Results of the QIS5 Report Short Version
|
|
|
- Jonathan Randall
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 aktuariat-witzel Results of the QIS5 Report Short Version Universität Basel Frühjahrssemester 2013 Dr. Ruprecht Witzel
2 On 5 July 2010 the European Commission published the QIS5 Technical Specifications The calculations were done in the second half of the year 2010 The reporting date to be used by all participants should be end December 2009 On 14 March 2011 the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published the Report on the fifth Quantitative Impact Study (QIS5) for Solvency II This presentation summarizes the main results of this report in a short version Results QIS5 Short Version Dr. Ruprecht Witzel; FS 13 2
3 Content 1. Introduction 2. Overall Financial Impact 3. Valuation of Assets and other Liabilities 4. Technical Provisions 5. SCR Standard Formula Results QIS5 Short Version Dr. Ruprecht Witzel; FS 13 3
4 1. Introduction 1.3. Objectives The results of QIS5 are intended to be of use in the European Commission s development of level 2 implementing measures. To try to ensure that the results provided a representative view, the target participation rates were significantly increased from previous QIS exercises. There was a particular emphasis on increasing participation among small and medium-sized (re)insurance undertakings. QIS5 aimed to obtain detailed information on the quantitative impact of the proposals on insurers and reinsurers solvency balance sheets and also to check that the proposals were aligned with the principles and calibration targets set out in the Solvency II Framework Directive. Results QIS5 Short Version Dr. Ruprecht Witzel; FS 13 4
5 1. Introduction 1.3. Objectives It was also the intention to encourage undertakings and supervisors to prepare for the introduction of Solvency II and identify areas where further preparatory work may be required, and to provide a starting point for ongoing dialogue between supervisors and the industry as we move towards Solvency II implementation. Finally, it would also allow EIOPA to assess the feasibility and complexity of the proposals. Results QIS5 Short Version Dr. Ruprecht Witzel; FS 13 5
6 1. Introduction 1.4. Participation Results QIS5 Short Version Dr. Ruprecht Witzel; FS 13 6
7 Content 1. Introduction 2. Overall Financial Impact 3. Valuation of Assets and other Liabilities 4. Technical Provisions 5. SCR Standard Formula Results QIS5 Short Version Dr. Ruprecht Witzel; FS 13 7
8 2. Overall Financial Impact 2.1. Overall Surplus The financial position of the European insurance sector remains comfortable assessed against the standard formula SCR calculated according to the QIS5 specifications, with the eligible amount of own funds to cover the SCR/MCR exceeding the regulatory requirements by around 360bn. This surplus has decreased by c. 120bn compared to the current regime. At the same time, the margin before the MCR, the point of mandatory supervisory intervention, has increased by 200bn. Results QIS5 Short Version Dr. Ruprecht Witzel; FS 13 8
9 2. Overall Financial Impact 2.1. Overall Surplus Results QIS5 Short Version Dr. Ruprecht Witzel; FS 13 9
10 2. Overall Financial Impact 2.1. Overall Surplus Results QIS5 Short Version Dr. Ruprecht Witzel; FS 13 10
11 2. Overall Financial Impact 2.1. Overall Surplus Results QIS5 Short Version Dr. Ruprecht Witzel; FS 13 11
12 2. Overall Financial Impact 2.3. The main drivers of the surplus changes Three main drivers explain the changes in the surplus from the current regime to the Solvency II framework: the shift from the current balance sheet to the harmonized Solvency II balance sheet; the shift from the current requirements to the harmonized Solvency II capital requirements; and the differences in the own funds elements allowed to cover the requirements. The following graph shows the respective influence of these items, splitting the valuation impacts into positive and negative effects. As this revaluation changes the amount of own funds compared to the current situation, it also creates deferred tax assets or liabilities. Results QIS5 Short Version Dr. Ruprecht Witzel; FS 13 12
13 2. Overall Financial Impact 2.3. The main drivers of the surplus changes Results QIS5 Short Version Dr. Ruprecht Witzel; FS 13 13
14 2. Overall Financial Impact 2.4. Impact of diversification To calculate the Solvency II capital requirement, which is defined at the overall SCR level, the standard formula applies a modular bottom-up approach in which each of the underlying risk drivers is modeled using the same calibration as that set by the directive for the overall result. For QIS5, the sum of the individual risks modeled totaled more than 1300bn. To acknowledge the fact that the individual risks are not all expected to materialize at the same time (e.g. a shock on financial markets and a loss on underwriting risks would not necessarily crystallize at the same time), the standard formula recognizes the benefits of risk diversification through the use of linear correlation techniques. Results QIS5 Short Version Dr. Ruprecht Witzel; FS 13 14
