CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SUMMARY
|
|
- Lucas Pearson
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SUMMARY The purpose of the CIP Budget is to serve as a planning tool, which coordinates the financing and scheduling of major projects undertaken by the City. The CIP Budget document is prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. This document is dynamic and, consequently, must be revised annually to address changing needs, priorities, and financial conditions. The capital improvements presented in this document are the City s major projects, which exceed $30,000 in cost, have long-term life spans, and are generally non-recurring. These projects include land and right-of-way acquisition, design, construction or rehabilitation of public buildings or facilities, public infrastructure design and construction, park design and construction, and affordable housing projects. The City s goal in providing a CIP Budget is to develop a multi-year plan for capital improvement, update it annually, and follow through with all capital improvements in accordance with the plan. In determining the relative merit of a proposed project, key management team members evaluate projects for feasibility, community enhancement, infrastructure and historic preservation, and safety. PLAN DEVELOPMENT A component of the Strategic Business Plan includes the integration of the budget with the Quality of Life Master Plan (QLMP). The Quality of Life Master Plan (QLMP) provides the framework for the City s Strategic Budgeting activities. The City Council has set priorities and guided staff in developing six Core Values upon which to focus time and resources (as identified in the QLMP). These areas include: 1. Healthy and Livable City 2. Economic Prosperity 3. A Safe and Prepared Community 4. A Sustainable City 5. Transportation Mobility and Connectivity 6. Accountable and Responsive City Government All projects presented in the CIP are carefully programmed in concurrence with the City s Quality of Life Master Plan to ensure the community s capital improvement needs are met both now and in the future. The project sheets have been updated to include the specific Core Value(s) each project satisfies. The framework for the CIP is further defined in the City s CIP fiscal policy to provide a structure within which fiscal decisions can be made and to optimize all available resources toward the accomplishment of the City s Core Values as defined in the QLMP. This CIP budget document was developed by incorporating input from key management team members based on community comments and feedback received throughout the year. Through several workshops, the team then identified and evaluated community needs in the areas of roads/streets, bridges, public buildings, parks and recreation facilities. Each proposed project was reviewed and discussed to ensure funding, timing, and necessity. All projects are evaluated by the City s Planning Commission to ensure consistency with the provisions of the City of Temecula General Plan, while considering the City s long-term vision as developed by the City Council. The proposed circulation, infrastructure, and parks and recreation projects are reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission, Public/Traffic Safety Commission, and the Parks and Recreation Commission. 221
2 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SUMMARY (continued) Projects in this document have been scheduled in each of the five fiscal years based on community needs, as determined by the City Council and availability of funding. Priority rankings in each major category (Circulation, Infrastructure/Other, Parks and Recreation, and Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency / Housing) have been assigned in accordance with the priority guidelines as follows: LEVEL I: LEVEL II: LEVEL III: FUTURE YEARS PROJECTS: The project is urgent and must be completed as soon as feasible. Failure to address the project may impact the health, safety, or welfare of the community or have a potential significant impact on the financial well-being of the City. The project must be initiated or financial opportunity losses may result. The project is important and addressing it is necessary. The project impacts safety, law enforcement, health, welfare, economic base, quality of life, and has been identified as a priority in the Quality of Life Master Plan. The project will enhance quality of life and will provide a benefit to the community. Completion of the project will improve the community by providing cultural, recreational, and/or aesthetic value, or is deemed as a necessary improvement to a public facility. The project will be an improvement to the community, but does not necessarily need to be completed within a five-year capital improvement program time frame. The Fiscal Years CIP identifies a total of fifty 50 projects, summarized by category below. The total cost to complete all of the proposed projects is $321,707,361, of which $72,645,217 is programmed for. Also of note, in this document, there is $111,927,129 million in projects with unspecified funding sources. These projects have been identified as necessary infrastructure for the City, and will require that funding sources be identified before the projects can commence. Number of Projects Type of Project of Projects 16 Circulation $280,956, Infrastructure/Other 28,973,826 8 Parks and Recreation 6,570,233 1 SARDA/Housing 5,206, $321,707,
3 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SUMMARY (continued) The administrative costs associated with managing the development of these projects have been estimated (generally as five to ten percent of estimated construction costs), and programmed in each project budget. These projects will affect the Public Works Capital Improvement Program Division as they manage the construction of those projects. Future operations and maintenance costs that result from the projects included in the CIP budget have been estimated for each project. These incremental future operating costs have been incorporated into the five year operating budget forecast in the next section of this document. The estimated total operating and maintenance costs relating to capital improvement projects are shown by project in the Annual Operating and Maintenance s Summary schedule in this section of the Operating Budget. The estimates reflect operating and maintenance costs only. There are no anticipated personnel costs in relation to CIP projects yet. Personnel requirements are evaluated on an annual basis as part of that year s annual operating budget process. The following pages include a summary of projected CIP revenues; CIP projects included in the five-year CIP budget by type of project and priority, operating and maintenance costs for each project, and a description of major CIP revenue sources. A separate CIP budget document is prepared by the City that includes complete detail for each project including project description, scope, location map, level, responsible department, sources of funding, and annual project cost with detail of administration, design, and construction. 223
