RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS ADOPTING THE MEASURE I FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN

Transcription

1 RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS ADOPTING THE MEASURE I FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN WHEREAS, San Bernardino County voters approved passage of Measure I in November 2004, authorizing the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority to impose a one-half of one percent retail transactions and use tax applicable in the incorporated and unincorporated territory of the County of San Bernardino; and WHEREAS, revenue from the tax can only be used for transportation improvement and traffic management programs authorized in the Expenditure Plans set forth in Ordinance No of the Authority; and WHEREAS, the Strategic Plan requires each local jurisdiction applying for revenue from the Local Streets Program to annually adopt and update a Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan; and WHEREAS, California Public Utilities Code and Ordinance No require each local jurisdiction to maintain General Fund expenditures for transportationrelated construction and maintenance activities at the required Maintenance of Effort base year level in each fiscal year of the adopted Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan, which for the City of Redlands is $845,866; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS that the Measure I Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan, attached to this resolution as Exhibit A, is hereby adopted. ADOPTED, SIGNED AND APPROVED this 6 th day of September, ATTEST: Paul W. Foster, Mayor Sam Irwin, City Clerk I:\ca\Reso\Reso Measure I CIP.docx

2 I, Sam Irwin, City Clerk of the City of Redlands, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 6 th day of September, 2016, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Sam Irwin, City Clerk I:\ca\Reso\Reso Measure I CIP.docx

3 Exhibit A to Resolution CITY OF REDLANDS MEASURE I CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN EXPENDITURE STRATEGY Fiscal Year through Fiscal Year The City of Redlands intends to use Measure I dollars to partially fund the City s City Council-approved Pavement Accelerated Repair Implementation Strategy (PARIS) program which will pave 2/3 of Redlands city streets over a five year period. The City s Pavement Management Program, which provides a decision making matrix in identifying streets that are priority paving projects, will be used to determine future Measure I Capital Improvement Plans.

4 Measure I Capital Improvement Plan Compliance Checklist Do not exceed the limit on categorical expenditures in the Plan. Include no more than 50% of estimated annual revenue to general program categories for pavement management programs, system improvements, and general maintenance or other miscellaneous categorical expenditures (Policies VLS-9c, VVLS-13c, MDLS-11c). Each jurisdiction shall constrain the total annual amount of Measure I planned expenditures to 150% of SANBAG s forecasted annual revenue for Mi Local Pass-Through, plus any fund balances and/or revenue resulting from bonds secured by Measure I Revenue (Policies VLS-9b, VVLS-13b, MDLS-11b). Projects over $100,000 must be individually listed in the Plan. While categorical expenditures are justified in the Plan, any single project expenditure in excess of $100,000 shall be listed as an individual project and shall not be included in a general program category. (Policies VLS-10, VVLS-14, MDLS-12) Expenditure of Measure I funds must be on projects identified in the current Capital Improvement Plan adopted by the governing body. The Five Year Capital Improvement Plan is the basis for the annual audit. Jurisdictions will have flexibility in moving projects around in the Plan; however, in order for a project to be eligible for expenditure of Local Street funds, the project must be included in the current Plan (Policies VLS-11 VVLS-15, MDLS-13). The Plan can be also be modified by action of the governing body throughout the year, if necessary or beneficial. A copy of the modified Plan should be sent to SANBAG prior to the end of the fiscal year to avoid an audit finding. Expenditure of Measure I funds on Nexus Study projects must include a development share. For capacity enhancement projects to Nexus Study Network roadways, the Capital Improvement Plan must identify the Measure I share of project cost and development share of project cost (Policies VLS-9d VVLS-13d). Maintenance projects or projects that do not enhance the capacity of a roadway do not require a development contribution to be included in the Five Year Plan. Streets and roads under one project/contract must be itemized on the invoice. Plans that include expenditures for multiple streets and roads under one contract must list specific streets and roads, but may list only the total cost for work on all streets and roads in the contract. To avoid an audit finding, the local jurisdiction must: (1) List the project with individual streets and roads in the Plan; and (2) Break down the work on each street and road in the project on the invoice (i.e. an expense must be shown for each project identification). This protocol most typically applies to jurisdictions that group projects under their Pavement Management Program with one cost estimate. If itemized invoices are not provided to the auditor and the project exceeds 50% of annual revenue, a categorical expenditure audit finding will result. Measure I Plans must be in the established format. Plans that are in unique formats, budget documents, and general capital improvement plans have lead to interpretive difference during the audit process. Projects contained in the Plans must be broken down by year of expenditure. An electronic format for the Measure I Plans can be obtained from Measure I Central on the SANBAG web site at this link: Spend Measure I Local Pass Through only on transportation related projects. If there are any questions about the eligibility of Measure I to be expended on a project, refer to the local expenditure policies on the SANBAG web site or contact SANBAG Staff for additional assistance MICIP-Checklist.DOC

