Florida Department of Community Affairs & Regional Planning Councils of Florida STATEWIDE EVACUATION STUDY: East Central Report

Transcription

1 2008 Florida Department of Community Affairs & Regional Planning Councils of Florida STATEWIDE EVACUATION STUDY: Report Authors: Phillip E. Downs, Ph.D., Principal Investigator Sonia Prusaitis, Senior Project Director Joey St. Germain, Project Director Kerr & Downs Research With contributions from Earl J. Baker, Ph.D. Hazards Management Group

2

3 2008 Florida Department of Community Affairs & Regional Planning Councils of Florida STATEWIDE EVACUATION STUDY: Report Authors: Phillip E. Downs, Ph.D., Principal Investigator Sonia Prusaitis, Senior Project Director Joey St. Germain, Project Director Kerr & Downs Research With contributions from Earl J. Baker, Ph.D. Hazards Management Group

4

5 Table of Contents 1. Introduction Executive Summary Sources of Information About Hurricanes Awareness of Evacuation s Perceived Vulnerability Evacuation Plans Vehicle Availability & Intended Use Obstacles to Evacuation Historical Evacuation Behavior Housing & Mitigation Wildfi res Freshwater Flooding Hazardous Materials Region & Questions Demographics Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report

6

7 1. INTRODUCTION

8

9 1. Introduction Introduction & Methods This document presents regional findings from a survey of Florida residents conducted as part of the Statewide Regional Evacuation Study. The primary aim of the survey was to provide data to assist in deriving evacuation behavioral assumptions for transportation and shelter analyses. The main focus of the survey was hurricane evacuation, but questions were also asked about evacuation due to freshwater flooding, wildfires, hazardous material accidents, and nuclear power plant accidents. The survey included questions that are important in developing accurate behavioral projections for transportation and shelter planning but also incorporated questions deemed useful by county emergency management officials. Meetings were held with county and regional planning council representatives to discuss the questionnaire and related survey issues. In each non-coastal county of the state, 150 interviews were conducted randomly by telephone. In each coastal county of the state 400 interviews were conducted. The interviews were allocated among aggregations of hurricane evacuation zones (e.g., category 1-2) in the respective counties. The aggregation of evacuation zones and allocations of interviews among the evacuation zones were determined after input from county and regional representatives and varied among counties and regions. Selections were also made in order to reflect aggregations of evacuation zones currently used operationally and in public information materials by counties and to provide appropriate distributions of data that would be necessary to derive behavioral projections as required by the Statewide Regional Evacuation Study. In order to ensure that respondents resided in the evacuation zones of interest, addresses were selected first and then matched with telephone numbers. Only residences with land-line telephones were called, as sampling was conducted by address. For non-coastal counties, tables in this document report survey findings for the county without geographical breakdowns. For coastal counties, tables summarize survey findings in several ways geographically. For the region and for each county, results for all evacuation zones are aggregated without weighting the evacuation zones to reflect actual populations in each zone. Results are also presented by evacuation zone for the region, and the regional aggregations for evacuation zones are also not weighted to reflect actual population variations among counties. Finally, results are presented for each zone within each county. In one respect, this is the most accurate level of reporting because findings are not being mixed with those for other locations. However, this is also the reporting level with the smallest number of respondents, and statistical reliability is poorer for smaller samples. For every coastal county and for every region with coastal counties, tables report findings for six evacuation zones (category 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 surge-related evacuation zones, plus non-surge zones). In locations where evacuation zones were aggregated the tables show the same data for each zone separately (for category 1 and 2, for example). This is done to achieve uniformity of tables among counties and regions, but tables should not be misconstrued to infer that sample sizes apply to each evacuation zone separately. Tables are formatted to make clear instances where sample sizes are shared among evacuation zones. For hazards other than hurricanes, sample sizes are smaller. In most counties, one-third of the respondents were asked about freshwater flooding or wildfires or hazardous material accidents. In counties within the emergency planning zone for a nuclear power plant, one-fourth of the respondents were asked about one of the previously listed hazards or about nuclear power plants. Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 3

10

11 2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

12

13 2. Executive Summary Information about Hurricanes Four out of five residents in the region (82%) have access to the Internet. One in four residents (25%) claims to have visited their county s website to search for information about hurricanes. Three in four residents (74%) in the region maintain they have seen a map of their county showing areas that need to evacuate in case of hurricanes. Have access to Internet Residents who visited county s website for hurricane information Have seen a map with hurricane evacuation zones Information about Hurricanes 25% 74% 82% Awareness of Evacuation s Two in five residents (42%) of the coastal counties in the region believe they live in an evacuation zone. Knowledge about one s evacuation zone is limited as shown below: Know evacuation zone Evacuation zone in which one lives 50% Category 2 50% Category 3 49% 54% Category 5 8% Perceived Danger from Hurricanes Percentages of residents in the region who believe hurricanes of varying strengths pose safety risks from flooding for their increase exponentially with the strength of hurricanes: Evacuation zone Category 2 hurricane Category 3 hurricane hurricane 19% 32% 58% Category 2 19% 32% 58% Category 3 20% 38% 65% 19% 36% 67% Category 5 16% 33% 64% Non- 7% 17% 32% 19% 26% 38% Percentages of residents who believe it is safe to stay in their if hurricanes pass directly over them decrease dramatically as hurricanes strengthen from category 2 to 3 to 4. Evacuation zone Category 2 hurricane Category 3 hurricane hurricane 62% 35% 22% Category 2 62% 35% 22% Category 3 65% 36% 26% 65% 34% 22% Category 5 69% 45% 21% Non- 78% 43% 11% 74% 44% 21% Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 7

14 2. Executive Summary Emergency Management Officials Percentages of residents who feel that Emergency Management officials will issue evacuation notices saying resident should leave their to seek safer locations increase significantly as hurricane strength increases. Evacuation zone Category 2 hurricane Category 3 hurricane hurricane 62% 82% 91% Category 2 62% 82% 91% Category 3 65% 84% 92% 64% 83% 93% Category 5 51% 75% 92% Non- 44% 61% 89% 37% 65% 84% Evacuation Intent Percentages of citizens who say they will follow mandatory evacuation notices increase linearly as hurricanes strengthen from or 2 to 3 to 5. Evacuation zone or 2 hurricane Category 3 hurricane Category 5 hurricane 65% 82% 90% Category 2 65% 82% 90% Category 3 67% 82% 93% 63% 81% 93% Category 5 52% 67% 91% Non- 65% 77% 89% 77% 84% 91% Shadow Evacuations Significant percentages of residents say they intend to evacuate their even when the evacuation notice does not apply directly to them. Shadow evacuations increase as hurricane strength increases. Evacuation zone Evacuation notice for zones 1 and 2 Evacuation notice for zones 1, 2, and 3 Evacuation notice for zones 1, 2, 3, 4, & 5 45% 80% 93% Category 2 45% 80% 93% Category 3 44% 75% 90% 37% 71% 93% Category 5 30% 59% 88% Non- 61% 73% 90% 70% 80% 93% 8 Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

15 2. Executive Summary Evacuation Destination Regardless of the hurricane strength, pluralities of residents in the region intend to go to friends or relatives if they evacuate. Minor changes in evacuation destinations occur as hurricanes strengthen. Most residents intend to evacuate to other places in Florida regardless of hurricane strength. Percentages of residents who intent to evacuate outside Florida increase considerably as hurricanes strengthen to category 5. Most residents who intend to evacuate outside Florida will go to Georgia. Evacuation Destinations Evacuation Destinations Friend/relative 40% 39% 36% Someplace else in Florida 39% 39% 37% 18% Hotel/motel 18% 20% 19% Category 1 or 2 Public shelter 19% Category 3 18% Category 5 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Own county Someplace outside Florida Own neighborhood 25% 23% 20% 17% 19% 26% 12% 11% 11% Category 1 or 2 Category 3 Category 5 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Hurricane Planning Almost six in ten households (57%) have definite plans for deciding to evacuate and where to go. The typical household plans to take one vehicle during an evacuation. Seven percent (7%) of households plan to take a motor home, pull a trailer, boat, etc., when they evacuate. Issues Impacting Evacuation More than half of residents in the region (53%) have pets, and 89% of these residents plan to take their pets with them if the evacuate. Most residents with pets (92%) are aware that public shelters will not accept pets inside, and 11% of these residents claim they will not evacuate because of this. Eleven percent (11%) of households contain an individual who requires assistance during evacuation. Seven in ten of these households (72%) have an individual who is disabled, has a medical condition or requires some other type of special assistance beyond transportation assistance. Fourty-two percent of these households (5% of all households) will require assistance from an outside agency. Only one in four households (24%) that require special assistance have registered with their county as needing special assistance. Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 9

16 2. Executive Summary Past Hurricanes Percentages of residents reporting they were home for recent hurricanes are shown below: 79% Charley 79% Frances 77% Jeanne The percentages of all households that evacuated and the most popular types of destinations are shown below: Storm Evacuated Neighborhood Florida Outside Florida Hurricane Charley 20% 3% 6% 8% 3% Hurricane Frances 28% 2% 8% 13% 5% Hurricane Jeanne 19% 2% 5% 8% 2% Percentages of households who thought evacuation notices for past hurricanes were mandatory or voluntary are shown below: Storm Mandatory Voluntary Hurricane Charley 29% 51% Hurricane Frances 37% 46% Hurricane Jeanne 39% 46% 10 Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

17 3. SOURCES OF INFORMATION ABOUT HURRICANES

18

19 3. Sources of Information About Hurricanes Do you have access to the Internet so you could look up information about hurricanes? Four out of five residents (82%) in the region have access to the Internet so they can search for information about hurricanes. Internet access is lowest in inland areas (80%). -Level Results Internet access is at or above 80% for five of the six counties in the region with only residents in having lower Internet access (65%). Access to Internet n Yes No Don't know/ depends 1,400 82% 18% 0% % 15% 0% Category % 15% 0% Category % 15% 0% % 14% 0% Category % 13% 0% Non % 16% 0% % 20% 0% % 14% 0% 86% 14% 0% Category 2 86% 14% 0% Category 3 86% 14% 0% 86% 14% 0% Category % 12% 0% Non % 17% 0% % 17% 0% 82% 18% 0% 175 Category 2 82% 18% 0% Category % 22% 0% 86% 14% 0% 75 Category 5 86% 14% 0% Non % 13% 1% % 35% 0% % 20% 0% % 15% 0% % 16% 0% 1 Categories 1, 2, 3, and 4 were not delineated in. Access to Internet Category 2 Category 3 Category 5 Non- Category 2 Category 3 82% 85% 85% 85% 86% 87% 84% 80% 86% 86% 86% 86% Category 5 Non- Category 2 Category 3 Category 5 Non- 86% 88% 83% 83% 82% 82% 78% 86% 86% 86% 65% 80% 85% 84% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 13

20 3. Sources of Information About Hurricanes Have you ever visited your county s website to look up information about hurricanes? Exactly one out of four residents (25%) in the region report visiting their county s website to look up information about hurricanes. Residents in non-surge zones (19%) are least likely to look up hurricane information on their counties websites, while residents living in evacuation zone 5 (40%) are most likely. -Level Results residents (33%) are slightly more likely than their counterparts in other counties in the region to look up hurricane information on their county s website, while residents in (13%) and (14%) counties are less likely. Visited s Website n Yes No Don't know/ depends 1,400 25% 74% 1% % 70% 1% Category % 70% 1% Category % 70% 1% % 65% 1% Category % 59% 1% Non % 65% 1% % 79% 2% % 65% 2% 32% 67% 1% Category 2 32% 67% 1% 250 Category 3 32% 67% 1% 32% 67% 1% Category % 64% 0% Non % 62% 1% % 71% 1% 24% 75% 1% 175 Category 2 24% 75% 1% Category % 81% 0% 43% 56% 1% 75 Category 5 43% 56% 1% Non % 69% 1% % 87% 0% % 86% 0% % 76% 2% % 73% 0% Visited s Website 25% Category 2 Category 3 29% 29% 29% 34% Category 5 40% Non- 34% 19% Category 2 Category 3 33% 32% 32% 32% Category 5 Non- 32% 36% 37% 28% 24% Category 2 24% Category 3 19% Category 5 43% 43% Non- 30% 13% 14% 22% 27% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 14 Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

21 4. AWARENESS OF EVACUATION ZONES

22

23 4. Awareness of Evacuation s Have you ever seen a map of your county showing areas that would need to evacuate in case of a hurricane? Three out of four residents (74%) in the region maintain they have seen a map of their county showing areas that need to evacuate in case of hurricanes. Residents living in non-surge zones (63%) are least likely to report seeing a map of their county showing evacuation zones. -Level Results Residents of (79%) are more likely than residents (69%) to say they have seen maps with evacuation zones marked. Have Seen Hurricane Map n Yes No Don't know/not sure % 23% 3% % 20% 1% Category % 20% 1% Category % 18% 2% % 15% 2% Category % 15% 2% Non % 33% 4% % 18% 3% 84% 15% 1% Category 2 84% 15% 1% 250 Category 3 84% 15% 1% 84% 15% 1% Category % 12% 2% Non % 30% 4% % 28% 3% 70% 28% 2% 175 Category 2 70% 28% 2% Category % 31% 4% 81% 16% 3% 75 Category 5 81% 16% 3% Non % 37% 6% Have Seen Hurricane Map Category 2 Category 3 Category 5 74% 79% 79% 80% 83% 83% Non- 63% Category 2 79% 84% 84% Category 3 Category 5 84% 84% 86% Non- Category 2 Category 3 66% 69% 70% 70% 65% Category 5 81% 81% Non- 57% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 17

24 4. Awareness of Evacuation s Your county has identified storm surge areas that people would need to evacuate in certain hurricanes. Do you live in one of the storm surge evacuation zones or do you live in an area that would not be affected by storm surge? Residents of coastal counties were asked if they lived in areas identified by their counties as evacuation zones, i.e., areas that would need to evacuate in certain hurricanes. Two in five residents (42%) of the coastal counties in the region believe they live in a evacuation zone. Very few residents living in non-surge zones (9%) believe they live in areas identified by their counties as evacuation zones. Residents who live in evacuation zones 1 through 4 have fairly similar responses to this question. -Level Results Responses vary significantly across the three costal counties as 50% of residents believe they live in evacuation zones, while only 31% of residents in believe they live in evacuation zones. Live in Storm Hurricane Evacuation n evacuation zone Area not affected by surge Don't know/not sure % 40% 18% % 26% 18% Category % 26% 18% Category % 26% 16% % 25% 16% Category % 39% 11% Non % 67% 24% % 33% 17% 65% 20% 15% Category 2 65% 20% 15% 250 Category 3 65% 20% 15% 65% 20% 15% Category % 30% 4% Non % 63% 27% % 48% 21% 41% 35% 24% 175 Category 2 41% 35% 24% Category % 48% 21% 38% 46% 16% 75 Category 5 38% 46% 16% Non- 75 8% 73% 19% Live in Storm Evacuation 42% Category 2 56% 56% Category 3 58% 59% Category 5 50% Non- 9% 50% Category 2 65% 65% Category 3 Category 5 65% 65% 66% Non- 10% 31% Category 2 41% 41% Category 3 31% Category 5 38% 38% Non- 8% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 18 Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

25 4. Awareness of Evacuation s Residents of coastal counties in the region who claim they live in evacuation zones were asked to indicate the evacuation zone in which they live. Significant percentages do not know. For example, 40% of residents in the region living in evacuation zone 1 are not certain in which evacuation zone they live. Half of residents in the region who live in evacuation zone 1 (50%) correctly identify themselves as living in evacuation zone 1. As many as 54% of residents (evacuation zone 5) identify their evacuation zone incorrectly. However, residents living in other evacuation zones are much better at correctly identifying the evacuation zones in which they live. -Level Results One in three residents in who live in evacuation zones 1, 2, and 3 (32%) say they do not know in which evacuation zone they live. Sixty-five percent (65%) of residents who live in evacuation zone 1 correctly identify that they do in fact live in evacuation zone 1. residents who think they live in evacuation zones are worse at naming their specific evacuation zones, yet 50% of residents who live in evacuation zone 1 are not certain in which evacuation zone they live. One in three residents (32%) who think they live in an evacuation zone correctly identify that they live in evacuation zone 1, 16% correctly identify that they live in a evacuation zone 3, and 23% correctly identify that they live in evacuation zone 5. Aware of Storm Evacuation () Correct Incorrect Don t know/not sure 50% 10% 40% Category 2 50% 10% 40% Category 3 49% 13% 39% 54% 8% 38% Category 5 8% 54% 37% Non- 20% 20% 60% Aware of Storm Evacuation () n Cat1//Cat 3/ Don t know/ not sure 65% 3% 32% Category 2 65% 3% 32% 168 Category 3 65% 3% 32% 65% 3% 32% Category % 1 1% 29% Non % 0% 37% 1 70% of residents who live in evacuation zone 5 think they live in evacuation zone 1/2/3/4. Aware of Storm Evacuation () n Cat1/ /5 Don t know/ not sure 32% 14% 4% 50% 72 Category 2 32% 14% 4% 50% Category % 16% 29% 52% 16% 7% 23% 54% 31 Category 5 16% 7% 23% 54% Non- 8 0% 0% 0% 100% Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 19

26

27 5. PERCEIVED VULNERABILITY

28

29 5. Perceived Vulnerability Do you believe storm surge or waves from a category 2 hurricane would reach your home and cause flooding severe enough to pose a serious danger to your safety? Residents in coastal counties of the region were read the following description: A category 2 hurricane has winds of 100 miles per hour. If a category 2 hurricane with 100 mile per hour winds passed directly over your location, do you believe storm surge or waves would reach your home and cause flooding severe enough to pose a serious danger to your safety? Only one in six residents (17%) in the region believes a category 2 hurricane poses serious danger to their safety. Responses to this question did not vary significantly by evacuation zone with the exception that residents in nonsurge areas (7%) are less likely to think that a category 2 storm poses a serious danger to their safety. -Level Results residents (24%) are more likely to believe a category 2 hurricane represents serious danger to their safety. Residents in (13%) and (14%) counties are less likely to think that a category 2 hurricane would send storm surge or waves to their and cause a threat to their safety. Only 5% of residents living in non-surge zones of feel that a category 2 storm poses a threat to their safety, while twice as many residents (11%) living in non-surge zones of share this opinion. Would Flood Dangerously in a Category 2 Hurricane n Yes No Don't know/ depends 1,400 17% 77% 6% % 71% 10% Category % 71% 10% Category % 73% 7% % 74% 7% Category % 81% 3% Non % 89% 4% % 77% 4% % 77% 7% 20% 72% 8% Category 2 20% 72% 8% 250 Category 3 20% 72% 8% 20% 72% 8% Category % 76% 4% Non % 89% 6% % 79% 7% 16% 71% 13% 175 Category 2 16% 71% 13% Category % 80% 3% 13% 84% 4% 75 Category 5 13% 84% 4% Non % 88% 1% % 80% 7% % 75% 5% % 74% 2% % 81% 3% Would Flood Dangerously in a Category 2 Hurricane East Central 17% Category 1 Category 2 19% 19% Category 3 Category 4 20% 19% Category 5 16% Non 7% 19% 16% Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 20% 20% 20% Category 4 Category 5 20% 20% Non 5% 14% Category 1 16% Category 2 Category 3 16% 17% Category 4 Category 5 13% 13% Non 11% 13% 16% 20% 24% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 23

30 5. Perceived Vulnerability Do you believe storm surge or waves from a category 3 hurricane would reach your home and cause flooding severe enough to pose a serious danger to your safety? Residents were given the following description: Remembering that a category 1 is the weakest and 5 is the strongest, a category 3 hurricane has winds of 125 miles per hour. Emergency management officials call it a major hurricane. If a category 3 hurricane with 125 mile per hour winds passed directly over your location, do you believe storm surge or waves would reach your home and cause flooding severe enough to pose a serous danger to your location? Just over one in four residents of the region (27%) believe that storm surge or waves from a category 3 hurricane that passed directly over them would cause flooding severe enough to pose a serious danger to their location. Reactions to this question differ across evacuation zones as fewer residents in inland (26%) and non-surge (17%) areas believe their are in danger from a category 3 hurricane than residents living in evacuation zones 1 through 4. -Level Results Significantly more residents in (34%) feel they would be in serious danger from a category 3 hurricane, while only 23% to 28% of residents in other counties express this opinion. Would Flood Dangerously in a Category 3 Hurricane n Yes No Don't know/ depends 1,400 27% 66% 7% % 57% 11% Category % 57% 11% Category % 51% 11% % 53% 11% Category % 55% 12% Non % 77% 6% % 70% 4% % 56% 10% 39% 50% 11% Category 2 39% 50% 11% 250 Category 3 39% 50% 11% 39% 50% 11% Category % 45% 12% Non % 75% 5% % 67% 10% 22% 67% 11% 175 Category 2 22% 67% 11% Category % 52% 14% 26% 62% 12% 75 Category 5 26% 62% 12% Non % 81% 5% % 72% 4% % 70% 4% % 67% 5% % 74% 2% East Central 27% Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Category 4 Category 5 Non 17% 26% Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Category 4 Category 5 Non 20% 23% Category 1 22% Category 2 22% Category 3 Category 4 26% Category 5 26% Non Would Flood Dangerously in a Category 3 Hurricane 14% 24% 26% 28% 24% 32% 32% 38% 36% 33% 34% 34% 39% 39% 39% 39% 43% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 24 Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

31 5. Perceived Vulnerability Do you believe storm surge or waves from a category 4 hurricane would reach your home and cause flooding severe enough to pose a serious danger to your safety? Residents were read the following: Finally I would like you to consider a category 4 hurricane with winds of 155 miles per hour. It would almost be a category 5 hurricane. If a category 4 hurricane passed directly over your location, do you believe storm surge or waves would reach your home and cause flooding severe enough to pose a serious danger to your safety? Not quite half of residents (45%) in the region think storm surge or waves from a category 4 hurricane passing directly over them should reach their and cause severe enough flooding to pose serious danger to their safety. Residents living in non-surge zones (32%) and inland (38%) areas are considerably less likely to think storm surge or waves from a category 4 hurricane passing directly over them should reach their and cause severe enough flooding to pose serious danger to their safety. Would Flood Dangerously in a Category 4 Hurricane n Yes No Don t know/ depends 1,400 45% 47% 8% % 31% 11% Category % 31% 11% Category % 27% 8% % 25% 8% Category % 28% 8% Non % 54% 14% % 56% 6% % 32% 9% 68% 24% 8% Category 2 68% 24% 8% 250 Category 3 68% 24% 8% 68% 24% 8% Category % 27% 5% Non % 51% 15% % 43% 13% 40% 42% 18% 175 Category 2 40% 42% 18% Category % 40% 8% 61% 29% 10% 75 Category 5 61% 29% 10% Non % 59% 10% % 63% 5% % 53% 6% % 55% 5% % 57% 5% -Level Results residents (59%) are more likely than residents in other counties within the region to believe their will be in danger from storm surge or waves from a category 4 hurricane. Only 32% of residents and 38% of residents believe their will be in serious danger from storm surge or waves from a category 4 hurricane. Would Flood Dangerously in a Hurricane East Central 45% Category 1 Category 2 58% 58% Category 3 Category 4 Category 5 65% 67% 64% Non 32% 38% 59% Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 68% 68% 68% Category 4 Category 5 68% 68% Non 34% Category 1 44% 40% Category 2 40% Category 3 52% Category 4 Category 5 61% 61% Non 31% 32% 41% 40% 38% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 25

32 5. Perceived Vulnerability Considering both wind from the hurricane and flooding, do you think it would be safe for you to stay in your home or building if a category 2 hurricane with 100 MPH winds passed directly over your location? Residents of coastal counties were given the following question: Considering both the wind from a hurricane as well as flooding, do you think it would be safe for you to stay in your home or building if a category 2 hurricane with 100 mile per hour winds passed directly over your location? Seven in ten residents (71%) believe they can safely survive a category 2 hurricane despite 100 mile per hour winds and flooding and remain in their. Residents who live in non-surge zones (78%) and inland areas (74%) are more likely to think they can safely ride out a category 2 hurricane. -Level Results Results vary across counties in the region with a high of 78% of residents thinking they will be safe in their during a category 2 hurricane and only 65% of residents and 68% of and counties residents holding this belief. Safe from Wind and Water in a Category 2 Hurricane n Yes No Don't know/ depends 1,400 71% 22% 7% % 31% 7% Category % 31% 7% Category % 28% 7% % 26% 9% Category % 23% 8% Non % 18% 4% % 19% 7% % 27% 5% 63% 29% 8% Category 2 63% 29% 8% 250 Category 3 63% 29% 8% 63% 29% 8% Category % 34% 3% Non % 17% 3% % 25% 7% 60% 32% 8% 175 Category 2 60% 32% 8% Category % 22% 4% 73% 14% 13% 75 Category 5 73% 14% 13% Non % 21% 6% % 30% 5% % 21% 6% % 11% 11% % 21% 4% Safe from Wind and Water in a Category 2 Hurricane East Central 71% Category 1 62% Category 2 62% Category 3 65% Category 4 65% Category 5 69% Non 78% 74% 68% Category 1 63% Category 2 63% Category 3 63% Category 4 63% Category 5 63% Non 80% 68% Category 1 60% Category 2 60% Category 3 74% Category 4 73% Category 5 73% Non 73% 65% 73% 78% 75% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 26 Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

33 5. Perceived Vulnerability Considering both wind from the hurricane and flooding, do you think it would be safe for you to stay in your home or building if a category 3 hurricane with 125 MPH winds passed directly over your location? Over two out of five (42%) residents think it is safe to stay in their if a category 3 storm with 125 mile per hour winds passed directly over them. Feelings of safety in the face of a direct hit from a category 3 storm are slightly correlated with evacuation zone as 35% of residents living in evacuation 1 zone feel they are safe during a direct hit from a category 3 storm, while 45% of residents living in evacuation zone 5 believe they are safe while a category 3 storm with 125 mile per hour winds passes directly over them. -Level Results Over half of residents (52%) feel it is safe to stay in their if a category 3 storm with 125 mile per hour winds passed directly over them, while only 36% of residents and 37% of residents share this opinion. Safe from Wind and Water in a Category 3 Hurricane n Yes No Don't know/ depends 1,400 42% 50% 8% % 58% 7% Category % 58% 7% Category % 57% 7% % 57% 9% Category % 44% 11% Non % 49% 8% % 47% 9% % 57% 6% 32% 61% 7% Category 2 32% 61% 7% 250 Category 3 32% 61% 7% 32% 61% 7% Category % 46% 7% Non % 50% 8% % 48% 9% 40% 53% 7% 175 Category 2 40% 53% 7% Category % 42% 6% 43% 43% 14% 75 Category 5 43% 43% 14% Non % 48% 8% % 55% 9% % 51% 10% % 39% 9% % 47% 8% Safe from Wind and Water in a Category 3 Hurricane East Central 42% Category 1 Category 2 35% 35% Category 3 Category 4 36% 34% Category 5 Non 45% 43% 44% 37% Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 32% 32% 32% Category 4 32% Category 5 47% Non Category 1 42% 43% 40% Category 2 40% Category 3 52% Category 4 Category 5 43% 43% Non 44% 36% 39% 52% 45% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 27

34 5. Perceived Vulnerability Considering both wind from the hurricane and flooding, do you think it would be safe for you to stay in your home or building if a category 4 hurricane with 155 MPH winds passed directly over your location? Only 21% of residents in the region perceive it is safe to stay in their if a category 4 hurricane passed directly over them. This is a dramatic drop from the percentages of residents who believe it is safe to stay in their if category 2 (71%) or category 3 (42%) hurricanes pass directly over them. Residents living in non-surge zones (11%) are less likely than residents living in other areas to think they will be safe in their if a category 4 hurricane strikes them directly. -Level Results Responses to this question vary comparatively little across counties and evacuation zones. residents (26%) are more likely to believe it is safe to ride out a category 4 hurricane in their, while residents in (15%) are relatively less likely to feel they can ride out a category 4 hurricane safely. Safe from Wind and Water in a Hurricane n Yes No Don't know/ depends 1,400 21% 72% 7% % 72% 6% Category % 72% 6% Category % 71% 3% % 74% 4% Category % 73% 6% Non % 80% 9% % 70% 9% % 75% 5% 24% 74% 2% Category 2 24% 74% 2% 250 Category 3 24% 74% 2% 24% 74% 2% Category % 71% 2% Non % 80% 11% % 71% 9% 19% 70% 11% 175 Category 2 19% 70% 11% Category % 61% 5% 16% 75% 9% 75 Category 5 16% 75% 9% Non % 79% 7% % 78% 7% % 70% 8% % 68% 12% % 68% 6% Safe from Wind and Water in a Hurricane East Central Category 1 Category 2 21% 22% 22% Category 3 26% Category 4 Category 5 22% 21% Non 11% 21% 20% Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 24% 24% 24% Category 4 24% Category 5 27% Non 9% Category 1 Category 2 20% 19% 19% Category 3 Category 4 16% Category 5 16% Non 14% 15% 22% 20% 26% 34% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 28 Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

35 5. Perceived Vulnerability In a category 2 hurricane with winds of 100 MPH, do you think Emergency Management officials in your county would issue an evacuation notice saying you should leave your home and go someplace safer? That is, would they tell you to evacuate? Fewer than half of residents of the region (46%) think Emergency Management officials would issue an evacuation notice for residents to leave their and seek safer locations if a category 2 hurricane with winds of 100 miles per hour hit their area. Results vary considerably across geographic locations as over 60% of residents living in evacuation zones 1 through 4 think emergency management officials would issue an evacuation notice during a category 2 hurricane, while only 37% of residents living in inland areas share this opinion. -Level Results residents (60%) are more likely to think Emergency Management officials would issue an evacuation notice in the event of a category 2 hurricane. Only 30% of residents and 33% of residents hold this belief. Emergency Management Officials Will Issue an Evacuation Notice in a Categoryegory 2 Hurricane n Yes No Don't know/ depends 1,400 46% 38% 16% % 18% 20% Category % 18% 20% Category % 18% 17% % 19% 17% Category % 35% 14% Non % 43% 13% % 48% 15% % 24% 16% 69% 13% 18% Category 2 69% 13% 18% 250 Category 3 69% 13% 18% 69% 13% 18% Category % 31% 8% Non % 46% 14% % 32% 19% 51% 26% 23% 175 Category 2 51% 26% 23% Category % 34% 17% 44% 37% 19% 75 Category 5 44% 37% 19% Non % 38% 11% % 32% 22% % 53% 14% % 40% 18% % 61% 9% Emergency Management Officials Will Issue an Evacuation Notice in a Category 2 Hurricane 46% Category 2 Category 3 Category 5 51% Non- 44% 37% Category 2 Category 3 Category 5 Non- 40% 49% 51% Category 2 51% Category 3 49% 44% Category 5 44% Non- 51% 46% 33% 42% 30% 62% 62% 65% 64% 60% 61% 69% 69% 69% 69% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 29

36 5. Perceived Vulnerability In a category 3 hurricane with winds of 125 MPH, do you think Emergency Management officials in your county would issue an evacuation notice saying you should leave your home and go someplace safer? Most residents (70%) think Emergency Management officials will issue evacuation notices saying residents should leave their in the event that a category 3 hurricane comes into their area. Over eight out of ten residents living in evacuation zones 1 through 4 feel this way, while around six out of ten residents living in non-surge zones (61%) and inland (65%) areas think Emergency Management officials will issue evacuation notices saying residents should leave their in the event that a category 3 hurricane comes into their area. -Level Results Residents of (81%) are more likely to think Emergency Management officials will issue evacuation notices saying residents should leave their in the event that a category 3 hurricane comes into their area, while (61%) and (62%) counties residents are less likely to share this opinion. Emergency Management Officials Will Issue an Evacuation Notice in a Category 3 Hurricane n Yes No Don't know/ depends 1,400 70% 17% 13% % 7% 11% Category % 7% 11% Category % 7% 9% % 7% 10% Category % 12% 13% Non % 20% 19% % 22% 13% % 7% 12% 87% 5% 8% Category 2 87% 5% 8% 250 Category 3 87% 5% 8% 87% 5% 8% Category % 8% 6% Non % 10% 24% % 17% 14% 75% 11% 14% 175 Category 2 75% 11% 14% Category % 13% 16% 67% 15% 18% 75 Category 5 67% 15% 18% Non % 35% 10% % 13% 14% % 26% 13% % 21% 13% % 26% 12% Emergency Management Officials Will Issue an Evacuation Notice in a Category 3 Hurricane 70% 82% Category 2 82% Category 3 84% 83% Category 5 75% Non- 61% 65% 81% 87% Category 2 87% Category 3 87% 87% Category 5 86% Non- 66% 69% 75% Category 2 75% Category 3 71% 67% Category 5 67% Non- 55% 73% 61% 66% 62% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 30 Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

