Tel.No No.4/1/P- 1 Office of the Cantonment Board Kirkee, Pune Dated : 26 December, To,

Transcription

1 Tel.No No.4/1/P- 1 Office of the Cantonment Board Kirkee, Pune Dated : 26 December, To, 1. Brig. Dhiraj Mohan, President. 2. Shri Suresh. Laxman Kamble, Vice President. 3. Brig.H.S. Agrawal, VSM, SEMO, Ex-Officio Member. 4 Maj. Nemani Subhash, GE (C), Ex.Officio Member. 5. Col. V. Bhatnagar, Nominated Member. 6. Col. Deepak Varshney, Nominated Member. 7. Lt.Col. A.D. Sawant, Nominated Member 8. Shri Kamlesh Sharad Chaskar, Member. 9. Shri. Manish Surendra Anand, Member. 10. Smt. Pooja Manish Anand, Member. 11. Kum. Kartiki Prakash Hivarkar, Member. 12. Smt.Vaishali Kailas Pahilwan, Member. 13. Shri Duryodhan Tukaram Bhapkar, Member. 14. Shri Abhay Krishna Sawant, Member. 15. District Magistrate or his Representative. SUB : CANTONMENT BOARD MEETING OF THE BOARD. Dear Sir, A Ordinary Cantonment Board Meeting shall be held on 30/12/2016 at 3.30 hours in the office of the Cantonment Board, Kirkee. The Agenda for the said meeting is enclosed herewith. You are requested to make it convenient to attend the meeting on the above said date and time. The files pertaining to the agenda items are available in the concerned Sections for inspection of the relevant documents for the convenience of Members who may do so during office hours before the meeting. Yours faithfully, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER & MEMBER-SECRETARY CANTONMENT BOARD, KHADKI (SHRI AMOL JAGTAP) Encl : As above

2 MINUTES OF THE ORDINARY BOARD MEETING HELD ON AT 3.30 HRS. PRESENT :- 1. Brig. Dhiraj Mohan, President. 2. Shri Suresh L. Kamble, (Vice President) 3. Shri Amol Jagtap, Member Secretary. 4. Lt. Col.A.D.Sawant, Nominated Member. 5. Smt. Pooja M Anand, Member 6. Ms. Kartiki P Hivarkar, Member 7. Smt. Vaishali K. Pahilwan, Member 8. Shri Duryodhan T. Bhapkar,Member 9. Shri Abhay K Sawant, Member Not Present :- 1. Brig. H.S.Agrawal, VSM,SEMO Ex-Officio Member. 2. Maj. Nemani Subhash,GE( C ), Ex. Officio Member 3. Col.V.Bhatnagar,Nominated Member. 4. Col.Deepak Varshney, Nominated Member. 5. Shri. Kamlesh Sharad Chaskar, Member 6. Shri Manish.S.Anand, Member. 7. District Magistrate or his Representative.

3 1. To note the minutes of Civil Area Committee meeting held on 10/10/2016 at 1100 hours 1. Considered and approved. While discussing various issue, Shri. Duryodhan Bhapkar and other elected members stated that the road side hawkers should be resolved as per the government policy at the earliest. 2. To note the minutes of Finance Committee held on 10/10/2016 at 1200 hours. 2. Considered and approved. 3. PROPOSAL FOR RECONSTRUCTION OF EAST KIRKEE DISPENSARY: PROPOSAL UNDER D1 HEAD OF BUDGET ESTIMATES. Ref:- Principal Directorate, Defence Estates, Southern Command letter 8078/Dispensary/Kirkee/C/DE/2016, dated 28/09/2016 To consider the office report dated 03/10/2016 received from Cantonment Executive Engineer. As per the report the Board vide CBR No.01, dated 22/01/2016 had considered the proposal for the demolition and reconstruction of East Kirkee Dispensary and resolved to submit the proposal to the GOC-in-C, Southern Command to obtain sanction under rule 17(a) read with 19(b) of Cantonments Account Code, Accordingly the proposal was submitted to GOC-in-C through PDDE, SC vide letter No.4/1-D/East Kirkee Dispens./P-37, dated 18/06/2016. The Principal Directorate,Defence Estates, vide letter referred above has suggested that the matter may please be placed before the Board for carrying out the work under Maintenance Head., as it was found that proposal does not appear to be under the category of Original Works but actually its replacement of already created asset. The item is placed before the Board for taking decision on the execution of the work under Maintenance Head D(2)(a) at an estimated cost of Rs lacs. The Budget provision have been made incur an expenditure under recently considered budget estimates for the financial year (Revised) and Rs lacs for the year (Original) Rs lacs under budget head D-1(a). In this regard file containing all relevant documents alongwith office note and letter referred above are placed on the table. 3. Considered and approved. It was resolved to make necessary Budget under Budget Head D2(a) and accordingly invite. Tenders as per procedure. During discussions, Shri Suresh.L.Kamble, Vice-President scale curtailments have been made in the Budget Estimates stated that large sanctioned by the

4 Competent Authority and therefore a letter should be sent to them for restoration as curtailments will definitely affect development works. Shri Suresh.L.Kamble also brought out that the drinking water supplied by the PMC to Civil area of Khadki is highly inadequate and a high level meeting be held with them which was agreed to. Shri Kamble also desired to expedite the process of recruitment & appointments on vacant posts of the Board. Mrs. Pooja.M.Anand, Elected Member raised the issue of requirement of additional staff in Sangamwadi Dispensary which was agreed to; Shri Abhay Sawant elected Member raised the issue of Shri B.S.Naik s issue and it was desired to obtain legal opinion for further action in the matter. 4. PROPOSAL FOR RE-CONSTRUCTION OF (06) QUARTERS FOR GROUP-D EMPLOYEES AT EAST KHADKI. Ref:- Principal Directorate, Defence Estates, Southern Command letter No.8078/Class-IV(06)Quarters/ Kirkee/ /2016/DE, dated 07/09/2016. To consider the office report dated 03/10/2016 received from Cantonment Executive Engineer. As per the report the Board vide CBR No.29, dated 22/01/2016 had considered the proposal for the demolition and reconstruction of (06) quarters for Group-D category employees at East Kirkee and resolved to submit the proposal to the Principal Director, Defence Estates, Southern Command to obtain sanction under budget head Creation of Capital Assets. Accordingly, the proposal was submitted to PDDE, SC vide letter No.4/1-D/Const.of Quart./Capital Asset/P-25, dated 18/06/2016. The Principal Directorate, Defence Estates, vide letter referred above had suggested that the matter may please be placed before the Board for carrying out the work under Maintenance Head, as it was found that proposal does not appear to be under the category of Original Works but actually its replacement of already created asset. The item is placed before the Board for taking decision on the execution of the work under Maintenance Head D-2(a) at an estimated cost of Rs lacs. The Budget provision have been made to incur an expenditure under recently considered budget estimates for the financial year (Revised) Rs lacs and for the year (Original) Rs lacs under budget head D-1(a). In this regard file containing all relevant documents alongwith office note and letter referred above are placed on the table.

