Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report"

Transcription

1 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Course-Based Survey Option The course-based option asks faculty members to respond to questions about student engagement based on a course taught during the current academic year. This option is valuable for institutions that want to know more about faculty practices and student engagement tied to individual courses taught on campus. Sample The Frequency Distributions report is based on information from all faculty at your institution who responded to the survey based on their experiences teaching either a lower or upper division course. Faculty who responded based on another type of course or who did not report the course level are not included in this report. Survey Items The items from the FSSE course-based survey option appear in the left column in the same order and wording as they appear on the instrument. Course Level Frequency distributions are reported separately for faculty who teach lower division and upper division courses. Variable Names The name of each variable appears in the first column for easy reference to your data file and the FSSE-NSSE Combined Report. Count The 'Count' column represents the actual number of faculty who selected a particular response option for each item. Response Categories Column Percentage (%) Response options are This column represents listed just as they appear the percentage of faculty on the instrument. responding to the particular option for each item.

2 How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following? a. Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or clinical FINTERN Not important 0 0% 2 2% 2 1% assignment Somewhat important 8 16% 15 11% 23 13% Important 17 35% 41 31% 58 32% Very important 24 49% 75 56% 99 54% % % % b. Community service or volunteer work FVOLUNTR Not important 5 10% 22 17% 27 15% Somewhat important 14 29% 38 29% 52 29% Important 26 53% 53 40% 79 43% Very important 4 8% 20 15% 24 13% % % % c. Participation in a learning community or some other formal program FLERNCOM Not important 8 17% 32 24% 40 22% where groups of students take two or more classes together Somewhat important 20 42% 49 37% 69 38% Important 15 31% 40 30% 55 30% Very important 5 10% 12 9% 17 9% % % % d. Work on a research project with a faculty FIMPR05 Not important 2 4% 11 8% 13 7% member outside of course or program requirements Somewhat important 20 42% 37 27% 57 31% Important 17 35% 49 36% 66 36% Very important 9 19% 38 28% 47 26% % % % e. Foreign language coursework FFORLANG Not important 10 21% 27 20% 37 20% Somewhat important 22 46% 55 41% 77 42% Important 10 21% 40 30% 50 27% Very important 6 13% 13 10% 19 10% % % % f. Study abroad FSTUDYAB Not important 12 25% 32 24% 44 24% Somewhat important 20 42% 63 47% 83 46% Important 10 21% 24 18% 34 19% Very important 6 13% 14 11% 20 11% % % % 1

3 How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following? (continued) g. Independent study or self-designed major FINDST06 Not important 13 27% 32 24% 45 25% Somewhat important 21 44% 56 42% 77 42% Important 13 27% 29 22% 42 23% Very important 1 2% 17 13% 18 10% % % % h. Culminating senior experience (capstone course, senior project or FSENIOR Not important 2 4% 0 0% 2 1% thesis, comprehensive exam, etc.) Somewhat important 3 6% 10 7% 13 7% Important 20 42% 40 30% 60 33% Very important 23 48% 84 63% % % % % Select the response that you believe best represents the quality of student relationships with people at your institution. Student relationships with other students FENVSTU Unfriendly, Unsupportive, Sense of Alienation 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 2 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 3 2 4% 1 1% 3 2% % 17 13% 23 13% % 28 21% 43 24% % 62 47% 80 44% Friendly, Supportive, Sense of Belonging 7 15% 25 19% 32 18% Student relationships with faculty members FENVFAC Unavailable, Unhelpful, Unsympathetic % % % 1 2% 1 1% 2 1% 2 2 4% 2 2% 4 2% 3 1 2% 3 2% 4 2% % 15 11% 21 12% % 43 32% 58 32% % 44 33% 59 33% Available, Helpful, Sympathetic 7 15% 25 19% 32 18% % % % 2

4 Select the response that you believe best represents the quality of student relationships with people at your institution. (continued) Student relationships with administrative personnel and offices FENVADM Unhelpful, Inconsiderate, Rigid 1 2% 1 1% 2 1% 2 1 2% 11 8% 12 7% % 13 10% 19 11% % 32 24% 43 24% % 34 26% 47 26% % 33 25% 43 24% Helpful, Considerate, Flexible 4 9% 9 7% 13 7% % % % To what extent does your institution emphasize each of the following? a. Requiring students to spend significant amounts FENVSCHO Very little 3 6% 8 6% 11 6% of time studying and on academic work Some 11 23% 24 18% 35 19% Quite a bit 26 54% 62 46% 88 48% Very much 8 17% 40 30% 48 26% % % % b. Providing students the support they need to help FENVSUPR Very little 1 2% 2 1% 3 2% them succeed academically Some 5 11% 28 21% 33 18% Quite a bit 25 53% 61 46% 86 48% Very much 16 34% 43 32% 59 33% % % % c. Encouraging contact among students from different economic, social, FENVDIVR Very little 9 19% 29 22% 38 21% and racial or ethnic backgrounds Some 23 49% 52 39% 75 41% Quite a bit 10 21% 34 25% 44 24% Very much 5 11% 19 14% 24 13% % % % 3

5 To what extent does your institution emphasize each of the following? (continued) d. Helping students cope with their non-academic responsibilities (work, FENVNACA Very little 9 19% 29 22% 38 21% family, etc.) Some 23 48% 61 46% 84 47% Quite a bit 12 25% 32 24% 44 24% Very much 4 8% 10 8% 14 8% % % % e. Providing students the support they need FENVSOCA Very little 5 11% 13 10% 18 10% to thrive socially Some 24 51% 65 50% 89 50% Quite a bit 14 30% 40 31% 54 31% Very much 4 9% 12 9% 16 9% % % % f. Encouraging students to participate in co-curricular activities FENVACT Very little 3 6% 4 3% 7 4% (organizations, campus publications, student government, fraternity or sorority, intercollegiate or intramural sports, etc.) Some 15 31% 35 26% 50 27% Quite a bit 17 35% 74 55% 91 50% Very much 13 27% 21 16% 34 19% % % % g. Encouraging students to attend campus events and activities (special FENVEVEN Very little 3 6% 10 8% 13 7% speakers, cultural performances, athletic events, etc.) Some 15 32% 45 34% 60 33% Quite a bit 17 36% 56 42% 73 41% Very much 12 26% 22 17% 34 19% % % % h. Encouraging students to use computers in their academic work FENVCOMP Very little 2 4% 1 1% 3 2% Some 4 8% 5 4% 9 5% Quite a bit 16 33% 46 34% 62 34% Very much 26 54% 82 61% % % % % 4

6 About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week doing each of the following? a. Teaching undergraduate students in class UGTEACH 0 0 0% 3 2% 3 2% % 40 30% 52 28% % 60 44% 81 44% % 19 14% 32 17% % 8 6% 9 5% % 1 1% 2 1% % 3 2% 3 2% More than % 1 1% 1 1% % % % b. Grading papers and exams GRADEPAP 0 0 0% 2 1% 2 1% % 63 47% 83 45% % 45 33% 58 32% % 23 17% 34 19% % 0 0% 1 1% % 0 0% 3 2% % 1 1% 1 1% More than % 1 1% 1 1% % % % c. Giving other forms of written and oral feedback GRADEBCK 0 1 2% 1 1% 2 1% to students % 83 61% % % 33 24% 45 25% % 12 9% 22 12% % 2 1% 2 1% % 1 1% 1 1% % 2 1% 2 1% More than % 1 1% 1 1% % % % 5

