Comparison of Two Industrial Quantitative Risk Analyses Using the OECD Risk Assessment Dictionary/Thesaurus
|
|
- Octavia Lloyd
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Comparison of Two Industrial Quantitative Risk Analyses Using the OECD Risk Assessment Dictionary/Thesaurus Dennis C. Hendershot Rohm and Haas Company PO Box 584 Bristol, PA Prepared for Presentation at the Fourteenth International Hazardous Materials Spills Conference Chicago, Illinois April 5-9, 1998 Wednesday Morning April 8, :30-10:00 Session Methodology for Improving International Communication of Risk Assessment Terminology Related to Chemical Accidents Copyright Rohm and Haas Company February 25, 1998 UNPUBLISHED
2 Comparison of Two Industrial Quantitative Risk Analyses Using the OECD Risk Assessment Dictionary/Thesaurus Dennis C. Hendershot Rohm and Haas Company Bristol, PA Abstract The OECD has developed a dictionary/thesaurus for describing risk assessment processes, laws, and regulations. The thesaurus/dictionary provides a generic structure which can be applied to a specific quantitative risk analysis to understand how it relates to other analyses, and also to risk management laws or regulations. The proposed OECD risk structure will be used to compare two industrial quantitative risk analyses. Introduction The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has developed a Risk Assessment Thesaurus/Dictionary with the help of a group organized by the Wharton Risk and Decision Processes Center of the University of Pennsylvania and supported by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (Ross and Ignatowski, 1997; Ignatowski, et. al., 1997). The Dictionary/Thesaurus is intended for use in describing and comparing various risk management laws, regulations, policies, and risk analysis methodologies, with particular attention to catastrophic industrial risks. The OECD Dictionary/Thesaurus is intended to help people in different countries, companies, governments, and other organizations to understand the meaning of the various terminologies they use to describe risk regulations, assessments, and other documents. It is intended to overcome the two communications theorems proposed by Kaplan (1997): C 50% of the problems in the world result from people using the same words with different meanings C The other 50% come from people using different words with the same meaning The Dictionary/Thesaurus is intended to provide a common base line which can be used to understand the meaning of the language in various risk assessment documents and regulations. The OECD Dictionary/Thesaurus was used to characterize two industrial quantitative risk analyses (QRAs) as a test of its utility. This discussion will briefly describe the QRAs and summarize the description using the OECD Dictionary/Thesaurus. Both QRAs were done a number of years ago,
3 and the studies are characterized in the context of the legal requirements, regulations, and corporate policies which were in place at the time the QRAs were actually done. The Quantitative Risk Analyses Glacial Methacrylic Acid Storage The first QRA which was characterized using the OECD Risk Assessment Dictionary/Thesaurus was for a proposed storage facility for glacial methacrylic acid (GMAA). The QRA was done to aid design engineers in choosing between two alternate locations for the storage facility. GMAA is a combustible organic liquid which can polymerize exothermically if it is not stored and handled properly. For example, Anderson and Skloss (1992) describe a railroad tank car explosion which resulted from polymerization of GMAA. Potential causes of uncontrolled polymerization include contamination with a polymerization initiator, insufficient or incorrect polymerization inhibitor, insufficient dissolved oxygen in the GMAA (dissolved oxygen is required for the polymerization inhibitor to work), or exposure to external heat. The scope of the QRA was limited to estimation of the risk of uncontrolled polymerization. The results were used to compare two alternate proposed locations for the storage facility within the same manufacturing plant. The analysis focused on estimating the likelihood of a runaway polymerization, and it used simple, extremely conservative consequence and exposure models to place an upper bound on the risk to workers and local population. Upper bound individual and societal risk measures were estimated. Although the main purpose of this risk analysis was as an engineering design tool, the results were compared to Rohm and Haas corporate risk guidelines (Renshaw, 1990). The conclusion of the study was that there was little difference in the risk of polymerization between the two proposed locations, and that the decision could be made based on other factors such as operability and economics. The facility was also determined to meet the risk guidelines. Chlorine Storage and Distribution The second QRA used to evaluate the OECD Risk Assessment Dictionary/Thesaurus was for a chlorine handling facility, done in the mid 1980s. A summary of the risk analysis and its use as a risk management and decision making tool was published by Hendershot (1991). A description of this QRA using the OECD Risk Assessment Dictionary/Thesaurus was also published by Hendershot and Schechter (1997). The QRA was done as part of an expansion project for a plant, which would result in a doubling of chlorine usage, hence increasing the potential risk. The purpose of the QRA was to assist engineers in the selection of an appropriate design for the new and expanded chlorine unloading facility. The scope of this QRA was broader than the GMAA QRA, and it considered a variety of potential chlorine release scenarios. The QRA estimated both individual and societal risk using several risk measures described by CCPS (1989). The results were used to identify the major contributors to risk, and, from that information, to identify design and operational changes in the facility which significantly reduced risks. The tolerability of the estimated risk was evaluated by comparison to the existing facility, and by comparison of the facility design to industry and regulatory standards. 2
4 Dictionary/Thesaurus Application to the GMAA Storage QRA Although the OECD Dictionary/Thesaurus was intended as a tool to aid in understanding risk management policies, risk regulations, and risk assessment methodologies, it can be applied to a specific QRA study. This can help in understanding the methodology of the study, and might be useful in understanding how well a particular study meets the requirements of a risk management policy or regulation. The Dictionary/Thesaurus postulates that all risk assessments include four basic elements: Element I: Element II: Element III: Element IV: Sources with the potential to cause undesired outcomes to subjects of concern Basis for generating possible sequences of events Mode of contact between the potential to cause the undesired outcome and the subjects of concern Basis for estimating the likelihood that specified undesired effects will occur The details of the structure of the Dictionary/Thesaurus are described by Ignatowski, et. al. (1997). Tables 1 through 4 summarize the characterization of the GMAA QRA, including the tools used to fulfill the various elements and subelements used to describe risk analysis processes in the Dictionary/Thesaurus. The descriptions can be summarized as follows: C Element I: Sources with the potential to cause undesired outcomes to subjects of concern: The QRA considered the risk of uncontrolled polymerization, which could cause fatality due to acute toxicity of released vapors or from the potential for explosion of the storage tank. Risk to people was estimated, including on-site and off-site population. C Element II: Basis for generating possible sequences of events Potential accident scenarios were identified based on past experience in the company and industry, and using analytical tools such as Hazard and Operability studies (HAZOP), What If, fault trees, and event trees. C Element III: Mode of contact between the potential to cause the undesired outcome and the subjects of concern The modeling of the mode of contact was done for a worst case bounding case for this QRA. Essentially the assumption was made that any uncontrolled polymerization would result in multiple fatalities in the population of concern. This is an extremely conservative assumption in the incident reported by Anderson and Skloss (1992), for example, there 3
