KANE COUNTY 2030 TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Transcription

1 KANE COUNTY 2030 TRANSPORTATION PLAN ADOPTED OCTOBER 12, 2004

2 Kane County 2030 Transportation Plan Adopted October 12, 2004 Prepared By:

3 ! "# $" %% &!! "' $!'!( )!'%!( # ' &* (&% $!( +'!,-#!( ('. %!! $!' %%& ) %# '& '), (%(2! # '&#) %! '!), (%! ( '(), (%# '(), (%!' ' ), (%! '3'&) % ( $#!) %"# ' #), (%" ' & '), (% '&), (%! '$* ), (% '), (%!'!( % & /0-11- &!!, &!$ ) %& ' ), (%( '!), (%! ' ( ), (%-3( ', ), (% ("# '& ), (%&3 ' ), (%&! ( '& ), (%&!("# ' ), (%, ( ' ), (% '$), (%!'!) %4# 1 $)! ( )$'!!"(3 ) &') )! ( + ) ' 1 )) %% (' ( ( +)+ &!) 5! # %+ ( (+ &!' ( +! 6

4 Contents 1 Introduction Regional Setting Purpose of the Study Overview of the Planning Process Plan Development Process Prior and On-Going Studies Transportation Plan Public Transit Studies Metra STAR Line West Suburban Commuter Rail Feasibility Study Pace Vision 2020 Moving into the Future Kane County Transit Opportunity Assessment Study Kane/Kendall Commuter Rail Extension Feasibility Study Phase One and Two Kane County Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Paratransit Coordination Study Transportation Planning Area Study Existing Transportation Conditions and Forecasts of Future Travel Demand Delineation and Prioritization of Planning Areas West Upper Fox Planning Area Elgin Far West Planning Area Sugar Grove, Aurora, Montgomery (SAM) Planning Area Northwest Kane County Planning Area Kane County Impact Fee Program Transportation Goals and Strategies Mission Statement Goals and Strategies Cooperative Planning Goal System Efficiency Goal Personal Mobility Goal Quality of the Environment Goal Planning Assumptions Land Development and Access Land Use and Access Management Location of Access Points Number of Access Points Internal Circulation Transportation Connectivity Kane County 2030 Transportation Plan October 12, 2004 II

5 CONTENTS 4.3 Street Standards Design Requirements Functional Classification Transportation System Planning The Role of Functional Classification Level of Service Congestion Management Access Management Travel Demand Management (TDM) Transportation System Management (TSM) Traffic Calming Effect of Land Use Policies on Transportation Existing Transportation Facilities and System Performance Introduction Existing Highway System Public Transportation Non-Motorized Travel Rustic Roads Travel Demand Model Background Methodology Existing Traffic Demand Existing Travel Desires Performance Measures Traffic Service Measures Congestion Measures Traffic Safety Measures Existing Traffic Performance Analysis Existing Traffic Service Measures Existing Congestion Measures Existing Safety Measures Existing Public Transportation System Performance Travel Forecast and Future System Performance Introduction Population and Employment Forecasts Existing plus Committed Highway System External-Internal (E-I/I-E) and Through (E-E) Travel Growth Vehicle Traffic Volume and Pattern System Performance Traffic Service Measures Congestion Measures Conclusions and Comparisons Existing and Committed Highway System Improvement Strategies Streets and Highways Kane County 2030 Transportation Plan October 12, 2004 III

6 CONTENTS 8.2 Public Transportation Commuter Rail Routes Fixed Route Bus Service Paratransit Supporting Transit Options Transit Supportive Land Planning Transportation Demand Management Transportation System Management Non-Motorized Transportation Summary Financing Transportation Improvements Introduction Financing Improvements Funding for Transportation Projects Financial Resources A Comparison of Revenues and Costs Projected Revenue Summary Transportation Expenditures Capital Improvement Needs Cost Model CRIP Projects Roadway Cost Methodology Construction Costs Right-of-Way Costs Collector Road Cost Freeway Cost Methodology Construction Costs Right-of-Way Engineering and Contingencies Comparison of Revenues and Needs Recommended Transportation Plan Roadway Plan Committed Projects Interstate Projects Additional Freeway/Expressway Projects Prairie Parkway Strategic Regional Arterials Regional Fox River Bridge Corridors Existing Arterials New Alignments Realignments CRIP Intersection Projects Collectors/Local Projects Fiscally Constrained Plan Transit Proposed Metra Commuter Rail Service Transit Areas Kane County 2030 Transportation Plan October 12, 2004 IV

7 CONTENTS Transportation Hubs and Centers Park-n-ride Paratransit Non-Motorized Regional Bikeways Planning a Safe and Desirable Non-Motorized System Operational Performance of Plan Alternative Transportation Strategies Plan Implementation and On-Going Management Transportation and Land Use Integrated Planning Plan Evaluation to Goals and Strategies Cooperative Planning System Efficiency Personal Mobility Quality of the Environment On-Going Management of Transportation Plan Future Planning Opportunities Coordinated Planning Transportation and Land Use Aggressively Seek Funding for Transportation Projects Context Sensitive Solutions Access Management Rustic Roads Travel Control Measures Historic Preservation Summary Appendixes A Synopses of Prior & On-Going Studies B Model Output 2003 C Model Output 2030 Existing plus Committed Network D Model Output 2030 Recommended Plan with Freeway/Arterial Road Projects E Public Involvement Tables 4-1 Access Guidelines Application Matrix Minimum Right-of-way Guidelines for County Roads by Road Functional Classification LOS Criteria for Signalized Intersections LOS Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections Mileage of all Highways in Kane County by Jurisdiction Classification Kane County 2030 Transportation Plan October 12, 2004 V

8 CONTENTS 6-2 Mileage of Highways in Kane County by Functional Class Mileage of Kane County Highways by Functional Class Features of a Rustic Road Level of Congestion Measures Traffic Performance Congestion Change in Weekday Boardings from 1989 to 1999 in Kane County Fixed Route Service Projected Growth of Population, Households and Employment Traffic Service Future Roadway Congestion Comparison of Traffic Performance Comparison of Congestion Cost Estimate for New Roadway Construction/Reconstruction Cost Estimate For At-Grade Intersections Cost Estimate for Interchanges Percent of Pavement Cost for Additional Freeway Items Kane County Revenues and Needs Forecast through Year 2030 Scenario Kane County Revenues and Needs Forecast through Year 2030 Scenario Kane County Revenues and Needs Forecast through Year 2030 Scenario Kane County Revenues and Needs Forecast through Year 2030 Scenario Non-SRA Arterial Improvements Recommended Highway Projects North Kane County Regional Bikeway Considerations South Kane County Regional Bikeway Considerations West Kane County Regional Bikeway Considerations Kane County 2030 Transportation Plan October 12, 2004 VI

9 CONTENTS Figures (Figures are located at the end of each section.) 1-1 Location of Kane County and Surrounding Areas 1-2 Plan Development Process 4-1 Access and Mobility, Function of Highways 4-2 Urban/Suburban, Typical Cross-Sections 4-3 Rural, Typical Cross-Sections 6-1 Jurisdictional Classification of Existing Highways Roadway Functional Classification, Adopted by Kane County Board, January Metra Rail Service Pace Bus Service Bicycle and Pedestrian Trails 6-6 Kane County Traffic Analysis Zones 6-7 Kane Count Travel Demand Model, Full Metropolitan Area Traffic Analysis Zone 6-8 Average Daily Traffic, Existing Year Travel Desire 6-10 Existing Year 2003 Congested Roadway Segments, Based on Average Daily Traffic 6-11 Pace Bus Service, 2000 Population and Employment Density Population Density 7-2 Population Growth Employment Density 7-4 Employment Growth Priority Places 7-6 Average Daily Traffic, Forecast Year Change in Average Daily Traffic Future Travel Growth Desire Bands Congested Roadway Segments, Based on Average Daily Traffic 9-1 Projected Revenues 9-2 Comparison of Revenues to Needs Recommended Transportation Plan, Roadway Recommended Transportation Plan, Transit 10-3 STAR Line Recommended Transportation Plan, Bike/Pedestrian Trails 10-5 Comparison of Transportation Performance, Vehicle Miles of Travel 10-6 Comparison of Transportation Performance, Vehicle Hours of Delay 10-7 Comparison of Transportation Performance, Percent Congested Lane Miles Congested Roadway Segments, With Freeway/Arterial Road Projects Based on Average Daily Traffic 11-1 Draft 2030 Land Use Plan Kane County 2030 Transportation Plan October 12, 2004 VII

10 Acronyms and Abbreviations ADT ATC BLOS BNSF BRRP BRT CATS CLAF CMAQ CRIP CSD E-E E-I EJ&E EWCCA FHWA FRA HBO HBW HOV IC IDOT I-E ISTEA ISTHA ITE ITEP ITS KCCOM KCDOT KCPCC LOMFT LOS MD-W MOS NHB Average Daily Traffic Aurora Transportation Center Bicycle Level of Service Burlington Northern Santa Fe Bridge Rehabilitation and Replacement Program Bus Rapid Transit Chicago Area Transportation Study County Limited Access Freeway Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Comprehensive Road Improvement Plan Context Sensitive Design External-External External-Internal Elgin, Joliet and Eastern Railway East-West Corporate Corridor Association Federal Highway Administration Federal Railroad Administration Home-Based Other Home-Based Work high occupancy vehicle Illinois Central Illinois Department of Transportation Internal-External Intermodel Surface Transportation Efficiency Act Illinois State Toll Highway Authority Institute of Transportation Engineers Illinois Transportation Enhancements Program Intelligent Transportation Systems Kane County Council of Mayors Kane County Division of Transportation Kane County Paratransit Coordinating Council Local Option Motor Fuel Tax Level of Service Milwaukee District West Minimum Operable Segment Non-Home Based Kane County 2030 Transportation Plan October 12, 2004 VIII

11 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS NHS NIPC NWKC OCS OGL OTC PPA RTA RTP SAM SMFT SOV SRA STAR STP-L STP-R T TAZ TCM TCP TCRP TDM TEA-21 TMA TOD TRB TSM UP UP-W v/c VHD VHT VMT WUF National Highway System Northeastern Illinois Planning Commission Northwest Kane County Outer Circumferential Commuter Rail Service Operational Green Light Ogilvie Transportation Center Planning Partnership Area Regional Transportation Authority Regional Transportation Plan Sugar Grove, Aurora, Montgomery State Motor Fuel Tax Single Occupancy Vehicle Strategic Regional Arterial Suburban Transit Access Route Surface Transportation Program Local Surface Transportation Program - Rural truck traffic analysis zone Transportation Control Measure Transit Corridor Planning Transit Cooperative Research Program Travel Demand Management Transportation Equity Act for the 21 st Century Transportation Management Association Transit Oriented Development Transportation Research Board Transportation System Management Union Pacific Union Pacific West volume to capacity vehicle hours of delay vehicle hours of travel vehicle miles of travel West Upper Fox Kane County 2030 Transportation Plan October 12, 2004 IX

12

13 ! " # $ % # # & " # & & & ' # # (& # & $" &# # # % ) & % * &&! +, -, & &. ) /%0#! % & #!(! ) / ' " % $ 1 1 2$! 33!+4! +!13 # 5! &! 5# 0(! &!6(7( " &) # # & & % ) # " ':! &!! &! # " &!,! /! # #

14 ! " ## $ ; ' 2 ' & # $ <%.$, & # 3 <# # + & # / ', # ## #$ " # & $! # # # " & ( ' % " $ # <% # #! & # 8&) #! &) # " # # # # "#!& & &, # # & # & # " &% ' / '= # #!. " # # ( # # # ). & #& " & & =& ( # / '

15 !