5 4. Considered and approved. Necessary Budget provision be made under Budget Head D2 (a). Tenders be invited as per procedure. 5. INSTALLATION OF A COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS STATION Ref:- CBR No.14, dated 27/05/2016 The Board vide CBR No.14, dated 27/05/2016 had considered the proposal for installation of a CNG Station at GLR Sy No.42-A classified as Class B-4 land located on Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marg, opposite Gurudwara Khadki. It was resolved to accept option no 1 for installation of a CNG station on an open area of 6000 sqft. The decision taken by the Board was conveyed to Managing Director, Maharashtra Natural Gas Limited (MD,MNGL) vide this office letter No.4/1-D/MNGL/CNG Station/P-40, dated 04/08/2016. The MD, MNGL was requested to give the willingness for taking land on lease and on the terms mentioned in this office letter. The MD, MNGL vide letter No. MNGL/MD/KCB/2016, dated 05/08/2016 had informed that as per the layout of the CNG station the area required will be 6855 sqft whereas the area approved by Board is 6000 sqft. The issue is placed before the Board for reconsidering and amendment of the area requirement to 6855 sqft for CNG Station instead of 6000 sqft. In this connection file containing all relevant document, letter received from MNGL along with office report of CEE are placed on the table. 5. Considered and approved. It was resolved to send a Proposal for the reclassification of the land from Class B-4 to Class-C for the said land required for CNG Station. 6. PROPOSAL FOR RE-CONSTRUCTION OF MATERNITY WARD IN THE PREMISES OF DR BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR GENERAL HOSPITAL, KHADKI. Reference :- Principal Directorate, Defence Estates, Southern Command letter No.8078/Maternity Ward/ Khadki/2016/DE, dated 08/09/2016. To consider the office report dated 03/10/2016 received from Cantonment Executive Engineer. As per the report the Board vide CBR No.28, dated 22/01/2016 had considered the proposal for the demolition and reconstruction of Maternity Ward in the premises of Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar General Hospital, Khadki and resolved to submit the proposal to the Principal Director, Defence Estates, Southern Command to obtain sanction under budget head Creation of Capital Asset. Accordingly the proposal was

6 submitted to PDDE, SC vide letter No.4/1-D/Mat Ward/Capital Asset/P-21, dated 18/06/2016. The Principal Director, Defence Estates, Southern Command, vide letter referred above have the suggested that the matter may please be placed before the Board for taking revised resolution for execution of work under Original Head. The item is placed before the Board for the execution of the work under budget head D(1) (a) & to submit the proposal under rule 17(a) read with 19(b) of Cantonments Account Code, 1924 to incur an expenditure of Rs.1,84,50,000/- (One Crore Eighty Four Lacs Fifty Thousands only ) out of Cantonment Fund. In this regard file containing all relevant documents alongwith office note and letter referred above are placed on the table. 6. Considered and approved. It was resolved to submit a proposal to the GOC-in- Chief, Southern Command Pune to obtain the sanction under Rule 17(a) read with 19(b) of Cantonment Account Code,1924. Necessary Budget provision be made under Budget Head D1(a) 7. PROPOSAL FOR INSTALLATION OF SOLAR PANELS IN KHADKI CANTONMENT Ref:- Director Defence Estates, Southern Command letter No.8078/Solar Panels/ Khadki/C/DE/2016, dated 28/09/2016. To consider the office report dated 03/10/2016 received from CEE. As per the report the Board vide CBR No.2, dated 22/01/2016 had approved the subject work and it was further resolved to submit the proposal to Principal Director, Defence Estates for forwarding the same to Ministry of Defence, Govt. of India for allocation and sanction of required funds of Rs.1,74,81,100/- under Budget Head Creation of Capital Assets. The Directorate Defence Estates, Southern Command vide letter referred above had intimated that i) The proposal has been examined in this Dte. it may be pointed out that the Cantonment Board, Khadki has shown an amount of Rs.14,65,18,491/- as opening balance and invested funds of Rs.41,50,00,000/- as on 01/04/2016. It means that the Cantonment Board, Khadki has adequate funds to bear the expenses for the subject project.