5 were no injuries or fatalities. The undesired outcome was measured in terms of the (worst case) likelihood of fatality at a particular location, and as the worst case estimated number of fatalities. C Element IV: Basis for estimating the likelihood that specified undesired effects will occur Quantitative fault tree analysis and historical data were used to estimate the likelihood of occurrence of the undesired outcome. For this QRA, best estimate data were used, and the uncertainty of the estimates was not evaluated. The analysis was done for the total population, as well as for several sub-groups of interest (for example, on-site employees, nearby residents). Several different individual and societal risk measures were used (CCPS, 1989), and two design options (different locations) were considered to help the process designers select the best overall system. Dictionary/Thesaurus Application to the Chlorine Handling QRA The application of the Dictionary/Thesaurus to the chlorine handling QRA was described in detail by Hendershot and Schechter (1997). The description of the chlorine handling QRA is summarized in Tables 5 through 8 for the four elements of the Dictionary/Thesaurus. Comparison of the Two QRAs Version 2 of the Dictionary/Thesaurus provides some simple reports which allow comparison of one study entry to another. This is potentially valuable in comparing two different regulations or laws, or in comparing a particular study to the requirements of a regulation or law. This reporting facility was used to compare the two QRA studies described. Figures 1 and 2 summarize the results. Basically, the comparison reports show that both studies included consideration of all four elements of a QRA as defined by the Dictionary/Thesaurus (Figure 1). Figure 2 compares the two analyses in more detail and shows that the GMAA QRA did not include a consideration of some subelements. For example, the GMAA QRA did not evaluate the units of the potential which causes the undesired outcome in detail, but, instead, used a simple and conservative (overestimate risk) assumption to provide a worst case estimate of the impact of a runaway polymerization. Also, the GMAA QRA did not evaluate the impact on the results of alternative assumptions (for example, evacuation and escape of the surrounding population) which were considered in the chlorine QRA. Conclusions The OECD Dictionary/Thesaurus provides a logical description of the example QRAs, and documents the assumptions used to do the analyses. The description of the QRA illustrates a sound and logical risk management process and describes the basis for decision making. Work continues on improving the Dictionary/Thesaurus. Data entry in Version 2.0 is less repetitive than in earlier versions through the use of a reference database. Reporting capability continues to 4
6 improve, with the simple comparison reports representing a significant improvement. More detailed comparison reports would be even more useful, and such reports would show more significant differences between the two QRAs described above. Other efforts to improve the utility of the database should focus on further improvements in searching capabilities, to it easier to find specific information. Overall, the Dictionary/Thesaurus is a useful tool for understanding a quantitative risk analysis. Tables 1 through 8 represent a substantial condensation of the actual Dictionary/Thesaurus reports, but they also allow a quick understanding of the basis and assumptions used for the example QRAs. The Dictionary/Thesaurus has potential usefulness in the following areas: C For documenting the basis, tools, and assumptions used for a particular QRA C For understanding the requirements of risk management laws, regulations, and policies C For comparing a particular QRA to the requirements of laws, regulations, or policies C For comparing the methodologies of QRAs done by various organizations or agencies References Anderson, S. E., and R. W. Skloss (1992). More Bang for the Buck: Getting the Most From Accident Investigations. Plant/Operations Progress 11, 3 (July), Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS) (1989). Guidelines for Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis. New York: American Institute of Chemical Engineers. Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS) (1985). Guidelines for Hazard Evaluation Procedures. New York: American Institute of Chemical Engineers. Hendershot, D. C. (1991). The Use of Quantitative Risk Assessment in the Continuing Risk Management of a Chlorine Handling Facility. The Analysis, Communication, and Perception of Risk, ed. B. J. Garrick, and W. C. Gekler, New York: Plenum Press. Hendershot, D. C. and S. J. Schechter (1997). Evaluation of a Proposed Thesaurus/Dictionary for Risk Assessment Using an Industrial Quantitative Risk Analysis International Conference and Workshop on Risk Analysis in Process Safety. October 21-24, 1997, Atlanta, GA New York: American Institute of Chemical Engineers. Ignatowski, A. J., I. Rosenthal, and L. D. Helsing (1997). An Internet Thesaurus/Dictionary for Analyzing Risk Assessment Processes, Laws, and Regulations. International Conference and Workshop on Risk Analysis in Process Safety. October 21-24, 1997, Atlanta, GA New York: American Institute of Chemical Engineers. Kaplan, S. (1997). The Words of Risk Analysis. Risk Analysis 17, 4, Renshaw, F. M. (1990). A Major Accident Prevention Program. Plant/Operations Progress 9, 3 (July), Ross, W. C., and A. J. Ignatowski (1997). OECD Risk Assessment Dictionary/Thesaurus System Instructions and Workbook. Version 2.0. Wharton Risk and Decision Processes Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. (July 1). 5
7 Withers, R. M. J., and F. P. Lees (1985). The Assessment of Major Hazards: The Lethal Toxicity of Chlorine. Parts 1 and 2. Journal of Hazardous Materials 12, 3 (December), and
8 GMAA QRA Element I: Sources with the potential to cause undesired outcomes to subjects of concern Subelement Descriptors I Sources Systems containing reactive chemicals GMAA can self-react (polymerize) exothermically, generating pressure in a closed system such as a storage tank. For example, see Anderson and Skloss (1992). ii Subjects of concern People Nearby residents, employees of neighboring factories and businesses, and on-site workers were considered. iii Undesired outcomes considered People The QRA was done using immediate fatality as the measured outcome. Other potential outcomes (for example, injury, delayed fatality, legal sanctions, economic loss, anxiety) were not considered explicitly in the QRA, although management was certainly aware of them in the decision making process. Table 1: Subelements and Descriptors for Element I for the GMAA QRA 7
9 GMAA QRA Element II: Basis for generating possible sequences of events Subelement Descriptor I Basis for generating accident scenarios Past experience Industry records, company records, professional judgment Technical analysis Fault tree analysis, HAZOP analysis ii Basis for estimating distribution of potential for undesired outcome over space and time Other approaches Assume that any uncontrolled polymerization reaction causes multiple fatalities in each population of concern - worst case conservative assumption. iii Basis for estimating distribution of subjects of concern Other approaches Assume that the subjects of concern are always in a location where they will be impacted by an uncontrolled reaction - worst case conservative assumption. iv Basis for boundaries or endpoints Other approaches Assume that any person in the population of interest will be impacted in case of an uncontrolled reaction - worst case conservative assumption. Table 2: Subelements and Descriptors for Element II for the GMAA QRA 8
