SAN FRANCISCO AIRPORT COMMISSION MINUTES. Tuesday, December 18, :00 A.M.

Transcription

1 SAN FRANCISCO AIRPORT COMMISSION MINUTES Tuesday, December 18, :00 A.M. Room City Hall #1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place (400 Van Ness Avenue) City and County of San Francisco LONDON N. BREED, MAYOR COMMISSIONERS LARRY MAZZOLA President LINDA S. CRAYTON Vice President ELEANOR JOHNS RICHARD J. GUGGENHIME PETER A. STERN IVAR C. SATERO Airport Director C. CORINA MONZÓN Commission Secretary SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94128

2 Minutes of the Airport Commission Meeting of Tuesday, December 18, 2018 CALENDAR SECTION AGENDA ITEM TITLE RESOLUTION NUMBER PAGE A. CALL TO ORDER:... 4 B. ROLL CALL:... 4 C. ADOPTION OF MINUTES:... 4 No Regular meeting of December 4, D. ITEMS INITIATED BY COMMISSIONERS:... 4 E. ACTION ITEMS RELATED TO ADMINISTRATION, OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE Award of the Terminal 1 Retail Concession Lease No. 3 Special Retail to Emporio Rulli, Inc... 5 No Authorization to Accept Proposals for the Terminal 3 Boarding Area F Café Lease, a Small Business Enterprise Set-Aside... 6 No Approval of Phase D to Establish Final Guaranteed Maximum Price to Contract No , Design-Build Services for the New Boarding Area B Project Austin Webcor Joint Venture $19,172, No Authorization to Issue a Request for Proposals for Contract No , Elevator Maintenance, Repair, and On-Call Service... 8 No Authorization to Issue a Request for Proposals for Contract No , Escalator and Electric Walk Maintenance, Repair, and On- Call Service No Approval of Modification No. 5 to Contract No. 9254, Airport Shuttle Bus Services No F. CONSENT CALENDAR OF ROUTINE ADMINISTATIVE MATTERS Minutes, December 18, 2018, Page 2

3 7. Authorization to Issue a Request for Proposals for Contract No , Aviation Security Consulting Services, and Negotiate with the Highest Ranked Proposer No Authorization to Accept Proposals for the Terminal 2 Specialty Retail Lease No No Authorization to Accept Bids for the Domestic Parking Garage Food Truck Lease No Rental Credit to American Airlines, Inc., in the Amount of $405,697, Due to the Diminished Use of Leased Premises Occupied at the SuperBay Hangar on Plot 40 Under Lease L No Authorization to Issue a Request for Qualifications/Proposals for Two Professional Services Contract Nos and , As- Needed Construction Management Support Services No Approval of National Aeronautics and Space Administration Ames Research Center Reimbursable Umbrella Space Act Agreement (Agreement SAA ) ) and Annex One for Research and Technologies For a Not-to-Exceed Amount of $305, No G. NEW BUSINESS: H. CORRESPONDENCE: I. CLOSED SESSION: J. ADJOURNMENT: Minutes, December 18, 2018, Page 3

4 Minutes of the Airport Commission Meeting of Tuesday, December 18, 2018 A. CALL TO ORDER: The regular meeting of the Airport Commission was called to order at 9:00 A.M. in Room 400, City Hall, San Francisco, CA. * * * B. ROLL CALL: Present: Hon. Larry Mazzola, President Hon. Linda S. Crayton, Vice President Hon. Eleanor Johns Hon. Richard J. Guggenhime Hon. Peter A. Stern C. ADOPTION OF MINUTES: The minutes of the regular meeting of December 4, 2018 were adopted unanimously upon a motion by Commissioner Crayton and a second by Commissioner Guggenhime. No Regular meeting of December 4, Commissioner Crayton said I have a question. In the Minutes, previously you have Commissioner Stern being present at a meeting that he was y absent at. Ms. Corina Monzón, Commission Secretary said so the Minutes for December 4 th, I have Commissioner Stern listed as absent. Commissioner Crayton said see at the top you have him present and then, on the other way you have him absent. One of the two. Ms. Monzón asked so it s for, not for the December 4 th Commission meeting, it s for a previous meeting? Okay. I will take a look. Thank you. D. ITEMS INITIATED BY COMMISSIONERS: Commissioner Crayton asked Director Satero to talk about the Conference of Minority Transportation Officials (COMTO). Mr. Ivar Satero, Airport Director responded yes glad to Commissioners. It s our pleasure to inform the Commission of an acknowledgement of our own, Jeff Littlefield. We re very proud of the acknowledgement the other night at the Conference of Minority Transportation Officials. Our own Minutes, December 18, 2018, Page 4

