9.24 Village of Afton

Transcription

1 9.24 Village of Afton This section presents the jurisdictional annex for the Village of Afton Hazard Mitigation Plan Point of Contact The following individuals have been identified as the hazard mitigation plan s primary and alternate points of contact. Primary Point of Contact Gerry Matthews, Trustee PO Box 26, Afton, NY Phone: gmatthews@stny.rr.com Alternate Point of Contact Sally Muller, Mayor PO Box 26, Afton, NY Phone: Municipal Profile This section provides a summary of the community. Population According to the U.S. Census, the 2010 population for the Village was 822. Location The Village of Afton is the commercial and residential center of the Town of Afton. The Village is on the west bank of the Susquehanna River at the junction of the junction of NYS Routes 7 and 41. The Village is 24 miles north of the City of Binghamton, N.Y. and only 170 miles west of New York City. Brief History Afton traces its history back to the Sullivan-Clinton Expedition in 1779 to clear the Susquehanna Valley of Indians. The first settlement in the area was around 1786, and the settlement which is now Village of Afton was known as South Jericho. Afton was named for Afton Water after a small river in Ayrshire, England and the Village was incorporated from the Town of Afton in Governing Body Format The Village of Afton is governed by an elected five member Village Board of Trustees, composed of a Mayor and four (4) Trustees. This governing body will assume responsibility for adoption and implementation of this plan. The Village operates a water distribution system and has two volunteer boards: Planning and Zoning Board of Appeals. Growth/Development Trends The following table summarizes major residential/commercial development and major infrastructure development that are identified for the next five (5) years in the municipality. Refer to the map in section of this annex which illustrates the hazard areas along with the location of potential new development. Table Growth and Development Property Name Constitution Pipeline (see details following) Type (Residential or Commercial) Number of Structures Parcel ID(s) Known Hazard Zone* Description / Status Commercial N/A TBD TBD Proposed DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Chenango County, New York

2 * Only location-specific hazard zones or vulnerabilities identified. Constitution Pipeline A natural gas pipeline to deliver NG from Susquehanna County, PA to a tie in point in Schoharie County NY. The pipeline will run through the towns of Afton and Bainbridge in Chenango County. This will facilitate the build out of distribution lines into both the Village of Afton and Bainbridge and into portions of both towns. Construction is expected to begin in September of 2015 assuming DEC approval Natural Hazard Event History Specific to the Municipality Chenango County has a history of natural and non-natural hazard events as detailed in Volume I, Section 5.0 of this plan. A summary of historical events is provided in each of the hazard profiles and includes a chronology of events that have affected the County and its municipalities. The table below presents a summary of natural events that have occurred to indicate the range and impact of natural hazard events in the community. Information regarding specific damages is included if available based on reference material or local sources. For details of events prior to 2008, refer to Volume I, Section 5.0 of this plan. Table Hazard Event History Dates of Event September 7-11, 2011 August 26 September 5, 2011 Notes: Event Type Tropical Storm Lee Hurricane Irene FEMA Declaration # (If Applicable) DR-4031 EM-3341 DR-4020 EM-3328 County Designated? Yes - IA, PA No Summary of Damages/Losses Village of Afton DPW closed street (Rte. 41 North) due to bridge damage. Village water supply wellhouse on East Main St. (NYS Rte.41) was flooded 9/11/11. Several days later the wellhouse electronics were out of order due to condensation inside. The system was operated manually until February Some water services were shut down due to flooding inside private homes. Dougherty residence on East Main St. flooded. Iaia house on Evelyn Ave. flooded. Bank below house on Roberts Road washed out endangering Merrill house. Six (6) project worksheets submitted. (1) Category (Cat.) A; (2) Cat. B; (1) Cat. C; (1) Cat. F; (1) Cat. G. Many volunteer hours. Village of Afton DPW closed street (Rte. 41 North) due to bridge damage. Some water services were shut down due to flooding inside private homes. Dougherty residence on East Main St. flooded. Iaia house on Evelyn Ave. flooded. Bank below house on Roberts Road washed out endangering Merrill house. Six (6) project worksheets submitted. (1) Category (Cat.) A; (2) Cat. B; (1) Cat. C; (1) Cat. F; (1) Cat. G. Many volunteer hours. EM Emergency Declaration (FEMA) FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency DR Major Disaster Declaration (FEMA) IA Individual Assistance N/A Not applicable PA Public Assistance Hazard Vulnerabilities and Ranking The hazard profiles in Section 5.0 of this plan have detailed information regarding each plan participant s vulnerability to the identified hazards. The following summarizes the hazard vulnerabilities and their ranking in the Village of Afton. For additional vulnerability information relevant to this jurisdiction, refer to Section 5.0. DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Chenango County, New York

