COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AGENDA November 18, :00 p.m. Council Chamber. Chair: Acting Mayor

Transcription

1 District of Maple Ridge COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AGENDA November 18, :00 p.m. Council Chamber Committee of the Whole is the initial venue for review of issues. No voting takes place on bylaws or resolutions. A decision is made to send an item to Council for debate and vote or to send an item back to staff for more information or clarification before proceeding to Council. Note: If required, there will be a 15-minute break at 3:00 p.m. Chair: Acting Mayor 1. DELEGATIONS/STAFF PRESENTATIONS (10 minutes each) 1:00 p.m. 1.1 Information Technology Update - Christina Crabtree, Director of Information Technology 2. PUBLIC WORKS AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Note: Owners and/or Agents of Development Applications may be permitted to speak to their applications with a time limit of 10 minutes. Note: The following items have been numbered to correspond with the Council Agenda: RZ, and Larch Avenue, RS-3 and RS-2 to RM-1 Staff report dated November 18, 2013 recommending that rezoning Application be denied. (Report to be circulated separately)

2 Committee of the Whole Agenda November 18, 2013 Page 2 of RZ, Avenue, RS-1 to RS-1b Staff report dated November 18, 2013 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No to rezone from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban [Medium Density] Residential) to permit future subdivision into two single family lots be given first reading and that the applicant provide further information as described on Schedule B of the Development Procedures Bylaw No , along with the information required for a Subdivision application RZ, Street, RS-3 to RS-1b Staff report dated November 18, 2013 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No to rezone from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban [Medium Density] Residential) to allow single family lot sizes in accordance with the Community Amenity Program be given first reading and that the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules A, B and F of the Development Procedures Bylaw No , along with the information required for a Subdivision application RZ, Street, RS-3 to RS-2 Staff report dated November 18, 2013 recommending that Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No to rezone from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) to permit a future subdivision of 2 lots be given second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing DVP, Street Staff report dated November 18, 2013 recommending that the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal DVP to permit future subdivision into 19 residential lots Maple Ridge Ticket Information Utilization Amending Bylaw No Staff report dated November 18, 2013 recommending that Maple Ridge Ticket Information Utilization Amending Bylaw No be given first, second and third readings.

3 Committee of the Whole Agenda November 18, 2013 Page 3 of Intermunicipal Business Licence Pilot Project Update Staff report dated November 18, 2013 recommending that the existing Intermunicipal Business Licence Pilot Project be extended for an additional two year term and that Maple Ridge Intermunicipal Business Licence Amending Bylaw No to allow for the extension be given first, second and third readings. 3. FINANCIAL AND CORPORATE SERVICES (including Fire and Police) 1131 Disbursements for the month ended October 31, 2013 Staff report dated November 18, 2013 recommending that the disbursements for the month ended October 31, 2013 be approved Town Centre Investment Incentive Program Extension (TCIIP2013) Staff report dated November 18, 2013 recommending that the Maple Ridge Revitalization Tax Exemption Bylaw No be given first, second and third readings, that Maple Ridge Off-Street Parking and Loading Amending Bylaw No be given first, second and third readings and that the Town Centre Investment Incentive TCIIP2013 be implemented Pitt Meadows Airport Society Staff report dated November 18, 2013 recommending that the District of Maple Ridge consent to the bylaws of the Pitt Meadows Airport Society being amended in respect of membership, that the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute all such resolutions and documents and that the Mayor and the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute the Protocol Agreement. 4. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND RECREATION SERVICES CORRESPONDENCE 1171

4 Committee of the Whole Agenda November 18, 2013 Page 4 of 4 6. OTHER ISSUES ADJOURNMENT 8. COMMUNITY FORUM COMMUNITY FORUM The Community Forum provides the public with an opportunity to ask questions of Council on items that are of concern to them, with the exception of Public Hearing by-laws that have not yet reached conclusion. Council will not tolerate any derogatory remarks directed at Council or staff members. Each person will be permitted 2 minutes to speak or ask questions (a second opportunity is permitted if no one else is sitting in the chairs in front of the podium). Questions must be directed to the Chair of the meeting and not to the individual members of Council. The total time for this Forum is limited to 15 minutes. If a question cannot be answered, the speaker will be advised when and how a response will be given. Other opportunities are available to address Council including public hearings and delegations. The public may also make their views known to Council by writing or via and by attending open houses, workshops and information meetings. Serving on an Advisory Committee is an excellent way to have a voice in the future of this community. For more information on these opportunities contact: Clerk s Department at or clerks@mapleridge.ca Mayor and Council at mayorandcouncil@mapleridge.ca Checked by: Date:

5 Item RZ, and Larch Avenue, RS-3 and RS-2 to RM-1 To be circulated separately 1101

6 District of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: November 18, 2013 and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W SUBJECT: First Reading Zone Amending Bylaw No Avenue EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone Avenue, the subject property, from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) to permit future subdivision into two single family lots. To proceed further with this application additional information is required as outlined below. RECOMMENDATIONS: That Zone Amending Bylaw No be given first reading; and That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedule B of the Development Procedures Bylaw No , along with the information required for a Subdivision application. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Owner: Legal Description: OCP: Existing: Zoning: Existing: Proposed: Mayur Mehta Anuradha Sharma Lot 45, Except Part Dedicated Road on Plan LMP 6759, District Lot 276, Group 1, New Westminster District Plan Urban Residential RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Designation: Urban Residential 1102

7 South: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential Designation: Urban Residential East: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Designation: Urban Residential West: Uses: Single Family Residential and Duplex Zones: RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) and RT-1 (Two Family Urban Residential) Designation: Urban Residential Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing requirement: Single Family Residential Single Family Residential 0.24 ha (0.59 acres) 123 Avenue Urban Standard b) Site Characteristics: The subject property is approximatey 0.24 ha in size and is bound by single family residential properties to the north, east, and west, and 123 Avenue to the south (see Appendix A). c) Project Description: The current application proposes to rezone the subject property from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential), to permit future subdivision into two single family residential lots. At this time the current application has been assessed to determine its compliance with the Official Community Plan (OCP) and provide a land use assessment only. Detailed review and comments will need to be made once full application packages have been received. A more detailed analysis and a further report will be required prior to second reading. Such assessment may impact proposed lot boundaries, yields, OCP designations, and bylaw particulars, and may require application for further development permits. d) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The development site is currently designated Urban Residential Major Corridor. This designation is characterized by having frontage on a Major Road Corridor as identified on Figure 4 of the OCP, or has frontage on a road built in whole or part to a collector, arterial, Translink Major Road, or Provincial Highway standard. This designation includes ground-oriented housing forms such as single detached dwellings, garden suites, duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes, townhouses, apartments, or small lot intensive residential, subject to compliance with Major Corridor Residential Infill policies. The subdivision of this property into two lots and use of the RS-1B (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) zone is in compliance with the OCP

8 Zoning Bylaw: The current application proposes to rezone the subject property, located at Avenue from RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) (see Appendix B) to permit future subdivision into two single family lots of approximately 1200 m² (see Appendix C). Any variations from the requirements of the proposed zone will require a Development Variance Permit application. e) Interdepartmental Implications: In order to advance the current application, after first reading, comments and input, will be sought from the various internal departments and external agencies listed below: a) Engineering Department; b) Operations Department; c) Fire Department; d) Licences, Permits and Bylaws Department; and e) Canada Post. The above list is intended to be indicative only and it may become necessary, as the application progresses, to liaise with agencies and/or departments not listed above. This application has not been forwarded to the Engineering Department for comments at this time; therefore, an evaluation of servicing requirements has not been undertaken. This evaluation will take place between first and second reading. f) Development Applications: In order for this application to proceed the following information must be provided, as required by Development Procedures Bylaw No as amended: 1. A complete Rezoning Application (Schedule B); and 2. A Subdivision Application. The above list is intended to be indicative only, other applications may be necessary as the assessment of the proposal progresses. CONCLUSION: The development proposal is in compliance with the Official Community Plan, therefore, it is recommended that Council grant first reading subject to additional information being provided and assessed prior to second reading

9 The proposed layout has not been reviewed in relation to the relevant bylaws and regulations governing subdivision applications. Any subdivision layout provided is strictly preliminary and must be approved by the District of Maple Ridge s Approving Officer. Original signed by Michelle Baski Prepared by: Michelle Baski, AScT Planning Technician Original signed by Christine Carter Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning Original signed by Frank Quinn Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng. GM: Public Works & Development Services Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A Subject Map Appendix B Zone Amending Bylaw Appendix C Proposed Subdivision Plan - 4 -

10 APPENDIX A SUBJECT PROPERTY Scale: 1:1,500 City of Pitt Meadows ^ District of Langley FRASER R. District of Mission AVENUE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE FINANCE DEPARTMENT DATE: Sep 25, 2013 FILE: RZ BY: PC

11 APPENDIX B CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No as amended WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No " 2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 45 Except: Part Dedicated Road on Plan LMP6759; District Lot 276 Group 1 New Westminster District Plan and outlined in heavy black line on Map No a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of, 20 READ a second time the day of, 20 PUBLIC HEARING held the day of, 20 READ a third time the day of, 20 RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of, 20 PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER

12 ST VE. P P P AVE P P P P P RW EP P E 150' P S 52' 7 P P P Rem 80 P P EP Rem 7 P EPP LMS *LMP13506 LMP A B BCP P / P B AVE. 1 P LMP 5255 LMP LMP Rem LMP ST LMP LMP 1594 MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. Map No. From: 203 ST A AVE P P Rem RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) P LMP AVE LMP P P BCP LMP LMP EP B ST B AVE. BCP 7509 BCP B AVE EP BCP P LMP 6719 P EP A LMP P P A B BCP LMP B To: RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) SCALE 1:2,000