5 Jeff Littlefield was acknowledged for Leadership Excellence by COMTO. It was a very austere occasion with former Secretary, Norm Mineta acknowledged for a Lifetime Achievement Award. And then AC Transit and Contra Costa Transit Authority also acknowledged. It was a very proud moment for our Airport and we congratulate Jeff and I wanted the Commission to be aware of that. Commissioner Mazzola congratulated Mr. Jeff Littlefield. E. ACTION ITEMS RELATED TO ADMINISTRATION, OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE Item No. 1 was approved unanimously by a motion by Commissioner Guggenhime and a second by Commissioner Crayton. 1. Award of the Terminal 1 Retail Concession Lease No. 3 Special Retail to Emporio Rulli, Inc. No Resolution: (1) Awarding the Terminal 1 Retail Concession Lease No. 3 Specialty Retail to Emporio Rulli, Inc., and (2) Directing the Commission Secretary to request approval of the lease from the Board of Supervisors. So Good Morning. My name is John Reeb. I work in Revenue Development and Management. My team is responsible for conducting all of the Concession RFP s at the Airport. This morning I m here to seek your award of the Terminal 1 Retail Concession Lease No. 3 to Emporio Rulli, Inc. The concept they proposed is called G.R. Chocolate Boutique, which will feature a wide array of artisanal chocolates made in small batches in his Emporio Rulli s Larkspur kitchen. Emporio Rulli currently operates two food and beverage facilities in Terminal 3 at SFO and they were also the permittee of one of our Pop-Up shops in Terminal 3, under a partnership with Jean-Marie Auboihe Chocolates for a year. The Airport received two proposals for this opportunity. One of the proposers failed to submit a proposal bond, deeming their proposal non-responsive. Consequently, Emporio Rulli was the only qualified proposal. A four-member panel did evaluate the proposal and deemed it responsive and responsible. The lease has a term of seven years. The rent will be the greater of tiered percentage rent or a Minimum Annual Guarantee of $150,000. They actually project the first-year rent to be about $200,000 based on anticipated $1.1 million in sales and I would be happy to answer any questions. Commissioner Johns said so my concern is the fact that we only had two responders and then one ended up not being responsive..[inaudible] Mr. Reeb said certainly. We did actually have five interested parties attend the informational conference. We had others that vocally stated that they had an interest as well. One of the pieces of feedback we received from some of the other operators was, we have this limitation on leases and specialty leases tend to be kind of challenging financially for operators to operate. There s not a lot of margin. So, they chose not to propose, waiting for other opportunities that might be a little bit more lucrative. And of the other attendees, we have Minutes, December 18, 2018, Page 5