7 ii) It is, therefore, requested that the Cantonment Board may send a revised Board Resolution for sanction of competent authority for installation of Solar Panels in Khadki Cantonment out of its own resources. Item is placed before the Board for approval of execution of the work under Budget Head D(1) and to submit the proposal to GOC-in-C to incur an expenditure of Rs. 1,74,81,100/- under rule 17(a) read with 19(b) of Cantonments Account Code, 1924 under budget head Creation of Capital Asset. For consideration the Board will require to incur an expenditure of Rs.1,74,81,100/- out of Cantonment Funds and this will generate power of 260 KW per hour. MSEDCL will be paying the cost of Rs.3.70/- per unit for buy back.the financial synopsis of the proposal is appended below for perusal. Generation of power ( kw) 260 Average Hours per day 5 Total Power Generated per day (units) 1300 Total Power Generated per 300 days ( in units) Average rate per unit of MSEDCL paid by KCB (in Rs) 10 Total saving per annum (in Rs) 39,00,000 Total Exp.for 260 KW solar plant (in Rs) 1,74,81,100 Pay back period in years 4.48 Sale to MSEDCL grid 3.70/-)per unit pay back period when sale to MSEDCL in years From the above it can be seen that to achieve that returns of the investment (payback) 4.5 years will be required, excluding cost of maintenance which will be additional. The Board may take up the work through its own resources, being one of the most important priority areas of the Government. A proposal will be forwarded under D1 Head, of the Budget Estimates, to the GOC-in-C for his approval, as advised even by the PDDE, as an Original work. In this regard file containing all relevant documents alongwith office note and letter referred above are placed on the table. 7. Considered and approved. It was resolved to submit a proposal to the GOC-in- Chief, Southern Command Pune to obtain the sanction under Rule 17(a) read with 19(b) of Cantonment Account Code,1924. Necessary Budget provision be made under Budget Head D1(f)

8 8. SANCTION OF BUILDING PLAN OF HOUSE No.7,NEW BAZAR, KHADKI To consider the office report received from AE/CEE, KCB for the subject as per the report the HOR of House No.7, New Bazar, Kirkee had submitted building plans for making the internal changes like relocation of the staircase and internal ducks without making any changes in plinth area, height of the building and total built up area. The internal changes are in conformity with the prevailing building bye laws and FSI restrictions. Property located inside the notified civil area of Kirkee Cantonment Board and CEO is competent authority sanctioned the plan. As per the provision of clause I(5) of Lease Agreement No to erect or suffer to be erected on any part of the premises hereby demised any building other than and except the dwelling house/shops already in existence as shown in the plan annexed to the presents without the previous consent in writing of the Board. The plans are placed before the Board for consent as required by Clause No. I(5) of lease agreement. In this connection the building plan received from the appellant, office report received from AE/CEE alongwith file containing all relevant documents are placed on the table. 8. The issue considered. The PCB desired that the details be up for scrutiny so as to take decision which was agreed to by members. 9. SANCTION OF BUILDING PLAN OF HOUSE No.20, NB, KHADKI Ref:- CBR No.21,dated 01/09/2014 To consider the office report received from AE/CEE, KCB for the subject as per the report the building plan of House No.20,NB, Khadki was sanctioned by the CEO after obtaining the consent of the Board as per clause I(5) of Lease Agreement. The plan was valid for a period of 2 years from 03/12/2014. The HOR had obtained the sanction for the demolition and reconstruction excluding the area occupied by the tenant. The HOR again submitted the building plans for the entire area of the property including the area occupied by the tenants. The brief details of the plans sanctioned by the Board:- a. GLR Sy.No. -24/564 b. Area of holding sqft i.e c. Purpose of Lease - House & Shops d. Location - Inside civil area e. Management - Board

9 f. Sanction built up area sqmtr (i) Built up area of existing structure Not to be demolished sqmtr (ii) Proposed built up area sqmtr g. Total built up area sqft h. Proposed FSI i. Permissible FSI j. Residential area as per lease sqft k. Commercial area as per lease sqft As the HOR had carried out deviations a notice was issued under section 248 of Cantonments Act,2006 vide No. NB/20/P-310,dated 05/09/2015. Details of the revised plans:- a. Proposed Commercial area sqft b. Proposed Residential area sqmtr c. Total Proposed built up area sqft d. Proposed FSI e. Permissible FSI f. Cost of Unauthorized Construction /- per sqft g. Cost of Unauthorized Construction - Rs.7,56,662/- h. Composition 10% of residential area - Rs.75,667/- If approved the HOR will require to pay the scrutiny charges Rs.1000/- and development charges Rs.30,877/- The HOR had submitted the revised plan for the demolition and reconstruction of the entire area of property including area occupied by the tenant who was not included in the earlier sanctioned building plan dated 21/09/2014. The revised building plan received from the HOR conforming with the building bye laws and FSI restrictions as reported by Assistant Engineer. The consent of the Board is required as per clause I(5) of Lease Agreement No to erect or suffer to be erected on any part of the premises hereby demised any building other than and except the dwelling house/shops already in existence as shown in the plan annexed to the presents without the previous consent in writing of the Board. Item is placed before the Board for consent as per clause I(5) of lease agreement and to compound the deviations made by the appellant during the course of construction after charging a composition fee of Rs.75,667/-.

10 In this connection the building plan received from the appellant, office report received from AE/CEE alongwith file containing all relevant documents are placed on the table. 9. The issue considered. The PCB desired that the details be up for scrutiny so as to take decision which was agreed to by members. 10. REVIEW OF THE BOUNDARIES OF THE CIVIL AREA IN KHADKI CANTONMENT. Ref:-CBR No.23, dated 2/11/2013 As per Section 46(2) of Cantonments Act, 2006 The Central Government may in consultation with Board undertake, as and when required and shall undertake after every census a review of the boundaries of the civil area in each cantonment. Accordingly a proposal for Review of the Boundary of Civil Area was considered by the Board vide CBR No.23, dated 02/11/2013 and it was resolved to submit the proposal to the higher authorities as per the provisions of Section 46(2) of Cantonments Act, The proposal was submitted to Principal Director, Defence Estates, Southern Command vide this office letter No.KCB/Extn./Civil Area/ /P-10, dated 24/12/2013. The Principal Director vide Directorate letter No.1530/Revision of Civil Area Boundary/Gen/DE, dated 19/06/2014 returned the proposal for re-submission as per the guidelines issued by the PDDE,SC, Pune vide letter No.1530/Revision of Civil Area Boundary/Gen/DE, dated 01/05/2014. The revised proposal for review of the boundary of civil area was prepared based on the directives issued by the PDDE, SC, Pune. The detailed power point presentation was given to the PCB and all the members of the Board on 25/08/2016 by CEE, KCB. It was proposed to include four pockets of the areas at present located outside the civil area as under:- POCKET No.1:- It was proposed to include following areas:- S.N O. 1 2 LOCATI ON Indiranagar Vasahat Indiranagar Vasahat GL R SY. NO. MANAG ED BY CLAS S AREA IN ACRES 31 DEO A DEO A POPULAT ION (AS PER CENSUS 2011) 3182 REASONS FOR INCLUSION IN THE CIVIL AREA Occupied by the Encroacher (slum) heavily populated urban informal settlement characterized