16 90 20 BOONE Marengo Union 176 MCHENRY Woodstock Lakewood Crystal Lake Lake in the Hills Cary Island Lake Oakwood Hills 14 Fox River Grove Wauconda Fox River Valley Gardens Tower Lakes North Barrington Lake Barrington LAKE Hawthorn Woods Forest Lake Lake Zurich Kingston Genoa Hampshire 20 Huntley Algonquin Gilberts Carpentersville 72 Sleepy Hollow 25 East Dundee Barrington Hills Barrington South Barrington Deer Park Inverness Palatine 23 Burlington Pingree Grove Elgin Streamwood Hoffman Estates COOK Schaumburg De Kalb 23 Waterman Sycamore Cortland DEKALB Hinckley Maple Park Virgil Lily Lake Big Rock KANE Elburn Sugar Grove Geneva North Aurora Aurora Montgomery Boulder Hill Oswego South Elgin Batavia Wayne St. Charles Bartlett West Chicago Warrenville Hanover Park Carol Stream Naperville Will City Winfield DUPAGE 88 Roselle Medinah Bloomingdale Glen Ellyn Wheaton Glenbard South Lisle Dupage City Woodridge Bolingbrook Somonauk Sandwich Plano 34 KENDALL Yorkville WILL Romeoville Plainfield Miles Interstate U.S. Highway State Highway Streams Location of Kane County and Surrounding Areas Figure 1-1 Kane County 2030 Transportation Plan File Path: \\athena\proj\kanecountydivisionof\180820\gis\mapdocs\section1\fig1-01_location.mxd, Date: October 13, :03:11 PM

17 2030 Socioeconomic Assumption 2030 Travel Forecast 2030 Transportation Deficiencies Transit Market/Opportunity Assessment Bicycle/Pedestrian Planning Study Safety Assessment TDM Actions Goals & Strategies Alternative Transportation Improvement Strategies Alternatives Evaluation TSM Actions Comprehensive Road Improvement Plan Area Planning Studies Cost Financial Resources Analysis = Public Involvement Draft Plan 2030 Transportation Plan Plan Development Process Figure 1-2 Kane County 2030 Transportation Plan T AA.03 Plan Develop Process lg

18

19 !"#"$% &' ( )&'(*+,-../ ' 0 )'0 + 1" " 2 ' & ' % 1" '0 " " 1 3 " 1" 4 %! 1" " " ' 9 : " " " " 0 " % 0 "";

20 ! " " # $! % # 0%< : %< = ' *'' % 4 )*'+ *' 0><:! *' 2", 2 %)2,$2+ : 0? ' ;" ; ;" " ' ; 0 "; "" &' "/ &'? ' " *' 2,$2%3 " 2,$2 - : A 0 %<, 3 2" = *?3! " # # $ % % 0"' %( % )%+"! )&' + ' : '):'+; 0 0 > <:!,? "!? " # )+0 " " # " & ' ( ) * $?B, " 1 1 "

21 ! " " # $! % # C; " ; D ;" " " : ; " " +, " % % # % * < ": &'(* ; "" " " &' ' )'+" " )' )2 0 )0 ++ < C 9 9C ' E ;";E 3" '"; ;" " " " " " " -,., " # # / 0 $ % % 1 * 2 & '!!; - 0! = 4)!=4+ & ' & ' * " * ')'+ " * 4 1 * A)0*+ ' *;C 6 0*

22 ! " " # $! % # *" 1 1' ""0* 1" &, " % 3 % 1 " &' 4 "&' "&' ' 0 2&) (+ " " " ;" ; 1 ; ; " " ; &' ) +4 % " " " 9 " 9 ;E " " " " " ) +" ;" ; ; ; " ; ; ; " ;! ; C! E " "

23 ! " " # $! % # + " % &' ( 0),+ & ' " 0 1 " " ;" " C F ; ; ;? ; ; & G ' " ' #" ' % D D G 2 &' ' ' )&'''+)* + ( ' 0 ; )6+ : F 2&% (%! 1" - % - / 0 " $ 4$ ) 5 # '303:<< &'(*0- ; &' &

24 ! " " # $! % # & ' 9 :-.." H ;&' &'(* '30 3:<< ; '-../ ) +2 I :"&' ' 2 9 " "A : "-8 A 1 = : ' )=:'+ -7" " 3 1-7" -.."" -76" --" 1 J3< &' " F :. )B0 +&'.4 "8/ /- 4 "6-67 ' # C &' -../" C " &'(*'30 3:<<,-" 9 &' " )+ " 9 " 9 '

25 ! " " # $! % # " " 9 " " # ; ;&' &' * C" - &! 7 $ 0! 7 $ :"'30 3:<< &'(* # F4 &0 3 "3 % "!% : % 67 1#F4 &' )+ ' #F4" "HH # F4* " " " ; # " " 2 #F4! 1 1 # F4 ; (

26 ! " " # $! % # " " " 1 I; " / 5- " ";I - + / $! '30 3:<< 24#,E &'(*24# - -7"/;0 ;? ( - H" 0 ; ; 24# # F4 ) + ; - ;" ; - <*4 -)+ -/D " ' % "9 " " " " " -8 " 77 # 1" 1 <* #' 1 )

27 ! " " # $! % # '"' " ; ; ; < )<*+ -: ) 8 8 # % :6"'303:<< &'(* 0 && "2( ": ):HH+ (% 0 )+ ' "7 0 86?" ; ; " ( * ;" ; 1 " " 0 : ; " " 1 I; " 9 ; 0 " 1 9"; # ; " 0 2 ) +0 5/ 5 ;# *

28 ! " " # $! % # " 5/ " 5 "" ;I - 9 : * 2, " % : "'30 3:<< &'(* = &' )=#&'+ &(; " &0 3 " 2 % :<67 " ' % ;%!% J =#&' )+ ' "8/ =#&' ; ; " ( * ;" ; =#&' : ; " "" " 1 I; " 2 ) +=#&' ; # " 5--8 " 568 "";I =#&'=#&' 9 6

29 ! " " # $! % # - ;, " % <# $ # :4 '303:<< &'(* : C 9&' ; 9 <* : <*2 <*4 4 " -" &' ( (" ' % : )'%:+ '%: 1 1

30

31 !"# $! # %! & ' % " ( ) *)! + +, - #./#.0 % 1. /1.0!/!0 %

32 ! " # $ % "!%! " 2 # & /#&0 ) 2)&. & /.& 0 )!. ) % )! # $ %&%'.! + + #13! "." +!! " # ( )!! 4 2 %!"-& 5 2 #13

33 ! " # $ % "!% 2)& 6. 2 # $ " * 7!! 7 (2! 7 ) (2! 7 2 ( (2!/( 70 1 "!! &! #./: & 091#. 91#. "

34

35 ! " # $ # %& %& $%&'( $&)*+,-.., $ $-.., & & / $ $ "$ 0 & 1 & $ $ $ 1 +4 $$ 25/ 5/& $ $ $ 2$8$$ 1 Note that the term freeway used here does not correspond with this functional classification as described later in the report. County Limited Access Freeways (CLAF) consist of portions of five major arterial roadways in the county (Fabyan Parkway, Kirk Road, Dunham Road, Orchard Road and Randall Road).

36 ! "! #!! $ $ $ & $ $2$ $,6+ % & # ' Traffic Generation Movements Per Day Urban/Suburban Rural Highway Minimum Use Highway Classification CLAF & SRA Commercial CLAF & SRA Residential <10 movements Access Level 3 Access Level 3 Access Level 3 Access Level 3 Minor Access <150 movements Access Level 2 Access Level 2 Access Level 2 Access Level 2 Major Access >150 movements Access Level 2 Access Level 1 Access Level 1 Access Level 1 Notes: 1. Major Access includes all commercial accesses and public streets classified as collector or above which includes most subdivisions. 2. The County Engineer may in his/her professional discretion elect to apply a different priority level or deviate above or below the standard for a given priority level based on unique property, site development, highway design and/or traffic conditions. Source: KCDOT Permit Regulations and Access Control Regulations, Table 1, Page : $ $ & 3$ " 2$ ;3 $ $ $ 0 & $$$ $ $ < $ 0 2 $ $ $2 $ $ $ 32

37 ! "! #!! $ $ $ " " $ $ 66! " # $ $ = $ $0 $ $1(5 $$ ; " $ $ $ $ $ $ %# & #!!3 2 " $ $$ $ 3 $ $ $ 6 > 2 8 >< $ 3$> > 66 # # & ' $ 3 $$ $ $ $6 $6 " 5 3 $ $ $ $

38 ! "! #!! $ $ 2$ $ & $ 66 $ $ 3 $>$ $ # # $ ( )! # & 3 $ ' 3 $0 $ $> >6 6 $ 2$ 3 $ $ $ / $ $ ; ' ;'( %& $ *! & < 3 $ $ $ $ = $ $2 " $ $ $ " $ $ 3> $ 6 " $ $ 3> 2 6

