Solvency II: Implementation Challenges & Experiences Learned
|
|
- Donna Rich
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Solvency II: Implementation Challenges & Experiences Learned Appointed Actuary Symposium Actuarial Society of Hong Kong (ASHK) Jonathan Zhao - Actuarial Services Practice Leader, Asia Pacific 3 November 2010
2 Agenda Solvency II introduction & recap Implementation procedures Experiences & lessons from QIS 5 Looking ahead Page 2
3 Solvency II introduction & recap Solvency II introduction & recap Implementation procedures Experiences & lessons from QIS 5 Looking ahead Page 3
4 Solvency II introduction & recap Background Solvency II is the proposed new Europe-wide framework for prudential supervision of insurance Aims to address problems with Solvency I - Outdated system - Insufficiently risk-sensitive - Does not reflect best practice - Difficulties in supervising multinational, diversified groups A fundamental change to Solvency requirements: - Principles based approach to supervision - Market consistent approach for valuing liabilities - Capital requirements linked to risk profile - Convergence of economic capital and regulatory capital - Major focus on risk management - Significant disclosure requirements - Capital add-ons for deficiencies - Links to other reporting measures Page 4
5 Implementation activity Regulatory timetable We are here Solvency II introduction & recap Regulatory timeline and implementation activities European CEIOPS/ > EIOPA > May 2009 Framework Directive Approved Level 2 advice to Commission QIS5 QIS5 feedback Develop guidance under Level 3 October 2011 Level 2 Directive Approved Implementation 31 December 2012 L2 drafting (Commission and EIOPC) Impact study of L2 (Commission) Legislative process Internal Model Application Process (IMAP) submission Member States Planning for implementation in 30 countries and associated territories Transposition into domestic law and regulation UK Interactive firms & FSA IMAP dry run (June 2010 to October 2011) IMAP by April 2012 Full implementation Vision & Gap analysis Road Map design Detailed Implementation design Build and test Implementation Embed Page 5
6 Solvency II introduction & recap Frame work 3 Pillar Approach Risk Quantifications Pillar 1 Quantitative Capital Requirements Solvency Capital Requirements (SCR) Minimum Capital Requirements (MCR) Risk Management Pillar 2 Supervisory activities Risk Governance A risk oriented framework Risk Transparency Pillar 3 Supervisory reporting & public disclosure Transparency & Disclosure Page 6
7 Pillar 1 Pillar 1 Pillar 2 Pillar 3 Technical Provisions MCR Minimum Capital Requirement SCR Solvency Capital Requirement Model Approval Risk Management Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) Supervisory powers & processes Disclosure- Solvency & Financial Condition Report Market Discipline Page 7
8 Solvency II Pillar 1 Market consistent balance sheet The starting point for Solvency II is an economic, market-consistent approach to the valuation of assets and liabilities. Alignment as far as possible between Solvency II and IFRS 4 Phase II. Solvency II Balance Sheet Assets are valued at market value Own Funds Assets Free Surplus MCR Risk margin SCR Technical provisions = BEL + Risk Margin Best Estimate Liability (BEL) Best estimate of all future cash flows discounted at a risk free rate with adjustment for illiquidity premium Risk free rate is derived from swap rates less an adjustment for credit risk (10bps), level of illiquidity premium various by contract type (50bps 100bps) + Risk Margin Cost of capital method will 6% factor used for QIS 5, IFRS 4 Phase II suggested 3 methods (CI, CTE and CoC) Best estimate liability Technical provisions Capital requirements SCR = first regulatory intervention point CI over 1 year) Standard Formula or Internal Model MCR = final regulatory intervention point CI over 1 year) Framework directive has also set MCR to a minimum of 25% and a maximum of 45% of the SCR Page 8
9 Solvency II Pillar I Structure of standard formula for SCR SCR = BSCR + Adj + Op Risk SCR intangibles risk module introduced for QIS 5. Adj BSCR Operational Risk SCR illiquidity premium sub-module introduced for QIS 5. Market Health Def ault Life Non-Life Intangibles Interest rate Equity SLT Health Mortality Health CAT Non-SLT Health Premium Reserve Mortality Longevity Premium Reserve Lapse Health risk module split between SLT (similar to life techniques) and NonSLT some reduction in QIS5 for certain correlations between sub-module risks. Health CAT risk introduced (as per Final Advice although the CAT risk is now aggregated across SLT and NonSLT). Property Spread Longevity Disability Morbidity Lapse Disability Morbidity Lapse CAT A lapse risk module for Non Life business has been introduced to recognise the impact if policy take-up rates were lower than expected. Basic SCR correlations Market Default Life Health Non-Life Currency Lapse Expenses Market 1 Concentration Expenses Revision Default Life Health Illiquidity Revision CAT Non-Life = included in the adjustment for the risk mitigating effect of future profit sharing Page 9
10 Solvency II - Pillar 2 Pillar 1 Pillar 2 Pillar 3 Technical Provisions MCR Minimum Capital Requirement SCR Solvency Capital Requirement Model Approval Risk Management Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) Supervisory powers & processes Disclosure- Solvency & Financial Condition Report Market Discipline Page 10
11 Pillar 2 Requirements The key requirement of Pillar 2 is for firms to have a system of governance to provide for sound and prudent management of the business. This system of governance shall at least include an adequate transparent organisational structure with a clear allocation and appropriate segregation of responsibilities and an effective system for ensuring the transmission of information. Supporting this requirement are six key aspects based on conditions and functions which the Directive expects Firms to address and have in place: Conditions Fitness and Propriety Outsourcing Internal Control Functions Risk Management Function Internal Audit Function Actuarial Function Pillar 2 can be split in two Governance and ORSA Evidencing Successful Pillar 2 Implementation Governance Clear and documented delegation of authority cascading through the organisation with appropriate spans of control and suitable persons holding roles Suitable allocation of function responsibility that avoids duplication Clear articulation of committee responsibilities split between doing and oversight and assurance. Policies that set out how the business is overseen and controlled and that reflect the current reality Risk information to support individuals and committees in their roles across the lines of defence Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) A demonstrable strategy and appetite for risk that is cascaded down through the organisation A process for identifying all the risks to the business, quantifying them across a range of outcomes controlling them and reporting within them within the governance arrangements set out A dynamic approach to using risk information within the business on a timely basis Page 11