11 3 Mosque 95 DEO B by substandard housing by civil population and the area is contiguous. 4 Dargah Vasahat 94 DEO A Gadiadda 28 LMA A Military Dairy Farm (MDF) land lying unused having entry and exit from Gadiadda part of congested Civil area. can be used for shifting of cattle sheds. Being an isolated piece, may not be useful for Army purpose and prone for encroachment. TOTAL During presentation after detailed discussion it was decided that as most of the land involved are classified as either A1 or A2 hence inclusion of all above mentioned GLR Sy. Nos are dropped. POCKET No.2:- It was proposed to include following areas:- Sr.N o LOCATION GLR SY. NO. MANAGED BY CLASSIF ICATIO N AREA IN ACRES POPULATION (AS PER CENSUS 2011) REASONS FOR INCLUSION IN THE CIVIL AREA 1 Cantonment Stalls 91 CB C Cobbler Stalls 89 CB C Cantt. Water Reservoir 89-A CB C The pieces of lands are classified as class C land and vested with the Cantt. Board and the area is contiguous to the notified civil area of the Board. 4 Cantt. Water Reservoir 89-B CB C

12 5 RIASC Quarter on Commiserate Road 90 LMA A Although the piece of land is classified as class A-1, surrounded by Civil area and Class C land around. At present lying vacant and unused. May not be useful for Army purpose being an isolated piece of land. Useful commercial land. 6 Parking 108-A CB C The piece of land is classified as class C land and vested with the Cantt. Board and the area is contiguous to the notified civil area of the Board. Can be developed as multistoried parking. 7 S M Joshi Bhavan (Part) 82-A DEO B Part of this building is within the notified Civil area and the balance area of acres is outside the notified Civil area and the area is contiguous to the notified civil area of the Board Bungalows on Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Rd. from M.G Road to Gurudawara DEO B Being occupied by the civil population and the area is contiguous to the notified civil area of the Board B LMA A B CB C 2.00 TOTAL Kirkee Business Centre owned by Khadki Cantonment Board

13 During presentation to the President and the members of the Cantonment Board, after detail discussion it was decided to include below mentioned GLR Sy.Nos :- Sr No. 1 LOCATION Cantonment Stalls GL R SY. NO. MANAG ED BY CLASS IFICA TION AREA IN ACRES POPULATIO N (AS PER CENSUS 2011) 91 CB C Cobbler Stalls 89 CB C Cantt. Water Reservoir Cantt. Water Reservoir 89- A 89- B CB C CB C REMARKS The pieces of lands are classified as class C land and vested with the Cantt. Board and the area is contiguous to the notified civil area of the Board. 6 5 RIASC Quarter on Commiserate Road S M Joshi Bhavan (Part) 90 LMA A A DEO B Although the piece of land is classified as class A-1, surrounded by Civil area and Class C land around. At present lying vacant and unused. May not be useful for Army purpose being an isolated piece of land. Useful commercial land for municipal use. Part of this building is within the notified Civil area and the balance area of acres is outside the notified Civil area and the area is contiguous to the notified

14 civil area of the Board. 7 Bungalows on Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Rd. from M.G Road to Gurudawara DEO B B TOTAL Being occupied by the civil population and the area is contiguous to the notified civil area of the Board. POCKET No.3:- It was proposed to include following areas:- Sr. No. LOCATION 1 Bungalow No 6 (Frere Road) GLR SY. NO. MANAGED BY CLASSIFICA TION AREA IN ACRES 180 DEO A POPULATION (AS PER CENSUS 2011) REASONS FOR INCLUSION IN THE CIVIL AREA At present lying vacant located on Pune Mumbai Road. Can be used for commercial purpose. 2 Bungalow 181 DEO B Old Grant Bungalow No 7 (Frere Road) 3 Vacant Land 181- DEO A Vacant Land A 4 Bungalow 182 DEO A With LMA. No No 8 change in (Frere Road) classification & management suggested 5 Road 12 DEO A MES ROAD 6 Bungalow 183 DEO B St. Joseph School. No (Frere Road) 7 Bungalow No10 (Frere Road) 184 DEO A With LMA. No change in classification & management suggested

15 8 Bungalow No 11 (Frere Road) 9 Open Land Between Bungalow No (Frere Road) 10 Bungalow No 12 (Frere Road) DEO B Old Grant Bungalow 186 DEO B Vacant land useful to KCB for garage and parking of vehicles 187 DEO B Old Grant Bungalow 187-A DEO A Vacant 12 Open Land 187-B DEO A Vacant 13 Open Land 188 DEO B Vacant 14 Group Latrine 188-A CEO C CF Group Latrine 15 Under Ground 188-B DEO A PETROL Store 16 Bungalow No 13 (F.R.) AWWA Hostel 189 DEO B AWWA Hostel with LMA. No change in classification & management suggested 17 Bungalow No 14 (E.R.) 18 Bungalow No 23 (F.R.) 19 Bungalow No 22 (F.R.) 20 Bungalow No 21 (F.R.) 21 Bungalow No 20 (B.R.) 190 DEO B Old Grant Bungalow 194 DEO B DEO A DEO A DEO A Old Grant Bungalow With LMA. No change in classification & management suggested 22 Bungalow No 19 (B.R.) 23 Bungalow No 18 (F.R.) 198 DEO B Old Grant Bungalow 199 DEO A With LMA. No change 743 in classification & management suggested 24 Bungalow No 17 (F.R.) 200 CB C Cantonment Board Office 25 Bungalow No 16 (F.R.) 201 DEO B Old Grant Bungalow CEO s Residence 26 Post Office 208 DEO B Central Government 27 Open land 209 DEO B Proposed Sports & Commercial Complex

