2016 CASBO Annual Conference LCAP Proportionality and Compliance Performance. Presented By: Jannelle Kubinec

Transcription

1 2016 CASBO Annual Conference LCAP Proportionality and Compliance Performance Presented By: Jannelle Kubinec

2 Reforming Education Finance and Accountability Local Accountability Local Control Funding Formula Local Control and Accountability Plans Evaluation Rubrics CA Collaborative for Educational Excellence Improve Student Outcomes Resources/ Funding

3 Minimum Proportionality Percentage California Code of Regulation (Title 5) An LEA shall provide evidence in its LCAP to demonstrate how funding apportioned on the basis of the number and concentration of unduplicated pupils is used to support such pupils. This funding shall be used to increase or improve services for unduplicated pupils as compared to the services provided to all pupils in proportion to the increase in funds apportioned on the basis of the number and concentration of unduplicated pupils as required by Education Code section (a)(1).

4 LCAP Section 3B Minimum Proportionality Percentage Instructions for 3B: In the box below, identify the percentage by which services for unduplicated pupils must be increased or improved as compared to the services provided to all pupils in the LCAP year as calculated pursuant to 5 CCR 15496(a). Consistent with the requirements of 5 CCR 15496, demonstrate how the services provided in the LCAP year for low income pupils, foster youth, and English learners provide for increased or improved services for these pupils in proportion to the increase in funding provided for such pupils in that year as calculated pursuant to 5 CCR 15496(a)(7). An LEA shall describe how the proportionality percentage is met using a quantitative and/or qualitative description of the increased and/or improved services for unduplicated pupils as compared to the services provided to all pupils. %

5 Minimum Proportionality Percentage Calculation Options Dollars Supplemental and Concentration All Other LCFF Outcomes Quantify and/or qualify change in outcomes to show/explain type or level of improvement Input/Services Quantify and/or qualify change in services to show/explain type or level of increase Hybrid

6 Keys to Calculating the Minimum Proportionality Percentage Ability to: (1) Distinguish between Base and Supplemental/Concentration (2) Associate investments with expectations or realized outcomes

7 Building a Budget with Complements Complementary Federal Supported Services Complementary State Supported Services Complementary State Supported Services Projected Outcome Current Performance

8 Examples: Increased Learning Time FEDERAL Staff development to maximize extended time, technology that supports curriculum Complementary State Supported Services LCFF SUPPLEMENTAL Extended Learning Time (afterschool, summer school) Projected Outcome Current Performance LCFF BASIC Regular School Day (Teachers. Administrators, instructional materials, etc.)

9 Examples: English Learner Support FEDERAL Staff development related to ELD; instructional aides Complementary State Supported Services LCFF SUPPLEMENTAL Additional teachers to support English Learners Projected Outcome Current Performance LCFF BASIC Regular School Day (Teachers. Administrators, instructional materials, etc.)

10 LOCAL CONTROL UNIFIED LCFF FUNDING BY TYPE ($ IN MILLIONS) $62.4 $39.3 $21.3 $18.8 $21.3 $114.9 $122.1 $146.8 $161.5 $ ( F U L L Base S/C I M P L E M E N T A T I O N) (Est. Full Implementation) Change to ($ in millions) Base $114.9 $122.1 $146.8 $161.5 $ % S/C $18.8 $21.3 $21.3 $39.3 $ % Total $133.7 $143.4 $168.1 $200.8 $ % % S/C 14% 15% 13% 20% 26%

11 Accountability and Minimum Proportionality Percentage Accountability at multiple levels Review by county office of education use of template and sufficiency Local stakeholder assessment and feedback Local context matters Full implementation around the corner One of several aspects of accountability