Optimal asset allocation under forward performance criteria Oberwolfach, February 2007
|
|
- Priscilla Newton
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Optimal asset allocation under forward performance criteria Oberwolfach, February 2007 Thaleia Zariphopoulou The University of Texas at Austin 1
2 References Indifference valuation in binomial models (with M. Musiela) Investments and forward utilities (with M. Musiela) Investment and valuation under backward and forward dynamic exponential utilities in a stochastic factor model (with M. Musiela) Optimal asset allocation under forward exponential criteria (with M. Musiela) Horizon-independent risk measures (with G. Zitkovic) 2
3 Performance measurement 3
4 Deterministic environment Preferences u(x, t) : x wealth and t time Monotonicity u x (x, t) > 0 Risk aversion u xx (x, t) < 0 Impatience u t (x, t) < 0 Fisher (1913, 1918), Koopmans (1951), Koopmans-Diamond-Williamson (1964)... 4
5 Stochastic environment Important ingredients Time evolution concurrent with the one of the investment universe Consistency with up to date information Incorporation of available opportunities and constraints Meaningful optimal performance 5
6 Performance process U t (x) is an F t -adapted process As a function of x, U is increasing and concave For each self-financing strategy, represented by π, the associated (discounted) wealth X t satisfies E P (U t (X π t ) F s ) U s (X π s ) 0 s t There exists a self-financing strategy, represented by π,forwhich the associated (discounted) wealth Xt π satisfies E P (U t (Xt π ) F s ) = U s (Xs π ) 0 s t 6
7 Traditional framework A deterministic utility datum u T (x) is assigned at the end of a fixed investment horizon U T (x) =u T (x) Backwards in time generation of optimal utility V t (x) =sup π E P (u T (X π T ) F t; X π t = x) V t (x) =sup π E P (V s (X π s ) F t ; X π t = x) (DPP) V t (x) =E P (V s (Xs π ) F t ; Xt π = x) U t (x) V t (x) 0 t<t The performance process coincides with the traditional value function 7
8 A deterministic datum u 0 (x) is assigned at the beginning of the trading horizon, t =0 U 0 (x) =u 0 (x) Forward in time generation of optimal performance U s (X π s )=E P (U t (X π t ) F s ) 0 s t Performance can be defined for all trading horizons Performance and allocations take a very intuitive form Difficulties due to the inverse in time nature of the problem Performance criterion is not exogeneously given but is implied/calibrated w.r.t. investment opportunities 8
9 Motivational examples 9
10 An incomplete multiperiod binomial example Exponential datum Traded security: S t,t=0, 1,... ξ t+1 = S t+1 S t,ξ t+1 = ξ d t+1,ξu t+1 with 0 <ξ d t+1 < 1 <ξu t+1 Second traded asset is riskless yielding zero interest rate Stochastic factor: Y t,t=0, 1,... η t+1 = Y t+1 Y t,η t+1 = η d t+1,ηu t+1 with η d t <η u t Probability space (Ω, (F t ), P) {S t,y t : t =0, 1,...} : a two-dimensional stochastic process 10
11 State wealth process: X t, t = s +1,s+2,...,... α i : the number of shares of the traded security held in this portfolio over thetimeperiod[i 1,i] X t = X s + t i=s+1 α i S i Forward exponential performance U s (X α s )=E P (U t (X α t ) F s ) U 0 (x) = e γx, γ > 0 11
12 A forward performance process U t (x) = e γx if t =0 e γx+ t i=1 h i if t 1 Auxiliary quantities with h i = q i log q i P (A i F i 1 ) +(1 q i)log 1 q i 1 P (A i F i 1 ) A i = {ξ i = ξ u i } and q i = Q (A i F i 1 ) for i =0, 1,.. and Q being the minimal martingale measure 12
13 Important insights The forward performance process U t (x) = e γx+ t i=1 h i is of the form U t (x) =u(x, A t ) where u(x, t) is the deterministic function u(x, t) = e γx+1 2 t and A t corresponds to a time change depending on the market input A t =2 t h i i=1 13
14 Important insights (continued) The differential utility input u(x, t) = e γx+1 2 t solves the partial differential equation u t u xx = 1 2 u2 x u(x, 0) = e γx The stochastic market input A t =2 t h i i=1 plays now the role of time. It depends exclusively on the market parameters 14
15 A continuous-time example Investment opportunities Riskless bond : r =0 Risky security : ds t = σ t S t (λ t dt + dw t ) Datum at t =0: u 0 (x) Wealth process dx t = σ t π t (λ t dt + dw t ) X 0 = x Market input : λ t, A t da t = λ 2 t dt A 0 =0 15
16 Building the martingale U t (X π t ) Assume that we can construct U t (x) via U t (Xt π )=u(xt π,a t ) U 0 (x) =u(x, 0) = u 0 (x) where u(x, t) is the differential utility input and A t the stochastic market input du t (Xt π)=u x(x t,a t )σ t π t dw t +(u t (Xt π,a t)λ 2 t + u x(xt π,a t)σ t π t λ t u xx(xt π,a t)σt 2π2 t )dt }{{} 0 16
17 Differential utility input condition u t u xx = 1 2 u2 x u(x, 0) = u 0 (x) The optimal allocations in stock, π t π t = σ 1 t π 0, t = X π t, and in bond, π0, t, u x (X λ t π,a t ) t u xx (X π,a t ) = σ 1 t λ t R t t σt 1 λ t R t R t = r(x π t,a t ) ; r(x, t) = u x(x, t) u xx (x, t) The local risk tolerance r(x, t) and the subordinated risk tolerance process R t emerge as important quantities 16
18 Forward performance measurement time t 1,informationF t1 asset returns 110 constraints market view away from equilibrium benchmark calendar time numeraire subordination u(x,t 1 ) Time Wealth MI(t 1 ) + u(x, t 1 ) U t1 (x; MI) F t1 π t1 (x; MI) F t1 17
19 Forward performance measurement time t 2,informationF t2 asset returns constraints market view away from equilibrium benchmark numeraire u(x,t 2 ) calendar time subordination Time Wealth MI(t 2 ) + u(x, t 2 ) U t2 (x; MI) F t2 π t2 (x; MI) F t2 18
20 Forward performance measurement time t 3,informationF t3 asset returns 110 constraints market view away from equilibrium benchmark calendar time numeraire subordination u(x,t 3 ) Time Wealth MI(t 3 ) + u(x, t 3 ) U t3 (x; MI) F t3 π t3 (x; MI) F t3 19
21 Forward performance measurement time t, informationf t u(x,t) asset returns additional market input Time Wealth MI(t) + u(x, t) U t (X t ) F t π t (X t ) F t 20
22 Forward performance measurement time t 1,informationF t1 u(x,t) asset returns additional market input Time Wealth MI(t 1 ) + u(x, t 1 ) U t1 (X t 1 ) F t1 π t 1 (X t 1 ) F t1 21
