Implementation Status & Results Indonesia URBAN SECTOR DEVELOPMENT AND REFORM PROJECT (P071296)

Transcription

1 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized The World Bank Implementation Status & Results Indonesia URBAN SECTOR DEVELOPMENT AND REFORM PROJECT (P071296) Operation Name: URBAN SECTOR DEVELOPMENT AND REFORM Project Stage: Implementation Seq.No: 11 Status: ARCHIVED Archive Date: 03-Dec-2012 PROJECT (P071296) Country: Indonesia Approval FY: 2005 Product Line: IBRD/IDA Region: EAST ASIA AND PACIFIC Lending Instrument: Specific Investment Loan Implementing Agency(ies): Ministry of Public Works, DG Human Settlements Key Dates Board Approval Date 07-Jun-2005 Original Closing Date 30-Jun-2011 Planned Mid Term Review Date 15-Apr-2008 Last Archived ISR Date 03-Apr-2012 Effectiveness Revised Closing Date Actual Mid Term Review Date 16-Mar-2009 Project Development Objectives Project Development Objective (from Project Appraisal Document) The project development objective is to assist the Borrower to strengthen local governance and improve the provision of selected urban services by participating Urban Local Governments (ULGs) and additional participating ULGs. Has the Project Development Objective been changed since Board Approval of the Project? Yes No Component(s) losure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Component Name Component Cost Urban Reform and Institutional Support Component 9.00 Urban Investment Component Overall Ratings Previous Rating Current Rating Progress towards achievement of PDO Moderately Satisfactory Moderately Satisfactory Overall Implementation Progress (IP) Moderately Satisfactory Moderately Satisfactory Overall Risk Rating Implementation Status Overview The project is nearing completion of physical works and governance reforms being undertaken by 10 urban local governments (ULGs). The investment subprojects are mostly aimed at upgrading and rehabilitating public markets, and have already provided better, cleaner, and more modern facilities for vendors and customers, and increased revenues for operation and maintenance. The ULGs have also strengthened governance by improving transparency and accountability, systematically disclosing public information, establishing complaints handling mechanisms, evaluating performance of contractors/suppliers, improving financial management regulations and systems, and finalizing the national urban strategy, policy, and economic development plans. Page 1 of 10

2 Locations Country First Administrative Division Location Planned Actual Indonesia Not Entered Kotamadya Yogyakarta Indonesia Not Entered Toboli Indonesia Not Entered Propinsi Sulawesi Tengah Indonesia Not Entered Kabupaten Sidenreng-Rapang Indonesia Not Entered Kotamadya Semarang Indonesia Not Entered Kotamadya Parepare Indonesia Not Entered Kota administratip Palu Indonesia Not Entered Palopo Indonesia Not Entered Kabupaten Musibanyuasin Indonesia Not Entered Kabupaten Manokwari Indonesia Not Entered Mangkang Indonesia Not Entered Kota Administratip Cimahi Indonesia Not Entered Kotamadya Blitar Indonesia Not Entered Kemirimuka Indonesia Not Entered Kecamatan Gamping Indonesia Not Entered Kabupaten Sleman Indonesia Not Entered Desa Umbulharjo Indonesia Not Entered Kecamatan Pangkajene Indonesia Not Entered Kotamadya Depok Indonesia Not Entered Kecamatan Moutong Indonesia Not Entered Lakessi Results Project Development Objective Indicators Page 2 of 10

