EXPLICIT MARTINGALE REPRESENTATIONS FOR BROWNIAN FUNCTIONALS AND APPLICATIONS TO OPTION HEDGING
|
|
- Brendan Sharp
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 EXPLICIT ARTINGALE REPRESENTATIONS FOR BROWNIAN FUNCTIONALS AND APPLICATIONS TO OPTION HEDGING JEAN-FRANÇOIS RENAUD AND BRUNO RÉILLARD Abstract. Using Clark-Ocone formula, explicit martingale representations for path-dependent Brownian functionals are computed. As direct consequences, explicit martingale representations of the extrema of geometric Brownian motion and explicit hedging portfolios of path-dependent options are obtained. 1. Introduction The representation of functionals of Brownian motion by stochastic integrals, also known as martingale representation, has been widely studied over the years. The first proof of what is now known as Itô s representation theorem was implicitly provided by Itô (1951) himself. This theorem states that any square-integrable Brownian functional is equal to a stochastic integral with respect to Brownian motion. any years later, Dellacherie (1974) gave a simple new proof of Itô s theorem using Hilbert space techniques. any other articles were written afterward on this problem and its applications but one of the pioneer work on explicit descriptions of the integrand is certainly the one by Clark (1970). Those of Haussmann (1979), Ocone (1984), Ocone and Karatzas (1991) and Karatzas et al. (1991) were also particularly significant. A nice survey article on the problem of martingale representation was written by Davis (005). Even though this problem is closely related to important issues in applications, for example finding hedging portfolios in finance, much of the work on the subject did not seem to consider explicitness of the representation as the ultimate goal, at least as it is intended in this Date: November 4, athematics Subject Classification. 60H05, 60J65, 60G44, 60H07, 90A09. Key words and phrases. artingale representation; stochastic integral representation; Brownian functionals; Clark-Ocone formula; Black-Scholes model; hedging; path-dependent options. Corresponding author: renaud@dms.umontreal.ca. 1
2 JEAN-FRANÇOIS RENAUD AND BRUNO RÉILLARD work. In many papers using alliavin calculus or some kind of differential calculus for stochastic processes, the results are quite general but unsatisfactory from the explicitness point of view: the integrands in the stochastic integral representations always involve predictable projections or conditional expectations and some kind of gradients. Recently, Shiryaev and Yor (004) proposed a method based on Itô s formula to find explicit martingale representations for Brownian functionals. They mention in their introduction that the search for explicit representations is an uneasy business. Even though they consider Clark-Ocone formula as a general way to find stochastic integral representations, they raise the question if it is possible to handle it efficiently even in simple cases. In the present paper, we show that Clark-Ocone formula is easier to handle than one might think in the first place. Using this tool from alliavin calculus, explicit martingale representations for pathdependent Brownian functionals, i.e. random variables involving Brownian motion and its running extrema, are computed. No conditional expectations nor gradients appear in the closed-form representations obtained. The method of Shiryaev and Yor (004) yields in particular the explicit martingale representation of the running maximum of Brownian motion. In the following, this representation will be obtained once more as an easy consequence of our main result. oreover, the explicit martingale representations of the maximum and the minimum of geometric Brownian motion will be computed. Using these representations in finance, hedging portfolios will be obtained for strongly path-dependent options such as lookback and spread lookback options, i.e. options on some measurement of the volatility. The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In Section, the problem of martingale representation is presented and, in Section 3, the martingale representations of the maximum and the minimum of Brownian motion are recalled. artingale representations for more general Brownian functionals are given in Section 4 and those for the extrema of geometric Brownian motion are given in Section 5. Finally, in Section 6, our main result is applied to the maximum of Brownian motion and, in Section 7, explicit hedging portfolios of exotic options are computed.. artingale representation Let B = (B t ) t [0,T be a standard Brownian motion defined on a complete probability space (Ω, F T, P), where (F t ) t [0,T is the augmented
3 ARTINGALE REPRESENTATIONS FOR BROWNIAN FUNCTIONALS 3 Brownian filtration which satisfies les conditions habituelles. If F is a square-integrable random variable, Itô s representation theorem tells us that there exists a unique adapted process (ϕ t ) t [0,T in L ([0, T Ω) such that (1) F = E [F + T 0 ϕ t db t. In other words, there exists a unique martingale representation or, more precisely, the integrand ϕ in the representation exists and is unique in L ([0, T Ω). The expression martingale representation comes from the fact that Itô s representation theorem is essentially equivalent to the representation of Brownian martingales (see Karatzas and Shreve (1991)). Unfortunately, the problem of finding explicit representations is still unsolved..1. Clark-Ocone representation formula. When F is alliavin differentiable, the process ϕ appearing in Itô s representation theorem, i.e. in Equation (1), is given by ϕ t = E [D t F F t where t D t F is the alliavin derivative of F. This is Clark-Ocone representation formula. ore precisely, let W (h) = T h(s) db 0 s be defined for h L ([0, T ). For a smooth Brownian functional F, i.e. a random variable of the form F = f(w (h 1 ),..., W (h n )) where f is a smooth bounded function with bounded derivatives of all orders, the alliavin derivative is defined by n D t F = i f(w (h 1 ),..., W (h n )) h i (t) i=1 where i stands for the i th partial derivative. Note that D t ( T 0 h(s) db s) = h(t) and in particular D s (B t ) = I {s t}. The operator D being closable, it can be extended to obtain the alliavin derivative D : D 1, L ([0, T Ω) where the domain D 1, is the closure of the set of smooth functionals under the seminorm { [ 1/ F 1, = E [F + E DF L ([0,T )}.
4 4 JEAN-FRANÇOIS RENAUD AND BRUNO RÉILLARD Random variables in D 1, are said to be alliavin differentiable. An interesting fact is that D 1, is dense in L (Ω). This means that Clark- Ocone representation formula is not restricted to a small subset of Brownian functionals. Fortunately, the alliavin derivative satisfies some chain rules. First of all, if g : R m R is a continuously differentiable function with bounded partial derivatives and if F = (F 1,..., F m ) (D 1, ) m, then g(f ) D 1, and D(g(F )) = m i=1 ig(f ) DF i. If g : R m R is instead a Lipschitz function, then g(f ) D 1, still holds. If in addition the law of F is absolutely continuous with respect to Lebesgue measure on R m, then D(g(F )) = m i=1 ig(f ) DF i. These last results will be useful in the sequel. For more on alliavin calculus, a concise presentation is available in the notes of Øksendal (1996) and a more detailed and general one in the book of Nualart (1995)... Hedging portfolios. As mentioned in the introduction, stochastic integral representations appear naturally in mathematical finance. Since the work of Harrison and Pliska (1983), it is known that the completeness of a market model and the computation of hedging portfolios, relies on these representations. One can illustrate this connection by considering the classical Black-Scholes model. Under the probability measure P, the price dynamics of the risky and the risk-free assets follow respectively { dst = µs t dt + σs t db t, S 0 = s; da t = ra t dt, A 0 = 1, where r is the interest rate, µ is the drift and σ is the volatility. Let Q be the unique equivalent martingale measure of this complete market model and let B Q be the corresponding Q-Brownian motion. Note that under the risk neutral measure Q, so that for any t 0, ds t = rs t dt + σs t db Q t, S 0 = s, S t = se (r σ /)t+σb Q t. Let G be the payoff of an option on S and (η t, ξ t ) the self-financing trading strategy replicating this option, i.e. a process over the time interval [0, T such that dv t = η t da t + ξ t ds t and V T = G where V t = η t A t + ξ t S t, where ξ t is the number of shares of the risky asset, ξ t S t being the amount invested in it, while η t is the number of