23 Forward performance measurement time t 2,informationF t2 u(x,t) asset returns additional market input Time Wealth MI(t 2 ) + u(x, t 2 ) U t2 (X t 2 ) F t2 π t 2 (X t 2 ) F t2 22
24 Forward performance measurement time t 3,informationF t3 u(x,t) asset returns additional market input Time Wealth MI(t 3 ) + u(x, t 3 ) U t3 (X t 3 ) F t3 π t 3 (X t 3 ) F t3 23
25 Construction of a class of forward performance processes 25
26 Creating the martingale that yields the optimal performance Minimal model assumptions Stochastic optimization problem inverse in time Key idea Stochastic input Market Differential input Individual Maximal performance Optimal allocation 26
27 Differential input utility surfaces 27
28 Performance surface A model independent differential constraint on impatience, risk aversion and monotonicity Initial datum u 0 (x) =u(x, 0) Fully non-linear pde u t u xx = 1 2 u2 x u(x, 0) = u 0 (x) 28
29 Transport equation The u-equation can be alternatively viewed as a transport equation with slope of its characteristics equal to (half of) the risk tolerance r(x, t) = u x(x, t) u xx (x, t) u t r(x, t)u x =0 u(x, 0) = u 0 (x) Characteristic curves: dx(t) dt = 1 2 r(x(t),t) 29
30 Construction of performance surface u(x, t) using characteristics dx(t) dt = 1 2 r(x(t),t) Performance datum u(x, 0) 30
31 Construction of characteristics dx(t) dt = 1 2 r(x(t),t) Performance datum u(x, 0) Characteristic curves 31
32 Propagation of performance datum along characteristics 32
33 Propagation of performance datum along characteristics 33
34 Performance surface u(x, t) 34
35 Two related pdes Fast diffusion equation for risk tolerance r t r2 r xx =0 r(x, 0) = r 0 (x) (FDE) Conductivity : r 2 Porous medium equation for risk aversion γ t = γ(x, t) = 1 r(x, t) ( ) 1 γ xx γ(x, 0) = 1 r 0 (x) (PME) Pressure : r 2 and (PME) exponent: m = 1 35
36 Difficulties Differential input equation: u t u xx = 1 2 u2 x Inverse problem and fully nonlinear Transport equation: u t r(x, t)u x =0 Shocks, solutions past singularities Fast diffusion equation: r t r2 r xx =0 Inverse problem and backward parabolic, solutions might not exist, locally integrable data might not produce locally bounded slns in finite time Porous medium equation: γ t =( γ 1) xx Majority of results for (PME), γ t =(γ m ) xx, are for m>1, partialresultsfor 1 <m<0 36
37 A rich class of risk tolerance differential inputs Addititively separable risk tolerance r 2 (x, t; α, β) =m(x; α, β)+n(t; α, β) m(x; α, β) =αx 2 r(x, t; α, β) = Example n(x; α, β) =βe αt αx 2 + βe αt α, β > 0 (Very) special cases r(x, t;0,β)= β u(x, t) = e x β + t 2 r(x, t;1, 0) = x u(x, t) =log x t 2 r(x, t; α, 0) = α x u(x, t) = γ 1xγ e 2(1 γ) t, γ = α 1 γ α 37
38 Multiplicatively separable risk tolerance r(x, t; α, β) =m(x; α)n(t; β) Example m(x; α) =ϕ(φ 1 (x; α)) n(t; β) = 1 t + β, β > 0 Φ(x; α) = x α ez2 /2 dz ϕ =Φ r(x, t; α, β) =ϕ(φ 1 (x; α)) (Very) special cases m(x; α) =α, n(t; β) =1 u(x, t) = e x α + t 2 m(x; α) =x, n(t; β) =1 u(x, t) =log x 2 t m(x; α) =αx, n(t; β) =1 u(x, t) = 1 γ xγ e γ 2(1 γ) t, γ = α 1 α 37
39 Summary on differential input Key state variables: wealth and risk tolerance Risk tolerance solves a fast diffusion equation posed inversely in time r t r2 r xx =0 r(x, 0) = u 0 (x) u 0 (x) Transport equation u t r(x, t)u x =0 u(x, 0) = u 0 (x) Forward performance process constructed by compiling differential input and stochastic market input 39
40 Stochastic market input 40
41 Investment universe Riskless and risky securities (Ω, F, P) ; W =(W 1,...,W d ) standard Brownian Motion Traded securities 1 i k ds i t = S i t(µ i tdt + σ i t dw t ), S i 0 > 0 db t = r t B t dt, B 0 =1 µ t,r t R, σ i t Rd bounded and F t -measurable stochastic processes Postulate existence of a F t -measurable stochastic process λ t R d satisfying µ t r t 1=σ T t λ t 41
42 Investment universe Self-financing investment strategies π 0 t,πi t, i =1,...,k Present value of this allocation X t = k πt i i=0 dx t = k i=0 π i t(µ i t r t ) dt + k i=0 π i tσ i t dw t = σ t π t (λ t dt + dw t ) π t =(π 1 t,...,πk t ), µ t r t 1=σ T t λ t 42
43 Market input processes (σ t,λ t ) and (Y t,z t,a t ) These F t -mble processes do not depend on the investor s differential input They reflect and represent, respectively (λ t,σ t ) : dynamics of traded securites Y t : benchmark numeraire Z t : market view away from market equilibrium feasibility and trading constraints A t : subordination 43
44 The processes (Y t,z t,a t ) Benchmark and/or numeraire A replicable process Y t satisfying dy t = Y t δ t (λ t dt + dw t ) Y 0 =1 δ t F t, σ t σ + t δ t = δ t σ + t : Moore-Penrose matrix inverse 44
45 Market input processes Market views, feasibility and trading constraints An exponential martingale Z t satisfying dz t = Z t φ t dw t Z 0 =1, φ t F t Subordination A non-decreasing process A t solving da t = δ t σ t σ + t (λ t + φ t ) 2 dt A 0 =0 45
46 Forward performance process Optimal asset allocation 46
47 Forward performance process Stochastic input : (Y t,z t,a t ) Differential input : u(x, t) Time change A t Benchmark Y t u t u xx = 1 2 u2 x u(x, 0) = u 0 (x) Market view Z t U t (x) =u( x Y t,a t )Z t 47
48 Forward performance process Stochastic market input Differential input λ t,σ t x, r 0 (x) = u 0 (x) u 0 (x) benchmark, views r t r2 r xx =0 (FDE) subordination u t ru x =0 (TE) (Y t,z t,a t ) u(x, t) 7 U t (x) =u( x A t,y t )Z t Model independent construction! 48
49 What is the optimal allocation? Optimal portfolio processes π t =(π 0 t,π 1 t,...,π k t ) can be directly and explicitly characterized along with the construction of the forward performance! 49
50 Stochastic input Market The structure of optimal portfolios dx t = σ t π t (λ t dt + dw t ) Differential input Individual (Y t,z t,a t ) wealth x λ t,σ t,δ t,φ t risk tolerance r(x, t) 7 1 πt is a linear combination Y t of (benchmarked) optimal wealth and subordinated (benchmarked) risk tolerance 50
51 Optimal asset allocation Let X t be the optimal wealth, Y t the benchmark and A t the subordination processes dx t = σ tπ t (λ tdt + dw t ) dy t = Y t δ t (λ t dt + dw t ) da t = σ t σ + t (λ t + φ t ) δ t 2 dt Define r t the subordinated (benchmarked) risk tolerance r t = r ( X t Y t,a t ) Optimal (benchmarked) portfolios 1 Y t π t = σ + t ( (λ t + φ t )r t + δ t ( X t Y t r t )) 51