13 APPENDIX C

14 District of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: November 18, 2013 and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W SUBJECT: First Reading Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No Street EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone Street (the subject property) from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential). The applicant intends to choose the Density Bonus option within the RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) zone, which is specific to the Albion Area, enabling single-family lot sizes of 371 m². The required amenity fee of $3, per lot less than 557 m² will be collected by the Approving Officer at the subdivision approval stage. A portion of the subject property in the northwest corner is within the 30 m setback area from the top of bank of Seigel Creek and will therefore be dedicated as park for conservation purposes. As such, an Official Community Plan (OCP) amendment will be required to amend the land use designation in this area from Residential Low Medium to Conservation. To proceed further with this application additional information is required as outlined below. RECOMMENDATIONS: In respect of Section 879 of the Local Government Act, requirement for consultation during the development or amendment of an Official Community Plan, Council must consider whether consultation is required with specifically: i. The Board of the Regional District in which the area covered by the plan is located, in the case of a Municipal Official Community Plan; ii. The Board of any Regional District that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan; iii. The Council of any municipality that is adjacent to the area covered by the plan; iv. First Nations; v. School District Boards, greater boards and improvements district boards; and vi. The Provincial and Federal Governments and their agencies and in that regard it is recommended that no additional consultation be required in respect of this matter beyond the early posting of the proposed Official Community Plan amendments on the District's website, together with an invitation to the public to comment; and That Zone Amending Bylaw No be given first reading; and That the applicant provide further information as described on Schedules A, B, and F of the Development Procedures Bylaw No , along with the information required for a Subdivision application. 1103

15 DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Owner: Legal Description: OCP: Existing: Proposed: Zoning: Existing: Proposed: Dave Laird, Damax Consultants Ltd. Maridge Properties Ltd. Lot 18, Section 15, Township 12, New Westminster District Plan Residential Low-Medium Density Residential Low-Medium Density and Conservation RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential), with a Density Bonus through the Community Amenity Program Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Residential Low-Medium Density and Conservation South: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Institutional, Residential Low-Medium Density, Residential Low Density, and Conservation East: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) Designation: Residential Low-Medium Density West: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Residential Low-Medium Density and Conservation Existing Use of Property: Proposed Use of Property: Site Area: Access: Servicing requirement: Single Family Residential Single Family Residential 0.81 ha (2 acres) 112 Avenue and new road Urban Standard b) Site Characteristics: The subject property is located within the Albion Area Plan and is approximately 0.81 ha (2 acres) in size. The subject property is bound by 112 Avenue to the south, 243 Street to the east, and single family residential lots to the north and west (see Appendix A). Seigel Creek is located to the northwest of the subject property, which will require a small portion of the property to be dedicated as park for conservation purposes

16 c) Project Description: The applicant has requested to rezone the development site from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential), with a Density Bonus, in accordance with the Community Amenity Program, which received final reading on October 8, The Community Amenity Program is detailed in Zone Amending Bylaw No , which will permit the following: For the RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) zone, the base density is a net lot area of 557 m 2. A Density Bonus is an option in the RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) zone and shall be applied as follows: a. An Amenity Contribution of $3,100 per lot will be required in any subdivision containing one or more lots with an area of less than 557 m 2, payable when the Approving Officer approves the subdivision. b. The maximum density permitted through the Density Bonus option is: i. minimum net lot area of 371 m 2 ; ii. minimum lot width of 12.0 m; iii. minimum lot depth of 24 m. c. Zoning requirements consistent with the R-1 (Residential District) zone will apply and supersede the zoning requirements for the RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) zone. The proposed development consists of approximately 16 R-1 (Residential District) sized lots, amounting to an Amenity Contribution of approximately $49, The final number of lots and amenity contribution will be determined at the time of approval of the subdivision. At this time the current application has been assessed to determine its compliance with the Official Community Plan and provide a land use assessment only. Detailed review and comments will need to be made once full application packages have been received. A more detailed analysis and a further report will be required prior to second reading. Such assessment may impact proposed lot boundaries and yields, Official Community Plan designations and Bylaw particulars, and may require application for further development permits. d) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The development site is located within the Albion Area Plan and is currently designated Residential Low-Medium Density. For the proposed development, an OCP amendment will be required to redesignate the north-west portion of the site currently designated Residential Low-Medium Density to Conservation, as this area will be dedicated as park due to the watercourse setback to Seigel Creek (see Appendix B). The application is in compliance with the proposed OCP Amending Bylaw No , that establishes the Community Amenity Program, and in compliance with the proposed Zoning Amending Bylaw No , that permits a Density Bonus option in the Residential Low-Medium Density designation in the Albion Area Plan. The applicant intends to apply the Density Bonus option to this project, as discussed above in the Project Description

17 Zoning Bylaw: The current application proposes to rezone the property located at Street from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) with a Density Bonus (see Appendix C), to permit future subdivision into approximately 16 single family lots. The application of the Density Bonus, which is specific to the Albion Area Plan, will permit the applicant to reduce the single-family lot size from the RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) base density of 557 m 2 to 371 m 2. An Amenity Contribution of $3,100 per lot for each lot that is less than 557 m 2 is required, as discussed in the Project Description above. Any variations from the requirements of the Density Bonus zone of R-1 (Residential District) for lots less than 557 m² or from the requirements of the RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) zone for lots greater than 557 m² will require a Development Variance Permit application. Development Permits: Pursuant to Section 8.9 of the Official Community Plan, a Watercourse Protection Development Permit application is required for all developments and building permits within 50 metres of the top of bank of all watercourses and wetlands. The purpose of the Watercourse Protection Development Permit is to ensure the preservation, protection, restoration and enhancement of watercourse and riparian areas. Advisory Design Panel: A Form and Character Development Permit is not required because this is a single family project, therefore this application does not need to be reviewed by the Advisory Design Panel. Development Information Meeting: A Development Information Meeting is not required for this application because it is in compliance with the OCP and is less than 25 dwelling units. e) Interdepartmental Implications: In order to advance the current application, after first reading, comments and input, will be sought from the various internal departments and external agencies listed below: a) Engineering Department; b) Operations Department; c) Fire Department; d) Licenses, Permits and Bylaws Department; e) Parks Department; f) Canada Post; and g) School District. The above list is intended to be indicative only and it may become necessary, as the application progresses, to liaise with agencies and/or departments not listed above

18 This application has not been forwarded to the Engineering Department for comments at this time; therefore, an evaluation of servicing requirements has not been undertaken. We anticipate that this evaluation will take place between first and second reading. f) Early and Ongoing Consultation: In respect of Section 879 of the Local Government Act for consultation during an Official Community Plan amendment, it is recommended that no additional consultation is required beyond the early posting of the proposed OCP amendments on the District s website, together with an invitation to the public to comment. g) Development Applications: In order for this application to proceed the following information must be provided, as required by Development Procedures Bylaw No as amended: 1. An Official Community Plan Application (Schedule A); 2. A complete Rezoning Application (Schedule B); 3. A Watercourse Protection Development Permit Application (Schedule F); and 4. A Subdivision Application. The above list is intended to be indicative only, other applications may be necessary as the assessment of the proposal progresses. CONCLUSION: The development proposal is in compliance with the policies of the OCP with respect to designated land use; however, minor adjustments to the Conservation boundaries are required. Justification has been provided to support the OCP amendment. It is therefore recommended that Council grant first reading subject to additional information being provided and assessed prior to second reading. It is recommended that Council not require any further additional OCP consultation. It is expected that once complete information is received, Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No may be amended and an OCP Amendment for Conservation boundary adjustment may be required

19 The proposed layout has not been reviewed in relation to the relevant bylaws and regulations governing subdivision applications. Any subdivision layout provided is strictly preliminary and must be approved by the District of Maple Ridge s Approving Officer. Original signed by Michelle Baski Prepared by: Michelle Baski, AScT Planning Technician "Original signed by Christine Carter" Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning "Original signed by Frank Quinn" Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng GM: Public Works & Development Services "Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule" Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A Subject Map Appendix B Zone Amending Bylaw Appendix C Preliminary Subdivision Plan - 6 -

20 EP PAR K BCP A S T BCP pump sta. BCP 15 9 PAR K APPENDIX A P A V E S T. 3 P P P Subject Property B S T. A Re m 1 P RP S T. 1 P P B S T. 2 P AV E. Re m Re m 11 A P 80 9 P P 80 9 EP Scale: 1:2,500 City of Pitt Meadows District of Langley ^ FRAS ER R. District of Mis sion S t CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE FI N A N C E D E P A R T M E N T DATE: Nov 14, RZ BY: J V

21 APPENDIX B CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No " 2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 18 Section 15 Township 12 New Westminster District Plan and outlined in heavy black line on Map No a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the day of, A.D. 20. READ a second time the day of, A.D. 20. PUBLIC HEARING held the day of, A.D. 20. READ a third time the day of, A.D. 20. RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of, A.D. 20. PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER

22 BC BCP P AV E S T. 3 P P P B S T A RP S T. 1 P EP P B S T. 2 P AVE. 112 AVE. Rem Rem 11 A EP P 809 P P 809 EP MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. Map No. From: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) To: RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) SCALE 1:2,500

23 APPENDIX C

24 District of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: November 18, 2013 and Members of Council FILE NO: RZ FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: C of W SUBJECT: Second Reading Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No Street EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An application has been received to rezone the subject property from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential), to permit a future subdivision of 2 lots not less than 4000m2 (0.4 hectares). First reading was granted on January 10, This application is in compliance with the Official Community Plan. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. That Zone Amending Bylaw No be given second reading and be forwarded to Public Hearing; and 2. That the following condition be met prior to Final Reading. i. Road dedication as required. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Owners: Martti Vainionpaa Martti and Lea Vainionpaa Legal Description: Lot 10, Section 18, Township 15, NWD Plan OCP: Existing: Zoning: Existing: Proposed: Suburban Residential RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) 1104