15 2. Overall Financial Impact 2.4. Impact of diversification For QIS5, these diversification benefits amounted to a 466bn reduction in the total risk charge at solo level. The last stage in the derivation of the SCR recognizes that if risks were to materialize, part of their cost might be transferred onto policyholders (e.g. through a reduction in the bonuses attributed to policies with profit participation), and part of the remaining cost might result in a reduction in the future taxes expected to be paid to tax authorities. For QIS5, the expected sharing of the cost of risk crystallization with policyholders and tax authorities resulted in a 314bn reduction in the own funds needed. Results QIS5 Short Version Dr. Ruprecht Witzel; FS 13 15
16 2. Overall Financial Impact 2.4. Impact of diversification Results QIS5 Short Version Dr. Ruprecht Witzel; FS 13 16
17 2. Overall Financial Impact 2.4. Impact of diversification Overall, the final SCR of 547bn is a little above 41% of the sum of individual risks modeled. Using this overall risk reduction as a basis for calculating the reduction in individual risks gives a rough idea of the average real risk charges. Using this simple approach would for example show that while the initial risk loading for listed equity in QIS5 was 30% of the equity exposure, the final risk capital required was on average equivalent to a 12.4% capital charge. Results QIS5 Short Version Dr. Ruprecht Witzel; FS 13 17
18 Content 1. Introduction 2. Overall Financial Impact 3. Valuation of Assets and other Liabilities 4. Technical Provisions 5. SCR Standard Formula Results QIS5 Short Version Dr. Ruprecht Witzel; FS 13 18
19 3. Valuation of Assets and other Liabilities 3. Valuation of Assets and other Liabilities Outlined below is the composition of the balance sheet, for solo undertakings under the current accounting regime and the valuation principles of QIS5. Results QIS5 Short Version Dr. Ruprecht Witzel; FS 13 19
20 3. Valuation of Assets and other Liabilities The current balance sheet (solo) Results QIS5 Short Version Dr. Ruprecht Witzel; FS 13 20
21 3. Valuation of Assets and other Liabilities The current balance sheet (solo) Results QIS5 Short Version Dr. Ruprecht Witzel; FS 13 21
22 3. Valuation of Assets and other Liabilities The QIS5 balance sheet (solo) Results QIS5 Short Version Dr. Ruprecht Witzel; FS 13 22
23 3. Valuation of Assets and other Liabilities The QIS5 balance sheet (solo) Results QIS5 Short Version Dr. Ruprecht Witzel; FS 13 23
24 Content 1. Introduction 2. Overall Financial Impact 3. Valuation of Assets and other Liabilities 4. Technical Provisions 5. SCR Standard Formula Results QIS5 Short Version Dr. Ruprecht Witzel; FS 13 24
25 4. Technical Provisions 4.1. Comparison with current regime Overall gross technical provisions for all lines of business decreased by 1.4% from Solvency I to QIS5. The main differences between technical provisions under the QIS5 and Solvency I methodologies can be explained by the following: the use of a new discounting model including the use of an illiquidity premium; the absence of any surrender floor; the recognition of future premiums and charges; and the use of realistic assumptions in the best estimate calculation (i.e. no implicit prudence margin, although this is partly offset by the inclusion of an explicit risk margin in addition to the best estimate). Results QIS5 Short Version Dr. Ruprecht Witzel; FS 13 25
26 4. Technical Provisions 4.1. Comparison with current regime In the valuation of QIS5 liabilities, management actions and policyholders behavior, such as lapses, renewals and surrenders, were taken into account. Results QIS5 Short Version Dr. Ruprecht Witzel; FS 13 26
27 4. Technical Provisions 4.1. Comparison with current regime For life insurance business net technical provisions in QIS5 increased in comparison with Solvency I. This was mainly caused by the decrease in reinsurance recoverables, as gross technical provisions in fact showed a slight decrease of 1.0%. The graph below shows a comparison of life net provisions for all QIS5 participants under QIS5 and Solvency I. We note that total net provisions are greater under QIS5 than under Solvency I and that this is an increase of around 3% (for solo undertakings). Net provisions for with profit business increased by 8% under the new regime. Results QIS5 Short Version Dr. Ruprecht Witzel; FS 13 27
28 4. Technical Provisions 4.1. Comparison with current regime Results QIS5 Short Version Dr. Ruprecht Witzel; FS 13 28
29 4. Technical Provisions 4.1. Comparison with current regime For most non-life lines of business net provisions have decreased from Solvency I to QIS5; gross provisions for non-life decreased by 24.9%. Please note that equalization reserves can no longer be included in the technical provisions. The decrease between Solvency I and QIS5 for non-life business is mainly due to the discounting of future cash flows, and the exclusion of the implicit safety margin included in technical provisions through prudent and cautious assumptions, partially offset by the inclusion of an explicit risk margin. The observed changes could also be partially due to different segmentations between the two regimes. Results QIS5 Short Version Dr. Ruprecht Witzel; FS 13 29
