THE BAKERRISK BULLETIN
|
|
- Bertha Horton
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 THE BAKERRISK BULLETIN The Newsletter of Baker Engineering and Risk Consultants, Inc. Volume 15 Issue 1 January 2009 MAINTAINING SAFETY DURING A RECESSION by Quentin A. Baker, President With an uncertain economic climate facing all of us this year, we My safety message for oil and chemical are reminded that maintaining safety practices during a recession will provide safety benefits that can far outweigh the companies is clear: even during economic consequences of an incident. Unfortunately, there is often not a downturns, spending for needed process convenient cost argument for safety benefits because good safety measures must be maintained. results the absence of incidents does not provide a measurable benefit. Moreover, cutbacks that directly affect John S. Bresland, CSB Chairman major risks may have a delayed effect, possibly on a time scale of years. In a news release* issued December 22, 2008, the chairman of the Chemical Safety Board, John S. Bresland, noted that corporate spending decisions can directly impact plant safety when budgets are cut for preventive maintenance, training, and staffing in efforts by companies to economize their operations. Chairman Bresland also mentioned that downturns and recessions can actually be a good time to take care of deferred maintenance because there s less financial impact from temporarily shutting down a process during periods when sales are depressed. Of course, the business reality may limit activities that can be conducted during a recession. Nonetheless, safety should continue to remain a top priority for all of us, regardless of economic conditions. *Editor s Note: to view the entire news release, visit the CSB website ( INDUSTRY AND REGULATORY TRENDS IN FACILITY SITING by Quentin A. Baker, President Several trends have emerged in industry and regulatory practices with regard to the siting of buildings at chemical processing facilities that present potential explosion, flammable, or toxic hazards. These trends are a result of a number of factors including: Several major accidents that resulted in fatalities with increased visibility to the public, Recommendations from the U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazards Investigation Board regarding siting of portable buildings, Publication of American Petroleum Institute (API) Recommended Practices RP753 for portable buildings, Management of Hazards Associated with Location of Process Plant Portable Buildings, Occupational Health and Safety Administration s (OSHA) National Emphasis Program (NEP) audits, and Pending revision of API Recommended Practice RP752 for permanent buildings, Management of Hazards Associated with Location of Process Plant Buildings. In this Issue Industry Trends in Facility Siting... 1 Natural Hazards Risks and Decision Making High Pressure JIP... 4 Risk Management / QRA... 6 (continued on page 5) Page 1
2 NATURAL HAZARDS RISKS AND DECISION MAKING by Charles A. Pacella, Principal Consultant The most powerful, and often most unpredictable forces on earth are driven by nature, and the hazards they pose can be devastating to businesses in every industry. Many companies still may not fully understand the potential impact to their business and fail to address the risks associated with natural hazards. Historically, according to the U.S. Geological Survey, one in four businesses impacted by a natural disaster do not recover, and insurance coverage for those losses is typically less than 20% of the total loss. E arthquakes, hurricanes, tornadoes, hail, and flood can all have a profound affect on a business. Still, many companies do not fully understand the risks or how they can be managed. A company s ability to manage the risks associated with natural hazards can make the difference between success in achieving strategic objectives and business failure. Although it is impossible to predict natural disasters, companies can minimize their impact by first analyzing and modeling how an event at a single facility can ripple through the entire supply chain, or how a single event can impact multiple components or locations. Once the risks and their potential impacts are qualified and quantified, it becomes possible to develop a sound business plan and process for mitigating such exposures and applying the appropriate operational, financial, and strategic risk management strategies. Prior to the 1980 s, only actuarial techniques were available to estimate potential losses. These were based on historic frequency and intensity data. Unfortunately, such data were limited and covered only a relatively brief period of time. The resulting single point loss estimates were of limited and questionable use. In short, they did not provide a good basis for decision making. Advancements in computer technology over the last two decades have allowed development of sophisticated Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) models. These models are an integration of expert knowledge, experience, and technology from a wide range of engineering, geophysical sciences, and mathematics. They allow for hundreds of thousands of simulations or scenarios where results populate a virtual or stochastic universe with natural hazard event frequencies and severities. Perhaps the single most important output of these PRA models is the Exceedance Probability (EP) curve. Such a curve puts financial exposure into a context that financial and risk managers can readily understand and use. (continued on following page) NEW CHICAGO OFFICE BakerRisk is pleased to announce our continued growth with the addition of a new office in Chicago. The office is conveniently located northwest of downtown in the Citicorp Plaza Building, east of O Hare Airport on the Blue line. BakerRisk Chicago Office 8430 West Bryn Mawr, Suite 720 Chicago, IL Tel. (708) Page 2
3 (continued from previous page) For example, the typical EP curve shown in Figure 1 gives the relationship between the loss and the probability of exceeding that loss for a given portfolio. The same curve can be flipped as shown in Figure 2 to show the relationship between the loss levels and their mean return periods. (Mean return period is the average time interval between reoccurrence of the same magnitude of event). Additionally, this same curve can be expanded to show longer or shorter return periods, as shown in Figure 3. Annual Exceedance Probability 20% 18% 16% 14% 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% $0 $50 $100 $150 $200 $250 $300 $350 $400 Projected Loss Level (USD$ million) Figure 1: Typical Exceedance Probability Curve These types of output and others are invaluable input to management decision making. In addition to the big picture corporate vulnerability assessments, these results are instrumental in: Estimating property damage potential How large is your loss likely to be, and what are the chances of incurring such a loss? Estimating business interruption loss potential Where are your supply chain and operations most vulnerable and how long would key facilities and operations be affected? Projected Loss Level (USD$ million) $400 $350 $300 $250 $200 $150 $100 $50 $0 0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 