2 Underwriting performance 5 A.3 Investment performance
More informationILA LRM Model Solutions Fall Learning Objectives: 1. The candidate will demonstrate an understanding of the principles of Risk Management.
ILA LRM Model Solutions Fall 2015 1. Learning Objectives: 1. The candidate will demonstrate an understanding of the principles of Risk Management. 2. The candidate will demonstrate an understanding of
More informationStress and Scenario Testing Survey
Stress and Scenario Testing Survey Briallen Cummings Gerard Callaghan Georgina Hemmings KPMG This presentation has been prepared for the Actuaries Institute 017 Actuaries Summit. The Institute Council
More informationECB Guide to the internal liquidity adequacy assessment process (ILAAP)
ECB Guide to the internal liquidity adequacy assessment process (ILAAP) March 2018 Contents 1 Introduction 2 1.1 Purpose 3 1.2 Scope and proportionality 3 2 Principles 5 Principle 1 The management body
More informationActuaries Club of the Southwest
www.pwc.com Actuaries Club of the Southwest 3-2-1-ORSA Drivers of Enterprise Risk Management ( ERM ) Fed 1. Rating Agencies AM Best SRQ ERM Questions & S&P ERM Level III Reviews FASB/IASB 2. IAIS ICP 16
More informationBERMUDA MONETARY AUTHORITY BANKS AND DEPOSIT COMPANIES ACT 1999: PRINCIPLES FOR SOUND LIQUIDITY RISK MANAGEMENT AND SUPERVISION
BERMUDA MONETARY AUTHORITY BANKS AND DEPOSIT COMPANIES ACT 1999: PRINCIPLES FOR SOUND LIQUIDITY RISK MANAGEMENT AND SUPERVISION DECEMBER 2010 Table of Contents Introduction... 3 1. Approach to liquidity
More informationLIFE INSURANCE & WEALTH MANAGEMENT PRACTICE COMMITTEE
Contents 1. Purpose 2. Background 3. Nature of Asymmetric Risks 4. Existing Guidance & Legislation 5. Valuation Methodologies 6. Best Estimate Valuations 7. Capital & Tail Distribution Valuations 8. Management
More informationConsultation: Revised Specifi c TASs Annex 1: TAS 200 Insurance
Consultation Financial Reporting Council May 2016 Consultation: Revised Specifi c TASs Annex 1: TAS 200 Insurance The FRC is responsible for promoting high quality corporate governance and reporting to
More informationOwn Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA)
Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) Presentations to OCCA (Nov. 19, 2014) and AAIARD (Nov. 21, 2014) Jacqueline Friedland, FCIA, FCAS, FSA, MAAA Chief Actuary, RSA Canada Presentation Outline What
More informationPillar 3 Disclosure ICAP Europe Limited
Pillar 3 Disclosure 31 st March 2017 1. INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE The purpose of this report is to meet Pillar 3 requirements laid out by the European Banking Authority (EBA) in Part Eight of the Capital
More informationActuarial practice in relation to the ORSA process under Solvency II
ACTUARIAL ASSOCIATION OF EUROPE ASSOCIATION ACTUARIELLE EUROPÉENNE 1 PLACE DU SAMEDI B-1000 BRUSSELS, BELGIUM TEL: (+32) 22 01 60 21 FAX: (+32) 27 92 46 48 E-MAIL: info@actuary.eu WEB: www.actuary.eu Draft
More informationAshmore Group plc Pillar 3 Disclosures as at 30 June 2018
Ashmore Group plc Pillar 3 Disclosures as at 30 June 2018 Table of Contents 1. OVERVIEW 3 1.1 BASIS OF DISCLOSURES 1.2 FREQUENCY OF DISCLOSURES 1.3 MEDIA AND LOCATION OF DISCLOSURES 2. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
More informationGuidelines on PD estimation, LGD estimation and the treatment of defaulted exposures
Guidelines on PD estimation, LGD estimation and the treatment of defaulted exposures European Banking Authority (EBA) www.managementsolutions.com Research and Development December Página 2017 1 List of
More informationCurrent Estimates under International Financial Reporting Standards IFRS [2005]
International Actuarial Association Association Actuarielle Internationale IASP 5 Current Estimates under International Financial Reporting Standards IFRS [2005] Prepared by the Subcommittee on Actuarial
More informationINSURANCE CORE PRINCIPLES, STANDARDS, GUIDANCE AND ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
INSURANCE CORE PRINCIPLES, STANDARDS, GUIDANCE AND ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY Revised ICP 8 and the additional ComFrame material in ICP 8 for public consultation (redline version) This public consultation
More informationI should firstly like to say that I am entirely supportive of the objectives of the CD, namely:
From: Paul Newson Email: paulnewson@aol.com 27 August 2015 Dear Task Force Members This letter constitutes a response to the BCBS Consultative Document on Interest Rate Risk in the Banking Book (the CD)
More informationBasel Committee on Banking Supervision
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Consultative Document Principles for the Management and Supervision of Interest Rate Risk Supporting Document to the New Basel Capital Accord Issued for comment by
More informationGuidance on the Actuarial Function April 2016
Guidance on the Actuarial Function April 2016 Disclaimer No responsibility or liability is accepted by the Society of Lloyd s, the Council, or any Committee of Board constituted by the Society of Lloyd
More informationRED 2.1 & 4.2: Quantifying Risk Exposure for ORSA. Moderator: Presenters: Lesley R. Bosniack, CERA, FCAS, MAAA
RED 2.1 & 4.2: Quantifying Risk Exposure for ORSA Moderator: Lesley R. Bosniack, CERA, FCAS, MAAA Presenters: Lesley R. Bosniack, CERA, FCAS, MAAA William Robert Wilkins, ASA, CERA, FCAS, MAAA SOA Antitrust
More informationGuidance consultation FSA REVIEWS OF CREDIT RISK MANAGEMENT BY CCPS. Financial Services Authority. July Dear Sirs
Financial Services Authority Guidance consultation FSA REVIEWS OF CREDIT RISK MANAGEMENT BY CCPS July 2011 Dear Sirs The financial crisis has led to a re-evaluation of supervisory approaches and standards,
More informationGuidance on Liquidity Risk Management
Guidance on Liquidity Risk Management XXXX 2016 CONTENTS 1. Introduction... 3 2. Standard Liquidity Approach (SLA)... 4 3. Enhanced Liquidity Approach (ELA): Maximum Mismatch Limits... 5 4. Enhanced Liquidity
More information