5 ARTINGALE REPRESENTATIONS FOR BROWNIAN FUNCTIONALS 5 shares of the risk-free asset, so η t A t is the amount invested without risk. Then, the price of the option at time t is given by V t. It is clear that η t is a linear combination of ξ t and V t. When the price is known, the problem of finding the hedging portfolio is the same as finding ξ t. It is easily deduced that () ξ t = e r(t t) (σs t ) 1 ϕ t, where ϕ t is the integrand in the martingale representation of E Q [G F t, i.e., e r(t t) V t = E Q [G F t = E Q [G + t 0 ϕ s db Q s. We will use Equation () extensively in the section on financial applications. For example, let G = (S T K) +, where K is a constant. This is the payoff of a call option. Since S T is a alliavin differentiable random variable and since f(x) = (x K) + is a Lipschitz function, one obtains that D t G = σs T I {ST >K}. Then ϕ t = E Q [ σs T I {ST >K} F t = g(t, St ), where [ g(t, a) = σae (r σ /)(T t) E = ( log (a/k) + (r + σ σae r(t t) /)() Φ σ e σ T t Z I { } Z> log (K/a) (r σ /)(T t) σ T t with Z N(0, 1). Therefore ( ) log (St /K) + (r + σ /)() ξ t = Φ σ, recovering the well-known formula of the Black-Scholes hedging portfolio for the call option. Note that even if the payoff of the option involves the non-smooth function f(x) = (x K) +, the alliavin calculus approach is applicable. As mentioned in the preceding subsection, f only needs to be a continuously differentiable function with bounded derivative, or a Lipschitz function if it is applied to a random variable with an absolutely continuous law with respect to Lebesgue measure. This was the case for S T. ),
6 6 JEAN-FRANÇOIS RENAUD AND BRUNO RÉILLARD 3. aximum and minimum of Brownian motion Let B θ = (B θ t ) t [0,T be a Brownian motion with drift θ, i.e. B θ t = B t + θt, where θ R. Its running maximum and its running minimum are respectively defined by θ t = sup Bs θ and m θ t = inf 0 s t 0 s t Bθ s. When θ = 0, t and m t will be used instead. The range process of B θ t is then defined by R θ t = θ t m θ t and R R θ if θ = 0. A result of Nualart and Vives (1988) leads to the following lemma; see also Section.1.4 in Nualart (1995). Lemma 3.1. The random variables T θ and mθ T and their alliavin derivatives are given by are elements of D1, D t ( θ T ) = I [0,τ θ (t) and D t (m θ T ) = I [0,τ θ m (t) for t [0, T, where τ θ = inf{0 t T t θ = T θ} and τ m θ = inf{0 t T m θ t = m θ T } are the almost surely unique random points where B θ attains respectively its maximum and its minimum. This lemma will be of great use in the sequel The case θ = 0. If θ = 0, the martingale representation of the maximum of Brownian motion is T T [ ( ) (3) T = π + t B t 1 Φ db t where Φ(x) = P {N(0, 1) x} and E [ T = 0 T π T d = B T d = T N(0, 1). because This representation can be found in the book of Rogers and Williams (1987). Their proof uses Clark s formula (see Clark (1970)), which is essentially a Clark-Ocone formula on the canonical space of Brownian motion. As mention in the introduction, it can also be computed using the completely different method of Shiryaev and Yor (004). Obviously, the martingale representation of the minimum of Brownian motion is a direct consequence: m T = T π T 0 [ ( ) Bt m t 1 Φ db t.
7 ARTINGALE REPRESENTATIONS FOR BROWNIAN FUNCTIONALS The general case. If one extends this by adding a drift to Brownian motion, the results are similar. In the papers of Graversen et al. (001) and Shiryaev and Yor (004), the integrand in the martingale representation of T θ is computed. Indeed, the stationary and independent increments of B θ yield E [ θ T F t = θ t + θ t Bθ t P { θ T t > z } dz. Thus, t t θ + P{ t θ Bθ T θ t > z} dz is a martingale and a function t of (Bt θ, t θ ). An application of Itô s formula to this martingale and coefficients analysis yield the martingale representation of T θ. The integrand in this integral representation is given by ( ) θ (4) 1 Φ t Bt θ θ() ( ) + e θ( t θ Bθ t [1 ) θ Φ t Bt θ + θ(). The integrand in the representation of m θ T, the minimum of Brownian motion with drift θ, is then easily deduced and given by (5) [ 1 Φ ( ) B θ t m θ t θ() ( ) e θ(bθ t mθ t B [1 ) θ Φ t m θ t + θ(). Consequently, the integrand in the martingale representation of R θ, i.e. the range process of B θ, is given by the difference of Equation (4) and Equation (5). It is worth mentioning that all these stochastic integral representations can be easily derived with the main result of this paper, i.e. Theorem Path-dependent Brownian functionals For a function F : R 3 R with gradient F = ( x F, y F, z F ), define Div x,y (F ) = x F + y F, Div x,z (F ) = x F + z F, and so on. Then, Div(F ) is the divergence of F, i.e. Div(F ) = x F + y F + z F. Before stating and proving our main result, let s mention that the joint law of (B t, m t, t ) is absolutely continuous with respect to Lebesgue measure. The joint probability density function will be denoted by g B,m, (x, y, z; t).
8 8 JEAN-FRANÇOIS RENAUD AND BRUNO RÉILLARD Theorem 4.1. If F : R 3 R is a continuously differentiable function with bounded partial derivatives or a Lipschitz function, then the Brownian functional X = F ( BT θ, mθ T, ) T θ admits the following martingale representation: where f (a, b, c; t) = e 1 θ τ X = E [X + T 0 f ( B θ t, m θ t, θ t ; t ) db t, E [ Div F (B τ + a, m τ + a, τ + a)e θbτ I {mτ b a,c a τ } + Div x,y F (B τ + a, m τ + a, c)e θbτ I {mτ b a, τ c a} + Div x,z F (B τ + a, b, τ + a)e θbτ I {b a mτ,c a τ } + x F (B τ + a, b, c)e θb τ I {b a mτ, τ c a} for b < a < c, b < 0, c > 0, and τ =. Proof. If F is a continuously differentiable function with bounded partial derivatives or if F is a Lipschitz function, then, using one of alliavin calculus chain rules given in Subsection.1, the Brownian functional X is an element of the space D 1, and its alliavin derivative is given by D t X = F ( B θ T, m θ T, θ T ) ( Dt (B θ T ), D t (m θ T ), D t ( θ T ) ). This is true in both cases since the law of ( BT θ, mθ T, ) T θ is absolutely continuous with respect to Lebesgue measure. Define an equivalent probability measure Q on F T by dq = Z dp T, where Z t = exp{ θb t 1 θ t} for t [0, T. Notice that dp = (Z dq T ) 1. Since D t X is F T -measurable for each t [0, T, using the abstract Bayes rule (see Lemma 5.3 in Karatzas and Shreve (1991)), one obtains E [D t X F t = Z t E [ Q (Z T ) 1 D t X F t = e 1 θ (T t) E Q [ e θ(b T B t) D t X F t = e 1 θ (T t) E Q [ e θ(bθ T Bθ t ) D t X F t. By Girsanov s theorem, B θ is a standard Brownian motion under Q with respect to the filtration generated by B. Using Lemma 3.1 and the fact that for any random variable Z and partition (A i ) i of Ω the equality Z = i Z I A i holds, one gets (6) D t X = Div(F ) I [0,τ θ m (t)i [0,τ θ (t) + Div x,y (F ) I [0,τ θ m (t)i (τ θ, )(t) + Div x,z (F ) I (τ θ m, )(t)i [0,τ θ (t) + x (F ) I (τ θ m, )(t)i (τ θ, )(t).