90, ,000 Mean Return Period (years) Figure 2: Exceedance Probability Curve showing relationship between loss levels and their mean return periods Evaluating cost effectiveness of risk management strategies Does the probability of loss warrant additional coverage, operational or production changes, engineering redesigns, or new financial risk transfer strategies? Developing emergency response plans What is your strategy if a facility is impacted by a natural hazard event? Developing business continuity response plans What must you consider if operations are impacted, or if more than one facility is subject to more than one loss event? Projected Loss Level (USD$ million) $400 $350 $300 $250 $200 $150 $100 $50 $ ,000 Mean Return Period (years) Figure 3: Typical Exceedance Probability Curve showing shorter return periods Gathering the right information is critical for conducting these analyses. Through a detailed analysis, risks and their impacts can be better quantified and qualified, providing essential components for making effective business decisions. Although we cannot prevent natural disasters from occurring, gaining understanding of the exposures to your business can help establish strategies to manage these risks. Page 3
4 HIGH PRESSURE TESTING SAFETY RESEARCH 2009 JOINT INDUSTRY PROGRAM by Jeff Baker, Business Development BakerRisk s Joint Industry Program (JIP) for High Pressure Testing Safety Research begins its fourth year in The JIP evaluates pressure-testing hazards that are common to oilfield equipment companies. The following three studies are planned for the 2009 program year: 1. Testing of barriers with energy absorbing material sandwiched between steel plates, 2. A survey of best practices for pressure testing procedures, and 3. The construction of a water tank for underwater high pressure gas testing. The JIP helps interested companies better understand and predict hazards in their pressure test facilities, learn how to effectively improve testing safety, and mitigate test fragment hazards with effective protective structures. The focus is on safety issues common to the industry, with the results, benefits, and costs shared among all Participants. Participants of the 2008 JIP were: Baker Hughes, Cameron, FMC Technologies, Halliburton, Schlumberger, Smith International, Weatherford, WellDynamics, and the Wood Pressure Control Group. The 2006 and 2007 test programs focused on hydrostatic testing, including a range of tool fittings, test pressures (up to 30,000 psi), test temperatures (up to 450 ºF), and test barriers and shields (including various barriers and shields of interest to the Participants). The 2008 test program focused on similar test conditions with high pressure gas testing. Test results were documented in a technical report, including Hydrostatic Tool Failure Launching a 13-lb Bull Plug comparisons to current test cell design methodologies and calculations. Many of the Participants use the JIP data (high speed test videos and photos) in training programs for managers and technicians involved in pressure testing. Most pressure testing personnel have never seen a test failure under pressure conditions and do not appreciate the potential severe consequences of such an event. Safety awareness has improved significantly after participation in training programs using the test videos. An annual JIP meeting is held to review the JIP testing results in which the JIP Participants and BakerRisk determine the testing parameters and conditions that will be run for the following year. Based upon the results of the Programs, and the requirements for pressure testing (including increases in the number of tests, testing locations, test pressures and temperatures), the interest in this JIP continues to grow. Page 4
5 (continued from page 1 Industry Trends) Release Conditions for Consequence Based Analysis There is a growing movement to consider larger release sizes than were common practice when siting studies were first performed over a decade ago for facilities using a consequence-based approach. A consequence-based approach uses damage or injury as the end point, irrespective of the probability that the postulated event will occur. For example, API RP753 states that Consequence analysis should be based on major release scenarios, considering incidents and their outcomes that have or could have occurred in similar process units in the industry (i.e., scenarios with the most severe consequence). Unfortunately, no current or pending U.S. Government or industry criteria exists regarding the size of release that should be evaluated, leaving owners/operators to select their own criteria. We suggest reviewing release scenarios in light of RP753 and the pending revision of RP752 when it is released. Also, companies may want to consider a risk-based approach in which a wide range of scenarios are evaluated with the appropriate incident frequency assigned to each. Occupancy Criteria Screening of buildings from a siting evaluation has become more stringent. API RP753 adopted a functional definition of occupancy and disallowed screening based on the example occupancy criteria (man-hours) in the current edition of API RP752. According to RP753, if a portable building is intended for occupancy, it is considered occupied regardless of occupancy level. In addition, OSHA issued an NEP audit guideline disallowing the API RP752 example occupancy criteria. Many companies adopted standards based on that criteria, and now face the prospect that OSHA considers buildings occupied that had previously been screened out as unoccupied. Identification of essential personnel and the location of non-essential personnel is another recent trend. RP753 introduced the concept of essential personnel in an industry recommended practice. Non-essential personnel are not allowed in portable buildings in a zone that is close to process units. A guiding principle of RP753 is: Locating personnel away from process areas (is) consistent with safe and effective operations. The essential personnel approach is one means of enforcing this guiding principle. OSHA Citations A review of recent OSHA citations illustrates the agency s position on facility siting, including: Failure to perform a siting study that addressed all occupied buildings, Failure to mitigate risks identified in existing siting studies, and Failure to address all of the hazards associated with fire, explosion, and toxic releases. The OSHA NEP audits have been limited to refineries, but OSHA plans to expand this program to other processing facilities in the near future, including facilities that process combustible solids. OSHA inspectors have demonstrated high interest in buildings located inside of process units and questioned continued occupancy of conventional buildings that are not specifically blast hardened in these locations. The trend is clearly towards less tolerance of occupied conventional buildings inside process units by both government agencies and industry groups. Pending Changes API RP752 is currently in revision and the 3rd edition will be published in mid BakerRisk is participating on the API Task Force. The 3rd edition will be a major revision, and chemical processing companies should be prepared to obtain and review it as soon as it is released. In light of these trends, we encourage facility owner/operators to review their facility siting studies and evaluate whether they meet current and anticipated industry guidelines and practices. We recommend that companies perform a self-audit prior to an OSHA NEP audit. Specific issues to review include: scenario selection, occupancy screening, siting of portable buildings, location of non-essential personnel and conventional buildings inside process units. For facilities with combustible dust hazards, audit for compliance with NFPA 654 is also recommended. Page 5