7 About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week doing each of the following? (continued) d. Preparing for class CLASSPRP 0 0 0% 1 1% 1 1% % 21 16% 25 14% % 57 42% 77 42% % 30 22% 43 23% % 12 9% 18 10% % 9 7% 13 7% % 3 2% 3 2% More than % 2 1% 3 2% % % % e. Reflecting on ways to improve my teaching REFLECT 0 0 0% 1 1% 1 1% % 92 69% % % 29 22% 37 20% % 4 3% 7 4% % 3 2% 4 2% % 2 2% 2 1% % 0 0% 0 0% More than % 2 2% 2 1% % % % f. Research and scholarly activities SCHOLAR 0 2 4% 3 2% 5 3% % 9 7% 20 11% % 17 13% 25 14% % 20 15% 29 16% % 18 14% 27 15% % 21 16% 25 14% % 21 16% 25 14% More than % 23 17% 24 13% % % % 6

8 About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week doing each of the following? (continued) g. Working with undergraduates on research FRESEARC % 35 26% 52 29% % 53 40% 75 41% % 19 14% 24 13% % 13 10% 15 8% % 4 3% 5 3% % 4 3% 5 3% % 1 1% 1 1% More than % 4 3% 4 2% % % % h. Advising undergraduate students ADVISE % 25 19% 39 22% % 74 56% 97 54% % 18 14% 27 15% % 8 6% 9 5% % 4 3% 5 3% % 2 2% 2 1% % 0 0% 0 0% More than % 2 2% 2 1% % % % i. Supervising internships or other field experiences FIELDEXP % 77 59% % % 41 32% 49 28% % 7 5% 8 4% % 5 4% 5 3% % 0 0% 0 0% % 0 0% 0 0% % 0 0% 0 0% More than % 0 0% 0 0% % % % 7

9 About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week doing each of the following? (continued) j. Working with students on activities other than course work FFACOTHR % 48 36% 68 38% (committees, orientation, student life activities, etc.) % 65 49% 92 51% % 11 8% 11 6% % 8 6% 9 5% % 0 0% 0 0% % 0 0% 0 0% % 0 0% 0 0% More than % 0 0% 0 0% % % % k. Other interactions with students outside of the classroom FINTERAC % 19 14% 29 16% % 85 64% % % 18 14% 20 11% % 8 6% 9 5% % 0 0% 0 0% % 1 1% 1 1% % 0 0% 0 0% More than % 1 1% 1 1% % % % l. Conducting service activities SERVICE % 23 17% 33 18% % 62 47% 86 48% % 30 23% 39 22% % 10 8% 12 7% % 3 2% 5 3% % 3 2% 4 2% % 0 0% 0 0% More than % 1 1% 1 1% % % % 8

10 Please respond to the following questions based on one particular undergraduate course section you are teaching or have taught during this academic year. In what format do you teach your selected course section? Does your selected course section fulfill a general education requirement on your campus? How many students are enrolled in your selected course section? Prior to this semester, how many times have you taught your selected course? TEACFORM Classroom, on-campus 47 98% % % Classroom, auxiliary location 0 0% 3 2% 3 2% Distance education 1 2% 1 1% 2 1% % % % GENEDREQ No 20 42% 86 64% % Yes 28 58% 49 36% 77 42% % % % CS05 9 or less 1 2% 6 4% 7 4% 10 to % 32 24% 39 21% 20 to % 26 19% 33 18% 30 to % 38 28% 46 25% 50 to % 29 22% 49 27% 100 or more 5 10% 3 2% 8 4% % % % CT % 16 12% 23 13% 1 to % 27 20% 33 18% 3 to % 53 40% 74 41% 10 to % 21 16% 29 16% 20 or more 5 11% 17 13% 22 12% % % % 9

11 About what percent of students in your selected course section do the following? a. Frequently ask questions in class or contribute to class discussions FCLQUEST None 1 2% 1 1% 2 1% 1-24% 25 53% 68 51% 93 51% 25-49% 14 30% 38 28% 52 29% 50-74% 4 9% 23 17% 27 15% 75% or higher 3 6% 4 3% 7 4% % % % b. Frequently come to class without completing readings or assignments FCLUNPRE None 1 2% 11 8% 12 7% 1-24% 21 47% 55 41% 76 43% 25-49% 6 13% 27 20% 33 19% 50-74% 11 24% 26 20% 37 21% 75% or higher 6 13% 14 11% 20 11% % % % c. Frequently work harder than they usually do to meet your standards FWORKHRD None 2 4% 6 5% 8 5% 1-24% 20 44% 48 36% 68 38% 25-49% 13 29% 40 30% 53 30% 50-74% 7 16% 28 21% 35 20% 75% or higher 3 7% 10 8% 13 7% % % % d. Occasionally use to communicate F None 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% with you 1-24% 21 45% 48 36% 69 38% 25-49% 15 32% 39 29% 54 30% 50-74% 6 13% 33 25% 39 22% 75% or higher 5 11% 14 10% 19 10% % % % e. Occasionally discuss grades or assignments FGRADE None 0 0% 2 2% 2 1% with you 1-24% 32 68% 67 50% 99 55% 25-49% 12 26% 43 32% 55 31% 50-74% 2 4% 14 11% 16 9% 75% or higher 1 2% 7 5% 8 4% % % % 10

12 About what percent of students in your selected course section do the following? (continued) f. At least once, talk about career plans FPLANS None 5 11% 8 6% 13 7% with you 1-24% 33 72% 81 61% % 25-49% 4 9% 27 20% 31 17% 50-74% 3 7% 16 12% 19 11% 75% or higher 1 2% 1 1% 2 1% % % % g. At least once, discuss ideas from readings or classes with you outside FIDEAS None 5 11% 8 6% 13 7% of class 1-24% 32 68% 83 62% % 25-49% 7 15% 32 24% 39 22% 50-74% 2 4% 10 7% 12 7% 75% or higher 1 2% 1 1% 2 1% % % % How often do students in your selected course section engage in the following? a. Have class discussions or writing assignments that include diverse FDIVCLAS Never 25 53% 58 44% 83 46% perspectives (different races, religions, genders, political beliefs, etc.) Sometimes 11 23% 42 32% 53 30% Often 6 13% 17 13% 23 13% Very often 5 11% 15 11% 20 11% % % % b. Work with other students on projects FCLASSGR Never 5 11% 21 16% 26 15% during class Sometimes 21 46% 40 31% 61 35% Often 5 11% 30 23% 35 20% Very often 15 33% 38 29% 53 30% % % % c. Participate in a community-based project (e.g., service learning) as FCOMMPRO Never 40 85% % % part of your course Sometimes 6 13% 19 15% 25 14% Often 1 2% 5 4% 6 3% Very often 0 0% 7 5% 7 4% % % % 11

13 How often do students in your selected course section engage in the following? (continued) d. Use an electronic medium (listserv, chat group, Internet, instant FITICADE Never 11 23% 36 27% 47 26% messaging, etc.) to discuss or complete an assignment Sometimes 14 30% 37 28% 51 28% Often 9 19% 18 14% 27 15% Very often 13 28% 41 31% 54 30% % % % e. Receive prompt written or oral feedback from you on their academic FFEED Never 1 2% 1 1% 2 1% performance Sometimes 4 9% 27 20% 31 17% Often 15 32% 46 35% 61 34% Very often 27 57% 59 44% 86 48% % % % f. Have serious conversations in your course with students of a different FDIVRSTU Never 22 48% 65 49% 87 49% race or ethnicity than their own Sometimes 20 43% 49 37% 69 39% Often 3 7% 11 8% 14 8% Very often 1 2% 7 5% 8 4% % % % g. Have serious conversations in your course with students who are very FDIFFSTU Never 22 48% 55 42% 77 44% different from them in terms of their religious beliefs, political Sometimes 17 37% 57 44% 74 42% opinions, or personal values Often 5 11% 9 7% 14 8% In your selected course section, about how much reading and writing do you assign students? Very often 2 4% 9 7% 11 6% % % % a. Number of assigned textbooks, books, or book-length packs of course FREADASG None 0 0% 9 7% 9 5% readings % 76 61% % % 30 24% 43 26% % 2 2% 4 2% More than 6 2 5% 7 6% 9 5% % % % 12