9 ARTINGALE REPRESENTATIONS FOR BROWNIAN FUNCTIONALS 9 Next, note that t < τ θ if and only if θ t < θ T and t < τ θ m if and only if m θ t > m θ T. It can be shown that the random variables τ θ and τ θ m have absolutely continuous laws. In fact, under Q, τ θ /T and τ θ m/t both have a Beta(1/, 1/) distribution. As a result, I [0,τ θ (t) = I [0,τ θ )(t) = I { θ t < θ T } (t) I [0,τ θ m (t) = I [0,τ θ m )(t) = I {m θ t >m θ T } (t) almost surely. Hence, the expression of D t X previously obtained in Equation (6) becomes D t X = Div(F ) I {m θ t >m θ T, θ t < θ T } (t) + Div x,y (F ) I {m θ t >m θ T, θ t = θ T } (t) + Div x,z (F ) I {m θ t =m θ T, θ t < θ T } (t) + x (F ) I {m θ t =m θ T, θ t = θ T } (t). Then, using the arkov property of (B θ, m θ, θ ) under Q, we get that E [D t X F t e 1 θτ is equal to E [Div Q F (Bτ θ + a, m θ τ + a, τ θ + a)e θbθ τ I{m θ τ b a,c a τ θ } + E [Div Q x,y F (Bτ θ + a, m θ τ + a, c)e θbθ τ I{m θ τ b a,τ θ c a} + E [Div Q x,z F (Bτ θ + a, b, τ θ + a)e θbθ τ I{b a m θ τ,c a τ θ } + E [ Q x F (Bτ θ + a, b, c)e θbθ τ I{b a m θ τ,τ θ c a} where τ =, a = B θ t, b = m θ t and c = θ t. Since the law of (B θ, m θ, θ ) under Q and the law of (B, m, ) under P are equal, E [D t X F t e 1 θτ is then equal to E [ Div F (B τ + a, m τ + a, τ + a)e θb τ I {mτ b a,c a τ } + E [ Div x,y F (B τ + a, m τ + a, c)e θb τ I {mτ b a, τ c a} + E [ Div x,z F (B τ + a, b, τ + a)e θb τ I {b a mτ,c a τ } + E [ x F (B τ + a, b, c)e θbτ I {b a mτ, τ c a}. The statement follows from Clark-Ocone formula. Using Theorem 4.1, the results of Section 3, i.e. the martingale representations of the extrema of Brownian motion, are easily derived. For
10 10 JEAN-FRANÇOIS RENAUD AND BRUNO RÉILLARD example, one obtains the martingale representation of T by considering the function F (x, y, z) = z. Indeed, f (a, b, c; t) = E [ I {mt t b a,c a T t } + I {b a mt t,c a T t } = P {c a T t } = π() e = = c a 1 c a T t [ 1 Φ π e z z (T t) dz dz ( ) c a since the density function of t is given by z πt e z t I {z 0}. Remark 4.1. As mentioned before, the expectation appearing in the integrand of the martingale representation of Theorem 4.1 is a simple expectation, i.e. it is not a conditional expectation, and the integrand does not involve any gradient. This expectation can also be written in the following form: (7) b a c a c a b a Div F (x + a, y + a, z + a)g(dx, dy, dz; τ) c a b a c a 0 + Div x,y F (x + a, y + a, c) g(dx, dy, dz; τ) Div x,z F (x + a, b, z + a) g(dx, dy, dz; τ) 0 b a x F (x + a, b, c) g(dx, dy, dz; τ) where g(dx, dy, dz; s) = e θx+ 1 θs g B,m, (x, y, z; s) dxdydz. Here, G(x, y, z) g(dx, dy, dz; s) means z A A B y B C x C G(x, y, z) g(dx, dy, dz; s). In order to apply Theorem 4.1, one needs the joint distribution of the random vector (B t, m t, t ). This is recalled next.
11 ARTINGALE REPRESENTATIONS FOR BROWNIAN FUNCTIONALS The joint probability density function. The expression of the joint law of (B t, m t, t ) was obtained by Feller (1951). Let y, z > 0 and y a < b z. If φ t (x) = 1 πt e x t, then it is known that P {B t (a, b), y m t, t z} ( b = Hence, a k Z φ t (k(y + z) + x) k Z g B,m, (x, y, z; t) = 4 k Z [ k φ t (k(y + z) + x) φ t (k(y + z) + z x) ) dx. n(n 1)φ t (k(y + z) + z x) where φ t (x) = (x 1) φ t t (x). Rearranging terms, one obtains that g B,m, (x, y, z; t) is also given by 4 k 1 k φ t (k(y + z) + x) + 4 k φ t (k(y + z) x) k 1 4 k k(k 1)φ t (k(y + z) + z x) 4 k 1 k(k + 1)φ t (k(y + z) z + x). Integrating with respect to z, one obtains the joint PDF of (B t, m t ): g B,m (x, y; t) = (x y) πt 3 e 1 t (x y) I {y x} I {y 0}. The same work can be done to compute the joint PDF of (B t, t ). Its expression is given in the proof of Proposition aximum and minimum of geometric Brownian motion In this section, Theorem 4.1 is applied to produce explicit martingale representations for the maximum and the minimum of geometric Brownian motion. These particular Brownian functionals are important in finance and fortunately the upcoming representations are plainly explicit. For a stochastic process (X t ) t [0,T, let its running extrema be denoted respectively by X t = sup X s and m X t = inf X s. 0 s t 0 s t
12 1 JEAN-FRANÇOIS RENAUD AND BRUNO RÉILLARD The range process of X is then given by R X t = X t m X t. Proposition 5.1. If X is a geometric Brownian motion, i.e. X t = e µt+σb t for µ R and σ > 0, its maximum on [0, T admits the following martingale representation: X T Here, θ = µ and g (a, b) is given by σ { σe σa (µ (8) ) + σ e µ + σ for a < b and b > 0. = E [ T T X + g ( ) Bt θ, t θ dbt. σ (µ+ )(T t) 0 [ ( ) σ(b a) (µ + σ )() 1 Φ σ + µ ( e σ(b a)) ( ) σ σ (µ+ [1 } ) σ(b a) + µ() Φ σ, Proof. Applying Theorem 4.1 with F (x, y, z) = e σz and using the density function of (B s, s ), i.e. g B, (x, y; s) = the integrand in the representation of X T (9) σe σa 1 θ τ y b a (y x) e 1 s (y x) I {y x} I {y 0}, πs 3 is given by σy+θx (y x) e 1 πτ 3 e τ (y x) dxdy where a = Bt θ, b = t θ and τ =. Hopefully, in this case, the integrand can be greatly simplified and so the rest of the proof involves only elementary calculations. For a b, let I denote only the integral in Equation (9). If z = y x, then I = e 1 θ τ e (σ+θ)y z 1 πτ 3 e τ (z+θτ) dzdy = e 1 θ τ b a b a y e (σ+θ)y 1 πτ e 1 τ (y+θτ) dy θe θ τ = e 1 θτ I 1 θe 1 θτ I, b a ( )) y + θτ e (1 (σ+θ)y Φ dy τ
13 ARTINGALE REPRESENTATIONS FOR BROWNIAN FUNCTIONALS 13 where the integrals I 1 and I are obviously defined. If z = y+θτ τ β = σ + θ, then [ ( ) I 1 = e βθτ e 1 β τ b a (θ + σ)τ 1 Φ, τ and and Finally, I = e 1 θ τ I = eβ(b a) β ( ( )) b a + θτ 1 Φ + 1 τ β I 1. ( 1 θ ) I 1 + θ ( )) β β e 1 b a + θτ θτ e (1 β(b a) Φ. τ The statement follows. The martingale representation of the minimum of geometric Brownian motion is not a completely direct consequence of the last corollary since the exponential function is not linear. However, the proof is almost identical to the proof of Proposition 5.1. Corollary 5.1. If X is a geometric Brownian motion, i.e. X t = e µt+σb t for µ R and σ > 0, its minimum m X T admits the following martingale representation: Here, θ = µ σ m X T = E [ T m X T + h ( ) Bt θ, m θ t dbt. and h (a, b) is given by 0 (10) σe σa µ + σ { (µ + σ ) e σ (µ+ )(T t) [ ( ) σ(a b) + (µ σ )() 1 Φ σ + µ ( e σ(b a)) ( σ σ (µ+ [1 ) σ(a b) µ() Φ σ ) }, for a > b and b < 0. In Proposition 5.1, the expression of g is not simplified further because its actual form will be useful to get Black-Scholes like formulas in the upcoming financial applications. oreover, it gives this interesting
