OTHER MATTERS UNITED NATIONS REGULAR AND EXTRABUDGETARY TECHNICAL COOPERATION EXPENDITURES

Transcription

1 UNITED NATIONS DP Executive Board of the United Nations Development Programme and of the United Nations Population Fund DP/1995/56/Add. I 27 June 1995 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH Third regular session September 1995, New York Item 1 4 of the provisional agenda OTHER MATTERS UNITED NATIONS REGULAR AND EXTRABUDGETARY TECHNICAL COOPERATION EXPENDITURES Information on United Nations system reoular and extrabudoetarv technical cooperations exoenditures financed from sources other than UNDP Reoort of the Administrator EXPLANATORY NOTES D /...

2 DP/1995/56/Add. 1 English Page 2 CONTENTS Paae I. NOTE ON THE DATA... 6 Ii. UNITED NATIONS SYSTEM EXPENDITURE III. A. Non-UNDP-financed technical cooperation (NFTCE): Aggregate profile... B. Sources of NFTCE... C. Sources of extrabudgetary expenditures... D. The United Nations system: total assistance delivered... E. United Nations Fund for Population Activities... F. United Nations Children s Fund... G. World Food Programme... H United Nations Development Programme... I. World Bank Group... EXTRABUDGETARY CONTRIBUTIONS TO AGENCIES TO FINANCE TECHNICAL COOPERATION ACTIVITIES Annex: A guide to the terminology Statistical tables Table 1. Table 2. Table 3. Table 4. Table 5. Non-UNDP and UNDP-financed technical cooperation expenditures, 1993 and Non-UNDP and UNDP-financed technical cooperation expenditures by sector, Regular and extrabudgetary expenditures by category of expenditure, Regular budget expenditures of agencies by country or area, Extrabudgetary expenditures financed from United Nations system sources other than UNDP by country or area, Table 6. Extrabudgetary expenditures financed from non-united Nations system multilateral sources, by country or area,

3 DP/1995F~3/Add. 1 English Page 3 Table 7. Table 8. Table 9. Table 10. Table 11. Extrabudgetary expenditures financed from bilateral resources channelled through the United Nations system, by country or area, Extrabudgetary contributions to agencies: multilateral and bilateral, excluding unilateral self-supporting, sources, Extrabudgetary contributions to agencies: unilateral self-supporting sources, Contributions to the World Food Programme, 1993 and United Nations system: summary of technical and non-technical cooperation assistance delivered,

4 DP/1995/56/Add. 1 English Page 4 ABBREVIATIONS ACC AfDB AFESD AsDB DDSMS DESIPA EBE ECA ECE ECLAC ESCAP ESCWA FAO GCCC IAEA IBRD ICAO IDA IFC ILO IMF IPF IMO ITC ITU NFTCE NGO RBE SIS SMF/LDCs SPR TAS TC UN UNCDF UNCED UNCHS UNCTAD UNDP UNESCO UNFPA UNICEF Administrative Committee on Coordination African Development Bank Arab Fund for Economic and Social Development Asian Development Bank Department of Development Support and Management Services Department for Economic and Social Information and Policy Analysis Extrabudgetary expenditures Economic Commission for Africa Economic Commission for Europe Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific Economic and Social Commission for Western Africa Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations Government cash counterpart contribution International Atomic Energy Agency International Bank for Reconstruction and Development International Civil Aviation Organization International Development Association International Finance Corporation International Labour Organization International Monetary Fund Indicative planning figures International Maritime Organization International Trade Centre International Telecommunication Union Non-UNDP-financed technical cooperation expenditures Non-governmental organization Regular budgetary expenditure Special Industrial Services Special Measures Fund for the Least Developed Countries Special Programme Resources Total Assistance from the United Nations system Technical Cooperation United Nations United NationsCapital Development Fund United NationsConference on Environment and Development United NationsCentre for Human Settlements (HABITAT) United Nations Conference on Trade and Development United Nations Development Programme United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization United Nations Fund for Population Activities United Nations Children s Fund

