DEBENHAM PARISH COUNCIL
|
|
- Leo McGee
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 DEBENHAM PARISH COUNCIL Chair: Cllr S Palframan Clerk: Mrs. Dina Bedwell Please address all correspondence to 22, Great Harlings Shotley Gate Ipswich Suffolk IP9 1NY Tel: debenham.pc@btinternet.com Mr. Alex Scott Planning Services Mid Suffolk District Council 131 High Street Needham Market Suffolk IP6 8DL Ref. application DC/17/04036 The Cherry Tree Inn, 1 Cherry Tree Lane, Debenham. August 22 nd Dear Mr. Scott Following last night's Debenham Parish Council meeting, please find detailed below the comments and recommendations from the Council: The Debenham Parish Council is totally against and, furthermore, strongly disagrees with this planning application. Members expressed their extreme disappointment with the current state of affairs with regards to this development and the application for change of use which, if approved, represented the end of the iconic Cherry Tree Inn in Debenham. When the Debenham Parish Council submitted their positive comments re application nos. 2780/10 and 2781/10, it had done so in the clear understanding that it was conditional to the reinstatement of the Cherry Tree Inn once the developer was financially able to do so. A copy of the original letter is attached for your perusal. As the dwellings within the site were being sold and conditions were being discharged, questions started to be raised with regards to lack of progress when it came to the Cherry
2 Tree Inn. It was hoped that this would be a priority respected not only by the developer, who would have been very aware of the importance of this amenity to the local community, but also by the Planning Authority. Members found it very disappointing that the MSDC Enforcement Team was not more proactive when concerns started to be raised about this as far back as Some of the reasons listed by members for the refusal of this application are as follows: a) The Cherry Tree Inn is imbedded in the history of Debenham and in the minds of residents and visitors alike. It is the only public house left in the village of Debenham, a key service centre, that can accommodate families and large gatherings. b) The provision of another four-bedroom dwelling does not meet the needs identified on the draft Debenham Neighbourhood Plan. c) Some of the comments contained within the application and marketing campaign are erroneous and may colour the judgement of a planning officer less familiar with the setting, ie: Debenham is a key service centre, not a small village with a small population ; The inherent problem of the site is its location ; Reduced rental basis implemented in June the revised prices were not implemented as stated. The Parish Council strongly questions these and other comments and would like to request that the content of the said marketing campaign is also challenged by the planning officer. d) The planning application is inherently against MSDC s own Local Plan, when you consider the loss of employment opportunity, loss of commercial premises with suitable car parking facilities and possible effects on other businesses locally. e) The property has not been up for sale for the minimum required period of two years. f) The building is Grade II listed and in a Conservation Area. However, the cellar has been filled in with concrete, which renders it unusable and there is no kitchen provision. This is clearly not in accordance with approved plans and the cost of bringing it back to a workable state makes it financially prohibitive for a future publican or landlord. A considerable number of comments had also been received from members of the public, who were equally against this planning application and whom must be represented by this Parish Council. A number of planning policies were considered when reaching this decision and the Debenham Parish Council wishes to refer to the following: NPPF- Paragraphs 14, 28, 69 and 70. Policy E6 of the Local Plan
3 Policy CS1 of the Core Strategy Policies FC1 and FC1.1 of the Core Strategy Review Supplementary Planning Guidance- Retention of Shops, Post Offices and Public Houses in Villages Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any queries. Kindest regards, Mrs Dina Bedwell Clerk to the Council
4 DEBENHAM PARISH COUNCIL Chair: Mrs L Cockerton Clerk: Mrs. Dina Bedwell Please address all correspondence to 22, Great Harlings Shotley Gate Ipswich Suffolk IP9 1NY Tel: debenham.pc@btinternet.com Mr. Malcom Dixon Planning Services Mid Suffolk District Council 131 High Street Needham Market Suffolk IP6 8DL Ref. applications 2780/10 and 2781/10 The Cherry Tree Public House November 9 th Dear Mr. Dixon, Following last night's Debenham Parish Council meeting, please find detailed below the comments and recommendations from the Council: 1. The priority on this application must be a robust connection between the timely building of the dwellings and renovation and opening of the Public House. 2. The entrance to the development on the Ipswich Road bend has been highlighted as a road safety concern in the past. This still remains the case. 3. There seems to be inadequate parking for a Public House, particularly when you take into account that there will be additional businesses, such as a function room, a restaurant, a cafe and possibly a Hairdressing salon. 4. There are no time limits for the function room. Midnight is being proposed as a limit in order to avoid noise pollution and disturbance to neighboring properties. This has certainly been as issue in the past with previous landlords and we certainly hope that it would not re-occur. 5. The developer must try to minimize the effects of the build on neighboring properties, such as overlooking windows and light reduction due to height of new dwellings. 6. For the above reason, the Parish Council would recommend obscured glass windows on the first floor level.