52 Stochastic evolution of wealth-risk tolerance 52
53 A system of SDEs at the optimum X t = X t Y t and r t = r( X t,a t ) d X t = r t (σ t σ + t (λ t + φ t ) δ t ) ((λ t δ t ) dt + dw t ) d r t = r x ( X t,a t )d X t Separability of wealth dynamics in terms of risk tolerance and market input Sensitivity of risk tolerance in terms of its spatial gradient and changes in optimal wealth Utility functional has essentially vanished Universal representation, no Markovian assumptions 53
54 Wealth-Risk tolerance Optimal wealth-risk tolerance ( X t, r t ) system of SDEs in original market configuration d X t = r t (σ tσ + t (λ t + φ t ) δ t ) ((λ t δ t ) dt + dw t ) d r t = r x ( X t,a t ) d X t change of measure historical benchmarked change of time Levy s theorem 54
55 Wealth-Risk tolerance Optimal wealth-risk tolerance (x 1 t,x2 t ) system of SDEs in canonical market configuration x 1 t = ( X t Y t ) A ( 1) t ( ) x 2 X t = r t,a t Y t A ( 1) t M t = A t w t = M A ( 1) dx 1 t = x2 t dw t dx 2 t = r x(x 1 t,t)x2 t dw t x 1 0 = x y, x2 0 = r x( x y, 0) 55
56 Analytic solution of the SDE system dx 1 t = x2 t dw t dx 2 t = r x(x 1 t,t)x2 t dw t Define the budget capacity function h(x, t) via x = h(x,t) x du h(x,t) r(u, t) = γ(u, t)du x x : related to symmetry properties of risk tolerance, reflection point of its spatial derivative and risk aversion front 56
57 Analytic solutions The budget capacity function h solves the (inverse) heat equation h t h xx 1 2 r x(x,t)h x =0 h(x, 0) = h 0 (x), x = h0 (x) x du r(u, 0) Solution of the SDE system x 1 t = h(z t,t) x 2 t = h z(z t,t) z t = h 1 0 (x) t r x(x,s)ds + w t Using equivalent measure transformations and time change we recover the original pair of optimal (benchmarked) wealth and (benchmark) risk tolerance 57
58 Forward performance measurement Market Benchmark, views, constraints Investor Wealth, risk tolerance Market input processes Subordination Fast diffusion eqn Transport eqn Forward evolution > Y t,z t,a t < x, r(x, t), u(x, t) Optimal performance and optimal portfolios measure change time change Wealth-Risk tolerance SDE system Heat eqn Fast diffusion eqn Universal analytic solutions
59 An example 59
60 Forward exponential performance Objective: Find an F t adapted process U t (x) such that U 0 (x) = exp ( x y E P (U s (Xs π ) F t ) U t (Xt π) ) E P ( Us ( X π s ) ) ( Ft = Ut X π ) t, s t Solution Differential input u (x, y, z) = exp ( xy ) + z 60
61 Forward exponential performance (continued) Stochastic market input consists of a pair of Ito processes, (Y,Z), solving, respectively, dy t = Y t δ t (κ t dt + dw t ) and Y 0 = y>0 dz t = η t dt + ξ t dw t Z 0 =0. 61
62 Dynamic exponential utility (continued) The processes δ t,κ t,η t,ξ t are taken to be bounded and F t progressively measurable. It is, also, assumed that σ t σ + t δ t = δ t and δ t (κ t λ t )=0 The drift η t of the process Z t satisfies 2η t = δt σ t σ + t (λ t + ξ t ) 2 ξt 2 Wlog, the dynamics of the benchmark process Y t can be written as dy t = Y t δ t (λ t dt + dw t ) 62
63 At the optimum Feedback portfolio control process πt = Y t B t σ t + ( λt + ( Xt Yt 1 1 ) ) δ t + ξ t Optimal wealth process Optimal utility volume dx t = B t 1σ tπ t (λ t dt + dw t ) = ( Y t ( σt σ + t (λ t + ξ t ) δ t ) + X t δ t ) (λt dt + dw t ) du t (X t )=U t (X t ) ( Y 1 t Bt 1 σ t πt + Xt Y 1 ) δ t + ξ t dwt t = U t (X t ) ( σ t σ + t (δ t λ t )+ ( I σ t σ + t ) ξt ) dwt Explicit solutions can be found 63
64 Explicit solutions Optimal wealth process: X t = E ( t x + t0 Es 1 ( Y s σs σ s + ) (λ s + ξ s ) δ s ((λs δ s ) ds + dw s ) ) E t =exp ( ( t0 δs λ s 1 2 δ s 2) ds + ) t 0 δ s dw s Optimal portfolio process +B t E t ( t 0 E 1 Optimal utility volume U t (X t )=exp π t = B t Y t σ + t (λ t + ξ t δ t )+B t X t σ + t δ t = xe t B t σ + t δ t + B t Y t σ + t (λ t + ξ t δ t ) s Y s ( σs σ + s (λ s + ξ s ) δ s ) ((λs δ s ) ds + dw s ) + t 0 ( x y t σ s σ + s (δ s λ s )+ ( I σ s σ + s ( σs σ + s (δ s λ s )+ ( I σ s σ + s ) ξs ) dws ) ) σ + t δ t ) ξs 2 ds 64
65 Case 1: No benchmark and no views δ = ξ =0 Then, Y t = y, fort 0. The forward performance process takes the form U t (x) = exp ( x y + t ) σ s σ s + λ 2 s ds Note that even in this simple case, the solution is equal to the classical exponential utility only at t =0. The optimal discounted wealth and optimal asset allocation are given, respectively, by and X t = x + t y ( σ s σ + ) s λ s (λs ds + dw s ) 0 π t = yb t σ + t λ t Observe that π is independent of the initial wealth x. 65
66 Case 1: No benchmark and no views δ = ξ =0 (continued) Optimal performance U t (X t )= exp ( x y t Total amount allocated in the risky assets Amount invested in the riskless asset σ s σ s + ) λ 2 t s ds σ sσ s + λ s dw s 0 1 π t B t = 1 yσ + t λ t π 0, t = X t 1 yσ + t λ t Such an allocation is rather conservative and is often viewed as an argument against the classical exponential criteria. 66
67 Case 2: No benchmark and risk neutralization δ =0and λ + ξ =0 Then, E t =1,Y t = y>0 and Z t = t λ s 2 ds t 0 λ s dw s. Forward exponential performance process ( U t (x) = exp x y 1 2 t 0 λ s 2 ds t 0 λ s dw s ) Optimal discounted wealth X t = x 67
68 Case 2: No benchmark and risk neutralization δ =0and λ + ξ =0 (continued) Optimal allocations π t =0 and π 0, t = X t = x Optimal exponential performance U t (X t )=U t (x) = exp ( x y 1 2 t 0 λ s 2 ds t 0 λ s dw s ) It is important to notice that, for all trading times, the optimal allocation consists of putting zero into the risky assets and, therefore, investing the entire wealth into the riskless asset. Such a solution seems to capture quite accurately the strategy of a derivatives trader for whom the underlying objective is to hedge as opposed to the asset manager whose objective is to invest. 68
69 Case 3: Static performance σσ + (δ λ)+ ( I σσ +) ξ =0 Then σ + (δ λ) =0and σσ + ξ = ξ, and Z t = t 0 ξ s dw s Forward exponential performance process ( U t (x) = exp x + Y t t 0 ξ s dw s ) Optimal discounted wealth X t = E t (x + t 0 E 1 s Y s ξ s ((λ s δ s ) ds + dw s ) ) 69