16 28 Group Public Toilet 209- A CB C Open land 210 DEO B Group Public Toilet 210-A CB C Central Arm Force Vehicle Depot 210- B DEO A With LMA. No change in classification & management 32 Archival Unit & Research Center 210- C suggested DEO A DGDE 33 Cistern 211 DEO B CAFVD 34 Group Public 212- CEO C CEO Toilet B 35 Old Tanga 212- CEO C CEO Stand C 36 St. Ignatius 213 DEO B Church 37 St. Joseph Boys School 214 DEO B St. Joseph Boys School. 38 Nala 216 DEO B Open Land 217 DEO B Proposed Commercial Complex 40 Open Land 230 DEO B Proposed Commercial Complex 41 Bungalow No 27 (Mumbai Pune Road) 42 Assistant Commissioner of Police(ACP) 231 DEO B Old Grant 232 DEO A LMA. Useful for municipal purpose Office 43 All St. Church 123 DEO B All St. School 126 DEO B Lease, St. Joseph Boys School TOTAL

17 It was decided to include following GLR Sy.Nos being classified as B4 land under the management of DEO, PC and laying vacant and unused for decades. Only exception is to inclusion of Sy.No.232 which is classified as A1 land but given to police authorities in lieu of their office which were located at Bungalow No.13, FR (AWWA Hostel). Inclusion of below mentioned GLR Sy.Nos in civil area will definitely create permanent source of income and will definitely fetch substantial revenue for Cantonment Board if put to some commercial use. Sr.N o. LOCATION GLR SY. NO. MANAGED BY CLASSIFICATION AREA IN ACRES POPULATION (AS PER CENSUS 2011) REASONS FOR INCLUSION IN THE CIVIL AREA 1 Open land 209 DEO B Sports & Commercial Complex proposed by KCB 2 Group Toilet 209-A CB C Nala 216 DEO B Open Land 217 DEO B Proposed Commercial Complex 5 Open Land 230 DEO B Bungalow No 27 (Mumbai Pune Road) 7 Assistant of Commissioner Police(ACP) Office Proposed Commercial Complex 231 DEO B Old Grant 232 DEO A TOTAL Useful for Municipal purpose POCKET No.4:- It was proposed to include following areas. However, after detail discussion above mentioned GLR Sy. Nos. are dropped. Sr No Location GLR Sy. No. Managed By Class Area in Acres Population (As per Census 2011) 1 East Kirkee 279 DEO/LMA A Cremation/ Burial Ground Slaughter House CF Tanga Stand Hindu Smashan Bhoomi Miniature range for BEG 279/1 LMA A /M LMA A /P CB C /R CB C /A LMA A TOTAL

18 POCKET No.5:- It was proposed to include following areas:- Sr No Location GLR Sy. No. Managed By Class Area in Acres Population (As per Census 2011) Reason for Inclusion in the Civil Area 1 Sangamw adi village 298- A Collector (State Govt.) Pune B Being occupied by the civil population having no any Army installation. The issue of declaration of Sangamwadi Village as Civil area considered and recommended being occupied by the civil population only. This land is classified as B2 land placed under the management of State Govt. If approved acres area of the above GLR Sy Nos. of Pocket No.2,3,5 required to be declared as Civil Area. Area of the Pocket No.2 is contiguous to notified civil area. Inclusion of the above areas will give some relief to the residents in terms of permissible FSI. The Board will also get additional house tax and revenue due to development of land classified as Class B-4 placed under the management of Defence Estate Officer, Pune Circle (DEO,PC) and if the said land included in the civil area, the Board can undertake commercial projects on these open land for creation of permanent source of income and the Board may expect to get the revenue to the tune of Rs.150 lacs -200 lacs p.m. Item is placed before the Board for the approval of the revised proposal of Review of Civil Area Boundary. In this connection file containing all relevant documents alongwith original and revised proposal and original and revised plans are placed on the table. 10. The issue discussed once again. The CEO apprised that a detailed presentation is already made once on the subject to all the members & the PCB. It was decided to visit some of the areas for taking further decision. 11. FSI RESTRICTION IN SOUTHERN COMMAND Ref:- Head Quarters, Southern Command letter No /FSI/Q(L), dated 18/07/2016 FSI restrictions were imposed by the GOC-in-C, Southern Command vide order dated 26/03/1984 for prevention of overcrowding in Khadki Cantonment area under section 181(A) of Cantonment Act, The following restrictions were imposed :-

19 (a) The permissible Floor Space Index shall be 1 in the Civil area notified under section 43 A of the Cantonment Act and bazar area notified under Rule 2(b) of the Cantonment Land Administration Rules 1937 and 0.5 in the remaining areas of Kirkee Cantonment. (b) Marginal open space along the periphery of land or plot shall be 4.5 meters minimum for sites in areas other than the civil area and bazar area. (c) The height of all building public/government buildings will be restricted to a maximum of 18 meters. (d) The maximum number of storeys permissible shall be ground plus two floors in all areas of the Cantonment. The GOC-in-C, Southern Command letter referred above has inserted following provisions in the FSI order published in the year 1984 in pursuance of Govt. of India, Ministry of Defence letter No.12/1/Build. Bye Laws/2014/D(Q&C), dated 19/05/2016:- (a) Wherever there is existing structure/building that exceeds coverage and FAR, reerection shall be permitted as per the approval granted to the original structure prior to the FSI restrictions in the Southern Command. (b) It is further ordered that this provision will be taken into account while sanctioning building plans as per relevant provisions in the Cantonments Act, 2006 along with building byelaws of the respective Cantonment Boards, existing FSI restrictions as contained in the aforesaid orders as also land policy of the Ministry of Defense issued from time to time in this regards. (c) Re-construction/re-erection, as per original FSI will only be allowed, if the owner is able to produce the original sanctioned plan and record of the same exists with the Cantonment Board. (d) No composition/relaxation shall be allowed for residents who have carried out illegal construction over and above the sanctioned plan. (e) Existing FSI restrictions as contained in (a) above, will continue to be imposed for all construction/reconstruction/re-erection/repair for structures that have been constructed or approved after the orders came into effect. The item is placed before the Board for noting of Orders of the GOC-in-C, SC, Pune.

