GUIDING PRINCIPLES UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA STRATEGIC INVESTMENT FUND
|
|
- Dina Poole
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 GUIDING PRINCIPLES UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA STRATEGIC INVESTMENT FUND Purpose 2. Types of Investments 3. Limitations 4. Administration 5. Funding 6. Eligibility 7. Review Process 8. Review Guidelines 9. Awards 10. Post Award Monitoring 11. Annual Public Report 12. Amendment Purpose. The primary purpose of the University of Virginia Strategic Investment Fund (the Investment Fund ) is to serve as a source of funding for initiatives that have the potential to transform a critical area of knowledge or operation. As the University embarks upon its third century, it is intended that the Investment Fund be utilized by the Board of Visitors ( BOV ) and the President of the University to position strategically the University as one of the world s leading institutions of higher learning. Types of Investments. Illustrative investments include, but are not limited to: (1) advancing the research capability of the University with a preference for multidisciplinary or multi-school initiatives, (2) transforming the University s infrastructure, (3) access and affordability initiatives, and (4) enhancing the student experience. Should the University revise or replace the current strategic plan (Cornerstone Plan), deference shall be given in the awards process to the revised plan and to the President s priorities as expressed therein. Limitations. It is expressly intended that the Investment Fund proceeds not be used to supplement the ongoing operations of the University within the scope of the annual budgeting process. However, it is acknowledged that the Investment Fund consists of reserves originally set aside for debt service, Health System emergency working capital, building maintenance, and other potential operating and capital needs. It is the explicit intent of the Board that no funds be withdrawn and used for such reserve purposes or for any operational needs unless the Administration has exhausted all other practical avenues for payment of such operating and capital needs. Although reserve funds held within the Investment Fund will continue to be accounted for based upon their original sources, any intended use of the Investment Fund operating reserves should be presented in the annual budget process as an intended source of funds. Any unplanned use of reserves must be consistent with the University s liquidity policy and shall be reported to the Rector and Vice Rector. 1
2 Administration. The Investment Fund will be administered by the following committees: Administrative Committee: A committee comprised of the Rector, the Vice Rector, the President, the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, the Executive Vice President and Provost, the Executive Vice President for Health Affairs, and 2 at-large members designated by the BOV, collectively, shall comprise the Strategic Investment Administrative Committee ( Administrative Committee ) to manage all aspects of the Investment Fund (except as provided herein) including, but not limited to, o developing a process and schedule for soliciting proposals from the University community for Investment Fund grants; o developing criteria for evaluating proposals seeking Investment Fund grants and for evaluating the success of an Investment Fund grant; o developing reporting requirements for a proposal s progress in meeting designated milestones to qualify for future grant allocations; o selecting faculty and other advisors to evaluate and rank Investment Fund grant proposals seeking funding; o making recommendations to the BOV for the awarding of Investment Fund grants; and o otherwise taking such action (including the expenditure of monies solely for administrative purposes) as appropriate to carry out the intended purpose for the Investment Fund. The President shall serve as Chair of the Administrative Committee. Evaluation Committee: The Administrative Committee shall establish a Strategic Investment Evaluation Committee ( Evaluation Committee ) comprised of at least five (5) faculty members or advisors to evaluate proposals seeking Investment Fund grants. The Evaluation Committee members will serve limited terms, subject to renewal, and their terms will be staggered. The Evaluation Committee selects its own chair. No member of senior management of the University shall serve on the Evaluation Committee. Members of the Evaluation Committee shall be selected from among the faculty by the President and appointed after consultation with the other members of the Administrative Committee. In the nomination of new members, the President shall consider the intellectual breadth of the Evaluation Committee, the demonstrated competence and judgment of the nominees, and their willingness to serve. The President shall seek nominations from the deans, the relevant vice presidents, and members of the Administrative Committee. The Evaluation Committee shall have primary responsibility for evaluating all proposals for Investment Fund grants and shall provide its analysis and rankings of the proposals (with appropriate classifications and written explanations of the basis for the rankings) to the Administrative Committee. The Evaluation Committee shall 2
3 be compensated on a basis determined by the Administrative Committee and shall be provided appropriate staffing and resources to carry out its responsibilities. The Administrative Committee may, from time to time, require the Evaluation Committee to amend its evaluation processes and procedures. For example, the Administrative Committee may require that applications be acted upon on a different timetable, that the application process be streamlined or modified, or that the details or analysis in the Evaluation Committee s report be revised. Student Advisory Committee: The President of Student Council shall work with the Office of the Vice President for Student Affairs to appoint a Student Advisory Committee ( Student Committee ), with members that represent both undergraduate and graduate students who hold leadership positions as well as represent the student body at large. The Student Member of the Board of Visitors and the President of Student Council shall chair the Student Committee. The members shall serve terms of one year. The Student Committee, in coordination with the Office of the Vice President for Student Affairs, may provide guidance to students wishing to develop a proposal in order to facilitate the submission of strong proposals. The Student Committee may also provide input to the Evaluation Committee for proposals related to the student experience. Funding. The funds for the Investment Fund shall be designated in a fund or funds managed by the University of Virginia