MINUTES PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF MISSISSAUGA

Transcription

1 MINUTES PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF MISSISSAUGA MONDAY, FEBRUARY 4, 2008 AFTERNOON SESSION Cancelled EVENING SESSION 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBER, 2 ND FLOOR - CIVIC CENTRE 300 CITY CENTRE DRIVE, MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO L5B 3C1 MEMBERS PRESENT: Councillor C. Corbasson (Ward 1) Councillor P. Mullin (Ward 2) Councillor M. Prentice (Ward 3) Councillor F. Dale (Ward 4) Councillor E. Adams (Ward 5) Councillor C. Parrish (Ward 6) Councillor N. Iannicca (Ward 7) Councillor K. Mahoney (Ward 8) Councillor P. Saito (Ward 9) (Chair) Councillor S. McFadden (Ward 10) Councillor G. Carlson (Ward 11) Mayor H. McCallion MEMBERS ABSENT: Nil

2 - 2 - STAFF PRESENT: Mr. E. Sajecki, Commissioner, Planning & Building Ms. M. Ball, Director, Development & Design Mr. J. Calvert, Director, Policy Planning Ms. E. Irvine, Planner, Policy Planning Mr. R. Miller, Manager, Long Range Planning, Policy Planning Ms. L. Pavan, Manager, Development Team East Ms. D. Rusnov, Manager, Development Team West Ms. A. Krijan, Planner, Development & Design Mr. M. Crechiolo, Planner, Development & Design Mr. D. Bryan, Supervisor, Sign Unit O. Terminisi, Manager, Development Engineering, Transportation & Works Mr. D. Marcucci, Manager, Planning & Heritage Mr. M. Minkowski, Legal Counsel, Litigation Ms. S. Alleluia, Legislative Coordinator, Office of the City Clerk Ms. D. Sheffield, Legislative Coordinator, Office of the City Clerk Ms. D. Haas, Council Committee Support Assistant, Office of the City Clerk

3 INDEX - PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE FEBRUARY 4, 2008 CALL TO ORDER DECLARATIONS OF (DIRECT OR INDIRECT) PECUNIARY INTEREST - NIL MATTERS CONSIDERED AFTERNOON SESSION CANCELLED EVENING SESSION 7:00 P.M. 1. Sign Variance Applications - Sign By-law , as amended 2. Community Uses Draft for Discussion Mississauga Plan Review 3. PUBLIC MEETING Rezoning and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications 6680 McLaughlin Road, OZ 06/021 and T-M06005 W PUBLIC MEETING - SUPPLEMENTARY REPORT Official Plan Amendment and Rezoning Applications 2537 Confederation Parkway, OZ 06/025 W7 ADJOURNMENT

4 Planning & Development Committee February 4, 2008 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE FEBRUARY 4, 2008 CALL TO ORDER DECLARATIONS OF (DIRECT OR INDIRECT) PECUNIARY INTEREST - NIL MATTERS CONSIDERED AFTERNOON SESSION CANCELLED EVENING SESSION 7:00 P.M. 1. Sign Variance Applications - Sign By-law , as amended Report dated January 15, 2008 from the Commissioner of Planning and Building with respect to Sign Variance Applications - Sign By-law , as amended. RECOMMENDATION: That the Report dated January 15, 2008 from the Commissioner of Planning and Building regarding Sign By-law , as amended, and the requested eighteen (18) Sign Variance Applications described in Appendices 1 to 18 to the Report, be adopted in accordance with the following: 1. That the following Sign Variances be granted: (a) Sign Variance Application Ward 1 AyA Kitchens and Baths Ltd Caterpillar Road (ii) Two (2) banner signs each with an area of sq. m. (900 sq. ft.). Two (2) fascia signs located above the upper limits of the first storey of the building. For a period of 1 year.