20 In this connection copies of the orders issued by GOC-in-C in the year 1984 and 2016 are placed on the table. 11. Noted. It was decided that wide publicity be given for the information of the general Public, 12. COMPLETION CERTIFICATE IN R/o HOUSE NO.481, OLD BAZAR, KHADKI To consider the office report received from AE/CEE for the issue of the completion certificate. Shri Deepak L Kudale for Neeraj Horticulturists Pvt. Ltd, & Vilus Talkies Khadki, vide letter dated 10/06/2016 requested for issue of a completion certificate of Cinema Hall etc. Earlier Shri Deepak Kudale submitted an application for issue of part completion, as there is no provision under Section 246 read with Section 242 of Cantonments Act, 2006 for issue of a part completion certificate. The matter was referred to PDDE,SC vide letter No.OB/481/P-126, dated 22/08/2016. In reply PDDE, SC vide letter No. 973/DE/SC/L/CB/Kirkee/Ty, dated 29/09/2016 advised to consider to issue of the completion certificate against the composition plan sanctioned by the Board. Accordingly the AE/CEE has suggested for issue of the completion certificate as per orders. As the composition plan was sanctioned by the Board, the matter is placed before the Board to consider the issue of completion certificate. In this connection the office report received from AE/CEE alongwith the Dte. Letter dated 29/09/2016 are placed on the table. 12. The issue considered. The PCB desired that the details be up for scrutiny so as to take decision which was agreed to by members. 13. THIRD PARTY INSPECTION & CERTIFICATION SERVICES FOR THE ORIGINAL AND MAINTENANCE WORK CARRIED OUT BY THE BOARD Ref:- CBR No.23, dated 27/05/2016 Board vide CBR No.23, dated 27/05/2016 had considered the report dated 11/05/2016 received from CEE, KCB for the subject work and it was resolved by the Board. considered and approved in principle subject to negotiation of charges with Certification Engineers International Ltd (CEI) as the charges of Rs.10,800/- appears to be high. Accordingly matter may be taken up with CEI.

21 The CEIL was requested to convey their revised proposal vide this office letter No.4/1-D/CEIL/P-51, dated19/09/2016. In reply a mail has been received by CEE,KCB on 07/11/2016 from Shri Ajit Yadav, CEIL. As per the mail they have modified and submitted their revised offer as follows:- Original offer Our offer and the our revised Third Party Inspection fees shall be at the rate of 0.90% of Basic Purchase Order value plus service tax at actual (Presently it is 15%) or Rs.10,800/- per man day plus Service tax at actual (Presently it is 15%) whichever is higher for the one year on same rate, terms and condition. Revised offer Our offer and the our revised Third Party Inspection fees shall be at the rate of 0.85% of Basic Purchase Order value plus service tax at actual (Presently it is 15%) or Rs.10,000/- per man day plus Service tax at actual (Presently it is 15%) whichever is higher for the one year on same rate, terms and condition. Item is placed before the Board for consideration of revised offer received from CEIL as above. It is for the information of the Board that the PDDE, SC, Pune vide their letter No.8078/Budget/Cantt/Gen/Vol.III, dated 24/08/2016 addressed to all the Cantonment Boards in the Southern Command have directed to engage a quality checking technical evaluator it may be either Central or State Govt. agency to incurred expenditure.. The DGDE, New Delhi have also, vide their letter No.56/15/DGDE/CORRD/CONF/VOL- V/FMS No.52436, dated 06/10/2016, directed all the Boards in the country to engagement of a third party technical evaluator to check on execution of the work. In addition checking of work by an Officer of Directorate at the rank of Director. In this connection mail received from CEIL alongwith the file containing all relevant documents are placed on the table. 13 Considered and approved. It was further resolved that Certification Engineers International (CEI) (A Govt. of India Undertaking subsidiary of Engineers India Ltd. (EIL) ) be appointed for the Inspection and Certification of the Maintenance of Original works and stores items of Engineering Section at their revised rates, after execution and agreement, initially for a period of one year. 14. REPAIRS TO PARK ROAD, KHADKI. To consider office report regarding non-maintenance of Park Road, i.e. from junction of Aundh Road backside of Khadki Railway Station to Stone Sett Road at the junction of CSD road.

22 There have been constant complaints from the public as well as the inmates of Paraplegic Home and Queen Mary s Technical Institute (QMTI), Khadki which are run by Indian Army for their disabled War Weterens and Army Personnel regarding nonmaintenance of Park Road, i.e. from junction of Aundh Road backside of Khadki Railway Station to rear gate of Savitaribai Phule Pune University due to which lot of potholes have developed on the said stretch of the road. In this regard, Shri Suresh L Kamble, Vice-President, Cantonment Board, Khadki vide his letter dated 30 Sept has requested for undertaking resurfacing of Park Road on priority basis on humanitarian grounds although the ownership of the road may not be with the Cantonment Board. Also, the Medical Officer, Paraplegic Rehabilitation Centre (Army) vide his letter no. PRC/Hygiene/2016 dated 19 Jan has requested for undertaking the repairs of the road as it is in bad condition for the users and military personnel using wheelchair who are 100% disabled, use the road frequently for morning/evening walk. The matter of poor maintenance of this important road has been constantly raised by senior visiting Military officers and other dignitaries visiting QMTI and Paraplegic Home. As per the office records Park Road is under the management of Public Works Department, Government of Maharashtra (PWD). Accordingly, PWD authorities were contacted and it has been informed by the Executive Engineer, P.W. (Building) Division, Pune vide letter no. PB/1/VBP/2420/2016 dated 19 July 2016 that as per available documents & record repairs & maintenance of Park Road is not being done by them; as also, the road is not under their jurisdiction. The General Land Register records maintained by the office of DEO, Pune state that GLR Sy. No. 65 has been classified as Class B-2 land for all the P.W.D Streets admeasuring Acres with Bombay Government under the management of Provincial Government with Holder of Occupancy rights with P.W.D. The matter was taken up for clarification with the GM, AFK; GE (MH & RH) and GE (C) other probable agencies who normally maintain the roads within the Cantonment limits. In reply GE (C) vide his letter no. 2014/237/E2 dated 25 Oct has informed that the said Park road does not belong to them. Similarly, GE (MH & RH) vide his letter no. 2015/116/E2 dated 03 Nov has informed that the said road is not under MES area of responsibility. The matter along with other relevant documents is placed on the table for further consideration as Cantonment Board, Khadki being the local body where all the general public lodge their complaints and the Cantonment Board is being criticized for nonmaintenance of the road. In case the Board decides to repair/maintain the said road (which will Rs.41,00,000/-) in larger public interest, the land occupied by the road (approx. 8285