37 5. Perceived Vulnerability In a category 4 hurricane with winds of 155 MPH, do you think Emergency Management officials in your county would issue an evacuation notice saying you should leave your home and go someplace safer? Nearly nine out of ten of region residents (87%) think Emergency Management officials will issue an evacuation notice saying they have to leave their if a category 4 hurricane with 155 mile per hour winds hits their area. Over 90% of residents in all evacuation zones think Emergency Management officials will issue evacuation notices in the event of a category 4 hurricane, while over 80% of residents living in non-surge zones and inland areas also share this opinion. Percentage of residents who believe Emergency Management officials will issue evacuation notices increases considerably as hurricane strength increases as shown below: 46% Category 2 hurricane 70% Category 3 hurricane 87% hurricane Emergency Management Officials Will Issue an Evacuation Notice in a Hurricane n Yes No Don't know/ depends 1,400 87% 7% 6% % 3% 6% Category % 3% 6% Category % 3% 5% % 2% 5% Category % 1% 7% Non % 5% 6% % 10% 6% % 2% 4% 94% 3% 3% Category 2 94% 3% 3% 250 Category 3 94% 3% 3% 94% 3% 3% Category % 0% 4% Non % 2% 5% % 4% 9% 86% 3% 11% 175 Category 2 86% 3% 11% Category % 5% 8% 89% 2% 9% 75 Category 5 89% 2% 9% Non % 8% 8% % 7% 5% % 10% 6% % 10% 8% % 11% 6% -Level Results Residents in (94%) are more likely to think Emergency Management officials will issue evacuation notices if a category 4 hurricane comes into their county, while (82%), (83%), and (84%) counties residents are less likely to think so. Emergency Management Officials Will Issue an Evacuation Notice in a Hurricane 87% 91% Category 2 91% Category 3 92% 93% Category 5 92% Non- 89% 84% 94% 94% Category 2 94% Category 3 94% 94% Category 5 96% Non- 93% 87% 86% Category 2 86% Category 3 87% 89% Category 5 89% Non- 84% 88% 84% 82% 83% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 31

38 5. Perceived Vulnerability Perceived Vulnerability by Storm Scenario The percentage of residents of the region who believe their will be in danger by category 2, 3, and 4 hurricanes passing directly over them increases as shown below: 17% Category 2 hurricane 27% Category 3 hurricane 45% hurricane Perceived danger increases monotonically as hurricanes intensify. Perceived Vulnerability by Storm Scenario Would Flood Dangerously Safe from Wind and Water Expect Evacuation Notice Category 2 Hurricane 17% 71% 46% 19% 62% 62% Category 2 19% 62% 62% Category 3 20% 65% 65% 19% 65% 64% Category 5 16% 69% 51% Non- 7% 78% 44% 19% 74% 37% Category 3 Hurricane 27% 42% 70% 32% 35% 82% Category 2 32% 35% 82% Category 3 38% 36% 84% 36% 34% 83% Category 5 33% 45% 75% Non- 17% 43% 61% 26% 44% 65% Hurricane 45% 21% 87% 58% 22% 91% Category 2 58% 22% 91% Category 3 65% 26% 92% 67% 22% 93% Category 5 64% 21% 92% Non- 32% 11% 89% 38% 21% 84% 32 Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

39 6. EVACUATION PLA

40

41 6. Evacuation Plans Suppose officials DID issue a mandatory evacuation notice saying you had to leave because of potential flooding from a category 1 or 2 hurricane. In that case, would you leave your home to go someplace safer? Seven out of ten residents of the region (71%) will leave their to seek safer locations if Emergency Management officials did issue mandatory evacuation notices because of potential flooding from a category 1 or 2 hurricane. residents (77%) were more likely to say they would leave their to seek safer locations if Emergency Management officials did issue mandatory evacuation notices because of potential flooding from a category 1 or 2 hurricane. Residents who live in evacuation zone 5 (52%) are least likely to leave their. -Level Results (85%) residents are more likely to follow mandatory evacuation orders in the event of possible flooding from a category 1 or 2 hurricane. Just over six in ten residents in (63%) and (64%) counties will leave their in the event of mandatory evacuation notices. Would Leave Home if Mandatory Evacuation Notice is Given for a or 2 Hurricane n Yes No Don t know/ depends 1,400 71% 24% 5% % 28% 7% Category % 28% 7% Category % 27% 6% % 29% 8% Category % 37% 11% Non % 31% 4% % 19% 4% % 30% 6% 67% 27% 6% Category 2 67% 27% 6% 250 Category 3 67% 27% 6% 67% 27% 6% Category % 41% 5% Non % 33% 7% % 29% 8% 63% 29% 8% 175 Category 2 63% 29% 8% Category % 27% 6% 50% 35% 15% 75 Category 5 50% 35% 15% Non % 27% 2% % 21% 3% % 10% 5% % 20% 4% % 25% 3% Would Leave Home if Mandatory Evacuation Notice is Given for a or 2 Hurricane East Central 71% Category 1 65% Category 2 65% Category 3 67% Category 4 63% Category 5 52% Non 65% 77% 64% Category 1 67% Category 2 67% Category 3 67% Category 4 67% Category 5 54% Non 60% 63% Category 1 63% Category 2 63% Category 3 67% Category 4 50% Category 5 50% Non 71% 76% 85% 76% 72% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 35

42 6. Evacuation Plans Suppose officials DID issue a mandatory evacuation notice saying you had to leave because of potential flooding from a category 3 hurricane. In that case, would you leave your home to go someplace safer? Four out of five residents (81%) living in the region will leave their in the event of a category 3 hurricane if told to do so by Emergency Management officials. Residents living in evacuation zone 5 (67%) are least likely to evacuate if told so by Emergency Management officials. -Level Results Responses to this question vary somewhat across counties. A high of 85% of and county residents and a low of 75% of residents will leave their in the event of a mandatory evacuation notice due to a category 3 hurricane. Would Leave Home if Mandatory Evacuation Notice is Given for a Category 3 Hurricane n Yes No Don t know/ depends 1,400 81% 15% 4% % 11% 7% Category % 11% 7% Category % 14% 4% % 14% 5% Category % 25% 8% Non % 19% 4% % 13% 3% % 16% 4% 85% 11% 4% Category 2 85% 11% 4% 250 Category 3 85% 11% 4% 85% 11% 4% Category % 27% 5% Non % 24% 3% % 16% 9% 78% 10% 12% 175 Category 2 78% 10% 12% Category % 26% 7% 67% 24% 9% 75 Category 5 67% 24% 9% Non % 13% 3% % 13% 6% % 12% 3% % 12% 3% % 16% 2% Would Leave Home if Mandatory Evacuation Notice is Given for a Category 3 Hurricane East Central 81% Category 1 82% Category 2 82% Category 3 82% Category 4 81% Category 5 67% Non 77% 84% 80% Category 1 85% Category 2 85% Category 3 85% Category 4 85% Category 5 68% Non 73% 75% Category 1 78% Category 2 78% Category 3 67% Category 4 67% Category 5 67% Non 84% 81% 85% 85% 82% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 36 Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

43 6. Evacuation Plans Suppose that officials decided that the storm could strengthen and become a category 5 hurricane. If they issued a mandatory evacuation notice saying you should leave your home and go someplace safer, would you leave your home to go someplace safer? Residents were read the following: Suppose that officials decided that the storm could strengthen and become a category 5 hurricane. If they issued a mandatory evacuation notice saying you should leave your home and go someplace safer, would you leave your home to go someplace safer? Nine out of ten residents (90%) will follow Emergency Management officials orders to evacuate. Results varied very slightly across counties. The percentage of residents who say they will follow evacuation orders increases linearly as storm strength increases: 71% Category 2 hurricane 81% Category 3 hurricane 90% hurricane Would Leave Home if Mandatory Evacuation Notice is Given for a Category 5 Hurricane n Yes No Don t know/ depends 1,400 90% 6% 4% % 6% 4% Category % 6% 4% Category % 5% 2% % 5% 2% Category % 6% 3% Non % 5% 6% % 6% 3% % 6% 2% 93% 5% 2% Category 2 93% 5% 2% 250 Category 3 93% 5% 2% 93% 5% 2% Category % 8% 3% Non % 5% 5% % 6% 7% 84% 6% 10% 175 Category 2 84% 6% 10% Category % 6% 4% 92% 5% 3% 75 Category 5 92% 5% 3% Non % 5% 8% % 5% 2% % 2% 5% % 8% 3% % 9% 1% -Level Results (93%) and (93%) counties residents are slightly more likely to follow Emergency Management officials orders to evacuate as a category 5 hurricane approaches. Yet at least 87% of residents in all counties within the region say they will evacuate if told to do so by Emergency Management officials given warning that a hurricane is likely to strengthen to a category 5 storm. Would Leave Home if Mandatory Evacuation Notice is Given for a Category 5 Hurricane East Central Category 1 Category 2 90% 90% 90% Category 3 Category 4 93% 93% Category 5 91% Non 89% 91% Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 92% 93% 93% 93% Category 4 93% Category 5 Non 89% 90% 87% Category 1 84% Category 2 84% Category 3 90% Category 4 Category 5 92% 92% Non 87% 93% 93% 89% 90% 75% 80% 85% 90% 95% 100% Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 37

44 6. Evacuation Plans Percentages of residents who say they will follow evacuation orders increases linearly as storm strength increases: 71% or 2 hurricane 81% Category 3 hurricane 90% Category 5 hurricane Intention to Evacuate if Ordered or 2 hurricane Category 3 hurricane Category 5 hurricane 71% 81% 90% 65% 82% 90% Category 2 65% 82% 90% Category 3 67% 82% 93% 63% 81% 93% Category 5 52% 67% 91% Non- 65% 77% 89% 77% 84% 91% Category 2 Category 3 Category 5 Non- Intention to Evacuate if Ordered 71% 81% 90% 65% 82% 90% 65% 82% 90% 67% 82% 93% 63% 81% 52% 67% 93% 91% 65% 77% 89% 77% 84% 91% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% or 2 Hurricane Category 3 Hurricane Category 5 Hurricane 38 Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

45 6. Evacuation Plans Category 2 Category 3 Category 5 Non- Evacuation Rates Depending on Perceived Vulnerability in a or 2 Hurricane 63% 92% 77% 51% 95% 61% 51% 95% 61% 55% 94% 70% 52% 97% 48% 42% 94% 20% 56% 97% Safe 79% Unsafe 73% 90% 94% Don't know Evacuation Rates Depending on Perceived Vulnerability by Storm Scenario Safe Unsafe Don t know or 2 Hurricane 63% 92% 77% 51% 95% 61% Category 2 51% 95% 61% Category 3 55% 94% 70% 52% 97% 48% Category 5 42% 94% 20% Non- 56% 97% 79% 73% 90% 94% Category 3 Hurricane 70% 93% 67% 63% 97% 56% Category 2 63% 97% 56% Category 3 60% 97% 65% 63% 97% 50% Category 5 51% 92% 35% Non- 55% 94% 96% 80% 90% 69% Category 5 Hurricane 78% 96% 74% 80% 97% 40% Category 2 80% 97% 40% Category 3 82% 97% 79% 82% 96% 87% Category 5 67% 97% 94% Non- 87% 92% 64% 77% 96% 85% Category 2 Category 3 Category 5 Non- Category 2 Category 3 Category 5 Non- 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Evacuation Rates Depending on Perceived Vulnerability in a Category 3 Hurricane 35% 70% 67% 63% 56% 63% 56% 60% 65% 63% 50% 51% 55% 69% 80% 93% 92% 97% 97% 97% 97% 94% 96% 90% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Evacuation Rates Depending on Perceived Vulnerability in a Category 5 Hurricane 40% 40% 78% 96% 74% 80% 97% 80% 97% 82% 97% 79% 82% 96% 87% 67% 97% 94% 87% 92% 64% 77% 96% 85% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Safe Unsafe Don't know Safe Unsafe Don't know Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 39

46 6. Evacuation Plans Suppose officials DID issue a mandatory evacuation notice saying everyone living in OR 2 evacuation zones and everyone in mobile had to leave. Would you leave to go someplace safer? Residents in the region were read the following question: Suppose that officials DID issue a mandatory evacuation notice saying that everyone living in areas that would be affected by flooding in a category 1 OR 2 hurricane and everyone living in mobile or manufactured housing in your county must evacuate their and go to a safer location. In that case, would you leave your home to go someplace safer? The purpose of this question is to gauge shadow evacuation. Significant portions of residents who live in evacuation zones 3 (44%), 4 (37%), and 5 (30%), which are outside the mandatory evacuation zone, say they intend to evacuate if officials issue a mandatory evacuation notice for everyone living in areas that would be affected by flooding in a category 1 or 2 hurricane and everyone living in mobile or manufactured housing in the entire region. Residents living in inland counties (70%) and those in non-surge zones of coastal counties (61%) are most likely to say they intend to evacuate under these circumstances. Would Leave Home if Mandatory Evacuation Notice is Given for Everyone Living in OR 2 Evacuation s and Everyone in Mobile Homes n Yes No Don t know/ depends % 37% 5% 5 45% 39% 16% Category % 39% 16% Category % 41% 16% 27 37% 50% 13% Category % 62% 8% Non % 38% 1% % 28% 3% 90 46% 46% 7% 45% 39% 16% Category 2 45% 39% 16% 30 Category 3 45% 39% 16% 45% 39% 16% Category % 61% 7% Non % 40% 0% 90 45% 47% 9% Category Category % 43% 15% 28% 63% 9% 30 Category 5 28% 63% 9% Non % 34% 2% 30 73% 22% 5% 30 69% 29% 2% 30 71% 25% 4% 30 68% 30% 2% -Level Results Residents of (73%) are more likely to say they intend to evacuate if officials issue a mandatory evacuation notice for everyone living in areas that would be affected by flooding in a category 1 or 2 hurricane and everyone living in mobile or manufactured housing in the entire region. Residents of (46%) and (45%) counties are less likely to share this intention. Would Leave Home if Mandatory Evacuation Notice is Given for Everyone Living in OR 2 Evacuation s and Everyone in Mobile Homes 58% Category 2 45% 45% Category 3 44% 37% Category 5 30% Non- 61% 70% Category 2 Category 3 46% 45% 45% 45% 45% Category 5 32% Non- 60% 45% - Category 2 - Category 3 42% Category 5 28% 28% Non- 64% 73% 69% 71% 68% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 40 Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

47 6. Evacuation Plans Suppose officials DID issue a mandatory evacuation notice saying everyone living in category 1, 2, or 3 evacuation zones and everyone in mobile had to leave. Would you leave to go someplace safer? Residents of the region were read the following question: Suppose that officials DID issue a mandatory evacuation notice saying that everyone living in areas that would be affected by flooding in a category 1, 2 or 3 hurricane and everyone living in mobile or manufactured housing in your county must evacuate their and go to a safer location. In that case, would you leave your home to go someplace safer? Majorities of residents of the region who live in evacuation zones 4 and 5, non-surge zones, and inland areas intend to evacuate when faced with the threat of a category 3 hurricane even though the evacuation notice does not pertain to them. Residents living in inland counties (80%) are more likely to say they will evacuate given the aforementioned announcement by Emergency Management officials, while 73% of residents living in non-surge areas intend to evacuate. -Level Results Evacuation rates are greater in (82%) in the face of a category 3 hurricane, while evacuation rates are lowest in (69%) and (69%) counties. Would Leave Home if Mandatory Evacuation Notice is Given for Everyone Living in, 2, or 3 Evacuation s and Everyone in Mobile Homes n Yes No Don t know/ depends % 21% 5% 5 80% 17% 2% Category % 17% 2% Category % 20% 5% 27 71% 22% 7% Category % 27% 14% Non % 23% 5% % 18% 2% 90 69% 24% 7% 80% 17% 2% Category 2 80% 17% 2% 30 Category 3 80% 17% 2% 80% 17% 2% Category % 27% 16% Non % 28% 2% 90 69% 22% 9% Category Category % 23% 9% 61% 28% 11% 30 Category 5 61% 28% 11% Non % 15% 8% 30 82% 15% 3% 30 80% 18% 3% 30 80% 17% 3% 30 79% 21% 0% Would Leave Home if Mandatory Evacuation Notice is Given for Everyone Living in, 2, or 3 Evacuation s and Everyone in Mobile Homes 74% 80% Category 2 80% Category 3 75% 71% Category 5 59% Non- 73% 80% 69% 80% Category 2 80% Category 3 80% 80% Category 5 57% Non- 70% 69% - Category 2 - Category 3 68% 61% Category 5 61% Non- 77% 82% 80% 80% 79% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 41

48 6. Evacuation Plans Suppose officials DID issue a mandatory evacuation notice saying everyone living in, 2, 3, 4, or 5 evacuation zones and everyone in mobile had to leave. Would you leave to go someplace safer? Residents of the region were read the following question: Suppose that officials DID issue a mandatory evacuation notice saying that everyone living in areas that would be affected by flooding in a category 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 hurricane and everyone living in mobile or manufactured housing in your county must evacuate their and go to a safer location. In that case, would you leave your home to go someplace safer? Ninety percent (90%) of residents who live in non-surge zones and 93% of residents in inland counties intend to evacuate when faced with the threat of a category 5 hurricane even though the evacuation notice does not pertain to them. -Level Results Shadow evacuation for a category 5 hurricane is greater in (94%) and (94%) counties, while shadow evacuation is lowest in (85%). Would Leave Home if Mandatory Evacuation Notice is Given for Everyone Living in, 2, 3, 4, or 5 Evacuation s and Everyone in Mobile Homes n Yes No Don t know/ depends % 5% 3% 5 93% 5% 2% Category % 5% 2% Category % 3% 8% 27 93% 3% 4% Category % 7% 5% Non % 9% 2% % 4% 2% 90 87% 10% 3% 93% 5% 2% Category 2 93% 5% 2% 30 Category 3 93% 5% 2% 93% 5% 2% Category % 14% 4% Non % 11% 3% 90 92% 2% 7% Category Category % 0% 14% 94% 0% 6% 30 Category 5 94% 0% 6% Non % 5% 0% 30 91% 6% 3% 30 93% 3% 4% 30 94% 5% 1% 30 94% 5% 1% Would Leave Home if Mandatory Evacuation Notice is Given for Everyone Living in, 2, 3, 4, or 5 Evacuation s and Everyone in Mobile Homes 91% 93% Category 2 93% Category 3 90% 93% Category 5 88% Non- 90% 93% 87% 93% Category 2 93% Category 3 93% 93% Category 5 83% Non- 85% 92% - Category 2 - Category 3 86% 94% Category 5 94% Non- 95% 91% 93% 94% 94% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 42 Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

49 6. Evacuation Plans Evacuation Rates Based on Perceived Vulnerability The tables on this and the subsequent page show the percentages of residents who say they will evacuate based on various warnings from Emergency Management Officials and based on their perceptions of whether or not they would be safe remaining in their. At risk zones evacuation zones 1 & 2 + mobile Almost three in five residents living in the region (50%) plan to evacuate based on a mandatory evacuation notice for evacuation zones 1 and 2 + mobile. Propensity for evacuating under these conditions is lowest in evacuation zone 5 (30%). At risk zones evacuation zones 1, 2 & 3 + mobile Almost three in five residents living in the region (74%) plan to evacuate based on a mandatory evacuation notice for evacuation zones 1, 2, and 3 + mobile. Propensity for evacuating under these conditions is highest in evacuation zones 1 and 2 and inland counties (80%) and lowest in evacuation zone 5 (59%). At risk zones evacuation zones 1 through 5 + mobile Nine out of ten residents living in the region (91%) plan to evacuate based on a mandatory evacuation notice for evacuation zones 1 through 5 + mobile. Propensity for evacuating under these conditions is stable across evacuation zones ranging from a low of 88% to a high of 93%. Intention to Evacuate by Notification Scenario or 2 Evacuation s, 2, or 3 Evacuation s, 2, 3, 4, or 5 Evacuation s 58% 74% 91% 45% 80% 93% Category 2 45% 80% 93% Category 3 44% 75% 90% 37% 71% 93% Category 5 30% 59% 88% Non- 61% 73% 90% 70% 80% 93% Category 2 Category 3 Category 5 Non- Intention to Evacuate by Notification Scenario 30% 37% 45% 45% 44% 58% 59% 61% 70% 74% 71% 75% 73% 80% 80% 80% 91% 93% 93% 90% 88% 93% 90% 93% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% or 2 Evacuation s, 2, or 3 Evacuation s, 2, 3, 4, or 5 Evacuation s Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 43

50 6. Evacuation Plans At risk zones evacuation zones 1 & 2 + mobile After an evacuation notice for evacuation zones 1 and 2 + mobile, half of residents (51%) living in the region who feel safe in their plan to evacuate. Conversely, after a mandatory evacuation notice for evacuation zones 1 and 2, 81% of residents in the region who do not feel safe in their plan to evacuate. Category 2 Category 3 Category 5 Non- Shadow Evacuation Rates Depending on Perceived Vulnerability in Evacuation s 1 and 2 0% 0% 22% 29% 28% 51% 81% 68% 44% 47% 44% 47% 40% 51% 72% 55% 69% 72% 74% 51% 83% 87% 64% 94% Safe Unsafe Don't know At risk zones evacuation zones 1, 2 & 3 + mobile After an evacuation notice for evacuation zones 1, 2, and 3 + mobile, nearly six in ten residents (59%) living in the region who feel safe in their plan to evacuate. Conversely, after a mandatory evacuation notice for evacuation zones 1, 2, and 3, 88% of residents in the region who do not feel safe in their plan to evacuate. At risk zones evacuation zones 1 through 5 + mobile After an evacuation notice for evacuation zones 1 through 5 + mobile, four in five residents (79%) living in the region who feel safe in their plan to evacuate. Conversely, after a mandatory evacuation notice for evacuation zones 1 through 5, 95% of residents in the East Central region who do not feel safe in their plan to evacuate. Category 2 Category 3 Category 5 Non- Category 2 Category 3 Category 5 Non- 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Shadow Evacuation Rates Depending on Perceived Vulnerability in Evacuation s 1, 2, and 3 44% 54% 54% 52% 51% 49% 59% 88% 86% 89% Shadow Evacuation Rates Depending on Perceived Vulnerability in Evacuation s 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 89% 88% 85% 78% 93% 71% 90% 90% 93% 69% 92% 81% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 100% 100% Safe Unsafe Don't know 79% 95% 94% 100% 91% 100% 100% 91% 100% 70% 95% 100% 100% 92% 89% 65% 97% 86% 86% 91% Safe 85% Unsafe 84% 97% 97% Don't know 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 44 Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

51 6. Evacuation Plans If you did evacuate during a category 1 or 2 hurricane, where would you go? Residents of the region are more likely to go to friends or relatives if they leave their in the event that a category 1 or 2 hurricane strikes their area. Two out of five residents (40%) will evacuate to friends or relatives. Only one in five residents (19%) will travel to a shelter operated by a county or the Red Cross, while nearly one in five residents (18%) will go to a hotel or motel. Over one in four residents (27%) living in inland areas will go to a hurricane shelter. Relatively more residents who live in non-surge areas (27%) will evacuate to a hotel or motel. -Level Results residents (45%) are more likely to travel to friends and relatives if they evacuate based on a category 2 hurricane. Residents of (30%), (29%), and counties (28%) are more likely to seek a hurricane shelter operated by the county or the Red Cross if they evacuate. Residents of (24%) are more likely to evacuate to a hotel or motel. Type of Refuge in a or 2 Hurricane n Public shelter Friend/ relative Hotel/ motel Depends/ don't know Would not evacuate 1,400 19% 40% 18% 13% 4% 6% 150 8% 48% 20% 12% 4% 8% Category % 48% 20% 12% 4% 8% Category % 44% 21% 11% 3% 10% 100 7% 46% 21% 14% 3% 9% Category % 41% 18% 17% 5% 13% Non % 42% 27% 10% 4% 8% % 36% 15% 13% 4% 5% 400 6% 45% 24% 11% 2% 12% 7% 48% 22% 12% 2% 9% Category 2 7% 48% 22% 12% 2% 9% 250 Category 3 7% 48% 22% 12% 2% 9% 7% 48% 22% 12% 2% 9% Category % 42% 17% 12% 3% 22% Non % 41% 31% 9% 2% 11% % 43% 18% 13% 7% 5% 10% 49% 16% 13% 6% 6% 175 Category 2 10% 49% 16% 13% 6% 6% Category % 32% 18% 8% 8% 7% 8% 41% 19% 21% 7% 4% 75 Category 5 8% 41% 19% 21% 7% 4% Non % 43% 21% 12% 7% 3% % 31% 17% 8% 5% 9% % 41% 12% 13% 2% 4% % 31% 18% 18% 5% 3% % 40% 12% 12% 4% 3% Other Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 45

52 6. Evacuation Plans If you did evacuate during a category 3 hurricane, where would you go? There is little variation across types of places people will evacuate in a category 3 hurricane compared to a category 2 hurricane. For example, the same percentage will go to a hurricane shelter in a category 3 hurricane (19%) compared to a category 2 hurricane (19%). Only 1% fewer (39%) will go to friends and relatives in a category 3 hurricane compared to a category 2 hurricane. The same percentage of residents (18%) will go to a hotel or motel in category 2 and 3 hurricanes. -Level Results In a category 3 hurricane, residents of (44%) and (43%) are more likely to go to friends and relatives, while residents of (31%) and (29%) counties are comparatively more likely to go to hurricane shelters. residents (26%) show the greatest propensity for evacuating to hotels or motels. Type of Refuge in a Category 3 Hurricane n Public shelter Friend/ relative Hotel/ motel Depends/ don't know Would not evacuate 1,400 19% 39% 18% 12% 5% 7% 150 8% 48% 21% 12% 3% 8% Category % 48% 21% 12% 3% 8% Category % 44% 23% 10% 3% 9% 100 7% 45% 22% 15% 3% 8% Category % 40% 17% 21% 5% 11% Non % 39% 26% 9% 5% 8% % 35% 16% 13% 3% 6% 400 7% 43% 26% 11% 2% 11% 7% 46% 24% 11% 2% 10% Category 2 7% 46% 24% 11% 2% 10% 250 Category 3 7% 46% 24% 11% 2% 10% 7% 46% 24% 11% 2% 10% Category % 41% 18% 13% 3% 21% Non % 38% 33% 9% 3% 11% % 44% 16% 13% 7% 5% 10% 52% 15% 12% 5% 6% 175 Category 2 10% 52% 15% 12% 5% 6% Category % 36% 18% 6% 9% 5% 8% 39% 16% 27% 6% 4% 75 Category 5 8% 39% 16% 27% 6% 4% Non % 40% 17% 10% 7% 4% % 31% 16% 8% 3% 13% % 38% 18% 14% 2% 4% % 30% 19% 18% 5% 3% % 40% 10% 9% 3% 7% Other 46 Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

53 6. Evacuation Plans If you DID evacuate during a category 5 hurricane, where would you go? The percentages of residents who will evacuate to a hurricane shelter do not change appreciably as hurricane strength increases from a 2 to a 3 to nearly a 5 as shown below: 19% Category 2 hurricane 19% Category 3 hurricane 18% hurricane strengthening to a category 5 Slightly fewer residents will evacuate to friends or neighbors as hurricanes strengthen in intensity: 40% Category 2 hurricane 39% Category 3 hurricane 36% hurricane strengthening to a category 5 Percentages of residents saying they will evacuate to hotels/motels increase two percentage points as a hurricane intensifies from a category 3 (18%) to a category 5 hurricane (20%). Type of Refuge in a Category 5 Hurricane n Public shelter Friend/ relative Hotel/ motel Depends/ don't know Would not evacuate 1,400 18% 36% 20% 14% 3% 9% 150 8% 46% 20% 13% 2% 11% Category % 46% 20% 13% 2% 11% Category % 42% 22% 13% 1% 10% 100 8% 42% 22% 16% 2% 10% Category % 39% 19% 20% 3% 12% Non % 38% 30% 11% 3% 10% % 31% 17% 15% 3% 8% 400 6% 41% 25% 13% 2% 13% 7% 43% 22% 14% 2% 12% Category 2 7% 43% 22% 14% 2% 12% 250 Category 3 7% 43% 22% 14% 2% 12% 7% 43% 22% 14% 2% 12% Category % 39% 19% 14% 4% 21% Non % 36% 34% 11% 1% 13% % 44% 18% 13% 5% 7% 8% 51% 15% 12% 5% 9% 175 Category 2 8% 51% 15% 12% 5% 9% Category % 38% 18% 7% 4% 5% 9% 39% 18% 25% 4% 5% 75 Category 5 9% 39% 18% 25% 4% 5% Non % 40% 25% 11% 6% 4% % 26% 21% 9% 3% 13% % 35% 16% 19% 1% 6% % 27% 21% 17% 2% 9% % 33% 13% 14% 4% 8% Other -Level Results Because residents evacuation destinations do not change dramatically as hurricane strength increases from 2 to 3 to 5, differences in evacuation destinations across counties are roughly the same for a category 5 hurricane as they are for less intensity hurricanes. That is, residents of (44%) are more likely to go to a friends or neighbors, while residents of and counties (28%) are more likely to go to public shelter than residents of other counties in the region. residents (25%) are more likely to go to hotels or motels in the event of a category 5 hurricane. Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 47

54 6. Evacuation Plans Summary of Types of Refuge Based on Intensity of Hurricanes The graph below summarizes evacuation destinations in the region based on the strength of hurricanes. Intentions to evacuate to public shelters actually decrease slightly as storm strength intensifies. Propensity for evacuating to friends and relatives decreases slightly as hurricane strength intensifies. Slightly more residents in the region will evacuate to a hotel or motel as storm strength intensifies. Intended Type of Refuge by Storm Scenario Public shelter Friend/ relative Hotel/ motel Other or 2 19% 40% 18% 23% 8% 48% 20% 24% Category 2 8% 48% 20% 24% Category 3 11% 44% 21% 24% 7% 46% 21% 26% Category 5 6% 41% 18% 35% Non- 9% 42% 27% 22% 27% 36% 15% 22% Category 3 19% 39% 18% 24% 8% 48% 21% 23% Category 2 8% 48% 21% 23% Category 3 11% 44% 23% 22% 7% 45% 22% 26% Category 5 6% 40% 17% 37% Non- 13% 39% 26% 22% 27% 35% 16% 22% Category 5 18% 36% 20% 26% 8% 46% 20% 26% Category 2 8% 46% 20% 26% Category 3 12% 42% 22% 24% 8% 42% 22% 28% Category 5 7% 39% 19% 35% Non- 8% 38% 30% 24% 26% 31% 17% 26% Public shelter Friend/relative Hotel/motel Depends/don't know Would not evacuate Other Intended Type of Refuge by Storm Scenario 4% 5% 3% 6% 7% 9% 13% 12% 14% 19% 19% 18% 18% 18% 20% 40% 39% 36% Category 1 or 2 Category 3 Category 5 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 48 Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