5 Planning & Development Committee February 4, 2008 (iii) The sign proposed on the east elevation is not located on a building façade. (b) Sign Variance Application Ward 1 Aqua Systems 1730 Dundas Street East One (1) fascia sign on the east elevation erected higher than the upper limits of the first storey of the building. (c) Sign Variance Application Ward 2 RBC Dominion Securities 1672 Lakeshore Road West (ii) One (1) awning sign on the north elevation projecting partly over a street, subject to the applicant entering into an encroachment agreement with the City. One (1) awning sign on the east elevation not located on a building façade. (iii) Four (4) awning signs (one on each elevation) projecting 0.91 m (3 ft.). (d) Sign Variance Application Ward 4 Deloitte 1 City Centre Drive A sixth fascia sign located between the limits of the top floor and the parapet/roof level.

6 Planning & Development Committee February 4, 2008 (e) Sign Variance Application Ward 4 Earl s Restaurant 100 City Centre Drive One (1) fascia sign not located on the unit occupied by the business. (f) Sign Variance Application Ward 4 Square One 100 City Centre Drive (ii) Two (2) multi-faced cube signs on columns at the east elevation. Two (2) roof signs located on the north elevation and two roof signs located on the east elevation. (g) Sign Variance Application Ward Huntington Ridge Drive A ground sign having a sign area of 2.97 sq. m. (31.96 sq. ft.), subject to the municipal address and street name being added to the sign. (h) Sign Variance Application Ward 5 Casebank Technologies Inc Airport Road (ii) A third fascia sign located between the limits of the top floor and parapet or roof level. One (1) fascia sign that is 2.44% (102.3 sq. ft (9.5 sq. m.)) of the building face on which the sign is located.

7 Planning & Development Committee February 4, 2008 Sign Variance Application Ward Avonwick Avenue A ground sign having a sign area of 2.97 sq. m. (31.96 sq. ft.), subject to the municipal address and street name being added to the sign. (j) Sign Variance Application Ward 5 Daniels Gateway Rental communities 689 Fourwinds Drive A ground sign having a sign area of 2.97 sq. m. (31.96 sq. ft.), subject to the municipal address and street name being added to the sign. (k) Sign Variance Application Ward 5 Malton Village 7075 Rexwood Road Proposed ground sign with an area of 2.5 sq. m. (26.3 sq. ft.). (l) Sign Variance Application Ward 7 Ready Honda-Certified Used Cars 424 Hensall Circle (ii) One (1) ground sign having a sign area of sq. m. ( sq. ft.) per sign face. One (1) ground sign having an overall height of 7.22 m (23.68 ft.).

8 Planning & Development Committee February 4, 2008 (m) Sign Variance Application Ward Artesian Drive A ground sign having a sign area of 2.97 sq. m. (31.96 sq. ft.), subject to the municipal address and street name being added to the sign. (n) Sign Variance Application Ward Kimbermount Avenue A ground sign having a sign area of 2.97 sq. m. (31.96 sq. ft.), subject to the municipal address and street name being added to the sign. (o) Sign Variance Application Ward Glen Erin Drive A ground sign having a sign area of 2.97 sq. m. (31.96 sq. ft.), subject to the municipal address and street name being added to the sign. (p) Sign Variance Application Ward Rio Court A ground sign having a sign area of 2.97 sq. m. (31.96 sq. ft.), subject to the municipal address and street name being added to the sign.

9 Planning & Development Committee February 4, That the following Sign Variance not be granted: (a) Sign Variance Application Ward 1 Pizza-Pizza 707 Lakeshore Road East One (1) ground sign with an overall height of 7.46 m. (24.5 ft.) and a sign area of 9.30 sq. m. ( sq. ft.). (b) Sign Variance Application Ward 4 HT Physiotherapy 640 Eglinton Avenue West One (1) fascia sign located on the second storey of the building and not located on the unit which the business occupies. Councillor Carmen Corbasson advised of her support in not granting Sign Variance Application as outlined in item 2 (a), as the proposed sign is illuminated and abuts a residential area. Councillor Frank Dale requested that item 2 (b), Sign Variance Application , HT Physiotherapy, 640 Eglinton Avenue West, Ward 4 be granted. Mayor McCallion inquired that due to the number of sign variance applications coming forward for approval, is there a need to amend the Sign By-law to avoid delays in the approval process. Ed Sajecki, Commissioner, Planning and Building advised that staff do monitor the By-law and will be able to provide particulars back to the Planning and Development Committee. Councillor Eve Adams discussed Item 1 Sign Variance Application , Ward 5,, 720 Avonwick Avenue and Item 1 (j) Sign Variance Application ,, 689 Fourwinds Drive. She expressed concern that, including Item 1 (g), there are three Daniels rental signs all square feet in size, being proposed along Mavis Road. She mentioned that the application for 720 Avonwick abuts a single family residential community. Further,