25 Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation Suburban Residential South: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Suburban Residential East: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Suburban Residential West: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) Designation: Suburban Residential Existing Use of Property: Single Family Residential Proposed Use of Property: Single Family Residential Site Area: ha. (2.28 acres) Access: Dewdney Trunk Road and 267 Street Servicing requirement: Rural Standard b) Project Description: The applicant proposes to rezone the property from RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) for the purpose of future subdivision into two one acre lots. The property is located within the boundaries of the Whonnock Lake Aquifer; therefore a Groundwater Impact Assessment was required in order to assess the impact of the existing and proposed septic fields on the aquifer. c) Planning Analysis: Official Community Plan: The property is designated Suburban Residential in the OCP, which permits a single detached housing form located outside the Urban Area Boundary. The RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) zone is in compliance with this designation and requires municipal water and sewage disposal provided by a private system. Zoning Bylaw: The proposed lots meet the minimum width, depth and areas required under the RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) zone. Setbacks for the existing and proposed structures will be confirmed at the subdivision stage. Proposed Variances: A Development Variance Permit will be required to allow for the road carriageway on 267 Street to remain at six meters in width as opposed to seven meters, which is the width the current Subdivision Servicing Bylaw requires. This Development Variance Permit is supportable as the present road has adequate capacity and width to serve the proposed additional lot. The Development Variance Permit will be the subject of a future report to Council

26 d) Environmental Implications: Due to its location within the Whonnock Aquifer, a Groundwater Impact Assessment was required and received September 18, 2013 from Ace Consulting Engineers Ltd. Analysis shows that future impact of nitrate loading from an additional septic system is low, and a public water supply is available to the surrounding lots. The Groundwater Impact Assessment also recommended that siting of the septic field for proposed lot A be sited nearer to the east property boundary to maximize the setback distance to the shallow well servicing Dewdney Trunk Road and site grading ensuring that surface flows are directed away from the well. e) Interdepartmental Implications: Engineering: The Engineering Department has reviewed the application and has advised that all required services exist. A letter confirming the absence of underground storage tanks was received October 29, 2013 by Ace Consulting Engineers Ltd. CONCLUSION: As the proposed development is in compliance with the Official Community Plan, it is recommended that second reading be given to Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No , and that application RZ be forwarded to Public Hearing. Original signed by Siobhan Murphy Prepared by: Siobhan Murphy, MA, MCIP, RPP Planning Technician "Original signed by Christine Carter" Approved by: Christine Carter, M.PL, MCIP, RPP Director of Planning "Original signed by Frank Quinn" Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng. GM: Public Works & Development Services "Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule" Concurrence: J. L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A Subject Map Appendix B Zone Amending Bylaw No Appendix C Subdivision Layout - 3 -

27 APPENDIX A RP A EP B P Re m 2 EPP P LMP Pcl A RP Subject Property RP S T. 267 S T. 9 P P P EP P /89 10 P Re m E 12 5' 5 Re m 1 A P Re m 5 EP B P SK N 1 / P Re m 4 EP B S 1/ Scale: 1:2,500 City of Pitt Meadows District of Langley FRAS ER R. ^ District of Mis sion N 1 / S t CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE FI N A N C E D E P A R T M E N T DATE: Oct 29, RZ BY: J V

28 APPENDIX B CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO A Bylaw to amend Map "A" forming part of Zoning Bylaw No as amended. WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No as amended; NOW THEREFORE, the Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No " 2. That parcel or tract of land and premises known and described as: Lot 10 Section 18 Township 15 New Westminster District Plan and outlined in heavy black line on Map No a copy of which is attached hereto and forms part of this Bylaw, is hereby rezoned to RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential). 3. Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw No as amended and Map "A" attached thereto are hereby amended accordingly. READ a first time the 10 th day of January, A.D READ a second time the day of, A.D. 20. PUBLIC HEARING held the day of, A.D. 20. READ a third time the day of, A.D. 20. RECONSIDERED AND FINALLY ADOPTED, the day of, A.D. 20. PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER

29 ST EP 2 12 RP A RW EP B P 8097 Rem 2 EPP P LMP LMP Pcl A RP DEWDNEY TRUNK ROAD RP P 5702 DEWDNEY TRUNK ROAD 9 P P 7439 P 8171 EP P / P 7439 Rem 5 Rem E 125' 5 EP B Rem 1 A 267 ST. 267 ST. P SK N 1/ P 7439 Rem 4 EP B MAPLE RIDGE ZONE AMENDING Bylaw No. Map No. From: RS-3 (One Family Rural Residential) To: RS-2 (One Family Suburban Residential) SCALE 1:2,500

30 APPENDIX C

31 District of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: November 18, 2013 and Members of Council FILE NO: DVP FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: CoW SUBJECT: Development Variance Permit Street EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Haney-Pitt Meadows Christian School Association has been seeking means to rezone and subdivide their property to assist with their growth plans. The awkward shape and size of the parcel, as well as their shifting plans has made reaching this objective challenging. The site itself requires multiple access points and new roads to get to the school. This results in a remnant development lot difficult to subdivide without multiple variances. A compromised subdivision and road pattern has been negotiated that results in good neighbourhood traffic patterns and lots which, although shallow in depth, still render buildable lots that will provide a normal streetscape. Accordingly, Development Variance Permit application DVP has been received in conjunction with a subdivision application ( SD) to permit future subdivision of the subject property, Street (see Appendix A Subject Map) into 19 residential lots. This subdivision (see Appendix B Subdivision Plan) requires variances to: reduce the minimum lot depth from 24m to 20.9m for proposed lots 1 through 19; increase the maximum height from 9m to 11m, for proposed lots 9 through 18; reduce the minimum front yard setback from 5.5m to 3.0m (for lots 9 through 16, lot 18, and lot 19) and 4.4m (for lots 1 through 5, and lot 8) (see Appendix C Summary of Setback Variances) reduce the minimum rear yard setback from 8m to 6m for proposed lots 1 through 19; and reduce the minimum road width on 121 Avenue (18m vs. 20m) and the lane (6m vs. 7.5m). Council considered rezoning application RZ/004/06 and granted first reading for Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No and for Maple Ridge Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No on April 8, This application was presented at Public Hearing on May 20, Council granted second and third readings for Maple Ridge Zone Amending Bylaw No and for Official Community Plan Amending Bylaw No on May 27, Council granted a first extension on May 26, 2009, and a second extension on May 11, Council gave final reading for rezoning application RZ/004/06 on May 10, RECOMMENDATION: That the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal DVP respecting the property located at Street. 1105

32 DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: Applicant: Owner: Legal Descriptions: Dave Laird, DAMAX Consultants Villagewalk Homes Ltd. Lot A, District Lot 241, Group 1, New Westminster District Plan EPP OCP : Existing: Urban Residential Zoning: Existing: R-1 (Residential District) Surrounding Uses: North: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) Designation: Urban Residential South: Use: Single Family Residential, Vacant Zone: RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential), RS-1 (One Family Urban Residential) Designation: Urban Residential East: Use: School (Maple Ridge Christian School) Zone: P-2 (Special Institutional) Designation: Institutional West: Use: Single Family Residential Zone: RS-1b (One Family Urban (Medium Density) Residential) Designation: Urban Residential Existing Use of Properties: Proposed Use of Properties: Site Area: Access: Servicing: Companion Applications: Vacant Single Family Residential 1.05 ha (2.6 acres) 121 Avenue and 121B Avenue Full Urban SD b) Requested Variances: 1. Zoning Bylaw No , Schedule D Minimum Lot Area and Dimensions: To reduce the minimum required lot depth of an R-1 (Residential District) zoned lot from 24 m to 20.9 m for proposed lots 1 through 16, 18, and Zoning Bylaw No , Part 6, Section 601, C. REGULATIONS FOR THE SIZE, SHAPE AND SITING OF BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES (11) (b): To increase the maximum height of 9 m to 11 m on proposed lots 9 through

33 3. Zoning Bylaw No , Part 6, Section 601, C. REGULATIONS FOR THE SIZE, SHAPE AND SITING OF BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES (11) (c) (i): To reduce the minimum setback from a front lot line from 5.5 m to 3.0 m (for lots 9 through 16, lot 18, and lot 19) and 4.4 m (for lots 1 through 5, and lot 8) (see Appendix C Summary of Setback Variances). 4. Zoning Bylaw No , Part 6, Section 601, C. REGULATIONS FOR THE SIZE, SHAPE AND SITING OF BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES (11) (c) (ii): To reduce the minimum setback from a rear lot line from 8 m to 6 m on proposed lots 1 through Subdivision and Development Services Bylaw No , Schedule B: To reduce the minimum required width of 121 Avenue, a collector street, from 20 m to 18 m; and To reduce the minimum required width of the lane from 7.5 m to 6 m. c) Project Description: The subject property was rezoned to R-1 (Residential District) on May 10, The proposed subdivision will subdivide the subject property into 19 R-1 (Residential District) properties (see Appendix B Subdivision Plan). d) Planning Analysis: Zoning Bylaw: The Zoning Bylaw establishes general minimum and maximum regulations for single family development. A Development Variance Permit allows Council some flexibility in the approval process. The applicant has requested variances to the Maple Ridge Zoning Bylaw, and the following rationale for support is provided by the Planning Department: 1. Zoning Bylaw No , Schedule D Minimum Lot Area and Dimensions: To reduce the minimum required lot depth of an R-1 (Residential District) zoned lot from 24 m to 20.9 m for proposed lots 1 through 16, 18, and 19. The reduction is supportable, as the lots meet the required minimum lot area of 371 m² and the wider lots are more appropriate for the layout, given the road dedication requirements and existing lot widths north of 121B Avenue. 2. Zoning Bylaw No , Part 6, Section 601, C. REGULATIONS FOR THE SIZE, SHAPE AND SITING OF BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES (11) (b): To increase the maximum height of 9 m to 11 m on proposed lots 9 through 18. The increase in height is supportable, as it is consistent with the proposed changes to the R- 1 (Residential District) zone in the draft Zoning Bylaw, and the variance is only requested for internal lots fronting 121 Avenue and 204B Street

