A Brief Note on Implied Historical LGD
|
|
- Martina Shelton
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 A Brief Note on Implied Historical LGD Rogério F. Porto Bank of Brazil SBS Q.1 Bl. C Lt.32, Ed. Sede III, 10.andar, , Brasília, Brazil rogerio@bb.com.br March 14,
2 Executive Summary We discuss, in a formal way, the implied historical method used to evaluate loss given default (LGD), mainly for Basel II requirements. For an ex post evaluation, we show that, under some mild assumptions, this method gives results equivalent to the workout LGD method when the average expositions at default for defaulted and non-defaulted assets are equal. We also show that when these exposures are not equal, the difference between the two methods is more pronounced for a bigger probability of default. Finally, we discuss how the ex post and the ex ante evaluations are asymptotically equal. keywords: credit risk, loss given default, recovery rates, implied historical method, Basel II, New Accord. 2
3 1 Introduction Financial institutions (FIs) that provide credit to their clients are subject to default risk. To enforce that the FIs will positively contribute to the financial system s wealth, regulators, at several countries, usually ask for capital allocations in order to maintain a buffer for unexpected and non mitigated defaults. This requirement is, among others, a subject in the Basel s New Accord, named Basel II (Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, 2004, p. 2). A typical default, of interest to credit risk management of retail portfolios, occurswhentheclientdoesnotpaypartoforalltheduesinacontract. More generally, any predicted cash inflow that is not observed due to a contractual default, in a financial instrument, can be considered as an event of interest. This event is called default. For credit risk measurement, following Basel II, we can attach, to any financial asset and at each moment in time, a monetary value or exposure (Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, 2006, p.53, 218), a maturity (M), a probability of default (PD) and an economic loss related to a possible default. Generally, it is reasonable to assume that, if there is no default, then there is no economic loss as well. After a default event, the FIs try to minimize their economic loss through asset recovering actions like direct debt collection, guarantees selling, renewals or asset selling. Most of the regulators under Basel II, permit that these informations can be used in an internal ratings-based approach (IRB) for credit risk management (Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, 2006, p.52, 211). These informations originate the so called credit risk parameters. Measuring these parameters require definitions, evaluations and data bases. In this paper, we discuss some aspects related to the evaluation of one of these parameters, the loss given default (LGD). There are basically four methods to evaluate the LGD. Two of them use financial market public data and will not be discussed here. The other two use FIs internal data and are discussed in this paper. In fact, we give sufficient and necessary conditions for their equivalence. Some practical implications are discussed through the paper but statistical aspects are not considered. One of these two methods can be applied to virtually any asset, but the other can only be applied to retail assets, according to the actual Basel II requirements. Thus, during the paper, buckets or cohorts of retail assets are our main focus. The paper is organized in the following way. In Section 2 we review the main definitions. In Section 3, LGD is discussed for one unique financial asset. Its extension for a portfolio of assets is done in the following Section 4. A second method to evaluate LGD is discussed in Sections 5 and 6, for two 3
4 moments in time: ex post and ex ante facto. Finally, in Section 7 we collect the conclusions of our study. Mathematical proofs are in Section 8. 2 Definitions In this section we roughly review some definitions that will be useful along the paper. Details can be consulted on the cited bibliography. The asset maturity (M) will not be considered. The definition of default includes various aspects (Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, 2006, 452) but usually considers whether the obligor is past due on any material credit obligation. The idea is to achieve a definition that does not generate lots of defaults while keeping FIs credit risk comparable. At the time of default, the monetary value of the exposure is called exposure at default (EAD). For an asset portfolio, we can evaluate ex post the probability of randomly choosing a defaulted asset, called probability of default, by PD = D/N, where D denotes the number of defaulted assets among N assets, in a fixed time frame H (Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, 2005a, p. 18). If the definition of default is adequate, it is reasonable to suppose that there is neither economic loss nor profit bigger than the EAD. Then we consider LGD as the ratio of economic loss to EAD for each asset (Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, 2006, 297), (Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, 2005a, p. 61). Ex post values for PD and LGD are also called default rate and loss given default rate (or realized LGD), respectively (Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, 2005b, p. 2). The EAD, M, PD and LGD are called credit risk parameters. 3 Individual LGD Consider the individual evaluation of LGD. For this, let LGD i,t0 the LGD for an asset i, i = 1,...,D, evaluated at the time t 0 when default occurs. Up to the time when the asset i is totally recovered, consider that the FI receives J i values R i,j > 0 at times t R i,j, j = 1,...,J i. That is, cash inflows like debts collected, sold guarantees etc. Also, consider that the FI pays K i values P i,k > 0 at times t P i,k, k = 1,...,K i. That is, cash outflows like costs, fees etc. 4