14 In your selected course section, about how much reading and writing do you assign students? (continued) b. Number of written papers or reports of 20 pages or more FWRTMR05 None 41 89% 92 73% % % 15 12% 20 12% % 11 9% 11 6% % 5 4% 5 3% More than 6 0 0% 3 2% 3 2% % % % c. Number of written papers or reports between 5 and 19 pages FWRTMD05 None 26 58% 44 34% 70 40% % 29 22% 39 22% % 29 22% 36 21% % 14 11% 16 9% More than 6 0 0% 14 11% 14 8% % % % d. Number of written papers or reports of fewer than 5 pages FWRITSML None 17 37% 30 23% 47 27% 1 4 9% 16 12% 20 11% % 37 29% 42 24% % 15 12% 24 14% More than % 31 24% 42 24% % % % In a typical week, how many homework problem sets do you require students in your selected course section to complete? a. Number of problem sets that take your students more than one hour FPROBSTA None 9 19% 27 21% 36 21% to complete % 46 36% 61 35% % 24 19% 29 17% % 4 3% 9 5% More than % 26 20% 39 22% % % % b. Number of problem sets that take your students less than one hour to FPROBSTB None 21 47% 62 48% 83 48% complete % 33 26% 41 24% % 14 11% 18 10% % 5 4% 8 5% More than % 14 11% 23 13% % % % 13

15 Time students spend preparing for your selected course section: a. In a typical 7-day week, about how many hours FEXPREP 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% do you expect your students to spend preparing for your class (studying, reading, writing, doing % 2 2% 2 1% homework or lab work, analyzing data, % 37 28% 48 27% rehearsing, and other academic activities) % 36 27% 47 26% % 25 19% 41 23% % 21 16% 25 14% % 5 4% 9 5% More than % 6 5% 7 4% % % % b. In a typical 7-day week, about how many hours FACTPREP 0 1 2% 4 3% 5 3% do you think your students actually spend % 48 36% 62 35% preparing for your class (studying, reading, writing, doing homework or lab work, % 39 30% 55 31% analyzing data, rehearsing, and other academic activities) % 21 16% 31 17% In your selected course section, how important to you is it that your students do the following? % 10 8% 14 8% % 6 5% 6 3% % 2 2% 2 1% More than % 2 2% 3 2% % % % a. Prepare two or more drafts of a paper or assignment before turning it FREWROPA Not important 16 34% 43 33% 59 34% in Somewhat important 8 17% 23 18% 31 18% Important 13 28% 39 30% 52 30% Very important 10 21% 24 19% 34 19% % % % 14

16 In your selected course section, how important to you is it that your students do the following? (continued) b. Work on a paper or project that requires integrating ideas or FINTEGRA Not important 12 26% 18 14% 30 17% information from various sources Somewhat important 10 21% 16 12% 26 15% Important 10 21% 39 30% 49 28% Very important 15 32% 57 44% 72 41% % % % c. Work with classmates outside of class to prepare class assignments FOCCGRP Not important 6 13% 21 16% 27 15% Somewhat important 15 32% 37 29% 52 30% Important 13 28% 38 29% 51 29% Very important 13 28% 33 26% 46 26% % % % d. Put together ideas or concepts from different courses when FINTIDEA Not important 14 30% 11 8% 25 14% completing assignments or during class discussions Somewhat important 12 26% 33 25% 45 25% Important 14 30% 51 39% 65 37% Very important 7 15% 36 27% 43 24% % % % e. Discuss ideas from your readings or classes with others outside of FOOCID05 Not important 16 34% 31 24% 47 27% class (other students, family members, co-workers, etc.) Somewhat important 9 19% 40 31% 49 28% Important 18 38% 43 33% 61 35% Very important 4 9% 15 12% 19 11% % % % f. Tutor or teach other students (paid or voluntary) FTUTOR Not important 16 34% 53 42% 69 40% Somewhat important 15 32% 37 29% 52 30% Important 13 28% 28 22% 41 24% Very important 3 6% 9 7% 12 7% % % % g. Examine the strengths and weaknesses of their views on a topic or FOWNVIEW Not important 14 30% 31 24% 45 26% issue Somewhat important 6 13% 22 17% 28 16% Important 18 38% 40 31% 58 33% Very important 9 19% 36 28% 45 26% % % % 15

17 In your selected course section, how important to you is it that your students do the following? (continued) h. Try to better understand someone else's views by imagining how an FOTHRVW Not important 14 30% 34 27% 48 28% issue looks from that person's perspective Somewhat important 11 24% 34 27% 45 26% Important 11 24% 31 24% 42 24% Very important 10 22% 28 22% 38 22% % % % i. Learn something that changes the way they understand an issue or FCHNGVW Not important 1 2% 10 8% 11 6% concept Somewhat important 5 11% 15 12% 20 11% Important 18 39% 43 33% 61 35% Very important 22 48% 61 47% 83 47% % % % In your selected course section, on average, what percent of class time is spent on the following? a. Lecture LECTURE 0% 1 2% 5 4% 6 3% 1-9% 2 4% 2 2% 4 2% 10-19% 4 9% 12 9% 16 9% 20-29% 5 11% 10 8% 15 8% 30-39% 3 6% 11 8% 14 8% 40-49% 6 13% 15 12% 21 12% 50-74% 17 36% 38 29% 55 31% 75% or more 9 19% 37 28% 46 26% % % % b. Teacher-led discussion TEACHLED 0% 3 6% 10 8% 13 7% 1-9% 12 26% 28 22% 40 23% 10-19% 13 28% 38 29% 51 29% 20-29% 10 21% 30 23% 40 23% 30-39% 4 9% 6 5% 10 6% 40-49% 0 0% 5 4% 5 3% 50-74% 3 6% 7 5% 10 6% 75% or more 2 4% 5 4% 7 4% % % % 16

18 In your selected course section, on average, what percent of class time is spent on the following? (continued) c. Teacher-student shared responsibility (seminar, discussion, etc.) TEACHSTU 0% 18 41% 43 34% 61 36% 1-9% 11 25% 32 25% 43 25% 10-19% 7 16% 17 13% 24 14% 20-29% 4 9% 14 11% 18 11% 30-39% 2 5% 12 9% 14 8% 40-49% 1 2% 4 3% 5 3% 50-74% 1 2% 1 1% 2 1% 75% or more 0 0% 4 3% 4 2% % % % d. Student computer use COMPMED 0% 18 39% 80 63% 98 57% 1-9% 9 20% 13 10% 22 13% 10-19% 3 7% 12 10% 15 9% 20-29% 9 20% 8 6% 17 10% 30-39% 3 7% 2 2% 5 3% 40-49% 2 4% 2 2% 4 2% 50-74% 1 2% 1 1% 2 1% 75% or more 1 2% 8 6% 9 5% % % % e. Small group activities GROUPSML 0% 7 15% 38 30% 45 26% 1-9% 12 26% 28 22% 40 23% 10-19% 6 13% 27 21% 33 19% 20-29% 10 21% 19 15% 29 17% 30-39% 3 6% 7 5% 10 6% 40-49% 6 13% 4 3% 10 6% 50-74% 3 6% 2 2% 5 3% 75% or more 0 0% 3 2% 3 2% % % % 17