30 4. Technical Provisions 4.1. Comparison with current regime Results QIS5 Short Version Dr. Ruprecht Witzel; FS 13 30
31 4. Technical Provisions 4.2. Discount rate and illiquidity premium General comment The effect of the introduction of the illiquidity premium in the valuation of technical provisions in QIS5 can be estimated as being almost 1% of the value of technical provisions (which represents around 15% of SCR). Results QIS5 Short Version Dr. Ruprecht Witzel; FS 13 31
32 4. Technical Provisions 4.2. Discount rate and illiquidity premium The 50% Bucket The most common products where 50% of the illiquidity premium was used were nonlife in general, unit- and index-linked business, life without profit participation, SLT (Similar to Life Techniques) health, non-slt health and reinsurance (both life and non-life). The 50% bucket has a share of round about 35%. Results QIS5 Short Version Dr. Ruprecht Witzel; FS 13 32
33 4. Technical Provisions 4.2. Discount rate and illiquidity premium The 75% Bucket The most common products where 75% of the illiquidity premium was used were life insurance with profit participation in general, pure savings products, unitand index-linked insurance with guarantees, and various types of annuities. The 75% bucket has a share of round about 55% The 100% Bucket The most common products where 100% of the illiquidity premium was used were different types of annuities (including annuities from non-life). The 100% bucket has a share of only round about 8%. Results QIS5 Short Version Dr. Ruprecht Witzel; FS 13 33
34 4. Technical Provisions 4.3. Risk margin The two following graphs show for EEA solo undertakings the ratio of the risk margin to net technical provisions for life and non-life obligations Results QIS5 Short Version Dr. Ruprecht Witzel; FS 13 34
35 4. Technical Provisions 4.3. Risk margin Results QIS5 Short Version Dr. Ruprecht Witzel; FS 13 35
36 4. Technical Provisions 4.3. Risk margin Results QIS5 Short Version Dr. Ruprecht Witzel; FS 13 36
37 Content 1. Introduction 2. Overall Financial Impact 3. Valuation of Assets and other Liabilities 4. Technical Provisions 5. SCR Standard Formula Results QIS5 Short Version Dr. Ruprecht Witzel; FS 13 37
38 5. SCR Standard Formula 5.1. The overall SCR The Solvency Capital Requirement (SCR) is the riskbased capital requirement for undertakings under Solvency II. It is calibrated to a 99.5% Value at Risk confidence level over one year. In structure the SCR is composed of a number of modules which in turn are composed of sub-modules. The capital requirements arising from these submodules and modules are aggregated using a correlation matrix. Results QIS5 Short Version Dr. Ruprecht Witzel; FS 13 38
39 5. SCR Standard Formula 5.1. The overall SCR (all; SCR = 100%) Results QIS5 Short Version Dr. Ruprecht Witzel; FS 13 39
40 5. SCR Standard Formula 5.1. The overall SCR (all; BSCR = 100%) Results QIS5 Short Version Dr. Ruprecht Witzel; FS 13 40
41 5. SCR Standard Formula 5.1. The overall SCR (all; SCR in % of BSCR) Results QIS5 Short Version Dr. Ruprecht Witzel; FS 13 41
42 5. SCR Standard Formula 5.1. The overall SCR (Life; BSCR = 100%) Results QIS5 Short Version Dr. Ruprecht Witzel; FS 13 42
43 5. SCR Standard Formula 5.1. The overall SCR (Non-Life; BSCR = 100%) Results QIS5 Short Version Dr. Ruprecht Witzel; FS 13 43
44 5. SCR Standard Formula 5.5. Market risk (all; Market Risk = 100%) Results QIS5 Short Version Dr. Ruprecht Witzel; FS 13 44
45 5. SCR Standard Formula 5.7. Life Underwriting risk (all; Life Risk = 100%) Results QIS5 Short Version Dr. Ruprecht Witzel; FS 13 45
46 5. SCR Standard Formula 5.7. Life Underwriting risk (Life; Life Risk = 100%) Results QIS5 Short Version Dr. Ruprecht Witzel; FS 13 46
47 5. SCR Standard Formula 5.9. Non-life Underwriting risk (Non-L; Non-Life Risk = 100%) Results QIS5 Short Version Dr. Ruprecht Witzel; FS 13 47
Results of the QIS5 Report
aktuariat-witzel Universität Basel Frühjahrssemester 2011 Dr. Ruprecht Witzel ruprecht.witzel@aktuariat-witzel.ch On 5 July 2010 the European Commission published the QIS5 Technical Specifications The
The Solvency II project and the work of CEIOPS
Thomas Steffen CEIOPS Chairman Budapest, 16 May 07 The Solvency II project and the work of CEIOPS Outline Reasons for a change in the insurance EU regulatory framework The Solvency II project Drivers Process
Solvency II, messages and findings from QIS 5. Carlos Montalvo Rebuelta Executive Director Brussels, 7 March 2011
Solvency II, messages and findings from QIS 5 Carlos Montalvo Rebuelta Executive Director Brussels, 7 March 2011 Index Preparedness of Insureres and Supervisors Impact of the proposed regime Feasibility
An Introduction to Solvency II
An Introduction to Solvency II Peter Withey KPMG Agenda 1. Background to Solvency II 2. Pillar 1: Quantitative Pillar Basic building blocks Assets Technical Reserves Solvency Capital Requirement Internal
LONGEVITY SWAPS. Impact of Solvency II AN EFFECTIVE, INNOVATIVE WAY TO MANAGE THE LONGEVITY RISK. Presenter: Tom O Sullivan, F.S.A, F.C.I.A, M.A.A.A.