55 6. Evacuation Plans Do you have friends or relatives in safe locations with whom you could stay in an evacuation if necessary? Nearly six in ten residents of the region (57%) have friends or relatives in safe locations with whom they could seek refuge in the event that a hurricane forced them to evacuate. Residents living in evacuation zones 1 and 2 and nonsurge zones (47%) are less likely than residents in evacuation zones 3 and 4 (52%) and 5 (56%) to indicate that they can seek safe refuge with friends or relatives in safe locations. Residents living in inland areas (60%) are most likely to indicate that they have friends or relatives in safe locations with whom they could stay if they were to evacuate. Count-Level Results Results varied considerably across counties. For example, residents in (69%), (65%), and (60%) counties are much more likely than residents in and counties (45%) to say they have friends or relatives in safe locations with whom they could stay if they were to evacuate. Could Evacuate to Friends or Relatives n Yes No Don't know/ depends Other % 38% 4% 1% 16 47% 50% 1% 2% Category % 50% 1% 2% Category % 47% 1% 0% 9 52% 48% 0% 0% Category % 37% 7% 0% Non % 53% 0% 0% % 35% 4% 1% 34 54% 44% 2% 0% 55% 45% 0% 0% Category 2 55% 45% 0% 0% 19 Category 3 55% 45% 0% 0% 55% 45% 0% 0% Category % 0% 19% 0% Non % 60% 0% 0% 61 45% 52% 2% 1% 35% 56% 4% 5% 23 Category 2 35% 56% 4% 5% Category % 48% 2% 0% 44% 56% 0% 0% 9 Category 5 44% 56% 0% 0% Non % 50% 0% 0% 41 60% 39% 1% 0% 35 69% 27% 2% 2% 30 45% 51% 4% 0% 41 65% 24% 11% 0% Could Evacuate to Friends or Relatives 57% Category 2 Category 3 Category 5 Non- Category 2 Category 3 47% 47% 52% 52% 56% 47% 60% 54% 55% 55% 55% 55% Category 5 81% Non- Category 2 Category 3 Category 5 Non- 40% 45% 35% 35% 50% 44% 44% 50% 60% 69% 45% 65% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 49

56 6. Evacuation Plans Do you have any pets? More than half of the residents in the region (53%) have pets in their households. Incidence of pets is greatest in evacuation zone 5 (75%), while only 48% of inland county residents have pets. -Level Results Results did not vary significantly across counties: 59% of residents have pets, but only 46% of residents in and counties have pets. Have Pets n Yes No Refused 1,400 53% 47% 0% % 48% 0% Category % 48% 0% Category % 45% 0% % 42% 0% Category % 25% 0% Non % 40% 0% % 52% 0% % 41% 0% 54% 46% 0% Category 2 54% 46% 0% 250 Category 3 54% 46% 0% 54% 46% 0% Category % 23% 0% Non % 37% 0% % 44% 0% 48% 51% 1% 175 Category 2 48% 51% 1% Category % 42% 0% 73% 27% 0% 75 Category 5 73% 27% 0% Non % 45% 0% % 52% 2% % 54% 0% % 50% 0% % 52% 0% Have Pets Category 2 Category 3 53% 52% 52% 55% 58% Category 5 75% Non- 60% 48% Category 2 Category 3 59% 54% 54% 54% 54% Category 5 77% Non- 63% 56% Category 2 48% 48% Category 3 58% Category 5 73% 73% Non- 55% 46% 46% 50% 48% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 50 Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

57 6. Evacuation Plans What would you do with your pets during a hurricane evacuation? Nearly nine out of ten of the region pet owners (89%) plan to take their pets with them if they evacuate. Intent to include pets during an evacuation is greater for pet owners who live in non-surge zones (93%) and lower for pet owners who live in evacuation zone 4 (80%). Few pet owners (3%) maintain they will leave their pets at home during an evacuation, and few (30%) indicate they will stay behind with their pets. -Level Results Results did not vary significantly across counties: pet owners (83%) are least likely to take their pets with them during an evacuation, while pet owners are most likely to take their pets with them (95%). Percentages of residents who claim they will stay home with their pets ranges from a low of 2% ( ) to a high of 6% ( ). Plan for Pets During a Hurricane Evacuation n Other Stay behind with them Take them to our destination with us Leave them at home Board them Leave them with a friend Leave some, take some Don't know Refused Not applicable; would not evacuate 705 2% 3% 89% 3% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0% 1% 66 3% 3% 87% 4% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0% 1% Category % 3% 87% 4% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0% 1% Category % 3% 84% 6% 1% 0% 0% 2% 0% 1% 54 4% 3% 82% 4% 1% 0% 1% 4% 0% 1% Category % 3% 80% 5% 0% 0% 2% 6% 0% 3% Non- 90 0% 1% 93% 3% 0% 1% 0% 1% 0% 1% 307 2% 4% 89% 2% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0% 1% 206 2% 3% 85% 5% 1% 0% 0% 2% 0% 2% 4% 4% 83% 5% 1% 0% 0% 2% 0% 1% Category 2 4% 4% 83% 5% 1% 0% 0% 2% 0% 1% 120 Category 3 4% 4% 83% 5% 1% 0% 0% 2% 0% 1% 4% 4% 83% 5% 1% 0% 0% 2% 0% 1% Category % 5% 85% 6% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 4% Non- 55 0% 1% 92% 4% 0% 0% 0% 2% 0% 1% 192 0% 2% 88% 4% 0% 1% 1% 3% 0% 1% 0% 2% 93% 2% 1% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% 72 Category 2 0% 2% 93% 2% 1% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% Category % 5% 85% 8% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 2% 1% 77% 5% 0% 0% 3% 10% 0% 2% 47 Category 5 2% 1% 77% 5% 0% 0% 3% 10% 0% 2% Non- 35 0% 2% 91% 3% 0% 4% 0% 0% 0% 0% 69 1% 3% 85% 2% 1% 2% 2% 1% 0% 3% 78 4% 6% 83% 2% 1% 0% 0% 4% 0% 0% 84 1% 2% 91% 3% 0% 0% 0% 3% 0% 0% 76 1% 3% 95% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 51

58 6. Evacuation Plans Are you aware that most public hurricane shelters don t allow pets inside? Over nine out of ten residents in the region (92%) are aware that most public shelters do not allow pets inside. Awareness of this fact varies slightly from a low of 88% in inland counties to a high of 96% in evacuation zones 1 and 2. -Level Results Awareness that most public shelters do not allow pets inside does not vary significantly across counties within the East Central region. Know Public Shelters Don t Allow Pets Inside n Yes No % 8% 66 96% 4% Category % 4% Category % 7% 54 95% 5% Category % 7% Non % 9% % 12% % 11% 96% 4% Category 2 96% 4% 120 Category 3 96% 4% 96% 4% Category % 6% Non % 5% % 13% 96% 4% 72 Category 2 96% 4% Category % 17% 92% 8% 47 Category 5 92% 8% Non % 15% 69 89% 11% Osceole 84 88% 12% Know Public Shelters Don t Allow Pets Inside East Central Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Category 4 Category 5 Non Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 92% 96% 96% 93% 95% 93% 91% 88% 89% 96% 96% 96% Category 4 Category 5 Non Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Category 4 Category 5 Non 96% 94% 95% 87% 96% 96% 83% 92% 92% 85% 89% Osceole 88% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 52 Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

59 6. Evacuation Plans If you would not be allowed to take your pet with you to a public shelter, would that keep you from evacuating or would you go someplace else? Just over one in ten residents in the region (11%) would rather stay home with their pets given the fact that public shelters may not allow the pets inside. When informed that public shelters may not allow their pets inside, most residents (83%) will evacuate to another location. Responses to this question vary only slightly across evacuation zones. -Level Results Residents of and counties (16%) are more than twice as likely to stay home with their pets during a hurricane if they cannot take them inside a public shelter than residents of (5%) and (6%) counties. Would Not Evacuate Without Pet n Yes - would keep me from evacuating No - I would evacuate to someplace else Don't know Other % 83% 5% 1% 66 12% 85% 2% 1% Category % 85% 2% 1% Category % 81% 2% 3% 54 13% 82% 3% 2% Category % 85% 3% 2% Non % 79% 11% 0% % 83% 4% 1% % 80% 4% 1% 15% 81% 2% 2% Category 2 15% 81% 2% 2% 120 Category 3 15% 81% 2% 2% 15% 81% 2% 2% Category % 86% 0% 2% Non % 77% 11% 0% 192 5% 87% 6% 2% 2% 94% 4% 0% 72 Category 2 2% 94% 4% 0% Category % 81% 4% 6% 7% 85% 5% 3% 47 Category 5 7% 85% 5% 3% Non- 35 6% 82% 11% 1% 69 7% 86% 4% 3% 78 16% 83% 1% 0% 84 6% 87% 6% 1% 76 16% 77% 5% 2% Would Not Evacuate Without Pet Category 2 11% 12% 12% Category 3 14% 13% Category 5 Non- 10% 10% 12% Category 2 Category 3 15% 15% 15% 15% 15% Category 5 Non- 12% 12% 5% Category 2 2% 2% Category 3 9% Category 5 7% 7% Non- 6% 7% 16% 6% 16% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 53

60 6. Evacuation Plans If you evacuated for a category 1 or 2 hurricane, where would you go? In the event of a category 2 hurricane, a plurality of residents in the region (39%) will evacuate to some other location in Florida that is outside their county. Evacuating within the same county (25%) is the second most popular destination. One in six residents (17%) will evacuate to a location outside of Florida. Residents in evacuation zone 5 are more likely to evacuate to locations within their own counties. Residents in inland counties are more likely to seek shelter in their own neighborhoods. -Level Results residents (52%) are comparatively more likely to evacuate to some other location within Florida, while residents (21%) and Sumter (18%) county residents are unlikely to do so. Residents in are more likely to evacuate closer to home, while 23% of residents in will evacuate to locations outside of Florida. Evacuation Destinations ( or 2) n Own neighborhood Own county Someplace else in Florida Someplace outside Florida Don't know 1,139 12% 25% 39% 17% 7% 123 5% 21% 49% 19% 6% Category % 21% 49% 19% 6% Category % 22% 51% 16% 5% 81 5% 22% 53% 15% 5% Category % 33% 41% 15% 6% Non % 27% 41% 20% 7% % 25% 33% 16% 7% 342 4% 23% 52% 15% 6% 4% 20% 56% 15% 5% Category 2 4% 20% 56% 15% 5% 215 Category 3 4% 20% 56% 15% 5% 4% 20% 56% 15% 5% Category % 38% 43% 12% 5% Non- 84 6% 25% 47% 17% 5% 317 7% 27% 35% 23% 8% 7% 22% 38% 26% 7% 138 Category 2 7% 22% 38% 26% 7% Category % 32% 31% 20% 7% 8% 29% 39% 18% 6% 54 Category 5 8% 29% 39% 18% 6% Non- 62 3% 32% 30% 26% 9% % 23% 21% 22% 3% % 26% 32% 16% 11% % 26% 33% 15% 6% % 23% 42% 12% 10% 54 Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

61 6. Evacuation Plans If you evacuated for a category 3 hurricane, where would you go? Evacuation destinations for a category 3 hurricane are very similar to evacuation destinations for a category 2 hurricane. Somewhere else in Florida is still the most popular destination (39%), while somewhere else within the same county is the second most popular destination (23%). Slightly fewer residents will stay in their own county during a category 3 hurricane, while slightly more residents will seek shelter outside of Florida. Comparatively more residents living in evacuation zone 5 (33%) and non-surge zones (28%) will seek shelter in their own county. About half of residents living in evacuation zones 1 through 4 will seek shelter somewhere else in Florida. Residents living in evacuation zones 1 and 2 (22%) are more likely to evacuate to someplace outside Florida. -Level Results Residents of (53%) and (47%) counties are more likely to seek shelter elsewhere in Florida, while somewhere outside Florida is a more popular destination for residents of (28%). Residents of (27%) are more likely to stay in their own neighborhoods. Evacuation Destination (Category 3) n Own neighborhood Own county Someplace else in Florida Someplace outside Florida Don't know 1,149 11% 23% 39% 19% 8% 126 5% 19% 48% 22% 6% Category % 19% 48% 22% 6% Category % 21% 50% 18% 6% 80 4% 21% 52% 17% 6% Category % 33% 42% 16% 4% Non % 28% 38% 23% 6% % 23% 35% 16% 9% 347 4% 22% 53% 16% 5% 4% 19% 55% 17% 5% Category 2 4% 19% 55% 17% 5% 221 Category 3 4% 19% 55% 17% 5% 4% 19% 55% 17% 5% Category % 35% 48% 11% 4% Non- 84 6% 23% 49% 18% 4% 318 6% 27% 31% 28% 8% 7% 19% 35% 31% 8% 141 Category 2 7% 19% 35% 31% 8% Category % 30% 31% 25% 6% 8% 32% 36% 21% 3% 50 Category 5 8% 32% 36% 21% 3% Non- 63 3% 36% 21% 30% 10% % 22% 21% 20% 10% % 22% 37% 18% 9% % 25% 31% 18% 6% % 22% 47% 11% 9% Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 55

62 6. Evacuation Plans If you evacuated for a category 5 hurricane, where would you go? During evacuation from a category 5 hurricane, residents of the region are more likely to leave the State of Florida (26%) as opposed to instances of lesser strength hurricanes; yet relocating to another part of Florida is still the most popular destination (37%). Residents in evacuation zones 1 through 4 (46% to 50%) are more likely to seek shelter someplace else in Florida, and residents in evacuation zones 1 and 2 (28%) are more likely to seek shelter outside of Florida. Residents in evacuation zone 5 (27%) are more likely than other residents to seek shelter in other parts of their counties. -Level Results Residents of (27%) are most likely to seek shelter in their own neighborhoods. Residents of (50%) and (44%) counties are more likely to evacuate to someplace in Florida but outside their own counties. Residents in (36%) are most likely to evacuate outside of Florida. Evacuation Destination (Category 5) n Own neighborhood Own county Someplace else in Florida Someplace outside Florida Don't know 1,146 11% 20% 37% 26% 6% 124 6% 14% 46% 28% 6% Category % 14% 46% 28% 6% Category % 17% 48% 23% 7% 80 5% 16% 50% 23% 6% Category % 27% 36% 27% 5% Non % 20% 36% 35% 5% % 21% 33% 22% 8% 335 5% 16% 50% 25% 4% 5% 14% 53% 22% 6% Category 2 5% 14% 53% 22% 6% 211 Category 3 5% 14% 53% 22% 6% 5% 14% 53% 22% 6% Category % 28% 39% 24% 7% Non- 84 5% 15% 46% 31% 3% 328 6% 22% 29% 36% 7% 7% 13% 34% 39% 7% 143 Category 2 7% 13% 34% 39% 7% Category % 31% 26% 29% 7% 8% 25% 34% 30% 3% 54 Category 5 8% 25% 34% 30% 3% Non- 64 3% 29% 19% 40% 9% % 15% 22% 27% 9% % 21% 30% 26% 6% % 23% 34% 21% 6% 121 7% 23% 44% 17% 9% 56 Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

63 6. Evacuation Plans Summary of Evacuation Destinations Based on Intensity of Hurricanes As hurricane intensity increases, residents are more likely to seek shelter outside the State of Florida (17% for a category 2, 19% for a category 3, and 26% for a category 5). Conversely, residents are more likely to seek shelter from less intense hurricanes in their own counties, their own neighborhoods, and elsewhere in Florida. Own neighborhood Own county Someplace else in Florida Someplace outside Florida Don't know Intended Type of Refuge by Storm Scenario 7% 8% 6% 12% 11% 11% 25% 23% 20% 17% 19% 26% 39% 39% 37% Category 1 or 2 Category 3 Category 5 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Intended Type of Refuge by Storm Scenario Own neighborhood Own county Someplace else in Florida Someplace outside Florida Don t know or 2 12% 25% 39% 17% 7% 5% 21% 49% 19% 6% Category 2 5% 21% 49% 19% 6% Category 3 6% 22% 51% 16% 5% 5% 22% 53% 15% 5% Category 5 5% 33% 41% 15% 6% Non- 5% 27% 41% 20% 7% 19% 25% 33% 16% 7% Category 3 11% 23% 39% 19% 8% 5% 19% 48% 22% 6% Category 2 5% 19% 48% 22% 6% Category 3 5% 21% 50% 18% 6% 4% 21% 52% 17% 6% Category 5 5% 33% 42% 16% 4% Non- 5% 28% 38% 23% 6% 17% 23% 35% 16% 9% Category 5 11% 20% 37% 26% 6% 6% 14% 46% 28% 6% Category 2 6% 14% 46% 28% 6% Category 3 5% 17% 48% 23% 7% 5% 16% 50% 23% 6% Category 5 5% 27% 36% 27% 5% Non- 4% 20% 36% 35% 5% 16% 21% 33% 22% 8% Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 57

64 6. Evacuation Plans If you evacuated in a category 1 or 2 hurricane, to what state would you evacuate? Four out of five residents who will evacuate for a category 1 or 2 hurricane will stay in Florida. Residents living in evacuation zones 4 (84%) and 5 (81%) are more likely to stay in Florida than are other residents. Most residents in the region who report that they will evacuate outside Florida for a category 1 or 2 hurricane name Georgia as their destination. One in ten residents (8%) will evacuate to Georgia. -Level Results residents (75%) are less likely to stay in Florida if a category 1 or 2 hurricane warrents evacuation; they are more likely to evacuate to North Carolina (6%) than any other county. (87%) has the highest percentage of residents who will stay in Florida in the event that a category 1 or 2 hurricane warrants evacuation. State to Which You Will Evacuate ( or 2) n Don t know Florida Alabama Georgia Tennessee Mississippi South Carolina North Carolina 1,053 3% 81% 1% 8% 1% 0% 1% 2% 3% 115 3% 80% 1% 7% 1% 0% 1% 4% 3% Category % 80% 1% 7% 1% 0% 1% 4% 3% Category % 83% 1% 8% 1% 0% 1% 1% 2% 76 4% 84% 1% 7% 1% 0% 1% 1% 1% Category % 84% 0% 9% 0% 0% 0% 1% 2% Non % 78% 0% 8% 2% 0% 1% 2% 4% 438 3% 83% 1% 8% 0% 0% 0% 1% 4% 324 4% 84% 1% 6% 1% 0% 1% 1% 2% 4% 85% 1% 6% 1% 0% 0% 1% 2% Category 2 4% 85% 1% 6% 1% 0% 0% 1% 2% 204 Category 3 4% 85% 1% 6% 1% 0% 0% 1% 2% 4% 85% 1% 6% 1% 0% 0% 1% 2% Category % 88% 0% 7% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% Non- 79 3% 82% 0% 6% 0% 0% 2% 4% 3% 291 1% 75% 2% 11% 1% 0% 1% 6% 3% 1% 72% 3% 9% 0% 0% 1% 11% 3% 127 Category 2 1% 72% 3% 9% 0% 0% 1% 11% 3% Category % 78% 2% 14% 0% 0% 1% 3% 2% 3% 81% 0% 11% 0% 0% 1% 2% 2% 51 Category 5 3% 81% 0% 11% 0% 0% 1% 2% 2% Non- 56 3% 72% 0% 12% 6% 0% 1% 0% 6% 116 4% 78% 1% 9% 1% 1% 1% 2% 3% 105 1% 82% 2% 11% 0% 0% 0% 2% 2% 111 5% 84% 0% 4% 0% 0% 0% 0% 7% 106 0% 87% 0% 7% 1% 0% 1% 1% 3% Other 58 Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

65 6. Evacuation Plans If you evacuated in a category 3 hurricane, to what state would you evacuate? Four out of five residents (80%) will stay in Florida if a category 3 storm causes an evacuation; one in ten (9%) will go to Georgia. As with a less intense hurricane, comparatively more residents living in evacuation zones 4 (82%) and 5 (83%) and inland counties (82%) will stay in Florida if they evacuate, while comparatively more residents in evacuation zones 1 and 2 will go to Georgia or North Carolina. -Level Results residents (88%) are more likely to evacuate within Florida if a category 3 hurricane forces evacuation. (13%) and (12%) county residents are comparatively more likely to evacuate to Georgia. Six percent (6%) of residents say they will evacuate to North Carolina if a category 3 hurricane hits their area. State to Which You Will Evacuate (Category 3) n Don t know Florida Alabama Georgia Tennessee Mississippi South Carolina North Carolina 1,055 2% 80% 1% 9% 1% 0% 1% 2% 4% 116 2% 77% 1% 9% 2% 0% 1% 5% 3% Category % 77% 1% 9% 2% 0% 1% 5% 3% Category % 81% 1% 9% 1% 0% 1% 1% 3% 76 4% 82% 1% 9% 1% 0% 0% 1% 2% Category % 83% 0% 11% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% Non % 76% 0% 9% 2% 0% 1% 2% 5% 436 3% 82% 1% 8% 0% 0% 0% 1% 5% 327 2% 83% 1% 7% 1% 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 82% 1% 8% 2% 0% 0% 1% 2% Category 2 4% 82% 1% 8% 2% 0% 0% 1% 2% 207 Category 3 4% 82% 1% 8% 2% 0% 0% 1% 2% 4% 82% 1% 8% 2% 0% 0% 1% 2% Category % 89% 0% 8% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Non- 80 3% 81% 0% 6% 0% 0% 2% 4% 4% 292 3% 70% 1% 13% 2% 0% 1% 6% 4% 3% 66% 3% 10% 1% 0% 1% 12% 4% 129 Category 2 3% 66% 3% 10% 1% 0% 1% 12% 4% Category % 73% 0% 17% 1% 0% 3% 3% 3% 4% 79% 0% 13% 0% 0% 0% 2% 2% 48 Category 5 4% 79% 0% 13% 0% 0% 0% 2% 2% Non- 56 6% 67% 0% 14% 6% 0% 1% 0% 6% 110 4% 78% 1% 9% 1% 1% 1% 2% 3% 106 1% 81% 2% 12% 0% 0% 0% 2% 2% 112 5% 81% 0% 4% 0% 0% 0% 0% 10% 108 0% 88% 0% 7% 1% 0% 1% 1% 2% Other Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 59

66 6. Evacuation Plans If you evacuated in a category 5 hurricane, to what state would you evacuate? As with hurricanes of lesser strength but to a lesser extent, most residents in the region (72%) will evacuate within the State of Florida if a category 5 hurricane strikes. Twelve percent (12%) of residents will evacuate to Georgia in the event of a category 5 hurricane (4% more than for a category 2 hurricane). Residents living in evacuation zones 3 (75%) and 4 (75%) and those living in inland counties (76%) are more likely than residents of other evacuation zones to stay in Florida in the event of a Category 5 hurricane striking. Conversely, residents living in evacuation zones 4 and 5 are slightly more likely to go to Georgia if a Category 5 hurricane passes their way. -Level Results residents (81%) indicate the highest propensity for evacuating within Florida in the event of a Category 5 hurricane, while residents (61%) are less likely to evacuate within Florida. Significantly more (17%) and (19%) county residents will go to Georgia, while only 4% of residents say they will evacuate to Georgia if a Category 5 hurricane approaches them. State to Which You Will Evacuate (Category 5) n Don t know Florida Alabama Georgia Tennessee Mississippi South Carolina North Carolina 1,058 4% 72% 1% 12% 1% 0% 1% 3% 6% 115 4% 70% 2% 11% 2% 0% 1% 5% 5% Category % 70% 2% 11% 2% 0% 1% 5% 5% Category % 75% 1% 12% 2% 0% 1% 1% 3% 75 4% 75% 1% 11% 2% 0% 1% 2% 4% Category % 71% 0% 14% 0% 0% 2% 2% 6% Non % 63% 1% 15% 3% 0% 1% 2% 6% 439 3% 76% 1% 11% 1% 0% 0% 1% 7% 315 7% 74% 1% 10% 1% 0% 1% 2% 4% 5% 77% 1% 9% 2% 0% 1% 1% 4% Category 2 5% 77% 1% 9% 2% 0% 1% 1% 4% 197 Category 3 5% 77% 1% 9% 2% 0% 1% 1% 4% 5% 77% 1% 9% 2% 0% 1% 1% 4% Category % 74% 0% 10% 0% 0% 3% 0% 7% Non- 81 9% 68% 1% 11% 0% 0% 2% 4% 5% 304 5% 61% 2% 17% 2% 0% 1% 6% 6% 3% 58% 4% 14% 1% 0% 1% 12% 7% 132 Category 2 3% 58% 4% 14% 1% 0% 1% 12% 7% Category % 69% 3% 20% 1% 0% 2% 3% 2% 3% 69% 0% 17% 0% 0% 2% 3% 2% 52 Category 5 3% 69% 0% 17% 0% 0% 1% 4% 6% Non- 58 7% 56% 0% 21% 7% 0% 1% 0% 8% 112 4% 70% 1% 15% 1% 1% 1% 2% 5% 105 1% 72% 2% 19% 0% 0% 0% 2% 4% 114 3% 78% 0% 4% 0% 0% 0% 0% 15% 108 2% 81% 1% 8% 2% 0% 1% 2% 3% Other 60 Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

67 6. Evacuation Plans Summary of Evacuation Destinations Based on Intensity of Hurricanes State to Which You Will Evacuate Florida 81% 80% 72% Georgia 8% 9% 12% Other Don't know 8% 9% 12% 3% 2% 4% Category 1 or 2 Category 3 Category 5 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 61

68 6. Evacuation Plans Do you and your family currently have a definite plan for deciding whether to evacuate and where to go if a hurricane threatens? Nearly six out of ten residents (57%) of the region have a definite plan for deciding whether to evacuate and where they will go if threatened by a hurricane. Higher percentages of residents living in evacuation zones 3 (69%) and 4 (69%) have definite plans, while only half of the residents who live in inland counties (50%) have definite plans. -Level Results The percentage of residents who have definite plans for deciding whether to evacuate and where to go if a hurricane threatens range from a high of 69% in and a low of 45% in. Have Hurricane Evacuation Plan n Yes No Not very definite Don't know Other 1,400 57% 28% 14% 1% 0% % 19% 15% 1% 1% Category % 19% 15% 1% 1% Category % 20% 10% 0% 1% % 19% 10% 1% 1% Category % 24% 12% 0% 0% Non % 27% 10% 0% 0% % 33% 15% 2% 0% % 20% 9% 1% 1% 71% 18% 9% 1% 1% Category 2 71% 18% 9% 1% 1% 250 Category 3 71% 18% 9% 1% 1% 71% 18% 9% 1% 1% Category % 23% 12% 2% 0% Non % 23% 7% 0% 0% % 24% 18% 0% 0% 54% 20% 26% 0% 0% 175 Category 2 54% 20% 26% 0% 0% Category % 25% 11% 0% 0% 65% 24% 11% 0% 0% 75 Category 5 65% 24% 11% 0% 0% Non % 32% 14% 0% 0% % 30% 13% 1% 0% % 32% 17% 1% 1% % 36% 16% 3% 0% % 33% 13% 0% 0% Have Hurricane Evacuation Plan 57% Category 2 Category 3 Category 5 Non- 64% 64% 69% 69% 64% 63% 50% Category 2 Category 3 69% 71% 71% 71% 71% Category 5 63% Non- 70% Category 2 58% 54% 54% Category 3 Category 5 64% 65% 65% Non- 54% 56% 49% 45% 54% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 62 Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

69 7. VEHICLE AVAILABILITY & INTENDED USE

70

71 7. Vehicle Availability & Intended Use How many vehicles would be available in your household that you could use to evacuate? How many vehicles would your household take if you evacuated? The typical household in the region has two vehicles available for use during an evacuation. This figure is constant throughout different evacuation zones. The typical household will take, on average, 1.4 vehicles during an evacuation. This figure varies slightly from a low of 1.3 vehicles in non-surge areas to a high of1.5 vehicles in evacuation zones 3 through 5. -Level Results While households have comparatively more vehicles available for evacuation (2.3), there are absolutely no differences across counties in the number of vehicles the typical household will use for evacuation. Households in each county in the region will take 1.4 vehicles during evacuation. Vehicle Availability and Use During an Evacuation Available vehicles Vehicles used in evacuation % of available vehicles used in evacuation % of households with no vehicle n Mean Mean Mean 1, % 3% % 3% Category % 3% Category % 4% % 3% Category % 2% Non % 1% % 3% % 2% % 3% Category % 3% 250 Category % 3% % 3% Category % 2% Non % 1% % 3% % 3% 175 Category % 3% Category % 8% % 3% 75 Category % 3% Non % 1% % 4% % 1% % 6% % 2% East Central 77% Category 1 78% Category 2 78% Category 3 77% Category 4 78% Category 5 80% Non 73% 78% 78% Category 1 78% Category 2 78% Category 3 78% Category 4 78% Category 5 83% Non 73% 76% Category 1 79% Category 2 79% Category 3 72% Category 4 78% Category 5 78% Non Percent of Available Vehicles Used in Evacuation 73% 78% 79% 77% 77% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 65

72 7. Vehicle Availability & Intended Use If you evacuated, would you take a motor home or pull a trailer, boat, or camper? Fewer than one in ten households (7%) will take a large vehicle (motor home, trailer, boat, camper) with them if they evacuate because of a hurricane. Residents in evacuation zones 1 through 4 are more likely (11% - 12%) to take a motor home or pull a trailer, boat or camper during an evacuation. -Level Results residents (12%) and residents (11%) are more likely to take a motor home or to pull a conveyance if they evacuate, while (1%) and (3%) residents are less likely to do so. If you evacuated, would you take a motor home or pull a trailer, boat, or camper? n Yes No Don't know Other 1,355 7% 92% 1% 0% % 88% 1% 0% Category % 88% 1% 0% Category % 87% 1% 0% 97 12% 87% 1% 0% Category % 91% 0% 0% Non % 93% 1% 0% 582 6% 94% 0% 0% % 87% 1% 0% 14% 85% 1% 0% Category 2 14% 85% 1% 0% 243 Category 3 14% 85% 1% 0% 14% 85% 1% 0% Category % 87% 0% 0% Non- 98 7% 91% 2% 0% 384 6% 93% 1% 0% 6% 93% 1% 0% 169 Category 2 6% 93% 1% 0% Category % 94% 2% 0% 7% 93% 0% 0% 73 Category 5 7% 93% 0% 0% Non- 74 4% 96% 0% 0% % 88% 1% 0% 148 3% 97% 0% 0% 144 9% 90% 0% 1% 146 1% 96% 3% 0% 66 Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

73 8. OBSTACLES TO EVACUATION

74

75 8. Obstacles to Evacuation Are there any obstacles other than a lack of transportation or special needs that I ve asked about that would prevent you from being able to leave your home and go someplace safer during a hurricane threat? More than one in ten households (12%) claims that there are obstacles to evacuation beyond transportation and disabilities/medical needs. Evacuation zone 3 had the highest percentage of households (17%) that had obstacles to evacuation, while only 10% of households in non-surge zones and inland areas reported obstacles to evacuation. -Level Results Percentages of households in the region reporting obstacles to evacuating varied considerably from a low of 4% in to a high of 14% in and counties. Obstacles to Evacuating n Yes No 1,400 12% 88% % 86% Category % 86% Category % 83% % 85% Category % 87% Non % 90% % 90% % 86% 16% 84% Category 2 16% 84% 250 Category 3 16% 84% 16% 84% Category % 85% Non % 91% % 86% 12% 88% 175 Category 2 12% 88% Category % 78% 12% 88% 75 Category 5 12% 88% Non % 88% % 89% % 87% % 90% 150 4% 96% Obstacles to Evacuating 12% Category 2 14% 14% Category 3 17% 15% Category 5 13% Non- 10% 10% 14% Category 2 Category 3 16% 16% 16% Category 5 16% 15% Non- 9% 14% Category 2 12% 12% Category 3 22% Category 5 Non- 12% 12% 12% 11% 13% 10% 4% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 69

