Address and/or Block & Lot Recent Development from 2011 to Present. Rush Crossing Res. 281 Blocks 1401 & 1501 Flood? Complete

Transcription

1 9.12 CITY OF TRENTON This section presents the jurisdictional annex for the of HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT The following individuals have been identified as the hazard mitigation plan s primary and alternate points of contact. Primary Point of Contact Qareeb Bashir, Director, Fire 244 Perry Street,, NJ qbashir@trentonnj.org Alternate Point of Contact Leonard Carmichael, Deputy Fire Chief, Special Operations 244 Perry Street,, NJ lcarmichael@trentonnj.org MUNICIPAL PROFILE The of is the state capital of New Jersey. It is located in southwestern Mercer County and encompasses an area of 8.15 square miles. As of the 2010 United States Census, had a population of 84,913. The was founded on June 3, 1719 and incorporated on vember 13, 1792 as one of New Jersey s initial group of 104 municipalities. The of became the state capital in Today, the is broken into numerous neighborhoods and sub-neighborhoods: Downtown Hanover/Academy, Mill Hill East - Coalport/rth Clinton, Ewing/Carroll, Greenwood/Hamilton, Villa Park, and Wilbur Western - Berkeley Square, Cadwalader Heights, Central West, Fisher/Richey/Perdicaris, Glen Afton, Hillcrest, Hiltonia, Parkside, Pennington/Prospect, Stuyvesant/Prospect, The Island, and West End South Chambersburg, Chestnut Park, Duck Island, Franklin Park, and Lamberton/Waterfront rth Battle Monument (Five Points), rth 25, and Top Road The of is bordered to the north by Ewing and Lawrence Townships; to the east and south by Hamilton Township; and to the west by the Delaware River. Other bodies of water found in the include the Delaware & Raritan Canal, Assunpink Creek, and Crosswicks Creek. Growth/Development Trends The following table summarizes recent residential/commercial development since 2011 to present and any known or anticipated major residential/commercial development and major infrastructure development that has been identified in the next five years within the municipality. Refer to the maps in Section of this annex which illustrate the hazard areas along with the location of potential new development. Table Growth and Development Property or Development Name Type (e.g. Res., Comm.) # of Units / Structures Address and/or Block & Lot Recent Development from 2011 to Present Known Hazard Zone(s) Description/Status of Development Rush Crossing Res. 281 Blocks 1401 & 1501 Flood? Complete * Only location-specific hazard zones or vulnerabilities identified. Known or Anticipated Development in the Next Five (5) Years ne identified DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Mercer County, New Jersey

2 NATURAL HAZARD EVENT HISTORY SPECIFIC TO THE MUNICIPALITY Mercer County has a history of natural and non-natural hazard events as detailed in Volume I, Section 5.0 of this plan. A summary of historical events is provided in each of the hazard profiles and includes a chronology of events that have affected the County and its municipalities. For the purpose of this plan update, events that have occurred in the County from 2008 to present were summarized to indicate the range and impact of hazard events in the community. Information regarding specific damages at the municipal level, is presented in the table below. This summary is based on reference material or local sources. For further details on these and additional events, refer to Volume I, Section 5.0 of this plan. Table Hazard Event History Date(s) of Event March 12- April 15, 2010 vember 17, 2010 February 4, 2011 August 26- September 5, 2011 September 28-October 6, 2011 October 26- vember 8, 2012 April 30, 2014 Event Type Severe Storms and Flooding FEMA Declaration # (If Applicable) County Designated? Summary of Damages/Losses DR-1897 All departments had overtime; shelter was opened Thunderstorms N/A N/A Fire, Police and DPW had overtime Severe Winter Storm and Snowstorm Hurricane Irene Remnants of Tropical Storm Lee Hurricane Sandy Heavy Rain and Flooding DR-1954 DR-4021 DR-4039 DR-4086 Fire, Police and DPW had overtime ($91,941.35); salt, sand; power outages in the Hurricane Irene caused power outages and forced road closures. There were evacuations in the and shelters were opened. Private homes received some damage. The had over $350,000 in emergency protective services and debris removal costs. Tropical Storm Lee caused power outages and road closures. There were evacuations and shelters opened. There was some damage to private homes. The had $151, in protective measures costs. Hurricane Sandy caused power outages, road closures, evacuations, and sheltering. Some private homes were damaged. The had damages to sidewalks that needed repair and two buildings were demolished (no FEMA reimbursement). The had over $412,000 in emergency protective services and debris removal. N/A N/A Street closings HAZARD VULNERABILITIES AND RANKING The hazard profiles in Section 5.0 of this plan have detailed information regarding each plan participant s vulnerability to the identified hazards. The risk ranking methodology is presented in Section 5.3. However, each municipality had the opportunity to adjust the final ranking based on municipal feedback. The following summarizes the hazard vulnerabilities and their ranking in the of. For additional vulnerability information relevant to this jurisdiction, refer to Section 5.0. DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Mercer County, New Jersey