39 ! "! #!! $ $ "$ $$ $ 1 " $ 25,6+ $$ $ 0 & $ 0 $ 7 6 $ ' $8$$ 6 $3 $ >$ " 6 #$85$$,6- $ $ $ $0 & 36 6 $ 2 ; 0 6 $!> $$ 5 " $6 3 5/ 6 " 5 > $ $ $ 6,69; $ 0"63 $ %# & +, & " (

40 ! "! #!! $ $ %&'( " ' 0$! " 3 66 $ $ ( + - ' /66 $ $ 3 6 > > 66 $ 3 $> 3 66 $ $ $ ( 3 66$,6-66 &$ # * * +, -./ % &. + & + & 0. Functional Classification SRA s and County Freeways Principal Arterials Minor Arterials Collectors Local Right-of-Way 170 feet to 200 feet 120 feet to 150 feet 120 feet 80 feet to 120 feet 66 feet to 80 feet )

41 *! #

42 Mobility Arterials Collectors Land Access Locals Source: A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets 2001 Access and Mobility Function of Highways Figure 4-1 Kane County 2030 Transportation Plan T AA.07(.05) Access_Mobility lg

43 Right-of Way Limits Varies 1-Lane Lane Varies CL Sidewalk without Buffer Area Curb & Gutter Buffer Area Sidewalk Two-Lane Urban Collector Right-of Way Limits Varies 2-Lanes 24 Median 2-Lanes Varies CL Sidewalk Curb & Gutter Buffer Area Five-Lane Urban Arterial Right-of Way Limits Varies 3-Lanes 36 Median 3-Lanes Varies CL Sidewalk Buffer Area T AA.03 CrSec lg Curb & Gutter Seven-Lane Urban Arterial Sidewalk Curb & Gutter Urban/Suburban Typical Cross-Sections Figure 4-2 Kane County 2030 Transportation Plan

44 Shoulder Right-of Way Limits Shoulder Varies 8 2-Lanes 24 8 Varies CL Two-Lane Rural Collectors Right-of Way Limits Shoulder Shoulder Varies Lane 12 Median 1-Lane Varies CL Three-Lane Rural Arterial Varies Shoulder 10 2-Lanes 24 CL Right-of Way Limits Left Shoulder Median 16 + Shoulder 2-Lanes Varies CL Four-Lane Rural Divided Arterial Rural Typical Cross-Sections Figure 4-3 Kane County 2030 Transportation Plan T AA.03 CrSec lg

45

46 ! "#$ % "#$ "#$ & '() * +, -., - / - "#$ 0 & 1, - 2 3, - "#$ "#$ 5 "#$ & "#$ %

47 ! "! #! $ % & " ' % "#$ ( 5 "#$ % ( 6, $ "#$ 5 (,.+ 7 "#$ 4 (,88 &,.+ % "#$ ( "#$ & - # "#$ 2 ' 6, ) % ' 9, ) 1-6 "#$ 4 ( ( ( 6, & % (,+,! " &! (! ) * + " LOS Control Delay per Vehicle (seconds/vehicle) A <10 B >10-20 C >20-35 D >35-55 E >55-80 F >80 Source: Highway Capacity Manual HCM2000, Transportation Research Board (TRB), Exhibit 16-2 % "#$ : "#$ # "#$ 2 ' 6, ) % ' 1, ) 1-; "#$ - % "#$ 4 # $ 4 & 0

48 ! "! #! $ % & " '! " &! (, ) * + " LOS Control Delay per Vehicle (seconds/vehicle) A 0 10 B > C > D > E >35 50 F > 50 Source: Highway Capacity Manual HCM2000, TRB, Exhibit &< $7 47 = ') # - ( ( ( % $ 7 & 5 2 $

49 ! "! #! $ % & " ' 1 $ & $ 3 & ' $ ( & $ ) & 2 47 * ' ) 0-47 > > - $ 47 ( * $ ( $ ) $7 -? 47 $7 $ $7 * ( ':#@) 1 Access Management Handbook, prepared for the Iowa DOT, the Safety Management System (SMS) Coordination Committee, and the Access Management Task Force, by the Center for Transportation Research and Education (CTRE), Iowa State University, Ames Iowa, October, A Guidance Manual for Implementing Effective Employer-Based Travel Demand Management Programs, prepared for FHWA by Comsis Corporation and ITE is association with Georgia Institute of Technology, K.T. Analytics, Inc. R.H. Pratt, Consultant, Inc. Final Report, November 1993

50 ! "! #! $ % & " ' '5) / 3 7 & $ A> * $ B - % " ( - # B C,! ' -! D C ' B EB F B +1 ;,,G)* ' ) 2 H 3 I.M. Lockwood, ITE Traffic Calming Definition, ITE Journal, Vol. 67, July 1997, pp 22-24

51 ! "! #! $ % & " ' # 1 6, ' B 0 'B0) B 6.9, 5 ;,,6) I ' ) ': 6++, 6++3) B : $#@ " J $! 0 ;,G, " B 7 H J 2 % B/ K 2 J / 2(B 2 K 2 1,,, 6,,,, / & / / 2$ ;,G, B 'B ) #4 #4 #4 C B #4 -

52

53 ! " #$ %& % &!% & #$ ' $()*! ) +, + -. %#$ /! 0)1 2 3! 0)441&" $!5, %!66 01#$ +7 ". 8) 0 ),! 1&5,9 &), 9 &#$ 9!" 7 :. $ ;' &! " # $! " # $ Jurisdiction Route Miles Lane Miles Interstates U.S. Highways State Highways County Highways Total 553 1,413 + #$, < + &

54 % & ' () (* +, - * ), - ( *. - (/ ((& ) - * 0 ) 1 ) & &,., - * & 0 %1 & 0 % " +7 # $ &!"7 " +. #$!"7'! " # $! ". % Functional Class Route Miles Lane Miles Freeways and Ramps County Freeways and SRA Principal Arterials Minor Arterials Collector 511 1,065 Total 1, Note: Excludes local streets.! " # $%! ". % Functional Class Route Miles Lane Miles County Freeway and SRA Principal Arterials Minor Arterials Collector Total !$!,,(!,( "% %! " % ;! &'<,( $ #$ * $,( = >(?(( +"*; #;?@(

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

56 % & ' () (* +, - * ), - ( *. - (/ ((& ) - * 0 ) 1 ) & &,., - * &! <4 % "+76 " #$, - - ( ( " ". C(* % % % " "!( ( =,*"% (*% &" ( "%. % 2@% " % "!#$ B ( (G! # $ % $- * % "!"7< ( (! ( (&!(& -<! ( (& B(& " 2 /%"<!! " # $'.,, $ Natural Features Expansive views, such as those that overlook stream valleys Unusual land forms, ridgelines, ravines, narrow valleys, and rock outcrops Water Woods Wildflower glades, evergreen groves, flowering native trees, and shrub masses Other areas of native vegetation Built Features Churches and old cemeteries Farmsteads Architecturally and/or historically significant buildings Monuments, memorials, statues, historical markers Concrete automobile club guideposts Railroad and accessory features Designed landscapes Roadway pavement, drainage, bridges, tunnels, and other features Local activity centers, such as farm supply stores, village stores, inns, mills, factories, and institutions

57 % & ' () (* +, - * ), - ( *. - (/ ((& ) - * 0 ) 1 ) & &,., - * & +. ) " /!$!, % # $ 7 " "$!,& %! *!#$ %! *,! : " /)*$ $!,>D90>(@1! '% $()* C : "'. %" /)*$ % )! % : # $ " '1!$!,% :0!H1! " #$$%! : &'!H $ > &4!H #$,+77! "; $!,: +7 : : : #$! " "+ " % =9B3 ;09B3 189B> 09B>18/9B 0/9B1= ;0!12 "!H & &"! " "! ". % " "!H " :! " ; %!% " :!HD " "!HD % 0 % 1"!HD!"!H "!H! " %% % ; ; "! : " " % 2" "% % " 2

58 % & ' () (* +, - * ), - ( *. - (/ ((& ) - * 0 ) 1 ) & &,., - * &!" % % & % ;!% % % %.! #$ %"!(/*C/ " #$@>!!% " " ; $!,%!"#! #$$%! %%. %?" +74 0'1%@!0@!1 # $!'@!% """ )@>!> **; % " 9 %!% % ) )44&((& $ %?@?/ 2! $%0 ;1 %!)@>! % %%% # $ " &! & " ; % )C<)C7< %! % ;B ;" " %" &! % " " % ; ) %& 4$!,!H #$ 6 :! " : $. : " ; % " " 0'1 % " ;0+71! %? ": +(%& % $!% ", $ 2! % " "

59 % & ' () (* +, - * ), - ( *. - (/ ((& ) - * 0 ) 1 ) & &,., - * & " & % $ )& %" $ % " #! % = / " # $ - 9$;$ 2 #$ " " #@*$ / " # $ #@*$! % % $ / "& % $ "%! % =!/! 5, % )C7<&)C'4&+"*; % )44?)C67?5,')C6?5,'< % 1 ) * " "! % % " '! :=!% $!!" " ; % 1 + )!% % % % I-! " ) %% I % 0I9!1" %, % % I9! % % 0I9@1! 0I9@1 " ;" % " 3

60 % & ' () (* +, - * ), - ( *. - (/ ((& ) - * 0 ) 1 ) & &,., - * & " I9@ % " %! " ";, "" "% % %!% %! % " " I-!I9!" 1 2 ) $ C>,%?@ C>,", 6&C>, "" " + & %? % %! %% %"!%%? "!"76" %? %! " # $, / 5 Level of Congestion Max v/c Little or none >0.66 Moderate 0.79 Severe 1.00 Extreme >1.00 Source: Highway Capacity Manual, TRB Special Report 209, Table 7-1. Levels of congestion correspond generally with LOS C or better through LOS E 1 % ) & % % & & " #$, %! & " " >& " "9 " " :" ". " " " " "!" "& "! 4

