Facility Master Plan Update: 2018 Steering Committee Meeting #3 March 1, 2018

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "Facility Master Plan Update: 2018 Steering Committee Meeting #3 March 1, 2018"

Chad Adams
6 years ago
Views:

1 Facility Master Plan Update: 2018 Steering Committee Meeting #3 March 1, 2018

2 W E L C O M E Facilities Master Plan Scott Leopold Partner, Cooperative Strategies Alex Boyer GIS Analyst, Cooperative Strategies Beth Martinez Chief of Staff, FBISD Alice Ledford Executive Director, Strategic Planning, FBISD 2 2

3 AGENDA Facilities Master Plan Welcome Scott Leopold Process and Timeline Preliminary Results from Community Meeting #1 PASA Demographic Data Capacity and Utilization Data Preliminary Facility Condition Data Small Group Report Out Questions and Answers Adjourn 3 3

4 P L A N N I N G P R O C E S S ( R E V I E W ) Facilities Master Plan 4 4

A Fort Bend ISD Graduate has a rigorous academic foundation, strong character, and is equipped

5 Profile of the Graduate: FBISD exists to inspire and equip ALL students to pursue futures beyond what they can imagine. A Fort Bend ISD Graduate has a rigorous academic foundation, strong character, and is equipped with skills for life. a servant leader. an effective communicator. a critical thinker. a compassionate citizen. a collaborative team member. a lifelong learner. 5

6 C O M M I T T E E P R OTO C O L ( R E V I E W ) Facilities Master Plan Roles and Responsibilities Attend all Steering Committee Meetings; Review materials between meetings in an effort to continue collaborative thought and provide ongoing insight to associated committee members; Attend and facilitate conversations during community meetings to engage the larger community and collect feedback to inform the work of the Committee; and, Work collaboratively as a member of the Steering Committee focusing on the development of the options and recommendations resulting in an update to the Facilities Master Plan for Board consideration 6 6

7 C O M M I T T E E P R OTO C O L ( R E V I E W ) Facilities Master Plan Charge of the Committee The is a District advisory committee. The consultants will be providing preliminary options for you to evaluate and provide your feedback. The final decisions on any facility planning actions will take place at the Trustee Level Committee Meetings are Open to the Public If there any noncommittee members present, we ask that you respect the role of the committee and provide you feedback or concerns to the appropriate committee member outside of group discussion. 7 7

8 GOAL OF THIS PROCESS (CLARIFICATION) 1. Develop a robust comprehensive master plan for all facilities Support The Profile of a Graduate Develop options, collect feedback, and make recommendations to the Superintendent to the FUTURE 8 8

9 HOW DO WE GET THERE (CLARIFICATION) 1. 5 year plan of action for each facility Not limited to brick & mortar and may include programmatic changes. 2. Actions are not limited to capital projects that would be included in a bond program. This allows us to the to FUTURE effectively plan for the future. If a major system fails in a facility anytime within near future, we will know how to address it. Example: a facility is recommended for a major renovation within the next 5 years, and the roofing system fails before it is up. We know that we need to patch the system or move it up on the replacement list. 9 9

10 M A S T E R P L A N N I N G AC T I O N S ( C L A R I F I C AT I O N ) Facilities Master Plan What is a Master Planning Action? Tool Kit of Actions New School Addition Repurpose Consolidation Program Change Consider Boundary Change Renovation Physical Condition Educational Adequacy 10 10

11 FUNDING? (CLARIFICATION) The purpose of the committee is to identify and prioritize needs of all facilities. This committee will not determine the size of the next bond program. to the FUTURE 11 11

12 Facilities Master Plan Community Feedback COMMUNITY MEETING #1 PRELIMINARY RESULTS 12

13 Q1: Which Community Meeting(s) did you attend?

14 Q2: To what degree do the following items impact the District's ability to support the FBISD Profile of a Graduate?(Please select one for each topic.)

15 Q3: Please share your level of support for the following programmatic strategies that would increase high school capacity without expanding the building size (Some of these strategies may be used on combination).

