STATE CAPITAL OUTLAY PLANNING

Transcription

1 STATE CAPITAL OUTLAY PLANNING CCC Chancellor s Office Cheryl Larry Lan Yuan San Mateo CCD Jose Nunez Karen Pinkham CCFC 2016 AGENDA Overview Eligibility Priority Review/Approval Effective Practices 1

2 Key Policies Zero-Based Budgeting >$656k State-Supportable No Augmentation One Project per Campus In a 2-Year Cycle FUSION Facilities Planning Space Inventory Building Assessment Project Administration 2

3 Application Components Facilities Master Plan Five-Year Plan Initial Project Proposal Final Project Proposal Space Inventory Enrollment Projections Space Inventory Due October Existing Capacity Age of site/building ASF summary by space type Keep Current 3

4 Five-Year Capital Outlay Plan Call Letter Project Planning Enrollment (Load) Priority Status Category Initial Project Proposal Input from users Prerequisite for FPP (except Cat. A) Submitted 3 years prior to funding Conceptual 4

5 Final Project Proposal Submitted 2 years prior to funding Formal proposal SAM JCAF 31, 32, & 33 Quantities and Unit Cost Diagrams New Quantities and Unit Cost Rolled out for plan Minimize data entries JCAF 31 data populates in Q&UC Q&UC auto populates JCAF 31 Reduce computations Q&UC formulated costs Escalation options Enhance consistency 5

6 FUSION Plan Year , Space Inventory Oct 2016* Feb 2017 Enrollment Projections (2016) YP FPP IPP Local/Future July 2017 *Energy Usage Calculators Capacity Load Capacity (ASF in S.I. and 5YP) Load (Enrollment Forecast) Laboratory and Lecture ASF to WSCH WSCH Office ASF to Staff FTE Staff FTE Library and AV/TV ASF Day Enrollment to ASF 6

7 Category Criteria Cat. A (Safety) Least cost solution: A1 Imminent danger to building occupants A3 Seismic deficiency A4 Immediate infrastructure failure Independent 3 rd party report Cat. B Instructional & Cat. E Inst. Support (Growth) Expands program/support space Preponderance of space cannot be >105% Cat. C Instructional & Cat. F Inst. Support (Modernization) Program/support efficiency No GSF growth except for code Cannot create or sustain overbuilt status Cat. D (Complete Campus) Growth or modernization, i.e., Performing Arts Physical Education Child Dev. Center Board s Funding Priorities Allocation Cat. D 15% Cat. E 5% Cat. F 5% Cat. C 25% Cat. B 50% of remaining Cat. A up to 50% of total 7

8 Prioritizing Cat. B and E Factors (up to 50 points each): Enrollment Growth Existing Inventory ASF Change Local Contribution Prioritizing Cat. C and F Factors: Age of Building (up to 120 points) Activation of Unused Space (30 points) Local Contribution (up to 50 points) 8

9 Prioritizing Cat. D Factors (up to 50 points each): Age of Site Program Service Offerings Enrollment growth or code= 10 pts. New degree/certificate= 20 pts. Initial program offering on campus= 20 pts. Project Design Solutions (3 options) Replace temporary building= 50 pts. Structurally/functionally deficient building= 30 pts. Addition/expansion= 20 pts. Local Contribution Approval Timeline Plan Year FPU Board s Spending Plan DOF Gov s Budget LAO Analysis Budget Act Summer- Winter 2016 Spring 2017 Summer/ Fall 2017 Jan 2018 Feb 2018 June

10 CCC System Estimated Systemwide Needs= $28 billion 2016 Local Bonds= $10 billion for 16 districts Prop. 51= $2 billion $750 million $750 million $500 million Resources Chancellor s Office Website /FacilitiesPlanning/ReferenceMaterials.aspx FUSION Help Desk fusionhelp@foundationccc.org Call FPU Specialist 10

11 Questions? 11

12 CCFC 23 rd Annual Conference State Capital Outlay Planning Facilities Master Planning / Project Sequencing / Onuma November 15, 2016 Facilities Master Planning District Strategic Plan College Educational Master Plan (2000, 2005, 2014) Facilities Assessment (Building Systems & Infrastructure) 2001 Energy Audit 2001, 2010 Facilities Master Plan 2001 TBp Architecture 2005 Steinberg Architecture 2011 HMC Architecture 2015 Amendment to the 2011 HMC Architecture Funding Local Bond Measures (C, A, H) State (Capital Outlay, SMSR, Haz Mat) Grants / Rebates (CCC/IOU, Prop 39, CPUC) 1

13 2015 Facilities Master Plan Amendment Cañada College Facilities Master Plan Map 2