6 RISK MANAGEMENT - QUANTITATIVE RISK ANALYSIS (QRA) AND THE POWER OF OBJECTIVE RISK COMPARISON by Jatin N. Shah, Sr. Principal Consultant Successful organizations understand that a goal of zero risk is not possible. Understanding the degree of risk one is exposed to and managing it to a tolerable level is a critical component of successful risk management strategy. There are a variety of qualitative and quantitative methods that companies can utilize to identify and assess risk exposures associated with their activities. You want a valve that doesn t leak and you try everything possible to develop one. But the real world provides you with a leaky valve. You have to determine how much leaking you can tolerate. Arthur Rudolph ( ) Project Director for the Saturn V rocket program While the vast majority of risk issues can be addressed utilizing qualitative techniques, some risk exposures require additional clarification utilizing quantitative techniques. For these types of exposures, BakerRisk utilizes Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) studies to quantify the impact and likelihood of potential risk exposures to provide insight and help answer typical questions from clients such as: We have already adopted many risk reduction technologies; do we need to do more? If so, what? We operate this high risk unit at multiple locations; how do the risks compare? Where do I start first? We have four possible project configurations that we can adopt; how do the risks compare? Our facility has many occupied buildings; which ones need to be relocated? Which ones can be upgraded? Which ones are OK as is? In a QRA study, statistical databases are used to determine release frequencies based upon the type of equipment utilized in the process being evaluated, which allows the analyst to use a range of release sizes instead of having to assume a credible release size. Event trees are utilized to capture conditional probabilities (success failure of various mitigation measures, potential ignition of flammable release, outcome of ignition fire or explosion) and explore possible outcomes associated with the accidental release. Results are typically presented as geographic risk contours and in terms of societal risk (FN curves, Societal Risk Index). An example of offsite risk exposures from process units at five different facilities is shown in the figure at left. The cumulative frequency of having N or more impacts is depicted for each site from all potential scenarios within the unit for each site. Even though each location utilizes the same process technology, the site-specific differences are clearly evident, allowing one to prioritize the risk reduction efforts. Example FN comparison at five site locations (continued on following page) Page 6
7 (continued from previous page) The chart below shows onsite risk comparison by nine equipment groups at one site. Here, the information can be used to identify equipment groups with the higher risk contribution and target appropriate risk reduction efforts to those individual items. In this particular case, efforts are directed at addressing risks associated with equipment group 1, 3, 4 and 5. Example risk comparison by nine equipment groups at one site location Though the QRA study produces quantitative numerical values of risk expressed as lines on a chart or as index values, it provides our clients with the ability to objectively compare risks of various options, locations, or operations. The ability to specifically target equipment groups that contribute the most to risk exposure improves the efficiency of the risk management options and allows companies to produce highly effective, defensible risk management strategies. BAKERRISK IN THE NEWS In 2008, BakerRisk was named to the Inc.5000, the Inc. magazine list of the fastest growing private companies in America. Inc.5000 is the most comprehensive survey of fast-growing companies assembled by any organization. We were ranked #2,872 overall for 2008 based on corporate growth. In addition, we made the list of Top 50 Engineering Companies, ranked 44th. BakerRisk was also honored by the Center for New Ventures & Entrepreneurship at the Mays Business School at Texas A&M University. We were named to the Aggie 100 for 2008, which identifies the 100 fastest growing businesses in the world that are owned or run by Texas A&M alumni. BakerRisk ranked 74th. We are honored to have received these awards and pleased that the efforts of our team have been recognized by these organizations. Page 7
8 B AKER ENGINEERING AND RISK C ONSULTANTS, INC. About BakerRisk Baker Engineering and Risk Consultants, Inc. is one of the world s leading explosion analysis, structural design, and risk engineering companies. BakerRisk provides comprehensive consulting, engineering, laboratory and range testing services to government agencies and private companies who are involved with dangerous, highly hazardous, reactive, or explosive materials. Our Mission: To provide integrated engineering, research, and risk assessment to aid our clients in managing hazards associated with explosive, flammable, reactive and toxic materials. Headquarters San Antonio, TX (210) Chicago Office (708) Houston Office (281) Los Angeles Office (424) Washington DC Office (202) Canada Office (289) UK Office (+44) Blast Effects & Explosion Testing Dynamic Structural Analysis & Design Risk Engineering Process Safety Incident Investigations Reactive Chemicals Testing and Materials Engineering BAKERRISK CONFERENCE SCHEDULE Look for BakerRisk at these upcoming events: MARCH 26-27, 2009 International Concrete Repair Institute (ICRI) Carolinas Chapter Spring Conference Southport Durham, North Carolina APRIL 14-17, 2009 Defense Research Institute (DRI) Product Liability Conference San Diego, California APRIL 26-30, 2009 American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE) Spring Nat l Meeting & 5th Global Congress on Process Safety Tampa, Florida MAY 11-15, 2009 International Symposium on the Interaction of the Effects of Munitions with Structures (ISIEMS) Bruhl, Germany MAY 12-13, 2009 National Petrochemical and Refiners Association (NPRA) National Safety Conference and Exhibition Grapevine, Texas For subscription inquiries, address changes or additional information about BakerRisk, please send your request to BakerRisk_News@BakerRisk.com Page 8
Modeling Extreme Event Risk
Modeling Extreme Event Risk Both natural catastrophes earthquakes, hurricanes, tornadoes, and floods and man-made disasters, including terrorism and extreme casualty events, can jeopardize the financial
More informationWHAT IS A QRA AND WHAT CAN IT TELL YOU?