5 7. The proximity of the holiday lets to Deben Rise has been identified as a concern for a variety of reasons. 8. The landscaping along that boundary would also need to be looked into and, indeed, the Parish Council would like to see as much landscaping as possible between the Public House and Deben Rise. 9. There is a considerable concern over flooding risks. 10. The Parish Council would like the developer to consider contributing to the funding of parking restrictions on Low Road. 11. The Parish Council also believe that more energy efficient power generation should be sought for the dwellings. 12. We would also like to make it conditional that the Public House remains a Public House and that it is not, at any point, considered for any other form of development, particularly residential. And finally, the Council are extremely concerned that there is a risk that the dwellings may be built and sold (or not, if you take into account the number of existing properties in the Village currently for sale that have been on the market for a considerable period of time) but the Public House is left undeveloped. The Parish Council have, therefore, requested that it be noted that it only agrees with the proposed build of the 4 dwellings if we are given the certainty that the Public House will also be developed, that there are conditions put in place to ensure that this happens in a timely way. Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any queries. Kindest regards, Mrs. Dina Bedwell Clerk to the Council
6 Your Ref: DC/17/04036 Our Ref: 570\CON\2926\17 Date: 22/08/2017 Highways Enquiries to: All planning enquiries should be sent to the Local Planning Authority. The Planning Officer Mid Suffolk District Council 131 High Street Ipswich Suffolk IP6 8DL For the Attention of: Alex Scott Dear Alex TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT CONSULTATION RETURN DC/17/04036 PROPOSAL: LOCATION: Change of use from Class A3/A4 public house including internal and minor external alterations to 3no Class C3 dwellinghouses. The Cherry Tree Inn, Cherry Tree Lane, Debenham, Stowmarket, Suffolk Notice is hereby given that the County Council as Highway Authority recommends that any permission which that Planning Authority may give should include the conditions shown below: 1 P 1 Condition: The use shall not commence until the area(s) within the site shown on Drawing No. 200a for the purposes of [LOADING, UNLOADING,] manoeuvring and parking of vehicles has been provided and thereafter that area(s) shall be retained and used for no other purposes. Reason: To ensure that sufficient space for the on site parking of vehicles is provided and maintained in order to ensure the provision of adequate on-site space for the parking and manoeuvring of vehicles where on-street parking and manoeuvring would be detrimental to highway safety to users of the highway. Yours sincerely, Mr Kyle Porter Development Management Technician Strategic Development Endeavour House, 8 Russell Road, Ipswich, Suffolk IP1 2BX
7 Consultation Response Pro forma 1 Application Number DC/17/04036 Cherry Tree PH, Debenham 2 Date of Response Responding Officer Name: Paul Harrison Job Title: Heritage and Design Officer Responding on behalf Heritage of... 4 Summary and Recommendation (please delete those N/A) Note: This section must be completed before the response is sent. The recommendation should be based on the information submitted with the application. 1. The Heritage Team considers that the proposal would cause less than substantial harm to a designated heritage asset because it would detract from its significance and from the vitality of the Conservation Area, and introduce incongruous features. 2. The Heritage Team recommends that consideration be given to whether there is clear and convincing justification for the harm. 5 Discussion Please outline the reasons/rationale behind how you have formed the recommendation. Please refer to any guidance, policy or material considerations that have informed your recommendation. It should be noted that the listed building comprises both the Cherry Tree public house and the adjoining dwelling 2 Cherry Tree Lane. The older parts of the building are in the house; much of the public house is of 1700s and 1800s date. Changing the use of the public house will result in some harm, firstly from the loss of the historic use maintaining the historic use of a building contributes positively to heritage significance, and a change of use will inevitably result in some loss of significance; in this instance it is possible that the original use was as a dwelling but this is likely to be centuries ago. Secondly, accommodating a new use will normally entail internal and external alterations in this instance this is limited because the main historic part of the building is proposed to form a single unit; internal partitions will be introduced in various rooms, and in our view there is some harm resulting from forming a bathroom in the attic of the lean-to element. Rooflights are proposed over the bathroom and the landing outside, when the bathroom at least could be lit by a window, and the landing by borrowed light. This room preserves an area of original external render with patterned finish, which might be at risk from the extreme humidity changes of a bathroom. Please note that this form can be submitted electronically on the Councils website. Comments submitted on the website will not be acknowledged but you can check whether they have been received by reviewing comments on the website under the application reference number. Please note that the completed form will be posted on the Councils website and available to view by the public.
8 There would also be potential harm from any loss of vitality to the historic core of the town in the Conservation Area. The site is just outside the Conservation Area, but while in use it has been a significant venue contributing to the vitality and economy of the Conservation Area. 6 Amendments, Clarification or Additional Information Required (if holding objection) If concerns are raised, can they be overcome with changes? Please ensure any requests are proportionate Justification for these potential harms would rest on an assessment of the viability of pub / restaurant use compared with other uses, and also on the pub s role in the economy of the historic core in the Conservation Area. We do not consider the lean-to attic to be suitable for use as a bathroom; bathroom space should be incorporated in the subdivision of the first floor of the main block. Notwithstanding this recommendation, if the bathroom is to stay in the roof space the rooflights should be omitted and the bathroom lit from a window in the gable, with internal glazing to light the landing. The rendered internal wall should be lined for protection. 7 Recommended conditions Please note that this form can be submitted electronically on the Councils website. Comments submitted on the website will not be acknowledged but you can check whether they have been received by reviewing comments on the website under the application reference number. Please note that the completed form will be posted on the Councils website and available to view by the public.