10 Planning & Development Committee February 4, 2008 Councillor Adams deemed one location on Mavis Road to be more appropriate and requested that Items 1 and 1 (j) be deferred providing for an opportunity to speak with the applicant. A verbal motion by Councillor Carmen Corbasson to amend Items 1, 1 (j) and 2 (b) of the recommendation in the Corporate Report dated January 15, 2008 from the Commissioner of Planning and Building and approve the remainder of the staff recommendation, was voted on and carried. AMENDED Recommendation PDC (Councillor Carmen Corbasson) BL.03-SIG (2008) 2. Community Uses Draft for Discussion Mississauga Plan Review Report dated January 15, 2008 from the Commissioner of Planning and Building with respect to Community Uses Draft for Discussion Mississauga Plan Review. RECOMMENDATION: That the report titled Community Uses - Draft for Discussion - Mississauga Plan Review dated January 15, 2008 from the Commissioner of Planning and Building be circulated to City Departments, external agencies and other stakeholders for review and comment. John Calvert, Director, Policy Planning made a presentation to Committee on the above noted report, and indicated that this is the first in a series of studies associated with the work program for Mississauga Plan Review. He explained that the main reason for these studies is to bring the Mississauga Plan into conformity with the new planning initiatives associated with the Provincial Policy Statement, the Growth Plan and Bill 51. He also discussed the change from greenfield to infill development and corporate initiatives such as the Waterfront Parks Strategy, Strategic Plan and Transportation Master Plan. In May 2007 the work plan was adopted by City Council and it was agreed that individual components would be brought back to the Planning and Development Committee as the Policy proceeds. The work plan components consist of corporate studies, planning studies, department policy reviews, and local area policy reviews. Mr. Calvert reviewed the status of the various studies and indicated that a consultant will be retained as part of the process to develop a new format for consideration next year.

11 Planning & Development Committee February 4, 2008 Emily Irvine, Planner, Policy Planning addressed Council and described the purpose of the study as it relates to requests for clarification of general policies through the Comprehensive Zoning By-law and Official Plan Amendment 25 Reviews. Ms. Irvine provided a description of community services, changing community needs and impacts. She described the four policy options as outlined in the corporate report noted above. Mayor McCallion stated that she was glad to be informed about one of the many studies being undertaken by the City and expressed her concern about the number of times that residents will be approached as a result of these various studies. Mayor McCallion will ask for a memo to be drafted to the City Manager requesting a detailed list of all studies being conducted by the City to be outlined in a spreadsheet, listing the people responsible, the timing of a final report, and their tie-in to the Official Plan, Strategic Plan and Building a City for the 21 st Century. Mayor McCallion questioned if the City s approach in contacting the public for the different studies should be coordinated, and will seek Council s comments upon the completion of the spreadsheet. Councillor Pat Mullin acknowledged the problem faced trying to address constant change. She felt the report on Community Uses was difficult to read and indicated concern about selecting the wrong option. She recalled a previous report that dealt with residential areas and schools, with a realm of conditions attached. John Calvert, Director, Policy Planning addressed Committee regarding the private school issue and spoke to the policy that states private schools cannot be located on local roads which, he advised, is still in effect. Mr. Calvert explained that the current report is proposing a broader and more comprehensive approach. In response to Councillor Pat Mullin s inquiry, Mr. Calvert confirmed that Option # 4 would be the most restrictive in that it provides for the public process and all additional policies. Councillor Mullin thanked staff for their presentation and clarification. Councillor Carmen Corbasson concurred that the report was difficult to comprehend and inquired if it was the intention to share the report with stakeholders as it is currently written. John Calvert responded that it is the intention to share the above noted report as written with a range of stakeholders, i.e. agencies, school boards, and the Region. He indicated that staff can refine the report but noted that if it proceeds to the Ontario Municipal Board, a very comprehensive review would be necessary. Mr. Calvert discussed next steps as being a draft back to Planning and Development Committee early 2009 in order to meet the June 2009 deadline for the Official Plan. He advised that staff will be in consultation with the City for the 21 st Century team regarding this project.