WHAT IS A QRA AND WHAT CAN IT TELL YOU? Jeffrey D. Marx and John B. Cornwell Presented At Mary Kay O Conner Process Safety Center 2001 Annual Symposium Beyond Regulatory Compliance, Making Safety Second
More informationCatastrophe Reinsurance Pricing
Catastrophe Reinsurance Pricing Science, Art or Both? By Joseph Qiu, Ming Li, Qin Wang and Bo Wang Insurers using catastrophe reinsurance, a critical financial management tool with complex pricing, can
More informationCatastrophe Risk Engineering Solutions
Catastrophe Risk Engineering Solutions Catastrophes, whether natural or man-made, can damage structures, disrupt process flows and supply chains, devastate a workforce, and financially cripple a company
More informationFAQ SHEET - LAYERS OF PROTECTION ANALYSIS (LOPA)
FAQ SHEET - LAYERS OF PROTETION ANALYSIS (LOPA) Acronyms and Abbreviations Used ANSI - American National Standards Institute IPL - Independent Protection Layer ISA - International Society for Automation
More informationRISK ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA OR HOW SAFE IS SAFE ENOUGH?
RISK ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA OR HOW SAFE IS SAFE ENOUGH? John B. Cornwell and Mark M. Meyer Presented At II Risk Control Seminar Petróleos de Venezuela Puerto La Cruz, Venezuela October 13, 1997 Presented
More informationRegulation DD-12.0: Risk Assessment Study
Regulation DD-12.0: Risk Assessment Study 12.0 Risk Assessment Study 12.1 Guidelines for Conducting Risk Assessment (RA) Study 12.2 Outline for Risk Assessment Study Report 12.3 Specific Fire Protection
More informationRisk Assessments for Fire and Life Safety
Risk Assessments for Fire and Life Safety Cameron Bardas, P.Eng. March 12, 2015 FIRE RESCUE E D M O N T O N What is a Risk Assessment? * Tool used for decision making * Systematic, defensible, measures
More informationClassification Based on Performance Criteria Determined from Risk Assessment Methodology
OFFSHORE SERVICE SPECIFICATION DNV-OSS-121 Classification Based on Performance Criteria Determined from Risk Assessment Methodology OCTOBER 2008 This document has been amended since the main revision (October
More informationControlling Risk Ranking Variability Using a Progressive Risk Registry
Controlling Risk Ranking Variability Using a Progressive Risk Registry 32nd Annual National VPPPA Safety & Health Conference/Expo September 1, 2016 Agenda What is a Progressive Risk Registry? How does
More informationZurich Hazard Analysis (ZHA) Introducing ZHA
Introducing ZHA March 8, 2019 21st Annual Master Property Program Annual Loss Control Workshop Michael Fairfield, CSP Zurich North America - Risk Engineering Introducing ZHA Objectives After this introduction,
More informationUNDERSTANDING RISK TOLERANCE CRITERIA. Paul Baybutt. Primatech Inc., Columbus, Ohio, USA.
UNDERSTANDING RISK TOLERANCE CRITERIA by Paul Baybutt Primatech Inc., Columbus, Ohio, USA www.primatech.com Introduction Various definitions of risk are used by risk analysts [1]. In process safety, risk
More informationAdvances in Layer of Protection Analysis. Wayne Chastain, P.E. Eastman Chemical Company
Advances in Layer of Protection Analysis Wayne Chastain, P.E. Eastman Chemical Company Agenda Overview of Layer of Protection Analysis Guidelines for Initiating Events and Independent Protection Layers
More informationSIL and Functional Safety some lessons we still have to learn.
SIL and Functional Safety some lessons we still have to learn. David Craig, Amec This paper reflects AMEC s recent experience in undertaking functional safety assessments (FSA) (audits against IEC 61511)
More informationHazard Mitigation Planning
Hazard Mitigation Planning Mitigation In order to develop an effective mitigation plan for your facility, residents and staff, one must understand several factors. The first factor is geography. Is your
More informationRisk-Based Approach to Building Designs and Decision Making
Risk-Based Approach to Building Designs and Decision Making Anay P. Raibagkar BAKER ENGINEERING AND RISK CONSULTANTS, INC. 2010 Baker Engineering and Risk Consultants, Inc. Key Items The Bunker Mentality
More informationPROCEDURE: APPROVAL FOR RISK ASSESSMENT (RA) STUDIES
1. PURPOSE: PROCEDURE: APPROVAL FOR RISK ASSESSMENT (RA) STUDIES The development of projects under the jurisdiction of Trakhees-EHS, that possess a significant risk of Environment, Health & Safety and
More informationUse of Internal Models for Determining Required Capital for Segregated Fund Risks (LICAT)
Canada Bureau du surintendant des institutions financières Canada 255 Albert Street 255, rue Albert Ottawa, Canada Ottawa, Canada K1A 0H2 K1A 0H2 Instruction Guide Subject: Capital for Segregated Fund
More informationT-318. Hazard Mitigation Section TDEM Recovery, Mitigation, and Standards
T-318 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Requirements Hazard Mitigation Section TDEM Recovery, Mitigation, and Standards Raymond Mejia, Lead Hazard Mitigation Planner Samantha Aburto, Hazard Mitigation Planner
More informationOverview of Standards for Fire Risk Assessment