10 GMAA QRA Element III: Mode of contact between the potential to cause the undesired outcome and the subjects of concern Subelement Descriptor I Type of contact People Inhalation; explosion overpressure; fireball radiation ii Basis for relationship used to predict undesired outcome People Assume any uncontrolled reaction results in sufficient exposure to impact all members of the population of interest - worst case conservative assumption. iii Measurement units of the potential specified Not specified Conservative worst case assumption results in no need to quantify the potential. iv Measurement units of undesired outcome Total number of outcome events in the specified population Worst case estimated number of deaths; Worst case likelihood of fatality at a particular location Table 3: Subelements and Descriptors for Element III for the Example QRA 9
11 GMAA QRA Element IV: Basis for estimating the likelihood that specified undesired effects will occur Subelement Descriptor I Basis for estimating the likelihood that the undesired events will occur Quantitative assessment Fault tree analysis Historical data Equipment failure rate data and human error rates from various chemical industry databases for use in fault trees Expressions of likelihood of undesired event Quantitative Frequency of uncontrolled polymerization reaction; probability of various sequences of events resulting in various specific outcomes Quality/uncertainty Characterization of estimate Best estimate Undesired effects Specified for a single member of the population Member closest to potential Table 4: Subelements and Descriptors for Element IV for the GMAA QRA (continued on next page) 10
12 GMAA QRA Element IV: Basis for estimating the likelihood that specified undesired effects will occur (continued) Subelement Descriptor ii Comparison with relevant standards and guidelines Type of standard or guideline Comparison of one proposed location to another; comparison to risk guidelines (Renshaw, 1990) Comparison metrics Worst case individual risk Consideration of all practical measures to reduce likelihood of undesired events iii Impact of alternative assumptions Not considered Table 4: Subelements and Descriptors for Element IV for the GMAA QRA (continued from previous page) 11
13 Chlorine QRA Element I: Sources with the potential to cause undesired outcomes to subjects of concern Subelement Descriptors I Sources Substances Toxic to humans The human toxicity of chlorine is well known (Withers and Lees, 1985). Legally defined Although the chlorine inventory in the facility is below the threshold quantity for coverage by the relevant national and local regulations, the fact that chlorine was a listed substance in those regulations identified this facility to Rohm and Haas management as one requiring special attention. Energy Pressure A Rohm and Haas internal prioritization, since published in a modified form (Renshaw, 1990), highlighted the contribution of elevated pressure to the system hazard. ii Subjects of concern People Nearby residents, employees of neighboring factories and businesses, and on-site workers were considered. iii Undesired outcomes considered People The QRA was done using immediate fatality as the measured outcome. Other potential outcomes (for example, injury, delayed fatality, legal sanctions, economic loss, anxiety) were not considered explicitly in the QRA, although management was certainly aware of them in the decision making process. Facilities Sensitive population locations (schools, hospitals, a pedestrian tunnel) were considered in the QRA Table 5: Subelements and Descriptors for Element I for the Chlorine QRA (from Hendershot and Schechter, 1997) 12
14 Chlorine QRA Element II: Basis for generating possible sequences of events Subelement Descriptor I Basis for generating accident scenarios Past experience Insurance and industry records, company records, professional judgment Technical analysis Fault tree analysis, event tree analysis, HAZOP, What If? analyses as defined in the original edition of the CCPS Guidelines for Hazard Evaluation Procedures (CCPS, 1985) ii Basis for estimating distribution of potential for undesired outcome over space and time Technical analysis Event tree analysis PHAST consequence analysis program and SAFETI risk analysis program (from Technica, Inc., now DNV-Technica) iii Basis for estimating distribution of subjects of concern Historical data National census data, plant population data, contact with neighboring plants and businesses to obtain population data iv Basis for boundaries or endpoints Other toxicologically derived endpoints Probit relationship for inhalation toxicity of chlorine (Withers and Lees, 1985) Table 6: Subelements and Descriptors for Element II for the Chlorine QRA (from Hendershot and Schechter, 1997) 13
15 Chlorine QRA Element III: Mode of contact between the potential to cause the undesired outcome and the subjects of concern Subelement Descriptor I Type of contact People Inhalation ii Basis for relationship used to predict undesired outcome People Human epidemiological data, animal data, weighted combination of data (Withers and Lees, 1985) iii Measurement units of the potential specified Concentration of substance over specified time Dose-response relationship over 0-60 minute time period based on Withers and Lees (1985) probit iv Measurement units of undesired outcome Total number of outcome events in the specified population Estimated number of deaths; likelihood of fatality at a particular location Table 7: Subelements and Descriptors for Element III for the Chlorine QRA (from Hendershot and Schechter, 1997) 14
16 Chlorine QRA Element IV: Basis for estimating the likelihood that specified undesired effects will occur Subelement Descriptor I Basis for estimating the likelihood that the undesired events will occur Quantitative assessment Event tree analysis, fault tree analysis, SAFETI risk analysis program, consultant and in-house vapor cloud dispersion models Historical data Equipment failure rate data and human error rates from various chemical industry databases for use in fault tree and event tree analyses Expressions of likelihood of undesired event Quantitative Frequency of releases; probability of various sequences of events resulting in various specific outcomes; probability of specific undesired outcomes at a particular location in a specified time period Quality/uncertainty Characterization of estimate Best estimate Undesired effects Specified for a single member of the population Average member Member closest to potential Members at specified locations (individual risk contour map) Specified for a group of N or more people in the specified population F-N Curve for entire population and specified sub-groups of the population (on-site workers, nearby residents) Table 8: Subelements and Descriptors for Element IV for the Chlorine QRA (from Hendershot and Schechter, 1997) (continued on next page) 15
17 Chlorine QRA Element IV: Basis for estimating the likelihood that specified undesired effects will occur (continued) Subelement Descriptor ii Comparison with relevant standards and guidelines Type of standard or guideline Other standards or guidelines - internal company guideline that the risk of the new facility would not exceed the risk of the existing plant. Comparison metrics Individual risk at specific locations F-N Curves Average individual risk Rate of death Individual risk contours Consideration of all practical measures to reduce magnitude and likelihood of undesired events (case studies for various design options) iii Impact of alternative assumptions Alternative assumptions Impact of sheltering in place was considered Table 8: Subelements and Descriptors for Element IV for the Example QRA (From Hendershot and Schechter, 1997) (continued from previous page) 16
18 Figure 1: Example high level comparison report for the GMAA and chlorine QRAs from the OECD Risk Dictionary/Thesaurus 17
19 Figure 2: More detailed comparison of the GMAA and chlorine QRAs using the comparison report feature of the OECD Risk Assessment Dictionary/Thesaurus 18
Advances in Layer of Protection Analysis. Wayne Chastain, P.E. Eastman Chemical Company
Advances in Layer of Protection Analysis Wayne Chastain, P.E. Eastman Chemical Company Agenda Overview of Layer of Protection Analysis Guidelines for Initiating Events and Independent Protection Layers
More informationWHAT IS A QRA AND WHAT CAN IT TELL YOU?