Investment Management Company ( UVIMCO ). Such funds shall be managed by UVIMCO in the same way as other University endowment funds. Eligibility. Any faculty, student or staff member of the University community, which includes the Academic Division, the Medical Center and UVa-Wise, is welcome to develop ideas that could form the basis for a proposal for consideration for an Investment Fund grant. Any such University community member shall work in concert with the appropriate dean, vice president or other executive leader. Any such proposal for an Investment Fund grant shall be submitted by a dean, vice president, or other executive leader to the Evaluation Committee for consideration and ranking in accordance with a schedule and process developed by such committee. Investment Fund awards will not be made to University-related foundations or to any other entities that are not part of the state agencies that comprise UVA. If the Investment Fund awards a sum of money intended to provide challenge grants to attract philanthropy, both such Investment Fund grants and the philanthropy raised must be held in the Rector & Visitors of the University of Virginia endowment. Review Process. As part of its evaluation, the Evaluation Committee may meet with proposal sponsors to gather additional information and offer refinements and improvements. The Evaluation Committee shall provide to the Administrative Committee written evaluations of proposals recommended for consideration, which may include amendments designed to enhance a proposal s viability. In the course of considering the analysis of the Evaluation Committee, the Administrative Committee may also meet with the sponsor of any proposal and may suggest amendments to enhance such proposal or provide a basis for evaluating the proposal during its funding. The Administrative Committee may also consider input from the Student Committee for 3
4 proposals related to the student experience. Upon completion of the analysis of the Evaluation Committee and the Administrative Committee, the Administrative Committee shall make recommendations to the BOV. All projects must be approved by the BOV to receive Investment Fund grants. Review Guidelines. The following guidelines shall be used during review of Investment Fund proposals: 1. Investment Fund grants for specific schools are expected to align with the strategic priorities of that school. As such, these commitments will be considered as part of the funding committed in the dean s contract and/or startup package. 2. The Investment Fund is not intended to replace the normal budget process or traditional methods for financing capital projects. For projects that involve long-term capital commitments, Investment Funds may be awarded to cover the initial three years of debt service while other sources of capital, such as philanthropy, are being secured. 3. Larger scale projects should minimize execution risk when possible through a phased or incremental approach. This could take the form of pilots, feasibility studies, and the like. Once success is demonstrated, the requester may apply for consequent funding. 4. Schools and units are encouraged to collaborate and, where possible, identify areas of synergy that will yield incremental returns or efficiencies. 5. Proposals should strive to leverage external funds (philanthropy, federal grants, etc.) and internal school/departmental funds. Where grant request is for matching funds, the ideal match will be 2:1 ($2 from other sources for every $1 Investment Fund grant). Awards. The BOV shall award Investment Fund grants after considering the recommendations of the Administrative Committee and the analysis of the Evaluation Committee. The BOV may make awards constituting all or only a portion of the funds available for Investment Fund grants in any given year. Such awards may be for one or more years in duration not to exceed three (3) years unless there is a compelling business reason for a longer duration. For those projects that will continue beyond three years, there must be a plan for sustainable funding after Investment Fund grants are expended. All projects must align with the University s Cornerstone Plan, Health System Strategic Plan, or UVA-Wise Strategic Plan. Approved proposals will contain metrics for measuring the success of the project, and all proposers must expect to provide periodic progress reports. For multiyear projects, funding in years two and three will be contingent upon satisfactory progress. The amount of funds available from the Investment Fund for Investment Fund grants in any given award period shall be determined by the BOV on a preliminary basis at the commencement of the solicitation process for grant proposals and may be increased by the BOV in the event the grant proposals warrant additional funds in any given award period. 4
5 Post Award Monitoring. The University s Executive Vice President & Chief Operating Officer shall establish a Post-award Assessment Committee ( PAC ) to support the Administrative Committee in evaluating the success and progress of Investment Fund projects. The PAC will engage with projects and project owners once their projects have been approved by the BOV. The PAC is comprised of members appointed by the Executive Vice President & Chief Operating Officer. The PAC members will serve three-year terms that may be extended or staggered in the interest of the committee. The PAC will utilize the expertise of its members and, as needed, call upon subject matter experts in assessing projects. The PAC develops criteria for evaluating the progress of Investment Fund projects, provides feedback and guidance to projects to improve their chances of success, and reports project progress to the Administrative Committee on an annual basis. The PAC will monitor the progress of Investment Fund grants, evaluate and make recommendations related to future grant allocations and provide feedback to support decision making with regard to future funding. From time to time the PAC may share feedback, based upon data derived from its work, with the Evaluation Committee for the purpose of improving the granting process. The PAC will use a risk-based approach to assess projects. Project progress will be assessed based upon certain risk factors with each category of projects receiving a different level of assessment. Risk factors may include, but are not limited to, resources committed, milestone achievement, engagement of key personnel, and alignment with the Investment Fund mission. The process is intended to provide an early warning system in the event a proposal is not going to achieve its expected outcomes in the timelines suggested, and allows the PAC to focus its efforts on interacting with the teams in greatest need of support. Projects achieving their milestones are not expected to require