16 Q4: Please rate the level of importance of the following factors when considering a school for your child.

17 Q5: Of the listed design principles, select the top five that should be considered a higher priority than the others when renovating or replacing a school?(please select only 5)

18 Q6: When determining whether a school should be renovated, replaced, repurposed, or closed; Please indicate the level of importance for the following factors.

address the challenge of Overutilized Schools

19 Q7: Please indicate any of the following solutions that you believe should be considered by the District to address the challenge of Overutilized Schools Overutilization: Enrollment that is near or exceeds the capacity of a school.

address the challenge of Underutilized Schools.

20 Q8: Please indicate any of the following solutions that you believe should be considered by the District to address the challenge of Underutilized Schools. Underutilization: Enrollment that is much lower than the capacity of a school

Declining Facility Adequacy Educational Facility Adequacy: a measure of

21 Q9: Please indicate any of the following solutions that you believe should be considered by the District to address the challenge of Declining Facility Adequacy Educational Facility Adequacy: a measure of how well an existing school facility can deliver the current educational program.

Condition Facility Condition: The integrity of the structure and internal

22 Q10: Please indicate any of the following solutions that you believe should be considered by the District to address the challenge of Declining Facility Condition Facility Condition: The integrity of the structure and internal systems of a building. This would include HVAC, roofing, safety, architectural integrity, etc.

23 Q12: Your Age Q13: Highest Educational Attainment Q14: Ethnicity Q15: Parental / Guardian / Student Status (Please mark all that apply)

24 Q18: How many years have you lived in the Fort Bend ISD?

25 REFLECTION (10 MINUTES) For those of you that attended one of the community meetings, please share any takeaways from your table discussions. to the FUTURE 25 25

26 Facility Condition / Adequacy Index Option Matrix DRAFT Greater than 66% Major Renovation Rightsize Replacement Consolidation Rezone students in Move Program In Committee Ideas Major Renovation Replacement Other?? Committee Ideas Major Renovation + Addition Rightsize Replacement Rezone students out Move Program out Committee Ideas 33% 66% Minor Renovation (Component Replacement) Rezone students in Committee Ideas Minor Renovation (Component Replacement) Committee Ideas Minor Renovation (Component Replacement) Rezone students out Move Program out Committee Ideas Less than 33% General Maintenance Rezone students in Move Program In Other?? Committee Ideas General Maintenance General Maintenance Addition Rezone students out Move Program out Committee Ideas Utilization Less than 80% 80% 120% Greater than 120% 2626

27 H I S T O R I C A L & P R O J E C T E D E N R O L L M E N T DEMOGRAPHIC UPDATE 27

28 H I S T O R I C A L & P R O J E C T E D E N R O L L M E N T 90,000 Historical Projected 80,000 70,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 Elementary Middle High 28 28

29 P L A N N I N G U N I T E N R O L L M E N T C H A N G E Legend 5 Year Student Change by Planning Unit < >

30 P L A N N I N G U N I T E N R O L L M E N T C H A N G E Legend 10 Year Student Change by Planning Unit < >

31 Old Sienna Plantation Aliana Harvest Green Grand Mission Riverstone B I G G E S T G R OWTH AREAS Facilities Master Plan New FM 521 Corridor Fort Bend Toll Road / Lake Olympia Parkway Corridor 31 31

32 C U R R E N T E L E M E N TA R Y U T I L I Z AT I O N Legend Under Utilized < 60% 60% 69% 70% 79% Well Utilized 80 94% 95% 104% 105% 119% Over Utilized % 130% 139% >140% # of TBuildings on site 32 32

33 S C H O O L Y E A R E L E M E N TA R Y U T I L I Z AT I O N Legend Under Utilized < 60% 60% 69% 70% 79% Well Utilized 80 94% 95% 104% 105% 119% Over Utilized % 130% 139% >140% # of TBuildings on site 33 33

34 S C H O O L Y E A R E L E M E N TA R Y U T I L I Z AT I O N Legend Under Utilized < 60% 60% 69% 70% 79% Well Utilized 80 94% 95% 104% 105% 119% Over Utilized % 130% 139% >140% # of TBuildings on site 34 34