5 For adequate comparison with the of asset i at t 0, the values R i,j and P i,k need to be discounted by rates r i,j r ( t 0,ti,j) R and si,k s ( t 0,ti,k) P, respectively, for j = 1,...,J i and k = 1,...,K i. Thus, LGD i,t0 = 1 Ji R i,j j=1 r i,j K i P i,k k=1 s i,k = 1 Ji j=1r i,j K i k=1 P i,k, is called realized LGD (Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, 2005a, p. 66). Note that the LGD can be evaluated at any time t and not only at the time t 0 of default. For a fixed time of default t 0, the values of, R i,j and P i,j simply need to be discounted from t 0 to t, to reflect the time value of money. Note that this is not a redefinition of the time of default from t 0 to t that, to be done right, should take care of its impact on the values of, R i,j and P i,j. The important point is that the economic loss must be evaluated at the same time as the EAD, in order to keep monetary comparability and to guarantee that the LGD lies between 0 and 1. If LGD evaluation is done before the asset is completely recovered, the realized LGD is called workout LGD (Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, 2005a, p. 65). In practice, we want the recovery process to be almost close to the end. 4 Portfolio LGD Consider now the LGD evaluation for a portfolio with D defaulted assets. We need the following assumption: S1 the values R i,j, P i,k and, for all j = 1,...,J i, k = 1,...,K i, i = 1,...,D, are evaluated at the same time t = t 0. Note that t 0 is not necessarily the time of default, since each asset in the portfolio can default ina different time. Thus, the usual way to evaluate the portfolio LGD is to treat it as a synthetic asset, such that ( D Ji j=1r i,j K i k=1 LGD t0 = 1 P ) i,k D (1) has the same form of the realized LGD and still guarantees that LGD t0 [0,1]. 5
6 The following proposition shows how to obtain LGD t0 for a portfolio from the individual LGD i,t0, i = 1,...,D previously evaluated. Proposition 1 Under assumption S1, where w i = / D l=1 EAD l. D LGD t0 = w i LGD i,t0, That is, the portfolio LGD is equal to the EAD-weighted average of the individual LGD. LetLGD t0 = D 1 D LGD i,t0, betheaverageportfoliolgd.then, note that, LGD t0 LGD t0, unless = C for all i = 1,...,D, where C > 0 denotes some fixed constant. Thus a, statistical model for the average LGD will not be the portfolio LGD unless we have the EAD be approximately constant. 5 Ex post implied historical LGD For portfolios made of retail assets, it is permitted that the LGD be evaluated by a implied historical method (Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, 2005a, p. 62), (Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, 2006, 465). This method seems to be derived from the expected loss (EL) formula (Schuermann, 2004), (Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, 2004, p. 4): EL = EAD PD LGD, i.e., EL LGD = EAD PD. ThisLGDisalwayspositiveforpositivevaluesofEL,EADandPD.However, if EL/s bigger than PD, then LGD will be bigger than 1. This, for instance, may happen for some specific discount rates. Note that now the portfolio includes non-defaulted assets. Then, in what follows, consider the evaluation of LGD for a portfolio with N assets, where the assets i = 1,...,D are defaulted while the assets i = D + 1,...,N are not defaulted. Thus, ex post, D J i K i EL = R i,j P i,k j=1 k=1 and, additionally to S1, we need the following assumption: 6
7 S2 it is possible to obtain values evaluated at the time t = t 0, for all i = D+1,...,N. Again, t 0 is not necessarily the time of default. Since the assets considered in the assumption S2 are not defaulted, in practice their EAD values are based in possible defaults (in accordance with our definition of default) at the time closest to (but not before) t 0. Generally this is done by the use of credit conversion factors (CCF) (Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, 2005a, p. 94). Then, it only makes sense to consider t 0 as the time when there is non zero exposures for all N assets in the portfolio. The EAD values, like LGD, need to be evaluated at the same time t 0, in order to correctly reflect the time value of money of the LGD components. Finally, the implied historical LGD (ILGD) is defined as ILGD t0 = [ D EADi ( Ji j=1r i,j K i N D N k=1 P i,k )]. (2) That is, under assumptions S1 and S2, the numerators of the implied LGD ILGD t0 andoftherealizedlgd(1)lgd t0 arethesame, whilethedenominator of ILGD t0 uses the portfolio s total exposure, including the non-defaulted assets, multiplied by PD. The following result gives the necessary and sufficient condition for equality between the realized portfolio LGD (1) and the implied historical LGD (2). Proposition 2 Under the assumptions S1 e S2, D LGD t0 = βilgd t0 αd 1 = (N D) 1 N i=d+1, where LGD t0 and ILGD t0 are respectively given by (1) and (2) e β = α + PD(1 α). The immediate consequence of Proposition 2 is that the realized portfolio and implied historical LGD values are the same if and only if the defaulted and non-defaulted average exposures are equal, in which case, α = 1 = β. By Proposition 2, if the LGD values evaluated by the two methods are different, then the average exposures are not equal or the formulas used for them are different related to the exposures, losses, costs or any combination of these. In a sense, one can consider this result as a justification for the homogeneity requirement in credit risk evaluation (Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, 2006, p. 91, 401, and p. 107, 492). 7
8 PD α Figure 1: Contour plot with iso-β curves, where β = α + PD(1 α), for values β = 0.2,0.4,...,1.8. It is interesting to analyze the impact of differences in the average exposures for the two LGD evaluation methods: if the defaulted assets average exposure is greater than the non-defaulted assets average exposure, then the implied historical LGD will be greater than the realized LGD and viceversa. Besides that, the impact of the difference will be bigger for portfolios with bigger PD. (Figure 1). In fact, by writing (1 β) = (1 α)(1 PD), and noticing that PD < 1 (since the portfolio includes defaulted and nondefaulted assets), one can not only see that α = 1 β = 1, but also that α < 1 β < 1 and α > 1 β > 1. In cases where the values N, N R i,j and N P i,j are recorded by date for a bucket of N similar assets, as happen in some accounting databases, then it may be easier to evaluate the implied LGD than the portfolio LGD, mainly when D is large and it is hard to obtain individual values for the defaulted assets. In this case, using simple averages and the default rate, one can decide what method to use taking into account the regulator s and the institution s tolerance to approximations. Likewise, this can be useful when evaluating LGD for a cohort of similar contracts, like loans from a lending campaign, for instance. 8