19 In your selected course section, on average, what percent of class time is spent on the following? (continued) f. Student presentations STUPRES 0% 21 46% 45 36% 66 38% 1-9% 18 39% 37 29% 55 32% 10-19% 4 9% 30 24% 34 20% 20-29% 2 4% 8 6% 10 6% 30-39% 0 0% 3 2% 3 2% 40-49% 0 0% 1 1% 1 1% 50-74% 1 2% 1 1% 2 1% 75% or more 0 0% 1 1% 1 1% % % % g. In-class writing CLSWRITE 0% 25 53% 85 68% % 1-9% 16 34% 21 17% 37 22% 10-19% 2 4% 11 9% 13 8% 20-29% 2 4% 5 4% 7 4% 30-39% 1 2% 2 2% 3 2% 40-49% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 50-74% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 75% or more 1 2% 1 1% 2 1% % % % h. Testing and evaluation TESTEVAL 0% 4 9% 12 10% 16 9% 1-9% 25 53% 72 57% 97 56% 10-19% 14 30% 27 21% 41 24% 20-29% 3 6% 10 8% 13 8% 30-39% 0 0% 1 1% 1 1% 40-49% 0 0% 2 2% 2 1% 50-74% 1 2% 1 1% 2 1% 75% or more 0 0% 1 1% 1 1% % % % 18

20 In your selected course section, on average, what percent of class time is spent on the following? (continued) i. Performances in applied and fine arts PERFORM 0% 45 96% % % (e.g., dance, drama, music) 1-9% 1 2% 1 1% 2 1% 10-19% 0 0% 1 1% 1 1% 20-29% 0 0% 2 2% 2 1% 30-39% 0 0% 2 2% 2 1% 40-49% 1 2% 0 0% 1 1% 50-74% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 75% or more 0 0% 1 1% 1 1% % % % j. Experiential (labs, field work, art exhibits, etc.) EXPERIEN 0% 23 49% 59 47% 82 47% Select the response that represents the extent to which your evaluations of student performance (e.g., examinations, portfolio) challenge students in your selected course section to do their best work? 1-9% 7 15% 16 13% 23 13% 10-19% 4 9% 18 14% 22 13% 20-29% 4 9% 10 8% 14 8% 30-39% 2 4% 4 3% 6 3% 40-49% 5 11% 10 8% 15 9% 50-74% 2 4% 4 3% 6 3% 75% or more 0 0% 5 4% 5 3% % % % FEXAMS Very Little 0 0% 1 1% 1 1% 2 0 0% 3 2% 3 2% 3 1 2% 1 1% 2 1% 4 4 9% 16 12% 20 11% % 46 35% 67 38% % 37 28% 53 30% Very much 5 11% 26 20% 31 18% % % % 19

21 In your selected course section, how much emphasis do you place on engaging students in each of these mental activities? a. Memorizing facts, ideas, or methods from your course and readings FMEMORIZ Very little 14 33% 47 37% 61 36% so students can repeat them pretty much in the same form Some 21 49% 53 42% 74 44% Quite a bit 6 14% 19 15% 25 15% Very much 2 5% 8 6% 10 6% % % % b. Analyzing the basic elements of an idea, experience, or theory, such FANALYZE Very little 1 2% 0 0% 1 1% as examining a particular case or situation in depth, and considering its components Some 8 19% 8 6% 16 9% Quite a bit 18 42% 48 38% 66 39% Very much 16 37% 71 56% 87 51% % % % c. Synthesizing and organizing ideas, information, FSYNTHES Very little 0 0% 3 2% 3 2% or experiences into new, more complex interpretations and relationships Some 6 14% 12 9% 18 11% Quite a bit 24 56% 56 44% 80 47% Very much 13 30% 56 44% 69 41% % % % d. Making judgments about the value of information, arguments, or FEVALUAT Very little 4 9% 5 4% 9 5% methods such as examining how others gathered and interpreted data Some 17 40% 27 22% 44 26% and assessing the soundness of their conclusions Quite a bit 11 26% 49 39% 60 36% Very much 11 26% 44 35% 55 33% % % % e. Applying theories or concepts to practical problems or in new FAPPLYIN Very little 1 2% 3 2% 4 2% situations Some 6 14% 9 7% 15 9% Quite a bit 17 40% 46 36% 63 37% Very much 18 43% 69 54% 87 51% % % % 20

22 To what extent do you structure your selected course section so that students learn and develop in the following areas? a. Writing clearly and effectively FGNWRITE Very little 11 26% 18 14% 29 17% Some 14 33% 40 32% 54 32% Quite a bit 11 26% 32 25% 43 25% Very much 7 16% 36 29% 43 25% % % % b. Speaking clearly and effectively FGNSPEAK Very little 16 37% 29 23% 45 27% Some 14 33% 46 37% 60 36% Quite a bit 9 21% 25 20% 34 20% Very much 4 9% 26 21% 30 18% % % % c. Thinking critically and analytically FGNANALY Very little 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Some 2 5% 9 7% 11 7% Quite a bit 18 44% 51 40% 69 41% Very much 21 51% 66 52% 87 52% % % % d. Analyzing quantitative problems FGNQUANT Very little 4 10% 17 13% 21 13% Some 4 10% 17 13% 21 13% Quite a bit 20 48% 36 29% 56 33% Very much 14 33% 56 44% 70 42% % % % e. Using computing and information technology FGNCMPTS Very little 8 19% 26 21% 34 20% Some 12 28% 34 27% 46 27% Quite a bit 9 21% 34 27% 43 25% Very much 14 33% 32 25% 46 27% % % % 21

23 To what extent do you structure your selected course section so that students learn and develop in the following areas? (continued) f. Working effectively with others FGNOTHER Very little 4 9% 21 17% 25 15% Some 17 40% 37 29% 54 32% Quite a bit 11 26% 40 32% 51 30% Very much 11 26% 28 22% 39 23% % % % g. Learning effectively on their own FGNINQ Very little 1 2% 1 1% 2 1% Some 10 24% 16 13% 26 16% Quite a bit 17 40% 56 45% 73 44% Very much 14 33% 51 41% 65 39% % % % h. Understanding themselves FGNSELF Very little 14 36% 43 35% 57 35% Some 14 36% 31 25% 45 28% Quite a bit 7 18% 21 17% 28 17% Very much 4 10% 29 23% 33 20% % % % i. Understanding people of other racial and ethnic backgrounds FGNDIVER Very little 26 65% 72 58% 98 60% Some 6 15% 28 23% 34 21% Quite a bit 4 10% 12 10% 16 10% Very much 4 10% 12 10% 16 10% % % % j. Solving complex real-world problems FGNPROBS Very little 2 5% 10 8% 12 7% Some 14 34% 28 22% 42 25% Quite a bit 19 46% 46 37% 65 39% Very much 6 15% 41 33% 47 28% % % % 22