34 3. Zoning Bylaw No , Part 6, Section 601, C. REGULATIONS FOR THE SIZE, SHAPE AND SITING OF BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES (11) (c) (i): To reduce the minimum setback from a front lot line from 5.5 m to 3.0 m (for lots 9 through 16, lot 18, and lot 19) and 4.4 m (for lots 1 through 5, and lot 8) (See Appendix C Summary of Setback Variances). The front yard setback reductions are supportable, as there is limited space on the shorter lots to site a house. The applicant also proposes to put a restrictive covenant on Lots 1 through 5 and Lot 8 to require a greater setback (6.8 m) from the front lot line to the garage to minimize the impact of the reduced setback to the house. 4. Zoning Bylaw No , Part 6, Section 601, C. REGULATIONS FOR THE SIZE, SHAPE AND SITING OF BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES (11) (c) (ii): To reduce the minimum setback from a rear lot line from 8 m to 6 m on proposed lots 1 through 19. The rear yard setback reductions are supportable, as there is limited space on the shorter lots to site a house, and the rear yard setbacks are consistent with the proposed changes to the R-1 (Residential District) zone in the draft Zoning Bylaw. e) Interdepartmental Implications: Engineering Department: Subdivision and Development Services Bylaw: The applicant has requested the following variances to the Maple Ridge Subdivision and Development Services Bylaw: 5. Subdivision and Development Services Bylaw No , Schedule B: To reduce the minimum required width of 121 Avenue, a collector street, from 20 m to 18 m; and To reduce the minimum required width of the lane from 7.5 m to 6 m. The Engineering Department supports the road width variances requested for 121 Avenue and the lane, as the required services can be provided in the proposed widths. CONCLUSION: The proposed variances are supportable by the Planning and Engineering Departments, and the Approving Officer because of the road dedication requirements restricting the depth of the lots, height and rear yard setback reductions that are consistent with proposed changes to the R-1 (Residential District) zone; and the required servicing will be achieved in the proposed road widths. The variances will also apply to the majority of the lots, ensuring the future homes will all share a similar style, massing, and location on each lot

35 It is therefore recommended that this application be favourably considered and the Corporate Officer be authorized to sign and seal Development Variance Permit DVP. Original signed by Michelle Baski Prepared by: Michelle Baski, AScT Planning Technician "Original signed by Charles R. Goddard" Approved by: Charles R. Goddard, BA MA Manager of Development & Environmental Services "Original signed by Frank Quinn" Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng. GM: Public Works & Development Services "Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule" Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer The following appendices are attached hereto: Appendix A Subject Map Appendix B Subdivision Plan Appendix C Summary of Setback Variances - 5 -

36 APPENDIX A SUBJECT PROPERTY Scale: 1:2,500 City of Pitt Meadows ^ District of Langley FRASER R. District of Mission STREET CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE FINANCE DEPARTMENT DATE: Nov 14, 2013 FILE: VP BY: PC

37 APPENDIX B

38 APPENDIX C

39 District of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: November 18, 2013 and Members of Council FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Committee of the Whole SUBJECT: Maple Ridge Ticket Information Utilization Amending Bylaw No EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Maple Ridge Ticket Information Utilization Amending Bylaw No has been prepared to update and coordinate the bylaw with other District bylaws. Since the adoption of the current Maple Ridge Ticket Information Utilization Bylaw (MTI) in February 2013, the Maple Ridge Highway and Traffic Bylaw No has been amended to include resident parking as Section 16 and to add Section 52, which refers to obeying traffic controls and signs, to Schedule 9. The wording of the MTI bylaw must match up with the Highway and Traffic bylaw to be applicable. This amending bylaw also updates individual positions that are designated to pursue compliance with specific District bylaws. RECOMMENDATION(S): That Maple Ridge Ticket Information Utilization Amending Bylaw No be given first, second and third readings. DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: As Fire Department Officers are often dealing with violations of this bylaw, it is important that they be named designated Bylaw Enforcement Officers. As part of the bylaw amendment, the position of Fire Department Officer is now included as a designated Bylaw Enforcement Officer for the Fireworks Bylaw No The most recent amendment to the MTI Bylaw was passed in February Since that time, Council has amended Maple Ridge Highway and Traffic Bylaw No with regards to resident parking, adding it as Section 16 in Schedule 9. The addition of Section 52 provides the ability to deal with persons failing to obey traffic controls and signs. The MTI Bylaw needs to be updated to reflect these changes so that issued tickets will include the correct wording and refer to the applicable sections. CONCLUSIONS: Maple Ridge Ticket Information Utilization Amending Bylaw No ensures coordination and compliance with other District bylaws. Page 1 of

40 Original signed by R. MacNair Prepared by: R. MacNair Manager, Bylaw and Licencing Services Original signed by E.S. (Liz) Holitzki Approved by: E.S. (Liz) Holitzki Director: Licences, Permits and Bylaws Original signed by Frank Quinn Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng General Manager: Public Works and Development Services Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Office RM/ Appendix I - Maple Ridge Ticket Information Utilization Amending Bylaw No Page 2 of 2

41 APPENDIX I District of Maple Ridge Maple Ridge Ticket Information Utilization Amending Bylaw No A bylaw to amend Maple Ridge Ticket Information Utilization Bylaw No WHEREAS the Council of The Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge deems it expedient to amend Maple Ridge Ticket Information Utilization Bylaw No ; NOW THEREFORE, the Council of the District of Maple Ridge enacts as follows: 1. This bylaw may be cited as Maple Ridge Ticket Information Utilization Amending Bylaw No Maple Ridge Ticket Information Utilization Bylaw No is amended by adding to Schedule 1, Fire Department Officer as a Designated Bylaw Enforcement Officer under the Maple Ridge Fireworks Bylaw No Maple Ridge Ticket Information Utilization Bylaw. No is amended by adding to the end of Schedule 9: Fail to obey traffic controls Maple Ridge Ticket Information Utilization Bylaw No is amended by adding the following to the table in Schedule 9, immediately after Unattached trailer : Park in resident zone 16.3 and renumbering Schedule 9 according to Maple Ridge Highway and Traffic Bylaw No READ A FIRST TIME this day of, READ A SECOND TIME this day of, READ A THIRD TIME this day of, ADOPTED this day of, PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER

42 District of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: November 18, 2013 and Members of Council FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Committee of the Whole SUBJECT: Intermunicipal Business Licence Pilot Project Update EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On January 1, 2013, nine Fraser Valley municipalities implemented a one year Intermunicipal Business Licence Pilot Project (IML). The participating municipalities included the District of Maple Ridge, Township of Langley, City of Langley, City of Abbotsford, City of Surrey, City of Pitt Meadows, District of Mission, City of Chilliwack and the District of Hope. The current pilot project expires December 31, On October 3, 2013 the Intermunicipal Business Licence Steering Committee conducted a review of the existing pilot to determine if the Intermunicipal Business Licence program was meeting the needs of the municipalities and businesses and whether the program should be continued. A financial summary for the period of January 1, 2013 to September 30, 2013 was prepared by the Province using data collected from each participating municipality to determine the number of business licences issued and revenues generated from the Intermunicipal Business Licence program (attached as Appendix 1). Although the existing pilot appears to have had an encouraging start, it was determined that additional time was required to complete a more comprehensive review before recommending a permanent program be adopted. All participating municipalities are bringing forward proposed amendments to their current Intermunicipal Business Licence Bylaw for their Councils consideration. The proposed bylaw amendments included minor housekeeping changes to extend the existing pilot program for an additional two years to and to amend the dates of the revenue disbursement in accordance with the new proposed extended term. The current revenue sharing formula will continue to be used. Subject to a resolution of all respective Councils the existing pilot project will be extended until December 31, RECOMMENDATION(S): 1. That staff be directed to extend the existing Intermunicipal Business Licence Pilot Project for an additional two year term ending December 31, That Maple Ridge Intermunicipal Business Licence Amending Bylaw No be given first, second and third readings. Page 1 of