12 Pillar 2 Own Risk and Solvency Assessment The ORSA is the regular practice of assessing overall capital needs with a view to the firm s specific risk profile that forms part of the risk management system. It is: an internal assessment process and as such should be embedded in strategic decisions, and a supervisory tool for the supervisory authorities. The ORSA can be defined as the entirety of the processes and procedures employed to identify, assess, monitor, manage, and report the short and long term risks that the business faces or may face and to determine the own funds necessary to ensure that its overall solvency needs are met at all times. The ORSA aims at enhancing awareness of the interrelationships between the risks the business is currently exposed to, or may face in the long term, and the internal capital needs that follow from this risk exposure. The ORSA needs to be supported by an effective and robust escalation process paying particular attention to Functional escalation Risk exposures and the linkages to decision making 3 lines of defence model a possible approach to meet Solvency II requirements 1 st Line Risk Ownership Executive Committee Supported by Risk Taking Business Units Board Strategy, risk appetite and policy 2nd Line Risk Control and Monitoring Oversight Committee Supported by Compliance, Actuarial, Risk Management and Risk Modelling Functions Risk Management Systems Own Risk and Solvency Assessment Internal Control Framework 3rd Line Independent Assurance Audit Committee Supported by Internal Audit The ORSA process for assessing and monitoring overall solvency builds on the Pillar I SCR calculation by articulating the firm s view of required capital. It should form an integral part of the business planning of the organisation. A key challenge will be integrating the appropriate modelling approaches into the risk framework and ORSA. Page 12
13 Solvency II - Pillar 3 Pillar 1 Pillar 2 Pillar 3 Technical Provisions MCR Minimum Capital Requirement SCR Solvency Capital Requirement Model Approval Risk Management Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) Supervisory powers & processes Disclosure - Solvency & Financial Condition Report Market Discipline Page 13
14 Pillar 3 Overview Three aspects: Report to Supervisor RTS Information to submit to regulator Solvency and Financial condition report - SFCR Public disclosures at least annually Disclosures by regulators RTS and SFCR will contain a qualitative report, including quantitative data and quantitative reporting templates Proportionality principle: detail of information is in line with nature, scale and complexity of risks inherent in the business Need a written disclosure policy approved by the management body to ensure appropriate governance procedures and practices so that information is complete, consistent and accurate (on an ongoing basis) There are provisions to avoid competitors of the undertaking gaining significant undue advantage non-disclosure of information in specific cases need to be explicitly mentioned (along with reasons) in the SFCR In the SFCR, you may refer to or make use of equivalent information available elsewhere in the public domain (although CEIOPS do not consider it appropriate to refer through hyperlinks to other documents - rather reference if further information is provided elsewhere) Page 14
15 Implementation procedures Solvency II introduction & recap Implementation procedures Experiences & lessons from QIS 5 Looking ahead Page 15
16 Implementation activity Some key questions regarding your Solvency II implementation May 2009 Framework Directive Approved QIS5 QIS5 feedback Internal Model Application Process (IMAP) submission Implementation 31 December 2012 Planning for implementation in 30 countries and associated territories Transposition into domestic law and regulation IMAP dry run (June 2010 to October 2011) IMAP by April 2012 Full implementation Vision & Gap analysis Road Map design Detailed Implementation plan and activities Build and test Implementation Embed What level of detail does your implementation plan go to? (e.g., high-level road map and detail activity plan) Does your plan build on the output from the gap analysis and identified solutions to mitigate all deficiencies? Has your plan been reviewed and approved by the governance committee, with agreed budget, headcounts, and timeline that are realistic? What do you plan to do next with your plan? Page 16
17 Enabling Illustrative SII governance and program structure making it happen A well defined SII governance/program structure will ensure rapid decision-making, and effective execution of the SII implementation plan Key Features Horizontal & vertical workstreams to drive aligned business requirements and a complete business case Dedicated technical challenge and support at all levels of the program Steering Committee Program Governance Technical Review Panel Program Management Program Management Office Program Directorate Design Authority Team Workstreams Internal Model Risk & ORSA Reporting & Disclosures Optimisation Product Pricing and Development Technology/Data and Tools Workstreams Process & Controls Change Management Documentation Page 17
18 Resourcing for SII and understanding its implications on existing headcount Analyst Senior Analyst Assistant Manager Manager Senior Manager Director SII headcount means a x% growth 2 Current team Open positions SII resources required Considerations on resourcing: Where to hire resources from? Internal vs. external use of resources and its cost implications? Impact on existing headcount and integrating new resources into business as usually activities? Speed at which resources can be obtained? Impact on SII programme? When do the resources need to be brought it? All at a point in time? Spread over time? Page 18
19 Phase 3 - Transition from Development to Production Phase 2 SII Reporting Implementation and Testing Phase 1 - Understand & Design SII Reporting Metrics & Modeling Requirements Example of Detailed Road Map Risk Modelling & Reporting 2H H H H H H H 2012 Business As Usual SII Reporting Methodology Overall SII Reporting Framework 1 Define and document required enhancement to models to meet requirements 2 ALM Model 3 Economic Scenario Generator (ESG) 4 Complete QIS5 QIS5 Solo delivery by Oct Asset Valuation Implementation 6 ALM Modeling 7 Implementation of the internal model ESG 8 Financial Reporting Infrastructures 9 Complete design and implement of valuation processes and reporting Validation, documentation & User Testing 10 Internal Finalisation of Models & External Model Audit SII Reporting Full Testing & Dry Runs SII Reporting System Go Live 11 External Audit Process being Carried Out 12 Parallel runs of Q1 ~ Q System launched 13 Page 19
20 Review of ORSA Review of Governance Review of Risk Appetite & Tolerance Limits Example of Detailed Road Map Risk Management 2H H H H H H H 2012 Business As Usual Define and Determine Risk Appetite Set Risk Tolerances per Major Risk Category Define Management Response to Risk Identification and Appetite Define Control Activities to Address Risk Management requirements Assess / Update Governance Manuals, Terms of Reference and Role Definitions Definition of Risk Appetite Completed Allocation of Risk Tolerances per Major Risk Category Completed Definition of Management Response to Risk Management Completed Definition of Control Activities Completed Annually review and update as required Build Process Catalogue Embed Risk Management Changes 6 7 Embedding Change Management Programs Completed Define and Design Process Identify and Assess Operational Risks Assessment of other Risk categories Build ORSA Report Formats Design of ORSA 8 Process Completed 10 Define Independent Review of ORSA 12 Use Test 11 9 Final Documentation of Operational Risks Completed Final Documentation of Other Risk Categories Completed Definition of Independent Review of ORSA Completed 13 Use Test Complete Page 20
