Acknowledgments. Special thanks to public- and private-sector financial contributors: Arapahoe County. City of Arvada.

Transcription

1

2 Acknowledgments Preparation of this report has been financed in part through grants from the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration and Federal Highway Administration. Special thanks to public- and private-sector financial contributors: Arapahoe County City of Arvada City of Boulder City of Centennial City of Commerce City City and County of Denver City of Englewood City of Lakewood City of Louisville Colorado Department of Local Affairs, Division of Housing Regional Transportation District Thornton Gateway Property, LLC City of Thornton City of Westminster City of Wheat Ridge Page i

3 Table of Contents Executive Summary... 1 Survey Background... 3 Study Purpose... 3 Stakeholder Involvement... 3 Survey Methods... 5 Understanding the Results... 8 Comparing Survey Results... 8 Businesses in TOD Influence of Neighborhood Amenities on Business Location Transportation Demand Management Strategies Parking Conclusion Appendix A: Responses to Survey Questions Appendix B: Responses to Survey Questions by Area Appendix C: Responses to Survey Questions by Business Type Appendix D: Survey Results by Shortest Walking Distance to a Rail Transit Station Appendix E: Survey Methodology Developing the Interview Script Selecting Survey Recipients Identifying the Walk Distance Survey Administration and Response Survey Processing (Data Entry) Survey Analysis Appendix F: Copy of Survey Questionnaire Appendix G: Economic Conditions at Time of Survey Appendix H: Walk Distance Maps Page ii

4 List of Tables Table 1: Employment Density within a Half Mile of Rail Transit Stations... 6 Table 2: Average Number of Employees by Business Type Table 5: Awareness of Station When Locating Business Table 6: Top Reasons for Choosing Current Location Table 7: Top Reasons for Choosing Current Location by Business Type Table 8: Categories of Amenities Table 9: Preferred Additions to Area Table 10: Proportion of Businesses using Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Strategies Table 11: Proportion of Businesses using TDM Strategies by Number of Employees Table 12: Interest in TDM Strategies Table 13: Effectiveness of TDM Strategies Table 14: Distance of Nearest Free Parking Table 15: Distance of Nearest Free Parking by Business Type Table 16: Types of Parking Provided or Available Table 17: Parking Spaces Owned or Leased per 1,000 Square Feet of Building Space (by Companies who Owned and/or Leased Any Spaces) Table 18: Employees Payment for Parking in Spaces Owned or Leased by Company Table 19: Employees Payment for Parking in Non-Company Controlled Spaces Table 20: Employees Payment for Parking in Any Space Table 21: Customers Payment for Parking in Company Controlled Spaces Table 22: Shared Parking Table 23: Type of Company Parking Shared With Page iii

5 List of Figures Figure 1: Station Areas Included in Business Survey Sample... 7 Figure 2: Types of Businesses Interviewed within a Mile Walking Distance of Rail Transit Stations Figure 3: Number of Employees by Area Figure 4: Proportion of Businesses Renting Facility by Area Figure 5: Proportion of Businesses Renting Facility by Business Type Figure 6: Influence of Specific Neighborhood Amenities on Location Choice Figure 7: Influence of Transit Amenities on Location Choice by Area Figure 8: Influence of Mixed-use Amenities on Location Choice by Area Figure 9: Influence of Access and Parking for Cars on Location Choice by Area Figure 10: Influence of Transit Amenities on Location Choice by Business Type Figure 11: Influence of Mixed-use Amenities on Location Choice by Business Type Figure 12: Influence of Access and Parking for Cars on Location Choice by Business Type Figure 13: Satisfaction with Expectations Regarding Neighborhood Amenities Figure 14: Overall Access to Parking for Employees Figure 15: Overall Access to Parking for Customers Figure 16: Parking Concerns Figure 17: Do you run out of spaces at any time of day in this shared lot? Page iv

6 Executive Summary This report summarizes the findings of a survey conducted in April 2009 of 300 businesses located within an estimated one-mile walk distance of a metro Denver rail transit station. It provides information regarding the types of business, number of employees, ownership, square footage, management's motivations for selecting current location, satisfaction with current location, intent to move, supply and demand for parking, and use of transit management strategies and incentives of businesses located in existing rail-transit station areas. The Who is TOD in Metro Denver? study is the first original research in the Denver region to benchmark how people s attitudes, perceptions and behaviors are changing as transit-oriented development (TOD) policy and investment decisions are being made. Metro Denver has a relatively small transit system compared to regions such as Washington, D.C., that have more mature transit systems and TODs. In fact, the three most significant findings of the business survey confirm that TOD is still evolving in metro Denver. Auto orientation still dominates. While many businesses near station areas perceive benefits associated with locating near rail transit stations, these benefits have not risen above the importance placed on accommodating the automobile. Seventy-eight percent of respondents stated that access for parking and cars was influential in their location decisions compared to only 49 percent who stated the benefits associated with transit amenities were influential. There is abundant free parking. Convenient, free parking (which has been associated with low transit ridership) is abundant near rail-transit stations outside of downtown Denver. More than 80 percent of non-downtown businesses had free parking adjacent to their building, and 79 percent felt that they had enough or more than enough for employees and customers. Use of travel demand management (TDM) strategies, including incentives to use transit, is low outside of downtown. Only four percent of businesses outside of downtown Denver reported offering their employees free or subsidized transit passes. By comparison, 33 percent of businesses in downtown Denver provide free or subsidized passes. These results contrast with a 2008 study of three transit station areas in metropolitan Washington, D.C., that found businesses value commute options over parking availability in their location decisions, and that the majority of businesses offer transit subsidies to their employees. This contrast suggests that business perceptions and behaviors in the Denver region are likely to change as the transit system continues to expand. The business survey results are part of a larger study that will include surveys of employees and residents and in transit station areas. A final report will summarize the findings of all three studies. Repetition of these surveys in the future will provide further information on how business, employee and resident perceptions and behaviors change over time as the rail-transit system expands and TOD matures. Page 1

7 Raw data from this survey is available to those interested in completing further analysis. Data can be downloaded from or contact Tom Boone at or for further information. Page 2

8 Survey Background Study Purpose The Who is TOD in Metro Denver? study is the first original research to benchmark how people s attitudes, perceptions and behaviors are changing as TOD policy and investment decisions are being made. As described in the Who is TOD in Metro Denver? research plan dated August 23, 2008, this research contains three surveys. A business survey (discussed in this preliminary report) collected information regarding businesses located within one mile of an existing rail transit station, including the type of business, number of employees, ownership, square footage, management's motivations for selecting current location, satisfaction with current location, intent to move, supply and demand for parking, and use of transit management strategies and incentives. An employee survey (to be conducted in the fall of 2009) will collect information from employees of businesses that participated (and agreed to have employees surveyed), including the location of the employee's home, reason for employment and home location decisions, mode choice and perceptions of transportation management strategies and incentives. A resident survey (to be conducted in the winter of 2009 and spring of 2010) will provide a comprehensive assessment of demographics, behaviors and perceptions of residents at varying distances from rail-transit. It will collect information from households across the metro area, with emphasis on those living within one mile of transit stations. Information to be collected includes household member ages, incomes, employment, travel behaviors, current housing characteristics, home location decision influences, and future intent regarding home location. This report covers the findings of the business survey, the first of the three to be implemented. Stakeholder Involvement In phase one of this project, a list of potential stakeholders was developed that included metro- Denver area local government planners and representatives, housing and land developers, transportation modelers and affordable housing advocates. Each stakeholder was invited via to participate in an input process to determine the data needs of these groups related to TOD. The process included a Web survey of local government stakeholders with a follow-up meeting, and telephone interviews with housing and land developers, transportation modelers and affordable housing advocates. Local Governments DRCOG identified 134 local government representatives (employees and elected officials) from 28 jurisdictions that were likely to have a vested interest in this research. Representatives were members of their jurisdiction s planning department or the DRCOG Board of Directors. All local Page 3

9 government representatives were asked to review preliminary research plans that outlined potential questions for residents, businesses and employees in TOD areas. They were then asked to complete a Web survey about how useful each potential research plan would be for their organization and how they would use the information gathered through these surveys. Thirtythree local government representatives from 20 jurisdictions responded. These stakeholders indicated that the most pressing issues or decisions they face with respect to TOD were related to parking and economic development, followed by affordable housing and accessibility. Developers Six developers with an interest in TOD were interviewed by telephone. They were asked about the kinds of data they use to make decisions about developing properties in TOD areas, what additional data they would like to have and how useful surveys of residents, businesses and employees in TOD areas would be. As with local government stakeholders, developers were most interested in finding out about current TOD residents and businesses and understanding how people throughout metro Denver make decisions about where to live. Affordable housing advocates Two stakeholders working on issues of workforce and affordable housing were interviewed via telephone. They were most interested in finding out whether locating a business near a rail transit area expands access to larger workforce, whether living near rail transit gives residents access to a larger employment base and how far a resident can live from a station and still perceive rail transit to be a convenient commute option. Page 4

10 Transportation Modelers Transportation modelers working at DRCOG provided feedback via and telephone interviews. To enhance transportation models, modelers wanted to collect specific information about the travel patterns of people living in TOD areas, including: commute data (distance, modes, and stops en route), data about trips for leisure/entertainment (distance, modes, and stops en route), data about shopping trips (distance, modes, and stops en route) and rail transit passenger characteristics. Modelers were consulted throughout the stakeholder input process and reviewed survey instruments during the development stage to ensure their data needs would be met. Survey Methods Representatives from 300 metro Denver businesses located within one mile of a rail transit station were interviewed from April 13 to April 24, The sample of businesses was stratified by metro area with 80 located in downtown Denver, 110 in higher employment density areas outside downtown and 110 in lower employment density areas outside downtown. Table 1 shows the number of employees within a half-mile of each rail station. Figure 1 shows the location of each station area included in the sample and whether it was classified as downtown Denver, a higher-density employment area outside downtown or a lower-density employment area outside downtown. More information about the survey methodology can be found in Appendix E: Survey Methodology. Page 5

11 Table 1: Employment Density within a Half Mile of Rail Transit Stations Downtown High Employment Density Not Downtown Low Employment Density Not Downtown Number of Number of Number of Station employees Station employees Station employees All stations 72,509 All stations 78,918 All stations 42,294 Convention Center 6,359 Arapahoe 28,782 Alameda 2, th and California 13,179 Belleview 10,665 I-25 and Broadway 3, th and Stout 8,609 Colorado Center 7, th and Welton 1, th and California 21,054 County Line 6,321 27th and Welton th and Stout 6,045 Dry Creek 6, th and Welton th and Welton 6,045 Lincoln 5, th and Downing 359 Union Station 11,218 Orchard 14, th and Osage 4,143 Auraria 1,604 Auraria West 613 Mile High 635 Pepsi Center/Six Flags 1,363 Louisiana 1,539 Nine Mile 2,683 Southmoor 1,013 University 2,738 Yale 1,029 Evans 2,492 Mineral 832 Oxford 2,755 Littleton 4,688 Englewood 4,216 Dayton 1,047 Page 6

12 Figure 1: Station Areas Included in Business Survey Sample Page 7

13 Understanding the Results How the Results are Reported For the most part, frequency distributions (the percent of respondents giving each possible response to a particular question) are presented in the body of the report. A complete set of frequencies for each survey question is presented in Appendix A: Responses to Survey Questions. Precision of Estimates It is customary to describe the precision of estimates made from surveys by a level of confidence (or margin of error). The 95 percent confidence level for this survey is generally no greater than plus or minus six percentage points around any given percent reported for the entire sample (300). For comparisons among subgroups, the margin of error rises to approximately plus or minus 14 percent for sample sizes of 80 and to plus or minus 10 percent for sample sizes of 110. Don t Know Responses and Rounding On many of the questions in the survey, respondents gave an answer of don t know. The proportion of respondents giving this reply is shown in the full set of responses included in Appendix A: Responses to Survey Questions. These responses are excluded from the analyses presented in the body of the report, unless the proportion is 20 percent or greater. In other words, the majority of the tables and graphs in the body of the report display the responses from respondents who had an opinion about a specific item. For some questions, respondents were permitted to select multiple responses. When the total exceeds 100 percent in a table for a multiple-response question, it is because some respondents are counted in multiple categories. When a table for a question that only permitted a single response does not total to exactly 100 percent, it is due to the customary practice of rounding percentages to the nearest whole number. Comparing Survey Results Survey results were compared by several subgroups and these cross tabulations are presented in Appendices B, C and D. The subgroups are: Business location o o o Downtown Higher employment density, not downtown Lower employment density, not downtown Type of business based on North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) categories. 1 1 The public administration category (government buildings, offices or services) was not included in the survey effort as their decisions about location, parking and commute strategies were thought to be different than the private sector, and the number of public administration offices that would be randomly selected for the survey would be too small to be representative. Page 8

14 o o o o o o Professional, Scientific, Technical, Information Services Finance, Insurance, Real Estate, Leasing, Administration and Support and Management of Companies Retail Trade, Accommodation and Food Services and other services Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation, Wholesale Trade and Warehousing Health Care, Social Assistance, Education, Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation Mining, Oil and Gas, Agriculture and Utilities Walking distance from business to a rail-transit station o o o o 0.00 to 0.24 miles 0.25 to 0.49 miles 0.50 to 0.74 miles 0.75 miles or more Page 9

15 Businesses in TOD Businesses were categorized into six groups by combining North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) categories thought to be most similar (e.g. finance was grouped with insurance, and real estate and retail trade was grouped with accommodation and food services). Figure 2 shows the types of businesses located downtown and in higher employment density areas and lower employment density areas. Most business types were found in all three areas. However, businesses that require an office setting were most likely located downtown or in higher employment density areas outside of downtown. Retail, accommodation and food services were prominently in lower employment density rail station areas outside of downtown. Construction, manufacturing, transportation, wholesale trade and warehousing were most common in lower employment density areas outside downtown, but were also found downtown and in higher employment density areas. There were only a few mining, oil and gas, agriculture and utilities business personnel interviewed and they tended to be in offices located downtown. Page 10

16 Figure 2: Types of Businesses Interviewed within a Mile Walking Distance of Rail Transit Stations Percent of respondents 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 50% 29% Professional, Scientific, Technical, Information Services 21% Finance, Insurance, Real Estate, etc. 29% Retail Trade, Accommodation and Food Services 15% Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation, Wholesale Trade, Warehousing 1% Downtown Health Care, Social Assistance, Education, Arts, Entertainment, Recreation 5% Mining, Oil and Gas, Agriculture and Utilities Percent of respondents 40% 30% 20% 10% 27% 35% 20% 8% 7% High Density Not Downtown 3% 0% Professional, Scientific, Technical, Information Services Finance, Insurance, Real Estate, etc. Retail Trade, Accommodation and Food Services Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation, Wholesale Trade, Warehousing Health Care, Social Assistance, Education, Arts, Entertainment, Recreation Mining, Oil and Gas, Agriculture and Utilities Percent of respondents 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 12% 12% Professional, Scientific, Technical, Information Servi ces Finance, Insurance, Real Estate, etc. 39% Retail Trade, Accommodation and Food Servi ces 24% Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation, Wholesale Trade, Warehousing Low Density Not Downtown 14% Health Care, Social Assistance, Education, Arts, Entertai nment, Recreation 0% Mining, Oil and Gas, Agriculture and Utilities Types of businesses are based on North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) categories, not including public administration (government buildings, offices or services), the distribution of NAICS categories of businesses interviewed was similar the distribution of NAICS categories in the sample. Page 11

17 All rail transit areas (downtown, higher and lower employment density) included a range of company sizes (Figure 3). Office-based companies were more likely to have smaller staff sizes (on average employees) and retail, accommodation and food services were most likely to have larger staff sizes (on average 56 employees; see Table 2). As would be expected, retail, accommodation and food services also had the most part-time employees and the most employees working weekends, evenings and unpredictable schedules). These schedules were also more common in lower employment density non-downtown areas, compared to downtown and higher employment density non-downtown areas. 50% Figure 3: Number of Employees by Area Percent of respondents 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 39% 24% 41% 16% 25% 20% 23% 23% 24% 10% 14% 9% 4% 10% Downtown High Density Not Downtown Low Density Not Downtown 0% 9% 5% 5% 0% 0% 1% or more Number of employees at location Table 2: Average Number of Employees by Business Type Including yourself, how many full-time, part-time and contract employees do you have at this location? Full time Part time Contract All types Retail Trade, Accommodation and Food Services and other services Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation, Wholesale Trade and Warehousing Mining, Oil and Gas, Agriculture and Utilities Health Care, Social Assistance, Education, Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation Finance, Insurance, Real Estate, Leasing, Administration and Support and Management of Companies Professional, Scientific, Technical, Information Services Page 12

18 Including yourself, how many full-time, part-time and Full Part All contract employees do you have at this location? time time Contract types All business types Page 13

19 The majority of businesses near rail transit were renting their building space. This varied across the region with 81percent of downtown businesses, 75 percent of higher employment density area businesses and 64% of lower employment density area businesses renting (Figure 4). Those in the retail, accommodation and food services as well as construction and manufacturing trades were more likely to own their building space (Figure 5). Overall the average business size was 2,200 square feet, ranging from 60 to 285,197 square feet. The most common size (the mode) was 1,000 square feet for both downtown and higher employment density areas and 2,000 square feet for lower employment density areas. The median size was 2,000 square feet for downtown, 2,400 square feet for higher employment density areas and 2,200 square feet for lower employment density areas. Company representatives were also asked about the cost of the space they rented; too many either did not want to share this information or gave improbable answers. For that reason it was not possible to assess the rental costs with a reasonable degree of certainty. Figure 4: Proportion of Businesses Renting Facility by Area Downtown High Density Not Downtown 75% 81% Low Density Not Downtown 64% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Percent of respondents Page 14

20 Figure 5: Proportion of Businesses Renting Facility by Business Type Mining, Oil and Gas, Agriculture and Utilities 86% Health Care, Social Assistance, Education, Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation 79% Professional, Scientific, Technical, Information Services 77% Finance, Insurance, Real Estate, Leasing, Administration and Support and Management of Companies Retail Trade, Accommodation and Food Services and other services Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation, Wholesale Trade and Warehousing 64% 69% 74% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Percent of respondents Page 15

21 Influence of Neighborhood Amenities on Business Location Stakeholders would like to know whether rail stations and other amenities (higher-density communities, access to residences, businesses and shopping and commuters) influence businesses to locate near rail transit stations. Most downtown businesses (68 percent) moved to their location after the rail station nearest them was open. However, only 45 percent in lower employment density and 18 percent in higher employment density non-downtown areas moved after their nearest station was opened and only a few more made their location choice knowing the nearest rail station would be built (Table 3). Table 3: Awareness of Station When Locating Business High Density Downtown Not Downtown Low Density Not Downtown Moved before station, did not know about station 29% 75% 51% Moved before station, knew station was coming 4% 7% 5% Moved after rail station was open 68% 18% 45% Respondents were asked to give the top three reasons they chose their current location. They were not read a list of potential reasons or otherwise prompted in their answers. The most common reasons they gave were that it was near main roads for easy access, it had good lease rates and the building structure suited their business needs (Table 4). Overall, fewer than seven percent of businesses cited access to rail transit as a top reason for choosing the location. This did not vary between those who were aware and not aware of their nearest rail transit station before they made their business location choice. Those in the professional, scientific, technical, information services and construction, manufacturing, transportation, wholesale trade and warehousing fields being somewhat more likely (11 percent) to name access to rail transit as a top reason for locating their business, compared to other sectors (Table 5). Page 16

22 Table 4: Top Reasons for Choosing Current Location High Density Downtown Not Downtown Low Density Not Downtown Near main roads 25% 35% 36% Lease rates 30% 27% 25% Building structure 23% 33% 24% Other complementary businesses 11% 5% 17% Close to home 3% 13% 15% Parking availability 4% 12% 6% Access to customers from employees at near by businesses 5% 10% 7% Central or downtown 13% 5% 5% Access to rail transit 6% 4% 7% Access to customers from near by residences 6% 5% 5% Owns the building 3% 5% 7% Supports brand positioning (being in young, green, urban area etc.) 8% 3% 5% Access to customer base 8% 4% 2% Location 4% 5% 3% Access to customers from rail station foot traffic 4% 5% 0% Security 0% 2% 1% Close to bus 0% 0% 2% Other 8% 5% 5% Page 17

23 Table 5: Top Reasons for Choosing Current Location by Business Type Professional, Scientific, Technical, Information Services Finance, Insurance, Real Estate, Leasing, Administration and Support and Management of Companies Retail Trade, Accommodation and Food Services and other services Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation, Wholesale Trade and Warehousing Health Care, Social Assistance, Education, Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation Mining, Oil and Gas, Agriculture and Utilities Near main roads 36% 32% 30% 43% 17% 29% Lease rates 39% 28% 19% 28% 17% 29% Building structure 35% 32% 20% 19% 29% 14% Other complementary businesses 6% 6% 19% 13% 4% 14% Close to home 9% 10% 10% 9% 21% 29% Parking availability 9% 12% 6% 6% 4% 0% Access to customers from employees at nearby businesses 5% 10% 10% 9% 0% 0% Central/downtown 12% 1% 3% 6% 8% 43% Access to rail transit 11% 3% 3% 11% 0% 0% Access to customers from near by residences 3% 4% 9% 6% 4% 0% Other 5% 6% 7% 4% 8% 0% Owns the building 3% 10% 3% 4% 4% 14% Supports brand positioning (young/green/urban area etc.) 8% 3% 6% 2% 4% 0% Access to customer base 3% 3% 5% 4% 4% 14% Location 2% 6% 6% 2% 4% 0% Access to customers from 3% 4% 2% 2% 0% 0% Page 18

24 Professional, Scientific, Technical, Information Services Finance, Insurance, Real Estate, Leasing, Administration and Support and Management of Companies Retail Trade, Accommodation and Food Services and other services Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation, Wholesale Trade and Warehousing Health Care, Social Assistance, Education, Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation Mining, Oil and Gas, Agriculture and Utilities rail station foot traffic Security 0% 3% 1% 0% 0% 0% Close to bus 0% 0% 1% 2% 0% 0% Page 19

25 Respondents who moved to their location after the station was built or were aware that the station would be built were asked to indicate how strong an influence specific neighborhood amenities were on their location choice. These amenities may or may not be present at each business location. As shown in Figure 6, access by car and availability of parking were the strongest influencers of location choice, followed by employees seeing access to restaurants, coffee shops or bars as a benefit and employees seeing the rail commute option as a benefit. Employees seeing the rail commute option as a benefit was a strong influence for 13percent of the businesses and somewhat of an influence for 29 percent. Additionally, about 20 percent of businesses indicated that access to a larger workforce from rail transit and access to rail transit foot traffic had at least some influence on their location choice. Page 20

26 Figure 6: Influence of Specific Neighborhood Amenities on Location Choice Having easy access by car for customers or employees Strong influence 42% Somewhat of an influence 30% The availability of parking for customers and employees 33% 36% Your employees seeing access to restaurants, coffee shops or bars as a benefit 20% 25% Your employees seeing the rail commute option as a benefit 13% 29% Customer foot traffic from customers of nearby businesses 12% 17% Customer foot traffic from local residents 9% 10% Customer foot traffic from the rail station 7% 13% Customer foot traffic from employees at nearby businesses 6% 19% Having access to a larger workforce through the rail transit system Your employees seeing access to grocery stores and drug stores as a benefit 5% 5% 17% 14% Your employees seeing access to medical or daycare centers is seen as benefit by employees 4% Your employees seeing access to personal services (such as 2% hair salons or dry cleaners) as a benefit 7% 11% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Percent of respondents Asked only if were aware the station would be built or the station was already built at time of move Page 21

27 Table 6 groups the amenities into three categories: transit amenities; mixed-use amenities; and access and parking for cars. Overall, 49 percent of businesses stated that least one amenity in the transit category was somewhat or strongly influential. By comparison, 61 percent stated that at least one amenity in the mixed-use category was influential, and 78 percent stated that at least one amenity in the access for parking and cars category was influential. Figures 7 through 9 show these figures broken down by area. Access and parking for cars was the strongest location choice influence for all three areas (downtown, high employment density and low employment density areas outside downtown). Mixed-use amenities had the next strongest influence on location, particularly for downtown and lower employment density areas outside downtown. Transit amenities were a somewhat or strong influence on location for about half the businesses in each of the areas, but were a stronger influence on location choice for downtown businesses. Table 6: Categories of Amenities Transit Amenities Mixed-Use Amenities Access and Parking for Cars Having access to a larger workforce through the rail transit system Your employees seeing the rail commute option as a benefit Customer foot traffic from the rail station Customer foot traffic from employees at nearby businesses Customer foot traffic from customers of nearby businesses Customer foot traffic from local residents Your employees seeing access to restaurants, coffee shops or bars as a benefit Your employees seeing access to grocery stores and drug stores as a benefit Your employees seeing access to personal services (such as hair salons or dry cleaners) as a benefit Your employees seeing access to medical or daycare centers is seen as benefit Having easy access by car for customers or employees The availability of parking for customers and employees Page 22

28 Figure 7: Influence of Transit Amenities on Location Choice by Area Strong influence Somewhat of an influence Downtown 25% 25% High Density Not Downtown 7% 39% Low Density Not Downtown 20% 30% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Percent of respondents Asked only if were aware the station would be built or the station was already built at time of move Figure 8: Influence of Mixed-use Amenities on Location Choice by Area Strong influence Somewhat of an influence Downtown 39% 26% High Density Not Downtown 21% 32% Low Density Not Downtown 33% 28% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Percent of respondents Asked only if were aware the station would be built or the station was already built at time of move Figure 9: Influence of Access and Parking for Cars on Location Choice by Area Strong influence Somewhat of an influence Downtown 32% 35% High Density Not Downtown 64% 21% Low Density Not Downtown 54% 31% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Percent of respondents Asked only if were aware the station would be built or the station was already built at time of move Page 23

29 Figures 10 through 12 show the influence of each amenity category by business sector. Retail trade, accommodation and food services businesses were the most likely to cite rail transit amenities as a strong influence in their location choice followed by office-based businesses such as information services, finance and real estate. This was also true for the influence of mixed-use amenities. Access and parking for cars had the strongest influence on location for all types of businesses. Health care, social assistance, education, arts, entertainment and recreation-based businesses were the least likely to cite access and parking for cars as an influence in their location choice, but it was at least somewhat of an influence for 63 percent. Figure 10: Influence of Transit Amenities on Location Choice by Business Type Strong influence Somewhat of an influence Professional, Scientific, Technical, Information Services 15% 36% Finance, Insurance, Real Estate, etc. 18% 36% Retail Trade, Accommodation and Food Services 34% 25% Construction, Manufacturing, Transporation, Wholesale Trade, Wharehousing Health Care, Social Assistance, Education, Arts, Entertainment, Recreation 12% 18% 19% 18% Mining, Oil and Gas, Agriculture and Utilities 0% 67% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Percent of respondents Asked only if were aware the station would be built or the station was already built at time of move Page 24

30 Figure 11: Influence of Mixed-Use Amenities on Location Choice by Business Type Strong influence Somewhat of an influence Professional, Scientific, Technical, Information Services 31% 26% Finance, Insurance, Real Estate, etc. 36% 25% Retail Trade, Accommodation and Food Services 44% 34% Construction, Manufacturing, Transporation, Wholesale Trade, Wharehousing Health Care, Social Assistance, Education, Arts, Entertainment, Recreation 23% 27% 27% 27% Mining, Oil and Gas, Agriculture and Utilities 33% 33% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Percent of respondents Asked only if were aware the station would be built or the station was already built at time of move Figure 12: Influence of Access and Parking for Cars on Location Choice by Business Type Strong influence Somewhat of an influence Professional, Scientific, Technical, Information Services 44% 41% Finance, Insurance, Real Estate, etc. 54% 18% Retail Trade, Accommodation and Food Services 41% 34% Construction, Manufacturing, Transporation, Wholesale Trade, Wharehousing Health Care, Social Assistance, Education, Arts, Entertainment, Recreation 36% 54% 27% 31% Mining, Oil and Gas, Agriculture and Utilities 67% 0% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Percent of respondents Asked only if were aware the station would be built or the station was already built at time of move Page 25

31 Businesses satisfaction with their location choices appears to be high. Ninety-five percent have no plans to move, and 98 percent of businesses that anticipated employees would be attracted to the rail commute option had their expectations at least somewhat met (Figure 13). Also, ninety percent of businesses that chose their location anticipating that they would have access to a larger workforce had their expectations met. Page 26

32 Figure 13: Satisfaction with Expectations Regarding Neighborhood Amenities Fully met Somewhat met Not met Having easy access by car for customers or employees 75% 23% 2% The availability of parking for customers and employees 64% 31% 5% Your employees seeing access to restaurants, coffee shops or bars as a benefit 63% 34% 3% Your employees seeing the rail commute option as a benefit 61% 37% 2% Customer foot traffic from customers of nearby businesses 38% 54% 8% Customer foot traffic from local residents 36% 60% 4% Customer foot traffic from the rail station 38% 54% 8% Customer foot traffic from employees at nearby businesses 52% 36% 12% Having access to a larger workforce through the rail transit system 45% 45% 10% Your employees seeing access to grocery stores and drug stores as a benefit 46% 54% 0% Your employees seeing access to medical or daycare centers is seen as benefit by employees 57% 36% 7% Your employees seeing access to personal services (such as hair salons or dry cleaners) as a benefit 50% 44% 6% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Percent of respondents Asked only if indicated the amenity had a somewhat or strong influence on their decision to locate business Page 27

33 When asked what amenities or services were missing from their neighborhoods, about 45 percent of businesses indicated that they didn t know or thought that nothing more was needed (Table 7). About one-quarter of businesses outside of downtown would like to see more restaurants, but no other strong preferences emerged. In the downtown area, department and grocery stores were the most desired additions. Table 7: Preferred Additions to Area Downtown High Density Not Downtown Low Density Not Downtown Don't know 46% 42% 35% Nothing more/ good as is 3% 7% 5% Restaurants 11% 26% 22% Department stores 18% 3% 5% Grocery/ drug/ convenience stores 16% 4% 3% Multi family housing 8% 5% 5% Clothing/shoe stores 9% 3% 5% General office (law, insurance, temp help, marketing etc) 3% 7% 5% Coffee shops 4% 1% 5% Financial (banking, investment, mortgage, accounting) 3% 4% 3% Single family housing 4% 2% 4% Parks/ open space 3% 5% 2% Entertainment (theater, art gallery, museum) 1% 2% 5% Only those mentioned by at least 5 percent of businesses are shown. Page 28

34 Transportation Demand Management Strategies Transportation demand management (TDM) is the application of strategies and policies to reduce automobile travel demand, or to redistribute this demand in space or in time, as opposed to simply increasing the supply by building more roads or lanes to accommodate single-occupancy vehicle travel. Table 8 lists a variety of TDM strategies. Representatives of the companies surveyed were asked whether their organization provided any TDM strategies to its employees. (The question wording used was, There are many strategies for influencing how employees travel to and from work. A few examples are: providing transit passes, organizing car or van pools, charging for parking, providing secure bike storage and showers or lockers for cyclists, guaranteed ride home programs and flexible work schedules. Do you use any of these strategies, or others, to influence how employees travel to and from work? ) Overall only 69 of the 300 companies (23 percent, Table 8) reported they were using TDM strategies. It may be that more companies would have reported using some strategies if they had been asked about each strategy one at a time, instead of reading the example list and asking the respondent to recall. Companies in the downtown area (Table 8) and large companies (Table 9) were most likely to use TDM strategies. The most common TDM strategy employed was subsidized transit passes for employees, through the Eco Pass or other pass programs, although these offerings were made almost exclusively by downtown businesses. Table 8: Proportion of Businesses using Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Strategies Downtown High Density Not Downtown Low Density Not Downtown Total None of these 54% 85% 86% 77% Free/subsidized transit passes, such as the Eco Pass 33% 4% 3% 11% Secure bike storage 8% 5% 8% 7% On-site amenities for walkers and bicyclists (i.e. showers, lockers) 3% 5% 5% 4% Flexible work schedules (varying starting and ending times) 5% 4% 2% 3% Guaranteed ride home 4% 0% 2% 2% Organized carpooling 3% 0% 2% 1% Organized vanpooling 4% 0% 0% 1% Substituting "paid parking" with a commute allowance which could be used for bus or vanpool fares as well as parking fees 3% 0% 0% 1% Page 29

35 Teleworking (a regular, off-site work arrangement) 0% 2% 0% 1% Shuttles to transit or other frequently used locations 0% 0% 1% 0% Access to vehicles for mid-day trips 1% 0% 0% 0% Access to bicycles for mid-day trips 1% 0% 0% 0% Compressed work weeks (i.e. 40 hrs in 4 days, 80 hrs in 9 days) 0% 1% 0% 0% Table 9: Proportion of Businesses using TDM Strategies by Number of Employees Number of Employees or more None of these 87% 78% 75% 67% 64% 56% 0% Free/subsidized transit passes, such as the Eco Pass 6% 8% 10% 18% 21% 28% 100%* Secure bike storage 4% 6% 3% 9% 21% 22% 0% Organized vanpooling 0% 0% 0% 3% 0% 11% 0% On-site amenities for walkers and bicyclists (i.e. showers, lockers) 4% 0% 4% 6% 14% 11% 0% Guaranteed ride home 1% 0% 1% 3% 0% 11% 0% Flexible work schedules (varying starting and ending times) 1% 5% 6% 0% 0% 11% 0% Organized carpooling 0% 3% 1% 0% 0% 6% 0% Access to vehicles for mid-day trips 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 6% 0% Teleworking (a regular, off-site work arrangement) 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 6% 0% Preferred parking spaces for carpools/vanpools 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Charging employees to park in company owned or leased spaces 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Substituting "paid parking" with a commute allowance which could be used for bus or vanpool fares as well as parking fees 1% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% Shuttles to transit or other frequently used locations 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Access to bicycles for mid-day trips 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% Compressed work weeks (i.e. 40 hrs in 4 days, 80 hrs in 9 days) 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Other 0% 0% 0% 3% 7% 0% 0% *there was only one business in this size category. Page 30

36 Are you interested in learning more about transportation management strategies? Table 10: Interest in TDM Strategies Number of businesses Percent Yes 52 17% No % Page 31

37 For each TDM strategy that the company representative said their organization offered, the representative was then asked how effective they felt that strategy was in reducing automobile travel and parking needs. Most respondents (86 percent) felt that the strategies were at least somewhat effective (Table 11). Transit passes, organized carpooling, substitution of paid parking with a commuting allowance, access to bicycles for mid-day trips and teleworking were deemed very effective at encouraging alternate mode travel by 50 percent or more of companies providing such options. Table 11: Effectiveness of TDM Strategies Do you think...is very effective, somewhat effective or not effective in reducing single car trips and parking needs?* Very effective Somewha t effective Not effective Total Free/subsidized transit passes, such as the Eco Pass? 58% 32% 10% 100% Organized carpooling 50% 50% 0% 100% Organized vanpooling 33% 33% 33% 100% Substituting "paid parking" with a commute allowance which could be used for bus or vanpool fares as well as parking fees 50% 50% 0% 100% Shuttles to transit or other frequently used locations 0% 100% 0% 100% Access to vehicles for mid-day trips 0% 100% 0% 100% Access to bicycles for mid-day trips 100% 0% 0% 100% Secure bike storage 35% 55% 10% 100% On-site amenities for walkers and bicyclists (i.e. showers, lockers) 38% 46% 15% 100% Guaranteed ride home 40% 20% 40% 100% Teleworking (a regular, off-site work arrangement) 100% 0% 0% 100% Flexible work schedules (varying starting and ending times) 50% 20% 30% 100% Compressed work weeks (i.e. 40 hrs in 4 days, 80 hrs in 9 days) 0% 100% 0% 100% Average across all strategies** 47% 39% 14% 100% * For each strategy, only asked of those whose company offered the strategy. ** Weighted average strategies used by more companies were given greater weight. Page 32

38 Parking Free parking was readily available to businesses that were not located downtown, while downtown businesses had much less access to free parking. More than three-quarters of businesses located in downtown Denver had no free parking within a block of their building, while more than 80 percent of businesses in other locations had free parking right next to their building (Table 12). Table 12: Distance of Nearest Free Parking How close is your business to parking that is free for both your company and your customers and employees? Is there free parking right next to your building, within a block of your building or more than a block from your building? Downtown High Density Not Downtown Low Density Not Downtown Right next to your building 18% 83% 86% Within a block of your building 6% 14% 12% More than a block 76% 4% 2% As might be expected, businesses in the health care or entertainment sector were the most likely to have free parking right next to their building compared to other types of businesses (Table 13). The few companies in the mining, oil and gas, agriculture, and utilities sector, which were almost all downtown, were least likely to have access to free parking within one block. Professional, Scientific, Technical, Information Services Table 13: Distance of Nearest Free Parking by Business Type Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Companies Retail Trade, Accommodation and Food Services and other services Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation, Wholesale Trade and Warehousing Health Care, Social Assistance, Education, Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation Mining, Oil and Gas, Agriculture and Utilities Right next to building 61% 63% 68% 68% 92% 43% Within a block 6% 21% 10% 9% 4% 14% More than a block 33% 16% 22% 23% 4% 43% Page 33

39 More than 80 percent of businesses felt they had enough or more than enough access to parking for their employees (Figure 14). More than 70 percent felt they had enough or more than enough access to parking for their customers ( Figure 15). Figure 14: Overall Access to Parking for Employees Too little Enough More than enough Downtown 16% 40% 44% High Density Not Downtown 6% 48% 45% Low Density Not Downtown 16% 43% 41% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Percent of respondents Figure 15: Overall Access to Parking for Customers Too little Enough More than enough Downtown 25% 39% 36% High Density Not Downtown 9% 48% 43% Low Density Not Downtown 20% 44% 36% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Percent of respondents When asked if they had any concerns about parking being far away, difficult to access, poorly lit or unsafe, most respondents felt they did not have any of these concerns about their parking. Companies located in downtown Denver were somewhat more likely to have parking concerns than those in other locations. When concerns were mentioned, those in downtown were more likely to mention access than those in other locations. Lighting was a bigger concern for those in locations other than downtown (Figure 16). Page 34

40 Figure 16: Parking Concerns Downtown 9% 6% 11% 10% 79% Feels unsafe It is poorly lit It is difficult to access It is too far away None of these High Density Not Downtown 2% 4% 1% 1% 95% Low Density Not Downtown 10% 9% 5% 5% 81% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100 % Percent of respondents Just over half of the companies surveyed reported that they own and/or lease their parking (Table 14). Companies in the lower employment density areas outside of downtown were the least likely to report that they own and/or lease parking spaces. Table 14: Types of Parking Provided or Available Downtown High Density Not Downtown Low Density Not Downtown Company reported they do not own or lease parking 42% 37% 50% Company reported they own and/or lease parking 58% 63% 50% Company owns parking spaces* 13% 26% 35% Company has assigned spaces included in building lease* 22% 37% 19% Company has assigned spaces leased separately from building lease* 31% 4% 3% * These percents may add to more than the total percent reporting they own and/or lease parking, as companies could fall into more than one category. Page 35