9 From:Nathan Pittam Sent:22 Aug :40: To:BMSDC Planning Mailbox Subject:DC/17/ EH - Land Contamination. EP Reference : DC/17/ EH - Land Contamination. 1 Cherry Tree Lane, Debenham, STOWMARKET, Suffolk. Change of use from Class A3/A4 public house including internal and minor external alterations to 3no Class C3 dwellinghouses. Many thanks for your request for comments in relation to the above application. Given the planning history of the site and the redevelopment of ancillary land to the public house I can confirm that I have no objections to the proposed development from the perspective of land contamination. Regards Nathan Nathan Pittam BSc. (Hons.) PhD Senior Environmental Management Officer Babergh and Mid Suffolk District Councils Working Together Nathan.pittam@baberghmidsuffolk.gov.uk Work: Mobile::
10 Alex Scott Mid Suffolk District Council Planning Department 131, Council Offices High Street Needham Market Ipswich IP6 8DL Our ref: AE/2017/122113/01-L01 Your ref: DC/17/04036 Date: 26 October 2017 Dear Alex CHANGE OF USE FROM CLASS A3/A4 PUBLIC HOUSE INCLUDING INTERNAL AND MINOR EXTERNAL ALTERATIONS TO 3NO CLASS C3 DWELLING HOUSES. CHERRY TREE INN, 1 CHERRY TREE LANE, DEBENHAM, IP14 6QT Thank you for your consultation dated 10 October We have inspected the application, as submitted, and are raising a holding objection on flood risk grounds. Flood Risk Our maps show the application site lies within fluvial Flood Zone 3a, the high probability zone. The proposal is for a change of use from public house including internal and minor external alterations to 3no dwelling houses which is classified as a more vulnerable development, as defined in Table 2: Flood Risk Vulnerability Classification of the Planning Practice Guidance. Therefore, to comply with national policy the application is required to pass the Sequential and Exception Tests and be supported by a site specific Flood Risk Assessment (FRA). We have not seen evidence that you have applied the Sequential and Exception Tests. This is your responsibly and we recommend you consider them before the applicants review their FRA. The flood risk assessment (FRA) submitted with this application does not comply with the requirements set out in paragraph 102 of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). This states that for areas at risk of flooding, a site-specific FRA must be undertaken that demonstrates that the development will be safe for its lifetime. The FRA also does not comply with paragraph 94 of the NPPF, which requires Local Planning Authorities to adopt proactive strategies to adapt to climate
11 change, taking full account of flood risk and coastal change. The submitted FRA does not, therefore, provide a suitable basis for assessment to be made of the flood risks arising from the proposed development. In particular, the submitted FRA fails to: Assess the impact of climate change using appropriate climate change allowances. In this instance, according to Flood risk assessments: climate change allowances', the allowances that should be assessed are the Higher Central of 35% and the Upper End of 65%. Please see the guidance attached. Use the most up to date modelled data Product 4 data within the FRA is from Debenham 2014 is the most recent model for this location. Overcoming our Objection The applicant can overcome our holding objection by submitting an FRA that covers the deficiencies highlighted above and demonstrates that the development will not increase risk elsewhere and where possible reduces flood risk overall. If this cannot be achieved, we are likely to maintain our objection to the application. Production of an FRA will not in itself result in the removal of an objection. More detailed advice on overcoming our objection is provided in an appendix to this letter. We ask to be re-consulted with the results of the FRA. We will provide you with bespoke comments within 21 days of receiving formal re-consultation. Our objection will be maintained until an adequate FRA has been submitted. Other Sources of Flooding In addition to the above flood risk, the site may be within an area at risk of flooding from surface water, reservoirs, sewer and/or groundwater. We have not considered these risks in any detail, but you should ensure these risks are all considered fully before determining the application. We trust this advice is useful. Yours sincerely Miss Charlie Christensen Planning Adviser Direct dial Direct charlie.christensen@environment-agency.gov.uk cc Hollins Architects & Surveyors
12 Technical appendix Flood Risk Climate Change Guidance for the Applicant Intermediate Allowance Climate change allowances have changed recently. The Planning Practice Guidance provides advice on what is considered to be the lifetime of the development in the context of flood risk and coastal change. Our guidance 'Flood risk assessments: climate change allowances' provides allowances for future sea level rise, wave height and wind speed to help planners, developers and their advisors to understand likely impact of climate change on coastal flood risk. It also provides peak river flow and peak rainfall intensity allowances to help planners understand likely impact of climate change on river and surface water flood risk. For some development types and locations, it is important to assess a range of risk using more than one allowance. The extent, speed and depth of flooding shown in the assessment should be used to determine the flood level for flood risk mitigation measures. Where assessment shows flood risk increases steadily and to shallow depths, it is likely to be more appropriate to choose a flood lower in the range. Where assessment shows flood risk increases sharply due to a 'cliff edge' effect caused by, for example, sudden changes in topography or defences failing or overtopping, it is likely to be more appropriate to choose a flood level higher in the range. The proposed development is classified as a More Vulnerable, Minor development, and lies within Flood Zone 3a. This means the applicant can adopt an intermediate assessment. An intermediate assessment requires the applicant to use existing modelled flood and flow data to construct a stage-discharge rating curve, which can be used to interpolate a flood level based on the required peak flow allowance to apply to the design flood flow. Assuming the lifetime of the development is until 2069/2115, the allowances the applicant must apply are, Higher Central (35%) and Upper End (65%). We do currently have model coverage for this area (Debenham 2014 model) and have extracted flows and levels. The flows and levels can be requested from our Customers and Engagement Team on Enquiries_EastAnglia@environmentagency.gov.uk. We recommend that you assess both the 35% and 65% allowances, and if possible design the development to be safe through raised floor levels in the 65% climate change allowance. If this is not possible then robust justification should be provided, and the development should be designed to be safe through raised floor levels in the 35% allowance and the safety and sustainability of the development should be assessed for the 65% and managed through flood resilient/resistant construction measures to the satisfaction of the LPA.