4 PROJECT SOURCE OF FUNDS Prior Years Actuals as of 12/31/2014 FYE 2015 Carryover Budget Adopted Appropriation Total Project To Complete CIRCULATION CIRCULATION Abbott Corporation Roadway Improvements Bond Proceeds (2007 TABS) - 209, , ,689 Distribution (RPTTF) - 540, , ,311 Total Abbott Corporation Roadway Improvements 750, , ,000 Butterfield Stage Road Extension CFD (Roripaugh Ranch) 29,149,960 12,078,577-41,228,537 12,078,577 Reimbursement/Other (EMWD) 10,965 10,965 - Reimbursement/Other (RCWD) 590, ,028 - Reimbursement/Other (Shea Homes) 173, ,808 - Reimbursement/Other (SCE) 8,537-8,537 - TUMF 1,438,000-1,438,000 - Total Butterfield Stage Road Extension 31,371,298 12,078, ,449,875 12,078,577 Flashing Beacons and Speed Advisory Signs DIF (Traffic Signals) 64,055 17,523 81,578 17,523 Unspecified* 20,000-20,000 40,000 40,000 Total Flashing Beacons and Speed Advisory Signs 64,055 17, ,000-20, ,578 57,523 French Valley Parkway / Interstate-15 Over-Crossing and Interchange Improvements-Phase I General Fund Contributions 369, , , ,000 DIF (Street Improvements) 444, ,203 Measure A (Local Street and Road) 2,869,351-2,869,351 - TUMF (CETAP/RCTC)(1) 19,360, , ,000, ,566 TUMF (RCTC)(2) 3,379, ,379,407 - TUMF (WRCOG)(3) 660, ,523 - TUMF (WRCOG)(4) 1,101, ,101,482 - Total French Valley Parkway / Interstate-15 Over-Crossing and Interchange Improvements-Phase I 28,185, , , ,019, ,566 French Valley Parkway / Interstate-15 Over-Crossing and Interchange Improvements-Phase II General Fund Contributions 1,593, , , , , ,000 2,333, ,000 CFD (Harveston) 1,005, ,005,840 - DIF (Street Improvements) 75, ,360 - Federal Highway Administration 8, ,000 - Measure A (Local Streets and Roads) 1,627, ,627,914 - Reimbursements/Other (Land Donation) 6,000, ,000,000 - SAFETEA-LU ,600, ,600,000 1,600,000 STIP Augmentation ,545,000 31,545,000 31,545,000 STIP(1) ,000,000 10,000,000 10,000,000 TUMF (RCTC)(2) 4,137, ,137,593 - TUMF (WRCOG)(3) 10,240, , ,473, ,472 TUMF (WRCOG)(4) 35,012 3,382, ,417,477 3,382,465 TUMF (WRCOG)(5) - 500, , , ,925,000 1,925,000 TUMF (WRCOG)(6) ,998,381-2,980,619 11,979,000 11,979,000 TUMF (WRCOG)(7) ,480,000 43,480,000 43,480,000 Unspecified(8) ,118,381 86,118,381 86,118,381 Total French Valley Parkway / Interstate-15 Over-Crossing and Interchange Improvements-Phase II 24,723,220 4,115, , ,500 10,742, , ,268, ,726, ,003,318 Illuminated Street Name Sign Replacement Program-Citywide Unspecified* 205, , , , ,
5 PROJECT SOURCE OF FUNDS Prior Years Actuals as of 12/31/2014 FYE 2015 Carryover Budget Adopted Appropriation Total Project To Complete CIRCULATION (Continued) CIRCULATION (Continued) Interstate-15 / State Route 79 South Ultimate Interchange CFD (Crowne Hill) 502, ,211 - Reimbursement/Other (Morgan Hill) 1,190,582 1,190,582 - SAFETEA-LU 1,600,000-1,600,000 1,600,000 Senate Bill ,018,141 1,245,342 2,966, ,000 62, ,454,823 4,436,682 STP (Surface Transportation Program-RCTC) (1) - - 7,158,741 5,817, ,976,100 12,976,100 TUMF (RCTC/CETAP)(2) 4,452,000-4,452,000 - TUMF (RCTC/Region)(3) 1,400,000 4,000, ,400,000 4,000,000 TUMF (WRCOG)(4) ,759,466 3,804,630 2,506,311-10,070,407 10,070,407 Total Interstate-15 / State Route 79 South Ultimate Interchange 17,562,934 1,245,342 15,725,244 9,738,825 3,867,467 2,506,311-50,646,123 33,083,189 Medians and Parkways-Citywide DIF (Street Improvements) 134, ,000-88,000 20, , ,000 Murrieta Creek Bridge and Overland Drive Extension to Diaz Road General Fund Contributions 235, ,422 - DIF (Street Improvements) 5,431,752 2,843, ,059, ,334,797 4,903,045 Reimbursement/Other 59,060 59,060 - Unspecified* 8,672, ,672,195 8,672,195 Total Murrieta Creek Bridge and Overland Drive Extension to Diaz Road 5,726,234 2,843, ,731, ,301,474 13,575,240 Pavement Rehabilitation Program-Citywide General Fund Contributions 2,664,345 4,319, , , , ,000 7,983,523 5,319,178 Measure A 10,507,727 2,030, , ,257 1,049,600 1,163,525 1,284,384 17,955,345 7,447,618 Total Pavement Rehabilitation Program-Citywide 13,172,072 6,349, ,639 1,192,257 1,299,600 1,413,525 1,534,384 25,938,868 12,766,796 Pavement Rehabilitation Program- Winchester Road Measure A , , ,762 STP (Surface Transportation Program) - 646, , ,190 Total Pavement Rehabilitation Program- Winchester Road 23 1,529, ,529,975 1,529,952 Traffic Signal Conductor Enhancement Program-Citywide Unspecified* 205, , , , ,000 Traffic Signal Equipment Enhancement Program- Citywide DIF (Traffic Signals) 187, , , , , ,101 Unspecified* - 80,000 80,000 80, , ,000 Total Traffic Signal Equipment Enhancement Program- Citywide 187, , , ,783 80,000 80,000 80, , ,101 Traffic Signal Installation Citywide DIF (Traffic Signals) - 75, , , ,500 Unspecified* - 1,077, ,000 1,105,000 2,772,000 2,772,000 Traffic Signal Installation Citywide 75, ,500-1,077, ,000 1,105,000 3,089,500 3,089,500 Traffic Signal Interconnect Equipment Installation DIF (Traffic Signals) 272, ,409 - Unspecified* - 400, , , ,000 Total Traffic Signal Interconnect Equipment Installation 272, , , , ,000 Western Bypass Bridge Over Murrieta Creek General Fund Contributions 236,487 45, ,480 45,993 TUMF (WRCOG)(1) 709,576 33, , ,479, ,424 TUMF (WRCOG)(2) 13,500-25, , , ,500 TUMF (WRCOG)(3) ,389, ,389,000 6,389,000 Unspecified(4) 1,905,750 1,905,750 1,905,750 Total Western Bypass Bridge Over Murrieta Creek 959,563 79,768 25,000-7,396,149 1,905,750-10,366,230 9,406,667 TOTAL CIRCULATION PROJECTS $ 122,359,300 $ 29,994,957 $ 18,246,883 $ 11,978,365 $ 36,044,254 $ 7,049,586 $ 177,642,384 $ 403,315,729 $ 280,956,
6 PROJECT SOURCE OF FUNDS Prior Years Actuals as of 12/31/2014 FYE 2015 Carryover Budget Adopted Appropriation Total Project To Complete INFRASTRUCTURE / OTHER INFRASTRUCTURE / OTHER Bike Lane and Trail Program DIF (Open Space and Trails) 59, ,584 67, ,244 90,346 62,689 34, , ,246 Unspecified* 333,517 87,311 2,465,890 2,886,718 2,886,718 Total Bike Lane and Trail Program 59, ,584 67, , , ,000 2,500,000 3,816,380 3,756,964 City Facilities Rehabilitation General Fund Contributions 1,000, , , , , ,000 2,250,000 1,250,000 DIF (Corporate Facilities) 31, , , ,111 Total City Facilities Rehabilitation 1,031, , , , , , ,000 2,500,000 1,468,111 City Hall Exterior LED Lighting "Light it Up" Public Art Fund 67,482 67,482 67,482 Citywide Drainage Master Plan Unspecified* 500, , ,000 Citywide Sidewalks General Fund Contributions 82,737 42, , , , , , , ,263 Citywide Storm Drain Improvements General Fund Contributions 680, ,582 55, , ,582 Citywide Surveillance Cameras DIF (Corporate Facilities) 170,376 27, , , ,051 DIF (Police Facilities) 443, ,090 55, , ,449 Total Citywide Surveillance Cameras 614, , ,500 1,187,500 1,187,500 Consolidate and Update Evaluation of Disabled Access to City Facilities, Programs and Public Right of Way General Fund Contributions 100, ,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50, , ,000 Developer Reimbursements DIF (Corporate Facilities) 6,031 6,031 DIF (Fire) 1,005 1,005 DIF (Parks& Recreation) 1,230, ,123 1,567,164 1,567,164 Total Developer Reimbursements 7,036 1,230, ,123 1,574,200 1,567,164 Emergency Operations Center Improvements DIF (Corporate Facilities) 37,000 24,000 14,000 75,000 75,000 EMPG (Grant) 4,000 24,000 14,000 42,000 42,000 Total Emergency Operations Center Improvements 41,000 48,000 28, , ,000 Fire Station 73 Living Quarters Upgrade Advanced from General Fund 817, , ,400 General Fund Contributions 200, , ,000 DIF (Fire) 204, ,409 22, , ,909 DIF (Police Facilities) 2,000 2,000 2,000 Total Fire Station 73 Living Quarters Upgrade 204,191 1,632,809 22,500 1,859,500 1,655,309 Fire Station 95 Roripaugh Ranch Site-Phase II DIF (Fire) 38,663 11,337 25,000 75,000 36,337 Library Parking Phase II General Fund Contributions 37,628 37,628 - DIF (Library) 490,033 1,218, ,449 2,684,821 2,194,788 DIF (Police Facilities) 50,000 50,000 50,000 Total Library Parking Phase II 527,661 1,268, ,449 2,772,449 2,244,788 Medians and Ornamental Pedestrian Barriers-Citywide DIF (Street Improvements) 29,900 10,100 40,000 10,100 Unspecified* 393, , , ,700 Total Medians and Ornamental Pedestrian Barriers-Citywide 29,900 10, , , , ,800 Murrieta Creek Improvements General Fund Contributions 132, ,412 Reimbursements (Sale of Property) 58,200 58, , ,400 Unspecified* 150, , ,000 Total Murrieta Creek Improvements 132,412 58,200 58, , , ,400 Old Town Boardwalk Enhancement Unspecified* 300, , ,000 1,430,000 1,430,