41 The average number of parking spaces owned or leased per 1,000 spare feet of business space was 2.7 for higher employment density areas and 2.4 for lower employment density areas. The median was about 1 parking space per 1,000 square feet of business space. However, the range was quite large, as some large businesses had only a few assigned spots and some smaller businesses had many (Table 15). Table 15: Parking Spaces Owned or Leased per 1,000 Square Feet of Building Space (by Companies who Owned and/or Leased Any Spaces) Number of businesses Average number of spaces per 1,000 SF of building space Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Downtown High Density Not Downtown Low Density Not Downtown Those who did own and/or lease parking spaces were asked whether their employees had to pay to park in those spaces. Among companies that owned or leased parking spaces, less than 15 percent reported that their employees pay to park in those spaces (Table 16), with a slightly higher percent in the downtown area reporting their employees pay to park in those spaces than those outside downtown. Table 16: Employees Payment for Parking in Spaces Owned or Leased by Company Type of Parking Downtown High Density Not Downtown Low Density Not Downtown Parking spaces Employee Pays 13% 7% 4% owned or leased by Employee Does Not Pay 87% 93% 96% company Total 100% 100% 100% All companies, regardless of whether they owned or leased some parking, were asked whether employees had to pay to park in spaces not owned or leased by the company. Very few companies outside of downtown reported that employees had to pay to park in these types of spaces (Table 17). In downtown Denver, however, 40 percent of companies reported that employees do have to pay for parking in spaces not owned or leased by the company. These findings will be confirmed via the employee survey. Page 36

42 Table 17: Employees Payment for Parking in Non-Company Controlled Spaces Type of Parking Downtown High Density Not Downtown Low Density Not Downtown Parking that is not Employee Pays 40% 1% 2% owned or leased by Employee Does Not Pay 60% 99% 98% your company Total 100% 100% 100% In order to determine what proportion of companies had free parking always available to employees, a company was classified as employee does not pay if employees did not have to pay to park in spaces owned or leased by the company (when companies owned or leased parking) and did not have to pay to park in spaces not owned or leased by the company. Free parking was available to employees of more than half of the surveyed companies in downtown Denver (Table 18), while nearly all (95 percent or more) of the companies surveyed outside of downtown Denver had free parking available to employees. All parking, company provided or not (Companies could have both kinds of parking) Table 18: Employees Payment for Parking in Any Space High Density Not Type of Parking Downtown Downtown Low Density Not Downtown Employee Pays For At Least One Type of Space 46% 5% 4% Employee Does Not Pay 54% 95% 96% TOTAL 100% 100% 100% All companies were asked whether their customers have to pay for parking that is not owned or leased by the company. About three in five companies downtown reported that their customers have to pay for parking if they park in spaces not owned or leased by the company (Table 19). Outside of downtown, very few companies reported that their customers have to pay for parking that is not owned or leased by the company. Customers pay for parking that is not owned or leased by your company Table 19: Customers Payment for Parking in Company Controlled Spaces Downtown High Density Not Downtown Low Density Not Downtown Customer Pays 61% 5% 2% Customer Does Not Pay 39% 95% 98% Total 100% 100% 100% Page 37

43 Surveyed companies were asked whether they shared a parking lot with another business or businesses. Among those located in high-density areas outside of downtown Denver, 70 percent reported they did share a parking lot (Table 20). About 50 percent of companies in downtown Denver or in low-density areas outside of downtown reported they shared a parking lot. Companies who shared parking lots with other businesses were asked whether they run out of parking spaces in the shared lot. Only about 10 percent of those in the high-density areas outside of downtown with shared lots reported that they run out of parking spaces (Figure 17). About a quarter of those with shared spaces in downtown Denver reported they run out of parking spaces, and about a third of those in low-density areas outside of downtown said they run out of parking spaces in the shared lot. Table 20: Shared parking High Density Not Downtown Downtown Low Density Not Downtown Share a parking lot with other business(es) 47% 70% 50% Do not share a parking lot with other business(es) 53% 30% 50% Total 100% 100% 100% Figure 17: Do you run out of spaces at any time of day in this shared lot? Downtown 26% High Density Not Downtown 10% Low Density Not Downtown 33% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Percent respondent yes Page 38

44 Parking is most easily shared if businesses work on different schedules (e.g. an insurance company sharing a parking lot with a tavern) or if both have high turnover in parking (e.g. retail businesses where customers park for short periods of time throughout the day). Office businesses who shared parking tended to share their parking with other office-based businesses. However, retail, construction and service businesses shared parking with a variety of other businesses (Table 21). Table 21: Type of Company Share Parking with Number Type of company parking is shared with Business Type of businesse s who share parking Office based business Service(dry cleaning, gas station, health care) Restaurant, coffee shop, bar etc. Retail stores Professional, Scientific, Technical, Information Services 45 84% 16% 7% 7% Finance, Insurance, Real Estate, Leasing, Administration and Support and Management of Companies 39 97% 18% 13% 8% Retail Trade, Accommodation and Food Services and other services 45 47% 29% 42% 24% Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation, Wholesale Trade and Warehousing 20 75% 25% 20% 30% Health Care, Social Assistance, Education, Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation 15 87% 33% 20% 7% Mining, Oil and Gas, Agriculture and Utilities 6 100% 17% 17% 0% Page 39

45 Conclusion This research is the first step in documenting the evolution of TOD in metro Denver. The employee and resident surveys, to be implemented within the next few months, will complete the picture of the current state of TOD in metro Denver. Repeating these studies every five to ten years will reveal how people s attitudes, perceptions and behaviors change over time as the rail-transit system expands and TOD matures. This study s key findings indicate that metro Denver is early on the TOD evolutionary curve. An auto orientation still dominates business location decisions, relatively few businesses use TDM strategies, and free, convenient parking dominates station areas outside of downtown. Studies conducted across the country, specifically those conducted in more mature transit markets, provide a glimpse of what can be expected to occur in metro Denver as the transit system continues to expand. The Washington, D.C., Metrorail system is the most extensive network of any recent generation system in the country and has the highest recorded rail capture rates, according to TCRP Project H27. In contrast to the current business survey, a 2008 study of three Metrorail station areas in Arlington County, Virginia (Ballston, Crystal City and Rosslyn), found that businesses near these stations rated the ability to provide employees with commute options as more important than the availability of parking in their location decisions. The Arlington study further found that 58 percent of businesses located in the three station areas reported offering their employees free or subsidized transit subsidies, compared with only 23 percent in this study. The report for the Arlington County study can be found at: 0Study.pdf. Every market is different, however, and not all lessons from other markets can be applied directly to metro Denver. While research has shown that system extensiveness is positively correlated with transit ridership (TCRP 128), real change in travel behaviors are dependent on the specific policy and investment decisions that are made here. This research provides the opportunity to analyze how policy and investment decisions affect mode choice in metro Denver. Of particular interest are parking policies. According to TCRP Report 128, The availability of free or low-cost parking is a major deterrent to transit ridership. Also, a 2001 report by The Ralph & Goddy Lewis Center for Regional Policy Study stated that When commuters can park their cars for free at work, they are more likely to drive alone. The finding that free and convenient parking is abundant in metro Denver transit station areas suggests that policies aimed at reducing the availability of parking in these areas may boost transit ridership over time. However, until and unless people are provided with a transit system that can compete with the automobile, people will continue to drive and will require a place to park their cars. Page 40

46 Appendix A: Responses to Survey Questions The following pages contain a complete set of responses to each question on the survey. Position What is your position in the company? Number Percent Human resources personnel 11 5% Office manager 29 14% Manager/ assistant manager/ supervisor 36 18% Receptionist/ secretary/ assistant 15 7% CEO/ president/ vice president/ director/ officer 46 23% Owner 54 27% Other (non-administrative/ non-management) 12 6% Total % *Was not asked in the first 97 interviews. Other positions indicated Position in company Number Contractor 1 Geologist 1 Night instructor 1 Project engineer 1 Sales 2 Sales associate 1 Senior shipping coordinator 1 Senior underwriter 1 Third key 1 Travel agent 1 Refused 1 Average Number of Employees by Type Page 41

47 Including yourself, how many fulltime, parttime and contract employees do you have at this location? Number of businesses Average number of employees Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Full time ,400 Part time Contract All types ,200 Number of Employees at Businesses by Type Number of Full time Part time Contract All types employees N % N % N % N % None 12 4% % % 0 0% % % 43 14% % % 23 8% 5 2% 63 21% % 14 5% 4 1% 69 23% % 5 2% 4 1% 33 11% % 3 1% 5 2% 14 5% % 1 0% 1 0% 18 6% 500 or more 1 0% 1 0% 0 0% 1 0% Total % % % % Roughly, what percent of employees at your worksite work the following schedules: Average Percent of Employees Working each Schedule Type Number of businesses Average percent of employees Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Weekdays, daytime? % 1.48% 100% 100% 0% 100% Weekdays, evenings or night? % 1.42% 0% 0% 0% 100% Weekends? % 1.77% 0% 0% 0% 100% Page 42

48 Roughly, what percent of employees at your worksite work the following schedules: Average Percent of Employees Working each Schedule Type Number of businesses Average percent of employees Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Varying or unpredictable schedule? % 1.55% 0% 0% 0% 100% Page 43

49 Percent of Employees Working each Schedule Type Percent of Weekdays, daytime? Weekdays, evenings or night? Weekends? Varying or unpredictable schedule? employees N % N % N % N % None 8 3% % % % 1%-25% 14 5% 43 14% 45 15% 41 14% 26%-50% 9 3% 22 7% 27 9% 10 3% 51%-75% 25 8% 13 4% 8 3% 5 2% 76%-100% % 13 4% 29 10% 21 7% Total % % % % Business Facility Tenure Does your company rent or own your business facility? Number of businesses Percent Rent % Own 81 27% Don't know 2 1% Annual Rent Per Square Foot Number of businesses Percent Owns property 81 27% $0.25 to $ % $5.00 to $ % $10.00 to $ % $15.00 to $ % $25.00 to $ % $50.00 to $ % $ or more 12 4% Refused % Total % This question was not answered in a consistent manner and the data may be inaccurate Page 44

50 What is the square footage of this business facility? Number of businesses Average square footage Size of Business Facility Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum 259 7,722 1, ,155 1, ,197 Size of Business Facility Square footage Number of businesses Percent 0 to 999 sq. feet 45 15% 1,000 to 2,499 sq. feet 93 31% 2,500 to 4,999 sq. feet 47 16% 5,000 to 9,999 sq. feet 40 13% 10,000 sq. feet or more 34 11% Refused 41 14% Total % Businesses by North American Industry Classification System Code Number of NAICS Category businesses Percent Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction 6 2% Utilities 1 0% Construction 16 5% Manufacturing 11 4% Wholesale Trade 9 3% Retail Trade 36 12% Transportation and Warehousing 11 4% Information 5 2% Finance and Insurance 29 10% Real Estate and Rental and Leasing 27 9% Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services 61 20% Management of Companies and Enterprises 4 1% Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services 8 3% Educational Services 5 2% Health Care and Social Assistance 19 6% Accommodation and Food Services 30 10% Page 45

51 Businesses by North American Industry Classification System Code Number of NAICS Category businesses Percent Other Services (except Public Administration) 22 7% Total % Page 46

52 Number of Parking Spaces Owned Does your company own any parking spaces? Number of businesses Percent No spaces % 1-4 spaces 18 6% 5-9 spaces 18 6% spaces 10 3% spaces 15 5% 50 or more spaces 16 5% Total % Number of businesses Average Number of Parking Spaces Owned* Average number of spaces* Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum ,000 *If business owns spaces. Number of Company Parking Spaces included in Lease Do you have assigned spaces included in your building lease? Number of businesses Percent No spaces % 1-4 spaces 41 14% 5-9 spaces 18 6% spaces 5 2% spaces 9 3% 50 or more spaces 6 2% Total % Number of businesses Average Number of Parking Spaces Included in Lease* Average number of spaces included in lease* Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum *If spaces included in lease. Cost per Space for Parking Included in Lease* Number of businesses Percent $ % Page 47

53 Cost per Space for Parking Included in Lease* Number of businesses Percent $0.01 to $ % $25.00 to $ % $50.00 to $ % $100 or more 8 23% Total % * Of the 79 businesses with parking included in their lease, 34 did not know what portion of their lease covered parking Page 48

54 Number of Businesses Average Cost per Space for Parking Included in Lease Average Cost per Space Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum 35 $72.94 $13.60 $50.00 $.00 $.00 $ Number of Assigned Parking Spaces Separate from Lease How many assigned spaces do you lease separately from your building lease? Number of businesses Percent No spaces % 1-4 spaces 18 6% 5-9 spaces 5 2% spaces 5 2% spaces 2 1% 50 or more spaces 2 1% Total % Number of businesses Average Number of Assigned Parking Spaces Separate from Lease* Average number of spaces separate from lease* Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum *If business has spaces separate from lease. Cost per Space for Parking Spaces Separate from Lease* Number of businesses Percent $ % $0.01 to $ % $25.00 to $ % $50.00 to $ % $100 or more 15 60% Total % *Of the 32 businesses with parking separate from their lease, 7 did not know the cost Number of businesses Average Cost per Space for Parking Spaces Separate from Lease* Average Cost per Space Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum 26 $ $14.51 $ $85.00 $.68 $ Page 49

55 Company Charges Employees for Parking Do your employees pay for use of parking spaces that are either owned or leased by your company? Number of businesses Percent Yes 13 8% No % Employee Cost per Space Provided by Company Number of What is their monthly parking rate? businesses Percent $0.01 to $ % $25.00 to $ % $50.00 to $ % $100 or more 4 33% Total % Number of businesses Average Employee Cost per Space Provided by Company Average Cost per Space Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum 12 $77.50 $16.01 $72.50 $15.00 $15.00 $ Number of spaces Company owned parking spaces Number of Company Provided Spaces by Type Assigned spaces included in building lease Assigned spaces leased separately from building lease Total number of parking spaces owned or leased N % N % N % N % No spaces % % % % 1-4 spaces 18 6% 41 14% 18 6% 69 23% 5-9 spaces 18 6% 18 6% 5 2% 31 10% spaces 10 3% 5 2% 5 2% 22 7% spaces 15 5% 9 3% 2 1% 25 8% 50 or more spaces 16 5% 6 2% 2 1% 22 7% Employees Pay for Non-Company Parking Do any of your employees pay for parking that is not owned or leased by your company? Number of businesses Percent Yes 35 12% No % Page 50

56 Page 51

57 Employees Reimbursed for Non-Company Parking Are your employees reimbursed for parking that is not owned or leased by your company? Number of businesses Percent Yes 12 34% No 23 66% Employee Reimbursement for Non-Company Spaces Number of How much are employees reimbursed for this parking? businesses Percent $ % $50.00 to $ % $100 or more 9 26% Total % Number of businesses *If reimbursed Average Employee Reimbursement for Non-Company Spaces Average Reimbursement* Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum 12 $ $23.83 $ $ $55.00 $ Customers Pay for Non-Company Parking Do any of your customers pay for parking that is not owned or leased by your company? Number of businesses Percent Yes 57 19% No % Customers Reimbursed for Non-Company Parking Number of Do you reimburse your customers for this parking cost? businesses Percent Yes 13 23% No 44 77% Proximity to Free Parking How close is your business to parking that is free for both your company and your customers and employees? Number of businesses Percent Right next to your building % Within a block of your building 33 11% More than a block 67 22% Page 52

58 Shared Parking Do you share a parking lot with any other businesses? Number of businesses Percent Yes % No % Proportion of Parking Shared What percent of your total parking is shared with other businesses? Number of businesses Percent None % 1%-25% 17 6% 26%-50% 10 3% 51%-75% 5 2% 76%-100% % Number of businesses Average Proportion of Parking Shared* Average percent of total parking Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum % 2.20% 100% 100% 1% 100% *If share parking Page 53

59 Business Types Sharing Parking Lot What type of business do you share this lot with? Number of businesses Percent General office (law, insurance, temp help, marketing etc) 91 54% Financial (banking, investment, mortgage, accounting) 59 35% Restaurants 25 15% Health care (medical, dental, chiropractic, therapy) 25 15% Construction/trades (builder, plumber, painter, electrician) 12 7% Clothing/shoe stores 10 6% Beauty/nails/hair (spa/salon/products) 9 5% Real estate / property management/ architect 9 5% Many other businesses 9 5% Entertainment (theater, art gallery, museum) 8 5% Computer/Information Technology (IT)/Software and Hardware 8 5% Telecom field 8 5% Department stores 7 4% Non-profit organization 6 4% Other 6 4% Bars/ taverns/ night clubs 5 3% Dry cleaners/ laundry/ alterations/ tailors 5 3% Grocery/ drug/ convenience stores 4 2% Books, office supplies, print/photos shop, computer store 4 2% Hotel/motel 3 2% Coffee shops 2 1% Home improvement/hardware/paint and wallpaper stores 2 1% Sports and fitness (gyms/organizations) 2 1% Auto repair 2 1% Energy provision/consulting 2 1% Sporting good stores 1 1% Pet supply/veterinarian 1 1% Gas station 1 1% Aviation field 1 1% Respondents may choose more than one option. Shared Parking Capacity Do you run out of spaces at any time of day in this shared lot? Number of businesses Percent Yes 36 21% Page 54

60 Shared Parking Capacity Do you run out of spaces at any time of day in this shared lot? Number of businesses Percent No % Page 55

61 Sufficiency of Parking Overall, would you say you have access to too little parking, enough parking, or more than enough Parking for employees Parking for customers parking for your employees and customers? N % N % Too little 38 13% 52 17% Enough % % More than enough % % Parking Issues Do you have any of the following issues with parking? Number of businesses Percent None of these parking issues % Feels unsafe 20 7% It is poorly lit 19 6% It is difficult to access 16 5% It is too far away 14 5% Respondents may choose more than one option. Page 56

62 Proportion of Employees Using Alternate Modes of Transportation for Commute Can you tell us what proportion of your employees use modes other than a single occupant car to get to work on a regular basis? Modes other than a single occupant car Carpool Transit Walk or bike N % N % N % N % None % % % % 1%-25% 78 26% 28 9% 77 26% 59 20% 26%-50% 44 15% 2 1% 32 11% 11 4% 51%-75% 13 4% 1 0% 7 2% 1 0% 76%-100% 20 7% 1 0% 10 3% 3 1% Can you tell us what proportion of your employees use modes other than a single occupant car to get to work on a regular basis? Average Percent of Employees Using Alternate Modes of Transportation for Commute Number of businesses Average percent of employees Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Modes other than a single occupant car % 1.59% 1% 0% 0% 100% Carpool %.46% 0% 0% 0% 100% Transit % 1.29% 0% 0% 0% 100% Walk or bike %.75% 0% 0% 0% 100% Page 57

63 Transportation Management Strategies Do you use any of these strategies, or others, to influence how employees travel to and from work? Number of businesses Percent None of these % Free/subsidized transit passes, such as the Eco Pass 33 11% Secure bike storage 20 7% On-site amenities for walkers and bicyclists (i.e. showers, lockers) 13 4% Flexible work schedules (varying starting and ending times) 10 3% Guaranteed ride home 5 2% Organized carpooling 4 1% Organized vanpooling 3 1% Substituting "paid parking" with a commute allowance which could be used for bus or vanpool fares as well as parking fees 2 1% Teleworking (a regular, off-site work arrangement) 2 1% Shuttles to transit or other frequently used locations 1 0% Access to vehicles for mid-day trips 1 0% Access to bicycles for mid-day trips 1 0% Compressed work weeks (i.e. 40 hrs in 4 days, 80 hrs in 9 days) 1 0% Other 2 1% Respondents may choose more than one option. Page 58

64 Effectiveness of Transportation Management Strategies Do you think...is very effective, somewhat effective or not effective in reducing single car trips and parking needs? Very effective Somewhat effective Not effective Total Free/subsidized transit passes, such as the Eco N Pass? % 58% 32% 10% 100% N Organized carpooling % 50% 50% 0% 100% N Organized vanpooling % 33% 33% 33% 100% Substituting "paid parking" with a commute N allowance which could be used for bus or vanpool fares as well as parking fees % 50% 50% 0% 100% Shuttles to transit or other frequently used N locations % 0% 100% 0% 100% N Access to vehicles for mid-day trips % 0% 100% 0% 100% N Access to bicycles for mid-day trips % 100% 0% 0% 100% N Secure bike storage % 35% 55% 10% 100% On-site amenities for walkers and bicyclists (i.e. N showers, lockers) % 38% 46% 15% 100% N Guaranteed ride home % 40% 20% 40% 100% Teleworking (a regular, off-site work N arrangement) % 100% 0% 0% 100% Flexible work schedules (varying starting and N ending times) % 50% 20% 30% 100% Compressed work weeks (i.e. 40 hrs in 4 days, N hrs in 9 days) % 0% 100% 0% 100% N Other strategy % 75% 0% 25% 100% Asked only if business is using the transportation management strategy. Interest in Transportation Management Strategies Are you interested in learning more about transportation management strategies? Number of businesses Percent Page 59

65 Interest in Transportation Management Strategies Are you interested in learning more about transportation management strategies? Number of businesses Percent Yes 52 17% No % Page 60

66 Location Did you move to this location from another location or was this the first location for this business or a new branch of the business? Number of businesses Percent Moved % New location % New branch 15 5% Reasons for Choosing Current Location What were the three top reasons for choosing your current location? Number of businesses Percent Near main roads 98 33% Lease rates 81 27% Building structure 80 27% Don't know 45 15% Other complementary businesses 33 11% Close to home 33 11% Parking availability 23 8% Access to customers from employees at near by businesses 23 8% Central/downtown 20 7% Access to rail transit 17 6% Access to customers from near by residences 17 6% Owns the building 16 5% Supports brand positioning (being in young, green, urban area etc.) 14 5% Access to customer base 12 4% Location 12 4% Access to customers from rail station foot traffic 8 3% Security 3 1% Close to bus 2 1% Other 17 6% Timing of Move to Current Location When you made the decision to locate here, did you know the station would be built? Number of businesses Percent Moved before station, did not know about station % Moved before station, knew station was coming 16 5% Moved after rail station was open % Page 61

67 Page 62

68 Influence of Potential TOD Amenities on Location Choice Did your expectation of... have a strong influence, somewhat of an influence, or was not an influence in choosing this location. Customer foot traffic from the rail station Customer foot traffic from employees at nearby businesses Customer foot traffic from customers of nearby businesses Customer foot traffic from local residents Having access to a larger workforce through the rail transit system Your employees seeing the rail commute option as a benefit Your employees seeing access to restaurants, coffee shops or bars as a benefit Your employees seeing access to grocery stores and drug stores as a benefit Your employees seeing access to personal services (such as hair salons or dry cleaners) as a benefit Your employees seeing access to medical or daycare centers is seen as benefit by employees Strong influence Somewhat of an influence Not an influence Don't know N % 6% 12% 77% 4% N % 6% 18% 73% 4% N % 12% 17% 68% 4% N % 9% 9% 78% 4% N % 5% 16% 74% 5% N % 12% 27% 55% 5% N % 19% 24% 53% 5% N % 4% 13% 78% 4% N % 2% 11% 82% 5% N % 4% 6% 84% 6% Having easy access by car for customers N or employees % 40% 29% 27% 4% The availability of parking for customers N and employees % 32% 34% 29% 5% Asked only if moved after station built or knew that station would be built. (N=139) Page 63

69 ... and were your expectations of... fully met, somewhat met or not met? Customer foot traffic from the rail station Customer foot traffic from employees at nearby businesses Customer foot traffic from customers of nearby businesses Customer foot traffic from local residents Having access to a larger workforce through the rail transit system Your employees seeing the rail commute option as a benefit Your employees seeing access to restaurants, coffee shops or bars as a benefit Your employees seeing access to grocery stores and drug stores as a benefit Your employees seeing access to personal services (such as hair salons or dry cleaners) as a benefit Your employees seeing access to medical or daycare centers is seen as benefit by employees Effects of Expected TOD Amenities on Business Fully met Somewhat met Not met Don't know Total N % 38% 54% 8% 0% 100% N % 52% 36% 12% 0% 100% N % 38% 54% 8% 0% 100% N % 36% 60% 4% 0% 100% N % 45% 45% 10% 0% 100% N % 60% 36% 2% 2% 100% N % 63% 34% 3% 0% 100% N % 46% 54% 0% 0% 100% N % 50% 44% 6% 0% 100% N % 57% 36% 7% 0% 100% Having easy access by car for customers or N employees % 74% 23% 2% 1% 100% The availability of parking for customers and N employees % 64% 31% 5% 0% 100% Asked only if amenity was an influence on the location choice Importance of FasTracks Timing How important, if at all, is having FasTracks completed on schedule to achieving your business objectives? Number of businesses Percent Very important 47 16% Somewhat important 85 28% Not at all important % Page 64

70 Reasons for Choosing Current Location What other types of businesses, houses or other land uses would you most like to have move near you? Number of businesses Percent Don't know % Restaurants 62 21% Department stores 22 7% Grocery/ drug/ convenience stores 20 7% Multi family housing 17 6% Nothing more/ good as is 16 5% Clothing/shoe stores 15 5% General office (law, insurance, temp help, marketing etc) 15 5% Other 10 3% Coffee shops 9 3% Financial (banking, investment, mortgage, accounting) 9 3% Single family housing 9 3% Parks/ open space 9 3% Entertainment (theater, art gallery, museum) 8 3% Businesses/business parks 7 2% Sporting good stores 5 2% Gas station 5 2% Retail- general 5 2% Manufacturing/ industry 5 2% Hotel/motel 4 1% Beauty/nails/hair (spa/salon/products) 3 1% Home improvement/hardware/paint and wallpaper stores 3 1% Books, office supplies, print/photos shop, computer store 3 1% Bike paths/sidewalks 3 1% Parking 3 1% More rail stops/lines 3 1% Residential - general 3 1% Bars/ taverns/ night clubs 2 1% Dry cleaners/ laundry/ alterations/ tailors 2 1% Health care (medical, dental, chiropractic, therapy) 2 1% Sports and fitness (gyms/organizations) 2 1% Construction/trades (builder, plumber, painter, electrician) 2 1% Child care/day care 1 0% Computer/Information Technology (IT)/Software and Hardware 1 0% Page 65

71 Reasons for Choosing Current Location What other types of businesses, houses or other land uses would you most like to have move near you? Number of businesses Percent Auto repair 1 0% Real estate / property management/ architect 1 0% Page 66

72 Relocation Plans Do you plan to stay in this location for the next few years? Number of businesses Percent No % Yes 16 5% Relocation Timeline In what year do you intend to move? Number of businesses Percent % % Reasons for Planned Move Why do you want to move? Number of businesses Percent Too expensive 5 31% Need larger space 3 19% Need different building structure/amenities 3 19% Need smaller space 2 13% Closing business/retiring 2 13% Not enough parking 1 6% Lease is up 1 6% Bought new building 1 6% Eminent domain seizure by RTD 1 6% Relocation and Rail Transit Will you move to another location near a transit station or away from a transit station? Number of businesses Percent Near 7 44% Away from 5 31% Don't know 4 25% Gender of Employees Female Male Can you tell us what proportion of your employees are: N % N % None 31 10% 32 11% 1%-25% 53 18% 41 14% 26%-50% 96 32% 90 30% Page 67

73 Gender of Employees Female Male Can you tell us what proportion of your employees are: N % N % 51%-75% 60 20% 69 23% 76%-100% 58 19% 66 22% Page 68

74 Age of Employees Can you tell us what proportion of Under 30 years old Between 30 and 50 years old Over 50 years old your employees are: N % N % N % None 94 32% 44 15% % 1%-25% 87 30% 47 16% 78 27% 26%-50% 62 21% 81 28% 44 15% 51%-75% 21 7% 62 21% 31 11% 76%-100% 26 9% 56 19% 29 10% Employee Wages Can you tell us what proportion of Less than $10 per hour Between $10 and $20 per hour More than $20 per hour your employees earn: N % N % N % None % 66 25% 58 22% 1%-25% 24 9% 61 23% 43 16% 26%-50% 11 4% 56 21% 40 15% 51%-75% 9 3% 31 12% 36 13% 76%-100% 14 5% 54 20% 91 34% Participate in Employee Survey Would you be willing to have us send you a set of surveys for your employees? Number of businesses Percent Yes % No 73 24% Page 69

75 Appendix B: Responses to Survey Questions by Area The following pages contain a complete set of responses to each question on the survey. Position of Respondent by Area What is your position in the Downtown High Density Not Downtown Low Density Not Downtown company? N % N % N % Human resources personnel 3 6% 5 6% 3 4% Office manager 5 10% 16 20% 8 11% Manager/ assistant manager/ supervisor 8 17% 12 15% 16 22% Receptionist/ secretary/ assistant 6 13% 8 10% 1 1% CEO/ president/ vice president/ director/ officer 12 25% 25 30% 9 12% Owner 11 23% 12 15% 31 42% Other (non-administrative/ nonmanagement) 3 6% 4 5% 5 7% Total % % % *Was not asked in the first 97 interviews. Other positions indicated by Area Downtown High Density Not Downtown Low Density Not Downtown Number Number Number Project Engineer Geologist Contractor Sales Associate Sales Night Instructor Senior Shipping Coordinator Sales Senior Underwriter Third Key Travel Agent Page 70

76 Including yourself, how many fulltime, parttime and contract employees do you have at this location? Average Number of Employees by Type -Downtown Number of businesses Average number of employees Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Full time Part time Contract All types Including yourself, how many fulltime, parttime and contract employees do you have at this location? Average Number of Employees by Type - High Density Not Downtown Number of businesses Average number of employees Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Full time Part time Contract All types Including yourself, how many fulltime, parttime and contract employees do you have at this location? Average Number of Employees by Type - Low Density Not Downtown Number of businesses Average number of employees Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Full time ,400 Part time Page 71

77 Including yourself, how many fulltime, parttime and contract employees do you have at this location? Average Number of Employees by Type - Low Density Not Downtown Number of businesses Average number of employees Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Contract All types ,200 Page 72

78 Number of Full Time Employees by Area Including yourself, how many full-time Downtown High Density Not Downtown Low Density Not Downtown employees do you have at this location? N % N % N % Number of Businesses % % % None 3 4% 1 1% 8 7% % 36 33% 60 55% % 22 20% 22 20% % 24 22% 10 9% % 13 12% 6 5% % 10 9% 1 1% % 4 4% 2 2% 500 or more 0 0% 0 0% 1 1% Number of Part Time Employees by Area Including yourself, how many part-time Downtown High Density Not Downtown Low Density Not Downtown employees do you have at this location? N % N % N % Number of Businesses % % % None 40 50% 53 48% 55 50% % 42 38% 33 30% % 7 6% 12 11% % 7 6% 4 4% % 1 1% 3 3% % 0 0% 1 1% % 0 0% 1 1% 500 or more 0 0% 0 0% 1 1% Number of Contract Employees by Area Including yourself, how many contract Downtown High Density Not Downtown Low Density Not Downtown employees do you have at this location? N % N % N % Number of Businesses % % % None 63 79% 90 82% 85 77% % 13 12% 17 15% % 2 2% 3 3% % 2 2% 1 1% % 0 0% 3 3% Page 73

79 Number of Contract Employees by Area Including yourself, how many contract Downtown High Density Not Downtown Low Density Not Downtown employees do you have at this location? N % N % N % % 3 3% 0 0% % 0 0% 1 1% 500 or more 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Number of Employees by Area Including yourself, how many full-time, part-time and contract employees do you Downtown High Density Not Downtown Low Density Not Downtown have at this location? N % N % N % Number of Businesses % % % None 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% % 26 24% 45 41% % 28 25% 22 20% % 25 23% 26 24% % 15 14% 10 9% % 11 10% 0 0% % 5 5% 6 5% 500 or more 0 0% 0 0% 1 1% Roughly, what percent of employees at your worksite work the following schedules: Average Percent of Employees Working each Schedule Type - Downtown Number of businesses Average percent of employees Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Weekdays, daytime? % 2.90% 100% 100% 0% 100% Weekdays, evenings or night? % 2.07% 0% 0% 0% 100% Weekends? % 3.01% 0% 0% 0% 100% Varying or unpredictable schedule? % 3.36% 0% 0% 0% 100% Page 74

80 Average Percent of Employees Working each Schedule Type - High Density Not Downtown Roughly, what percent of employees at your worksite work the following schedules: Number of businesses Average percent of employees Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Weekdays, daytime? % 1.71% 100% 100% 5% 100% Weekdays, evenings or night? % 2.31% 0% 0% 0% 100% Weekends? % 2.44% 0% 0% 0% 100% Varying or unpredictable schedule? % 1.61% 0% 0% 0% 100% Average Percent of Employees Working each Schedule Type - Low Density Not Downtown Roughly, what percent of employees at your worksite work the following schedules: Number of businesses Average percent of employees Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Weekdays, daytime? % 2.90% 100% 100% 0% 100% Weekdays, evenings or night? % 2.67% 0% 0% 0% 100% Weekends? % 3.42% 0% 0% 0% 100% Varying or unpredictable schedule? % 3.02% 0% 0% 0% 100% Percent of Employees Working each Schedule Type - Downtown Percent of Weekdays, daytime? Weekdays, evenings or night? Weekends? Varying or unpredictable schedule? employees N % N % N % N % None 3 4% 59 74% 57 71% 57 71% 1%-25% 3 4% 13 16% 9 11% 11 14% Page 75

81 Percent of Employees Working each Schedule Type - Downtown Percent of Weekdays, daytime? Weekdays, evenings or night? Weekends? Varying or unpredictable schedule? employees N % N % N % N % 26%-50% 4 5% 6 8% 8 10% 4 5% 51%-75% 6 8% 1 1% 1 1% 1 1% 76%-100% 64 80% 1 1% 5 6% 7 9% Total % % % % Page 76

82 Percent of Employees Working each Schedule Type - High Density Not Downtown Varying or Percent of Weekdays, daytime? Weekdays, evenings or night? Weekends? unpredictable schedule? employees N % N % N % N % None 0 0% 80 73% 78 71% 90 82% 1%-25% 3 3% 14 13% 16 15% 13 12% 26%-50% 3 3% 6 5% 6 5% 4 4% 51%-75% 5 5% 6 5% 3 3% 1 1% 76%-100% 99 90% 4 4% 7 6% 2 2% Total % % % % Percent of Employees Working each Schedule Type - Low Density Not Downtown Varying or Percent of Weekdays, daytime? Weekdays, evenings or night? Weekends? unpredictable schedule? employees N % N % N % N % None 5 5% 70 64% 56 51% 76 69% 1%-25% 8 7% 16 15% 20 18% 17 15% 26%-50% 2 2% 10 9% 13 12% 2 2% 51%-75% 14 13% 6 5% 4 4% 3 3% 76%-100% 81 74% 8 7% 17 15% 12 11% Total % % % % Business Facility Tenure by Area SAMPLE GROUP Does your company rent or own Downtown High Density Not Downtown Low Density Not Downtown your business facility? N % N % N % Rent 65 81% 82 75% 70 64% Own 13 16% 28 25% 40 36% Don't know 2 3% 0 0% 0 0% Page 77

83 Annual Rent Per Square Foot by Area Downtown High Density Not Downtown Low Density Not Downtown N % N % N % Owns property 13 16% 28 25% 40 36% $0.25 to $ % 5 5% 6 5% $5.00 to $ % 9 8% 6 5% $10.00 to $ % 9 8% 8 7% $15.00 to $ % 8 7% 7 6% $25.00 to $ % 7 6% 4 4% $50.00 to $ % 1 1% 1 1% $ or more 4 5% 1 1% 7 6% Refused 31 39% 42 38% 31 28% Total % % % This question was not answered in a consistent manner and the data may be inaccurate What is the square footage of this business facility? Number of businesses Size of Business Facility by Area Average square footage Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Downtown 69 9,971 4, ,000 1, ,197 High Density Not Downtown 97 9,215 2, ,400 1, ,396 Low Density Not Downtown 93 4, ,200 2, ,000 Page 78

84 Square footage Size of Business Facility by Area High Density Not Low Density Not Downtown Downtown Downtown N % N % N % 0 to 999 sq. feet 15 19% 12 11% 18 16% 1,000 to 2,499 sq. feet 25 31% 38 35% 30 27% 2,500 to 4,999 sq. feet 11 14% 18 16% 18 16% 5,000 to 9,999 sq. feet 6 8% 13 12% 21 19% 10,000 sq. feet or more 12 15% 16 15% 6 5% Refused 11 14% 13 12% 17 15% Total % % % Page 79

85 Businesses by North American Industry Classification System Code by Area Downtown High Density Not Downtown Low Density Not Downtown NAICS Category N % N % N % Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction 4 5% 2 2% 0 0% Utilities 0 0% 1 1% 0 0% Construction 0 0% 3 3% 7 7% Manufacturing 3 4% 2 2% 7 7% Wholesale Trade 3 4% 4 4% 10 9% Retail Trade 8 10% 5 5% 18 17% Transportation and Warehousing 2 3% 4 4% 1 1% Information 1 1% 3 3% 0 0% Finance and Insurance 9 12% 18 17% 3 3% Real Estate and Rental and Leasing 5 6% 11 10% 9 8% Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services 25 32% 28 26% 11 10% Management of Companies and Enterprises 2 3% 0 0% 1 1% Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services 5 6% 6 6% 3 3% Educational Services 1 1% 1 1% 2 2% Health Care and Social Assistance 0 0% 7 6% 13 12% Accommodation and Food Services 6 8% 10 9% 11 10% Other Services (except Public Administration) 3 4% 3 3% 11 10% Total % % % Page 80

86 Number of Parking Spaces Owned by Area by Area Does your company own any Downtown High Density Not Downtown Low Density Not Downtown parking spaces? N % N % N % No spaces 70 88% 81 74% 72 65% 1-4 spaces 5 6% 5 5% 8 7% 5-9 spaces 2 3% 4 4% 12 11% spaces 2 3% 2 2% 6 5% spaces 0 0% 8 7% 7 6% 50 or more spaces 1 1% 10 9% 5 5% Total % % % Number of businesses Average Number of Parking Spaces Owned by Area* Average number of spaces* Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Downtown High Density Not Downtown Low Density Not Downtown ,000 *If business owns spaces. Number of Company Parking Spaces included in Lease by Area Do you have assigned spaces Downtown High Density Not Downtown Low Density Not Downtown included in your building lease? N % N % N % No spaces 62 78% 69 63% 90 82% 1-4 spaces 12 15% 19 17% 10 9% 5-9 spaces 3 4% 10 9% 5 5% spaces 0 0% 3 3% 2 2% spaces 1 1% 6 5% 2 2% 50 or more spaces 2 3% 3 3% 1 1% Total % % % Page 81

87 Average Number of Parking Spaces Included in Lease by Area* Number of businesses Average number of spaces included in lease* Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Downtown High Density Not Downtown Low Density Not Downtown *If spaces included in lease. Cost per Space for Parking Included in Lease by Area* Downtown High Density Not Downtown Low Density Not Downtown N % N % N % $ % 2 11% 3 50% $0.01 to $ % 2 11% 2 33% $25.00 to $ % 6 32% 0 0% $50.00 to $ % 8 42% 1 17% $100 or more 7 70% 1 5% 0 0% Total % % 6 100% * Of the 79 businesses with parking included in their lease, 34 did not know what portion of their lease covered parking Average Cost per Space for Parking Included in Lease by Area Number of businesses Average Cost per Space Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Downtown 10 $ $28.39 $ $ $.00 $ High Density Not Downtown 19 $49.40 $11.97 $46.15 $.00 $.00 $ Low Density Not Downtown 6 $13.19 $7.94 $6.25 $.00 $.00 $50.00 Page 82