active involvement or remediation efforts by the Administrative Committee. Projects deemed to be at risk may require more thorough assessments and meetings with the Administrative Committee, which will allow the Administrative Committee to consider progress to date and determine whether continued funding is warranted. The PAC Charter can be found in Appendix A to these Guiding Principles. Annual Public Report. In order to provide ongoing external visibility into the Investment Fund s strategic and financial progress, the Chief Operating Officer will produce an annual public report which will contain two important sections. The first section is intended to provide highlights on the progress of selected projects. The second section is intended to provide annual reporting on the Investment Fund's financial position, to include: carry forward of Investment Fund balance from prior year end (to include details of any operating reserves used), Investment Fund earnings for the full fiscal year, and administrative expenses. This analysis shall be coupled with a schedule of approved Investment Fund commitments over future years. Amendment. Amendments to these guiding principles ( Guiding Principles ) for the Investment Fund shall be effected by a majority vote of the members of the BOV assuming a 5
6 quorum is present. It is understood that management and operation of the Investment Fund will evolve as experience will inform and refine the process. The Administrative Committee shall advise the Executive Committee of the BOV on an annual basis of any changes to the Guiding Principles deemed necessary or appropriate. Such amendments and the process developed by the Administrative Committee for soliciting grant proposals as well as the criteria utilized to evaluate the grant proposals shall upon approval by the BOV become part of the Guiding Principles of the Investment Fund (with the process and criteria being appended to these Guiding Principles) and shall be communicated to the University community to ensure awareness of the potential for Investment Fund grants, and to promote interest in seeking such grants. 6
7 Appendix A Post-Award Assessment Committee Charter Name: Post-award Assessment Committee ( PAC ) Background: The University s Rector and Chief Operating Officer commissioned the PAC to assess the progress of investments made under the University s Strategic Investment Fund ( SIF ). The University intends to make significant investments in the areas of research, infrastructure, access and affordability, and the student experience and the PAC plays a key role in assuring the success of these investments. The PAC reviews and assesses the progress of SIF investments to help assure that the University is realizing the benefits envisioned under the SIF program. The PAC reports on that progress to the SIF Administrative Committee. Mission: The primary role of the PAC is to enable the success of SIF-funded projects and oversee the value derived from SIF investments. The PAC s focus is to support the overarching goal of the SIF program to strategically position the University as one of the world s leading institutions of higher education. Scope and Objectives: The PAC functions to support the SIF Administrative Committee in evaluating the success and progress of SIF projects. The PAC will engage with projects and project owners once their projects have been approved by the BOV. The PAC shall assess the progress and success of projects while they are receiving SIF funding. The PAC may provide guidance once the SIF funding period for any project is completed. This guidance may be to support continued success of a project or be in conjunction with any success-based extension. From time to time, the PAC will share feedback, based upon data derived from its work, with the SIF Evaluation Committee for the purpose of improving the SIF granting process. The process is intended to provide an early warning system in the event a proposal appears it may not achieve its expected outcomes in the timelines suggested, and allow the PAC focus its efforts on interacting with the teams in greatest need of support. The PAC has developed criteria for evaluating the progress of SIF projects. At least annually the PAC will report proposal progress to the SIF Administrative Committee. The PAC will measure the progress of Investment Fund grants, evaluate, and make recommendations to the SIF Administrative Committee related to future grant allocations to improve decision making with regard to future funding. The PAC will use a risk-based approach to assess projects. Risk factors may include, but are not limited to, resources committed, funding category (e.g., research, student experience), milestone achievement, key personnel, and alignment with the SIF mission. 7
8 Reporting: Each SIF Project owner will submit a periodic progress report to the PAC. The PAC shall provide project reporting information, progress evaluations, and future grant allocation recommendations. Membership Roster: Members are appointed by the SIF Administrative Committee or its designee(s). Inaugural members are: Jim Matteo (Chair) Office of the Treasurer Urmila Bajaj Office of Sponsored Programs Jeff Keller Medical Center Archie Holmes Office of the EVP & Provost Pace Lochte Office of Strategic Initiatives Melur Ramasubramanian Office of the VP for Research Michael Straightiff Licensing & Ventures Group Patrick Tolan Curry School of Education Term of Service: The PAC members will serve three-year terms that may be extended or staggered as deemed to be in the best interests of the PAC. Charter Review: This charter should be reviewed and if necessary updated annually to assure that the PAC is properly organized to facilitate the SIF Post-award Process. 8
Capital Project Approval Process Table of Contents
Table of Contents I. Preliminary Project Proposal 1 II. Final Project Proposal 2 III. Project Proposal Executive Review Committee 2 IV. Business Plan 2 V. Annual Renovation and Infrastructure Plan 3 VI.
More informationUniversity Planning Phase 1. Organizational and Process Enhancements
University Planning Phase 1 Organizational and Process Enhancements October 31, 2008 Today s Agenda Background, Vision, Goals Guiding Principles University Planning Proposed Organizational Structure Operating
More informationWhat is Responsibility Centered Management?
Jim Florian Associate Vice President, Institutional Analysis Office of the Provost What is Responsibility Centered Management? Budget model that links budgets to activity Allocates revenues based on activity
More informationUniversity of Virginia Debt Policy Dated February 22, 2013
University of Virginia Debt Policy Dated February 22, 2013 Table of Contents I. Overview... 2 II. Scope and Objectives... 2 III. Oversight and Approval... 3 IV. Debt Affordability and Capacity... 3 V.