9 6 Ex ante implied historical LGD Banks that have received supervisory approval to use the IRB approach may rely on their own internal estimates of risk parameter in determining the capital required for a given exposure (Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, 2006, p.52, 211). Thus, to be effective, these estimates need to be evaluated ex ante the defaults, for the non-defaulted assets. In this section we relate the ILGD t0 to a formula for LGD estimate that is well known in the literature. Consider a portfolio with N non-defaulted assets. In this case, using random variables, one can postulate the model L i = D i LGD i, (3) for i = 1,...,N, where L i denotes the value of the losses with the asset i, D i is the indicator function of default of asset i and and LGD i denote the same as in Section 3. Under various independence assumptions, there are correspondent formulas using (3), where the most interesting for this paper are the following. If LGD i is independent of D i, then E( LGD i ) = E(L i) E(D i ) = E(L i) P (D i = 1), (4) where the loss given default is a monetary value (see, e.g., Li, 2010). On the other side, if, LGD i and D i are mutually independent, then E(LGD i ) = E(L i ) E( D i ) = E(L i ) E( )P (D i = 1), (5) where the loss given default is a value between zero and one (see, e.g., Barco, 2007; Guo et al., 2007; Seidler and Jakubík, 2009). In the literature (see, e.g., Hillebrand, 2006)), sometimes it is assumed that for all i = 1,...,N, E(L i ) = el, P (D i = 1) = pd and E( ) = ead, then, from (4), E( LGD i ) = el/pd and, from (5), E(LGD i ) = el/(ead pd). Additionally, if the assets are independent random variables, by the Weak Law of Large Numbers and by the Slutsky Theorem, the ex post LGD value (Section 5) converges in distribution to E(LGD i ), in (5), as N increases. In this case, for sufficiently large values of D and N, LGD t0 ILGD t0 and E(LGD t0 ) LGD t0. Equation (5) seems to be the most used by regulators (see, e.g., Hungarian Financial Supervisory Authority, 2008), together with the associated assumptions. However, they suggest an estimation procedure using historical time series. In this case, additional assumptions are necessary to obtain results similar to ours, shown for cross-section data, but this will not be treated here. 9
10 7 Conclusion Inthispaper, wehavepresentedsomeaspectsofthelossgiven default(lgd) evaluation. We have shown formulas to obtain LGD for a portfolio, from the individual assets LGD. Also we have given a necessary and sufficient condition for equivalence of two generally suggested ways of LGD evaluation, realized and implied historical LGD. The condition is that the defaulted and non-defaulted assets average exposure be the same. Some implications when this condition is not met were discussed, highlighting the attention to the evaluation of other credit risk parameters and their impact in the LGD evaluation by the two ways. Finally, we have discussed the case of ex ante evaluation of LGD in crosssection data, giving explicit assumptions for comparison between this and the ex post implied historical LGD evaluation. 8 Proofs 8.1 Proof of Proposition 1 D w i LGD i,t0 = 1 D J i Dl=1 R i,j EAD l j=1 K i P i,k k=1 = LGD t Proof of Proposition 2 LGD t0 = βilgd t0 D N D = β N N = α N D D D + D N = α N D D i=d+1 D Ni=D+1 N D D = α. D 10
11 References Michael Barco. Going downturn. Risk Australia, Spring Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. An explanatory note on the basel ii irb risk weight functions. Technical report, Bank for International Settlements, Basel, Switzerland, October Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Studies on the validation of internal rating systems. Working paper no. 14. revised version, Bank for International Settlements, Basel, Switzerland, May 2005a. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Guidance on paragraph 468 of the framework document. Technical report, Bank for International Settlements, Basel, Switzerland, July 2005b. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. International convergence of capital measurement and capital standards. A revised framework. comprehensive version, Bank for International Settlements, Basel, Switzerland, June Xin Guo, Robert A. Jarrow, and Yan Zeng. Modeling the recovery rate in a reduced form model. Working paper, Martin Hillebrand. Modeling and estimating dependent loss given default. RISK, September Hungarian Financial Supervisory Authority. Validation guidelines on the implementation, assessment and approval of internal ratings based (irb) approaches and advanced measurement approaches (ama). Validation guidelines, part i, internal ratings based approach, Pénzügyi Szervezetek Állami Felügyelete, June Hui Li. Downturn lgd: A spot recovery approach. Working paper, Munich University, URL Til Schuermann. What do we know about loss given default? Working paper no , Wharton Financial Institutions Center, Available at SSRN: on August, 13th Jakub Seidler and Petr Jakubík. Implied market loss given default in the czech republic structural-model approach. Czech Journal of Economics and Finance, 59(1):20 40,
Internal LGD Estimation in Practice
Internal LGD Estimation in Practice Peter Glößner, Achim Steinbauer, Vesselka Ivanova d-fine 28 King Street, London EC2V 8EH, Tel (020) 7776 1000, www.d-fine.co.uk 1 Introduction Driven by a competitive
More information2 Modeling Credit Risk
2 Modeling Credit Risk In this chapter we present some simple approaches to measure credit risk. We start in Section 2.1 with a short overview of the standardized approach of the Basel framework for banking
More informationEconomi Capital. Tiziano Bellini. Università di Bologna. November 29, 2013
Economi Capital Tiziano Bellini Università di Bologna November 29, 2013 Tiziano Bellini (Università di Bologna) Economi Capital November 29, 2013 1 / 16 Outline Framework Economic Capital Structural approach
More informationComments on The Application of Basel II to Trading Activities and the Treatment of Double Default Effects
May 27, 2005 Comments on The Application of Basel II to Trading Activities and the Treatment of Double Default Effects Japanese Bankers Association The Japanese Bankers Association would like to express
More informationAbstract. Key words: Maturity adjustment, Capital Requirement, Basel II, Probability of default, PD time structure.