61 % & ' () (* +, - * ), - ( *. - (/ ((& ) - * 0 ) 1 ) & &,., - * & 1 % % 1 3!! #$ % & & %% D % 3 + )! %I-!&I9!&I9@ " & & :!" 77) & & 4 & "; 0 6 I-!1 6 I9@! "6 ;% ;+ & 7 & " 4 I9@! " # $ 7 8 VMT VHT VHD Functional Class Miles % Hours % Hours % 2003 All Highways Freeways and Ramps 2,446, , County Freeway and SRA 2,554, , , Principal Arterials 1,901, , , Minor Arterials 711, , Collectors 1,454, , , Totals 9,068, , , County Highways County Freeway and SRA 1,233, , Principal Arterials 201, , Minor Arterials 289, , Collectors 20, < 1 Totals 1,745, ,

62 % & ' () (* +, - * ), - ( *. - (/ ((& ) - * 0 ) 1 ) & &,., - * & 3 2 ) $ '" +7> " C>,@&2&+! %" %% = - $ 0C>,@1,%$ 0C>,21 2 $ 0C>,+1 3 #$ &4 ' +. & " >7 $ %?@?2&, $?E%&!"7 C>,! " # $0 8 Route Miles Lane Miles Level of Service Miles % Miles % 2003 All Highways A , B C D E F Total 1, , Total Congested* County Highways A B C D E F Total Total Congested* *LOS D, E and F

63 % & ' () (* +, - * ), - ( *. - (/ ((& ) - * 0 ) 1 ) & &,., - * & 3 % ) )> "& #$! $ #$@>! % ) %& #$@>! ( ) *! = # -! : % : ) ) : ( & ) ) % " ; (%% *% " (" " (%? ( * ( B;? % %%&%&&%& * %% ; * % ;

64 % & ' () (* +, - * ), - ( *. - (/ ((& ) - * 0 ) 1 ) & &,., - * &! ( ) " 3 ' & )& 4 ; "#$ "> 0 "&"& 1 4 ; B 4& ; " """ & ; " 0 1 """ 4& %" &#$ &- 7 4!" 74 % ;" #$ 4! " # $1! 9 : $ ; $ Station Percent Change Aurora % Geneva % National Street % Elgin % Big Timber Road % Total % Source: Commuter Rail System Station Boarding/Alighting Count, Summary Results Fall 2002!" % " " %";*; "%" - & " - ; " : 46 ) &&E%&2 46 ; % ; " *& (!D"""%%'4 ) % % # $,% & &; -! 7* $% > * " %" % )&" <& 0?1 +" % &6

65 % & ' () (* +, - * ), - ( *. - (/ ((& ) - * 0 ) 1 ) & &,., - * & > 2 # $ ( *"% " +7! % ; * &6 # $! % &7 2 0!"71! % %" % ;" "-! " # $3. < $, ) 5 Area Number of Routes Average Weekday Riders Elgin Aurora Total Source: Pace Ridership Data, January 2001

66

67 MCHENRY COUNTY COOK COUNTY DEKALB COUNTY DUPAGE COUNTY Miles KENDALL COUNTY Kane County Roads Interstate U.S. Highway State Highway County Highway Other Jurisdictional Classification of Existing Highways Figure 6-1 Kane County 2030 Transportation Plan File Path: \\athena\proj\kanecountydivisionof\180820\gis\mapdocs\section6\fig6-01_jurisdiction.mxd, Date: October 13, :24:18 PM

68 Root Walker Peplow IL 47 Orchard Randall Rd Sleepy Hollow Engel Swan Harmony Meredith Davis IL 31 Dugan Tower Kendall Schrader Pouley Dittman Coombs Percy Sauber Anderson Howard Barron Waughon Widmayer Butts Getzelman Corron Stevens Hart Florence Jones Thomas Sanwald Swanberg Burr Rd Tyrrell Randall Mitchell Raddant Bertram Hill Farnsworth IL 25 N Co Line Falcy Obrien Melms 72 Lenshow Stoxen French Allen Getty Higgins I-90 Kelley Gast Dietrich 90 Berner US 20 MCHENRY COUNTY 20 Brier Hill Henning Thurnau Manning Reinking Freeman Powers Galligan Highland Binnie IL 72 Big Timber 72 Huntley Elgin 90 IL IL 62 COOK COUNTY Romke Barr Roherson Marshall Damisch McCornack Square Barn Boyer Mason Boncosky Longmeadow Parkway Helm Lake Marian Lake Cook Rd Lukens Lawrence Muirhead Plank Switzer Russell 20 US 20 Larkin Wing Dundee Marcy Ellithorpe Chapman Pease Nesler Water Middleton Burlington Lenz Crawford Nolan Bowes Hopps McLean McDonald Umdenstock Spring State Middle DEKALB COUNTY W Co line Rd W Co Line Rd W Co Line Rd Ramm Old State US 30 McGough Snyder McGough Peterson Beith Perry Shaw Nelson Thatcher 38 Owens Jericho Rd Bushnell Fabris Winters Keslinger Miner 30 Ramm Watson 64 IL 38 Rhodes Price Galena Rd Beith McNulty 88 Harter Welter Dauberman Wheeler Warford Francis Lasher IL 64 Harter Scott Clark Granart Lees Read Freeland IC Trail Schneider Bateman Lorang Seavey Raymond Jericho Ashe Wooley 47 Rowe McCannon Hanson Beith Seavey Mighell Smith Silver Glen Green Merrill Base Line Empire Campton Hills IL 56 US KENDALL COUNTY Harley Denny Brown Bliss Bunker Prairie LaFox Norris Healy Norris Gordon Denmore Old LaFox Garfield Hughes Denker Bolcum Old Burlington Brundige Deerpath Galena Blvd Barnes Tanner Nelson Lake I Peck Kaneville Wenmoth Aucutt 88 Prairie Edgelawn Dean St 38 Fabyan Deerpath Jericho McKee Oak St US 30 Red Gate Crane Rd South Main St Sullivan Western Mooseheart Indian Trail Illinois 31 Prairie 3rd Stearns Corridor IL 25 Galena Montgomery 25 Country Club Pine IL 56 7th Sullivan 56 Church Kirk Rd Fabyan Wilson New York St Army Trail Dunham Molitor Sheffer Farnsworth 5th Kautz US 34 DUPAGE COUNTY Miles Expressway SRA Proposed SRA Principle Arterial Proposed Principle Arterial Minor Arterial Proposed Minor Arterial Collector Roadway Functional Classification Adopted by Kane County Board January 2004 Figure 6-2 Kane County 2030 Transportation Plan File Path: \\athena\proj\kanecountydivisionof\180820\gis\mapdocs\section6\fig6-02_funclass.mxd, Date: October 13, :26:44 PM

69 MCHENRY COUNTY COOK COUNTY Big Timber Milwakee District West Elgin National St DEKALB COUNTY Geneva Union Pacific West DUPAGE COUNTY Miles Burlington Northern/ Sante Fe Aurora KENDALL COUNTY Existing Rail Service Lines Existing Metra Stations Railroad 2004 Metra Rail Service Figure 6-3 Kane County 2030 Transportation Plan File Path: \\athena\proj\kanecountydivisionof\180820\gis\mapdocs\section6\fig6-03_metra.mxd, Date: October 13, :29:01 PM

70 MCHENRY COUNTY COOK COUNTY DEKALB COUNTY DUPAGE COUNTY Miles KENDALL COUNTY Existing Pace Bus Service Pace Bus Service Area 2004 Pace Bus Service Figure 6-4 Kane County 2030 Transportation Plan File Path: \\athena\proj\kanecountydivisionof\180820\gis\mapdocs\section6\fig6-04_pace.mxd, Date: October 13, :31:41 PM

71 MCHENRY COUNTY COOK COUNTY DEKALB COUNTY DUPAGE COUNTY Miles KENDALL COUNTY Existing Bicycle and Pedestrian Trails 2004 Bicycle and Pedestrian Trails Figure 6-5 Kane County 2030 Transportation Plan File Path: \\athena\proj\kanecountydivisionof\180820\gis\mapdocs\section6\fig6-05_trails.mxd, Date: October 13, :32:49 PM

72 MCHENRY COUNTY COOK COUNTY DEKALB COUNTY DUPAGE COUNTY Miles KENDALL COUNTY Kane County Traffic Analysis Zones Traffic Analysis Zone Figure 6-6 Kane County 2030 Transportation Plan File Path: \\athena\proj\kanecountydivisionof\180820\gis\mapdocs\section6\fig6-06_taz.mxd, Date: October 13, :34:05 PM

73 Miles TAZ County Kane County Travel Demand Model Full Metropolitan Area Traffic Analysis Zones Figure 6-7 Kane County 2030 Transportation Plan File Path: \\athena\proj\kanecountydivisionof\180820\gis\mapdocs\section6\fig6-07_taz_all.mxd, Date: October 13, :35:21 PM

74 MCHENRY COUNTY COOK COUNTY DEKALB COUNTY DUPAGE COUNTY Miles KENDALL COUNTY No Data Available 30,001-45, ,000 45,001-60,000 15,001-30,000 > 60,000 Sources: - Kane County Division of Transportation, July 2004 Average Daily Traffic Existing Year 2003 Figure 6-8 Kane County 2030 Transportation Plan File Path: \\athena\proj\kanecountydivisionof\180820\gis\mapdocs\section6\fig6-08_adt.mxd, Date: October 13, :37:32 PM

75 MCHENRY COUNTY COOK COUNTY DEKALB COUNTY DUPAGE COUNTY KENDALL COUNTY Miles 2003 Trips Volume of Trips (Two-Way) 50,000 vpd 100,000 vpd 2003 Travel Desire Figure 6-9 Kane County 2030 Transportation Plan File Path: \\athena\proj\kanecountydivisionof\180820\gis\mapdocs\section6\fig6-09_desirelines03.mxd, Date: October 13, :43:40 PM

76 MCHENRY COUNTY COOK COUNTY DEKALB COUNTY DUPAGE COUNTY Miles KENDALL COUNTY No Congestion Moderate Congestion Severe Congestion Extreme Congestion Existing Year 2003 Congested Roadway Segments Based on Average Daily Traffic Figure 6-10 Kane County 2030 Transportation Plan File Path: \\athena\proj\kanecountydivisionof\180820\gis\mapdocs\section6\fig6-10_congestion.mxd, Date: October 13, :55:41 PM