More informationResource Allocation Charter Document
Resource Allocation Charter Document v8 Updated: September 12, 2012 Team Name Resource Allocation Executive Sponsors Business Process Owner(s) Governance Objectives - Chancellor - Provost - Vice Chancellor
More informationAdopting a Different Approach to University Budgeting February 10, 2016
Adopting a Different Approach to University Budgeting February 10, 2016 1. Purpose. This document captures the analytical process and decision to change the Northwestern State University budgeting model
More informationPolicy on Policies. Augusta University Policy Library. Policy Owner: Office of Compliance and Risk Management
Augusta University Policy Library Policy on Policies Policy Owner: Office of Compliance and Risk Management POLICY STATEMENT This policy addresses how policies are formally approved, issued, and maintained
More informationBudgeting at the University of Virginia
There are four primary approaches to budgeting at UVa. I. Targeted budgeting II. Sales and services budgeting III. High-level summary budgeting IV. Sponsored program budgeting In addition, the University
More informationNew Mexico Highlands University Annual Operating Budget Process. approved Fall 2016
New Mexico Highlands University Annual Operating Budget Process approved Fall 2016 Appendix I added Spring 2017 2 Table of Contents Introduction... 3 NMHU Budget Values and the NMHU Strategic Plan... 4
More information1.103 Policy Development and Approval Process
Antioch University AURA - Antioch University Repository and Archive 1.000 General Policies Antioch University Policies October 2011 1.103 Policy Development and Approval Process Follow this and additional
More informationRoger Williams University. Business Plan for Expansion or Initiation of an Academic or Support Program
Program title: Please check one: [ ] Academic program [ ] Support program Please check one: [ ] Expansion of an existing program [ ] Initiation of a new program Department: Prepared by: Program proposer
More informationOffice of the Provost University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. 3 February 2016
Office of the Provost University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign BUDGET REPORT GUIDANCE FOR FY17: CTE, DRES, I 3, KAM, KCPA, SPURLOCK, UNIVERSITY LIBRARY, LAW LIBRARY 3 February 2016 The campus finds itself
More informationBUDGET REPORT GUIDANCE FOR FY19: ACTIVITY-BASED UNITS
Office of the Provost University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign BUDGET REPORT GUIDANCE FOR FY19: ACTIVITY-BASED UNITS 3 November 2017 The State of Illinois recent budget impasse ended in July 2017. Allocations
More informationWKU Budget Restructuring Plan: Recommendations to President Caboni. WKU Budget Council. February 20, 2018
WKU Budget Restructuring Plan: Recommendations to President Caboni WKU Budget Council February 20, 2018 Executive Summary In the fall of 2017, WKU President Timothy Caboni redefined the responsibilities
More informationResource Allocation, Management, and Planning Steering Committee #7
Resource Allocation, Management, and Planning Steering #7 August 28, 2018 1 Agenda Huron is pleased to partner with WKU on this resource allocation, management, and planning ( RAMP ) initiative. Our goals
More informationResearch Centres Formation, Monitoring & Review Guidelines. Research Centres Task Group (RCTG) Research & Post Graduate Studies Committee (RPGSC)
Research Centres Formation, Monitoring & Review Guidelines Research Centres Task Group (RCTG) Research & Post Graduate Studies Committee (RPGSC) 1 B U E R e s e a r c h C e n t r e s G u i d e l i n e
More informationTHE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PROCESS
Rev. 08/01/07 THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PROCESS This document describes the project development and approval process for Capital Improvement Projects,
More informationPurpose: Goals: Terms and Financing:
OFFICE OF SUSTAINABILITY GREEN TO GOLD FUND Purpose: The mission of the Green to Gold Fund (GGF) is to reduce William and Mary s impact on the environment by financing initiatives that lead to sustainable
More informationDEANS, VICE CHANCELLORS, UNIVERSITY LIBRARIAN, ATHLETIC DIRECTOR AND CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER
DEANS, VICE CHANCELLORS, UNIVERSITY LIBRARIAN, ATHLETIC DIRECTOR AND CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER Re: Dear Colleagues, The budget planning process for 2019-20 marks a point of inflection for our financial
More informationUW-Platteville Pioneer Budget Model
UW-Platteville Pioneer Budget Model This document is intended to provide a comprehensive overview of the UW-Platteville s budget model. Specifically, this document will cover the following topics: Model
More informationI. INTRODUCTION II. ROLES & RESPONSIBILITIES
Page 1 I. INTRODUCTION The District implements a broad-based comprehensive and integrated planning system that is a foundation for strategic directions and resource allocation decisions. The Superintendent/President
More informationBOARD RESOURCES COMMITTEE DESCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCE COMMITTEE CHARTER. Terms of Reference:
S ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCE COMMITTEE CHARTER Terms of Reference: The principal responsibility of the Administration and Finance Committee is to oversee the administrative financial operation of the organization
More informationIDENTIFICATION AR II /15/06 THE PLANNING, BUDGETING, AND ASSESSMENT CYCLE. Part 1. THE PLANNING, BUDGETING, AND ASSESSMENT CYCLE
UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS IDENTIFICATION AR II-1.0-6 DATE EFFECTIVE PAGE 1 SUPERSEDES REGULATIONS DATED II-1.5-1 (1/01/01); II-1.5-2 (1/01/01); II-1.0-6 (8/23/93) THE PLANNING,
More informationTHE COLLEGE OF NEW JERSEY STRATEGIC BUDGET PLANNING FISCAL YEAR 2015
THE COLLEGE OF NEW JERSEY STRATEGIC BUDGET PLANNING FISCAL YEAR 2015 Committee on Strategic Planning and Priorities (CSPP) Budget Decision-Making Principles and Process Approved by the Board of Trustees