14 14 JEAN-FRANÇOIS RENAUD AND BRUNO RÉILLARD other expression of g ( B θ t, θ t ) in terms of ( Xt, X t ) : (11) σx t µ + σ { (µ + σ ) e σ (µ+ )(T t) [ ( ) ln( X 1 Φ t /X t ) (µ + σ )() σ ( ) σ X σ (µ+ ) [ ( ) } + µ t ln( X 1 Φ t /X t ) + µ() X t σ. Of course, a similar expression for h ( ) ( ) Bt θ, m θ t in terms of Xt, m X t is available. The representation of RT X, the range process of geometric Brownian motion X t = exp{µt + σb t } at time T, is now obvious. Corollary 5.. The random variable RT X admits a martingale representation with the following integrand: { g(bt θ, t θ ) h(bt θ, m θ t ) σx t (µ ) σ + σ (µ+ )(T t) e µ + σ [ ( ) ln(xt /m X t ) + (µ σ )() Φ σ ( ) ln( X Φ t /X t ) (µ + σ )() σ ( ) σ X σ (µ+ ) [ ( ) + µ t ln( X 1 Φ t /X t ) + µ() X t σ ( ) σ m X σ (µ+ ) [ ( ) } µ t ln(xt /m X t ) µ() 1 Φ X t σ the difference of the integrands in Equation (8) and Equation (10), i.e. the integrands in the representations of X T and mx T respectively. 6. Applications: hedging for path-dependent options As mentioned earlier, martingale representations results are important in mathematical finance for option hedging. With the previous explicit representations, one can compute explicit hedging portfolios for some strongly path-dependent options. For example, options involving the maximum and/or the minimum of the risky asset can be replicated explicitly. To get the complete hedging portfolio of such options, i.e. (η t, ξ t ) (see the introduction), recall that one also needs the
15 ARTINGALE REPRESENTATIONS FOR BROWNIAN FUNCTIONALS 15 price of the option. The prices of the options in consideration can be found in the literature. Recall from the introduction the classical Black-Scholes risk-neutral market model: { dst = rs t dt + σs t db t, S 0 = 1; da t = ra t dt, A 0 = 1, where P and B stand respectively for the risk-neutral probability measure and the corresponding P-Brownian motion. In this case, S t = e (r 1 σ )t+σb t and then all the notation introduced earlier is adapted, i.e. µ = r 1 σ θ = µ σ = r 1 σ. σ From Equation (), the amount to invest in the risky asset to replicate an option with payoff G is (1) ξ t = e r(t t) (σs t ) 1 ϕ t Standard lookback options. Let s compute the explicit hedging portfolio of a standard lookback put option. The payoff of a standard lookback put option is given by G = [ S T S T + = S T S T. Corollary 6.1. The number of shares to invest in the risky asset to replicate a standard lookback put option is ) ξ t = (1 { ( ) r } σ [1 Φ (d 1 (t)) + e r(t t) S σ t [1 Φ (d (t)), r S t for t [0, T [, where d 1 (t) = σ t θ σbt θ (r + σ )() σ, d (t) = σ t θ σbt θ + (r σ )() σ. Proof. Apply Equation (1) and Proposition 5.1 with the representation in Equation (11). The preceding portfolio was computed by Bermin (000) in a slightly different manner. The payoff and the hedging portfolio of a standard lookback call option are similar to those of the standard lookback put option. The
16 16 JEAN-FRANÇOIS RENAUD AND BRUNO RÉILLARD prices of these two options are in the article of Conze and Viswanathan (1991) and in the book of usiela and Rutkowski (1997). 6.. Options on the volatility. The range of the risky asset is a particular measure of the volatility. Payoffs involving the range are therefore very sensitive to the volatility of the market. First, consider a contract who gives its owner G = T S ms T at maturity, i.e. a payoff equivalent to buying the maximum at the price of the minimum. Corollary 6.. The number of shares to invest in the risky asset to replicate a contingent claim with payoff S T ms T is ( ) ( ) r (13) ξ t = e r(t t) 1 σ S σ t r S t ) + (1 + σ r ( ) ( + e r(t t) 1 σ m S t r for t [0, T [, where [1 Φ (d (t)) [Φ (d 3 (t)) Φ (d 1 (t)) d 3 (t) = σbθ t σm θ t + (r 3σ )() σ, S t d 4 (t) = σbθ t σm θ t (r σ )() σ. ) r σ [1 Φ (d 4 (t)), Proof. Apply Equation (1) with the representation given by Corollary 5.. The price of this option is easily derived from those of the standard lookback put and call options. Since S T m S T = ( S T S T ) (m S T S T ) and since the pricing operator is linear, the price of an option with payoff T S ms T is the difference of the prices of the standard lookback options just considered. One can generalize the previous payoff by considering a spread lookback call option, i.e. an option with payoff [( ) S T m S + T K where K 0 is the strike price. The amount to invest in the risky asset will depend if the option is in-the-money or out-of-the-money. Notice that t S t m S t is an increasing function.
17 ARTINGALE REPRESENTATIONS FOR BROWNIAN FUNCTIONALS 17 Corollary 6.3. If Ψ(y, z; s) = eθx g B,m, (x, y, z; s) dx, τ = and A = {(y, z) K e σz e σy }, the number of shares to invest in the risky asset to replicate a spread lookback call option ξ t is equal to θ t Bθ t m θ t B θ t (e σz e σy ) I A (y + B θ t, z + B θ t ) Ψ(y, z; τ, θ) dy dz I { S t K} θ t B t θ m θ t Bt θ 0 + I {m s t 1 K} θ t Bθ t 0 m θ t Bθ t e σy I A (y + B θ t, θ t ) Ψ(y, z; τ, θ) dy dz e σz I A (m θ t, z + B θ t ) Ψ(y, z; τ, θ) dy dz times exp{ rτ 1 (r σ σ ) τ} when Rt S = t S m S t < K, i.e. when the option is out-of-the-money, and ξ t is as in Equation (13) as soon as Rt S = t S m S t K, i.e. as soon as the option is in-the-money. Proof. Define F ( B θ T, mθ T, θ T ) = [( S T m S T ) K + where F is the Lipschitz function F (x, y, z) = (e σz e σy ) I {e σz e σy K}. Clearly, x F 0, y F = σe σy I {e σz e σy K} and z F = σe σz I {e σz e σy K}. Using Theorem 4.1 and Equation (1), one gets that ξ t is equal to times θ t Bθ t m θ t B t θ θ t B t θ m θ t B t θ + 0 θ t Bθ t 0 m θ t Bθ t e rτ (S t ) 1 e σbθ t 1 θ τ (e σz e σy ) e θx I A (y + B θ t, z + B θ t ) g(x, y, z; τ) dxdydz e σy+θx I A (y + B θ t, θ t )g(x, y, z; τ) dxdydz e σz+θx I A (m θ t, z + B θ t )g(x, y, z; τ) dxdydz, since A = {(y, z) K e σz e σy } and where g = g B,m,. completes the proof. This It is possible to simplify the function Ψ. The details are given in Appendix A. Of course, the payoff and the hedging portfolio of a spread lookback put option are similar and the computations of the latter follow the same steps. Numerical prices of these options can be found in He et al. (1998).
18 18 JEAN-FRANÇOIS RENAUD AND BRUNO RÉILLARD In Corollary 6.3, if K = 0 then I A 1 and the payoff becomes T S ms T. Consequently, the hedging portfolio in Corollary 6. is recovered, as one would expect. 7. Acknowledgments The authors wish to thank the Associate Editor and the referees for a careful reading of the paper and helpful comments. Partial funding in support of this work was provided by a doctoral scholarship of the Institut de Finance athématique de ontréal, as well as by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and by the Fonds québécois de la recherche sur la nature et les technologies. Appendix A. Some integral manipulations In the way toward computing Ψ(y, z; s) = e θx g B,m, (x, y, z; s) dx R where g( ; s) is the joint PDF of (B s, m s, s ), one has to compute integrals of the form: z ( ) x + a e θx φ dx, s y for some constant a and where φ(x) = 1 π e x. Integrating by parts twice yields the following: z y ( ) x + a e θx φ dx = s s [ ( ) ( ) z + a y + a e θz φ e θy φ s s [ ( z + a s θ e θz φ s ) e θy φ + s θ e s θ aθ [Φ = s e s θ e aθ { φ ( z) φ (ȳ) where w = w+a sθ s, for w = y, z. To simplify, define ( ) y + a s ( ) z + a sθ s Φ ( ) y + a sθ s + θ Φ ( z) θ Φ (ȳ) }, H(y, z, a; s) = e aθ{ φ ( z) φ (ȳ) + θ Φ ( z) θ Φ (ȳ) }.