77 MCHENRY COUNTY COOK COUNTY DEKALB COUNTY DUPAGE COUNTY Miles KENDALL COUNTY Population & Employment per Square Mile 1,001-4,000 4,001-10,000 Existing Pace Bus Service 10,001-30,000 > 30,000 Pace Bus Service Population and Employment Density Figure 6-11 Kane County 2030 Transportation Plan File Path: \\athena\proj\kanecountydivisionof\180820\gis\mapdocs\section6\fig6-11_pacebus_pop_emp_2000.mxd, Date: October 13, :59:09 PM

78

79 ! "#$%$ & ' ( #$%$ )#$%$! "!#$$%! " & *+,&-. #$$$ #$%$! "! " #! $ % % & Percent Increase Population 404, , % Households 133, , % Employment 206, , % Source: 2030 NIPC Forecast, November #$%$ ),& -) #$$$ #$%$ ),&# *+ #$%$ %$& ) /0, 1 ),&%,&0) *+ ),&%

80 & ' ( ) $ * $ ' + ', ( - $ ( -. + / / ' $ $, $ ' + ', ( - $ #$$$#$%$ ),&02. *+! ". ". "" ),&3*"" *"" # $ % & $ ' ( * / 78 / & + && #$%$ ) # " * "+", ' $ ' * ", - ( ' 5 9 &4 : &4; *+ <4 & :4& ; < 4 &4 :4&4; -==( *' #$$% #$%$ &4 4& &9 - ) &4 4&

81 & ' ( ) $ * $ ' + ', ( - $ ( -. + / / ' $ $, $ ' + ', ( - $ # 5 : & ;-%( #$%$ 4&4 #$$$&#$#$ *'. / ' / #$%$ && %( * ),&( #$%$*> ),&,. *> #$$%&#$%$? / / 80,2 #$$$$ 8,# & 8 (0 8%A 5/ > ),&A #$$% #$%$ :#$$%; :#$%$; & " 0 1 ' 3 B7 BC BC>,&# #$%$ ' :0%, B7; 0(0 BC>

82 & ' ( ) $ * $ ' + ', ( - $ ( -. + / / ' $ $, $ ' + ', ( - $ #A- & 303 (3, BC> #(0 &! " "" 0 2 VMT VHT VHD Functional Class Miles % Hours % Hours % 2030 All Highways Freeways and Ramps 5,087, , , County Freeway and SRA 5,447, , , Principal Arterials 3,891, , , Minor Arterials 2,142, , ,311 7 Collectors 3,685, , , Totals 20,254, , , County Highways County Freeway and SRA 2,479, , , Principal Arterials 817, , , Minor Arterials 1,284, , , Collectors 68, , <1 Totals 4,650, , , % $ 1 )#$%$ *> ),&=) 3,% (-, & :,&%;) 3#( 3A0 & #$$% #$%$ #$$% #$%$ D@)!D '1 &4

83 & ' ( ) $ * $ ' + ', ( - $ ( -. + / / ' $ $, $ ' + ', ( - $! " + ' 4 Route Miles Lane Miles Level of Service Miles % Miles % 2030 All Highways A B C D E F , Total 1, , Total Congested County Highways A B C D E F Total Total Congested % % # $ % & $ ' (,&0 B7BC BC> #$$% #$%$ )B7 BC #$$% #$%$ BC> -% ) B7 BC BC> #A & 86' #$$% 86'2#$%$ 86'>,&3. & 86') & D #% #$$% (# #$%$ 3

84 & ' ( ) $ * $ ' + ', ( - $ ( -. + / / ' $ $, $ ' + ', ( - $! ") % """ "% VMT VHT VHD Functional Class Miles % Hours % Hours % All Highways Freeways and Ramps 2,640, , ,486 1,558 County Freeway and SRA 2,893, , ,642 1,570 Principal Arterials 1,990, , ,898 1,179 Minor Arterials 1,431, , ,731 1,161 Collectors 2,230, , ,914 1,313 Totals 11,186, , ,671 1, County Highways County Freeway and SRA 1,246, , ,322 2,147 Principal Arterials 616, , ,097 5,612 Minor Arterials 995, , ,806 12,687 Collectors 48, , ,200 Totals 2,905, , , ! ". % "4 Route Miles Lane Miles Level of Service Miles % Miles % All Highways A B C D E F Total Congested County Highways A B C D E F 102 1, Total Congested

85 $

86 MCHENRY COUNTY COOK COUNTY DEKALB COUNTY DUPAGE COUNTY Miles KENDALL COUNTY Population Density (People Per Acre) Sources: NIPC Socioeconomic Forecast, Nov Population Density Figure 7-1 Kane County 2030 Transportation Plan File Path: \\athena\proj\kanecountydivisionof\180820\gis\mapdocs\section7\fig7-01population_density_2030.mxd, Date: October 13, :06:14 PM

87 MCHENRY COUNTY COOK COUNTY DEKALB COUNTY DUPAGE COUNTY Miles KENDALL COUNTY Population Growth < > 2000 Sources: U.S. Census NIPC Socioeconomic Forecast, Nov 2003 Population Growth Figure 7-2 Kane County 2030 Transportation Plan File Path: \\athena\proj\kanecountydivisionof\180820\gis\mapdocs\section7\fig7-02population_growth.mxd, Date: October 13, :08:44 PM

88 MCHENRY COUNTY COOK COUNTY DEKALB COUNTY DUPAGE COUNTY Miles KENDALL COUNTY Employment Density (Employees Per Acre) Sources: NIPC Socioeconomic Forecast, Nov Employment Density Figure 7-3 Kane County 2030 Transportation Plan File Path: \\athena\proj\kanecountydivisionof\180820\gis\mapdocs\section7\fig7-03employment_density_2030.mxd, Date: October 13, :10:50 PM

89 MCHENRY COUNTY COOK COUNTY DEKALB COUNTY DUPAGE COUNTY Miles KENDALL COUNTY Employment Growth < > 1000 Sources: U.S. Census NIPC Socioeconomic Forecast, Nov 2003 Employment Growth Figure 7-4 Kane County 2030 Transportation Plan File Path: \\athena\proj\kanecountydivisionof\180820\gis\mapdocs\section7\fig7-04employment_growth.mxd, Date: October 13, :11:58 PM

90 MCHENRY COUNTY 72 Hampshire Huntley Gilberts Algonquin 72 Carpentersville Barrington Hills 25 East Dundee Sleepy HollowWest Dundee COOK COUNTY Pingree Grove 90 Hoffman Estates Burlington 20 Elgin South Elgin Bartlett DEKALB COUNTY Maple Park Virgil 47 Lily Lake Elburn St. Charles Geneva Batavia 31 Wayne DUPAGE COUNTY Miles North Aurora Big Rock Sugar Grove Aurora Montgomery KENDALL COUNTY Priority Places Proposed Agriculture Preservation (2030 Land Use Plan) File Path: \\athena\proj\kanecountydivisionof\180820\gis\mapdocs\section7\fig7-05priorityplaces.mxd, Date: October 13, :14:26 PM Priority Places Figure 7-5 Kane County 2030 Transportation Plan

91 MCHENRY COUNTY COOK COUNTY DEKALB COUNTY DUPAGE COUNTY Miles KENDALL COUNTY No Data Available 30,001-45, ,000 45,001-60,000 15,001-30,000 > 60,000 Sources: - Kane County Division of Transportation, July 2004 Average Daily Traffic Forecast Year 2030 Figure 7-6 Kane County 2030 Transportation Plan File Path: \\athena\proj\kanecountydivisionof\180820\gis\mapdocs\section7\fig7-06adt30.mxd, Date: October 13, :22:14 PM

92 MCHENRY COUNTY COOK COUNTY DEKALB COUNTY DUPAGE COUNTY Miles KENDALL COUNTY No Data Available 10,001-15,000 < 5,000 15,001-20,000 5,001-10,000 > 20,000 Sources: - Kane County Division of Transportation, July 2004 Change in Average Daily Traffic Figure 7-7 Kane County 2030 Transportation Plan File Path: \\athena\proj\kanecountydivisionof\180820\gis\mapdocs\section7\fig7-07changeadt03_30.mxd, Date: October 13, :49:27 PM

93 MCHENRY COUNTY COOK COUNTY DEKALB COUNTY DUPAGE COUNTY KENDALL COUNTY Miles 2003 Trips 2030 Trips Volume of Trips (Two-Way) 50,000 vpd 100,000 vpd Future Travel Growth Desire Bands File Path: \\athena\proj\kanecountydivisionof\180820\gis\mapdocs\section7\fig7-08desirelines03_30.mxd, Date: October 13, :23:55 PM Figure 7-8 Kane County 2030 Transportation Plan

94 MCHENRY COUNTY COOK COUNTY DEKALB COUNTY DUPAGE COUNTY Miles KENDALL COUNTY No Congestion Moderate Congestion Severe Congestion Extreme Congestion 2030 Congested Roadway Segments Based on Average Daily Traffic Figure 7-9 Kane County 2030 Transportation Plan File Path: \\athena\proj\kanecountydivisionof\180820\gis\mapdocs\section7\fig7-09congestion_2030.mxd, Date: October 13, :26:26 PM

95

96 ! "# $ %! &%'!(! ) * +#,# / 0! & *.1234(!2!2-!2- "#5 1* 2 6!.2 6!

97 ! " " # $ % " & " $ ! " # / 6! - - 9### 8-8 : %8 5&+8 ( 9### 8 ; )3 8 9### < =+#+# 8 $ - >55! % & 6! *? % % 8 2

98 ! " " # $ % " & " 25A#.<<?! 0 B % %! C / * 8.<< 6!-.<<!.!-.<< * - =+#+#?*=0 &0(6! ' ( - 5 *> *> *> $ ) * >. 8!+#,#- < > % >.5 5 : -.?*=-.

99 ! " " # $ % " & " $ - % 2 / :! " " # " # " "!! " $ % "!& >. % + 3 * > 6! $.! $.!.! "3D E,, % * 5 F> : - $ $ & ( - 1?*= -. % 6! <25-

100 ! " " # $ % " & " $ ' +,* -. 6! '( (.... $ !. """.6!....! 6!.,#" ; '

101 ! " " # $ % " & " $. * 6! 5 $ > 6! -B5 $ &0*( 5 > (

102

103 ! "!!! # $!! %& $ '(%& $)* '! '! ' # +,- ",- '!!!!!.! /00/1% 2 (1%2 ) * %2! 2" / (2 4/)! /00+! 4#!!!! 1!