43 DISCUSSION: Prior to the implementation of the Intermunicipal Business Licence Pilot, non-resident trade contractor businesses were required to obtain a business licence from their home municipality in which they were based in, as well as purchase a non-resident business licence from each municipality in which they operated in. Under the Intermunicipal Business Licence Pilot, the participating nine municipalities agreed to allow non-resident trade contractor businesses from within the participating municipalities to operate in their municipality on the basis of one Intermunicipal Business Licence purchased from their home municipality. The cost of the IML is $250 annually, and each mobile trade business is still required to purchase a resident business licence from their home municipality. The revenue generated from sales of Intermunicipal Business Licence is subsequently shared among the participating municipalities based on a revenue sharing formula. The calculation and the distribution of the Intermunicipal Business Licence revenue were carried out at the end of June 2013 and will be distributed again at the end of the December The current Fraser Valley Intermunicipal Business Licence Pilot Program will expire on December 31, On October 3, 2013 the Steering Committee conducted a review of the existing pilot to determine if the Fraser Valley Intermunicipal Business Licence program was meeting the needs of the municipalities and businesses and whether the program should be continued. Upon further discussion, it was determined that additional time was required to allow for a more comprehensive review of the program. The one year timeline for the current pilot project has not allowed sufficient time for the Steering Committee to give consideration to key factors that are necessary to ensure the success of the program beyond a pilot stage. Further consideration is required to address the potential addition of other municipalities to the program. Other municipalities that are interested in joining the Fraser Valley Intermunicipal Business Licencing program would need to provide the Steering Committee with their Business Licencing data for a revenue analysis review before consideration for inclusion in the program. The inclusion of other municipalities would require an amendment to the revenue sharing formula. Additionally, the Steering Committee has been requested to explore the possibility of expanding the types of businesses beyond Trades Contractors that could be eligible for an Intermunicipal Business Licence. Representatives from the Provinces Small Business Branch has agreed to reach out to other trades and construction types of businesses to seek input as to whether or not they would strongly be interested in purchasing an Intermunicipal Business Licence if it were to be available to them. Participating municipalities will need to discuss expanding the potential types of businesses for eligibility as part of the program taking into consideration bylaw regulations and policies of each municipality with respect to those additional business types. Therefore, the recommendation is to continue with the existing program for an additional two (2) years making a few minor housekeeping changes to the bylaw to extend the dates of the pilot itself and to adjust the dates of the revenue disbursement. In January 2014 the goal of the Intermunicipal Business Licence Steering Committee will be to continue working towards the growth and development of the Intermunicipal Business Licencing program to ensure it will be effective for both businesses and municipalities. Page 2 of 3

44 CONCLUSION: That the Intermunicipal Business Licence Pilot program be extended for an additional two (2) year term, ending December 31, The one year timeline for the current Intermunicipal Business Licence Pilot program has not allowed sufficient time for the Steering Committee to give consideration to key factors that are necessary to ensure the success of the program beyond a pilot stage. Further consideration is required to address the potential addition of other municipalities to the program. Other municipalities that are interested in joining the Fraser Valley Intermunicipal Business Licencing program would need to provide the Steering Committee with their Business Licencing data for a revenue analysis review before consideration for inclusion in the program. Original signed by E.S. (Liz) Holitzki Prepared by: E. S. (Liz) Holitzki Director: Licences, Permits and Bylaws Original signed by Frank Quinn Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBA, P.Eng General Manager, Public Works & Development Services Original signed by J.L (Jim) Rule Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Office LH/jd Appendix I - Intermunicipal Business Licence Financial Summary Report Appendix II Intermunicipal Business Licence Amending Bylaw No Page 3 of 3

45

46

47

48

49

50

51 District of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: November 18, 2013 and Members of Council Committee of the Whole FROM: Chief Administrative Officer SUBJECT: Disbursements for the month ended October 31, 2013 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The disbursements summary for the past period is attached for information. All voucher payments are approved by the Mayor or Acting Mayor and a Finance Manager. Council authorizes the disbursements listing through Council resolution. Expenditure details are available by request through the Finance Department. RECOMMENDATION: That the disbursements as listed below for the month ended October 31,, 2013 now be approved. GENERAL $ 8,888,871 PAYROLL $ 1,590,045 PURCHASE CARD $ 102,377 $ 10,581,293 DISCUSSION: a) Background Context: The adoption of the Five Year Consolidated Financial Plan has appropriated funds and provided authorization for expenditures to deliver municipal services. The disbursements are for expenditures that are provided in the financial plan. b) Community Communications: The citizens of Maple Ridge are informed on a routine monthly basis of financial disbursements. 1131

52 c) Business Plan / Financial Implications: Highlights of larger items included in Financial Plan or Council Resolution Emergency Communications Dispatch levy 4 th quarter $ 244,066 GCL Contracting & Engineering 232 St. bridge replacement $ 736,629 G.V. Regional District debt payment $ 2,239,907 Imperial Paving 2013 paving program $ 653,838 Imperial Paving Downtown improvements Lougheed Hwy $ 375,737 Imperial Paving Road & drainage improvements 122 Ave $ 371,154 Mission Contractors Ltd. Lougheed Hwy multi-use path $ 186,861 TGK Irrigation Ltd. Albion Sports Water Play Park $ 171,327 d) Policy Implications: Approval of the disbursements by Council is in keeping with corporate governance practice. CONCLUSIONS: The disbursements for the month ended October 31, 2013 have been reviewed and are in order. Prepared by: G Ann Rygg Accounting Clerk II Approved by: Trevor Thompson, BBA, CGA Manager of Financial Planning Approved by: Paul Gill, BBA, CGA GM Corporate & Financial Services Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer gmr

53 CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE MONTHLY DISBURSEMENTS - OCTOBER 2013 VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION OF PAYMENT AMOUNT BC Ltd Security refund 34, BC Ltd Roadside mowing 18,837 Adriatic Construction Security refund 15,875 Amec Environment & Infrastruct Lougheed Hwy multi-use cycle path 18,383 Ansan Industries Ltd Traffic control 19,412 BC Hydro Electricity 113,594 BC SPCA Contract payment 27,527 CUPE Local 622 Dues - pay periods 13/20 & 13/21 23,426 Canada Pipe Company Ltd Water mains on 125 Ave 23,513 Inventory pipes & gaskets 7,343 30,856 Canadian Lawn Care Services Albion Park play field upgrade 35,695 Chelsea Park Holdings Ltd Security refund 54,258 Chevron Canada Ltd Gasoline & diesel fuel 64,371 Civicplus Website improvements 27,188 Delcan Corporation 232 Street bridge replacement - construction services 44,289 Diamond Land Consultants Inc Abernethy Way property acquisition (128 Ave road widening) 16,182 Emergency Communications Dispatch levy - 4th quarter 244,066 Fitness Edge Fitness classes & programs 16,203 Fitness Town Commercial Leisure Centre fitness equipment 35,631 Frazer Excavation Ltd Water mains on 125 Ave 16,128 Soil disposal for utility projects (water & sewer) 24,308 40,436 GCL Contracting & Engineering 232 Street bridge replacement 736,629 Gibson Waterworks Supply Inc Waterworks supplies 19,844 Greater Vancouver Regional Dis Debt payment 2,239,907 Water sample analysis 2,764 2,242,671 Guillevin International Inc Downtown improvements Lougheed Hwy ( St) 60,760 Fire fighters' equipment 1,725 Facilities electrical supplies 1,265 Operations electrical supplies 4,011 67,761 Hanks Trucking And Bulldozing Soil delivery & disposal for utility projects (water & sewer) 16,651 Imperial Paving 2013 paving program 653,838 Downtown improvements Lougheed Hwy ( St) 375,737 Road & drainage improvements 122 Ave ( St) 371,154 Roadworks 20,436 1,421,165 Keywest Asphalt Ltd 232 Street road improvements 37,711 Maclean Homes Brown Road Ltd Security refund 100,000 Manulife Financial Employee benefits premiums 140,487 Maple Ridge & PM Arts Council Arts Centre contract payment Oct 49,889 Program revenue Aug & Sep 42,272 92,161 Maple Ridge Historical Society Quarterly contract payment 33,329 McElhanney Consulting Services Hampton Street local area service 1,726 Site inspection services 23,176 24,902 Medical Services Plan Employee medical & health premiums 35,857 Mission Contractors Ltd Lougheed Hwy multi-use cycle path 186,861 Municipal Pension Plan BC Employee benefits premiums 388,757 Newlands Lawn & Garden Mainten Grass cutting 19,273 Now Solutions Payroll software annual license 58,079 Popular Landscaping & Gardening Boulevard landscaping 15,635 Property Owners Land acquisitions Ave road dedication 64,000

54 Raincity Janitorial Serv Ltd Janitorial services & supplies: Firehalls 6,222 Library 6,022 Municipal Hall 2,934 Operations 2,954 Randy Herman Building 4,348 RCMP 3,112 South Bonson Community Centre 5,530 31,122 Rec Tec Industries Inc Albion Spray Park 24,451 Receiver General For Canada Employer/Employee remit PP13/20 & PP13/21 562,921 Industry Canada radio license renewal ,386 RG Arenas (Maple Ridge) Ltd Ice rental Sep 59,196 Curling rink operating expenses Jul & Aug 5,299 64,495 Ricoh Canada Inc Document processing 14,448 Photocopiers 2,348 16,796 Ridge Meadows Seniors Society Quarterly operating grant 56,114 Ridge Meadows Recycling Society Monthly contract for recycling 106,784 Weekly recycling 336 Litter pickup contract 1,787 Recycling station pickup 319 Roadside waste removal ,375 Spartan Controls Ltd System Control & Data Acquisition (SCADA) upgrade 20,122 Sumas Remediation Services Inc Wood stave culvert structural lining 90,162 Suttle Recreation Inc Cliff Park playground equipment 40,000 Chilcotin Park playground equipment 49,976 89,976 TGK Irrigation Ltd Albion Sports Water Play Park 171,327 Total Energy Systems Ltd Maintenance: Leisure Centre 10,302 Library 1,727 Maple Ridge Museum 259 Municipal Hall 10,248 Operations 873 Pitt Meadwos Family Rec. Centre 220 Pitt Meadows Heritage Hall 209 Pitt Meadows Museum 331 Randy Herman Building 1,138 RCMP 2,421 South Bonson Community Centre 2,438 30,166 Wade & Associates Land Survey Abernethy Way (210-E Blackstock) 14,785 Maple Ridge Cemetery 8,466 23,251 Warrington PCI Management Advance for Tower common costs 44,130 Wordsworth & Associates Security consulting services 18,900 Workers Compensation Board BC rd qtr remittance 83,200 Young, Anderson - Barristers Professional fees Aug 22,798 Disbursements In Excess $15,000 8,042,724 Disbursements Under $15, ,147 Total Payee Disbursements 8,888,871 Payroll PP13/20 & PP13/21 1,590,045 Purchase Cards - Payment 102,377 Total Disbursements October ,581,293 GMR \\mr.corp\docs\fin\05-finance\1630-accts-payable\01-general\ap Disbursements\2013\[Monthly_Council_Report_2013.xlsx]OCT'13