Direct Calibration of Maturity Adjustment Formulae from Average Cumulative Issuer-Weighted Corporate Default Rates, Compared with Basel II Recommendations. Authors: Dmitry Petrov Postgraduate Student,
More informationCompetitive Advantage under the Basel II New Capital Requirement Regulations
Competitive Advantage under the Basel II New Capital Requirement Regulations I - Introduction: This paper has the objective of introducing the revised framework for International Convergence of Capital
More informationValidation Mythology of Maturity Adjustment Formula for Basel II Capital Requirement
Validation Mythology of Maturity Adjustment Formula for Basel II Capital Requirement Working paper Version 9..9 JRMV 8 8 6 DP.R Authors: Dmitry Petrov Lomonosov Moscow State University (Moscow, Russia)
More informationWhat will Basel II mean for community banks? This
COMMUNITY BANKING and the Assessment of What will Basel II mean for community banks? This question can t be answered without first understanding economic capital. The FDIC recently produced an excellent
More informationA note on the adequacy of the EU scheme for bank recovery, resolution and deposit insurance in Spain
A note on the adequacy of the EU scheme for bank recovery, resolution and deposit insurance in Spain Pilar Gómez-Fernández-Aguado is a Senior Lecturer at the Department of Financial Economics and Accounting,
More informationIn various tables, use of - indicates not meaningful or not applicable.
Basel II Pillar 3 disclosures 2008 For purposes of this report, unless the context otherwise requires, the terms Credit Suisse Group, Credit Suisse, the Group, we, us and our mean Credit Suisse Group AG
More informationPillar 3 and regulatory disclosures Credit Suisse Group AG 2Q17
Pillar 3 and regulatory disclosures Credit Suisse Group AG 2Q17 For purposes of this report, unless the context otherwise requires, the terms Credit Suisse, the Group, we, us and our mean Credit Suisse
More informationBasel II Implementation Update
Basel II Implementation Update World Bank/IMF/Federal Reserve System Seminar for Senior Bank Supervisors from Emerging Economies 15-26 October 2007 Elizabeth Roberts Director, Financial Stability Institute
More informationBasel II Pillar 3 disclosures 6M 09
Basel II Pillar 3 disclosures 6M 09 For purposes of this report, unless the context otherwise requires, the terms Credit Suisse Group, Credit Suisse, the Group, we, us and our mean Credit Suisse Group
More informationLiquidity Coverage Ratio Information (Consolidated) Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Liquidity Coverage Ratio Information (Consolidated), Inc. and Subsidiaries Since, 2015, the Liquidity Coverage Ratio (hereinafter referred to as LCR ), the liquidity regulation under the Basel III, has
More informationBasel II Pillar 3 disclosures
Basel II Pillar 3 disclosures 6M10 For purposes of this report, unless the context otherwise requires, the terms Credit Suisse, the Group, we, us and our mean Credit Suisse Group AG and its consolidated
More informationRCAP jurisdictional assessments: self-reporting monitoring template for RCAP follow-up actions
RCAP jurisdictional assessments: self-reporting monitoring template for RCAP follow-up actions Jurisdiction: United States Status as of: 31 December 2016 With reference to RCAP report(s): Assessment of
More informationDependence Modeling and Credit Risk
Dependence Modeling and Credit Risk Paola Mosconi Banca IMI Bocconi University, 20/04/2015 Paola Mosconi Lecture 6 1 / 53 Disclaimer The opinion expressed here are solely those of the author and do not
More informationCredit VaR: Pillar II Adjustments
Credit VaR: Adjustments www.iasonltd.com 2009 Indice 1 The Model Underlying Credit VaR, Extensions of Credit VaR, 2 Indice The Model Underlying Credit VaR, Extensions of Credit VaR, 1 The Model Underlying
More informationBasel Committee on Banking Supervision. Frequently asked questions on Basel III monitoring ad hoc exercise
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Frequently asked questions on Basel III monitoring ad hoc exercise 6 July 2016 This publication is available on the BIS website (www.bis.org/bcbs/qis/). Grey underlined
More informationMANAGEMENT OF RETAIL ASSETS IN BANKING: COMPARISION OF INTERNAL MODEL OVER BASEL
MANAGEMENT OF RETAIL ASSETS IN BANKING: COMPARISION OF INTERNAL MODEL OVER BASEL Dinabandhu Bag Research Scholar DOS in Economics & Co-Operation University of Mysore, Manasagangotri Mysore, PIN 571006
More informationBCBS Discussion Paper: Regulatory treatment of accounting provisions
12 January 2017 EBF_024875 BCBS Discussion Paper: Regulatory treatment of accounting provisions Key points: The regulatory framework must ensure that the same potential losses are not covered both by capital
More informationPoint Estimation. Stat 4570/5570 Material from Devore s book (Ed 8), and Cengage
6 Point Estimation Stat 4570/5570 Material from Devore s book (Ed 8), and Cengage Point Estimation Statistical inference: directed toward conclusions about one or more parameters. We will use the generic
More informationLeaseurope & Eurofinas response to the EBA consultation paper on PD estimation, LGD estimation and treatment of defaulted assets