76 8. Obstacles to Evacuation Are there any obstacles other than a lack of transportation or special needs that would prevent you from being able to leave your home and go someplace safer during a hurricane? Pets (37%), traffic (22%), and lack of money (17%) are the main obstacles to evacuation beyond lack of transportation and special needs. Pets are cited more frequently in evacuation zones 1 through 4 as obstacles to evacuation, while the percentages of households citing traffic as an obstacle to evacuation vary considerably across evacuation zones: 35% of households in non-surge zones report traffic as an impediment wile only 14% of households in evacuation zone 4 do so. -Level Results Residents in (49%) (44%), and (41%) countiesare more likely to think of their pets as obstacles to evacuation. Residents in (44%) and (39%) counties cite traffic as an obstacles to evacuation more so than other residents. Obstacles to evacuating n Pet Job Need to care for another person Spouse/ other won't leave Lack of money No place to go Other Traffic Gas Road obstruction % 14% 6% 2% 17% 11% 19% 22% 4% 9% 18 50% 14% 5% 3% 14% 10% 15% 23% 3% 8% Category % 14% 5% 3% 14% 10% 15% 23% 3% 8% Category % 17% 7% 3% 16% 5% 16% 17% 3% 1% 12 56% 12% 5% 3% 18% 10% 15% 14% 3% 3% Category % 3% 9% 9% 27% 19% 33% 22% 0% 13% Non % 15% 5% 0% 22% 19% 19% 35% 5% 16% 57 35% 15% 4% 1% 18% 11% 19% 17% 5% 9% 51 49% 10% 4% 5% 24% 11% 22% 15% 5% 3% 59% 14% 3% 4% 20% 7% 15% 12% 4% 0% Category 2 59% 14% 3% 4% 20% 7% 15% 12% 4% 0% 32 Category 3 59% 14% 3% 4% 20% 7% 15% 12% 4% 0% 59% 14% 3% 4% 20% 7% 15% 12% 4% 0% Category % 5% 0% 19% 43% 14% 54% 19% 0% 5% Non % 0% 10% 0% 29% 23% 26% 25% 10% 16% 48 28% 18% 11% 0% 7% 12% 15% 39% 0% 16% 31% 14% 9% 0% 0% 16% 13% 47% 0% 25% 19 Category 2 31% 14% 9% 0% 0% 16% 13% 47% 0% 25% Category % 25% 17% 0% 7% 0% 19% 33% 0% 3% 43% 0% 18% 0% 13% 25% 13% 25% 0% 20% 8 Category 5 43% 0% 18% 0% 13% 25% 13% 25% 0% 20% Non- 7 11% 32% 0% 0% 14% 14% 11% 46% 0% 18% 19 44% 10% 14% 0% 18% 7% 14% 6% 0% 22% 11 37% 22% 0% 0% 18% 18% 32% 3% 8% 0% 18 23% 14% 4% 3% 21% 4% 6% 44% 0% 2% 9 41% 0% 0% 0% 9% 9% 17% 11% 20% 33% 70 Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

77 8. Obstacles to Evacuation In an evacuation, would you or anyone in your household require assistance in order to evacuate? More than one in ten households (11%) includes one or more individuals who will require assistance in the event of an evacuation. This percentage is slightly higher within households in inland counties (14%). -Level Results has the fewest households (5%) containing individuals needing assistance during hurricane evacuations, while (18%) and (17%) counties contain the most. Household Members Need Assistance to Evacuate n Yes No Not sure 1,400 11% 88% 1% 150 9% 90% 1% Category % 90% 1% Category % 89% 1% % 88% 1% Category % 89% 3% Non % 95% 1% % 85% 1% 400 8% 91% 1% 10% 89% 1% Category 2 10% 89% 1% 250 Category 3 10% 89% 1% 10% 89% 1% Category % 95% 3% Non % 95% 1% 400 7% 91% 2% 6% 92% 2% 175 Category 2 6% 92% 2% Category % 91% 0% 12% 85% 3% 75 Category 5 12% 85% 3% Non- 75 4% 93% 3% % 82% 1% % 85% 1% % 81% 1% 150 5% 94% 1% Household Members Need Assistance to Evacuate 11% Category 2 9% 9% Category 3 10% 11% Category 5 8% Non- 4% 14% 8% Category 2 Category 3 10% 10% 10% 10% Category 5 2% Non- 4% 7% Category 2 6% 6% Category 3 9% Category 5 12% 12% Non- 4% 17% 14% 18% 5% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 71

78 8. Obstacles to Evacuation Would the person just need transportation, or do they have a disability or medical problem that would require special assistance? Over seven out of ten of households (72%) containing individuals needing assistance during hurricane evacuation have special needs (44% special needs + 28% special needs and transportation needs). This represents only 8% of all households in the region. Percentages of all households that need special assistance by evacuation zone are shown in the table below. Nearly half of households (47%) containing individuals needing assistance during a hurricane evacuation require transportation assistance (19% transportation only + 28% transportation and special needs). This translates to 5% of all households in region. -Level Results The percentage of all households in the region that need transportation or special needs assistance during hurricane evacuation are shown below: Assistance Needed (Percentages of All Households) Transportation 1 Represents 2% of all households. 2 Represents 4% of all households. Special needs Need outside agency 5% 8% 5% 5% 6% 2% Category 2 5% 6% 2% Category 3 6% 5% 2% 5% 7% 2% Category 5 1% 6% 1% Non- 2% 3% 1% 7% 11% 7% 5% 5% 2% 6% 6% 2% Category 2 6% 6% 2% Category 3 6% 6% 2% 6% 6% 2% Category 5 1% 2% 1% Non- 2% 2% 2% 2% 5% 1% 2% 5% 2% Category 2 2% 5% 2% Category 3 4% 4% 2% 1% 9% 1% Category 5 1% 9% 1% Non- 2% 3% 0% 8% 13% 5% 6% 10% 9% 10% 13% 8% 2% 4% 2% Type of Assistance Needed During Evacuation n Transportation only Special need Both Don't know Other % 1 44% 2 28% 3% 6% 14 29% 36% 24% 0% 11% Category % 36% 24% 0% 11% Category % 32% 22% 1% 10% 11 28% 43% 17% 5% 7% Category 5 8 4% 76% 4% 16% 0% Non % 49% 20% 0% 0% 66 16% 44% 33% 2% 5% 34 35% 36% 21% 0% 8% 36% 32% 23% 0% 9% Category 2 36% 32% 23% 0% 9% 23 Category 3 36% 32% 23% 0% 9% 36% 32% 23% 0% 9% Category 5 3 0% 67% 33% 0% 0% Non- 8 43% 48% 9% 0% 0% 41 13% 53% 17% 8% 9% 9% 47% 28% 1% 15% 16 Category 2 9% 47% 28% 1% 15% Category % 30% 17% 6% 17% 5% 77% 0% 18% 0% 10 Category 5 5% 77% 0% 18% 0% Non- 5 14% 50% 36% 0% 0% 19 21% 52% 27% 0% 0% 16 3% 33% 41% 6% 17% 20 25% 43% 30% 2% 0% 11 5% 58% 31% 6% 0% 72 Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

79 8. Obstacles to Evacuation Would that assistance be provided by someone within your household, by an outside agency, or by a friend or relative outside your household? Four out of ten (42%) households that need assistance during hurricane evacuation require assistance from an outside agency. This translates to 5% of all households in the region. Many households that need assistance during an evacuation will either provide that assistance within their household (32%) or depend on a friend or relative (18%) to provide this assistance. Sample sizes within evacuation zones and within counties are fairly small and should be interpreted with caution. Who Will Provide Evacuation Assistance n Within household Friend/ relative (outside) Outside agency Don't know Other % 18% 42% 6% 2% 14 45% 23% 24% 5% 3% Category % 23% 24% 5% 3% Category % 23% 19% 4% 3% 11 51% 23% 17% 6% 3% Category % 29% 12% 20% 0% Non % 28% 29% 14% 6% 66 28% 15% 52% 3% 2% 34 48% 22% 24% 3% 3% 54% 21% 20% 1% 4% Category 2 54% 21% 20% 1% 4% 23 Category 3 54% 21% 20% 1% 4% 54% 21% 20% 1% 4% Category % 33% 33% 1% 0% Non- 8 15% 28% 48% 9% 0% 41 32% 29% 19% 18% 2% 17% 31% 36% 16% 0% 16 Category 2 17% 31% 36% 16% 0% Category % 30% 17% 13% 0% 40% 28% 9% 23% 0% 10 Category 5 40% 28% 9% 23% 0% Non- 5 35% 28% 0% 23% 14% 19 33% 31% 30% 6% 0% 16 24% 6% 66% 1% 3% 20 34% 3% 58% 3% 2% 11 3% 54% 34% 9% 0% Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 73

80 8. Obstacles to Evacuation Is that person registered with your county as a person who would have special needs during a hurricane evacuation? One in four households (24%) that need special assistance maintains that the person providing this assistance is registered with that county. Sample sizes within evacuation zones and within counties are fairly small and should be interpreted with caution. Person Needing Assistance is Registered with n Yes No Don't know/not sure % 60% 16% 14 47% 45% 8% Category % 45% 8% Category % 46% 5% 11 50% 47% 3% Category % 64% 4% Non % 89% 0% 66 17% 62% 21% 34 50% 45% 5% 56% 40% 4% Category 2 56% 40% 4% 23 Category 3 56% 40% 4% 56% 40% 4% Category % 33% 34% Non- 8 19% 81% 0% 41 21% 69% 10% 20% 61% 19% 16 Category 2 20% 61% 19% Category % 70% 13% 32% 68% 0% 10 Category 5 32% 68% 0% Non- 5 0% 100% 0% 19 16% 61% 23% 16 3% 75% 22% 20 30% 50% 20% 11 11% 71% 18% Category 2 Category 3 Category 5 Non- Category 2 Category 3 Category 5 Non- Category 2 Category 3 Category 5 Non- Person Needing Assistance is Registered with 0% 3% 11% 11% 17% 19% 21% 20% 20% 17% 16% 24% 32% 33% 32% 32% 30% 47% 47% 49% 50% 50% 56% 56% 56% 56% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 74 Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

81 9. HISTORICAL EVACUATION BEHAVIOR

82

83 9. Historical Evacuation Behavior Were You at Home for Hurricane Charley? Nearly four out of five households (79%) indicate they were home during Hurricane Charley. Responses are consistent across evacuation zones with the exception of evacuation zone 5 in which 89% of residents claim they experienced Hurricane Charley. -Level Results Percentages of residents who experienced Hurricane Charley range from a low of 74% for to a high of 85% for. Were you at home for Hurricane Charley? n Yes No Don't know/ other 1,400 79% 20% 1% % 21% 1% Category % 21% 1% Category % 19% 2% % 19% 1% Category % 11% 0% Non % 20% 0% % 21% 1% % 16% 1% 78% 19% 3% Category 2 78% 19% 3% 250 Category 3 78% 19% 3% 78% 19% 3% Category % 4% 0% Non % 13% 0% % 22% 0% 77% 23% 0% 175 Category 2 77% 23% 0% Category % 18% 0% 84% 16% 0% 75 Category 5 84% 16% 0% Non % 30% 0% % 21% 5% % 23% 0% % 23% 0% % 15% 0% Were You at Home for Hurricane Charley? Category 2 Category 3 79% 78% 78% 79% 80% Category 5 89% Non- Category 2 Category 3 80% 78% 83% 78% 78% 78% 78% Category 5 96% Non- 87% Category 2 Category 3 Category 5 78% 77% 77% 82% 84% 84% Non- 70% 74% 77% 77% 85% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 77

84 9. Historical Evacuation Behavior Were You at Home for Hurricane Frances? Eight out of ten residents (79%) in the region maintain they were home during Hurricane Frances. Responses across evacuation zones range from a low of 76% for evacuation zones 1 and 2 to a high of 88% for evacuation zone 5. -Level Results (72%) households were less likely to be at home during Hurricane Frances, while residents in (84%) were more likely to have experienced Hurricane Frances. Were You at Home for Hurricane Frances? n Yes No Don't know/ other 1,400 79% 19% 2% % 20% 4% Category % 20% 4% Category % 19% 3% % 18% 4% Category % 10% 2% Non % 18% 2% % 20% 1% % 14% 4% 77% 19% 4% Category 2 77% 19% 4% 250 Category 3 77% 19% 4% 77% 19% 4% Category % 3% 4% Non % 9% 2% % 22% 2% 74% 23% 3% 175 Category 2 74% 23% 3% Category % 18% 0% 84% 15% 1% 75 Category 5 84% 15% 1% Non % 32% 0% % 27% 1% % 22% 1% % 21% 0% % 15% 1% Were You at Home for Hurricane Frances? Category 2 Category 3 79% 76% 76% 78% 78% Category 5 88% Non- Category 2 Category 3 80% 79% 82% 77% 77% 77% 77% Category 5 Non- 93% 89% Category 2 Category 3 Category 5 Non- 76% 74% 74% 82% 84% 84% 68% 72% 77% 79% 84% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 78 Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

85 9. Historical Evacuation Behavior Were You at Home for Hurricane Jeanne? Over three out of four households (77%) in the region report being home during Hurricane Jeanne with incidence of being home ranging from a low of 68% in to a high of 84% in and counties. Were You at Home for Hurricane Jeanne? n Yes No Don't know/ other 1,400 77% 20% 3% % 20% 5% Category % 20% 5% Category % 19% 4% % 17% 4% Category % 12% 3% Non % 15% 1% % 22% 2% % 13% 3% 78% 17% 5% Category 2 78% 17% 5% 250 Category 3 78% 17% 5% 78% 17% 5% Category % 6% 4% Non % 7% 1% % 24% 3% 69% 25% 6% 175 Category 2 69% 25% 6% Category % 28% 1% 81% 16% 3% 75 Category 5 81% 16% 3% Non % 28% 1% % 24% 2% % 31% 1% % 20% 1% % 15% 1% Were You at Home for Hurricane Jeanne? Category 2 Category 3 Category 5 Non- Category 2 Category 3 77% 75% 75% 77% 79% 85% 84% 76% 84% 78% 78% 78% Category 5 Non- Category 2 Category 3 Category 5 Non- 78% 90% 93% 73% 69% 69% 71% 81% 81% 71% 74% 68% 79% 84% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 79

86 9. Historical Evacuation Behavior Did you leave your home to go someplace safer in response to the threat created by Hurricane Charley? One in five residents (20%) of the region report leaving their household to seek safer ground when Hurricane Charley struck. Residents in evacuation zones 1 through 4 report higher incidences of leaving their for safety during Hurricane Charley. -Level Results Evacuation behavior recall varies considerably across counties as 35% of residents recall evacuating for Hurricane Charley, while only 9% of and residents recall evacuating for Hurricane Charley. Did you leave your home to go someplace safer in response to the threat created by Hurricane Charley? n Yes No Don't know 1,140 20% 78% 2% % 63% 4% Category % 63% 4% Category % 60% 5% 81 35% 59% 6% Category % 69% 6% Non % 74% 3% % 87% 1% % 60% 5% 40% 54% 6% Category 2 40% 54% 6% 200 Category 3 40% 54% 6% 40% 54% 6% Category % 61% 3% Non % 71% 4% % 78% 3% 21% 77% 2% 138 Category 2 21% 77% 2% Category % 83% 0% 16% 75% 9% 62 Category 5 16% 75% 9% Non % 80% 1% % 79% 1% % 86% 2% 125 9% 91% 0% 128 9% 90% 1% Category 2 Category 3 Category 5 Non- Category 2 Category 3 Category 5 Non- Category 2 Category 3 Category 5 Non- Did you leave your home to go someplace safer in response to the threat created by Hurricane Charley? 12% 20% 25% 23% 25% 19% 21% 21% 17% 16% 16% 19% 20% 12% 9% 9% 33% 33% 35% 35% 35% 40% 40% 40% 40% 36% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 80 Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

87 9. Historical Evacuation Behavior Did you leave your home to go someplace safer in response to the threat created by Hurricane Frances? Nearly three in ten residents (28%) of the region left their for safer locations as a result of Hurricane Frances. Reported evacuation for Hurricane Frances was considerably higher among households in evacuation zones 1 through 4. -Level Results Households in (53%) were much more likely to evacuate for Hurricane Frances, while residents in (13%) and (15%) had comparatively low evacuation rates for Hurricane Frances. Did you leave your home to go someplace safer in response to the threat created by Hurricane Frances? n Yes No Don't know 1,114 28% 70% 2% % 50% 3% Category % 50% 3% Category % 45% 3% 78 51% 44% 5% Category % 54% 6% Non % 63% 3% % 83% 1% % 43% 4% 59% 37% 3% Category 2 59% 37% 3% 190 Category 3 59% 37% 3% 59% 37% 3% Category % 38% 2% Non % 56% 5% % 71% 3% 29% 70% 1% 133 Category 2 29% 70% 1% Category % 72% 0% 24% 66% 10% 61 Category 5 24% 66% 10% Non % 76% 1% % 80% 2% % 85% 2% % 84% 1% % 82% 1% Category 2 Category 3 Category 5 Non- Category 2 Category 3 Category 5 Non- Category 2 Category 3 Category 5 Non- Did you leave your home to go someplace safer in response to the threat created by Hurricane Frances? 16% 28% 26% 29% 29% 28% 24% 24% 23% 18% 13% 15% 18% 33% 40% 39% 48% 48% 53% 51% 53% 59% 59% 59% 59% 60% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 81

88 9. Historical Evacuation Behavior Did you leave your home to go someplace safer in response to the threat created by Hurricane Jeanne? Hurricane Jeanne caused 19% of households in the region to evacuate with households in evacuation zones 3 and 4 more likely to have evacuated. Only 10% of inland residents reported evacuating during Hurricane Jeanne. -Level Results households report a much higher evacuation incidence (39%) while (8%) and (9%) counties households report the lowest level of evacuation. Summary of Reported Hurricane Evacuation The numbers below summarize the percentages of households in the region who recall being at home and recall evacuating during hurricanes Charley, Frances, and Jeanne: At Home Evacuated Hurricane Charley 79% 20% Hurricane Frances 79% 28% Hurricane Jeanne 77% 19% Did you leave your home to go someplace safer in response to the threat created by Hurricane Jeanne? n Yes No Don't know 1,097 19% 78% 3% % 63% 4% Category % 63% 4% Category % 57% 5% 78 37% 57% 6% Category % 63% 6% Non % 75% 2% % 88% 2% % 58% 3% 43% 53% 4% Category 2 43% 53% 4% 193 Category 3 43% 53% 4% 43% 53% 4% Category % 50% 2% Non % 70% 3% % 79% 5% 15% 81% 4% 123 Category 2 15% 81% 4% Category % 76% 5% 17% 73% 10% 59 Category 5 17% 73% 10% Non % 84% 0% % 81% 3% % 86% 2% 122 8% 92% 0% 126 9% 91% 0% East Central Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Category 4 Category 5 Non Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Category 4 Category 5 Non Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Category 4 Category 5 Non Did you leave your home to go someplace safer in response to the threat created by Hurricane Jeanne? 10% 19% 16% 15% 15% 19% 17% 17% 16% 16% 12% 8% 9% 23% 27% 33% 33% 38% 37% 31% 39% 43% 43% 43% 43% 48% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 82 Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

89 9. Historical Evacuation Behavior Where did you evacuate to during Hurricane Charley? Most residents in the region who evacuated during Hurricane Charley report going to a friend or relative (53%), while 22% report going to a hotel or motel and 11% recall going to a public shelter. Reported use of a public shelter for Hurricane Charley is highest for inland residents. -Level Results (25%) and (27%) counties report the highest incidence of using public shelters for Hurricane Charley, while none of the residents in report using a public shelter for this hurricane. At least six in ten residents in,, and counties report going to friends/relatives for Hurricane Charley. Where did you evacuate to during Hurricane Frances? Most households (54%) that evacuated during Hurricane Frances recall going to friends or relatives; slightly more than one in five households (22%) recall going to hotels or motels. Only 8% of households recall going to a public shelter during Hurricane Frances. -Level Results (30%) and (23%) county residents report going to a pubic shelter in much greater numbers than residents of other counties during Hurricane Frances. Conversely, residents in (73%) and (71%) counties report going to friends and relatives in much greater numbers. Where did you evacuate to during Hurricane Charley? n Public shelter Friend/ relative Hotel/ motel Other Don't know % 53% 22% 13% 1% 39 9% 53% 28% 10% 0% Category % 53% 28% 10% 0% Category % 51% 26% 11% 2% 28 12% 52% 25% 11% 0% Category % 38% 16% 37% 0% Non- 34 9% 51% 23% 17% 0% 65 16% 61% 16% 7% 0% 124 9% 46% 27% 18% 0% 10% 52% 28% 10% 0% Category 2 10% 52% 28% 10% 0% 87 Category 3 10% 52% 28% 10% 0% 10% 52% 28% 10% 0% Category % 30% 22% 48% 0% Non % 36% 29% 24% 0% 69 9% 58% 19% 11% 3% 5% 54% 29% 11% 1% 34 Category 2 5% 54% 29% 11% 1% Category % 42% 15% 17% 17% 26% 52% 4% 18% 0% 12 Category 5 26% 52% 4% 18% 0% Non- 13 4% 87% 9% 0% 0% 20 25% 52% 11% 12% 0% 16 27% 68% 2% 3% 0% 18 6% 63% 24% 7% 0% 11 0% 60% 34% 6% 0% Where did you evacuate to during Hurricane Frances? n Public shelter Friend/ relative Hotel/ motel Other Don't know 334 8% 54% 22% 15% 1% 49 8% 55% 23% 14% 0% Category % 55% 23% 14% 0% Category % 54% 21% 15% 0% 37 10% 54% 22% 14% 0% Category % 37% 30% 27% 0% Non- 47 2% 53% 21% 18% 6% 79 12% 59% 21% 8% 0% 171 6% 48% 25% 19% 2% 9% 54% 22% 15% 0% Category 2 9% 54% 22% 15% 0% 116 Category 3 9% 54% 22% 15% 0% 9% 54% 22% 15% 0% Category % 29% 36% 35% 0% Non- 33 1% 43% 25% 23% 8% 84 8% 61% 18% 13% 0% 4% 58% 27% 11% 0% 39 Category 2 4% 58% 27% 11% 0% Category % 58% 7% 22% 0% 17% 51% 17% 15% 0% 16 Category 5 17% 51% 17% 15% 0% Non- 14 3% 85% 8% 4% 0% 19 30% 56% 8% 6% 0% 19 0% 73% 22% 5% 0% 26 23% 40% 27% 10% 0% 15 0% 71% 20% 9% 0% Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 83

90 9. Historical Evacuation Behavior Where did you evacuate to during Hurricane Jeanne? Not quite six out of ten residents (59%) of the region report going to friends or relatives when they evacuated during Hurricane Jeanne. One in ten residents (9%) recalls evacuating to a public shelter. Sample sizes within evacuation zones are small so detailed results should be viewed with caution. Having stated this caution, residents in evacuation zones 1 through 4 and inland counties were more likely to report evacuating to friends and relatives. -Level Results Residents in (35%) and (14%) counties are much more likely to report evacuating to public shelters during Hurricane Jeanne. Comparatively more households in (75%), and (73%) counties that evacuated during Hurricane Frances report going to friends or relatives. Summary of Evacuation Activity As the figures below show, more residents in the region recall evacuating for Hurricane Charley (23%). Thirteen percent of all residents (55% of those who evacuated) went to friends and relatives during Hurricane Charley, while 3% of all residents went to a public shelter. The percentage of residents who report going to a public shelter is constant (3%) across hurricanes Charley, Frances, and Jeanne. Evacuated Went to friend/ relative Went to public shelter Went to hotel/ motel Hurricane Charley 20% 11% 2% 4% Hurricane Frances 28% 15% 2% 6% Hurricane Jeanne 19% 11% 2% 3% Where did you evacuate to during Hurricane Jeanne? n Public shelter Friend/ relative Hotel/ motel Other Don't know 226 9% 59% 18% 13% 1% 30 10% 64% 19% 7% 0% Category % 64% 19% 7% 0% Category % 64% 17% 9% 0% 27 11% 60% 18% 11% 0% Category % 37% 22% 31% 0% Non- 34 2% 52% 24% 17% 5% 53 13% 61% 15% 11% 0% 121 8% 53% 21% 16% 2% 11% 62% 19% 8% 0% Category 2 11% 62% 19% 8% 0% 82 Category 3 11% 62% 19% 8% 0% 11% 62% 19% 8% 0% Category % 34% 24% 34% 0% Non- 22 1% 42% 28% 22% 7% 52 7% 73% 14% 6% 0% 4% 75% 21% 0% 0% 19 Category 2 4% 75% 21% 0% 0% Category 3 9 5% 88% 0% 7% 0% 17% 45% 17% 21% 0% 12 Category 5 17% 45% 17% 21% 0% Non- 12 4% 84% 12% 0% 0% 16 35% 44% 2% 19% 0% 15 14% 75% 2% 9% 0% 13 3% 68% 23% 6% 0% 9 0% 57% 34% 9% 0% 84 Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

91 9. Historical Evacuation Behavior Evacuation Destination for Hurricane Charley Nearly half of residents (47%) who evacuated for Hurricane Charley stayed within their own county. Most of those (30%) evacuated beyond the boundaries of their neighborhood while 17% stayed within their neighborhood. Just over half of residents (51%) who evacuated went beyond their county boundaries with comparatively more (38%) staying within Florida. Residents living in evacuation zones 1 through 4 are more likely to report leaving their county for Hurricane Charley. Residents who live in inland areas are more likely to report evacuating within their own counties. Eighty-seven percent (87%) of the reported evacuees stayed within Florida for Hurricane Charley, while about half of the rest (6% of all evacuees) went to Georgia. -Level Results Very few residents of (6%), (4%), and (0%) counties report evacuating outside of Florida during Hurricane Charley. One in five residents of (20%) report evacuating outside the state of Florida, with half of those respondants (10%) evacuating to Georgia. Residents of (35%) report the lowest incidence of staying within their own county during evacuation for Hurricane Charley. residents (79%) report the highest incidence of evacuating within the county for Hurricane Charley. Where was that located? (Hurricane Charley) n Own neighborhood Own county Someplace else in Florida Someplace outside Florida Don't know % 30% 38% 13% 2% 39 14% 18% 51% 15% 2% Category % 18% 51% 15% 2% Category % 16% 52% 14% 6% 28 15% 18% 54% 11% 2% Category % 64% 23% 4% 1% Non- 34 5% 34% 41% 20% 0% 65 33% 33% 27% 6% 1% % 25% 50% 14% 1% 14% 15% 57% 12% 2% Category 2 14% 15% 57% 12% 2% 87 Category 3 14% 15% 57% 12% 2% 14% 15% 57% 12% 2% Category % 71% 22% 7% 0% Non- 21 5% 28% 46% 21% 0% 69 11% 36% 27% 20% 6% 13% 30% 33% 23% 1% 34 Category 2 13% 30% 33% 23% 1% Category % 24% 11% 31% 34% 22% 49% 25% 0% 4% 12 Category 5 22% 49% 25% 0% 4% Non- 13 4% 47% 30% 19% 0% 20 39% 30% 16% 14% 1% 16 48% 31% 20% 0% 1% 18 19% 36% 35% 4% 6% 11 18% 36% 40% 6% 0% Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 85

92 9. Historical Evacuation Behavior In what state was that located? (Hurricane Charley) n Don t know Florida Alabama Georgia Tennessee Mississippi South Carolina North Carolina 253 1% 87% 1% 6% 1% 0% 0% 0% 4% 39 0% 85% 2% 8% 0% 0% 0% 1% 4% Category % 85% 2% 8% 0% 0% 0% 1% 4% Category % 85% 3% 7% 0% 0% 1% 0% 3% 26 0% 89% 3% 5% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3% Category % 95% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 2% Non- 34 0% 79% 1% 9% 4% 0% 0% 0% 7% 64 0% 94% 0% 3% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% 123 0% 86% 2% 7% 0% 0% 0% 0% 5% 0% 87% 3% 6% 0% 0% 0% 0% 4% Category 2 0% 87% 3% 6% 0% 0% 0% 0% 4% 86 Category 3 0% 87% 3% 6% 0% 0% 0% 0% 4% 0% 87% 3% 6% 0% 0% 0% 0% 4% Category % 93% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 3% Non- 21 0% 79% 2% 12% 0% 0% 0% 0% 7% 66 0% 79% 0% 10% 4% 0% 2% 2% 3% 0% 77% 0% 14% 0% 0% 0% 3% 6% 34 Category 2 0% 77% 0% 14% 0% 0% 0% 3% 6% Category 3 8 0% 53% 0% 24% 7% 0% 16% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 11 Category 5 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Non- 13 0% 81% 0% 0% 15% 0% 0% 0% 4% 20 0% 86% 0% 9% 5% 0% 0% 0% 0% 16 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 17 0% 95% 0% 2% 0% 2% 0% 0% 1% 11 0% 94% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 6% Other 86 Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

93 9. Historical Evacuation Behavior Evacuation Destination for Hurricane Frances Residents of the region (45%) were more likely to report evacuating to someplace else in Florida outside their county during Hurricane Frances. Just over one in three residents (36%) report evacuating within their county, while 18% report leaving the State of Florida. Residents living in evacuation zones 1 through 4 report higher incidences of evacuating outside their respective counties to other parts of Florida. residents (50%) report staying within their own county more so than other residents. Residents in evacuation zones 1 and 2 and non-surge zones report higher incidences of leaving Florida. -Level Results Residents in (34%) were more likely to report evacuating outside the state during Hurricane Frances. residents (70%) report staying within their county for the most part, yet only 26% of residents report staying within their county. Where was that located? (Hurricane Frances) n Own neighborhood Own county Someplace else in Florida Someplace outside Florida Don't know 334 8% 28% 45% 18% 1% 49 7% 16% 52% 24% 1% Category % 16% 52% 24% 1% Category % 16% 57% 19% 1% 37 9% 15% 58% 17% 1% Category % 36% 49% 10% 0% Non- 47 1% 34% 34% 25% 6% 79 14% 36% 40% 10% 0% 171 5% 21% 54% 18% 2% 8% 13% 60% 18% 1% Category 2 8% 13% 60% 18% 1% 116 Category 3 8% 13% 60% 18% 1% 8% 13% 60% 18% 1% Category % 39% 56% 6% 0% Non- 33 0% 33% 36% 22% 9% 84 5% 34% 27% 34% 0% 4% 29% 23% 44% 0% 39 Category 2 4% 29% 23% 44% 0% Category % 46% 31% 23% 0% 14% 32% 35% 19% 0% 16 Category 5 14% 32% 35% 19% 0% Non- 14 3% 37% 26% 34% 0% 19 39% 31% 22% 8% 0% 19 21% 36% 42% 1% 0% 26 1% 36% 46% 17% 0% 15 9% 39% 42% 10% 0% Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 87

94 9. Historical Evacuation Behavior In what state was that located? (Hurricane Frances) n Don t know Florida Alabama Georgia Tennessee Mississippi South Carolina North Carolina 329 1% 82% 1% 10% 2% 0% 2% 1% 1% 48 2% 76% 1% 14% 1% 1% 2% 1% 2% Category % 76% 1% 14% 1% 1% 2% 1% 2% Category % 81% 1% 10% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 37 2% 82% 1% 10% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Category % 90% 4% 6% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Non- 44 0% 73% 1% 9% 6% 0% 7% 2% 2% 79 0% 90% 0% 7% 2% 0% 0% 0% 1% 166 1% 83% 2% 7% 1% 1% 3% 1% 1% 2% 82% 1% 9% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% Category 2 2% 82% 1% 9% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 114 Category 3 2% 82% 1% 9% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 82% 1% 9% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% Category % 94% 6% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Non- 30 0% 76% 1% 10% 0% 0% 10% 3% 0% 84 0% 66% 1% 23% 4% 0% 4% 0% 2% 0% 55% 1% 33% 0% 0% 5% 0% 6% 39 Category 2 0% 55% 1% 33% 0% 0% 5% 0% 6% Category % 76% 0% 17% 0% 0% 7% 0% 0% 0% 81% 0% 19% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 16 Category 5 0% 81% 0% 19% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Non- 14 0% 67% 0% 5% 24% 0% 0% 0% 4% 19 0% 92% 0% 2% 5% 0% 0% 0% 1% 19 0% 98% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 26 0% 83% 1% 12% 1% 1% 0% 0% 2% 15 0% 91% 0% 9% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Other 88 Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