3 Hazard Risk/Vulnerability Risk Ranking The table below summarizes the hazard risk/vulnerability rankings of potential hazards for the of. Table Hazard Risk/Vulnerability Risk Ranking Probability of Occurrence Risk Ranking Score (Probability x Impact) Hazard type Estimate of Potential Dollar Losses to Structures Vulnerable to the Hazard a, c Hazard Ranking b Dam Failure Damage estimate not available Occasional 24 * Drought Damage estimate not available Frequent 30 Medium 100-Year MRP: $0 Earthquake 500-Year MRP: $8,021,417 Occasional 12 Low 2,500-Year MRP: $135,864,393 Flood 1% Annual Chance: $679,274,329 Frequent 33 * Geologic Exposed to Landslide- Susceptible Areas: $317,547,286 Occasional 12 Low 100-year MRP: $13,084,226 Hurricane 500-year MRP: $32,791,767 Frequent 48 Annualized: $484,567 r'easter Damage estimate not available Frequent Year MRP: $13,084,226 Severe Weather 500-year MRP: $32,791,767 Frequent 48 Annualized: $484,567 Severe Winter 1% of GBS: $121,664,830 Weather 5% of GBS: $608,324,148 Frequent 51 Wildfire Estimated Value in the Extreme, Very, and Hazard Areas: $16,415,661 Frequent 18 Medium Disease Outbreak Damage estimate not available Frequent 36 Hazardous Materials Damage estimate not available Frequent 42 tes: GBS = General building stock; MRP = Mean return period. *The hazard ranking for dam failure was changed due to the location of high hazard dams in the. Additionally, the hazard ranking for flood was changed due to the number of repetitive loss and severe repetitive loss properties located in the. a. The general building stock valuation is based on the custom inventory generated for the County utilizing improved value. b. = Total hazard priority risk ranking score of 31 and above Medium = Total hazard priority risk ranking of Low = Total hazard risk ranking below 20 c. Refer to Section 5.1 for further details on the loss methodology. Loss estimates for the severe storm and severe winter storm hazards are structural values only and do not include the estimated value of contents. Loss estimates for the flood and earthquake hazards represent both structure and contents. Potential flood loss estimates were generated using Hazus-MH and the 2012 FEMA DFIRM for the 1-percent annual chance event. For the geologic and wildfire hazards, the improved value and estimated contents of buildings located within the identified hazard zones is provided. National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Summary The following table summarizes the NFIP statistics for the of. Table NFIP Summary # Rep. Loss Prop. (1) # Severe Rep. Loss Prop. (1) # Policies in 1% Flood Boundary (3) # Claims Total Loss Municipality # Policies (1) (Losses) (1) Payments (2) $15,879, DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Mercer County, New Jersey

4 Source: FEMA Region 2, 2015 (1) Policies, claims, repetitive loss and severe repetitive loss statistics provided by FEMA Region 2, and are current as of 02/28/15. The total number of repetitive loss properties does not include the severe repetitive loss properties. The number of claims represents claims closed by 02/28/15. (2) Total building and content losses from the claims file provided by FEMA Region 2. (3) The policies inside and outside of the flood zones is based on the latitude and longitude provided by FEMA Region 2 in the policy file. tes: FEMA noted that where there is more than one entry for a property, there may be more than one policy in force or more than one GIS possibility. A zero percentage denotes less than 1/100th percentage and not zero damages or vulnerability as may be the case. Number of policies and claims and claims total exclude properties located outside County boundary, based on provided latitude and longitude. Critical Facilities The table below presents the number of critical facilities, by type, in the community located in the effective FEMA flood zones (1% and 0.2% annual chance boundaries). Table Potential Flood Losses to Critical Facilities Municipality 1% Annual Chance Air Church Fire Government Housing Museum Park Parking Rail School % Annual Chance Air Church Fire Government Housing Museum Park Parking Rail School Source: Mercer County; FEMA, 2012 Other Vulnerabilities Identified by Municipality According to the 2016 preliminary Flood Insurance Study (FIS) for Mercer County, the primary flooding sources in the of are the Delaware River and the Assunpink Creek (FEMA 2016). The FIS states that flows conveyed by the Stockton Street culvert are discharged into Assunpink Creek downstream without causing significant damage to adjacent development. Flooding in this portion of the lower section is primarily caused by backwater from the Delaware River (FEMA 2016). Additionally, the FIS indicates that between the Stockton Street culvert and the confluence of Assunpink Creek and Pond Run, flooding disrupts local and express rail traffic. There are freight handling yards and industries that are located within the floodplain and flood during larger storm events. The floodplain in this part of the has been so altered that inflows of floodwater that flow along the rail line eventually discharge into the streets of South (FEMA 2016). The hazard profiles in Section 5.0 of this plan have detailed information regarding each plan participant s vulnerability to the identified hazards. Further, mitigation projects have been identified that may more specifically detail vulnerabilities in the community. There are no additional vulnerabilities identified at this time CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT This section identifies the following capabilities of the local jurisdiction: Planning and regulatory capability Administrative and technical capability Fiscal capability DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Mercer County, New Jersey