12 Planning & Development Committee February 4, 2008 Councillor Carolyn Parrish stated her support with respect to the Mayor s request to have the data compiled for studies being conducted by the City. She expressed her interest in knowing the cost of consultant fees and staff time involved in these studies, and indicated that a duplication of efforts could be costly. Emily Irvine, in response to Councillor Prentice s request, verified the list of external agencies and stakeholders to be involved in the process as being the Region of Peel, the school boards, Peel Social Planning Council, and the ratepayer groups. Councillor Prentice felt it was important for the communities to be engaged. Councillor Maja Prentice expressed her support for all four options in part, but for none in their entirety. She indicated concern in the event a public process was not in place to engage the community. Mr. Calvert noted that if a more restrictive option was chosen, an Official Plan Amendment and public process would be required. Councillor Eve Adams indicated her preference for Option # 4 providing the public process would be utilized for the conversion of land uses. She referred to large industrial areas in Ward 5 and vast places of religious assembly and asked that staff consider the creation of more appropriate buffers. Councillor Pat Saito asked for clarification of the Open Space designation. She also inquired about emergency services and why hospitals were not listed. Ron Miller, Manager, Long Range Planning discussed the overall policy framework with respect to major institutions. He explained that hospitals are designated institutions which fall under a different policy and framework. Councillor Saito also requested that staff clarify health clinics which are considered a community use. John Calvert referred Committee to Page 49 of the report which provides a summary table of the four options. He offered to meet with Council Members over the next few months to review the background and answer any further questions they may have. A verbal motion by Councillor Katie Mahoney to approve the recommendation in the Corporate Report dated January 15, 2008 from the Commissioner of Planning & Building, and to receive and refer to staff the correspondence dated February 4, 2008 from Pound & Stewart Services, was voted on and carried. APPROVED Recommendation PDC (Councillor Katie Mahoney) CD.02.COM

13 Planning & Development Committee February 4, PUBLIC MEETING Rezoning and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications 6680 McLaughlin Road, OZ 06/021 and T-M06005 W11. Report dated January 15, 2008 from the Commissioner of Planning and Building with respect to the Rezoning and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications 6680 McLaughlin Road, OZ 06/021 and T-M06005 W11. RECOMMENDATION: That the Report dated January 15, 2008, from the Commissioner of Planning and Building regarding the applications to change the Zoning from "R1" (Detached Dwellings Typical Lots) and "D" (Development) to "R16-Exception" (Detached Dwellings on a Common Element Condominium Private Road) and "G1" (Greenbelt) to permit six (6) detached dwellings and the retention of one (1) detached dwelling on a common element condominium road under files OZ 06/021 W11 & T-M06005 W11, Ranko and Natasa Lazarevic, 6680 McLaughlin Road, be received for information. Councillor Pat Saito called this public meeting to order at approximately 8:00 p.m. and read the above recommendation from the corporate report. The applicant, Michael Wortel of John D. Rogers and Associates addressed Committee on behalf of his clients, the owners of the property Ranko and Natasa Lazarevic. Mr. Wortel began his presentation by describing the lands as a 10.5 acre site located at 6680 McLaughlin Road, north of Courtneypark Drive West. He advised that the owners of the property currently live in the existing home with an independent access road. The majority of the subject lands are considered hazard lands associated with Fletcher s Creek which runs east to west through the site. Mr. Wortel described the surrounding land uses as detached dwellings, predominantly two-storeys in height to the north, a stormwater management facility to the east, Fletcher s Creek and detached dwellings, predominantly two-storeys in height to the south, and a City owned park to the west. Mr. Wortel advised that the current Official Plan designation is partially Residential - Low Density II, which allows a maximum density of 37 units per net residential hectare, and partially Greenbelt lands. The current zoning for the site is R1 Residential Detached Dwellings and D - Development. He noted that the proposal is to rezone the R1 to R16 designation allowing the development to proceed on a common element condominium road. The six proposed dwellings are larger lots, varying in size, on a 7 m common element condo road with a t turnaround.