More informationKAPI'OLANI CC OPERATIONAL POLICY
KAPI'OLANI CC OPERATIONAL POLICY KOP #1.111 Created March 14, 2014 Revised January 31, 2017 SUBJECT: Planning and Assessment Integration with Resource Allocation (PAIR) 1. Purpose: a. The primary purpose
More informationBUDGET ADVISORY COMMITTEE OPERATING BUDGET PLAN FOR REPORT LVI
BUDGET ADVISORY COMMITTEE OPERATING BUDGET PLAN FOR 2018 19 REPORT LVI March 28, 2018 The Budget Advisory Committee (BAC) was established by the President in 1992 to advise on budgetary matters. The BAC
More informationUNTHSC. Annual Budget Development Process Fiscal Year 2019 Guidelines & Instructions - Spring 2018
UNTHSC Annual Budget Development Process Fiscal Year 2019 Guidelines & Instructions - Spring 2018 INTRODUCTION: The budgeting process at the University of North Texas Health Science Center (UNTHSC) assigns
More informationVersion 2.0- Project. Q: What is the current status of your project? A: Completed
Baker College, MI Project: Develop an institutional quality assurance framework to measure institutional effectiveness and drive continuous quality improvement efforts Version 2.0- Project What is the
More informationGIFT ACCEPTANCE POLICY
GIFT ACCEPTANCE POLICY SUBJECT: Gift Acceptance Policy Date Issued: 12/8/2015 Date Updated: 2/6/2018 Review Date: 6/30/2018 APPLIES TO: Office of Development and Alumni Relations ISSUED BY: Vice President
More informationBoard of Visitors Finance Subcommittee Meeting September 10, 2014
Board of Visitors Finance Subcommittee Meeting September 10, 2014 1 Agenda I. Introduction and Comments from Chair II. Reports A. Research B. Philanthropy C. Observations from Completion of Recent Admissions
More informationSequoias Community College District RESOURCE
RESOURCE A L L O C AT I O N Sequoias Community College District College of the Sequoias 2013 Resource Allocation Manual College of the Sequoias Community College District Visalia Campus 915 S. Mooney Blvd.
More informationBudget Reform Update. Paul Ellinger, Associate Chancellor & Vice Provost Budget and Resource Planning
Budget Reform Update Paul Ellinger, Associate Chancellor & Vice Provost Budget and Resource Planning February 2018 Outline Brief budget model overview Communication plan Principles Major components Timeline
More informationI. Background. Budget Advisory Council
Office of the Vice President for Finance & Business Operations 330.941.1331 Fax 330.941.1380 University Budget Process Updated 1/17/18 I. Background Youngstown State University s annual operating budget
More informationq. PLANNING, RESOURCE, AND BUDGET COMMITTEE CURRENT
q. PLANNING, RESOURCE, AND BUDGET COMMITTEE CURRENT 1) Composition. Vice President for Academic Affairs, Vice President for Administration and Finance, Vice President for Human Resources, Equity and Inclusiveness,
More informationAn Overview of University at Buffalo Governance, Funding Sources and Financial Reporting
An Overview of University at Buffalo Governance, Funding Sources and Financial Reporting Monday, February 22, 2016 Presented by: Laura J. Barnum, Associate Vice President for Resource Planning Beth A.
More informationUSF System Annual Strategic Budget Planning Process
USF System Annual Strategic Budget Planning Process University budget strategy, planning and development should be led by the Provost to assure that the budget reflects USF s strategic priorities The President
More informationThe Criterion Two Team found that Estrella Mountain has demonstrated effective organization of its financial resources through the following
99 SECTION C - FINANCIAL RESOURCES OVERVIEW The Criterion Two Team found that Estrella Mountain has demonstrated effective organization of its financial resources through the following findings. The existence
More informationBoard Policy on Debt Management Board of Trustees of Oregon Institute of Technology
Board Policy on Debt Management Board of Trustees of Oregon Institute of Technology 1.0 Authority of the Board of Trustees 1.1 Under ORS 352.107, Oregon Institute of Technology is authorized to borrow
More informationDRAFT August 2, Overview of OSU New Education and General (or Shared Responsibility) Budget Model Academic Colleges Focus
Overview of OSU New Education and General (or Shared Responsibility) Budget Model Academic Colleges Focus OSU-Corvallis is implementing a new budget model with the FY18 E&G budget. The model was used to
More informationFY APPENDIX #1 - BUDGET IMPROVEMENT TARGET MEASUREMENT
FY2017-18 APPENDIX #1 - BUDGET IMPROVEMENT TARGET MEASUREMENT UC BERKELEY BUDGET GUIDELINES AND ASSUMPTIONS This document provides additional information specific to the FY2017-18 Budget Process and should
More informationJanuary 22, Budget Model Review and Implementation Committee
Progress Report on Design and Implementation of the Resource Management Model Budget Model Review and Implementation Committee Tom Andre Tim Borich Joe Colletti Rick Dark Doug Epperson (Committee Chair)
More informationUniversity of Wisconsin-Oshkosh Green Fund Committee Policies and Procedure Manual
University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh Green Fund Committee Policies and Procedure Manual Last Revised: October 22, 2014 Article 1: Purpose and Scope of the Green Fund Committee Section 1.01: The Green Fund Committee
More informationHandbook for GSC Council Representatives Prepared by Michael McClellan, GSC President (draft 11/12/15)
GRADUATE STUDENT COUNCIL Handbook for GSC Council Representatives Prepared by Michael McClellan, 2015-2016 GSC (draft 11/12/15) What does the GSC do? The GSC exists to enhance the overall graduate experience
More information1702 Short-Term Emergency Student Loans Extension of Credit for Sales & Services Loans to Affiliates Employee Loans
LOAN AND RECEIVABLE POLICIES 1701 Long-Term Student Loans NDSL, NSL & International 1702 Short-Term Emergency Student Loans 1703 Extension of Credit for Sales & Services 1704 Loans to Affiliates 1705 Employee