WHAT IS A QRA AND WHAT CAN IT TELL YOU? Jeffrey D. Marx and John B. Cornwell Presented At Mary Kay O Conner Process Safety Center 2001 Annual Symposium Beyond Regulatory Compliance, Making Safety Second
More informationRegulation DD-12.0: Risk Assessment Study
Regulation DD-12.0: Risk Assessment Study 12.0 Risk Assessment Study 12.1 Guidelines for Conducting Risk Assessment (RA) Study 12.2 Outline for Risk Assessment Study Report 12.3 Specific Fire Protection
More informationThe Challenge of Risk Control in a Hydrogen based Economy, Part I
The Challenge of Risk Control in a Hydrogen based Economy, Part I Hans J. Pasman Chemical Risk Management What are the risks, how can we determine them, How can we avoid, how to reduce, when can we be
More informationRisk Assessments for Fire and Life Safety
Risk Assessments for Fire and Life Safety Cameron Bardas, P.Eng. March 12, 2015 FIRE RESCUE E D M O N T O N What is a Risk Assessment? * Tool used for decision making * Systematic, defensible, measures
More informationProcess Business Risk A methodology for assessing and mitigating the financial impact of process plant accidents
Process Business Risk A methodology for assessing and mitigating the financial impact of process plant accidents Dr Nic Cavanagh Head of Product Management DNV Software, London, UK Nic.Cavanagh@dnv.com
More informationJob Safety Analysis Preparation And Risk Assessment
Job Safety Analysis Preparation And Risk Assessment Sample Only Reference CPL_PCR_JSA_Risk_Assessment Revision Number SAMPLE ONLY Document Owner Sample Date 2015 File Location Procedure Revision Date Major
More informationEvaluating Process Safety in the Chemical Industry
Evaluating Process Safety in the Chemical Industry A USER S GUIDE TO QUANTITATIVE RISK ANALYSIS J. S. Arendt D. K. Lorenzo EQE International, Inc. Knoxville, Tennessee American Chemistry Council 1300 Wilson
More informationControlling Risk Ranking Variability Using a Progressive Risk Registry
Controlling Risk Ranking Variability Using a Progressive Risk Registry 32nd Annual National VPPPA Safety & Health Conference/Expo September 1, 2016 Agenda What is a Progressive Risk Registry? How does
More informationINCIDENT INVESTIGATION FORM
INCIDENT INVESTIGATION FORM This form will help satisfy requirements of 40 CFR 68.60 Incident Investigation for RMP Program 2 facilities. The person responsible for RMP compliance for this facility may
More informationPART 4 QUANTITATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT
PART 4 QUANTITATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT Prof. Arshad Ahmad Email: arshad@utm.my Content QRA Procedure Consequence & Impact Analysis Risk Computation Tolerability Criteria Risk Mitigation & Management 2 QRA
More informationSummary of 2 nd Edition Changes
API-754, Process Safety Performance Indicators for the Refining and Petrochemical Industries, Second Edition Summary of 2 nd Edition Changes Kelly Keim EMRE Global Technology Sponsor for Process Safety
More informationTable of Contents Advantages Disadvantages/Limitations Sources of additional information. Standards, textbooks & web-sites.
Table of Contents Table of Contents 1. Consequence Analysis & Risk Reduction Option Selection 1.1. A description of the techniques, including its purpose 1.1.0.. Introduction 1.1.0.3. Consequence Analysis
More informationUNDERSTANDING RISK TOLERANCE CRITERIA. Paul Baybutt. Primatech Inc., Columbus, Ohio, USA.