3 Hazard Risk/Vulnerability Risk Ranking The table below summarizes the hazard risk/vulnerability rankings of potential hazards for Village of Afton. Table Hazard Risk/Vulnerability Risk Ranking Hazard type Estimate of Potential Dollar Losses to Structures Vulnerable to the Hazard a Probability of Occurrence c Risk Ranking Score (Probability x Impact) Hazard Ranking b Drought Damage estimate not available Occasional 14 Medium Extreme Temperature Damage estimate not available Frequent 21 Medium Flood 1% Annual Chance: $7,587,000 Frequent Year MRP: $0 Severe Storm 500-year MRP: $12,189 Frequent 48 Annualized: $254 Winter Storm 1% GBS: $0 5% GBS: $0 Frequent 30 Medium Wildfire Estimated Value in the WUI: $110,021,000 Occasional 28 Medium Infestation Damage estimate not available Frequent 39 Low Natural Gas Damage estimate not available Frequent 21 Medium a. Building damage ratio estimates based on FEMA (August 2001) b. The valuation of general building stock and loss estimates was based on the custom inventory developed for Chenango County and probabilistic modeling results and exposure analysis as discussed in Section 5. c. Frequent = Hazard event is likely to occur within 25 years. Occasional = Hazard event is likely to occur within 100 years Rare = Hazard event is not likely to occur within 100 years d. The estimated potential losses for Severe Storm are from the HAZUS-MH probabilistic hurricane wind model results. See footnote c. GBS = General building stock MRP = Mean return period RCV = Replacement cost value National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Summary The following table summarizes the NFIP statistics for the municipality. Table NFIP Summary Municipality # Policies (1) # Claims (Losses) (1) Total Loss Payments (2) # Rep. Loss Prop. (1) # Severe Rep. Loss Prop. (1) # Policies in the 1% Flood Boundary (3) Village of Afton $554, Source: FEMA Region 2, 2014 (1) Policies, claims, repetitive loss and severe repetitive loss statistics provided by FEMA Region 2, and are current as of April 30, Please note the total number of repetitive loss properties includes the severe repetitive loss properties. The number of claims represents claims closed by 4/30/2014. (2) Total building and content losses from the claims file provided by FEMA Region 2. (3) The policies inside and outside of the flood zones is based on the latitude and longitude provided by FEMA Region 2 in the policy file. Notes: FEMA noted that where there is more than one entry for a property, there may be more than one policy in force or more than one GIS possibility. A zero percentage denotes less than 1/100th percentage and not zero damages or vulnerability as may be the case. Critical Facilities The table below presents HAZUS-MH estimates of the damage and loss of use to critical facilities in the community as a result of a 1-percent annual chance flood event. DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Chenango County, New York

4 Table Potential Flood Losses to Critical Facilities Name Municipality Type Village of Afton Well and Pump Potable Afton (V) House Water Afton Edge Apartment Senior Housing Afton Country Store Exposure 1% Event Percent Structure Damage X 40 Potential Loss from 1% Flood Event Percent Content Damage Afton (V) Senior X Afton (V) User Defined X Days to 100- Percent (2) Source: HAZUS-MH 2.1 Note: NA = Not applicable; NP = Not provided by HAZUS; x = Facility located within the DFIRM boundary. - = No results generated in HAZUS. Please note it is assumed the wells have electrical equipment and openings are three-feet above grade. (1) HAZUS-MH 2.1 provides a general indication of the maximum restoration time for 100% operations. Clearly, a great deal of effort is needed to quickly restore essential facilities to full functionality; therefore this will be an indication of the maximum downtime (HAZUS-MH 2.1 User Manual). (2) In some cases, a facility may be located in the DFIRM flood hazard boundary; however HAZUS did not calculate potential loss. This may be because the depth of flooding does not amount to any damages to the structure according to the depth damage function used in HAZUS for that facility type. Other Vulnerabilities Identified by Municipality A pre-existing floodway has been reduced by the NYS Rte. 88 access ramp. The 24 inch culvert does not adequately allow water to flow freely through the area. Over the years sandbars have developed in the Susquehanna River diverting the water flow into the east side of the river bank. This has caused considerable erosion with the potential to damage Village infrastructure Capability Assessment This section identifies the following capabilities of the local jurisdiction: Planning and regulatory capability Administrative and technical capability Fiscal capability Community classification National Flood Insurance Program Integration of Mitigation Planning into Existing and Future Planning Mechanisms Planning and Regulatory Capability The table below summarizes the regulatory tools that are available to the municipality. Table Planning and Regulatory Tools Tool / Program (code, ordinance, plan) Do you have this? (Y/N) Authority (local, county, state, federal) Dept. /Agency Responsible Building Code Y Local, County, State Handled by County Code Citation and Comments (Code Chapter, date of adoption, name of plan, explanation of authority, etc.) NYS-International Fire & Building Codes Zoning Ordinance Y Local Adopted 1976 Subdivision Ordinance Y Local Adopted 1976 Flood Damage Prevention Village Floodplain Y Federal, State, Local Ordinance (per NFIP) Administrator Adopted June 1991 Amended September 1, 2010 DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Chenango County, New York