21 The biggest issue/difficulty faced by company in its Solvency II implementation Resource, resource, resource!!! Understand the scale and complexity of the SII project and reflecting it realistically in the time, resource and cost estimate Deciding the appropriate detail action plans for both short term and medium to long term activities, including the key workstream leaders and SII program structure Allowing flexibility to cope with surprises arising from the Level 2 Implementing Measures and Level 3 Guidance Allowing for hand-offs and dependencies between workstreams and different department Other Page 21
22 Experiences & lessons from QIS 5 Solvency II introduction & recap Implementation procedures Experiences & lessons from QIS 5 Looking ahead Page 22
23 Experiences & lessons from QIS 5 QIS 5 Overview Overview The final QIS5 Technical Specification was issued on 6 July 2010 after discussions on the Draft Specification with selected stakeholders (CEA, AMICE, CRO Forum, CFO Forum, ECIROA, FERMA and Groupe Consultatif). The Commission has emphasized the importance of dealing with all areas of the exercise comprehensively, and is expecting high quality submissions from firms on which to base its decisions. A number of key changes from the draft technical spec: Changes in calibrations generally less favourable compared to QIS4, but more favourable compared to CEIOPS Consultation Papers / Final Advice. Changes in methodology additional sub-modules proposed and refinements in methodology for existing (sub)modules compared to QIS4. The technical specifications should not be seen as the final outcome as the intention is to publish the Level 2 implementing measures once the results of QIS5 are known. Results not required to be submitted to OCI. QIS5 objectives To provide detailed information on the quantitative impact of future Level 2 implementing measures. To encourage industry preparation and to: Identify areas where internal processes, procedures and infrastructure may need to be enhanced and encourage improvements to data collection processes To provide a starting point for an ongoing dialogue in preparation for the new supervisory system. QIS5 provides an ideal checkpoint for Solvency II programmes to: Educate stakeholders with quantitative evidence of the potential impacts, informing lobbying activity. Review and realign Solvency II plans based on your experience of performing QIS5. Extending the dialogue between local operating companies and European parent. Page 23
24 Experiences & lessons from QIS 5 Issues & Challenges - Overview Key issues and challenges encountered while carrying out QIS 5 exercise: Application of contract boundary condition. Calculation of expected profits in future premiums ( EPIFP ). Calculation of risk margin. Severity of standard formula currency risk stress. System and resource limitations. Page 24
25 Experiences & lessons from QIS 5 Issues & Challenges Contract Boundary Definition of contract boundary as per QIS 5 Technical Specifications: where an undertaking has the unilateral right to terminate the contract; or where an undertaking has the unilateral right to reject premiums; or where an undertaking has the unilateral right to amend premiums or benefits, at some point in the future, then any cash flows pertaining to time period after that date should not be included in the liability calculations. For insurers in the region, yearly renewable business likely to be affected. Likely to affect the BEL negatively as these business tend to have a negative BEL value. Current debate on application of contract boundary unit-linked contracts. Companies might calculate (submit) two set of results (one follow QIS 5 guidance exactly, and one follow their interpretation) given the definition of contract boundary is unclear Page 25
26 Experiences & lessons from QIS 5 Issues & Challenges EPIFP Calculation QIS 5 introduces the concept of expected profits in future premiums ( EPIFP ). Explicit recognition of expected profits built into future cash flows on best estimate basis. EPIFP value is to be included as Tier 1 capital for Own Funds calculations. Methodology for calculating EPIFP: Calculate technical provisions (ex-risk margin) using best estimate assumptions. [A] Calculate technical provisions (ex-risk margin) assuming no future premiums are received. [B] Technical provision (ex-risk margin) from [B] less that from [A] is the EPIFP value (if negative, EPIFP set to zero). In calculating [B], benefit levels are adjusted to be consistent with assumption of no future premiums. This adjustment not trivial as use of retrospectively or prospectively calculated surrender benefits will include elements of past or future profits. Severity of issue depend on reliance on EPIFP to meet the required capital requirements. Page 26
27 Experiences & lessons from QIS 5 Issues & Challenges Risk Margin Calculation Recall - risk margin calculation is a cost of capital approach, where the capital is the projected SCR. Projected SCR to include: unavoidable market risk; life underwriting risk; counterparty default risk relating to reinsurance and SPV reinsurance arrangements; and operational risk. Projection of the SCR requires nested stochastic calculations stresses to be applied for each future time period. Possible modeling solutions being explored include replicating portfolios and formula fitting techniques. Meanwhile, QIS 5 technical specifications set out a number of simplifications. Hierarchy of simplifications: full calculation of projected required SCR (no simplification used); approximate only certain risks in some of the required SCR; approximate whole SCR for each future year; approximate all future required SCR at once ; approximate risk margin as a percentage of the best estimate liabilities. In deciding simplification to be used, need to consider the information, resources and modeling capability available. May impact the capital position of the firm as risk margin could be a material value. Page 27
28 Experiences & lessons from QIS 5 Issues & Challenges Currency Risk Stress Standard formula stress for currency stress is an increase and decrease of 25% in net foreign currency exposure. This calibration may not be suitable for the Hong Kong dollar /United States dollar relationship given the close relationship of the two currencies in recent history. Some participants are viewing this as being too penal. Likely to have a significant impact on the SCR calculations. Page 28