35 C U R R E N T M I D D L E U T I L I Z AT I O N Legend Under Utilized < 60% 60% 69% 70% 79% Well Utilized 80 94% 95% 104% 105% 119% Over Utilized % 130% 139% >140% # of TBuildings on site 35 35

36 S C H O O L Y E A R M I D D L E U T I L I Z AT I O N Legend Under Utilized < 60% 60% 69% 70% 79% Well Utilized 80 94% 95% 104% 105% 119% Over Utilized % 130% 139% >140% # of TBuildings on site 36 36

37 S C H O O L Y E A R M I D D L E U T I L I Z AT I O N Legend Under Utilized < 60% 60% 69% 70% 79% Well Utilized 80 94% 95% 104% 105% 119% Over Utilized % 130% 139% >140% # of TBuildings on site 37 37

38 C U R R E N T H I G H S C H O O L U T I L I Z AT I O N Legend Under Utilized < 60% 60% 69% 70% 79% Well Utilized 80 94% 95% 104% 105% 119% Over Utilized % 130% 139% >140% # of TBuildings on site 38 38

39 S C H O O L Y E A R H I G H S C H O O L U T I L I Z AT I O N Legend Under Utilized < 60% 60% 69% 70% 79% Well Utilized 80 94% 95% 104% 105% 119% Over Utilized % 130% 139% >140% # of TBuildings on site 39 39

40 S C H O O L Y E A R H I G H S C H O O L U T I L I Z AT I O N Legend Under Utilized < 60% 60% 69% 70% 79% Well Utilized 80 94% 95% 104% 105% 119% Over Utilized % 130% 139% >140% # of TBuildings on site 40 40

41 H I S T O R I C A L & P R O J E C T E D E N R O L L M E N T UTILIZATION AND FACILITY CONDITION 41

E L E M E N TA R Y U T I L I Z AT I O N & F C I S C H O O L Y E A R 2 0 2 2 Legend Under Utilized < 60% 60% 69% 70% 79%

42 E L E M E N TA R Y U T I L I Z AT I O N & F C I S C H O O L Y E A R Legend Under Utilized < 60% 60% 69% 70% 79% Well Utilized 80 94% 95% 104% 105% 119% Over Utilized % 130% 139% >140% FCI Percentage 0% 33% 34% 66% > 67% 4242

43 M I D D L E U T I L I Z AT I O N & F C I S C H O O L Y E A R Legend Under Utilized < 60% 60% 69% 70% 79% Well Utilized 80 94% 95% 104% 105% 119% Over Utilized % 130% 139% >140% FCI Percentage 0% 33% 34% 66% > 67% 4343

H I G H U T I L I Z AT I O N & F C I S C H O O L Y E A R 2 0 2 2 Legend Under Utilized < 60% 60% 69% 70% 79% Well

44 H I G H U T I L I Z AT I O N & F C I S C H O O L Y E A R Legend Under Utilized < 60% 60% 69% 70% 79% Well Utilized 80 94% 95% 104% 105% 119% Over Utilized % 130% 139% >140% FCI Percentage 0% 33% 34% 66% > 67% 444

45 DATA S H E E T E X A M P L E S Facilities Master Plan Capacity Info Condition Info Enrollment Utilization School Type Capacity Portables Temp Capacity Year Built FCI Deficiency + Life Cycle Current Enrollment (201718) Projected 5 Year Enrollment (202223) Change Current Utilization (201718) Blue Ridge ES % % 68% Briargate ES % % 90% Ridgegate ES % % 73% Ridgemont ES % % 69% Projected Utilization (202223) Subtotal 2, % 2,238 1,851 (387) 89% 74% Capacity Info Condition Info Enrollment Utilization School Type Capacity Portables Temp Capacity Year Built FCI Deficiency + Life Cycle Current Enrollment (201718) Projected 5 Year Enrollment (202223) Austin Parkway ES % % 83% Colony Bend ES % % 87% Colony Meadows ES % % 120% Commonwealth ES % 937 1, % 165% Cornerstone ES 1, % 1, % 96% Settlers Way ES % % 106% Sullivan ES 1, % 1,251 1, % 113% Change Current Utilization (201718) Projected Utilization (202223) Subtotal 5, % 5,941 6, % 110% 45 45