55 District of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin DATE: November 18, 2013 and Members of Council FROM: Chief Administrative Officer ATTN: Committee of the Whole SUBJECT: Town Centre Investment Incentive Program - Extension (TCIIP2014) Executive Summary: On May 27, 2013, Council passed a resolution directing staff to develop a job creation program following the public consultation phase of the Commercial and Industrial Strategy. Council has also directed that staff continue the commercial component of the Town Centre Investment Incentive Program for one year, while allowing the residential component to expire as of December 30, The purpose of this report is to bring forward regulations to ensure a comprehensive incentive program continues to encourage private sector investment in commercial projects in the Town Centre. In alignment with Council direction and the Commercial and Industrial Strategy, a new incentive program to support employment growth in the community is also under development. Recommendations: a. That Maple Ridge Revitalization Tax Exemption Bylaw be given first, second and third readings; b. That Maple Ridge Off-Street Parking and Loading Amending Bylaw No be given first, second and third readings; and further, c. That the Town Centre Investment Incentive TCIIP2014 as set out in this report be implemented. Background Context: The Town Centre Investment Incentive Program was endorsed by Council on November 1, 2010, to encourage and accelerate investment in the Town Centre area. In the three years since it began, the program has been very successful, resulting in more than $100 million in building permit applications since its launch in January This represents more than 7,500 m 2 of new commercial space and 52 commercial improvement projects, as well as 495 residential units completed with an estimated 326 units to come. An important element of the program was to offer both upfront incentives to support developers, and downstream benefits to support property owners and tenants. Upfront incentives included priority processing, reduced parking requirements, fee reductions and partnering incentives to help offset Page 1 of

56 front-end development costs. Municipal property tax exemptions help to offset operating costs for the first three to six years. To qualify, building permits must be issued by Monday, December 30, At the May 27, 2013, Council Workshop, Council directed: That a job creation incentive program be developed following the public consultation phase of the Commercial and Industrial Strategy process, reflective of Council s comments at the May 27, 2013 Council Workshop meeting; and further That the residential component of the Town Centre Investment Incentive Program be allowed to lapse following expiry on December 30, 2013, and that enabling regulations be brought forward to extend the commercial component for another year reflective of Council s comments at the May 27, 2013 Council Workshop Meeting. The purpose of this report is to bring forward an extension of the Town Centre Investment Incentive Program (TCIIP2011), set to expire at year-end, for the commercial portion of the program, in alignment with Council direction. A fuller discussion around job creation incentives, extending beyond the Town Centre, will be addressed separately. For the purpose of this report, the Town Centre Investment Incentive Program extension will be referred to as TCIIP2014. Discussion: Council s direction to allow the residential component of the Town Centre Investment Incentive Program to lapse while the commercial component is extended for one year will change the incentive program criteria slightly. As with the TCIIP2011 intake, TCIIP2014 is aimed at development that is required in order to fully realize the vision for the Town Centre. The starting point for eligibility for TCIIP2014 will be those projects for which a building permit is issued on or after Tuesday, December 31, 2013, and the last issue date for building permits will be Tuesday, December 30, Listed below are details on the qualifying criteria proposed for TCIIP2014, which includes mixed-use construction, new commercial construction and renovations, investment-ready site preparation and façade improvements. Schedule A provides a table which outlines TCIIP2014 at a glance. Aside from the removal of residential construction from qualifying criteria, one notable change is the minimum construction value to for tax exemption has been increased to $100,000. An explanation is provided below under the categories of Commercial Renovation and Façade Improvement. Mixed-use Construction Under TCIIP2014, incentives are provided for mixed-use construction of a minimum four-storey building. Sub-Area 1 is of a higher priority, and provides incentives for four-storey and higher mixeduse new construction, while Sub-Area 2 provides incentives for five-storey and higher mixed-use new construction. There is an extra height requirement in Sub-Area 2 which represents the density desired in the Town Centre without the relaxation on height permitted for incentives in the higher-priority Sub- Area 1. Reduced parking requirements apply to Sub-Area 1 only. Page 2 of 7

57 Incentives will be calculated on the commercial portion of the building, excluding the residential portion. A three-year exemption from municipal property taxes on the commercial portion is provided, with an additional three-year exemption for projects meeting the green requirement (addressed in a later section). Other incentives, including reduced fees, priority processing and reduced parking requirements, are outlined on Schedule A. Commercial Construction For TCIIP2014, incentives are provided for new commercial construction within the Town Centre, with a total municipal permit value of $1,000,000 or more. A three-year exemption from general municipal property taxes is proposed, with an additional three years exemption for projects meeting the green requirement (addressed in a later section). Other incentives, including reduced fees, reduced parking requirements for construction in Sub-Area 1 and priority processing, are outlined on Schedule A. Commercial Renovation Renovation of existing commercial buildings was supported through TCIIP2011 with a three-year tax exemption on the renovation portion and reduced fees. For these projects, the total municipal permit value (e.g. building permit) must be at least $20,000. Our experience has shown that smaller projects and some of the much larger projects are not eligible for a tax exemption because they fail to generate a non-market change in assessment value. Administratively, these projects were very onerous for both customers and staff, and both would be better served by removing the requirement for staff to prepare paperwork for projects unlikely to receive an exemption. For this reason, staff recommend that the minimum eligibility amount be increased to $100,000 for TCIIP2014. Investment-Ready Site Preparation Steps have been taken to clean up many brownfield sites (idle, abandoned or underutilized land that may have been formerly in industrial or commercial use) in the Town Centre, but there are still some areas where these properties continue to exist. Tearing down existing buildings and clean-up of sites would immediately improve those areas and would help to express an atmosphere of future investment potential. Brownfields can be less attractive to developers due to real or perceived contamination issues. This unknown risk can make it difficult to obtain financing because of the potential loss of value and potential liability surrounding contamination. Incentives through TCIIP2014 include a three-year exemption from general municipal property taxation along with incentives noted on Schedule A. This includes the District acting as liaison between the developer and senior governments, and assistance with accessing the Provincial Brownfield Redevelopment Program and related funding and tools. Façade Improvements For façade improvement projects, the total municipal permit construction value (e.g. building permit) must be at least $10,000 to be eligible for a building permit fee reduction of 50%. In addition, projects may apply to the Downtown Maple Ridge Business Improvement Association (DMRBIA) through their Façade Improvement Program for The District provided the DMRBIA with $75,000 over the past three years to match their own funds, which then provide a matching grant to eligible businesses. The DMRBIA reported the success of this program to Council in October 2013, Page 3 of 7

58 and Council directed an additional $25,000 be allocated in the 2014 financial plan to extend this support. Similar to the commercial renovation projects, staff recommend that the minimum eligibility amount for a tax exemption increased from $10,000 under TCIIP2011 to $100,000 for TCIIP2014, to remove the administrative burden on both customers and staff, for projects unlikely to generate a tax exemption. Green Requirement (optional) An enhanced level of incentives is available for projects achieving LEED-Silver or better certification, or for those choosing energy that does not consume non-renewable resources, and is not provided by BC Hydro. The intent is to support the use of alternative, renewable energy sources. Examples include solar, wind, water, geothermal, and biomass. Enabling Regulations: An important element of TCIIP2011 and TCIIP2014 was to ensure there were both upfront incentives to support developers, and downstream benefits to support property owners and tenants. Upfront incentives to help offset front-end development charges included: Priority Processing; Reduced Parking Requirements; Fee Reductions; and Partnering Incentives. Downstream incentives are provided to property owners through: Property Tax Exemptions. With the extension of the Incentive Program, staff recommend that the following enabling regulations for upfront incentives and downstream incentives active during TCIIP2011, also be extended: Priority Processing: All eligible projects under TCIIP2014 will be entitled to priority processing. Priority processing provides development applications to the Program with a shorter timeline through the District s development process. As with TCIIP2011, no additional resources will be allocated to assist in the priority processing of these applications, and, as a result, non-qualifying applications may experience a lengthened timeline. Every effort will be made to reduce the impact to non-qualifying applicants, and this will be closely monitored by staff. Reduced Parking Requirements: Reduced parking standards were established in the Central Business District of the Town Centre as part of the parking strategy process that took place during the development of the Town Centre Area Plan. The reduced parking standards were adopted into the parking bylaw, through Off-Street and Loading Bylaw No , along with the adoption of the Town Centre Area Plan on November 4, The reduced standards were applied to multi-family, mixed-used and commercial development. When the Town Centre Investment Incentives Program was established by Council in 2010, the program included expanding the reduced parking standards to include the Port Haney area. An amendment to include reduced parking standards in Port Haney was made through Off- Street Parking and Loading Amendment Bylaw No , adopted on November 23, The amendment to the parking bylaw included a requirement that a Zoning Bylaw application would have Page 4 of 7