88 Number of Assigned Parking Spaces Separate from Lease by Area How many assigned spaces do you lease Downtown High Density Not Downtown Low Density Not Downtown separately from your building lease? N % N % N % No spaces 55 69% % % 1-4 spaces 14 18% 2 2% 2 2% 5-9 spaces 5 6% 0 0% 0 0% spaces 3 4% 1 1% 1 1% spaces 2 3% 0 0% 0 0% 50 or more spaces 1 1% 1 1% 0 0% Total % % % Average Number of Assigned Parking Spaces Separate from Lease by Area* Number of businesses Average number of spaces separate from lease* Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Downtown High Density Not Downtown Low Density Not Downtown *If business has spaces separate from lease. Cost per Space for Parking Spaces Separate from Lease by Area* Downtown High Density Not Downtown Low Density Not Downtown N % N % N % $ % 0 0% 0 0% $0.01 to $ % 2 50% 0 0% $25.00 to $ % 0 0% 0 0% $50.00 to $ % 2 50% 0 0% $100 or more 13 68% 0 0% 2 100% Total % 4 100% 2 100% * Of the 32 businesses with parking separate from their lease, 7 did not know the cost Page 83

89 Average Cost per Space for Parking Spaces Separate from Lease by Area* Number of businesses Average Cost per Space Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Downtown 20 $ $15.84 $ $85.00 $.68 $ High Density Not Downtown 4 $39.58 $14.25 $35.00 $13.33 $13.33 $75.00 Low Density Not Downtown 2 $ $50.00 $ $ $ $ Company Charges Employees for Parking by Area Do your employees pay for use of parking spaces that are either owned or leased by Downtown High Density Not Downtown Low Density Not Downtown your company? N % N % N % Yes 6 13% 5 7% 2 4% No 40 87% 64 93% 53 96% Employee Cost per Space Provided by Company by Area What is their monthly Downtown High Density Not Downtown Low Density Not Downtown parking rate? N % N % N % $0.01 to $ % 1 25% 0 0% $25.00 to $ % 2 50% 1 50% $50.00 to $ % 1 25% 0 0% $100 or more 3 50% 0 0% 1 50% Total 6 100% 4 100% 2 100% Average Employee Cost per Space Provided by Company by Area Number of businesses Average Cost per Space Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Downtown 6 $ $24.45 $ $20.00 $20.00 $ High Density Not Downtown 4 $35.00 $9.35 $32.50 $15.00 $15.00 $60.00 Low Density Not Downtown 2 $70.00 $30.00 $70.00 $40.00 $40.00 $ Page 84

90 Number of spaces Company owned parking spaces Number of Company Provided Spaces by Type - Downtown Assigned spaces included in building lease Assigned spaces leased separately from building lease Total number of parking spaces owned or leased N % N % N % N % No spaces 70 88% 62 78% 55 69% 34 43% 1-4 spaces 5 6% 12 15% 14 18% 26 33% 5-9 spaces 2 3% 3 4% 5 6% 7 9% spaces 2 3% 0 0% 3 4% 5 6% spaces 0 0% 1 1% 2 3% 4 5% 50 or more spaces 1 1% 2 3% 1 1% 4 5% Number of spaces Number of Company Provided Spaces by Type - High Density Not Downtown Company owned parking spaces Assigned spaces included in building lease Assigned spaces leased separately from building lease Total number of parking spaces owned or leased N % N % N % N % No spaces 81 74% 69 63% % 41 37% 1-4 spaces 5 5% 19 17% 2 2% 24 22% 5-9 spaces 4 4% 10 9% 0 0% 13 12% spaces 2 2% 3 3% 1 1% 6 5% spaces 8 7% 6 5% 0 0% 13 12% 50 or more spaces 10 9% 3 3% 1 1% 13 12% Page 85

91 Number of spaces Company owned parking spaces Number of Company Provided Spaces by Type - Low Density Not Downtown Assigned spaces included in building lease Assigned spaces leased separately from building lease Total number of parking spaces owned or leased N % N % N % N % No spaces 72 65% 90 82% % 56 51% 1-4 spaces 8 7% 10 9% 2 2% 19 17% 5-9 spaces 12 11% 5 5% 0 0% 11 10% spaces 6 5% 2 2% 1 1% 11 10% spaces 7 6% 2 2% 0 0% 8 7% 50 or more spaces 5 5% 1 1% 0 0% 5 5% Page 86

92 Do any of your employees pay for parking that is not owned or leased by your company? Employees Pay for Non-Company Parking by Area High Density Not Downtown Downtown Low Density Not Downtown N % N % N % Yes 32 40% 1 1% 2 2% No 48 60% % % Are your employees reimbursed for parking that is not owned or leased by your company? Employees Reimbursed for Non-Company Parking by Area Downtown High Density Not Downtown Low Density Not Downtown N % N % N % Yes 10 31% 0 0% 2 100% No 22 69% 1 100% 0 0% Employee Reimbursement for Non-Company Spaces by Area How much are employees reimbursed Downtown High Density Not Downtown Low Density Not Downtown for this parking? N % N % N % $ % 1 100% 0 0% $50.00 to $ % 0 0% 0 0% $100 or more 7 22% 0 0% 2 100% Total % 1 100% 2 100% Average Employee Reimbursement for Non-Company Spaces by Area Number of businesses Average Reimbursement* Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Downtown 10 $ $22.90 $ $ $55.00 $ High Density Not Downtown 0 Low Density Not Downtown 2 $ $50.00 $ $ $ $ *If reimbursed Page 87

93 Do any of your customers pay for parking that is not owned or leased by your company? Customers Pay for Non-Company Parking by Area High Density Not Downtown Downtown Low Density Not Downtown N % N % N % Yes 49 61% 6 5% 2 2% No 31 39% % % Customers Reimbursed for Non-Company Parking by Area Do you reimburse your customers for this Downtown High Density Not Downtown Low Density Not Downtown parking cost? N % N % N % Yes 11 22% 2 33% 0 0% No 38 78% 4 67% 2 100% How close is your business to parking that is free for both your company and your customers and employees? Proximity to Free Parking by Area High Density Not Downtown Downtown Low Density Not Downtown N % N % N % Right next to your building 14 18% 91 83% 95 86% Within a block of your building 5 6% 15 14% 13 12% More than a block 61 76% 4 4% 2 2% Shared Parking by Area Do you share a High Density Not Low Density Not parking lot with any Downtown Downtown Downtown other businesses? N % N % N % Yes 38 48% 77 70% 55 50% No 42 53% 33 30% 55 50% Page 88

94 Proportion of Parking Shared by Area What percent of your High Density Not Low Density Not total parking is shared Downtown Downtown Downtown with other businesses? N % N % N % None 42 53% 33 30% 55 50% 1%-25% 6 8% 4 4% 7 6% 26%-50% 0 0% 7 6% 3 3% 51%-75% 1 1% 2 2% 2 2% 76%-100% 31 39% 64 58% 43 39% Number of businesses Average Proportion of Parking Shared by Area* Average percent of total parking Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Downtown % 5.68% 100% 100% 1% 100% High Density Not Downtown % 2.76% 100% 100% 2% 100% Low Density Not Downtown % 4.05% 100% 100% 1% 100% *If share parking What type of business do you share this lot with? Business Types Sharing Parking Lot by Area Downtown High Density Not Downtown Low Density Not Downtown N % N % N % General office (law, insurance, temp help, marketing etc) 21 55% 57 74% 13 24% Financial (banking, investment, mortgage, accounting) 12 32% 36 47% 11 20% Restaurants 3 8% 8 10% 14 25% Health care (medical, dental, chiropractic, therapy) 3 8% 13 17% 9 16% Construction/trades (builder, plumber, painter, electrician) 2 5% 5 6% 5 9% Clothing/shoe stores 2 5% 3 4% 5 9% Page 89

95 What type of business do you share this lot with? Business Types Sharing Parking Lot by Area Downtown High Density Not Downtown Low Density Not Downtown N % N % N % Beauty/nails/hair (spa/salon/products) 0 0% 0 0% 9 16% Real estate / property management/ architect 3 8% 5 6% 1 2% Many other businesses 3 8% 0 0% 6 11% Entertainment (theater, art gallery, museum) 1 3% 3 4% 4 7% Computer/Information Technology (IT)/Software and Hardware 0 0% 7 9% 1 2% Telecom field 0 0% 3 4% 5 9% Department stores 2 5% 1 1% 4 7% Non-profit organization 1 3% 4 5% 1 2% Other 5 13% 0 0% 1 2% Bars/ taverns/ night clubs 2 5% 0 0% 3 5% Dry cleaners/ laundry/ alterations/ tailors 0 0% 0 0% 5 9% Grocery/ drug/ convenience stores 2 5% 0 0% 2 4% Books, office supplies, print/photos shop, computer store 0 0% 1 1% 3 5% Hotel/motel 3 8% 0 0% 0 0% Coffee shops 1 3% 0 0% 1 2% Home improvement/hardware/paint and wallpaper stores 0 0% 1 1% 1 2% Sports and fitness (gyms/organizations) 1 3% 0 0% 1 2% Auto repair 0 0% 0 0% 2 4% Energy provision/consulting 0 0% 2 3% 0 0% Sporting good stores 0 0% 0 0% 1 2% Pet supply/veterinarian 0 0% 0 0% 1 2% Gas station 0 0% 0 0% 1 2% Aviation field 0 0% 1 1% 0 0% Respondents may choose more than one option. Page 90

96 Shared Parking Capacity by Area Do you run out of High Density Not Low Density Not spaces at any time of Downtown Downtown Downtown day in this shared lot? N % N % N % Yes 10 26% 8 10% 18 33% No 28 74% 69 90% 37 67% Page 91

97 Sufficiency of Parking for Employees by Area Overall, would you say you have access to too little parking, enough parking, or more than Downtown High Density Not Downtown Low Density Not Downtown enough parking for your employees? N % N % N % Too little 13 16% 7 6% 18 16% Enough 32 40% 53 48% 47 43% More than enough 35 44% 50 45% 45 41% Sufficiency of Parking for Customers by Area Overall, would you say you have access to too little parking, enough parking, or more than Downtown High Density Not Downtown Low Density Not Downtown enough parking for your customers? N % N % N % Too little 20 25% 10 9% 22 20% Enough 31 39% 53 48% 48 44% More than enough 29 36% 47 43% 40 36% Do you have any of the following issues with parking? Parking Issues by Area High Density Not Low Density Not Downtown Downtown Downtown N % N % N % None of these parking issues 63 79% % 89 81% Feels unsafe 7 9% 2 2% 11 10% It is poorly lit 5 6% 4 4% 10 9% It is difficult to access 9 11% 1 1% 6 5% It is too far away 8 10% 1 1% 5 5% Respondents may choose more than one option. Page 92

98 Proportion of Employees Using Alternate Modes of Transportation for Commute - Downtown Can you tell us what proportion of your employees use modes other than a single occupant car to get to work on a regular basis? Modes other than a single occupant car Carpool Transit Walk or bike N % N % N % N % None 16 20% 65 81% 24 30% 47 59% 1%-25% 17 21% 13 16% 23 29% 25 31% 26%-50% 22 28% 1 1% 19 24% 6 8% 51%-75% 12 15% 0 0% 7 9% 1 1% 76%-100% 13 16% 1 1% 7 9% 1 1% Proportion of Employees Using Alternate Modes of Transportation for Commute - High Density Not Downtown Can you tell us what proportion of your employees use modes other than a single occupant car to get to work on a regular basis? Modes other than a single occupant car Carpool Transit Walk or bike N % N % N % N % None 67 61% 98 89% 75 68% 97 88% 1%-25% 36 33% 11 10% 32 29% 12 11% 26%-50% 7 6% 1 1% 3 3% 1 1% 51%-75% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 76%-100% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Proportion of Employees Using Alternate Modes of Transportation for Commute - Low Density Not Downtown Can you tell us what proportion of your employees use modes other than a single occupant car to get to work on a regular basis? Modes other than a single occupant car Carpool Transit Walk or bike N % N % N % N % None 62 56% % 75 68% 82 75% 1%-25% 25 23% 4 4% 22 20% 22 20% 26%-50% 15 14% 0 0% 10 9% 4 4% 51%-75% 1 1% 1 1% 0 0% 0 0% Page 93

99 Proportion of Employees Using Alternate Modes of Transportation for Commute - Low Density Not Downtown Can you tell us what proportion of your employees use modes other than a single occupant car to get to work on a regular basis? Modes other than a single occupant car Carpool Transit Walk or bike N % N % N % N % 76%-100% 7 6% 0 0% 3 3% 2 2% Page 94

100 Average Percent of Employees Using Alternate Modes of Transportation for Commute by Area Can you tell us what proportion of your employees use modes other than a single occupant car to get to work on a regular basis? Number of businesses Average percent of employees Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Downtown % 3.71% 33% 0% 0% 100% High Density Not Downtown % 1.06% 0% 0% 0% 50% Low Density Not Downtown % 2.43% 0% 0% 0% 100% Can you tell us what proportion of your employees carpool to get to work on a regular basis? Average Percent of Employees Carpooling for Commute by Area Number of businesses Average percent of employees Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Downtown % 1.39% 0% 0% 0% 100% High Density Not Downtown %.40% 0% 0% 0% 30% Low Density Not Downtown %.63% 0% 0% 0% 60% Can you tell us what proportion of your employees use transit to get to work on a regular basis? Average Percent of Employees Use Transit for Commute by Area Number of businesses Average percent of employees Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Downtown % 3.39% 20% 0% 0% 100% High Density %.80% 0% 0% 0% 40% Page 95

101 Can you tell us what proportion of your employees use transit to get to work on a regular basis? Not Downtown Average Percent of Employees Use Transit for Commute by Area Number of businesses Average percent of employees Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Low Density Not Downtown % 1.78% 0% 0% 0% 100% Page 96

102 Can you tell us what proportion of your employees walk or bike to get to work on a regular basis? Average Percent of Employees Walk or Bike for Commute by Area Number of businesses Average percent of employees Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Downtown % 1.90% 0% 0% 0% 100% High Density Not Downtown %.45% 0% 0% 0% 27% Low Density Not Downtown % 1.37% 0% 0% 0% 100% Page 97

103 Transportation Management Strategies by Area Do you use any of these strategies, or others, to influence how employees travel to and Downtown High Density Not Downtown Low Density Not Downtown from work? N % N % N % None of these 43 54% 93 85% 95 86% Free/subsidized transit passes, such as the Eco Pass 26 33% 4 4% 3 3% Secure bike storage 6 8% 5 5% 9 8% On-site amenities for walkers and bicyclists (i.e. showers, lockers) 2 3% 6 5% 5 5% Flexible work schedules (varying starting and ending times) 4 5% 4 4% 2 2% Guaranteed ride home 3 4% 0 0% 2 2% Organized carpooling 2 3% 0 0% 2 2% Organized vanpooling 3 4% 0 0% 0 0% Substituting "paid parking" with a commute allowance which could be used for bus or vanpool fares as well as parking fees 2 3% 0 0% 0 0% Teleworking (a regular, off-site work arrangement) 0 0% 2 2% 0 0% Other 1 1% 1 1% 0 0% Shuttles to transit or other frequently used locations 0 0% 0 0% 1 1% Access to vehicles for mid-day trips 1 1% 0 0% 0 0% Access to bicycles for mid-day trips 1 1% 0 0% 0 0% Compressed work weeks (i.e. 40 hrs in 4 days, 80 hrs in 9 days) 0 0% 1 1% 0 0% Respondents may choose more than one option. Page 98

104 Effectiveness of Transportation Management Strategies - Downtown Do you think...is very effective, somewhat effective or not effective in reducing single car trips and parking needs? Very effective Somewhat effective Not effective Total Free/subsidized transit passes, such as the Eco N Pass? % 67% 29% 4% 100% N Organized carpooling % 0% 100% 0% 100% N Organized vanpooling % 33% 33% 33% 100% Substituting "paid parking" with a commute N allowance which could be used for bus or vanpool fares as well as parking fees % 50% 50% 0% 100% N Access to vehicles for mid-day trips % 0% 100% 0% 100% N Access to bicycles for mid-day trips % 100% 0% 0% 100% N Secure bike storage % 17% 83% 0% 100% On-site amenities for walkers and bicyclists (i.e. N showers, lockers) % 0% 100% 0% 100% N Guaranteed ride home % 0% 33% 67% 100% Flexible work schedules (varying starting and N ending times) % 50% 0% 50% 100% N Other strategy % 100% 0% 0% 100% Asked only if business is using the transportation management strategy. Page 99

105 Effectiveness of Transportation Management Strategies - High Density Not Downtown Do you think...is very effective, somewhat effective or not effective in reducing single car trips and parking needs? Very effective Somewhat effective Not effective Total Free/subsidized transit passes, such as the N Eco Pass? % 50% 25% 25% 100% N Secure bike storage % 20% 60% 20% 100% On-site amenities for walkers and bicyclists N (i.e. showers, lockers) % 50% 17% 33% 100% Teleworking (a regular, off-site work N arrangement) % 100% 0% 0% 100% Flexible work schedules (varying starting and N ending times) % 25% 50% 25% 100% Compressed work weeks (i.e. 40 hrs in 4 days, N hrs in 9 days) % 0% 100% 0% 100% N Other strategy % 0% 0% 100% 100% Asked only if business is using the transportation management strategy. Effectiveness of Transportation Management Strategies - Low Density Not Downtown Do you think...is very effective, somewhat effective or not effective in reducing single car trips and parking needs? Free/subsidized transit passes, such as the Eco Pass? Organized carpooling Shuttles to transit or other frequently used locations Secure bike storage On-site amenities for walkers and bicyclists (i.e. showers, lockers) Guaranteed ride home Flexible work schedules (varying starting and ending times) Very effective Somewhat effective Not effective Total N % 0% 67% 33% 100% N % 100% 0% 0% 100% N % 0% 100% 0% 100% N % 56% 33% 11% 100% N % 40% 60% 0% 100% N % 100% 0% 0% 100% N % 100% 0% 0% 100% Page 100

106 Asked only if business is using the transportation management strategy. Page 101

107 Interest in Transportation Management Strategies by Area Are you interested in learning more about Downtown High Density Not Downtown Low Density Not Downtown transportation management strategies? N % N % N % Yes 11 14% 20 18% 21 19% No 69 86% 90 82% 89 81% Did you move to this location from another location or was this the first location for this business or a new branch of the business? Location by Area High Density Not Downtown Downtown Low Density Not Downtown N % N % N % Moved 29 36% 49 45% 45 41% New location 46 58% 57 52% 59 54% New branch 5 6% 4 4% 6 5% Page 102

108 Reasons for Choosing Current Location by Area What were the three top reasons for Downtown High Density Not Downtown Low Density Not Downtown choosing your current location? N % N % N % Near main roads 20 25% 38 35% 40 36% Lease rates 24 30% 30 27% 27 25% Building structure 18 23% 36 33% 26 24% Don't know 14 18% 19 17% 12 11% Other complementary businesses 9 11% 5 5% 19 17% Close to home 2 3% 14 13% 17 15% Parking availability 3 4% 13 12% 7 6% Access to customers from employees at near by businesses 4 5% 11 10% 8 7% Central/downtown 10 13% 5 5% 5 5% Access to rail transit 5 6% 4 4% 8 7% Access to customers from near by residences 5 6% 6 5% 6 5% Other 6 8% 5 5% 6 5% Owns the building 2 3% 6 5% 8 7% Supports brand positioning (being in young, green, urban area etc.) 6 8% 3 3% 5 5% Access to customer base 6 8% 4 4% 2 2% Location 3 4% 6 5% 3 3% Access to customers from rail station foot traffic 3 4% 5 5% 0 0% Security 0 0% 2 2% 1 1% Close to bus 0 0% 0 0% 2 2% When you made the decision to locate here, did you know the station would be built? Timing of Move to Current Location by Area Downtown High Density Not Downtown Low Density Not Downtown N % N % N % Moved before station, did not know about station 23 29% 82 75% 56 51% Moved before station, knew station was coming 3 4% 8 7% 5 5% Moved after rail station was open 54 68% 20 18% 49 45% Page 103

109 Page 104

110 Influence of Potential TOD Amenities on Location Choice - Downtown Did your expectation of... have a strong influence, somewhat of an influence, or was not an influence in choosing this location. Customer foot traffic from the rail station Customer foot traffic from employees at nearby businesses Customer foot traffic from customers of nearby businesses Customer foot traffic from local residents Having access to a larger workforce through the rail transit system Your employees seeing the rail commute option as a benefit Your employees seeing access to restaurants, coffee shops or bars as a benefit Your employees seeing access to grocery stores and drug stores as a benefit Your employees seeing access to personal services (such as hair salons or dry cleaners) as a benefit Your employees seeing access to medical or daycare centers is seen as benefit by employees Strong influence Somewhat of an influence Not an influence Don't know N % 11% 7% 81% 2% N % 9% 21% 68% 2% N % 11% 21% 67% 2% N % 5% 11% 82% 2% N % 7% 18% 72% 4% N % 16% 26% 54% 4% N % 26% 30% 40% 4% N % 0% 12% 84% 4% N % 0% 14% 82% 4% N % 2% 5% 89% 4% Having easy access by car for customers N or employees % 25% 28% 44% 4% The availability of parking for customers N and employees % 19% 42% 35% 4% Asked only if moved after station built or knew that station would be built. (N=57) Page 105

111 Influence of Potential TOD Amenities on Location Choice - High Density Not Downtown Did your expectation of... have a strong influence, somewhat of an influence, or was not an influence in choosing this location. Customer foot traffic from the rail station Customer foot traffic from employees at nearby businesses Customer foot traffic from customers of nearby businesses Customer foot traffic from local residents Having access to a larger workforce through the rail transit system Your employees seeing the rail commute option as a benefit Your employees seeing access to restaurants, coffee shops or bars as a benefit Your employees seeing access to grocery stores and drug stores as a benefit Your employees seeing access to personal services (such as hair salons or dry cleaners) as a benefit Your employees seeing access to medical or daycare centers is seen as benefit by employees Strong influence Somewhat of an influence Not an influence Don't know N % 0% 14% 82% 4% N % 0% 14% 82% 4% N % 4% 4% 89% 4% N % 4% 0% 93% 4% N % 4% 14% 79% 4% N % 4% 43% 46% 7% N % 18% 21% 57% 4% N % 7% 7% 82% 4% N % 0% 4% 93% 4% N % 4% 11% 82% 4% Having easy access by car for customers N or employees % 57% 29% 11% 4% The availability of parking for customers N and employees % 43% 29% 21% 7% Asked only if moved after station built or knew that station would be built. (N=28) Page 106

112 Influence of Potential TOD Amenities on Location Choice - Low Density Not Downtown Did your expectation of... have a strong influence, somewhat of an influence, or was not an influence in choosing this location. Customer foot traffic from the rail station Customer foot traffic from employees at nearby businesses Customer foot traffic from customers of nearby businesses Customer foot traffic from local residents Having access to a larger workforce through the rail transit system Your employees seeing the rail commute option as a benefit Your employees seeing access to restaurants, coffee shops or bars as a benefit Your employees seeing access to grocery stores and drug stores as a benefit Your employees seeing access to personal services (such as hair salons or dry cleaners) as a benefit Your employees seeing access to medical or daycare centers is seen as benefit by employees Strong influence Somewhat of an influence Not an influence Don't know N % 6% 17% 70% 7% N % 6% 17% 72% 6% N % 17% 19% 57% 7% N % 15% 13% 65% 7% N % 4% 15% 74% 7% N % 13% 20% 61% 6% N % 11% 19% 63% 7% N % 7% 17% 70% 6% N % 6% 11% 76% 7% N % 6% 6% 80% 9% Having easy access by car for customers N or employees % 48% 30% 17% 6% The availability of parking for customers N and employees % 39% 28% 28% 6% Asked only if moved after station built or knew that station would be built. (N=54) Page 107

113 Effects of Expected TOD Amenities on Business - Downtown... and were your expectations of... fully met, somewhat met or not met? Customer foot traffic from the rail station Customer foot traffic from employees at nearby businesses Customer foot traffic from customers of nearby businesses Customer foot traffic from local residents Having access to a larger workforce through the rail transit system Your employees seeing the rail commute option as a benefit Your employees seeing access to restaurants, coffee shops or bars as a benefit Your employees seeing access to grocery stores and drug stores as a benefit Your employees seeing access to personal services (such as hair salons or dry cleaners) as a benefit Your employees seeing access to medical or daycare centers is seen as benefit by employees Fully met Somewhat met Not met Don't know Total N % 20% 70% 10% 0% 100% N % 53% 35% 12% 0% 100% N % 50% 50% 0% 0% 100% N % 44% 56% 0% 0% 100% N % 57% 36% 7% 0% 100% N % 58% 33% 4% 4% 100% N % 78% 19% 3% 0% 100% N % 57% 43% 0% 0% 100% N % 50% 38% 13% 0% 100% N % 50% 50% 0% 0% 100% Having easy access by car for customers or N employees % 70% 23% 7% 0% 100% The availability of parking for customers and N employees % 49% 43% 9% 0% 100% Asked only if amenity was an influence on the location choice Page 108

114 Effects of Expected TOD Amenities on Business - High Density Not Downtown... and were your expectations of... fully met, somewhat met or not met? Customer foot traffic from the rail station Customer foot traffic from employees at nearby businesses Customer foot traffic from customers of nearby businesses Customer foot traffic from local residents Having access to a larger workforce through the rail transit system Your employees seeing the rail commute option as a benefit Your employees seeing access to restaurants, coffee shops or bars as a benefit Your employees seeing access to grocery stores and drug stores as a benefit Your employees seeing access to personal services (such as hair salons or dry cleaners) as a benefit Your employees seeing access to medical or daycare centers is seen as benefit by employees Fully met Somewhat met Not met Don't know Total N % 100% 0% 0% 0% 100% N % 75% 0% 25% 0% 100% N % 0% 50% 50% 0% 100% N % 0% 100% 0% 0% 100% N % 20% 40% 40% 0% 100% N % 62% 38% 0% 0% 100% N % 64% 36% 0% 0% 100% N % 50% 50% 0% 0% 100% N % 0% 100% 0% 0% 100% N % 50% 50% 0% 0% 100% Having easy access by car for customers or N employees % 83% 17% 0% 0% 100% The availability of parking for customers and N employees % 85% 15% 0% 0% 100% Asked only if amenity was an influence on the location choice Page 109

115 Effects of Expected TOD Amenities on Business - Low Density Not Downtown... and were your expectations of... fully met, somewhat met or not met? Customer foot traffic from the rail station Customer foot traffic from employees at nearby businesses Customer foot traffic from customers of nearby businesses Customer foot traffic from local residents Having access to a larger workforce through the rail transit system Your employees seeing the rail commute option as a benefit Your employees seeing access to restaurants, coffee shops or bars as a benefit Your employees seeing access to grocery stores and drug stores as a benefit Your employees seeing access to personal services (such as hair salons or dry cleaners) as a benefit Your employees seeing access to medical or daycare centers is seen as benefit by employees Fully met Somewhat met Not met Don't know Total N % 33% 58% 8% 0% 100% N % 42% 50% 8% 0% 100% N % 32% 58% 11% 0% 100% N % 33% 60% 7% 0% 100% N % 40% 60% 0% 0% 100% N % 61% 39% 0% 0% 100% N % 31% 63% 6% 0% 100% N % 38% 62% 0% 0% 100% N % 56% 44% 0% 0% 100% N % 67% 17% 17% 0% 100% Having easy access by car for customers or N employees % 71% 26% 0% 2% 100% The availability of parking for customers and N employees % 67% 28% 6% 0% 100% Asked only if amenity was an influence on the location choice Importance of FasTracks Timing by Area How important, if at all, is having FasTracks completed on schedule to achieving your Downtown High Density Not Downtown Low Density Not Downtown business objectives? N % N % N % Very important 15 19% 10 9% 22 20% Somewhat important 22 28% 42 38% 21 19% Not at all important 43 54% 58 53% 67 61% Page 110

116 What other types of businesses, houses or other land uses would you most like to have move near you? Reasons for Choosing Current Location by Area Downtown High Density Not Downtown Low Density Not Downtown N % N % N % Don't know 37 46% 46 42% 38 35% Restaurants 9 11% 29 26% 24 22% Department stores 14 18% 3 3% 5 5% Grocery/ drug/ convenience stores 13 16% 4 4% 3 3% Multi family housing 6 8% 5 5% 6 5% Nothing more/ good as is 2 3% 8 7% 6 5% Clothing/shoe stores 7 9% 3 3% 5 5% General office (law, insurance, temp help, marketing etc) 2 3% 8 7% 5 5% Other 1 1% 3 3% 6 5% Coffee shops 3 4% 1 1% 5 5% Financial (banking, investment, mortgage, accounting) 2 3% 4 4% 3 3% Single family housing 3 4% 2 2% 4 4% Parks/ open space 2 3% 5 5% 2 2% Entertainment (theater, art gallery, museum) 1 1% 2 2% 5 5% Businesses/business parks 1 1% 3 3% 3 3% Sporting good stores 2 3% 0 0% 3 3% Gas station 0 0% 2 2% 3 3% Retail- general 2 3% 0 0% 3 3% Manufacturing/ industry 2 3% 0 0% 3 3% Hotel/motel 1 1% 2 2% 1 1% Beauty/nails/hair (spa/salon/products) 0 0% 2 2% 1 1% Home improvement/hardware/paint and wallpaper stores 0 0% 1 1% 2 2% Books, office supplies, print/photos shop, computer store 0 0% 1 1% 2 2% Page 111

117 What other types of businesses, houses or other land uses would you most like to have move near you? Reasons for Choosing Current Location by Area Downtown High Density Not Downtown Low Density Not Downtown N % N % N % Bike paths/sidewalks 0 0% 1 1% 2 2% Parking 0 0% 0 0% 3 3% More rail stops/lines 0 0% 2 2% 1 1% Residential - general 1 1% 0 0% 2 2% Bars/ taverns/ night clubs 0 0% 1 1% 1 1% Dry cleaners/ laundry/ alterations/ tailors 1 1% 0 0% 1 1% Health care (medical, dental, chiropractic, therapy) 1 1% 1 1% 0 0% Sports and fitness (gyms/organizations) 1 1% 0 0% 1 1% Construction/trades (builder, plumber, painter, electrician) 0 0% 1 1% 1 1% Child care/day care 1 1% 0 0% 0 0% Computer/Information Technology (IT)/Software and Hardware 1 1% 0 0% 0 0% Auto repair 0 0% 0 0% 1 1% Real estate / property management/ architect 0 0% 1 1% 0 0% Relocation Plans by Area Do you plan to stay in this High Density Not Low Density Not location for the next few Downtown Downtown Downtown years? N % N % N % No 74 93% % % Yes 6 8% 4 4% 6 5% Relocation Timeline In what year do you Downtown High Density Not Downtown Low Density Not Downtown intend to move? N % N % N % % 2 67% 4 100% % 1 33% 0 0% Page 112

118 Reasons for Planned Move by Area Downtown High Density Not Downtown Low Density Not Downtown Why do you want to move? N % N % N % Too expensive 2 33% 1 25% 2 33% Need larger space 1 17% 2 50% 0 0% Need different building structure/amenities 1 17% 0 0% 2 33% Need smaller space 2 33% 0 0% 0 0% Closing business/retiring 0 0% 1 25% 1 17% Not enough parking 0 0% 0 0% 1 17% Lease is up 0 0% 0 0% 1 17% Bought new building 1 17% 0 0% 0 0% Eminent domain seizure by RTD 0 0% 0 0% 1 17% Will you move to another location near a transit station or away from a transit station? Relocation and Rail Transit by Area High Density Not Downtown Downtown Low Density Not Downtown N % N % N % Near 2 33% 3 75% 2 33% Away from 3 50% 0 0% 2 33% Don't know 1 17% 1 25% 2 33% Gender of Employees - Downtown Female Male Can you tell us what proportion of your employees are: N % N % None 9 12% 6 8% 1%-25% 8 10% 12 15% 26%-50% 27 35% 29 37% 51%-75% 19 24% 19 24% 76%-100% 15 19% 12 15% Page 113

119 Gender of Employees - High Density Not Downtown Female Male Can you tell us what proportion of your employees are: N % N % None 8 7% 7 6% 1%-25% 17 15% 19 17% 26%-50% 42 38% 33 30% 51%-75% 25 23% 32 29% 76%-100% 18 16% 19 17% Gender of Employees - Low Density Not Downtown Female Male Can you tell us what proportion of your employees are: N % N % None 14 13% 19 17% 1%-25% 28 25% 10 9% 26%-50% 27 25% 28 25% 51%-75% 16 15% 18 16% 76%-100% 25 23% 35 32% Can you tell us what proportion of your employees are: Age of Employees - Downtown Under 30 years old Between 30 and 50 years old Over 50 years old N % N % N % None 26 33% 14 18% 23 29% 1%-25% 21 27% 14 18% 27 35% 26%-50% 16 21% 23 29% 10 13% 51%-75% 6 8% 14 18% 6 8% 76%-100% 9 12% 13 17% 12 15% Can you tell us what proportion of your employees are: Age of Employees - High Density Not Downtown Under 30 years old Between 30 and 50 years old Over 50 years old N % N % N % None 26 25% 11 10% 43 41% 1%-25% 43 41% 15 14% 30 28% 26%-50% 23 22% 30 28% 14 13% 51%-75% 10 9% 28 26% 13 12% 76%-100% 4 4% 22 21% 6 6% Page 114

120 Can you tell us what proportion of your employees are: Age of Employees - Low Density Not Downtown Under 30 years old Between 30 and 50 years old Over 50 years old N % N % N % None 42 40% 19 18% 42 40% 1%-25% 23 22% 18 17% 21 20% 26%-50% 23 22% 28 26% 20 19% 51%-75% 5 5% 20 19% 12 11% 76%-100% 13 12% 21 20% 11 10% Can you tell us what proportion of your employees earn: Employee Wages - Downtown Less than $10 per hour Between $10 and $20 per hour More than $20 per hour N % N % N % None 53 77% 25 36% 13 19% 1%-25% 5 7% 19 28% 6 9% 26%-50% 5 7% 11 16% 8 12% 51%-75% 1 1% 5 7% 9 13% 76%-100% 5 7% 9 13% 33 48% Can you tell us what proportion of your employees earn: Employee Wages - High Density Not Downtown Less than $10 per hour Between $10 and $20 per hour More than $20 per hour N % N % N % None 83 84% 22 22% 11 11% 1%-25% 8 8% 26 26% 18 18% 26%-50% 2 2% 23 23% 17 17% 51%-75% 3 3% 14 14% 17 17% 76%-100% 3 3% 14 14% 36 36% Can you tell us what proportion of your employees earn: Employee Wages - Low Density Not Downtown Less than $10 per hour Between $10 and $20 per hour More than $20 per hour N % N % N % None 74 74% 19 19% 34 34% 1%-25% 11 11% 16 16% 19 19% 26%-50% 4 4% 22 22% 15 15% 51%-75% 5 5% 12 12% 10 10% Page 115

121 Can you tell us what proportion of your employees earn: Employee Wages - Low Density Not Downtown Less than $10 per hour Between $10 and $20 per hour More than $20 per hour N % N % N % 76%-100% 6 6% 31 31% 22 22% Page 116

122 Participate in Employee Survey by Area Would you be willing to have us send Downtown High Density Not Downtown Low Density Not Downtown you a set of surveys for your employees? N % N % N % Yes 67 84% 78 71% 82 75% No 13 16% 32 29% 28 25% Page 117

123 Appendix C: Responses to Survey Questions by Business Type The following pages contain a complete set of responses to each question on the survey. What is your position in the company? Professional, Scientific, Technical Position of Respondent by Business Type Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Retail, Accommodation, Food Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Health, Social, Education Mining, Oil, Utilities N % N % N % N % N % N % Human resources personnel 3 7% 2 4% 2 3% 1 4% 2 13% 1 20% Office manager 12 28% 4 9% 4 6% 6 25% 3 19% 0 0% Manager/ assistant manager/ supervisor 4 9% 7 15% 19 28% 5 21% 1 6% 0 0% Receptionist/ secretary/ assistant 3 7% 5 11% 3 4% 0 0% 2 13% 2 40% CEO/ president/ vice president/ director/ officer 12 28% 17 37% 9 13% 4 17% 3 19% 1 20% Owner 7 16% 7 15% 28 41% 7 29% 4 25% 1 20% Other (nonadministrative/ nonmanagement) 2 5% 4 9% 4 6% 1 4% 1 6% 0 0% Total % % % % % 5 100% *Was not asked in the first 97 interviews. Page 118

124 Professional, Scientific, Technical Other positions indicated by Business Type Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Retail, Accommodation, Food Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Health, Social, Education Senior Shipping Contractor Sales Project Engineer Night Instructor Coordinator Refused Sales Associate Geologist Sales Third Key Senior Underwriter Travel Agent Including yourself, how many fulltime, parttime and contract employees do you have at this location? Average Number of Employees by Type - Professional, Scientific, Technical Number of businesses Average number of employees Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Full time Part time Contract All types Including yourself, how many fulltime, parttime and contract employees do you have at this location? Average Number of Employees by Type - Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Number of businesses Average number of employees Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Full time Part time Contract All types Average Number of Employees by Type - Retail, Accommodation, Food Page 119

125 Including yourself, how many fulltime, parttime and contract employees do you have at this location? Number of businesses Average number of employees Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Full time ,400 Part time Contract All types ,200 Average Number of Employees by Type - Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Including yourself, how many fulltime, parttime and contract employees do you have at this location? Number of businesses Average number of employees Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Full time Part time Contract All types Including yourself, how many fulltime, parttime and contract employees do you have at this location? Average Number of Employees by Type - Health, Social, Education Number of businesses Average number of employees Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Full time Part time Contract All types Page 120

126 Including yourself, how many fulltime, parttime and contract employees do you have at this location? Average Number of Employees by Type - Mining, Oil, Utilities Number of businesses Average number of employees Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Full time Part time Contract All types Page 121

127 Including yourself, how many full-time employees do you have at this location? Professional, Scientific, Technical Number of Full Time Employees by Business Type Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Retail, Accommodation, Food Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Health, Social, Education Mining, Oil, Utilities N % N % N % N % N % N % Number of Businesses % % % % % 7 100% None 3 5% 1 1% 7 8% 0 0% 1 4% 0 0% % 24 35% 44 50% 19 40% 14 58% 4 57% % 13 19% 16 18% 12 26% 2 8% 0 0% % 16 24% 8 9% 6 13% 4 17% 1 14% % 8 12% 5 6% 4 9% 1 4% 0 0% % 4 6% 5 6% 2 4% 0 0% 1 14% % 2 3% 2 2% 4 9% 2 8% 1 14% 500 or more 0 0% 0 0% 1 1% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Including yourself, how many part-time employees do you have at this location? Professional, Scientific, Technical Number of Part Time Employees by Business Type Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Retail, Accommodation, Food Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Health, Social, Education Mining, Oil, Utilities N % N % N % N % N % N % Number of Businesses % % % % % 7 100% None 38 58% 39 57% 26 30% 33 70% 9 38% 3 43% % 26 38% 30 34% 12 26% 8 33% 4 57% % 2 3% 16 18% 1 2% 3 13% 0 0% % 0 0% 10 11% 0 0% 2 8% 0 0% % 1 1% 3 3% 0 0% 1 4% 0 0% % 0 0% 1 1% 1 2% 1 4% 0 0% Page 122