7 PROJECT SOURCE OF FUNDS Prior Years Actuals as of 12/31/2014 FYE 2015 Carryover Budget Adopted Appropriation Total Project To Complete INFRASTRUCTURE / OTHER (Continued) INFRASTRUCTURE / OTHER (Continued) Old Town Sidewalks Improvement Project CDBG 360, , ,000 Open Space Acquisition Program DIF (Open Space and Trails) 265, ,021 Unspecified* 200, , ,000 Total Open Space Acquisition Program 265, , , ,000 Pechanga Parkway Environmental Mitigation CFD (Wolf Creek) 514, , ,318 28,000 28,000 28,000 1,017, ,643 Santa Gertrudis Creek Pedestrian/Bicycle Trail Extension And Interconnect AB , , , ,778 BTA (Bicycle Transportation Account) 223, ,311 General Fund Contributions 78,920 78,920 DIF (Open Space and Trails) 40, , , ,285 Unspecified* 3,394,622 3,394,622 3,394,622 Total Santa Gertrudis Creek Pedestrian/Bicycle Trail Extension And Interconnect 401, ,285 3,811,400 4,361,387 3,959,685 Teen Center DIF (Parks & Recreation) 10,682 19,318 30,000 19,318 Temecula Park and Ride AB , , , , ,987 General Fund Contributions 319, , , ,678 *CMAQ 1,300,750 1,300,750 1,300,750 DIF (Police Facilities) 100, , ,000 Total Temecula Park and Ride 418,678 2,045, ,000 2,764,093 2,345,415 Theater LED Lighting DIF (Corporate Facilities) 30,600 30,600 30,600 Theater Remediation General Fund Contributions 289,585 3,512,973 3,802,558 3,512,973 DIF (Police Facilities) 6,108 48,892 55,000 48,892 Total Theater Remediation 295,693 3,561,865 3,857,558 3,561,865 YMCA Repair and Remediation General Fund Contributions 161, ,047 DIF (Corporate Facilities) 67, , , ,207 DIF (Police Facilities) 115, , ,000 DIF (Quimby) 661, , ,393 Total YMCA Repair and Remediation 228,969 1,219,600 1,448,569 1,219,600 TOTAL INFRASTRUCTURE/OTHER PROJECTS $ 4,929,729 $ 13,012,974 $ 3,352,945 $ 734,444 $ 2,473,363 $ 1,683,700 $ 7,716,400 $ 33,903,555 $ 28,973,
8 PROJECT SOURCE OF FUNDS Prior Years Actuals as of 12/31/2014 FYE 2015 Carryover Budget Adopted Appropriation Total Project To Complete PARKS / RECREATION PARKS / RECREATION Children s Museum Enhancement Project DIF (Parks & Recreation) 30,140 83, ,000 83,860 Flood Control Channel Reconstruction and Repair General Fund Contributions 138, , , , ,000 1,250,000 1,111,466 Parks Improvement Program General Fund Contributions 583, , , , , , ,873 1,560, ,578 DIF (Quimby) 50,000-50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 59, , ,127 Total Parks Improvement Program 633, , , , , , ,000 1,870,000 1,236,705 Patricia H Birdsall Sports Park Synthetic Turf Enhancement DIF (Parks& Recreation) , , , ,053,237 1,053,237 Unspecified* 71, , , , ,763 Total Patricia H Birdsall Sports Park Synthetic Turf Enhancement , , , , ,000 1,875,000 1,875,000 Playground Equipment Enhancement and Safety Surfacing DIF (Parks& Recreation) - 290, , , ,020,000 1,020,000 DIF (Quimby) , , ,000 Total Playground Equipment Enhancement and Safety Surfacing - 290, , , , ,460,000 1,460,000 Ronald Reagan Sports Park Channel Silt Removal and Desilting Pond General Fund Contributions 398,397 33,321 29,648 29, ,014 92,617 Proposition 42 88,000 88,000 - Total Ronald Reagan Sports Park Channel Silt Removal and Desilting Pond 637,017 33,321 29,648 29, ,634 92,617 Sam Hicks Monument Park Playground Enhancement CDBG 16, , , , ,157 DIF (Police Facilities) - 35, ,000 35,000 Total Sam Hicks Monument Park Playground Enhancement 16, , , , ,157 Senior Citizen Outdoor Fitness Lot DIF (Parks & Recreation) 11,372 78,428 89,800 78,428 TOTAL PARKS / RECREATION PROJECTS $ 1,467,089 $ 1,488,599 $ 1,341,986 $ 1,014,648 $ 1,285,000 $ 595,000 $ 845,000 $ 8,037,322 $ 6,570,233 SARDA / HOUSING SARDA / HOUSING Affordable Housing SARDA Housing (2010 TABS) 4,000,000 5,206,873 9,206,873 5,206,873 TOTAL SARDA PROJECTS $ 4,000,000 5,206,873 9,206,873 5,206,873 TOTALS $ 132,756,118 $ 49,703,403 $ 22,941,814 $ 13,727,457 $ 39,802,617 $ 9,328,286 $ 186,203,784 $ 454,463,479 $ 321,707,361 *Project cannot be constructed until a funding source is identified
9 FUNDING SOURCE PROJECTED REVENUE SUMMARY Available Fund Balance Revenue Revenue Revenue City of Temecula Revenue Revenue Funds Available Assembly Bill 2766 $ 665,783 $ 99,204 $ 101,161 $ 103,157 $ 105,192 $ 107,268 $ 1,181,765 General Fund Contributions 9,006,481 1,668,326 1,018,648 1,239, ,000 1,229,873 15,151,328 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) 957, ,157 Public Art 41,374 26,108 25,819 22,671 29,134 1, ,974 Community Facilities Districts Roripaugh Community Facilities District 12,078,577 12,078,577 Wolf Creek Community Facilities District 502, ,643 Development Impact Fees (DIF) Corporate Facilities 354, , , , ,000 19,237 1,358,115 Fire Facilities 567, , ,129 64,459 44,726 24, ,238 Library Facilities 752, , , , ,076 31,170 2,194,788 Open Space and Trails 458, , ,244 90,346 62,689 34,110 1,018,531 Parks and Recreation 1,738, , , , , ,026 3,822,007 Police Facilities 694, ,537 93,727 27,139 18,831 10,246 1,012,341 Quimby - 348, , , ,942 8,835 1,360,520 Street Improvements 2,008,473 2,016, , , ,315 70,906 5,164,145 Traffic Signals 266, , ,767 26,585 18,447 10, ,869 Measure A Programs Measure A (Local Streets and Roads) 3,050, , ,257 1,049,600 1,163,525 1,284,384 8,331,380 Grants Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ) 1,300,750 1,300,750 Emergency Management Program Grant 4,000 24,000 14,000 42,000 SAFETEA-LU 1,600,000 1,600,000 3,200,000 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) 31,545,000 31,545,000 Surface Transportation Program (STP) 7,804,931 5,817,359 10,000,000 23,622,290 Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund 540, ,311 Tax Allocation Bonds , ,689 Affordable Housing Tax Allocation Bonds ,206,873 5,206,873 Reimbursements/Other Sale of Property 58,200 58, ,400 Senate Bills Senate Bill 621 4,436,682 4,436,682 Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Community and Environmental Transportation Accountability Program (CETAP/RCTC) 639, ,566 Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) 4,000,000 4,000,000 Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) 4,887,212 4,471,966 20,199,160 2,506,311 46,460,619 78,525,268 TOTAL REVENUE $ 42,580,745 $ 28,256,490 $ 15,537,659 $ 25,837,135 $ 6,206,263 $ 90,954,915 $ 209,373,