19 Then, ARTINGALE REPRESENTATIONS FOR BROWNIAN FUNCTIONALS 19 z y ( ) x + a e θx φ dx = s e s θ s Consequently, Ψ(y, z; s) is given by H(y, z, a; s). 4 θ s es n H(y, z, ny nz; s) n=1 4 s es θ n(n 1)H(y, z, ny + (n 1)z; s) n= + 4 s es θ n H(y, z, ny + nz; s) n=1 4 s es θ n(n + 1)H(y, z, ny (n + 1)z; s). n=1 References H.-P. Bermin. Hedging lookback and partial lookback options using alliavin calculus. Applied athematical Finance, 7:75 100, 000. J.. C. Clark. The representation of functionals of Brownian motion by stochastic integrals. Ann. ath. Statist., 41:18 195, A. Conze and R. Viswanathan. Path dependent options: the case of lookback options. The Journal of Finance, 46(5): , H. A. Davis. artingale representation and all that. In Advances in control, communication networks, and transportation systems, Systems Control Found. Appl., pages Birkhäuser Boston, 005. C. Dellacherie. Intégrales stochastiques par rapport aux processus de Wiener ou de Poisson. In Séminaire de Probabilités, VIII, pages 5 6. Lecture Notes in ath., Vol Springer, W. Feller. The asymptotic distribution of the range of sums of independent random variables. Ann. ath. Statistics, :47 43, S. E. Graversen, G. Peskir, and A. N. Shiryaev. Stopping Brownian motion without anticipation as close as possible to its ultimate maximum. Theory of Probability and its Applications, 45(1):15 136, 001. J.. Harrison and S. R. Pliska. A stochastic calculus model of continuous trading: complete markets. Stochastic Process. Appl., 15(3): , U. G. Haussmann. On the integral representation of functionals of Itô processes. Stochastics, 3(1):17 7, 1979.
20 0 JEAN-FRANÇOIS RENAUD AND BRUNO RÉILLARD H. He, W. P. Keirstead, and J. Rebholz. Double lookbacks. ath. Finance, 8(3):01 8, K. Itô. ultiple Wiener integral. J. ath. Soc. Japan, 3: , I. Karatzas, D. L. Ocone, and J. Li. An extension of Clark s formula. Stochastics Stochastics Rep., 37(3):17 131, I. Karatzas and S. E. Shreve. Brownian motion and stochastic calculus. Springer-Verlag, second edition, usiela and. Rutkowski. artingale methods in financial modelling. Springer-Verlag, D. Nualart. The alliavin calculus and related topics. Springer-Verlag, D. Nualart and J. Vives. Continuité absolue de la loi du maximum d un processus continu. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I ath., 307(7): , D. Ocone. alliavin s calculus and stochastic integral representations of functionals of diffusion processes. Stochastics, 1(3-4): , D. L. Ocone and I. Karatzas. A generalized Clark representation formula, with application to optimal portfolios. Stochastics Stochastics Rep., 34(3-4):187 0, B. Øksendal. An introduction to alliavin calculus with applications to economics. Lecture notes from the Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration, L. C. G. Rogers and D. Williams. Diffusions, arkov processes and martingales, volume : Itô calculus. Wiley and Sons, A. N. Shiryaev and. Yor. On stochastic integral representations of functionals of Brownian motion. Theory of Probability and its Applications, 48(): , 004. Département de mathématiques et de statistique, Université de ontréal, C.P. 618, Succ. Centre-Ville, ontréal, Québec, H3C 3J7, Canada address: renaud@dms.umontreal.ca Service d enseignement des méthodes quantitatives de gestion, HEC ontréal, 3000 chemin de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, ontréal, Québec, H3T A7, Canada address: bruno.remillard@hec.ca
Stochastic Integral Representation of One Stochastically Non-smooth Wiener Functional
Bulletin of TICMI Vol. 2, No. 2, 26, 24 36 Stochastic Integral Representation of One Stochastically Non-smooth Wiener Functional Hanna Livinska a and Omar Purtukhia b a Taras Shevchenko National University
More informationA note on the existence of unique equivalent martingale measures in a Markovian setting
Finance Stochast. 1, 251 257 1997 c Springer-Verlag 1997 A note on the existence of unique equivalent martingale measures in a Markovian setting Tina Hviid Rydberg University of Aarhus, Department of Theoretical
More informationSTOCHASTIC CALCULUS AND BLACK-SCHOLES MODEL
STOCHASTIC CALCULUS AND BLACK-SCHOLES MODEL YOUNGGEUN YOO Abstract. Ito s lemma is often used in Ito calculus to find the differentials of a stochastic process that depends on time. This paper will introduce
More informationA MARTINGALE REPRESENTATION FOR THE MAXIMUM OF A LÉVY PROCESS
Communications on Stochastic Analysis Vol. 5, No. 4 (211) 683-688 Serials Publications www.serialspublications.com A MATINGALE EPESENTATION FO THE MAXIMUM OF A LÉVY POCESS BUNO ÉMILLAD AND JEAN-FANÇOIS
More information1.1 Basic Financial Derivatives: Forward Contracts and Options
Chapter 1 Preliminaries 1.1 Basic Financial Derivatives: Forward Contracts and Options A derivative is a financial instrument whose value depends on the values of other, more basic underlying variables
More informationConstructive martingale representation using Functional Itô Calculus: a local martingale extension
Mathematical Statistics Stockholm University Constructive martingale representation using Functional Itô Calculus: a local martingale extension Kristoffer Lindensjö Research Report 216:21 ISSN 165-377
More informationRMSC 4005 Stochastic Calculus for Finance and Risk. 1 Exercises. (c) Let X = {X n } n=0 be a {F n }-supermartingale. Show that.
1. EXERCISES RMSC 45 Stochastic Calculus for Finance and Risk Exercises 1 Exercises 1. (a) Let X = {X n } n= be a {F n }-martingale. Show that E(X n ) = E(X ) n N (b) Let X = {X n } n= be a {F n }-submartingale.
More informationAMH4 - ADVANCED OPTION PRICING. Contents
AMH4 - ADVANCED OPTION PRICING ANDREW TULLOCH Contents 1. Theory of Option Pricing 2 2. Black-Scholes PDE Method 4 3. Martingale method 4 4. Monte Carlo methods 5 4.1. Method of antithetic variances 5
More informationOptimal stopping problems for a Brownian motion with a disorder on a finite interval
Optimal stopping problems for a Brownian motion with a disorder on a finite interval A. N. Shiryaev M. V. Zhitlukhin arxiv:1212.379v1 [math.st] 15 Dec 212 December 18, 212 Abstract We consider optimal
More informationRisk Neutral Measures
CHPTER 4 Risk Neutral Measures Our aim in this section is to show how risk neutral measures can be used to price derivative securities. The key advantage is that under a risk neutral measure the discounted
More informationPath Dependent British Options
Path Dependent British Options Kristoffer J Glover (Joint work with G. Peskir and F. Samee) School of Finance and Economics University of Technology, Sydney 18th August 2009 (PDE & Mathematical Finance
More informationAn overview of some financial models using BSDE with enlarged filtrations
An overview of some financial models using BSDE with enlarged filtrations Anne EYRAUD-LOISEL Workshop : Enlargement of Filtrations and Applications to Finance and Insurance May 31st - June 4th, 2010, Jena
More informationThe stochastic calculus
Gdansk A schedule of the lecture Stochastic differential equations Ito calculus, Ito process Ornstein - Uhlenbeck (OU) process Heston model Stopping time for OU process Stochastic differential equations
More informationBasic Arbitrage Theory KTH Tomas Björk
Basic Arbitrage Theory KTH 2010 Tomas Björk Tomas Björk, 2010 Contents 1. Mathematics recap. (Ch 10-12) 2. Recap of the martingale approach. (Ch 10-12) 3. Change of numeraire. (Ch 26) Björk,T. Arbitrage
More informationThe Use of Importance Sampling to Speed Up Stochastic Volatility Simulations
The Use of Importance Sampling to Speed Up Stochastic Volatility Simulations Stan Stilger June 6, 1 Fouque and Tullie use importance sampling for variance reduction in stochastic volatility simulations.
