PAKISTAN ECONOMIC REVIEW FY18 GDP Growth at 13 year High of 5.8%

Transcription

1 Pakistan Equity Economy April 26, 2018 REP 057 PAKISTAN ECONOMIC REVIEW FY18 GDP Growth at 13 year High of 5.8% Topline Research Tel: Topline Securities, Pakistan Best Local Brokerage House Brokers Poll , Best Local Brokerage House

2 Pakistan GDP Grows at a 13 year high of 5.8% Pakistan s Ministry of Finance published the Annual Pakistan Economic Survey for FY18 today. Asperthe Economic Survey, Pakistan s GDP grew by 5.8% in fiscal year ending Jun 2018 (FY18), after 13 years, compared to 5.4% in FY17 and last 3 year average GDP growth of 4.7%. This is led by strong growth in Agriculture and Services sectors. GDP grew slightly slower than targeted rate of 6.0% set by Govt. primarily because of lower than the anticipated growth in industrial sector. Industrial sector grew by 5.8% as against the target of 6.4%. Agriculture sector (18.8% weight in GDP) posted growth of 3.8%, which is better than the last year s growth of 2.1% and higher than government target of 3.5%. Services sector (60.2% weight in GDP) continued to post strong growth of 6.4% in line with target and last year s growth rate. Growth in services sector was mainly driven by improvement General Govt. Services (up 11.4% vs. 6.0% last year) and Wholesale & Retail (up 7.5% in line with last year). Key Economic Indicators FY13A FY14A FY15A FY16A FY17A FY18E* Real GDP growth (%) 3.7% 4.1% 4.0% 4.7% 5.4% 5.8% Inflation (%) 74% 7.4% 86% 8.6% 46% 4.6% 29% 2.9% 43% 4.3% 40% 4.0% Fiscal Deficit (%) 8.2% 5.5% 5.3% 4.6% 5.8% 5.8% Investment to GDP ratio (%) 14.6% 14.9% 15.0% 15.2% 16.1% 16.4% Current Account as % of GDP 1.0% 1.3% 1.0% 0.6% 4.1% 5.1% FX reserves (US$bn) Remittances (US$bn) Source: Economic Survey; Topline Research; *Estimated 2

3 Pakistan GDP Grows at a 13 year high of 5.8% Industrial sector s (20.9% weight ihin GDP) output stood at 5.8% lower than thetargeted 6.4% and higherh than last year s growth rate of 5.4%. Large scale manufacturing (LSM), the biggest component of Industrial sector and comprising of 52% posted growth of 6.1%, slightly below government target of 6.3%. In terms of regional comparison (South Asian players), Pakistan fell behind regional players having average growth rates of 6.1%, according to Economic Survey. Pakistan per capita income increased by 0.4% to US$1,641 in FY18 (up by 11% in Rs. terms). We are of the view that ongoing economic challenges in light of large external current account deficit will lead to further currency devaluation and increase in interest rates. This is expected to slow down GDP growth to less than 5% during thenextfew years as against thegovt.targetof 6.2% for FY19. Weexpectnextyear s GDP growth to be at 4.6% as rupee devaluation & expected hike in interest rates could slowdown economic growth. Sector weight age in Pakistan GDP Pakistan Per Capita Income (US$) 19% US$ 1,800 1,500 1,389 1,514 1,529 1,632 1,641 60% 21% 1, Industrial Agricultural Services FY14A FY15A FY16A FY17A FY18P Source: Economic Survey, Topline Research Source: Economic Survey; *Provisional 3

4 GDP growth trend over the years Pakistan GDP growth trend Pakistan Regional GDP growth trend FY18 6.0% 5.0% 4.0% 4.1% 4.0% 4.6% 5.4% 5.8% 9.0% 7.0% 5.0% 7.4% 7.0% 5.0% 4.0% 3.0% 3.0% 2.0% 1.0% 1.0% FY14A FY15A FY16A FY17A P FY18 India Bangla adesh kistan Pa rilanka S Source: Economic Survey, Topline Research *Provisional Source: Economic Survey, Topline Research *Provisional Pakistan Industrial sector growth trend Pakistan Agriculture sector growth trend 6.5% Industrial Sector LSM 4.5% Agriculture Crops Livestock 5.5% 2.5% 45% 4.5% 0.5% -1.5% 3.5% -3.5% 2.5% 14A FY 15A FY 16A FY 17A FY 18P FY -5.5% FY Y14A FY Y15A FY Y16A FY Y17A FY Y18P Source: Economic Survey, Topline Research *Provisional Source: Economic Survey, Topline Research *Provisional 4