128 Including yourself, how many part-time employees do you have at this location? Professional, Scientific, Technical Number of Part Time Employees by Business Type Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Retail, Accommodation, Food Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Health, Social, Education Mining, Oil, Utilities N % N % N % N % N % N % % 0 0% 1 1% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 500 or more 0 0% 0 0% 1 1% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Including yourself, how many contract employees do you have at this location? Professional, Scientific, Technical Number of Contract Employees by Business Type Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Retail, Accommodation, Food Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Health, Social, Education Mining, Oil, Utilities N % N % N % N % N % N % Number of Businesses % % % % % 7 100% None 45 68% 56 82% 80 91% 37 79% 15 63% 5 71% % 8 12% 4 5% 7 15% 6 25% 1 14% % 1 1% 2 2% 0 0% 2 8% 0 0% % 0 0% 0 0% 1 2% 0 0% 0 0% % 0 0% 1 1% 1 2% 1 4% 1 14% % 2 3% 1 1% 1 2% 0 0% 0 0% % 1 1% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 500 or more 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Including yourself, how many full-time, part-time and contract employees do you have at this location? Professional, Scientific, Technical Number of Employees by Business Type Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Retail, Accommodation, Food Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Health, Social, Education Mining, Oil, Utilities N % N % N % N % N % N % Page 123

129 Including yourself, how many full-time, part-time and contract employees do you have at this location? Professional, Scientific, Technical Number of Employees by Business Type Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Retail, Accommodation, Food Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Health, Social, Education Mining, Oil, Utilities N % N % N % N % N % N % Number of Businesses % % % % % 7 100% None 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% % 19 28% 35 40% 14 30% 7 29% 4 57% % 16 24% 18 20% 12 26% 5 21% 0 0% % 17 25% 18 20% 10 21% 6 25% 1 14% % 8 12% 8 9% 5 11% 3 13% 0 0% % 5 7% 4 5% 2 4% 0 0% 1 14% % 3 4% 4 5% 4 9% 3 13% 1 14% 500 or more 0 0% 0 0% 1 1% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Page 124

130 Average Percent of Employees Working each Schedule Type - Professional, Scientific, Technical Roughly, what percent of employees at your worksite work the following schedules: Number of businesses Average percent of employees Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Weekdays, daytime? % 3.13% 100% 100% 0% 100% Weekdays, evenings or night? % 2.62% 0% 0% 0% 100% Weekends? % 2.18% 0% 0% 0% 100% Varying or unpredictable schedule? % 3.95% 0% 0% 0% 100% Average Percent of Employees Working each Schedule Type - Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Roughly, what percent of employees at your worksite work the following schedules: Number of businesses Average percent of employees Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Weekdays, daytime? % 1.63% 100% 100% 0% 100% Weekdays, evenings or night? % 2.00% 0% 0% 0% 100% Weekends? % 2.15% 0% 0% 0% 100% Varying or unpredictable schedule? % 2.23% 0% 0% 0% 100% Average Percent of Employees Working each Schedule Type - Retail, Accommodation, Food Roughly, what percent of employees at your worksite work the following schedules: Number of businesses Average percent of employees Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Page 125

131 Average Percent of Employees Working each Schedule Type - Retail, Accommodation, Food Roughly, what percent of employees at your worksite work the following schedules: Number of businesses Average percent of employees Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Weekdays, daytime? % 3.27% 100% 100% 0% 100% Weekdays, evenings or night? % 3.09% 0% 0% 0% 100% Weekends? % 4.17% 25% 0% 0% 100% Varying or unpredictable schedule? % 3.37% 0% 0% 0% 100% Average Percent of Employees Working each Schedule Type - Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Roughly, what percent of employees at your worksite work the following schedules: Number of businesses Average percent of employees Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Weekdays, daytime? % 2.84% 100% 100% 0% 100% Weekdays, evenings or night? % 4.00% 0% 0% 0% 100% Weekends? % 3.23% 0% 0% 0% 100% Varying or unpredictable schedule? % 3.66% 0% 0% 0% 100% Average Percent of Employees Working each Schedule Type - Health, Social, Education Page 126

132 Roughly, what percent of employees at your worksite work the following schedules: Number of businesses Average percent of employees Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Weekdays, daytime? % 6.85% 100% 100% 2% 100% Weekdays, evenings or night? % 4.46% 0% 0% 0% 90% Weekends? % 5.92% 0% 0% 0% 100% Varying or unpredictable schedule? % 3.41% 0% 0% 0% 74% Average Percent of Employees Working each Schedule Type - Mining, Oil, Utilities Roughly, what percent of employees at your worksite work the following schedules: Number of businesses Average percent of employees Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Weekdays, daytime? %.00% 100% 100% 100% 100% Weekdays, evenings or night? 7 1.4% 1.43% 0% 0% 0% 10% Weekends? % 14.26% 0% 0% 0% 100% Varying or unpredictable schedule? 7.1%.14% 0% 0% 0% 1% Percent of Employees Working each Schedule Type - Professional, Scientific, Technical Varying or Percent of Weekdays, daytime? Weekdays, evenings or night? Weekends? unpredictable schedule? employees N % N % N % N % None 3 5% 49 74% 52 79% 50 76% 1%-25% 1 2% 10 15% 8 12% 5 8% 26%-50% 2 3% 3 5% 5 8% 3 5% Page 127

133 Percent of Employees Working each Schedule Type - Professional, Scientific, Technical Varying or Percent of Weekdays, daytime? Weekdays, evenings or night? Weekends? unpredictable schedule? employees N % N % N % N % 51%-75% 2 3% 2 3% 0 0% 1 2% 76%-100% 58 88% 2 3% 1 2% 7 11% Total % % % % Percent of Employees Working each Schedule Type - Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Varying or Percent of Weekdays, daytime? Weekdays, evenings or night? Weekends? unpredictable schedule? employees N % N % N % N % None 1 1% 55 81% 51 75% 53 78% 1%-25% 0 0% 10 15% 12 18% 9 13% 26%-50% 0 0% 1 1% 3 4% 4 6% 51%-75% 3 4% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 76%-100% 64 94% 2 3% 2 3% 2 3% Total % % % % Percent of Employees Working each Schedule Type - Retail, Accommodation, Food Varying or Percent of Weekdays, daytime? Weekdays, evenings or night? Weekends? unpredictable schedule? employees N % N % N % N % None 3 3% 46 52% 32 36% 63 72% 1%-25% 9 10% 13 15% 13 15% 12 14% 26%-50% 6 7% 15 17% 16 18% 1 1% 51%-75% 16 18% 9 10% 6 7% 3 3% 76%-100% 54 61% 5 6% 21 24% 9 10% Total % % % % Page 128

134 Percent of Employees Working each Schedule Type - Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Varying or Percent of Weekdays, daytime? Weekdays, evenings or night? Weekends? unpredictable schedule? employees N % N % N % N % None 1 2% 36 77% 35 74% 34 72% 1%-25% 1 2% 5 11% 7 15% 9 19% 26%-50% 0 0% 1 2% 2 4% 1 2% 51%-75% 3 6% 2 4% 1 2% 0 0% 76%-100% 42 89% 3 6% 2 4% 3 6% Total % % % % Percent of Employees Working each Schedule Type - Health, Social, Education Varying or Percent of Weekdays, daytime? Weekdays, evenings or night? Weekends? unpredictable schedule? employees N % N % N % N % None 0 0% 17 71% 16 67% 17 71% 1%-25% 3 13% 4 17% 4 17% 5 21% 26%-50% 1 4% 2 8% 1 4% 1 4% 51%-75% 1 4% 0 0% 1 4% 1 4% 76%-100% 19 79% 1 4% 2 8% 0 0% Total % % % % Percent of Employees Working each Schedule Type - Mining, Oil, Utilities Varying or Percent of Weekdays, daytime? Weekdays, evenings or night? Weekends? unpredictable schedule? employees N % N % N % N % None 0 0% 6 86% 5 71% 6 86% 1%-25% 0 0% 1 14% 1 14% 1 14% 26%-50% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 51%-75% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 76%-100% 7 100% 0 0% 1 14% 0 0% Total 7 100% 7 100% 7 100% 7 100% Page 129

135 Professional, Scientific, Technical Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Business Facility Tenure by Business Type Retail, Accommodation, Food Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Health, Social, Education Mining, Oil, Utilities N % N % N % N % N % N % Rent 51 77% 50 74% 61 69% 30 64% 19 79% 6 86% Own 14 21% 17 25% 27 31% 17 36% 5 21% 1 14% Don't know 1 2% 1 1% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Page 130

136 Professional, Scientific, Technical Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Annual Rent Per Square Foot by Business Type Retail, Accommodation, Food Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Health, Social, Education Mining, Oil, Utilities N % N % N % N % N % N % Owns property 14 21% 17 25% 27 31% 17 36% 5 21% 1 14% $0.25 to $ % 2 3% 5 6% 3 6% 0 0% 0 0% $5.00 to $ % 3 4% 2 2% 4 9% 4 17% 2 29% $10.00 to $ % 6 9% 4 5% 0 0% 1 4% 0 0% $15.00 to $ % 5 7% 8 9% 4 9% 0 0% 2 29% $25.00 to $ % 3 4% 9 10% 2 4% 3 13% 0 0% $50.00 to $ % 0 0% 0 0% 1 2% 1 4% 0 0% $ or more 5 8% 2 3% 3 3% 1 2% 1 4% 0 0% Refused 18 27% 30 44% 30 34% 15 32% 9 38% 2 29% Total % % % % % 7 100% This question was not answered in a consistent manner and the data may be inaccurate. Page 131

137 What is the square footage of this business facility? Number of businesses Size of Business Facility by Business Type Average square footage Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Professional, Scientific, Technical 59 5,549 1, ,155 1, ,000 Finance, Insurance, Real Estate 58 6,011 1, ,000 1, ,000 Retail, Accommodation, Food 76 5,771 1, ,000 1, ,349 Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation 43 18,896 7, ,900 6, ,197 Health, Social, Education 19 3,476 1, ,700 1, ,000 Mining, Oil, Utilities 4 1, , ,800 Page 132

138 Square footage Professional, Scientific, Technical Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Size of Business Facility by Business Type Retail, Accommodation, Food Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Health, Social, Education Mining, Oil, Utilities N % N % N % N % N % N % 0 to 999 sq. feet 10 15% 7 10% 17 19% 6 13% 4 17% 1 14% 1,000 to 2,499 sq. feet 21 32% 24 35% 27 31% 12 26% 7 29% 2 29% 2,500 to 4,999 sq. feet 12 18% 12 18% 13 15% 5 11% 4 17% 1 14% 5,000 to 9,999 sq. feet 8 12% 8 12% 9 10% 12 26% 3 13% 0 0% 10,000 sq. feet or more 8 12% 7 10% 10 11% 8 17% 1 4% 0 0% Refused 7 11% 10 15% 12 14% 4 9% 5 21% 3 43% Total % % % % % 7 100% Page 133

139 Businesses by North American Industry Classification System Code by Business Type Professional, Scientific, Technical Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Retail, Accommodatio n, Food Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Health, Social, Education Mining, Oil, Utilities NAICS Category N % N % N % N % N % N % Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 6 86% Utilities 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 14% Construction 1 2% 2 3% 0 0% 7 15% 0 0% 0 0% Manufacturing 0 0% 0 0% 1 1% 11 24% 0 0% 0 0% Wholesale Trade 1 2% 1 2% 5 6% 10 22% 0 0% 0 0% Retail Trade 2 3% 0 0% 29 34% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Transportation and Warehousing 0 0% 1 2% 1 1% 5 11% 0 0% 0 0% Informati on 3 5% 0 0% 0 0 % 0 0% 1 4% 0 0 % Finance and Insuran ce 0 0% 29 44% 0 0 % 1 2% 0 0% 0 0 % Real Estate and Rental and Leasing 1 2% 22 33% 0 0 % 1 2% 1 4% 0 0 % Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services 55 85% 2 3% 4 5% 3 7% 0 0% 0 0% Management of Companies and Enterprises 0 0% 2 3% 1 1 % 0 0% 0 0% 0 0 % Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services 0 0% 7 11% 3 4 % 4 9% 0 0% 0 0 % Educational Servic es 0 0% 0 0% 0 0 % 0 0% 4 17% 0 0 % Health Care and Social Assistan ce 0 0% 0 0% 3 4 % 0 0% 17 74% 0 0 % Accommodation and Food 0 0% 0 0% 27 32% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Page 134

140 Businesses by North American Industry Classification System Code by Business Type Professional, Scientific, Technical Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Retail, Accommodatio n, Food Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Health, Social, Education Mining, Oil, Utilities NAICS Category N % N % N % N % N % N % Services Other Services (except Public Administration) 2 3% 0 0% 11 13% 4 9% 0 0% 0 0% Total % % % % % 7 100% Page 135

141 Does your company own any parking spaces? Professional, Scientific, Technical Number of Parking Spaces Owned by Business Type by Business Type Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Retail, Accommodation, Food Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Health, Social, Education Mining, Oil, Utilities N % N % N % N % N % N % No spaces 52 79% 49 72% 65 74% 32 68% 18 75% 7 100% 1-4 spaces 6 9% 4 6% 5 6% 3 6% 0 0% 0 0% 5-9 spaces 4 6% 2 3% 5 6% 3 6% 4 17% 0 0% spaces 3 5% 1 1% 3 3% 3 6% 0 0% 0 0% spaces 1 2% 5 7% 4 5% 4 9% 1 4% 0 0% 50 or more spaces 0 0% 7 10% 6 7% 2 4% 1 4% 0 0% Total % % % % % 7 100% Page 136

142 Average Number of Parking Spaces Owned by Business Type* Number of businesses Average number of spaces* Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Professional, Scientific, Technical Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Retail, Accommodation, Food ,000 Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Health, Social, Education Mining, Oil, Utilities *If business owns spaces. Page 137

143 Do you have assigned spaces included in your building lease? Number of Company Parking Spaces included in Lease by Business Type Professional, Scientific, Technical Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Retail, Accommodation, Food Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Health, Social, Education Mining, Oil, Utilities N % N % N % N % N % N % No spaces 44 67% 45 66% 75 85% 34 72% 18 75% 5 71% 1-4 spaces 14 21% 10 15% 7 8% 8 17% 1 4% 1 14% 5-9 spaces 4 6% 7 10% 4 5% 1 2% 2 8% 0 0% spaces 2 3% 0 0% 1 1% 0 0% 2 8% 0 0% spaces 1 2% 5 7% 1 1% 1 2% 1 4% 0 0% 50 or more spaces 1 2% 1 1% 0 0% 3 6% 0 0% 1 14% Total % % % % % 7 100% Page 138

144 Average Number of Parking Spaces Included in Lease by Business Type* Number of businesses Average number of spaces included in lease* Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Professional, Scientific, Technical Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Retail, Accommodation, Food Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Health, Social, Education Mining, Oil, Utilities *If spaces included in lease. Page 139

145 Professional, Scientific, Technical Cost per Space for Parking Included in Lease by Business Type* Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Retail, Accommodation, Food Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Health, Social, Education Mining, Oil, Utilities N % N % N % N % N % N % $ % 0 0% 0 0% 2 33% 1 100% 1 50% $0.01 to $ % 2 17% 1 33% 1 17% 0 0% 0 0% $25.00 to $ % 4 33% 0 0% 1 17% 0 0% 0 0% $50.00 to $ % 5 42% 1 33% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% $100 or more 3 27% 1 8% 1 33% 2 33% 0 0% 1 50% Total % % 3 100% 6 100% 1 100% 2 100% * Of the 79 businesses with parking included in their lease, 34 did not know what portion of their lease covered parking Page 140

146 Average Cost per Space for Parking Included in Lease by Business Type Number of businesses Average Cost per Space Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Professional, Scientific, Technical 11 $82.27 $21.64 $75.00 $.00 $.00 $ Finance, Insurance, Real Estate 12 $53.54 $17.91 $45.00 $25.00 $1.00 $ Retail, Accommodation, Food 3 $ $88.39 $65.00 $12.50 $12.50 $ Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation 6 $76.30 $38.94 $31.41 $.00 $.00 $ Health, Social, Education 1 $.00 $. $.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 Mining, Oil, Utilities 2 $85.00 $85.00 $85.00 $.00 $.00 $ Page 141

147 How many assigned spaces do you lease separately from your building lease? Number of Assigned Parking Spaces Separate from Lease by Business Type Professional, Scientific, Technical Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Retail, Accommodation, Food Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Health, Social, Education Mining, Oil, Utilities N % N % N % N % N % N % No spaces 62 94% 57 84% 80 91% 42 89% 23 96% 4 57% 1-4 spaces 2 3% 6 9% 7 8% 1 2% 0 0% 2 29% 5-9 spaces 2 3% 2 3% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 14% spaces 0 0% 2 3% 1 1% 1 2% 1 4% 0 0% spaces 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 2 4% 0 0% 0 0% 50 or more spaces 0 0% 1 1% 0 0% 1 2% 0 0% 0 0% Total % % % % % 7 100% Page 142

148 Average Number of Assigned Parking Spaces Separate from Lease by Business Type* Number of businesses Average number of spaces separate from lease* Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Professional, Scientific, Technical Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Retail, Accommodation, Food Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Health, Social, Education Mining, Oil, Utilities *If business has spaces separate from lease. Page 143

149 Professional, Scientific, Technical Cost per Space for Parking Spaces Separate from Lease by Business Type* Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Retail, Accommodation, Food Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Health, Social, Education Mining, Oil, Utilities N % N % N % N % N % N % $ % 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% $0.01 to $ % 3 43% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% $25.00 to $ % 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 33% $50.00 to $ % 2 29% 2 29% 0 0% 1 100% 0 0% $100 or more 2 67% 2 29% 5 71% 4 100% 0 0% 2 67% Total 3 100% 7 100% 7 100% 4 100% 1 100% 3 100% *Of the 32 businesses with parking separate from their lease, 7 did not know the cost Page 144

150 Average Cost per Space for Parking Spaces Separate from Lease by Business Type* Number of businesses Average Cost per Space Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Professional, Scientific, Technical 3 $ $29.49 $ $85.00 $85.00 $ Finance, Insurance, Real Estate 7 $74.01 $25.50 $67.50 $13.33 $13.33 $ Retail, Accommodation, Food 7 $ $23.48 $ $85.00 $85.00 $ Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation 5 $ $38.14 $ $ $.68 $ Health, Social, Education 1 $50.00 $. $50.00 $50.00 $50.00 $50.00 Mining, Oil, Utilities 3 $ $57.18 $ $46.00 $46.00 $ Page 145

151 Do your employees pay for use of parking spaces that are either owned or leased by your company? Professional, Scientific, Technical Company Charges Employees for Parking by Business Type Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Retail, Accommodation, Food Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Health, Social, Education Mining, Oil, Utilities N % N % N % N % N % N % Yes 3 9% 4 8% 3 7% 3 10% 0 0% 0 0% No 32 91% 44 92% 38 93% 28 90% % 4 100% Page 146

152 What is their monthly parking rate? Professional, Scientific, Technical Employee Cost per Space Provided by Company by Business Type Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Retail, Accommodation, Food Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Health, Social, Education Mining, Oil, Utilities N % N % N % N % N % N % $0.01 to $ % 2 50% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% $25.00 to $ % 1 25% 1 33% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% $50.00 to $ % 1 25% 1 33% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% $100 or more 0 0% 0 0% 1 33% 3 100% 0 0% 0 0% Total 2 100% 4 100% 3 100% 3 100% 0 0% 0 0% Page 147

153 Average Employee Cost per Space Provided by Company by Business Type Number of businesses Average Cost per Space Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Professional, Scientific, Technical 2 $45.00 $15.00 $45.00 $30.00 $30.00 $60.00 Finance, Insurance, Real Estate 4 $38.75 $15.99 $27.50 $15.00 $15.00 $85.00 Retail, Accommodation, Food 3 $76.67 $18.56 $90.00 $40.00 $40.00 $ Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation 3 $ $24.55 $ $ $ $ Health, Social, Education 0 $. $. $. $. $. $. Mining, Oil, Utilities 0 $. $. $. $. $. $. Page 148

154 Number of spaces Number of Company Provided Spaces by Type - Professional, Scientific, Technical Company owned parking spaces Assigned spaces included in building lease Assigned spaces leased separately from building lease Total number of parking spaces owned or leased N % N % N % N % No spaces 52 79% 44 67% 62 94% 31 47% 1-4 spaces 6 9% 14 21% 2 3% 18 27% 5-9 spaces 4 6% 4 6% 2 3% 7 11% spaces 3 5% 2 3% 0 0% 7 11% spaces 1 2% 1 2% 0 0% 2 3% 50 or more spaces 0 0% 1 2% 0 0% 1 2% Number of spaces Number of Company Provided Spaces by Type - Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Company owned parking spaces Assigned spaces included in building lease Assigned spaces leased separately from building lease Total number of parking spaces owned or leased N % N % N % N % No spaces 49 72% 45 66% 57 84% 20 29% 1-4 spaces 4 6% 10 15% 6 9% 19 28% 5-9 spaces 2 3% 7 10% 2 3% 9 13% spaces 1 1% 0 0% 2 3% 1 1% spaces 5 7% 5 7% 0 0% 11 16% 50 or more spaces 7 10% 1 1% 1 1% 8 12% Page 149

155 Number of spaces Number of Company Provided Spaces by Type - Retail, Accommodation, Food Company owned parking spaces Assigned spaces included in building lease Assigned spaces leased separately from building lease Total number of parking spaces owned or leased N % N % N % N % No spaces 65 74% 75 85% 80 91% 47 53% 1-4 spaces 5 6% 7 8% 7 8% 18 20% 5-9 spaces 5 6% 4 5% 0 0% 7 8% spaces 3 3% 1 1% 1 1% 6 7% spaces 4 5% 1 1% 0 0% 4 5% 50 or more spaces 6 7% 0 0% 0 0% 6 7% Number of spaces Number of Company Provided Spaces by Type - Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Company owned parking spaces Assigned spaces included in building lease Assigned spaces leased separately from building lease Total number of parking spaces owned or leased N % N % N % N % No spaces 32 68% 34 72% 42 89% 17 36% 1-4 spaces 3 6% 8 17% 1 2% 11 23% 5-9 spaces 3 6% 1 2% 0 0% 3 6% spaces 3 6% 0 0% 1 2% 4 9% spaces 4 9% 1 2% 2 4% 7 15% 50 or more spaces 2 4% 3 6% 1 2% 5 11% Page 150

156 Number of spaces Company owned parking spaces Number of Company Provided Spaces by Type - Health, Social, Education Assigned spaces included in building lease Assigned spaces leased separately from building lease Total number of parking spaces owned or leased N % N % N % N % No spaces 18 75% 18 75% 23 96% 13 54% 1-4 spaces 0 0% 1 4% 0 0% 1 4% 5-9 spaces 4 17% 2 8% 0 0% 4 17% spaces 0 0% 2 8% 1 4% 4 17% spaces 1 4% 1 4% 0 0% 1 4% 50 or more spaces 1 4% 0 0% 0 0% 1 4% Number of spaces Company owned parking spaces Number of Company Provided Spaces by Type - Mining, Oil, Utilities Assigned spaces included in building lease Assigned spaces leased separately from building lease Total number of parking spaces owned or leased N % N % N % N % No spaces 7 100% 5 71% 4 57% 3 43% 1-4 spaces 0 0% 1 14% 2 29% 2 29% 5-9 spaces 0 0% 0 0% 1 14% 1 14% spaces 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% spaces 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 50 or more spaces 0 0% 1 14% 0 0% 1 14% Page 151

157 Do any of your employees pay for parking that is not owned or leased by your company? Employees Pay for Non-Company Parking by Business Type Professional, Scientific, Technical Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Retail, Accommodation, Food Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Health, Social, Education Mining, Oil, Utilities N % N % N % N % N % N % Yes 8 12% 6 9% 10 11% 8 17% 1 4% 2 29% No 58 88% 62 91% 78 89% 39 83% 23 96% 5 71% Are your employees reimbursed for parking that is not owned or leased by your company? Employees Reimbursed for Non-Company Parking by Business Type Professional, Scientific, Technical Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Retail, Accommodation, Food Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Health, Social, Education Mining, Oil, Utilities N % N % N % N % N % N % Yes 4 50% 1 17% 3 30% 2 25% 1 100% 1 50% No 4 50% 5 83% 7 70% 6 75% 0 0% 1 50% Page 152

158 How much are employees reimbursed for this parking? Employee Reimbursement for Non-Company Spaces by Business Type Professional, Scientific, Technical Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Retail, Accommodation, Food Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Health, Social, Education Mining, Oil, Utilities N % N % N % N % N % N % $ % 5 83% 7 70% 6 75% 0 0% 1 50% $50.00 to $ % 1 17% 0 0% 1 13% 0 0% 1 50% $100 or more 4 50% 0 0% 3 30% 1 13% 1 100% 0 0% Total 8 100% 6 100% % 8 100% 1 100% 2 100% Average Employee Reimbursement for Non-Company Spaces by Business Type Number of businesses Average Reimbursement* Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Professional, Scientific, Technical 4 $ $44.36 $ $ $ $ Finance, Insurance, Real Estate 1 $92.00 $. $92.00 $92.00 $92.00 $92.00 Retail, Accommodation, Food 3 $ $44.85 $ $ $ $ Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation 2 $77.50 $22.50 $77.50 $55.00 $55.00 $ Health, Social, Education 1 $ $. $ $ $ $ Mining, Oil, Utilities 1 $60.00 $. $60.00 $60.00 $60.00 $60.00 *If reimbursed Page 153

159 Do any of your customers pay for parking that is not owned or leased by your company? Customers Pay for Non-Company Parking by Business Type Professional, Scientific, Technical Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Retail, Accommodation, Food Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Health, Social, Education Mining, Oil, Utilities N % N % N % N % N % N % Yes 16 24% 15 22% 16 18% 8 17% 0 0% 2 29% No 50 76% 53 78% 72 82% 39 83% % 5 71% Do you reimburse your customers for this parking cost? Customers Reimbursed for Non-Company Parking by Business Type Professional, Scientific, Technical Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Retail, Accommodation, Food Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Health, Social, Education Mining, Oil, Utilities N % N % N % N % N % N % Yes 3 19% 7 47% 2 13% 0 0% 0 0% 1 50% No 13 81% 8 53% 14 88% 8 100% 0 0% 1 50% Page 154

160 How close is your business to parking that is free for both your company and your customers and employees? Proximity to Free Parking by Business Type Professional, Scientific, Technical Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Retail, Accommodation, Food Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Health, Social, Education Mining, Oil, Utilities N % N % N % N % N % N % Right next to your building 40 61% 43 63% 60 68% 32 68% 22 92% 3 43% Within a block of your building 4 6% 14 21% 9 10% 4 9% 1 4% 1 14% More than a block 22 33% 11 16% 19 22% 11 23% 1 4% 3 43% Do you share a parking lot with any other businesses? Professional, Scientific, Technical Shared Parking by Business Type Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Retail, Accommodation, Food Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Health, Social, Education Mining, Oil, Utilities N % N % N % N % N % N % Yes 45 68% 39 57% 45 51% 20 43% 15 63% 6 86% No 21 32% 29 43% 43 49% 27 57% 9 38% 1 14% What percent of your total parking is shared with other businesses? Proportion of Parking Shared by Business Type Professional, Scientific, Technical Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Retail, Accommodation, Food Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Health, Social, Education Mining, Oil, Utilities N % N % N % N % N % N % None 21 32% 29 43% 43 49% 27 57% 9 38% 1 14% 1%-25% 5 8% 3 4% 6 7% 2 4% 1 4% 0 0% 26%-50% 2 3% 2 3% 3 3% 2 4% 1 4% 0 0% 51%-75% 3 5% 1 1% 0 0% 0 0% 1 4% 0 0% 76%-100% 35 53% 33 49% 36 41% 16 34% 12 50% 6 86% Page 155

161 Average Proportion of Parking Shared by Business Type* Number of businesses Average percent of total parking Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Professional, Scientific, Technical % 4.44% 100% 100% 1% 100% Finance, Insurance, Real Estate % 4.21% 100% 100% 1% 100% Retail, Accommodation, Food % 4.97% 100% 100% 1% 100% Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation % 6.44% 100% 100% 5% 100% Health, Social, Education % 6.18% 100% 100% 20% 100% Mining, Oil, Utilities %.83% 100% 100% 95% 100% *If share parking Page 156

162 What type of business do you share this lot with? Professional, Scientific, Technical Business Types Sharing Parking Lot by Business Type Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Retail, Accommodation, Food Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Health, Social, Education Mining, Oil, Utilities N % N % N % N % N % N % General office (law, insurance, temp help, marketing etc) 31 69% 32 82% 10 22% 10 50% 4 27% 4 67% Financial (banking, investment, mortgage, accounting) 14 31% 20 51% 11 24% 4 20% 8 53% 2 33% Restaurants 2 4% 3 8% 15 33% 3 15% 2 13% 0 0% Health care (medical, dental, chiropractic, therapy) 3 7% 6 15% 11 24% 1 5% 3 20% 1 17% Construction/trades (builder, plumber, painter, electrician) 1 2% 2 5% 3 7% 3 15% 2 13% 1 17% Clothing/shoe stores 2 4% 0 0% 8 18% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Beauty/nails/hair (spa/salon/products) 2 4% 1 3% 2 4% 2 10% 2 13% 0 0% Real estate / property management/ architect 4 9% 2 5% 2 4% 0 0% 0 0% 1 17% Many other businesses 3 7% 0 0% 4 9% 2 10% 0 0% 0 0% Entertainment (theater, art gallery, museum) 1 2% 1 3% 3 7% 1 5% 1 7% 1 17% Computer/Information Technology (IT)/Software and Hardware 3 7% 3 8% 1 2% 0 0% 1 7% 0 0% Telecom field 2 4% 3 8% 3 7% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Department stores 0 0% 1 3% 3 7% 2 10% 1 7% 0 0% Non-profit organization 2 4% 0 0% 2 4% 0 0% 2 13% 0 0% Page 157

163 What type of business do you share this lot with? Professional, Scientific, Technical Business Types Sharing Parking Lot by Business Type Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Retail, Accommodation, Food Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Health, Social, Education Mining, Oil, Utilities N % N % N % N % N % N % Other 1 2% 1 3% 0 0% 1 5% 1 7% 2 33% Bars/ taverns/ night clubs 0 0% 0 0% 2 4% 1 5% 2 13% 0 0% Dry cleaners/ laundry/ alterations/ tailors 1 2% 0 0% 2 4% 2 10% 0 0% 0 0% Grocery/ drug/ convenience stores 0 0% 0 0% 2 4% 2 10% 0 0% 0 0% Books, office supplies, print/photos shop, computer store 1 2% 1 3% 1 2% 1 5% 0 0% 0 0% Hotel/motel 0 0% 1 3% 2 4% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Coffee shops 1 2% 0 0% 1 2% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Home improvement/hardware/paint and wallpaper stores 0 0% 1 3% 0 0% 1 5% 0 0% 0 0% Sports and fitness (gyms/organizations) 1 2% 0 0% 1 2% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Auto repair 1 2% 0 0% 0 0% 1 5% 0 0% 0 0% Energy provision/consulting 0 0% 0 0% 2 4% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Sporting good stores 0 0% 0 0% 1 2% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Pet supply/veterinarian 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 5% 0 0% 0 0% Gas station 1 2% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Aviation field 1 2% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Respondents may choose more than one option. Page 158

164 Do you run out of spaces at any time of day in this shared lot? Professional, Scientific, Technical Shared Parking Capacity by Business Type Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Retail, Accommodation, Food Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Health, Social, Education Mining, Oil, Utilities N % N % N % N % N % N % Yes 7 16% 4 10% 18 40% 4 20% 3 20% 0 0% No 38 84% 35 90% 27 60% 16 80% 12 80% 6 100% Overall, would you say you have access to too little parking, enough parking, or more than enough parking for your employees? Sufficiency of Parking for Employees by Business Type Professional, Scientific, Technical Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Retail, Accommodation, Food Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Health, Social, Education Mining, Oil, Utilities N % N % N % N % N % N % Too little 9 14% 6 9% 18 20% 2 4% 3 13% 0 0% Enough 27 41% 33 49% 37 42% 19 40% 11 46% 5 71% More than enough 30 45% 29 43% 33 38% 26 55% 10 42% 2 29% Overall, would you say you have access to too little parking, enough parking, or more than enough parking for your customers? Sufficiency of Parking for Customers by Business Type Professional, Scientific, Technical Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Retail, Accommodation, Food Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Health, Social, Education Mining, Oil, Utilities N % N % N % N % N % N % Too little 11 17% 11 16% 21 24% 3 6% 5 21% 1 14% Enough 24 36% 30 44% 40 45% 23 49% 10 42% 5 71% More than enough 31 47% 27 40% 27 31% 21 45% 9 38% 1 14% Page 159

165 Do you have any of the following issues with parking? Parking Issues by Business Type Professional, Scientific, Technical Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Retail, Accommodation, Food Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Health, Social, Education Mining, Oil, Utilities N % N % N % N % N % N % None of these parking issues 58 88% 63 93% 67 76% 41 87% 20 83% 7 100% Feels unsafe 5 8% 1 1% 6 7% 6 13% 2 8% 0 0% It is poorly lit 1 2% 2 3% 10 11% 2 4% 4 17% 0 0% It is difficult to access 4 6% 1 1% 9 10% 1 2% 1 4% 0 0% It is too far away 2 3% 3 4% 8 9% 0 0% 1 4% 0 0% Respondents may choose more than one option. Proportion of Employees Using Alternate Modes of Transportation for Commute - Professional, Scientific, Technical Can you tell us what proportion of your employees use modes other than a single occupant car to get to work on a regular basis? Modes other than a single occupant car Carpool Transit Walk or bike N % N % N % N % None 28 42% 60 91% 35 53% 49 74% 1%-25% 22 33% 6 9% 21 32% 13 20% 26%-50% 7 11% 0 0% 5 8% 2 3% 51%-75% 4 6% 0 0% 1 2% 1 2% 76%-100% 5 8% 0 0% 4 6% 1 2% Page 160

166 Proportion of Employees Using Alternate Modes of Transportation for Commute - Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Can you tell us what proportion of your employees use modes other than a single occupant car to get to work on a regular basis? Modes other than a single occupant car Carpool Transit Walk or bike N % N % N % N % None 40 59% 63 93% 44 65% 59 87% 1%-25% 16 24% 4 6% 16 24% 8 12% 26%-50% 7 10% 1 1% 4 6% 1 1% 51%-75% 3 4% 0 0% 2 3% 0 0% 76%-100% 2 3% 0 0% 2 3% 0 0% Proportion of Employees Using Alternate Modes of Transportation for Commute - Retail, Accommodation, Food Can you tell us what proportion of your employees use modes other than a single occupant car to get to work on a regular basis? Modes other than a single occupant car Carpool Transit Walk or bike N % N % N % N % None 36 41% 74 84% 47 53% 58 66% 1%-25% 20 23% 12 14% 23 26% 23 26% 26%-50% 18 20% 1 1% 13 15% 5 6% 51%-75% 5 6% 0 0% 2 2% 0 0% 76%-100% 9 10% 1 1% 3 3% 2 2% Page 161

167 Proportion of Employees Using Alternate Modes of Transportation for Commute - Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Can you tell us what proportion of your employees use modes other than a single occupant car to get to work on a regular basis? Modes other than a single occupant car Carpool Transit Walk or bike N % N % N % N % None 27 57% 42 89% 31 66% 36 77% 1%-25% 12 26% 4 9% 9 19% 10 21% 26%-50% 5 11% 0 0% 5 11% 1 2% 51%-75% 0 0% 1 2% 2 4% 0 0% 76%-100% 3 6% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Proportion of Employees Using Alternate Modes of Transportation for Commute - Health, Social, Education Can you tell us what proportion of your employees use modes other than a single occupant car to get to work on a regular basis? Modes other than a single occupant car Carpool Transit Walk or bike N % N % N % N % None 11 46% 23 96% 14 58% 19 79% 1%-25% 7 29% 1 4% 7 29% 3 13% 26%-50% 5 21% 0 0% 3 13% 2 8% 51%-75% 1 4% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 76%-100% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Page 162

168 Proportion of Employees Using Alternate Modes of Transportation for Commute - Mining, Oil, Utilities Can you tell us what proportion of your employees use modes other than a single occupant car to get to work on a regular basis? Modes other than a single occupant car Carpool Transit Walk or bike N % N % N % N % None 3 43% 6 86% 3 43% 5 71% 1%-25% 1 14% 1 14% 1 14% 2 29% 26%-50% 2 29% 0 0% 2 29% 0 0% 51%-75% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 76%-100% 1 14% 0 0% 1 14% 0 0% Page 163

169 Average Percent of Employees Using Alternate Modes of Transportation for Commute by Business Type Can you tell us what proportion of your employees use modes other than a single occupant car to get to work on a regular basis? Number of businesses Average percent of employees Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Professional, Scientific, Technical, Information Services % 3.67% 5% 0% 0% 100% Finance, Insurance, Real Estate, Leasing, Administration and Support and Management of Companies % 2.75% 0% 0% 0% 100% Retail Trade, Accommodation and Food Services and other services % 3.15% 14% 0% 0% 100% Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation, Wholesale Trade and Warehousing % 3.71% 0% 0% 0% 100% Health Care, Social Assistance, Education, Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation % 4.53% 1% 0% 0% 75% Mining, Oil and Gas, Agriculture and Utilities % 13.88% 20% 0% 0% 100% Page 164

170 Can you tell us what proportion of your employees carpool to get to work on a regular basis? Average Percent of Employees Carpool for Commute by Business Type Number of businesses Average percent of employees Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Professional, Scientific, Technical, Information Services 66.9%.46% 0% 0% 0% 20% Finance, Insurance, Real Estate, Leasing, Administration and Support and Management of Companies 68.7%.46% 0% 0% 0% 30% Retail Trade, Accommodation and Food Services and other services % 1.28% 0% 0% 0% 100% Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation, Wholesale Trade and Warehousing % 1.34% 0% 0% 0% 60% Health Care, Social Assistance, Education, Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation % 1.04% 0% 0% 0% 25% Mining, Oil and Gas, Agriculture and Utilities 7.1%.14% 0% 0% 0% 1% Page 165

171 Can you tell us what proportion of your employees use transit to get to work on a regular basis? Average Percent of Employees Use Transit for Commute by Business Type Number of businesses Average percent of employees Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Professional, Scientific, Technical, Information Services % 3.25% 0% 0% 0% 100% Finance, Insurance, Real Estate, Leasing, Administration and Support and Management of Companies % 2.58% 0% 0% 0% 100% Retail Trade, Accommodation and Food Services and other services % 2.35% 0% 0% 0% 92% Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation, Wholesale Trade and Warehousing % 2.62% 0% 0% 0% 70% Health Care, Social Assistance, Education, Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation % 2.93% 0% 0% 0% 50% Mining, Oil and Gas, Agriculture and Utilities % 13.80% 20% 0% 0% 100% Page 166

172 Can you tell us what proportion of your employees walk or bike to get to work on a regular basis? Average Percent of Employees Walk of Bike for Commute by Business Type Number of businesses Average percent of employees Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Professional, Scientific, Technical, Information Services % 1.98% 0% 0% 0% 100% Finance, Insurance, Real Estate, Leasing, Administration and Support and Management of Companies %.75% 0% 0% 0% 27% Retail Trade, Accommodation and Food Services and other services % 1.71% 0% 0% 0% 100% Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation, Wholesale Trade and Warehousing %.94% 0% 0% 0% 40% Health Care, Social Assistance, Education, Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation % 2.94% 0% 0% 0% 50% Mining, Oil and Gas, Agriculture and Utilities 7.4%.30% 0% 0% 0% 2% Page 167