Environment Agency pre-application advice incorporating Local Flood Risk Standing Advice from East Lindsey District Council
Environment Agency pre-application advice incorporating Local Flood Risk Standing Advice from East Lindsey District Council Version 1 UNCLASSIFIED We are the Environment Agency. We protect and improve
MID SUFFOLK DISTRICT COUNCIL
MID SUFFOLK DISTRICT COUNCIL Minutes of the meeting of the MID SUFFOLK DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE A held in the King Edmund Chamber - Endeavour House, 8 Russell Road, Ipswich on Wednesday, 11 April
CITY OF WESTMINSTER. PLANNING APPLICATIONS SUB COMMITTEE Report of Director of Planning. Date. Classification For General Release.
CITY OF WESTMINSTER PLANNING APPLICATIONS SUB COMMITTEE Report of Director of Planning Subject of Report Proposal Agent On behalf of Date 27 June 2017 21 Berwick Street, London, W1F 0PZ Classification
an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
Appeal Decision Site visit made on 29 November 2016 by David Cliff BA Hons MSc MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government Decision date: 22 nd December
Sequential Flood Risk Test for Mid Sussex Neighbourhood Plans
Sequential Flood Risk Test for Mid Sussex Neighbourhood Plans Introduction This Sequential Test has been prepared to assess the flood risk of sites within the parish that have been identified as suitable,
ROYAL BOROUGH OF WINDSOR & MAIDENHEAD PLANNING COMMITTEE
ROYAL BOROUGH OF WINDSOR & MAIDENHEAD PLANNING COMMITTEE MAIDENHEAD DEVELOPMENT CONTROL PANEL 26 October 2016 Item: 1 Application 16/01449/FULL No.: Location: Kingfisher Cottage Spade Oak Reach Cookham
Strategic Flood Risk Assessment
Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Draft Claremorris Local Area Plan 2012 2018 Prepared by Forward Planning Section Mayo County Council 1 Table of Contents Section 1: Overview of the Guidelines... 4 1.1 Introduction...
Ymweliad â safle a wnaed ar 04/04/16 Site visit made on 04/04/16
Penderfyniad ar yr Apêl Appeal Decision Ymweliad â safle a wnaed ar 04/04/16 Site visit made on 04/04/16 gan Richard Duggan BSc (Hons) DipTP MRTPI Arolygydd a benodir gan Weinidogion Cymru Dyddiad: 29/04/16
Slaugham Neighbourhood Plan Working Group response to MSDC comments on draft Submission Documents: September 2018
Slaugham Neighbourhood Plan Working Group response to MSDC comments on draft Submission Documents: September 2018 Para/Policy 1.7-1.10 page 2 Given the District Plan is now adopted, MSDC advised it is
Flood Risk Sequential Test
Flood Risk Sequential Test Assessment of Proposed Development Sites Stroud District Council Evidence Base (December 2013) Development and Flood Risk Sequential Test 1.0 Introduction 1.1 This document considers
September 2014 Pagham Neighbourhood Plan
September 2014 Pagham Neighbourhood Plan 2014-2029 Basic Conditions Statement Published by Pagham Parish Council for Consultation under the Neighbourhood Planning (General) Regulations 2012. 1 Pagham Neighbourhood
RECOMMENDATION: Granted Subject to Conditions
CASE OFFICER RECOMMENDATION SHEET Reference: P13-00986PLA Location: 253, HIGH STREET, ENFIELD, EN3 4DX Proposal: Change of use from shop (A1) to Betting shop (A2). RECOMMENDATION: Granted Subject to Conditions
an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
Appeal Decision Site visit made on 19 December 2016 by Geoff Underwood BA(Hons) PGDip(Urb Cons) MRTPI IHBC an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government Decision
2A Alverstone Avenue Barnet EN4 8DS
Location 2A Alverstone Avenue Barnet EN4 8DS Reference: 17/6096/FUL Received: 26th September 2017 Accepted: 27th September 2017 Ward: East Barnet Expiry 22nd November 2017 Applicant: Mr KANESU ATHITHAN
Strategic Flood Risk Assessment
Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Ireland West Airport Knock Local Area Plan 2012 2018 Prepared by Forward Planning Section Mayo County Council 0 1 Table of Contents Section 1: Overview of the Guidelines...
Development and Flood Risk - the Environment Agency s approach to PPS25. scrutinised before planning decisions are made
Development and Flood Risk - the Environment Agency s approach to PPS25 Steve Cook Flood Risk Policy Advisor Stephen.cook@environment-agency.gov.uk Our role in PPS25 h Providing advice and information
RE: PROPOSED MANAWATU DISTRICT PLAN CHANGE 55 HEARINGS
30 November 2016 File: 13/134 DDI: 09 917 4305 Email: kblair@burtonconsultants.co.nz Manawatu District Council Private Bag 10 001 FEILDING 4743 Attention: Hearing Committee: Plan Change 55 By email only:
Suffolk County Council: Minerals and Waste Plan; Issues and Options Consultation November 2016.
Suffolk County Council: Minerals and Waste Plan; Issues and Options Consultation November 2016. Representation on behalf of the Mineral Products Association (MPA). Contact: Mark E North, (Director of Planning
Flood Risk Assessment for Planning
Flood Risk Assessment for Planning Report on: Sample Property, Sample Town, Sample Postcode Report prepared for: Report Reference: Report Date: Sample AEL-XXXX-FRA-XXXX 28 th October 2016 Client Reference:
an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
Appeal Decision Hearing held on 8 April 2014 Site visit made on 8 April 2014 by Anthony Lyman BSc(Hons) DipTP MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
Provision of Flood Risk Information for sites on Duchess Street, Grimsby and Doughty Road, Grimsby.