29 Experiences & lessons from QIS 5 Issues & Challenges System and Resource System limitations: Data systems not able to support the extraction of data at the expected level of granularity required for Solvency II Pillar 1 compliance. Example historical and forecast premium information by line of business. Modeling capabilities not sufficiently refined to model key liability and asset portfolio features. Example dynamic policyholder behavior and equivalent scenario. Resource limitations: Lack of buy-in from management due to submission to OCI not required. Possible solutions: educate stakeholders; build relevant Solvency II features into business as usual activities. Lack of personnel with the relevant knowledge/experience. Possible solutions: tap knowledge of colleagues in European HQ; start recruiting and training now; engage consultants for specific modules. Page 29
30 Looking ahead Solvency II introduction & recap Implementation procedures Experiences & lessons from QIS 5 Looking ahead Page 30
31 Looking ahead Expected Implementation Challenges as SII Progress Use test This will be one of the most challenging areas of the new regime The impact will be far reaching and as a result the implementation challenges will be significant Significant business changes In the end state of Solvency II, there will be significant changes to the models, management information, data, infrastructure and procedures There are commercial and profitability implications arising out of implementation Links to other projects Solvency II can potentially link directly or impact on projects already ongoing. Ensuring that work done in these workstreams is leveraged appropriately to ensure no duplication of effort will be a key role of the Solvency II Steering Group. Implementation challenges Cultural changes Changes in the culture would be required to reflect new metrics and processes There is a necessity to manage the business to different metrics consistently across the group and to reward people on the basis of these new metrics. Page 31
32 Looking ahead Impact from IFRS 4 Phase II Page 32 3 September 2009 Training Materials
33 Thank You Appointed Actuary Symposium 3 November 2010
Solvency II overview
Solvency II overview David Payne, FIA Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar 21 September 2010 INTNL-2: Solvency II - Update and Current Events Antitrust Notice The Casualty Actuarial Society is committed to adhering
More informationAn Introduction to Solvency II
An Introduction to Solvency II Peter Withey KPMG Agenda 1. Background to Solvency II 2. Pillar 1: Quantitative Pillar Basic building blocks Assets Technical Reserves Solvency Capital Requirement Internal
More informationThe Solvency II project and the work of CEIOPS
Thomas Steffen CEIOPS Chairman Budapest, 16 May 07 The Solvency II project and the work of CEIOPS Outline Reasons for a change in the insurance EU regulatory framework The Solvency II project Drivers Process
More informationSolvency II Update. Latest developments and industry challenges (Session 10) Réjean Besner
Solvency II Update Latest developments and industry challenges (Session 10) Canadian Institute of Actuaries - Annual Meeting, 29 June 2011 Réjean Besner Content Solvency II framework Solvency II equivalence
More informationAppointed Actuary Symposium 2007 Solvency II Update
watsonwyatt.com Appointed Actuary Symposium 2007 Solvency II Update Naomi Burger 7 November 2007 Agenda Overview Pillar 1 - Capital requirements Pillar 2 - Supervisory review Pillar 3 - Disclosure Conclusions
More informationKarel VAN HULLE. Head of Unit, Insurance and Pensions, DG Markt, European Commission
Solvency II: State of Play Guernsey, 18th December 2009 Karel VAN HULLE Head of Unit, Insurance and Pensions, DG Markt, European Commission 1 Why do we need Solvency II? Lack of risk sensitivity in existing
More informationLife under Solvency II Be prepared!
Life under Solvency II Be prepared! Moderator: Hugh Rosenbaum, Towers Watson Speakers: Tomas Wittbjer, Global Head of Insurance, IKANO SA Lorraine Stack, Marsh Management Services Dublin Session Overview
More informationCOVER NOTE TO ACCOMPANY THE DRAFT QIS5 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Internal Market and Services DG FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS Insurance and Pensions 1. Introduction COVER NOTE TO ACCOMPANY THE DRAFT QIS5 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS Brussels, 15 April 2010
More informationThe Society of Actuaries in Ireland
The Society of Actuaries in Ireland The Solvency II Actuary Kathryn Morgan Annette Olesen 8 Content Overview of Solvency II and latest developments The Actuarial Function Impact on the role of the actuary
More informationSolvency II Detailed guidance notes for dry run process. March 2010
Solvency II Detailed guidance notes for dry run process March 2010 Introduction The successful implementation of Solvency II at Lloyd s is critical to maintain the competitive position and capital advantages
More informationRISK BASED CAPITAL AND SOLVENCY
RISK BASED CAPITAL AND SOLVENCY 1 1 N O V E M B E R 2 0 1 5 N E I L TAV E R N E R, S E N I O R A C T U A R Y AIMS OF RISK BASED CAPITAL AND SOLVENCY WORKSTREAM Establish a high level of observance of IAIS
More informationHot Topic: Understanding the implications of QIS5
Hot Topic: Understanding the 17 March 2011 Summary On 14 March 2011 the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published the results of the fifth Quantitative Impact Study (QIS5)
More informationSociety of Actuaries in Ireland Solvency II for Beginners. Mike Frazer. 19 May 2011
Society of Actuaries in Ireland Solvency II for Beginners Mike Frazer 19 May 2011 1 Agenda Why has Solvency II been created? Structure of Solvency II The Solvency II Balance Sheet Pillar II & III Aspects
More informationSolvency II Insights for North American Insurers. CAS Centennial Meeting Damon Paisley Bill VonSeggern November 10, 2014
Solvency II Insights for North American Insurers CAS Centennial Meeting Damon Paisley Bill VonSeggern November 10, 2014 Agenda 1 Introduction to Solvency II 2 Pillar I 3 Pillar II and Governance 4 North
More informationINTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INSURANCE SUPERVISORS
Guidance Paper No. 2.2.x INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INSURANCE SUPERVISORS GUIDANCE PAPER ON ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT FOR CAPITAL ADEQUACY AND SOLVENCY PURPOSES DRAFT, MARCH 2008 This document was prepared
More informationCurrent status of Solvency II and challenges down the line. Matthew Edwards 11 October 2011
Current status of Solvency II and challenges down the line Matthew Edwards 11 October 2011 Solvency II Timeline Page 2 15 September 2011 UK Life Solvency II Discussion Forum Regulatory timelines Level
More informationThe Challenges of Solvency II
Solvency II The Challenges of Solvency II Gain-Line & Solvency II Solvency II is the biggest ever exercise in bringing together insurers and re-insurers under one regulatory regime. Solvency II is a set
More informationA (personal) view. Philip Whittingham, European Chief Enterprise Risk Officer. 22 March 2010
The role of the risk profession in a Solvency II world A (personal) view Philip Whittingham, European Chief Enterprise Risk Officer XL Group plc 22 March 2010 Session Aims Successful Solvency II implementation
More informationWe referred to ICP 20 which deals with public disclosures and is therefore directly comparable to the SFCR.