95 9. Historical Evacuation Behavior Evacuation Destination for Hurricane Jeanne Residents of the region are equally likely to report staying within their counties (44%) or going somewhere else in Florida (44%) when evacuating for Hurricane Jeanne. One in ten (6%) reports going to Georgia. Residents in evacuation zones 1 and 2 (10%) were more likely to say they evacuated to Georgia during Hurricane Jeanne, while residents in evacuation zones 1 through 4 report higher incidence of evacuation to some other destination within Florida. -Level Results Sample sizes within counties are small, therefore caution is suggested when interpreting county level results. Residents of (87%) and (67%) counties report staying within their county boundaries when evacuating for Hurricane Jeanne. Residents of (74%) and (53%) counties report evacuating more frequently to other destinations within Florida. residents (23%) cited more incidences of leaving Florida to escape Hurricane Jeanne. Where was that located? (Hurricane Jeanne) n Own neighborhood Own county Someplace else in Florida Someplace outside Florida Don't know % 31% 44% 10% 2% 30 13% 17% 56% 13% 1% Category % 17% 56% 13% 1% Category % 17% 59% 10% 1% 27 14% 15% 60% 9% 2% Category % 50% 41% 4% 0% Non- 34 1% 44% 39% 9% 7% 53 24% 33% 34% 8% 1% 121 9% 27% 53% 9% 2% 14% 14% 62% 9% 1% Category 2 14% 14% 62% 9% 1% 82 Category 3 14% 14% 62% 9% 1% 14% 14% 62% 9% 1% Category % 58% 38% 4% 0% Non- 22 0% 46% 40% 7% 7% 52 6% 37% 33% 23% 1% 4% 32% 23% 41% 0% 19 Category 2 4% 32% 23% 41% 0% Category 3 9 0% 53% 30% 17% 0% 17% 32% 47% 4% 0% 12 Category 5 17% 32% 47% 4% 0% Non- 12 4% 38% 36% 18% 4% 16 38% 29% 18% 15% 0% 15 43% 44% 8% 0% 5% 13 3% 18% 74% 5% 0% 9 9% 40% 42% 9% 0% Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 89

96 9. Historical Evacuation Behavior In what state was that located? (Hurricane Jeanne) n Don t know Florida Alabama Georgia Tennessee Mississippi South Carolina North Carolina 221 1% 89% 0% 6% 0% 0% 0% 1% 3% 30 2% 86% 0% 10% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% Category % 86% 0% 10% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% Category % 90% 0% 6% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 26 3% 91% 0% 4% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% Category % 96% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 4% Non- 31 0% 90% 0% 4% 0% 0% 0% 0% 6% 52 0% 92% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% 2% 4% 118 2% 92% 0% 4% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 3% 91% 0% 4% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% Category 2 3% 91% 0% 4% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 81 Category 3 3% 91% 0% 4% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 3% 91% 0% 4% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% Category % 96% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 4% Non- 20 0% 93% 0% 6% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 51 0% 77% 0% 19% 0% 0% 0% 0% 4% 0% 59% 0% 41% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 19 Category 2 0% 59% 0% 41% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Category 3 9 0% 83% 0% 17% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 96% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 4% 12 Category 5 0% 96% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 4% Non- 11 0% 82% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 18% 16 0% 85% 0% 0% 6% 0% 0% 0% 9% 14 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 13 0% 94% 0% 6% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 9 0% 91% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 9% 0% Other 90 Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

97 9. Historical Evacuation Behavior Perceived Mandatory Evacuation Just over half of residents (51%) of the region believe that Emergency Management officials issued a voluntary evacuation notice during Hurricane Charley. Three in ten residents (29%) thought the evacuation notice was mandatory, i.e., residents must rather than should leave their. Perceptions of voluntary evacuation were higher in non-surge areas (58%) and inland (62%). Conversely, higher percentages of residents living in evacuation zones 1 through 4 maintain that the evacuation notice for Hurricane Charley was mandatory. -Level Results (73%) and (79%) county residents were more likely to perceive that officials issued a voluntary evacuation order during Hurricane Charley. Residents in (41%) and (35%) counties were more likely to think the evacuation order was mandatory. During Hurricane Charley, did officials recommend that you should evacuate or did they say it was mandatory that you must evacuate? n Should Must Don't know % 29% 20% 41 36% 39% 25% Category % 39% 25% Category % 40% 22% 32 36% 42% 22% Category % 37% 16% Non % 19% 23% 81 62% 20% 18% % 41% 24% 32% 44% 24% Category 2 32% 44% 24% 83 Category 3 32% 44% 24% 32% 44% 24% Category % 45% 23% Non % 19% 21% 94 55% 25% 20% 46% 25% 29% 41 Category 2 46% 25% 29% Category % 21% 9% 56% 31% 13% 23 Category 5 56% 31% 13% Non % 19% 25% 21 45% 35% 20% 15 73% 13% 14% 21 53% 23% 24% 24 79% 10% 11% During Hurricane Charley, did officials recommend that you should evacuate or did they say it was mandatory that you must evacuate? Category 2 Category 3 Category 5 Non- Category 2 Category 3 Category 5 Non- Category 2 Category 3 Category 5 Non- 10% 13% 19% 20% 19% 25% 25% 25% 21% 19% 23% 29% 31% 31% 39% 39% 40% 42% 37% 35% 41% 44% 44% 44% 44% 45% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 91

98 9. Historical Evacuation Behavior Perceived Mandatory Evacuation Hurricane Frances Not quite two in five residents in the region (37%) believe that Emergency Management officials issued a mandatory evacuation notice during Hurricane Frances, and nearly one in two residents (46%) thought that the evacuation notice was optional, i.e., residents should rather than must leave their. Perceptions of mandatory evacuation were higher in evacuation zones 1 through 5 (42% to 47%). Conversely, only 28% of residents in inland counties thought there was a mandatory evacuation notice. -Level Results Residents of (45%) and (46%) were more likely to perceive Emergency Management officials evacuation notices during Hurricane Charley as mandatory, while comparatively fewer residents of (13%) and (23%) counties perceived that the notices were mandatory. During Hurricane Frances, did officials recommend that you should evacuate or did they say it was mandatory that you must evacuate? n Should Must Don't know % 37% 17% 49 36% 42% 22% Category % 42% 22% Category % 45% 22% 37 35% 44% 21% Category % 47% 21% Non % 32% 6% 74 60% 28% 12% % 45% 22% 31% 45% 24% Category 2 31% 45% 24% 118 Category 3 31% 45% 24% 31% 45% 24% Category % 54% 30% Non % 35% 7% 83 58% 30% 12% 55% 26% 19% 38 Category 2 55% 26% 19% Category % 38% 12% 66% 34% 0% 17 Category 5 66% 34% 0% Non % 20% 4% 20 52% 46% 2% 18 69% 31% 0% 22 43% 23% 34% 14 85% 13% 2% During Hurricane Frances, did officials recommend that you should evacuate or did they say it was mandatory that you must evacuate? Category 2 Category 3 Category 5 Non- Category 2 Category 3 Category 5 Non- Category 2 Category 3 Category 5 Non- 13% 20% 23% 37% 42% 42% 45% 44% 47% 32% 28% 45% 45% 45% 45% 45% 35% 30% 26% 26% 38% 34% 34% 31% 46% 54% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 92 Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

99 9. Historical Evacuation Behavior Perceived Mandatory Evacuation Hurricane Jeanne Nearly two in five residents (39%) of the region believe that Emergency Management officials issued a mandatory evacuation notice during Hurricane Jeanne, while 46% thought that the evacuation notice was optional, i.e., residents should rather than must leave their. Perceptions of mandatory evacuation were higher in evacuation zones 1 through 4 (46% to 49%). Conversely, only 26% of residents in inland areas thought there was a mandatory evacuation notice. -Level Results Residents of (48%) were more likely to perceive Emergency Management officials evacuation notices during Hurricane Jeanne as mandatory, while residents of (81%), (59%), and (57%) counties were comparatively more likely to perceive that the notices were voluntary. During Hurricane Jeanne, did officials recommend that you should evacuate or did they say it was mandatory that you must evacuate? n Should Must Don't know % 39% 15% 39 37% 46% 17% Category % 46% 17% Category % 49% 15% 32 37% 49% 14% Category % 42% 21% Non % 40% 3% 57 59% 26% 15% % 48% 15% 35% 50% 15% Category 2 35% 50% 15% 101 Category 3 35% 50% 15% 35% 50% 15% Category % 42% 26% Non % 45% 4% 61 51% 34% 15% 44% 27% 29% 27 Category 2 44% 27% 29% Category % 44% 5% 48% 43% 9% 14 Category 5 48% 43% 9% Non % 26% 0% 20 59% 36% 5% 14 81% 16% 3% 11 46% 35% 19% 12 57% 16% 27% During Hurricane Jeanne, did officials recommend that you should evacuate or did they say it was mandatory that you must evacuate? Category 2 Category 3 Category 5 Non- Category 2 Category 3 Category 5 Non- Category 2 Category 3 Category 5 Non- 16% 16% 26% 27% 27% 26% 34% 36% 35% 39% 46% 46% 49% 49% 42% 40% 48% 50% 50% 50% 50% 42% 45% 44% 43% 43% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 93

100 9. Historical Evacuation Behavior The tables on pages 94 and 95 show what percentage of people evacuated for Hurricanes Charley, Frances, and Jeanne based on whether they heard an evacuation notice or not and if they heard that the evacuation notice was mandatory or recommended. Evacuation Rates Depending on Evacuation Notice for Hurricane Charley n Didn t hear notice or doesn t know if heard notice Heard should evacuate Heard must evacuate Doesn t know if heard should or must 1,140 12% 31% 64% 44% % 43% 70% 65% Category % 43% 70% 65% Category % 46% 67% 65% 80 19% 48% 63% 61% Category % 23% 51% 30% Non % 43% 92% 26% 484 8% 26% 51% 21% % 58% 69% 54% % 62% 68% 65% Category % 62% 68% 65% Category % 62% 68% 65% % 62% 68% 65% Category % 51% 65% 28% Non % 48% 100% 0% % 16% 66% 57% % 12% 80% 66% Category % 12% 80% 66% Category % 11% 64% 62% 62 12% 13% 38% 33% Category % 13% 38% 33% Non- 57 9% 38% 85% 44% % 45% 68% 26% 122 7% 60% 45% 58% 125 8% 9% 22% 17% 128 6% 16% 76% 0% Evacuation Rates Depending on Evacuation Notice for Hurricane Frances n Didn t hear notice or doesn t know if heard notice Heard should evacuate Heard must evacuate Doesn t know if heard should or must 1,114 15% 45% 78% 65% % 62% 85% 60% Category % 62% 85% 60% Category % 62% 85% 63% 78 27% 58% 82% 60% Category % 28% 73% 84% Non % 54% 86% 34% % 33% 58% 63% % 68% 84% 64% % 70% 85% 60% Category % 70% 85% 60% Category % 70% 85% 60% % 70% 85% 60% Category % 64% 80% 84% Non % 65% 87% 20% % 27% 79% 71% % 42% 88% 61% Category % 42% 88% 61% Category % 18% 90% 100% 61 24% 10% 52% 0% Category % 10% 52% 0% Non % 23% 75% 100% 108 7% 33% 70% 100% % 27% 42% 0% % 27% 37% 64% % 41% 100% 0% 94 Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

101 9. Historical Evacuation Behavior Evacuation Rates Depending on Evacuation Notice for Hurricane Jeanne n Didn t hear notice or doesn t know if heard notice Heard should evacuate Heard must evacuate Doesn t know if heard should or must 1,034 10% 35% 67% 53% % 52% 67% 64% Category % 52% 67% 64% Category % 60% 65% 73% 91 13% 59% 64% 76% Category % 40% 68% 100% Non % 36% 77% 0% 194 8% 19% 62% 7% % 55% 69% 79% % 64% 65% 75% Category % 64% 65% 75% Category % 64% 65% 75% 30 15% 64% 65% 75% Category % 50% 76% 100% Non % 29% 81% 0% % 21% 68% 45% 46 9% 4% 84% 38% Category % 4% 84% 38% Category % 15% 72% 0% 27 9% 27% 52% 100% Category % 27% 52% 100% Non % 48% 54% 0% 278 4% 34% 75% 0% 62 11% 15% 50% 100% 50 7% 21% 28% 14% 42 8% 3% 76% 0% Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 95

102

103 10. HOUSING & MITIGATION

104

105 10. Housing & Mitigation Which of the following types of structures do you live in? Four in five households (78%) interviewed in the region live in single-family, detached housing. Only 4% in the study lives in either a mobile home or a manufactured home. Almost one in four (23%) in evacuation zones 1 and 2 are multi-family structures. -Level Results Percentages of housing stock that are single-family detached housing vary from a low of 71% in to a high of 84% in. Mobile /manufactured housing varies across counties in the region from a low of 3% in to a high of 16% in. Type of Housing n Detached single family home Duplex, triplex, quadruple home Apartment/ condo - 4 stories or less Apartment/ condo - more than 4 stories Mobile home Manufactured home Recreational vehicle (RV) Boat Some other type of structure 1,400 78% 4% 7% 3% 4% 2% 0% 0% 2% % 4% 10% 9% 2% 1% 0% 0% 1% Category % 4% 10% 9% 2% 1% 0% 0% 1% Category % 6% 8% 6% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% % 4% 7% 6% 2% 1% 0% 0% 1% Category % 2% 5% 2% 3% 2% 0% 1% 2% Non % 2% 2% 0% 7% 4% 0% 0% 0% % 4% 8% 0% 4% 2% 0% 0% 3% % 4% 6% 5% 3% 1% 0% 0% 1% 77% 5% 8% 7% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% Category 2 77% 5% 8% 7% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% 250 Category 3 77% 5% 8% 7% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% 77% 5% 8% 7% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% Category % 2% 5% 4% 2% 0% 0% 3% 3% Non % 3% 1% 0% 6% 3% 0% 0% 1% % 3% 9% 5% 4% 3% 0% 0% 0% 67% 2% 13% 11% 4% 2% 0% 0% 0% 175 Category 2 67% 2% 13% 11% 4% 2% 0% 0% 0% Category % 9% 10% 2% 2% 2% 0% 0% 1% 85% 1% 5% 1% 3% 3% 0% 0% 1% 75 Category 5 85% 1% 5% 1% 3% 3% 0% 0% 1% Non % 2% 3% 0% 8% 5% 0% 0% 0% % 4% 7% 0% 10% 6% 0% 0% 2% % 3% 9% 0% 2% 1% 0% 0% 1% % 4% 6% 0% 4% 1% 0% 0% 3% % 6% 9% 0% 2% 1% 0% 0% 4% Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 99

106 10. Housing & Mitigation Is your Mobile or Manufactured home built to the stronger wind standards they started using in 1994? Fewer than half of the residents living in mobile or manufactured (40%) believe their were built to the stronger wind standards established in Residents living in mobile/manufactured in non-surge zones (45%) and inland counties (44%) are more likely to maintain their were built to the more stringent 1994 wind standards. -Level Results Sample sizes are small, but residents living in mobile/manufactured in (85%) are more likely to indicate that their were built to specifications established in Mobile Home Strength n Yes No Don't know % 51% 9% 10 25% 70% 5% Category % 70% 5% Category % 64% 5% 5 32% 63% 5% Category % 60% 0% Non % 49% 6% 66 44% 45% 11% 20 53% 41% 6% 38% 54% 8% Category 2 38% 54% 8% 7 Category 3 38% 54% 8% 38% 54% 8% Category % 0% 0% Non % 40% 5% 38 25% 70% 5% 18% 78% 4% 16 Category 2 18% 78% 4% Category % 84% 0% 25% 75% 0% 6 Category 5 25% 75% 0% Non % 58% 8% 31 32% 47% 21% 10 44% 51% 5% 16 43% 54% 3% 9 85% 15% 0% Mobile Home Strength 40% Category 2 Category 3 25% 25% 31% 32% Category 5 Non- 40% 45% 44% 53% Category 2 Category 3 38% 38% 38% 38% Category 5 100% Non- 55% Category 2 Category 3 Category 5 25% 18% 18% 16% 25% 25% Non- 34% 32% 44% 43% 85% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% 100 Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

107 10. Housing & Mitigation Was your home built after 2002? Only 15% of (not including mobile/manufactured ) in the region were built after Comparatively lower percentages of housing stock in evacuation zone 5 (8%) were built after Level Results Residents in (20%) and (19%) counties are more likely to say their were built after 2002, while only 9% of housing stock in was built after Age of Home n Yes No Don't know 1,257 15% 83% 2% % 85% 2% Category % 85% 2% Category % 86% 1% 94 11% 88% 1% Category % 92% 0% Non % 88% 0% % 80% 3% 375 9% 90% 1% 11% 87% 2% Category 2 11% 87% 2% 240 Category 3 11% 87% 2% 11% 87% 2% Category % 97% 0% Non- 87 7% 93% 0% % 82% 1% 17% 81% 2% 158 Category 2 17% 81% 2% Category % 78% 2% 12% 88% 0% 68 Category 5 12% 88% 0% Non % 79% 1% % 74% 9% % 78% 3% % 79% 1% % 87% 1% Age of Home 15% Category 2 Category 3 13% 13% 13% 11% Category 5 8% Non- 12% 17% 9% Category 2 Category 3 11% 11% 11% 11% Category 5 3% Non- 7% Category 2 17% 17% 17% Category 3 20% Category 5 12% 12% Non- 20% 17% 19% 20% 12% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 101

108 10. Housing & Mitigation Do you have protection for all of the windows and sliding glass doors in your house? Two in three residents in the region (63%) say all of their windows and glass doors are protected from wind and debris. Residents living in evacuation zones 4 (72%) and 5 (73%) are more likely to have protection for all of their windows and glass doors. -Level Results Residents living in (74%) are more likely to have protection for all of their window and glass doors, while only 51% of residents in indicate they have protection. Protection for Glass Openings n Yes No Don't know 1,257 63% 37% 0% % 31% 1% Category % 31% 1% Category % 30% 1% 94 72% 28% 0% Category % 27% 0% Non % 41% 0% % 40% 0% % 26% 0% 72% 27% 1% Category 2 72% 27% 1% 240 Category 3 72% 27% 1% 72% 27% 1% Category % 22% 0% Non % 27% 0% % 42% 1% 62% 37% 1% 158 Category 2 62% 37% 1% Category % 42% 2% 68% 32% 0% 68 Category 5 68% 32% 0% Non % 63% 0% % 49% 0% % 41% 1% % 31% 0% % 42% 0% Protection for Glass Openings Category 2 Category 3 Category 5 Non- Category 2 Category 3 63% 68% 68% 69% 72% 73% 59% 60% 74% 72% 72% 72% Category 5 Non- Category 2 Category 3 Category 5 72% 78% 73% 57% 62% 62% 56% 68% 68% Non- 37% 51% 58% 69% 58% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 102 Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

109 11. WILDFIRES

110

111 11. Wildfi res Do you believe that your home might ever be threatened by a wildfire? Only one in four residents in the region (24%) believes that their area may, at some point, be threatened by wildfire. This feeling is more prevalent in non-surge zones (34%), while only 9% of residents in evacuation zones 1 and 2 believe their may be threatened by wildfire. -Level Results Residents in (37%) are much more likely to feel threatened by wildfires, while residents of (8%) and (9%) counties have considerably less concern that wildfires my threaten their areas. Do you believe that your home might ever be threatened by a wildfire? n Yes No Don t know % 73% 3% 5 9% 91% 0% Category 2 5 9% 91% 0% Category % 88% 2% 32 26% 71% 3% Category % 75% 2% Non % 63% 3% % 76% 4% % 73% 0% 9% 91% 0% Category 2 9% 91% 0% 20 Category 3 9% 91% 0% 9% 91% 0% Category % 86% 0% Non % 59% 0% % 65% 5% Category Category % 64% 14% 33% 63% 4% 54 Category 5 33% 63% 4% Non % 67% 6% 49 9% 83% 8% 50 37% 62% 1% 49 22% 75% 3% 50 8% 86% 6% East Central 24% Category 1 Category 2 9% 9% Category 3 10% Category 4 Category 5 26% 23% Non 20% 27% Category 1 9% Category 2 9% Category 3 9% Category 4 Category 5 Non Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Category 4 Category 5 Non Do you believe that your home might ever be threatened by a wildfire? 9% 9% 8% 14% 22% 22% 27% 30% 34% 33% 33% 37% 41% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 105

112 11. Wildfi res If a wildfire threatened your community and public safety officials ordered you to evacuate, would you? Nearly nine out of ten residents of the region (89%) claim they intend to evacuate if ordered to do so by public safety officials because of wildfire threats. Intent to evacuate if ordered to do so is highest in non-surge zones (90%) and inland counties (91%) and lowest in evacuation zones 1 and 2 (65%). -Level Results Intent to evacuate varies somewhat across counties as 97% of residents say they intend to evacuate because of wildfires if ordered to do so by public safety officials, while 84% of and 85% of residents intend to evacuate. If a wildfire threatened your community and public safety officials ordered you to evacuate, would you? n Yes No Don t know/ depends % 6% 5% 5 65% 29% 6% Category % 29% 6% Category % 25% 5% 33 78% 17% 5% Category % 9% 6% Non % 4% 6% % 5% 4% % 9% 7% 65% 29% 6% Category 2 65% 29% 6% 20 Category 3 65% 29% 6% 65% 29% 6% Category % 6% 6% Non % 6% 7% % 6% 4% Category Category % 0% 0% 82% 13% 5% 55 Category 5 82% 13% 5% Non % 1% 4% 50 85% 12% 3% 50 87% 1% 12% 50 90% 8% 2% 50 97% 1% 2% East Central 89% Category 1 65% Category 2 65% Category 3 70% Category 4 78% Category 5 85% Non 90% 91% 84% Category 1 65% Category 2 65% Category 3 65% Category 4 Category 5 Non Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Category 4 Category 5 Non If a wildfire threatened your community and public safety officials ordered you to evacuate, would you? 65% 88% 87% 90% 82% 82% 100% 95% 85% 87% 90% 97% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% 106 Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

113 11. Wildfi res Where would you go if you evacuated because of a wildfire? Just one in ten residents (10%) intends to go to public shelters if there is a need to evacuate because of wildfires. A plurality of residents (45%) intends to evacuate to friends and relatives, while nearly two in ten (18%) plan to go to a hotel or motel. zone residents are slightly more likely to go to friends and relatives. -Level Results Responses to this question vary widely across counties. For example, 26% of residents say they intend to evacuate to a public shelter, while fewer (1%), (6%), and (7%) residents intend to do so. Over half of residents in (56%) and (51%) counties plan to evacuate to friends or relatives. Where would you go if you evacuated because of a wildfire? n Public shelter Friend/ relative Hotel/ motel Other Don t know % 45% 18% 8% 19% 5 8% 37% 18% 14% 23% Category 2 5 8% 37% 18% 14% 23% Category % 41% 17% 12% 23% 33 7% 40% 18% 14% 21% Category % 42% 15% 16% 21% Non % 47% 26% 7% 14% % 45% 16% 7% 22% 130 6% 43% 21% 15% 15% 8% 37% 18% 14% 23% Category 2 8% 37% 18% 14% 23% 20 Category 3 8% 37% 18% 14% 23% 8% 37% 18% 14% 23% Category % 43% 11% 17% 22% Non- 60 4% 45% 29% 13% 9% 135 7% 46% 22% 6% 19% Category Category 3 5 0% 64% 14% 0% 22% 6% 41% 19% 14% 20% 55 Category 5 6% 41% 19% 14% 20% Non- 75 8% 49% 24% 1% 18% 50 26% 34% 19% 6% 15% 50 12% 56% 15% 11% 6% 50 1% 51% 15% 7% 26% 50 12% 35% 16% 3% 34% Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 107

114 11. Wildfi res Since you ve been living in this location, have you ever evacuated your home because of a wildfire? Only 1% of residents in the region say they have experienced a wildfire while living in this area. The following years were mentioned by at least one resident when asked in which year wildfires threatened their : Since you ve been living in this location, have you ever evacuated your home because of a wildfire? n Yes No Don t know 465 1% 99% 0% 5 0% 100% 0% Category 2 5 0% 100% 0% Category % 100% 0% 33 4% 96% 0% Category % 97% 0% Non % 98% 0% 200 1% 99% 0% 130 1% 99% 0% 0% 100% 0% Category 2 0% 100% 0% 20 Category 3 0% 100% 0% 0% 100% 0% Category % 100% 0% Non- 60 2% 98% 0% 135 3% 97% 0% Category Category 3 5 0% 100% 0% 5% 95% 0% 55 Category 5 5% 95% 0% Non- 75 2% 98% 0% 50 3% 97% 0% 50 0% 100% 0% 50 1% 99% 0% 50 0% 100% 0% 108 Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

115 12. FRESHWATER FLOODING

116

117 12. Freshwater Flooding Do you believe that your home might ever be threatened by freshwater flooding? Nearly one in four residents (23%) of the region say their home might be threatened by freshwater flooding at some point. Residents in evacuation zone 5 (41%) are more likely to make this claim, while only 10% of residents living in non-surge zones think their may be threatened by freshwater flooding at some point. -Level Results (31%) residents are more likely to claim their might eventually be threatened by freshwater flooding, while only 11% of residents in make this claim. Do you believe that your home might ever be threatened by freshwater flooding? n Yes No Don t know % 71% 6% 71 30% 66% 4% Category % 66% 4% Category % 61% 5% 34 36% 60% 4% Category % 54% 5% Non % 81% 9% % 74% 8% % 64% 5% 36% 60% 4% Category 2 36% 60% 4% 115 Category 3 36% 60% 4% 36% 60% 4% Category Non % 81% 9% % 72% 5% 19% 77% 4% 85 Category 2 19% 77% 4% Category % 65% 7% 41% 54% 5% 10 Category 5 41% 54% 5% Non % 77% 6% 50 11% 79% 10% 50 26% 67% 7% 50 18% 75% 7% East Central Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Category 4 Category 5 Non Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Category 4 Category 5 Non Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Category 4 Category 5 Non Do you believe that your home might ever be threatened by freshwater flooding? 10% 10% 11% 18% 23% 23% 19% 19% 17% 18% 26% 30% 30% 34% 36% 28% 31% 36% 36% 36% 36% 41% 41% 41% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 111

118 12. Freshwater Flooding If freshwater flooding threatened your community and public safety officials ordered you to evacuate, would you? Three in four residents in the region (73%) maintain they will evacuate their if ordered to do so by public safety officials because of freshwater flooding. This percentage is considerably lower than the 89% of residents who claim they will evacuate because of wildfires. Residents living in evacuation zone 5 (87%) are more likely to say they intend to evacuate for freshwater flooding if ordered to do so by public officials. -Level Results (81%) residents are more likely to intend to evacuate because of freshwater flooding. Only 66% of residents and 68% of residents say they will evacuate if ordered to do so because of freshwater flooding. If freshwater flooding threatened your community and public safety officials ordered you to evacuate, would you? n Yes No Don t know/ depends % 20% 7% 71 70% 17% 13% Category % 17% 13% Category % 16% 12% 34 74% 13% 13% Category % 13% 0% Non % 21% 7% % 22% 3% % 14% 13% 73% 13% 14% Category 2 73% 13% 14% 115 Category 3 73% 13% 14% 73% 13% 14% Category Non % 21% 7% % 24% 10% 64% 24% 12% 85 Category 2 64% 24% 12% Category % 28% 5% 87% 13% 0% 10 Category 5 87% 13% 0% Non % 30% 2% 50 77% 17% 6% 50 81% 19% 0% 50 72% 25% 3% If freshwater flooding threatened your community and public safety officials ordered you to evacuate, would you? East Central Category 1 Category 2 73% 70% 70% Category 3 Category 4 72% 74% Category 5 Non 72% 75% 73% Category 1 73% Category 2 73% Category 3 73% Category 4 73% Category 5 Non 72% 66% Category 1 64% Category 2 64% Category 3 67% Category 4 Category 5 Non 68% 77% 81% 72% 87% 87% 87% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 112 Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

119 12. Freshwater Flooding Where would you go if you evacuated because of freshwater flooding? A plurality of residents (37%) intends to evacuate to friends or relatives if ordered to evacuate by public officials as a result of freshwater flooding. Residents living in evacuation zone 5 (57%) are more likely to evacuate to friends and relatives. One in ten residents (10%) maintains they will go to a public shelter (25% of residents in evacuation zone 5). One in five residents (20%) intends to evacuate to a hotel or motel with 31% of non-surge zones residents intending to do so. -Level Results Residents of (18%) and (19%) counties are more likely to seek out public shelters, and residents (44%) are more likely to evacuate to friends and relatives. Nearly one in four residents in and counties (23%) will evacuate to hotels or motels if ordered to do so due to freshwater flooding. Where would you go if evacuated because of freshwater flooding? n Public shelter Friend/ relative Hotel/ motel Other Don t know % 37% 20% 14% 19% 71 8% 40% 19% 14% 19% Category % 40% 19% 14% 19% Category % 36% 18% 13% 22% 34 11% 39% 18% 13% 19% Category % 57% 18% 0% 0% Non- 20 5% 28% 31% 16% 20% % 35% 20% 15% 19% 135 9% 37% 20% 14% 20% 10% 38% 18% 14% 20% Category 2 10% 38% 18% 14% 20% 115 Category 3 10% 38% 18% 14% 20% 10% 38% 18% 14% 20% Category Non- 20 5% 28% 31% 16% 20% 130 9% 41% 19% 12% 19% 5% 43% 20% 15% 17% 85 Category 2 5% 43% 20% 15% 17% Category % 30% 15% 9% 29% 25% 57% 18% 0% 0% 10 Category 5 25% 57% 18% 0% 0% Non % 27% 23% 18% 14% 50 12% 33% 23% 10% 22% 50 1% 32% 18% 24% 25% 50 19% 44% 17% 9% 11% Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 113

120 12. Freshwater Flooding Since you ve been living in this location, have you ever evacuated your home because of freshwater flooding? Few residents of the region (3%) indicate they have experienced freshwater flooding while living in this area. Residents in evacuation zones 1 through 4 (5% to 7%) are more likely to indicate they have lived through freshwater flooding. -Level Results Variations between counties are significant with (7%) and (7%) counties reporting the highest incidence of freshwater flooding. Residents cited the following years when asked in which year freshwater flooding occurred: Most residents sought shelter with friends and relatives during that event. Since you ve been living in this location, have you ever evacuated your home because of freshwater flooding? n Yes No Don t know 465 3% 97% 0% 66 5% 95% 0% Category % 95% 0% Category % 94% 0% 33 7% 93% 0% Category % 100% 0% Non- 20 5% 95% 0% 200 2% 97% 1% 135 7% 93% 0% 7% 93% 0% Category 2 7% 93% 0% 115 Category 3 7% 93% 0% 7% 93% 0% Category Non- 20 5% 95% 0% 130 1% 99% 0% 2% 98% 0% 85 Category 2 2% 98% 0% Category % 100% 0% 0% 100% 0% 10 Category 5 0% 100% 0% Non % 100% 0% 50 7% 93% 0% 50 0% 98% 2% 50 0% 100% 0% East Central Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Category 4 Category 5 Non Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Category 4 Category 5 Non Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Category 4 Category 5 Non Since you ve been living in this location, have you ever evacuated your home because of freshwater flooding? 3% 5% 5% 6% 7% 0% 5% 2% 7% 7% 7% 7% 1% 2% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 5% 7% 7% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 114 Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