Hassan Choudhry hassan.choudhry@arcadis.com Our ref: CCN/217/66343 & 66345 Date: 2 November 217 Dear Hassan Provision of Flood Risk Information for sites on Duchess Street, Grimsby and Doughty Road, Grimsby.
BLESSINGTON LOCAL AREA PLAN FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT
BLESSINGTON LOCAL AREA PLAN 2013-2019 FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT Table of Contents Page Number 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Definition of Flooding 2 1.2 Policy Framework 2 1.3 Flood Risk Identification 3 1.4 Mapping
2. The complaints from Mrs C which I investigated (and my conclusions) are:
Scottish Parliament Region: Mid Scotland and Fife Case 200400766: Fife Council Summary Planning - Objections to Development by Neighbours The complainants were 11 residents in a Fife village whose rear
an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
Appeal Decision Site visit made on 13 June 2013 by J M Trask BSc(Hons) CEng MICE an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government Decision date: 11 July 2013 Appeal
an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
Appeal Decision Site visit made on 6 December 2016 by D A Hainsworth LL.B(Hons) FRSA Solicitor an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government Decision date: 1 February
Potton Neighbourhood Plan Produced by Potton Town Council. Health Check December 2018: Undertaken by Derek Stebbing BA (Hons) DipEP MRTPI 1
Potton Neighbourhood Plan 2016-2035 Produced by Potton Town Council Health Check December 2018: Undertaken by Derek Stebbing BA (Hons) DipEP MRTPI 1 Summary of Recommendations Process We recommend below
an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
Appeal Decision Hearing held on 7-8 September 2016 Site visit made on 7 September 2016 by Roger Catchpole DipHort BSc(hons) PhD MCIEEM an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and
Decision Statement Regarding Longdon Neighbourhood Plan Proceeding to Referendum
Decision Statement Regarding Longdon Neighbourhood Plan Proceeding to Referendum 1. Summary 1.1 Following an Independent Examination, Lichfield District Council has recommended that the Longdon Neighbourhood
FLOODING INFORMATION SHEET YOUR QUESTIONS ANSWERED
The information in this document has been written in partnership by the Association of British Insurers and the Environment Agency 1. Flood risk and insurance Q1. How can I find out the flood risk affecting
Perth and Kinross Council Development Control Committee 28 May 2008 Recommendation by Development Quality Manager
Perth and Kinross Council Development Control Committee 28 May 2008 Recommendation by Development Quality Manager 4(4) 08/285 Alter the terms of Condition No 17 of planning consent 05/02389/REM to delete
Flood Risk Management Planning in Scotland: Arrangements for February 2012
Flood Risk Management Planning in Scotland: Arrangements for 2012 2016 February 2012 Flood Risk Management (Scotland) Act 2009 1 Contents Forewords 1. Introduction to this document... 5 2. Sustainable
P art B 4 NATURAL HAZARDS. Natural Hazards ISSUE 1. River Flooding
4 NATURAL HAZARDS ISSUE 1 River Flooding A large part of the plains within the Timaru District is subject to some degree of flooding risk. At least part of all of the main settlements in the District and
an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
Appeal Decisions Inquiry held on 13 January 2015 Site visit made on 12 January 2015 by J A Murray LLB (Hons), Dip.Plan.Env, DMS, Solicitor an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities
Strategic Flood Risk Assessment for SDCC Development Plan
Strategic Flood Risk Assessment for SDCC Development Plan Detailed Report on Flood Risk in the Baldonnell Area 8 th May 2015 rpsgroup.com/ireland Strategic Flood Risk Assessment for SDCC Development Plan
LOW. Overall Flood risk. Flood considerations. Specimen Address, Specimen Town. Rivers and the Sea Low page 4. Historic Flood.
Specimen Address, Specimen Town Overall Flood risk LOW Crown copyright and database rights 2018. Ordnance Survey licence 100035207 Groundsure Floodview complies with relevant Law Society practice notes
Draft Lichfield Local Plan Allocations Document Part 2 Examination. Inspector s Matters, Issues and Questions Discussion Note
Draft Lichfield Local Plan Allocations Document Part 2 Examination Inspector s Matters, Issues and Questions Discussion Note Introduction This note provides a summary of the matters and issues identified
SOUTH NORTHAMPTONSHIRE COUNCIL STATEMENT OF CASE ON BEHALF OF THE LOCAL PLANNING AUTHORITY
SOUTH NORTHAMPTONSHIRE COUNCIL STATEMENT OF CASE ON BEHALF OF THE LOCAL PLANNING AUTHORITY Appeal by Mrs. S Biddle against the decision by South Northamptonshire Council to refuse planning permission for
Report on the Disley and Newtown Neighbourhood Plan
Report on the Disley and Newtown Neighbourhood Plan 2017-2030 An Examination undertaken for Cheshire East Council with the support of the Disley Parish Council on the December 2017 submission version of
Decision by Jo-Anne Garrick, a Reporter appointed by the Scottish Ministers
Appeal Decision Notice T: 01324 696 400 F: 01324 696 444 E: dpea@gov.scot Decision by Jo-Anne Garrick, a Reporter appointed by the Scottish Ministers Planning appeal reference: Site address: 7 Redhall
Planning and Flood Risk
Planning and Flood Risk Patricia Calleary BE MEngSc MSc CEng MIEI After the Beast from the East Patricia Calleary Flood Risk and Planning Flooding in Ireland» Floods are a natural and inevitable part of
YORKSHIRE DALES NATIONAL PARK AUTHORITY ITEM 8
YORKSHIRE DALES NATIONAL PARK AUTHORITY ITEM 8 Date: 29 September 2015 Report: Outcome of Publication of the Local Plan: Yorkshire Dales Local Plan, pre submission Publication version July 2015. to emerging
Good Practice Guide. GPG 101 Document Owner: Steve Cook. Page 1 of 7.