Solvency Assessment and Management: Steering Committee Position Paper 52 1 (v 4) Solvency Financial Condition Report and Report to Supervisor Detailed Requirements - Risk Profile EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. INTRODUCTION
More informationERM/ORSA Training Thai General Insurance Association (TGIA)
ERM/ORSA Training Thai General Insurance Association (TGIA) 10 October 2017 Agenda Time Topics 8.30-9.00 Registration ORSA for Non-life Insurance Top 10 global business risk in 2017 Weakness and past failures
More informationPRA Solvency II update James Orr. 29 April 2015
PRA Solvency II update James Orr 29 April 2015 Agenda 1. 2015 Update 2. What is standard formula? 3. Internal models 4. Matching adjustment 5. ORSA 6. System of governance 7. Regulatory reporting 1. 2015
More informationSolvency and financial condition report 2017
Solvency and financial condition report 2017 The Standard Life Assurance Company 2006 Contents Summary 2 A Business and performance 4 A.1 Business 4 A.2 Underwriting performance 5 A.3 Investment performance
More informationSolvency II. Yannis Pitaras IACPM Brussels, 15 May 2009
Solvency II Yannis Pitaras IACPM Brussels, 15 May 2009 CEA s Member Associations 33 national member associations: 27 EU Member States + 6 Non EU Markets Switzerland, Iceland, Norway, Turkey, Liechtenstein,
More informationRisk Appetite Survey Current state of the Insurance Industry
Risk Appetite Survey Current state of the Insurance Industry Deloitte Belgium and The Netherlands Financial Services Industry The survey was conducted during July 2013 till December 2013 Introduction The
More informationResults of the QIS5 Report
aktuariat-witzel Universität Basel Frühjahrssemester 2011 Dr. Ruprecht Witzel ruprecht.witzel@aktuariat-witzel.ch On 5 July 2010 the European Commission published the QIS5 Technical Specifications The
More information1. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE
Solvency Assessment and Management: Pillar I - Sub Committee Capital Requirements Task Group Discussion Document 61 (v 1) SCR standard formula: Operational Risk EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE
More informationSolvency II. New Rules in Europe for the Insurance Industry. Lecture at UConn Law, January 28, 2013
Solvency II New Rules in Europe for the Insurance Industry Lecture at UConn Law, January 28, 2013 Christian Armbrüster Freie Universität Berlin c.armbruester@fu-berlin.de Main institutions of the European
More informationFIL Life Insurance (Ireland) DAC. Solvency and Financial Condition Report as at 30 June 2016
FIL Life Insurance (Ireland) DAC Solvency and Financial Condition Report as at 30 June 2016 1 Contents INTRODUCTION... 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 6 A.1 Business... 8 A.2 Underwriting Performance... 9 A.3 Investment
More informationSolvency II Detailed guidance notes
Solvency II Detailed guidance notes March 2010 Section 8 - supervisory reporting and disclosure Section 8: reporting and disclosure Overview This section outlines the Solvency II requirements for supervisory
More informationSolvency Assessment and Management (SAM)
Solvency Assessment and Management (SAM) 1. Solvency Assessment and Management (SAM) The FSB is in the process of developing a new risk-based solvency regime for South African shortterm and long-term insurers,
More informationGUIDELINE ON ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT
GUIDELINE ON ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT Insurance Authority Table of Contents Page 1. Introduction 1 2. Application 2 3. Overview of Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework and 4 General Requirements
More informationSOLVENCY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT (SAM) FRAMEWORK
SOLVENCY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT (SAM) FRAMEWORK Hantie van Heerden Head: Actuarial Insurance Department 5 October 2010 High-level summary of Solvency II Background to SAM Agenda Current Structures Progress
More informationINTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INSURANCE SUPERVISORS
Guidance Paper No. 2.2.6 INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INSURANCE SUPERVISORS GUIDANCE PAPER ON ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT FOR CAPITAL ADEQUACY AND SOLVENCY PURPOSES OCTOBER 2007 This document was prepared
More informationAgile Capital Modelling. Contents
Agile Capital Modelling Contents Introduction Capital modelling Capital modelling snakes and ladders Software development Agile software development Agile capital modelling 1 Capital Modelling Objectives
More informationORSA An International Development
ORSA An International Development 25.02.14 Agenda What is an ORSA? Global reach Comparison of requirements Common challenges Potential solutions Origin of ORSA FSA ICAS Solvency II IAIS ICP16 What is an
More informationActuaries and the Regulatory Environment. Role of the Actuary in the Solvency II framework
Actuaries and the Regulatory Environment Role of the Actuary in the Solvency II framework IAA Fund Southeast Europe Actuarial Seminar, Zagreb, 3 October 2011 1 Solvency II primary objectives fundamental
More informationERM Concepts and Framework. Paul Duffy
Society of Actuaries in Ireland ERM Concepts and Framework Paul Duffy 13 th May 2010 *connectedthinking Lecture Plan Introduction to ERM Describe the concept of ERM Discuss the framework for risk management
More informationCritical Reflection of Two State-of-the-Art Risk Management Frameworks (SRM004)
Critical Reflection of Two State-of-the-Art Risk Management Frameworks (SRM004) Speakers: Dr. Kathrin Anne Meier, Chief Risk Officer, Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty John Adams, VP Global ERM, PepsiCo
More informationSOLVENCY AND FINANCIAL CONDITION REPORT EUROLIFE LTD
SOLVENCY AND FINANCIAL CONDITION REPORT EUROLIFE LTD FOR THE YEAR ENDING 31 DECEMBER 2016 1 Table of Contents 1.Executive Summary... 5 1.1 Overview... 5 1.2 Business and performance... 5 1.3 System of
More informationLife 2008 Spring Meeting June 16-18, Session 14, Key Issues Arising from Solvency II. Moderator Marc Slutzky, FSA, MAAA
Life 2008 Spring Meeting June 16-18, 2008 Session 14, Key Issues Arising from Moderator Marc Slutzky, FSA, MAAA Authors Mark Chaplin, FIA Matthew P. Clark, FSA, MAAA Henk van Broekhoven, AAG watsonwyatt.com
More information29th India Fellowship Seminar
29th India Fellowship Seminar Is Risk Based Capital way forward? Adaptability to Indian Context & Comparison of various market consistent measures Guide: Sunil Sharma Presented by: Rakesh Kumar Niraj Kumar
More informationTax in Solvency II. Ayesha Patel. 10 June Tel: June 2014
Tax in Solvency II Ayesha Patel Email: ayesha.patel@uk.pwc.com Tel: 020 7212 1239 June 2014 10 June 2014 Agenda 1 Background 2 The three Pillars 3 Pillar I in detail 4 Survey 5 Summary 6 Questions 2 Background
More informationSolvency II Update. Craig McCulloch