14 Planning & Development Committee February 4, 2008 Mr. Wortel pointed out that the proposed development represents good planning for this area and is in keeping with the intent of the Official Plan. Councillor Pat Saito inquired as to where visitors would park if the proposed standard for visitor parking is zero as indicated in the corporate report. Mr. Wortel stated that the intent is to have two car or three car garages with driveway widths that would allow for visitor parking to be included as part of the lots. Lesley Pavan, Manager, Development Team East, clarified that typically the common element condo requirements outline a separate and distinct visitor parking area, not typical to a detached neighbourhood. She also clarified that the proposed minimum setback of zero feet to the greenbelt lands refers to the existing patio area. Irene Andrich addressed Council and asked for clarification with regard to the D (Development) zoning. She advised of her attendance at a public Ward meeting where she made comments and was assured that these lands would remain greenbelt. Ms. Andrich stated that she does not have a problem with the applicant developing this land but would like to see the land remain greenbelt. Lesley Pavan advised that the lands are all designated, through the Official Plan, as greenbelt, and are considered hazard lands not suitable for development. She acknowledged that staff cannot recommend development in a hazard area and stated that it is the intention to keep this as greenbelt. Further, she noted that the applicant has not applied to develop the G lands and any lands zoned D will require a rezoning. Gustavo Mora addressed Committee with regard to the potential environmental impact as a result of the proposed development in the greenbelt. Lesley Pavan explained that the greenbelt will be left in tact and there will be no development in the greenbelt area. She also noted that the City s Transportation and Works Department requires studies regarding stormwater management to ensure no contaminants are allowed into streams and that an EIS study will ensure no loss of habitat. Mr. Mora advised that he lives in the townhomes on Spinnaker Circle and has noticed that the increased activity in the area has deterred natural life in the greenbelt and expressed concern about additional human activity.

15 Planning & Development Committee February 4, 2008 Alvara DiBlasio, who is currently developing the lands north of the proposed development site, indicated that he likes the plan but would prefer to see the lot sizes maintained. Mr. DiBlasio also advised that he likes the concept and believes it works well in the area. Councillor George Carlson felt the environmental impact of these applications will be minimal and noted that the largest part of the lot is being maintained by the current owners. A verbal motion by Councillor George Carlson to receive the Corporate Report dated January 15, 2008 from the Commissioner of Planning & Building and move it forward with the notwithstanding Planning Protocol clause, was voted on and carried. The public meeting closed at 8:20 p.m. AMENDED Recommendation PDC (Councillor George Carlson) OZ 06/021 W11 T-M06005 W11 4. SUPPLEMENTARY REPORT Official Plan Amendment and Rezoning Applications 2537 Confederation Parkway, OZ 06/025 W7 Report dated January 15, 2008 from the Commissioner of Planning and Building with respect to Official Plan Amendment and Rezoning Applications 2537 Confederation Parkway, OZ 06/025 W7. RECOMMENDATION: That the Report dated January 15, 2008, from the Commissioner of Planning and Building recommending approval of the applications under File OZ 06/025 W7, Ania and Bogdan Szpirak, 2537 Confederation Parkway, northeast corner of Confederation Parkway and King Street West, be adopted in accordance with the following: 1. That the application to amend Mississauga Plan from "Residential - Low Density II" to "Residential - Low Density II - Special Site" to permit an office use, be approved.