Good Practice Guide Producing flood risk hydraulic models and flood consequence assessments for development planning purposes Date Published: September 2015 GPG 101 Document Owner: Steve Cook Page 1 of
an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
Appeal Decision Site visits made on 20 February 2017 and 9 th March 2017 by Zoe Raygen Dip URP MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government Decision date:
Guildford Borough Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Summary Report. January 2016
Guildford Borough Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Summary Report January 2016 What is this document? This document provides a summary of Guildford Borough Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA,
STRATFORD NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN PRE-SUBMISSION CONSULTATION
Response from RPS Dear Sir/Madam STRATFORD NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN PRE-SUBMISSION CONSULTATION Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the above document. This response is made on behalf of
an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
Appeal Decision Hearing held on 9 September 2015 Site visit made on 9 September 2015 by G J Rollings BA(Hons) MA(UD) MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
Flood Risk and Land Use Vulnerability Guidance
Flood Risk and Land Use Vulnerability Guidance UPS-BP-GU2a v.2 UNCONTROLLED DOCUMENT WHEN PRINTED Pag SCOTTISH ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION AGENCY Identifier: LUPS-GU24 Land Use Planning System SEPA Guidance
South Derbyshire Local Plan Part 2 Examination
South Derbyshire Local Plan Part 2 Examination Inspector Mike Hayden BSc (Hons) DipTP MRTPI Programme Officer Helen Wilson Email: progofficer@aol.com Tel: 01527 65741 MATTERS, ISSUES AND QUESTIONS (MIQs)
Appeal Decision. Site visit made on 11 May by David Fitzsimon MRTPI
Appeal Decision Site visit made on 11 May 2010 by David Fitzsimon MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government The Planning Inspectorate 4/11 Eagle Wing Temple
CASE OFFICER REPORT DELEGATED
CASE OFFICER REPORT DELEGATED Subject: Proposal: Application No. Applicant: Agent: 897 Christchurch Road Alterations and change of use of ground floor retail unit (Use Class A1) and associated basement
Frequently Asked Questions
Frequently Asked Questions The West of Wales Shoreline Management Plan (SMP) provides a high level strategy for managing flood and erosion risk for the coastline and is a non statutory policy document
I write on behalf of our residents association to object to the above planning application.
Please reply to: 34 Wellington Road Northfields Ealing W5 4UH James Egan Planning Services Ealing Council Perceval House 14-16 Uxbridge Road Ealing W5 2HL 15 th August 2014 Dear Mr Egan, Planning Application
Sample Site, Sample Street, Sample Town
Telephone: 2 7261 191 Email: SitecheckFlood@rpsgroup.com Sample Site, Sample Street, Sample Town Prepared for: L And1 Landmark1 Account Landmark(Test Account) 6-7 Abbey Court, Sowton Ind Estate Exeter
Test Valley Borough Council Cabinet 13 January 2016
ITEM 7 Test Valley Revised Local Plan Report of the Planning Policy & Transport Portfolio Holder Recommended: 1. To note the outcome of the Test Valley Revised Local Plan Inspector s report as shown in
Article 23-6 FLOODPLAIN DISTRICT
AMENDING THE CODE OF THE CITY OF PITTSFIELD CHAPTER 23, ZONING ORDINANCE SECTION I That the Code of the City of Pittsfield, Chapter 23, Article 23-6 Floodplain District, shall be replaced with the following:
I546. Warkworth 3 Precinct
I546. Warkworth 3 Precinct I546.1. Precinct Description The purpose of this precinct is to protect the character of the older parts of the Warkworth town centre by requiring new development to be of a
an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
Appeal Decision Hearing held on 8 November 2016 Site visit made on 8 November 2016 by Kevin Gleeson BA MCD MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government Decision
Review of preliminary flood risk assessments (Flood Risk Regulations 2009): guidance for lead local flood authorities in England
Review of preliminary flood risk assessments (Flood Risk Regulations 2009): guidance for lead local flood authorities in England 25 January 2017 We are the Environment Agency. We protect and improve the
Shropshire Local Flood Risk Management Strategy. Summary for Consultation. July 2014
Shropshire Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Summary for Consultation July 2014 SHROPSHIRE LOCAL FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY 1 Introduction This Strategy is about managing flooding in Shropshire.
an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
Appeal Decision Hearing held on 12 October 2016 Site visit made on 13 October 2016 by Kenneth Stone BSc (Hons) DipTP MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
Housing & Neighbourhoods Committee are requested to consider and approve the Council s Housing Adaptations Policy 2018.
Subject: Community Housing Adaptations Policy 2018 Report to: Management Team 29 th May 2018 Housing & Neighbourhoods Committee 14 th June 2018 Report by: Senior Projects Officer SUBJECT MATTER/RECOMMENDATIONS
AGENT DETAILS (If any) to whom correspondence should be sent.