3 Indicator Name Core Unit of Measure Baseline Current End Target Increased revenue, operations and Percentage Value maintenance expenditures, and satisfaction rates among users and consumers of selected urban services in at least 70% of ULGs with completed subprojects 70% of ULGs increase their local revenue from urban services financed by the project by at least 10% 70% of ULGs increase expenditures for O&M of infrastructure financed by the project by at least 10% Percentage of ULGs in which at least 50% of users express increased satisfaction in doing business in the improved facility. Percentage Sub Type Breakdown Percentage Sub Type Breakdown Percentage Sub Type Breakdown Overall ULG target (70%) is based on achievement of four sub-indicators that each have their own targets, and are in turn determined by individual baselines and values achieved for each subproject. At inception of the project, overall baseline is zero as the project investments have not yet taken place. 30 % ULG have increased monthly revenue. At least another 30 % ULGs are preparing the USDRPfinanced infrastructure to operation. t The PBME for assessing users revenue and satisfaction will be prepared prior project closing. However, 10% ULGs have carried out satisfaction survey to traders and resulted that more than 50% traders satisfy to the facilities provided and the use of infrastructure Target value is the percentage of participating ULGs with completed investment sub-projects that have achieved the individual goalsin each of the four subindicators. Value Date 18-Jan-2006 Sub-indicator based on individual baselines for each 30 % ULG have increased monthly revenue. At least Percentage of ULGs with completed subprojects that ULG and subproject. Data are another 30 % ULGs are have met the revenue target. collected through municipal records on revenues from each facility or service. preparing the USDRPfinanced infrastructure to operation Value Sub-indicator based on individual baselines for each ULG and subproject. Data are collected through municipal records on O&M expenditures for each service infrastructure financed by the project. Seven ULGs have completed subprojects in which five ULGs have subprojects in operation, but data on O&M expenditures is not yet available. Percentage of ULGs with completed subprojects that have met the O&M expenditure target. Value Date 18-Jan-2006 Baseline is zero because the Data will be collected through Percentage of ULGs with target is based on percentage an impact assessment completed subprojects that of ULGs meeting targets for (PBME) conducted either a Page 3 of 10

4 Percentage of ULGs in which at least 50% of consumers express increase satisfaction of using the facilities Intermediate Results Indicators Percentage Sub Type Breakdown user satisfaction in facilities that were not yet improved and in some cases not identified. Increased satisfaction for individual subprojects will not include and ex-ante baseline but rather through a survey of current users who also were users of the unimproved infrastructure. "Users" refers to vendors orother stakeholders that use the facilities improved through project investments to conduct business activities and provide commercial services. year after each subproject's infrastructure becomes operational, or at the close of the project. However, 10% ULGs have carried out satisfaction survey to traders and resulted that morethan 50% traders satisfy to the facilities provided and the use of infrastructure have met the user satisfaction target. Value Date 18-Jan-2006 Baseline is zero because the Data will be collected through Percentage of ULGs with target is based on percentage an impact assessment completed subprojects that of ULGs meeting targets for consumer satisfaction in facilities that were not yet improved and in some cases not identified. Increased satisfaction for individual subprojects will not include and ex-ante baseline but rather through a survey of current consumers who also were consumers of the services before they were improved. "Consumers" refers to customers of vendors or recipients of services provided through the facilities. (PBME) conducted either a year after each subproject's infrastructure becomes operational, or at the close of the project. However, 10% ULGs have carried out satisfaction survey to traders and resulted that morethan 50% traders satisfy to the facilities provided and the use of infrastructure have met the consumer satisfaction target. Page 4 of 10

5 Indicator Name Core Unit of Measure Baseline Current End Target Participating ULGs have public feedback Text Value 0.00 (i) 70%; (ii) 100%; (iii) 70% 80 mechanisms in place incl:(i) the use of at least one type of media(s) for public complaintsmanaged by complaint handling unit; (ii) availability Participatory planning process: (i) allocation of block grants to kecamatan and/or kelurahan from the ULG and/or from at least oneagency with Standard Operating Procedure for the use of block grants Participating ULGs practicing sound Fin. Mgt: (i) issuance of local regulation (PERDA or Decree or Perbup/Perwal) on Principle of Regional Financial Management; (ii) Issuance of local regulation At the inception of the project, 70 % ULGs have a systematic use of media for managing complaints and feedback 100 % ULGs have specific unit to manage 70 % ULGs have SOP of complaints handling Text Value % ULGs has block grant mechanism or indicative budget At the inception of the project, 70% ULGs has block grant mechanism or indicative budget Text Value i) 100%; (ii) 100%; and (iii) 70% At the inception of the project, 100 % ULGs have local regulation concerning the Principle of Regional Finance 100% ULGs have local regulation concerning Policies, Systems, and Page 5 of 10