LONGEVITY SWAPS AN EFFECTIVE, INNOVATIVE WAY TO MANAGE THE LONGEVITY RISK Impact of Solvency II Presenter: Tom O Sullivan, F.S.A, F.C.I.A, M.A.A.A. Date: December 3, 2010 AGENDA 1. Solvency II - Background
Solvency II Interpreting the key principles
Solvency II Interpreting the key principles Contents Introduction 2 Pillar I: solvency capital requirements 5 Pillar II: general regulatory principles 7 Pillar III: financial disclosure and solvency 9
Solvency II Update. Latest developments and industry challenges (Session 10) Réjean Besner
Solvency II Update Latest developments and industry challenges (Session 10) Canadian Institute of Actuaries - Annual Meeting, 29 June 2011 Réjean Besner Content Solvency II framework Solvency II equivalence
COVER NOTE TO ACCOMPANY THE DRAFT QIS5 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Internal Market and Services DG FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS Insurance and Pensions 1. Introduction COVER NOTE TO ACCOMPANY THE DRAFT QIS5 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS Brussels, 15 April 2010
Hot Topic: Understanding the implications of QIS5
Hot Topic: Understanding the 17 March 2011 Summary On 14 March 2011 the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published the results of the fifth Quantitative Impact Study (QIS5)
REQUEST TO EIOPA FOR TECHNICAL ADVICE ON THE REVIEW OF THE SOLVENCY II DIRECTIVE (DIRECTIVE 2009/138/EC)
Ref. Ares(2019)782244-11/02/2019 REQUEST TO EIOPA FOR TECHNICAL ADVICE ON THE REVIEW OF THE SOLVENCY II DIRECTIVE (DIRECTIVE 2009/138/EC) With this mandate to EIOPA, the Commission seeks EIOPA's Technical
1. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE
Solvency Assessment and Management: Pillar I - Sub Committee Capital Requirements Task Group Discussion Document 61 (v 1) SCR standard formula: Operational Risk EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE
European insurers in the starting blocks
Solvency Consulting Knowledge Series European insurers in the starting blocks Contacts: Martin Brosemer Tel.: +49 89 38 91-43 81 mbrosemer@munichre.com Dr. Kathleen Ehrlich Tel.: +49 89 38 91-27 77 kehrlich@munichre.com
Solvency II Update. Craig McCulloch
Solvency II Update Craig McCulloch Agenda SII overview Latest Developments Legislative timetable Current regulatory progress Implementation measures QIS4 results & implications Australian Implications
Solvency II. New Rules in Europe for the Insurance Industry. Lecture at UConn Law, January 28, 2013
Solvency II New Rules in Europe for the Insurance Industry Lecture at UConn Law, January 28, 2013 Christian Armbrüster Freie Universität Berlin c.armbruester@fu-berlin.de Main institutions of the European
REPORT ON THE USE OF CAPITAL ADD-ONS DURING 2017
https://eiopa.europa.eu/ REPORT ON THE USE OF CAPITAL ADD-ONS DURING 2017 PDF ISBN 978-92-9473-118-0 ISSN 2599-8781 doi:10.2854/795644 EI-06-18-354-EN-N Print ISBN 978-92-9473-117-3 doi:10.2854/521028
Solvency II: Implementation Challenges & Experiences Learned
Solvency II: Implementation Challenges & Experiences Learned Appointed Actuary Symposium Actuarial Society of Hong Kong (ASHK) Jonathan Zhao - Actuarial Services Practice Leader, Asia Pacific 3 November
2.1 Pursuant to article 18D of the Act, an authorised undertaking shall, except where otherwise provided for, value:
Valuation of assets and liabilities, technical provisions, own funds, Solvency Capital Requirement, Minimum Capital Requirement and investment rules (Solvency II Pillar 1 Requirements) 1. Introduction
Essential adjustments for the success of Solvency II for groups
Position Paper Essential adjustments for the success of Solvency II for groups (based on the findings from QIS5 for groups and the current discussion on implementing measures) CEA reference: ECO-SLV-11-729
Solvency Assessment and Management (SAM)
Solvency Assessment and Management (SAM) 1. Solvency Assessment and Management (SAM) The FSB is in the process of developing a new risk-based solvency regime for South African shortterm and long-term insurers,
Life under Solvency II Be prepared!
Life under Solvency II Be prepared! Moderator: Hugh Rosenbaum, Towers Watson Speakers: Tomas Wittbjer, Global Head of Insurance, IKANO SA Lorraine Stack, Marsh Management Services Dublin Session Overview
Challenger Life Company Limited Comparability of capital requirements across different regulatory regimes
Challenger Life Company Limited Comparability of capital requirements across different regulatory regimes 26 August 2014 Challenger Life Company Limited Level 15 255 Pitt Street Sydney NSW 2000 26 August
Link between Pillar 1 and Pillar 2
Link between Pillar 1 and Pillar 2 XXIV International Seminar on Insurance and Surety, November 2014, Mexico City Olaf Ermert, BaFin Link between Pillar 1 and Pillar 2 Content Introduction Own Risk and
Solvency Assessment and Management: Steering Committee Position Paper (v 4) Life SCR - Retrenchment Risk
Solvency Assessment and Management: Steering Committee Position Paper 108 1 (v 4) Life SCR - Retrenchment Risk EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This document discusses the structure and calibration of the proposed Retrenchment
17/06/2012. Solvency II: Implementation Challenges & Opportunities. What is Solvency II about?