5 Education/Outreach and Community classification Self-Assessment of Capability National Flood Insurance Program Integration of Mitigation Planning into Existing and Future Planning Mechanisms Planning and Regulatory Capability The table below summarizes the regulatory tools that are available to the of. Table Planning and Regulatory Tools Tool / Program (code, ordinance, plan) Planning Capability Do you have this? (/) If, date of adoption or update Authority (local, county, state, federal) Dept. /Agency Responsible Code Citation and Comments (Code Chapter, name of plan, explanation of authority, etc.) Master Plan Local Planning Re-Examination in September 2015 Capital Improvements Plan Local Budget Floodplain Management / Basin Plan, 2008 Local, Regional Delaware River Basin Commission A Multi-Jurisdictional Flood Mitigation Plan for Municipalities in the n-tidal, New Jersey Section of the Delaware River Basin Stormwater Management Plan See Chapter 169 of Code Open Space Plan State, Local Planning Stream Corridor Management Plan Watershed Management or Protection Plan Local Economic Development Plan Local Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan Historical Society Economic Development Open Space Master Plan 1990 Assunpink Creek Stream Corridor Study Chapter 2-33 of Code; Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (2004); 250 Emergency Operation Plan Local OEM 2007, County updates Post-Disaster Recovery Plan Transportation Plan Local Planning Strategic Recovery Planning Report Other Plans: Regulatory Capability Local Planning, 2008 Local OEM Building Code State and Local Part of the Master Plan; Transportation Master Plan (2004) Historic Preservation Plan for the of (2001) Environmental Plan of Hazard Mitigation Plan State Uniform Construction Code Act (N.J.S.A. 52:27D-119 et seq.), Chapter 42 Zoning Ordinance Local Planning Chapter 315; Ordinance DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Mercer County, New Jersey

6 Table Planning and Regulatory Tools Tool / Program (code, ordinance, plan) Do you have this? (/) If, date of adoption or update Authority (local, county, state, federal) Subdivision Ordinance Local Planning NFIP Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance NFIP: Cumulative Substantial Damages State, Local State, Local NFIP: Freeboard State, Local Growth Management Ordinances Site Plan Review Requirements Stormwater Management Ordinance Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Dept. /Agency Responsible Building Inspector Building Inspector Building Inspector Local Planning Code Citation and Comments (Code Chapter, name of plan, explanation of authority, etc.) Chapter 315-Article IX and various, Ordinance Chapter 109 Chapter Chapter Development application, Chapter Local DPW Code 259:1, Chapter 254 Local Division of Water and Sewer (DPW) Chapter 309 Natural Hazard Ordinance Local Administration Chapter Post-Disaster Recovery Ordinance Real Estate Disclosure Requirement Other [Special Purpose Ordinances (i.e., sensitive areas, steep slope)] Administrative and Technical Capability Local Various Chapter 97 (Fire Prevention), Chapter 127 (Hazardous Materials Cleanup), Chapter 248 (Solid Waste) The table below summarizes potential staff and personnel resources available to the of. Table Administrative and Technical Capabilities Resources Administrative Capability Is this in place? ( or ) / Agency/Position Planning Board Division of Planning Mitigation Planning Committee Hazard Mitigation Committee (2008 HMP) Environmental Board/Commission Open Space Board/Committee Economic Development Commission/Committee Mayor s Office / Division of Economic Development Maintenance Programs to Reduce Risk Mutual Aid Agreements Technical/Staffing Capability Planner(s) or Engineer(s) with knowledge of land development and land management practices Division of Planning / Principal Planner DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Mercer County, New Jersey

7 Table Administrative and Technical Capabilities Resources Engineer(s) or Professional(s) trained in construction practices related to buildings and/or infrastructure Planners or engineers with an understanding of natural hazards Is this in place? ( or ) / Agency/Position Division of Planning, OEM, of Public Works Division of Planning, OEM, of Public Works NFIP Floodplain Administrator Building Inspector (Chapter /20) Surveyor(s) Personnel skilled or trained in GIS and/or Hazus-MH applications Scientist familiar with natural hazards GIS Planning/Principal Planner Emergency Manager OEM, Fire Grant Writer(s) Purchasing Staff with expertise or training in benefit/cost analysis Division of Economic Development Professionals trained in conducting damage assessments OEM and Engineering Fiscal Capability The table below summarizes financial resources available to the of. Table Fiscal Capabilities Financial Resources Community development Block Grants (CDBG, CDBG-DR) Capital Improvements Project Funding Authority to Levy Taxes for specific purposes User fees for water, sewer, gas or electric service Impact Fees for homebuyers or developers of new development/ homes Stormwater Utility Fee Incur debt through general obligation bonds Incur debt through special tax bonds Incur debt through private activity bonds Withhold public expenditures in hazard-prone areas Other Federal or State Funding Programs Open Space Acquisition Funding Programs Other Accessible or Eligible to Use (//Don t Know) Green Acres N/A Education/Outreach and Community Classifications The table below summarizes education/outreach programs the community participates in and the classifications for community program available to the of. Table Education/Outreach and Community Classifications Program Do you have/participate in this? (/) Classification (if applicable) Date Classified (if applicable) Community Rating System (CRS) NP NP DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Mercer County, New Jersey