121 13. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS

122

123 13. Hazardous Materials Do you believe that your home might ever be threatened by a hazardous material accident? One in six region residents (16%) believes they will be threatened by a hazardous material accident. Concern for this type of accident peaks in inland counties (43%) and is nonexistent in evacuation zone 5. -Level Results Belief of future threats from a hazardous material accident varies widely across counties in East Contral region and is highest in (28%) and lowest in (6%). Do you believe that your home might everbe threatened by a hazardous material accident? n Yes No Don t know % 75% 9% 68 20% 70% 10% Category % 70% 10% Category % 71% 6% 26 23% 69% 8% Category % 67% 33% Non % 55% 2% % 80% 8% % 67% 5% 25% 69% 6% Category 2 25% 69% 6% 115 Category 3 25% 69% 6% 25% 69% 6% Category Non % 55% 2% % 73% 14% 13% 72% 15% 90 Category 2 13% 72% 15% Category % 77% 5% 0% 67% 33% 10 Category 5 0% 67% 33% Non % 76% 10% 50 6% 91% 3% 50 19% 68% 13% 50 9% 83% 8% East Central Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Category 4 Category 5 Non Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Category 4 Category 5 Non Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Category 4 Category 5 Non Do you believe that your home might ever be threatened by a hazardous material accident? 0% 0% 0% 6% 9% 12% 13% 13% 13% 16% 20% 20% 23% 23% 14% 18% 19% 28% 25% 25% 25% 25% 43% 43% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 117

124 13. Hazardous Materials If a hazardous material accident threatened your community and public safety officials ordered you to evacuate, would you? While only 16% of residents in the region believe that they may be threatened by a future hazardous material accident, a high percentage (91%) say they intend to evacuate their if public safety officials ask them to do so in response to this type of accident. Residents living in evacuation zone 5, non-surge zones, and inland areas are most likely to evacuate (94% to 97%), while slightly fewer residents living in evacuation zones 1 through 4 say they intend to evacuate if told to do so (85% to 89%). -Level Results Intention to evacuate in response to hazardous material accidents if told to do so by public safety officials peaks in (98%) and (97%) counties and is lowest in and counties (86%). If a hazardous material accident threatened your community and public safety officials ordered you to evacuate, would you? n Yes No Don t know/ depends % 5% 4% % 4% 7% Category % 4% 7% Category % 6% 9% 26 89% 4% 7% Category % 6% 0% Non % 0% 3% % 4% 2% % 3% 7% 88% 4% 8% Category 2 88% 4% 8% 115 Category 3 88% 4% 8% 88% 4% 8% Category Non % 0% 3% % 8% 6% 89% 6% 5% 90 Category 2 89% 6% 5% Category % 16% 11% 94% 6% 0% 10 Category 5 94% 6% 0% Non % 2% 1% 50 98% 1% 1% 50 86% 10% 4% 50 92% 4% 4% East Central Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Category 4 Category 5 Non Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Category 4 Category 5 Non Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Category 4 Category 5 Non If a hazardous material accident threatened your community and public safety officials ordered you to evacuate, would you? 73% 91% 89% 89% 85% 89% 94% 97% 94% 90% 88% 88% 88% 88% 97% 86% 89% 89% 94% 94% 97% 98% 86% 92% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 118 Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

125 13. Hazardous Materials Where would you go if you evacuated because of a hazardous material accident? Only 13% of residents in the region say they intend to go to a public shelter if they evacuate because of a hazardous material accident. A plurality of residents (42%) intends to go to friends or relatives. One in six (16%) intends to evacuate to a hotel or motel. Residents living in non-surge zones (63%) are slightly more likely to go to a friend or relatives home. Residents living in inland areas (20%) are comparatively more likely to seek safety at public shelters. -Level Results residents (32%) are more likely to escape to public shelters, while residents are unlikely (4%) to do so. About a quarter of residents (24%) say they will seek refuge in hotels or motels. Where would you go if you evacuated because of a hazardous material accident? n Public shelter Friend/ relative Hotel/ motel Other Don t know % 42% 16% 11% 18% 68 5% 44% 17% 15% 19% Category % 44% 17% 15% 19% Category % 51% 19% 10% 14% 26 3% 49% 19% 10% 19% Category % 55% 0% 0% 45% Non- 23 7% 63% 15% 7% 8% % 37% 15% 9% 19% 135 4% 51% 20% 10% 15% 3% 48% 21% 11% 17% Category 2 3% 48% 21% 11% 17% 115 Category 3 3% 48% 21% 11% 17% 3% 48% 21% 11% 17% Category Non- 20 7% 63% 15% 7% 8% 135 8% 45% 12% 16% 19% 7% 39% 12% 21% 21% 90 Category 2 7% 39% 12% 21% 21% Category % 58% 15% 7% 5% 0% 55% 0% 0% 45% 10 Category 5 0% 55% 0% 0% 45% Non % 41% 24% 8% 9% 50 15% 38% 13% 7% 27% 50 32% 33% 9% 13% 13% 50 12% 38% 22% 7% 21% Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 119

126 13. Hazardous Materials Since you ve been living in this location, have you ever evacuated your home because of a hazardous material accident? Only one percent (1%) of residents in the region say they have experienced a hazardous material accident in the region. residents (3%) are more likely to claim a hazardous material accident forced evacuation in their area. Residents cited the following years when asked in which year the hazardous material accident occurred: Since you ve been living in this location, have you ever evacuated your home because of a hazardous material accident? n Yes No Don t know 470 1% 99% 0% 68 1% 99% 0% Category % 99% 0% Category % 99% 0% 26 1% 99% 0% Category % 100% 0% Non- 23 0% 100% 0% 200 1% 99% 0% 135 1% 99% 0% 1% 99% 0% Category 2 1% 99% 0% 115 Category 3 1% 99% 0% 1% 99% 0% Category Non- 20 0% 100% 0% 135 0% 100% 0% 0% 100% 0% 90 Category 2 0% 100% 0% Category % 100% 0% 0% 100% 0% 10 Category 5 0% 100% 0% Non % 97% 0% 50 0% 100% 0% 50 0% 100% 0% 50 0% 100% 0% 120 Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

127 13. Hazardous Materials Suppose there was a hazardous material accident but public safety officials advised you to close your windows and doors, turn off your air conditioner, and stay indoors rather than trying to evacuate. Would you stay indoors rather than trying to evacuate? Three out of four residents in the region (75%) claim they will follow public safety officials instructions to stay indoors rather than trying to evacuate. Residents living in non-surge zones (82%) are more likely to follow public safety officials directives on this issue, while only 67% of residents living in evacuation zone 5 intend to do so. -Level Results Willingness to stay indoors following a hazardous material accident ranges from a high of 81% in to a low of 72% in and counties. Suppose there was a hazardous material accident but public safety officials advised you to stay in indoors rather than trying to evacuate. Would you stay indoors? n Yes No Don t know/ depends % 11% 14% 68 75% 7% 18% Category % 7% 18% Category % 9% 19% 26 74% 5% 21% Category % 0% 33% Non % 4% 14% % 13% 10% % 6% 18% 74% 6% 20% Category 2 74% 6% 20% 115 Category 3 74% 6% 20% 74% 6% 20% Category Non % 4% 14% % 10% 18% 75% 7% 18% 90 Category 2 75% 7% 18% Category % 21% 14% 67% 0% 33% 10 Category 5 67% 0% 33% Non % 8% 13% 50 78% 17% 5% 50 72% 12% 16% 50 81% 14% 5% Suppose there was a hazardous material accident but public safety officials advised you to stay indoors rather than trying to evacuate. Would you stay indoors? East Central Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Category 4 Category 5 Non Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Category 4 Category 5 Non Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Category 4 Category 5 Non 75% 75% 75% 72% 74% 67% 82% 77% 76% 74% 74% 74% 74% 82% 72% 75% 75% 65% 67% 67% 79% 78% 72% 81% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 121

128

129 14. REGION & COUNTY QUESTIO

130

131 14. Region & Questions The following 7 pages present the results of the three questions submitted by the region. What are the main sources of information you normally rely on to obtain emergency information prior to a hurricane evacuation? n Local newspaper Local TV Local radio Cable news/ weather NOAA weather radio Word of mouth Internet Other 1,400 10% 79% 50% 32% 27% 8% 29% 6% 150 9% 82% 50% 28% 28% 8% 34% 8% Category % 82% 50% 28% 28% 8% 34% 8% Category % 82% 52% 24% 24% 8% 35% 7% % 82% 51% 26% 24% 8% 32% 9% Category % 74% 50% 34% 25% 12% 37% 6% Non % 84% 51% 26% 22% 8% 33% 7% % 76% 49% 35% 28% 8% 23% 4% % 79% 50% 28% 22% 9% 36% 7% 10% 82% 51% 25% 23% 8% 33% 9% Category 2 10% 82% 51% 25% 23% 8% 33% 9% 250 Category 3 10% 82% 51% 25% 23% 8% 33% 9% 10% 82% 51% 25% 23% 8% 33% 9% Category % 63% 49% 39% 21% 16% 51% 4% Non % 81% 49% 30% 21% 8% 36% 4% 400 9% 84% 50% 28% 31% 8% 33% 6% 8% 83% 47% 33% 38% 8% 35% 5% 175 Category 2 8% 83% 47% 33% 38% 8% 35% 5% Category % 84% 53% 21% 29% 8% 40% 1% 9% 81% 51% 30% 28% 8% 40% 1% 75 Category 5 9% 81% 51% 30% 28% 9% 28% 7% Non- 75 6% 88% 54% 21% 23% 8% 27% 11% 150 5% 73% 39% 34% 45% 7% 13% 4% 150 7% 72% 52% 43% 23% 9% 25% 3% % 79% 49% 37% 23% 4% 27% 5% % 78% 51% 27% 28% 13% 23% 6% Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 125

132 14. Region & Questions Does a television meteorologist s or reporter s opinion affect your decision to evacuate? n Yes No Depends/ sometimes Don t know 1,400 52% 34% 13% 1% % 34% 14% 3% Category % 34% 14% 3% Category % 37% 12% 2% % 38% 10% 3% Category % 38% 9% 1% Non % 37% 16% 1% % 33% 11% 2% % 39% 11% 2% 47% 39% 11% 3% Category 2 47% 39% 11% 3% 250 Category 3 47% 39% 11% 3% 47% 39% 11% 3% Category % 42% 9% 1% Non % 35% 14% 2% % 31% 17% 1% 53% 26% 20% 1% 175 Category 2 53% 26% 20% 1% Category % 28% 15% 1% 54% 34% 9% 3% 75 Category 5 54% 34% 9% 3% Non % 40% 18% 0% % 32% 7% 1% % 32% 20% 3% % 36% 8% 0% % 31% 9% 1% Category 2 Category 3 Category 5 Non- Category 2 Category 3 Category 5 Non- Category 2 Category 3 Category 5 Non- Does a television meteorologist s or reporter s opinion affect your decision to evacuate? 52% 49% 49% 49% 49% 52% 46% 54% 48% 47% 47% 47% 47% 48% 49% 51% 53% 53% 56% 54% 54% 42% 60% 45% 56% 59% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 126 Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

133 14. Region & Questions How soon after a hurricane do you expect to have food, water, and ice provided to you by disaster relief workers? n Within 8 hours Within 24 hours Within 48 hours Within 72 hours Other 1,400 20% 31% 16% 15% 18% % 27% 16% 17% 27% Category % 27% 16% 17% 27% Category % 25% 20% 19% 24% % 29% 17% 18% 24% Category % 31% 23% 15% 20% Non % 26% 21% 17% 18% % 33% 13% 14% 14% % 25% 21% 20% 22% 11% 27% 17% 20% 25% Category 2 11% 27% 17% 20% 25% 250 Category 3 11% 27% 17% 20% 25% 11% 27% 17% 20% 25% Category % 26% 31% 17% 23% Non % 22% 25% 20% 16% % 30% 17% 13% 24% 15% 29% 13% 12% 31% 175 Category 2 15% 29% 13% 12% 31% Category % 25% 29% 14% 16% 16% 35% 18% 13% 18% 75 Category 5 16% 35% 18% 13% 18% Non % 31% 16% 13% 21% % 31% 16% 18% 11% % 35% 9% 14% 16% % 31% 13% 17% 14% % 39% 13% 8% 12% Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 127

134 14. Region & Questions How long would you be able to manage on your own following a hurricane without needing relief workers to provide supplies such as food, water, and ice? n 24 hours 48 hours 72 hours Longer than 3 days Other 1,400 10% 13% 18% 51% 8% 150 4% 8% 17% 60% 11% Category % 8% 17% 60% 11% Category % 7% 17% 59% 11% 100 5% 6% 16% 63% 10% Category % 10% 12% 66% 4% Non % 9% 18% 57% 7% % 17% 20% 43% 7% 400 7% 6% 15% 63% 9% 5% 5% 16% 63% 11% Category 2 5% 5% 16% 63% 11% 250 Category 3 5% 5% 16% 63% 11% 5% 5% 16% 63% 11% Category % 11% 5% 72% 2% Non % 4% 17% 61% 6% 400 5% 13% 18% 55% 9% 4% 13% 17% 56% 10% 175 Category 2 4% 13% 17% 56% 10% Category % 15% 22% 46% 7% 6% 9% 17% 63% 5% 75 Category 5 6% 9% 17% 63% 5% Non- 75 5% 15% 19% 52% 9% % 18% 17% 49% 3% % 10% 21% 47% 8% % 17% 18% 45% 5% 150 9% 25% 22% 35% 10% What is your main source of information for evacuations? n Local media Florida Today Emergency Management Orlando TV stations Red Cross Other % 1% 12% 30% 0% 5% 52% 1% 9% 32% 0% 6% Category 2 52% 1% 9% 32% 0% 6% 250 Category 3 52% 1% 9% 32% 0% 6% 52% 1% 9% 32% 0% 6% Category % 1% 11% 25% 0% 5% Non % 1% 19% 28% 0% 3% 128 Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

135 14. Region & Questions In recent hurricanes, have you received enough information to feel comfortable with your evacuation decisions? n Yes No Sometimes Don t know Other % 4% 3% 0% 0% 93% 4% 2% 0% 1% Category 2 93% 4% 2% 0% 1% 250 Category 3 93% 4% 2% 0% 1% 93% 4% 2% 0% 1% Category % 8% 1% 0% 0% Non % 4% 3% 1% 0% Category 2 Category 3 Category 5 93% 93% 93% 93% 93% 91% Non- 92% 90% 91% 92% 93% 94% What main route would you use when evacuating for a hurricane? n (Beachline) US 1 I-95 Other 400 7% 35% 7% 3% 1% 4% 31% 12% 5% 44% 10% 4% 0% 3% 24% 10% Category 2 5% 44% 10% 4% 0% 3% 24% 10% 250 Category 3 5% 44% 10% 4% 0% 3% 24% 10% 5% 44% 10% 4% 0% 3% 24% 10% Category % 36% 4% 1% 1% 12% 28% 12% Non % 13% 1% 0% 3% 4% 50% 17% Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 129

136 14. Region & Questions Suppose a category 3 hurricane was going to strike the west coast of Florida near Tampa and was expected to cross the state and come directly through as a category 2 hurricane before moving over the Atlantic. Do you believe that officials would tell you to evacuate your home to go someplace safer in a storm like that? n Yes No Don t know/ depends % 54% 13% 34% 51% 15% 175 Category 2 34% 51% 15% Category % 46% 14% 41% 54% 5% 75 Category 5 41% 54% 5% Non % 66% 15% Category 2 33% 34% 34% Category 3 40% Category 5 41% 41% Non- 19% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Would you leave your home to go someplace safer in a storm like that? n Yes No Don t know/ depends % 61% 10% 36% 56% 8% 175 Category 2 36% 56% 8% Category % 53% 10% 17% 70% 13% 75 Category 5 17% 70% 13% Non % 66% 13% 29% Category 2 36% 36% Category 3 37% Category 5 17% 17% Non- 21% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% What main route would you use when evacuating for a hurricane? n 92 I US 1 I-95 Other 400 4% 16% 10% 10% 7% 36% 17% 2% 8% 13% 7% 12% 40% 18% 175 Category 2 2% 8% 13% 7% 12% 40% 18% Category % 9% 3% 26% 9% 32% 21% 3% 12% 11% 6% 3% 47% 18% 75 Category 5 3% 12% 11% 6% 3% 47% 18% Non % 40% 8% 5% 1% 21% 12% 130 Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

137 14. Region & Questions Do you have a family disaster plan? n Yes No Don t know/ depends % 41% 2% Do you have a family disaster plan? Don't know/depends 2% No 41% Yes 57% Are all members of your family familiar with the action items in the plan? n Yes No Don t know/ depends 89 96% 2% 2% Are all members of your family familiar with the action items in the plan? No 2% Don't know/depends 2% Yes 96% Does your family have a disaster supply kit available? n Yes No Don t know/ depends % 25% 1% Does your family have a disaster supply kit available? Don't know/depends 1% No 25% Yes 74% Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 131

138

139 15. DEMOGRAPHICS

140

141 15. Demographics Age Years in Present Home % 0-1 year 2 years 8% 7% % 3-5 years 6-10 years 22% 23% % years 21+ years 16% 24% 0% 20% 40% 60% 0% 10% 20% 30% Age n ,336 21% 44% 35% % 43% 45% Category % 43% 45% Category % 45% 41% 95 13% 49% 38% Category % 54% 35% Non % 53% 32% % 42% 30% % 52% 37% 12% 48% 39% Category 2 12% 48% 39% 241 Category 3 12% 48% 39% 12% 48% 39% Category % 60% 35% Non % 56% 33% % 40% 44% 10% 35% 55% 162 Category 2 10% 35% 55% Category % 29% 46% 16% 49% 34% 71 Category 5 16% 49% 34% Non % 49% 29% % 28% 49% % 48% 20% % 46% 27% % 40% 33% Years in Present Home n 0-1 year 2 years 3-5 years 6-10 years years 21+ years % 7% 22% 23% 24% 16% 147 7% 4% 18% 23% 27% 20% Category % 4% 18% 23% 27% 20% Category % 5% 19% 23% 28% 19% 99 6% 4% 18% 23% 30% 18% Category % 4% 22% 20% 34% 16% Non % 7% 18% 28% 26% 17% % 9% 26% 22% 20% 14% 398 4% 4% 17% 25% 29% 21% 6% 4% 17% 24% 28% 20% Category 2 6% 4% 17% 24% 28% 20% 249 Category 3 6% 4% 17% 24% 28% 20% 6% 4% 17% 24% 28% 20% Category % 3% 21% 23% 27% 24% Non- 99 0% 4% 15% 27% 32% 22% 393 8% 7% 21% 23% 26% 15% 9% 5% 19% 23% 26% 19% 171 Category 2 9% 5% 19% 23% 26% 19% Category % 9% 25% 20% 26% 15% 6% 4% 23% 18% 38% 10% 74 Category 5 6% 4% 23% 18% 38% 10% Non- 74 9% 12% 22% 30% 16% 11% % 5% 20% 31% 17% 12% % 12% 31% 19% 17% 11% 148 9% 14% 25% 23% 21% 9% 149 7% 2% 24% 18% 25% 24% Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 135

142 15. Demographics Years in This Area of Florida People in Household 0-5 years 16% 1 person 15% 6-10 years 17% years 26% 2 people 42% years 19% 3 people 15% years 41 to 50 years 10% 8% 4 people 17% 51+ years 5% 5+ people 11% 0% 10% 20% 30% 0% 20% 40% 60% Years in This Area of Florida n 0-5 years 6-10 years years years years 41 to 50 years 51+ years % 17% 26% 19% 10% 8% 5% % 14% 22% 24% 14% 8% 5% Category % 14% 22% 24% 14% 8% 5% Category % 11% 23% 29% 12% 9% 4% 99 12% 12% 26% 26% 14% 8% 3% Category % 8% 29% 28% 13% 9% 2% Non % 21% 27% 15% 11% 11% 4% % 19% 27% 16% 8% 7% 4% 398 8% 13% 25% 26% 13% 11% 3% 11% 12% 24% 28% 14% 9% 3% Category 2 11% 12% 24% 28% 14% 9% 3% 249 Category 3 11% 12% 24% 28% 14% 9% 3% 11% 12% 24% 28% 14% 9% 3% Category % 3% 20% 41% 14% 16% 2% Non- 99 5% 21% 32% 17% 10% 14% 2% % 15% 23% 19% 11% 7% 7% 17% 17% 20% 17% 13% 8% 8% 170 Category 2 17% 17% 20% 17% 13% 8% 8% Category % 9% 19% 31% 5% 10% 8% 15% 12% 36% 19% 12% 5% 2% 74 Category 5 15% 12% 36% 19% 12% 5% 2% Non % 21% 19% 12% 12% 5% 9% % 21% 25% 18% 6% 6% 6% % 16% 29% 14% 8% 7% 3% % 25% 26% 13% 4% 3% 3% 149 7% 16% 28% 19% 13% 12% 6% People in Household n 1 person 2 people 3 people 4 people 5+ people 1,382 15% 42% 15% 17% 11% % 52% 13% 13% 3% Category % 52% 13% 13% 3% Category % 52% 11% 15% 4% 99 18% 49% 12% 15% 6% Category % 39% 16% 10% 17% Non % 41% 17% 18% 10% % 36% 16% 20% 15% % 46% 13% 16% 6% 18% 51% 11% 16% 4% Category 2 18% 51% 11% 16% 4% 249 Category 3 18% 51% 11% 16% 4% 18% 51% 11% 16% 4% Category % 36% 19% 8% 18% Non % 41% 15% 20% 7% % 49% 15% 10% 9% 18% 54% 17% 8% 3% 173 Category 2 18% 54% 17% 8% 3% Category % 57% 8% 10% 6% 18% 42% 13% 11% 16% 73 Category 5 18% 42% 13% 11% 16% Non % 41% 18% 14% 15% % 51% 14% 8% 10% % 30% 15% 19% 20% 148 9% 34% 18% 20% 19% % 37% 16% 28% 8% 136 Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

143 15. Demographics Household Members Under 18 Household Members 80 or Older 0 children 67% 0 people 80 or older 90% 1 child 14% 1 person 80 or older 8% 2 children 13% 3+ children 6% 2 people 80 or older 2% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 0% 50% 100% Household Members Under 18 n 0 children 1 child 2 children 3+ children 1,384 67% 14% 13% 6% % 13% 7% 3% Category % 13% 7% 3% Category % 14% 8% 2% % 14% 8% 3% Category % 12% 7% 4% Non % 16% 15% 6% % 15% 16% 7% % 14% 10% 3% 74% 15% 9% 2% Category 2 74% 15% 9% 2% 248 Category 3 74% 15% 9% 2% 74% 15% 9% 2% Category % 12% 6% 0% Non % 14% 14% 5% % 12% 7% 5% 80% 11% 4% 4% 174 Category 2 80% 11% 4% 4% Category % 10% 5% 3% 76% 11% 7% 6% 74 Category 5 76% 11% 7% 6% Non % 18% 16% 8% % 7% 11% 5% % 15% 18% 8% % 19% 19% 9% % 15% 14% 6% Household Members 80 or Older n 0 people 80 or older 1 person 80 or older 2 people 80 or older 1,381 90% 8% 2% % 11% 2% Category % 11% 2% Category % 12% 2% 99 87% 11% 2% Category % 9% 3% Non % 10% 1% % 6% 2% % 10% 1% 87% 12% 1% Category 2 87% 12% 1% 247 Category 3 87% 12% 1% 87% 12% 1% Category % 9% 2% Non % 4% 1% % 11% 3% 89% 9% 3% 173 Category 2 89% 9% 3% Category % 13% 4% 88% 9% 3% 73 Category 5 88% 9% 3% Non % 17% 1% % 10% 2% % 6% 3% % 5% 2% % 6% 1% Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 137

144 15. Demographics Ethnicity Household Income African American or Black 14% Less than $15,000 10% White or Caucasian 65% $15,000 to $24,999 12% Hispanic 17% $25,000 to $39,999 21% $40,000 to $79,999 32% Other 3% Over $80,000 26% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% Ethnicity n African American or Black White or Caucasian Hispanic Other 1,400 14% 65% 17% 3% 150 5% 85% 8% 2% Category % 85% 8% 2% Category % 83% 6% 2% 100 7% 84% 6% 2% Category % 88% 6% 2% Non % 72% 8% 5% % 49% 27% 4% 400 9% 80% 9% 2% 7% 83% 8% 2% Category 2 7% 83% 8% 2% 250 Category 3 7% 83% 8% 2% 7% 83% 8% 2% Category % 86% 14% 0% Non % 70% 10% 4% 400 7% 85% 5% 3% 2% 88% 9% 2% 175 Category 2 2% 88% 9% 2% Category % 85% 0% 1% 7% 90% 0% 3% 75 Category 5 7% 90% 0% 3% Non % 75% 6% 6% % 74% 6% 3% % 48% 28% 3% % 36% 42% 5% % 50% 20% 3% Household Income n Less than $15,000 $15,000 to $24,999 $25,000 to $39,999 $40,000 to $79,999 Over $80,000 1,400 10% 12% 21% 32% 26% 150 7% 12% 18% 33% 30% Category % 12% 18% 33% 30% Category % 12% 15% 36% 30% 100 6% 10% 17% 37% 30% Category % 9% 24% 37% 25% Non % 12% 21% 39% 25% % 12% 22% 29% 24% 400 6% 10% 16% 37% 30% 7% 10% 15% 36% 32% Category 2 7% 10% 15% 36% 32% 250 Category 3 7% 10% 15% 36% 32% 7% 10% 15% 36% 32% Category % 5% 24% 34% 28% Non % 12% 16% 42% 27% 400 5% 15% 23% 33% 24% 7% 16% 23% 28% 27% 175 Category 2 7% 16% 23% 28% 27% Category % 18% 14% 36% 23% 3% 11% 24% 39% 23% 75 Category 5 3% 11% 24% 39% 23% Non- 75 0% 14% 30% 35% 21% 150 9% 20% 20% 35% 15% % 9% 34% 20% 22% % 11% 20% 23% 28% 150 9% 10% 13% 40% 27% 138 Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

145 15. Demographics Education Level Gender Some high school 6% Female 51% Male 49% High school graduate 20% Some college 30% College graduate 28% Post graduate 17% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% Education Level n Some high school High school graduate Some college College graduate Post graduate 1,400 6% 20% 30% 28% 17% 150 5% 12% 31% 26% 27% Category % 12% 31% 26% 27% Category % 14% 29% 26% 27% 100 4% 15% 26% 29% 26% Category % 22% 26% 33% 18% Non % 22% 30% 27% 18% 600 7% 24% 30% 28% 12% 400 5% 16% 25% 27% 28% 5% 12% 27% 27% 30% Category 2 5% 12% 27% 27% 30% 250 Category 3 5% 12% 27% 27% 30% 5% 12% 27% 27% 30% Category % 15% 33% 27% 23% Non % 24% 18% 27% 26% 400 3% 18% 35% 28% 16% 5% 13% 37% 24% 22% 175 Category 2 5% 13% 37% 24% 22% Category % 21% 35% 25% 16% 2% 27% 20% 37% 15% 75 Category 5 2% 27% 20% 37% 15% Non- 75 1% 19% 47% 27% 5% % 28% 34% 13% 8% 150 6% 17% 30% 35% 12% 150 3% 29% 19% 37% 11% 150 7% 22% 38% 20% 13% Gender n Male Female 1,398 49% 51% % 46% Category % 46% Category % 48% % 50% Category % 54% Non % 48% % 52% % 44% 54% 46% Category 2 54% 46% 250 Category 3 54% 46% 54% 46% Category % 36% Non % 45% % 54% 52% 48% 175 Category 2 52% 48% Category % 55% 32% 68% 75 Category 5 32% 68% Non % 53% % 55% % 51% % 53% % 51% Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 139

146

147 16. APPENDIX A

148

149 16. Appendix A Evacuation Study Q.1 INTERVIEWER: Type in appropriate number from introduction. 1 Youngest male over 18 2 Oldest male 3 Youngest female over 18 4 Oldest female [IF THE AWER IS NOT 99, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION 6] Q.2 DUMMY QUESTION Cluster Q.4 DUMMY QUESTION Region Code Q.5 DUMMY QUESTION / Q.6 Do you live at this residence year round? 1 Yes 2 No 3 Other [IF THE AWER IS 1, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION 8] Q.7 Do you live here at least part of the time during the summer or fall? 1 Yes 2 No 3 Other [IF THE AWER IS 2 OR 3, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION 224] Q.8 Q.15 DUMMY QUESTIO Q.16 Have you ever seen a map of your county showing areas that would need to evacuate in case of a hurricane? 1 Yes 2 No 3 Don't know/not sure Q.17 Hurricanes are numbered from Category 1, the weakest, to Category 5, the strongest. Do you have access to the Internet so you could look up information about hurricanes? 1 Yes 2 No 3 Don't know/depends Q.18 Have you ever visited 's website to look up information about hurricanes? 1 Yes 2 No 3 Don't know/depends [IF THE AWER TO QUESTION 5 IS 2, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION 30] 1 Q.19 has identified storm surge areas that people would need to evacuate in certain hurricanes. Do you live in one of the storm surge hurricane evacuation zones or do you live in an area that would not be affected by storm surge? 1 evacuation zone 2 Area not affected by surge 3 Don't know/not sure Q.20 [VERSION1] Do you live in the Tropical Storm Category 2 evacuation zone or the Category 3 Category 5 evacuation zone? [Levy, Dixie, Taylor, Jefferson] 1 Tropical Storm Category Category 3 Category Don't know/not sure Q.21 [VERSION2] Do you live in Category 1, Category 2/3, or the Category 4/5 evacuation zone? [Citrus, Gulf, Escambia, Santa Rosa,Walton] 1 Category 1 2 Category 2/3 3 4 Category 4/ Don't know/not sure Q.22 [VERSION3] Do you live in the A/B evacuation zone, the C evacuation zone, or the D/E evacuation zone? [Hernando] 1 A/B 2 3 C 4 D/E Don't know/not sure Q.23 [VERSION4] Do you live in the zone that would need to be evacuated in Category 1, 2, 3, and 4 hurricanes or in the zone that would need to be evacuated only in Category 5 hurricanes? [] 1 Cat1/Cat 2/Cat 3/Cat Cat Don't know/not sure 2 Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 143

150 16. Appendix A Q.24 [VERSION5] Do you live in the Category 1/Category 2 zone, the Category 3 zone, or the Category 4/Category 5 zone? [] 1 Cat1/Cat Cat 3 4 Cat 4/ Don't know/not sure Q.25 [VERSION6] Do you live in the Tropical Storm Category 1 evacuation zone or the Category 2 Category 5 evacuation zone? [Wakulla, Franklin] 1 Tropical Storm/Cat 1 2 Cat 2 Cat Don't know/not sure Q.26 [VERSION7] Indian River: Do you live in the Category 1/2 zone or the Category 3/5 zone? Palm Beach: Do you live in A Category 1 and 2 storms or B Category 3, 4, and 5 storms? [Indian River, Palm Beach] 1 A Cat 1/2 2 3 B Cat 3/ Don't know/not sure Q.27 [VERSION8] Do you live in the Category 1 zone, the Category 3 zone, or the Category 5 zone? [Martin, St. Lucie] 1 Cat Cat Cat Don't know/not sure 3 Q.28 [VERSION9] Do you live in evacuation zone A, B, C, D, or E? [Tampa Bay] 1 A 2 B 3 C 4 D 5 E 6 7 Don't know/not sure Q.29 [VERSION10] Do you live in evacuation A, B, or C? [Miami Dade, Okaloosa] 1 A 2 B 3 4 C Don't know/not sure Q.30 Let s talk about hurricanes. A category 2 hurricane has winds of 100 MPH. If a category 2 hurricane with 100 MPH winds passed directly over your location, do you believe storm surge or waves would reach your home and cause flooding severe enough to pose a serious danger to your safety? 1 Yes 2 No 3 Don't know/depends Q.31 Considering both wind from the hurricane as well as flooding, do you think it would be safe for you to stay in your home or building if a category 2 hurricane with 100 MPH winds passed directly over your location? 1 Yes 2 No 3 Don't know/depends Q.32 In a category 2 hurricane with winds of 100 MPH, do you think Emergency Management officials in would issue an evacuation notice saying you should leave your home and go someplace safer? That is, would they tell you to evacuate? 1 Yes 2 No 3 Don't know/depends Q.33a Suppose officials DID issue a mandatory evacuation notice saying you had to leave because of potential flooding from a category 1 OR 2 hurricane. In that case, would you leave your home to go someplace safer? 1 Yes 2 No 3 Don't know/depends [IF THE AWER IS NOT 99, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION 358] Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