173 Do you use any of these strategies, or others, to influence how employees travel to and from work? Transportation Management Strategies by Business Type Professional, Scientific, Technical Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Retail, Accommodation, Food Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Health, Social, Education Mining, Oil, Utilities N % N % N % N % N % N % None of these 49 74% 50 74% 72 82% 36 77% 21 88% 3 43% Free/subsidized transit passes, such as the Eco Pass 10 15% 9 13% 5 6% 5 11% 1 4% 3 43% Secure bike storage 2 3% 4 6% 5 6% 5 11% 3 13% 1 14% On-site amenities for walkers and bicyclists (i.e. showers, lockers) 3 5% 5 7% 3 3% 0 0% 1 4% 1 14% Flexible work schedules (varying starting and ending times) 2 3% 3 4% 3 3% 1 2% 0 0% 1 14% Guaranteed ride home 1 2% 0 0% 2 2% 1 2% 0 0% 1 14% Organized carpooling 0 0% 0 0% 1 1% 3 6% 0 0% 0 0% Organized vanpooling 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 3 6% 0 0% 0 0% Substituting "paid parking" with a commute allowance which could be used for bus or vanpool fares as well as parking fees 1 2% 0 0% 1 1% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Teleworking (a regular, off-site work arrangement) 0 0% 1 1% 0 0% 1 2% 0 0% 0 0% Other 0 0% 2 3% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Shuttles to transit or other frequently used locations 0 0% 0 0% 1 1% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Access to vehicles for mid-day trips 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 2% 0 0% 0 0% Access to bicycles for mid-day trips 0 0% 1 1% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Page 168

174 Do you use any of these strategies, or others, to influence how employees travel to and from work? Transportation Management Strategies by Business Type Professional, Scientific, Technical Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Retail, Accommodation, Food Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Health, Social, Education Mining, Oil, Utilities N % N % N % N % N % N % Compressed work weeks (i.e. 40 hrs in 4 days, 80 hrs in 9 days) 1 2% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Respondents may choose more than one option. Page 169

175 Effectiveness of Transportation Management Strategies - Professional, Scientific, Technical Do you think...is very effective, somewhat effective or not effective in reducing single car trips and parking needs? Free/subsidized transit passes, such as the Eco Pass? Substituting "paid parking" with a commute allowance which could be used for bus or vanpool fares as well as parking fees Very effective Somewhat effective Not effective Total N % 60% 30% 10% 100% N % 100% 0% 0% 100% N Secure bike storage % 50% 50% 0% 100% On-site amenities for walkers and bicyclists (i.e. N showers, lockers) % 33% 0% 67% 100% N Guaranteed ride home % 0% 0% 100% 100% Flexible work schedules (varying starting and N ending times) % 0% 50% 50% 100% Compressed work weeks (i.e. 40 hrs in 4 days, N hrs in 9 days) % 0% 100% 0% 100% Asked only if business is using the transportation management strategy. Effectiveness of Transportation Management Strategies - Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Do you think...is very effective, somewhat effective or not effective in reducing single car trips and parking needs? Very effective Somewhat effective Not effective Total Free/subsidized transit passes, such as the N Eco Pass? % 57% 29% 14% 100% N Access to bicycles for mid-day trips % 100% 0% 0% 100% N Secure bike storage % 50% 50% 0% 100% On-site amenities for walkers and bicyclists N (i.e. showers, lockers) % 80% 20% 0% 100% Teleworking (a regular, off-site work N arrangement) % 100% 0% 0% 100% Flexible work schedules (varying starting and N ending times) % 67% 33% 0% 100% N Other strategy % 75% 0% 25% 100% Asked only if business is using the transportation management strategy. Page 170

176 Effectiveness of Transportation Management Strategies - Retail, Accommodation, Food Do you think...is very effective, somewhat effective or not effective in reducing single car trips and parking needs? Very effective Somewhat effective Not effective Total Free/subsidized transit passes, such as the Eco N Pass? % 60% 40% 0% 100% N Organized carpooling % 0% 100% 0% 100% Substituting "paid parking" with a commute N allowance which could be used for bus or vanpool fares as well as parking fees % 0% 100% 0% 100% Shuttles to transit or other frequently used N locations % 0% 100% 0% 100% N Secure bike storage % 60% 40% 0% 100% On-site amenities for walkers and bicyclists (i.e. N showers, lockers) % 0% 100% 0% 100% N Guaranteed ride home % 100% 0% 0% 100% Flexible work schedules (varying starting and N ending times) % 67% 0% 33% 100% Asked only if business is using the transportation management strategy. Page 171

177 Effectiveness of Transportation Management Strategies - Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Do you think...is very effective, somewhat effective or not effective in reducing single car trips and parking needs? Very effective Somewhat effective Not effective Total Free/subsidized transit passes, such as the N Eco Pass? % 60% 40% 0% 100% N Organized carpooling % 67% 33% 0% 100% N Organized vanpooling % 33% 33% 33% 100% N Access to vehicles for mid-day trips % 0% 100% 0% 100% N Secure bike storage % 20% 60% 20% 100% N Guaranteed ride home % 0% 100% 0% 100% Teleworking (a regular, off-site work N arrangement) % 100% 0% 0% 100% Flexible work schedules (varying starting and N ending times) % 0% 0% 100% 100% Asked only if business is using the transportation management strategy. Effectiveness of Transportation Management Strategies - Health, Social, Education Do you think...is very effective, somewhat effective or not effective in reducing single car trips and parking needs? Very effective Somewhat effective Not effective Total Free/subsidized transit passes, such as the N Eco Pass? % 0% 0% 100% 100% N Secure bike storage % 0% 67% 33% 100% On-site amenities for walkers and bicyclists N (i.e. showers, lockers) % 0% 100% 0% 100% Asked only if business is using the transportation management strategy. Page 172

178 Effectiveness of Transportation Management Strategies - Mining, Oil, Utilities Do you think...is very effective, somewhat effective or not effective in reducing single car trips and parking needs? Very effective Somewhat effective Not effective Total Free/subsidized transit passes, such as the N Eco Pass? % 67% 33% 0% 100% N Secure bike storage % 0% 100% 0% 100% On-site amenities for walkers and bicyclists N (i.e. showers, lockers) % 0% 100% 0% 100% N Guaranteed ride home % 0% 0% 100% 100% Flexible work schedules (varying starting and N ending times) % 100% 0% 0% 100% Asked only if business is using the transportation management strategy. Page 173

179 Are you interested in learning more about transportation management strategies? Interest in Transportation Management Strategies by Business Type Professional, Scientific, Technical Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Retail, Accommodation, Food Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Health, Social, Education Mining, Oil, Utilities N % N % N % N % N % N % Yes 12 18% 11 16% 20 23% 6 13% 3 13% 0 0% No 54 82% 57 84% 68 77% 41 87% 21 88% 7 100% Did you move to this location from another location or was this the first location for this business or a new branch of the business? Professional, Scientific, Technical Location by Business Type Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Retail, Accommodation, Food Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Health, Social, Education Mining, Oil, Utilities N % N % N % N % N % N % Moved 36 55% 30 44% 19 22% 22 47% 14 58% 2 29% New location 29 44% 36 53% 60 68% 22 47% 10 42% 5 71% New branch 1 2% 2 3% 9 10% 3 6% 0 0% 0 0% Page 174

180 What were the three top reasons for choosing your current location? Professional, Scientific, Technical Reasons for Choosing Current Location by Business Type Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Retail, Accommodation, Food Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Health, Social, Education Mining, Oil, Utilities N % N % N % N % N % N % Near main roads 24 36% 22 32% 26 30% 20 43% 4 17% 2 29% Lease rates 26 39% 19 28% 17 19% 13 28% 4 17% 2 29% Building structure 23 35% 22 32% 18 20% 9 19% 7 29% 1 14% Don't know 9 14% 11 16% 14 16% 6 13% 4 17% 1 14% Other complementary businesses 4 6% 4 6% 17 19% 6 13% 1 4% 1 14% Close to home 6 9% 7 10% 9 10% 4 9% 5 21% 2 29% Parking availability 6 9% 8 12% 5 6% 3 6% 1 4% 0 0% Access to customers from employees at near by businesses 3 5% 7 10% 9 10% 4 9% 0 0% 0 0% Central/downtown 8 12% 1 1% 3 3% 3 6% 2 8% 3 43% Access to rail transit 7 11% 2 3% 3 3% 5 11% 0 0% 0 0% Access to customers from near by residences 2 3% 3 4% 8 9% 3 6% 1 4% 0 0% Other 3 5% 4 6% 6 7% 2 4% 2 8% 0 0% Owns the building 2 3% 7 10% 3 3% 2 4% 1 4% 1 14% Supports brand positioning (being in young, green, urban area etc.) 5 8% 2 3% 5 6% 1 2% 1 4% 0 0% Access to customer base 2 3% 2 3% 4 5% 2 4% 1 4% 1 14% Location 1 2% 4 6% 5 6% 1 2% 1 4% 0 0% Access to customers from 2 3% 3 4% 2 2% 1 2% 0 0% 0 0% Page 175

181 What were the three top reasons for choosing your current location? rail station foot traffic Professional, Scientific, Technical Reasons for Choosing Current Location by Business Type Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Retail, Accommodation, Food Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Health, Social, Education Mining, Oil, Utilities N % N % N % N % N % N % Security 0 0% 2 3% 1 1% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Close to bus 0 0% 0 0% 1 1% 1 2% 0 0% 0 0% When you made the decision to locate here, did you know the station would be built? Professional, Scientific, Technical Timing of Move to Current Location by Business Type Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Retail, Accommodation, Food Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Health, Social, Education Mining, Oil, Utilities N % N % N % N % N % N % Moved before station, did not know about station 27 41% 40 59% 56 64% 21 45% 13 54% 4 57% Moved before station, knew station was coming 3 5% 5 7% 1 1% 5 11% 1 4% 1 14% Moved after rail station was open 36 55% 23 34% 31 35% 21 45% 10 42% 2 29% Page 176

182 Influence of Potential TOD Amenities on Location Choice - Professional, Scientific, Technical Did your expectation of... have a strong influence, somewhat of an influence, or was not an influence in choosing this location. Customer foot traffic from the rail station Customer foot traffic from employees at nearby businesses Customer foot traffic from customers of nearby businesses Customer foot traffic from local residents Having access to a larger workforce through the rail transit system Your employees seeing the rail commute option as a benefit Your employees seeing access to restaurants, coffee shops or bars as a benefit Your employees seeing access to grocery stores and drug stores as a benefit Your employees seeing access to personal services (such as hair salons or dry cleaners) as a benefit Your employees seeing access to medical or daycare centers is seen as benefit by employees Strong influence Somewhat of an influence Not an influence Don't know N % 3% 3% 92% 3% N % 0% 18% 79% 3% N % 5% 8% 85% 3% N % 0% 8% 90% 3% N % 5% 18% 74% 3% N % 10% 33% 51% 5% N % 26% 26% 46% 3% N % 8% 10% 79% 3% N % 0% 10% 87% 3% N % 5% 8% 85% 3% Having easy access by car for customers N or employees % 36% 31% 31% 3% The availability of parking for customers N and employees % 28% 46% 21% 5% Asked only if moved after station built or knew that station would be built. (N=57) Page 177

183 Influence of Potential TOD Amenities on Location Choice - Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Did your expectation of... have a strong influence, somewhat of an influence, or was not an influence in choosing this location. Customer foot traffic from the rail station Customer foot traffic from employees at nearby businesses Customer foot traffic from customers of nearby businesses Customer foot traffic from local residents Having access to a larger workforce through the rail transit system Your employees seeing the rail commute option as a benefit Your employees seeing access to restaurants, coffee shops or bars as a benefit Your employees seeing access to grocery stores and drug stores as a benefit Your employees seeing access to personal services (such as hair salons or dry cleaners) as a benefit Your employees seeing access to medical or daycare centers is seen as benefit by employees Strong influence Somewhat of an influence Not an influence Don't know N % 7% 14% 75% 4% N % 4% 25% 71% 0% N % 4% 21% 71% 4% N % 7% 7% 82% 4% N % 0% 14% 82% 4% N % 14% 36% 46% 4% N % 29% 21% 46% 4% N % 4% 11% 82% 4% N % 0% 14% 82% 4% N % 0% 7% 89% 4% Having easy access by car for customers N or employees % 50% 18% 29% 4% The availability of parking for customers N and employees % 36% 36% 25% 4% Asked only if moved after station built or knew that station would be built. (N=28) Page 178

184 Influence of Potential TOD Amenities on Location Choice - Retail, Accommodation, Food Did your expectation of... have a strong influence, somewhat of an influence, or was not an influence in choosing this location. Customer foot traffic from the rail station Customer foot traffic from employees at nearby businesses Customer foot traffic from customers of nearby businesses Customer foot traffic from local residents Having access to a larger workforce through the rail transit system Your employees seeing the rail commute option as a benefit Your employees seeing access to restaurants, coffee shops or bars as a benefit Your employees seeing access to grocery stores and drug stores as a benefit Your employees seeing access to personal services (such as hair salons or dry cleaners) as a benefit Your employees seeing access to medical or daycare centers is seen as benefit by employees Strong influence Somewhat of an influence Not an influence Don't know N % 19% 19% 56% 6% N % 16% 16% 63% 6% N % 31% 28% 34% 6% N % 25% 22% 47% 6% N % 9% 22% 59% 9% N % 16% 25% 53% 6% N % 9% 31% 53% 6% N % 3% 22% 69% 6% N % 3% 13% 78% 6% N % 0% 13% 78% 9% Having easy access by car for customers N or employees % 31% 34% 28% 6% The availability of parking for customers N and employees % 34% 25% 34% 6% Asked only if moved after station built or knew that station would be built. (N=54) Page 179

185 Influence of Potential TOD Amenities on Location Choice - Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Did your expectation of... have a strong influence, somewhat of an influence, or was not an influence in choosing this location. Customer foot traffic from the rail station Customer foot traffic from employees at nearby businesses Customer foot traffic from customers of nearby businesses Customer foot traffic from local residents Having access to a larger workforce through the rail transit system Your employees seeing the rail commute option as a benefit Your employees seeing access to restaurants, coffee shops or bars as a benefit Your employees seeing access to grocery stores and drug stores as a benefit Your employees seeing access to personal services (such as hair salons or dry cleaners) as a benefit Your employees seeing access to medical or daycare centers is seen as benefit by employees Strong influence Somewhat of an influence Not an influence Don't know N % 0% 12% 88% 0% N % 4% 15% 81% 0% N % 4% 12% 85% 0% N % 4% 0% 96% 0% N % 4% 8% 88% 0% N % 8% 19% 73% 0% N % 15% 15% 65% 4% N % 4% 4% 92% 0% N % 4% 8% 85% 4% N % 4% 0% 92% 4% Having easy access by car for customers N or employees % 46% 38% 15% 0% The availability of parking for customers N and employees % 31% 31% 38% 0% Asked only if moved after station built or knew that station would be built. (N=57) Page 180

186 Influence of Potential TOD Amenities on Location Choice - Health, Social, Education Did your expectation of... have a strong influence, somewhat of an influence, or was not an influence in choosing this location. Customer foot traffic from the rail station Customer foot traffic from employees at nearby businesses Customer foot traffic from customers of nearby businesses Customer foot traffic from local residents Having access to a larger workforce through the rail transit system Your employees seeing the rail commute option as a benefit Your employees seeing access to restaurants, coffee shops or bars as a benefit Your employees seeing access to grocery stores and drug stores as a benefit Your employees seeing access to personal services (such as hair salons or dry cleaners) as a benefit Your employees seeing access to medical or daycare centers is seen as benefit by employees Strong influence Somewhat of an influence Not an influence Don't know N % 0% 18% 64% 18% N % 9% 18% 55% 18% N % 18% 18% 45% 18% N % 9% 9% 64% 18% N % 9% 9% 64% 18% N % 18% 0% 64% 18% N % 0% 18% 64% 18% N % 0% 27% 55% 18% N % 9% 0% 73% 18% N % 18% 0% 64% 18% Having easy access by car for customers N or employees % 36% 18% 27% 18% The availability of parking for customers N and employees % 36% 18% 27% 18% Asked only if moved after station built or knew that station would be built. (N=28) Page 181

187 Influence of Potential TOD Amenities on Location Choice - Mining, Oil, Utilities Did your expectation of... have a strong influence, somewhat of an influence, or was not an influence in choosing this location. Customer foot traffic from the rail station Customer foot traffic from employees at nearby businesses Customer foot traffic from customers of nearby businesses Customer foot traffic from local residents Having access to a larger workforce through the rail transit system Your employees seeing the rail commute option as a benefit Your employees seeing access to restaurants, coffee shops or bars as a benefit Your employees seeing access to grocery stores and drug stores as a benefit Your employees seeing access to personal services (such as hair salons or dry cleaners) as a benefit Your employees seeing access to medical or daycare centers is seen as benefit by employees Strong influence Somewhat of an influence Not an influence Don't know N % 0% 33% 67% 0% N % 0% 0% 100% 0% N % 0% 0% 100% 0% N % 0% 0% 100% 0% N % 0% 33% 67% 0% N % 0% 67% 33% 0% N % 33% 33% 33% 0% N % 0% 0% 100% 0% N % 0% 33% 67% 0% N % 0% 0% 100% 0% Having easy access by car for customers N or employees % 67% 0% 33% 0% The availability of parking for customers N and employees % 0% 33% 67% 0% Asked only if moved after station built or knew that station would be built. (N=54) Page 182

188 Effects of Expected TOD Amenities on Business - Professional, Scientific, Technical... and were your expectations of... fully met, somewhat met or not met? Customer foot traffic from the rail station Customer foot traffic from employees at nearby businesses Customer foot traffic from customers of nearby businesses Customer foot traffic from local residents Having access to a larger workforce through the rail transit system Your employees seeing the rail commute option as a benefit Your employees seeing access to restaurants, coffee shops or bars as a benefit Your employees seeing access to grocery stores and drug stores as a benefit Your employees seeing access to personal services (such as hair salons or dry cleaners) as a benefit Your employees seeing access to medical or daycare centers is seen as benefit by employees Fully met Somewhat met Not met Don't know Total N % 50% 50% 0% 0% 100% N % 43% 43% 14% 0% 100% N % 20% 80% 0% 0% 100% N % 0% 100% 0% 0% 100% N % 56% 22% 22% 0% 100% N % 65% 35% 0% 0% 100% N % 70% 30% 0% 0% 100% N % 71% 29% 0% 0% 100% N % 75% 25% 0% 0% 100% N % 60% 40% 0% 0% 100% Having easy access by car for customers or N employees % 81% 12% 8% 0% 100% The availability of parking for customers and N employees % 69% 28% 3% 0% 100% Asked only if amenity was an influence on the location choice Page 183

189 Effects of Expected TOD Amenities on Business - Finance, Insurance, Real Estate... and were your expectations of... fully met, somewhat met or not met? Customer foot traffic from the rail station Customer foot traffic from employees at nearby businesses Customer foot traffic from customers of nearby businesses Customer foot traffic from local residents Having access to a larger workforce through the rail transit system Your employees seeing the rail commute option as a benefit Your employees seeing access to restaurants, coffee shops or bars as a benefit Your employees seeing access to grocery stores and drug stores as a benefit Your employees seeing access to personal services (such as hair salons or dry cleaners) as a benefit Your employees seeing access to medical or daycare centers is seen as benefit by employees Fully met Somewhat met Not met Don't know Total N % 50% 50% 0% 0% 100% N % 50% 38% 13% 0% 100% N % 43% 57% 0% 0% 100% N % 50% 50% 0% 0% 100% N % 50% 25% 25% 0% 100% N % 57% 36% 0% 7% 100% N % 71% 29% 0% 0% 100% N % 25% 75% 0% 0% 100% N % 25% 75% 0% 0% 100% N % 50% 50% 0% 0% 100% Having easy access by car for customers or N employees % 84% 16% 0% 0% 100% The availability of parking for customers and N employees % 70% 30% 0% 0% 100% Asked only if amenity was an influence on the location choice Page 184

190 Effects of Expected TOD Amenities on Business - Retail, Accommodation, Food... and were your expectations of... fully met, somewhat met or not met? Customer foot traffic from the rail station Customer foot traffic from employees at nearby businesses Customer foot traffic from customers of nearby businesses Customer foot traffic from local residents Having access to a larger workforce through the rail transit system Your employees seeing the rail commute option as a benefit Your employees seeing access to restaurants, coffee shops or bars as a benefit Your employees seeing access to grocery stores and drug stores as a benefit Your employees seeing access to personal services (such as hair salons or dry cleaners) as a benefit Your employees seeing access to medical or daycare centers is seen as benefit by employees Fully met Somewhat met Not met Don't know Total N % 17% 67% 17% 0% 100% N % 40% 40% 20% 0% 100% N % 42% 47% 11% 0% 100% N % 40% 53% 7% 0% 100% N % 30% 70% 0% 0% 100% N % 54% 38% 8% 0% 100% N % 38% 46% 15% 0% 100% N % 13% 88% 0% 0% 100% N % 20% 60% 20% 0% 100% N % 25% 50% 25% 0% 100% Having easy access by car for customers or N employees % 48% 48% 0% 5% 100% The availability of parking for customers and N employees % 47% 37% 16% 0% 100% Asked only if amenity was an influence on the location choice Page 185

191 Effects of Expected TOD Amenities on Business - Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation... and were your expectations of... fully met, somewhat met or not met? Customer foot traffic from the rail station Customer foot traffic from employees at nearby businesses Customer foot traffic from customers of nearby businesses Customer foot traffic from local residents Having access to a larger workforce through the rail transit system Your employees seeing the rail commute option as a benefit Your employees seeing access to restaurants, coffee shops or bars as a benefit Your employees seeing access to grocery stores and drug stores as a benefit Your employees seeing access to personal services (such as hair salons or dry cleaners) as a benefit Your employees seeing access to medical or daycare centers is seen as benefit by employees Fully met Somewhat met Not met Don't know Total N % 100% 0% 0% 0% 100% N % 80% 20% 0% 0% 100% N % 25% 75% 0% 0% 100% N % 100% 0% 0% 0% 100% N % 33% 67% 0% 0% 100% N % 71% 29% 0% 0% 100% N % 63% 38% 0% 0% 100% N % 100% 0% 0% 0% 100% N % 67% 33% 0% 0% 100% N % 100% 0% 0% 0% 100% Having easy access by car for customers or N employees % 82% 18% 0% 0% 100% The availability of parking for customers and N employees % 63% 38% 0% 0% 100% Asked only if amenity was an influence on the location choice Page 186

192 Effects of Expected TOD Amenities on Business - Health, Social, Education... and were your expectations of... fully met, somewhat met or not met? Customer foot traffic from the rail station Customer foot traffic from employees at nearby businesses Customer foot traffic from customers of nearby businesses Customer foot traffic from local residents Having access to a larger workforce through the rail transit system Your employees seeing the rail commute option as a benefit Your employees seeing access to restaurants, coffee shops or bars as a benefit Your employees seeing access to grocery stores and drug stores as a benefit Your employees seeing access to personal services (such as hair salons or dry cleaners) as a benefit Your employees seeing access to medical or daycare centers is seen as benefit by employees Fully met Somewhat met Not met Don't know Total N % 0% 100% 0% 0% 100% N % 67% 33% 0% 0% 100% N % 50% 25% 25% 0% 100% N % 0% 100% 0% 0% 100% N % 100% 0% 0% 0% 100% N % 50% 50% 0% 0% 100% N % 50% 50% 0% 0% 100% N % 67% 33% 0% 0% 100% N % 100% 0% 0% 0% 100% N % 100% 0% 0% 0% 100% Having easy access by car for customers or N employees % 67% 33% 0% 0% 100% The availability of parking for customers and N employees % 83% 0% 17% 0% 100% Asked only if amenity was an influence on the location choice Page 187

193 Effects of Expected TOD Amenities on Business - Mining, Oil, Utilities... and were your expectations of... fully met, somewhat met or not met? Customer foot traffic from the rail station Having access to a larger workforce through the rail transit system Your employees seeing the rail commute option as a benefit Your employees seeing access to restaurants, coffee shops or bars as a benefit Your employees seeing access to personal services (such as hair salons or dry cleaners) as a benefit Fully met Somewhat met Not met Don't know Total N % 100% 0% 0% 0% 100% N % 0% 100% 0% 0% 100% N % 50% 50% 0% 0% 100% N % 100% 0% 0% 0% 100% N % 100% 0% 0% 0% 100% Having easy access by car for customers or N employees % 100% 0% 0% 0% 100% The availability of parking for customers and N employees % 0% 100% 0% 0% 100% Asked only if amenity was an influence on the location choice Page 188

194 How important, if at all, is having FasTracks completed on schedule to achieving your business objectives? Importance of FasTracks Timing by Business Type Professional, Scientific, Technical Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Retail, Accommodation, Food Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Health, Social, Education Mining, Oil, Utilities N % N % N % N % N % N % Very important 12 18% 7 10% 19 22% 5 11% 4 17% 0 0% Somewhat important 18 27% 25 37% 23 26% 11 23% 6 25% 2 29% Not at all important 36 55% 36 53% 46 52% 31 66% 14 58% 5 71% What other types of businesses, houses or other land uses would you most like to have move near you? Reasons for Choosing Current Location by Business Type Professional, Scientific, Technical Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Retail, Accommodation, Food Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Health, Social, Education Mining, Oil, Utilities N % N % N % N % N % N % Don't know 30 45% 34 50% 26 30% 23 49% 6 25% 2 29% Restaurants 14 21% 12 18% 24 27% 3 6% 7 29% 2 29% Department stores 4 6% 2 3% 12 14% 3 6% 0 0% 1 14% Grocery/ drug/ convenience stores 4 6% 6 9% 5 6% 3 6% 1 4% 1 14% Multi family housing 3 5% 3 4% 9 10% 0 0% 1 4% 1 14% Nothing more/ good as is 3 5% 6 9% 2 2% 1 2% 4 17% 0 0% Clothing/shoe stores 3 5% 0 0% 10 11% 1 2% 0 0% 1 14% General office (law, insurance, temp help, marketing etc) 5 8% 3 4% 2 2% 2 4% 2 8% 1 14% Other 1 2% 3 4% 3 3% 2 4% 1 4% 0 0% Coffee shops 1 2% 1 1% 4 5% 2 4% 1 4% 0 0% Financial (banking, investment, mortgage, accounting) 2 3% 4 6% 1 1% 1 2% 0 0% 1 14% Page 189

195 What other types of businesses, houses or other land uses would you most like to have move near you? Reasons for Choosing Current Location by Business Type Professional, Scientific, Technical Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Retail, Accommodation, Food Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Health, Social, Education Mining, Oil, Utilities N % N % N % N % N % N % Single family housing 1 2% 1 1% 6 7% 0 0% 1 4% 0 0% Parks/ open space 3 5% 0 0% 2 2% 0 0% 3 13% 1 14% Entertainment (theater, art gallery, museum) 1 2% 0 0% 6 7% 0 0% 1 4% 0 0% Businesses/business parks 0 0% 1 1% 4 5% 1 2% 1 4% 0 0% Sporting good stores 1 2% 0 0% 4 5% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Gas station 2 3% 0 0% 1 1% 1 2% 0 0% 1 14% Retail- general 0 0% 1 1% 3 3% 0 0% 1 4% 0 0% Manufacturing/ industry 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 4 9% 0 0% 1 14% Hotel/motel 1 2% 2 3% 1 1% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Beauty/nails/hair (spa/salon/products) 0 0% 1 1% 2 2% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Home improvement/hardware/paint and wallpaper stores 0 0% 0 0% 2 2% 1 2% 0 0% 0 0% Books, office supplies, print/photos shop, computer store 2 3% 0 0% 1 1% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Bike paths/sidewalks 1 2% 0 0% 1 1% 1 2% 0 0% 0 0% Parking 0 0% 0 0% 2 2% 1 2% 0 0% 0 0% More rail stops/lines 0 0% 2 3% 1 1% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Residential - general 1 2% 0 0% 1 1% 1 2% 0 0% 0 0% Bars/ taverns/ night clubs 0 0% 1 1% 1 1% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Dry cleaners/ laundry/ alterations/ tailors 0 0% 1 1% 1 1% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Page 190

196 What other types of businesses, houses or other land uses would you most like to have move near you? Reasons for Choosing Current Location by Business Type Professional, Scientific, Technical Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Retail, Accommodation, Food Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Health, Social, Education Mining, Oil, Utilities N % N % N % N % N % N % Health care (medical, dental, chiropractic, therapy) 1 2% 1 1% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Sports and fitness (gyms/organizations) 1 2% 0 0% 1 1% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Construction/trades (builder, plumber, painter, electrician) 1 2% 0 0% 0 0% 1 2% 0 0% 0 0% Child care/day care 0 0% 1 1% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Computer/Information Technology (IT)/Software and Hardware 0 0% 1 1% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Auto repair 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 2% 0 0% 0 0% Real estate / property management/ architect 0 0% 0 0% 1 1% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Do you plan to stay in this location for the next few years? Professional, Scientific, Technical Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Relocation Plans by Business Type Retail, Accommodation, Food Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Health, Social, Education Mining, Oil, Utilities N % N % N % N % N % N % No 63 95% 64 94% 86 98% 42 89% 23 96% 6 86% Yes 3 5% 4 6% 2 2% 5 11% 1 4% 1 14% Relocation Timeline Page 191

197 In what year do you intend to move? Professional, Scientific, Technical Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Retail, Accommodation, Food Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Health, Social, Education Mining, Oil, Utilities N % N % N % N % N % N % % 2 67% 1 100% 4 80% 1 100% 1 100% % 1 33% 0 0% 1 20% 0 0% 0 0% Page 192

198 Why do you want to move? Professional, Scientific, Technical Reasons for Planned Move by Business Type Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Retail, Accommodation, Food Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Health, Social, Education Mining, Oil, Utilities N % N % N % N % N % N % Too expensive 1 33% 1 25% 1 50% 2 40% 0 0% 0 0% Need larger space 0 0% 2 50% 0 0% 0 0% 1 100% 0 0% Need different building structure/amenities 0 0% 0 0% 1 50% 2 40% 0 0% 0 0% Need smaller space 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 20% 0 0% 1 100% Closing business/retiring 1 33% 0 0% 0 0% 1 20% 0 0% 0 0% Not enough parking 0 0% 0 0% 1 50% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Lease is up 0 0% 0 0% 1 50% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Bought new building 1 33% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Eminent domain seizure by RTD 0 0% 1 25% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Will you move to another location near a transit station or away from a transit station? Professional, Scientific, Technical Relocation and Rail Transit by Business Type Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Retail, Accommodation, Food Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Health, Social, Education Mining, Oil, Utilities N % N % N % N % N % N % Near 0 0% 3 75% 0 0% 2 40% 1 100% 1 100% Away from 2 67% 1 25% 0 0% 2 40% 0 0% 0 0% Page 193

199 Will you move to another location near a transit station or away from a transit station? Professional, Scientific, Technical Relocation and Rail Transit by Business Type Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Retail, Accommodation, Food Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Health, Social, Education Mining, Oil, Utilities N % N % N % N % N % N % Don't know 1 33% 0 0% 2 100% 1 20% 0 0% 0 0% Page 194

200 Gender of Employees - Professional, Scientific, Technical Female Male Can you tell us what proportion of your employees are: N % N % None 4 6% 5 8% 1%-25% 14 21% 7 11% 26%-50% 25 38% 21 32% 51%-75% 12 18% 21 32% 76%-100% 11 17% 12 18% Gender of Employees - Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Female Male Can you tell us what proportion of your employees are: N % N % None 4 6% 3 4% 1%-25% 11 16% 15 22% 26%-50% 22 33% 23 34% 51%-75% 20 30% 13 19% 76%-100% 10 15% 13 19% Gender of Employees - Retail, Accommodation, Food Female Male Can you tell us what proportion of your employees are: N % N % None 13 15% 16 18% 1%-25% 11 13% 10 11% 26%-50% 23 26% 27 31% 51%-75% 18 20% 17 19% 76%-100% 23 26% 18 20% Gender of Employees - Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Female Male Can you tell us what proportion of your employees are: N % N % None 8 17% 2 4% 1%-25% 15 33% 1 2% 26%-50% 16 35% 11 24% 51%-75% 5 11% 12 26% 76%-100% 2 4% 20 43% Page 195

201 Gender of Employees - Health, Social, Education Female Male Can you tell us what proportion of your employees are: N % N % None 0 0% 6 25% 1%-25% 2 8% 8 33% 26%-50% 7 29% 6 25% 51%-75% 3 13% 3 13% 76%-100% 12 50% 1 4% Gender of Employees - Mining, Oil, Utilities Female Male Can you tell us what proportion of your employees are: N % N % None 2 29% 0 0% 1%-25% 0 0% 0 0% 26%-50% 3 43% 2 29% 51%-75% 2 29% 3 43% 76%-100% 0 0% 2 29% Can you tell us what proportion of your employees are: Age of Employees - Professional, Scientific, Technical Under 30 years old Between 30 and 50 years old Over 50 years old N % N % N % None 20 31% 9 14% 18 28% 1%-25% 21 33% 6 9% 20 31% 26%-50% 18 28% 23 36% 13 20% 51%-75% 2 3% 14 22% 7 11% 76%-100% 3 5% 12 19% 6 9% Can you tell us what proportion of your employees are: Age of Employees - Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Under 30 years old Between 30 and 50 years old Over 50 years old N % N % N % None 23 34% 7 10% 27 40% 1%-25% 22 33% 10 15% 19 28% 26%-50% 12 18% 18 27% 6 9% 51%-75% 5 7% 16 24% 10 15% 76%-100% 5 7% 16 24% 5 7% Page 196

202 Can you tell us what proportion of your employees are: Age of Employees - Retail, Accommodation, Food Under 30 years old Between 30 and 50 years old Over 50 years old N % N % N % None 25 29% 19 22% 43 50% 1%-25% 19 22% 23 27% 13 15% 26%-50% 14 16% 23 27% 12 14% 51%-75% 11 13% 8 9% 8 9% 76%-100% 17 20% 13 15% 10 12% Age of Employees - Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Can you tell us what proportion of your employees are: Under 30 years old Between 30 and 50 years old Over 50 years old N % N % N % None 15 33% 5 11% 11 24% 1%-25% 16 35% 7 15% 15 33% 26%-50% 11 24% 11 24% 10 22% 51%-75% 3 7% 18 39% 6 13% 76%-100% 1 2% 5 11% 4 9% Can you tell us what proportion of your employees are: Age of Employees - Health, Social, Education Under 30 years old Between 30 and 50 years old Over 50 years old N % N % N % None 8 40% 2 10% 8 40% 1%-25% 8 40% 1 5% 8 40% 26%-50% 4 20% 3 15% 2 10% 51%-75% 0 0% 5 25% 0 0% 76%-100% 0 0% 9 45% 2 10% Can you tell us what proportion of your employees are: Age of Employees - Mining, Oil, Utilities Under 30 years old Between 30 and 50 years old Over 50 years old N % N % N % None 3 43% 2 29% 1 14% 1%-25% 1 14% 0 0% 3 43% 26%-50% 3 43% 3 43% 1 14% 51%-75% 0 0% 1 14% 0 0% Page 197

203 Can you tell us what proportion of your employees are: Age of Employees - Mining, Oil, Utilities Under 30 years old Between 30 and 50 years old Over 50 years old N % N % N % 76%-100% 0 0% 1 14% 2 29% Page 198

204 Can you tell us what proportion of your employees earn: Employee Wages - Professional, Scientific, Technical Less than $10 per hour Between $10 and $20 per hour More than $20 per hour N % N % N % None 55 92% 26 43% 4 7% 1%-25% 2 3% 14 23% 6 10% 26%-50% 1 2% 11 18% 9 15% 51%-75% 1 2% 3 5% 3 5% 76%-100% 1 2% 6 10% 38 63% Can you tell us what proportion of your employees earn: Employee Wages - Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Less than $10 per hour Between $10 and $20 per hour More than $20 per hour N % N % N % None 58 94% 13 21% 9 15% 1%-25% 2 3% 21 34% 7 11% 26%-50% 1 2% 11 18% 7 11% 51%-75% 0 0% 6 10% 14 23% 76%-100% 1 2% 11 18% 25 40% Can you tell us what proportion of your employees earn: Employee Wages - Retail, Accommodation, Food less than $10 per hour Between $10 and $20 per hour More than $20 per hour N % N % N % None 38 48% 12 15% 36 46% 1%-25% 15 19% 16 20% 16 20% 26%-50% 8 10% 18 23% 12 15% 51%-75% 8 10% 10 13% 7 9% 76%-100% 10 13% 23 29% 8 10% Employee Wages - Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Can you tell us what proportion of your employees earn: Less than $10 per hour Between $10 and $20 per hour More than $20 per hour N % N % N % None 37 93% 8 20% 4 10% 1%-25% 2 5% 7 18% 7 18% 26%-50% 1 3% 10 25% 10 25% 51%-75% 0 0% 8 20% 6 15% Page 199

205 Employee Wages - Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Can you tell us what proportion of your employees earn: Less than $10 per hour Between $10 and $20 per hour More than $20 per hour N % N % N % 76%-100% 0 0% 7 18% 13 33% Page 200

206 Can you tell us what proportion of your employees earn: Employee Wages - Health, Social, Education Less than $10 per hour Between $10 and $20 per hour More than $20 per hour N % N % N % None 19 83% 5 22% 4 17% 1%-25% 3 13% 3 13% 7 30% 26%-50% 0 0% 4 17% 2 9% 51%-75% 0 0% 4 17% 4 17% 76%-100% 1 4% 7 30% 6 26% Can you tell us what proportion of your employees earn: Employee Wages - Mining, Oil, Utilities Less than $10 per hour Between $10 and $20 per hour More than $20 per hour N % N % N % None 3 75% 2 50% 1 25% 1%-25% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 26%-50% 0 0% 2 50% 0 0% 51%-75% 0 0% 0 0% 2 50% 76%-100% 1 25% 0 0% 1 25% Page 201

207 Would you be willing to have us send you a set of surveys for your employees? Professional, Scientific, Technical Participate in Employee Survey by Business Type Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Retail, Accommodation, Food Construction, Manufacturing, Transportation Health, Social, Education Mining, Oil, Utilities N % N % N % N % N % N % Yes 54 82% 49 72% 68 77% 32 68% 19 79% 5 71% No 12 18% 19 28% 20 23% 15 32% 5 21% 2 29% Page 202

208 Appendix D: Survey Results by Shortest Walking Distance to a Rail Transit Station The following pages contain a complete set of responses to each question on the survey. What is your position in the company? Position of Respondent by Distance 0.00 to 0.24 miles 0.25 to 0.49 miles 0.50 to 0.74 miles 0.75 to 1.00 miles N % N % N % N % Human resources personnel 2 5% 2 3% 6 9% 1 3% Office manager 3 8% 7 11% 13 19% 6 20% Manager/ assistant manager/ supervisor 6 15% 13 20% 13 19% 4 13% Receptionist/ secretary/ assistant 3 8% 4 6% 5 7% 3 10% CEO/ president/ vice president/ director/ officer 7 18% 21 32% 10 15% 8 27% Owner 14 35% 15 23% 18 27% 7 23% Other (non-administrative/ nonmanagement) 5 13% 4 6% 2 3% 1 3% Total % % % % *Was not asked in the first 97 interviews. Other positions indicated by Distance 0.00 to 0.24 miles 0.25 to 0.49 miles 0.50 to 0.74 miles 0.75 or more miles Contractor Night Instructor Third Key Sales Geologist Project Engineer Travel Agent Sales Senior Underwriter Sales Associate Senior Shipping Coordinator Including yourself, how many full-time, part-time and contract employees do you have at this location? Average Number of Employees by Type Miles Number of businesses Average number of employees Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Page 203