Fire Science and Technorogy Vol.25 No.2(2006) 55-62 55 Overview of Standards for Fire Risk Assessment 1. INTRODUCTION John R. Hall, Jr. National Fire Protection Association In the past decade, the world
More informationPrivate property insurance data on losses
38 Universities Council on Water Resources Issue 138, Pages 38-44, April 2008 Assessment of Flood Losses in the United States Stanley A. Changnon University of Illinois: Chief Emeritus, Illinois State
More informationEmergency Management. December 16, 2010
Applications of Hazus-MH for Emergency Management December 16, 2010 What is Hazus-MH? Free ArcGIS extension Facilitates a risk-based approach to mitigation Identifies and visually displays hazards and
More informationCrowe, Dana, et al "EvaluatingProduct Risks" Design For Reliability Edited by Crowe, Dana et al Boca Raton: CRC Press LLC,2001
Crowe, Dana, et al "EvaluatingProduct Risks" Design For Reliability Edited by Crowe, Dana et al Boca Raton: CRC Press LLC,2001 CHAPTER 13 Evaluating Product Risks 13.1 Introduction This chapter addresses
More informationTowards the inclusion of external factors in quantitative risk assessment: the analysis of NaTech accident scenarios
Towards the inclusion of external factors in quantitative risk assessment: the analysis of NaTech accident scenarios Valerio Cozzani Dipartimento di Ingegneria Chimica, Mineraria e delle Tecnologie Ambientali
More informationMODEL VULNERABILITY Author: Mohammad Zolfaghari CatRisk Solutions
BACKGROUND A catastrophe hazard module provides probabilistic distribution of hazard intensity measure (IM) for each location. Buildings exposed to catastrophe hazards behave differently based on their
More informationHazard Identification, Risk Assessment and Control at Gas Inlet Area of Onshore Terminal Yeshaswee Bijalwan 1 Dr. Nehal A Siddique 2
IJSRD - International Journal for Scientific Research & Development Vol. 3, Issue 09, 2015 ISSN (online): 2321-0613 Hazard Identification, Risk Assessment and Control at Gas Inlet Area of Onshore Terminal
More informationISSUES IN DEVELOPING AND USING RISK TOLERANCE CRITERIA
ISSUES IN DEVELOPING AND USING RISK TOLERANCE CRITERIA by Paul Baybutt, Primatech Inc. 1 Presented at the 2013 AIChE Spring Meeting 9th Global Congress on Process Safety San Antonio, Texas April 28 May
More informationGUIDE BUSINESS & INDUSTRY A STEP-BY-STEP APPROACH TO EMERGENCY PLANNING, RESPONSE AND RECOVERY FOR COMPANIES OF ALL SIZES
GUIDE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT GUIDE FOR BUSINESS & INDUSTRY A STEP-BY-STEP APPROACH TO EMERGENCY PLANNING, RESPONSE AND RECOVERY FOR COMPANIES OF ALL SIZES Sponsored by a Public-Partnership with the Federal
More informationDisaster resilient communities: Canada s insurers promote adaptation to the growing threat of high impact weather
Disaster resilient communities: Canada s insurers promote adaptation to the growing threat of high impact weather by Paul Kovacs Executive Director, Institute for Catastrophic Loss Reduction Adjunct Research
More informationRecommendations Concerning the Terrorism Section of A.M. Best s Supplemental Rating Questionnaire. February 20, 2004
Recommendations Concerning the Terrorism Section of A.M. Best s Supplemental Rating Questionnaire February 20, 2004 INTRODUCTION A.M. Best Company s recent additions to the Supplemental Rating Questionnaire
More informationEVALUATING OPTIMAL STRATEGIES TO IMPROVE EARTHQUAKE PERFORMANCE FOR COMMUNITIES
EVALUATING OPTIMAL STRATEGIES TO IMPROVE EARTHQUAKE PERFORMANCE FOR COMMUNITIES Anju GUPTA 1 SUMMARY This paper describes a new multi-benefit based strategy evaluation methodology to will help stakeholders
More informationPART 1 2 HAZARDS, RISKS & SAFETY.
PART 1 2 HAZARDS, RISKS & SAFETY arshad@utm.my 1 Types of Hazards Definition of Risk & Safety Content 2 Hazard 3 Hazards A "source of danger" is a property, a situation, or a state. It is not an event
More informationANSI / API RP-754 Process Safety Performance Indicators for the Refining & Petrochemical Industries
ANSI / API RP-754 Process Safety Performance Indicators for the Refining & Petrochemical Industries Presented : Lloyd s Register Energy Conference October 18, 2012 Karen M. Haase Process Safety Incidents
More informationAccording to the U.S. Geological
Estimating economic losses in the Bay Area from a magnitude-6.9 earthquake Data from the BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages are used to analyze potential business and economic losses resulting
More informationTERRORISM MODELING. Chris Folkman, Senior Director, Product. Copyright 2015 Risk Management Solutions, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
TERRORISM MODELING Chris Folkman, Senior Director, Product 1 What is a catastrophe model and why use one? AGENDA Terrorism modeling, and how it differs from natural catastrophe modeling The terrorism threat
More informationHow the industry uses incident data from multiple sources to improve safety
How the industry uses incident data from multiple sources to improve safety Tim Overton Group Head of Process Safety BP Sources of information Industry Benchmarking Metrics Published Learning reports (e.g.