6 not reached out to them to find out why they didn t propose. Commissioner Johns said..[inaudible] Mr. Reeb said we initially had put this out as a set-aside and gotten no responses. We were hoping to create small business opportunity by making it a set-aside. And again, this last round we thought we had a lot of interest and then people just didn t come to. This is going to be in Terminal 1, it will be mid Concourse, it s about 375 square feet so it s a smaller shop. We had even opened this up to various concepts excluding the concepts that were in the vicinity hoping that, that would elicit a lot more interest as well. We also have a new round of Terminal 1 leasing to come up. And a lot of operators are waiting for that to come out as well because those are going to be a lot of concessions as well. Commissioner Crayton said okay thank you. I just want to be certain that I have my information correct. It seems to me and my memory is not long but I m trying to exercise it today that we had some issues with Emporio Rulli previously? And we ve come to some sort of resolution on that matter and? Mr. Reeb responded we have, we have, yes. Commissioner Crayton asked and so this particular place and this particular concept is very different than what they did previously? Mr. Reeb responded correct, they currently operate restaurants. Chocolate is one of his sides specialties and they ve attempted to propose in the past. Commissioner Crayton said okay, so they are operating restaurants at the Airport also? Mr. Reeb responded correct. Commissioner Crayton asked seven, seven restaurants? Mr. Reeb responded they use to, yeah. They have in the Bay Area, they have a number. Commissioner Crayton said okay, thank you. That s good information. There were no further questions. Item No. 2 was approved unanimously by a motion by Commissioner Crayton and a second by Commissioner Guggenhime. 2. Authorization to Accept Proposals for the Terminal 3 Boarding Area F Café Lease, a Small Business Enterprise Set-Aside No Resolution approving the lease specifications, minimum qualifications Minutes, December 18, 2018, Page 6

7 and proposed requirements, and authorizing Staff to accept proposals for the Terminal 3 Boarding Area F Café Lease, a Small Business Enterprise set-aside. My name is John Reeb with Revenue Development and Management. This morning I m here to seek your authorization to accept proposals for the Terminal 3 Boarding Area F Café Lease, A Small Business Set-Aside. On October 16, you authorized the issuance of the RFP for this Lease, which is currently a Peet s Coffee location at the end of Terminal 3. In order to create more opportunity for smaller businesses, once again, you also allowed us to make this lease a Small Business set-aside. We held an informational conference on November 15 which was attended by 24 different companies. Of the 24, 15 were small businesses under our definition and six were actually first-time attendees. We collected comments from the industry. There were very few substantive changes requested. The two most substantive questions were: 1) Could we add a 2-year option to the existing10-year term; and 2) If the Airport would be providing any cash to the new tenant for tenant improvements? We believe the term is already fair. 10 years is kind of an industry standard and in-line with all of our other food leases at the Airport. Also, we don t even have any options to provide cash to incoming tenants for any type of improvements. So, we re not able to do that. So as a result, we re not recommending any changes to the initial terms or the proposed terms. The proposal deadline for this opportunity is January 30, 2019, and we hope to be back in March for the award. And I would be happy to take any questions. There were no questions. Item No. 3. was approved unanimously by a motion by Commissioner Crayton and a second by Commissioner Guggenhime. 3. Approval of Phase D to Establish Final Guaranteed Maximum Price to Contract No , Design-Build Services for the New Boarding Area B Project Austin Webcor Joint Venture $19,172,176 No Resolution approving Phase D to Contract No , Design-Build Services for the New Boarding Area B Project, with Austin Webcor Joint Venture, in an amount of $19,172,176 to establish the Final Guaranteed Maximum Price of $785,000,000. Good Morning Commissioners, I m Judi Mosqueda, Director of Project Management. This Item is for your approval of Phase D, which establishes the Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) for our contract with Austin Webcor Joint Venture. The GMP includes an increase to the contract capacity amount by $19.2 million for a total contract amount of $785 million, and with no change to the contract duration. It also includes a decrease to the contract contingency by $12.7 million. The Project will construct up to 28 new aircraft parking positions with new boarding bridges; a new architectural building envelope; complete Minutes, December 18, 2018, Page 7