UNDERSTANDING RISK TOLERANCE CRITERIA by Paul Baybutt Primatech Inc., Columbus, Ohio, USA www.primatech.com Introduction Various definitions of risk are used by risk analysts [1]. In process safety, risk
More informationPROCEDURE: APPROVAL FOR RISK ASSESSMENT (RA) STUDIES
1. PURPOSE: PROCEDURE: APPROVAL FOR RISK ASSESSMENT (RA) STUDIES The development of projects under the jurisdiction of Trakhees-EHS, that possess a significant risk of Environment, Health & Safety and
More informationTransactions on Ecology and the Environment vol 20, 1998 WIT Press, ISSN
Risk assessment and cost-benefit techniques as management tools for oil spill prevention S. Diller National Oil Spill Contingency Plan Advisor, Petroleos de Venezuela, PDVSA, Caracas, Venezuela. Email:
More informationThe Approach of a Regulatory Authority to the Concept of Risk
The Approach of a Regulatory Authority to the Concept of Risk by H.J. Dunster Risk is a poorly defined term and is commonly used in at least two quite different ways. I shall use risk in a qualitative
More informationPAGE 1 OF 7 HEALTH, SAFETY & ENVIROMENTAL MANUAL PROCEDURE: S220 Hazard Communication Program REV /13/2012
PAGE 1 OF 7 Hazard Communication Program Right to Know PURPOSE: It is the intention of BMT and all of its subsidiary companies to conduct its operations in such a manner that not only complies with health,
More informationACTUAL METHODS ON TECHNOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT
ACTUAL METHODS ON TECHNOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT Marco Nicola Carcassi First European Summer School on Hydrogen Safety Belfast UK, 15th - 21st August 2006 Presentation Outline Technological Risk Categories
More informationRISK ASSESSMENT AND ITS MANAGEMENT IN MINING INDUSTRY
RISK ASSESSMENT AND ITS MANAGEMENT IN MINING INDUSTRY *Ram Prasad Choudhary Department of Mining Engineering, National Institute of Technology Karnataka, Surathkal-575025 *Author for Correspondence ABSTRACT
More informationApplication of Aramis developed in the framework of SEVESOII directive to the Canadian Context
Application of Aramis developed in the framework of SEVESOII directive to the Canadian Context Jean-Paul Lacoursière, P.E. Université de Sherbrooke Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada 1 Presentation Content Introduction
More informationRISK ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA OR HOW SAFE IS SAFE ENOUGH?
RISK ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA OR HOW SAFE IS SAFE ENOUGH? John B. Cornwell and Mark M. Meyer Presented At II Risk Control Seminar Petróleos de Venezuela Puerto La Cruz, Venezuela October 13, 1997 Presented
More informationCEPA S200 The Risk-based Approach
CEPA S200 The Risk-based Approach Presented by Ertugrul Alp, Ph.D., P.Eng. February 24, 2004 Toronto, Ontario Incorporated Change Agents in Risk Management, Specialists in Risk Assessment 87 Topham Crescent,
More informationRISK EVALUATIONS FOR THE CLASSIFICATION OF MARINE-RELATED FACILITIES
GUIDE FOR RISK EVALUATIONS FOR THE CLASSIFICATION OF MARINE-RELATED FACILITIES JUNE 2003 American Bureau of Shipping Incorporated by Act of Legislature of the State of New York 1862 Copyright 2003 American
More informationSubchapter 7. General Industry Safety Orders Group 16. Control of Hazardous Substances Article 109. Hazardous Substances and Processes
Subchapter 7. General Industry Safety Orders Group 16. Control of Hazardous Substances Article 109. Hazardous Substances and Processes 5191. Occupational Exposure to Hazardous Chemicals in Laboratories.
More informationMUPSA Methodology: Future Developments & Safety Goals
MUPSA Methodology: Future Developments & Safety Goals Presentation at the IAEA Consultancy Meeting on Multi-Unit Probabilistic Safety Assessment Vienna, Austria October 16-18, 2017 Mohammad Modarres Center
More informationGuidance for Analysis Required by COMAR Hazardous Material Security
Guidance for Analysis Required by COMAR 26.27.01 Hazardous Material Security 1.0 Prioritization of security threats, vulnerabilities, and consequences 1.1 Exclusions 1.1.1 Facilities in Baltimore City
More informationLAND-USE PLANNING REGULATIONS IN FRANCE AFTER THE TOULOUSE DISASTER
LAND-USE PLANNING REGULATIONS IN FRANCE AFTER THE TOULOUSE DISASTER Jérôme TAVEAU Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety Industrial Risks, Fire and Containment Assessment and Study Department
More informationGUIDE BUSINESS & INDUSTRY A STEP-BY-STEP APPROACH TO EMERGENCY PLANNING, RESPONSE AND RECOVERY FOR COMPANIES OF ALL SIZES
GUIDE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT GUIDE FOR BUSINESS & INDUSTRY A STEP-BY-STEP APPROACH TO EMERGENCY PLANNING, RESPONSE AND RECOVERY FOR COMPANIES OF ALL SIZES Sponsored by a Public-Partnership with the Federal
More informationClassification Based on Performance Criteria Determined from Risk Assessment Methodology
OFFSHORE SERVICE SPECIFICATION DNV-OSS-121 Classification Based on Performance Criteria Determined from Risk Assessment Methodology OCTOBER 2008 This document has been amended since the main revision (October
More informationAPPLICATION OF FORMAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT IN THE LEGAL ACTIVITY OF INTERNATIONAL MARITIME
Journal of KONES Powertrain and Transport, Vol. 21, No. 4 2014 ISSN: 1231-4005 e-issn: 2354-0133 ICID: 1130510 DOI: 10.5604/12314005.1130510 APPLICATION OF FORMAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT IN THE LEGAL ACTIVITY
More informationRISK ANALYSIS AND MODELING
RISK ANALYSIS AND MODELING Mohammad Modarres Minta Martin Professor of Engineering Director, Reliability Engineering Program Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Maryland, College Park, MD
More informationFrumkin, 2e Part 5: The Practice of Environmental Health. Chapter 29: Risk Assessment
Frumkin, 2e Part 5: The Practice of Environmental Health Chapter 29: Risk Assessment Risk Assessment Risk assessment is the process of identifying and evaluating adverse events that could occur in defined
More informationAppendix C Title Occupational Exposure to Hazardous Chemicals in Laboratories. Found at:
Appendix C Title 8 5191 Occupational Exposure to Hazardous Chemicals in Laboratories Found at: http://www.dir.ca.gov/title8/5191.html Subchapter 7. General Industry Safety Orders Group 16. Control of Hazardous
More informationA Streamlined Approach for Full Compliance with SIF Implementation Standards
A Streamlined Approach for Full Compliance with SIF Implementation Standards William G. Bridges, President PROCESS IMPROVEMENT INSTITUTE, INC. (PII) 1321 Waterside Lane, Knoxville, TN 37922 Phone: (865)
More informationAPPLICATION OF LOPA AND SIL ASSESSMENT TO A NEW COMAH PLANT
APPLICATION OF LOPA AND ASSESSMENT TO A NEW COMAH PLANT Jerry Mullins Principal Consultant, Abbott Risk Consulting, Manchester, UK High hazard industries such as those regulated by COMAH face a number
More informationGUIDELINE ACTIVITY RISK MANAGEMENT GUIDELINE
GUIDELINE ACTIVITY RISK MANAGEMENT GUIDELINE Contact Officer Director, Risk Management Purpose The risk management process can be complex and requires the exercise of good judgement. This guideline provides
More informationRISKTOPICS DISCUSSION. Product Design January 2013
RISKTOPICS Product Design January 2013 Design is an extremely important phase of a Product Liability Prevention Program because it is the only phase where defects can be corrected efficiently and effectively.