More informationThe Challenge of Risk Control in a Hydrogen based Economy, Part I
The Challenge of Risk Control in a Hydrogen based Economy, Part I Hans J. Pasman Chemical Risk Management What are the risks, how can we determine them, How can we avoid, how to reduce, when can we be
More informationJob Safety Analysis Preparation And Risk Assessment
Job Safety Analysis Preparation And Risk Assessment Sample Only Reference CPL_PCR_JSA_Risk_Assessment Revision Number SAMPLE ONLY Document Owner Sample Date 2015 File Location Procedure Revision Date Major
More informationDemonstrating Continuous Risk Reduction
Demonstrating Continuous Risk Reduction Alastair Bird 1, Angus Lyon 1, and Volton Edwards 2 1 DNV 2 bp Trinidad and Tobago Measurement of risk at large industrial sites has generally been achieved through
More informationANSI API RP-754 Quarterly Webinar
ANSI API RP-754 Quarterly Webinar September 13, 2016 Process Safety Performance Indicators for the Refining and Petrochemical Industries 1 Purpose of RP 754 Quarterly Webinars To support broad adoption
More informationIntroduction to Process Safety & Risk Assessment
Introduction to Process Safety & Risk Assessment Protection Layers University of West Indies October 4, 2013 Seminar Contents Overview of Trinidad & Tobago Process Industry Basic Concepts and Process Safety
More informationDepartment of Energy s
Department of Energy s An Introduction to Current Practices at DOE James O Brien DOE / HSS Workshop on Risk Assessment and dsafety Decision i Making Under Uncertainty t September 2010 DOE Nuclear Safety
More informationA Multihazard Approach to Building Safety: Using FEMA Publication 452 as a Mitigation Tool
Mila Kennett Architect/Manager Risk Management Series Risk Reduction Branch FEMA/Department of Homeland Security MCEER Conference, September 18, 2007, New York City A Multihazard Approach to Building Safety:
More informationThe AIR Model for Terrorism
The AIR Model for Terrorism More than a decade after 9/11, terrorism remains a highly dynamic threat capable of causing significant insurance losses. The AIR model takes a probabilistic approach to estimating
More informationExecutive Summary. Introduction and Purpose. Scope
Executive Summary Introduction and Purpose This is the first edition of the Los Angeles Unified School District All-Hazard Mitigation Plan, and through completion of this plan the District continues many
More informationUNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC FORM 10-K
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC 20549 FORM 10-K [X] Annual Report Under Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the fiscal year ended September 30,
More informationDepartment of Defense INSTRUCTION
Department of Defense INSTRUCTION NUMBER 7041.03 September 9, 2015 Incorporating Change 1, October 2, 2017 DCAPE SUBJECT: Economic Analysis for Decision-making References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. In
More informationTable of Contents Advantages Disadvantages/Limitations Sources of additional information. Standards, textbooks & web-sites.
Table of Contents Table of Contents 1. Consequence Analysis & Risk Reduction Option Selection 1.1. A description of the techniques, including its purpose 1.1.0.. Introduction 1.1.0.3. Consequence Analysis
More informationRisk Based Inspection A Key Component to Generating Value from a Mechanical Integrity Program API Singapore 2012
the global leader in asset performance management solutions Risk Based Inspection A Key Component to Generating Value from a Mechanical Integrity Program API Singapore 2012 Agenda Introduction Achieving
More informationSafety Economics and Sustainable Performance - Risk Based Implementation of Safety Measures
Safety Economics and Sustainable Performance - Risk Based Implementation of Safety Measures This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0) Licence
More informationRISK ASSESSMENT AND ITS MANAGEMENT IN MINING INDUSTRY
RISK ASSESSMENT AND ITS MANAGEMENT IN MINING INDUSTRY *Ram Prasad Choudhary Department of Mining Engineering, National Institute of Technology Karnataka, Surathkal-575025 *Author for Correspondence ABSTRACT
More informationComparison of Two Industrial Quantitative Risk Analyses Using the OECD Risk Assessment Dictionary/Thesaurus
Comparison of Two Industrial Quantitative Risk Analyses Using the OECD Risk Assessment Dictionary/Thesaurus Dennis C. Hendershot Rohm and Haas Company PO Box 584 Bristol, PA 19007 EMail: nagdh@rohmhaas.com
More informationRisk Management Plan for the <Project Name> Prepared by: Title: Address: Phone: Last revised:
for the Prepared by: Title: Address: Phone: E-mail: Last revised: Document Information Project Name: Prepared By: Title: Reviewed By: Document Version No: Document Version Date: Review Date:
More informationRISK MANAGEMENT. Budgeting, d) Timing, e) Risk Categories,(RBS) f) 4. EEF. Definitions of risk probability and impact, g) 5. OPA
RISK MANAGEMENT 11.1 Plan Risk Management: The process of DEFINING HOW to conduct risk management activities for a project. In Plan Risk Management, the remaining FIVE risk management processes are PLANNED
More informationReservoir safety risk assessment a new guide
Reservoir safety risk assessment a new guide Mark Morris 1,2, Mike Wallis 1, Alan Brown 3, David Bowles 4, John Gosden 3, Dr Andy Hughes 5, Alex Topple 1, Paul Sayers 6 and Keith Gardiner 7 1 HR Wallingford
More informationMINI GUIDE. Project risk analysis and management
MINI GUIDE Project risk analysis and management Association for Project Management January 2018 Contents Page 3 Introduction What is PRAM? Page 4 Page 7 Page 9 What is involved? Why is it used? When should
More informationRISK EVALUATIONS FOR THE CLASSIFICATION OF MARINE-RELATED FACILITIES
GUIDE FOR RISK EVALUATIONS FOR THE CLASSIFICATION OF MARINE-RELATED FACILITIES JUNE 2003 American Bureau of Shipping Incorporated by Act of Legislature of the State of New York 1862 Copyright 2003 American
More informationLAND-USE PLANNING REGULATIONS IN FRANCE AFTER THE TOULOUSE DISASTER
LAND-USE PLANNING REGULATIONS IN FRANCE AFTER THE TOULOUSE DISASTER Jérôme TAVEAU Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety Industrial Risks, Fire and Containment Assessment and Study Department
More informationPage 1 of 55 First Revision No. 13-NFPA 600-2013 [ Global Input ] Change Title of the document from NFPA 600 Standard on Industrial Fire Brigades to NFPA 600 Standard on Facility Fire Brigades Submittal
More informationPOWER LAW ANALYSIS IMPLICATIONS OF THE SAN BRUNO PIPELINE FAILURE
Proceedings of the 2016 11th International Pipeline Conference IPC2016 September 26-30, 2016, Calgary, Alberta, Canada IPC2016-64512 POWER LAW ANALYSIS IMPLICATIONS OF THE SAN BRUNO PIPELINE FAILURE Dr.