8 building systems, concessions program; a jet fuel hydrant system; and all other support systems, along with public art installation. This approval establishes a Final GMP amount sufficient for Austin Webcor JV to assume the remaining risk to complete the Project, with cost components as follows: 1) Unawarded base contract scope; 2) Pending additional scope and trends; 3) Trade Package allowances for other anticipated scope; and 4) Trade Package Set Reserves, which is the Contractor s contingency to cover any obligation it has under the Final GMP including scope gaps, design errors and omissions, construction coordination costs, cost increases due to market conditions, and non-airport initiated design changes or clarifications. The forecast for this contract is $802 million which is equal to the contract budget of $802 million. This Phase D approval has no change to the contract duration and the Project remains on-schedule to be substantially complete in May of The LBE goals for this contract are 25% for design services and 18% for construction services and Austin Webcor is committed to meeting these goals. We recommend your approval and I d be happy to answer any questions. Commissioner Guggenhime asked why if you re increasing the amount by $19 million, why, why do you only use part of the contingency amount? Ms. Mosqueda responded as we have negotiated the GMP, through your prior actions with the Commission, you had given, awarded us a certain contract capacity to date along with the contingency to date. And as we settled in on our Guaranteed Maximum Price with Austin Webcor, what we realized is, not realized what we worked out, what we negotiated was, their contract capacity needs to be $785 million. But the contract contingency awarded to date is I believe $17 million plus $12 million. Commissioner Guggenhime said it was, yeah. That s a new contingency after you use $12 million? Ms. Mosqueda responded no. We, so you awarded $29 million to date in contingency. We want to reduce that to $17 million which is the appropriate amount for remaining risk on the Project. Commissioner Guggenhime said yeah, I m okay with that. I m fine with that. There were no further questions. Ms. Monzón said next I will call Item No. 4 and No. 5 together. Item No. 4 was approved unanimously by a motion by Commissioner Crayton and a second by Commissioner Guggenhime. 4. Authorization to Issue a Request for Proposals for Contract No , Elevator Maintenance, Repair, and On-Call Service No Resolution authorizing issuance of a Request for Proposals for Contract No. Minutes, December 18, 2018, Page 8

9 50204, Elevator Maintenance, Repair, and On-Call Service. Good morning Commissioners. My name is Leroy Sisneros, I m the Director, Facilities. I m coming here this morning to seek authorization to issue a Request for Proposal for Contract No , for Elevator Maintenance, Repair, and On-Call Services and Contract No for Escalator and Electric Walk Maintenance, Repair, and On-Call Services. The current elevator contract with ThyssenKrupp Elevator Corporation will expire on June 30, We seek authorization to issue a Request for Proposals (RFP) for Contract No and to provide regular preventive maintenance, repair, and on-call services on a campus-wide support of the Airport. Such work is necessary to keep the elevators safe, reliable, and to extend their life. The term of this contract will be five years. The term of the two contracts will be five years each. Currently we have 184 elevators and we need for them to operate in a safe and reliable manner to support the passenger, the visiting public, and the Airport workers as they pass through the campus. In addition, we also have 133 escalators and 43 electric walkways. Our current contract is for maintenance from 7am-3:30pm. The difference here with the two different contracts is we re going to go 24/7, 365 days/week. The Staff will also request the Commission approve this RFP for the repairs and the maintenance and on-call services. Both RFPs will state specifically the Airport s intent to award two contracts to two different vendors to maintain our services. If a single proposer achieves the highest ranking for both contracts, Staff will open up a sealed envelope so that the proposal will get his first choice. So, based on the above, what I just spoken about, I recommend that the Commission authorize and issue the two RFPs for Contract and Commissioner Crayton said as part of this contract, I noticed that one of the requirements was that the proposer must have a business within 50 miles of the Airport. Was that correct? Mr. Sisneros responded that they may have an office within 50 miles. Commissioner Crayton said so I m assuming you already determined that already since you put it into the proposal. Mr. Sisneros asked that elevator company? Commissioner Crayton said that there s someone who meets those qualifications. That s the question. Mr. Sisneros replied yes. Commissioner Crayton said the other thing I have a question about is the under your recommended evaluations selection criteria, the training program and the transition plan only was waited with 25 points vs. the approach which was a 100 and the experience and qualifications of the firm were 50. So, I m thinking that there should be more weighting to the experience and qualifications of the firm because as I read that, it s seemed as if you ve Minutes, December 18, 2018, Page 9