More informationEquivalence between Semimartingales and Itô Processes
International Journal of Mathematical Analysis Vol. 9, 215, no. 16, 787-791 HIKARI Ltd, www.m-hikari.com http://dx.doi.org/1.12988/ijma.215.411358 Equivalence between Semimartingales and Itô Processes
More informationNon-semimartingales in finance
Non-semimartingales in finance Pricing and Hedging Options with Quadratic Variation Tommi Sottinen University of Vaasa 1st Northern Triangular Seminar 9-11 March 2009, Helsinki University of Technology
More informationThe British Russian Option
The British Russian Option Kristoffer J Glover (Joint work with G. Peskir and F. Samee) School of Finance and Economics University of Technology, Sydney 25th June 2010 (6th World Congress of the BFS, Toronto)
More informationMATH3075/3975 FINANCIAL MATHEMATICS TUTORIAL PROBLEMS
MATH307/37 FINANCIAL MATHEMATICS TUTORIAL PROBLEMS School of Mathematics and Statistics Semester, 04 Tutorial problems should be used to test your mathematical skills and understanding of the lecture material.
More informationOption Pricing Formula for Fuzzy Financial Market
Journal of Uncertain Systems Vol.2, No., pp.7-2, 28 Online at: www.jus.org.uk Option Pricing Formula for Fuzzy Financial Market Zhongfeng Qin, Xiang Li Department of Mathematical Sciences Tsinghua University,
More informationHedging under Arbitrage
Hedging under Arbitrage Johannes Ruf Columbia University, Department of Statistics Modeling and Managing Financial Risks January 12, 2011 Motivation Given: a frictionless market of stocks with continuous
More informationAdvanced Stochastic Processes.
Advanced Stochastic Processes. David Gamarnik LECTURE 16 Applications of Ito calculus to finance Lecture outline Trading strategies Black Scholes option pricing formula 16.1. Security price processes,
More informationMath 416/516: Stochastic Simulation
Math 416/516: Stochastic Simulation Haijun Li lih@math.wsu.edu Department of Mathematics Washington State University Week 13 Haijun Li Math 416/516: Stochastic Simulation Week 13 1 / 28 Outline 1 Simulation
More information1 Implied Volatility from Local Volatility
Abstract We try to understand the Berestycki, Busca, and Florent () (BBF) result in the context of the work presented in Lectures and. Implied Volatility from Local Volatility. Current Plan as of March
More informationA No-Arbitrage Theorem for Uncertain Stock Model
Fuzzy Optim Decis Making manuscript No (will be inserted by the editor) A No-Arbitrage Theorem for Uncertain Stock Model Kai Yao Received: date / Accepted: date Abstract Stock model is used to describe
More informationPricing theory of financial derivatives
Pricing theory of financial derivatives One-period securities model S denotes the price process {S(t) : t = 0, 1}, where S(t) = (S 1 (t) S 2 (t) S M (t)). Here, M is the number of securities. At t = 1,
More informationMartingale Approach to Pricing and Hedging
Introduction and echniques Lecture 9 in Financial Mathematics UiO-SK451 Autumn 15 eacher:s. Ortiz-Latorre Martingale Approach to Pricing and Hedging 1 Risk Neutral Pricing Assume that we are in the basic
More informationExponential utility maximization under partial information
Exponential utility maximization under partial information Marina Santacroce Politecnico di Torino Joint work with M. Mania AMaMeF 5-1 May, 28 Pitesti, May 1th, 28 Outline Expected utility maximization
More informationAmerican Option Pricing Formula for Uncertain Financial Market
American Option Pricing Formula for Uncertain Financial Market Xiaowei Chen Uncertainty Theory Laboratory, Department of Mathematical Sciences Tsinghua University, Beijing 184, China chenxw7@mailstsinghuaeducn
More informationHedging of Contingent Claims under Incomplete Information
Projektbereich B Discussion Paper No. B 166 Hedging of Contingent Claims under Incomplete Information by Hans Föllmer ) Martin Schweizer ) October 199 ) Financial support by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft,
More informationThe ruin probabilities of a multidimensional perturbed risk model
MATHEMATICAL COMMUNICATIONS 231 Math. Commun. 18(2013, 231 239 The ruin probabilities of a multidimensional perturbed risk model Tatjana Slijepčević-Manger 1, 1 Faculty of Civil Engineering, University
More informationMASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY 6.265/15.070J Fall 2013 Lecture 19 11/20/2013. Applications of Ito calculus to finance
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY 6.265/15.7J Fall 213 Lecture 19 11/2/213 Applications of Ito calculus to finance Content. 1. Trading strategies 2. Black-Scholes option pricing formula 1 Security
More informationStochastic Processes and Stochastic Calculus - 9 Complete and Incomplete Market Models
Stochastic Processes and Stochastic Calculus - 9 Complete and Incomplete Market Models Eni Musta Università degli studi di Pisa San Miniato - 16 September 2016 Overview 1 Self-financing portfolio 2 Complete
More informationBasic Concepts and Examples in Finance
Basic Concepts and Examples in Finance Bernardo D Auria email: bernardo.dauria@uc3m.es web: www.est.uc3m.es/bdauria July 5, 2017 ICMAT / UC3M The Financial Market The Financial Market We assume there are
More informationIntroduction to Probability Theory and Stochastic Processes for Finance Lecture Notes
Introduction to Probability Theory and Stochastic Processes for Finance Lecture Notes Fabio Trojani Department of Economics, University of St. Gallen, Switzerland Correspondence address: Fabio Trojani,
More informationEnlargement of filtration
Enlargement of filtration Bernardo D Auria email: bernardo.dauria@uc3m.es web: www.est.uc3m.es/bdauria July 6, 2017 ICMAT / UC3M Enlargement of Filtration Enlargement of Filtration ([1] 5.9) If G is a
More informationMath 6810 (Probability) Fall Lecture notes
Math 6810 (Probability) Fall 2012 Lecture notes Pieter Allaart University of North Texas April 16, 2013 2 Text: Introduction to Stochastic Calculus with Applications, by Fima C. Klebaner (3rd edition),
More informationOn Leland s strategy of option pricing with transactions costs
Finance Stochast., 239 25 997 c Springer-Verlag 997 On Leland s strategy of option pricing with transactions costs Yuri M. Kabanov,, Mher M. Safarian 2 Central Economics and Mathematics Institute of the
More informationAsymmetric information in trading against disorderly liquidation of a large position.
Asymmetric information in trading against disorderly liquidation of a large position. Caroline Hillairet 1 Cody Hyndman 2 Ying Jiao 3 Renjie Wang 2 1 ENSAE ParisTech Crest, France 2 Concordia University,
More informationLecture 3: Review of mathematical finance and derivative pricing models
Lecture 3: Review of mathematical finance and derivative pricing models Xiaoguang Wang STAT 598W January 21th, 2014 (STAT 598W) Lecture 3 1 / 51 Outline 1 Some model independent definitions and principals
More informationM5MF6. Advanced Methods in Derivatives Pricing
Course: Setter: M5MF6 Dr Antoine Jacquier MSc EXAMINATIONS IN MATHEMATICS AND FINANCE DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS April 2016 M5MF6 Advanced Methods in Derivatives Pricing Setter s signature...........................................
More informationLecture 17. The model is parametrized by the time period, δt, and three fixed constant parameters, v, σ and the riskless rate r.