23 sqm) including road berms etc which is around sqm (from Aundh Road junction to Stone Sett road at the junction of CSD road) needs to be reclassified into class C for which a separate proposal for sanction will be forwarded to the Competent Authority. 14. Considered and resolved to submit a proposal to Higher Authorities for reclassification of land pertaining to Park Road as Class C land. considering the poor maintenance of the road and inconvenience being caused to the inmates of Paraplegic Home on their wheel chairs. During discussions on the issues pertaining to Range Hills Estate area. Smt Vaishali.K.Pahilwan, Smt Pooja.M.Anand & Ms.Kartiki.P.Hiwarkar and other elected members requested to explore possibility of undertaking development works as deposite works and take up matter to request the Ammunition Factory Kirkee (AFK) Authorities in this regard which was agreed to Smt Vaishali.K.Pahilwan also submitted a copy of her letter dt.28/12/2016 to AFK on the subject. 15. EXEMPTION IN ROAD RE-INSTATEMENT (RI) CHARGES TOWARDS UNDERGROUND CABLE WORKS UNDER IPDS SCHEME. To consider letter no. CE/IPDS/CMD/33116 dated 29 Oct (received on 17 Nov. 2016) from the Chairman & Managing Director, Maharashtra State Electric Distribution Co Ltd. requesting for exemption for payment of Road Re-instatement Charges towards underground cable works under Integrated Power Development Scheme (IPDS). As per the letter of Chairman & Managing Director, MSEDCL almost 50% of the total project cost for various strengthening and improvement of distribution network undertaken by MSEDCL through IPDS for Urban areas is required to be outlaid for road re-instatement charges to different local Municipal Authorities. This outlay of road reinstatement charges reduces the scope of underground cabling work to fit in the sanctioned project cost. Also, Government of India while approving Detailed Project Report (DPR) has disallowed the provision of Road re-instatement charges. In view of the above, it has been requested that necessary exemption be made towards Road Reinstatement charges towards underground cable works under IPDS Scheme. The matter along with the letter and office report and other relevant papers are placed on the table for further consideration. 15. Considered and resolved to permit Maharashtra State Electric Distribution Co.Ltd.(MSEDCL) to carry out the underground cable work Integrated Power Development Scheme (IPDS) on the following terms and conditions:-

24 1) No reinstatement charges towards underground cable works will be imposed. The damaged surface of roads and foot path will be reinstated by the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL) within the stipulated time to the entire satisfaction of the Board, failing which MSEDCL will be liable to pay the reinstatement charges to the Board. 2) MSEDCL will submit plans showing details of underground cable works road wise and obtained a formal approval from CEO, Khadki. 3) The site will be clear in all respect immediately after completion of the work. The same is not done by MSEDCL in previous work carried out. 4) After removal of HT/LT overhead lines, idle poles should be removed immediately to enable the Board to carry out the road widening, if possible. 5) For the installation of transformers and DPs the MSEDCL will fix the transformers and DPs to the locations shown by the Khadki Cantonment Board representative as In the previous works the location of transformers and DPs are creating obstruction in road widening and obstacles in smooth flow of traffic. 6) MSEDCL will relocate underground cables, transformers and DPs at their own cost, if asked by the Board in future in public interest. 7) Any other condition which may be put by Govt of India. 16. BUILDING PLANS IN RESPECT OF HOUSE NO.70, CTS NO. 3567, 3568 & 3569, YERWADA, SANGAMWADI, KHADKI. To consider office note regarding application dated 05 Nov received from Shri Rajendra M Naidu and Smt. Vaishali R Naidu, owners of House No. 70, CTS No. 3567, 3568 & 3569, Yerwada, Sangamwadi, Khadki requesting for sanction of the building plan on the said CTS Nos. Shri Rajendra M Naidu and Smt. Vaishali R Naidu, have submitted a building plan proposing to construct parking and one floor above it on House No. 70, CTS No. 3567, 3568 & 3569, Yerwada, Sangamwadi, Khadki. Sangamwadi village is situated outside the notified Civil area of Khadki Cantonment and the land is under the management of the Collector, Pune Sangamwadi village is included within the Cantonment limits only for Municipal purposes. As per the property cards dated 29 March 2016 issued by State Government Land department the CTS No admeasuring sqm ( sqft); CTS No.