5 Tool / Program (code, ordinance, plan) Do you have this? (Y/N) Authority (local, county, state, federal) NFIP - Freeboard Y State, Local NFIP - Cumulative Substantial Damages Growth Management Floodplain Management / Basin Plan Stormwater Management Plan/Ordinance Comprehensive Plan / Master Plan Capital Improvements Plan Site Plan Review Requirements Habitat Conservation Plan Economic Development Plan Emergency Response Plan N N N Y N N Local, State Dept. /Agency Responsible Village Floodplain Administrator NYSDEC permits required for any major construction projects Y Local Village Board N Y Y Local Local, County, State By Non-profit Development Afton Fire District/Chenango County EMS Chenango County EMS Code Citation and Comments (Code Chapter, date of adoption, name of plan, explanation of authority, etc.) State mandated BFE+2 for single and two-family residential construction, BFE+1 for all other construction types. Zoning/ Subdivision Regulations State Mandated Post Disaster Recovery Plan Y County Post Disaster Recovery Ordinance N Real Estate Disclosure req. Y Local/ State State Mandated Other (e.g. steep slope ordinance, local Village Incorporated with Zoning Y Local waterfront revitalization Government regulations plan) (1) Chenango County Planning Commission has review authority on certain actions. If they disapprove an action, local Zoning Board can approve with a greater majority and present findings. (2) NYS Subdivision laws provide a general framework, but allow room for local ordinances and interpretation. Administrative and Technical Capability The table below summarizes potential staff and personnel resources available to the Village of Afton. Table Administrative and Technical Capabilities Staff/ Personnel Resources Planner(s) or Engineer(s) with knowledge of land development and land management practices Engineer(s) or Professional(s) trained in construction practices related to buildings and/or infrastructure Planners or engineers with an understanding of natural hazards Available (Y or N) Department/ Agency/Position Y Y Y County Planning & Development County way Engineer for highway, drainage support County Planning & Development NFIP Floodplain Administrator Y Richard Metzger, Code Enforcement Officer Surveyor(s) Y County way Department DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Chenango County, New York

6 Available Staff/ Personnel Resources (Y or N) Department/ Agency/Position Personnel skilled or trained in GIS applications Y County Planning & Development Scientist familiar with natural hazards in the County. Y Chenango County Soil and Water Department Emergency Manager Y Chenango County Emergency Management Office in conjunction with Afton Fire Department Grant Writer(s) Y Consultant on Retainer Staff with expertise or training in benefit/cost analysis Y Contract if necessary Fiscal Capability The table below summarizes financial resources available to the Village of Afton. Table Fiscal Capabilities Financial Resources Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) Capital Improvements Project Funding Authority to Levy Taxes for specific purposes User fees for water, sewer, gas or electric service Impact Fees for homebuyers or developers of new development/homes Incur debt through general obligation bonds Incur debt through special tax bonds Incur debt through private activity bonds Withhold public expenditures in hazard-prone areas Federal and State grant programs (e.g. FEMA, NYS DHSES, NYSDEC) Other Accessible or Eligible to Use (Yes/No/Don t Know) Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No No Yes No Community Classifications The table below summarizes classifications for community program available to the Village of Afton. Table Community Classifications Program Classification Date Classified Community Rating System (CRS) NP N/A Building Code Effectiveness Grading Schedule (BCEGS) Public Protection Storm Ready NP N/A Firewise NP N/A N/A = Not applicable. NP = Not participating. - = Unavailable. TBD = To be determined. TBD TBD The classifications listed above relate to the community s ability to provide effective services to lessen its vulnerability to the hazards identified. These classifications can be viewed as a gauge of the community s capabilities in all phases of emergency management (preparedness, response, recovery and mitigation) and are used as an underwriting parameter for determining the costs of various forms of insurance. The CRS class applies to flood insurance while the BCEGS and Public Protection classifications apply to standard property insurance. CRS classifications range on a scale of 1 to 10 with class 1 being the best possible classification, and class 10 representing no classification benefit. Firewise classifications include a higher classification when DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Chenango County, New York