Solvency II Update Craig McCulloch Agenda SII overview Latest Developments Legislative timetable Current regulatory progress Implementation measures QIS4 results & implications Australian Implications
More informationREQUEST TO EIOPA FOR TECHNICAL ADVICE ON THE REVIEW OF THE SOLVENCY II DIRECTIVE (DIRECTIVE 2009/138/EC)
Ref. Ares(2019)782244-11/02/2019 REQUEST TO EIOPA FOR TECHNICAL ADVICE ON THE REVIEW OF THE SOLVENCY II DIRECTIVE (DIRECTIVE 2009/138/EC) With this mandate to EIOPA, the Commission seeks EIOPA's Technical
More informationSolvency Assessment and Management: Pillar 2 - Sub Committee ORSA and Use Test Task Group Discussion Document 35 (v 3) Use Test
Solvency Assessment and Management: Pillar 2 - Sub Committee ORSA and Use Test Task Group Discussion Document 35 (v 3) Use Test EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE The purpose of this document
More informationGregg Clifton. CFO Aurigen Reinsurance
Gregg Clifton CFO Aurigen Reinsurance Regulatory Capital When it comes to regulatory capital, is there a discernable clicking sound of a ratchet? More onerous Canadian capital requirements and the inherent
More informationStatement of Guidance for Licensees seeking approval to use an Internal Capital Model ( ICM ) to calculate the Prescribed Capital Requirement ( PCR )
MAY 2016 Statement of Guidance for Licensees seeking approval to use an Internal Capital Model ( ICM ) to calculate the Prescribed Capital Requirement ( PCR ) 1 Table of Contents 1 STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES...
More informationPwC Assurance Main contacts
PwC Croatia PwC Croatia is a professional services firm providing audit and assurance, valuation, transaction, performance improvement, tax, legal and bookkeeping services. We have more than 160 professionals
More information17/06/2012. Solvency II: Implementation Challenges & Opportunities. What is Solvency II about?
What is Solvency II about? Solvency II: Implementation Challenges & Opportunities The Solvency II Directive is a regulatory framework for the European insurance industry that adopts a more dynamic and
More informationUndertaking-specific parameters (USPs)
General Insurance Convention 2011 - Liverpool Richard Bulmer Undertaking-specific parameters (USPs) Workshop B9 Wednesday 12 October 2011 Undertaking-specific parameters Background to USPs Discussion of
More informationSolvency Assessment and Management: Steering Committee Position Paper (v 4) Life SCR - Retrenchment Risk
Solvency Assessment and Management: Steering Committee Position Paper 108 1 (v 4) Life SCR - Retrenchment Risk EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This document discusses the structure and calibration of the proposed Retrenchment
More informationSolvency II. Insurance and Pensions Unit, European Commission
Solvency II Insurance and Pensions Unit, European Commission Introduction Solvency II Deepened integration of the EU insurance market 14 existing Directives on insurance and reinsurance supervision, insurance
More informationSOLVENCY AND FINANCIAL CONDITION REPORT EUROLIFE LTD
SOLVENCY AND FINANCIAL CONDITION REPORT EUROLIFE LTD FOR THE YEAR ENDING 31 DECEMBER 2017 1 Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary... 5 1.1 Overview... 5 1.2 Business and performance... 5 1.3 System of
More informationORSA is a central part of Solvency II and
13th Global Conference of Actuaries 2011 Emerging Risks Daring Solutions From quantification to management: Solvencyy II Own Risk and Solvencyy Assessment James Creedon Director, Towers Watson Hong Kong
More informationSolvency Assessment and Management (SAM) Roadmap
Solvency Assessment and Management (SAM) Roadmap November 2010 Version 1 C O N T A C T D E T A I L S Physical Address: Riverwalk Office Park, Block B 41 Matroosberg Road (Corner Garsfontein and Matroosberg
More informationIAA Fund Seminar in Chinese Taipei
IAA Fund Seminar in Chinese Taipei Solvency II 12 October 2014 Contents 1. What is Solvency II 2. What are the Loose Ends 3. On the Way to IMAP 4. Solvency Regime in Asia Pacific What is Solvency II -Solvency
More informationInsurance Summit Mr Raymond Tam Executive Director (Policy and Development) Insurance Authority 21 September 2017
Insurance Summit 2017 Mr Raymond Tam Executive Director (Policy and Development) Insurance Authority 21 September 2017 Priority of Policy Initiatives Development of risk-based capital regime Facilitation
More informationEIOPA Proposal for Guidelines on the preparation for Solvency II. October Milliman Solvency II Update
EIOPA Proposal for Guidelines on the preparation for Solvency II October 2013 EIOPA s final guidelines for the preparation of Solvency II look set to require firms and supervisors to put in place elements
More informationSolvency II, messages and findings from QIS 5. Carlos Montalvo Rebuelta Executive Director Brussels, 7 March 2011
Solvency II, messages and findings from QIS 5 Carlos Montalvo Rebuelta Executive Director Brussels, 7 March 2011 Index Preparedness of Insureres and Supervisors Impact of the proposed regime Feasibility
More informationAnalyst Conference on Solvency II
Triglav Group Analyst Conference on Solvency II June 2018 Triglav Group in 2018 Solvency II Disclosure 2017 Outlook 2 Triglav Group in 2018 Highlights in 2018 Q1 2018 Performance: Good results in the insurance
More informationENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT, INTERNAL MODELS AND OPERATIONAL RISK FOR LIFE INSURERS DISCUSSION PAPER DP14-09
ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT, INTERNAL MODELS AND FOR LIFE INSURERS DISCUSSION PAPER DP14-09 This paper is issued by the Insurance and Pensions Authority ( the IPA ), the regulatory authority responsible
More informationThe Review of Solvency II. 01/02/2018 Hans De Cuyper, President of Assuralia
The Review of Solvency II 01/02/2018 Hans De Cuyper, President of Assuralia 1 Implementation of Solvency II Belgian insurance companies early adopters with first dry runs in 2014 2 From Solvency I to Solvency
More informationSolvency II Implementation
Solvency II Implementation Allianz Life Korea October 21, 2015 Solvency II in history 2001-02 Financial Crisis Solvency I not risk based, especially on asset side Basel II seen as a success in banking
More informationConsultation Paper on the draft proposal for Guidelines on reporting and public disclosure
EIOPA-CP-14/047 27 November 2014 Consultation Paper on the draft proposal for Guidelines on reporting and public disclosure EIOPA Westhafen Tower, Westhafenplatz 1-60327 Frankfurt Germany - Tel. + 49 69-951119-20;
More informationFramework for a New Standard Approach to Setting Capital Requirements. Joint Committee of OSFI, AMF, and Assuris
Framework for a New Standard Approach to Setting Capital Requirements Joint Committee of OSFI, AMF, and Assuris Table of Contents Background... 3 Minimum Continuing Capital and Surplus Requirements (MCCSR)...