59 to be received by the end of business day on July 15, 2013, and a Development Permit application would have to be received by the end of business day on September 30, 2013, in order to take advantage of the reduced parking requirements. This was intended to provide a realistic timeline for applicants to get their applications through the Council approval process and obtain a building permit by the December 30, 2013, deadline. On May 27, 2013, Council directed staff to extend the commercial component of the Town Centre Investment Incentives Program, which will be applied to commercial uses only. As such, an amendment will be required to the Off-Street Parking and Loading Bylaw to update the program changes, including it being applied to commercial use only and the new expiry dates. These changes are proposed through Off-Street Parking & Loading Amending Bylaw No Fee Reductions: Fee reductions provide development applicants a direct financial incentive in exchange for specific development types in the Town Centre. The only change from TCIIP2011 will be for mixed-use applications, where only the commercial portion of the project will be eligible for a building permit fee discount. The commercial component will be determined by the floor space area of the commercial component of the project relative to total floor space area, excluding parking. Under TCIIP2011, mixed-use construction is eligible for a building permit fee discount of 50%, plus an additional $6,000. The commercial space ratio will be applied against these rate reductions to determine the TCIIP2014 incentive amount. During TCIIP2011, Maple Ridge Building Amending Bylaw No was adopted by Council to implement building permit fee reductions and other subsequent fee reductions through a District initiated investment incentive program; therefore, a subsequent Building Bylaw amendment is not required to continue the building permit fee reductions for building permit applications to TCIIP2014. Partnering Incentives: As with TCIIP2011, trigger points for eligibility with partnering incentives will remain consistent with that previously endorsed by Council. Because the residential component of the incentive for mixeduse construction has been removed for TCIIP2014, only the commercial component of those projects will qualify. The commercial component will be determined by the floor space area of the commercial component of the project relative to total floor space area, with the incentive amount calculated as 25% of Development Cost Charges, to a maximum incentive amount of $25,000, rising to $37,500 for projects meeting the LEED-Silver or energy criteria. Property Tax Exemptions: Eligible projects will qualify for a municipal property tax exemption for three years through TCIIP2014. An additional property tax exemption of three years is available for projects that meet the green requirement. Because the residential component of the incentive for mixed-use construction has been removed for TCIIP2014, only the commercial component of those projects will qualify for a municipal property tax exemption. Site preparation and façade improvement projects are not eligible for an additional property tax exemption. Page 5 of 7

60 Changes to these criteria are also outlined on the attached TCIIP2014 program at a glance as Schedule A. Desired Outcome: That the residential component of the Town Centre Investment Incentive Program be allowed to lapse following expiry on December 30, 2013, and that enabling regulations be brought forward to extend the commercial component for another year, in alignment with Council direction. Financial Plan Implications: The cost of upfront incentives associated with the 3-year TCIIP2011, still in progress, is estimated at $980,000, or $29 to the average home. About half of this amount is related to partnering agreements, which use Development Cost Charges (DCC) as a basis for the rebate, and almost all relates to residential development. Because TCIIP2014 will not apply to residential, partnering agreement costs will be minimal. Building permit fee discounts make up the other half of the $980,000 cost, with about 55% relating to residential construction. Using TCIIP2011 costs as an estimate would generate a cost of about $75,000 for a one-year commercial program. However, the cost is expected to be substantially lower, and manageable within the existing funding structure. The five-year financial plan includes revenue projections resulting from growth in the tax base, in the form of property tax revenue, and building permit revenue. If a project occurs that makes up a portion of this anticipated growth but results in a reduced amount of revenue due to this program, the result may be a budget shortfall. The increased residential and commercial base will eventually generate tax revenue, recapturing any short-term revenue reductions. Forgone revenues projected to the end of 2013 as a result of TCIIP2011 are projected to come under $3 million, and to date have been manageable within existing resources and funding set aside for this purpose. The continuation of this program for an additional year is expected to require significantly less funding, given that the eligibility for residential construction has been withdrawn. The underlying premise of the incentive program is the District will forgo revenue for a period of time, with the intent that future revenues as a result of stimulated growth and density will provide a net financial benefit. Alternatives: Council could choose to allow the TCIIP2011 program to expire on its scheduled date of December 30, 2013, since new job creation program is under development in alignment with the Commercial and Industrial Strategy. However, extending the Town Centre program ensures that commercial development and renovations will continue to be supported in the event of a gap in timing. Page 6 of 7

61 Conclusion: Encouraging commercial investment in the Town Centre to create a strong and vibrant Town Centre is a key component of Council s vision for our community. Council s Strategic Plan, the Town Centre Area Plan and the Smart Growth on the Ground are all in support of this vision. An important aspect of the Town Centre Investment Incentives Program and the Program s extension is to apply a balanced approach where upfront incentives support developers, and downstream incentives support subsequent property owners and tenants. Council s commitment to the vision for our Town Centre is evident with the direction to staff to extend the commercial component of the Town Centre Investment Incentive Program for an additional year, and with the commitment of funds to the Downtown Maple Ridge Business Improvement Association s Face Improvement Program. Staff request that Council endorse the Town Centre Investment Incentive Program-TCIIP2014 as set out in this report, including the attached Maple Ridge Revitalization Tax Exemption Program Bylaw , and Maple Ridge Off-Street Parking and Loading Amending Bylaw No , both of which are recommended for first, second and third readings. Original signed by Laura Benson Prepared by: Laura Benson, CPA, CMA Manager of Sustainability & Corporate Planning Original signed by Frank Quinn Approved by: Frank Quinn, MBC, P. Eng General Manager: Public Works and Development Services Original signed by Paul Gill Approved by: Paul Gill, BBA, CGA General Manager: Corporate and Financial Services Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer Attachments: Schedule A Town Centre Investment Incentive Program 2014 Program at-a Glance Schedule B Maple Ridge Revitalization Tax Exemption Program Bylaw Schedule C Maple Ridge Off-Street Parking and Loading Amending Bylaw No Page 7 of 7

62 Schedule A Town Centre Investment Incentive Program 2014 Program-at-a-Glance Criteria: 1 Building permit must be issued by Tuesday, December 30, 2014 See Map Incentive Package 1 Mixed-Use Buildings (incentives apply to commercial portion only) 2 New Construction: Minimum 5 storeys New Construction: Minimum 4 storeys Sub Area 2 Sub Area 1 New Construction: $1,000,000 Sub Areas 1 and 2 Commercial Renovation: $20,000 Sub Areas 1 and 2 Site Prep On Council approval Sub Areas 1 and 2 Priority Processing Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Partnering Incentive 3 Property Tax Exemptions 4 Additional Property Tax Exemption ( Green Requirement) 5 Building Permit Fee Discount 6 Reduced Parking Standards Brownfield Support - potential grants Building Height Flexibility Comprehensive Development Guidelines Façade Improvement Program (in partnership with BIA) 25% of DCCs to a max. of $25,000 ($37,500 for LEED/energy) 25% of DCCs to a max. of $25,000 ($37,500 for LEED/energy) 25% of DCCs to a max. of $25,000 ($37,500 for LEED/energy) 3 years 3 years 3 years 3 years (on renovation portion) Min. $100,000 Additional 3 years 50% plus additional $6,000 n/a Additional 3 years 50% plus additional $6,000 Yes Additional 3 years 50% plus additional $6,000 Sub Area 1 only n/a n/a n/a Additional 3 years 50% plus additional $1,200 n/a Façade Improvements Renovation to commercial façade $10,000 Sub Areas 1 and 2 3 years 3 years (on renovation portion) Min. $100,000 n/a n/a 50% 50% Yes Yes Yes n/a Yes n/a Yes Yes Yes Yes n/a n/a Yes Yes Yes Yes n/a Yes 7 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a DMR portion $25, Must also comply with all land use regulations; may require development variance applications; if a conflict exists between existing bylaws/regulations and this program, the former will prevail. 2. Incentives will be calculated on commercial floor space area only. 3. Fulfilment of agreed-upon Town Centre goals and objectives, to be negotiated on a project-by-project basis. 4. Property tax exemption from general municipal tax portion, on non-market change in assessed value of improvements. 5. Enhanced level of incentives available for projects achieving LEED-Silver or better certification, or for those choosing energy that does not consume non-renewable resources, and is not provided by BC Hydro, including solar, wind, water, geothermal, and biomass. 6. Building permit discount not to exceed total building permit fee. 7. Development permit required for alterations $25,000 if not consistent with DP guidelines. n/a n/a

63 Schedule B CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE Bylaw No A Bylaw to establish a revitalization tax exemption program WHEREAS Council may, by bylaw, establish a revitalization tax exemption program to encourage various types of revitalization to achieve a range of economic, social and environmental objectives, pursuant to the Community Charter; AND WHEREAS Council has given notice of the proposed Bylaw in accordance with the Community Charter; NOW THEREFORE, the Council of the District of Maple Ridge ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: PART 1 CITATION 1.1 This Bylaw may be cited as "Maple Ridge Revitalization Tax Exemption Program Bylaw No ". PART 2 SEVERABILITY 2.1 If any part, section, subsection, clause, or sub clause of this Bylaw is, for any reason, held to be invalid by the decision of a Court of competent jurisdiction, such decision does not affect the validity or the remaining portions of this Bylaw. PART 3 REPEAL 3.1 Maple Ridge Revitalization Tax Exemption Program Bylaw No is repealed. PART 4 DEFINITIONS 4.1 In this Bylaw: Building Permit means a District of Maple Ridge building permit; Building Permit Value means the Construction value as stated on a printed building permit; Commercial means a land use that includes retail sales, wholesale, small-scale manufacture or assembly, service industry, or office. Examples range in size from small storefronts to shopping centres, hotels, and office buildings; Commercial Façade Improvement means the renovation, restoration or redesign of a commercial building façade/storefront; Commercial Renovation means the work regulated by the District of Maple Ridge Building Bylaw by the process of altering a building or portion thereof, to improve its functionality or performance beyond a level which currently exists. These improvements may also be termed as addition, landlord improvement and tenant improvement, but shall not include repair;