10 ANNUAL OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE COSTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM City of Temecula CIRCULATION PROJECT Priority Butterfield Stage Road Extension I 19,102 19,484 19,874 20,271 20,677 Flashing Beacons and Speed Advisory Signs I 1,061 1,082 1,104 1,126 1,148 French Valley Parkway / Interstate-15 Over-Crossing and Interchange Improvements-Phase II I ,000 Interstate-15 / State Route 79 South Ultimate Interchange I - - 6,242 6,367 6,494 Medians and Parkways-Citywide III - 1,400 1,428 1,457 1,486 Murrieta Creek Bridge and Overland Drive Extension to Diaz Road I - - 1,061 1,082 - Traffic Signal Conductor Enhancementnt Program- Citywide I - - 1,000 1,020 1,040 Traffic Signal Equipment Enhancementnt Program- Citywide I 1,000 1,020 1,040 1,061 1,082 Traffic Signal Installation Citywide I - 4,000 8,000 4,000 8,000 Traffic Signal Interconnect Equipment Installation II - - 2,000-1,000 Western Bypass Bridge Over Murrieta Creek II ,404 10,612 10,824 TOTAL CIRCULATION PROJECTS $ 21,163 $ 26,986 $ 52,153 $ 46,996 $ 66,752 PROJECT Priority INFRASTRUCTURE/OTHER Citywide Surveillance Cameras I - 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 Emergency Operations Center Improvements I YMCA Repair and Remediation I - 71,250 95,000 96,900 98,838 TOTAL INFRASTRUCTURE / OTHER PROJECTS $ - $ 121,750 $ 155,510 $ 166,900 $ 178,
11 ANNUAL OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE COSTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM City of Temecula PROJECT Priority PARKS / RECREATION Patricia H. Birdsall Sports Park Synthetic Turf Enhancement II ,000 15,300 15,606 Playground Equipment Enhancement and Safety Surfacing II - 2,550 2,601 2,653 2,706 Sam Hicks Monument Park Playground Replacement I - 5,100 5,202 5,306 5,412 Senior Citizen Outdoor Fitness Lot II 2,500 2,550 2,601 2,653 TOTAL PARKS/RECREATION PROJECTS $ - $ 10,150 $ 25,353 $ 25,860 $ 26,377 GRAND TOTAL $ 21,163 $ 158,886 $ 233,016 $ 239,756 $ 271,
12 DESCRIPTION OF REVENUE SOURCES Assembly Bill 2766 (AB 2766) State funds that are available to implement programs and projects that reduce air pollution from motor vehicles. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) The Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) provides funds through the Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG) for local community development, housing activities, and public services. The primary objective of the CDBG Program is the development of viable communities by providing decent housing, a suitable living environment, and expanded economic opportunities primarily focused on low- and moderate-income persons and neighborhoods. Community Facilities District (CFD) A tool that allows the City to construct desired and authorized public improvements with costs of the projects paid for by the benefitted properties within the boundaries of a designated area. The costs are then financed through the issuance of bonds payable over a period of years. Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) This program funds transportation projects or programs that will result in air quality benefits, contribute to attain or maintenance of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ozone and carbon monoxide and provide congestion relief. Development Impact Fees (DIF) Fees generated by development applications to offset the effect of development to include infrastructure, fire protection, public facilities and services, libraries, roads, schools, parks, traffic signal mitigation and open space/public art. Fees are determined by the cost of the project at the time of application. Emergency Management Performance Grant The purpose of this grant is to sustain and improve comprehensive emergency management programs at the state, tribal and local levels from all man-made and natural disasters through the prevention, mitigation, response and recovery of all hazards events. General Fund Contributions City General Funds retained for capital improvement projects. Measure A (Local Streets and Roads) Funds generated from the one-half percent sales tax levied throughout Riverside County to carry out transportation projects by the County and cities. Public Art Fund Public Artwork enhances the quality of life for individuals living and working in the Temecula. This fund was adopted by City Council for design, acquisition, installation, improvement, maintenance and insurance of public artwork displayed on city property; offering of performing arts programs on city property for the community; and art education programs on city property for the community (provided, however, that not more than five percent of the fund s annual budget shall be used for this purpose. 237
13 DESCRIPTION OF REVENUE SOURCES (continued) Quimby The City s park-in-lieu or park development fee is assessed under provisions of the Subdivision Map Act which allows the City to require the dedication of land or the payment of a fee in lieu of land to be used for the purchase (or development) of park property. Reimbursements/Other Funding made available from other agencies or sources on a reimbursement, donation, and contribution basis. The actual agreement states the conditions of monies specific to a particular project. Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient, Transportation Equity Act - Legacy for Users (SAFETEA LU) Signed into law on August 10, 2005, and provides for highways, highway safety, and public transportation to improve safety, reduce traffic congestion, and other activities related to solving transportation problems. This new program takes off where STP, TEA-21, and ISTEA left off. Senate Bill 621 Represents a regional organization made up of tribal governments primarily within Riverside and San Bernardino counties. Tribal Alliance of Sovereign Indian Nations (TASIN) member tribes contribute a percentage of their gaming revenues to the Indian Gaming Special Distribution Fund (SDF), as established by the State Legislature, to offset the impacts of Indian gaming on public services and infrastructure. State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Augmentation State and Federal funds used for the construction of projects that add capacity to the transportation system. Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency Affordable Housing Tax Allocation Bonds (TABs) As of January 31, 2012, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula has been dissolved and the City has elected to become the Successor Agency. The Successor Agency will be responsible for the winding down of the remaining activities of the dissolved Redevelopment Agency. These remaining activities include completing affordable housing and infrastructure projects that are funded with tax allocation bonds issued by the former redevelopment agency. Surface Transportation Program (STP) Federal funds available for local agencies to improve the safety and efficiency of the local transportation system. Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Multi-jurisdictional development impact fee paid for by new development to provide the transportation infrastructure necessary to accommodate new development. 238
Public Works and Development Services
City of Commerce Capital Improvement Program Prioritization Policy Public Works and Development Services SOP 101 Version No. 1.0 Effective 05/19/15 Purpose The City of Commerce s (City) Capital Improvement
More informationContents. Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization. Introduction S. St. Mary s Street San Antonio, Texas 78205
Contents Introduction 1 Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Tel 210.227.8651 Fax 210.227.9321 825 S. St. Mary s Street San Antonio, Texas 78205 www.alamoareampo.org aampo@alamoareampo.org Pg.