7 the subject property is located beyond 1000 feet of a creditable fire hydrant and is within 5 road miles of a recognized Fire Station. Criteria for classification credits are outlined in the following documents: The Community Rating System Coordinators Manual The Building Code Effectiveness Grading Schedule The ISO Mitigation online ISO s Public Protection website at The National Weather Service Storm Ready website at The National Firewise Communities website at National Flood Insurance Program The following section provides details on the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) as implemented within the municipality: NFIP Floodplain Administrator: Richard Metzger, Code Enforcement Official Program and Compliance History Village of Afton joined the NFIP in June, 1991, and is currently an active member of the NFIP. The current effective Flood Insurance Rate Maps are dated November 26, The community s Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance (FDPO) was last updated on September 1, 2010]. As of April, 2014 there are 25 policies in force, insuring $4.7 million of property with total annual insurance premiums of $ 20,771. The Village is currently in good standing in the NFIP. The most recent CAV was performed in Loss History and Mitigation Since 1978, 24 claims have been paid totaling $ 554,018. As of April, 2014 there are 2 Repetitive Loss and no Severe Repetitive Loss properties in the community. Substantial Damage estimates are addressed by a third party at the discretion of the property owner. The County maintains a list of the properties damaged during events. There is a need at the Village level to keep better records of those properties sustaining damage during events. There has been some interest in mitigation, but property owners have not followed through. Lack of funding and financial assistance has led to limited action. Planning and Regulatory Capabilities Floodplain management regulations and ordinances within the Village of Afton meet both FEMA and New York State minimum requirements. When a Site Plan Review is done by the Planning Board, it is checked for runoff potential. Buildings damaged within the floodplain, even if less than 50% damaged, must be brought into 100% compliance with floodplain regulations. Administrative and Technical Capabilities The community FDPO identifies Code Enforcement Officer as the local NFIP Floodplain Administrator, currently Richard Metzger, for which floodplain administration is an auxiliary duty. Richard Metzger is the sole individual responsible for floodplain management. DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Chenango County, New York

8 Duties and responsibilities of the Code Enforcement Official/ NFIP Administrator include explaining construction requirements to property owners and making referrals to the County Floodplain Administrator, Steve Fox, CFM. All other floodplain management responsibilities are taken care of at the County level. Richard Metzger, feels he is adequately supported and trained to fulfill his responsibilities as the municipal floodplain administrator. Richard Metzger is not a certified in floodplain management but attends regular continuing education programs. Public Education and Outreach Following a flood event, the floodplain administrator provides forms and pamphlets on recovery to the community and those properties which sustained damage. Duties and responsibilities of the Code Enforcement Official/ NFIP Administrator include explaining construction requirements to property owners and making referrals to the County Floodplain Administrator, Steve Fox, CFM. All other floodplain management responsibilities are taken care of at the County level. Actions to Strengthen the Program Barriers to running an effective floodplain management program include lack of financing. Additional training and information on both floodplain management and the Community Rating System (CRS) would be welcomed. At this time, the Village of Afton is not a CRS community. Integration of Hazard Mitigation into Existing and Future Planning Mechanisms It is the intention of this municipality to incorporate hazard mitigation planning and natural hazard risk reduction as an integral component of ongoing municipal operations. The following textual summary and table identify relevant planning mechanisms and programs that have been/will be incorporated into municipal procedures, which may include former mitigation initiatives that have become continuous/on-going programs and may be considered mitigation capabilities : Infrastructure Protection: Consider non-structural flood hazard alternatives for at risk properties within the floodplain, including the one identified as repetitive loss, such as acquisition/relocation or elevation depending on feasibility. The parameters for feasibility for this initiative would be: funding, benefits versus costs and willing participation of property owners. Floodplain Management: Continue/Enhance Stormwater Management by replacing culverts with larger capacity units and reinforcing embankments to reduce/eliminate erosion, and control flooding especially along the banks of Bumps Creek and Kelsey Brook. Reinforcement of the banks will maintain the integrity of these water bodies. Infrastructure Protection: Develop tree trimming and removal program to keep trees from threatening property and infrastructure. Infrastructure Protection: Purchase back-up utilities for sewer water system, specifically booster and lift stations. Open Space Plans/Floodplain Management: Convert current flood prone and repetitive flooded properties to open space, contingent on property owner co-operation. Floodplain Management: Consider participation in incentive-based programs such as CRS. Infrastructure Protection: Improve water flow under NYS Rte. 88 access ramp by opening existing barrier. Infrastructure Protection: River and stream bank stabilization; removal of sandbar in river. DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Chenango County, New York