More informationDean s RCM Workshops January 2015
Dean s RCM Workshops January 2015 Agenda General overview of RCM Overview of the model and college budget composition Education s view of RCM Engineering s view of RCM Group Activity: Scenarios 2 General
More informationOffice of the Academic Senate One Washington Square San Jose, California Fax:
A campus of The California State University Office of the Academic Senate One Washington Square San Jose, California 95192-0024 408-924-2440 Fax: 408-924-2451 At its meeting of February 25, 2002, the Academic
More informationNominating Committee Charter
Nominating Committee Charter Praxis Mutual Funds A fund family of Everence I. Introduction The Board of Trustees governs the Praxis Mutual Funds (the Trust or Praxis Funds ) and, as a fiduciary, is responsible
More informationFAQs Finance and Budget Modeling Initiative
FAQs Finance and Budget Modeling Initiative Why do we need to create a new budget model? o To improve transparency, to ensure that data drives decision making, and to make strategic decisions based on
More informationUSF SYSTEM ANNUAL STRATEGIC BUDGET PLANNING PROCESS OVERVIEW
USF SYSTEM ANNUAL STRATEGIC BUDGET PLANNING PROCESS OVERVIEW Ralph C. Wilcox, Ph.D. Provost & Senior Vice President for Academic Affairs January 21, 2009 Purpose Prepare balanced budget and legislative
More informationUniversity Cabinet Outline of Budget Reduction Decisions February 22, 2018
Priorities in Budget Planning Student success Equity and diversity Fiscal stability and good stewardship of resources Shared responsibility and accountability Values (These are summarized from the Values
More informationPolicy Development Checklist University Policies
Policy Team: Kim Potter, Director, potter.146@osu.edu, 614-292-8728 Krystal Reeb, Coordinator, reeb.47@osu.edu, 614-292-9765 Office of University Compliance and Integrity 21 E. 11 th Ave., Columbus, OH
More informationCentral Connecticut State University Integrated Budget Model. Pilot Department Overview and Training Session
Central Connecticut State University Integrated Budget Model Pilot Department Overview and Training Session Welcome and Introductions CCSU Budget Current As Is Process Zero-Based Budgeting in Practice
More informationLEHIGH University. Financial Planning Report With Budget
LEHIGH University Financial Planning Report With 2012-2013 Budget L E H I G H U N I V E R S I T Y 2 0 1 2-1 3 B U D G E T ------------------------- T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S PAGE I. COMMENTARY 1-9
More informationComponents of the Implementation Process
This is the eighth monthly report of the progress on implementing the Resource Management Model. Decisions about detailed design of the model were essentially completed by the end of December 2007. The
More informationCapital Project Funding Guidelines
In order to maintain the university s fiscal integrity, the university has developed the following capital project funding guidelines. This document will be reviewed and adjusted annually, with adjustments
More informationFinancial Operating. & Capital Plan Reviews FY Budget Forum. February 14, FY 2014 Budget Forum - February
Financial Operating & Capital Plan Reviews FY 2014 Budget Forum February 14, 2013 FY 2014 Budget Forum - February 2013 0 University Budget Council (UBC) Bob Warren, Chair VP Administration & Finance Dennis
More informationInstitutional Conflicts of Interest in Research Responsible Office: Research & Innovation
POLICY USF System USF USFSP USFSM Number: 0-317 Title: Institutional Conflicts of Interest in Research Responsible Office: Research & Innovation Date of Origin: 6-23-15 Date Last Amended: 4-13-17 Date
More informationThe University of Rhode Island Kingston, Rhode Island. Fall 2010 Report to:
The University of Rhode Island Kingston, Rhode Island Fall 2010 Report to: The Commission on Institutions of Higher Education of the New England Association of Schools and Colleges September 10, 2010 This
More informationEnterprise GIS Steering Committee. Operating Guidelines
Enterprise GIS Steering Committee Table of Contents 1.0 Document Control...3 2.0 Revision History...3 3.0 Executive Summary...4 4.0 Executive Committee...5 4.1 Role...5 4.2 Composition...5 4.3 Chair and
More informationIntroduction to the UND s New Budget Model
Introduction to the UND s New Budget Model Existing Budget Model? UND s budget approach has been historical and incremental Meaning: The next year s budget for a unit would be what units got this year
More informationUW-STOUT Annual Operating Budget Process
UW-STOUT Annual Operating Budget Process An institution s budget process is shaped by institutional character; institutional size; administrative sophistication; faculty governance structures and processes;
More informationFiscal Year 2019 Budget Listening Session
Fiscal Year 2019 Budget Listening Session August 30, 2017 Max Baca, Vice President for Finance and Administration Budget Process Overview Step 1 Priorities Strategic Planning Group FY19 Budget Priorities
More informationFINANCE AND AUDIT COMMITTEE
FINANCE AND AUDIT COMMITTEE The primary responsibility for the financial reporting, accounting systems, risk management, management plans and budgets, internal controls and treasury of UNBC is vested in
More informationSuperintendent Evaluation Instrument
Evaluation Instrument 2018-2019 District Goal #1 The will assist the BOE in the continuous improvement of the school district: 1. Assist the board to meet or exceed the required training requirements of
More informationThe Institutional Effectiveness Process at SJU: From Unit Assessment to Institutional Decision Making. Wenjun Chi Shawn Krahmer
The Institutional Effectiveness Process at SJU: From Unit Assessment to Institutional Decision Making Wenjun Chi Shawn Krahmer Resources in Higher ED Source: Sean McKitrick 2015 Workshop Group Activity
More informationFive-year Financial Plan Orientation
Five-year Financial Plan Orientation Agenda Budget Overview Five-year Financial Plan Initiative Budget Overview Financing the Future The Financial Challenge Ahead Operating budget history Projects for