70 Case 3: Static performance σσ + (δ λ)+ ( I σσ +) ξ =0 (continued) Optimal allocation ( t πt = xe t B t σ t + δ t + Y t B t σ t + ξ t + B t E t Optimal exponential performance U t (Xt )=U 0 (x) = exp 0 E 1 s ( x y Y s ξ s dw s ) ) σ + t δ t Observe that the optimal level of forward performance remains constant across times. 70
71 Case 4: Following the benchmark δ = λ + ξ with λ + ξ 0 Then δ = σσ + (λ + ξ) and, in turn, Z t = t ξ s 2 ds + t 0 ξ s dw s Forward exponential performance process Optimal wealth U t (x) = exp ( x Y t t ξ s 2 ds + t 0 ξ s dw s ) Returns of wealth and of benchmark X t = xe t dx t X t = dy t Y t 71
72 Case 4: Following the benchmark δ = λ+ξ with λ+ξ 0 (continued) Optimal allocation π t = B t X t σ + t δ t Optimal exponential performance ( U t (Xt )= exp x Y t t ξ s 2 ds + t 0 ξ s dw s ) Observe that, contrary to what we have observed in traditional (backward) exponential utility problems, the optimal portfolio is a linear functional of the wealth and not independent of it. 72
73 Case 5: Generating arbitrary portfolio allocations Assume that 1 σ + t (λ t + ξ t )=1.Then 1 π t B t = X t and π 0, t =0 Hence, the optimal allocation π puts zero amount in the riskless asset and invests all wealth in the risky assets, according to the weights specified by the vector σ + (λ + ξ) 73
74 Case 5: Generating arbitrary portfolio allocations (continued) Note, also, that for an arbitrary vector ν t with 1 σ + t ν t 0, the vector ξ t = 1 1 σ+ t λ t 1 σ t + ν t satisfies the above constraint since 1 σ + t ( ν t λ t σ+ t λ t 1 σ + t ν t ν t ) =1 Can we generate optimal portfolios that allocate arbitrary, but constant, fractions of wealth to the different accounts? The answer is affirmative. Indeed, for p R,set, 1 σ + t (λ t + ξ t )=p Then, the total investment in the risky assets and the allocation in the riskless bond are 1 π t B t = px t and π 0 t B t =(1 p) X t 74
75 Examples of differential input 75
76 Risk tolerance r(x, t) = 0.05x e 0.05t Time Wealth
77 Utility surface u(x, t) generated by risk tolerance r(x, t) = 0.05x e 0.05t Time Wealth Characteristics: dx(t) dt = x(t) e 0.05t 77
78 Risk tolerance r(x, t) = 10x 2 + e 10t Time Wealth
79 Utility surface u(x, t) generated by risk tolerance r(x, t) = 10x 2 + e 10t Time 0 0 Wealth Characteristics: dx(t) dt = x(t) 2 + e 10t 79
80 Risk tolerance r(x, t;0, 1) = 0x 2 +1= Time Wealth
81 Utility surface u(x, t) = e x+ t 2 generated by risk tolerance r(x, t) = Time Wealth Characteristics: dx(t) dt =
82 Risk tolerance r(x, t;1, 0) = x 2 +0e t = x Time Wealth
83 Utility surface u(x, t) =logx 2 t, x>0 generated by risk tolerance r(x) =x Time Wealth Characteristics: dx(t) dt = 1 2 x(t) 83
84 Risk tolerance r(x, t;4, 0) = 4x 2 +0e 4t =2 x Time Wealth
85 Utility surface u(x, t) =2 xe t 2, x>0 generated by risk tolerance r(x, t) =2x Time Wealth Characteristics: dx(t) dt = x(t) 85
86 Risk tolerance r(x, t) = ϕ(φ 1 (x;0.5) t Time Wealth
87 Utility surface u(x, t) =Φ(Φ 1 (x;0.5) t +5) generated by risk tolerance r(x, t) = ϕ(φ 1 (x;0.5)) t Time Wealth Characteristics: dx(t) dt = ϕ(φ 1 (x(t); 0.5)) t +5 87
88 Utility function u(x, t 0 ) (fixed time) t 0 = Utility Wealth 88
89 Utility function u(x 0,t) (fixed wealth level) x 0 = Utility Time 89
90 Forward exponential performance Solution U t (x) = exp ( x ) + Z t Yt Idea of the proof: applying Ito calculus and using the structural assumptions on the market input yields du (X) =U (X) ( Y 1 β dw + XY 1 δ dw + ξ dw ) U (X) ( 2Y 1 β λ +2XY 1 δ κ +2η + Y 2 β 2 +2 ( Y 1 XY 2) δ β 2Y 1 ξ β +2XY 1 δ ξ + ( X 2 Y 2 2XY 1) δ 2 + ξ 2) dt = U (X) ( Y 1 β dw + XY 1 δ dw + ξ dw ) U (X) ( Y 1 β ( (λ + ξ)+ ( XY 1 1 ) δ ) 2 +2XY 1 δ (κ λ) +2η + ξ 2 δ (λ + ξ) 2) dt 90
91 Idea of the proof (continued) and, in turn, du (X) =U (X) ( Y 1 B 1 σπ + XY 1 δ + ξ ) dw U (X) ( Y 1 B 1 σπ σσ + ( (λ + ξ)+ ( XY 1 1 ) δ ) 2 +2XY 1 δ (κ λ) + ( I σσ + ) (λ + ξ) 2 +2η + ξ 2 δ (λ + ξ) 2 ) dt... and, finally, du (X) =U (X) ( Y 1 B 1 σπ + XY 1 δ + ξ ) dw 1 2 U (X) Y 1 B 1 σπ σσ + ( λ + ( XY 1 1 ) δ + ξ ) 2 dt 91
BACHELIER FINANCE SOCIETY. 4 th World Congress Tokyo, Investments and forward utilities. Thaleia Zariphopoulou The University of Texas at Austin
BACHELIER FINANCE SOCIETY 4 th World Congress Tokyo, 26 Investments and forward utilities Thaleia Zariphopoulou The University of Texas at Austin 1 Topics Utility-based measurement of performance Utilities
More informationOptimal investments under dynamic performance critria. Lecture IV
Optimal investments under dynamic performance critria Lecture IV 1 Utility-based measurement of performance 2 Deterministic environment Utility traits u(x, t) : x wealth and t time Monotonicity u x (x,
More informationSPDE and portfolio choice (joint work with M. Musiela) Princeton University. Thaleia Zariphopoulou The University of Texas at Austin
SPDE and portfolio choice (joint work with M. Musiela) Princeton University November 2007 Thaleia Zariphopoulou The University of Texas at Austin 1 Performance measurement of investment strategies 2 Market
More informationStochastic Partial Differential Equations and Portfolio Choice. Crete, May Thaleia Zariphopoulou
Stochastic Partial Differential Equations and Portfolio Choice Crete, May 2011 Thaleia Zariphopoulou Oxford-Man Institute and Mathematical Institute University of Oxford and Mathematics and IROM, The University
More informationSpot and forward dynamic utilities. and their associated pricing systems. Thaleia Zariphopoulou. UT, Austin
Spot and forward dynamic utilities and their associated pricing systems Thaleia Zariphopoulou UT, Austin 1 Joint work with Marek Musiela (BNP Paribas, London) References A valuation algorithm for indifference
More informationForward Dynamic Utility
Forward Dynamic Utility El Karoui Nicole & M RAD Mohamed UnivParis VI / École Polytechnique,CMAP elkaroui@cmapx.polytechnique.fr with the financial support of the "Fondation du Risque" and the Fédération
More informationM5MF6. Advanced Methods in Derivatives Pricing
Course: Setter: M5MF6 Dr Antoine Jacquier MSc EXAMINATIONS IN MATHEMATICS AND FINANCE DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS April 2016 M5MF6 Advanced Methods in Derivatives Pricing Setter s signature...........................................