More informationA Streamlined Approach for Full Compliance with SIF Implementation Standards
A Streamlined Approach for Full Compliance with SIF Implementation Standards William G. Bridges, President PROCESS IMPROVEMENT INSTITUTE, INC. (PII) 1321 Waterside Lane, Knoxville, TN 37922 Phone: (865)
More informationCITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE. Honorable Members of the Planning and Land Use Management Committee
FORM GEN. 60 CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE 00-050-0000 Date: November 0, 05 To: Honorable Members of the Planning and Land Use Management Committee From: Miguel A. Santana City
More informationChapter 7: Risk. Incorporating risk management. What is risk and risk management?
Chapter 7: Risk Incorporating risk management A key element that agencies must consider and seamlessly integrate into the TAM framework is risk management. Risk is defined as the positive or negative effects
More informationFrumkin, 2e Part 5: The Practice of Environmental Health. Chapter 29: Risk Assessment
Frumkin, 2e Part 5: The Practice of Environmental Health Chapter 29: Risk Assessment Risk Assessment Risk assessment is the process of identifying and evaluating adverse events that could occur in defined
More informationRisk Based Approaches for Levees in the U.S. and Abroad: Lessons for the NFIP
Proud Platinum Sponsor of the ASFPM 2017 Annual Conference Risk Based Approaches for Levees in the U.S. and Abroad: Lessons for the NFIP Mike Seering (AECOM) David Powers (HR Wallingford) ASFPM 2017 Annual
More informationSensitivity Analyses: Capturing the. Introduction. Conceptualizing Uncertainty. By Kunal Joarder, PhD, and Adam Champion
Sensitivity Analyses: Capturing the Most Complete View of Risk 07.2010 Introduction Part and parcel of understanding catastrophe modeling results and hence a company s catastrophe risk profile is an understanding
More informationAn Approach for the Assessment of the Maximum Probable Loss for Insurance Purposes
1. INTRODUCTION An Approach for the Assessment of the Maximum Probable Loss for Insurance Purposes During the last decades, the financing of the construction and maintenance of new motorways in various
More informationCEPA S200 The Risk-based Approach
CEPA S200 The Risk-based Approach Presented by Ertugrul Alp, Ph.D., P.Eng. February 24, 2004 Toronto, Ontario Incorporated Change Agents in Risk Management, Specialists in Risk Assessment 87 Topham Crescent,
More informationMitigation Measures: Sound Investments in Disaster Recovery
ISSUE 14 EDITOR S NOTE While FEMA is best known for emergency assistance after a disaster, the agency s support of mitigation programs to help identify and reduce risks to life and property before a disaster
More informationRisk Check: Applying Community Risk Reduction Strategies To Enforcement Inspections
2017 NFPA Conference & Expo Risk Check: Applying Community Risk Reduction Strategies To Enforcement Inspections Presented by: David Lynam Fire Marshal / Deputy Building Official Kitsap County What To Expect
More informationApplying Risk-based Decision-making Methods/Tools to U.S. Navy Antiterrorism Capabilities
Applying Risk-based Decision-making Methods/Tools to U.S. Navy Antiterrorism Capabilities Mr. Charles Mitchell ABSG Consulting Inc. Alexandria, VA (703) 519-6387 cmitchell@absconsulting.com Commander Chris
More informationRegulatory Implications of Fukushima for Nuclear Power Plants in the U.S.
Regulatory Implications of Fukushima for Nuclear Power Plants in the U.S. Commissioner George Apostolakis U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission CmrApostolakis@nrc.gov Carnegie Nuclear Policy Program Conference
More informationHomeowners Ratemaking Revisited
Why Modeling? For lines of business with catastrophe potential, we don t know how much past insurance experience is needed to represent possible future outcomes and how much weight should be assigned to
More informationDirector Risk & Reliability, HSB Professional Loss Control
Cost-Benefit Analysis of Fire Risk Reduction Alternatives Thomas F. Barry, P.E. Director Risk & Reliability, HSB Professional Loss Control The term fire risk reduction is defined as the application of
More informationSCAF Workshop Integrated Cost and Schedule Risk Analysis. Tuesday 15th November 2016 The BAWA Centre, Filton, Bristol
The following presentation was given at: SCAF Workshop Integrated Cost and Schedule Risk Analysis Tuesday 15th November 2016 The BAWA Centre, Filton, Bristol Released for distribution by the Author www.scaf.org.uk/library
More informationRick Burnheimer Director, Risk Management and Environmental, Health & Safety Sprint Nextel. All rights reserved.
The Benefits of an Integrated Environmental, Health & Safety Program to Risk Management International Telecommunications Safety Conference, September 2008 Rick Burnheimer Director, Risk Management and
More informationProactive Location Identification for Emergency Response and 911 Purposes
Proactive Location Identification for Emergency Response and 911 Purposes Identifying Commercial Properties, Certificates of Occupancies, and Boat Docks for 911 Purposes Victoria Ogaga E911 Coordinator
More informationCatastrophe Risk Modelling. Foundational Considerations Regarding Catastrophe Analytics
Catastrophe Risk Modelling Foundational Considerations Regarding Catastrophe Analytics What are Catastrophe Models? Computer Programs Tools that Quantify and Price Risk Mathematically Represent the Characteristics
More informationA Practical Framework for Assessing Emerging Risks
A Practical Framework for Assessing Emerging Risks John Bowman, MBCI Enterprise Business Continuity Management Share one approach to assess the current level of business continuity risk in your organization.