More informationArticle I: School of Social Work Graduate Student Organization (GSO) By-Laws
University of Connecticut School of Social Work Graduate Student Organization By-Laws By-laws were ratified via a vote of the Steering Committee on August 16, 2017 Article I: School of Social Work Graduate
More informationFinancial Management Guidelines and Procedures
The financial position and future of the Colorado School of Mines is dependent on several variables including enrollment, research growth, changes in industry demand, and competing institutions at the
More informationSUMMARY OF KEY BUDGET MODEL ISSUES WITH RECOMMENDATIONS
SUMMARY OF KEY BUDGET MODEL ISSUES WITH RECOMMENDATIONS The current budget model used by UM-Flint was developed over several years by the Vice Chancellor for Administration and Director of Financial Services
More informationII. POLICY STATEMENT RELATING TO CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA POLICY ON CONFLICT OF INTEREST/FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE IN RESEARCH AND OTHER SPONSORED PROGRAMS I. BACKGROUND The University of Alabama (UA) realizes that actual or potential conflicts
More informationFY 2013 Budget Development Academic Budget Considerations
ACADEMIC EXTERNAL ACADEMIC BUDGET AFFAIRS DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO OF BOARD TOLEDO OF TRUSTEES BOARD OF TRUSTEES David Dabney William McMillen Jeffrey Gold November 30, 2011 1 President
More informationOn behalf of the Resource Allocation Task Force (RATF), I am pleased to forward you our final report. Your charge to the RATF was:
To: Dr. Rodolfo Arévalo, President From: Rex Fuller, Dean and Task Force Chair Date: May 21, 2008 Re: Resource Allocation Task Force On behalf of the Resource Allocation Task Force (RATF), I am pleased
More informationEXHIBIT A ENDOWMENT AGREEMENT. THE ENDOWMENT FUND at the University of Houston
EXHIBIT A ENDOWMENT AGREEMENT THE ENDOWMENT FUND at the University of Houston 1. This agreement dated between,,, and the University of Houston, establishes the Endowment Fund. This endowment account consists
More informationAn Overview: Responsibility Center Management (RCM) Treasurer s Town Hall January 15, 2015
An Overview: Responsibility Center Management (RCM) Treasurer s Town Hall January 15, 2015 Common University Budget Models EVERY TUB ON ITS OWN BOTTOM INCREMENTAL FORMULA-BASED RESPONSIBILITY CENTER MANAGEMENT
More informationNORTHWESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY Budget Development. Budget Model
VII-2 Budget Development NORTHWESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY Budget Development Budget Model The Planning, Programming, and Budget Execution (PPBE) model best fits the University s Budget Development. This model
More informationTransition Review Team Report to President Stearns August 2017
Transition Review Team Report to President Stearns August 2017 In December 2016, the Commissioner of Higher Education sent a memorandum to the campus and the Board of Regents discussing a transition plan
More informationFY 2011 BUDGET (MAY 5, 2010)
Approved by Chancellor Spakes May 11, 2010 FY 2011 BUDGET (MAY 5, 2010) INTRODUCTION Taking into account a constrained resource environment, the FY 2011 budget recommendation supports the mission of the
More informationDecember 13, The Asia-Pacific Risk Management and Insurance Program
December 13, 2004 MEMORANDUM To: From: Subject: Peter Englert Chancellor University of Hawaii at Manoa James R. Wills, Jr. Interim Dean The Asia-Pacific Risk Management and Insurance Program With reference
More informationCOLUMBIA UNIVERSITY POLICY ON ENDOWMENT AND GIFT FUND ADMINISTRATION AND COMPLIANCE
Effective Date: May 1, 2008 Latest Revision: December 2016 Policy Statement It is the policy of Columbia University to adopt and adhere to standards that are designed to ensure the proper management, administration
More informationPOLICY ON THE ADMINISTRATION OF CIDA GRANTS
Effective Date: December 14, 1998 Originating Office: Office of the Vice- President, Finance Supersedes /Amends Policy dated: n/a Policy Number: CFO-7 SCOPE This policy applies to the administration of
More informationCITIGROUP INC. RISK MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE CHARTER As of January 18, 2018
CITIGROUP INC. RISK MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE CHARTER As of January 18, 2018 Mission The Risk Management Committee (the Committee ) of Citigroup Inc. ( Citigroup ) is a standing committee of the Board of Directors
More informationCalifornia State University, Los Angeles University Resource Allocation Process for Change CURRENT ALLOCATION MODEL OVERVIEW
Overview California State University, Los Angeles University Resource Allocation Process for Change CURRENT ALLOCATION MODEL OVERVIEW The University Resource Allocation, as defined by Administrative Procedure
More informationThe Dubie Group at Morgan Stanley. Experience That Makes a Difference
The Dubie Group at Morgan Stanley Experience That Makes a Difference Water Tower Hill 105 West View Road, 5th Fl., Colchester, VT 05446 802-658-2424/MAIN 800-446-0193/Toll-Free 802-860-1623/fax morganstanleyfa.com/dubie
More informationJoseph Trubacz Senior Vice President for Finance and Administration
TO: FROM: Board of Trustees Joseph Trubacz Senior Vice President for Finance and Administration DATE: May 21, 2011 SUBJECT: FY 2013 Budget I. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Fiscal Year 2013 Operating Budget Summary
More informationAcademic Affairs Department of Environmental Science and Management Online Minor in Sustainability
Academic Affairs Department of Environmental Science and Management Online Minor in Sustainability Management Plan P a g e 1 Contents Management Plan Purpose Scope Deliverables Governance Roles and Responsibilities
More informationA 10 STANDING COMMITTEES. A. Academic and Student Affairs Committee. Activity Based Budgeting Update. For information only.