More informationThe PWCS Hazard Communication Program shall include provisions for the following:
Hazard Communication Program In accordance with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Hazard Communication Standard, 29 CFR 1910.1200, Subpart Z, Prince William County Public Schools
More informationQuantitative Risk Assessment Process of Fuel Assembly Retrieval from Spent Fuel Pool in Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning
PSA 2017 September 25-28, 2017 Quantitative Risk Assessment Process of Fuel Assembly Retrieval from Spent Fuel Pool in Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Presented by Akira Yamaguchi
More informationHow potential exposures may be incorporated in IAEA Safety Standards
How potential exposures may be incorporated in Safety Standards Diego Telleria NSRW- Meeting of INPRO ENV POTENTIAL CIEMAT, Madrid, April 2014 International Atomic Energy Agency REQUIREMENTS FOR ASSESSMENT
More informationDEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS DIRECTOR'S OFFICE GENERAL INDUSTRY AND CONSTRUCTION SAFETY AND OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH STANDARD STANDARDS
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS DIRECTOR'S OFFICE GENERAL INDUSTRY AND CONSTRUCTION SAFETY AND OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH STANDARD STANDARDS Filed with the secretary of state on These rules take
More informationDepartment of Defense Explosives Safety Board (DDESB)
Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board (DDESB) Explosives Safety Munitions Risk Management (ESMRM) Technical Paper 23- DoD Explosives Safety And Munitions Risk Management: Acquisition Lifecycle
More informationDetermination process for a major hazard facility
Guidance Note Determination process Information for operators of dangerous goods sites on how WorkSafe determines if the site is a major hazard facility. March 2011 1. Introduction 1 1.1. Concepts of determination
More informationRisk and safety Part 2: Risk analysis and safety measures
Risk and safety Part 2: Risk analysis and safety measures EPA1132 Technology development and impact assessment Frank Guldenmund, Safety Science & Security Group, Faculty TPM Overview 1. Risk analysis (con?nued)
More informationclient user GUIDE 2011
client user GUIDE 2011 STEP ACTION Accessing Risk Register 1. Type https://www.scm rms.ca/riskregister/login.aspx 2. Click in the Username field on the Risk Register home page. 3. Type your Username and
More informationANOTHER LOOK AT RISK AND STRUCTURAL RELIABILITY CRITERIA
ANOTHER LOOK AT RISK AND STRUCTURAL RELIABILITY CRITERIA V.M. Trbojevic, Risk Support Ltd., UK Abstract The paper presents a comparison of societal risk criteria and the several structural reliability
More informationFOOD SAFETY RISK ANALYSIS
Appendix D FOOD SAFETY RISK ANALYSIS 1.0 RISK IN FOOD PROCESSING 1.1 Risk Analysis 1.2 Risk Assessment 1.3 When to do a Risk Assessment 1.4 Risk Assessment and HACCP 1.5 The Health Risk Assessment Model
More informationThe Role of the COMAH Safety Report in Improving Health, Safety and Environmental Performance at a Chemical Processing Site
The Role of the COMAH Safety Report in Improving Health, Safety and Environmental Performance at a Chemical Processing Site Michael Beanland BSc CEng MIMechE MIOSH ABB Eutech Process Solutions SYNOPSIS
More informationUsing Tolerable Risk to Drive Asset Management Decision Making
Using Tolerable Risk to Drive Asset Management Decision Making Richmond, Virginia May 12, 2016 1 Principal Asset Management Consultant with GHD and has over 25 years experience in utility management. Nationally
More informationANSI API RP-754. June 6, Quarterly Webinar. Process Safety Performance Indicators for the Refining and Petrochemical Industries
ANSI API RP-754 Quarterly Webinar June 6, 2017 Process Safety Performance Indicators for the Refining and Petrochemical Industries 1 Purpose of Industry Learning & Outreach Quarterly Webinars To support
More informationUncertainty aspects in process safety analysis
Uncertainty aspects in process safety analysis A.S. Markowski*,M.S. Mannan**, A.Bigoszewska* and D. Siuta* *Process and Ecological Safety Division Faculty of Process and Environmental Engineering Technical
More informationRisk Check: Applying Community Risk Reduction Strategies To Enforcement Inspections
2017 NFPA Conference & Expo Risk Check: Applying Community Risk Reduction Strategies To Enforcement Inspections Presented by: David Lynam Fire Marshal / Deputy Building Official Kitsap County What To Expect
More informationUsing Monte Carlo Analysis in Ecological Risk Assessments
10/27/00 Page 1 of 15 Using Monte Carlo Analysis in Ecological Risk Assessments Argonne National Laboratory Abstract Monte Carlo analysis is a statistical technique for risk assessors to evaluate the uncertainty
More informationAN APPROACH TO THE SAFE MANAGEMENT OF THE STORAGE OF MILITARY EXPLOSIVES BASED ON QUANTITATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT
AN APPROACH TO THE SAFE MANAGEMENT OF THE STORAGE OF MILITARY EXPLOSIVES BASED ON QUANTITATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT DR J CONNOR CHAIRMAN, EXPLOSIVES STORAGE AND TRANSPORT COMMITTEE, MODUK INTRODUCTION 1. The
More informationMAKING THE BUSINESS CASE FOR PROCESS SAFETY USING VALUE-AT-RISK CONCEPTS
MAKING THE BUSINESS CASE FOR PROCESS SAFETY USING VALUE-AT-RISK CONCEPTS A Thesis by JAYMING SHA FANG Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements
More informationThe Inexact Science of Risk Assessment (and Implications for Risk Management)
Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 245-251 (1998) The Inexact Science of Risk Assessment (and Implications for Risk Management) Susan Felter and Michael Dourson Toxicology Excellence
More informationMethodology for risk analysis in railway tunnels using Monte Carlo simulation
673 Methodology for risk analysis in railway tunnels using Monte Carlo simulation G. Vanorio & J. M. Mera Technical University of Madrid, Spain Abstract In the context of safety analyses for railway tunnels,