Brussels, 10 February 2017 Leaseurope & Eurofinas response to the EBA consultation paper on PD estimation, LGD estimation and treatment of defaulted assets Eurofinas and Leaseurope, the voices of consumer
More informationRCAP jurisdictional assessments: self-reporting monitoring template for RCAP follow-up actions
RCAP jurisdictional assessments: self-reporting monitoring template for RCAP follow-up actions Jurisdiction: United States Status as of: 31 December 2017 With reference to RCAP report(s): Assessment of
More informationThe Manipulation of Basel Risk-Weights
The Manipulation of Basel Risk-Weights Mike Mariathasan University of Oxford Ouarda Merrouche Graduate Institute, Geneva CONSOB-BOCCONI Conference on Banks, Markets and Financial Innovation; presented
More informationComparative analysis of the Regulatory Capital calculation across major European jurisdictions. April 2013
Comparative analysis of the Regulatory Capital calculation across major European jurisdictions April 2013 CONFIDENTIALITY Our clients industries are extremely competitive, and the maintenance of confidentiality
More informationA New Model for Predicting the Loss Given Default Master Thesis Business Analytics
A New Model for Predicting the Loss Given Default Master Thesis Business Analytics Author: P.W.F. Alons Supervisor 1: drs. E. Haasdijk Supervisor 2 : dr. M. Jonker Supervisor ABN AMRO: MSc. A. Wyka VU
More informationBASEL II PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURE
2012 BASEL II PILLAR 3 DISCLOSURE HALF YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2012 APS 330: CAPITAL ADEQUACY & RISK MANAGEMENT IN ANZ Important notice This document has been prepared by Australia and New Zealand Banking
More informationThe Collateral Value in LGD Computation
Corso di Laurea magistrale in Economia e Finanza Tesi di Laurea The Collateral Value in LGD Computation Relatore Ch. Prof. Andrea Giacomelli Laureando Pietro Corfini Matricola 816673 Anno Accademico 2012
More information2 Day Workshop SME Credit Managers Credit Managers Risk Managers Finance Managers SME Branch Managers Analysts
SME Risk Scoring and Credit Conversion Factor (CCF) Estimation 2 Day Workshop Who Should attend? SME Credit Managers Credit Managers Risk Managers Finance Managers SME Branch Managers Analysts Day - 1
More informationRegulatory Disclosures 30 June 2017
Regulatory Disclosures 30 June 2017 CONTENTS PAGE 1. Key ratio 1 2. Overview of 2 3. Credit risk for non-securitization exposures 3 4. Counterparty credit risk 15 5. Securitization exposures 20 6. Market
More informationEffective Computation & Allocation of Enterprise Credit Capital for Large Retail and SME portfolios
Effective Computation & Allocation of Enterprise Credit Capital for Large Retail and SME portfolios RiskLab Madrid, December 1 st 2003 Dan Rosen Vice President, Strategy, Algorithmics Inc. drosen@algorithmics.com
More informationIn various tables, use of indicates not meaningful or not applicable.
Basel II Pillar 3 disclosures 2012 For purposes of this report, unless the context otherwise requires, the terms Credit Suisse, the Group, we, us and our mean Credit Suisse Group AG and its consolidated
More informationCredit Risk. Lecture 5 Risk Modeling and Bank Steering. Loïc BRIN
Credit Risk Lecture 5 Risk Modeling and Bank Steering École Nationale des Ponts et Chaussées Département Ingénieurie Mathématique et Informatique (IMI) Master II Credit Risk - Lecture 5 1/20 1 Credit risk
More informationExternal data will likely be necessary for most banks to
CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS Estimating Probability of Default via External Data Sources: A Step Toward Basel II Banks considering their strategies for compliance with the Basel II Capital Accord will likely use
More informationSELECTION BIAS REDUCTION IN CREDIT SCORING MODELS
SELECTION BIAS REDUCTION IN CREDIT SCORING MODELS Josef Ditrich Abstract Credit risk refers to the potential of the borrower to not be able to pay back to investors the amount of money that was loaned.
More information1.1 Interest rates Time value of money
Lecture 1 Pre- Derivatives Basics Stocks and bonds are referred to as underlying basic assets in financial markets. Nowadays, more and more derivatives are constructed and traded whose payoffs depend on
More informationCalibrating Low-Default Portfolios, using the Cumulative Accuracy Profile
Calibrating Low-Default Portfolios, using the Cumulative Accuracy Profile Marco van der Burgt 1 ABN AMRO/ Group Risk Management/Tools & Modelling Amsterdam March 2007 Abstract In the new Basel II Accord,
More informationIs regulatory capital pro-cyclical? A macroeconomic assessment of Basel II
Is regulatory capital pro-cyclical? A macroeconomic assessment of Basel II (preliminary version) Frank Heid Deutsche Bundesbank 2003 1 Introduction Capital requirements play a prominent role in international
More informationAdvancing Credit Risk Management through Internal Rating Systems
Advancing Credit Risk Management through Internal Rating Systems August 2005 Bank of Japan For any information, please contact: Risk Assessment Section Financial Systems and Bank Examination Department.