9 Mitigation Strategy and Prioritization This section discusses past mitigations actions and status, describes proposed hazard mitigation initiatives, and prioritization. Past Mitigation Initiative Status The following table indicates progress on the community s mitigation strategy identified in the 2008 Plan. Actions that are carried forward as part of this plan update are included in the following subsection in its own table with prioritization. Previous actions that are now on-going programs and capabilities are indicated as such in the following table and may also be found under Capability Assessment presented previously in this annex. Table Past Mitigation Initiative Status Description Status Review Comments VAF-1: Consider non-structural flood hazard alternatives for at risk properties within the floodplain, including the one identified as repetitive loss, such as acquisition/relocation or elevation depending on feasibility. The parameters for feasibility for this initiative would be: funding, benefits versus costs and willing participation of property owners. VAF-2: Continue/Enhance Stormwater Management by replacing culverts with larger capacity units and reinforcing embankments to reduce/eliminate erosion, and control flooding especially along the banks of Bumps Creek and Kelsey Brook. Reinforcement of the banks will maintain the integrity of these water bodies. VAF-3: Develop tree trimming and removal program to keep trees from threatening property and infrastructure. VAF-4: Purchase back-up utilities for sewer water system, specifically booster and lift stations. VAF-5: Convert current flood prone and repetitive flooded properties to open space, contingent on property owner co-operation. VAF-6: Consider participation in incentive-based programs such as CRS. VAF-7: Support County-wide initiatives identified in Section 9.1, Volume II of this Plan. Unknown Some Progress Continuous/Ongoing No Progress In Progress Continuous/Ongoing Continuous/Ongoing Lack of funding. A modified version of this initiative will be carried over to current mitigation strategy. Approximately 50 yards of Bumps Creek bank reinforced and Village Garage removed. This initiative will be carried over to current mitigation strategy. In the Village, aging trees are assessed to determine if trimming or removal is required. This initiative is being removed from the updated mitigation strategy, and identified as a mitigation capability as it refers to activities that are an ongoing and normal part of Village operations. Lack of funding. This initiative will be removed from the current mitigation strategy. Four (4) properties participated in FEMA s buyout program. This initiative will be removed from the current mitigation strategy. The Village has included an initiative to support county-led initiatives, which include programs to enhance floodplain management capabilities. The Village will attend a CRS workshop if offered locally. A modified version of this initiative is being carried forward, identifying local participation in specific county-led mitigation programs and initiatives. DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Chenango County, New York

10 Completed Mitigation Initiatives not Identified in the Previous Mitigation Strategy Four (4) properties have been selected for FEMA buy-out. Two (2) have been purchased and demolished, the remaining properties are in the process of being bought out. Proposed Hazard Mitigation Initiatives for the Plan Update The Village of Afton identified mitigation initiatives they would like to pursue in the future. Some of these initiatives may be previous actions carried forward for this plan update. These initiatives are dependent upon available funding (grants and local match availability) and may be modified or omitted at any time based on the occurrence of new hazard events and changes in municipal priorities. Table identifies the municipality s updated local mitigation strategy. As discussed in Section 6, 14 evaluation/prioritization criteria are used to complete the prioritization of mitigation initiatives. For each new mitigation action, a numeric rank is assigned (-1, 0, or 1) for each of the 14 evaluation criteria to assist with prioritizing actions as, Medium, or Low. The table below summarizes the evaluation of each mitigation initiative, listed by Action Number. Table provides a summary of the prioritization of all proposed mitigation initiatives for the Plan update. DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Chenango County, New York

11 Table Proposed Hazard Mitigation Initiatives Initiative VAF-1 VAF-2 VAF-3 (NEW) VAF-4 (Former VAF-1) VAF-5 (Former VAF-2) Mitigation Initiative NYS Route 41 Bridge Improvements NYS Route 88 Culvert Improvements: Continue to appeal to NYS DOT to improve water flow under NYS Rte. 88 access ramp by opening existing barrier. Applies to New and/or Existing Structures* Existing Existing Hazard(s) Mitigated Flood; Severe Storm Flood; Severe Storm Objectives Met O-1, O-6, O- 7 O-6, 0-7 Lead and Support Agencies NYS DOT; USACE Village appealing to NYSDOT Estimated Benefits Reduced flood vulnerability of bridge (critical infrastructure) Reduced local stormwater flooding; potential lifesafety Estimated Cost Local Low; NYS DOT Medium to Sources of Funding Timeline Priority NYSDOT; USACE Appeal Local Budget Mitigation Project NYS DOT Long term Ongoing for appeal to NYSDOT River and stream bank stabilization; removal of sandbar in river. This project would be the responsibility of the Army Corp of Engineers. The Village committee had a meeting in the fall with the Army Corp to assess the problem and consider potential solution. See above Existing Flood; Severe Storm 1, 6, 7, 8 USACE with support from the Village Increase water flow and bank erosion TBD TBD TBD Promote and support non-structural flood hazard mitigation alternatives for at risk properties within the floodplain, including those that have been identified as Repetitive Loss (RL 2 currently) and Severe Repetitive Loss (SRL none currently), such as acquisition/relocation or elevation depending on feasibility. The parameters for this initiative would be: funding, benefits versus cost and willing participation of property owners. Specifically identified are the two RL properties on East Main Street. See above. Exiting Flooding, Severe Storms O-7, O-10, O-13 Village Governing Body; support from NYS DHSES and FEMA (reduced or eliminated risk to property damage from flooding) FEMA or other mitigation grant funding, NFIP flood insurance and ICC; property owner for local match. Long-term DOF Continue/Enhance Stormwater Management by replacing culverts with larger capacity units and reinforcing embankments to reduce/eliminate erosion, and control flooding especially along the banks of Bumps Creek and Kelsey Brook. Reinforcement of the banks will maintain the integrity of these water bodies. Severe Village way reduced O-1, O-6, O- PDM grants, Depends on See above Existing Storms, Department, flood Medium 7, O-8 Local funding funding Flood Chenango County vulnerability Mitigation Category SIP, NSP SIP SIP, NSP SIP, EAP SIP DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Chenango County, New York