What is Solvency II about? Solvency II: Implementation Challenges & Opportunities The Solvency II Directive is a regulatory framework for the European insurance industry that adopts a more dynamic and
Society of Actuaries in Ireland Solvency II for Beginners. Mike Frazer. 19 May 2011
Society of Actuaries in Ireland Solvency II for Beginners Mike Frazer 19 May 2011 1 Agenda Why has Solvency II been created? Structure of Solvency II The Solvency II Balance Sheet Pillar II & III Aspects
2. The European insurance sector
2. The European insurance sector 2.1. Market share and growth The relative size of the insurance sector differs substantially among European countries (Figure 2.1). 18 19 As a share of the economy, Luxembourg
Re: Consultation Paper on Bermuda Solvency Capital Requirement Update Proposal, November 2016
15 th March 2017 Dear Stakeholders: Re: Consultation Paper on Bermuda Solvency Capital Requirement Update Proposal, November 2016 The Bermuda Monetary Authority (Authority) would like to thank stakeholders
Stress Test Exercise Questions & Answers
EIOPA-FS-11/17 Version 17 May 2011 Stress Test Exercise 2011 Questions & Answers Stress Test - List of Methodological Issues Raised by Participants and Supervisors General Disclaimer The answers given
Solvency II. Insurance and Pensions Unit, European Commission
Solvency II Insurance and Pensions Unit, European Commission Introduction Solvency II Deepened integration of the EU insurance market 14 existing Directives on insurance and reinsurance supervision, insurance
Solvency Regulation in the UAE: A Benchmark and Impact Study
: A Benchmark and Impact Study RAGHAV OHRI, ASA CONSULTING ACTUARY 14 NOV 16 DUSIT THANI HOTEL DUBAI AGENDA Principles of new Regulations Risk Based Capital Approach Solvency Capital Requirements (SCR):
Solvency Assessment and Management. Report on the results of 1 st South African Quantitative Impact Study ( SA QIS1 )
Solvency Assessment and Management Report on the results of 1 st South African Quantitative Impact Study ( SA QIS1 ) DECEMBER 2011 C O N T A C T D E T A I L S Physical Address: Riverwalk Office Park, Block
Solvency Assessment and Management: Steering Committee Position Paper (v 3) Loss-absorbing capacity of deferred taxes
Solvency Assessment and Management: Steering Committee Position Paper 112 1 (v 3) Loss-absorbing capacity of deferred taxes EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SAM introduces a valuation basis of technical provisions that
Solvency II and the Work of CEIOPS
The Geneva Papers, 2008, 33, (60 65) r 2008 The International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics 1018-5895/08 $30.00 www.palgrave-journals.com/gpp Solvency II and the Work of CEIOPS Thomas
SOLVENCY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT (SAM) FRAMEWORK
SOLVENCY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT (SAM) FRAMEWORK Hantie van Heerden Head: Actuarial Insurance Department 5 October 2010 High-level summary of Solvency II Background to SAM Agenda Current Structures Progress
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 110 ( 2014 ) Contemporary Issues in Business, Management and Education 2013
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 110 ( 2014 ) 822 831 Contemporary Issues in Business, Management and Education 2013 Solvency II assumptions
Report on long-term guarantees measures and measures on equity risk
EIOPA REGULAR USE EIOPA-BoS-17/334 20 December 2017 Report on long-term guarantees measures and measures on equity risk 2017 1/171 Table of Contents Executive summary... 3 I. Introduction... 6 I.1 Review
Judging the appropriateness of the Standard Formula under Solvency II
Judging the appropriateness of the Standard Formula under Solvency II Steven Hooghwerff, AAG Roel van der Kamp, CFA, FRM Sinéad Clarke, FSAI, FIA, BAFS 1 Introduction Solvency II, which went live on January
QIS5 Consultation Feedback: High Level Issues
20 MAY 2010 QIS5 Consultation Feedback: High Level Issues The CRO Forum and CFO Forum are pleased to be able to provide comment on the QIS5 draft specification, as prescribed in the QIS5 consultation.
Karel VAN HULLE. Head of Unit, Insurance and Pensions, DG Markt, European Commission
Solvency II: State of Play Guernsey, 18th December 2009 Karel VAN HULLE Head of Unit, Insurance and Pensions, DG Markt, European Commission 1 Why do we need Solvency II? Lack of risk sensitivity in existing
29th India Fellowship Seminar
29th India Fellowship Seminar Is Risk Based Capital way forward? Adaptability to Indian Context & Comparison of various market consistent measures Guide: Sunil Sharma Presented by: Rakesh Kumar Niraj Kumar
Hong Kong RBC First Quantitative Impact Study
Milliman Asia e-alert 1 17 August 2017 Hong Kong RBC First Quantitative Impact Study Introduction On 28 July 2017, the Insurance Authority (IA) of Hong Kong released the technical specifications for the
User Guide for Input Spreadsheet QIS on IORPs
Updated 15 November 2012 User Guide for Input Spreadsheet QIS on IORPs Contents 1. Introduction... 2 2. Overview of spreadsheet... 2 3. Participant information... 4 4. Current regime... 5 5. Holistic balance
Solvency Monitoring and
Solvency Monitoring and Reporting Venkatasubramanian A CILA2006/AV 1 Intro No amount of capital can substitute for the capacity to understand, measure and manage risk and no formula or model can capture
From Solvency I to Solvency II: a new era for capital requirements in insurance?