8 Table Education/Outreach and Community Classifications Program Building Code Effectiveness Grading Schedule (BCEGS) Public Protection (ISO Fire Protection Classes 1 to 10) Do you have/participate in this? (/) Classification (if applicable) TBD TBD Date Classified (if applicable) Storm Ready NP NP Firewise NP NP Disaster/Safety Programs in/for Schools Police, Fire (Girl Scouts) N/A Organizations with Mitigation Focus (advocacy group, non-government) Public Education Program/Outreach (through website, social media) Website, Social Media N/A Public-Private Partnerships N/A N/A N/A = t applicable; NP = t participating The classifications listed above relate to the community s ability to provide effective services to lessen its vulnerability to the hazards identified. These classifications can be viewed as a gauge of the community s capabilities in all phases of emergency management (preparedness, response, recovery and mitigation) and are used as an underwriting parameter for determining the costs of various forms of insurance. The CRS class applies to flood insurance while the BCEGS and Public Protection classifications apply to standard property insurance. CRS classifications range on a scale of 1 to 10 with class 1 being the best possible classification, and class 10 representing no classification benefit. Firewise classifications include a higher classification when the subject property is located beyond 1000 feet of a creditable fire hydrant and is within 5 road miles of a recognized Fire Station. Criteria for classification credits are outlined in the following documents: The Community Rating System Coordinators Manual The Building Code Effectiveness Grading Schedule The ISO Mitigation online ISO s Public Protection website at The National Weather Service Storm Ready website at The National Firewise Communities website at Self-Assessment of Capability The table below provides an approximate measure of the of s capability to work in a hazardmitigation capacity and/or effectively implement hazard mitigation strategies to reduce hazard vulnerabilities. Table Self-Assessment of Capability Area Planning and Regulatory Capability Administrative and Technical Capability Degree of Hazard Mitigation Capability Limited (If limited, what are your obstacles?) Moderate X limited staffing X limited staffing DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Mercer County, New Jersey

9 Table Self-Assessment of Capability Fiscal Capability Area Community Political Capability Community Resiliency Capability Capability to Integrate Mitigation into Municipal Processes and Activities. Degree of Hazard Mitigation Capability Limited (If limited, what are your obstacles?) Moderate X limited budget X limited staffing and budget X limited staffing and budget X National Flood Insurance Program NFIP Floodplain Administrator (FPA) Leslie Graham, Inspections Director Flood Vulnerability Summary The maintains lists/inventories of properties that have been damaged by flooding. Resources Leslie Graham is the identified floodplain administrator for the of. Hank Guarnieri, building subcode inspector, provides assistance to the FPA when needed. The city provides education and public outreach to the community regarding flood hazards/risk by circulating flyers to those living in flood zones. The FPA indicated that there are barriers to running an effective floodplain management program in the city that includes limited staff. Additionally, the FPA stated that there is a need for training as they do not feel adequately supported or trained to fulfill the role as the municipal floodplain administrator. The FPA would consider attending continuing education and/or certification training on floodplain management if offered in the county. Compliance History The of is currently participates in the NFIP. However, it is unknown as to when the most recent compliance audit was conducted. Regulatory The city s flood damage prevention ordinance meets the minimum set by FEMA and the State of New Jersey. The city has other local ordinances, plans and programs in place that support floodplain management as well. Community Rating System The of is not part of the Community Rating System (CRS). Integration of Hazard Mitigation into Existing and Future Planning Mechanisms For a community to succeed in reducing long-term risk, hazard mitigation must be integrated into the day-today local government operations. As part of this planning effort, each community was surveyed to obtain a better understanding of their community s progress in plan integration. A summary is provided below. In addition, the community identified specific integration activities that will be incorporated into municipal procedures. DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Mercer County, New Jersey

10 Planning The of participates in planning initiatives, as opportunities arise and as funding permits. This allows the community to develop comprehensive regional and local guidelines to ensure appropriate development, strategizing, and enhancement of the Township to benefit residents and local businesses. Perhaps the most relevant document to the s participation in the multijurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan update is the s own Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan, released in This document contains the same elements as the County HMP; however, it is dedicated entirely to the and integrates only planning mechanisms and capabilities. The identified floods, wind, winter storms, earthquakes, lightning, drought, wildfires and urban interface fires, hail, extreme temperatures, and sinkholes and land subsidence as the types of hazards needing to be profiled and mitigated. Two other critical planning documents for the include its Land Use Plan (adopted 1999) and the Downtown Capital District Master Plan (2008). The Downtown Master Plan is a strategic guidance document that seeks to incorporate smart growth and land use to provide guidance to private property owners and developers seeking to invest in. Both plans consider the importance of open space and incorporating other needs and capabilities. The Downtown Master Plan also references flood mitigation and environmental protection in applicable targeted sites. The s Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (2004) also considers the importance of flood and hazard mitigation, where necessary to advance the s long term economic, development, and growth management goals. While the s Historic Preservation Plan does not specifically reference hazard mitigation, it does consider the importance of historic integration with the s recreational and economic goals, demonstrating the s desire to maintain a comprehensive outlook in planning. The s Wastewater Management Plan, a municipal chapter of the County s Wastewater Management Plan, complies with the New Jersey of Environmental Protections and regulates locations and methods for wastewater disposal throughout the. It also considers the impacts of areas designated as environmentally sensitive, such as wetlands and stream corridors. This document provides the a resource for determining capacity, demand, and needs in regards to wastewater treatment. The of also has access to a flood mitigation plan, a valuable resource that complements its hazard mitigation plan update. The flood mitigation plan is a multi-jurisdictional plan developed for municipalities in the non-tidal New Jersey section of the Delaware River Basin. Participating jurisdictions comprise 43 municipalities in four different counties. Six of these communities are in Mercer County; specifically, they include Ewing Township, Hamilton Township, Hopewell Township, Lawrence Township, Pennington Borough, and. Although developed on a regional scale, the plan assesses vulnerability and potential losses for the community, examines the history and impacts of flooding in each community, and developed several mitigation strategies (one for the Delaware River Basin as a whole, one for the state, and County/local mitigation plans). Each participating jurisdiction has its own flood profile and mitigation action plan. The flood mitigation plan was integrated into the 2011 County HMP at all applicable locations. Additionally, the Historical Society conducted a study on the Assunpink Creek stream corridor in the Mill Hill neighborhood, with the assistance of grant funding from the New Jersey Historical Commission. The Historical Society intended this study to serve as a first step in compiling a comprehensive body of historical and archaeological information to inform future historic landscape analysis and historically sensitive development of the Assunpink Creek stream corridor within s revitalized urban core. Although this study was developed from a historical perspective, it can still support the s future land use planning and development. DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Mercer County, New Jersey