104 ! " #! $ #! % # & ' % ' $ 4%16/0 %& $ '67 4 % 1 ' 4*8& $! 69 4 ' '6:9!" ;*(%4*);% & (8&)! *% '6: & 8& %!" #3(%43)4% < '6: "!"4 4 = '6> $ %! &' 4 69/ ' 6/0 1!?8!! ' ( ) () ""!" 4 4 " % *!+, (+ *(41%A -;1?8 &'! +% ' "!" & 4 1?8

105 ! " #! $ #! % # & ' % ' $ *!+, " * 4$!!!! BA%!!'!. $AC +"!" ?8 2 4/ $'!"" 4 1?84? $ $!+ $ " "!" 4!.! 1?84? ( " "!" D* 1?84?!" 4 $3 ($3 ).(!" 4. 1?8 &.+$!" 4 "!! 4# 1?B3 '!" 4 "!!! # 4# 1?B3 $'!!" 1 (1)!+(!" 4 3

106 ! " #! $ #! % # & ' % ' $ " # 1?8 #! 4 $ 04/ '!!6+07 % *8& $!'?8 6/!9 %!*8&$!E' E ' ' 6//! /!+?8 6/!90 $ % &?8 ' #!!!! 4 6+7&!!! '('" 4690!! &' " : ""/; ' '!! # 8 / ' '>4 ' ' 6/>! 6>7 ' % +! ' 1!?8' '.

107 ! " #! $ #! % # & ' % ' $ '! ( '! )!! $! F.1 $31!44%3! B 4/! / $!!!!" ' *! 1 $ 31G/!9131 +, #! ) - # +!! # F!!!!!! +, # 1 '! ' '!.!!!!// 4!! ' ( :) B 4 9: 4 (

108 ! " #! $ #! % # & ' % ' $ +!' 2 '! ' '! A!!!' 04/! 1!" %! %.!! 3 " 4#" 04/ $ :!.!"!. / % 0 ' * +, # -,.# Cost ($ Millions per mile) Equivalent Number of Lanes Over Equivalent Number of Lanes Under 2 3 Lanes 4 5 Lanes 6 7 Lanes 2 to to Structures Over Minor Waterways Note: Structures that are part of interchanges are not costed separately. Equivalent lanes refer to travel lanes and medians only. See text. For extra long bridges (over 200 feet), use $75 per square foot of assumed deck '6/: ".!!. )

109 ! " #! $ #! % # & ' % ' $ + %4 4!! #@ 8 F 1 2'## 1 B '. HB!!! / % 0 ' *! " - Intersection Type Additional Cost ($ each) 4-leg full upgrade 1,000,000 4-leg partial upgrade 600,000 3-leg full upgrade 400,000 3-leg partial upgrade 200,000 At an interchange ramp -0- Other intersections -0- D4! ()! # () + " - 4! /

110 ! " #! $ #! % # & ' % ' $! # 04. / % 0 ' * Interchange Type Cost ($ Millions, each) Single Point Diamond 18.0 Typical Diamond or Parclo #!! " 44 "44.1 $ " !!. C5$% &! +!!!!44!, #! ) - # 5%1*:7!! # F!!.!!!!!@.!!!!! " 67 " 6: ", #! 049 0

111 ! " #! $ #! % # & ' % ' $. / % 0" +3 * +! - -, * Type Percent Earthwork 10% Drainage 8% Erosion Control 2% Traffic Control 10% Lighting 2% Signing/Markings 3% Typical Utilities 5% Incidentals 20% $! 6/: "1! # 1 44 ' 2 %! $!! 44! ( C '!!! ;$04 04:04+ ' ' "! 0: A!

112 ! " #! $ #! % # & ' % ' $ '! $ /! 6/0 *8& $ %& $! '%&$ 6> 4*8& $" I E' 4*8& $E' '6// 1! 0 ' %& $*8& $ 6:>: E'" %9! 4*8& $ E ' 6>9

113 ( ) ) $ * + *, - $ # Projected Revenue Annual Revenue Expansion Factor* 27 Year Cumulative Revenue % of Revenue for Capacity Projects Capacity Projects Revenue O&M Revenue County Highway Levy $5,050, % $276,117,357 $0 $276,117,357 County Bridge Levy $262, % $14,367,046 $0 $14,367,046 County Highway Matching Levy $54, % $2,984,934 $0 $2,984,934 Motor Fuel Tax - State $6,246, % $219,542,903 3% $6,586,287 $212,956,616 Motor Fuel Tax - Local Option $4,167, % $146,480,267 10% $14,648,027 $131,832,241 Impact Fee $2,700, $72,900,000 95% $69,255,000 $3,645,000 Council of Mayors Planning Funds $48, % $1,914,783 $0 $1,914,783 Fees $440, $11,880,000 $0 $11,880,000 Development Donation Accruals $50, $1,350,000 $0 $1,350,000 Other $1,050, $28,350,000 $0 $28,350,000 Interest (non federal only) $275, $7,425,000 $0 $7,425,000 STP-R $500, $13,500,000 $0 $13,500,000 Federal $100,000, % $100,000,000 $0 Total Projected Revenue $20,345,200 $896,812,291 $190,489,314 $706,322,977 Projected Needs Annual Need Expansion Factor* 27 Year Cumulative Needs Capacity Projects Needs O&M Needs Bond Payment $3,495, $62,910,000 $62,910,000 Building & Grounds $569, % $26,023,506 $26,023,506 Equipment $740, $19,982,700 $19,982,700 General Services $3,593, % $169,206,541 $169,206,541 Maintenance - General $2,949, % $152,979,006 $152,979,006 Maintenance - Highway (Resurfacing/Striping/Other) $4,100, % $184,723,940 $184,723,940 Maintenance - Deicing Materials $630, % $41,398,461 $41,398,461 Maintenance - Bridge $940, % $48,750,810 $48,750,810 Capital Capacity Improvement Projects* $0 $0.00 $ Total Projected Needs $17,017,700 $705,974,964 $705,974,964 Surplus (Deficit) $190,837,327 $190,489,314 $348,013 * - Expansion factors determined based on KCDOT 10-year revenue and needs forecast. Percentage factors represent percent increase per year.! "# # $ % # & '

114 ( ) ) $ * + *, - $ Projected Revenue Annual Revenue Expansion Factor* 27 Year Cumulative Revenue % of Revenue for Capacity Projects Capacity Projects Revenue O&M Revenue County Highway Levy $5,050, % $276,117,357 $0 $276,117,357 County Bridge Levy $262, % $14,367,046 $0 $14,367,046 County Highway Matching Levy $54, % $2,984,934 $0 $2,984,934 Motor Fuel Tax - State $6,246, % $219,542,903 53% $116,357,738 $103,185,164 Motor Fuel Tax - Local Option $4,167, % $146,480,267 18% $26,366,448 $120,113,819 Motor Fuel Tax - Local Option (additional 2 cents) $4,167, % $146,480,267 17% $24,901,645 $121,578,622 Impact Fee $2,700, $72,900,000 95% $69,255,000 $3,645,000 Council of Mayors Planning Funds $48, % $1,914,783 $0 $1,914,783 Fees $440, $11,880,000 $0 $11,880,000 Development Donation Accruals $50, $1,350,000 $0 $1,350,000 Other $1,050, $28,350,000 $0 $28,350,000 Interest (non federal only) $275, $7,425,000 $0 $7,425,000 STP-R $500, $13,500,000 $0 $13,500,000 Federal $100,000, % $100,000,000 $0 Total Projected Revenue $24,512,700 $1,043,292,558 $336,880,832 $706,411,726 Projected Needs Annual Need Expansion Factor* 27 Year Cumulative Needs Capacity Projects Needs O&M Needs Bond Payment $3,495, $62,910,000 $62,910,000 Building & Grounds $569, % $26,023,506 $26,023,506 Equipment $740, $19,982,700 $19,982,700 General Services $3,593, % $169,206,541 $169,206,541 Maintenance - General $2,949, % $152,979,006 $152,979,006 Maintenance - Highway (Resurfacing/Striping/Other) $4,100, % $184,723,940 $184,723,940 Maintenance - Deicing Materials $630, % $41,398,461 $41,398,461 Maintenance - Bridge $940, % $48,750,810 $48,750,810 Capital Capacity Improvement Projects* $0 $0.00 $ Total Projected Needs $17,017,700 $705,974,964 $705,974,964 Surplus (Deficit) $337,317,594 $336,880,832 $436,762 * - Expansion factors determined based on KCDOT 10-year revenue and needs forecast. Percentage factors represent percent increase per year.! $ % # & ' "#

115 ( ) ) $ * + *, - $ Projected Revenue Annual Revenue Expansion Factor* 27 Year Cumulative Revenue % of Revenue for Capacity Projects Capacity Projects Revenue O&M Revenue County Highway Levy $5,050, % $276,117,357 $0 $276,117,357 County Bridge Levy $262, % $14,367,046 $0 $14,367,046 County Highway Matching Levy $54, % $2,984,934 $0 $2,984,934 Motor Fuel Tax - State $6,246, % $219,542,903 53% $116,357,738 $103,185,164 Motor Fuel Tax - Local Option $4,167, % $146,480,267 10% $14,648,027 $131,832,241 Sales Tax (0.25 Cent) $11,000, % $386,630,580 71% $274,507,712 $112,122,868 Impact Fee $2,700, $72,900,000 95% $69,255,000 $3,645,000 Council of Mayors Planning Funds $48, % $1,914,783 $0 $1,914,783 Fees $440, $11,880,000 $0 $11,880,000 Development Donation Accruals $50, $1,350,000 $0 $1,350,000 Other $1,050, $28,350,000 $0 $28,350,000 Interest (non federal only) $275, $7,425,000 $0 $7,425,000 STP-R $500, $13,500,000 $0 $13,500,000 Federal $100,000, % $100,000,000 $0 Total Projected Revenue $31,345,200 $1,283,442,871 $574,768,477 $708,674,394 Projected Needs Annual Need Expansion Factor* 27 Year Cumulative Needs Capacity Projects Needs O&M Needs Bond Payment $3,495, $62,910,000 $62,910,000 Building & Grounds $569, % $26,023,506 $26,023,506 Equipment $740, $19,982,700 $19,982,700 General Services $3,593, % $169,206,541 $169,206,541 Maintenance - General $2,949, % $152,979,006 $152,979,006 Maintenance - Highway (Resurfacing/Striping/Other) $4,100, % $184,723,940 $184,723,940 Maintenance - Deicing Materials $630, % $41,398,461 $41,398,461 Maintenance - Bridge $940, % $48,750,810 $48,750,810 Capital Capacity Improvement Projects* $0 $0.00 $ Total Projected Needs $17,017,700 $705,974,964 $705,974,964 Surplus (Deficit) $577,467,907 $574,768,477 $2,699,430 * - Expansion factors determined based on KCDOT 10-year revenue and needs forecast. Percentage factors represent percent increase per year.! $ % # & ' "#