10 indicated that. It was a problem getting good quality help in the area of elevators and etc. And so therefore you need someone that really, really knows their business and have people that are trained in that and so, I just was questioning why it was weighted in this particular matter and also, a little concern about the 50 miles. Is that something not unusual in this business. Mr. Sisneros said I don t believe it s that unusual. Elevator contractors are State certified and so they all have licenses in place to show that they have the valid experience and the work. There s also some criteria here for the size of the company. Although elevator contracts are hard to come by because there s very few here within the City. And there s a high demand because of the construction but we do feel that there s adequate companies here that would be interested in this contract. Commissioner Crayton said okay, thank you. Commissioner Johns asked is the 50-mile radius something that you put in because you feel that you want them to be able to get there in case of an emergency..[inaudible] Mr. Sisneros said part of it has to do with the new contract who require the elevator contractors to have parts and supplies available to do quick emergency repairs. At the Airport, we re restricted to size, there spaces limited. And so, the 50 miles. For storage of a larger pieces of equipment. And so, the thinking is, is that if they were within 50 miles, they would be able to do significant repairs very quickly. Commissioner Crayton said makes sense. Commissioner Johns said well that s what I assumed. There were no further questions. Item No. 5 was approved unanimously by a motion by Commissioner Crayton and a second by Commissioner Guggenhime. 5. Authorization to Issue a Request for Proposals for Contract No , Escalator and Electric Walk Maintenance, Repair, and On-Call Service No Resolution authorizing issuance of a Request for Proposals for Contract No , Escalator and Electric Walk Maintenance, Repair, and On-Call Service. Item #4 and #5 were called together. Please refer to the notes under Item #4. Minutes, December 18, 2018, Page 10

11 Item No. 6 was approved unanimously by a motion by Commissioner Crayton and a second by Commissioner Guggenhime. 6. Approval of Modification No. 5 to Contract No. 9254, Airport Shuttle Bus Services SFO Hotel Shuttle, Inc. $2,700,000 No Resolution approving Modification No. 5 to Contract No. 9254, to authorize wage rate increases and include additional reimbursable costs in the calculation of charges for an additional $2,700,000 and a new not-to-exceed contract amount of $95,281,617. Good morning and Happy Holidays Commissioners. My name is Abubaker Azam. I m one of the Senior Operations Manager, at San Francisco International Airport, under Operations. This morning we seek your approval for Modification No. 5 to Contract No with SFO Hotel Shuttle, Inc. to provide shuttle bus service to the Airport. SFO Hotel Shuttle has been providing Shuttle bus services for the Airport s various parking garages and lots for both customers and employees under this contract since 2012 and they ve done a remarkable job. In order to address a shortage of Domestic Gates due to T1 construction in 2017, this contract was modified to include passenger bus service to the Airfield from the terminals to designated remote Aircraft parking positions. Now, due to the AirTrain construction project which extends the AirTrain to the new Long-Term Parking Garage, builds a new Station at the Airport Hotel and also upgrades the control systems, we are faced with additional overnight closures of the AirTrain requiring bus operations for the customers to the Rental Car Center. The duration of these closures has been extended due to unforeseen complications with the system controls upgrade and required testing of the system prior to full implementation. The overall closures will be necessary to complete the new Hotel Station prior to the Hotel opening. Additionally, the contractor has been challenged in hiring and retaining drivers due to highly competitive market for bus drivers. Technology companies that are now providing bus services from the City to the Peninsula for their employees have placed a strain on hiring bus drivers at the Airport. Technology companies are paying up to $5 more per hour for bus drivers, even after the requested wage increase in this modification. Modification No. 5 addresses the following items: Increases to wages and reimbursement expenses to address the competitive market and honor the collective bargaining agreement; Additional Customer service staff and technology on the bus to enhance the customer experience and reduce complaints during peak and AirTrain outages; Contingency funding for leasing additional as-needed buses and resources for the extended AirTrain closures. The immediate need for additional busing for extended overnight closures is expected to last through May There will also be additional bus needs to support the new Long-Term Parking Garage when it opens in early 2019 as well as closures required to activate the new long-term parking garage station in early After the completion of the AirTrain extension, the scope of bus services needed is expected to be reduced significantly and will be reflected in the future procurements. With that, I recommend approval of Modification No, 5 and would be happy to answer any questions. Minutes, December 18, 2018, Page 11