Lecture 7 Overture to continuous models Before rigorously deriving the acclaimed Black-Scholes pricing formula for the value of a European option, we developed a substantial body of material, in continuous
More informationForwards and Futures. Chapter Basics of forwards and futures Forwards
Chapter 7 Forwards and Futures Copyright c 2008 2011 Hyeong In Choi, All rights reserved. 7.1 Basics of forwards and futures The financial assets typically stocks we have been dealing with so far are the
More informationOPTION PRICE WHEN THE STOCK IS A SEMIMARTINGALE
DOI: 1.1214/ECP.v7-149 Elect. Comm. in Probab. 7 (22) 79 83 ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS in PROBABILITY OPTION PRICE WHEN THE STOCK IS A SEMIMARTINGALE FIMA KLEBANER Department of Mathematics & Statistics,
More informationContinuous Time Finance. Tomas Björk
Continuous Time Finance Tomas Björk 1 II Stochastic Calculus Tomas Björk 2 Typical Setup Take as given the market price process, S(t), of some underlying asset. S(t) = price, at t, per unit of underlying
More informationMSc Financial Engineering CHRISTMAS ASSIGNMENT: MERTON S JUMP-DIFFUSION MODEL. To be handed in by monday January 28, 2013
MSc Financial Engineering 2012-13 CHRISTMAS ASSIGNMENT: MERTON S JUMP-DIFFUSION MODEL To be handed in by monday January 28, 2013 Department EMS, Birkbeck Introduction The assignment consists of Reading
More informationPDE Methods for the Maximum Drawdown
PDE Methods for the Maximum Drawdown Libor Pospisil, Jan Vecer Columbia University, Department of Statistics, New York, NY 127, USA April 1, 28 Abstract Maximum drawdown is a risk measure that plays an
More informationReplication and Absence of Arbitrage in Non-Semimartingale Models
Replication and Absence of Arbitrage in Non-Semimartingale Models Matematiikan päivät, Tampere, 4-5. January 2006 Tommi Sottinen University of Helsinki 4.1.2006 Outline 1. The classical pricing model:
More informationProbability in Options Pricing
Probability in Options Pricing Mark Cohen and Luke Skon Kenyon College cohenmj@kenyon.edu December 14, 2012 Mark Cohen and Luke Skon (Kenyon college) Probability Presentation December 14, 2012 1 / 16 What
More informationSensitivity of American Option Prices with Different Strikes, Maturities and Volatilities
Applied Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 6, 2012, no. 112, 5597-5602 Sensitivity of American Option Prices with Different Strikes, Maturities and Volatilities Nasir Rehman Department of Mathematics and Statistics
More informationStochastic Dynamical Systems and SDE s. An Informal Introduction
Stochastic Dynamical Systems and SDE s An Informal Introduction Olav Kallenberg Graduate Student Seminar, April 18, 2012 1 / 33 2 / 33 Simple recursion: Deterministic system, discrete time x n+1 = f (x
More informationSTOCHASTIC INTEGRALS
Stat 391/FinMath 346 Lecture 8 STOCHASTIC INTEGRALS X t = CONTINUOUS PROCESS θ t = PORTFOLIO: #X t HELD AT t { St : STOCK PRICE M t : MG W t : BROWNIAN MOTION DISCRETE TIME: = t < t 1
More informationLecture 4. Finite difference and finite element methods
Finite difference and finite element methods Lecture 4 Outline Black-Scholes equation From expectation to PDE Goal: compute the value of European option with payoff g which is the conditional expectation
More informationLecture Note 8 of Bus 41202, Spring 2017: Stochastic Diffusion Equation & Option Pricing
Lecture Note 8 of Bus 41202, Spring 2017: Stochastic Diffusion Equation & Option Pricing We shall go over this note quickly due to time constraints. Key concept: Ito s lemma Stock Options: A contract giving
More informationStochastic Volatility
Stochastic Volatility A Gentle Introduction Fredrik Armerin Department of Mathematics Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden Contents 1 Introduction 2 1.1 Volatility................................
More informationStochastic Differential equations as applied to pricing of options
Stochastic Differential equations as applied to pricing of options By Yasin LUT Supevisor:Prof. Tuomo Kauranne December 2010 Introduction Pricing an European call option Conclusion INTRODUCTION A stochastic
More informationKØBENHAVNS UNIVERSITET (Blok 2, 2011/2012) Naturvidenskabelig kandidateksamen Continuous time finance (FinKont) TIME ALLOWED : 3 hours
This question paper consists of 3 printed pages FinKont KØBENHAVNS UNIVERSITET (Blok 2, 211/212) Naturvidenskabelig kandidateksamen Continuous time finance (FinKont) TIME ALLOWED : 3 hours This exam paper
More informationOptimal robust bounds for variance options and asymptotically extreme models
Optimal robust bounds for variance options and asymptotically extreme models Alexander Cox 1 Jiajie Wang 2 1 University of Bath 2 Università di Roma La Sapienza Advances in Financial Mathematics, 9th January,
More informationPartial differential approach for continuous models. Closed form pricing formulas for discretely monitored models
Advanced Topics in Derivative Pricing Models Topic 3 - Derivatives with averaging style payoffs 3.1 Pricing models of Asian options Partial differential approach for continuous models Closed form pricing
More informationBasic Concepts in Mathematical Finance
Chapter 1 Basic Concepts in Mathematical Finance In this chapter, we give an overview of basic concepts in mathematical finance theory, and then explain those concepts in very simple cases, namely in the
More informationOption pricing in the stochastic volatility model of Barndorff-Nielsen and Shephard
Option pricing in the stochastic volatility model of Barndorff-Nielsen and Shephard Indifference pricing and the minimal entropy martingale measure Fred Espen Benth Centre of Mathematics for Applications
More information1 Mathematics in a Pill 1.1 PROBABILITY SPACE AND RANDOM VARIABLES. A probability triple P consists of the following components:
1 Mathematics in a Pill The purpose of this chapter is to give a brief outline of the probability theory underlying the mathematics inside the book, and to introduce necessary notation and conventions
More informationOption Pricing. 1 Introduction. Mrinal K. Ghosh
Option Pricing Mrinal K. Ghosh 1 Introduction We first introduce the basic terminology in option pricing. Option: An option is the right, but not the obligation to buy (or sell) an asset under specified
More informationA Continuity Correction under Jump-Diffusion Models with Applications in Finance
A Continuity Correction under Jump-Diffusion Models with Applications in Finance Cheng-Der Fuh 1, Sheng-Feng Luo 2 and Ju-Fang Yen 3 1 Institute of Statistical Science, Academia Sinica, and Graduate Institute
More informationNear-Expiry Asymptotics of the Implied Volatility in Local and Stochastic Volatility Models
Mathematical Finance Colloquium, USC September 27, 2013 Near-Expiry Asymptotics of the Implied Volatility in Local and Stochastic Volatility Models Elton P. Hsu Northwestern University (Based on a joint
More informationCitation: Dokuchaev, Nikolai Optimal gradual liquidation of equity from a risky asset. Applied Economic Letters. 17 (13): pp
Citation: Dokuchaev, Nikolai. 21. Optimal gradual liquidation of equity from a risky asset. Applied Economic Letters. 17 (13): pp. 135-138. Additional Information: If you wish to contact a Curtin researcher
More informationarxiv: v2 [q-fin.pr] 23 Nov 2017
VALUATION OF EQUITY WARRANTS FOR UNCERTAIN FINANCIAL MARKET FOAD SHOKROLLAHI arxiv:17118356v2 [q-finpr] 23 Nov 217 Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Vaasa, PO Box 7, FIN-6511 Vaasa,
More informationCONTINUOUS TIME PRICING AND TRADING: A REVIEW, WITH SOME EXTRA PIECES
CONTINUOUS TIME PRICING AND TRADING: A REVIEW, WITH SOME EXTRA PIECES THE SOURCE OF A PRICE IS ALWAYS A TRADING STRATEGY SPECIAL CASES WHERE TRADING STRATEGY IS INDEPENDENT OF PROBABILITY MEASURE COMPLETENESS,
More informationSOME APPLICATIONS OF OCCUPATION TIMES OF BROWNIAN MOTION WITH DRIFT IN MATHEMATICAL FINANCE
c Applied Mathematics & Decision Sciences, 31, 63 73 1999 Reprints Available directly from the Editor. Printed in New Zealand. SOME APPLICAIONS OF OCCUPAION IMES OF BROWNIAN MOION WIH DRIF IN MAHEMAICAL
More informationPricing in markets modeled by general processes with independent increments
Pricing in markets modeled by general processes with independent increments Tom Hurd Financial Mathematics at McMaster www.phimac.org Thanks to Tahir Choulli and Shui Feng Financial Mathematics Seminar
More informationPricing Dynamic Solvency Insurance and Investment Fund Protection
Pricing Dynamic Solvency Insurance and Investment Fund Protection Hans U. Gerber and Gérard Pafumi Switzerland Abstract In the first part of the paper the surplus of a company is modelled by a Wiener process.
More informationPDE Approach to Credit Derivatives
PDE Approach to Credit Derivatives Marek Rutkowski School of Mathematics and Statistics University of New South Wales Joint work with T. Bielecki, M. Jeanblanc and K. Yousiph Seminar 26 September, 2007
More informationEFFICIENT MONTE CARLO ALGORITHM FOR PRICING BARRIER OPTIONS
Commun. Korean Math. Soc. 23 (2008), No. 2, pp. 285 294 EFFICIENT MONTE CARLO ALGORITHM FOR PRICING BARRIER OPTIONS Kyoung-Sook Moon Reprinted from the Communications of the Korean Mathematical Society
More informationLévy models in finance
Lévy models in finance Ernesto Mordecki Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay PASI - Guanajuato - June 2010 Summary General aim: describe jummp modelling in finace through some relevant issues.