More informationCity of Lake Elsinore, California. Capital Improvement Plan Budget FY to FY
City of Lake Elsinore, California Capital Improvement Plan Budget FY2016-17 to FY2020-21 1 2 Capital Improvement Plan Budget Fiscal Years 2016-2021 City Council Brian Tisdale, Mayor Robert E. Magee, Mayor
More informationCapital Improvement Projects
Capital Improvement Projects This section highlights the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects proposed for FY 2017-2018. Capital projects are designed to enhance the City s infrastructure, extend
More informationCITY FUNDS & FUND ACCOUNTING TAB 19
CITY FUNDS & FUND ACCOUNTING TAB 19 This page intentionally left blank. Special Revenue Funds Special Revenue Funds are used to account for proceeds of specific revenue sources (other than major capital
More informationLEGEND Bridges Parks Fire Stations Project Locations Libraries Schools A
LEGEND Bridges Parks Fire Stations Project Locations Libraries Schools A Aid to Construction Fund The Aid to Construction Fund (Water) are funds received from customers for requested water service and
More informationWASATCH FRONT REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN FINANCIAL PLAN. Technical Report 47 May 2007 DAVIS MORGAN SALT LAKE TOOELE WEBER
WASATCH FRONT REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN 2007-2030 FINANCIAL PLAN Technical Report 47 May 2007 DAVIS MORGAN SALT LAKE TOOELE WEBER 2030 RTP Financial Plan WASATCH FRONT REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN
More informationCITY OF SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA. April 27, 2012
OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER CALIFORNIA April 27, 2012 CITY HALL 5 th FLOOR 915 I STREET SACRAMENTO, CA 95814-2684 PH 916-808-5704 FAX 916-808-7618 Honorable Mayor and City Council Sacramento, California
More informationInternal Service and Special Revenue Funds May 24, 2016
Internal Service and Special Revenue Funds May 24, 2016 1 What are internal service funds? Used to accumulate funds for specific purposes. Required resources are collected from the participating City departments
More informationCITY OF PALM DESERT COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL PLAN
Comprehensive General Plan/Administration and Implementation CITY OF PALM DESERT COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL PLAN CHAPTER II ADMINISTRATION AND IMPLEMENTATION This Chapter of the General Plan addresses the administration
More informationCHAPTER 5 INVESTMENT PLAN
CHAPTER 5 INVESTMENT PLAN This chapter of the 2014 RTP/SCS plan illustrates the transportation investments for the Stanislaus region. Funding for transportation improvements is limited and has generally
More informationIMPLEMENTATION A. INTRODUCTION C H A P T E R
C H A P T E R 11 IMPLEMENTATION A. INTRODUCTION This chapter addresses implementation of the General Plan. The Plan s seven elements include 206 individual actions. 1 Many are already underway or are on-going.
More informationPolicy CIE The following are the minimum acceptable LOS standards to be utilized in planning for capital improvement needs:
Vision Statement: Provide high quality public facilities that meet and exceed the minimum level of service standards. Goals, Objectives and Policies: Goal CIE-1. The City shall provide for facilities and
More informationCITY OF LANCASTER FISCAL BUDGET REVENUE SOURCES
CITY OF LANCASTER FISCAL 2006-07 BUDGET REVENUE SOURCES TAXES The tax raising authority of cities has been severely limited for the past 25 years. Proposition 13 enacted in 1978 amended the California
More informationChapter 5. REMAINING REVIEW FACTORS
Chapter 5. REMAINING REVIEW FACTORS Section 5.1 Finance Constraints and Opportunities Chapter 5 REMAINING REVIEW FACTORS Introduction The remaining review factors required by the Cortese Knox Hertzberg
More informationOTHER GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS - SPECIAL REVENUE
OTHER GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS - SPECIAL REVENUE Special Revenue Funds are used to account for proceeds of specific revenue sources other than expendable trust that are legally restricted to expenditures for
More informationINVESTING STRATEGICALLY
11 INVESTING STRATEGICALLY Federal transportation legislation (Fixing America s Surface Transportation Act FAST Act) requires that the 2040 RTP be based on a financial plan that demonstrates how the program
More informationACTION STRATEGIES. Aurora Places is the guidebook
ACTION STRATEGIES Aurora Places is the guidebook for growth and development throughout city for the next 20 years. It outlines specific recommendations to successfully use the plan on a daily basis. This
More informationGLOSSARY. At-Grade Crossing: Intersection of two roadways or a highway and a railroad at the same grade.