24 To what extent do you structure your selected course section so that students learn and develop in the following areas? (continued) k. Developing a personal code of values and ethics FVALUES Very little 14 33% 39 32% 53 32% Some 18 43% 46 37% 64 39% Quite a bit 6 14% 23 19% 29 18% Very much 4 10% 15 12% 19 12% % % % l. Developing a deepened sense of spirituality FSPIRIT Very little 37 88% % % Some 3 7% 10 8% 13 8% Quite a bit 2 5% 8 6% 10 6% Very much 0 0% 6 5% 6 4% % % % m. Acquiring a broad general education FGNGENLE Very little 13 32% 38 31% 51 31% Some 14 34% 37 30% 51 31% Quite a bit 10 24% 32 26% 42 26% Very much 4 10% 16 13% 20 12% % % % n. Acquiring job or work-related knowledge and skills FGNWORK Very little 3 7% 3 2% 6 4% Disciplinary Area: Respondents identified the field/discipline in which they teach their courses. These responses were first coded into 84 specific fields/disciplines. Institutions had the option to customize how these were collapsed into as many as eight disciplinary areas. Institutions choosing not to customize receive FSSE s eight categories. All uncategorized fields go into "Other" or "Unassigned fields/disciplines." In instances of missing responses, the disciplinary area of one's academic appointment is substituted. See the FSSE codebook for the breakdown of disciplinary areas. IPEDS: Some 9 22% 16 13% 25 15% Quite a bit 12 29% 47 38% 59 36% Very much 17 41% 58 47% 75 45% % % % DISCAREA Arts and Humanities 2 5% 11 9% 13 8% Biological Sciences 1 2% 10 8% 11 6% Business 4 9% 9 7% 13 8% Education 0 0% 2 2% 2 1% Engineering 15 34% 43 33% 58 34% Physical Sciences 11 25% 19 15% 30 17% Professional (other) 1 2% 1 1% 2 1% Social Sciences 4 9% 10 8% 14 8% Other 6 14% 24 19% 30 17% % % % 23

FSSE 2011 Frequency Distributions Illinois State University

FSSE 2011 Frequency Distributions Illinois State University How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following? a. Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or FINTERN Not important 3 5% 3 1% 6 2% clinical assignment

More information

Frequency Distributions August University of Wisconsin-Whitewater

Frequency Distributions August University of Wisconsin-Whitewater Frequency Distributions August 2010 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Course-Based Survey Option The course-based option asks faculty members to respond to questions about student engagement

More information

Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2010

Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2010 Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2010 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Course-Based Survey Option The course-based option asks faculty members

More information

Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium and Smaller Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2012

Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium and Smaller Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2012 Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium and Smaller Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2012 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Course-Based Survey Option The course-based option asks

More information

Research Universities (high and very high research activity) Frequency Distributions August 2011

Research Universities (high and very high research activity) Frequency Distributions August 2011 Research Universities (high and very high research activity) Frequency Distributions August 2011 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Course-Based Survey Option The course-based option asks

More information

FSSE 2008 Frequency Distributions Baccalaureate Colleges Arts & Sciences

FSSE 2008 Frequency Distributions Baccalaureate Colleges Arts & Sciences 1 How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following? a. Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or FINTERN Not important 18 4% 33 7% 51 6% clinical

More information

FSSE 2006 Frequency Distributions University of Wisconsin-Whitewater

FSSE 2006 Frequency Distributions University of Wisconsin-Whitewater How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following? a. Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or FINTERN Not important 1 1% 2 1% 3 1% clinical assignment

More information

FSSE 2005 Frequency Distributions University of Wisconsin-Whitewater

FSSE 2005 Frequency Distributions University of Wisconsin-Whitewater How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following? a. Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or FINTERN Not important 2 3% 5 5% 7 4% clinical assignment

More information

Frequency Distributions August Baccalaureate Colleges Arts & Sciences

Frequency Distributions August Baccalaureate Colleges Arts & Sciences Frequency Distributions August 2010 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Typical-Student Survey Option The typical-student option asks faculty members to respond to questions based on the typical

More information

Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium & Small Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2009

Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium & Small Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2009 Master s Colleges & Universities (Medium & Small Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2009 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Typical-Student Survey Option The typical-student option asks

More information

Master s Colleges & Universities (Larger Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2011

Master s Colleges & Universities (Larger Programs) Frequency Distributions August 2011 Frequency Distributions August 2011 Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Typical-Student Survey Option The typical-student option asks faculty members to respond to questions based on the typical

More information

FSSE 2005 Frequency Distributions Total Grand Frequencies

FSSE 2005 Frequency Distributions Total Grand Frequencies 1 How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following? a. Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or FINTERN Not important 349 7% 122 5% 317 4% 25 4%

More information

FSSE 2009 Frequency Distributions Kentucky State University

FSSE 2009 Frequency Distributions Kentucky State University 1 How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following? a. Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or FINTERN Not important 1 2% 0 0% 1 1% clinical assignment

More information

NSSE Benchmarks Mean Score for 5 Indicators of Effective Educational Practice

NSSE Benchmarks Mean Score for 5 Indicators of Effective Educational Practice National Survey of Student Engagement Survey 2009 Results A total of 953 students (528 first-year and 425 seniors) participated in the 2009 NSSE. 103 first-year students with Undecided majors responded.

More information

The Student Experience in Brief: UNC Chapel Hill

The Student Experience in Brief: UNC Chapel Hill The Student Experience in Brief: Active Learning Each year the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) asks students at hundreds of colleges and universities to reflect on the time they devote to

More information

Class Frequency distributions are reported separately for first-year students and seniors. Institution-reported class ranks are used.

Class Frequency distributions are reported separately for first-year students and seniors. Institution-reported class ranks are used. Sample The Frequency Distributions report is based on information from all randomly selected students for both your institution and your comparison institutions.1 Targeted oversamples and other non-randomly

More information

What Students Are Saying About Their UNC Chapel Hill Experience

What Students Are Saying About Their UNC Chapel Hill Experience What Students Are Saying About Their Experience Each year the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) asks students at hundreds of colleges and universities to reflect on the time they devote to various

More information

National Survey of Student Engagement

National Survey of Student Engagement 1. Academic and Intellectual Experiences Asked questions in class or contributed to class a. discussions b. c. d. e. f. g. h. i. j. k. National Survey of Made a class presentation Prepared two or more

More information

Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report

Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Variables The items from the NSSE survey appear in the left column in the same order and wording as they appear on the instrument. Benchmark Items that make

More information

NSSE Survey Agriculture Majors Compared with All Other Majors

NSSE Survey Agriculture Majors Compared with All Other Majors NSSE Survey 2004 Agriculture s Compared with All Other s Statistical significance set to: p less than.01 Agriculture Other s Class Level Junior Senior 21 44 65 2 505 507 23 549 572 clpresen Made a class

More information

Level of Academic Challenge (LAC)

Level of Academic Challenge (LAC) NSSE 2012 Benchmark Comparisons Level of Academic Challenge (LAC) (ERHS) Mean Comparisons (ERHS) Class Mean a n Mean a n Sig b Size c Effect First-Year 57.7 11 53.5 1642 Senior 52.1 14 56.6 1649 a Benchmarks

More information

NSSE Scores for English Majors

NSSE Scores for English Majors NSSE Scores for Majors The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) collects information from first-year (FY) and senior (SR) undergraduates from hundreds of universities about their participation

More information

NSSE 2005 Engagement Item Frequency Distributions University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

NSSE 2005 Engagement Item Frequency Distributions University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 1a. Asked questions in class or CLQUEST Never 24 2% 68 5% 343 5% 1,260 3% 17 2% 49 5% 213 3% 753 1% contributed to class Sometimes 421 36% 614 49% 3,041 46% 16,939 35% 311 31% 420 40% 2,218 34% 11,819

More information

NSSE Scores for Art Majors

NSSE Scores for Art Majors NSSE Scores for Majors The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) collects information from first-year (FY) and senior (SR) undergraduates from hundreds of universities about their participation

More information

NSSE Scores for Geosciences Majors

NSSE Scores for Geosciences Majors NSSE Scores for Majors The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) collects information from first-year (FY) and senior (SR) undergraduates from hundreds of universities about their participation

More information

NSSE Scores for Psychology Majors

NSSE Scores for Psychology Majors NSSE Scores for Majors The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) collects information from first-year (FY) and senior (SR) undergraduates from hundreds of universities about their participation

More information

NSSE Scores for Health and Exercise Science (HES) Majors

NSSE Scores for Health and Exercise Science (HES) Majors NSSE Scores for (HES) Majors The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) collects information from first-year (FY) and senior (SR) undergraduates from hundreds of universities about their participation