5 MOUNTAIN/DESERT SUBAREA MEASURE I REVENUE ESTIMATES FOR LOCAL PASS-THROUGH FUNDS FY2016/2017 to FY2020/2021 MOUNTAIN/DESERT SUBAREA Distribution Percentage (50% Population & 50% Revenue Generation) Population Revenue Generation** d Annual Local Pass-Through Amount* FY16/17 FY17/18 FY18/19 FY19/20 FY20/21 Total FY16/17 through FY20/21 Needles 68.93% 85.11% $ 127, $ 132, $ 137, $ 142, $ 147, $ 689,110 County/Colorado River 31.07% 14.89% $ 38, $ 39, $ 41, $ 42, $ 44, $ 205,606 Colorado River Subarea % % $ 166, $ 172, $ 178, $ 185, $ 191, $ 894,716 Twentynine Palms 35.61% 21.62% $ 450, $ 468, $ 487, $ 506, $ 520, $ 2,433,270 Yucca Valley 29.00% 66.87% $ 753, $ 784, $ 816, $ 849, $ 872, $ 4,076,142 County/Morongo Basin 35.39% 11.51% $ 368, $ 383, $ 399, $ 415, $ 426, $ 1,994,066 Morongo Basin Subarea % % $ 1,572, $ 1,636, $ 1,702, $ 1,771, $ 1,819, $ 8,503,478 Barstow 41.23% 28.63% $ 1,384, $ 1,438, $ 1,493, $ 1,550, $ 1,608, $ 7,475,546 County/North Desert 58.77% 71.37% $ 2,579, $ 2,679, $ 2,782, $ 2,889, $ 2,995, $ 13,925,960 North Desert Subarea % % $ 3,964, $ 4,117, $ 4,275, $ 4,439, $ 4,603, $ 21,401,506 Big Bear Lake 9.45% 52.33% $ 431, $ 446, $ 462, $ 479, $ 494, $ 2,314,607 County/Mountains 90.55% 47.67% $ 964, $ 999, $ 1,035, $ 1,072, $ 1,107, $ 5,178,455 Mountains Subarea % % $ 1,395, $ 1,445, $ 1,497, $ 1,551, $ 1,602, $ 7,493,062 Adelanto 8.41% 2.94% $ 683, $ 706, $ 730, $ 754, $ 780, $ 3,656,322 Apple Valley 18.75% 15.06% $ 2,036, $ 2,105, $ 2,175, $ 2,248, $ 2,324, $ 10,891,652 Hesperia 23.41% 22.00% $ 2,735, $ 2,827, $ 2,922, $ 3,020, $ 3,122, $ 14,628,510 Victorville 31.02% 53.89% $ 5,115, $ 5,287, $ 5,464, $ 5,647, $ 5,838, $ 27,353,155 County/Victor Valley 18.41% 6.11% $ 1,477, $ 1,526, $ 1,577, $ 1,630, $ 1,685, $ 7,898,944 Victor Valley Subarea % % $ 12,049, $ 12,453, $ 12,871, $ 13,302, $ 13,751, $ 64,428,582 Total Mt Desert Region $ 19,148,777 $ 19,825,499 $ 20,526,215 $ 21,251,779 $ 21,969,074 $ 102,721,344 * Local pass-through funds are 70% of total Measure I funds collected, less 2% (of the 70%) set aside for PD/TMS projects. **Revenue Generation from Measure I Distribution Period of Performance March 2016 (distribution date 5/5/16)