11 Regulatory and Enforcement (Ordinances) The has multiple codes and ordinances pertaining to the mitigation of hazards. These ordinances include the establishment of several key boards and councils, Building Construction, Fire Prevention, Flood Control, Hazardous Materials Cleanup, Parks and Recreation Areas, Solid Waste, Stormwater Management, and Zoning and Land Development ordinances (which include subdivision and site plan review). The Code Book is linked directly from the s website and is available online at: Operational and Administration The of has established a Zoning Boards of Adjustment, Housing Authority, Construction Board of Appeals, Planning Board, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Committee, Capital Redevelopment Corporation, and Green Team, all of which support land use decisions and public health/safety, as well as ensure compliance with regulations, codes, and the Master Plan. The is governed by a seven-member Council; they are supported by 10 departments (and appropriate divisions and offices), which oversee the successful operations of the community. The Office of Emergency Management, Public Works, and Planning Board all play pivotal roles in maintaining a prepared and resilient jurisdiction. Funding The s operating budget contains minimal provisions for expected repairs like snow removal and infrastructure repair after a storm or natural disaster. When possible, the applies for State and Federal grant funds. In the Introduced 2016 Budget, The has line items for Municipal Homeland Security Assistance Aid, FEMA Fire Protection AFG Grant, Sandy Disaster Relief, FEMA Hazard Mitigation, and other funding sources (the Municipal Homeland Security Assistance Aid did not have any anticipated funds in 2015 or 2016; all other programs had anticipated funds for either 2015 or 2016). In addition, also budgets for capital improvement projects, some of which relate to or otherwise support hazard mitigation. These include street reconstruction, renovation of city facilities (including critical facilities and slope stabilizations), property acquisitions and improvements, and vehicle purchases (including for Public Works and Fire response). Education and Outreach of staff attend trainings and classes sponsored by Mercer County of Public Safety and Emergency Management, Mercer County Planning, or by state and federal agencies, as able and in order to meet all professional requirements. The of has an Office of Emergency Management webpage under the portion of its website linked to the Fire. The Emergency Management webpage provides definitions of the s emergency management functions, as well as links to state and national resources and the s own Hazard Mitigation Plan (i.e., not the County HMP). The also maintains some disaster preparedness information and hazardrelated webpages, including ones on fire prevention and the Green Team; however, the could continue to increase its outreach with a more targeted public information program. The, New Jersey Police maintains an active Facebook page and Twitter account from which the Police disseminates important safety tips, informational advisories, and general community notices. The Police also encourages residents to sign up for Nixle alerts. DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Mercer County, New Jersey

12 The also advertises its Emergency Broadcast System on its homepage. The Emergency Broadcast System is used for emergency notifications, events, initiatives, meetings, and holiday messages. It also addresses potential flooding and other issues, like a localized water main break or power outage. Residents can register either or phone information, and they can identify themselves as a resident or business. In addition, residents may register for the Mercer County Emergency tification System. A screenshot of the of Emergency Management webpage is provided below: Figure of Office of Emergency Management Webpage DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Mercer County, New Jersey

13 MITIGATION STRATEGY AND PRIORITIZATION This section discusses past mitigations actions and status, describes proposed hazard mitigation initiatives, and prioritization. Past Mitigation Initiative Status The following table indicates progress on the community s mitigation strategy identified in the s 2008 Plan. Actions that are carried forward as part of this plan update are included in the following subsection in its own table with prioritization. Previous actions that are now on-going programs and capabilities are indicated as such in the following table and may also be found under Capability Assessment presented previously in this annex. DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Mercer County, New Jersey