More informationAMH4 - ADVANCED OPTION PRICING. Contents
AMH4 - ADVANCED OPTION PRICING ANDREW TULLOCH Contents 1. Theory of Option Pricing 2 2. Black-Scholes PDE Method 4 3. Martingale method 4 4. Monte Carlo methods 5 4.1. Method of antithetic variances 5
More informationExponential utility maximization under partial information
Exponential utility maximization under partial information Marina Santacroce Politecnico di Torino Joint work with M. Mania AMaMeF 5-1 May, 28 Pitesti, May 1th, 28 Outline Expected utility maximization
More informationControl Improvement for Jump-Diffusion Processes with Applications to Finance
Control Improvement for Jump-Diffusion Processes with Applications to Finance Nicole Bäuerle joint work with Ulrich Rieder Toronto, June 2010 Outline Motivation: MDPs Controlled Jump-Diffusion Processes
More information13.3 A Stochastic Production Planning Model
13.3. A Stochastic Production Planning Model 347 From (13.9), we can formally write (dx t ) = f (dt) + G (dz t ) + fgdz t dt, (13.3) dx t dt = f(dt) + Gdz t dt. (13.33) The exact meaning of these expressions
More informationPDE Approach to Credit Derivatives
PDE Approach to Credit Derivatives Marek Rutkowski School of Mathematics and Statistics University of New South Wales Joint work with T. Bielecki, M. Jeanblanc and K. Yousiph Seminar 26 September, 2007
More informationValuation of derivative assets Lecture 8
Valuation of derivative assets Lecture 8 Magnus Wiktorsson September 27, 2018 Magnus Wiktorsson L8 September 27, 2018 1 / 14 The risk neutral valuation formula Let X be contingent claim with maturity T.
More informationOptimal trading strategies under arbitrage
Optimal trading strategies under arbitrage Johannes Ruf Columbia University, Department of Statistics The Third Western Conference in Mathematical Finance November 14, 2009 How should an investor trade
More informationWhat Can Rational Investors Do About Excessive Volatility and Sentiment Fluctuations?
What Can Rational Investors Do About Excessive Volatility and Sentiment Fluctuations? Bernard Dumas INSEAD, Wharton, CEPR, NBER Alexander Kurshev London Business School Raman Uppal London Business School,
More informationOptimal liquidation with market parameter shift: a forward approach
Optimal liquidation with market parameter shift: a forward approach (with S. Nadtochiy and T. Zariphopoulou) Haoran Wang Ph.D. candidate University of Texas at Austin ICERM June, 2017 Problem Setup and
More informationRisk Neutral Valuation
copyright 2012 Christian Fries 1 / 51 Risk Neutral Valuation Christian Fries Version 2.2 http://www.christian-fries.de/finmath April 19-20, 2012 copyright 2012 Christian Fries 2 / 51 Outline Notation Differential
More informationOption pricing in the stochastic volatility model of Barndorff-Nielsen and Shephard
Option pricing in the stochastic volatility model of Barndorff-Nielsen and Shephard Indifference pricing and the minimal entropy martingale measure Fred Espen Benth Centre of Mathematics for Applications
More informationIncorporating Managerial Cash-Flow Estimates and Risk Aversion to Value Real Options Projects. The Fields Institute for Mathematical Sciences
Incorporating Managerial Cash-Flow Estimates and Risk Aversion to Value Real Options Projects The Fields Institute for Mathematical Sciences Sebastian Jaimungal sebastian.jaimungal@utoronto.ca Yuri Lawryshyn
More informationLecture 3: Review of mathematical finance and derivative pricing models
Lecture 3: Review of mathematical finance and derivative pricing models Xiaoguang Wang STAT 598W January 21th, 2014 (STAT 598W) Lecture 3 1 / 51 Outline 1 Some model independent definitions and principals
More informationOptimal asset allocation in a stochastic factor model - an overview and open problems
Optimal asset allocation in a stochastic factor model - an overview and open problems Thaleia Zariphopoulou March 25, 2009 Abstract This paper provides an overview of the optimal investment problem in
More informationA note on the term structure of risk aversion in utility-based pricing systems
A note on the term structure of risk aversion in utility-based pricing systems Marek Musiela and Thaleia ariphopoulou BNP Paribas and The University of Texas in Austin November 5, 00 Abstract We study
More informationMartingale representation theorem
Martingale representation theorem Ω = C[, T ], F T = smallest σ-field with respect to which B s are all measurable, s T, P the Wiener measure, B t = Brownian motion M t square integrable martingale with
More informationGeneralized Multi-Factor Commodity Spot Price Modeling through Dynamic Cournot Resource Extraction Models
Generalized Multi-Factor Commodity Spot Price Modeling through Dynamic Cournot Resource Extraction Models Bilkan Erkmen (joint work with Michael Coulon) Workshop on Stochastic Games, Equilibrium, and Applications
More informationConstructing Markov models for barrier options
Constructing Markov models for barrier options Gerard Brunick joint work with Steven Shreve Department of Mathematics University of Texas at Austin Nov. 14 th, 2009 3 rd Western Conference on Mathematical
More information( ) since this is the benefit of buying the asset at the strike price rather
Review of some financial models for MAT 483 Parity and Other Option Relationships The basic parity relationship for European options with the same strike price and the same time to expiration is: C( KT
More informationRisk Neutral Measures
CHPTER 4 Risk Neutral Measures Our aim in this section is to show how risk neutral measures can be used to price derivative securities. The key advantage is that under a risk neutral measure the discounted
More informationEconomathematics. Problem Sheet 1. Zbigniew Palmowski. Ws 2 dw s = 1 t
Economathematics Problem Sheet 1 Zbigniew Palmowski 1. Calculate Ee X where X is a gaussian random variable with mean µ and volatility σ >.. Verify that where W is a Wiener process. Ws dw s = 1 3 W t 3
More informationVolatility Smiles and Yield Frowns
Volatility Smiles and Yield Frowns Peter Carr NYU CBOE Conference on Derivatives and Volatility, Chicago, Nov. 10, 2017 Peter Carr (NYU) Volatility Smiles and Yield Frowns 11/10/2017 1 / 33 Interest Rates
More informationKØBENHAVNS UNIVERSITET (Blok 2, 2011/2012) Naturvidenskabelig kandidateksamen Continuous time finance (FinKont) TIME ALLOWED : 3 hours
This question paper consists of 3 printed pages FinKont KØBENHAVNS UNIVERSITET (Blok 2, 211/212) Naturvidenskabelig kandidateksamen Continuous time finance (FinKont) TIME ALLOWED : 3 hours This exam paper
More informationHedging under Arbitrage
Hedging under Arbitrage Johannes Ruf Columbia University, Department of Statistics Modeling and Managing Financial Risks January 12, 2011 Motivation Given: a frictionless market of stocks with continuous
More informationOptimal Execution: II. Trade Optimal Execution
Optimal Execution: II. Trade Optimal Execution René Carmona Bendheim Center for Finance Department of Operations Research & Financial Engineering Princeton University Purdue June 21, 212 Optimal Execution
More informationTangent Lévy Models. Sergey Nadtochiy (joint work with René Carmona) Oxford-Man Institute of Quantitative Finance University of Oxford.