Milan, 26 November 2015 From Solvency I to Solvency II: a new era for capital requirements in insurance? prof. Nino Savelli Full professor of Risk Theory Faculty of Banking, Financial and Insurance Sciences
1. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE 2. DEFINITIONS
Solvency Assessment and Management: Steering Committee Position Paper 28 1 (v 6) Treatment of Expected Profits Included in Future Cash flows as a Capital Resource 1. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE An insurance
Re: Possible Solvency and Financial Condition Report components subject to assurance
Ms Sandra Hack European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) Westhafenplatz 1 D-60327 Frankfurt am Main 10 January 2012 Ref.: INS/PRJ/SKU/IDS Dear Ms Hack, Re: Possible Solvency and Financial
PRA Solvency II update James Orr. 29 April 2015
PRA Solvency II update James Orr 29 April 2015 Agenda 1. 2015 Update 2. What is standard formula? 3. Internal models 4. Matching adjustment 5. ORSA 6. System of governance 7. Regulatory reporting 1. 2015
Technical Specifications part II on the Long-Term Guarantee Assessment Final version
EIOPA/12/307 25 January 2013 Technical Specifications part II on the Long-Term Guarantee Assessment Final version Purpose of this document This document contains part II of the technical specifications
Client Alert August 2016
Financial Services Regulatory Singapore Client Alert August 2016 For further information please contact Stephanie Magnus Principal +65 6434 2672 Stephanie.magnus@bakermckenzie.com Selwyn Lim Senior Associate
Feedback on Solvency II Draft Directive
5 October 2007 Feedback on Solvency II Draft Directive Chief Risk Officer Forum Copyright 2007 Chief Risk Officer Forum Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary... 3 2 Introduction... 5 3 The CRO Forum Solvency
Quantitative Impact Study 4 Summary results and main messages
Quantitative Impact Study 4 Summary results and main messages Stakeholder Meeting Frankfurt, 20 October 2008 20/10/2008 Page 1 Agenda Welcome and introductory remarks (by Klaas Knot, Managing Board member)
EIOPA s first set of advice to the European Commission on specific items in the Solvency II Delegated Regulation
EIOPA-BoS-17/280 30 October 2017 EIOPA s first set of advice to the European Commission on specific items in the Solvency II Delegated Regulation EIOPA Westhafen Tower, Westhafenplatz 1-60327 Frankfurt
Opinion of the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority on the group solvency calculation in the context of equivalence
EIOPABoS15/201 25 September 2015 Opinion of the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority on the group solvency calculation in the context of equivalence Legal Basis 1. This opinion is issued
Solvency Assessment and Management: Steering Committee Position Paper 73 1 (v 3) Treatment of new business in SCR
Solvency Assessment and Management: Steering Committee Position Paper 73 1 (v 3) Treatment of new business in SCR EXECUTIVE SUMMARY As for the Solvency II Framework Directive and IAIS guidance, the risk
Financial management of insurance companies in the context of the new regime Solvency II
Financial management of insurance companies in the context of the new regime Solvency II Costin ISTRATE The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania istrate_costin@yahoo.com Dumitru
A. General comments. October 27, 2012
AEGON N.V./Transamerica comments on Comparing Certain Aspects of the Insurance Supervisory and Regulatory Regimes in the European Union and the United States October 27, 2012 AEGON appreciates the opportunity
Recent Solvency II Developments for European Life Insurers and Hannover Life Re. Dr. Wolf S. Becke CEO Hannover Life Re
Recent Solvency II Developments for European Life Insurers and Hannover Life Re Dr. Wolf S. Becke CEO Hannover Life Re IAJ Meeting Spring 2011 Tokyo, 8th February 2011 Disclaimer The information provided
Tax in Solvency II. Ayesha Patel. 10 June Tel: June 2014
Tax in Solvency II Ayesha Patel Email: ayesha.patel@uk.pwc.com Tel: 020 7212 1239 June 2014 10 June 2014 Agenda 1 Background 2 The three Pillars 3 Pillar I in detail 4 Survey 5 Summary 6 Questions 2 Background
Effective Risk Management. Act. Luis Alberto Morales
Act. Luis Alberto Morales The objective of risk management is: not to prevent people from taking risk but to allow people to understand and manage in the optimal way the risks that they take As risk manager,
1. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE
Solvency Assessment and Management: Pillar 1 Sub Committee Capital Requirements Task Group Discussion Document 74 (v 3) Minimum Capital Requirement (MCR) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Having compared the IAIS ICPs
Appendix 2: Supervisory Statements
Appendix 2: Supervisory Statements Transposition of Solvency II: Part 3 August 2014 1 Appendix 2.1 Supervisory Statement SS[xx]/14 Solvency II: general application August 2014 Prudential Regulation Authority
DISCLOSURE QRT REPORT Proteq Levensverzekeringen 2017
DISCLOSURE QRT REPORT Proteq Levensverzekeringen 2017 S.02.01 - Balance Sheet S.02.01... 2 S.05.01 - Premiums, claims and expenses by line of business S.05.01... 3 S.05.02 - Premiums, claims and expenses
Supervisory Statement SS44/15 Solvency II: third-country insurance and pure reinsurance branches. November 2015
Supervisory Statement SS44/15 Solvency II: third-country insurance and pure reinsurance branches November 2015 Prudential Regulation Authority 20 Moorgate London EC2R 6DA Prudential Regulation Authority,
Final Report on public consultation No. 14/049 on Guidelines on the implementation of the long-term guarantee measures
EIOPA-BoS-15/111 30 June 2015 Final Report on public consultation No. 14/049 on Guidelines on the implementation of the long-term guarantee measures EIOPA Westhafen Tower, Westhafenplatz 1-60327 Frankfurt
AIG Life Insurance Company (Switzerland) Ltd. Financial Condition Report 2017
AIG Life Insurance Company (Switzerland) Ltd. Financial Condition Report 2017 30 April 2018 Contents Executive Summary... 3 A. BUSINESS... 5 A.1 COMPANY INFORMATION... 5 A.2 POSITION WITHIN THE GROUP LEGAL
Consultation Paper. the draft proposal for. Guidelines. on the implementation of the long term. guarantee adjustments and transitional.