14 Table Past Mitigation Initiative Status 2008 Mitigation Action Elevate mechanical and electrical equipment in floodprone residential structures. Assess FEMA repetitive loss and severe repetitive loss properties throughout the to identify mitigation candidates. Purchase and/or flood detention at 163 rth Olden Avenue (Freightyards). Acquire and demolish floodprone property at 104 Taylor Street. Acquire and demolish floodprone property at 151 Taylor Street. Acquire and demolish floodprone property at 3 Amtico Square Responsible Party of Inspections of Inspections of Economic Development of Economic Development or Inspections of Economic Development or Inspections of Economic Development or Inspections Status (In progress, progress, Complete) Description of Status 1. Please describe what was accomplished and indicate % complete. 2. If there was no progress, indicate what obstacles/delays encountered? 3. If there was progress, how is/was the action being funded (e.g., FEMA HMGP grant, local budget)? Next Step (Include in 2016 HMP, Discontinue) progress Staffing and budget constraints Include Include as is progress Staffing and budget constraints Include Progress Funding and staffing constraints Include In Progress Acquisition has been completed; FEMA grant documentation is in review Include progress Property in foreclosure Discontinue Description of Next Step(s) 1. If including action in the 2016 HMP, revise/reword to be more specific (as appropriate). 2. If discontinue, explain why Conduct a Workshop for residents who wish to mitigate their property Determine owner of 163 rth Olden Avenue and discuss mitigation efforts Executive agreement; kickoff meeting anticipated for December 15 th ; bid specs/additional funding needed In Progress Certified Green Acres appraised (completed) Include Project underway DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Mercer County, New Jersey

15 2008 Mitigation Action Get the of into FEMA s Community Rating System Ongoing coordination and involvement with other agencies to maximize mitigation efforts and use of funds. Selective acquisition and demolition of highly floodprone residential or commercial properties. Localized portable flood barriers Detailed flood vulnerability study of the Water Filtration Plant. Flood protection at Water Filtration Plant. Wind vulnerability survey for essential public facilities. Selective tree pruning to limit damage from ice and wind storms. Responsible Party of Inspections of Economic Development or Inspections of Economic Development or Inspections Inspections of Public Works of Public Works Inspections Inspections ; Status (In progress, progress, Complete) Description of Status 1. Please describe what was accomplished and indicate % complete. 2. If there was no progress, indicate what obstacles/delays encountered? 3. If there was progress, how is/was the action being funded (e.g., FEMA HMGP grant, local budget)? Next Step (Include in 2016 HMP, Discontinue) progress Budget and staffing constraints Include On-going capability This action is considered a capability of the, not an action. Discontinue progress Budget and staffing constraints Discontinue progress Budget and staffing constraints Include progress Complete Current data has been utilized for mitigation 100% Complete - Major upgrade to the facility s sump pump systems (larger pumps and piping); Fabrication of flood barriers for exterior door openings; general waterproofing of vulnerable exterior areas of the building Include in 2016 HMP Discontinue progress Budget and staffing constraints Discontinue On-going capability of This action is considered an ongoing capability of the, not an action. Discontinue Description of Next Step(s) 1. If including action in the 2016 HMP, revise/reword to be more specific (as appropriate). 2. If discontinue, explain why Conduct meeting with NJDEP regarding application and participating in CRS program New Action will be: Conduct a workshop for residents who wish to mitigate their property Research the use of portable flood barriers as a mitigation action for repetitive flood prone are34as Included in the 2016 HMP Project has been completed; therefore, it will not be included in the 2016 HMP DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Mercer County, New Jersey

16 Responsible 2008 Mitigation Action Party Local power provider Daylighting the Assunpink from of Housing South Broad Street to Warren and Street Economic Development Determine Earthquake Risk to the of, Identify Mitigation Inspections, Alternatives with assistance from NJGS of Implement Specific Earthquake Inspections; Mitigation Actions other departments and operations OEM = Office of Emergency Management. Status (In progress, progress, Complete) local provider In progress Description of Status 1. Please describe what was accomplished and indicate % complete. 2. If there was no progress, indicate what obstacles/delays encountered? 3. If there was progress, how is/was the action being funded (e.g., FEMA HMGP grant, local budget)? Final design has been approved Next Step (Include in 2016 HMP, Discontinue) Include in 2016 HMP progress Budget and staffing constraints Discontinue progress Budget and staffing constraints Discontinue Description of Next Step(s) 1. If including action in the 2016 HMP, revise/reword to be more specific (as appropriate). 2. If discontinue, explain why The final design of the project has been approved; include action in the 2016 HMP State HMP and County HMP will be utilized as a resource as needed DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Mercer County, New Jersey

17 Completed Mitigation Initiatives not Identified in the Previous Mitigation Strategy There are no additional mitigation projects/activities identified that have also been completed but were not identified in the previous mitigation strategy in the 2011 Plan. Proposed Hazard Mitigation Initiatives for the Plan Update The of attended a mitigation action workshop in vember 2015, hosted by Mercer County, where the following FEMA publications were provided to all plan participants to use as a resource as part of the municipal comprehensive review of all possible activities and mitigation measures to address their hazards: FEMA 551 Selecting Appropriate Mitigation Measures for Floodprone Structures (March 2007) and FEMA Mitigation Ideas A Resource for Reducing Risk to Natural Hazards (January 2013). In December 2015, the participated in a second workshop led by FEMA Region 2 and NJOEM and was provided the results to the risk assessment to further assist with the identification of mitigation actions. Table summarizes the comprehensive-range of specific mitigation initiatives the would like to pursue in the future to reduce the effects of hazards. Some of these initiatives may be previous actions carried forward for this plan update. These initiatives are dependent upon available funding (grants and local match availability) and may be modified or omitted at any time based on the occurrence of new hazard events and changes in municipal priorities. Both the four FEMA mitigation action categories and the six CRS mitigation action categories are listed in the table below to further demonstrate the wide-range of activities and mitigation measures selected. As discussed in Section 6, 14 evaluation/prioritization criteria are used to complete the prioritization of mitigation initiatives. For each new mitigation action, a numeric rank is assigned (-1, 0, or 1) for each of the 14 evaluation criteria to assist with prioritizing your actions as, Medium, or Low. Table summarizes the evaluation of each mitigation initiative, listed by Action Number. DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Mercer County, New Jersey