More information

NSSE Scores for Human Development and Family Studies (HDFS) Majors

NSSE Scores for Human Development and Family Studies (HDFS) Majors NSSE Scores for (HDFS) Majors The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) collects information from first-year (FY) and senior (SR) undergraduates from hundreds of universities about their participation

More information

NSSE Scores for Human Dimensions of Natural Resources (HDNR) Majors

NSSE Scores for Human Dimensions of Natural Resources (HDNR) Majors NSSE Scores for (HDNR) Majors The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) collects information from first-year (FY) and senior (SR) undergraduates from hundreds of universities about their participation

More information

NSSE Scores for Fish, Wildlife, & Conservation Biology (FWCB) Majors

NSSE Scores for Fish, Wildlife, & Conservation Biology (FWCB) Majors NSSE Scores for Fish, Wildlife, & Conservation (FWCB) Majors The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) collects information from first-year (FY) and senior (SR) undergraduates from hundreds of universities

More information

NSSE Scores across Pell Recipient Status

NSSE Scores across Pell Recipient Status January 2013 Highlights: recipients are well represented in the NSSE sample First-year recipients have statistically significant higher mean scores compared to first-year non- students for two of the five

More information

California Baptist University NSSE 2011 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Arts and Humanities

California Baptist University NSSE 2011 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Arts and Humanities NSSE 2011 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Arts and Humanities Comparing your students majoring in Arts and Humanities fields to those in Arts and Humanities fields at your

More information

Ferris State University NSSE 2010 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions BUSINESS

Ferris State University NSSE 2010 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions BUSINESS NSSE 2010 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions BUSINESS Comparing your students majoring in BUSINESS fields to those in BUSINESS fields at your comparison groups Business includes

More information

SUNY Potsdam NSSE 2011 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Social Sciences

SUNY Potsdam NSSE 2011 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Social Sciences NSSE 2011 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Social Sciences Comparing your students majoring in Social Sciences fields to those in Social Sciences fields at your comparison

More information

NSSE 2014 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons

NSSE 2014 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons NSSE 2014 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons California State University-Los Angeles Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the

More information

NSSE First Year Students Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Illinois State University

NSSE First Year Students Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Illinois State University - First Year Students Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on

More information

SUNY Potsdam NSSE 2010 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions SOCIAL SCIENCES

SUNY Potsdam NSSE 2010 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions SOCIAL SCIENCES Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions SOCIAL SCIENCES Comparing your students majoring in SOCIAL SCIENCES fields to those in SOCIAL SCIENCES fields at your comparison groups Social

More information

The University of Arizona NSSE 2012 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Social Sciences

The University of Arizona NSSE 2012 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Social Sciences NSSE 2012 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Social Sciences Comparing your students majoring in Social Sciences fields to those in Social Sciences fields at your comparison

More information

College of Charleston NSSE 2010 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions ARTS & HUMANITIES

College of Charleston NSSE 2010 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions ARTS & HUMANITIES NSSE 2010 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions ARTS & HUMANITIES Comparing your students majoring in ARTS & HUMANITIES fields to those in ARTS & HUMANITIES fields at your comparison

More information

Mean Comparisons August Purdue University

Mean Comparisons August Purdue University Mean Comparisons August 2010 University Interpreting the Mean Comparisons Report Sample The Mean Comparisons report is based on information from all randomly selected students for both your institution

More information

2014 Student Experience at the Research University (SERU) Item Frequencies and Means - Ethnicity by College - Asian Amer. N % Hispanic Amer.

2014 Student Experience at the Research University (SERU) Item Frequencies and Means - Ethnicity by College - Asian Amer. N % Hispanic Amer. 2014 Student Experience at the Research University (SERU) Item Frequencies and s - Ethnicity by College - University of Washington, Seattle School of Business Q006.1 Q006.2 Q006.3 Contributed to a class

More information

The University of Arizona NSSE 2012 Major Field Report Part I. Within-Institution Comparisons

The University of Arizona NSSE 2012 Major Field Report Part I. Within-Institution Comparisons NSSE 2012 Major Field Report Part I. Within-Institution Comparisons Comparing your students' responses across groups of related majors within your institution (as displayed on the "Categories" worksheet)

More information

Illinois State University

Illinois State University You are taking this survey: tksrvy Before attending orientation 166 8% 93 8% 71 9% 45 7% 117 9% While attending orientation 1,831 92% 1,115 92% 711 91% 626 93% 1,146 91% After attending orientation 4 0%

More information

Western Carolina University NSSE 2012 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Other and Undecided

Western Carolina University NSSE 2012 Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Other and Undecided Major Field Report Part II. Comparisons to Other Institutions Other and Undecided Comparing your students majoring in Other and Undecided fields to those in Other and Undecided fields at your comparison

More information

Mean Comparisons August CUNY Hunter College

Mean Comparisons August CUNY Hunter College Mean Comparisons August 2007 Interpreting the Mean Comparisons Report Sample The Mean Comparisons report is based on information from all randomly selected students for both your institution and your comparison

More information

Washington State University - Pullman Campus. Mean Comparisons August 2012

Washington State University - Pullman Campus. Mean Comparisons August 2012 Mean Comparisons August 2012 Interpreting the Mean Comparisons Report Sample The Mean Comparisons report is based on information from all randomly selected or censusadministered students for both your

More information

Mean Comparisons August The American University in Cairo

Mean Comparisons August The American University in Cairo Mean Comparisons August 2012 Interpreting the Mean Comparisons Report Sample The Mean Comparisons report is based on information from all randomly selected or censusadministered students for both your

More information

Chabot College Fall 2007 Student Accreditation Survey: All Students

Chabot College Fall 2007 Student Accreditation Survey: All Students Chabot College Student Accreditation Survey: Student Sample October 2007 Percentage Distribution of All Survey Items Based on a sample of 1,379 student course enrollments Percentage who were Percentage

More information

Chapter 2: NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE)

Chapter 2: NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) Chapter : NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) Who takes it? All freshmen and seniors are requested to complete the survey. In, participated in the NSSE. pilot so half of our students were asked

More information

AY2018 Senior Survey: College of Business Administration Report Introduction

AY2018 Senior Survey: College of Business Administration Report Introduction Introduction Survey Information The Senior Survey is designed to give undergraduate students the opportunity to reflect upon their K-State experiences. This information is used to improve the college experience

More information

California State University-Channel Islands. BCSSE 2012 Frequency Distributions

California State University-Channel Islands. BCSSE 2012 Frequency Distributions BCSSE 2012 Frequency Distributions You are taking this survey: tksrvy Before attending orientation 1 0% 1 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 0% While attending orientation 743 92% 523 92% 220 93% 406 93% 292 91% After attending

More information

American University of Armenia 2016 FRESHMAN STUDENT EXIT SURVEY

American University of Armenia 2016 FRESHMAN STUDENT EXIT SURVEY American University of Armenia 2016 FRESHMAN STUDENT EXIT SURVEY Prepared by Institutional Research Office Email: iro@aua.am Telephone: (+374) 60 61 25 16 May 2017 2016 Freshman Student Exit Survey 1 Table

More information

American University of Armenia 2018 Freshman Student Exit Survey. Prepared by Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

American University of Armenia 2018 Freshman Student Exit Survey. Prepared by Office of Institutional Research and Assessment American University of Armenia 2018 Freshman Student Exit Survey Prepared by Office of Institutional Research and Assessment Email: iro@aua.am May, 2018 Contents Methodology and Background... 3 Instrument

More information

BCSSE. Beginning College Survey of Student Engagement Academic Unit Executive Summary. Fall 2015