EIOPA-CP-14/049 27 November 2014 Consultation Paper on the draft proposal for Guidelines on the implementation of the long term guarantee adjustments and transitional measures EIOPA WesthafenTower Westhafenplatz
CEIOPS-DOC-61/10 January Former Consultation Paper 65
CEIOPS-DOC-61/10 January 2010 CEIOPS Advice for Level 2 Implementing Measures on Solvency II: Partial internal models Former Consultation Paper 65 CEIOPS e.v. Westhafenplatz 1-60327 Frankfurt Germany Tel.
Solvency & Financial Condition Report Centrewrite Limited
Solvency & Financial Condition Report Centrewrite Limited For the year ended 31 December 2016 Prepared in accordance with Chapter XIII Section 1 Article 290-298 of Directive 2009/138/EC and Annex XX of
UNIQA Insurance Group AG. Group Embedded Value 2017
UNIQA Insurance Group AG Group Embedded Value 2017 Supplementary information on Group Embedded Value results for 2017 Table of Contents 1 Introduction... 3 2 Summary of 2017 results... 4 2.1 Group embedded
RAPPORT SUR LA SOLVABILITE ET LA SITUATION FINANCIERE
RAPPORT SUR LA SOLVABILITE ET LA SITUATION FINANCIERE Cardif Assurances Risques Divers Annexes Quantitative Reporting Templates - QRT 31 décembre 2016 Balance sheet S.02.01.21 Solvency II value C0010 Assets
Appointed Actuary Symposium 2007 Solvency II Update
watsonwyatt.com Appointed Actuary Symposium 2007 Solvency II Update Naomi Burger 7 November 2007 Agenda Overview Pillar 1 - Capital requirements Pillar 2 - Supervisory review Pillar 3 - Disclosure Conclusions
Solvency and financial condition report 2017
Solvency and financial condition report 2017 The Standard Life Assurance Company 2006 Contents Summary 2 A Business and performance 4 A.1 Business 4 A.2 Underwriting performance 5 A.3 Investment performance
The fourth quantitative impact study of new regulation in the insurance sector 1 Peter Paluš, Andrea Gondová
1 The article only deals with insurance undertakings, because no reinsurance undertaking was under the supervision of the National Bank of Slovakia when the fourth quantitative impact study was being carried
Solvency II Insights for North American Insurers. CAS Centennial Meeting Damon Paisley Bill VonSeggern November 10, 2014
Solvency II Insights for North American Insurers CAS Centennial Meeting Damon Paisley Bill VonSeggern November 10, 2014 Agenda 1 Introduction to Solvency II 2 Pillar I 3 Pillar II and Governance 4 North
Guidelines on application of outwards reinsurance arrangements to the nonlife underwriting risk submodule
EIOPABoS14/173 Guidelines on application of outwards reinsurance arrangements to the nonlife underwriting risk submodule EIOPA Westhafen Tower, Westhafenplatz 1 60327 Frankfurt Germany Tel. + 49 6995111920;
Undertaking-specific parameters (USPs)
General Insurance Convention 2011 - Liverpool Richard Bulmer Undertaking-specific parameters (USPs) Workshop B9 Wednesday 12 October 2011 Undertaking-specific parameters Background to USPs Discussion of
Pillar 3 reporting for Life Companies
Pillar 3 reporting for Life Companies 12 May 2016 Aidan Murphy (Zurich) Maaz Mushir (Deloitte) Disclaimer The views expressed in this presentation are those of the presenter(s) and not necessarily of the
SOLVENCY II Level 2 Implementing Measures
SOLVENCY II Level 2 Implementing Measures Position after the 3 waves of Consultation Papers and the Quantitative Impact Study 5 Technical Specifications Dr. Thomas Guidon CASUALTY LOSS RESERVE SEMINAR
EIOPA's Supervisory Statement. Solvency II: Solvency and Financial Condition Report
EIOPA-BoS/17-310 18 December 2017 EIOPA's Supervisory Statement Solvency II: Solvency and Financial Condition Report EIOPA Westhafen Tower, Westhafenplatz 1-60327 Frankfurt Germany - Tel. + 49 69-951119-20;
CEA proposed amendments, April 2008
CEA proposed amendments, April 2008 Amendment 1: Recital 14 a (new) The supervision of reinsurance activity shall take account of the special characteristics of reinsurance business, notably its global
EIOPA: recent developments in insurance and pensions. EVCA Investors' Forum Geneva, 14 March 2012
EIOPA: recent developments in insurance and pensions EVCA Investors' Forum Geneva, 14 March 2012 Content What is EIOPA? Recent developments on Solvency II EIOPA s advice on pensions 2 EIOPA: Background
REINSURANCE CONTRIBUTION UNDER SOLVENCY II STANDARD APPROACH (RISA)
REINSURANCE CONTRIBUTION UNDER SOLVENCY II STANDARD APPROACH (RISA) Athens, 19 May 211 & Nicosia, 2 May 211 Dr. Norbert Kuschel Solvency Consulting, Integrated Risk Management Agenda 1. Quantitative case
Quantitative reporting templates Appendix Verslag over de solvabiliteit en de financiële toestand Loyalis Leven 2017