16 Planning & Development Committee February 4, That the application to change the Zoning from "R3" to "R3-Exception" to permit an office use in accordance with the proposed zoning standards described in Appendix S-4, be approved subject to the following condition: (a) That the applicant agree to satisfy all the requirements of the City and any other official agency concerned with the development. 3. That the decision of Council for approval of the rezoning application be considered null and void, and a new development application be required unless a zoning by-law is passed within 18 months of the Council decision. Michael Crechiolo, Planner, Development & Design Division addressed Committee and made a Powerpoint presentation with respect to the Official Plan Amendment and Rezoning applications for lands located at the northeast corner of Confederation Parkway and King Street West within the Cooksville Node and the limits of Mississauga Plan's Urban Growth Centre. Mr. Crechiolo provided an explanation of the surrounding lands and advised of several office uses along Confederation Parkway approved through the Committee of Adjustment. He explained that the applications will require site plan approval to ensure compatibility with adjacent residential uses. Mr. Crechiolo stated that the Official Plan Amendment and Rezoning applications are acceptable from a planning perspective and it is anticipated that the Cooksville Node and Urban Growth Centre will experience significant land use change over the long term. Councillor Nando Iannicca indicated there were site plan issues associated with the initial submission of the application. However, he advised that the previous parking concerns identified have been addressed by the applicant, and in discussions with residents no objections were noted. A verbal motion by Councillor Nando Iannicca to approve the recommendation in the Corporate Report dated January 15, 2008 from the Commissioner of Planning & Building, was voted on and carried. APPROVED Recommendation PDC (Councillor Nando Iannicca) OZ 06/025 W7 ADJOURNMENT 8:30 P.M.

17 Planning & Development Committee February 4, 2008 REPORT TO: THE MAYOR & MEMBERS OF COUNCIL The Planning and Development Committee presents its second report of 2008 and recommends: PDC That the Report dated January 15, 2008 from the Commissioner of Planning and Building regarding Sign By-law , as amended, and the requested eighteen (18) Sign Variance Applications described in Appendices 1 to 18 to the Report, be adopted in accordance with the following: 1. That the following Sign Variances be granted: (a) Sign Variance Application Ward 1 AyA Kitchens and Baths Ltd Caterpillar Road Two (2) banner signs each with an area of sq. m. (900 sq. ft.). (ii) Two (2) fascia signs located above the upper limits of the first storey of the building. For a period of 1 year. (iii) The sign proposed on the east elevation is not located on a building façade. (b) Sign Variance Application Ward 1 Aqua Systems 1730 Dundas Street East

18 Planning & Development Committee February 4, 2008 One (1) fascia sign on the east elevation erected higher than the upper limits of the first storey of the building. (c) Sign Variance Application Ward 2 RBC Dominion Securities 1672 Lakeshore Road West (ii) (iii) One (1) awning sign on the north elevation projecting partly over a street, subject to the applicant entering into an encroachment agreement with the City. One (1) awning sign on the east elevation not located on a building façade. Four (4) awning signs (one on each elevation) projecting 0.91 m (3 ft.). (d) Sign Variance Application Ward 4 Deloitte 1 City Centre Drive A sixth fascia sign located between the limits of the top floor and the parapet/roof level. (e) Sign Variance Application Ward 4 Earl s Restaurant 100 City Centre Drive One (1) fascia sign not located on the unit occupied by the business.

19 Planning & Development Committee February 4, 2008 (f) Sign Variance Application Ward 4 Square One 100 City Centre Drive (ii) Two (2) multi-faced cube signs on columns at the east elevation. Two (2) roof signs located on the north elevation and two roof signs located on the east elevation. (g) Sign Variance Application Ward Huntington Ridge Drive A ground sign having a sign area of 2.97 sq. m. (31.96 sq. ft.), subject to the municipal address and street name being added to the sign. (h) Sign Variance Application Ward 5 Casebank Technologies Inc Airport Road (ii) A third fascia sign located between the limits of the top floor and parapet or roof level. One (1) fascia sign that is 2.44% (102.3 sq. ft (9.5 sq. m.)) of the building face on which the sign is located. Sign Variance Application Ward 5 Malton Village 7075 Rexwood Road Proposed ground sign with an area of 2.5 sq. m. (26.3 sq. ft.).