12 Initiative VAF-6 (Former VAF-6, -7) Mitigation Initiative Applies to New and/or Existing Structures* Hazard(s) Mitigated Objectives Met Lead and Support Agencies Soil/Water, NYSDEC and Private Property Owners Estimated Benefits and reduce/eliminate erosion Estimated Cost Sources of Funding Timeline Priority Support and participate in Federal, State and County-led programs and initiatives intended to build local and regional mitigation and risk-reduction capabilities (see Section 9.1), specifically: Attend regional workshops, trainings and continuing education as made available by the County with FEMA, ISO and NYS DHSES support, and as appropriate for the community, anticipated to included: NFIP for Insurance Agents, Lending Institutions and Realtors; Floodplain Management and the Certified Floodplain Managers (CFM) certification. See above Public education and awareness program for floodplain residents. Updates to NFIP floodplain mapping. Promotion of Firewise programs in the County. Establishment of an interagency program involving Public Health/DSS/Area Agency on Aging to identify vulnerable populations (elderly, homebound, homeless), and the development/enhancement of plans, programs and facilities to meet the specific needs of these populations. (improved Existing mitigation and programs and New and All Village Trustees, risk-reduction, All Hazards Low grant funding Short-term Existing Objectives County and emergency (where management applicable) capabilities) Notes: Not all acronyms and abbreviations defined below are included in the table. *Does this mitigation initiative reduce the effects of hazards on new and/or existing buildings and/or infrastructure? Not applicable (N/A) is inserted if this does not apply. Mitigation Category LPR, EAP Acronyms and Abbreviations: Potential FEMA HMA Funding Sources: Timeline: CAV Community Assistance Visit FMA Flood Mitigation Assistance Grant Program Short CRS Community Rating System HMGP Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Long Term DPW Department of Public Works PDM Pre-Disaster Mitigation Grant Program OG FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency RFC Repetitive Flood Claims Grant Program (discontinued DOF FPA Floodplain Administrator in 2015) HMA Hazard Mitigation Assistance SRL Severe Repetitive Loss Grant Program (discontinued N/A Not applicable in 2015) NFIP National Flood Insurance Program OEM Office of Emergency Management 1 to 5 years 5 years or greater On-going program Depending on funding Costs: Where actual project costs have been reasonably estimated: Low < $10,000 Medium $10,000 to $100,000 > $100,000 Where actual project costs cannot reasonably be established at this time: Low Possible to fund under existing budget. Project is part of, or can be part of an existing on-going program. Benefits: Where possible, an estimate of project benefits (per FEMA s benefit calculation methodology) has been evaluated against the project costs, and is presented as: Low= < $10,000 Medium $10,000 to $100,000 > $100,000 Where numerical project benefits cannot reasonably be established at this time: Low Long-term benefits of the project are difficult to quantify in the short term. DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Chenango County, New York

13 Costs: Medium Could budget for under existing work plan, but would require a reapportionment of the budget or a budget amendment, or the cost of the project would have to be spread over multiple years. Would require an increase in revenue via an alternative source (i.e., bonds, grants, fee increases) to implement. Existing funding levels are not adequate to cover the costs of the proposed project. Benefits: Medium Project will have a long-term impact on the reduction of risk exposure to life and property, or project will provide an immediate reduction in the risk exposure to property. Project will have an immediate impact on the reduction of risk exposure to life and property. Mitigation Category: Local Plans and Regulations (LPR) These actions include government authorities, policies or codes that influence the way land and buildings are being developed and built. Structure and Infrastructure Project (SIP)- These actions involve modifying existing structures and infrastructure to protect them from a hazard or remove them from a hazard area. This could apply to public or private structures as well as critical facilities and infrastructure. This type of action also involves projects to construct manmade structures to reduce the impact of hazards. Natural Systems Protection (NSP) These are actions that minimize damage and losses, and also preserve or restore the functions of natural systems. Education and Awareness Programs (EAP) These are actions to inform and educate citizens, elected officials, and property owners about hazards and potential ways to mitigate them. These actions may also include participation in national programs, such as StormReady and Firewise Communities. DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Chenango County, New York

14 Table Summary of Prioritization of Actions Mitigation Action/Project Number Mitigation Action/Initiative Life Safety Property Protection Cost-Effectiveness Technical VAF-1 NYS Route 41 Bridge Improvements VAF-2 NYS Route 88 Culvert Improvements VAF-3 River and stream bank stabilization VAF-4 (Former VAF-1) VAF-5 (Former VAF-2) VAF-6 (Former VAF-6, -7) Promote and support non-structural flood hazard mitigation alternatives for at risk properties within the floodplain Political Legal Fiscal Environmental Social Administrative Multi-Hazard Timeline Agency Champion Other Community Objectives Total / Medium / Low Continue/Enhance Stormwater Management Medium Support and participate in Federal, State and County-led programs and initiatives intended to build local and regional mitigation and risk-reduction capabilities Note: Refer to Section 6 which contains the guidance on conducting the prioritization of mitigation actions DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Chenango County, New York