More informationDepartment of Defense Explosives Safety Board (DDESB)
Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board (DDESB) Explosives Safety Munitions Risk Management (ESMRM) Technical Paper 23- DoD Explosives Safety And Munitions Risk Management: Acquisition Lifecycle
More informationTERREBONNE PARISH HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE
TERREBONNE PARISH HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE COMMITTEE KICK-OFF MEETING May 22, 2014 A World of Solutions 0 PRESENTATION AGENDA I. INTRODUCTIONS AND WELCOME II. PURPOSE,
More informationApplication of Aramis developed in the framework of SEVESOII directive to the Canadian Context
Application of Aramis developed in the framework of SEVESOII directive to the Canadian Context Jean-Paul Lacoursière, P.E. Université de Sherbrooke Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada 1 Presentation Content Introduction
More informationApache & Schlumberger Pitch
Apache & Schlumberger Pitch Apache & Schlumberger Sector Manager: Mark McGeough Senior Analyst: Brian Fleming Analysts: Will Von Behr, Eoin McQuaid, Paddy Orr, Mary Kelleher, Loman Begly, Cian O Hara TRINITY
More informationTEACHERS RETIREMENT BOARD. REGULAR MEETING Item Number: 7 CONSENT: ATTACHMENT(S): 1. DATE OF MEETING: November 8, 2018 / 60 mins
TEACHERS RETIREMENT BOARD REGULAR MEETING Item Number: 7 SUBJECT: Review of CalSTRS Funding Levels and Risks CONSENT: ATTACHMENT(S): 1 ACTION: INFORMATION: X DATE OF MEETING: / 60 mins PRESENTER(S): Rick
More informationANOTHER LOOK AT RISK AND STRUCTURAL RELIABILITY CRITERIA
ANOTHER LOOK AT RISK AND STRUCTURAL RELIABILITY CRITERIA V.M. Trbojevic, Risk Support Ltd., UK Abstract The paper presents a comparison of societal risk criteria and the several structural reliability
More information6. Financial Highlights
6. Financial Highlights 6.1 Financial Highlights 6.1.1 Condensed Balance Sheet Condensed Balance Sheet from 2012 to 2014 (Consolidated) Item 2012 2013 2014 Current Assets 250,325,436 358,486,654 626,566,787
More informationCriteria for Establishing Objectives & Targets
Impacts and Hazards Projects Alignment Process Criteria for Establishing Objectives & Targets Legal & Other Requirements Legal & Other Requirements 2 14 Technological Options 1 1 2 1 8 Financial 1 1 1
More informationTaking the Wind Out of Hurricane Damage
CLIENT UPDATE HURRICANE PREPAREDNESS HEADQUARTERS 32 Old Slip New York, NY 10005 800.221.5830 WWW.CRYSTALCO.COM Taking the Wind Out of Hurricane Damage The National Weather Service defines a hurricane
More informationRCA = root cause analysis SVA = security vulnerability analysis
Key acronyms Incident Investigation and Reporting RCA = root cause analysis SVA = security vulnerability analysis a s SAND No. 2011-1036C Sandia is a multiprogram laboratory operated by Sandia Corporation,
More informationStochastic Modelling: The power behind effective financial planning. Better Outcomes For All. Good for the consumer. Good for the Industry.
Stochastic Modelling: The power behind effective financial planning Better Outcomes For All Good for the consumer. Good for the Industry. Introduction This document aims to explain what stochastic modelling
More information(Ord ) Chapter RISK MANAGEMENT Background and findings Purpose and goals. Page 1.
Chapter 450-8 - RISK MANAGEMENT Sections: 450-8.002 - Background and findings. The board of supervisors of Contra Costa County finds as follows: (a) Recent incidents in Contra Costa County at industrial
More informationThe Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA): Unique Financing for a Unique Risk
The Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA): Unique Financing for a Unique Risk Erwann Michel-Kerjan and Howard Kunreuther Key Points Disaster financing is a critical element of our national security. The
More information(Last amended 18 December 2017, cf. page 4)
REGULATIONS RELATING TO MANAGEMENT AND THE DUTY TO PROVIDE INFORMATION IN THE PETROLEUM ACTIVITIES AND AT CERTAIN ONSHORE FACILITIES (THE MANAGEMENT REGULATIONS) (Last amended 18 December 2017, cf. page
More informationA Framework for Risk Assessment of Infrastructure in a Multi-Hazard Environment. Stephanie King, PhD, PE
A Framework for Risk Assessment of Infrastructure in a Multi-Hazard Environment Stephanie King, PhD, PE Weidlinger Associates, Inc. AEI-MCEER Symposium New York, NY September 18, 2007 www.wai.com New York
More informationPre-Earthquake, Emergency and Contingency Planning August 2015
RiskTopics Pre-Earthquake, Emergency and Contingency Planning August 2015 Regions that are regularly exposed to seismic events are well-known, e.g. Japan, New Zealand, Turkey, Western USA, Chile, etc.
More informationBusiness Case for Safety
Business U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Case Investigation for Board Safety SAFETY IS GOOD BUSINESS AND GOOD PUBLIC POLICY There s an old saying that if you think safety is expensive, try an accident.
More informationTangible Assets Threats and Hazards: Risk Assessment and Management in the Port Domain
Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering 5 (2017) 271-278 doi: 10.17265/2328-2142/2017.05.004 D DAVID PUBLISHING Tangible Assets Threats and Hazards: Risk Assessment and Management in the Port
More information(Ord. No N.S., I, ; Ord. No N.S., I, )
Chapter 6.43 - INDUSTRIAL SAFETY Sections: 6.43.010 - Summary. This chapter imposes regulations which supplement the requirements of California Health and Safety Code, Article 2 (commencing with Section
More informationHealth Care Workers Compensation Barometer
Health Care Workers Compensation Barometer Actuarial Analysis, November 2018 Executive Summary Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Letter to Our Readers.... 2 Executive Summary.... 3 Introduction Aon s
More informationPHASE 2 HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT
Prioritize Hazards PHASE 2 HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND After you have developed a full list of potential hazards affecting your campus, prioritize them based on their likelihood of occurrence. This step
More information