Glossary GLOSSARY Advanced Construction (AC): Authorization of Advanced Construction (AC) is a procedure that allows the State to designate a project as eligible for future federal funds while proceeding
More informationReview and Update of Year 2035 Regional Transportation Plan
Review and Update of Year 2035 Regional Transportation Plan #217752 1 Background Every four years, the Year 2035 Plan is reviewed Elements of review Validity of Plan Year 2035 forecasts Transportation
More informationFiscal Responsibility to Further Invest in the Future. Executive Committee Department of Finance May 4, 2017
Fiscal Responsibility to Further Invest in the Future Executive Committee Department of Finance May 4, 2017 1 Asset Inventory Denver s Assets Parks and Recreation $1.8B Transportation $4.7B Buildings $1.9B
More informationChapter 6: Financial Resources
Chapter 6: Financial Resources Introduction This chapter presents the project cost estimates, revenue assumptions and projected revenues for the Lake~Sumter MPO. The analysis reflects a multi-modal transportation
More informationChapter 5: Cost and Revenues Assumptions
Chapter 5: Cost and Revenues Assumptions Chapter 5: Cost and Revenues Assumptions INTRODUCTION This chapter documents the assumptions that were used to develop unit costs and revenue estimates for the
More informationTransportation Trust Fund Overview
Transportation Trust Fund Overview Created pursuant to New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority Act of 1984 Established to finance the cost of planning, acquisition, engineering, construction, reconstruction,
More informationOTHER GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS - SPECIAL REVENUE
OTHER GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS SPECIAL REVENUE Special Revenue Funds are used to account for proceeds of specific revenue sources other than expendable trust that are legally restricted to expenditures for specific
More informationNOTICE OF ELECTION 2021 $10,000, $10,000, $10,000, $10,000,000
NOTICE OF ELECTION TO THE QUALIFIED VOTERS OF DEKALB COUNTY, GEORGIA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on the 7 th day of November, 2017, an election will be held at the regular polling places in all of the
More informationALL Counties. ALL Districts
TEXAS TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ALL Counties rhnute ORDER Page of ALL Districts The Texas Transportation Commission (commission) finds it necessary to propose amendments to. and., relating to Transportation
More informationPolicy Statement No: 304 Adopted: June 2011 Category: Financial Management. Subject: Reporting Unrestricted Fund Balance in the General Fund Financial
CITY OF EL CENTRO POLICY STATEMENT Policy Statement No: 304 Adopted: June 2011 Category: Financial Management 1 Revised: Subject: Reporting Unrestricted Fund Balance in the General Fund Financial I. Purpose:
More informationMJEMORANJDUM GENERAL FUND. finance Department. DATE: August 26, 2015 TO: Steven A. Preston, City Manager FROM: Thomas C. Marston, Finance Director
finance Department MJEMORANJDUM DATE: August 26, 2015 TO: FROM: Steven A. Preston, City Manager Thomas C. Marston, Finance Director SUBJECT: Quarterly Budget Update- July through June (Pre-closing) 2015
More informationFunding Source: Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Grant - $315,100; Measure I - $60,500
FY 2017-18 Capital Improvement Program Detail STREETS Raised Median on Pipeline Avenue S14009 Program Year Initiated: FY 2013-14 Construction Year: FY 2016-17 Project Description: Install raised median
More informationMEMORANDUM. Attached for your review is the quarterly budget update for third quarter of the fiscal year.
Finance Department MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: April30, 2015 Steven A. Preston, City Manager ~ Thomas C. Marston, Finance Director'-\""~ SUBJECT: Quarterly Budget Update- July through March 2015 Attached
More informationFiscal Year VDOT Annual Budget June 2017
Fiscal Year 2018 VDOT Annual Budget June 2017 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Annual Budget FY 2018 2 Virginia Department of Transportation Table of Contents Overview.. 5 Revenues.. 7 Highway Maintenance
More informationThis page intentionally blank. Capital Facilities Chapter Relationship to Vision. Capital Facilities Chapter Concepts
This page intentionally blank. Capital Facilities Chapter Relationship to Vision Vision County Government. County government that is accountable and accessible; encourages citizen participation; seeks
More informationCity of Chino Five-Year Capital Improvement Program Budget Fiscal Years through
City of Chino Five-Year Capital Improvement Program Budget Fiscal Years 2015-16 through 2019-20 The Five-Year Capital Improvement Program budget for FY15-16 has a new look. The CIP projects have a new
More informationINVESTMENT STRATEGIES
3 INVESTMENT STRATEGIES 70 INVESTMENT STRATEGIES 71 A key role of Mobilizing Tomorrow is to outline a strategy for how the region will invest in transportation infrastructure over the next 35 years. This
More informationPUBLIC WORKS - ENGINEERING
PUBLIC WORKS - ENGINEERING 4 DIVISIONS: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING SEWER & STORM DRAIN ENGINEERING 18 FTE s, 2 Hourly s In FY 14/15 Expended approximately
More informationAPPENDIX I REVENUE PROJECTION AND ASSUMPTIONS
APPENDIX I REVENUE PROJECTION AND ASSUMPTIONS The 2018 StanCOG Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) financial forecasts provide revenue projections for StanCOG member
More informationTRUST AND CONFIDENCE
Torontonians City Council TRUST AND CONFIDENCE STRATEGY Public Service 2 2.9 million people call Toronto home each night 3.1 million people call Toronto home each day 3.8 million people will call Toronto
More information2018 CAPITAL BUDGET CAPITAL PLAN
2018 CAPITAL BUDGET 2019-2027 CAPITAL PLAN This is administrations recommended 2018 Capital Budget to Red Deer City Council. Final decisions will be made as a part of Councils review changes may occur.
More informationTRANSPORTATION CAPITAL PROGRAM
TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL PROGRAM The transportation capital program for fiscal year 2016 through fiscal year 2020 consists of a variety of transportation construction and maintenance capital projects primarily
More informationCOMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Plan Abstract
Village of Swansea, Illinois 10/26/2017 Executive Summary COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A Plan Abstract The following are excerpts from Swansea s 2017 Comprehensive Plan Update Comprehensive
More informationThis page intentionally left blank
197 This page intentionally left blank 198 Capital Improvement Program PROCEDURE Each year the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is prepared from project requests submitted by the various departments.