Tangent Lévy Models Sergey Nadtochiy (joint work with René Carmona) Oxford-Man Institute of Quantitative Finance University of Oxford June 24, 2010 6th World Congress of the Bachelier Finance Society Sergey
More informationFourier Space Time-stepping Method for Option Pricing with Lévy Processes
FST method Extensions Indifference pricing Fourier Space Time-stepping Method for Option Pricing with Lévy Processes Vladimir Surkov University of Toronto Computational Methods in Finance Conference University
More informationExponential utility maximization under partial information and sufficiency of information
Exponential utility maximization under partial information and sufficiency of information Marina Santacroce Politecnico di Torino Joint work with M. Mania WORKSHOP FINANCE and INSURANCE March 16-2, Jena
More informationSTOCHASTIC INTEGRALS
Stat 391/FinMath 346 Lecture 8 STOCHASTIC INTEGRALS X t = CONTINUOUS PROCESS θ t = PORTFOLIO: #X t HELD AT t { St : STOCK PRICE M t : MG W t : BROWNIAN MOTION DISCRETE TIME: = t < t 1
More informationVolatility Smiles and Yield Frowns
Volatility Smiles and Yield Frowns Peter Carr NYU IFS, Chengdu, China, July 30, 2018 Peter Carr (NYU) Volatility Smiles and Yield Frowns 7/30/2018 1 / 35 Interest Rates and Volatility Practitioners and
More informationBasic Arbitrage Theory KTH Tomas Björk
Basic Arbitrage Theory KTH 2010 Tomas Björk Tomas Björk, 2010 Contents 1. Mathematics recap. (Ch 10-12) 2. Recap of the martingale approach. (Ch 10-12) 3. Change of numeraire. (Ch 26) Björk,T. Arbitrage
More informationChapter 3: Black-Scholes Equation and Its Numerical Evaluation
Chapter 3: Black-Scholes Equation and Its Numerical Evaluation 3.1 Itô Integral 3.1.1 Convergence in the Mean and Stieltjes Integral Definition 3.1 (Convergence in the Mean) A sequence {X n } n ln of random
More informationSensitivity Analysis on Long-term Cash flows
Sensitivity Analysis on Long-term Cash flows Hyungbin Park Worcester Polytechnic Institute 19 March 2016 Eastern Conference on Mathematical Finance Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worceseter, MA 1 / 49
More informationDynamic Protection for Bayesian Optimal Portfolio
Dynamic Protection for Bayesian Optimal Portfolio Hideaki Miyata Department of Mathematics, Kyoto University Jun Sekine Institute of Economic Research, Kyoto University Jan. 6, 2009, Kunitachi, Tokyo 1
More informationFunctional vs Banach space stochastic calculus & strong-viscosity solutions to semilinear parabolic path-dependent PDEs.
Functional vs Banach space stochastic calculus & strong-viscosity solutions to semilinear parabolic path-dependent PDEs Andrea Cosso LPMA, Université Paris Diderot joint work with Francesco Russo ENSTA,
More informationTime-Consistent and Market-Consistent Actuarial Valuations
Time-Consistent and Market-Consistent Actuarial Valuations Antoon Pelsser 1 Mitja Stadje 2 1 Maastricht University & Kleynen Consultants & Netspar Email: a.pelsser@maastrichtuniversity.nl 2 Tilburg University
More informationHedging of swaptions in a Lévy driven Heath-Jarrow-Morton framework
Hedging of swaptions in a Lévy driven Heath-Jarrow-Morton framework Kathrin Glau, Nele Vandaele, Michèle Vanmaele Bachelier Finance Society World Congress 2010 June 22-26, 2010 Nele Vandaele Hedging of
More informationProspect Theory: A New Paradigm for Portfolio Choice
Prospect Theory: A New Paradigm for Portfolio Choice 1 Prospect Theory Expected Utility Theory and Its Paradoxes Prospect Theory 2 Portfolio Selection Model and Solution Continuous-Time Market Setting
More informationInformation, Interest Rates and Geometry
Information, Interest Rates and Geometry Dorje C. Brody Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ www.imperial.ac.uk/people/d.brody (Based on work in collaboration with Lane Hughston
More informationStochastic Differential equations as applied to pricing of options
Stochastic Differential equations as applied to pricing of options By Yasin LUT Supevisor:Prof. Tuomo Kauranne December 2010 Introduction Pricing an European call option Conclusion INTRODUCTION A stochastic
More informationIntroduction to Affine Processes. Applications to Mathematical Finance
and Its Applications to Mathematical Finance Department of Mathematical Science, KAIST Workshop for Young Mathematicians in Korea, 2010 Outline Motivation 1 Motivation 2 Preliminary : Stochastic Calculus
More informationThe stochastic calculus
Gdansk A schedule of the lecture Stochastic differential equations Ito calculus, Ito process Ornstein - Uhlenbeck (OU) process Heston model Stopping time for OU process Stochastic differential equations
More informationAn Introduction to Point Processes. from a. Martingale Point of View
An Introduction to Point Processes from a Martingale Point of View Tomas Björk KTH, 211 Preliminary, incomplete, and probably with lots of typos 2 Contents I The Mathematics of Counting Processes 5 1 Counting
More informationPortfolio Optimization Under Fixed Transaction Costs
Portfolio Optimization Under Fixed Transaction Costs Gennady Shaikhet supervised by Dr. Gady Zohar The model Market with two securities: b(t) - bond without interest rate p(t) - stock, an Ito process db(t)
More informationPricing in markets modeled by general processes with independent increments
Pricing in markets modeled by general processes with independent increments Tom Hurd Financial Mathematics at McMaster www.phimac.org Thanks to Tahir Choulli and Shui Feng Financial Mathematics Seminar
More informationTHE MARTINGALE METHOD DEMYSTIFIED