15 Future Needs To Better Understand Risk/Vulnerability None at this time Hazard Area Extent and Location Hazard area extent and location maps have been generated for the Village of Afton that illustrate the probable areas impacted within the municipality. These maps are based on the best available data at the time of the preparation of this plan, and are considered to be adequate for planning purposes. Maps have only been generated for those hazards that can be clearly identified using mapping techniques and technologies, and for which the Village of Afton has significant exposure. Figure illustrates the hazard area extent and location for the Village Additional Comments None at this time. DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Chenango County, New York

16 Figure Village of Afton Hazard Area Extent and Location Map Name of Jurisdiction: Village of Afton DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Chenango County, New York

17 Number: Mitigation Action/Initiative: VAF-1 NYS Route 41 Bridge Improvements Hazard(s) addressed: Specific problem being mitigated: Actions/Projects Considered (name of project and reason for not selecting): Description of Selected Action/Project Mitigation Action/Project Type Assessing the Risk Flood, Severe Storm Susquehanna River near NYS Rte. 41 Bridge, Village of Afton There are several areas of concern: The east bank is being washed away during periods of high water. At risk is the village road, River St. ~15-30 ft. from the river. Homes (3-5 houses) on the east side of the road are in danger from the potential of bank failure. In the riverbed there are sandbars being formed by the deposit of debris from the Susquehanna River and Kelsey Brook. These bars are pushing the water against the previously mentioned bank and base of the river bridge itself. The water has undermined the rip/rap covering the base of the bridge, creating 1-2 inch spaces between rocks that was originally edge to edge when in place. Evaluation of Potential Actions/Projects 1. Do nothing current problem continues 2. No other feasible options for identified for this project 3. Action/Project Intended for Implementation Improve the NYS Route 41 bridge SIP, NSP Objectives Met O-1, O-6, 0-7 Applies to existing structures/infrastructure, future, or not applicable Benefits (losses avoided) Estimated Cost Priority* Responsible Organization Local Planning Mechanism Potential Funding Sources Timeline for Completion Existing Reduced flood vulnerability of bridge (critical infrastructure) Medium- Plan for Implementation USACE, NYS DOT Stormwater Management, way NYSDOT; USACE Long-term Date of Status Report/ Report of Progress * Refer to results of Prioritization (page 2) Reporting on Progress Date: Progress on Action/Project: DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Chenango County, New York

18 Number: Mitigation Action/Initiative: VAF-1 NYS Route 41 Bridge Improvements Criteria Numeric Rank (-1, 0, 1) Provide brief rationale for numeric rank when appropriate Life Safety 1 Protect residents of homes that have been flooded in the past Property Protection 1 Protect homes and roadways from flooding events Cost-Effectiveness 1 This project will help prevent flooding of the Susquehanna River in the Village Technical 1 This project will help prevent flooding of the Susquehanna River in the Village Political 0 Legal 0 Fiscal 1 Seek funding through NYSDOT and USACE Environmental 1 Improve the stabilization of the river bank Social 0 Administrative 0 Multi-Hazard 1 Flooding, Severe Storm Timeline -1 Project may take longer than five years to complete Agency Champion 0 Other Community Objectives Priority (/Med/Low) 0 Total 6 DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Chenango County, New York

19 Name of Jurisdiction: Number: Mitigation Action/Initiative: Village of Afton VAF-2 NYS Route 88 Culvert Improvements Hazard(s) addressed: Specific problem being mitigated: Actions/Projects Considered (name of project and reason for not selecting): Description of Selected Action/Project Mitigation Action/Project Type Flood; Severe Storm Assessing the Risk Stormwater flooding at NYS 88 access ramp Evaluation of Potential Actions/Projects 1. Do nothing current problem continues 2. No other feasible options for identified for this project 3. Action/Project Intended for Implementation Continue to appeal to NYS DOT to improve water flow under NYS Rte. 88 access ramp by opening existing barrier. SIP Objectives Met O-6, 0-7 Applies to existing structures/infrastructure, future, or not applicable Benefits (losses avoided) Estimated Cost Priority* Responsible Organization Local Planning Mechanism Potential Funding Sources Timeline for Completion Existing Reduced local stormwater flooding; potential life-safety Medium- Plan for Implementation NYS DOT Stormwater Management, way NYS DOT Ongoing (local appeal to NYS DOT) Date of Status Report/ Report of Progress * Refer to results of Prioritization (page 2) Reporting on Progress Date: Progress on Action/Project: DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Chenango County, New York