5 Fiscal deficit to remain higher than budgeted We expect the fiscal deficit for the FY18 to at least remain at last year s level of 5.8% and higher than the budgeted deficit of 4.1%. As per the Economic Survey, fiscal deficit during 1HFY18 stood at 2.3% versus 2.5% in the similar period last year on account of improved revenues. Ttl Total revenues for government in 1HFY18 was up 19.8% to Rs2.4tn. Tax revenues increased by 16% to Rs2.0trn, however, it remained well below the revenue target. Non tax revenues of the government increased markedly by 43% Rs358bn due to higher dividends, markup payments, surplus profit of SBP, defense and PTA profits. Total expenditures of the government rose by 14% to Rs3.2tn during 1HFY18 mainly driven by rise in current expenditure (up 14% to Rs2.5tn). Federal Development Expenditures rose by 25% to Rs616bn during the period. For FY19, government is forecasting fiscal deficit of 4.9%, while we anticipate fiscal deficit to clock in at 5%. Pakistan Fiscal Indicators % of GDP FY14A FY15A FY16A FY17A 1HFY18P Fiscal Deficit 55% 5.5% 53% 5.3% 46% 4.6% 58% 5.8% 23% 2.3% Tax Revenues 10.2% 11.0% 12.6% 12.4% 5.9% Total Expenditures 20.0% 19.6% 19.9% 21.3% 9.2% Current Expenditures 15.9% 16.1% 16.1% 16.3% 7.4% Development Expenditures 4.9% 4.2% 4.5% 5.3% 1.8% Source: Economic Survey, *Provisional Honda Atlas Cars (HCAR) 5 Pakistan Economic Review FY18

6 Inflation to clock in below 6% target for FY18 CPI inflation during 9MFY18 clocked in at 3.78% and it is anticipated to clock in at 4% for FY18 which is well below the inflation target of 6% set by Federal Govt. for FY18. SBP has so far raised the policy rate by 25bps to 6.0% in 9MFY18 in order to curb mounting pressures on external account. We expect FY19 inflation to rise to 7% due to devaluation and expected increase in aggregate demand. In light of anticipation of increase in inflation, we expect SBP s policy rate to be raised by 175bps to 8.25% in FY19. Pakistan yearly inflation trend Real Interest Rates 9.5% 8.6% 7% 80% 8.0% 5% 6.5% 5.0% 3.5% 4.7% 2.9% 4.1% 3.8% 3% 1% 2.0% -1% FY14A FY15A FY16A FY17A 9M MFY18 Jun-12 Mar-13 Dec-13 Aug-14 May-15 Jan-16 Oct-16 Jun-17 Mar-18 Source: Economic Survey Source: Economic Survey 6

7 Investment to GDP ratio still low at 16.4% Investment to GDP ratio slightly improved to 16.4% in FY18 vs. 16.1% in FY17, lower than regional peers. Private investment as % of GDP remained low at 9.8% vs. 10.0% during the previous year. Further, Saving to GDP ratio of the country was reported at 12.1% of GDP in FY18 as compared to 12.0% last year. This is also on the lower side when compared to regional peers. Primary reason for low savings rate is high consumption levels, which are prevalent in Pakistan. Pakistan Investment and Savings trend 17.0% Investment to GDP Saving to GDP 15.8% 14.6% 13.5% 12.3% 11.2% 10.0% FY14A FY15A FY16A FY17A FY18P Source: Economic Survey; *Provisional 7

8 Concerns remain on External Account Foreign exchange reserves of the country have been under pressure declining to US$10.9bn asof April 20th, 2018 as against US$16.7bn in Apr Since Jun 2017, reserves have come down by US$5.2bn (avg of US$0.5bn/month). This is due to rising current account deficit that increased from US$8.0bn in 9MFY17 (2.6% of GDP) to US$12.0bn (3.8% of GDP) in 9MFY18. Rise in current account deficit can be largely attributed to 21% increase in trade deficit to US$22.3bn, driven by higher imports. Worker s remittances slightly increased by 3.6% YoY, somewhat supporting the current account deficit. For FY19, government is targeting a current account deficit of US$12.5bn which is in line with our estimate of US$12bn. This can only be achieved only if currency is further devalued and interest rates are further increased. Pakistan FX Reserves US$mn 20, ,000 12,000 8,000 4,000 9,098 13,526 18, ,144 9,000 Pakistan Imports & Import Cover US$mn 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 Imports (LHS) Import Cover (RHS) Months ,000 - FY14A FY15A FY16A FY17A FY18E Jun-15 Sep-15 Dec-15 Mar-16 Jun-16 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 Jun-17 Sep-17 Dec-17 Mar-18 Source: Economic Survey Pakistan Economic Review FY18 Source: Economic Survey, State Bank of Pakistan 8

9 Concerns remain on External Account Despite a large current account dfii deficit number of US$12.0bn during 9MFY17, bl balance of payment stood at a negative US$4.4bn only, thanks to inflows under the financial account in the form of loans. This resulted in drag on the FX reserves during FY18. Foreign direct investment, which is also a component of financial account, more or less remained flat at US$2.0bn during Jul Mar This is still considerably lower than the levels seen before Outlook on external account remains bleak and we expect Pakistan to get into another IMF program in 2H2018, which will be accompanied by currency devaluation and hike in interest rates that will result in lower economic growth and shrinkage in external current account deficit. Current Account Deficit vs. Overall Deficit US$mn Current account Balance Balance of Payment 2,500 6,000 4,000 2,000 (2,000) (4,000) (6,000) (8,000) (10,000) (12,000) (14,000) Source: Economic Survey FY14A FY15A FY16A FY17A 9MFY18A Foreign Direct Investment Over the Years 9 2,000 1,500 1, Source: Economic Survey FY14A FY15A FY16A FY17A 9MFY18A