116 ( ) ) $ * + *, - $ ' Projected Revenue Annual Revenue Expansion Factor* 27 Year Cumulative Revenue % of Revenue for Capacity Projects Capacity Projects Revenue O&M Revenue County Highway Levy $5,050, % $276,117,357 $0 $276,117,357 County Bridge Levy $262, % $14,367,046 $0 $14,367,046 County Highway Matching Levy $54, % $2,984,934 $0 $2,984,934 Motor Fuel Tax - State $6,246, % $219,542,903 53% $116,357,738 $103,185,164 Motor Fuel Tax - Local Option $4,167, % $146,480,267 18% $26,366,448 $120,113,819 Motor Fuel Tax - Local Option (additional 2 cents) $4,167, % $146,480,267 17% $24,901,645 $121,578,622 Sales Tax (0.25 Cent) $11,000, % $386,630, % $386,630,580 $0 Impact Fee $2,700, $72,900,000 95% $69,255,000 $3,645,000 Council of Mayors Planning Funds $48, % $1,914,783 $0 $1,914,783 Fees $440, $11,880,000 $0 $11,880,000 Development Donation Accruals $50, $1,350,000 $0 $1,350,000 Other $1,050, $28,350,000 $0 $28,350,000 Interest (non federal only) $275, $7,425,000 $0 $7,425,000 STP-R $500, $13,500,000 $0 $13,500,000 Federal $100,000, % $100,000,000 $0 Total Projected Revenue $35,512,700 $1,429,923,138 $723,511,412 $706,411,726 Projected Needs Annual Need Expansion Factor* 27 Year Cumulative Needs Capacity Projects Needs O&M Needs Bond Payment $3,495, $62,910,000 $62,910,000 Building & Grounds $569, % $26,023,506 $26,023,506 Equipment $740, $19,982,700 $19,982,700 General Services $3,593, % $169,206,541 $169,206,541 Maintenance - General $2,949, % $152,979,006 $152,979,006 Maintenance - Highway (Resurfacing/Striping/Other) $4,100, % $184,723,940 $184,723,940 Maintenance - Deicing Materials $630, % $41,398,461 $41,398,461 Maintenance - Bridge $940, % $48,750,810 $48,750,810 Capital Capacity Improvement Projects* $0 $0.00 $ Total Projected Needs $17,017,700 $705,974,964 $705,974,964 Surplus (Deficit) $723,948,174 $723,511,412 $436,762 * - Expansion factors determined based on KCDOT 10-year revenue and needs forecast. Percentage factors represent percent increase per year.! $ % # & ' "# '

117

118 $1,600 $1,430 $1,400 $1,283 $1,200 $1,043 $1,000 $897 $800 $600 $400 $200 $0 Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 4 Projected Revenues Figure 9-1 Kane County 2030 Transportation Plan

119 $1,600 $1,430 $1,400 $1,283 $1,200 $1,043 $724 $1,000 $897 $337 $577 $800 $191 $706 $706 $706 $706 $600 $400 $200 $0 Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 4 Projected Revenues Available for Operations and Maintenance Projected Revenues Available for Capacity Improvements Projected Operation and Maintenance Needs Comparison of Revenues to Needs Figure 9-2 Kane County 2030 Transportation Plan

120

121 !"!# $ % "!! &!!'% % (! )) * +,-!! - +-,*.(*!,.* + +&! + /, 0 1, *.,% 2, 3,4,5 +! +.3-.$.66 +,*.$! 5!* ",5!*.66! /, ".278!!.29:/,!.278.$.66!.$.66! 0!5!!!"!0,,!!

122 !! " # " $ % ".29: "!.66! "! 3&, " # * * &! /,.66 "'!!(! )) -,*! $ % %,- +!!.,-.'/,-,,#/,( * &'# &,,- +!//,!".,,,!.66,," /, -!,,.,,,,+ # "! #,- ( * &,, " - #,-!( &'.29 ".66.2:7!- ; 2.2:7!- ' " -,- +!.278,- " ".2 78! 5 "!!.278 " 4!,*,0,-"!!5!0.283!! & *&!,0!*! < $!!,,, ",0!.2 78 (",.2:7 4!,,,.2:!4!3

123 !! " # " $ % " & %! ' ( %!(",! +!! 2!* &#4,,4! /& #.2 9: -! 2!* &#4, " 3,.2: -, ",,% ',!,.29',5!#5! /& #.29: ".2)/&!"!.29:- 2! )))) 2* + )! % -,-! ))! +- "%!,/& +., 3,,! 3 ( * + # " " $& ' & Roadway Segment Limits Jurisdiction IL 72 State Street to IL 31 IDOT IL 31 Huntley Road to Longmeadow Parkway IDOT Huntley Road Kreutzer Road to IL 31 County Kreutzer Road IL 47 to Huntley Road McHenry County Galligan Road South realignment to north realignment County Tyrell Road Big Timber Road to IL 72 County Big Timber Road U.S. 20 to Randall Road County IL 68 IL 72 to East County Line IDOT Bowes Road Water Road to McLean Road County McLean Road IL 31 to Hopps Road IDOT IL 38 IL 47 Randall Road IDOT Keslinger Road West of Peck Road to Randall Road County Keslinger Road IL 47 to Anderson Road County Fabyan Parkway Main Street to Randall Road County Main Street Fabyan Parkway to Randall Road County Bliss Road IL 47 to Realignment County Galena Road IL 47 to Randall Road IDOT

124 !! " # " $ % " ( * + # " " $& ' & Roadway Segment Limits Jurisdiction U.S. 30 Dauberman Road to IL 47 IDOT Jericho Road IL 47 to Randall Road County Brier Hill Road Extension to North County Line Local Oak Street Randall Road to IL 31 Local Montgomery Road IL 25 to Farnsworth Extension County, - % +!! /!<, - <,!!! <,," 4,0 #.278,,," 0!, -, ".26!,! 5 %. -, 4, ".2)"; 2, 4, <!5", "!.278 % 3 -!=,! 3. "( -3' -!3 4 3, 04!,. %,! "! -! 4,!( * &% 4&, "!2(" # 4&,!! *&,!4!,! <!,! <!, >!<!,!! <!, " 3, 2&,% 3

125 !! " # " $ % " (!!! #!? <,', ',%, %,*, *,(,@4!4A (,3, < #',!!! '!,0 # 4!4( #3!!! B*, 2, -,.* + + +! -,.* +,.*) *! C0(5!-%;C!! - &!!! - (! *!- *-"- ) + * (

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

130 !! " # " $ % " ( * + & & * * +, -. / - / ' ' * % , & * "! & - * ;" ;" $ $& ' & ;" 4 2( 0, & * " & * ;" ;" $ $& ' & ;" 4 2 0, & * ", * ;" ;" $ $& ' & ;" 4 2) 0. * " * ;" ;" $ $& ' & ;" 4 (2 ( 0, * " * % 8 9 * ;" ;" $ $& ' & ;" 4 25 ) 0, * " * ;" ;" $ $& ' & ;" 4 2) 3 * "! * * ;" ;" $ $& ' & ;" 4 2) 5 + : * " $% () ;" ;" $ -, ;" , - * * " & * ;" ;" $ $& ' & ;" 4 2) $% " - * $% " # ' < * ;" ;" $ $& ' & ;" 4 25 ;" ;" $ $& ' & ;" 4 23 $% 3 " + * ;" ;" $ $& ' & ;" 4 2 $% 3 " $6 ;" ;" 8 $ -, ;" $% 3 " $55 ;" ;" 8 $ -, ;" ( % 8 9 * " & + * ) % : : * " ", B * ;" ;" $ $& ' & ;" 4 2 ;" ;" $ $& ' & ;" # " 0 : * ;" ;" $ $& ' & ;" * * " 7 2# 2 ;" ;" 7 * $ -, ;" / 4 5. &, C % ) 5 &, (! ))"!* * &D4!D))D)4 &,2!* &!!!!

131 !! " # " $ % " - " +! +!!!!! E+ +! 89 / : ' 5! $ " D)$ D87!! E + (! )) D))! " < +?,,/,,!(", 4! >..!,, /,!!! "!!! #,#/, #!!(",!! #!!*,.* +. & # 2 / ' % (! ) "! + 0*C25"5 F + + -,*.6" <- 2(" 5 "!!! C! <(! :% ( ;!

132 !! " # " $ % " "0*C6 <- 2(""!9 : %'C 5" 3 4 A ))"%'C2 4!,5!3!%!,&. < - "3 *! < %!*.( + + -,* 4;(5"F +" % 4;(!-, - 0/,:-! "! * */ * "!!! * " + + -,* 4;(5"! < " " -! < %! " -,* & -,. % E! & & &! & "!% -! E C -,!!-,.29$'!!!! --,2(! ) < 5!< - 0 (", >!= = 5!! +? -/'* *E>!