12 Commissioner Stern said I have a quick question on the technology equipment for the buses specifically, can you expand on the function of the technology and the use case? Mr. Azam said so in the technology side of house, we re adding, currently we have an older system that tells you when the next bus is coming. We re improving on that technology. We are also planning on adding with our new center island, shelters that are coming online, we re adding screens there, so customers could tell when the next bus is coming. So that s some of the technology improvements that we re doing on the bus. Commissioner Stern said great so that s equipment on and off the bus? It s not just on the bus? Mr. Azam responded correct. At the bus stop and on the bus. Commissioner Stern said okay, thank you. There were no further questions. F. CONSENT CALENDAR OF ROUTINE ADMINISTATIVE MATTERS The Consent Calendar, Item Nos. 7 through 12, was approved unanimously upon a motion by Commissioner Crayton and a second by Commissioner Stern. 7. Authorization to Issue a Request for Proposals for Contract No , Aviation Security Consulting Services, and Negotiate with the Highest Ranked Proposer No Authorize issuance of a Request for Proposals for Contract No , Aviation Security Consulting Services, and authorize Staff to conduct negotiations with the highest ranked proposer. 8. Authorization to Accept Proposals for the Terminal 2 Specialty Retail Lease No. 2 No Resolution approving the lease specifications, minimum qualifications and proposed requirements, and authorizing Staff to accept proposals for the Terminal 2 Specialty Retail Lease No. 2. Commissioner Johns said I just have one question on Item 8 which is again, the Specialty Retail Lease. So as in the prior one, where we only had two respondents [inaudible] Mr. Leo Fermin, Chief Business & Finance Officer said Commissioners, Terminal 2 is a highly desirable location and we ve gotten an excellent track history of our good retail results in Terminal 2. So, I suspect that maybe one of the reasons. Minutes, December 18, 2018, Page 12

13 Commissioner Johns said you re telling me that the location of the Specialty Retail in Terminal 1 is not as good as Terminal 2? Mr. Fermin said well it s still not in existence. It still hasn t happened yet. It s an unknown future. We think it s good. In One, and Terminal 1 is much smaller. It s only a 300 sq. ft. little location. Commissioner Johns asked how big is this one? Mr. Fermin responded I think this is about double the size. Commissioner Johns said alright I was just curious because there are so many more that responded to this one. Mr. Fermin said right, it s really hard to gauge now the interest of perspective proposers. There were no further questions. 9. Authorization to Accept Bids for the Domestic Parking Garage Food Truck Lease No Resolution approving the revised lease specifications, minimum qualifications and bid requirements, and authorizing Staff to accept bids for the Domestic Parking Garage Food Truck lease. 10. Rental Credit to American Airlines, Inc., in the Amount of $405,697, Due to the Diminished Use of Leased Premises Occupied at the SuperBay Hangar on Plot 40 Under Lease L No Resolution approving a rental credit to American Airlines, Inc. in the amount of $405,697, due to malfunctioning hangar doors at the SuperBay Hangar that limited access and diminished the use of the premises under Lease L Authorization to Issue a Request for Qualifications/Proposals for Two Professional Services Contract Nos and , As-Needed Construction Management Support Services No Resolution authorizing the Director to issue a Request for Qualifications/ Proposals for two Professional Services Contract Nos and , As-Needed Construction Management Support Services. Minutes, December 18, 2018, Page 13