20 Number: Mitigation Action/Initiative: VAF-2 NYS Route 88 Culvert Improvements Criteria Life Safety 1 Property Protection Numeric Rank (-1, 0, 1) Provide brief rationale for numeric rank when appropriate 1 Reduce local stormwater flooding in the Village and protect vehicles from flooded roadways Reduce local stormwater flooding in the Village and protect roadways from flooding Cost-Effectiveness 1 Reduce local stormwater flooding in the Village and protect infrastructure Technical 1 Reduce local stormwater flooding in the Village and protect infrastructure Political 0 Legal 0 Fiscal 0 Using local budget for appealing and grants (NYSDOT) for actual project Environmental 1 Reduce local stormwater flooding in the Village Social 0 Administrative 0 Multi-Hazard 1 Flood, Severe Storm Timeline 0 Appeal process is ongoing Agency Champion 0 Other Community Objectives Priority (/Med/Low) 0 Total 7 DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Chenango County, New York

21 Name of Jurisdiction: Number: Mitigation Action/Initiative: Village of Afton VAF-3 River and stream bank stabilization Hazard(s) addressed: Specific problem being mitigated: Actions/Projects Considered (name of project and reason for not selecting): Description of Selected Action/Project Mitigation Action/Project Type Flood; Severe Storm Assessing the Risk Evaluation of Potential Actions/Projects 1. Do nothing current problem continues 2. No other feasible options for identified for this project 3. Action/Project Intended for Implementation River and stream bank stabilization; removal of sandbar in river. This project would be the responsibility of the Army Corp of Engineers. The Village committee had a meeting in the fall with the Army Corp to assess the problem and consider potential solution. SIP, NSP Objectives Met 1, 6, 7, 8 Applies to existing structures/infrastructure, future, or not applicable Benefits (losses avoided) Existing Increase water flow and bank erosion Estimated Cost Priority* TBD Plan for Implementation Responsible Organization Local Planning Mechanism Potential Funding Sources Timeline for Completion USACE with support from the Village Stormwater Management, way TBD TBD Date of Status Report/ Report of Progress * Refer to results of Prioritization (page 2) Reporting on Progress Date: Progress on Action/Project: DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Chenango County, New York

22 Number: Mitigation Action/Initiative: VAF-3 River and stream bank stabilization Criteria Life Safety 1 Property Protection Numeric Rank (-1, 0, 1) Provide brief rationale for numeric rank when appropriate Protect surrounding critical infrastructure and residents from the impacts of flooding and erosion 1 Protect surrounding properties from the impacts of flooding and erosion Cost-Effectiveness 1 Reduce or eliminate flooding and/or erosion in this area of the Village Technical 1 Reduce or eliminate flooding and/or erosion in this area of the Village Political 0 Legal 0 Fiscal 0 Environmental 1 Protect the stream bank from further erosion Social 0 Administrative 0 Multi-Hazard 1 Flood, Severe Storm Timeline 0 Agency Champion 0 Other Community Objectives Priority (/Med/Low) 0 Total 6 DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Chenango County, New York

23 Name of Jurisdiction: Number: Mitigation Action/Initiative: Village of Afton VAF-5 Continue/Enhance Stormwater Management Hazard(s) addressed: Specific problem being mitigated: Actions/Projects Considered (name of project and reason for not selecting): Description of Selected Action/Project Mitigation Action/Project Type Flood; Severe Storm Assessing the Risk Erosion and flooding along Bumps Creek and Kelsey Brook Evaluation of Potential Actions/Projects 1. Do nothing current problem continues 2. No other feasible options for identified for this project 3. Action/Project Intended for Implementation Continue/Enhance Stormwater Management by replacing culverts with larger capacity units and reinforcing embankments to reduce/eliminate erosion, and control flooding especially along the banks of Bumps Creek and Kelsey Brook. Reinforcement of the banks will maintain the integrity of these water bodies. SIP, NSP Objectives Met 1, 6, 7, 8 Applies to existing structures/infrastructure, future, or not applicable Benefits (losses avoided) Estimated Cost Priority* Responsible Organization Local Planning Mechanism Potential Funding Sources Timeline for Completion Existing reduced flood vulnerability and reduce/eliminate erosion Medium Plan for Implementation Village way Department, Chenango County Soil/Water, NYSDEC and Private Property Owners Stormwater Management, way, Capital Improvement PDM grants, Local funding DOF Date of Status Report/ Report of Progress * Refer to results of Prioritization (page 2) Reporting on Progress Date: Progress on Action/Project: DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Chenango County, New York

24 Number: Mitigation Action/Initiative: VAF-5 Continue/Enhance Stormwater Management Criteria Life Safety Property Protection Cost-Effectiveness Technical Political Legal Fiscal Environmental Social Administrative Multi-Hazard Timeline Agency Champion Other Community Objectives Total Priority (/Med/Low) Numeric Rank (-1, 0, 1) Provide brief rationale for numeric rank when appropriate Medium DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Chenango County, New York