More informationAgenda on-site pre-application meeting INSTITUTION NAME Address (including city) DATE, start time / finish time
Agenda on-site pre-application meeting INSTITUTION NAME Address (including city) DATE, start time / finish time The ECB would like to discuss with INSTITUTION NAME the pre-application process and the main
More information2006 Bank Indonesia Seminar on Financial Stability. Bali, September 2006
Economic Capital 2006 Bank Indonesia Seminar on Financial Stability Bali, 21-22 September 2006 Charles Freeland Deputy Secretary General IRB approaches - Historical Default Rates High correlation between
More informationCommonwealth Bank of Australia ACN
Commonwealth of Australia Basel II Pillar 3 - Capital Adequacy and Risk Disclosures Quarterly update as at 3 March 00. Scope of application The Commonwealth of Australia (the Group) is an Authorised Deposit-taking
More informationMarkowitz portfolio theory
Markowitz portfolio theory Farhad Amu, Marcus Millegård February 9, 2009 1 Introduction Optimizing a portfolio is a major area in nance. The objective is to maximize the yield and simultaneously minimize
More informationBasel II Pillar 3 disclosures
Basel II Pillar 3 disclosures 6M12 For purposes of this report, unless the context otherwise requires, the terms Credit Suisse, the Group, we, us and our mean Credit Suisse Group AG and its consolidated
More informationFinancial Stability Institute
Financial Stability Institute The implementation of the new capital adequacy framework in the Middle East Summary of responses to the Basel II Implementation Assistance Questionnaire July 2004 The implementation
More informationCP ON DRAFT RTS ON ASSSESSMENT METHODOLOGY FOR IRB APPROACH EBA/CP/2014/ November Consultation Paper
EBA/CP/2014/36 12 November 2014 Consultation Paper Draft Regulatory Technical Standards On the specification of the assessment methodology for competent authorities regarding compliance of an institution
More informationConsultative Document on reducing variation in credit risk-weighted assets constraints on the use of internal model approaches
Management Solutions 2016. All Rights Reserved Consultative Document on reducing variation in credit risk-weighted assets constraints on the use of internal model approaches Basel Committee on Banking
More informationBasel II Pillar 3. Capital Adequacy and Risk Disclosures QUARTERLY UPDATE As at 31 March 2011
Determined to be better than we ve ever been. Basel II Pillar 3 Capital Adequacy and Risk Disclosures QUARTERLY UPDATE As at 31 March 2011 Commonwealth bank of Australia ACN 123 123 124 Commonwealth Bank
More informationIs Japanese Dutch Auction Unreasonable?: A Note on Dutch Auction with Mari
Is Japanese Dutch Auction Unreasonable?: A Note on Dutch Auction with Mari Minoru Kitahara and Ryo Ogawa February 7, 2006 Dutch auction is a widely used auction system in flower markets, and Japanese flower
More informationTwo hours. To be supplied by the Examinations Office: Mathematical Formula Tables and Statistical Tables THE UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER
Two hours MATH20802 To be supplied by the Examinations Office: Mathematical Formula Tables and Statistical Tables THE UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER STATISTICAL METHODS Answer any FOUR of the SIX questions.
More informationEconomics 101. Lecture 3 - Consumer Demand
Economics 101 Lecture 3 - Consumer Demand 1 Intro First, a note on wealth and endowment. Varian generally uses wealth (m) instead of endowment. Ultimately, these two are equivalent. Given prices p, if
More informationLoss Given Default: Estimating by analyzing the distribution of credit assets and Validation
Journal of Finance and Investment Analysis, vol. 5, no. 2, 2016, 1-18 ISSN: 2241-0998 (print version), 2241-0996(online) Scienpress Ltd, 2016 Loss Given Default: Estimating by analyzing the distribution
More informationELIGIBILITY CRITERIA AND MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR REAL (IN REM) SECURITY ON REAL PROPERTY IN THE LIGHT OF BASEL II CRITERIA
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA AND MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR REAL (IN REM) SECURITY ON REAL PROPERTY IN THE LIGHT OF BASEL II CRITERIA The present publication is intended to be the continuation of the publication
More information24 June Dear Sir/Madam
24 June 2016 Secretariat of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Bank for International Settlements CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland baselcommittee@bis.org Doc Ref: #183060v2 Your ref: Direct : +27 11
More information2016 RISK AND PILLAR III REPORT SECOND UPDATE AS OF JUNE 30, 2017
2016 RISK AND PILLAR III REPORT SECOND UPDATE AS OF JUNE 30, 2017 NATIXIS - 2016 Risk & Pillar III Report second update as of June 30, 2017 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Update by chapter of the Risk and Pillar
More informationAssessing the modelling impacts of addressing Pillar 1 Ciclycality
pwc.com/it Assessing the modelling impacts of addressing Pillar 1 Ciclycality London, 18 February 2011 Agenda Overview of the new CRD reforms to reduce pro-cyclicality Procyclicality and impact on modelling
More informationChapter 8. Markowitz Portfolio Theory. 8.1 Expected Returns and Covariance
Chapter 8 Markowitz Portfolio Theory 8.1 Expected Returns and Covariance The main question in portfolio theory is the following: Given an initial capital V (0), and opportunities (buy or sell) in N securities
More informationSTATUS OF CAPITAL ADEQUACY/ BASEL DATA SECTION
STATUS OF CAPITAL ADEQUACY/ BASEL DATA SECTION 1 CONTENTS 2 Scope of Consolidation 3 Capital 3 Structure of Capital and Assessment of Capital Adequacy 6 Main Features of Regulatory Capital Instruments
More informationData Collection Residential Belgian Real Estate - Guidelines (Update July 2016)
Data Collection Residential Belgian Real Estate - Guidelines (Update July 2016) I. Preliminary points of attention 1. The tables have to be reported three months after the end of the reference period,
More informationPillar 3 Disclosures (OCBC Group As at 31 December 2014)
Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited Pillar 3 Disclosures (OCBC Group As at 31 December 2014) Incorporated in Singapore Company Registration Number: 193200032W 1. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this
More informationBasel Committee Norms
Basel Committee Norms Basel Framework Basel Committee set up in 1974 Objectives Supervision must be adequate No foreign bank should escape supervision BASEL I Risk management Capital adequacy, sound supervision
More informationCOPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. Bank executives are in a difficult position. On the one hand their shareholders require an attractive
chapter 1 Bank executives are in a difficult position. On the one hand their shareholders require an attractive return on their investment. On the other hand, banking supervisors require these entities
More informationCredit VaR and Risk-Bucket Capital Rules: A Reconciliation
Published in Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference on Bank Structure and Competition, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, May 2000. Credit VaR and Risk-Bucket Capital Rules: A Reconciliation Michael B.