A 10 VII. STANDING COMMITTEES A. Academic and Student Affairs Committee Activity Based Budgeting Update For information only. Attachments Initial Charge to Working Group, June 24, 2009 Working Group Report,
More informationCarry Forward of Year End Funds
University of California, Merced Carry Forward of Year End Funds Responsible Official: Veronica Mendez, Vice Chancellor Finance and Admin Romi Kaur, Executive Director, Financial Planning & Analysis Responsible
More informationArticle I: School of Social Work Graduate Student Organization (GSO) By-Laws
University of Connecticut School of Social Work Graduate Student Organization By-Laws By-laws were ratified via a vote of the Steering Committee on September 18, 2018 Article I: School of Social Work Graduate
More informationCompetency Profile: A breakdown of the general areas of competencies into specific competency statements.
POLICY CATEGORY Academic POLICY NUMBER D35 POLICY NAME Program Curriculum Committee CROSS REFERENCE D20 - Graduation D21 Course Development and Revision D22 Program Review D27 Granting of Credit D34 New
More informationGuidelines for School of Public Health Centers Policy and Management Procedures Reviewed and Revised 7/1/15
Guidelines for School of Public Health Centers Policy and Management Procedures Reviewed and Revised 7/1/15 These Policy and Management Procedures were originally developed in 1998 and have been reviewed
More informationMSOE STUDENT TRAVEL POLICY Revised 12 January 2016
MSOE STUDENT TRAVEL POLICY Revised 12 January 2016 PURPOSE In order to protect the safety and well being of the institution and its members, in an effort to align with the university s overall mission,
More informationIDAHO STATE UNIVERSITY POLICIES AND PROCEDURES (ISUPP) Gifts and Donations ISUPP 6010
IDAHO STATE UNIVERSITY POLICIES AND PROCEDURES (ISUPP) Gifts and Donations ISUPP 6010 POLICY INFORMATION Policy Section: University Advancement Policy Title: Gifts and Donations Responsible Executive (RE):
More informationJohns Hopkins University. Policy on Individual Financial Interests and Financial Conflict of Interests 1, 2 in Research
Johns Hopkins University Policy on Individual Financial Interests and Financial Conflict of Interests 1, 2 in Research This policy applies to the Bloomberg School of Public Health, Krieger School of Arts
More informationSponsored Student Organization Agreement Instructions
Sponsored Student Organization Agreement Instructions Attached to these instructions is the Sponsored Student Organization (SSO) Agreement. These instructions are being provided for informational purposes
More informationFiscal Year 2019 Budget Listening Session - Updated
Fiscal Year 2019 Budget Listening Session - Updated September 13, 2017 Max Baca, Vice President for Finance and Administration and 1 Budget Process Overview Step 1 Priorities Strategic Planning Group FY19
More informationWright State University Financial Governance Policy DRAFT v.1 With Comments March 31, 2017
Wright State University Financial Governance Policy DRAFT v.1 With Comments March 31, 2017 A. Overview Wright State University is committed to transforming the lives of its students and the communities
More informationRefinements to Budget Procedures
Refinements to Procedures February 2016 Summarized Report of the Procedures Steering Committee Background - BPSC During the fall of 2015, an ad hoc Procedures Steering Committee was appointed by the President
More informationHome Capital Group Inc. Home Trust Company Home Bank Risk and Capital Committee Charter
Home Capital Group Inc. Home Trust Company Home Bank Risk and Capital Committee Charter Home Capital Group Inc. Home Trust Company Home Bank Risk and Capital Committee Charter 1.0 Overall Role and Responsibility
More informationCampus Budget Open Forum. October 5, 2017
Campus Budget Open Forum October 5, 2017 2 Agenda WSCUC Accreditation Area of Inquiry URPC membership and role Budget update Public facing budget dashboards Achieved budget savings (Spring 2017 - Phase
More informationReport of the Senior Administration Responsibility Review Committee Response from the President s Executive Team (formerly UMC)
Report of the Senior Administration Responsibility Review Committee Response from the President s Executive Team (formerly UMC) Title of the Vice-President Saint John Recommendation One: We recommend that
More information