14 12. Approval of National Aeronautics and Space Administration Ames Research Center Reimbursable Umbrella Space Act Agreement (Agreement SAA ) ) and Annex One for Research and Technologies For a Not-to-Exceed Amount of $305,029 No Resolution approving National Aeronautics and Space Administration Ames Research Center reimbursable Umbrella Space Act Agreement (Agreement SAA ) and Annex One to assist the Airport in improving Airfield efficiency, for a not-to-exceed contract amount of $305,029 for a period of one year. G. NEW BUSINESS: Discussion only. This is the "Public Comment" section of the calendar. Individuals may address the Commission on any topic within the jurisdiction of the Airport Commission for a period of up to two (2) minutes. Please fill out a "Request to Speak" form located on the table next to the speaker's microphone and submit it to the Commission Secretary. Commissioner Crayton said I have to say something. I just wanted to say that 2018 is ending we have been under the leadership of our leader, Mr. Ivar Satero for two years or maybe it s three years and he s done a fine job. And also, our Attorney from the Attorney s Office who s has done a fine job. And all of the Staff that worked underneath Mr. Satero. Will you please stand. We want to congratulate you, everybody on behalf of the President and everyone on the Commission. Thank you for your hard work and everything that you have done to bring us to where we are. I am so excited to be a part of this operation and to see how well it s run, I thank you so much. Just wonderful things. The Hotel was like magnanimous and so, you guys weren t with us last Friday, but people were just congratulating the Airport in so many, many ways. I just hate, Geoff wasn t there because many of the people he knows by first name and last names, side name, and all other things. But they were just excited and he s just a great part of the team with the other people. But it was wonderful to have both our Attorney and our Director there with us. And Jeff receiving that honor, it was quite something for SFO, so I left there with my heart pounding, so I just wanted to share that with everybody. Commissioner Guggenhime said I just want to wish everybody happy holiday season. It s been a privilege for me to be on the Commission. It s been almost 14 years now in working with you all is an honor and a privilege and I ve learned a lot from all of you. And I just want everybody to have a very happy holiday season. Commissioner Mazzola said I would like to say that none of you were here when I started and it s also been my pleasure to be a Commissioner and also the President for many years. And I also want to thank the Commissioners that I serve with. They are first class Commissioners and they really have concern of the Airport. And I want to thank them for their service. So Merry Christmas, happy holidays to you and your families and happy New Year. And so, we also want to congratulate our Minutes, December 18, 2018, Page 14

15 new Secretary, Corina. She came in to this new job running. And she s learning the personalities, she s moving forward trying to take charge to change some things and she still has to learn me. But anyway, welcome aboard. Ms. Monzón responded thank you every day is a gift, thank you. Commissioner Mazzola said alright well thank you very much and Happy New Year. We re adjourned. H. CORRESPONDENCE: There was no discussion by the Commission. I. CLOSED SESSION: There are no planned agenda items for a Closed Session for the current meeting. In the event of any urgent matter requiring immediate action which has come to the attention of the Airport Commission after the agenda was issued and which is an item appropriately addressed in Closed Session, the Airport Commission may discuss and vote whether to conduct a Closed Session under Brown Act (California Government Code Sections (b)(2) and ) and Sunshine Ordinance (San Francisco Administrative Code Section 67.11). If the Airport Commission enters Closed Session under such circumstances, the Airport Commission will discuss and vote whether to disclose action taken or discussions held in Closed Session under the Brown Act (California Government Code Section ) and Sunshine Ordinance (San Francisco Administrative Code Section 67.12). J. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further calendared business before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 9:29 A.M. (Original signed by: Corina Monzón) C. Corina Monzón Airport Commission Secretary Minutes, December 18, 2018, Page 15