More informationDefault-implied Asset Correlation: Empirical Study for Moroccan Companies
International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues ISSN: 2146-4138 available at http: wwweconjournalscom International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 2017, 7(2), 415-425 Default-implied
More informationCapital and Risk Management Report Second quarter 2018
Capital and Risk Management Report Second quarter 2018 Provided by Nordea Bank AB on the basis of its consolidated situation Table name EU OV1: Overview of 1 EU CR1-A: Credit quality of s by class and
More informationSuperseded document. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Consultative Document. The New Basel Capital Accord. Issued for comment by 31 July 2003
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Consultative Document The New Basel Capital Accord Issued for comment by 31 July 2003 April 2003 Table of Contents Part 1: Scope of Application... 1 A. Introduction...
More informationFinancial Instruments: Impairment Adapting to change
Financial Instruments: Impairment Adapting to change The building blocks A new measurement philosophy The change from the incurred to the expected loss methodology for measuring impairment represents a
More informationCapital calculations under the revised securitization framework
WHITEPAPER Capital calculations under the revised securitization framework Authors Pierre-Etienne Chabanel Managing Director, Regulatory & Compliance Solutions Contact Us Americas +1.212.553.1653 clientservices@moodys.com
More informationPillar 3 Disclosures (OCBC Group As at 31 December 2015)
Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited Pillar 3 Disclosures (OCBC Group As at 31 December 2015) Incorporated in Singapore Company Registration Number: 193200032W 1. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this
More informationTHE UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MILWAUKEE. Department of Economics. Banking and Finance: READING LIST
905-syl-S11.doc THE UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MILWAUKEE Department of Economics Banking and Finance: 296-905 Spring 2011 Professor: Hamid Mohtadi Office: 850 Bolton, hours: Wed, 2:30-4:00 and by appointment
More informationBasel III: Finalising post-crisis reforms
Basel III: Finalising post-crisis reforms The impact of Basel IV Robert Jan Sopers Milosz Krasowski Stephan van Weeren Agenda High Level Impact of Basel III: Finalising post-crisis reforms The Road to
More informationBasel II Pillar 3 - Capital Adequacy and Risk Disclosures Quarterly update as at 30 September 2009
Commonwealth of Australia Basel II Pillar 3 - Capital Adequacy and Risk Disclosures Quarterly update as at 30 September 2009 1. Scope of Application The Commonwealth of Australia (the Group) is an Authorised
More informationBonn Econ Discussion Papers
Bonn Econ Discussion Papers Discussion Paper 10/2009 Treatment of Double Default Effects within the Granularity Adjustment for Basel II by Sebastian Ebert and Eva Lütkebohmert July 2009 Bonn Graduate School
More informationSupplementary Notes on the Financial Statements (continued)
The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited Supplementary Notes on the Financial Statements 2014 Contents Supplementary Notes on the Financial Statements (unaudited) Page Introduction... 2 1
More informationPILLAR 3 DISCLOSURES
1. Introduction The purpose of this document is to provide the information in accordance with Pillar 3 directives under Monetary Authority of Singapore ( MAS ) Notice 637 on Risk Based Capital Adequacy
More informationRisk & Capital Report Incorporating the requirements of APS 330
Risk & Capital Report Incorporating the requirements of APS 330 Half Year Update 31 March National Australia Bank Limited ABN 12 004 044 937 (the Company ) Introduction This page has been left blank intentionally
More informationIEOR E4602: Quantitative Risk Management
IEOR E4602: Quantitative Risk Management Basic Concepts and Techniques of Risk Management Martin Haugh Department of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research Columbia University Email: martin.b.haugh@gmail.com
More informationRegulatory Disclosures 30 June 2017
Regulatory Disclosures 30 June 2017 CONTENTS PAGE Key ratio - Capital ratio 1 - Leverage ratio 1 Overview of RWA 2 Credit risk for non-securitization exposures 3 Counterparty credit risk 12 Securitization
More informationEverything you always wanted to know about Basel II in 15 minutes
Everything you always wanted to know about Basel II in 15 minutes (a real estate perspective) Erik Kersten Senior Policy Advisor Supervisory Policy Quantitative Risk Management Views and opinions expressed
More informationPossibilities of LGD Modelling
Possibilities of LGD Modelling Conference on Risk Management in Banks François Ducuroir Ljubljana, October 22, 2015 About Reacfin Reacfin s.a. is a Belgian-based actuary, risk & portfolio management consulting
More informationGuidelines on PD estimation, LGD estimation and the treatment of defaulted exposures
EBA/GL/2017/16 23/04/2018 Guidelines on PD estimation, LGD estimation and the treatment of defaulted exposures 1 Compliance and reporting obligations Status of these guidelines 1. This document contains