209 Including yourself, how many full-time, part-time and contract employees do you have at this location? Average Number of Employees by Type Miles Number of businesses Average number of employees Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Full time ,400 Part time Contract All types ,200 Page 204

210 Including yourself, how many full-time, part-time and contract employees do you have at this location? Average Number of Employees by Type Miles Number of businesses Average number of employees Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Full time Part time Contract All types Including yourself, how many full-time, part-time and contract employees do you have at this location? Average Number of Employees by Type Miles Number of businesses Average number of employees Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Full time Part time Contract All types Including yourself, how many full-time, part-time and contract employees do you have at this location? Average Number of Employees by Type to 1.00 miles Number of businesses Average number of employees Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Full time Part time Contract All types Page 205

211 Including yourself, how many full-time employees do you have at this location? Number of Full Time Employees by Distance 0.00 to 0.24 miles 0.25 to 0.49 miles 0.50 to 0.74 miles 0.75 to 1.00 miles N % N % N % N % Number of Businesses % % % % None 4 7% 6 6% 2 2% 0 0% % 45 44% 37 38% 19 49% % 17 17% 21 21% 8 21% % 15 15% 21 21% 4 10% % 8 8% 10 10% 4 10% % 4 4% 6 6% 2 5% % 7 7% 1 1% 2 5% 500 or more 1 2% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Including yourself, how many part-time employees do you have at this location? Number of Part Time Employees by Distance 0.00 to 0.24 miles 0.25 to 0.49 miles 0.50 to 0.74 miles 0.75 to 1.00 miles N % N % N % N % Number of Businesses % % % % None 30 49% 54 53% 46 47% 18 46% % 34 33% 33 34% 14 36% % 7 7% 9 9% 4 10% % 4 4% 6 6% 2 5% % 2 2% 3 3% 0 0% % 1 1% 1 1% 0 0% % 0 0% 0 0% 1 3% 500 or more 1 2% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Including yourself, how many contract employees do you have at this location? Number of Contract Employees by Distance 0.00 to 0.24 miles 0.25 to 0.49 miles 0.50 to 0.74 miles 0.75 to 1.00 miles N % N % N % N % Number of Businesses % % % % None 48 79% 77 75% 82 84% 31 79% % 19 19% 10 10% 4 10% % 1 1% 2 2% 2 5% Page 206

212 Including yourself, how many contract employees do you have at this location? Number of Contract Employees by Distance 0.00 to 0.24 miles 0.25 to 0.49 miles 0.50 to 0.74 miles 0.75 to 1.00 miles N % N % N % N % % 1 1% 1 1% 0 0% % 2 2% 1 1% 1 3% % 2 2% 1 1% 1 3% % 0 0% 1 1% 0 0% 500 or more 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Including yourself, how many full-time, parttime and contract employees do you have at this location? Number of Employees by Distance 0.00 to 0.24 miles 0.25 to 0.49 miles 0.50 to 0.74 miles 0.75 to 1.00 miles N % N % N % N % Number of Businesses % % % % None 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% % 38 37% 27 28% 11 28% % 21 21% 20 20% 12 31% % 20 20% 28 29% 6 15% % 11 11% 14 14% 4 10% % 5 5% 4 4% 3 8% % 7 7% 5 5% 3 8% 500 or more 1 2% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Roughly, what percent of employees at your worksite work the following schedules: Average Percent of Employees Working each Schedule Type Miles Number of businesses Average percent of employees Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Weekdays, daytime? % 3.42% 100% 100% 0% 100% Weekdays, evenings or night? % 3.01% 0% 0% 0% 100% Weekends? % 4.16% 0% 0% 0% 100% Varying or unpredictable % 3.77% 0% 0% 0% 100% Page 207

213 Roughly, what percent of employees at your worksite work the following schedules: schedule? Average Percent of Employees Working each Schedule Type Miles Number of businesses Average percent of employees Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Roughly, what percent of employees at your worksite work the following schedules: Average Percent of Employees Working each Schedule Type Miles Number of businesses Average percent of employees Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Weekdays, daytime? % 2.59% 100% 100% 0% 100% Weekdays, evenings or night? % 2.24% 0% 0% 0% 100% Weekends? % 2.79% 0% 0% 0% 100% Varying or unpredictable schedule? % 2.64% 0% 0% 0% 100% Page 208

214 Roughly, what percent of employees at your worksite work the following schedules: Average Percent of Employees Working each Schedule Type Miles Number of businesses Average percent of employees Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Weekdays, daytime? % 2.73% 100% 100% 0% 100% Weekdays, evenings or night? % 2.85% 0% 0% 0% 100% Weekends? % 3.24% 0% 0% 0% 100% Varying or unpredictable schedule? % 2.81% 0% 0% 0% 100% Roughly, what percent of employees at your worksite work the following schedules: Average Percent of Employees Working each Schedule Type to 1.00 miles Number of businesses Average percent of employees Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Weekdays, daytime? % 2.78% 100% 100% 8% 100% Weekdays, evenings or night? % 3.38% 0% 0% 0% 100% Weekends? % 4.90% 0% 0% 0% 100% Varying or unpredictable schedule? % 3.33% 0% 0% 0% 100% Percent of Employees Working each Schedule Type Miles Percent of Weekdays, daytime? Weekdays, evenings or night? Weekends? Varying or unpredictable schedule? employees N % N % N % N % None 2 3% 45 74% 36 59% 41 67% 1%-25% 3 5% 7 11% 7 11% 11 18% Page 209

215 Percent of Employees Working each Schedule Type Miles Percent of Weekdays, daytime? Weekdays, evenings or night? Weekends? Varying or unpredictable schedule? employees N % N % N % N % 26%-50% 3 5% 5 8% 10 16% 3 5% 51%-75% 5 8% 2 3% 1 2% 1 2% 76%-100% 48 79% 2 3% 7 11% 5 8% Total % % % % Page 210

216 Percent of Employees Working each Schedule Type Miles Percent of Weekdays, daytime? Weekdays, evenings or night? Weekends? Varying or unpredictable schedule? employees N % N % N % N % None 4 4% 66 65% 68 67% 77 75% 1%-25% 3 3% 20 20% 18 18% 14 14% 26%-50% 3 3% 8 8% 6 6% 3 3% 51%-75% 10 10% 6 6% 2 2% 1 1% 76%-100% 82 80% 2 2% 8 8% 7 7% Total % % % % Percent of Employees Working each Schedule Type Miles Percent of Weekdays, daytime? Weekdays, evenings or night? Weekends? Varying or unpredictable schedule? employees N % N % N % N % None 2 2% 69 70% 63 64% 76 78% 1%-25% 7 7% 11 11% 13 13% 9 9% 26%-50% 2 2% 6 6% 9 9% 3 3% 51%-75% 8 8% 4 4% 3 3% 3 3% 76%-100% 79 81% 8 8% 10 10% 7 7% Total % % % % Percent of Employees Working each Schedule Type to 1.00 miles Percent of Weekdays, daytime? Weekdays, evenings or night? Weekends? Varying or unpredictable schedule? employees N % N % N % N % None 0 0% 29 74% 24 62% 29 74% 1%-25% 1 3% 5 13% 7 18% 7 18% 26%-50% 1 3% 3 8% 2 5% 1 3% 51%-75% 2 5% 1 3% 2 5% 0 0% 76%-100% 35 90% 1 3% 4 10% 2 5% Total % % % % Page 211

217 Does your company rent or own your business facility? Business Facility Tenure by Distance Shortest walking distance to rail station 0.00 to 0.24 miles 0.25 to 0.49 miles 0.50 to 0.74 miles 0.75 to 1.00 miles N % N % N % N % Rent 47 77% 78 76% 64 65% 28 72% Own 13 21% 23 23% 34 35% 11 28% Don't know 1 2% 1 1% 0 0% 0 0% 0.00 to 0.24 miles Annual Rent Per Square Foot by Distance 0.25 to 0.49 miles 0.50 to 0.74 miles 0.75 to 1.00 miles N % N % N % N % Owns property 13 21% 23 23% 34 35% 11 28% $0.25 to $ % 10 10% 1 1% 2 5% $5.00 to $ % 5 5% 4 4% 6 15% $10.00 to $ % 10 10% 3 3% 5 13% $15.00 to $ % 12 12% 7 7% 2 5% $25.00 to $ % 6 6% 6 6% 2 5% $50.00 to $ % 0 0% 2 2% 0 0% $ or more 5 8% 4 4% 2 2% 1 3% Refused 23 38% 32 31% 39 40% 10 26% Total % % % % This question was not answered in a consistent manner and the data may be inaccurate What is the square footage of this business facility? Number of businesses Size of Business Facility by Distance Average square footage Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum 0.00 to 0.24 miles 56 9,178 5, ,000 1, , to 0.49 miles 88 6,742 1, ,775 1, , to 0.74 miles 81 8,844 2, ,500 1, , to 1.00 miles 34 5,187 1, ,000 2, ,000 Page 212

218 Size of Business Facility by Distance 0.00 to 0.24 miles 0.25 to 0.49 miles 0.50 to 0.74 miles 0.75 to 1.00 miles Square footage N % N % N % N % 0 to 999 sq. feet 10 16% 19 19% 12 12% 4 10% 1,000 to 2,499 sq. feet 23 38% 30 29% 26 27% 14 36% 2,500 to 4,999 sq. feet 9 15% 14 14% 16 16% 8 21% 5,000 to 9,999 sq. feet 7 11% 13 13% 15 15% 5 13% 10,000 sq. feet or more 7 11% 12 12% 12 12% 3 8% Refused 5 8% 14 14% 17 17% 5 13% Total % % % % Businesses by North American Industry Classification System Code by Distance 0.00 to 0.24 miles 0.25 to 0.49 miles 0.50 to 0.74 miles 0.75 to 1.00 miles NAICS Category N % N % N % N % Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction 3 5% 3 3% 0 0% 0 0% Utilities 0 0% 0 0% 1 1% 0 0% Construction 2 3% 2 2% 4 4% 2 5% Manufacturing 2 3% 3 3% 4 4% 3 8% Wholesale Trade 4 7% 7 7% 4 4% 2 5% Retail Trade 9 16% 7 7% 11 11% 4 11% Transportation and Warehousing 2 3% 2 2% 2 2% 1 3% Information 1 2% 1 1% 1 1% 1 3% Finance and Insurance 5 9% 11 11% 10 10% 4 11% Real Estate and Rental and Leasing 5 9% 9 9% 8 8% 3 8% Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services 13 22% 26 26% 16 16% 9 24% Management of Companies and Enterprises 0 0% 2 2% 1 1% 0 0% Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services 2 3% 8 8% 3 3% 1 3% Educational Services 1 2% 1 1% 1 1% 1 3% Health Care and Social Assistance 1 2% 3 3% 13 13% 3 8% Accommodation and Food Services 5 9% 10 10% 10 10% 2 5% Other Services (except Public Administration) 3 5% 4 4% 8 8% 2 5% Total % % % % Page 213

219 Does your company own any parking spaces? Number of Parking Spaces Owned by Distance by Distance 0.00 to 0.24 miles 0.25 to 0.49 miles 0.50 to 0.74 miles 0.75 to 1.00 miles N % N % N % N % No spaces 50 82% 80 78% 64 65% 29 74% 1-4 spaces 4 7% 6 6% 6 6% 2 5% 5-9 spaces 1 2% 5 5% 9 9% 3 8% spaces 2 3% 2 2% 6 6% 0 0% spaces 1 2% 6 6% 8 8% 0 0% 50 or more spaces 3 5% 3 3% 5 5% 5 13% Total % % % % Number of businesses Average Number of Parking Spaces Owned by Distance* Average number of spaces* Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum 0.00 to 0.24 miles , to 0.49 miles to 0.74 miles to 1.00 miles *If business owns spaces. Number of Company Parking Spaces included in Lease by Distance Do you have assigned spaces included in your building lease? 0.00 to 0.24 miles 0.25 to 0.49 miles 0.50 to 0.74 miles 0.75 to 1.00 miles N % N % N % N % No spaces 44 72% 76 75% 75 77% 26 67% 1-4 spaces 12 20% 13 13% 9 9% 7 18% 5-9 spaces 2 3% 6 6% 8 8% 2 5% spaces 0 0% 1 1% 3 3% 1 3% spaces 2 3% 4 4% 2 2% 1 3% 50 or more spaces 1 2% 2 2% 1 1% 2 5% Total % % % % Page 214

220 Average Number of Parking Spaces Included in Lease by Distance* Number of businesses Average number of spaces included in lease* Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum 0.00 to 0.24 miles to 0.49 miles to 0.74 miles to 1.00 miles *If spaces included in lease. Cost per Space for Parking Included in Lease by Distance* 0.00 to 0.24 miles 0.25 to 0.49 miles 0.50 to 0.74 miles 0.75 to 1.00 miles N % N % N % N % $ % 2 13% 1 11% 1 33% $0.01 to $ % 2 13% 1 11% 0 0% $25.00 to $ % 2 13% 3 33% 1 33% $50.00 to $ % 5 33% 3 33% 1 33% $100 or more 3 38% 4 27% 1 11% 0 0% Total 8 100% % 9 100% 3 100% *Of the 79 businesses with parking included in their lease, 34 did not know what portion of their lease covered parking Average Cost per Space for Parking Included in Lease by Distance Number of businesses Average Cost per Space Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum 0.00 to 0.24 miles 8 $78.52 $31.28 $52.08 $.00 $.00 $ to 0.49 miles 15 $86.17 $23.03 $60.00 $.00 $.00 $ to 0.74 miles 9 $59.56 $24.45 $40.00 $25.00 $.00 $ to 1.00 miles 3 $32.05 $16.06 $46.15 $.00 $.00 $50.00 Page 215

221 Number of Assigned Parking Spaces Separate from Lease by Distance How many assigned spaces do you lease separately from your building lease? 0.00 to 0.24 miles 0.25 to 0.49 miles 0.50 to 0.74 miles 0.75 to 1.00 miles N % N % N % N % No spaces 48 79% 87 85% 96 98% 37 95% 1-4 spaces 7 11% 8 8% 1 1% 2 5% 5-9 spaces 2 3% 3 3% 0 0% 0 0% spaces 1 2% 3 3% 1 1% 0 0% spaces 1 2% 1 1% 0 0% 0 0% 50 or more spaces 2 3% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Total % % % % Average Number of Assigned Parking Spaces Separate from Lease by Distance* Number of businesses Average number of spaces separate from lease* Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum 0.00 to 0.24 miles to 0.49 miles to 0.74 miles to 1.00 miles *If business has spaces separate from lease. Cost per Space for Parking Spaces Separate from Lease by Distance* 0.00 to 0.24 miles 0.25 to 0.49 miles 0.50 to 0.74 miles 0.75 to 1.00 miles N % N % N % N % $ % 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% $0.01 to $ % 1 8% 0 0% 2 100% $25.00 to $ % 1 8% 0 0% 0 0% $50.00 to $ % 2 15% 1 100% 0 0% $100 or more 6 67% 9 69% 0 0% 0 0% Total 9 100% % 1 100% 2 100% *Of the 32 businesses with parking separate from their lease, 7 did not know the cost Page 216

222 Average Cost per Space for Parking Spaces Separate from Lease by Distance* Number of businesses Average Cost per Space Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum 0.00 to 0.24 miles 10 $ $24.03 $ $85.00 $.68 $ to 0.49 miles 13 $ $18.69 $ $ $22.22 $ to 0.74 miles 1 $50.00 $. $50.00 $50.00 $50.00 $ to 1.00 miles 2 $16.67 $3.33 $16.67 $13.33 $13.33 $20.00 Company Charges Employees for Parking by Distance Do your employees pay for use of parking spaces that are either owned or leased by your company? 0.00 to 0.24 miles 0.25 to 0.49 miles 0.50 to 0.74 miles 0.75 to 1.00 miles N % N % N % N % Yes 5 14% 5 9% 1 2% 2 9% No 31 86% 49 91% 56 98% 21 91% What is their monthly parking rate? Employee Cost per Space Provided by Company by Distance 0.00 to 0.24 miles 0.25 to 0.49 miles 0.50 to 0.74 miles 0.75 to 1.00 miles N % N % N % N % $0.01 to $ % 2 40% 0 0% 0 0% $25.00 to $ % 1 20% 1 100% 1 100% $50.00 to $ % 2 40% 0 0% 0 0% $100 or more 4 80% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Total 5 100% 5 100% 1 100% 1 100% Average Employee Cost per Space Provided by Company by Distance Number of businesses Average Cost per Space Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum 0.00 to 0.24 miles 5 $ $19.91 $ $85.00 $85.00 $ to 0.49 miles 5 $43.00 $14.11 $30.00 $15.00 $15.00 $ to 0.74 miles 1 $40.00 $. $40.00 $40.00 $40.00 $ to $35.00 $. $35.00 $35.00 $35.00 $35.00 Page 217

223 miles Average Employee Cost per Space Provided by Company by Distance Number of businesses Average Cost per Space Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum Page 218

224 Number of spaces Number of Company Provided Spaces by Type Miles Company owned parking spaces Assigned spaces included in building lease Assigned spaces leased separately from building lease Total number of parking spaces owned or leased N % N % N % N % No spaces 50 82% 44 72% 48 79% 25 41% 1-4 spaces 4 7% 12 20% 7 11% 19 31% 5-9 spaces 1 2% 2 3% 2 3% 4 7% spaces 2 3% 0 0% 1 2% 4 7% spaces 1 2% 2 3% 1 2% 4 7% 50 or more spaces 3 5% 1 2% 2 3% 5 8% Number of spaces Number of Company Provided Spaces by Type Miles Company owned parking spaces Assigned spaces included in building lease Assigned spaces leased separately from building lease Total number of parking spaces owned or leased N % N % N % N % No spaces 80 78% 76 75% 87 85% 49 48% 1-4 spaces 6 6% 13 13% 8 8% 24 24% 5-9 spaces 5 5% 6 6% 3 3% 8 8% spaces 2 2% 1 1% 3 3% 6 6% spaces 6 6% 4 4% 1 1% 11 11% 50 or more spaces 3 3% 2 2% 0 0% 4 4% Page 219

225 Number of spaces Number of Company Provided Spaces by Type Miles Company owned parking spaces Assigned spaces included in building lease Assigned spaces leased separately from building lease Total number of parking spaces owned or leased N % N % N % N % No spaces 64 65% 75 77% 96 98% 41 42% 1-4 spaces 6 6% 9 9% 1 1% 16 16% 5-9 spaces 9 9% 8 8% 0 0% 14 14% spaces 6 6% 3 3% 1 1% 11 11% spaces 8 8% 2 2% 0 0% 10 10% 50 or more spaces 5 5% 1 1% 0 0% 6 6% Number of spaces Number of Company Provided Spaces by Type to 1.00 miles Company owned parking spaces Assigned spaces included in building lease Assigned spaces leased separately from building lease Total number of parking spaces owned or leased N % N % N % N % No spaces 29 74% 26 67% 37 95% 16 41% 1-4 spaces 2 5% 7 18% 2 5% 10 26% 5-9 spaces 3 8% 2 5% 0 0% 5 13% spaces 0 0% 1 3% 0 0% 1 3% spaces 0 0% 1 3% 0 0% 0 0% 50 or more spaces 5 13% 2 5% 0 0% 7 18% Employees Pay for Non-Company Parking by Distance Page 220

226 Do any of your employees pay for parking that is not owned or leased by your company? 0.00 to 0.24 miles 0.25 to 0.49 miles 0.50 to 0.74 miles 0.75 to 1.00 miles N % N % N % N % Yes 17 28% 16 16% 2 2% 0 0% No 44 72% 86 84% 96 98% % Page 221

227 Employees Reimbursed for Non-Company Parking by Distance Are your employees reimbursed for parking that is not owned or leased by your company? 0.00 to 0.24 miles 0.25 to 0.49 miles 0.50 to 0.74 miles 0.75 to 1.00 miles N % N % N % N % Yes 5 29% 6 38% 1 50% 0 0% No 12 71% 10 63% 1 50% 0 0% Employee Reimbursement for Non-Company Spaces by Distance How much are employees reimbursed for this parking? 0.00 to 0.24 miles 0.25 to 0.49 miles 0.50 to 0.74 miles 0.75 to 1.00 miles N % N % N % N % $ % 10 63% 1 50% 0 0% $50.00 to $ % 1 6% 0 0% 0 0% $100 or more 3 18% 5 31% 1 50% 0 0% Total % % 2 100% 0 0% Average Employee Reimbursement for Non-Company Spaces by Distance Number of businesses Average Reimbursement* Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum 0.00 to 0.24 miles 5 $ $26.10 $ $55.00 $55.00 $ to 0.49 miles 6 $ $31.78 $ $92.00 $92.00 $ to 0.74 miles 1 $ $. $ $ $ $ to 1.00 miles 0 $. $. $. $. $. $. *If reimbursed Customers Pay for Non-Company Parking by Distance Do any of your customers pay for parking that is not owned or leased by your company? 0.00 to 0.24 miles 0.25 to 0.49 miles 0.50 to 0.74 miles 0.75 to 1.00 miles N % N % N % N % Yes 22 36% 26 25% 9 9% 0 0% No 39 64% 76 75% 89 91% % Page 222

228 Customers Reimbursed for Non-Company Parking by Distance Do you reimburse your customers for this parking cost? 0.00 to 0.24 miles 0.25 to 0.49 miles 0.50 to 0.74 miles 0.75 to 1.00 miles N % N % N % N % Yes 4 18% 6 23% 3 33% 0 0% No 18 82% 20 77% 6 67% 0 0% Proximity to Free Parking by Distance How close is your business to parking that is free for both your company and your customers and employees? 0.00 to 0.24 miles 0.25 to 0.49 miles 0.50 to 0.74 miles 0.75 to 1.00 miles N % N % N % N % Right next to your building 24 39% 55 54% 84 86% 37 95% Within a block of your building 5 8% 15 15% 11 11% 2 5% More than a block 32 52% 32 31% 3 3% 0 0% Do you share a parking lot with any other businesses? Shared Parking by Distance 0.00 to 0.24 miles 0.25 to 0.49 miles 0.50 to 0.74 miles 0.75 to 1.00 miles N % N % N % N % Yes 27 44% 56 55% 60 61% 27 69% No 34 56% 46 45% 38 39% 12 31% What percent of your total parking is shared with other businesses? Proportion of Parking Shared by Distance 0.00 to 0.24 miles 0.25 to 0.49 miles 0.50 to 0.74 miles 0.75 to 1.00 miles N % N % N % N % None 34 56% 46 45% 38 39% 12 31% 1%-25% 1 2% 9 9% 7 7% 0 0% 26%-50% 1 2% 1 1% 5 5% 3 8% 51%-75% 1 2% 1 1% 1 1% 2 5% 76%-100% 24 39% 45 44% 47 48% 22 56% Number of businesses Average Proportion of Parking Shared by Distance* Average percent of total parking Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum 0.00 to % 4.26% 100% 100% 1% 100% Page 223

229 Number of businesses Average Proportion of Parking Shared by Distance* Average percent of total parking Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum miles 0.25 to 0.49 miles % 4.63% 100% 100% 1% 100% 0.50 to 0.74 miles % 3.70% 100% 100% 2% 100% 0.75 to 1.00 miles % 3.87% 100% 100% 30% 100% *If share parking Page 224

230 What type of business do you share this lot with? Business Types Sharing Parking Lot by Distance 0.00 to 0.24 miles 0.25 to 0.49 miles 0.50 to 0.74 miles 0.75 to 1.00 miles N % N % N % N % General office (law, insurance, temp help, marketing etc) 13 48% 30 54% 30 50% 18 67% Financial (banking, investment, mortgage, accounting) 6 22% 18 32% 24 40% 11 41% Restaurants 2 7% 8 14% 9 15% 6 22% Health care (medical, dental, chiropractic, therapy) 3 11% 7 13% 8 13% 7 26% Construction/trades (builder, plumber, painter, electrician) 0 0% 4 7% 6 10% 2 7% Clothing/shoe stores 2 7% 4 7% 3 5% 1 4% Beauty/nails/hair (spa/salon/products) 0 0% 6 11% 3 5% 0 0% Real estate / property management/ architect 5 19% 0 0% 2 3% 2 7% Many other businesses 3 11% 1 2% 4 7% 1 4% Entertainment (theater, art gallery, museum) 1 4% 2 4% 3 5% 2 7% Computer/Information Technology (IT)/Software and Hardware 1 4% 4 7% 2 3% 1 4% Telecom field 1 4% 3 5% 3 5% 1 4% Department stores 2 7% 3 5% 2 3% 0 0% Non-profit organization 2 7% 0 0% 3 5% 1 4% Other 2 7% 4 7% 0 0% 0 0% Bars/ taverns/ night clubs 0 0% 3 5% 1 2% 1 4% Dry cleaners/ laundry/ alterations/ tailors 1 4% 2 4% 1 2% 1 4% Grocery/ drug/ convenience stores 1 4% 3 5% 0 0% 0 0% Books, office supplies, print/photos shop, computer store 1 4% 0 0% 3 5% 0 0% Hotel/motel 2 7% 1 2% 0 0% 0 0% Coffee shops 0 0% 0 0% 2 3% 0 0% Home improvement/hardware/paint and wallpaper stores 0 0% 2 4% 0 0% 0 0% Sports and fitness (gyms/organizations) 1 4% 1 2% 0 0% 0 0% Auto repair 0 0% 1 2% 1 2% 0 0% Energy provision/consulting 1 4% 1 2% 0 0% 0 0% Sporting good stores 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 4% Pet supply/veterinarian 0 0% 0 0% 1 2% 0 0% Gas station 0 0% 1 2% 0 0% 0 0% Page 225

231 What type of business do you share this lot with? Business Types Sharing Parking Lot by Distance 0.00 to 0.24 miles 0.25 to 0.49 miles 0.50 to 0.74 miles 0.75 to 1.00 miles N % N % N % N % Aviation field 1 4% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Respondents may choose more than one option. Page 226

232 Do you run out of spaces at any time of day in this shared lot? Shared Parking Capacity by Distance 0.00 to 0.24 miles 0.25 to 0.49 miles 0.50 to 0.74 miles 0.75 to 1.00 miles N % N % N % N % Yes 3 11% 20 36% 10 17% 3 11% No 24 89% 36 64% 50 83% 24 89% Sufficiency of Parking for Employees by Distance Overall, would you say you have access to too little parking, enough parking, 0.75 to 1.00 miles than enough parking for your employees? 0.00 to 0.24 miles 0.25 to 0.49 miles 0.50 to 0.74 miles 0.75 to 1.00 miles N % N % N % N % Too little 9 15% 14 14% 11 11% 4 10% Enough 25 41% 49 48% 39 40% 19 49% More than enough 27 44% 39 38% 48 49% 16 41% Sufficiency of Parking for Customers by Distance Overall, would you say you have access to too little parking, enough parking, 0.75 to 1.00 miles than enough parking for your customers? 0.00 to 0.24 miles 0.25 to 0.49 miles 0.50 to 0.74 miles 0.75 to 1.00 miles N % N % N % N % Too little 13 21% 20 20% 16 16% 3 8% Enough 26 43% 47 46% 39 40% 20 51% More than enough 22 36% 35 34% 43 44% 16 41% Do you have any of the following issues with parking? Parking Issues by Distance 0.00 to 0.24 miles 0.25 to 0.49 miles 0.50 to 0.74 miles 0.75 to 1.00 miles N % N % N % N % None of these parking issues 51 84% 84 82% 87 89% 34 87% Feels unsafe 4 7% 8 8% 6 6% 2 5% It is poorly lit 3 5% 5 5% 7 7% 4 10% It is difficult to access 6 10% 4 4% 6 6% 0 0% It is too far away 3 5% 7 7% 4 4% 0 0% Respondents may choose more than one option. Page 227

233 Proportion of Employees Using Alternate Modes of Transportation for Commute Miles Can you tell us what proportion of your employees use modes other than a single occupant car to get to work on a regular basis? Modes other than a single occupant car Carpool Transit Walk or bike N % N % N % N % None 22 36% 54 89% 25 41% 40 66% 1%-25% 10 16% 6 10% 17 28% 17 28% 26%-50% 14 23% 1 2% 10 16% 4 7% 51%-75% 7 11% 0 0% 3 5% 0 0% 76%-100% 8 13% 0 0% 6 10% 0 0% Proportion of Employees Using Alternate Modes of Transportation for Commute Miles Can you tell us what proportion of your employees use modes other than a single occupant car to get to work on a regular basis? Modes other than a single occupant car Carpool Transit Walk or bike N % N % N % N % None 47 46% 90 88% 58 57% 76 75% 1%-25% 24 24% 10 10% 22 22% 20 20% 26%-50% 17 17% 0 0% 16 16% 3 3% 51%-75% 6 6% 1 1% 4 4% 1 1% 76%-100% 8 8% 1 1% 2 2% 2 2% Proportion of Employees Using Alternate Modes of Transportation for Commute Miles Can you tell us what proportion of your employees use modes other than a single occupant car to get to work on a regular basis? Modes other than a single occupant car Carpool Transit Walk or bike N % N % N % N % None 54 55% 89 91% 62 63% 79 81% 1%-25% 31 32% 9 9% 28 29% 15 15% 26%-50% 9 9% 0 0% 6 6% 3 3% 51%-75% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 76%-100% 4 4% 0 0% 2 2% 1 1% Page 228

234 Proportion of Employees Using Alternate Modes of Transportation for Commute to 1.00 miles Can you tell us what proportion of your employees use modes other than a single occupant car to get to work on a regular basis? Modes other than a single occupant car Carpool Transit Walk or bike N % N % N % N % None 22 56% 35 90% 29 74% 31 79% 1%-25% 13 33% 3 8% 10 26% 7 18% 26%-50% 4 10% 1 3% 0 0% 1 3% 51%-75% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 76%-100% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Average Percent of Employees Using Alternate Modes of Transportation for Commute by Distance Can you tell us what proportion of your employees use modes other than a single occupant car to get to work on a regular basis? Number of businesses Average percent of employees Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum 0.00 to 0.24 miles % 4.26% 25% 0% 0% 100% 0.25 to 0.49 miles % 2.99% 6% 0% 0% 100% 0.50 to 0.74 miles % 2.01% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0.75 to 1.00 miles % 2.22% 0% 0% 0% 50% Can you tell us what proportion of your employees carpool to get to work on a regular basis? Average Percent of Employees Carpool for Commute by Distance Number of businesses Average percent of employees Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum 0.00 to 0.24 miles %.78% 0% 0% 0% 33% 0.25 to 0.49 miles % 1.19% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0.50 to 0.74 miles 98.6%.25% 0% 0% 0% 20% Page 229

235 Can you tell us what proportion of your employees carpool to get to work on a regular basis? Average Percent of Employees Carpool for Commute by Distance Number of businesses Average percent of employees Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum 0.75 to 1.00 miles % 1.03% 0% 0% 0% 30% Page 230

236 Can you tell us what proportion of your employees use transit to get to work on a regular basis? Average Percent of Employees Using Transit for Commute by Distance Number of businesses Average percent of employees Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum 0.00 to 0.24 miles % 3.99% 10% 0% 0% 100% 0.25 to 0.49 miles % 2.26% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0.50 to 0.74 miles % 1.55% 0% 0% 0% 90% 0.75 to 1.00 miles % 1.12% 0% 0% 0% 25% Can you tell us what proportion of your employees walk or bike to get to work on a regular basis? Average Percent of Employees Walk or Bike for Commute by Distance Number of businesses Average percent of employees Standard Error Median Mode Minimum Maximum 0.00 to 0.24 miles % 1.52% 0% 0% 0% 50% 0.25 to 0.49 miles % 1.68% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0.50 to 0.74 miles %.99% 0% 0% 0% 80% 0.75 to 1.00 miles % 1.23% 0% 0% 0% 27% Page 231

237 Transportation Management Strategies by Distance Do you use any of these strategies, or others, to influence how employees travel to and from work? 0.00 to 0.24 miles 0.25 to 0.49 miles 0.50 to 0.74 miles 0.75 to 1.00 miles N % N % N % N % None of these 37 61% 76 75% 86 88% 32 82% Free/subsidized transit passes, such as the Eco Pass 16 26% 13 13% 3 3% 1 3% Secure bike storage 4 7% 8 8% 4 4% 4 10% On-site amenities for walkers and bicyclists (i.e. showers, lockers) 2 3% 5 5% 4 4% 2 5% Flexible work schedules (varying starting and ending times) 3 5% 2 2% 5 5% 0 0% Guaranteed ride home 3 5% 2 2% 0 0% 0 0% Organized carpooling 1 2% 2 2% 1 1% 0 0% Organized vanpooling 1 2% 2 2% 0 0% 0 0% Substituting "paid parking" with a commute allowance which could be used for bus or vanpool fares as well as parking fees 2 3% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Teleworking (a regular, off-site work arrangement) 0 0% 1 1% 1 1% 0 0% Other 0 0% 2 2% 0 0% 0 0% Shuttles to transit or other frequently used locations 1 2% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Access to vehicles for mid-day trips 0 0% 1 1% 0 0% 0 0% Access to bicycles for mid-day trips 0 0% 1 1% 0 0% 0 0% Compressed work weeks (i.e. 40 hrs in 4 days, 80 hrs in 9 days) 1 2% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Respondents may choose more than one option. Page 232

238 Effectiveness of Transportation Management Strategies Miles Do you think...is very effective, somewhat effective or not effective in reducing single car trips and parking needs? Very effective Somewhat effective Not effective Total N Free/subsidized transit passes, such as the Eco Pass? % 53% 33% 13% 100% N Organized carpooling % 100% 0% 0% 100% N Organized vanpooling % 0% 0% 100% 100% Substituting "paid parking" with a commute N allowance which could be used for bus or vanpool fares as well as parking fees % 50% 50% 0% 100% N Shuttles to transit or other frequently used locations % 0% 100% 0% 100% N Secure bike storage % 0% 100% 0% 100% On-site amenities for walkers and bicyclists (i.e. N showers, lockers) % 0% 100% 0% 100% N Guaranteed ride home % 33% 33% 33% 100% Flexible work schedules (varying starting and ending N times) % 33% 33% 33% 100% Compressed work weeks (i.e. 40 hrs in 4 days, 80 hrs N in 9 days) % 0% 100% 0% 100% N Other strategy % 100% 0% 0% 100% Asked only if business is using the transportation management strategy. Page 233

239 Effectiveness of Transportation Management Strategies Miles Do you think...is very effective, somewhat effective or not effective in reducing single car trips and parking needs? Very effective Somewhat effective Not effective Total Free/subsidized transit passes, such as the Eco N Pass? % 67% 25% 8% 100% N Organized carpooling % 0% 100% 0% 100% N Organized vanpooling % 50% 50% 0% 100% N Access to vehicles for mid-day trips % 0% 100% 0% 100% N Access to bicycles for mid-day trips % 100% 0% 0% 100% N Secure bike storage % 75% 25% 0% 100% On-site amenities for walkers and bicyclists (i.e. N showers, lockers) % 60% 40% 0% 100% N Guaranteed ride home % 50% 0% 50% 100% Teleworking (a regular, off-site work N arrangement) % 100% 0% 0% 100% Flexible work schedules (varying starting and N ending times) % 100% 0% 0% 100% N Other strategy % 67% 0% 33% 100% Asked only if business is using the transportation management strategy. Page 234

240 Effectiveness of Transportation Management Strategies Miles Do you think...is very effective, somewhat effective or not effective in reducing single car trips and parking needs? Very effective Somewhat effective Not effective Total Free/subsidized transit passes, such as the Eco N Pass? % 33% 67% 0% 100% N Organized carpooling % 100% 0% 0% 100% N Secure bike storage % 0% 75% 25% 100% On-site amenities for walkers and bicyclists (i.e. N showers, lockers) % 25% 50% 25% 100% N Teleworking (a regular, off-site work arrangement) % 100% 0% 0% 100% Flexible work schedules (varying starting and N ending times) % 40% 20% 40% 100% Asked only if business is using the transportation management strategy. Effectiveness of Transportation Management Strategies to 1.00 miles Do you think...is very effective, somewhat effective or not effective in reducing single car trips and parking needs? Very effective Somewhat effective Not effective Total Free/subsidized transit passes, such as the Eco N Pass? % 100% 0% 0% 100% N Secure bike storage % 25% 50% 25% 100% On-site amenities for walkers and bicyclists (i.e. N showers, lockers) % 50% 0% 50% 100% Asked only if business is using the transportation management strategy. Interest in Transportation Management Strategies by Distance Are you interested in learning more about transportation management strategies? 0.00 to 0.24 miles 0.25 to 0.49 miles 0.50 to 0.74 miles 0.75 to 1.00 miles N % N % N % N % Yes 11 18% 15 15% 18 18% 8 21% No 50 82% 87 85% 80 82% 31 79% Page 235

241 Did you move to this location from another location or was this the first location for this business or a new branch of the business? Location by Distance 0.00 to 0.24 miles 0.25 to 0.49 miles 0.50 to 0.74 miles 0.75 to 1.00 miles N % N % N % N % Moved 21 34% 41 40% 40 41% 21 54% New location 38 62% 54 53% 52 53% 18 46% New branch 2 3% 7 7% 6 6% 0 0% What were the three top reasons for choosing your current location? Reasons for Choosing Current Location by Distance 0.00 to 0.24 miles 0.25 to 0.49 miles 0.50 to 0.74 miles 0.75 to 1.00 miles N % N % N % N % Near main roads 17 28% 36 35% 32 33% 13 33% Lease rates 17 28% 30 29% 23 23% 11 28% Building structure 16 26% 24 24% 26 27% 14 36% Don't know 11 18% 12 12% 15 15% 7 18% Other complementary businesses 10 16% 14 14% 8 8% 1 3% Close to home 8 13% 9 9% 14 14% 2 5% Parking availability 3 5% 7 7% 8 8% 5 13% Access to customers from employees at near by businesses 4 7% 8 8% 8 8% 3 8% Central/downtown 5 8% 9 9% 4 4% 2 5% Access to rail transit 4 7% 8 8% 2 2% 3 8% Access to customers from near by residences 4 7% 3 3% 9 9% 1 3% Other 3 5% 7 7% 5 5% 2 5% Owns the building 3 5% 7 7% 3 3% 3 8% Supports brand positioning (being in young, green, urban area etc.) 3 5% 6 6% 5 5% 0 0% Access to customer base 4 7% 4 4% 4 4% 0 0% Location 1 2% 5 5% 3 3% 3 8% Access to customers from rail station foot traffic 3 5% 2 2% 2 2% 1 3% Security 0 0% 0 0% 2 2% 1 3% Close to bus 0 0% 1 1% 1 1% 0 0% Page 236