Quantitative reporting templates 2017 Appendix Verslag over de solvabiliteit en de financiële toestand Loyalis Leven 2017 2017 Inhoud Balance sheet....3 Premiums, claims and expenses by line of business....5
Regulatory Consultation Paper Round-up
Regulatory Consultation Paper Round-up Both the PRA and EIOPA have issued consultation papers in Q4 2017 - some of the changes may have a significant impact for firms if they are implemented as currently
Solvency II The Reporting Challenge
Solvency II The Reporting Challenge Standard Formula & Supervisory Reporting Steria Agenda Pillar 1 Requirements of the standard formula and lessons learnt from the QIS 5 Pillar 3 Pre consultation shows
QRT Appendix S.02.01.02 Balance sheet Solvency II Value Statutory accounts value Assets C0010 C0020 R0010 Goodwill - R0020 Deferred acquisition costs 208.073 R0030 Intangible assets - 1.349.412 R0040 Deferred
What do you know about Solvency II? High-level introduction for interested parties from Non-EU regions February 2013
What do you know about Solvency II? High-level introduction for interested parties from Non-EU regions February 2013 Global trends in solvency modernisation are tending towards comprehensive riskand economic
Proposal for the Quality Assurance of the Solvency II capital requirements, own funds and balance sheet
Proposal for the Quality Assurance of the Solvency II capital requirements, own funds and balance sheet Date of Paper : 21 November 2016 Version Number : V2.0 Table of Contents 1 Overview... 3 2 Solvency
ALM in a Solvency II World. Craig McCulloch
ALM in a Solvency II World Craig McCulloch Agenda Solvency II Background Implications of SII on ALM Case Study What it means for Australian Actuaries Questions/Discussion Solvency II Background Pan-European
AVIVA Solvency and Financial Condition Report ( SFCR )
AVIVA 2016 Solvency and Financial Condition Report ( SFCR ) 2 Disclaimer Cautionary statements: This should be read in conjunction with the documents distributed by Aviva plc (the Company or Aviva ) through
Capital Adequacy and Supervisory Assessment of Solvency Position
Capital Adequacy and Supervisory Assessment of Solvency Position Jeffery Yong IAIS Secretariat Regional Seminar for Supervisors in Africa on Risk-based Solvency and Supervision, 14 September 2010 Agenda
RISK BASED CAPITAL AND SOLVENCY
RISK BASED CAPITAL AND SOLVENCY 1 1 N O V E M B E R 2 0 1 5 N E I L TAV E R N E R, S E N I O R A C T U A R Y AIMS OF RISK BASED CAPITAL AND SOLVENCY WORKSTREAM Establish a high level of observance of IAIS
A Comparison of Solvency Systems: US and EU
A Comparison of Solvency Systems: US and EU Principles or Rules Uniformity Principles are included in numerous NAIC handbooks. The statutory accounting framework is based on overarching statements of concepts;
UNIQA Insurance Group AG. Group Economic Capital Report 2017
UNIQA Insurance Group AG Group Economic Capital Report 2017 Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary... 3 2 Risk Strategy UNIQA Group... 4 3 Risk Management Framework... 5 4 Own Funds... 5 4.1 Own Funds Development...
2016 Public Quantitative Reporting Templates Solvency II Aegon Spaarkas N.V.
216 Public Quantitative Reporting Templates Solvency II N.V. This document contains the following quantitative reporting templates (QRTs) which relate to the position at 31 December 216: S.2.1.2 Balance
EIOPACP 13/010. Guidelines on Submission of Information to National Competent Authorities
EIOPACP 13/010 Guidelines on Submission of Information to National Competent Authorities EIOPA Westhafen Tower, Westhafenplatz 1 60327 Frankfurt Germany Tel. + 49 6995111920; Fax. + 49 6995111919; site:
rv de septembre - 09/09/ XC
rv de septembre - 09/09/2008 - XC Rendez-vous de septembre 9 September 2008 - Monte Carlo RISK TRANSFER IN SOLVENCY II Xavier Cognat Fédération Française des Sociétés d Assurances rv de septembre - 09/09/2008
Christina Urias SMI Task Force Chair Director, Arizona Department of Insurance
May 21, 2010 TO: Christina Urias SMI Task Force Chair Director, Arizona Department of Insurance FROM: RE: Mary A. Weiss, Ph.D. Distinguished Scholar, CIPR NAIC Country Solvency Comparisons Materials for
Reinsurance cessions in 2012: Set to rise or fall? The impact of reinsurance on risk capital
Reinsurance cessions in 2012: Set to rise or fall? The impact of reinsurance on risk capital Solvency II Market Event, Turkey Istanbul, 15 July 2009 Ali Majidi Solvency Consulting Integrated Risk Management,
The Central Bank s Requirement for External Audit of Solvency II Regulatory Returns / Public Disclosures
2016 The Central Bank s Requirement for External Audit of Solvency II Regulatory Returns / Public Contents The Central Bank s Requirement for External Audit of Solvency II Regulatory Returns/Public...