6 VALLEY SUBAREA MEASURE I REVENUE ESTIMATES FOR LOCAL PASS-THROUGH FUNDS FY2016/2017 to FY2020/2021 VALLEY SUBAREA Population Distribution Percentage d Annual Local Pass-Through Amount Total FY16/17 through FY20/21 FY16/17 FY17/18 FY18/19 FY19/20 FY20/21 Chino 5.55% $ 1,443, $ 1,486, $ 1,535, $ 1,588, $ 1,652, $ 7,706, Chino Hills 5.09% $ 1,323, $ 1,363, $ 1,407, $ 1,457, $ 1,515, $ 7,067, Colton 3.44% $ 894, $ 921, $ 951, $ 984, $ 1,024, $ 4,776, Fontana 13.54% $ 3,521, $ 3,627, $ 3,744, $ 3,876, $ 4,031, $ 18,800, Grand Terrace 0.79% $ 205, $ 211, $ 218, $ 226, $ 235, $ 1,096, Highland 3.46% $ 899, $ 926, $ 956, $ 990, $ 1,030, $ 4,804, Loma Linda 1.59% $ 413, $ 425, $ 439, $ 455, $ 473, $ 2,207, Montclair 2.50% $ 650, $ 669, $ 691, $ 715, $ 744, $ 3,471, Ontario 10.96% $ 2,850, $ 2,935, $ 3,031, $ 3,137, $ 3,262, $ 15,218, Rancho Cucamonga 11.31% $ 2,941, $ 3,029, $ 3,128, $ 3,237, $ 3,367, $ 15,704, Redlands 4.41% $ 1,146, $ 1,181, $ 1,219, $ 1,262, $ 1,312, $ 6,123, Rialto 6.93% $ 1,802, $ 1,856, $ 1,916, $ 1,983, $ 2,063, $ 9,622, San Bernardino 13.91% $ 3,617, $ 3,726, $ 3,847, $ 3,981, $ 4,141, $ 19,314, Upland 4.89% $ 1,271, $ 1,309, $ 1,352, $ 1,399, $ 1,455, $ 6,789, Yucaipa 3.47% $ 902, $ 929, $ 959, $ 993, $ 1,033, $ 4,818, County/Valley 8.16% $ 2,122, $ 2,185, $ 2,256, $ 2,335, $ 2,429, $ 11,330, Total Valley Region % $ 26,007, $ 26,853, $ 27,726, $ 28,627, $ 29,536, $ 138,853, * Local pass-through funds equal 20% of total Measure I funds collected.

7 Please do not change, alter or modify this template. Use plus signs along left side of worksheet to add rows rather than manually inserting rows to ensure formulas are carried through. FY2016/2017 to FY2020/2021 MEASURE I LOCAL STREET PASS-THROUGH FUNDS FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN PLAN PERIOD: AGENCY NAME: City of Redlands FY2016/2017 FY2017/2018 FY2018/2019 FY2019/2020 FY2020/2021 Total Available ( plus estimate) CARRYOVER BALANCE: $7,075, MEASURE I ESTIMATE: $1,146, $1,181, $1,219, $1,262, $1,312, $13,199, Named Projects: CITY OF REDLANDS - PARIS PROGRAM d Total Project Cost Nexus Project? FY2016/2017 FY2017/2018 FY2018/2019 FY2019/2020 FY2020/2021 Total Local Street Measure I Programmed Public Share (%) DIF Share (%) $ 6,127, $ 1,147, $ 1,182, $ 1,220, $ 1,262, $ 1,313, $6,127, Project Count: 1 Named Projects Total: $ 6,127, $ 1,147, $ 1,182, $ 1,220, $ 1,262, $ 1,313, $6,127, Total + : $ 6,127,105 $1,147, $1,182, $1,220, $1,262, $1,313, $6,127, (%) Named Projects: 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Categorical Projects Total *: Categorical Projects Total: (%) Categorical Projects (cannot exceed 50%): 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% (*) = funds may not be used on Catergorical Projects. Total Programmed: $ 6,127, Total Programmed: $ - In Accordance with Measure I Strategic Plan Policy 40003/40012/40016: Total d Programmed: $ 6,127, If Measure I allocated to project is $100,000, then list individually in Named Projects section. Check: $ 6,127, There is a 50% limit on total categorical projects. 150% of d Measure I plus carryover: $ 19,798, There is a 150% constraint on total planned expenditures to Measure I estimated revenue. Does programing amount exceed 150% limit: No 4. Expenditures of Measure I Local Street funds must be detailed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan and adopted by resolution of the governing body. 5. Revised Capital Improvement Plans are due to SANBAG by the end of the fiscal year along with the resolution. RESOLUTION NUMBER: RESOLUTION APPROVAL DATE: CONTACT PERSON & TITLE: CONTACT PHONE: CONTACT Ross Wittman, Senior Project Manager x1 rwittman@cityofredlands.org Revised July 1, 2016