242 When you made the decision to locate here, did you know the station would be built? Timing of Move to Current Location by Distance 0.00 to 0.24 miles 0.25 to 0.49 miles 0.50 to 0.74 miles 0.75 to 1.00 miles N % N % N % N % Moved before station, did not know about station 26 43% 44 43% 65 66% 26 67% Moved before station, knew station was coming 1 2% 5 5% 8 8% 2 5% Moved after rail station was open 34 56% 53 52% 25 26% 11 28% Influence of Potential TOD Amenities on Location Choice Miles Did your expectation of... have a strong influence, somewhat of an influence, or was not an influence in choosing this location. Customer foot traffic from the rail station Customer foot traffic from employees at nearby businesses Customer foot traffic from customers of nearby businesses Customer foot traffic from local residents Having access to a larger workforce through the rail transit system Your employees seeing the rail commute option as a benefit Your employees seeing access to restaurants, coffee shops or bars as a benefit Your employees seeing access to grocery stores and drug stores as a benefit Your employees seeing access to personal services (such as hair salons or dry cleaners) as a benefit Strong influence Somewhat of an influence Not an influence Don't know N % 14% 9% 74% 3% N % 14% 17% 66% 3% N % 14% 20% 63% 3% N % 14% 9% 74% 3% N % 6% 17% 71% 6% N % 23% 23% 51% 3% N % 26% 26% 43% 6% N % 0% 20% 74% 6% N % 3% 6% 86% 6% Your employees seeing access to medical or N daycare centers is seen as benefit by employees % 3% 9% 83% 6% Having easy access by car for customers or N employees % 23% 37% 34% 6% The availability of parking for customers and N employees % 23% 37% 34% 6% Asked only if moved after station built or knew that station would be built. (N=57) Page 237

243 Influence of Potential TOD Amenities on Location Choice Miles Did your expectation of... have a strong influence, somewhat of an influence, or was not an influence in choosing this location. Customer foot traffic from the rail station Customer foot traffic from employees at nearby businesses Customer foot traffic from customers of nearby businesses Customer foot traffic from local residents Having access to a larger workforce through the rail transit system Your employees seeing the rail commute option as a benefit Your employees seeing access to restaurants, coffee shops or bars as a benefit Your employees seeing access to grocery stores and drug stores as a benefit Your employees seeing access to personal services (such as hair salons or dry cleaners) as a benefit Strong influence Somewhat of an influence Not an influence Don't know N % 7% 10% 79% 3% N % 2% 19% 78% 2% N % 12% 19% 66% 3% N % 5% 10% 81% 3% N % 5% 19% 72% 3% N % 9% 34% 53% 3% N % 19% 29% 48% 3% N % 5% 5% 88% 2% N % 2% 17% 78% 3% Your employees seeing access to medical or N daycare centers is seen as benefit by employees % 2% 5% 88% 5% Having easy access by car for customers or N employees % 45% 22% 31% 2% The availability of parking for customers and N employees % 26% 38% 33% 3% Asked only if moved after station built or knew that station would be built. (N=28) Page 238

244 Influence of Potential TOD Amenities on Location Choice Miles Did your expectation of... have a strong influence, somewhat of an influence, or was not an influence in choosing this location. Customer foot traffic from the rail station Customer foot traffic from employees at nearby businesses Customer foot traffic from customers of nearby businesses Customer foot traffic from local residents Having access to a larger workforce through the rail transit system Your employees seeing the rail commute option as a benefit Your employees seeing access to restaurants, coffee shops or bars as a benefit Your employees seeing access to grocery stores and drug stores as a benefit Your employees seeing access to personal services (such as hair salons or dry cleaners) as a benefit Strong influence Somewhat of an influence Not an influence Don't know N % 0% 15% 79% 6% N % 6% 21% 67% 6% N % 12% 12% 70% 6% N % 12% 9% 73% 6% N % 3% 12% 79% 6% N % 9% 24% 61% 6% N % 6% 18% 70% 6% N % 0% 18% 76% 6% N % 0% 6% 88% 6% Your employees seeing access to medical or N daycare centers is seen as benefit by employees % 3% 3% 88% 6% Having easy access by car for customers or N employees % 42% 33% 18% 6% The availability of parking for customers and N employees % 42% 24% 27% 6% Asked only if moved after station built or knew that station would be built. (N=54) Page 239

245 Influence of Potential TOD Amenities on Location Choice to 1.00 miles Did your expectation of... have a strong influence, somewhat of an influence, or was not an influence in choosing this location. Customer foot traffic from the rail station Customer foot traffic from employees at nearby businesses Customer foot traffic from customers of nearby businesses Customer foot traffic from local residents Having access to a larger workforce through the rail transit system Your employees seeing the rail commute option as a benefit Your employees seeing access to restaurants, coffee shops or bars as a benefit Your employees seeing access to grocery stores and drug stores as a benefit Your employees seeing access to personal services (such as hair salons or dry cleaners) as a benefit Strong influence Somewhat of an influence Not an influence Don't know N % 0% 23% 69% 8% N % 0% 8% 85% 8% N % 0% 8% 85% 8% N % 0% 8% 85% 8% N % 8% 8% 77% 8% N % 8% 15% 62% 15% N % 31% 8% 54% 8% N % 23% 15% 54% 8% N % 8% 8% 77% 8% Your employees seeing access to medical or N daycare centers is seen as benefit by employees % 15% 15% 62% 8% Having easy access by car for customers or N employees % 62% 23% 8% 8% The availability of parking for customers and N employees % 54% 31% 8% 8% Asked only if moved after station built or knew that station would be built. (N=57) Page 240

246 Effects of Expected TOD Amenities on Business Miles... and were your expectations of... fully met, somewhat met or not met? Customer foot traffic from the rail station Customer foot traffic from employees at nearby businesses Customer foot traffic from customers of nearby businesses Customer foot traffic from local residents Having access to a larger workforce through the rail transit system Your employees seeing the rail commute option as a benefit Your employees seeing access to restaurants, coffee shops or bars as a benefit Your employees seeing access to grocery stores and drug stores as a benefit Your employees seeing access to personal services (such as hair salons or dry cleaners) as a benefit Your employees seeing access to medical or daycare centers is seen as benefit by employees Having easy access by car for customers or employees The availability of parking for customers and employees Asked only if amenity was an influence on the location choice Fully met Somewhat met Not met Don't know Total N % 25% 63% 13% 0% 100% N % 55% 27% 18% 0% 100% N % 42% 50% 8% 0% 100% N % 38% 63% 0% 0% 100% N % 63% 38% 0% 0% 100% N % 63% 31% 0% 6% 100% N % 72% 28% 0% 0% 100% N % 71% 29% 0% 0% 100% N % 67% 33% 0% 0% 100% N % 50% 25% 25% 0% 100% N % 62% 33% 5% 0% 100% N % 57% 33% 10% 0% 100% Page 241

247 Effects of Expected TOD Amenities on Business Miles... and were your expectations of... fully met, somewhat met or not met? Customer foot traffic from the rail station Customer foot traffic from employees at nearby businesses Customer foot traffic from customers of nearby businesses Customer foot traffic from local residents Having access to a larger workforce through the rail transit system Your employees seeing the rail commute option as a benefit Your employees seeing access to restaurants, coffee shops or bars as a benefit Your employees seeing access to grocery stores and drug stores as a benefit Your employees seeing access to personal services (such as hair salons or dry cleaners) as a benefit Your employees seeing access to medical or daycare centers is seen as benefit by employees Having easy access by car for customers or employees The availability of parking for customers and employees Asked only if amenity was an influence on the location choice Fully met Somewhat met Not met Don't know Total N % 40% 60% 0% 0% 100% N % 50% 50% 0% 0% 100% N % 44% 56% 0% 0% 100% N % 33% 67% 0% 0% 100% N % 29% 50% 21% 0% 100% N % 60% 36% 4% 0% 100% N % 68% 29% 4% 0% 100% N % 33% 67% 0% 0% 100% N % 55% 36% 9% 0% 100% N % 75% 25% 0% 0% 100% N % 82% 15% 3% 0% 100% N % 59% 38% 3% 0% 100% Page 242

248 Effects of Expected TOD Amenities on Business Miles... and were your expectations of... fully met, somewhat met or not met? Customer foot traffic from the rail station Customer foot traffic from employees at nearby businesses Customer foot traffic from customers of nearby businesses Customer foot traffic from local residents Having access to a larger workforce through the rail transit system Your employees seeing the rail commute option as a benefit Your employees seeing access to restaurants, coffee shops or bars as a benefit Your employees seeing access to grocery stores and drug stores as a benefit Your employees seeing access to personal services (such as hair salons or dry cleaners) as a benefit Your employees seeing access to medical or daycare centers is seen as benefit by employees Having easy access by car for customers or employees The availability of parking for customers and employees Asked only if amenity was an influence on the location choice Fully met Somewhat met Not met Don't know Total N % 60% 20% 20% 0% 100% N % 56% 33% 11% 0% 100% N % 25% 50% 25% 0% 100% N % 43% 57% 0% 0% 100% N % 60% 40% 0% 0% 100% N % 55% 45% 0% 0% 100% N % 38% 50% 13% 0% 100% N % 33% 67% 0% 0% 100% N % 0% 100% 0% 0% 100% N % 50% 50% 0% 0% 100% N % 68% 28% 0% 4% 100% N % 64% 27% 9% 0% 100% Page 243

249 Effects of Expected TOD Amenities on Business to 1.00 miles... and were your expectations of... fully met, somewhat met or not met? Customer foot traffic from the rail station Customer foot traffic from employees at nearby businesses Customer foot traffic from customers of nearby businesses Customer foot traffic from local residents Having access to a larger workforce through the rail transit system Your employees seeing the rail commute option as a benefit Your employees seeing access to restaurants, coffee shops or bars as a benefit Your employees seeing access to grocery stores and drug stores as a benefit Your employees seeing access to personal services (such as hair salons or dry cleaners) as a benefit Your employees seeing access to medical or daycare centers is seen as benefit by employees Having easy access by car for customers or employees The availability of parking for customers and employees Asked only if amenity was an influence on the location choice Fully met Somewhat met Not met Don't know Total N % 33% 67% 0% 0% 100% N % 0% 0% 100% 0% 100% N % 0% 100% 0% 0% 100% N % 0% 0% 100% 0% 100% N % 50% 50% 0% 0% 100% N % 67% 33% 0% 0% 100% N % 40% 60% 0% 0% 100% N % 40% 60% 0% 0% 100% N % 50% 50% 0% 0% 100% N % 50% 50% 0% 0% 100% N % 82% 18% 0% 0% 100% N % 91% 9% 0% 0% 100% How important, if at all, is having FasTracks completed on schedule to achieving your business objectives? Importance of FasTracks Timing by Distance 0.00 to 0.24 miles 0.25 to 0.49 miles 0.50 to 0.74 miles 0.75 to 1.00 miles N % N % N % N % Very important 9 15% 20 20% 14 14% 4 10% Somewhat important 14 23% 27 26% 33 34% 11 28% Not at all important 38 62% 55 54% 51 52% 24 62% Page 244

250 Reasons for Choosing Current Location by Distance What other types of businesses, houses or other land uses would you most like to have move near you? 0.00 to 0.24 miles 0.25 to 0.49 miles 0.50 to 0.74 miles 0.75 to 1.00 miles N % N % N % N % Don't know 24 39% 38 37% 40 41% 19 49% Restaurants 11 18% 21 21% 18 18% 12 31% Department stores 10 16% 9 9% 3 3% 0 0% Grocery/ drug/ convenience stores 6 10% 8 8% 5 5% 1 3% Multi family housing 3 5% 8 8% 5 5% 1 3% Nothing more/ good as is 1 2% 5 5% 8 8% 2 5% Clothing/shoe stores 2 3% 9 9% 4 4% 0 0% General office (law, insurance, temp help, marketing etc) 2 3% 5 5% 6 6% 2 5% Other 2 3% 2 2% 4 4% 2 5% Coffee shops 3 5% 4 4% 2 2% 0 0% Financial (banking, investment, mortgage, accounting) 2 3% 6 6% 1 1% 0 0% Single family housing 2 3% 3 3% 4 4% 0 0% Parks/ open space 2 3% 2 2% 4 4% 1 3% Entertainment (theater, art gallery, museum) 1 2% 3 3% 4 4% 0 0% Businesses/business parks 1 2% 2 2% 4 4% 0 0% Sporting good stores 0 0% 4 4% 1 1% 0 0% Gas station 0 0% 3 3% 2 2% 0 0% Retail- general 0 0% 3 3% 2 2% 0 0% Manufacturing/ industry 2 3% 2 2% 0 0% 1 3% Hotel/motel 0 0% 2 2% 2 2% 0 0% Beauty/nails/hair (spa/salon/products) 0 0% 1 1% 1 1% 1 3% Home improvement/hardware/paint and wallpaper stores 2 3% 0 0% 1 1% 0 0% Books, office supplies, print/photos shop, computer store 0 0% 3 3% 0 0% 0 0% Bike paths/sidewalks 0 0% 1 1% 1 1% 1 3% Parking 1 2% 1 1% 1 1% 0 0% More rail stops/lines 0 0% 1 1% 2 2% 0 0% Residential - general 1 2% 1 1% 1 1% 0 0% Bars/ taverns/ night clubs 0 0% 1 1% 0 0% 1 3% Dry cleaners/ laundry/ alterations/ tailors 0 0% 2 2% 0 0% 0 0% Page 245

251 Reasons for Choosing Current Location by Distance What other types of businesses, houses or other land uses would you most like to have move near you? 0.00 to 0.24 miles 0.25 to 0.49 miles 0.50 to 0.74 miles 0.75 to 1.00 miles N % N % N % N % Health care (medical, dental, chiropractic, therapy) 0 0% 2 2% 0 0% 0 0% Sports and fitness (gyms/organizations) 1 2% 0 0% 1 1% 0 0% Construction/trades (builder, plumber, painter, electrician) 0 0% 1 1% 1 1% 0 0% Child care/day care 0 0% 1 1% 0 0% 0 0% Computer/Information Technology (IT)/Software and Hardware 0 0% 1 1% 0 0% 0 0% Auto repair 0 0% 0 0% 1 1% 0 0% Real estate / property management/ architect 0 0% 1 1% 0 0% 0 0% Do you plan to stay in this location for the next few years? Relocation Plans by Distance 0.00 to 0.24 miles 0.25 to 0.49 miles 0.50 to 0.74 miles 0.75 to 1.00 miles N % N % N % N % Yes 57 93% 97 95% 92 94% 38 97% No 4 7% 5 5% 6 6% 1 3% In what year do you intend to move? Relocation Timeline 0.00 to 0.24 miles 0.25 to 0.49 miles 0.50 to 0.74 miles 0.75 to 1.00 miles N % N % N % N % % 3 75% 3 75% 1 100% % 1 25% 1 25% 0 0% Reasons for Planned Move by Distance 0.00 to 0.24 miles 0.25 to 0.49 miles 0.50 to 0.74 miles 0.75 to 1.00 miles Why do you want to move? N % N % N % N % Too expensive 1 25% 2 40% 1 17% 1 100% Need larger space 0 0% 1 20% 2 33% 0 0% Need different building structure/amenities 1 25% 1 20% 1 17% 0 0% Need smaller space 1 25% 1 20% 0 0% 0 0% Closing business/retiring 0 0% 0 0% 2 33% 0 0% Not enough parking 0 0% 0 0% 1 17% 0 0% Page 246

252 Reasons for Planned Move by Distance 0.00 to 0.24 miles 0.25 to 0.49 miles 0.50 to 0.74 miles 0.75 to 1.00 miles Why do you want to move? N % N % N % N % Lease is up 0 0% 0 0% 1 17% 0 0% Bought new building 1 25% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Eminent domain seizure by RTD 0 0% 1 20% 0 0% 0 0% Page 247

253 Will you move to another location near a transit station or away from a transit station? Relocation and Rail Transit by Distance 0.00 to 0.24 miles 0.25 to 0.49 miles 0.50 to 0.74 miles 0.75 to 1.00 miles N % N % N % N % Near 2 50% 2 40% 2 33% 1 100% Away from 2 50% 2 40% 1 17% 0 0% Don't know 0 0% 1 20% 3 50% 0 0% Gender of Employees Miles Female Male Can you tell us what proportion of your employees are: N % N % None 8 13% 8 13% 1%-25% 9 15% 9 15% 26%-50% 19 31% 18 30% 51%-75% 11 18% 13 21% 76%-100% 14 23% 13 21% Gender of Employees Miles Female Male Can you tell us what proportion of your employees are: N % N % None 11 11% 15 15% 1%-25% 15 15% 12 12% 26%-50% 29 29% 30 30% 51%-75% 23 23% 23 23% 76%-100% 22 22% 20 20% Gender of Employees Miles Female Male Can you tell us what proportion of your employees are: N % N % None 11 11% 8 8% 1%-25% 22 22% 13 13% 26%-50% 31 32% 28 29% 51%-75% 17 17% 20 20% 76%-100% 17 17% 29 30% Page 248

254 Gender of Employees to 1.00 miles Female Male Can you tell us what proportion of your employees are: N % N % None 1 3% 1 3% 1%-25% 7 18% 7 18% 26%-50% 17 44% 14 36% 51%-75% 9 23% 13 33% 76%-100% 5 13% 4 10% Can you tell us what proportion of your employees are: Age of Employees Miles Under 30 years old Between 30 and 50 years old Over 50 years old N % N % N % None 26 43% 19 32% 19 32% 1%-25% 12 20% 12 20% 16 27% 26%-50% 8 13% 7 12% 7 12% 51%-75% 4 7% 9 15% 6 10% 76%-100% 10 17% 13 22% 12 20% Can you tell us what proportion of your employees are: Age of Employees Miles Under 30 years old Between 30 and 50 years old Over 50 years old N % N % N % None 33 33% 10 10% 37 37% 1%-25% 27 27% 17 17% 27 27% 26%-50% 24 24% 34 34% 17 17% 51%-75% 6 6% 19 19% 10 10% 76%-100% 9 9% 19 19% 8 8% Can you tell us what proportion of your employees are: Age of Employees Miles Under 30 years old Between 30 and 50 years old Over 50 years old N % N % N % None 26 28% 13 14% 35 38% 1%-25% 30 32% 14 15% 25 27% 26%-50% 22 24% 29 31% 15 16% 51%-75% 9 10% 22 24% 10 11% 76%-100% 6 6% 15 16% 8 9% Page 249

255 Page 250

256 Can you tell us what proportion of your employees are: Age of Employees to 1.00 miles Under 30 years old Between 30 and 50 years old Over 50 years old N % N % N % None 9 24% 2 5% 17 45% 1%-25% 18 47% 4 11% 10 26% 26%-50% 8 21% 11 29% 5 13% 51%-75% 2 5% 12 32% 5 13% 76%-100% 1 3% 9 24% 1 3% Can you tell us what proportion of your employees earn: Employee Wages Miles Less than $10 per hour Between $10 and $20 per hour More than $20 per hour N % N % N % None 40 75% 18 34% 12 23% 1%-25% 6 11% 13 25% 8 15% 26%-50% 2 4% 5 9% 6 11% 51%-75% 0 0% 7 13% 4 8% 76%-100% 5 9% 10 19% 23 43% Can you tell us what proportion of your employees earn: Employee Wages Miles Less than $10 per hour Between $10 and $20 per hour More than $20 per hour N % N % N % None 74 81% 21 23% 20 22% 1%-25% 6 7% 22 24% 15 16% 26%-50% 4 4% 19 21% 11 12% 51%-75% 3 3% 8 9% 12 13% 76%-100% 4 4% 21 23% 33 36% Can you tell us what proportion of your employees earn: Employee Wages Miles Less than $10 per hour Between $10 and $20 per hour More than $20 per hour N % N % N % None 67 74% 21 23% 22 24% 1%-25% 11 12% 17 19% 14 16% 26%-50% 4 4% 21 23% 17 19% 51%-75% 4 4% 13 14% 12 13% Page 251

257 Can you tell us what proportion of your employees earn: Employee Wages Miles Less than $10 per hour Between $10 and $20 per hour More than $20 per hour N % N % N % 76%-100% 4 4% 18 20% 25 28% Page 252

258 Can you tell us what proportion of your employees earn: Employee Wages to 1.00 miles Less than $10 per hour Between $10 and $20 per hour More than $20 per hour N % N % N % None 29 85% 6 18% 4 12% 1%-25% 1 3% 9 26% 6 18% 26%-50% 1 3% 11 32% 6 18% 51%-75% 2 6% 3 9% 8 24% 76%-100% 1 3% 5 15% 10 29% Would you be willing to have us send you a set of surveys for your employees? Participate in Employee Survey by Distance 0.00 to 0.24 miles 0.25 to 0.49 miles 0.50 to 0.74 miles 0.75 to 1.00 miles N % N % N % N % Yes 48 79% 82 80% 69 70% 28 72% No 13 21% 20 20% 29 30% 11 28% Page 253

259 Appendix E: Survey Methodology Developing the Interview Script The survey of businesses near rail transit stations is one part of the Who it TOD in Metro Denver? study. Its purpose was to first gather information about location choice, parking, commuting and transportation demand management strategies of the businesses and secondly to recruit businesses to participate in an employee survey that will gather more detailed information about employee commutes and use of TOD amenities. With these goals in mind, NRC developed the interview script in concert with DRCOG. A draft script was reviewed by key stakeholders and refined. Selecting Survey Recipients Sampling refers to the method by which survey recipients are chosen. The sample refers to all those who were given a chance to participate in the survey. To create the sample, NRC purchased a list of businesses from Dunn & Bradstreet (D&B) which were geocoded so that businesses within a one-mile walk distance of a rail transit station could be identified; those outside this radius were removed. Also removed from the sample were any government offices and buildings (such as libraries). This cleaned list was used as the sample. Business respondents were randomly chosen from the sample and to be asked to participate in a telephone survey. This sample of businesses located within a half mile of a rail station was stratified by three areas with 80 interviews conducted with businesses in downtown Denver, 110 interviews conducted with businesses in high density areas outside of downtown and 110 interviews conducted with businesses in low density areas outside of downtown. Identifying the Walk Distance The walk distances were developed using a combination of methods. First, DRCOG staff, used ESRI s Network Analyzer, (modified based on specific knowledge of the terrain) to measure (estimate) a one-half mile walk distance. These walk distance maps were then provided to member government planners for review. Several member governments requested the walk distance be expanded based on observed behavior (people seen walking to and from the stations from employment). These requests were accommodated and another 1,000 feet was added beyond these distances, expanding the walk distance to approximately one mile. Survey Administration and Response The interview script was programmed for use in a Computer-Assisted Telephone Interviewing (CATI) system, an interactive front-end computer system that aids interviewers in asking questions over the telephone, and manages the sample (telephone numbers to be called by the interviewers). The computer program controls branching to or skipping among questions, and validates the data as it is entered. As an interviewer reads the question on the screen and enters the response, the next question is automatically brought up onto their screen. In addition to controlling the branching, a CATI system provides on-line checks on the responses keyed in and Page 254

260 alerts the interviewer of inconsistent or out-of-range values. This improves the overall quality of data collected, and means that the separate step of data entry is unnecessary. A CATI system also schedules and dials businesses via an automated process. The system searches for the next business to call based on certain priority rules. If a call was not answered, the system automatically schedules the business to another time. If the interview could not be completed, the system also allows interviewers to re-schedule the appointment to a date and time favored by the business. Interviewing for this project occurred from April 13 to 24, Each phone number called was assigned a disposition describing the outcome of the call. Phone numbers determined not to serve a business (such as disconnected numbers or those for a residence) were assigned final dispositions and not called again. When an interview was completed, or if a potential respondent refused to complete the interview, a final disposition was entered and the phone number was not dialed again. Phone numbers dialed that reached voice mail or busy signals were scheduled for additional calls. Each number not assigned a final disposition was called multiple times to ensure every business in the selected sample had a good chance of participating in the survey. Final dispositions were assigned only after 8 or more attempts. Interviews were during the daytime business hours. A total of 5,916 phone numbers were dialed during the survey administration. Some of these numbers are considered ineligible for the survey. Of the approximately 5,225 businesses called, 300 completed interviews providing a response rate of 6%. Approximately 488 businesses refused the survey. Disconnected, fax/data line, or resident phone numbers were not included as eligible businesses. There were nine hundred nineteen phone numbers where the eligibility status of the business was unknown, 88% of these were estimated to be eligible. This proportion was assumed to hold for those businesses not contacted, or where the business refused, and therefore prevented knowing the eligibility status, and 88% of these numbers were included in the final response rate calculation. 95% Confidence Intervals The 95% confidence interval (or margin of error ) quantifies the sampling error or precision of the estimates made from the survey results. A 95% confidence interval can be calculated for any sample size, and indicates that in 95 of 100 surveys conducted like this one, for a particular item, a result would be found that is within ±X percentage points of the result that would be found if everyone in the population of interest was surveyed. The practical difficulties of conducting any business survey may introduce other sources of error in addition to sampling error. Despite our best efforts to boost participation and ensure potential inclusion of all businesses, some selected businesses will decline participation in the survey (referred to as non-response error) and some eligible businesses may be unintentionally excluded from the listed sources for the sample (referred to as coverage error). Page 255

261 While the 95 percent confidence level for the survey is generally no greater than plus or minus six percentage points around any given percent reported for the entire sample, results for subgroups will have wider confidence intervals. For each subgroup from the survey, the margin of error rises to as much as plus or minus 11.0% for a sample size of 80 (Downtown businesses) to plus or minus 9.3% for 110 completed surveys (high and low density areas that are not downtown). Where estimates are given for subgroups, they are less precise. Survey Processing (Data Entry) Use of a CATI system means that all collected data were entered into the dataset at the time of the interview. Skip patterns were programmed into CATI so interviewers were automatically skipped to the appropriate question based on the individual responses being given. Before the data were analyzed, an in-depth cleaning of the data was conducted as part of the standard quality control procedures. Survey Analysis Out of Range Data Walking distance to the nearest rail station was initially calculated during the sampling phase for all businesses in the sample. On completion of the survey this distance was re-calculated for the 300 businesses interviewed using a more precise mapping program. At this time, it was found that two of the businesses were outside of the one-mile walking distance (at 1.06 and 1.15 miles). These businesses were similar in their responses to the businesses which were within 0.75 to 1.00 miles walking distance from their nearest station, and so they were kept in the database and grouped with the businesses which were within 0.75 to 1.00 miles walking distance from their nearest station. Weighting the Data We considered two possible variables as weighting factors for the business survey: Size of organization (number of employees) and type of organization (NAICS category). The table below compares the employee size of all the businesses in the D&B sample of our region (within one half mile of rail-transit stations) to the employee size of the 300 businesses we surveyed. The first column shows the proportion of organizations by number of employees according to D&B. The second column shows the proportion of organizations after adjustment (described below). Finally, the third column displays the proportion of organizations in each size category among those surveyed based on the number of employees in the organization according to the respondent. The adjustments to the D&B figures for number of employees was done by comparing the number of employees reported by D&B to the number of employees reported by the survey respondent. The employee size reported by D&B differed from the size reported by survey respondents in about half the cases. To correct for this in the D&B sample, we followed the following protocol: Page 256

262 1) Using the survey data, the proportion of businesses in category A (from D&B) who were actually in categories A through Z (from the survey) was calculated, the proportion of businesses in category B (from D&B) who were actually in categories A through Z (from the survey) was calculated, etc for each category. Number of Number of employees from survey interview employees from D&B sample 1-4 (a) 5-9 (b) (c) (d) (e) 100+ (f) 1-4 (a) 62.4% 21.8% 8.3% 4.5% 0.8% 2.3% 5-9 (b) 34.7% 40.8% 20.4% 2.0% 0.0% 2.0% (c) 7.7% 20.5% 56.4% 7.7% 5.1% 2.6% (d) 3.0% 3.0% 33.3% 51.5% 3.0% 6.1% (e) 10.0% 0.0% 30.0% 0.0% 50.0% 10.0% 100+ (f) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 25.0% 75.0% unknown (z) 16.0% 20.0% 28.0% 16.0% 8.0% 12.0% 2) These proportions were then used to adjust the D&B sample (e.g. 62.4% of those in A should be in A, 34.7% of those in B should be in A, 7.7% of those in C should be in A, 3.0% of those in D should be in A, 10.0% of those in E should be in A, 16.0% of those in Z should be in A). 3) The adjusted D&B sample was then compared to the survey results. There was still some divergence in the proportions, but it was within a reasonable margin of error and not worth weighting the data to match the population proportions. Category Number of employees D&B sample D&B sample adjusted Survey (N=300) A % 44.6% 37.0% B % 22.0% 21.3% C % 17.5% 21.3% D % 8.0% 10.3% E % 3.2% 4.3% F % 4.6% 5.7% Z unknown 5.8% 0.0% 0.0% The biggest discrepancy noted between the surveyed population and the entire region was in the proportion of very small organizations. These organizations are more likely to have disconnected phone numbers compared to other size organizations, and this may explain the lower proportion in this category among surveyed organizations compared to the D&B list for the entire region. Page 257

263 The table on the following page compares the NAICS categories of the surveyed businesses to the NAICS categories of organizations in the entire region. The first column shows the category as reported by D&B for surveyed organizations, while the second shows the categories as reported by our survey respondents. The third column displays the D&B designation for the entire region. About 18% of the NAICS provided by D&B did not match those given by survey respondents. We did not adjust for these differences from the larger sample, as the discrepancies were not large. The survey data was not weighted by either size of organization or NAICS code. In both cases, weighting would overstate confidence in the accuracy of the estimates of the actual population. In addition, the discrepancies were not large, and weighting would not adjust the survey results in a significant manner. Page 258

264 North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Categories Survey (N=300) from responden from D&B t D&B sample Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction 2.0% 2.0% 2.4% Utilities 0.3% 0.3% 0.2% Construction 3.3% 5.3% 5.3% Manufacturing 4.0% 3.7% 3.7% Wholesale Trade 5.7% 3.0% 3.9% Retail Trade 10.3% 12.0% 8.4% Transportation and Warehousing 2.3% 3.7% 1.0% Information 1.3% 1.7% 3.9% Finance and Insurance 10.0% 9.7% 10.0% Real Estate and Rental and Leasing 8.3% 9.0% 6.3% Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services 21.3% 20.3% 22.8% Management of Companies and Enterprises 1.0% 1.3% 0.3% Administrative and Support and Waste Management 4.7% 2.7% 8.6% and Remediation Services Educational Services 1.3% 1.7% 0.9% Health Care and Social Assistance 6.7% 6.3% 6.4% Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation 0.0% 0.0% 1.6% Accommodation and Food Services 9.0% 10.0% 5.6% Other Services (except Public Administration) 5.7% 7.3% 6.2% blank 2.7% 0.0% 2.3% Page 259

265 Appendix F: Copy of Survey Questionnaire The following pages contain a copy of the script telephone interviewers followed when talking with survey participants. 1. We would like to talk to businesses near rail transit stations; can we confirm that your address is at 1=Yes 2=No 1x. What is your position in the company? (DO NOT READ LIST) 1=Human Resources Personnel 2=Office Manager 3=Manager 4=Receptionist/Secretary 5=CEO 6=Owner 9=(OTHER SPECIFY) 1X. OTHER SPECIFY 1=VERBATIM 2A C. Including yourself, how many full time, part time and contract employees do you have at this location? (RECORD NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES FOR EACH CATEGORY) A=Full time B=Part time C=Contract 3. Roughly, what percent of employees at your worksite work the following schedules: (READ LIST RECORD PERCENTAGE FOR EACH) 1=Weekdays, daytime? 2=Weekdays, evenings or night? 3=Weekends? 4=Varying or unpredictable schedule? 4. Does your company rent or own your business facility? 1=Rent 2=Own 3=(DON'T KNOW) 4a.pre. What do you pay per square foot, monthly? (IF DON'T KNOW) What is your monthly rent? 1=RECORD AMOUNT PER SQUARE FOOT 2=RECORD MONTHLY RENT 3=(DON'T KNOW EITHER AMOUNT) 4=(REFUSED) 4A. What do you pay per square foot, monthly? Page 260

266 (RECORD AMOUNT PER SQ.FT., IN DOLLARS AND CENTS) (3 DOLLARS WOULD BE ENTERED AS "300") 1=ENTER AMOUNT 4B. What is your monthly rent? (RECORD MONTHLY RENT, ROUND TO NEAREST DOLLAR) 1=NUMERIC 5. What is the square footage of this business facility? (RECORD TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE) ( = DK/NA/RF) 1=NUMERIC ( ) 6. Is your company in the following industry category: 1=Yes 2=No 6A. What type of business is this? 1=VERBATIM 7. Does your company own any parking spaces? 1=Yes 2=No 7A. How many company owned parking spaces do you have? 1=NUMERIC ( ) 8. Do you have assigned spaces included in your building lease? 1=Yes 2=No 8A. How many assigned spaces are included in your building lease? 1=RECORD TOTAL NUMBER 2=RECORD NUMBER PER SQUARE FEET 3=(DON'T KNOW) 8A1. TOTAL NUMBER OF ASSIGNED SPACES 1=NUMERIC ( ) 8A2. NUMBER OF ASSIGNED SPACES PER SQUARE FEET (ENTER THE OF SPACES PER SQUARE FEET) 1=SPACES PER 2=SQUARE FEET 8B. How much of your monthly lease is for parking? 1=RECORD TOTAL AMOUNT PER MONTH 2=RECORD AMOUNT PER MONTH PER SPACE Page 261

267 3=(DON'T KNOW) 8B1. TOTAL AMOUNT PER MONTH (RECORD AMOUNT, ROUNDED TO NEAREST DOLLAR) 1=NUMERIC ( ) 8B2. RECORD AMOUNT PER MONTH PER SPACE (RECORD AMOUNT, ROUNDED TO NEAREST DOLLAR) 1=NUMERIC ( ) 9. Do you have assigned spaces that are leased separately from your building lease? 1=Yes 2=No 9A. How many assigned spaces do you lease separately from your building lease? 1=NUMERIC ( ) 9B. How much does your company pay per month for these spaces? 1=RECORD TOTAL AMOUNT PER MONTH 2=RECORD AMOUNT PER MONTH PER SPACE 3=(DON'T KNOW) 9B1. TOTAL AMOUNT PER MONTH (RECORD AMOUNT, ROUNDED TO NEAREST DOLLAR) 1=NUMERIC ( ) 9B2. RECORD AMOUNT PER MONTH PER SPACE (RECORD AMOUNT, ROUNDED TO NEAREST DOLLAR) 1=NUMERIC ( ) 10. Do your employees pay for use of parking spaces that are either owned or leased by your company? 1=Yes 2=No 10A. What is their monthly parking rate? (RECORD AMOUNT, ROUNDED TO NEAREST DOLLAR) (9999 = DK/NA/RF) 1=NUMERIC (1 9999) 11. Do any of your employees pay for parking that is not owned or leased by your company? 1=Yes 2=No 11A. Are your employees reimbursed for parking that is not owned or leased by your company? Page 262

268 1=Yes 2=No 11B. How much are employees reimbursed for this parking? (RECORD AMOUNT PER EMPLOYEE PER MONTH, ROUNDED TO NEAREST DOLLAR) 1=NUMERIC (1 9999) 12. Do any of your customers pay for parking that is not owned or leased by your company? 1=Yes 2=No 12A. Do you reimburse your customers for this parking cost? 1=Yes 2=No 13. How close is your business to parking that is free for both your company and your customers and employees? Is there free parking right next to your building, within a block of your building or more than a block from your building? 1=Right next to your building 2=Within a block of your building 3=More than a block 14. Do you share a parking lot with any other businesses? 1=Yes 2=No 14A. What percent of your total parking is shared with other businesses? (RECORD PERCENTAGE FROM 1 100%) 1=NUMERIC (1 100) 14B. What type of business do you share this lot with? (DO NOT READ SELECT ALL THAT APPLY) 1=Restaurants 2=Coffee shops 3=Bars/ taverns/ night clubs 4=Entertainment (theater, art gallery, museum) 5=Hotel/motel 6=Dry cleaners/ laundry/ alterations/ tailors 7=Beauty/nails/hair (spa/salon/products) 8=Grocery/ drug/ convenience stores 9=Department stores 10=Clothing/shoe stores 11=Sporting good stores 12=Home improvement/hardware/paint and wallpaper stores 13=Books, office supplies, print/photos shop, computer store 14=Pet supply/veterinarian 15=Health care (medical, dental, chiropractic, therapy) 16=Child care/day care Page 263

269 17=Sports and fitness (gyms/organizations) 18=Computer/Information Technology (IT)/Software and Hardware 19=Financial (banking, investment, mortgage, accounting) 20=General office (law, insurance, temp help, marketing etc) 21=Non profit organization 22=Gas station 23=Auto repair 24=Real estate / property management/ architect 25=Construction/trades (builder, plumber, painter, electrician) 26=Energy provision/consulting 27=Aerospace field 28=Bioscience field 29=Telecom field 30=Aviation field 88=(OTHER SPECIFY) 14B. OTHER SPECIFY 1=VERBATIM 14C. Do you run out of spaces at any time of day in this shared lot? 1=Yes 2=No 16. Overall, would you say you have access to too little parking, enough parking, or more than enough parking for your employees? 1=Too little 2=Enough 3=More than enough 17. And for your customers?. (AS NEEDED) Overall, would you say you have access to too little parking, enough parking, or more than enough parking for your customers? 1=Too little 2=Enough 3=More than enough 18. Do you have any of the following issues with parking? (READ LIST SELECT ALL THAT APPLY) 1=It is too far away 2=It is difficult to access 3=It is poorly lit 4=Feels unsafe 5=(NONE OF THESE) 19. Can you tell us what proportion of your employees use modes other than a single occupant car to get to work on a regular basis? Page 264

270 (ENTER A PERCENTAGE FROM 0 100) 1=NUMERIC (0 100) 19A C. (ENTER A PERCENTAGE FROM FOR EACH) (ANSWERS MUST ADD UP TO PREVIOUS ANSWER) A=What proportion of your employees carpool? B=What proportion of your employees use transit? C=What proportion of your employees walk or bike? 20. There are many strategies for influencing how employees travel to and from work. A few examples are: providing transit passes, organizing car or van pools, charging for parking, providing secure bike storage and showers or lockers for cyclists, guaranteed ride home programs and flexible work schedules. Do you use any of these strategies, or others, to influence how employees travel to and from work? (DO NOT READ LIST SELECT ALL THAT APPLY). 1 > Free/subsidized transit passes, such as the Eco Pass. 2 > Organized carpooling. 3 > Organized vanpooling. 4 > Preferred parking spaces for carpools/vanpools. 5 > Charging employees to park in company owned or leased spaces. 6 > Substituting "paid parking" with a commute allowance which could. be used for bus or vanpool fares as well as parking fees. 7 > Shuttles to transit or other frequently used locations. 8 > Access to vehicles for mid day trips. 9 > Access to bicycles for mid day trips.10 > Secure bike storage.11 > On site amenities for walkers and bicyclists (i.e. showers, lockers).12 > Guaranteed ride home.13 > Teleworking (a regular, off site work arrangement).14 > Flexible work schedules (varying starting and ending times).15 > Compressed work weeks (i.e. 40 hrs in 4 days, 80 hrs in 9 days) 88=(OTHER SPECIFY) 97=(NONE) 20. OTHER SPECIFY 1=VERBATIM Do you think is very effective, somewhat effective or not effective in reducing single car trips and parking needs? 1=Very effective Free/subsidized transit passes, such as the Eco Pass Organized carpooling Organized vanpooling Preferred parking spaces for carpools/vanpools Charging employees to park in company owned or leased spaces Substituting "paid parking" with a commute allowance which could be used for bus or vanpool fares as well as parking fees Page 265