THE MARTINGALE METHOD DEMYSTIFIED SIMON ELLERSGAARD NIELSEN Abstract. We consider the nitty gritty of the martingale approach to option pricing. These notes are largely based upon Björk s Arbitrage Theory
More informationRisk Minimization Control for Beating the Market Strategies
Risk Minimization Control for Beating the Market Strategies Jan Večeř, Columbia University, Department of Statistics, Mingxin Xu, Carnegie Mellon University, Department of Mathematical Sciences, Olympia
More informationImplementing an Agent-Based General Equilibrium Model
Implementing an Agent-Based General Equilibrium Model 1 2 3 Pure Exchange General Equilibrium We shall take N dividend processes δ n (t) as exogenous with a distribution which is known to all agents There
More informationIlliquidity, Credit risk and Merton s model
Illiquidity, Credit risk and Merton s model (joint work with J. Dong and L. Korobenko) A. Deniz Sezer University of Calgary April 28, 2016 Merton s model of corporate debt A corporate bond is a contingent
More informationRobust Portfolio Decisions for Financial Institutions
Robust Portfolio Decisions for Financial Institutions Ioannis Baltas 1,3, Athanasios N. Yannacopoulos 2,3 & Anastasios Xepapadeas 4 1 Department of Financial and Management Engineering University of the
More informationOptimal Asset Allocation with Stochastic Interest Rates in Regime-switching Models
Optimal Asset Allocation with Stochastic Interest Rates in Regime-switching Models Ruihua Liu Department of Mathematics University of Dayton, Ohio Joint Work With Cheng Ye and Dan Ren To appear in International
More informationContinuous Time Finance. Tomas Björk
Continuous Time Finance Tomas Björk 1 II Stochastic Calculus Tomas Björk 2 Typical Setup Take as given the market price process, S(t), of some underlying asset. S(t) = price, at t, per unit of underlying
More informationAn example of indifference prices under exponential preferences
Finance Stochast. 8, 229 239 (2004) DOI: 0.007/s00780-003-02-5 c Springer-Verlag 2004 An example of indifference prices under exponential preferences Marek Musiela, Thaleia Zariphopoulou 2 BNP Paribas,
More informationOn Using Shadow Prices in Portfolio optimization with Transaction Costs
On Using Shadow Prices in Portfolio optimization with Transaction Costs Johannes Muhle-Karbe Universität Wien Joint work with Jan Kallsen Universidad de Murcia 12.03.2010 Outline The Merton problem The
More informationAn overview of some financial models using BSDE with enlarged filtrations
An overview of some financial models using BSDE with enlarged filtrations Anne EYRAUD-LOISEL Workshop : Enlargement of Filtrations and Applications to Finance and Insurance May 31st - June 4th, 2010, Jena
More informationUtility Indifference Pricing and Dynamic Programming Algorithm
Chapter 8 Utility Indifference ricing and Dynamic rogramming Algorithm In the Black-Scholes framework, we can perfectly replicate an option s payoff. However, it may not be true beyond the Black-Scholes
More informationis a standard Brownian motion.
Stochastic Calculus Final Examination Solutions June 7, 25 There are 2 problems and points each.. (Property of Brownian Bridge) Let Bt = {B t, t B = } be a Brownian bridge, and define dx t = Xt dt + db
More informationOptimal stopping problems for a Brownian motion with a disorder on a finite interval
Optimal stopping problems for a Brownian motion with a disorder on a finite interval A. N. Shiryaev M. V. Zhitlukhin arxiv:1212.379v1 [math.st] 15 Dec 212 December 18, 212 Abstract We consider optimal
More informationThe Life Cycle Model with Recursive Utility: Defined benefit vs defined contribution.
The Life Cycle Model with Recursive Utility: Defined benefit vs defined contribution. Knut K. Aase Norwegian School of Economics 5045 Bergen, Norway IACA/PBSS Colloquium Cancun 2017 June 6-7, 2017 1. Papers
More informationStochastic Dynamical Systems and SDE s. An Informal Introduction
Stochastic Dynamical Systems and SDE s An Informal Introduction Olav Kallenberg Graduate Student Seminar, April 18, 2012 1 / 33 2 / 33 Simple recursion: Deterministic system, discrete time x n+1 = f (x
More informationGeneralized Affine Transform Formulae and Exact Simulation of the WMSV Model
On of Affine Processes on S + d Generalized Affine and Exact Simulation of the WMSV Model Department of Mathematical Science, KAIST, Republic of Korea 2012 SIAM Financial Math and Engineering joint work
More informationA No-Arbitrage Theorem for Uncertain Stock Model
Fuzzy Optim Decis Making manuscript No (will be inserted by the editor) A No-Arbitrage Theorem for Uncertain Stock Model Kai Yao Received: date / Accepted: date Abstract Stock model is used to describe
More informationPDE Methods for the Maximum Drawdown
PDE Methods for the Maximum Drawdown Libor Pospisil, Jan Vecer Columbia University, Department of Statistics, New York, NY 127, USA April 1, 28 Abstract Maximum drawdown is a risk measure that plays an
More informationIndifference fee rate 1
Indifference fee rate 1 for variable annuities Ricardo ROMO ROMERO Etienne CHEVALIER and Thomas LIM Université d Évry Val d Essonne, Laboratoire de Mathématiques et Modélisation d Evry Second Young researchers
More informationMATH3075/3975 FINANCIAL MATHEMATICS TUTORIAL PROBLEMS
MATH307/37 FINANCIAL MATHEMATICS TUTORIAL PROBLEMS School of Mathematics and Statistics Semester, 04 Tutorial problems should be used to test your mathematical skills and understanding of the lecture material.