More informationEconomics has never been a science - and it is even less now than a few years ago. Paul Samuelson. Funeral by funeral, theory advances Paul Samuelson
Economics has never been a science - and it is even less now than a few years ago. Paul Samuelson Funeral by funeral, theory advances Paul Samuelson Economics is extremely useful as a form of employment
More informationPAPER 27 STOCHASTIC CALCULUS AND APPLICATIONS
MATHEMATICAL TRIPOS Part III Thursday, 5 June, 214 1:3 pm to 4:3 pm PAPER 27 STOCHASTIC CALCULUS AND APPLICATIONS Attempt no more than FOUR questions. There are SIX questions in total. The questions carry
More informationLecture Notes for Chapter 6. 1 Prototype model: a one-step binomial tree
Lecture Notes for Chapter 6 This is the chapter that brings together the mathematical tools (Brownian motion, Itô calculus) and the financial justifications (no-arbitrage pricing) to produce the derivative
More informationQueens College, CUNY, Department of Computer Science Computational Finance CSCI 365 / 765 Fall 2017 Instructor: Dr. Sateesh Mane.
Queens College, CUNY, Department of Computer Science Computational Finance CSCI 365 / 765 Fall 2017 Instructor: Dr. Sateesh Mane c Sateesh R. Mane 2017 14 Lecture 14 November 15, 2017 Derivation of the
More informationStochastic Calculus, Application of Real Analysis in Finance
, Application of Real Analysis in Finance Workshop for Young Mathematicians in Korea Seungkyu Lee Pohang University of Science and Technology August 4th, 2010 Contents 1 BINOMIAL ASSET PRICING MODEL Contents
More informationLECTURE 4: BID AND ASK HEDGING
LECTURE 4: BID AND ASK HEDGING 1. Introduction One of the consequences of incompleteness is that the price of derivatives is no longer unique. Various strategies for dealing with this exist, but a useful
More informationTangent Lévy Models. Sergey Nadtochiy (joint work with René Carmona) Oxford-Man Institute of Quantitative Finance University of Oxford.
Tangent Lévy Models Sergey Nadtochiy (joint work with René Carmona) Oxford-Man Institute of Quantitative Finance University of Oxford June 24, 2010 6th World Congress of the Bachelier Finance Society Sergey
More informationLecture 11: Ito Calculus. Tuesday, October 23, 12
Lecture 11: Ito Calculus Continuous time models We start with the model from Chapter 3 log S j log S j 1 = µ t + p tz j Sum it over j: log S N log S 0 = NX µ t + NX p tzj j=1 j=1 Can we take the limit
More informationBluff Your Way Through Black-Scholes
Bluff our Way Through Black-Scholes Saurav Sen December 000 Contents What is Black-Scholes?.............................. 1 The Classical Black-Scholes Model....................... 1 Some Useful Background
More information3.1 Itô s Lemma for Continuous Stochastic Variables
Lecture 3 Log Normal Distribution 3.1 Itô s Lemma for Continuous Stochastic Variables Mathematical Finance is about pricing (or valuing) financial contracts, and in particular those contracts which depend
More informationWeak Reflection Principle and Static Hedging of Barrier Options
Weak Reflection Principle and Static Hedging of Barrier Options Sergey Nadtochiy Department of Mathematics University of Michigan Apr 2013 Fields Quantitative Finance Seminar Fields Institute, Toronto
More informationPricing Exotic Options Under a Higher-order Hidden Markov Model
Pricing Exotic Options Under a Higher-order Hidden Markov Model Wai-Ki Ching Tak-Kuen Siu Li-min Li 26 Jan. 2007 Abstract In this paper, we consider the pricing of exotic options when the price dynamic
More informationRobust Pricing and Hedging of Options on Variance
Robust Pricing and Hedging of Options on Variance Alexander Cox Jiajie Wang University of Bath Bachelier 21, Toronto Financial Setting Option priced on an underlying asset S t Dynamics of S t unspecified,
More informationIntroduction Taylor s Theorem Einstein s Theory Bachelier s Probability Law Brownian Motion Itô s Calculus. Itô s Calculus.
Itô s Calculus Christopher Ting Christopher Ting http://www.mysmu.edu/faculty/christophert/ : christopherting@smu.edu.sg : 6828 0364 : LKCSB 5036 October 21, 2016 Christopher Ting QF 101 Week 10 October
More informationHow to hedge Asian options in fractional Black-Scholes model
How to hedge Asian options in fractional Black-Scholes model Heikki ikanmäki Jena, March 29, 211 Fractional Lévy processes 1/36 Outline of the talk 1. Introduction 2. Main results 3. Methodology 4. Conclusions
More informationNo-arbitrage theorem for multi-factor uncertain stock model with floating interest rate
Fuzzy Optim Decis Making 217 16:221 234 DOI 117/s17-16-9246-8 No-arbitrage theorem for multi-factor uncertain stock model with floating interest rate Xiaoyu Ji 1 Hua Ke 2 Published online: 17 May 216 Springer
More informationChapter 3: Black-Scholes Equation and Its Numerical Evaluation
Chapter 3: Black-Scholes Equation and Its Numerical Evaluation 3.1 Itô Integral 3.1.1 Convergence in the Mean and Stieltjes Integral Definition 3.1 (Convergence in the Mean) A sequence {X n } n ln of random
More informationMinimal Variance Hedging in Large Financial Markets: random fields approach
Minimal Variance Hedging in Large Financial Markets: random fields approach Giulia Di Nunno Third AMaMeF Conference: Advances in Mathematical Finance Pitesti, May 5-1 28 based on a work in progress with
More informationFinancial Risk Management
Risk-neutrality in derivatives pricing University of Oulu - Department of Finance Spring 2018 Portfolio of two assets Value at time t = 0 Expected return Value at time t = 1 Asset A Asset B 10.00 30.00
More informationTHE MARTINGALE METHOD DEMYSTIFIED
THE MARTINGALE METHOD DEMYSTIFIED SIMON ELLERSGAARD NIELSEN Abstract. We consider the nitty gritty of the martingale approach to option pricing. These notes are largely based upon Björk s Arbitrage Theory
More informationThe British Binary Option
The British Binary Option Min Gao First version: 7 October 215 Research Report No. 9, 215, Probability and Statistics Group School of Mathematics, The University of Manchester The British Binary Option
More informationAre the Azéma-Yor processes truly remarkable?
Are the Azéma-Yor processes truly remarkable? Jan Obłój j.obloj@imperial.ac.uk based on joint works with L. Carraro, N. El Karoui, A. Meziou and M. Yor Swiss Probability Seminar, 5 Dec 2007 Are the Azéma-Yor
More informationCHAPTER 2: STANDARD PRICING RESULTS UNDER DETERMINISTIC AND STOCHASTIC INTEREST RATES
CHAPTER 2: STANDARD PRICING RESULTS UNDER DETERMINISTIC AND STOCHASTIC INTEREST RATES Along with providing the way uncertainty is formalized in the considered economy, we establish in this chapter the
More informationEuropean call option with inflation-linked strike
Mathematical Statistics Stockholm University European call option with inflation-linked strike Ola Hammarlid Research Report 2010:2 ISSN 1650-0377 Postal address: Mathematical Statistics Dept. of Mathematics
More information4: SINGLE-PERIOD MARKET MODELS
4: SINGLE-PERIOD MARKET MODELS Marek Rutkowski School of Mathematics and Statistics University of Sydney Semester 2, 2016 M. Rutkowski (USydney) Slides 4: Single-Period Market Models 1 / 87 General Single-Period
More informationEconomathematics. Problem Sheet 1. Zbigniew Palmowski. Ws 2 dw s = 1 t
Economathematics Problem Sheet 1 Zbigniew Palmowski 1. Calculate Ee X where X is a gaussian random variable with mean µ and volatility σ >.. Verify that where W is a Wiener process. Ws dw s = 1 3 W t 3
More information