More informationSemiquantitative Risk Evaluation Methods
Semiquantitative Risk Evaluation Methods An EPSC Working Group Ulrich Hörcher 1 Information about the Working Group Basics of Semiquantitative Risk Evaluation (SQRA) Discussion of Risk Matrices from Members
More informationIntroduction to Quantitative Risk Assessment
Introduction to Quantitative Risk Assessment Webinar June 2017 14 June 2017 1 SAFER, SMARTER, GREENER Speakers Speakers Kenny Shaba Phast and Safeti Product Manager with extensive experience in Technical
More informationCHALLENGES IN USING LOPA TO DETERMINE SAFETY INTEGRITY LEVELS (SILS)
CHALLENGES IN USING LOPA TO DETERMINE SAFETY INTEGRITY LEVELS (SILS) by Paul Baybutt paulb@primatech.com www.primatech.com 1 Presented at the American Institute of Chemical Engineers 10th Global Congress
More informationCase study: Business risks in an oil refinery
Creating value from uncertainty Broadleaf Capital International Pty Ltd ABN 24 054 021 117 www.broadleaf.com.au Case study: Business risks in an oil refinery We conducted a risk assessment for the management
More informationIAEA-TECDOC Risk informed regulation of nuclear facilities: Overview of the current status
IAEA-TECDOC-1436 Risk informed regulation of nuclear facilities: Overview of the current status February 2005 IAEA SAFETY RELATED PUBLICATIONS IAEA SAFETY STANDARDS Under the terms of Article III of its
More information(Ord ) Chapter RISK MANAGEMENT Background and findings Purpose and goals. Page 1.
Chapter 450-8 - RISK MANAGEMENT Sections: 450-8.002 - Background and findings. The board of supervisors of Contra Costa County finds as follows: (a) Recent incidents in Contra Costa County at industrial
More informationTEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY HAZARD COMMUNICATION PROGRAM. For Texas A&M University Employees Subject to the Texas Hazard Communication Act
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY HAZARD COMMUNICATION PROGRAM For Texas A&M University Employees Subject to the Texas Hazard Communication Act Revised November 2016 I. GENERAL INFORMATION: 2 II. EXEMPTIONS 4 III.
More informationDirector Risk & Reliability, HSB Professional Loss Control
Cost-Benefit Analysis of Fire Risk Reduction Alternatives Thomas F. Barry, P.E. Director Risk & Reliability, HSB Professional Loss Control The term fire risk reduction is defined as the application of
More informationCHAPTER 31 - HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES ORDINANCE OF DUBUQUE COUNTY, IOWA. Adopted October 26, 1987 Amended October 19, Part 1 Introduction...
CHAPTER 31 - HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES ORDINANCE OF DUBUQUE COUNTY, IOWA Adopted October 26, 1987 Amended October 19, 2009 Table of Contents Page Part 1 Introduction...2 31-1 Purpose...2 31-2 Definitions...2
More informationSIL and Functional Safety some lessons we still have to learn.
SIL and Functional Safety some lessons we still have to learn. David Craig, Amec This paper reflects AMEC s recent experience in undertaking functional safety assessments (FSA) (audits against IEC 61511)
More informationWhat is LOPA and Why Should I Care?
What is LOPA and Why Should I Care? John M. Johnson Risk Management Professionals U.S. (877) 532-0806 www.rmpcorp.com John M. Johnson Risk Management Professionals Chemical Engineering B.S. University
More information(Ord. No N.S., I, ; Ord. No N.S., I, )
Chapter 6.43 - INDUSTRIAL SAFETY Sections: 6.43.010 - Summary. This chapter imposes regulations which supplement the requirements of California Health and Safety Code, Article 2 (commencing with Section
More informationThe Concept of Risk and its Role in Rational Decision Making on Nuclear Safety Issues
The Concept of Risk and its Role in Rational Decision Making on Nuclear Safety Issues George Apostolakis Head, Nuclear Risk Research Center apostola@criepi.denken.or.jp NRRC Symposium September 2, 1 1
More informationRisk assessments of contemporary accidents in construction industry
Risk assessments of contemporary accidents in construction industry Michal Kraus 1,* 1 Institute of Technology and Business in České Budějovice, Department of Civil Engineering, 70 01 České Budějovice,
More informationTHE NATIONAL SHIPBUILDING RESEARCH PROGRAM
SHIP PRODUCTION COMMITTEE FACILITIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS SURFACE PREPARATION AND COATINGS DESIGN/PRODUCTION INTEGRATION HUMAN RESOURCE INNOVATION MARINE INDUSTRY STANDARDS WELDING INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
More informationInsurance Claims for Recovery of Environmental Cleanup Costs
245 Fischer Avenue, Suite D-2 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Tel. +1.714.770.8040 Web: www.aquilogic.com April 2014 Insurance Claims for Recovery of Environmental Cleanup Costs Introduction Environmental Damage
More informationReport of the informal working group on the reduction of the risk of a BLEVE
INF.9 Economic Commission for Europe Inland Transport Committee Working Party on the Transport of Dangerous Goods 18 July 2014 Joint Meeting of the RID Committee of Experts and the Working Party on the
More informationMETHODOLOGY FOR MEASURING THE OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY RISKS IN TOURISM COMPANIES
METHODOLOGY FOR MEASURING THE OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY RISKS IN TOURISM COMPANIES Biljana Gjorgjeska, Ph.D., Associate Professor University "Gone Delco", Faculty of Medical Sciences, Štip, Republic
More informationHazard Identification and Risk Assessment by Qualitative and Quantitative methods
This work by IJARBEST is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Available at https://www.ijarbest.com Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment by Qualitative and Quantitative
More informationDilemmas in risk assessment
Dilemmas in risk assessment IRS, Stockholm www.irisk.se Perspectives: Accidents & Safety Industry Occupational safety Medical services Transport Energy etc. Themes Terminology and concepts Risk assessment
More information1. Define risk. Which are the various types of risk?