46 DATA S H E E T E X A M P L E S Facilities Master Plan Capacity Info Condition Info Enrollment Utilization School Type Capacity Portables Temp Capacity Year Built FCI Deficiency + Life Cycle Current Enrollment (201718) Projected 5 Year Enrollment (202223) Change Current Utilization (201718) Austin HS 2, % 2,273 2, % 92% Projected Utilization (202223) Bush HS 2, % 2,428 2, % 100% Clements HS 2, % 2,552 2, % 104% Dulles High HS 2, % 2,478 2, % 81% Elkins HS 2, % 2,307 2, % 110% Hightower HS 2, % 2,041 1, % 77% Kempner HS 2, % 2,264 2, % 88% Marshall HS 2, % 1,249 1, % 55% Ridge Point HS 2, % 2,713 3, % 139% Travis HS 2, % 2,616 2, % 95% Willowridge HS 2, % 1,327 1, % 62% Subtotal 27, % 24,248 25,504 1,256 87% 92% 46 46

47 C H A L L E N G E D FA C I L I T I E S ( I N N O PA R T I C U L A R O R D E R ) Facilities Master Plan Meadows ES: 91% FCI A detailed foundation assessment is underway. Lakeview ES: 78% FCI Madden ES: Current overutilization ES 51 is currently in design. Sienna Area: Projected overutilization Commonwealth: Current overutilization 47 47

48 H OW MUCH DO THINGS COST Facilities Master Plan Sticks & Bricks (No FF&E) Leonetti ES: $28M Thornton MS: $54.2M Ridge Point ( ): $64M Today a new HS would likely cost more than $100M Scanlan Oaks ES Addition $2.9M 2014 Bond Program was $484M 48 48

49 Facilities Master Plan Capacity: Madden + Neil + 51 = 2,550 Enrollment: Madden + Neil : 1,839 = 108% (Madden & Neill only) : 2,299 = 90% (51 comes online) : 2,585 = 101% : 2,837 = 111% : 3,020 = 118% : 3,480 = 136% E S #

50 S M A L L G R O U P D I S C U S S I O N Facilities Master Plan This was a lot of information in a short amount of time, you are overwhelmed. We need to come up with some options to address our challenges. We will flesh out option sheets with costs for our next meeting Discuss potential options in your groups and record notes on flip charts provided

51 E X A M P L E Facilities Master Plan Challenge: Overutilization of Ridge Point Considerations: Districtwide HS Utilization is in acceptable range, but is not balanced. Possible Options: Put Addition on Ridge Point Building a 9 th grade center or flexible facility Grade Configuration Change (Baines 67, Thornton 89, Ridge Point 1012) Major Rezoning (Hightower is not large enough to fix the issue) Relief High School 51 51

52 T I M E L I N E ( R E V I S E D ) COMMITTEE MEETINGS Facilities Master Plan Date Time Location March 22 6:009:00 p.m. Board Room of Administration Building, Lexington Blvd., Sugar Land April 18 6:009:00 p.m. Board Room of Administration Building, Lexington Blvd., Sugar Land April 26 6:009:00 p.m. Board Room of Administration Building, Lexington Blvd., Sugar Land COMMUNITY MEETINGS Date Time Location April 3, 4, 10, & 11 April 3 Travis High School, Harlem Road, Richmond 7:009:00 p.m. April 4 Marshall High School, 1220 Buffalo Run, Missouri City April 10 Elkins High School, 7007 Knights Court, Missouri City April 11 Austin High School, 3434 Pheasant Creek Drive, Sugar Land 52 52

GOOCHLAND COUNTY SCHOOLS

GOOCHLAND COUNTY SCHOOLS FACILITY MASTER PLAN STEERING COMMITTEE #1 JUNE 7, 2017 GOOCHLAND COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS A G E N D A Introductions Timeline Steering Committee Roles Futures Presentation Background