151 16. Appendix A Q.33b Suppose that officials DID issue a mandatory evacuation notice saying that everyone living in areas that would be affected by flooding in a category 1 OR 2 hurricane and everyone living in mobile or manufactured housing in [AWER TO Q. 10] must evacuate their and go to a safer location. In that case, would you leave your home to go someplace safer? 1 Yes 2 No 3 Don't know/depends Q.34 If you DID evacuate, would you go to: Read first 3 choices, then read or someplace else? [READ AWERS IN RANDOM ORDER, EXCEPT THE LAST 3] 1 Hurricane shelter operated by the or Red Cross 2 Friend or relative 3 Hotel/motel 4 Depends/don't know 5 None of the above; insists would not evacuate 6 Other place [IF THE AWER IS 4 OR 5, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION 38] Q.35 Where would that be located? (READ) 1 Your own neighborhood 2 Someplace else in your own county 3 Someplace else in Florida 4 Someplace outside Florida 5 [DO NOT READ] Don't know [IF THE AWER IS 1 OR 5, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION 38] Q.36 In what city would that be located? (If they cannot name a specific city, WRITE Not sure ) ( ) [IF THE AWER TO QUESTION 35 IS 1 OR 2 OR 3, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION 38] Q.37 In what state is that located? 1 Florida 2 Alabama 3 Georgia 4 Tennessee 5 Mississippi 6 South Carolina 7 North Carolina 8 Alabama 9 Other 0 Don't know Q.38 Remember that a category 1 is the weakest and 5 is the strongest. A category 3 hurricane has winds of 125 MPH. Emergency management officials call it a major hurricane. If a category 3 hurricane with 125 MPH winds passed directly over your location, do you believe storm surge or waves would reach your home and cause flooding severe enough to pose a serious danger to your safety? 1 Yes 2 No 3 Don't know/depends 5 Q.39 Considering both wind and flooding, do you think it would be safe for you to stay in your home if a category 3 hurricane with 125 MPH winds passed directly over your location? 1 Yes 2 No 3 Don't know/depends Q.40 In a category 3 hurricane with winds of 125 MPH, do you think Emergency Management officials in would issue an evacuation notice saying you should leave your home and go someplace safer? 1 Yes 2 No 3 Don't know/depends Q.41a Suppose officials DID issue a mandatory evacuation notice saying you had to leave because of potential flooding from a category 3 hurricane. In that case, would you leave your home to go someplace safer? 1 Yes 2 No 3 Don't know/depends Q41b Suppose that officials DID issue a mandatory evacuation notice saying that everyone living in areas that would be affected by flooding in a category 3 hurricane and everyone living in mobile or manufactured housing in [AWER TO Q. 10] must evacuate their and go to a safer location. That would apply to everyone living in areas that would be flooded by a category 1, 2, OR 3 hurricane and everyone in mobile. In that case, would you leave your home to go someplace safer? 1 Yes 2 No 3 Don't know/depends Q.42 If you DID evacuate, would you go to a different place than you would in a Category 2 hurricane? 1 Yes I would go someplace different 2 No same as category 2 answer [IF THE AWER IS 2, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION 47] Q.43 Would you go to: Read first 3 choices, then read or someplace else? [READ AWERS IN RANDOM ORDER, EXCEPT THE LAST 3] 1 Hurricane shelter operated by the or Red Cross 2 Friend or relative 3 Hotel/motel 4 Depends/don't know 5 None of the above; insists would not evacuate 6 Other place [IF THE AWER IS 4 OR 5, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION 47] Q.44 Where would that be located? (READ) 1 Your own neighborhood 2 Someplace else in your own county 3 Someplace else in Florida 4 Someplace outside Florida 5 [DO NOT READ] Don't know [IF THE AWER IS 1 OR 5, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION 47] Q.45 In what city would that be located? (If they cannot name a specific city, WRITE Not sure ) [IF THE AWER TO QUESTION 44 IS 1 OR 2 OR 3, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION 47] 6 Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 145

152 16. Appendix A Q.46 In what state is that located? 1 Florida 2 Alabama 3 Georgia 4 Tennessee 5 Mississippi 6 South Carolina 7 North Carolina 8 Alabama 9 Other 0 Don't know Q.47 Finally I would like you to consider a category 4 hurricane with winds of 155 MPH. It would almost be a category 5 hurricane. If a category 4 hurricane passed directly over your location, do you believe storm surge or waves would reach your home and cause flooding severe enough to pose a serious danger to your safety? 1 Yes 2 No 3 Don't know/depends Q.48 Considering both wind and flooding, do you think it would be safe for you to stay in your home or building if a category 4 hurricane with 155 MPH winds passed directly over your location? 1 Yes 2 No 3 Don't know/depends Q.49 In a category 4 hurricane with winds of 155 MPH, do you think Emergency Management officials in would issue an evacuation notice saying you should leave your home and go someplace safer? 1 Yes 2 No 3 Don't know/depends Q.50a Suppose that officials decided that the storm could strengthen and become a category 5 hurricane. If they issued a mandatory evacuation notice saying you should leave your home and go someplace safer, would you leave your home to go someplace safer? 1 Yes 2 No 3 Don't know/depends Q.50b Suppose that officials decided that the storm could strengthen and become a category 5 hurricane. They issued a mandatory evacuation notice saying that everyone living in areas that would be affected by flooding in Category 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 hurricane and everyone living in mobile or manufactured housing in [AWER TO Q. 10] must evacuate their home and go to a safer location. In that case, would you leave your home to go someplace safer? 1 Yes 2 No 3 Don't know/depends 7 Q.51 If you DID evacuate, would you go to a different place than you would in a category 3 hurricane? (IF NEEDED:...Which was described in the previous scenario) 1 Yes I would go someplace different 2 No same as category 3 answer 3 No same as category 2 answer Q.52 Would you go to: Read first 3 choices, then read or someplace else? 1 Hurricane shelter operated by the or Red Cross 2 Friend or relative 3 Hotel/motel 4 Depends/don't know 5 None of the above; insists would not evacuate 6 Other place [IF THE AWER IS 4 OR 5, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION 56] Q.53 Where would that be located? (READ) 1 Your own neighborhood 2 Someplace else in your own county 3 Someplace else in Florida 4 Someplace outside Florida 5 [DO NOT READ] Don't know [IF THE AWER IS 1 OR 5, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION 56] Q.54 In what city would that be located? (If they cannot name a specific city, WRITE Not sure ) [IF THE AWER TO QUESTION 53 IS 1 OR 2 OR 3, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION 56] Q.55 In what state is that located? 1 Florida 2 Alabama 3 Georgia 4 Tennessee 5 Mississippi 6 South Carolina 7 North Carolina 8 Alabama 9 Other 0 Don't know [IF THE AWER TO QUESTION 34 IS NOT 1, AND...] [IF THE AWER TO QUESTION 43 IS NOT 1, AND...] [IF THE AWER TO QUESTION 52 IS NOT 1, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION 57] Q.56 officials encourage evacuees to stay with friends or relatives in locations outside the areas being told to evacuate. Do you have friends or relatives in safe locations with whom you could stay in an evacuation if necessary? 1 Yes 2 No 3 Don't know/depends 4 Other Q.57 How many vehicles would be available in your household that you could use to evacuate? (33 = DK) (Record 0" if no vehicles are available) Number of vehicles... [IF THE AWER IS 0, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION 60] Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

153 16. Appendix A Q.58 How many vehicles would your household take if you evacuated? (33 = DK) (Record 0" if no vehicles are available) Number of vehicles... Q.59 If you evacuated, would you take a motor home or pull a trailer, boat, or camper? 1 Yes 2 No 3 Don't know 4 Other Q.60 In an evacuation, would you or anyone in your household require assistance in order to evacuate? 1 Yes 2 No 3 Not sure [IF THE AWER IS 2 OR 3, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION 64] Q.61 Would the person just need transportation, or do they have a disability or medical problem that would require special assistance? 1 Transportation only 2 Special need 3 Both 4 Don't know 5 Other Q.62 Would that assistance be provided by someone within your household, by an outside agency, or by a friend or relative outside your household? 1 Within household 2 Friend/relative (outside) 3 Outside agency 4 Don't know 5 Other Q.63 Is that person registered with as a person who would have special needs during a hurricane evacuation? 1 Yes 2 No 3 Don't know/not sure Q.64 Do you and your family currently have a definite plan for deciding whether to evacuate and where to go if a hurricane threatened? 1 Yes 2 No 3 Not very definite 4 Don't know 5 Other Q.65 Are there any obstacles other than a lack of transportation or special needs that I've asked about that would prevent you from being able to leave your home and go someplace safer during a hurricane threat? 1 Yes 2 No [IF THE AWER IS 2, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION 68] 9 Q.66 What is that obstacle? (Record up to 3) 1 Pet 2 Job 3 Need to care for another person 4 Spouse/other won't leave 5 Lack of money 6 No place to go 7 Other Q.67 Question Andrew Charley Dennis Floyd Frances Georges Ivan Jeanne Kate Katrina Opal Wilma Intstructional Where were you living in this location when Did you leave home to go someplace safer Did you go to: shelter, friend, hotel Where was that located? Neighborhood In what city? (VERBATIM) In what state? During the threat, were you told to evac.? Recommended or mandatory evacuation? Q.68 Andrew Q.69 Were you living in this location and at home, that is, not out of town, when Hurricane Andrew began to threaten this area in 1992? 1 Yes 2 No 3 Don't know/other [IF THE AWER IS 2 OR 3, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION 77] Q.70 Did you leave your home to go someplace safer in response to the threat created by Hurricane Andrew? 1 Yes 2 No 3 Don't know [IF THE AWER IS 2 OR 3, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION 75] Q.71 Did you go: Read first 3 choices, then read or someplace else? [READ AWERS IN RANDOM ORDER, EXCEPT THE LAST 2] 1 Public shelter (or Red Cross shelter) 2 Friend/relative 3 Hotel/motel 4 Other 5 Don't know Q.72 Where was that located? (READ) 1 Your own neighborhood 2 Someplace else in your own county 3 Someplace else in Florida 4 Someplace outside Florida 5 [DO NOT READ] Don't know [IF THE AWER IS 1 OR 5, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION 75] 10 Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 147

154 16. Appendix A Q.73 In what city was that located? (If they cannot name a specific city, WRITE Not sure ) [IF THE AWER TO QUESTION 72 IS 1 OR 2 OR 3, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION 75] Q.74 In what state was that located? 1 Florida 2 Alabama 3 Georgia 4 Tennessee 5 Mississippi 6 South Carolina 7 North Carolina 8 Alabama 9 Other 0 Don't know Q.75 During the threat, did you hear either directly or indirectly anyone in an official position such as elected officials, emergency management officials, or police say that you and people in your location should evacuate to a safer place? That is, did state or local officials issue any kind of evacuation notice that applied to you that you were aware of before the storm had passed? 1 Yes 2 No 3 Don't know [IF THE AWER IS 2 OR 3, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION 77] Q.76 During Hurricane Andrew, did officials recommend that you should evacuate or did they say it was mandatory that you must evacuate? 1 Should 2 Must 3 Don't know [IF THE AWER TO QUESTION 3 IS 40, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION 105] Q.176 Which of the following types of structures do you live in? Do you live in a: (READ) 1 Detached single family home 2 Duplex, triplex, quadruple home 3 Multi family building 4 stories or less (apartment/condo) 4 Multi family building more than 4 stories (apartment/condo) 5 Mobile home 6 Manufactured home 7 Recreational vehicle (RV) 8 Boat 9 Some other type of structure 0 [DO NOT READ] Don't know/refused [IF THE AWER IS 1-4 OR 7-8, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION 178] [IF THE AWER IS 9 OR 10, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION 180] Q.177 Is your Mobile or Manufactured home built to the stronger wind standards they started using in 1994? 1 Yes 2 No 3 Don't know [IF THE AWER TO QUESTION 176 IS 5 OR 6, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION 180] 11 Q.178 Was your home built after 2002? 1 Yes 2 No 3 Don't know Q.179 Do you have protection for all of the windows and sliding glass doors in your house? 1 Yes 2 No 3 Don't know [IF THE AWER TO QUESTION 66 IS 1, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION 181] Q.180 Do you have any pets? 1 Yes 2 No 3 Refused [IF THE AWER IS 2 OR 3, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION 184] Q.181 What would you do with your pets during a hurricane evacuation? (DO NOT READ CATEGORIZE) 1 Stay behind with them 2 Take them to our destination with us 3 Leave them at home 4 Board them 5 Leave them with a friend 6 Leave some, take some 7 Don't know 8 Refused 9 Not applicable; would not evacuate 0 Other [IF THE AWER TO QUESTION 3 IS 18 OR 20, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION 183] Q.182 Are you aware that most public hurricane shelters don't allow pets inside? 1 Yes 2 No Q.183 If you would not be allowed to take your pet with you to a public shelter, would that keep you from evacuating or would you go someplace else? 1 Yes would keep me from evacuating 2 No I would evacuate to someplace else 3 Don't know 4 Other [IF THE AWER TO QUESTION 9 IS NOT 2, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION 190] Q.184 My previous questions have dealt with hurricanes, but now I'd like to ask you just a few quick questions about wildfires. Wildfires are fires that mainly burn forests and other natural areas but can sometimes spread and threaten neighborhoods and communities where people live. First of all, do you believe that your home might ever be threatened by a wildfire? 1 Yes 2 No 3 Don't know Q.185 If a wildfire threatened your community and public safety officials ordered you to evacuate, would you? 1 Yes 2 No 3 Don't know/depends Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

155 16. Appendix A Q.186 Where would you go if you evacuated because of a wildfire? Would you go to: Read first 3 choices, then read or someplace else? [READ AWERS IN RANDOM ORDER, EXCEPT THE LAST 2] 1 Public shelter (or Red Cross shelter) 2 Friend/relative 3 Hotel/motel 4 Other 5 Don't know Q.187 Since you've been living in this location, have you ever evacuated your home because of a wildfire? 1 Yes 2 No 3 Don't know [IF THE AWER IS 2 OR 3, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION 233] Q.188 What year was that? (DK=99) (Write in 4 digit format, e.g, 1995) Year... Q.189 Did you go to: Read first 3 choices, then read or someplace else? [READ AWERS IN RANDOM ORDER, EXCEPT THE LAST 2] 1 Public shelter (or Red Cross shelter) 2 Friend/relative 3 Hotel/motel 4 Other 5 Don't know [IF THE AWER IS NOT 99, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION 233] [IF THE AWER TO QUESTION 11 IS NOT 2, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION 196] Q.190 My previous questions have dealt with hurricanes, but now I'd like to ask you just a few quick questions about freshwater flooding. In some locations, flooding can occur near rivers, streams, lakes, and low lying areas because of heavy rainfall. That's sometimes called freshwater flooding. Do you believe that your home might ever be threatened by freshwater flooding? 1 Yes 2 No 3 Don't know Q.191 If freshwater flooding threatened your community and public safety officials ordered you to evacuate, would you? 1 Yes 2 No 3 Don't know/depends Q.192 Where would you go if you evacuated because of freshwater flooding? Would you go to: Read first 3 choices, then read or someplace else? [READ AWERS IN RANDOM ORDER, EXCEPT THE LAST 2] 1 Public shelter (or Red Cross shelter) 2 Friend/relative 3 Hotel/motel 4 Other 5 Don't know 13 Q.193 Since you've been living in this location, have you ever evacuated your home because of freshwater flooding? 1 Yes 2 No 3 Don't know [IF THE AWER IS 2 OR 3, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION 233] Q.194 What year was that? (DK=99) (Write in 4 digit format, e.g, 1995) Year... Q.195 Did you go to: Read first 3 choices, then read or someplace else? [READ AWERS IN RANDOM ORDER, EXCEPT THE LAST 2] 1 Public shelter (or Red Cross shelter) 2 Friend/relative 3 Hotel/motel 4 Other 5 Don't know [IF THE AWER IS NOT 99, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION 233] [IF THE AWER TO QUESTION 13 IS NOT 2, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION 204] Q.196 My previous questions have dealt with hurricanes, but now I'd like to ask you just a few quick questions about hazardous material accidents. Sometimes threats can be created by transportation or industrial accidents that involved hazardous materials such as chemicals. Do you believe that your home might ever be threatened by a hazardous material accident? 1 Yes 2 No 3 Don't know Q.197 If a hazardous material accident threatened your community and public safety officials ordered you to evacuate, would you? 1 Yes 2 No 3 Don't know/depends Q.198 Where would you go if you evacuated because of a hazardous material accident? Would you go to: Read first 3 choices, then read or someplace else? [READ AWERS IN RANDOM ORDER, EXCEPT THE LAST 2] 1 Public shelter (or Red Cross shelter) 2 Friend/relative 3 Hotel/motel 4 Other 5 Don't know Q.199 Since you've been living in this location, have you ever evacuated your home because of a hazardous material accident? 1 Yes 2 No 3 Don't know [IF THE AWER IS 2 OR 3, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION 202] Q.200 What year was that? (DK=99) (Write in 4 digit format, e.g, 1995) Year Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 149

156 16. Appendix A Q.201 Did you go to: Read first 3 choices, then read or someplace else? [READ AWERS IN RANDOM ORDER, EXCEPT THE LAST 2] 1 Public shelter (or Red Cross shelter) 2 Friend/relative 3 Hotel/motel 4 Other 5 Don't know Q.202 Suppose there was a hazardous material accident but public safety officials advised you to close your windows and doors, turn off your air conditioner, and stay indoors rather than trying to evacuate. Would you stay indoors rather than trying to evacuate? 1 Yes 2 No 3 Don't know/depends [IF THE AWER IS NOT 99, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION 233] Q.203 DUMMY QUESTION Nuclear power plant names Q.204 My previous questions have dealt with hurricanes, but now I'd like to ask you just a few quick questions about [AWER TO Q. 203] nuclear power plant. Do you believe that your home might ever be threatened by radiation released as a result of an accident at [AWER TO Q. 203] nuclear power plant? 1 Yes 2 No 3 Don't know Q.205 If an accident at [AWER TO Q. 203] nuclear power plant threatened your community and public safety officials ordered you to evacuate, would you? 1 Yes 2 No 3 Don't know/depends Q.206 Where would you go if you DID evacuated because of an accident at [AWER TO Q. 203] nuclear power plant? Would you go to: Read first 3 choices, then read or someplace else? [READ AWERS IN RANDOM ORDER, EXCEPT THE LAST 2] 1 Public shelter (or Red Cross shelter) 2 Friend/relative 3 Hotel/motel 4 Other 5 Don't know Q.207 Are you located within the 10 mile emergency planning zone for [AWER TO Q. 203] nuclear power plant? 1 Yes 2 No 3 Don't know Q.208 Do you have a brochure or other information telling you what you should do in case of an accident at [AWER TO Q. 203] nuclear power plant? 1 Yes 2 No 3 Don't know 15 Q.209 Suppose there was an accident at [AWER TO Q. 203] nuclear power plant but public safety officials advised you to close your windows and doors, turn off your air conditioner, and stay indoors rather than trying to evacuate. Would you stay indoors rather than trying to evacuate? 1 Yes 2 No 3 Don't know/depends [IF THE AWER IS NOT 99, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION 233] Q.210 How old were you on your last birthday? (99=DK) (98=Refused) [If respondent is 98 years old or older, enter "97"] Number of years... Q.211 How long have you lived in your present home? (ROUND UP) (99=DK) (98=REFUSED) Number of years... Q.212 How long have you lived in this area of Florida? (ROUND UP) (99=DK) (98=REFUSED) Number of years... Q.213 How many people live in your household, including yourself? (99=DK) (98=REFUSED) Number of years... [IF THE AWER TO QUESTION 213 IS 1, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION 215] Q.214 How many of these are children, 17 or younger? (99=DK) (98=REFUSED) Number of years... Q.215 How many of these are 80 years old or older? (99=DK) (98=REFUSED) Number of years... Q.216 Which race or ethnic background best describes you? (READ) 1 African American or Black 2 White or Caucasian 3 Hispanic 4 Other 5 [DO NOT READ] Refused Q.217 Which of the following ranges best describes your total household income for 2007? (READ) 1 Less than $15,000 2 $15,000 to $24,999 3 $25,000 to $39,999 4 $40,000 to $79,999 5 Over $80,000 6 [DO NOT READ] Refused Q.218 Which category best describes your education level? (READ) 1 Some high school 2 High school graduate 3 Some college 4 College graduate 5 Post graduate 6 [DO NOT READ] Refused Q.219 Thank you so much. Sometimes my supervisor will call people to check on my work. May I get your first name in case she wants to check? Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

157 16. Appendix A Q.220 INTERVIEWER: Please record the gender of the respondent. 1 Male 2 Female Q.221 Record your (interviewer) name here. [IF THE AWER TO QUESTION 1 IS NOT 99, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION 269] Q.222 Threat Q.223 Interviewers now is the time to go back and edit your survey. This is your last chance to do so. Selecting "1" will take you back to the first question for editing. You may skip to any questions that need editing using the skip, next, and previous buttons. Skip forward to this question (223) when you are finished editing. Selecting "2" will record an automatic complete for this questionnaire. FOR YOUR TRACKING SHEET: Questionnaire #: Top of screen : City: [AWER TO Q. 228] : [AWER TO Q. 232] Threat: [AWER TO Q. 222] Gender: [AWER TO Q. 220] Telephone: Top of screen Respondent first name: [AWER TO Q. 219] 1 No I want to go back and edit this questionnaire 2 Yes This questionnaire is complete [IF THE AWER IS 1, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION 16] [IF THE AWER IS 2, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION 1051] Q.224 TERMINATE #1 NOT A FLORIDA RESIDENT DURING HURRICANE SEASON Thank you for your time, but we are looking for people who live in this area during hurricane season. Thank you again. Goodbye. [IF THE AWER TO QUESTION 1 IS 1-4, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION 1051] Q.225 Telephone Number Q.226 Name Q.227 Address Q.228 City Q.229 State Q.230 Zip code Q.231 name 17 Q.236 [EAST CENTRAL Q.1] What are the main sources of information you normally rely on to obtain emergency information prior to a hurricane evacuation? (Record up to 3) [READ AWERS IN RANDOM ORDER, EXCEPT THE LAST 1] 1 Local newspaper 2 Local TV 3 Local radio 4 Cable news/weather 5 NOAA weather radio 6 Word of mouth 7 Internet 8 Other Q.237 [EAST CENTRAL Q.2] Does a television meteorologist s or reporter s opinion affect your decision to evacuate? 1 Yes 2 No 3 Depends/sometimes 4 Don't know Q.238 [EAST CENTRAL Q.3] How soon after a hurricane do you expect to have food, water, and ice provided to you by disaster relief workers? (READ) 1 Within 8 hours 2 Within 24 hours 3 Within 48 hours 4 Within 72 hours 5 Other 19 Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 151

158 16. Appendix A Q.239 [EAST CENTRAL Q.4] How long would you be able to manage on your own following a hurricane without needing relief workers to provide supplies such as food, water, and ice? (READ) 1 24 hours 2 48 hours 3 72 hours 4 Longer than 3 days 5 Other [IF THE AWER TO QUESTION 3 IS NOT 15, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION 243] Q.240 [COUNTY: BREVARD Q.1] What is your main source of information for evacuations? 1 Local media 2 Florida Today 3 Emergency Management 4 Orlando TV stations 5 Red Cross 6 Other Q.241 [COUNTY: BREVARD Q.2] In recent hurricanes, have you received enough information to feel comfortable with your evacuation decisions? 1 Yes 2 No 3 Sometimes 4 Don't know 5 Other Q.242 [COUNTY: BREVARD Q.3] What main route would you use when evacuating for a hurricane? (Beachline) US 1 7 I 95 8 Other [IF THE AWER IS NOT 99, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION 210] [IF THE AWER TO QUESTION 3 IS NOT 16, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION 246] Q.243 [COUNTY: VOLUSIA Q.1] What main route would you use when evacuating for a hurricane? I US 1 6 I 95 7 Other 20 Q.244 [COUNTY: VOLUSIA Q.2] Suppose a category 3 hurricane was going to strike the west coast of Florida near Tampa and was expected to cross the state and come directly through as a category 2 hurricane before moving over the Atlantic. Do you believe that officials would tell you to evacuate your home to go someplace safer in a storm like that? 1 Yes 2 No 3 Don't know/depends Q.245 [COUNTY: VOLUSIA Q.3] Would you leave your home to go someplace safer in a storm like that? 1 Yes 2 No 3 Don't know/depends [IF THE AWER IS NOT 99, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION 210] [IF THE AWER TO QUESTION 3 IS NOT 20, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION 210] Q.246 [COUNTY: SEMINOLE Q.1] Do you have a family disaster plan? 1 Yes 2 No 3 Don't know/depends [IF THE AWER IS 2, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION 248] Q.247 [COUNTY: SEMINOLE Q.2] Are all members of your family familiar with the action items in the plan? 1 Yes 2 No 3 Don't know/depends Q.248 [COUNTY: SEMINOLE Q.3] Does your family have a disaster supply kit available? 1 Yes 2 No 3 Don't know/depends [IF THE AWER IS NOT 99, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION 210] [IF THE AWER TO QUESTION 4 IS NOT 2, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION 254] [IF THE AWER TO QUESTION 60 IS NOT 1, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION 250] Q.249 [CENTRAL Q.1] You said earlier that there's a person in your household who would need assistance in order to evacuate. Is the person who needs assistance registered with as a person with special needs for evacuation purposes? 1 Yes 2 No 3 Don't know 4 Other [IF THE AWER TO QUESTION 180 IS 2 OR 3, THEN SKIP TO QUESTION 251] Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

159 17. APPENDIX B

160

161 17. Appendix B Residents were asked to which city they would evacuate in three different hypothetical storm scenarios. They were also asked to which city they evacuated in three past hurricanes. Appendix B shows the residents responses to these questions for each county in the region. Evacuation Destination City ( or 2) n % n % n % n % n % n % n % Abbeville 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 2.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Alabama 2 0.2% 0 0.2% 1 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Alachua 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Alpharetta 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Altamonte Springs 6 0.6% 0 0.0% 1 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 3.6% Americus 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Anderson 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.4% 0 0.0% Apopka 8 1.8% 0 0.0% 8 4.0% 0 0.0% 6 4.5% 0 0.0% 1 1.3% Ashville 3 0.4% 1 0.6% 2 1.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Athens 2 0.2% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.9% 0 0.0% Atlanta % 6 2.3% % 2 3.2% 4 3.4% 2 2.4% 5 4.2% Auburn 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Augusta 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Bainbridge 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Baltimore 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.3% Barberville 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Baton Rouge 2 0.2% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% Beaumont 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Belleview 1 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Birmingham 2 0.2% 0 0.2% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Blackshear 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 2.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Boca Grande 1 0.2% 1 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Boca Raton 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Bombay 1 0.1% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Boston 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% Boynton Beach 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.3% Bradenton 1 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7 0.4% 4 1.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Bunnell 3 0.3% 0 0.0% 2 1.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Burlington 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Canaveral 2 0.2% 2 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Candler 1 0.1% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Carbondale 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Casselberry 5 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 5 4.6% Castleberry 2 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% Charleston 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Charlotte 5 0.5% 1 0.5% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 1 0.9% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% Chesapeake 2 0.4% 1 0.6% 1 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Chicago 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.9% 0 0.0% Chula Vista 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Cincinnati 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.9% 0 0.0% Clearwater 2 0.2% 1 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Clermont 8 0.8% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 4 7.6% 1 1.2% 0 0.4% 0 0.0% Cleveland 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.9% 0 0.0% Cocoa Beach % % 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Cookville 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Dade City 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.4% 0 0.0% Davenport 1 0.1% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Daytona Beach % 1 0.5% 6 3.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Debary 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Deland % 0 0.0% % 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% Deltona 5 1.0% 1 0.4% 2 1.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 3.9% 1 0.8% Destin 1 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Detroit 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.3% Dothan 3 0.2% 1 0.2% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Edgewater 7 0.7% 1 0.6% 5 2.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Elkton 1 0.2% 1 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Eustis 3 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 2.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Folkston 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.9% 0 0.0% Fruitland Park 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Ft. Lauderdale 2 0.2% 1 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Ft. Myers 3 0.3% 2 1.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Ft. Walton Beach 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Ft. White 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 2.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Gainesville % 4 1.6% 3 1.4% 1 1.7% 3 2.4% 1 0.9% 5 4.9% Georgia 5 0.5% 0 0.2% 2 0.8% 1 1.7% 1 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Gray 1 0.1% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Grayson 1 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6 5.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Greenville 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Groveland 1 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 9.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Hampton 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Hartford 1 0.1% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Hickory 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% High Point 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% High Springs 2 0.2% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Hilton Head Island 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 155

162 17. Appendix B Evacuation Destination City ( or 2) - continued n % n % n % n % n % n % n % Holiday 1 0.1% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Holly Hill 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Indian Harbour Beach 1 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Inverness 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.3% Jacksonville % 7 3.0% 4 1.8% 2 3.8% 6 5.0% 2 1.8% 3 2.5% Jessup 1 0.1% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Kerry 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Kissimmee % 3 1.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % 0 0.0% Knoxville 2 0.2% 0 0.0% 1 0.3% 1 1.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Lady 4 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 4.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Butler 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% City 4 0.6% 2 1.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 1 1.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Mary 2 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.7% Park 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Placid 1 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% land 6 0.7% 3 1.1% 1 0.8% 0 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% Lansing 1 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Largo 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Las Vegas 1 0.2% 2 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Leesburg % 0 0.2% 1 0.3% % 0 0.0% 0 0.4% 0 0.0% Longwood 6 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 3.1% Lutz 1 0.2% 1 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Lynchburg 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.9% 0 0.0% Macon 4 0.4% 3 1.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Madison 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Maitland 4 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.0% 0 0.0% 5 4.4% Margate city 1 0.1% 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Mascot 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Massachusetts 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Meadow Woods 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 3.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Melbourne % % 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6 5.6% Merritt Island 8 1.4% % 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Miami 4 1.1% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 8 6.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Michigan 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.4% 0 0.0% Middleburg 1 0.1% 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Mims 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% Mobile 1 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Monroe 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Mont Plymouth 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Montgomery 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Mount Dora 5 0.3% 0 0.0% 1 0.4% 1 1.4% 1 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Naples 1 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Nashville 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% New Orleans 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% New Port Richey 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% New Smyrna Beach % 0 0.0% % 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% North Carolina 3 1.0% 1 0.4% 6 3.2% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% North Florida 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Ocala 8 0.8% 2 0.6% 3 1.4% 1 2.7% 0 0.0% 1 0.9% 0 0.0% Ocoee 3 0.4% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 1.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Okeechobee 1 0.1% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% City 7 0.8% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 5 3.9% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% Park 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Orlando % % % 4 8.1% % % % Ormond Beach % 0 0.0% 8 4.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Otto 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Oviedo 3 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.2% 0 0.4% 1 1.1% Palatka 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Palm Bay 5 0.4% 3 1.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Palm Beach 1 0.8% 6 2.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Palm Coast 3 0.3% 0 0.0% 1 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% Palm Harbor 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.4% 0 0.0% Panama 3 0.3% 2 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Pearson 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Pelican Bay 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Pensacola 2 0.2% 0 0.0% 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Pikesville 1 0.1% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Pinellas 1 0.2% 1 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Plantation 1 0.1% 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Poinciana 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 3.9% 0 0.0% Ponce Inlet 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Port % 0 0.0% 7 3.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Port St. John 2 0.6% 5 1.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Punta Gorda 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.3% Raleigh 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Rockledge 4 0.3% 3 1.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Rogersville 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 156 Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