1. Define risk. Which are the various types of risk? Risk, is an integral part of the economic scenario, and can be termed as a potential event that can have opportunities that benefit or a hazard to an
More information5.- RISK ANALYSIS. Business Plan
5.- RISK ANALYSIS The Risk Analysis module is an educational tool for management that allows the user to identify, analyze and quantify the risks involved in a business project on a specific industry basis
More informationDevelopment of a Post-Consequence Model (PCoM) for Aircraft Accident Severity Assessment
Thesis Defense Presentation Rutgers University Development of a Post-Consequence Model (PCoM) for Aircraft Accident Severity Assessment by Denise Marie Andres Thesis Advisor: Dr. James Luxhøj Introduction
More informationManaging Risks with Hazardous Substances. DPLE 154 May 17, 2017
Managing Risks with Hazardous Substances DPLE 154 May 17, 2017 RLI Design Professionals is a Registered Provider with The American Institute of Architects Continuing Education Systems. Credit earned on
More informationISSUES IN DEVELOPING AND USING RISK TOLERANCE CRITERIA
ISSUES IN DEVELOPING AND USING RISK TOLERANCE CRITERIA by Paul Baybutt, Primatech Inc. 1 Presented at the 2013 AIChE Spring Meeting 9th Global Congress on Process Safety San Antonio, Texas April 28 May
More informationTitle: Environmental, Health and Safety Revision No.: 4 Effective Date: January 1, 2017
Notice: A printed copy of this document may not be the latest version. Always check online (L3 Internal Homepage, click Company Policies ) for latest version. Copyright by L3 Technologies, Inc. 2017 Corporate
More informationProcess Safety and Loss Management
Process Safety and Loss Management Session 6 Hazard and Risk Assessment, Frequency and Consequence Analysis Techniques 51 st Chemical Engineering Conference October, 2001 Halifax, Nova Scotia Chair: Ertugrul
More informationRisk Management Policy and Framework
Risk Management Policy and Framework Risk Management Policy Statement ALS recognises that the effective management of risks is a fundamental component of good corporate governance and is vital for the
More informationFAQ SHEET - LAYERS OF PROTECTION ANALYSIS (LOPA)
FAQ SHEET - LAYERS OF PROTETION ANALYSIS (LOPA) Acronyms and Abbreviations Used ANSI - American National Standards Institute IPL - Independent Protection Layer ISA - International Society for Automation
More informationTangible Assets Threats and Hazards: Risk Assessment and Management in the Port Domain
Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering 5 (2017) 271-278 doi: 10.17265/2328-2142/2017.05.004 D DAVID PUBLISHING Tangible Assets Threats and Hazards: Risk Assessment and Management in the Port
More informationChapter 7: Risk. Incorporating risk management. What is risk and risk management?
Chapter 7: Risk Incorporating risk management A key element that agencies must consider and seamlessly integrate into the TAM framework is risk management. Risk is defined as the positive or negative effects
More informationRisk-Based Corrective Action (RBCA) for UST Sites
PDHonline Course C328 (1 PDH) Risk-Based Corrective Action (RBCA) for UST Sites Instructor: Harlan H. Bengtson, Ph.D., PE 2012 PDH Online PDH Center 5272 Meadow Estates Drive Fairfax, VA 22030-6658 Phone
More informationREPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE
REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions,
More informationGuidance on. Significant Modifications. Under the. COMAH Regulations
Guidance on Significant Modifications Under the COMAH Regulations 1 P age Table of Contents Glossary of terms... 3 The COMAH Regulations... 4 Purpose of this Guidance... 4 Acknowledgements... 4 What is
More informationRisk Assessment Avoiding the Low Probability High Severity Event
Risk Assessment Avoiding the Low Probability High Severity Event Presenter: Diana M. Stegall, CSP, CFPS, ARM, ALCM, CPCU Loss Control Technical Consultant United Heartland ASSE Region V Vice President
More informationDriving Consistency in the Estimation of Severity Levels in PHA Studies Richard Piette, M.Sc.E., CPSP, MCIC, P.Eng. October CSChE Conference 2016,
Driving Consistency in the Estimation of Severity Levels in PHA Studies Richard Piette, M.Sc.E., CPSP, MCIC, P.Eng. October CSChE Conference 2016, Quebec City ADVISORIES Forward-Looking Statements This
More informationBasics of Quality Risk Management. CBE Pty Ltd
Basics of Quality Risk Management CBE Pty Ltd This training program is copyright to CBE Pty Ltd and may not be modified, reproduced, sold, loaned, hired or traded in any form without its express written
More informationRe: Generic Land-use Planning Advice for Gouldings Fertilisers at Stokestown, New Ross, Co. Wexford
Planning Department, Wexford County Council, County Hall, Spawell Road, Wexford Our Ref: Letter ID 46942 19 th April 2012 A Chara, Re: Generic Land-use Planning Advice for Gouldings Fertilisers at Stokestown,
More informationPART XIII. WORKER AND COMMUNITY RIGHT-TO-KNOW ACT
PART XIII. WORKER AND COMMUNITY RIGHT-TO-KNOW ACT Chap. Sec. 301. JURISDICTION, DEFINITIONS, EXEMPTIONS AND ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS... 301.1 303. PREPARATION OF HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARD
More informationPANAMA MARITIME AUTHORITY
PANAMA MARITIME AUTHORITY MERCHANT MARINE CIRCULAR MMC-213 PanCanal Building Albrook, Panama City Republic of Panama Tel: (507) 501-5000 segumar@segumar.com To: Ship-owners/Operators, Company Security
More informationDemonstrating Continuous Risk Reduction
Demonstrating Continuous Risk Reduction Alastair Bird 1, Angus Lyon 1, and Volton Edwards 2 1 DNV 2 bp Trinidad and Tobago Measurement of risk at large industrial sites has generally been achieved through
More information