Building Regulations Submission The Building Act 1984 The Building Regulations 2010 East Sussex Building Control Partnership, Wealden District Council, Vicarage Lane, Hailsham BN27 2AX Tel: (01892) 602005
an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
Appeal Decisions Hearing held on 31 July 2012 Site visit made on 31 July 2012 by Elizabeth Fieldhouse DipTP DipUD MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
Appeal Decision Hearing held on 2 August 2016 Site visits made on 1 & 2 August 2016 by Nick Fagan BSc (Hons) DipTP MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
Lound with Ashby, Herringfleet and Somerleyton NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN QUESTIONNAIRE. It s time to have your say
Lound with Ashby, Herringfleet and Somerleyton NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN QUESTIONNAIRE It s time to have your say It s Here! NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN QUESTIONNAIRE FOR Lound, Ashby, Herringfleet and Somerleyton The
Much Wenlock Neighbourhood Plan
Much Wenlock Neighbourhood Plan Submission Version Report by Independent Examiner Andrew Ashcroft Andrew Ashcroft BA (Hons) MA, DMS, MRTPI Assistant Director Economic, Environment & Cultural Services Herefordshire
RECENT LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT DECISIONS
RECENT LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT DECISIONS Paper given by Stephen Griffiths to Manly Council 29 June 2011 AFFORDABLE RENTAL HOUSING COMPATIBILITY WITH THE CHARACTER OF THE AREA Issue There has been considerable
HOW PLANNING APPEAL DECISIONS ARE INTERPRETING THE GUIDANCE 18 MONTHS ON. SASHA WHITE Q.C.
THE NPPF IN PRACTICE HOW PLANNING APPEAL DECISIONS ARE INTERPRETING THE GUIDANCE 18 MONTHS ON. SASHA WHITE Q.C. 1. INTRODUCTION. STRUCTURE OF LECTURE 2. KEY SECRETARY OF STATE DECISIONS. 3. KEY INSPECTOR
Strategic Flood Risk Assessment
PLANNING DEPARTMENT, KILKENNY COUNTY COUNCIL Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Proposed Amendment No. 2 of Callan Local Area Plan 2009-2020 Forward Planning January 2016 This Strategic Flood Risk Assessment
STRATEGIC FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT
STRATEGIC FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT FOR PROPOSED VARIATION NO. 1 (CORE STRATEGY) TO THE LONGFORD TOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2009-2015 for: Longford Local Authorities Great Water Street, Longford, Co. Longford by:
Vehicle Activated Signs (VAS) Policy 2 nd Version Updated June 2008
Vehicle Activated Signs (VAS) Policy 2 nd Version Updated June 2008 Gloucestershire County Council policy for the prioritisation implementation and maintenance of Vehicle Activated Signs 1 Purpose of policy
LAND AT DICKENS HEATH ROAD DICKENS HEATH
2014/1032 LAND AT DICKENS HEATH ROAD DICKENS HEATH Application No: Ward/Area: Location: 2014/1032/S BLYTHE LAND AT DICKENS HEATH ROAD DICKENS HEATH SOLIHULL Date Registered: 16/06/2014 Applicant: Proposal:
Draft LGNSW Submission on Short-term Rental Accommodation Planning Framework - Explanation of Intended Effect. November 2018
Draft LGNSW Submission on Short-term Rental Accommodation Planning Framework - Explanation of Intended Effect November 2018 Table of contents 1. Opening 3 2. Background 3 3. General comments 4 3.1 Whole-of-government
a) Ensure public safety through reducing the threats to life and personal injury.
SECTION VII: FLOODPLAIN DISTRICT 7-1 Statement Of Purpose The purposes of the Floodplain District are to: a) Ensure public safety through reducing the threats to life and personal injury. b) Eliminate
1.2 It is intended to provide ongoing updates for future quarters to the first available Development Control Committee after each quarter.
ITEM 9 Planning Appeals Record for Quarters 1 & 2 2017-18 Author: Jeremy Lee, Senior Planning Officer Email: Jeremy.lee@milton-keynes.gov.uk Tel: 01908 252316 1.0 Introduction 1.1 This report sets out
Minutes of the meeting of the Planning Committee held in Committee Rooms - East Pallant House on Wednesday 14 October 2015 at 9.
Minutes of the meeting of the Planning Committee held in Committee Rooms - East Pallant House on Wednesday 14 October 2015 at 9.30 am Members Present: Mr R Hayes (Chairman), Mrs C Purnell (Vice-Chairman),
in hereplanning Pilots Programme TOWN CENTRE 1ST PRINCIPLE Fife Council Reducing Planning Obligations to attract town centre investment
Heading Town text Centre in hereplanning Pilots Programme TOWN CENTRE 1ST PRINCIPLE Fife Council Reducing Planning Obligations to attract town centre investment Town Centres Planning Pilots Programme Town
Minutes of the ORDINARY MEETING OF IBSTONE PARISH COUNCIL Monday 12 th November 2018 at Ibstone C of E School Hall commencing at 7.