14 College of San Mateo Facilities Master Plan Map Skyline College Facilities Master Plan Map 3

15 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Funding Local Bond / State Funding / Grants / Rebates CIP Measure C $207M State Funding $65M Local / Grant / Rebates CIP Measure A $568M State Funding $35M Local / Grant / Rebates CIP Measure H $388M State Funding $25M ($19M) Local / Grant / Rebates State Capital Outlay Projects Approved Capital Outlay Funding (FY17-18 FPPs) State Funds Local Match Total CSM B9 Library/Learning Resources SKY B2 Workforce & Economic Development TOTAL $11,709,000 $11,410,000 $23,119,000 $13,433,000 $12,981,000 $26,414,000 $25,142,000 $24,391,000 $49,533,000 Pending Capital Outlay Funding (FY18-19 FPPs) CAN B13 Multiple Disciplinary Instructional SKY B5 Learning Resource Ctr Tech and Env Upgrade TOTAL $7,134,000 $11,503,094 $18,637,190 $12,345,000 $11,911,000 $24,256,000 $19,479,000 $23,414,094 $42,893,190 Submitted Capital Outlay Funding (FY19-20 IPPs) CSM B8 Demolition & New Kinesiology CAN B3 Performing Arts Center Tech and Env Modernization TOTAL $35,118,000 $34,882,000 $70,000,000 $11,039,000 $10,566,000 $ 21,605,000 $46,157,000 $45,448,000 $91,605,000 4

16 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) CIP 1 & 2 Projects CIP 1 CAN 9 New Construction (State $) CIP 2 CAN 5/6 Modernization (State $) CAN 22 New Construction CAN 16/18 Modernization CAN Facilities Maintenance Center (FMC) (State $) CSM 18 Modernization (State $) CSM 35 New Construction CSM 36 New Construction SKY 2 Modernization Phase II SKY 3 Modernization (State $) CAN Electrical Infrastructure Upgrade CAN Gateways CAN 12 Pony Espresso CSM 2 & 4 Modernization CSM Design Build: 5N, 10N, Site Work, Aquatics, Chiller, 12KV CSM 12, 15, 17 & 34 Modernization SKY 6/7A New Construction SKY 7 Modernization (State $) SKY 8 HHW SKY 8 Seismic Upgrade & Modernization SKY 19 Pac Heights Swing SKY Facilities Maintenance Center (FMC) (State $) CSM North Gateway (State $) SKY 19 Pac Heights Swing SKY Design Build: 4N, 11N, Site Work SKY Electrical Infrastructure Upgrade (State $) DW Athletics CIP3 Phase 1 Projects ( ) CAN 1 Demo & New Kinesiology DB Awarded (Blach Construction / ELS Architects) CAN 23N Math & Science RFP in Progress CSM 3 Theater Modernization CDs (TLCD Architects) CSM 12 / 19 Demo & New Construction Programming (Steinberg Architects) CSM 17 Student Life / Faculty Office Tennant Improvement DSA (Cody Anderson Wasney Architects) CSM Solar PV Energy Storage RFP Development SKY 1 Social Science / Creative Arts (Demo & New Construction) and Boiler Plant Relocation RFSOQ in Progress SKY 12N Environmental DB Awarded (XL Construction / Ratcliff Architects) SKY Lot L Expansion DSA (Carducci Landscape) SKY 19 (PH) Schematic Design in Progress (Group 4 Architects) DW Network Upgrade In Progress DW Door Lock Upgrade (Mandated by BOT 10/28/15) Phase 1 Completed, Phase 2 in Progress DW Fire Alarm Panel Upgrade AE Selected 5

17 CIP3 Phase 2 Projects ( ) CAN 3 Modernization (State $) IPP Pending CAN 13 Modernization (State $) FPP Pending CAN 16/18 Secondary Effects CSM 1 Modernization CSM 8 Demo & New Construction (State $) IPP Pending CSM 9 Modernization (State $) FPP Approved SKY 2 Modernization (State $) FPP Approved SKY 5 Modernization (State $) FPP Pending DW Roadways & Parking Process of a Project Facilities Planning is based upon Educational Planning Budget (Conceptual vs. Actual) Delivery Method (DBB vs. DB) Schedule Development & Execution Academic vs. Construction Logistics A&E Selection & Design Process (9-12 months) Programming / Schematic Design / Design Development / Construction Documents Contractor Procurement (DBB vs. DB) Permitting (4-7 Months) Construction (12-24 Months) Furniture Fixtures and Equipment Installation (FF&E) Commissioning Occupancy Close Out 6

18 Sequencing of Projects Case Study: Skyline College 6/2017-6/2019 Sequencing of Projects Case Study: Skyline College CIP 3 7

19 Onuma for Strategic Space Scheduling Case Study: Skyline College Onuma for Strategic Space Scheduling Case Study: Skyline College 8

20 Onuma for Strategic Space Scheduling Case Study: Skyline College Onuma for Strategic Space Scheduling Case Study: Skyline College traditionally used as meeting space 9

21 Onuma for Strategic Space Scheduling Case Study: Skyline College Portables 3A and 3D Currently dedicated for Athletics Only Onuma for Strategic Space Scheduling Case Study: Skyline College Cosmetology Classroom Currently Dedicated Could easily be used for General Lecture 10

22 Onuma for Strategic Space Scheduling Case Study: Skyline College Opportunity to think differently One lab has 36 stations, One has 40 stations Both have PC computers Question & Answer José D. Nuñez, LEED AP Vice Chancellor Facilities Planning, Maintenance & Operations (650) Karen Pinkham Interim Facilities Manager Cañada College (650)