18 Table Proposed Hazard Mitigation Initiatives Initiative Mitigation Initiative Encourage the consideration of low occupancy, low-density zoning in hazard areas (where practical). Limit development in high hazard areas Incorporate hazard resistant construction standards into the design and location of projects. The s rezoning procedures will recognize hazard areas as limits on zoning changes. During the next update of the Master Plan, incorporate hazard mitigation into the plan. Prepare and adopt a stormwater management plan for the. During the next update of the Transportation Plan, include language that limits access to hazard areas. When updating the ordinances, make hazard mitigation a priority. Incorporate a line item for mitigation project funding into the Budget and the Capital Improvement Budget. Purchase and install a generator at the Rescue Mission of. Elevate mechanical and electrical equipment in floodprone residential structures. Applies to New and/or Existing Structures* New and Existing New New and Existing New and Existing N/A N/A N/A N/A New and Existing Hazard(s) Mitigated All All All All All All All All All Goals Met 1, 2, 4, 5 1, 2, 4, 5 1, 2, 4, 5 1, 2, 4, 5 1, 2, 4, 5 1, 2, 4, 5 1, 2, 4, 5 1, 2, 4, 5 1, 2, 4, 5 Existing All 1, 2, 6 Existing Flood, Severe Weather, Hurricane / Tropical Storm 1, 2, 6 Lead and Support Agencies Rescue Mission with support from of Inspections Estimated Benefits Medium to Medium to Medium to Medium to Medium to Medium to Medium to Medium to Medium to Medium to Estimated Cost Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low - $245,500 Sources of Funding Timeline Priority Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget HMGP with local cost share HMGP with local cost share Mitigation Category CRS Category Ongoing Medium LPR PR Ongoing Medium LPR PR Ongoing Medium LPR PR Ongoing Medium LPR PR Ongoing Medium LPR PR Ongoing Medium LPR PR Ongoing Medium LPR PR Ongoing Medium LPR PR Ongoing Medium LPR PR Short Tem / DOF Short Term / DOF SIP PP SIP PP DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Mercer County, New Jersey

19 Table Proposed Hazard Mitigation Initiatives Initiative Mitigation Initiative Conduct a Workshop for residents who wish to mitigate their property Determine owner of 163 rth Olden Avenue and discuss mitigation efforts Conduct meeting with NJDEP regarding application and participating in CRS program Daylighting the Assunpink from South Broad Street to Warren Street - the final design of the project has been approved Detailed flood vulnerability study of the Water Filtration Plant. Continue to work with acquired properties located in the floodprone areas of the (Taylor Street, Amtico Square) Applies to New and/or Existing Structures* N/A Existing Existing Existing Existing Hazard(s) Mitigated All Flood Flood Flood, Severe Weather, Hurricane / Tropical Storm Flood Goals Met 1, 2, 3, 4 1, 2, 3, 4 1, 2, 3, 4 1, 2, 6 1, 2, 4, 6 Existing Flood 1, 2, 3 Lead and Support Agencies of Inspections of Inspections of Inspections, NJDEP of Housing and Economic Development; USACE of Public Works of Economic Development Estimated Benefits Medium Medium Medium Estimated Cost Low Low Low Sources of Funding Timeline Priority Budget Budget Budget USACE Medium to Medium Medium Budget Budget with grant funding where available Short Term / DOF Short Term / DOF Short Term / DOF Short Term / DOF Short Term / DOF Short Term / DOF Medium Mitigation Category LPR, EAP CRS Category PR, PI Medium EAP PI Medium LPR, EAP PR, PI SIP PP Support the mitigation of vulnerable structures via retrofit (e.g. elevation, flood-proofing) or acquisition/relocation to protect structures from future damage, with repetitive loss and severe repetitive loss properties as a priority when applicable. Phase 1: Identify appropriate candidates and determine most cost-effective mitigation option (in progress). Phase 2: Work with the property owners to implement selected action based on available funding and local match availability. See above. Existing Flood, Severe Weather Wildfire, Severe Winter Weather All Engineering via NFIP FPA with NJOEM, FEMA support FEMA Mitigation Grant Programs and local budget (or property owner) Ongoing (outreach and specific project identification); Long term DOF (specific project application and implementation) SIP, LPR LPR, EAP PP, PR PI, PR SIP PP DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Mercer County, New Jersey