10 Prospects and Challenges Pakistan s economy remains burdened with the challenges on external account where outlook on FX reserves and CAD seems alarming. Despite this the govt. is targeting GDP growth of 6.2% in FY19, which we believe is unlikely to be achieved. This is because Pakistan will have little option other than to go to the IMF in 2H2018, which will be accompanied by strict measures including devaluation and hike in interest rates along with expenditure controls that will adversely impact the country s overall economic growth. Pakistan can avoid knocking IMF s door, though probability of it happening is low, if the Govt. manages to arrange decent external financing from friendly countries (like China & Saudi Arabia) by 3Q2018 along with taking corrective measures. The recent Tax Reforms Package where the salaried class was given significant relief has set the tone of expectations of further relief in upcoming budget. However, we believe that tax and other populist measures could potentially be reversed or revised after general elections as the new Govt. will want to set realistic targets amid external account concerns. This will include containing the fiscal deficit below 5% as compared to at least 5.8% expected for FY18. Pakistan has remained embroiled in political turmoil since the ousting of former Prime Minister, Nawaz Sharif, by Supreme Court s July 2017 ruling on corruption cases. Going forward, outcome of National Accountability Bureau (NAB) hearings of Nawaz Sharif and upcoming General Elections expected to be held towards the end of Jul 2018 will likely dictate market sentiments. 10

11 Analyst Certification and Disclosures The research analyst(s), denoted by an AC on the cover of this report, primarily involved in the preparation of this report, certifies that (1) the views expressed in this report accurately reflect his/her personal views about all of the subject companies/securities/sectors and (2) no part of his/her compensation was, is or will be directly or indirectly related to the specific recommendations or views expressed in this report. Furthermore, it is stated that the research analyst or its close relative have neither served as a director/officer in the past 3 years nor received any compensation from the subject company in the past 12 months. Additionally, as per regulation 8(2)(i) of the Research Analyst Regulations, 2015, we currently do not have a financial interest in the securities of the subjectcompany aggregating more than 1% of the value of the company. Rating System Topline Securities employs three tier ratings system to rate a stock, as mentioned below, which is based upon the level of expected return for a specific stock. The rating is based on the following with time horizon of 12 months. Rating Expected Total Return Buy Stock will outperform the average total return of stocks in universe Neutral Stock will perform in line with the average total return of stocks in universe Sell Stock will underperform the average total return of stocks in universe For sector rating, Topline Securities employs three tier ratings system, depending upon the sector s proposed weight in the portfolio as compared to sector s weight in KSE 100 Index: Rating Sector s Proposed Weight in Portfolio Over Weight > Weight in KSE 100 Index Market Weight = Weight in KSE 100 Index Under Weight < Weight in KSE 100 Index Ratings are updated daily to account for the latest developments in the economy/sector/company, changes in stock prices and changes in analyst s assumptions or a combination of any of these factors. Valuation Methodology To arrive at our 12 months Target Price, Topline Securities uses different valuation methods which include: 1). Present value methodology, 2). Multiplier methodology, and 3). Asset basedmethodology. Research Dissemination Policy Topline Securities endeavors to make all reasonable efforts to disseminate research to all eligible clients in a timely manner through either physical or electronic distribution such as , fax mail etc. Nevertheless, all clients may not receive the material at the same time. Disclaimer i This report has been prepared by Topline Securities and is provided for information purposes only. Under no circumstances this is to be used orconsidered as an offer to sell or solicitation of any offer to buy. While reasonable care has been taken to ensure that the information contained therein is not untrue or misleading at the time of publication, we make no representation as to its accuracy or completeness and it should not be relied upon as such. From time to time, Topline Securities and/or any of its officers or directors may, as permitted by applicable laws, have a position, or otherwise be interested in any transaction, in any securities directly or indirectly subject of this report. This report is provided only for the information of professional advisers who are expected to make their own investment decisions without undue reliance on this report. Investments in capital markets are subject to market risk and Topline Securities accepts no responsibility whatsoever for any direct or indirect consequential loss arising from any use of this report or its contents. In particular, the report takes no account of the investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of investors, who should seek further professional advice or rely upon their own judgment and acumen before making any investment. The views expressed in this report are those of Topline Research Department and do not necessarily reflect those of Topline or its directors. Topline as a firm may have business relationships, including investment banking relationships, with the companies referred to in this report. All rights reserved by Topline Securities. This report or any portion hereof may not be reproduced, distributed or published by any person for any purpose whatsoever. Nor can it be sent to a third party without prior consent of Topline Securities. Action could be taken for unauthorized reproduction, distribution or publication. Pakistan Economic Review FY18 11