163 17. Appendix B Evacuation Destination City ( or 2) - continued n % n % n % n % n % n % n % Rome 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.9% 0 0.0% Ruskin 1 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Sanford 6 1.3% 3 1.1% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7 6.6% Sarasota 3 0.3% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.3% 0 0.0% 1 1.3% Savannah 6 0.8% 1 0.2% 5 2.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% Sebastian 5 0.4% 2 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.9% 0 0.0% Sebring 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% 6 1.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 8 7.2% Somers Point 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% South Carolina 3 0.3% 1 0.4% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% South Daytona 2 0.2% 0 0.0% 1 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Southeast 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Spartansburg 1 0.2% 1 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Springfield 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Springs 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Spruce Pine 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% St. Augustine 2 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% St. Cloud % 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % 0 0.0% St. Marys 2 0.7% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 5 4.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% St. Petersburg 4 0.6% 2 1.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 1 1.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Starke 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Sugar Island 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Summerfield 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Summerville 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Sumter 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Sun City 1 0.1% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Tallahassee % 6 2.5% 6 3.0% 0 0.0% 2 1.5% 0 0.0% 4 3.9% Tampa % % 1 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6 6.2% 2 2.2% Tampa Bay 1 0.2% 1 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Tarpon Springs 1 0.1% 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Tavares 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Tennessee 1 0.1% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% The Villages 2 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.7% 0 0.0% 1 0.9% 0 0.0% Titusville 7 0.7% 5 2.1% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% TItusville 1 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Tyler 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Umatilla 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Valdosta 9 1.5% 1 0.5% 4 2.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.9% 6 5.1% Valkaria 1 0.1% 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Venice 2 0.1% 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Viera 4 0.7% 5 2.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Virgina 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.0% 0 0.0% Virginia Beach 2 0.2% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 1 2.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7 1.9% 0 0.0% % 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6 5.6% Washington D.C % 1 0.6% 1 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Weirsdale 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% West Melbourne 2 0.2% 2 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Wildwood 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Winston Salem 1 0.1% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Winter Garden 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Winter Park 3 0.4% 1 0.6% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% Winter Springs 3 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 2.0% Yulee 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 157

164 17. Appendix B Evacuation Destination City (Category 3) n % n % n % n % n % n % n % Abbeville 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 2.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Alabama 1 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Alpharetta 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Altamonte Springs 5 0.5% 0 0.0% 1 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 2.6% Americus 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Anderson 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.4% 0 0.0% Apopka 8 1.8% 0 0.0% 8 4.0% 0 0.0% 6 4.6% 0 0.0% 1 1.2% Ashville 3 0.4% 1 0.6% 2 1.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Athens 2 0.2% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.9% 0 0.0% Atlanta % 5 2.2% % 2 3.3% 5 4.0% 2 2.4% 5 3.9% Auburn 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Augusta 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Bainbridge 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Barberville 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Baton Rouge 2 0.2% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% Beaumont 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Belleview 1 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Birmingham 1 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Blackshear 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 2.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Boca Grande 1 0.2% 1 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Boca Raton 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 1 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Bombay 1 0.1% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Boston 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% Boynton 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.2% Bradenton 1 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7 0.5% 4 1.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Bunell 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Burlington 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Canaveral 2 0.2% 2 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Candler 1 0.1% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Carbondale 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Carolinas 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% Casselberry 4 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 5 3.9% Castleberry 2 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% Charleston 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Charlotte 6 0.6% 2 0.7% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 1 1.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% Chesapeake 2 0.4% 1 0.6% 1 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Chicago 2 0.2% 0 0.0% 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.9% 0 0.0% Chickamauga 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Chula Vista 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Cinncinatti 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.9% 0 0.0% Claremont 4 0.4% 0 0.2% 1 0.5% 2 3.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Clearwater 2 0.2% 1 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Clermont 4 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.7% 1 1.2% 0 0.4% 0 0.0% Cleveland 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.9% 0 0.0% Cocoa 8 0.7% 6 2.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Cocoa Beach 6 0.8% 7 2.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Cookville 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Dade City 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.4% 0 0.0% Davenport 1 0.1% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Daytona 6 0.5% 1 0.5% 3 1.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Daytona Beach 8 0.6% 0 0.0% 5 2.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Debary 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Deland % 0 0.0% % 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% Deltona 2 0.3% 0 0.0% 1 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% Destin 1 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Detroit 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.2% Disney World 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 2.1% Dothan 3 0.2% 1 0.2% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Edgewater 7 0.7% 1 0.6% 5 2.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Elkton 1 0.2% 1 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Eustis 3 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 2.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Folkston 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.9% 0 0.0% Fords 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Franklin 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Fruitland Park 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Ft. Lauderdale 2 0.2% 1 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Ft. Myers 4 0.4% 3 1.4% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Ft. Walton Beach 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 1 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Ft. White 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 2.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Gainesville % 4 1.6% 2 0.9% 1 1.8% 4 3.4% 1 0.9% 5 4.7% Georgia 5 0.5% 0 0.2% 2 0.8% 1 1.8% 1 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Gray 1 0.1% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Grayson 1 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6 5.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Greenville 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Groveland 1 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 158 Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

165 17. Appendix B Evacuation Destination City (Category 3) - continued n % n % n % n % n % n % n % Hampton 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Hartford 1 0.1% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% High Point 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% High Springs 2 0.2% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Hillsborough 1 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6 5.3% Hilton Head Island 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Holdgate 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 3.9% 0 0.0% Holiday 1 0.1% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Indian Harbor Beach 1 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Inverness 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.2% Jacksonville % 7 3.0% 3 1.6% 2 4.0% 6 5.1% 2 1.8% 2 1.6% Jessup 1 0.1% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Johnson City 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Kerry 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Kingsfort 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 1 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Kissimmee % 3 1.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % 0 0.0% Knoxville 2 0.2% 0 0.0% 1 0.3% 1 1.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Lady 3 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 2.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Butler 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% City 4 0.6% 2 1.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 1 1.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Mary 3 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.1% Park 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 1 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Placid 1 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% land 5 0.5% 1 0.5% 1 0.7% 0 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% Largo 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Las Vegas 1 0.2% 2 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Lee 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.6% 0 0.0% Leesburg % 0 0.2% 1 0.3% % 0 0.0% 0 0.4% 0 0.0% Longwood 7 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 3.2% Lutz 1 0.2% 1 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Lynchburg 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.9% 0 0.0% Macon 3 0.3% 3 1.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Madison 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Maitland 4 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.1% 0 0.0% 5 4.1% Margaret 1 0.1% 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Maryland 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 1 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Mascot 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Massachusetts 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 1 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Melbourne % % 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6 5.3% Memphis 1 0.1% 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Merritt Island 8 1.4% % 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Miami 4 1.1% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 8 6.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Middleburg 1 0.1% 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Mims 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% Mississippi 1 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Mobile 1 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Monroe 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Montgomery 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Mount Dora 4 0.2% 0 0.0% 1 0.4% 0 0.7% 1 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Mount Plymouth 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Naples 2 0.2% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% New Orleans 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% New Port Richey 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% New Smyrna 3 0.3% 0 0.0% 3 1.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% New Symrna % 0 0.0% 8 4.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% North 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% North Carolina 3 1.0% 1 0.4% 6 3.2% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% North Florida 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Ocala % 2 1.0% 3 1.4% 1 2.9% 0 0.0% 1 0.9% 0 0.0% Ocoee 2 0.3% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Okeechobee 1 0.1% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% City 6 0.7% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 5 4.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% Park 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Orlando % % % 4 8.4% % % % Ormond Beach % 0 0.0% 8 4.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Otto 2 0.3% 0 0.0% 2 1.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Oviedo 3 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.2% 0 0.4% 1 1.0% Palatka 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Palm Bay 5 0.4% 3 1.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Palm Beach 1 0.8% 6 2.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Palm Coast 3 0.3% 0 0.0% 1 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% Palm Harbor 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.4% 0 0.0% Panama City 3 0.3% 2 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Pearson 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Pelican bank 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Pensacola 3 0.3% 0 0.0% 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 159

166 17. Appendix B Evacuation Destination City (Category 3) - continued n % n % n % n % n % n % n % Pikesville 1 0.1% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Pinellas 1 0.2% 1 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Plantation 1 0.1% 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Poinciana 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 3.9% 0 0.0% Ponce Inlet 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Port % 0 0.0% 6 3.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Port St. John 2 0.6% 5 2.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Punta Gorda 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.2% Raleigh 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Rockledge 3 0.2% 2 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Rogersville 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 1 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Rome 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.9% 0 0.0% Ruskin 1 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% San Francisco 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.2% 0 0.0% Sanford 5 1.2% 3 1.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7 6.3% Sarasota 3 0.3% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.3% 0 0.0% 1 1.2% Savannah 6 0.8% 1 0.2% 5 2.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% Sebastian 3 0.2% 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.9% 0 0.0% Sebring 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% 5 1.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 8 6.8% Simpsonsville 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% South Carolina 1 0.1% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% South Daytona 2 0.2% 0 0.0% 1 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Southeast 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Spartansburg 1 0.2% 1 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Springfield 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Springs 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Spruce Pine 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% St. Augustine 2 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% St. Cloud % 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % 0 0.0% St. Marys 2 0.7% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 5 4.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% St. Petersburg 4 0.6% 2 1.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 1 1.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Starke 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Summerfield 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Summers Point 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Summerville 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Sumter 2 0.2% 0 0.0% 1 0.3% 1 1.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Sun City 1 0.1% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Tallahassee % 6 2.6% 6 3.0% 0 0.0% 6 4.8% 0 0.0% 4 3.7% Tampa % % 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6 6.2% 2 2.0% Tampa Bay 1 0.2% 1 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Tarpon Springs 1 0.1% 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Tavares 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Tennessee 2 0.2% 2 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% The Villages 2 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.7% 0 0.0% 1 0.9% 0 0.0% Titusville 7 0.6% 5 1.9% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Tyler 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Umatilla 2 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 3.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Valdosta % 3 1.2% 4 2.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.9% 6 4.8% Valkaria 1 0.1% 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Venice 2 0.1% 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Viera 3 0.5% 4 1.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Virginia 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.0% 0 0.0% Virginia Beach 3 0.3% 0 0.2% 0 0.2% 1 2.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6 1.2% 0 0.0% % 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Washington D.C % 1 0.6% 1 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Weirsdale 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% West Melbourne 1 0.2% 1 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Wildwood 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Winchester 1 0.1% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Winston Salem 1 0.1% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Winter Garden 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Winter Park 3 0.4% 1 0.6% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% Winter Springs 3 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 1.9% Yulee 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 160 Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

167 17. Appendix B Evacuation Destination City (Category 5) n % n % n % n % n % n % n % Abbeville 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 2.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Alabama 2 0.1% 0 0.2% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Alpharetta 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 2.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Altamonte Springs 5 0.5% 0 0.0% 1 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 2.6% Americus 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Anderson 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.3% 0 0.0% Apopka 6 1.6% 0 0.0% 7 3.6% 0 0.0% 5 4.1% 0 0.0% 1 1.3% Ashville 3 0.4% 1 0.6% 2 0.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Athens 1 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Atlanta % 8 3.6% % 1 3.0% % 3 3.0% 6 4.8% Auburn 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Augusta 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Bainbridge 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 2.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Baton Rouge 2 0.2% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% Beaumont 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Belleview 1 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Birmingham 5 0.4% 1 0.4% 1 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% Blackshear 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 3.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Boca Grande 1 0.2% 1 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Boston 4 0.5% 0 0.0% 2 1.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.7% 1 0.8% Boynton 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.3% Bradenton 1 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 8 0.6% 4 1.8% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Brunswick 1 0.2% 1 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Buffalo 1 0.1% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Bunell 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Burlington 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Canaveral 1 0.1% 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Candler 1 0.1% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Cape May 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Carbondale 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Carolinas 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% Casselberry 5 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 5 4.3% Castleberry 2 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% Charleston 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Charlote 1 0.1% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Charlotte 5 0.5% 1 0.6% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 1 1.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% Chesapeake 2 0.4% 1 0.6% 1 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Chicago 2 0.2% 0 0.0% 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.9% 0 0.0% Chickamauga 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Chula Vista 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Cinncinatti 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.9% 0 0.0% Claremont 4 0.4% 0 0.2% 1 0.5% 2 3.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Clark 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Clearmont 2 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.3% 0 0.3% 0 0.0% Clearwater 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Clermont 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Cleveland 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.9% 0 0.0% Cocoa 5 0.4% 4 1.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Cocoa Beach 3 0.3% 3 1.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Columbia 1 0.1% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Cookville 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Dallas 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Davenport 1 0.1% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Daytona 5 0.4% 1 0.3% 2 1.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Daytona beach 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Daytona Beach 7 0.6% 0 0.0% 5 2.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Debary 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Deland % 1 0.6% % 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Deltona 2 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% Destin 1 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Detroit 2 0.4% 0 0.0% 1 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.3% Dothan 3 0.2% 1 0.3% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Douglasville 1 0.1% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Doylestown 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Edgewater 6 0.6% 0 0.0% 5 2.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Elkton 1 0.2% 1 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Eustis 4 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 3.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Folkston 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.9% 0 0.0% Fords 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Franklin 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Fruitland Park 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Ft. Lauderdale 2 0.3% 1 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Ft. Myers 3 0.3% 2 1.1% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Ft. Walton Beach 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 1 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Ft. White 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 3.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Gainesville % 4 1.7% 2 0.9% 1 2.1% 4 3.6% 1 0.9% 5 4.7% Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 161

168 17. Appendix B Evacuation Destination City (Category 5) - continued n % n % n % n % n % n % n % Georgia 9 1.1% 0 0.2% 2 1.2% 1 2.1% 5 4.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% Gray 1 0.1% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Grayson 1 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6 5.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Greenville 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Hampton 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Hartford 1 0.1% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% High Point 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% High Springs 1 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Hillsborough 1 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6 5.4% Holdgate 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 3.6% 0 0.0% Indian Harbour Beach 1 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Inverness 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.3% Jacksonville % 8 3.6% 2 1.2% 2 5.4% 0 0.0% 2 1.7% 3 2.4% Jessup 1 0.1% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Johnson City 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Kansas 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.9% 0 0.0% Kerry 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Kingsfort 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 1 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Kingston 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.3% 0 0.0% Kissimmee % 3 1.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % 0 0.0% Knoxville 2 0.2% 0 0.0% 1 0.3% 1 2.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Lady 3 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 3.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Butler 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% City 5 0.7% 2 1.1% 1 0.5% 1 2.1% 1 1.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Mary 2 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% Park 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 1 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% land 4 0.4% 1 0.6% 1 0.7% 0 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Largo 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Lee 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% Leesburg % 0 0.2% 1 0.3% % 0 0.0% 0 0.3% 0 0.0% Lofland 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.3% 0 0.0% Longwood 7 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 3.3% Los Angeles 1 0.2% 2 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Lutz 1 0.2% 1 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Lynchburg 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.9% 0 0.0% Macon 4 0.5% 4 1.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Madison 2 0.2% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Maitland 3 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% 0 0.0% 5 4.2% Margaret 1 0.1% 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Maryland 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 1 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Mascot 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 2.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Massachusetts 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 1 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Meadow Woods 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 3.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Melbourne % % 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Memphis 1 0.1% 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Merritt Island 6 1.2% % 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Miami 5 1.2% 2 1.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7 6.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Michigan 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Middleburg 1 0.1% 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Mississippi 1 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Mobile 1 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Monroe 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Montgomery 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Mount Dora 3 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.4% 0 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Mount Plymouth 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Naples 2 0.2% 2 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Nashville 3 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 2.4% New Orleans 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% New Port Richey 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 2.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% New Smyrna 4 0.4% 0 0.0% 3 1.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% New Symrna 9 0.8% 0 0.0% 6 3.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% New York 2 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 3.6% 0 0.0% North 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% North Carolina 4 1.1% 1 0.4% 6 3.1% 0 0.8% 1 0.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% North Florida 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Ocala % 2 1.1% 3 1.4% 2 5.4% 0 0.0% 1 0.9% 0 0.0% Ocean City 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Ocoee 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Okeechobee 1 0.1% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% City 6 0.7% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 5 4.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Park 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Orlando % % % 3 7.5% % % % Ormond Beach % 0 0.0% 7 3.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Otto 2 0.3% 0 0.0% 2 1.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Oviedo 3 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.3% 0 0.3% 1 1.0% Palatka 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Palm Bay 4 0.3% 3 1.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Palm Beach 1 0.8% 6 2.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Palm Coast 3 0.3% 0 0.0% 1 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% Palm Harbor 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.3% 0 0.0% Panama City 3 0.3% 2 0.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 162 Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

169 17. Appendix B Evacuation Destination City (Category 5) - continued n % n % n % n % n % n % n % Pearson 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Pelican Bank 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Pensacola 2 0.2% 0 0.0% 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 1 0.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Pikesville 1 0.1% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Pinellas 1 0.2% 1 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Plantation 1 0.1% 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Poinciana 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 3.6% 0 0.0% Ponce Inlet 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Port Canaveral 1 0.1% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Port % 0 0.0% 6 3.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Port St. Johns 1 0.1% 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Port St. Lucie 1 0.1% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Punta Gorda 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.3% Raleigh 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Richmond 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Roanoke 1 0.2% 1 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Rockledge 3 0.2% 2 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Rogersville 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 1 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Rome 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.9% 0 0.0% San Francisco 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.1% 0 0.0% Sanford 6 1.2% 1 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 8 7.2% Sarasota 3 0.2% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.3% Savannah 4 0.5% 0 0.0% 4 1.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% Sebastian 3 0.3% 1 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.9% 0 0.0% Sebring 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% 6 1.1% 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 8 7.0% Simpsonsville 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% South Carolina 3 0.3% 1 0.4% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 1 0.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% South Daytona 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Southeast 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 2.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Spartansburg 1 0.2% 1 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Springfield 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Spruce Pine 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% St. Augustine 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% St. Cloud % 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % 0 0.0% St. Marys 2 0.8% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 5 4.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% St. Petersburg 3 0.5% 2 1.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 1.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% St.Petersburg 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Stanford 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Starke 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 2.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Summerfield 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Summers Point 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Summerville 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Sun City 1 0.1% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Tallahassee % 6 2.7% 7 3.6% 0 0.0% 2 1.6% 1 1.3% 5 4.5% Tampa % % 2 1.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6 5.7% 2 2.1% Tarpon Springs 1 0.1% 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Tavares 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 2.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Tennessee 2 0.2% 2 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% The Villages 2 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.8% 0 0.0% 1 0.9% 0 0.0% Thomasville 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 2 1.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Tifton 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Titusville 5 0.5% 4 1.7% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Tyler Town 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 2.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Umatilla 2 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 4.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Valdosta % 3 1.2% 4 2.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.9% 6 4.9% Valkaria 1 0.1% 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Venice 2 0.1% 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Vierra 1 0.2% 1 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Virginia 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.9% 0 0.0% Virginia Beach 3 0.3% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 1 3.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7 1.2% 0 0.0% % 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Walterboro 1 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Wanette 1 0.1% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Washington D.C % 1 0.6% 1 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Waynesville 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% West Melbourne 1 0.2% 1 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Wildwood 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Winchester 1 0.1% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Winston Salem 1 0.1% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Winter Garden 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Winter Park 2 0.2% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.8% Winter Springs 3 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 1.9% Yorktown 1 0.2% 1 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Young Harris 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Yulee 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 163

170 17. Appendix B Evacuation Destination City (Hurricane Charley) n % n % n % n % n % n % n % Alabama 1 0.2% 0 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Alachua 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 7.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Arlington 1 0.3% 1 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Atlanta 5 1.8% 1 1.1% 0 1.0% % 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Beachside 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 1 1.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Bellbrook 1 0.2% 0 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Biloxi 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.9% 0 0.0% Birmingham 1 0.2% 0 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 1.2% 2 2.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Buford 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 1 2.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Canada 1 0.3% 1 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Castleberry 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 5.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Chattanooga 1 0.2% 0 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Chuluota 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Clearmont 1 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Clermont 1 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Cocoa 2 1.2% 2 2.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Cocoa Beach 1 0.8% 1 1.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Davis 1 0.6% 1 1.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Daytona 4 1.8% 0 0.0% 3 8.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Debary 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 1 2.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Deland 7 3.2% 0 0.0% % 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Dothan 1 0.3% 1 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Douglasville 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.9% 0 0.0% Edgewater 2 1.4% 1 1.7% 1 2.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Eustis 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Ft. Lauderdale 1 0.3% 1 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Ft. Myers 2 1.4% 2 2.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Gainesville 3 2.2% 4 4.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Haines City 1 0.2% 0 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Hickory 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Holly HIll 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 1 2.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Indian Harbour Beach 1 0.2% 0 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Jacksonville 9 4.5% 6 7.0% 2 4.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Key West 1 0.8% 1 1.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Kissimmee 5 1.6% 1 0.7% 0 1.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % 0 0.0% Knoxville 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 7.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Lady 1 0.5% 1 1.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% City 2 0.9% 0 0.0% 1 1.5% 0 0.0% 1 9.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Mary 2 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 7.5% Placid 1 0.2% 0 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% land 2 0.7% 1 1.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Leesburg 4 1.7% 0 0.4% 0 0.0% % 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Lofland 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.9% 0 0.0% Longwood 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.9% Lutz 1 0.8% 1 1.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Mascot 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 7.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Melbourne 7 3.4% 5 5.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 7.4% 0 0.0% Merritt Island 5 4.8% 8 9.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Middleburg 1 0.3% 1 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Mobile 1 0.8% 1 1.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Mount Dora 2 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 0 0.0% 1 7.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Naples 2 0.5% 1 1.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% New Orleans 1 0.8% 0 0.0% 1 3.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% New Smyrna Beach 5 1.9% 0 0.0% 3 8.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Ocala 2 0.5% 1 1.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Ocoee 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 9.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Ohio 1 0.2% 0 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Okeechobee 2 0.7% 1 1.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Oklahoma 1 0.2% 0 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% City 2 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 9.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Orlando % % 0 1.0% 0 0.0% % % % Ormond Beach 3 1.2% 0 0.0% 2 5.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Oviedo 2 0.4% 0 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.9% 0 0.0% Palm Bay 1 0.2% 0 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Panama City 2 1.2% 2 2.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Pet City 1 0.5% 1 1.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Philadelphia 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Poinciana 1 2.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % 0 0.0% Port 7 2.6% 0 0.0% % 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Port St. John 3 1.0% 2 1.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Rockledge 1 0.2% 0 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Rogersville 1 0.8% 0 0.0% 1 3.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Saint Augustine 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 1 2.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Sand 1 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % 0 0.0% Sanford 4 6.3% 5 6.0% 1 2.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % 164 Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

171 17. Appendix B Evacuation Destination City (Hurricane Charley) - continued n % n % n % n % n % n % n % Savannah 3 2.0% 1 1.7% 2 5.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Sebastian 1 0.2% 0 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% South Florida 1 0.3% 1 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% St. Augustine 4 1.1% 2 1.7% 0 1.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% St. Cloud 2 0.4% 0 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.9% 0 0.0% Starke 2 0.9% 0 0.0% 1 1.5% 1 7.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Summerfield 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Sun City 1 0.5% 1 1.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Tampa 8 3.8% 5 5.4% 2 4.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Tarpon Springs 1 0.3% 1 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Tavares 2 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Tennessee 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 1.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Tucson 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 7.3% Valdosta 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 1 2.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Valkaria 1 0.3% 1 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Viera 1 0.6% 1 1.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Washington D.C % 1 1.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% West Palm Beach 1 0.5% 1 1.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Wildwood 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 3.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Winter Springs 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.9% Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 165

172 17. Appendix B Evacuation Destination City (Hurricane Frances) n % n % n % n % n % n % n % Alachua 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 9.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Altamonte Springs 2 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 3.8% Alvarado 1 0.5% 1 1.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Apopka 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 5.6% Ashburn 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 2.1% 0 0.0% Athens 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 3.4% 0 0.0% Atlanta % 3 2.3% 6 9.9% 0 3.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 7.1% Atlantis 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 3.4% 0 0.0% Auburn 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Augusta 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 1 1.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Bellbrook 1 0.1% 0 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Biloxi 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.3% 0 0.0% Birmingham 2 0.3% 1 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Boca Grande 1 0.5% 1 1.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 0.9% 2 1.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 5.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Brunswick 2 0.8% 2 1.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Buford 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 1 1.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Cape Canaveral 1 0.3% 1 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Castleberry 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 3.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Charleston 3 0.8% 2 1.3% 1 1.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Charlotte 1 0.3% 1 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Chesapeake 1 0.5% 1 1.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Clearmont 1 0.3% 1 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Clearwater 2 0.3% 0 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Cocoa 3 0.8% 2 1.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Cocoa Beach 4 1.7% 5 3.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Cookeville 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 1 1.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Daytona Beach 5 1.6% 0 0.0% 5 7.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Deland 6 1.4% 0 0.0% 4 6.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Deltona 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 1 2.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Edgewater 2 0.7% 0 0.0% 2 3.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Elkton 1 0.5% 1 1.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Eustis 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Ft. Lauderdale 1 0.3% 1 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Ft. Myers 2 0.7% 1 0.6% 1 1.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Ft. Walton Beach 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 1 2.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Gainesville 6 4.2% % 2 4.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Georgia 2 0.5% 0 0.3% 1 1.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Greenville 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 1 1.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Hollywood 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.3% 0 0.0% Indian Rocks Beach 1 0.3% 1 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Jacksonville % 8 5.4% 2 4.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Jeckyll Island 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 1 1.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Kissimmee % 2 1.7% 0 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % 0 0.0% Knoxville 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 9.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% City 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 5.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Placid 1 0.1% 0 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% land 2 0.5% 1 0.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Largo 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Las Vegas 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.3% 0 0.0% Leesburg 6 1.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % 0 0.0% 0 1.3% 0 0.0% Lofland 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.3% 0 0.0% Longwood 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.4% Lutz 1 0.5% 1 1.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Macon 2 0.5% 2 1.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Maryland 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Mascot 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 9.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Melbourne % 9 6.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 3.4% 0 0.0% Merritt Island 3 2.6% 8 5.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Miami 1 0.1% 0 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Michigan 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 1 1.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Middleburg 1 0.2% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Mississippi 1 0.3% 1 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Montgomery 2 0.6% 1 1.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.3% 0 0.0% Mount Dora 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 4.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Mscclenny 1 0.3% 1 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Nashville 1 0.6% 0 0.0% 2 3.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% New Smyrna Beach 7 1.9% 0 0.0% 5 9.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Ocala 1 0.2% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Ocean City 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 1 1.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Ocoee 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 5.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Okeechobee 2 0.5% 1 0.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% City 2 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Orlando % % 1 1.2% 1 9.7% % % % 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 2.1% 0 0.0% Oviedo 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 1.3% 0 0.0% 166 Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

173 17. Appendix B Evacuation Destination City (Hurricane Frances) - continued n % n % n % n % n % n % n % Palatka 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 1 1.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Palm Bay 2 0.3% 1 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Palm Coast 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Panama City 2 0.3% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Pawley Island 1 0.3% 1 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Pelican Bay 1 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Pensacola 2 0.7% 0 0.0% 1 1.6% 0 0.0% 1 5.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Perry 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 1 1.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Plantation 1 0.2% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Port 7 1.8% 0 0.0% 5 8.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Port St. John 3 1.8% 5 3.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Port St. Lucie 1 0.3% 1 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Rockledge 1 0.1% 0 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Ruskin 1 0.1% 0 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Salt Springs 1 0.1% 0 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Sanford 5 4.2% 7 4.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % Sarasota 1 0.3% 1 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Savannah 2 0.8% 0 0.0% 1 2.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 3.4% 0 0.0% Sebastian 1 0.1% 0 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% South Daytona 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 1 2.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% South Florida 1 0.2% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Spartansburg 1 0.5% 1 1.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% St. Augustine 3 1.0% 0 0.0% 3 4.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% St. Cloud 2 0.5% 1 0.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% St. John 1 0.2% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% St. Petersburg 1 0.5% 1 1.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Starke 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 9.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Suwannee 1 0.3% 1 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Tallahassee 3 2.5% 0 0.3% 1 1.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % Tampa % % 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % Tarpon Springs 1 0.2% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Tavares 2 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Tennessee 2 0.5% 1 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Tifton 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 1 1.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Valdosta 1 0.3% 1 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Valkaria 1 0.2% 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Venice 2 0.3% 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Viera 1 0.4% 1 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Warner Robins 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 1 1.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Winter Park 1 0.5% 1 1.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Kerr & Downs Research Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report 167

174 17. Appendix B Evacuation Destination City (Hurricane Jeanne) n % n % n % n % n % n % n % Alachua 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Altamonte Springs 2 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 1.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 7.0% Alvarado 1 0.8% 1 1.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Apalachicola 1 0.5% 1 0.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Athens 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 6.5% 0 0.0% Atlanta 3 0.9% 0 0.0% 2 4.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Belbrook 1 0.2% 0 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Birmingham 1 0.2% 0 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Boca Grande 1 0.8% 1 1.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 0.9% 2 1.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Brunswick 1 0.5% 1 0.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Castleberry 1 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 6.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Chiefland 1 0.5% 1 0.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Cocoa Beach 6 3.7% 7 6.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Daytona 4 1.4% 0 0.0% 3 7.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Deland 5 1.9% 0 0.0% % 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Detroit 1 0.8% 0 0.0% 1 4.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Edgewater 4 2.2% 1 1.4% 2 7.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Elkton 1 0.8% 1 1.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Eustis 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 1.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Gainesville 5 5.8% 8 7.9% 2 7.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Indian Harbor Beach 1 0.2% 0 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Jacksonville 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 1 2.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Kissimmee 4 4.8% 0 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % 0 0.0% Knoxville 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% City 1 0.3% 1 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% land 1 0.2% 0 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Las Vegas 1 0.2% 0 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Leesburg 4 2.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % 0 0.0% 0 2.6% 0 0.0% Lofland 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.6% 0 0.0% Longwood 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.6% Lutz 1 0.8% 1 1.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Macclenny 1 0.5% 1 0.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Mascot 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Melbourne 13 51% 5.1% 8 83% 8.3% 0 00% 0.0% 0 00% 0.0% 0 00% 0.0% 1 65% 6.5% 0 00% 0.0% Merritt Island 5 5.2% 9 9.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Miami 1 0.8% 1 1.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Middleburg 1 0.3% 1 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Mt. Dora 1 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 8.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% New Smyrna Beach 2 0.8% 0 0.0% 1 4.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% North Carolina 1 0.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % Ocala 5 2.5% 4 3.8% 1 1.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Okeechobee 2 0.7% 1 1.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 1.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Orlando % % 1 3.9% % % 1 6.5% % Ormond Beach 2 1.1% 0 0.0% 2 6.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Oveido 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 2.6% 0 0.0% Palm Bay 2 0.5% 1 0.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Panama City 1 0.3% 1 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Pelican Bay 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 1.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Pet City 1 0.5% 1 0.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Plantation 1 0.3% 1 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Port 6 2.8% 0 0.0% % 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Port St. John 2 2.4% 4 4.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Rockledge 3 1.0% 2 1.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Ruskin 1 0.2% 0 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Sanford 4 6.4% 7 6.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % Savannah 2 1.0% 0 0.0% 2 5.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Sebastian 1 0.2% 0 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% St. Augustine 1 0.5% 0 0.0% 1 2.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% St. Cloud 3 0.6% 0 0.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 5.2% 0 0.0% Tallahassee 1 0.3% 1 0.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Tampa % 5 4.6% 2 7.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 6.5% Tavares 2 0.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Thomasville 1 1.2% 0 0.0% 2 6.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Titusville 1 0.5% 1 0.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Vero Beach 1 0.5% 1 0.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Watertown 1 0.5% 1 0.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% West Palm Beach 1 0.5% 1 0.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% West Virginia 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0 1.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Windermere 2 1.3% 1 0.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 9.5% 0 0.0% Winter Springs 1 0.2% 0 0.0% 0% 0 0.0% 0% 0 0.0% 0% 0 0.0% 0% 0 0.0% 0% 0 2.6% 168 Regional Evacuation Study Behavioral Analysis: Region Report Kerr & Downs Research

175 18. APPENDIX C