20 Table Proposed Hazard Mitigation Initiatives Initiative Mitigation Initiative Applies to New and/or Existing Structures* Hazard(s) Mitigated Goals Met Lead and Support Agencies Estimated Benefits Estimated Cost Sources of Funding Timeline Priority for cost share tes: t all acronyms and abbreviations defined below are included in the table. *Does this mitigation initiative reduce the effects of hazards on new and/or existing buildings and/or infrastructure? t applicable (N/A) is inserted if this does not apply. Mitigation Category CRS Category Acronyms and Abbreviations: Potential FEMA HMA Funding Sources: Timeline: CAV Community Assistance Visit FMA Flood Mitigation Assistance Grant Program Short CRS Community Rating System HMGP Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Long Term DPW of Public Works PDM Pre-Disaster Mitigation Grant Program OG FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency RFC Repetitive Flood Claims Grant Program DOF FPA Floodplain Administrator (discontinued) HMA Hazard Mitigation Assistance SRL Severe Repetitive Loss Grant Program N/A t applicable (discontinued) NFIP National Flood Insurance Program OEM Office of Emergency Management 1 to 5 years 5 years or greater On-going program Depending on funding Costs: Where actual project costs have been reasonably estimated: Low < $10,000 Medium $10,000 to $100,000 > $100,000 Where actual project costs cannot reasonably be established at this time: Low Possible to fund under existing budget. Project is part of, or can be part of an existing on-going program. Medium Could budget for under existing work plan, but would require a reapportionment of the budget or a budget amendment, or the cost of the project would have to be spread over multiple years. Would require an increase in revenue via an alternative source (i.e., bonds, grants, fee increases) to implement. Existing funding levels are not adequate to cover the costs of the proposed project. Benefits: Where possible, an estimate of project benefits (per FEMA s benefit calculation methodology) has been evaluated against the project costs, and is presented as: Low= < $10,000 Medium $10,000 to $100,000 > $100,000 Where numerical project benefits cannot reasonably be established at this time: Low Long-term benefits of the project are difficult to quantify in the short term. Medium Project will have a long-term impact on the reduction of risk exposure to life and property, or project will provide an immediate reduction in the risk exposure to property. Project will have an immediate impact on the reduction of risk exposure to life and property. Mitigation Category: Local Plans and Regulations (LPR) These actions include government authorities, policies or codes that influence the way land and buildings are being developed and built. Structure and Infrastructure Project (SIP)- These actions involve modifying existing structures and infrastructure to protect them from a hazard or remove them from a hazard area. This could apply to public or private structures as well as critical facilities and infrastructure. This type of action also involves projects to construct manmade structures to reduce the impact of hazards. Natural Systems Protection (NSP) These are actions that minimize damage and losses, and also preserve or restore the functions of natural systems. DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Mercer County, New Jersey

21 Education and Awareness Programs (EAP) These are actions to inform and educate citizens, elected officials, and property owners about hazards and potential ways to mitigate them. These actions may also include participation in national programs, such as StormReady and Firewise Communities CRS Category: Preventative Measures (PR) - Government, administrative or regulatory actions, or processes that influence the way land and buildings are developed and built. Examples include planning and zoning, floodplain local laws, capital improvement programs, open space preservation, and storm water management regulations. Property Protection (PP) - These actions include public activities to reduce hazard losses or actions that involve (1) modification of existing buildings or structures to protect them from a hazard or (2) removal of the structures from the hazard area. Examples include acquisition, elevation, relocation, structural retrofits, storm shutters, and shatter-resistant glass. Public Information (PI) - Actions to inform and educate citizens, elected officials, and property owners about hazards and potential ways to mitigate them. Such actions include outreach projects, real estate disclosure, hazard information centers, and educational programs for school-age children and adults. Natural Resource Protection (NR) - Actions that minimize hazard loss and also preserve or restore the functions of natural systems. These actions include sediment and erosion control, stream corridor restoration, watershed management, forest and vegetation management, and wetland restoration and preservation. Structural Flood Control Projects (SP) - Actions that involve the construction of structures to reduce the impact of a hazard. Such structures include dams, setback levees, floodwalls, retaining walls, and safe rooms. Emergency Services (ES) - Actions that protect people and property during and immediately following a disaster or hazard event. Services include warning systems, emergency response services, and the protection of essential facilities DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Mercer County, New Jersey

22 Table Summary of Prioritization of Actions Mitigation Action / Project Number Mitigation Action/Initiative Encourage the consideration of low occupancy, lowdensity zoning in hazard areas (where practical). Limit development in high hazard areas Incorporate hazard resistant construction standards into the design and location of projects. The s rezoning procedures will recognize hazard areas as limits on zoning changes. During the next update of the Master Plan, incorporate hazard mitigation into the plan. Prepare and adopt a stormwater management plan for the. During the next update of the Transportation Plan, include language that limits access to hazard areas. When updating the ordinances, make hazard mitigation a priority. Incorporate a line item for mitigation project funding into the Budget and the Capital Improvement Budget. Purchase and install a generator at the Rescue Mission of. Elevate mechanical and electrical equipment in floodprone residential structures. Life Safety Property Protection Cost-Effectiveness Technical Political Legal Fiscal Environmental Social Administrative Multi-Hazard Timeline Agency Champion Other Community Objectives Total / Medium / Low Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Mercer County, New Jersey