More informationSolvency and Financial Condition Report 20I6
Solvency and Financial Condition Report 20I6 Contents Contents... 2 Director s Statement... 4 Report of the External Independent Auditor... 5 Summary... 9 Company Information... 9 Purpose of the Solvency
More informationCATTOLICA LIFE DAC SOLVENCY AND FINANCIAL CONDITION REPORT 31 ST DECEMBER 2017
CATTOLICA LIFE DAC SOLVENCY AND FINANCIAL CONDITION REPORT 31 ST DECEMBER 2017 May 3, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 A. BUSINESS AND PEFORMANCE 5 A.1 Business A.2 Underwriting Performance 5
More informationResults of the QIS5 Report Short Version
aktuariat-witzel Results of the QIS5 Report Short Version Universität Basel Frühjahrssemester 2013 Dr. Ruprecht Witzel ruprecht.witzel@aktuariat-witzel.ch On 5 July 2010 the European Commission published
More informationWebinar. The Gibraltar Financial Services Commission. Solvency II Implications for Non-Executive Directors (NEDs) 28 th May 2015
Webinar Solvency II Implications for Non-Executive Directors (NEDs) 28 th May 2015 Kathryn Morgan, Director or Regulatory Operations Ken Hogg, Solvency II Project Manager Webinar 28 th May 2015 Agenda
More informationGuidance on the Actuarial Function MARCH 2018
Guidance on the Actuarial Function MARCH 2018 Disclaimer No responsibility or liability is accepted by the Society of Lloyd s, the Council, or any Committee of Board constituted by the Society of Lloyd
More informationSOLVENCY AND FINANCIAL CONDITION REPORT AS AT 31ST DECEMBER 2017
SOLVENCY AND FINANCIAL CONDITION REPORT AS AT 31ST DECEMBER 2017 May 2018 Executive Summary Business performance The principal activities of Hellenic Alico Life Insurance Company Limited are the underwriting
More informationNAIC OWN RISK AND SOLVENCY ASSESSMENT (ORSA) GUIDANCE MANUAL
NAIC OWN RISK AND SOLVENCY ASSESSMENT (ORSA) GUIDANCE MANUAL Created by the NAIC Group Solvency Issues Working Group Of the Solvency Modernization Initiatives (EX) Task Force 2011 National Association
More informationLONGEVITY SWAPS. Impact of Solvency II AN EFFECTIVE, INNOVATIVE WAY TO MANAGE THE LONGEVITY RISK. Presenter: Tom O Sullivan, F.S.A, F.C.I.A, M.A.A.A.
LONGEVITY SWAPS AN EFFECTIVE, INNOVATIVE WAY TO MANAGE THE LONGEVITY RISK Impact of Solvency II Presenter: Tom O Sullivan, F.S.A, F.C.I.A, M.A.A.A. Date: December 3, 2010 AGENDA 1. Solvency II - Background
More informationORSA: A relevant part of the governance system within Solvency II
ORSA: A relevant part of the governance system within Solvency II Prof. Dr. Martin Balleer, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen Germany Faculty of Economics Belgrade University 18th May 2016, Belgrade Solvency
More informationHOLLANDS WELVAREN LEVEN N.V.
HOLLANDS WELVAREN LEVEN N.V. Solvency and Financial Condition Report For the year ending 31 December 2016 Solvency and Financial Condition Report HOLLANDS WELVAREN LEVEN NV Table of Contents Summary 1
More informationCEIOPS-DOC-61/10 January Former Consultation Paper 65
CEIOPS-DOC-61/10 January 2010 CEIOPS Advice for Level 2 Implementing Measures on Solvency II: Partial internal models Former Consultation Paper 65 CEIOPS e.v. Westhafenplatz 1-60327 Frankfurt Germany Tel.
More informationSolvency and Financial Condition Report Aegon Ireland
Solvency and Financial Condition Report Aegon Ireland 2017 Page 1 of 58 Contents Scope of the report... 4 Summary... 5 Business and Performance... 5 System of Governance... 5 Risk Profile... 6 Valuation
More informationSAIA SAM PSO. Issue 3 / ORSA: meeting the challenge and seeking the value
SAIA SAM PSO Issue 3 / 2011 ORSA: meeting the challenge and seeking the value Insurers preparing for Solvency II are finding that meeting the requirements for the Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA)
More informationOwn Risk Solvency Assessment (ORSA) Linking Risk Management, Capital Management and Strategic Planning
Own Risk Solvency Assessment (ORSA) Linking Risk Management, Capital Management and Strategic Planning Moderator: David Holland, Risk Director, Ally Insurance SPEAKERS Mary-ellen Coggins, Managing Director,
More informationManaged Pension Funds Limited
. Managed Pension Funds Limited Solvency and Financial Condition Report as at 31 December 2016 Managed Pension Funds Limited General Contents Page Summary... 1 Section A: Business and Performance... 2
More informationREINSURANCE CONTRIBUTION UNDER SOLVENCY II STANDARD APPROACH (RISA)
REINSURANCE CONTRIBUTION UNDER SOLVENCY II STANDARD APPROACH (RISA) Athens, 19 May 211 & Nicosia, 2 May 211 Dr. Norbert Kuschel Solvency Consulting, Integrated Risk Management Agenda 1. Quantitative case
More informationEuropean Solvency II Survey 2014
European Solvency II Survey 2014 Agenda I. Regulatory update II. III. IV. Introduction to survey and findings Pillar 1 findings Eric Brown Pillar 2 findings Frank O Callaghan V. Pillar 3 findings VI. VII.