More informationStress-testing the asset fleet usage and the expected LGD in a renting business using an European macroeconomic model
Stress-testing the asset fleet usage and the expected LGD in a renting business using an European macroeconomic model ELENA DRAGOMIR ADELA IOANA TUDOR Cybernetics and statistics The Bucharest Academy of
More informationExpected Value of a Random Variable
Knowledge Article: Probability and Statistics Expected Value of a Random Variable Expected Value of a Discrete Random Variable You're familiar with a simple mean, or average, of a set. The mean value of
More informationWORKING MACROPRUDENTIAL TOOLS
WORKING MACROPRUDENTIAL TOOLS Jesús Saurina Director. Financial Stability Department Banco de España Macro-prudential Regulatory Policies: The New Road to Financial Stability? Thirteenth Annual International
More informationNon linearity issues in PD modelling. Amrita Juhi Lucas Klinkers
Non linearity issues in PD modelling Amrita Juhi Lucas Klinkers May 2017 Content Introduction Identifying non-linearity Causes of non-linearity Performance 2 Content Introduction Identifying non-linearity
More informationBasel III Pillar 3. Capital adequacy and risk disclosures Quarterly Update as at 31 March 2013
Basel III Pillar 3 Capital adequacy and risk disclosures Quarterly Update as at 31 March 2013 COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA ACN 123 123 124 15 May 2013 Basel III Pillar 3 Capital Adequacy and Risk Disclosures
More informationBasel Ⅱ Implementation in Korea
Basel Ⅱ Implementation in Korea Mun ChongChin Director New Basel Accord Office Financial Supervisory Service Seoul, 7 July 2006 Agenda Ⅰ. Features of Basel Ⅱ Ⅱ. Implementation Efforts in Korea Ⅲ. Implementation
More informationBasel III Pillar 3 disclosures 2014
Basel III Pillar 3 disclosures 2014 In various tables, use of indicates not meaningful or not applicable. Basel III Pillar 3 disclosures 2014 Introduction 2 General 2 Regulatory development 2 Location
More informationStandard Chartered Bank Malaysia Berhad and its subsidiaries Pillar 3 Disclosures 31 December 2017
31 December 2017 Incorporated in Malaysia with registered Company No. 115793P Level 16, Menara Standard Chartered No. 30, Jalan Sultan Ismail 50250 Kuala Lumpur 1. Overview This document describe the Standard
More informationRisk Management. BIS Capital Adequacy Ratio. Sep. 30, 2007 Sep. 30, Sumitomo Trust and Banking 2007 Interim Report 39
Capital Adequacy Ratio BIS Capital Adequacy Ratio Tier I Capital... Noncumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock... New Stock Subscription Rights... Capital Reserve... Other Capital Surplus... Earned Surplus
More informationEBA /RTS/2018/04 16 November Final Draft Regulatory Technical Standards
EBA /RTS/2018/04 16 November 2018 Final Draft Regulatory Technical Standards on the specification of the nature, severity and duration of an economic downturn in accordance with Articles 181(3)(a) and
More informationEstimating LGD Correlation
Estimating LGD Correlation Jiří Witzany University of Economics, Prague Abstract: The paper proposes a new method to estimate correlation of account level Basle II Loss Given Default (LGD). The correlation
More informationFixed-Income Securities Lecture 5: Tools from Option Pricing
Fixed-Income Securities Lecture 5: Tools from Option Pricing Philip H. Dybvig Washington University in Saint Louis Review of binomial option pricing Interest rates and option pricing Effective duration
More informationModelling Bank Loan LGD of Corporate and SME Segment
15 th Computing in Economics and Finance, Sydney, Australia Modelling Bank Loan LGD of Corporate and SME Segment Radovan Chalupka, Juraj Kopecsni Charles University, Prague 1. introduction 2. key issues
More informationOnline appendices from The xva Challenge by Jon Gregory. APPENDIX 8A: LHP approximation and IRB formula
APPENDIX 8A: LHP approximation and IRB formula i) The LHP approximation The large homogeneous pool (LHP) approximation of Vasicek (1997) is based on the assumption of a very large (technically infinitely
More informationAnalysing the IS-MP-PC Model
University College Dublin, Advanced Macroeconomics Notes, 2015 (Karl Whelan) Page 1 Analysing the IS-MP-PC Model In the previous set of notes, we introduced the IS-MP-PC model. We will move on now to examining
More informationModeling Credit Risk of Loan Portfolios in the Presence of Autocorrelation (Part 2)
Practitioner Seminar in Financial and Insurance Mathematics ETH Zürich Modeling Credit Risk of Loan Portfolios in the Presence of Autocorrelation (Part 2) Christoph Frei UBS and University of Alberta March
More informationEFFICIENT MARKETS HYPOTHESIS
EFFICIENT MARKETS HYPOTHESIS when economists speak of capital markets as being efficient, they usually consider asset prices and returns as being determined as the outcome of supply and demand in a competitive
More informationPILLAR3 AS AT31MARCH 2016
BASEL I PILLAR3 CAPITALADEQUACY AND RISKS DISCLOSURES AS AT31MARCH 2016 COMMONWEALTH BANK OFAUSTRALIA ACN 123123124 9MAY2016 This page has been intentionally left blank Table of Contents 1 Introduction
More information