133 !! " # " $ % " * "!% 5 "!!! * " * & % ( / - ; % < 5! - 5!>!5!! "!!% *!3 54 /E3 - +!? < > ( 5! 5"! 5! ; / < >!; - >!%! >!! <! 5! "! % *.66 1 /E3 - & 5C -A + 5!-!? ' &! < %! "!% 5"4;(% 0 %! -!! <, * /' & % '!! * /,- 3, < - 5"! -

134 !! " # " $ % " + - 4<! *% C!- /E !? ' <% * "0*C 5 * /' &, <% ',,!! " 7! 0 (" - >! 5'C '3< *! <! * 5!.$.28 /E (" -!? ',,! $ / < % /, >! >! &>!4!%* &*! < *! % *" +!! +!? * % " & "! % * /' & % '.278! & ( / 4, 6! 4, "!!,, &,

135 !! " # " $ % ".29.$.66 = / 4!! &!!!! & 5! - "!!! - <"!<% -! &!!? 2("! < %! 3 5! /!0 (" -. +!! C!, " # ++ * &! " &! &! * & &! % ( & / - $ *! "! (

136 !! " # " $ % " * / %!! " *!!. 7*! "!.!! =!"#$!% "! & F "! " 7 8&! %& "'"& ( "!!!! "!'-,!!!'-,!!!!? -!!! = * *-'-.! *-'- -!! &!!! * - +2 > "! &!! " & &; (! )7 )

137 !! " # " $ % " % ( # 4 * * &!!! & + ; &! -42/!!!!!"! &! +? 2&. & &.. & ' & 4 & 5! &! & G ; C! & &!? )*!F. "!42/, 42/! & )+%,! F* & "!! & ()+%!F0!!! & & ; & + ; - ) ( * + -, 0 :. * Project Location Description Randall Road Longmeadow Parkway Bikeway Corridor Silver Glen Road to Longmeadow Parkway Huntley Road to Algonquin Road Improved with a paved shoulder and linking several communities and other bike trails. Ideally, an off-system segment connecting an existing path on Longmeadow Parkway to the Fox River Trail. 3

138 !! " # " $ % " ( * + -, 0 :. * Project Location Description Helm Road Elgin Road eastward Improve on street facilities Forest Drive Shoe Factory Road Elgin neighborhoods to Fox River Trail Shoe Factory Road to Fox River Trail Improve on-street segments Provide improved connectivity between Poplar Creek system and Fox River Trail Higgins Road West Dundee to Hampshire Improve on street facilities South Elgin Connector South Elgin and Elgin Branch of the Illinois Prairie Path On-street and off-street connection Completion of Bikeway Gaps IL 64 Elgin Connector St. Charles to Charlestown Mall Elgin Community College to Fox River Trail Additional connectivity along existing roadways Provide additional connectivity along greenways and public spaces to connect trials, major trip attractions, and neighborhoods Conceptual Bikeway Corridors Stearns Road Bridge Corridor Union Pacific (UP) Rail Trail Mid-County Trail New Fox River Crossing Elgin to Gilberts IL 20 and Nesler Road to IL 56 and Virgil Gilman Trail Utilizing a proposed new corridor and Forest Preserve District trails Developed along active and abandoned rail corridors. Link existing trails, forest preserves, parks, and greenways. IL 68 Cook County to Fox River Trail Improvements along existing facilities # + - )7 ( * +" # -, 0 :. * Project Location Description Randall Road IL 64 to Fabyan Parkway Improved with a paved shoulder and linking several communities and other bike trails. Main Street, Batavia Rural Kane County to Mid- County Trail and Fox River Trail On-street improvements such as adequate paved shoulders. Kirk Road Fabyan Parkway to IL 38 Improved sidepaths, enhanced connectivity to activity centers 5

139 !! " # " $ % " ( * +" # -, 0 :. * Project Location Description Completions of Bikeway Gaps Fox River Trail Downtown Aurora Improve connectivity in Fox River Trail and connections to the Virgil Gilman Trail Gilman Trail To Waubonsee Creek Trail Provide a connection between the Gilman Trail and the Waubonsee Creek Trail Fabyan Connector Kaneville Road to Kirk Road Complete gaps including Fox River Bridge Crossing and between Viking Drive and Bent Tree Drive connecting the proposed Mid-County Trail, Fox River Trail, and Kirk Road Sidepath. Indian Trail To Fox River Trail Complete connection to Fox River Trail and possibly to the Illinois Prairie Path s Aurora Branch Johnson s Mound Conceptual Bikeway Corridors Complete connection between Kaneville Road/ Fabyan Parkway intersection to Johnson Mound Forest Preserve. UP or Keslinger Road Elburn to Geneva Provide a connection between Elburn and Geneva along existing corridors or along the UP Railroad. Possible connections to Johnson s Mound Forest Preserve or Mill Creek System North Aurora/Aurora Utility Trail Mid-County Trail to Fox River Trail Mid-County Trail IL 20 and Nesler Road to IL 56 and Virgil Gilman Trail Develop new corridor along utility easements with a possible connection to the Prairie Path. Link existing trails, forest preserves, parks, and greenways. Indian Trail Extension to Mid-County Trail Provide an connection between the Indian Trail Sidepath and the Mid-County Trail Indian Trail Gilman Connector Provide a connection between the Indian Trail Sidepath and the Virgil Gilman Trail through public lands Stuart Sports Complex Path Virgil Gilman Trail Extension Orchard Road Connect neighborhoods and the proposed Mid- County Trail to the sports complex. Eastward into DuPage County and westward to planned open spaces and Blackberry Creek Connect the Mid-County Trail, Virgil Gilman Trial, Fox River Trail, and Indian Trail Sidepath. C + C - )9 6

140 !! " # " $ % " ( * +$ 1, 0 :. * Project Location Description IL 47 Silver Glenn Road to Lees Road Connect the Lees Road facilities with the Silver Glen Road facilities. Conceptual Bikeway Corridors West Kane County Bikeway Corridor Full length of the county Develop a regional trail along the full length of County in the west. % 8? > =!!! (!! 4 * *!!.! * *! *!!. * '!& 5!&! 5! 5! C!!!!!!!!!!! C! +!? < C.! & (! 4* * , * -

141 !! " # " $ % " + (! )) +* * &!! +9 -(! )9>% 99 C +>% )!!! C >% >3' + 9) G (! ):!! ): +(! )8! +@"* * &A (! )6 * &!!!! ) $ ' %!% '% %!"!!. %( "!!!!,, /, ( * &.2:7.26 -%! E.* 4.$.66.*"!5! - * - %!!!!!!

142 !! " # " $ % " 1%!!! '%!!!!'%! 5"'%! &!?!!! & *! &! # /!" 2!! &! # *! && -!!! & '%!!&!! 5"! " " 9!!! / '% %-!!!!%-!.!%-!!.! (! 86 ;! "! (! )6 *!! (",!,,.2 ).2 9 &#',!! %-,#/, &, ( %-!!! 0

143 % /

144 MCHENRY COUNTY COOK COUNTY DEKALB COUNTY DUPAGE COUNTY Miles KENDALL COUNTY * Prairie Parkway alignment under study - alignment as shown in CATS 2030 Regional Transportation Plan The study area includes southwest Kane County, west of Orchard Road and south of I-88 Freeway/Arterial Improvement Collector Improvement Collector Improvement (Locally Planned) Prairie Parkway Study* Isolated Intersection Improvement Proposed Agriculture Preservation (2030 Land Use Plan) 2030 Recommended Transportation Plan Roadway File Path: \\athena\proj\kanecountydivisionof\180820\gis\mapdocs\section10\fig10-01_recroadplan.mxd, Date: October 13, :37:45 PM Figure 10-1 Kane County 2030 Transportation Plan

145 MCHENRY COUNTY COOK COUNTY DEKALB COUNTY DUPAGE COUNTY Miles KENDALL COUNTY Existing Rail Service Lines Existing Station Committed Extension Planned Extension Conceptual Extension Committed Station Planned Station Conceptual Station Existing Pace Bus Service Express Pace Bus Service Population & Employment per square mile < 1,000 1,001-4,000 4,001-10,000 10,001-30,000 > 30,000 File Path: \\athena\proj\kanecountydivisionof\180820\gis\mapdocs\section10\fig10-02_2030_transit.mxd, Date: October 13, :39:12 PM 2030 Recommended Transportation Plan Transit Figure 10-2 Kane County 2030 Transportation Plan

146 90 25 Hoffman Estates/ Golf Rd. Hoffman Estates/ Prairie Stone Elgin - Bartlett/ Spaulding 20 Hoffman Estates/ Barrington Rd. Schaumburg/ Roselle Rd. 290 Rolling Meadows/ Golf Rd. MD-W Schaumburg/IKEA Elk Grove Village/ Busse Rd. Arlington Heights/ Arlington Heights Rd. O'Hare Des Plaines/ Elmhurstt Rd. 294 O'Hare Rosemont MD-N UP-NW 59 NCS 25 KANE UP-W 64 West Chicago/ Washington St COOK 38 DUPAGE 1 56 Aurora/ Ferry Rd. Aurora - Naperville/ Eola BNSF HC Midway Naperville/95th St. 355 SWS 30 KENDALL 59 Plainfield/IL WILL Joliet/Divison St. SWS RI Miles Existing STAR Line STAR Line Under Study Existing STAR Station STAR Station Under Study Existing Metra Interstate U.S. Highway State Highway STAR Line Figure 10-3 Kane County 2030 Transportation Plan File Path: \\athena\proj\kanecountydivisionof\180820\gis\mapdocs\section10\fig10-03_star.mxd, Date: October 13, :40:07 PM

147 MCHENRY COUNTY COOK COUNTY DEKALB COUNTY DUPAGE COUNTY Miles KENDALL COUNTY Existing Bike/Pedestrian Trail Proposed/Conceptual Bike/Pedestrian Trail 2030 Recommended Transportation Bike/Pedestrian Trails Figure 10-4 Kane County 2030 Transportation Plan File Path: \\athena\proj\kanecountydivisionof\180820\gis\mapdocs\section10\fig10-04_bike-pedestrian.mxd, Date: October 13, :41:32 PM

148 25,000,000 20,000,000 Vehicle Miles of Travel (VMT) 15,000,000 10,000,000 5,000, Existing & Committed 2030 With Arterial & Freeway Projects Comparison of Transportation Performance Vehicle Miles of Travel Figure 10-5 Kane County 2030 Transportation Plan

149 120, ,000 Vehicle Hours of Delay (VHD) 80,000 60,000 40,000 20, Existing & Committed 2030 With Arterial & Freeway Projects Comparison of Transportation Performance Vehicle Hours of Delay Figure 10-6 Kane County 2030 Transportation Plan

150 70% 60% Percent Congested Lane Miles 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2030 Existing & Committed 2030 With Arterial & Freeway Projects Comparison of Transportation Performance Percent Congested Lane Miles Figure 10-7 Kane County 2030 Transportation Plan