20 Planning & Development Committee February 4, 2008 (j) Sign Variance Application Ward 7 Ready Honda-Certified Used Cars 424 Hensall Circle One (1) ground sign having a sign area of sq. m. ( sq. ft.) per sign face. (ii) One (1) ground sign having an overall height of 7.22 m (23.68 ft.). (k) Sign Variance Application Ward Artesian Drive A ground sign having a sign area of 2.97 sq. m. (31.96 sq. ft.), subject to the municipal address and street name being added to the sign. (l) Sign Variance Application Ward Kimbermount Avenue A ground sign having a sign area of 2.97 sq. m. (31.96 sq. ft.), subject to the municipal address and street name being added to the sign. (m) Sign Variance Application Ward Glen Erin Drive A ground sign having a sign area of 2.97 sq. m. (31.96 sq. ft.), subject to the municipal address and street name being added to the sign.

21 Planning & Development Committee February 4, 2008 (n) Sign Variance Application Ward Rio Court A ground sign having a sign area of 2.97 sq. m. (31.96 sq. ft.), subject to the municipal address and street name being added to the sign. (o) Sign Variance Application Ward 4 HT Physiotherapy 640 Eglinton Avenue West One (1) fascia sign located on the second storey of the building and not located on the unit which the business occupies. 2. That the following Sign Variance not be granted: (a) Sign Variance Application Ward 1 Pizza-Pizza 707 Lakeshore Road East One (1) ground sign with an overall height of 7.46 m. (24.5 ft.) and a sign area of 9.30 sq. m. ( sq. ft.). 3. That the following Sign Variances be deferred pending discussion between the Ward Councillor and applicant: (a) Sign Variance Application Ward Avonwick Avenue

22 Planning & Development Committee February 4, 2008 A ground sign having a sign area of 2.97 sq. m. (31.96 sq. ft.), subject to the municipal address and street name being added to the sign. (b) Sign Variance Application Ward Fourwinds Drive A ground sign having a sign area of 2.97 sq. m. (31.96 sq. ft.), subject to the municipal address and street name being added to the sign. BL.03-SIG (2008) PDC That the report titled Community Uses - Draft for Discussion - Mississauga Plan Review dated January 15, 2008 from the Commissioner of Planning and Building be circulated to City Departments, external agencies and other stakeholders for review and comment. 2. That the letter dated February 4, 2008 from Pound & Stewart Services with respect to providing their initial comments regarding the City s Community Uses Draft for Discussion Mississauga Plan Review corporate report be received for information and referred to staff. CD.02.COM PDC That the Report dated January 15, 2008, from the Commissioner of Planning and Building regarding the applications to change the Zoning from "R1" (Detached Dwellings Typical Lots) and "D" (Development) to "R16-Exception" (Detached Dwellings on a Common Element Condominium Private Road) and "G1" (Greenbelt) to permit six (6) detached dwellings and the retention of one (1) detached dwelling on a common element condominium road under files OZ 06/021 W11 & T-M06005 W11, Ranko and Natasa Lazarevic, 6680 McLaughlin Road, be received for information and notwithstanding Planning Protocol, the Supplementary Report be brought directly to a future Council Meeting. OZ 06/021 W11 T-M06005 W11

23 Planning & Development Committee February 4, 2008 PDC That the Report dated January 15, 2008, from the Commissioner of Planning and Building recommending approval of the applications under File OZ 06/025 W7, Ania and Bogdan Szpirak, 2537 Confederation Parkway, northeast corner of Confederation Parkway and King Street West, be adopted in accordance with the following: 1. That the application to amend Mississauga Plan from "Residential - Low Density II" to "Residential - Low Density II - Special Site" to permit an office use, be approved. 2. That the application to change the Zoning from "R3" to "R3- Exception" to permit an office use in accordance with the proposed zoning standards described in Appendix S-4, be approved subject to the following condition: (a) That the applicant agree to satisfy all the requirements of the City and any other official agency concerned with the development. 3. That the decision of Council for approval of the rezoning application be considered null and void, and a new development application be required unless a zoning by-law is passed within 18 months of the Council decision. OZ 06/025 W7