271 Shuttles to transit or other frequently used locations Access to vehicles for mid day trips Access to bicycles for mid day trips Secure bike storage On site amenities for walkers and bicyclists (i.e. showers, lockers) Guaranteed ride home Teleworking (a regular, off site work arrangement) Flexible work schedules (varying starting and ending times) Compressed work weeks (i.e. 40 hrs in 4 days, 80 hrs in 9 days) Other mentioned above 22. Are you interested in learning more about transportation management strategies? 1=Yes 2=No 23. Did you move to this location from another location or was this the first location for this business or a new branch of the business? 1=Moved 2=New location 3=New branch 23A. Where was previous location? (RECORD STREET ADDRESS OR NEARBY CROSS STREETS) 1=VERBATIM 23A. Where was previous location? What was the zip code? 1=NUMERIC ( ) 24. What were the three top reasons for choosing your current location? (DO NOT READ LIST SELECT ALL THAT APPLY) 1=Access to rail transit 2=Lease rates 3=Building structure 4=Parking availability 5=Near main roads 6=Other complementary businesses 7=Access to customers from rail station foot traffic 8=Access to customers from employees at near by businesses 9=Access to customers from near by residences 10=Close to home 11=Security 12=Supports brand positioning (being in young, green, urban area etc.) 88=(OTHER SPECIFY) 98=(DON'T KNOW) 24. OTHER SPECIFY Page 266

272 1=VERBATIM 25. In what year did you open this location? (RECORD FOUR DIGIT YEAR, i.e. 1977) 1=NUMERIC ( ) 25A. When you made the decision to locate here, did you know the station would be built? 1=Yes 2=No Did your expectation of have a strong influence, somewhat of an influence, or was not an influence in choosing this location. 1=Strong influence 2=Somewhat of an influence 3=Not an influence 4=(DON'T KNOW) A. Customer foot traffic from the rail station B. Customer foot traffic from employees at nearby businesses C. Customer foot traffic from customers of nearby businesses D. Customer foot traffic from local residents E. Having access to a larger workforce through the F. Your employees seeing the rail commute option as a benefit G. Your employees seeing access to restaurants, coffee shops or bars as a benefit H. Your employees seeing access to grocery stores and drug stores as a benefit I. Your employees seeing access to personal services (such as hair salons or dry cleaners) as a benefit J. Your employees seeing access to medical or daycare centers is seen as benefit by employees K. Having easy access by car for customers or employees L. The availability of parking for customers and employees and were your expectations of fully met, somewhat met or not met? 1=Fully met 2=Somewhat met 3=Not met 4=(DON'T KNOW) A. Customer foot traffic from the rail station B. Customer foot traffic from employees at nearby businesses C. Customer foot traffic from customers of nearby businesses D. Customer foot traffic from local residents E. Having access to a larger workforce through the F. Your employees seeing the rail commute option as a benefit G. Your employees seeing access to restaurants, coffee shops or bars as a benefit H. Your employees seeing access to grocery stores and drug stores as a benefit I. Your employees seeing access to personal services (such as hair salons or dry cleaners) as a benefit J. Your employees seeing access to medical or daycare centers is seen as benefit by employees K. Having easy access by car for customers or employees Page 267

273 L. The availability of parking for customers and employees 28. What other types of businesses, houses or other land uses would you most like to have developed near you? (DO NOT READ LIST SELECT ALL THAT APPLY) (REFER TO MASTER LIST) 1=Restaurants 2=Coffee shops 3=Bars/ taverns/ night clubs 4=Entertainment (theater, art gallery, museum) 5=Hotel/motel 6=Dry cleaners/ laundry/ alterations/ tailors 7=Beauty/nails/hair (spa/salon/products) 8=Grocery/ drug/ convenience stores 9=Department stores 10=Clothing/shoe stores 11=Sporting good stores 12=Home improvement/hardware/paint and wallpaper stores 13=Books, office supplies, print/photos shop, computer store 14=Pet supply/veterinarian 15=Health care (medical, dental, chiropractic, therapy) 16=Child care/day care 17=Sports and fitness (gyms/organizations) 18=Computer/Information Technology (IT)/Software and Hardware 19=Financial (banking, investment, mortgage, accounting) 20=General office (law, insurance, temp help, marketing etc) 21=Non profit organization 22=Gas station 23=Auto repair 24=Real estate / property management/ architect 25=Construction/trades (builder, plumber, painter, electrician) 26=Energy provision/consulting 27=Aerospace field 28=Bioscience field 29=Telecom field 30=Aviation field 31=Multi family housing 32=Single family housing 33=Parks/ open space 88=(OTHER SPECIFY) 98=(DON'T KNOW) 28. OTHER SPECIFY 1=VERBATIM 29. Do you plan to stay in this location for the next few years? Page 268

274 1=Yes 2=No 29A. In what year do you intend to move? (RECORD FOUR DIGIT YEAR, i.e. 2010) (9999 = DON'T KNOW) 1=NUMERIC ( ) 29B. Why do you want to move? (DO NOT READ LIST SELECT ALL THAT APPLY) 1=Need larger space 2=Need smaller space 3=Too expensive 4=Need different building structure/amenities 5=Not enough foot traffic 6=Not enough parking 7=Hard to access by car 8=Hard to access by transit 9=Hard to access by walk/bike 10=Want better access to workforce 88=(OTHER SPECIFY) 29B. OTHER SPECIFY 1=VERBATIM 29C. Will you move to another location near a transit station or away from a transit station? 1=Near 2=Away from 3=(DON'T KNOW) 30A B. Can you tell us what proportion of your employees: (READ LIST) (RECORD % FROM 0 100, MUST ADD TO 100%) (PROBE FOR BEST ESTIMATE, IF STILL DK RECORD `101' FOR EACH ANSWER) A=Are female? B=Are male? 31A C. Can you tell us what proportion of your employees: (READ LIST) (RECORD % FROM 0 100, MUST ADD TO 100%) (PROBE FOR BEST ESTIMATE, IF STILL DK RECORD `101' FOR EACH ANSWER) A=Are under 30? B=Are Between 30 and 50? C=Are Over 50? 32A C. Can you tell us what proportion of your employees: (READ LIST) (RECORD % FROM 0 100, MUST ADD TO 100%) (PROBE FOR BEST ESTIMATE, IF STILL DK RECORD `101' FOR EACH ANSWER) A=Earn less than $10 per hour? Page 269

275 B=Between $10 and $20 per hour? C=More than $20 per hour? 33. We would ask you distribute the survey packages to each employee and have them complete the survey at a convenient time and return it via the postage paid envelope and/or to each employee with information about the survey and a link to the survey website.. This survey should not take much time to complete, and can be completed at home by employees. Their responses will be anonymous. The information we gather from employees will help cities in the Denver Metro area better plan areas near rail transit stations.. Would you be willing to have us send you a set of surveys for your employees? 1=Yes 2=No Page 270

276 Appendix G: Economic Conditions at Time of Survey. This section outlines the economic conditions in Denver at the time of the business survey. These conditions may influence business decisions and commute behavior and are noted as context for current and, especially, future analyses. Denver region economic condition summary through 2008/Q1 2009: The nation, Colorado, and the Denver region are experiencing an economic downturn unprecedented in the past 70 years. The downturn has affected multiple aspects of the economy including employment, access to credit, migration into the state, and patterns of homeownership. As of the end of the first quarter 2009 the region s non-seasonally adjusted unemployment rate stands at 8.0 percent. This is up from 7.71 percent a month ago, and has nearly doubled from its rate of 4.68 percent in March of On a seasonally adjusted basis, the region (excluding Clear Creek and Gilpin counties, for which data were not available) has lost 51,200 jobs since March 2008, the majority of which were lost in late 2008 and early Since the beginning of this year the region has lost 17,600 jobs, an average of just under 5,900 jobs per month. Although the rate of seasonally adjusted job loss declined between February and March of 2009, uncertainty about the local economy remains. In times of uncertainty, it often helps to look to indicators and economic trends that suggest the future. Up though 2008 the region continued to gain population year over year, suggesting desirability for the region beyond economic conditions. The majority of the indicators below (S&P performance, consumer confidence, sales tax collections, etc,) have turned sharply down over the past year, however, there are some, such as housing, showing signs of better performance for the region against the nation. The Case & Shiller Home Price Index has the Denver region performing better than the 10 city composite. This is primarily due to Denver not experiencing the rapid housing price escalation that many other cities, particularly Las Vegas and Miami, experienced. In addition, residential building permits have declined to a point where new vacant inventory should have a chance to absorb into the market and find equilibrium with the resale market. Finally, foreclosures have decreased from the highpoint in 2007, but should be carefully monitored since the full effects of the unemployment rates have yet to be felt in the housing market. Overall the Denver region has appeared through indicators and anecdotal accounts to be faring better than the nation through this recession, but unemployment always lags recovery so weaknesses in the local market could still be felt beyond the traditional measure of positive economic growth. Page 271

277 Population Source: Colorado State Demographer Source: Colorado State Demographer Page 272

278 Employment Source: Colorado Department of Labor & Employment Source: Colorado Department of Labor & Employment Page 273

279 Unemployment Gross Domestic Product (GDP) Source: Colorado Department of Labor & Employment Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis Page 274

280 Personal Income/Consumption Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis Page 275

281 Market Performance Source: Standard & Poors Inflation Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Page 276

282 Sentiments Source: Conference Board Cost of Living Source: Council for Community and Economic Research Page 277

283 Lending Rates Source: Wall Street Journal Prime Rate/Freddie Mac Housing Source: National Association of Home Builders Page 278

284 Source: Macro Markets Case & Shiller Index Source: National Association of Home Builders Page 279

285 Source: US Census Bureau Source: US Census Bureau Page 280

286 Source: US Census Bureau Source: Colorado Division of Housing Page 281

287 Source: Colorado Division of Housing Page 282

288 Tax Coffers Source: Colorado Division of Property Taxation Source: Colorado Department of Revenue Page 283

289 Oil & Gas Source: Energy Information Administration Source: Energy Information Administration Page 284

290 Appendix H: Walk Distance Maps. The walk distances were developed using a combination of methods. First, DRCOG staff, used ESRI s Network Analyzer, (modified based on specific knowledge of the terrain) to measure (estimate) a one-half mile walk distance. These walk distance maps were then provided to member governments for review. Several requested the walk distance be expanded based on observed behavior (people seen walking to and from the stations from employment). These requests were accommodated and another 1,000 feet was added beyond these distances, expanding the walk distance to approximately one mile. Walk distances were not estimated for stations north of 10 th and Osage due to the close proximity to each other and the higher density of intersections in the downtown area. The maps in this appendix show the original estimated ½ mile walk distance plus any additional geography included by member governments. The added one-thousand feet distance is not shown. Station areas are presented in alphabetical order. Page 285

291 Yuma St Vallejo St Raritan St Quivas St Mariposa St Lipan St Santa Fe Dr Kalamath St Galapago St Walk shed vs. Geometric Half-Mile 10th & Osage Station W Colfax Ave Inca St W 14th Ave W 14th Ave W 14th Ave W 14th Ave W 14th Ave Speer Blvd Speer Blvd W Myrtle Pl Rio Ct Umatilla St Shoshone St W 12th Ave Pecos St Osage St W 12th Ave W 13th Ave N Yuma Ct Xinca Ct W 11th Ave Inca St W 10th Ave W 10th Ave W Mulberry Pl W 9th Ave I 25 Wyandot St Vallejo St W 8th Ave Tejon St Seminole Rd Navajo St W 8th Ave W 8th Ave I 25 Umatilla St W 7th Ave Unnamed Street Osage St W 7th Ave W 6th Avenue Fwy W 6th Avenue Fwy W 6th Ave W 6th Ave Miles ± Legend Estimated Half-Mile Station Walksheds Added Walkshed Half-Mile Station Buffer ^ Existing Stations Freeways Local Roads Light Rail Line SOURCE DATA: DRCOG, ESRI, Photography from DRAPP 2008 This data is intended for informational purposes only. DRCOG provides this information on an "as is" basis and makes no representation or warranty that the data will be error free. DRCOG is not responsible to any user for costs or damages arising from inconsistencies in its data. Projection: State Plane Colorado Central, NAD 83 (feet) MGT - 2 / 26/ 2009 \\kennedy\crs\gis\ad_hoc\71208\tos_walkshe_maps.mxd

292 S Lipan St S Jason St S Huron St S Fox St S Lincoln St Walk shed vs. Geometric Half-Mile Alameda Station S Kalamath St S Santa Fe Dr S Galapago St S Elati St W Archer Pl W Bayaud Ave E Bayaud Ave W Cedar Ave S Elati St S Bannock St W Maple Ave W Cedar Ave E Maple Ave E Cedar Ave S Platte River Dr W Byers Pl I 25 W Byers Pl W Alameda Ave E Alameda Ave S Broadway S Lincoln St S Cherokee St W Nevada Pl W Dakota Ave E Dakota Ave I 25 W Alaska Pl W Virginia Ave W Virginia Ave W Custer Pl S Sherman St W Center Ave W Center Ave E Center Ave W Exposition Ave E Exposition Ave W Alys Pl E Ohio Ave Miles E Ohio Ave ± S Grant St Legend Estimated Half-Mile Station Walksheds Added Walkshed Half-Mile Station Buffer ^ Existing Stations Freeways Local Roads Light Rail Line SOURCE DATA: DRCOG, ESRI, Photography from DRAPP 2008 This data is intended for informational purposes only. DRCOG provides this information on an "as is" basis and makes no representation or warranty that the data will be error free. DRCOG is not responsible to any user for costs or damages arising from inconsistencies in its data. Projection: State Plane Colorado Central, NAD 83 (feet) MGT - 2 / 26/ 2009 \\kennedy\crs\gis\ad_hoc\71208\tos_walkshe_maps.mxd

293 S Yosemite St S Alton Way Beacon Hill Ln Walk shed vs. Geometric Half-Mile Arapahoe Unnamed Street S Willow Dr S Akron Way S Beeler St S Chester Way E Lake Cir S Wabash Way E Caley Ave S Fiddlers Green Cir E Maplewood Ave E Fair Ave E Arbor Cir S Boston Cir E Caley Ave S Boston Ct E Peakview Ave Greenwood Plaza Blvd S Fiddlers Green Cir I 25 E Peakview Ave S Yosemite Cir S Alton Ct Southtech Dr S Boston St E Peakview Ave Unnamed Street S Boston St S Dallas Ct S Spruce St E Arapahoe Ct S Ulster Cir E Arapahoe Rd S Uinta St E Arapahoe Rd E Briarwood Ave E Briarwood Pl E Costilla Pl S Willow St S Xanthia St I Miles S Clinton St ± Legend Estimated Half-Mile Station Walksheds Added Walkshed Half-Mile Station Buffer ^ Existing Stations Freeways Local Roads Light Rail Line SOURCE DATA: DRCOG, ESRI, Photography from DRAPP 2008 This data is intended for informational purposes only. DRCOG provides this information on an "as is" basis and makes no representation or warranty that the data will be error free. DRCOG is not responsible to any user for costs or damages arising from inconsistencies in its data. Projection: State Plane Colorado Central, NAD 83 (feet) MGT - 2 / 26/ 2009 \\kennedy\crs\gis\ad_hoc\71208\tos_walkshe_maps.mxd

294 S Monaco St S Quebec St S Syracuse St S Syracuse St S Ulster St Walk shed vs. Geometric Half-Mile Belleview S Monaco St I 225 Unnamed Street Unnamed Street Technology Way S Ulster St E Tufts Ave S Monaco St E Union Ave E Union Ave E Belleview Ave E Progress Cir E Prentice Ave E Progress Ave Unnamed Street E Progress Pl S Roslyn St I 25 DTC Pkwy I Miles ± E Prentice Ave Legend Estimated Half-Mile Station Walksheds Added Walkshed Half-Mile Station Buffer ^ Existing Stations Freeways Local Roads Light Rail Line SOURCE DATA: DRCOG, ESRI, Photography from DRAPP 2008 This data is intended for informational purposes only. DRCOG provides this information on an "as is" basis and makes no representation or warranty that the data will be error free. DRCOG is not responsible to any user for costs or damages arising from inconsistencies in its data. Projection: State Plane Colorado Central, NAD 83 (feet) MGT - 2 / 26/ 2009 \\kennedy\crs\gis\ad_hoc\71208\tos_walkshe_maps.mxd

295 S Monroe St S Ash St S Birch St S Madison St S Monroe St S Garfield St S Jackson St S Jackson St S Harrison St S Albion St S Albion St S Bellaire St S Clermont St S Cherry St S Dexter St S Dexter St S Dahlia St Walk shed vs. Geometric Half-Mile Colorado Center E Mexico Ave S Jackson St S Harrison St S Birch St S Madison St E Montana Pl E Colorado Ave E Jewell Ave S Bellaire St Frontage Road Frontage Rd E Montana Pl E Colorado Ave E Utah Pl Frontage Road E Bails Pl E Jewell Ave S Dahlia St S Eudora St S Elm St E Atlantic Pl S Fairfax St E Asbury Ave Buchtel Blvd S Albion St E Asbury Ave S Ash St E Asbury Ave S Madison St S Bellaire St E Evans Ave E Asbury Cir Frontage Road E Pacific Pl I 25 E Warren Ave E Warren Ave S Madison St E Donald Ave E Iliff Ave E Iliff Ave E Jerome Ave E Wesley Ave E Wesley Ave E Dickenson Pl S Birch St S Dahlia Ln S Eudora St E Harvard Ln Miles ± S Valley Hwy I 25 Legend Estimated Half-Mile Station Walksheds Added Walkshed Half-Mile Station Buffer ^ Existing Stations Freeways Local Roads Light Rail Line SOURCE DATA: DRCOG, ESRI, Photography from DRAPP 2008 This data is intended for informational purposes only. DRCOG provides this information on an "as is" basis and makes no representation or warranty that the data will be error free. DRCOG is not responsible to any user for costs or damages arising from inconsistencies in its data. Projection: State Plane Colorado Central, NAD 83 (feet) MGT - 2 / 26/ 2009 \\kennedy\crs\gis\ad_hoc\71208\tos_walkshe_maps.mxd

296 Park Meadows Center Dr S Valley Hwy Walk shed vs. Geometric Half-Mile County Line S Chester St I 25 S Chester St E County Line Rd Dallas St Dallas St E County Line Rd Inverness Dr W Inverness Dr E Inverness Ct E Chester St Inverness Way S Park Meadows Mall S Yosemite St S Yosemite St Inverness Dr S Inverness Pkwy Park Meadows Dr State Hwy 470 I 25 State Hwy Miles ± Legend Estimated Half-Mile Station Walksheds Added Walkshed Half-Mile Station Buffer ^ Existing Stations Freeways Local Roads Light Rail Line SOURCE DATA: DRCOG, ESRI, Photography from DRAPP 2008 This data is intended for informational purposes only. DRCOG provides this information on an "as is" basis and makes no representation or warranty that the data will be error free. DRCOG is not responsible to any user for costs or damages arising from inconsistencies in its data. Projection: State Plane Colorado Central, NAD 83 (feet) MGT - 2 / 26/ 2009 \\kennedy\crs\gis\ad_hoc\71208\tos_walkshe_maps.mxd

297 S Alton Ct S Yosemite St Walk shed vs. Geometric Half-Mile Dayton E Kenyon Ave S Xenia St S Akron St E Kenyon Ave E Lehigh Ave S Beeler St S Chester Way E Jefferson Pl S Dallas St S Dayton Way S Dayton St S Emporia Way S Xanthia St E Mansfield Ave S Clinton Pl S Dallas Cir E Mansfield Ave S Boston St E Nassau Ave I 225 S Willow Way E Oxford Dr I 225 Frontage Road Frontage Road S Xenia St Legend S Yosemite St S Akron Ct S Akron St E Radcliff Ave Estimated Half-Mile Station Walksheds Added Walkshed Half-Mile Station Buffer S Alton Pl S Alton St E Stanford Ave ^ Existing Stations Freeways Local Roads Light Rail Line E Cherry Creek Dam Rd ± Miles SOURCE DATA: DRCOG, ESRI, Photography from DRAPP 2008 This data is intended for informational purposes only. DRCOG provides this information on an "as is" basis and makes no representation or warranty that the data will be error free. DRCOG is not responsible to any user for costs or damages arising from inconsistencies in its data. Projection: State Plane Colorado Central, NAD 83 (feet) MGT - 2 / 26/ 2009 \\kennedy\crs\gis\ad_hoc\71208\tos_walkshe_maps.mxd

298 S Yosemite St S Yosemite St Walk shed vs. Geometric Half-Mile Dry Creek S Alton Way E Easter Ln S Xenia Cir I 25 E Geddes Ave S Clinton St S Fulton St S Fulton St S Havana St S Alton Ct I 25 S Willow Cir E Dry Creek Rd S Chester St E Dry Creek Rd Main St Inverness Blvd Main St Inverness Dr E E Panorama Dr S Chester St E Panorama Cir Inverness Blvd E Mineral Cir E Mineral Ave S Xenia Ct Legend Estimated Half-Mile Station Walksheds Added Walkshed Half-Mile Station Buffer E Nichols Ave ^ Existing Stations Freeways Local Roads Light Rail Line S Dayton St Inverness Dr W ± Miles SOURCE DATA: DRCOG, ESRI, Photography from DRAPP 2008 This data is intended for informational purposes only. DRCOG provides this information on an "as is" basis and makes no representation or warranty that the data will be error free. DRCOG is not responsible to any user for costs or damages arising from inconsistencies in its data. Projection: State Plane Colorado Central, NAD 83 (feet) MGT - 2 / 26/ 2009 \\kennedy\crs\gis\ad_hoc\71208\tos_walkshe_maps.mxd

299 S Lipan St S Fox St S Elati St S Delaware St S Cherokee St S Bannock St Walk shed vs. Geometric Half-Mile Englewood Station S Platte River Dr S Lipan St S Galapago St W Cornell Ave Unnamed Street W Dartmouth Ave W Dartmouth Ave W Girton Ave W Floyd Ave W Girard Ave S Platte River Dr Rob Roy Rd S Santa Fe Dr S Inca Way S Inca Way SE Inca Way S Huron St W Floyd Ave Englewood Pkwy W Eastman Ave W Hamilton Pl W Hampden Pl Natches Ct W Ithaca Ave S Jason St S Inca Way S Inca St S Inca St S Huron St S Galapago St W Kenyon Ave W Ithaca Ave S Fox St S Delaware St W Jefferson Ave S Delaware St Miles ± S Cherokee St Legend Estimated Half-Mile Station Walksheds Added Walkshed Half-Mile Station Buffer ^ Existing Stations Freeways Local Roads Light Rail Line SOURCE DATA: DRCOG, ESRI, Photography from DRAPP 2008 This data is intended for informational purposes only. DRCOG provides this information on an "as is" basis and makes no representation or warranty that the data will be error free. DRCOG is not responsible to any user for costs or damages arising from inconsistencies in its data. Projection: State Plane Colorado Central, NAD 83 (feet) MGT - 2 / 26/ 2009 \\kennedy\crs\gis\ad_hoc\71208\tos_walkshe_maps.mxd

300 S Lipan St S Platte River Dr S Galapago St S Huron St S Delaware St S Cherokee St S Fox St S Elati St S Sherman St Walk shed vs. Geometric Half-Mile Evans Station W Colorado Ave E Colorado Ave W Jewell Ave E Jewell Ave S Acoma St W Asbury Ave S Broadway E Asbury Ave S Logan St W Evans Ave S Platte River Dr W Evans Ave W Evans Service Rd E Evans Ave S Jason St S Fox St S Bannock St W Warren Ave S Grant St E Warren Ave S Kalamath St W Iliff Ave W Iliff Ave W Iliff Ave E Iliff Ave W Wesley Ave W Wesley Ave W Wesley Ave S Lincoln St W Harvard Ave W Harvard Ave E Harvard Ave Miles ± S Grant St Legend Estimated Half-Mile Station Walksheds Added Walkshed Half-Mile Station Buffer ^ Existing Stations Freeways Local Roads Light Rail Line SOURCE DATA: DRCOG, ESRI, Photography from DRAPP 2008 This data is intended for informational purposes only. DRCOG provides this information on an "as is" basis and makes no representation or warranty that the data will be error free. DRCOG is not responsible to any user for costs or damages arising from inconsistencies in its data. Projection: State Plane Colorado Central, NAD 83 (feet) MGT - 2 / 26/ 2009 \\kennedy\crs\gis\ad_hoc\71208\tos_walkshe_maps.mxd

301 S Fox St S Jason St S Cherokee St S Lincoln St S Grant St S Grant St S Logan St S Pennsylvania St S Pearl St Walk shed vs. Geometric Half-Mile I-25 & Broadway Station W Dakota Ave S Lincoln St E Dakota Ave S Kalamath St S Santa Fe Dr S Bannock St W Alaska Pl W Virginia Ave S Sherman St E Virginia Ave W Center Ave S Broadway E Center Ave W Exposition Ave E Exposition Ave E Kentucky Ave E Kentucky Ave W Tennessee Ave S Huron St W Tennessee Ave I 25 W Mississippi Ave Unnamed Street E Mississippi Ave Buchtel Blvd S Inca St W Arizona Ave W Arizona Ave S Lincoln St E Arizona Ave Buchtel Blvd I Miles ± Legend Estimated Half-Mile Station Walksheds Added Walkshed Half-Mile Station Buffer ^ Existing Stations Freeways Local Roads Light Rail Line SOURCE DATA: DRCOG, ESRI, Photography from DRAPP 2008 This data is intended for informational purposes only. DRCOG provides this information on an "as is" basis and makes no representation or warranty that the data will be error free. DRCOG is not responsible to any user for costs or damages arising from inconsistencies in its data. Projection: State Plane Colorado Central, NAD 83 (feet) MGT - 2 / 26/ 2009 \\kennedy\crs\gis\ad_hoc\71208\tos_walkshe_maps.mxd

302 S Valley Hwy Walk shed vs. Geometric Half-Mile Lincoln I 25 S Valley Hwy Aspen Hill Cir E Aspen Hill Ln Park Meadows Dr S Jamaica St E Lansing Cir E Hidden Hill Ln I 25 San Luis Ct S Meridian Blvd S Silent Hills Dr Station St E Beirstadt Way Silent Hills Ln S Shadow Hill Cir S Heritage Hills Pkwy Sunset Hill Dr Sunset Hill Cir Unnamed Street Diente Ct Pyramid Ct S Meridian Blvd S Kingston Ct Maroon Cir Sunset Hill Pl Miles ± Havana St Legend Estimated Half-Mile Station Walksheds Added Walkshed Half-Mile Station Buffer ^ Existing Stations Freeways Local Roads Light Rail Line SOURCE DATA: DRCOG, ESRI, Photography from DRAPP 2008 This data is intended for informational purposes only. DRCOG provides this information on an "as is" basis and makes no representation or warranty that the data will be error free. DRCOG is not responsible to any user for costs or damages arising from inconsistencies in its data. Projection: State Plane Colorado Central, NAD 83 (feet) MGT - 2 / 26/ 2009 \\kennedy\crs\gis\ad_hoc\71208\tos_walkshe_maps.mxd

303 S Prince St S Hill St S Louthan St Walk shed vs. Geometric Half-Mile Littleton Station W Riverwalk Cir W Crestline Ave S Prince St W Berry Ave S Hill St S Rio Grande St W Crestline Dr W Crestline Ave S Windermere St S Cedar St W Powers Ave W Powers Ave S Curtice St S Nevada St W Main St W Alamo Ave S Court Pl S Spotswood St S Prescott St W Littleton Blvd S Mill St W Maplewood Ave S Vinewood St S Sumner St S Rapp St W Church Ave W College Dr S Nevada St Unnamed Street S Sycamore St W Shepperd Ave S Bemis St S Spotswood St S Crocker St W Ida Ave W Lake Ave S Sterne Pkwy W Shepperd Ave W Aberdeen Ave W Lake Pl W Maplewood Ave W Parkhill Ave W Fair Ave S Prescott St Miles ± W Fair Ave Legend Estimated Half-Mile Station Walksheds Added Walkshed Half-Mile Station Buffer ^ Existing Stations Freeways Local Roads Light Rail Line SOURCE DATA: DRCOG, ESRI, Photography from DRAPP 2008 This data is intended for informational purposes only. DRCOG provides this information on an "as is" basis and makes no representation or warranty that the data will be error free. DRCOG is not responsible to any user for costs or damages arising from inconsistencies in its data. Projection: State Plane Colorado Central, NAD 83 (feet) MGT - 2 / 26/ 2009 \\kennedy\crs\gis\ad_hoc\71208\tos_walkshe_maps.mxd

304 S Grant St S Ogden St S Emerson St S Corona St S Humboldt St S Grant St S Pearl St S Ogden St S Lafayette St S Lafayette St S Humboldt St S Downing St S Franklin St S Franklin St Walk shed vs. Geometric Half-Mile Louisiana S Pennsylvania St E Kentucky Ave S Humboldt St E Tennessee Ave Washington Park E Mississippi Ave E Mississippi Ave S Broadway S Lincoln St E Arizona Ave S Logan St Buchtel Blvd S Pennsylvania St S Washington St S Clarkson St Buchtel Blvd E Arizona Ave E Louisiana Ave E Arkansas Ave E Arkansas Ave E Florida Ave E Florida Ave I 25 I 25 E Iowa Ave S Sherman St S Pearl St S Clarkson St S Corona St S Marion St E Mexico Ave Miles ± Legend Estimated Half-Mile Station Walksheds Added Walkshed Half-Mile Station Buffer ^ Existing Stations Freeways Local Roads Light Rail Line SOURCE DATA: DRCOG, ESRI, Photography from DRAPP 2008 This data is intended for informational purposes only. DRCOG provides this information on an "as is" basis and makes no representation or warranty that the data will be error free. DRCOG is not responsible to any user for costs or damages arising from inconsistencies in its data. Projection: State Plane Colorado Central, NAD 83 (feet) MGT - 2 / 26/ 2009 \\kennedy\crs\gis\ad_hoc\71208\tos_walkshe_maps.mxd

305 Walk shed vs. Geometric Half-Mile Platte River Pkwy Aspen Grove Way S Bryant St S Bryant Ave S Houstoun Waring Cir S Costilla St S Crescent Dr Mineral S Costilla Ct S Highland Dr Park Ln S Ridgeview Dr S Prince St W Mineral Ave S Platte River Pkwy S Curtice Ct W Dry Creek Ct W Sunset Dr W Jackass Hill Rd W Jamison Way W Mineral Ave W Long Dr W Long Ct S Curtice St S Hill Cir S Hill Dr W Kettle Ave W Long Cir W Long Ave W Long Pl W Long Cir Miles ± S Bemis St S Bemis Pl Legend Estimated Half-Mile Station Walksheds Added Walkshed Half-Mile Station Buffer ^ Existing Stations Freeways Local Roads Light Rail Line SOURCE DATA: DRCOG, ESRI, Photography from DRAPP 2008 This data is intended for informational purposes only. DRCOG provides this information on an "as is" basis and makes no representation or warranty that the data will be error free. DRCOG is not responsible to any user for costs or damages arising from inconsistencies in its data. Projection: State Plane Colorado Central, NAD 83 (feet) MGT - 2 / 26/ 2009 \\kennedy\crs\gis\ad_hoc\71208\tos_walkshe_maps.mxd

306 S Ursula Ct Walk shed vs. Geometric Half-Mile Nine Mile S Moline Pl S Newark Pl E Cornell Cir S Oakland Cir E S Oakland St E Bates Cir E Cornell Cir E Dartmouth Ave Unnamed Street S Paris St E Cornell Ave S Peoria Ct S Peoria St E Bates Cir S Racine St I 225 E Bates Cir E Bethany Pl E Cornell Cir S Scranton St S Ursula St S Ursula Cir I 225 S Vaughn Way S Vaughn Way S Heather Gardens Way Parker Rd Cherry Creek State Park Cherry Creek State Park Unnamed Street Miles ± Legend Estimated Half-Mile Station Walksheds Added Walkshed Half-Mile Station Buffer ^ Existing Stations Freeways Local Roads Light Rail Line SOURCE DATA: DRCOG, ESRI, Photography from DRAPP 2008 This data is intended for informational purposes only. DRCOG provides this information on an "as is" basis and makes no representation or warranty that the data will be error free. DRCOG is not responsible to any user for costs or damages arising from inconsistencies in its data. Projection: State Plane Colorado Central, NAD 83 (feet) MGT - 2 / 26/ 2009 \\kennedy\crs\gis\ad_hoc\71208\tos_walkshe_maps.mxd

307 S Quebec St Walk shed vs. Geometric Half-Mile Orchard E Crestline Cir S Roslyn St E Prentice Ave S Valentia Way DTC Blvd DTC Blvd E Berry Ave E Marin Dr E Marin Dr S Syracuse St Unnamed Street S Quebec St E Berry Pl I 25 I 25 Windsor Way DTC Pkwy S Park Terrace Ave Royal Ann Dr Sommerset Cir S Park Pl DTC Blvd S Yosemite St E Dorado Pl Greenwood Plaza Blvd E Dorado Pl Ulster Cir W Unnamed Street Ulster Cir E E Orchard Rd E Orchard Rd S Willow Dr E Maplewood Ave S Syracuse Way Unnamed Street S Wabash Way Miles ± Legend Estimated Half-Mile Station Walksheds Added Walkshed Half-Mile Station Buffer ^ Existing Stations Freeways Local Roads Light Rail Line SOURCE DATA: DRCOG, ESRI, Photography from DRAPP 2008 This data is intended for informational purposes only. DRCOG provides this information on an "as is" basis and makes no representation or warranty that the data will be error free. DRCOG is not responsible to any user for costs or damages arising from inconsistencies in its data. Projection: State Plane Colorado Central, NAD 83 (feet) MGT - 2 / 26/ 2009 \\kennedy\crs\gis\ad_hoc\71208\tos_walkshe_maps.mxd S Willow Way

308 S Lipan St S Huron St Walk shed vs. Geometric Half-Mile Oxford Station Natches Ct S Santa Fe Dr S Windermere St W Lehigh Pl S Lipan St W Nassau Ave W Lehigh Ave S Kalamath St W Jefferson Ave S Jason St W Kenyon Ave S Inca St S Huron St S Huron St W Mansfield Ave S Huron St S Galapago St W Radcliff Ave S Natches Ct W Quincy Ave W Oxford Ave S Santa Fe Dr S Windermere St W Radcliff Ave S Navajo St S Lipan St W Oxford Pl W Princeton Pl S Lipan St W Quincy Ave W Stanford Dr S Jason St S Inca St W Stanford Pl S Huron Ct Miles ± S Galapago St Legend Estimated Half-Mile Station Walksheds Added Walkshed Half-Mile Station Buffer ^ Existing Stations Freeways Local Roads Light Rail Line SOURCE DATA: DRCOG, ESRI, Photography from DRAPP 2008 This data is intended for informational purposes only. DRCOG provides this information on an "as is" basis and makes no representation or warranty that the data will be error free. DRCOG is not responsible to any user for costs or damages arising from inconsistencies in its data. Projection: State Plane Colorado Central, NAD 83 (feet) MGT - 2 / 26/ 2009 \\kennedy\crs\gis\ad_hoc\71208\tos_walkshe_maps.mxd

309 S Monaco Pkwy S Newport St Walk shed vs. Geometric Half-Mile Southmoor S Grape St S Hudson Way E Greenwood Pl S Holly Pl S Magnolia St E Girard Ave S Oneida Way S Ivanhoe Way S Ivy Way S Locust St E Hampden Ave S Oleander Ct S Grape St S Hudson St E Lehigh Ave S Holly St E Mansfield Ave S Ivanhoe St E Ithaca Pl S Jersey St S Hillcrest Dr I 25 S Monaco Pkwy E Ithaca Pl S Magnolia Way S Monaco Pkwy E Milan Pl S Peach Way S Newport Way E Mansfield Ave Nassau Cir E S Ivy Way E Mansfield Ave S Holly St Happy Canyon Rd S Ivy Ln S Happy Canyon Dr S Jasmine St S Niagara Way Eastmoor Dr S Narcissus Way E Oxford Ave Southmoor Ln E Princeton Cir I 25 E Princeton Ave Miles ± Legend Estimated Half-Mile Station Walksheds Added Walkshed Half-Mile Station Buffer ^ Existing Stations Freeways Local Roads Light Rail Line SOURCE DATA: DRCOG, ESRI, Photography from DRAPP 2008 This data is intended for informational purposes only. DRCOG provides this information on an "as is" basis and makes no representation or warranty that the data will be error free. DRCOG is not responsible to any user for costs or damages arising from inconsistencies in its data. Projection: State Plane Colorado Central, NAD 83 (feet) MGT - 2 / 26/ 2009 \\kennedy\crs\gis\ad_hoc\71208\tos_walkshe_maps.mxd

310 S Downing St S Marion St S Lafayette St S Humboldt St S Williams St S Vine St S Elizabeth St S Gaylord St S Josephine St S Clayton St S Humboldt St S York St E Arkansas Ave E Louisiana Ave Walk shed vs. Geometric Half-Mile S Race St S York St E Arkansas Ave University S Columbine St E Florida Ave E Florida Ave I 25 E Iowa Ave E Iowa Ave S Marion St E Mexico Ave Buchtel Blvd S University Blvd I 25 E Mexico Ave E Colorado Ave E Jewell Ave E Jewell Ave E Jewell Ave E Asbury Ave S Franklin St S Gilpin St S High St S Race St E Evans Ave S Josephine St S Columbine St Miles ± Unnamed Street Legend Estimated Half-Mile Station Walksheds Added Walkshed Half-Mile Station Buffer ^ Existing Stations Freeways Local Roads Light Rail Line SOURCE DATA: DRCOG, ESRI, Photography from DRAPP 2008 This data is intended for informational purposes only. DRCOG provides this information on an "as is" basis and makes no representation or warranty that the data will be error free. DRCOG is not responsible to any user for costs or damages arising from inconsistencies in its data. Projection: State Plane Colorado Central, NAD 83 (feet) MGT - 2 / 26/ 2009 \\kennedy\crs\gis\ad_hoc\71208\tos_walkshe_maps.mxd

311 S Holly St S Birch St S Clermont St S Cherry St S Cherry St S Dennison Ct S Dahlia Ln S Kearney St Walk shed vs. Geometric Half-Mile Yale E Iliff Ave S Dexter St S Eudora St E Donald Ave I 25 S Elm Dr S Fairfax Dr S Forest Dr S Grape St S Holly Pl E Iliff Ave S Leyden St E Iliff Ave S Kearney St E Dickenson Pl S Krameria St S Leyden St S Birch St S Clermont St E La Salle Pl E Harvard Ln E Vassar Ln I 25 S Valley Hwy S Jasmine Pl S Ivanhoe Pl S Ivy St S Jasmine St S Jersey St S Brook Dr S Birch St S Carey Way S Clermont Dr E Amherst Ave S Cherry Way S Dexter Way S Dexter St E Yale Ave S Dahlia St S Eudora St E Bates Ave Plum Pl E Vassar Ave S Elm St E Cornell Ave S Fairfax St E Yale Cir S Forest St E Dartmouth Ave S Glencoe St S Grape Way Plum Pl E Vassar Ave S Holly St S Hudson St E Bates Ave S Holly Pl S Ivanhoe St E Cornell Ave S Jasmine St Miles ± S Kearney St Legend Estimated Half-Mile Station Walksheds Added Walkshed Half-Mile Station Buffer ^ Existing Stations Freeways Local Roads Light Rail Line SOURCE DATA: DRCOG, ESRI, Photography from DRAPP 2008 This data is intended for informational purposes only. DRCOG provides this information on an "as is" basis and makes no representation or warranty that the data will be error free. DRCOG is not responsible to any user for costs or damages arising from inconsistencies in its data. Projection: State Plane Colorado Central, NAD 83 (feet) MGT - 2 / 26/ 2009 \\kennedy\crs\gis\ad_hoc\71208\tos_walkshe_maps.mxd