More informationCity of San Juan Capistrano Age eport
6/19/2014 C1 City of San Juan Capistrano Age eport TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Karen P. Brust, City a Cindy Russell, Chief Financial Officer/City Treasure~~ Prepared by: Michelle Bannigan, Assistant Finance
More informationFY 2017 FY 2021 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Executive Summary
FY 2017 FY 2021 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Executive Summary The adopted FY 2017 FY 2021 CIP is $235.8 million (including prior year expenditures) and is $28 million higher than the previous CIP
More informationAnalysis of the Alameda County Transportation Expenditure Plan Prepared by Alameda County Transportation Commission
Analysis of the Alameda County Transportation Expenditure Plan Prepared by Alameda County Transportation Commission Discussion: In 1986, voters approved Measure B, a 1/2 cent sales tax, to fund transportation
More informationI. Introduction and Background
I. Introduction and Background The purpose of the Midterm Review of the 2007 Five-Year Implementation Plan (Implementation Plan) is to provide a review of the current status of the goals, programs and
More informationFISCAL YEAR RECOMMENDED BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 2017-2018 RECOMMENDED BUDGET JUNE 6, 2017 AGENDA City Manager s Budget Status FY 2017-18 General Fund Recommended Budget FY 2017-18 Recommended Non-General Fund Budget FY 2017-18 Recommended
More informationTRUST AND CONFIDENCE
-2019- BU1.3 Torontonians City Council TRUST AND CONFIDENCE STRATEGY Public Service 2 2.9 million 3.1 million 3.8 million people call Toronto people call Toronto people will call Toronto home each night
More informationFinancial Snapshot October 2014
Financial Snapshot October 2014 Financial Snapshot About the Financial Snapshot The Financial Snapshot provides answers to frequently asked questions regarding MoDOT s finances. This document provides
More informationDevelopment of the Cost Feasible Plan
March 15, 2012 TPO Board and Advisory Committee Meetings Development of the Cost Feasible Plan Transportation Outlook 2035 LRTP Update Atkins Development of the Cost Feasible Plan P a g e 1 Development
More informationDescription of Fund Types and Funds
Financial activities for local government fall into three broad categories, governmental, proprietary, and fiduciary fund categories. Governmental funds are used to account for activities primarily supported
More informationFinancial. Snapshot An appendix to the Citizen s Guide to Transportation Funding in Missouri
Financial Snapshot An appendix to the Citizen s Guide to Transportation Funding in Missouri November 2017 Financial Snapshot About the Financial Snapshot The Financial Snapshot provides answers to frequently
More informationBalanced Financial Plan Projected Changes and Assumptions
Appendix I Resolution Adopting the Three Year Plan Town of Castle Rock Projected Changes and Assumptions Unless otherwise noted, following is a general list of Townwide growth rates used in future years:
More informationNASHVILLE AREA MPO TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY
NASHVILLE AREA MPO TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY 2008-2011 Amendment Conformity Report for August 20, 2008 Amendments (Amendment # 2008-028 thru 2008-030) On August 20, 2008 the Executive Board
More informationTransportation Improvement Program and Incentives for Local Planning
Capital District November 9, 2004 Transportation Committee Transportation Improvement Program and Incentives for Local Planning CDTC has been successful in funding 36 Linkage Program planning studies since
More informationPublic Policy Issues and Sustainability in Southern California. Financing Infrastructure Development
Public Policy Issues and Sustainability in Southern California Financing Infrastructure Development University of California Riverside March 3, 2010 Outline What is Infrastructure?; Infrastructure Need;
More informationAppendix. G RTP Revenue Assumptions REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN/SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY
Appendix G RTP Revenue Assumptions REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN/SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY Exhibit G-1 2014 RTP REVENUE FORECAST ASSUMPTIONS LOCAL REVENUES Measure K Sales Tax Renewal Program: Description:
More informationAPPENDIX 5 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
APPENDIX 5 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS Background Starting with the Intermodal Surface Transportation Equity Act of 1991, it has been a consistent requirement of federal law and regulation that the projects included
More informationCity of SANTA ANA. Proposed Budget Summary FY
City of SANTA ANA Proposed Budget Summary FY 2015-2016 June 2, 2015 City Manager s Budget Message will be made available on May 29 th, 2015. This Page Intentionally Left Blank Total Annual Budget FY 2015-2016
More informationAgenda. Background Budget / PW General Fund Budget Streets & Infrastructure Citizen Engagement
1 Agenda Background 2013-2014 Budget / PW General Fund Budget Streets & Infrastructure Citizen Engagement Sustainable Transportation Funding Dedicated Revenues Potential Rate Impact Clarification Proposed
More informationMeasure I Strategic Plan, April 1, 2009 Glossary Administrative Committee Advance Expenditure Agreement (AEA) Advance Expenditure Process
Glossary Administrative Committee This committee makes recommendations to the Board of Directors and provides general policy oversight that spans the multiple program responsibilities of the organization
More informationFinancial Capacity Analysis
FINANCIAL CAPACITY ANALYSIS Introduction Federal transportation planning rules require that metropolitan area transportation plans include a financial capacity analysis to demonstrate that the plan is
More informationCapital Improvement Program. Fiscal Years
Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2014-2021 1 Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2014-2021 Agenda Background Significant Accomplishments (2012-2014) Proposed Work Plan (2014-2016) and 7- Year
More informationMinimum Elements of a Local Comprehensive Plan
Minimum Elements of a Local Comprehensive Plan Background OKI is an association of local governments, business organizations and community groups serving more than 180 cities, villages, and townships in
More informationImplementation Project Development and Review 255
Introduction 248 Implementation Principles 249 Public Agency Fiduciary Responsibilities 250 Project Development and Review Process 252 Project Development and Review 255 Maintenance 23 Implementation Implementation
More informationChange in Population & Unemployment Rates City of Chino - San Bernardino County - State of California
Change in Population & Unemployment Rates City of Chino - San Bernardino County - State of California Year Population Average Annual Population Percentage Change San Bernardino County Population City Population
More informationQUALITY TRANSPORTATION SUMMARY
QUALITY TRANSPORTATION SUMMARY Quality Transportation Overview... 126 Department of Transportation... 127 Traffic Field Operations... 129 Winston-Salem Transit Authority... 131 Quality Transportation Non-Departmental...