BCSSE. Beginning College Survey of Student Engagement Academic Unit Executive Summary. Fall 2015 BCE Beginning College Survey of Student Engagement Academic Unit Executive Summary Fall 2015 Office of Institutional Effectiveness 338 Miller Information and Technology Center (MITC) University of Louisville

More information

Instructors Who Taught Courses During the Spring 2007 Term. Spring 2007 Course and Teaching Evaluations

Instructors Who Taught Courses During the Spring 2007 Term. Spring 2007 Course and Teaching Evaluations TEMPLE UNIVERSITY Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122 A Commonwealth INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM OFFICE OF THE PROVOST Richard M. Englert Phone: (215) 204-4775 Interim Provost Fax: (215) 204-5816 E-mail: provost@temple.edu

More information

American University of Armenia 2016 ENTERING FRESHMAN STUDENT SURVEY

American University of Armenia 2016 ENTERING FRESHMAN STUDENT SURVEY American University of Armenia 2016 ENTERING FRESHMAN STUDENT SURVEY Prepared by Institutional Research Office Email: iro@aua.am Telephone: (+374) 60 61 25 16 April 2017 2016 Entering Freshman Student

More information

Cumulative. Percent. Faculty Staff Student External Total

Cumulative. Percent. Faculty Staff Student External Total Survey Participants Valid Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Faculty 441 17.3 17.3 17.3 Staff 508 20.0 20.0 37.3 Student 1431 56.3 56.3 93.6 External 164 6.4 6.4 100.0 2544 100.0 100.0

More information

2011 CCFSSE Student and Faculty Frequency Distributions Pima County Community College District

2011 CCFSSE Student and Faculty Frequency Distributions Pima County Community College District FCLQUEST FCLPRESEN FREWROPAP FINTEGRAT FCLUNPREP FCLASSGRP FOCCGRP selected course section ask questions in class or contribute to class discussions selected course section make a class presentation selected

More information

Master Degree Exit Interview Computer Science

Master Degree Exit Interview Computer Science Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Computer Science 2017 Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 Table of Content Sample Student Information COOP

More information

Instructors Who Taught Courses During the Spring 2006 Semester. Spring Semester 2006 Course and Teaching Evaluations

Instructors Who Taught Courses During the Spring 2006 Semester. Spring Semester 2006 Course and Teaching Evaluations TEMPLE UNIVERSITY Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122 A Commonwealth INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM OFFICE OF THE PROVOST Ira M. Schwartz Phone: (215) 204-4775 Provost Fax: (215) 204-5816 E-mail: ira.schwartz@temple.edu

More information

2009 Spring Check-In Survey Report

2009 Spring Check-In Survey Report 2009 Spring Check-In Survey Report All surveys All surveys: Number of surveys = 500 Number of completed surveys = 123 Percent of surveys completed = 24.60 % Number of people who have asked to be removed

More information

Graduating Student Survey Class of 2018

Graduating Student Survey Class of 2018 Graduating Student Survey Class of 2018 Graduating Student Survey Class of 2018 The Graduating Student Survey was administered May-July 2018 to the class of 2018 via a Web link sent by email in the invitation

More information

Master Degree Exit Interview Landscape Architecture

Master Degree Exit Interview Landscape Architecture Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Landscape Architecture 2015 Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 2 Sample Sample 2015 Population 11 Sample

More information

Master Degree Exit Interview Environmental Management

Master Degree Exit Interview Environmental Management Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Environmental Management 2014 Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 2 Sample Sample 2014 Population 11 Sample

More information

Master Degree Exit Interview Engineering Management

Master Degree Exit Interview Engineering Management Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Engineering Management 2015 Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 2 Sample Sample 2015 Population 83 Sample

More information

Graduate Survey Master's Degree Respondents Orlando Campus

Graduate Survey Master's Degree Respondents Orlando Campus Sample 4 Graduate Survey Master's Degree Respondents Orlando Campus - 2015 Master's Degree Gender Degree Frequency Percent Gender Frequency Percent Business Administration 1 33% Male 4 100% Engineering

More information

Slide 1. Slide 2. Slide 3. Northeastern Ohio Actuarial Collaboration. Thomas Wakefield Youngstown State University

Slide 1. Slide 2. Slide 3. Northeastern Ohio Actuarial Collaboration. Thomas Wakefield Youngstown State University Slide 1 Northeastern Ohio Actuarial Collaboration Thomas Wakefield Youngstown State University Slide 2 Undergraduate Mathematics and Statistics at Youngstown State University 150 undergraduate mathematics/mathematics

More information

Instructors Who Taught Courses During the Fall 2005 Semester. Fall Semester 2005 Course and Teaching Evaluations

Instructors Who Taught Courses During the Fall 2005 Semester. Fall Semester 2005 Course and Teaching Evaluations TEMPLE UNIVERSITY Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122 A Commonwealth INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM OFFICE OF THE PROVOST Ira M. Schwartz Phone: (215) 24-4775 Provost Fax: (215) 24-5816 E-mail: ira.schwartz@temple.edu

More information

Master Degree Exit Interview Computer Science

Master Degree Exit Interview Computer Science Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Computer Science 2014 Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 2 Sample Sample 2014 Population 11 Sample 8 Percent

More information

Master Degree Exit Interview Electrical Engineering

Master Degree Exit Interview Electrical Engineering Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Electrical Engineering 2014 Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 2 Sample Sample 2014 Population 6 Sample

More information

American University of Armenia 2017 Entering Freshman Student Survey. Prepared by Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

American University of Armenia 2017 Entering Freshman Student Survey. Prepared by Office of Institutional Research and Assessment American University of Armenia 2017 Entering Freshman Student Survey Prepared by Office of Institutional Research and Assessment Email: iro@aua.am May 2018 Contents Methodology and Background... 3 University

More information

BUSI 1307 Personal Finace. Revision Date: 10/17/16

BUSI 1307 Personal Finace. Revision Date: 10/17/16 Course Syllabus BUSI 1307 Personal Finace Revision Date: 10/17/16 Catalog Description: Personal and family accounts, budgets and budgetary control, bank accounts, charge accounts, borrowing, investing,

More information

Master Degree Exit Interview Master Computer Engineering

Master Degree Exit Interview Master Computer Engineering Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Master Computer Engineering Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 2 Sample Population 9 Sample 7 Percent of

More information

Institutional Diversity: Encourages students to have a public voice and share their ideas openly

Institutional Diversity: Encourages students to have a public voice and share their ideas openly DLE 2011 RESPONSES BY ETHNICITY Note: = African American, Chicano, Latino/ Spanish, Native American = Filipino, Pacific Islander, Institutional Diversity: Encourages students to have a public voice and

More information

GUIDE TO THE UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM IN ECONOMICS

GUIDE TO THE UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM IN ECONOMICS GUIDE TO THE UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM IN ECONOMICS 2018-2019 SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY THE COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES AND THE MAXWELL SCHOOL OF CITIZENSHIP AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT 110 EGGERS HALL

More information

THE ENROLLED STUDENT SURVEY

THE ENROLLED STUDENT SURVEY THE ENROLLED STUDENT SURVEY PART 1: Academics and Advising 1. During this academic year, how often have you done each of the following? Never Occasionally Often Very Often Course or classroom experiences

More information

STUDENT EXPERIENCE SURVEY - HE 2016

STUDENT EXPERIENCE SURVEY - HE 2016 RMIT Vietnam STUDENT EXPERIENCE SURVEY - HE 2016 615H-Accounting Survey Population: 114 Respondents: 34 Response Rate: 29.8% Demographics (% of total sample size) Commencement Year Age Gender Pre 2011

More information

Master Degree Exit Interview Electrical Engineering

Master Degree Exit Interview Electrical Engineering Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Electrical Engineering 2016 Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 2 Sample Sample 2016 Population 6 Sample

More information

Spring 2014 Graduate Student Survey Results by Degree Appendix B

Spring 2014 Graduate Student Survey Results by Degree Appendix B Appendix B Background I consider myself a... 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 1 Part-time student Full-time student 2% 14% 45% 98% 8 86% 55% EdD PhD MIT MEd I would prefer to take classes that meet during the.. Morning

More information

Q2.1 Please rate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements about the use of time in your school.