More informationArbitrageurs, bubbles and credit conditions
Arbitrageurs, bubbles and credit conditions Julien Hugonnier (SFI @ EPFL) and Rodolfo Prieto (BU) 8th Cowles Conference on General Equilibrium and its Applications April 28, 212 Motivation Loewenstein
More informationMASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY 6.265/15.070J Fall 2013 Lecture 19 11/20/2013. Applications of Ito calculus to finance
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY 6.265/15.7J Fall 213 Lecture 19 11/2/213 Applications of Ito calculus to finance Content. 1. Trading strategies 2. Black-Scholes option pricing formula 1 Security
More informationValuing volatility and variance swaps for a non-gaussian Ornstein-Uhlenbeck stochastic volatility model
Valuing volatility and variance swaps for a non-gaussian Ornstein-Uhlenbeck stochastic volatility model 1(23) Valuing volatility and variance swaps for a non-gaussian Ornstein-Uhlenbeck stochastic volatility
More informationLocal Volatility Dynamic Models
René Carmona Bendheim Center for Finance Department of Operations Research & Financial Engineering Princeton University Columbia November 9, 27 Contents Joint work with Sergey Nadtochyi Motivation 1 Understanding
More informationRobust Portfolio Choice and Indifference Valuation
and Indifference Valuation Mitja Stadje Dep. of Econometrics & Operations Research Tilburg University joint work with Roger Laeven July, 2012 http://alexandria.tue.nl/repository/books/733411.pdf Setting
More informationThe Black-Scholes Equation using Heat Equation
The Black-Scholes Equation using Heat Equation Peter Cassar May 0, 05 Assumptions of the Black-Scholes Model We have a risk free asset given by the price process, dbt = rbt The asset price follows a geometric
More informationAll Investors are Risk-averse Expected Utility Maximizers. Carole Bernard (UW), Jit Seng Chen (GGY) and Steven Vanduffel (Vrije Universiteit Brussel)
All Investors are Risk-averse Expected Utility Maximizers Carole Bernard (UW), Jit Seng Chen (GGY) and Steven Vanduffel (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) First Name: Waterloo, April 2013. Last Name: UW ID #:
More information1 The continuous time limit
Derivative Securities, Courant Institute, Fall 2008 http://www.math.nyu.edu/faculty/goodman/teaching/derivsec08/index.html Jonathan Goodman and Keith Lewis Supplementary notes and comments, Section 3 1
More informationEnlargement of filtration
Enlargement of filtration Bernardo D Auria email: bernardo.dauria@uc3m.es web: www.est.uc3m.es/bdauria July 6, 2017 ICMAT / UC3M Enlargement of Filtration Enlargement of Filtration ([1] 5.9) If G is a
More informationOptimal Investment with Deferred Capital Gains Taxes
Optimal Investment with Deferred Capital Gains Taxes A Simple Martingale Method Approach Frank Thomas Seifried University of Kaiserslautern March 20, 2009 F. Seifried (Kaiserslautern) Deferred Capital
More informationExtended Libor Models and Their Calibration
Extended Libor Models and Their Calibration Denis Belomestny Weierstraß Institute Berlin Vienna, 16 November 2007 Denis Belomestny (WIAS) Extended Libor Models and Their Calibration Vienna, 16 November
More information1.1 Basic Financial Derivatives: Forward Contracts and Options
Chapter 1 Preliminaries 1.1 Basic Financial Derivatives: Forward Contracts and Options A derivative is a financial instrument whose value depends on the values of other, more basic underlying variables
More informationAll Investors are Risk-averse Expected Utility Maximizers
All Investors are Risk-averse Expected Utility Maximizers Carole Bernard (UW), Jit Seng Chen (GGY) and Steven Vanduffel (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) AFFI, Lyon, May 2013. Carole Bernard All Investors are
More informationCredit Risk Models with Filtered Market Information
Credit Risk Models with Filtered Market Information Rüdiger Frey Universität Leipzig Bressanone, July 2007 ruediger.frey@math.uni-leipzig.de www.math.uni-leipzig.de/~frey joint with Abdel Gabih and Thorsten
More informationInternational Monetary Theory: Mundell Fleming Redux
International Monetary Theory: Mundell Fleming Redux by Markus K. Brunnermeier and Yuliy Sannikov Princeton and Stanford University Princeton Initiative Princeton, Sept. 9 th, 2017 Motivation Global currency
More informationContinuous-Time Consumption and Portfolio Choice
Continuous-Time Consumption and Portfolio Choice Continuous-Time Consumption and Portfolio Choice 1/ 57 Introduction Assuming that asset prices follow di usion processes, we derive an individual s continuous
More informationSparse Wavelet Methods for Option Pricing under Lévy Stochastic Volatility models
Sparse Wavelet Methods for Option Pricing under Lévy Stochastic Volatility models Norbert Hilber Seminar of Applied Mathematics ETH Zürich Workshop on Financial Modeling with Jump Processes p. 1/18 Outline
More informationChapter 15: Jump Processes and Incomplete Markets. 1 Jumps as One Explanation of Incomplete Markets
Chapter 5: Jump Processes and Incomplete Markets Jumps as One Explanation of Incomplete Markets It is easy to argue that Brownian motion paths cannot model actual stock price movements properly in reality,
More informationRohini Kumar. Statistics and Applied Probability, UCSB (Joint work with J. Feng and J.-P. Fouque)
Small time asymptotics for fast mean-reverting stochastic volatility models Statistics and Applied Probability, UCSB (Joint work with J. Feng and J.-P. Fouque) March 11, 2011 Frontier Probability Days,
More informationA Quadratic Gradient Equation for pricing Mortgage-Backed Securities
A Quadratic Gradient Equation for pricing Mortgage-Backed Securities Marco Papi Institute for Applied Computing - CNR Rome (Italy) A Quadratic Gradient Equation for pricing Mortgage-Backed Securities p.1
More informationValuation of derivative assets Lecture 6
Valuation of derivative assets Lecture 6 Magnus Wiktorsson September 14, 2017 Magnus Wiktorsson L6 September 14, 2017 1 / 13 Feynman-Kac representation This is the link between a class of Partial Differential
More informationA model for a large investor trading at market indifference prices
A model for a large investor trading at market indifference prices Dmitry Kramkov (joint work with Peter Bank) Carnegie Mellon University and University of Oxford 5th Oxford-Princeton Workshop on Financial
More informationStochastic Processes and Stochastic Calculus - 9 Complete and Incomplete Market Models
Stochastic Processes and Stochastic Calculus - 9 Complete and Incomplete Market Models Eni Musta Università degli studi di Pisa San Miniato - 16 September 2016 Overview 1 Self-financing portfolio 2 Complete
More informationMASM006 UNIVERSITY OF EXETER SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING, COMPUTER SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES FINANCIAL MATHEMATICS.
MASM006 UNIVERSITY OF EXETER SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING, COMPUTER SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES FINANCIAL MATHEMATICS May/June 2006 Time allowed: 2 HOURS. Examiner: Dr N.P. Byott This is a CLOSED
More informationLocal vs Non-local Forward Equations for Option Pricing
Local vs Non-local Forward Equations for Option Pricing Rama Cont Yu Gu Abstract When the underlying asset is a continuous martingale, call option prices solve the Dupire equation, a forward parabolic
More informationMAS452/MAS6052. MAS452/MAS Turn Over SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICS AND STATISTICS. Stochastic Processes and Financial Mathematics
t r t r2 r t SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICS AND STATISTICS Stochastic Processes and Financial Mathematics Spring Semester 2017 2018 3 hours t s s tt t q st s 1 r s r t r s rts t q st s r t r r t Please leave this
More informationNon-Time-Separable Utility: Habit Formation
Finance 400 A. Penati - G. Pennacchi Non-Time-Separable Utility: Habit Formation I. Introduction Thus far, we have considered time-separable lifetime utility specifications such as E t Z T t U[C(s), s]
More informationLimited liability, or how to prevent slavery in contract theory
Limited liability, or how to prevent slavery in contract theory Université Paris Dauphine, France Joint work with A. Révaillac (INSA Toulouse) and S. Villeneuve (TSE) Advances in Financial Mathematics,
More information