64 Schedule B Council means the Municipal Council of the District of Maple Ridge; Green Project means a project achieving LEED -Silver, Gold or Platinum certification, or a project that uses energy that does not consume non-renewable resources for 51% or more of its total energy consumption for the ongoing operation of the building, and is not provided by BC Hydro. The intent is to support the use of alternative, renewable energy sources. Examples include solar, wind, water, geothermal, and biomass; Mixed-Use Building means a building with a range of uses, including commercial uses, that are collocated in an integrated way; Municipal Property Tax means the property taxes Council has imposed pursuant to Schedule A of the Maple Ridge Tax Rates Bylaw, and does not include any other property taxes; Non-Market Change means the change as determined by BC Assessment under the Assessment Act, to the improvements portion of a parcel s assessed value, after issuance of a building permit for construction that is eligible under Part 7 of this Bylaw, that is not due to real estate market fluctuations or conditions; Owner means a person registered in the Land Title and Survey Authority s records as owner of land or of a charge on land, whether entitled to it in the person's own right or in a representative capacity or otherwise, and includes a registered owner; "Parcel" means a lot, block or other area in which land is held or into which land is subdivided; Program means the program established by Maple Ridge Revitalization Tax Exemption Program Bylaw No ; Project means a project as outlined in Part 7 of this Bylaw, and does not include any construction that is outside the scope of this Bylaw; Storey means that portion of a building which is situated between the top of any floor and the top of the floor next above it, and if there is no floor above it, that portion between the top of such floor and the ceiling above it. First storey means the uppermost storey having its floor level not more than two metres above grade. Basement means a storey or storeys of a building located below the first storey. Building height (in storeys) means the number of storeys contained between the roof and the floor of the first storey. Refer to the BC Building Code for the most current definition if there is a discrepancy, the BC Building Code shall prevail; Tax Exemption means a revitalization tax exemption pursuant to this Bylaw. PART 5 ESTABLISHMENT OF TOWN CENTRE INVESTMENT INCENTIVE AREAS AND A REVITALIZATION TAX EXEMPTION PROGRAM 5.1 Pursuant to the Community Charter, there is hereby established the Town Centre Investment Incentive Areas, namely Sub Area 1 and Sub Area 2, as outlined on Appendix A, which is attached to and forms part of this Bylaw. Appendix A is a representation of the District of Maple Ridge Town Centre Investment Incentive Areas; if there is any discrepancy, the official version shall prevail.

65 Schedule B 5.2 Pursuant to the Community Charter, there is hereby established a Revitalization Tax Exemption Program for the Town Centre Investment Incentive Areas, providing a Revitalization Tax Exemption for Parcels with Projects meeting Program requirements. PART 6 PROGRAM REASONS AND OBJECTIVES 6.1 The District of Maple Ridge has made significant investments in the Town Centre over the last several years, in keeping with Council s vision to create a vibrant and dynamic Town Centre. An incentive program has been established to encourage accelerated private sector investment in commercial projects to help achieve Council s vision, and this Revitalization Tax Exemption Program Bylaw is one element of that incentive program. 6.2 A Revitalization Tax Exemption Program is established under this Bylaw to: a. Encourage Commercial investment to create a strong local economy and expand employment opportunities for citizens; b. Increase pedestrian traffic with added Commercial activity, both to support local business and to enhance safety; c. Encourage and support the use of environmentally sustainable building construction methods and materials, and encourage energy efficiency and alternative technologies. PART 7 ELIGIBLE PROJECTS 7.1 The Project must be situated on a Parcel located within the Town Centre Investment Incentive Areas: a. If a Parcel is situated in more than one Sub Area, it shall be defined as being included in Sub Area 1; b. If a Parcel is situated partially within the Town Centre Investment Incentive Areas, it shall be defined as being included in the Sub Area within which it is partially located. 7.2 A Building Permit must have an issue date of not before Tuesday, December 31, 2013, and not after Tuesday, December 30, 2014, to qualify. 7.3 The Project must meet all Program criteria and comply with all applicable land use and other District of Maple Ridge regulations. 7.4 The Project must be one or more of the following types: a. Mixed-Use Building Construction with the building height being: 1. Four-storeys or higher occurring within Sub Area 1; or, 2. Five-storeys or higher occurring in Sub Area 2. b. New Commercial construction with a Building Permit Value greater than or equal to $1,000,000;

66 Schedule B c. Commercial Renovation and/or Commercial Façade Improvement with a Building Permit Value greater than or equal to $100, Green Project, pursuant to this Bylaw. PART 8 TAX EXEMPTION 8.1 The terms and conditions upon which a Revitalization Tax Exemption Certificate may be issued are as set out in this Bylaw, the Revitalization Tax Exemption Agreement and the Revitalization Tax Exemption Certificate. 8.2 A Revitalization Tax Exemption Certificate shall apply to a Parcel after the following conditions are met: a. The Owner of the Parcel has met all applicable provisions of this Bylaw; b. The Owner of the Parcel has entered into a Revitalization Tax Exemption Agreement with the District of Maple Ridge; c. The Owner of the Parcel has met all terms and conditions as set out in the Revitalization Tax Exemption Agreement; and, d. The Owner has applied for a Revitalization Tax Exemption Certificate and a Revitalization Tax Exemption Certificate has been issued for the Parcel. 8.3 The Tax Exemption is equivalent to 100% of the Municipal Property Tax payable on the amount of Non-Market Change attributed to the Project, as specified in Part 7 of this Bylaw, and where all the conditions as stated in Part 8 of this Bylaw have been met: a. for a total of three years; or, b. for a total of six years for a Green Project, pursuant to this Bylaw. 8.4 For a Tax Exemption to commence in a given year, an Owner must submit an Application for a Revitalization Tax Exemption Certificate to the District of Maple Ridge by October 1 of the preceding year. 8.5 A Revitalization Tax Exemption Program Certificate may be revoked by Council by means of any of the following infractions: a. The Owner breaches any covenant, condition or obligation as set out in the Revitalization Tax Exemption Agreement; b. The Parcel is put to any use that is not permitted or fails to meet any of the Project eligibility requirements as outlined in Part 7 of this Bylaw; c. The Owner breaches: 1. Any enactments, laws, statutes, regulations and orders by any authority having jurisdiction, including bylaws of the District of Maple Ridge; 2. Any federal, provincial, municipal, and environmental licences, permits and approvals.

67 Schedule B 8.6 For a Revitalization Tax Exemption Program Certificate that is revoked due to the infractions noted in Part 8, Section 8.5 of this Bylaw, the District of Maple Ridge may recapture the value of the Tax Exemption provided on the Parcel, for the current and any previous taxation years to which the Revitalization Tax Exemption Program Certificate applies. Failure on the part of the Owner to remit the recapture amount within thirty (30) days will result in the amount being placed on the general property tax bill for the Parcel. READ A FIRST TIME this day of READ A second time this day of READ A third time this day of ADOPTED this day of PRESIDING MEMBER Attachment: Appendix A Town Centre Investment Incentive Areas CORPORATE OFFICER

68 Schedule B Appendix A Town Centre Investment Incentive Areas

69 Schedule C CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF MAPLE RIDGE BYLAW NO A Bylaw to amend the Maple Ridge Off-Street Parking and Loading Bylaw WHEREAS, it is deemed expedient to amend Maple Ridge Off-Street Parking and Loading Bylaw as amended; NOW THEREFORE, The Municipal Council of the Corporation of the District of Maple Ridge, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. This bylaw may be cited as Maple Ridge Off-Street Parking and Loading Amending Bylaw No Schedule A, Section 10.0, Maple Ridge Town Centre Parking Standards, sub-section 10.1 Application of Town Centre Parking Standards, item (a)(2) shall be deleted and replaced with the following: 2. within Sub-Area 1 and for a commercial use only, if the development application is received by the end of business day on: a. July 15, 2014 for rezoning applications; and b. September 30, 2014 for development permit applications. READ a first time the day, A.D. 20 READ a second time the day of A.D. 20 READ a third time the day of, A.D. 20 RECONSIDERED AND ADOPTED, the day of, A.D. 20 PRESIDING MEMBER CORPORATE OFFICER

70 District of Maple Ridge TO: His Worship Mayor Ernie Daykin MEETING DATE: November 18, 2013 and Members of Council FILE NO: FROM: Chief Administrative Officer MEETING: Committee of the Whole SUBJECT: Pitt Meadows Airport Society EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Pitt Meadows Airport Society ( the Society ) is the owner of the Pitt Meadows Regional Airport. The members of the Society are the City of Pitt Meadows and the District of Maple Ridge and the Mayors of each community. In March 2013 the City of Pitt Meadows, with support from the District of Maple Ridge conducted a review of the governance model of the Airport. The review has been completed and while no operational changes are required, the consultant conducting the review recommended changes to the membership structure of the Society. The changes include removing the Mayors as members and as non-voting directors and replacing them with two independent voting directors. The consultant also recommended that a protocol for communication and consultation be entered into to clarify expectations. Attached as Appendix A is the Consent Resolution that will amend the Society s bylaws to remove the Mayors as members and as non-voting directors. The amendments will also clarify the terms of office of the directors of the Board. Attached as Appendix B is the Protocol Agreement. RECOMMENDATIONS: That the District of Maple Ridge consent to the bylaws of the Pitt Meadows Airport Society being amended in respect of the membership of the Society as shown in Appendix A of the staff report dated November 18, 2013; and That the Corporate Officer be authorized to execute all such resolutions and documents of the Pitt Meadows Airport Society that may be necessary to give effect to the above resolution; and further That the Mayor and Corporate Officer be authorized to execute on behalf of the District of Maple Ridge the Protocol Agreement attached as Appendix B to the staff report dated November 18, 2013; "Original signed by Ceri Marlo" Prepared by: Ceri Marlo, C.M.C. Manager of Legislative Services "Original signed by J.L. (Jim) Rule Concurrence: J.L. (Jim) Rule Chief Administrative Officer /cm 11331