More informationPublic Act No
AN ACT ESTABLISHING TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS. Page 1 of 11 v. (-)V CONN:curie I. - Substitute Senate Bill No. 677 Public Act No. 15-57 AN ACT ESTABLISHING TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS. Be
More informationChristopher Blunk, Deputy Director Public Works/City Engineer. PRESENTER: Christopher Blunk, Deputy Director Public Works/City Engineer
STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: April 10, 2018 TO: FROM: City Council Christopher Blunk, Deputy Director Public Works/City Engineer PRESENTER: Christopher Blunk, Deputy Director Public Works/City Engineer 922
More information10-Year Capital Highway Investment Plan DRAFT
This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp 10-Year Capital Highway
More informationCITY OF LANCASTER FISCAL BUDGET REVENUE SOURCES
CITY OF LANCASTER FISCAL 2007-08 BUDGET REVENUE SOURCES TAXES The tax raising authority of cities has been severely limited for many years. Proposition 13 enacted in 1978 amended the California Constitution
More informationCITY OF ROSEBURG, OREGON TABLE OF CONTENTS ENTERPRISE FUNDS
TABLE OF CONTENTS ENTERPRISE FUNDS Storm Drainage Fund... 121-124 Off Street Parking Fund... 125-126 Airport Fund... 127-131 Water Service Fund... 132-145 STORM DRAINAGE FUND CURRENT OPERATIONS This fund
More informationADOPTED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET
CITY OF PLACERVILLE ADOPTED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET 2012/2013 1 2 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM POLICY Each year the City faces the challenge of meeting infrastructure and equipment needs with
More informationFY 2016 FY 2020 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Executive Summary
FY 2016 FY 2020 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Executive Summary The adopted FY 2016 FY 2020 CIP is $205.3 million (including prior year expenditures) and is $2.9 million lower than the previous CIP
More informationFive-Year Capital Improvement Plan
FiveYear Capital Improvement Plan 2016 2020 CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA City of Rancho Cordova Council: Mayor:. Robert J. McGarvey Vice Mayor: David Sander Council Member:.. Linda Budge Council Member:.. Dan
More informationBudget Narrative Page 4. Fiscal Year
CITY OF CARSON FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 (FY17-18) BUDGET NARRATIVE The reader of this narrative will have a good understanding of the City s budget structure, current budget challenges, and the future budget
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES
TABLE OF CONTENTS A. GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES... 3 B. SUMMARY... 17 LIST OF TABLES Table IX 1: City of Winter Springs Five-Year Schedule of Capital Improvements (SCI) FY 2013/14-2017/18... 11 Table
More informationChapter 3: Regional Transportation Finance
Chapter 3: Regional Transportation Finance This chapter examines the sources of funding for transportation investments in the coming years. It describes recent legislative actions that have changed the
More informationAn Evaluation of the Performance Measurement Process of The City of Austin
To: Mayor Steve Adler From: Mike Hebert and Linda Bailey Cc: City Council Members April 22, 2016 Summary An Evaluation of the Performance Measurement Process of The City of Austin Recently, the City Council
More informationCHAPTER 11: Economic Development and Sustainability
AGLE AREA COMMUNITY Plan CHAPTER 11 CHAPTER 11: Economic Development and Sustainability Economic Development and Sustainability The overall economy of the Town and the Town government s finances are inextricably
More information2016 Bond Referenda. QUESTION: Shall Arlington County contract a debt and issue its general obligation
2016 Bond Referenda 1. Metro and Transportation bonds in the maximum principal amount of $58,785,000 to finance, together with other available funds, the cost of various capital projects for the Washington
More informationTOWN OF CARY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS BUDGET OVERVIEW FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015
TOWN OF CARY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS BUDGET OVERVIEW FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015 The Capital Improvements Budget/Plan Process Each year, staff prepares a capital improvements budget and a long range capital improvements
More informationPROPOSED 2018 BUDGET MESSAGE
PROPOSED 2018 BUDGET MESSAGE August 15, 2017 Honorable Mayor and Town Council Members, Budgets reflect priorities. On behalf of Town staff, I am pleased to submit the Proposed 2018 Budget to Town Council
More informationFiscal Year VDOT Annual Budget June 2011
Fiscal Year 2011-2012 VDOT Annual Budget June 2011 For Further Information Contact: Virginia Department of Transportation Financial Planning Division 1221 E. Broad Street, 4th Floor Richmond, VA 23219
More informationFY 16 - FY 18 Capital Fund Revenues
FY 16 - FY 18 Capital Fund Revenues Fiscal Year $ Change 2016 2017 2018 FY 17 to Revenue Source Budget Budget Budget FY 18 Local Transfer from General Fund $3,136,950 $2,977,556 $6,087,130 $3,109,574 Local
More informationCITY. RIALTO W w w. R I a l t o c a. g o v. Fiscal Year 2009/10 Interim Financial Report. 5 months ended November 30, 2009
CITY of RIALTO W w w. R I a l t o c a. g o v Fiscal Year 2009/10 Interim Financial Report 5 months ended November 30, 2009 To: The Mayor and City Council City Administrator From: Chief Financial Officer
More informationAllocated Costs A method for allocating overhead time and other expenses to activities that provide direct services.
Accounting System - The total set of records and procedures used to record, classify, and report information on the financial status and operations of an entity. Accrual A method of accounting that matches
More informationExecutive Summary. Fiscal Year ($ millions) Total Department Uses by Major Service Area 2, ,
Executive Summary SAN FR ANCISCO S BUDGET The budget for the City and County of San Francisco (the City) for (FY) and FY is $7.3 billion and $7.6 billion, respectively. Roughly 52.3 percent of the budget
More informationTAUSSIG. Annual Report Fiscal Year City of Irvine Community Facilities District No (Great Park) & Associates, Inc.
DAVID TAUSSIG & Associates, Inc. Annual Report Fiscal Year 2016-2017 City of Irvine Community Facilities District No. 2013-3 (Great Park) September 26, 2017 Public Finance Public Private Partnerships Urban
More informationRIDOA STATEWIDE PLANNING PROGRAM Transportation Planning
RIDOA STATEWIDE PLANNING PROGRAM Transportation Planning Land & Water Conservation Summit March 10, 2012 Statewide Planning Framework Department of Administration Statewide Planning Program State Planning
More informationCITY OFANAHEIM. Community Services Department. FY 2017/18Proposed Budget. June 6, Operating Budget & Capital Improvement Program
CITY OFANAHEIM FY 2017/18Proposed Budget Community Services Department June 6, 2017 Operating Budget & Capital Improvement Program Overview Core Services Proposed Budget Summary Personnel Notable Changes
More informationGRASS VALLEY TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE PROGRAM NEXUS STUDY
HEARING REPORT GRASS VALLEY TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE PROGRAM NEXUS STUDY Prepared for: City of Grass Valley Prepared by: Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. March 2008 EPS #17525 S A C R A M E N T O 2150
More informationCapital Improvement Projects
Capital Improvement Projects CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Introduction The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is a coordinated program for maintenance and development of the City infrastructure system. The
More informationSelf-Supported Municipal Improvement districts
Self-Supported Municipal Improvement districts Combined Annual Report Downtown Highland Park Ingersoll Sherman Hill June 30, 2012 FAQ s What is a self-supported municipal improvement district or SSMID?
More informationCAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT:
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT: Goals, Objectives and Policies Goal 1. The provision of needed public facilities in a timely manner, which protects investments in existing facilities, maximizes the use of
More informationN A D O N A D O R E S E A R C H F O U N D AT I O N R P O A M E R I C A
2009 NATIONAL SCAN: RURAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATIONS 2009 National Scan Results: Rural Transportation Planning Organizations Since the passage of ISTEA, an increasing number of states have turned
More informationChapter 8: Implementation Strategies
Chapter 8: Implementation Strategies Chapter 8: Implementation Strategies Table of Contents Introduction... 8-1 General Use of the Comprehensive... 8-2 A Guide for Daily Decision-Making... 8-2 A Flexible
More informationLocal Option Sales Tax Report Card Your Penny At Work. District 4
Local Option Sales Tax Report Card Your Penny At Work District 4 Local Option Sales Tax 2007-2017 Report Card Your Penny At Work Transportation $153,816,450 Public Facilities $50,384,889 Natural Resources/
More informationOHIO MPO AND LARGE CITY CAPITAL PROGRAM SFY 2015 SUMMARY
OHIO MPO AND LARGE CITY CAPITAL PROGRAM SFY 2015 SUMMARY TABLE OF CONTENTS MPO AND LARGE CITY PROGRAM OVERVIEW.. 3 MPO AND LARGE CITY SFY 2015 STP BUDGET SUMMARY......... 4 MPO AND LARGE CITY SFY 2015
More informationBudget Public Hearing 6/16/2015
Agenda Brea Community Benefit Financing Authority Budget FY 2014-15 Operating Budget Successor Agency Budget Brea Public Financing Authority Budget Brea Community Benefit Financing Authority Budget Midbury
More information