More informationPrudential Standard GOI 3 Risk Management and Internal Controls for Insurers
Prudential Standard GOI 3 Risk Management and Internal Controls for Insurers Objectives and Key Requirements of this Prudential Standard Effective risk management is fundamental to the prudent management
More informationSolvency & Financial Condition Report. Surestone Insurance dac March
Solvency & Financial Condition Report Surestone Insurance dac March 31 2018 Contents SUMMARY... 1 A BUSINESS AND PERFORMANCE... 3 B SYSTEM OF GOVERNANCE... 7 C. RISK PROFILE... 23 D. VALUATION FOR SOLVENCY
More informationSolvency II and Pension Funds. Instituto de seguros de Portugal 25 Oct Lisbon
Solvency II and Pension Funds Instituto de seguros de Portugal 25 Oct. 2007 Lisbon Outline: CEA and the European industry s input to Solvency II Essential Building Blocks of Solvency II Key Aspects of
More informationDevelopment of Risk Based Capital Framework in Singapore. Questor Ng, Raymond Cheung Singapore Actuarial Society
Development of Risk Based Capital Framework in Singapore Questor Ng, Raymond Cheung Singapore Actuarial Society History of RBC in Asia Indonesia Taiwan Malaysia Thailand 2000 2003 2004 2009 2011 Singapore
More informationIAIS: Enterprise Risk Management for Capital Adequacy & Solvency Purposes. George Brady. IAIS Deputy Secretary General
IAIS: Enterprise Risk Management for Capital Adequacy & Solvency Purposes George Brady IAIS Deputy Secretary General Table of Contents 1. Introduction 2. Governance and an Enterprise Risk Management (ERM)
More informationAdvent Insurance dac. Solvency and Financial Condition Report ( SFCR ) for the financial year ended 31 December P a g e 1
Advent Insurance dac Solvency and Financial Condition Report ( SFCR ) for the financial year ended 31 December 2016 P a g e 1 Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 4 A BUSINESS AND PERFORMANCE... 6 A.1 BUSINESS...
More informationRegulation and risk The strategic response to insurance regulatory developments Alex Thomson, May 2013
Regulation and risk The strategic response to insurance regulatory developments Alex Thomson, May 2013!@# Agenda 1. Strategic priorities and regulation 2. Global insurance regulatory developments 3. East
More informationThe internal and external reporting
The internal and external reporting Alberto Floreani School of Banking, Finance and Insurance Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan alberto.floreani@unicatt.it 1 (C) Alberto Floreani - 26/11/2015
More informationSolvency Assessment and Management: Steering Committee Position Paper (v 3) Loss-absorbing capacity of deferred taxes
Solvency Assessment and Management: Steering Committee Position Paper 112 1 (v 3) Loss-absorbing capacity of deferred taxes EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SAM introduces a valuation basis of technical provisions that
More informationIncreased Corporate Governance Requirements for Insurers
Increased Corporate Governance Requirements for Insurers 0 INCREASED CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR INSURERS Introduction On 17 December 2009, the definitive text of the Solvency II Directive (2009/138/EC)
More informationOwn Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA)
Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) Presentations to OCCA (Nov. 19, 2014) and AAIARD (Nov. 21, 2014) Jacqueline Friedland, FCIA, FCAS, FSA, MAAA Chief Actuary, RSA Canada Presentation Outline What
More informationSolvency Assessment and Management: Steering Committee Position Paper 73 1 (v 3) Treatment of new business in SCR
Solvency Assessment and Management: Steering Committee Position Paper 73 1 (v 3) Treatment of new business in SCR EXECUTIVE SUMMARY As for the Solvency II Framework Directive and IAIS guidance, the risk
More informationA.M. Best s New Risk Management Standards
A.M. Best s New Risk Management Standards Stephanie Guethlein McElroy, A.M. Best Manager, Rating Criteria and Rating Relations Hubert Mueller, Towers Perrin, Principal March 24, 2008 Introduction A.M.
More informationEIOPA s first set of advice to the European Commission on specific items in the Solvency II Delegated Regulation
EIOPA-BoS-17/280 30 October 2017 EIOPA s first set of advice to the European Commission on specific items in the Solvency II Delegated Regulation EIOPA Westhafen Tower, Westhafenplatz 1-60327 Frankfurt
More informationRisk Appetite for Life Offices IFoA working party
Risk Appetite for Life Offices IFoA working party Gautam Kakar, Chairman 30 October 2015 Members of Working Party: Gautam Kakar Lana Nguyen Shayanthan Pathmanathan Rod Bryn-Hussey Fabio Schiaffini Crystal
More informationCEA response to CEIOPS request on the calculation of the group SCR
Position CEA response to CEIOPS request on the calculation of the group SCR CEA reference: ECO-SLV-09-060 Date: 27 February 2009 Referring to: Related CEA documents: CEIOPS request on the calculation of
More informationLegal and General Assurance (Pensions Management) Limited. Solvency and Financial Condition Report 31 DECEMBER 2017
Legal and General Assurance (Pensions Management) Limited Solvency and Financial Condition Report 31 DECEMBER 2017 1 Contents Summary... 4 Directors certificate... 8 Auditors report and opinion... 9 A.
More informationBecare DAC. Solvency and Financial Condition Report ( SFCR ) for the financial year ended 31 December Page 1
Becare DAC Solvency and Financial Condition Report ( SFCR ) for the financial year ended 31 December 2016 Page 1 Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 4 A BUSINESS AND PERFORMANCE... 7 A.1 BUSINESS... 7 A.2 UNDERWRITING
More information