25 3568 admeasuring sqm ( sqft) and CTS No admeasuring sqm ( sqft) totaling sqm ( sqft) stands in the name of Shri Rajendra M Naidu and Smt. Vaishali R Naidu. The applicants have also submitted a demarcation certificate dated 25 Feb of CTS Nos. 3567, 3568 & The building plan submitted proposes the construction of parking plus one storey on the said CTS Nos. 3567, 3568 & The details of the proposed construction is as under:- i) Plot area of CTS No. 3567, 3568 & sqft. ii) Proposed built up area sqft iii) Proposed FSI v) Permissible FSI The building plan submitted for the proposed construction are conforming the prevailing building bye-laws and FSI restrictions except for the side margins as stipulated in the instructions of GOC-in-C, SC. Further, the matter regarding the transfer of the property in the name of Shri Rajendra M Naidu and Smt. Vaishali R Naidu is in progress and held up due to the fact that no structure exists on site. As land in Sangamwadi village is mostly under the management of the Collector, Pune and hence the Cantonment Board only transfers the right of the structure that too only for municipal purposes. Meanwhile, Shri Rajendra M Naidu and Smt. Vaishali R Naidu started the work of construction on site, which was stopped by the Board by confiscating the material from the site on 01 Oct The work of column footings were in progress when the work was stopped. But again the applicants had started the unauthorized constructions, accordingly the building plans submitted earlier on 03 Oct were returned back vide letter no. H.No. 70/SW/P-86 dated 29 Oct and further to show cause why action be not initiated against them for the said unauthorized construction as per the Cantonments Act, Also, there have number of complaints from the local residents of the area regarding the unauthorized construction being undertaken on site. Now, Shri Rajendra M Naidu and Smt. Vaishali R Naidu have submitted the building plan proposing construction on House No. 70, CTS No. 3567, 3568 & 3569, Yerwada, Sangamwadi, Khadki and stated that they will not undertake any work. The buildings plans may please be placed before the Board as the proposed construction is situated outside the notified civil area. If approved the applicant will have to deposit an amount of Rs. 1000/- towards the scrutiny charges and Rs /- towards the development Rs.10/- per sqft of the proposed construction. Further, the applicants may please be penalized a fine of Rs.15000/- i.e 10% of Rs. 1,50,000/- (approx. cost of unauthorized construction undertaken) for starting the work without obtaining prior permission from the Board and also, not getting the property transferred from the Board within time period. Applicants will also have to obtain the NOC from the Collector, Pune before the commencement of the construction. In case the same is not

26 approved by the Board notices u/s 248 and followed by u/s 320 of the Cantonments Act, 2006 be issued to the applicant for the unauthorized construction. In this regard the office note along with other relevant papers is placed on the table for further consideration of the matter. 16. The issue considered. The PCB desired that the details be up for scrutiny so as to take decision which was agreed to by members. 17 PROVISION OF DRAIN AND CONCRETING IN DARGA VASHAT/ GAWALIWADA VASHAT, WARD NO. VII, KHADKI CANTONMENT BOARD (OUT OF MLC FUNDS) (III CALL). To consider the office report regarding E-Tenders for the work Provision of Drain and Concreting in Darga Vashat/ Gawaliwada Vashat, Ward No. VII, Khadki Cantonment Board (Out of MLC Funds) (III Call) scheduled to be received up to 23 Aug in response to the tender advertisement vide this office letter AE/Tender/ /P- 15 dated 22 July 2016 published in Times of India, Lokmat and Navbharat. As per the above tender notice e-tenders were invited for various works to be undertaken out of Local Development Programme out of MP/MLA/MLC funds. As per the tender notice the technical bid was supposed to be opened on 25 Aug and financial bid on 29 Aug But, meanwhile a letter no /730 dated 20 July 2016 (received on 25 July 2016) was received from the office of the District Collector, District Planning & Development, Pune enclosing letter no. 809/2016 dated 15 July 2016 of Shri Anil Shivajirao Bhosale, Hon ble Member of Legislative Council regarding alleged corruptions in various works proposed during the period out of local development programme and seeking enquiry there upon. Accordingly, the matter was replied to the District Collector, District Planning & Development, Pune along with all facts and figures that till date no tenders have been received, no work order is issued and therefore no work has been executed in respect of all the works proposed by Shri Anil Shivajirao Bhosale, Hon ble Member of Legislative Council and without any doubt of iota it can be stated that no matter regarding corruption has taken place. In reply, the District Collector, District Planning & Development, Pune vide his letter no /1564 dated 07 Oct referring to letter no. 926/2016 dated 13 Sept of Shri Anil Shivajirao Bhosale, Hon ble Member of Legislative Council that the Hon. MLC has satisfied himself about the complaint & doubt raised and hence the works may be taken up and compliance report be submitted to the Collectarote. In view of the above the tenders were opened on 13 Oct (copy of the tender opening certificate attached). As per the above tender opening 03 tenders have been received for the work of Provision of Drain and concreting in Darga Vashat/

27 Gawaliwada Vashat, Ward No. 7, Khadki Cantonment Board (Out of MLC Funds). Meanwhile, the Election Commission of India, Nirvachan Sadan, New Delhi vide letter no. ECI/PN/61/2016 dated 19 Oct had informed about informed about the implementation of Model Code of Conduct from 19 Oct to 24 Nov for Biennial Elections to the Maharashtra Legislative Council. Accordingly, the financial bid was opened on 01 Dec and details of the rates received are as under:- S. No. Name of the Tenderer Rates above MES SSR M/s Waqid Construction 30% 2. M/s Vimal Enterprises 31% 3. M/s Reliance Enterprises 36% As per technical report of the Engg.Section, the lowest tenderer M/s Waqid Construction has quoted 30% above MES SSR Comparing with the rates approved by the Board vide CBR No. 30 dated 22 Jan for the work of Annual Term Contract for for Repairs to Cantonment Hospital and Schools at 39% above MES SSR 2010 the lowest rate of 30% above MES SSR 2010 seems to be reasonable. Further, as compared with the forecast percentage as issued by the Chief Engineer, Pune Zone for the period ending Dec which is 46% above MES SSR Office report along with other relevant documents is placed on the table for further consideration of the Board. 17. Considered and approved the lowest rates received from M/s Waqid Construction at 30% above MES SSR The work to be carried out of MLA Funds. 18 PROVISION OF INTERLOCKING PAVING BLOCKS AND CONCRETING IN HINDU SHAMSHAN BHUMI, WARD NO I (SC), KHADKI CANTONMENT BOARD (OUT OF MLA FUNDS) (III CALL). To consider the office report regarding E-Tenders for the work Provision of Interlocking Paving Blocks and Concreting in Hindu Shamshan Bhumi, Ward No I (SC), Khadki Cantonment Board (Out of MLA Funds) (III Call) scheduled to be received up to 23 Aug in response to the tender advertisement vide this office letter AE/Tender/ /P- 15 dated 22 July 2016 published in Times of India, Lokmat and Navbharat.