Minutes of the ORDINARY MEETING OF IBSTONE PARISH COUNCIL Monday 12 th November 2018 at Ibstone C of E School Hall commencing at 7.30pm Present: Cllr. Richard Scott Cllr. Jeremy Malkinson Cllr. Melanie
Chapter 8 Development Management & Zoning Objectives
Chapter 8 Development Management & Zoning Objectives 8.0 Introduction The Council, using its statutory powers granted under the Planning and Development Act 2000 (as amended) guides new development by
RTPI SOUTH-EAST LEGAL UPDATE SEMINAR: LOCAL & NEIGHBOURHOOD PLANS THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE NEW NPPF (JULY 2018)
RTPI SOUTH-EAST LEGAL UPDATE SEMINAR: LOCAL & NEIGHBOURHOOD PLANS THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE NEW NPPF (JULY 2018) 1 October 2018 Stephen Morgan 1. Overview 2. Key Changes with regard to plan making in the
Strategic Flood Risk Management
Strategic Management Duncan McLuckie (NSW Department of Infrastructure and Natural Resources) Introduction This paper discusses what is meant by strategic flood risk management, who is responsible in New
Ballina Shire Car Parking Contributions Plan Prepared for: Ballina Shire Council Date: May 2014 Project No 10084
Ballina Shire Car Parking Contributions Plan 2014 Prepared for: Date: May 2014 Project No 10084 Ballina Shire Car Parking Contributions Plan 2014 Prepared for By GLN Planning Pty Ltd ABN 39 585 269 237
Decision by Richard Dent, a reporter appointed by the Scottish Ministers
Directorate for Planning and Environmental Appeals Appeal Decision Notice T: 01324 696 400 F: 01324 696 444 E: dpea@scotland.gsi.gov.uk Decision by Richard Dent, a reporter appointed by the Scottish Ministers
Community Infrastructure Levy Neighbourhood Planning Toolkit
Community Infrastructure Levy Neighbourhood Planning Toolkit Written by Lorraine Hart, Community Land Use Table Of Contents Introduction... 3 Essential background... 4 The links between neighbourhood planning
MID SUFFOLK DISTRICT COUNCIL
MID SUFFOLK DISTRICT COUNCIL Minutes of the Meeting of the MID SUFFOLK DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE B held at the Council Chamber, Mid Suffolk District Council Offices, High Street, Needham Market on
BUSINESS LICENCE BYLAW A bylaw respecting the Licensing of Businesses
BUSINESS LICENCE BYLAW 3964-2007 A bylaw respecting the Licensing of Businesses THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED FOR CONVENIENCE ONLY and is a consolidation of "Mission " with the following amending bylaws:
Monthly Report of the Independent Compensation Panel Chair
March 2018 The Independent Compensation Panel (the Panel ) met on three occasions in March 2018 and undertook one site visit. 6 March (ICP81) Purpose To determine special medical case and compensation
ST. MARGARET S CHURCH CENTRE 22 Bolton Lane, Ipswich IP4 2BT. TERMS FOR HIRE OF PREMISES St Margaret s Church Centre
ST. MARGARET S CHURCH CENTRE 22 Bolton Lane, Ipswich IP4 2BT TERMS FOR HIRE OF PREMISES St Margaret s Church Centre 1 Thank you for considering St Margaret s Church Centre. Please read the following information
an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
Appeal Decisions Site visit made on 25 November 2014 by R J Marshall LLB DipTP MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government Decision date: 23 January 2015
Decision by Richard Dent, a reporter appointed by the Scottish Ministers
Appeal Decision Notice T: 01324 696 400 F: 01324 696 444 E: dpea@scotland.gsi.gov.uk Decision by Richard Dent, a reporter appointed by the Scottish Ministers Planning appeal reference: PPA-210-2047 Site
Appendix E. Cultural Reports
Appendix E Cultural Reports Appendix E-1 Preliminary Archaeological Reconnaissance Appendix E-2 Addendum to the Preliminary Archaeological Reconnaissance ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONSULTING P.O. BOX 3377
Comhairle Baile Cheanntair~ Nás na Ríogh
Comhairle Baile Cheanntair~ Nás na Ríogh DRAFT STRATEGIC FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT NAAS TOWN DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2011 ~ 2017 Kildare County Council Water Services Department Aras Chill Dara Devoy Park Naas County
Strategic Asset Management Policy
Strategic Asset Management Policy Submission Date: 2018-04-24 Approved by: Council Approval Date: 2018-04-24 Effective Date: 2018-04-24 Resolution Number: Enter policy number. Next Revision Due: Enter
June plot list
June 2015 -plot list Croftmead Kingsland, Herefordshire 5 exceptional plots in the highly sought after village of Kingsland with DPP for a range of bespoke Border Oak houses. A very rare opportunity to
The PC was asked to consider adding Councillor contact details and the latest Agenda and Minutes to the Parish Council section of the WCC website.
Tuesday 14 th October 2014 6 residents attended the Open Public Forum. Mr Martin requested clarification as to why the PC had stated that they Did not object in principle regarding planning application
MINUTES OF MEETING ASHLAND ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS May 22, 2018
MINUTES OF MEETING ASHLAND ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS May 22, 2018 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 Present: John Trefethen,
Britannia Village Flood Control Project
Britannia Village Flood Control Project Summary of Background Information February 2011 Contents 1) Flood Risks in the Village 2) Alternative Flood Risk Management Approaches Status Quo The Proposed Remedial
Solway Local Plan District 1 Flood risk management in Scotland 1.1 What is a Flood Risk Management Strategy? Flood Risk Management Strategies have bee
Flood Risk Management Strategy Solway Local Plan District Section 1: Flood Risk Management in Scotland 1.1 What is a Flood Risk Management Strategy?... 1 1.2 How to read this Strategy... 1 1.3 Managing
Councillors Colin Weatherall (Chairman), Richard Walls and Andrew Noone
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE HEARINGS COMMITTEE, HELD IN THE EDINBURGH ROOM, MUNICIPAL CHAMBERS, ON FRIDAY 27 JULY 2007, COMMENCING AT 9.38AM PRESENT: IN ATTENDANCE: Councillors Colin Weatherall (Chairman),
REMORTGAGING GUIDE TO REMORTGAGING A PROPERTY
REMORTGAGING GUIDE TO REMORTGAGING A PROPERTY This information guide is intended to provide you with a brief outline of the work involved in a remortgage transaction and to offer a brief insight into the