6 Center of Excellence: (i) Unit Informasi Pembangunan Permukiman dan Bangunan (UIP2B) functioned as a Prov. Center of Excellence to support reforms in the ULGs in the province; (ii) Work Plan for Participating ULGs implemented subprojects: (i) Participating ULGs sign Sub- project Loan Agreements (SLAs) with Ministry of Finance for urban investment subprojects; (ii) Participating ULGs complete Procedures for the Preparation and Execution of APBD 70 % ULGs published annual audited financial report Text Value PIP2B is established. Organizational structure and budget are available, and annual work plan is issued At the inception of the project, 1 PIP2B is established. Organizational structure and budget are available, and annual work plan is issued Center of Excellence: at least 1 Province has (i) and (ii) Local Economic Development and City Development Strategy: At least 60%of Partic ipating ULGs have (i) and at least 50% of Participating ULGs having the LED-focu sed City Development Strategy achieve (ii) Text Value 0.00 (i) 10 ULGs; (ii) 7 ULGs (i) 100% of Participating ULGs signed SLAs (ii) At least 80% of Participating ULGs completed construction of urban investment subproject At the inception of the project, 100 % ULGs have signed SLA 70 % ULGs have completed subproject construction Page 6 of 10

7 Participating ULGs practicing sound Procurement: (i) Min. 75% of the bids be awarded within the bid validity period, and publicizedin the public domain, e.g. website, local bulletin; (ii) Min 50% of Transparency, Participation and Accountability: ULGs that post semi-annual updates on websites or in printed media for specified information Text Value 0.00 i) 90%; (ii) 100%; (iii) 30% in progress At the inception of the project, awarded the bids within bid validity period, however only 90% of ULGs published the bid award in the public domain, e.g. website, local bulletin (ii) 100% ULGs have national certified tender committee (iii) At least 30% ULGs are preparing institutions and mechanism for giving award to best-performers Percentage Value At the inception of the project, Value: varies across ULGs, range from % for six types of specified information have been published in websites or in printed media (details are shown in the following six indicators below) At least 60 % of participating ULGs achieve (i) and (ii) and at least 60% of participating ULGs achieve (iii) Value: At least 80% of participating ULGs post the specified information at six months intervals Page 7 of 10

8 Transparency, Participation and Accountability: ULGs that post semi-annual updates on websites or in printed media for information on local development activities/programs Transparency, Participation and Accountability: ULGs that post semi-annual updates on websites or in printed media for specified information: Mid-term development Plan (RPJMD) Transparency, Participation and Accountability: ULGs that post semi-annual updates on websites or in printed media for specified information: summary of Local Budget (APBD) Percentage Value At the inception of the project, 100% ULGs published local Value: At least 80% of development activities/ programs on the website or printed media Participating ULGs post the information on local development activities/ programs at six month intervals Percentage Value At the inception of the project, 90% ULGs published summary RPJMD on the website or printed media Value: At least 80% of Participating ULGs post the information on RPJMD at six month intervals Percentage Value At the inception of the project, 70% ULGs published Value: At least 80% of summary of local budget of the ongoing FY, and 60% published summary of budget realization of previous FY Participating ULGs post the information on the summary of APBD at six month intervals Page 8 of 10

9 Data on Financial Performance (as of 09-Oct-2012) Financial Agreement(s) Key Dates Project Ln/Cr/Tf Status Approval Date Signing Date Effectiveness Date Original Closing Date Revised Closing Date P IBRD Effective 07-Jun Oct Jan Jun-2011 P IBRD Effective 06-Jul Jul Jul Jun-2011 P TF Effective 20-Oct Oct Jan Jun-2011 Disbursements (in Millions) Project Ln/Cr/Tf Status Currency Original Revised Cancelled Disbursed Undisbursed % Disbursed P IBRD Effective USD P IBRD Effective USD P TF Effective USD Disbursement Graph Key Decisions Regarding Implementation The next supervision mission is scheduled for December It will include discussion of final steps to complete unfinished works and activities prior to project closing, and plans for ensuring the long-term sustainability of project investments. Page 9 of 10

10 Restructuring History Level one Approved on 04-Jun-2010, Level two Approved on 13-Apr-2011, Level two Approved on 14-Jun-2012 Related Projects There are no related projects. Page 10 of 10