Q2.1 Please rate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements about the use of time in your school. Report for TELL Oregon 2018 54.18% responded 90.60% responded 58.44% responded 90.91% responded Time Q2.1 Please rate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements about the use of time

More information

The MSc in Actuarial Science programme consists of two stages.

The MSc in Actuarial Science programme consists of two stages. PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION KEY FACTS Programme name Actuarial Science Award MSc School Cass Business School Department or equivalent Specialist Masters Programme Programme code PSACSM Type of study Full Time

More information

Master Degree Exit Interview Manufacturing Engineering

Master Degree Exit Interview Manufacturing Engineering Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Master Degree Exit Interview Manufacturing Engineering 2016 Graduate School, Coop Program and Institutional Research Office 1 2 Sample Sample 2016 Population 23 Sample

More information

National Civic Engagement Survey Spring 2015 Descriptive Statistics

National Civic Engagement Survey Spring 2015 Descriptive Statistics National Civic Engagement Survey Spring 2015 Descriptive Statistics In spring 2015, nine community colleges from across the state were provided a small stipend to participate in the Civic Engagement Survey

More information

The MSc in Actuarial Science programme consists of two stages:

The MSc in Actuarial Science programme consists of two stages: PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION KEY FACTS Programme name Actuarial Science Award MSc School Cass Business School Department or equivalent Specialist Masters Programme Programme code PSACSC Type of study Full Time

More information

The degree is accredited by the Actuarial Profession and its structure mirrors that of the professional body qualifications.

The degree is accredited by the Actuarial Profession and its structure mirrors that of the professional body qualifications. PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION KEY FACTS Programme name Actuarial Management Award MSc School Cass Business School Department or equivalent Specialist Masters Programme Programme code PSACMA Type of study Full

More information

OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT IN MINING ENGINEERING. Mary Poulton Head, MGE Department

OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT IN MINING ENGINEERING. Mary Poulton Head, MGE Department OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT IN MINING ENGINEERING Mary Poulton Head, MGE Department ABET Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology 9 criteria evaluated: Students Program educational objectives Program

More information

SYLLABUS: AGEC AGRICULTURAL FINANCE

SYLLABUS: AGEC AGRICULTURAL FINANCE SYLLABUS: AGEC 600 -- AGRICULTURAL FINANCE Professor: Timothy G. Baker, 590 Krannert -- Office: 494-4237 Cell: 714-0426 E-mail: baker@purdue.edu Secretary: Linda Klotz. Krannert 565. E-mail: lrklotz@purdue.edu

More information

Registration for Senior Year CLASS OF 2018

Registration for Senior Year CLASS OF 2018 Registration for Senior Year CLASS OF 2018 Senior Scheduling Today, we are going to discuss your senior course selections. Some reminders when you get your verification card. Not all classes in the course

More information

COURSE OUTLINE. School of Business COURSE CODE: FINA 341 TOTAL COURSE HOURS: 60

COURSE OUTLINE. School of Business COURSE CODE: FINA 341 TOTAL COURSE HOURS: 60 COURSE OUTLINE SCHOOL: DEPARTMENT: PROGRAM (if applicable): COURSE TITLE: School of Business Accounting Financial Services Corporate Credit COURSE CODE: FINA 341 TOTAL COURSE HOURS: 60 PRE-REQUISITES/CO-REQUISITES:

More information

UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSSETS DARTMOUTH College of Business Department of Accounting and Finance. FIN 484, Advanced Investment Analysis, Online section

UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSSETS DARTMOUTH College of Business Department of Accounting and Finance. FIN 484, Advanced Investment Analysis, Online section UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSSETS DARTMOUTH College of Business Department of Accounting and Finance Fall 2016 COURSE: FIN 484, Advanced Investment Analysis, Online section PREREQUISITES: FIN 383 Investment

More information

SOUTHWESTERN OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATE'S DEGREE EXIT SURVEY 2017

SOUTHWESTERN OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATE'S DEGREE EXIT SURVEY 2017 SOUTHWESTERN OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATE'S DEGREE EXIT SURVEY 2017 1. What is your undergraduate CATC General Studies 0 0.00% major? Computer Science 0 0.00% Other: English Education Parks and

More information

Actuarial Science, M.S.

Actuarial Science, M.S. Actuarial Science, M.S. 1 Actuarial Science, M.S. FOX SCHOOL OF BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT (http://www.fox.temple.edu) About the Program The Fox School of Business and Management has a longstanding tradition

More information

DRAFT SYLLABUS SUBJECT TO CHANGE RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY SCHOOL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS AND ADMINISTRATION

DRAFT SYLLABUS SUBJECT TO CHANGE RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY SCHOOL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS AND ADMINISTRATION RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY SCHOOL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS AND ADMINISTRATION PUBLIC BUDGETING SYSTEMS Spring 2017 Unit/Subject/Course 20:834:542 Instructor: Cleopatra Charles, PhD Class Times:

More information

UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSSETS DARTMOUTH College of Business Department of Accounting and Finance

UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSSETS DARTMOUTH College of Business Department of Accounting and Finance UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSSETS DARTMOUTH College of Business Department of Accounting and Finance Summer 2018 COURSE: FIN 670, Investment Analysis, Online section PREREQUISITES: FIN 500 and graduate standing

More information

PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAMMES. Programme name Actuarial Science with foundation year

PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAMMES. Programme name Actuarial Science with foundation year PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAMMES KEY FACTS Programme name Actuarial Science with foundation year Award BSc (Hons) School Cass Business School Department or equivalent UG Programme (Cass

More information

Department of Finance and Quantitative Methods

Department of Finance and Quantitative Methods Department of Finance and Quantitative Methods FACULTY Professors Bhandari, Horvath (National City/ Stevenson Professor, chair), Webster; Associate Professors Hatfield, A. Rubash, Showers; Assistant Professor

More information

COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF CITY UNIVERSITY CITY UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG. Information on a Course offered by Division of Business

COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF CITY UNIVERSITY CITY UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG. Information on a Course offered by Division of Business COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF CITY UNIVERSITY CITY UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG Information on a Course offered by Division of Business Course Title: (English) Taxation (Chinese) Course Code: BUS20284 Credit Units:

More information

Frequently Asked Questions on the U.S. Qualification Standards

Frequently Asked Questions on the U.S. Qualification Standards Frequently Asked Questions on the U.S. Qualification Standards Developed and revised by the Committee on Qualifications of the American Academy of Actuaries The American Academy of Actuaries is a professional

More information

Finance 3000 EA1 Advanced Topics in Risk Management Fall Instructors:

Finance 3000 EA1 Advanced Topics in Risk Management Fall Instructors: Instructors: Thomas S. Marshall, CPCU, CLU, CIC tsmarsha@uncc.edu 350D Friday, 704-687-7641 Office Hours: Friday :30 PM 5:00 PM and by Appointment Faith R. Neale, PhD frneale@uncc.edu 351A Friday, 704-687-415

More information

Engagement Study February 2014

Engagement Study February 2014 Engagement Study February 2014 Our Strategic Plan Identify and understand key constituencies Increase engagement Motivate giving Project Objectives What do they know about us? Understand perceptions of

More information