5 DP/1995Fo6/Add.1 English Page 5 UNIDO UNIFEM UNITAR UNRFNRE UNRWA UNSO UNV UPU WB WFP WHO WlPO WMO WTO United United United United United United United United World Worm World World World World Nations Industrial Development Organization Nations Development Fund for Women Nations Institute for Training and Research Nations Revolving Fund for Natural Resources Exploration Nations Relief Works Agency Nations Sudano-Sahelian Office Nations Volunteers Nations Postal Union Bank Food Programme Health Organization Intellectual Property Organization Meteorological Organization Tourism Organization

6 DP/1995/56/Add. 1 English Page 6 I. NOTE ON THE DATA 1. By its decision of 27 June 1981, the Governing Council requested the Administrator to continue to provide data on the magnitude and composition of technical cooperation activities (not total activities) funded by organizations of the United Nations system other than the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). The present report fulfills this responsibility for Besides data on agency regular and extrabudgetary expenditures/contributions, the report also contains, for completeness, data on UNDP, the United Nations Children s Fund (UNICEF), the World Food Programme (WFP), the World Bank (IBRD) and the International Development Association (IDA). Only technical cooperation expenditure for the latter two agencies are reported in the present document. 2. It is necessary to point out that the present report does not contain a review of total expenditure (technical and non-technical) by the entire United Nations system since it excludes expenditures on activities relating to refugees, humanitarian and special economic assistance, peace-keeping operations and disaster relief. Because of the limitation, the phrase "United Nations system" should be interpreted to mean the executing agencies, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), UNDP, United Nations Fund for Population Activities (UNFPA), UNICEF, WFP the World Bank. A complete account of expenditure by the United Nations system can be found in the annual report of the Secretary- General on development activities. The present report, does, however, contain data on total technical cooperation expenditure of the entire United Nations system. 3. The present report is based on data supplied by participating and executing agencies, including the World Benk/IDA. The raw data for 1994 have been checked for consistency and accuracy, classified, aggregated and are presented in tables 1 to 11 of document DP/1993/58/Add.1 The tables are arranged in a specific order: tables 1 through 7 are concerned with technical cooperation expenditures; tables 8, 9 and 10 record contributions; and table 11 summarizes total expenditures for that portion of the United Nations system covered by the report. 4. In more detail, table 1 is intended as a summary, by agency, of grant technical cooperation expenditures by agencies, including UNFPA and UNDP (central resources and administered funds), while table 2 shows the same data but distributed by sectors. Table 3, an extremely aggregative table, brings together total non-undp financed technical cooperation expenditures: regular budget expenditures plus agency extrabudgetary expenditures plus expenditures by UNFPA. Several features of this table are worth observing: (a) expenditures are classified according to sectors; (b) for each agency, expenditures are distributed according to type of expenditure: regular budget (A); United Nations system extrabudgetary sources other than UNDP (B1); non-united Nations system multilateral sources (B2); bilateral sources channelled through the United Nations system (C1); unilateral "self-supporting" sources (C2); and (c) expenditures by UNFPA, all of which are taken be B1 expenditures, are distributed according to executing agency. This means that the reported B1 expenditures of agencies are augmented by the amount of UNFPA expenditures for which they have been responsible (as reported by UNFPA). As a result, UNFPA itself is responsible for only small portion of its own expenditure. For example, in 1994, UNFPA reported total expenditures of $201.4 million but was directly responsible for the implementation of only $84.9 million; the rest of the expenditures funded projects that were implemented by other agencies.

7 DP/1995Fo6/Add. 1 English Page 7 5. Tables 4 through 6 amplify on the "sources" of table 3. More specifically, table 4 breaks down regular budget expenditures (A) by country and agency. Obviously, the grand total of this table is the same as that shown in the total column of line A at the end of table 3. Table 5 contains the distribution of expenditures stemming from United Nations system other than UNDP (B1) by country and agencies. The total in this table also agrees with that shown in the total column of line B1 at the and of table 3. Table 6 is concerned with expenditures funded from non- United Nations system multilateral sources (B2), also classified by country and agency. Again, the total of this table equals that shown in the total column of line B2 at the end of table 3. The country-agency breakdown of bilateral resources channelled through the United Nations system (C1) is given in table 7; the total of this table is the same as that in the total column, line C1, at the and of table 3. Finally, the country-agency distribution of unilateral expenditure (C2) is shown the final column of table 10. Again, the total of this table agrees with that in line C2 of table Table 8 relates to contributions received for the funding of the extrabudgetary expenditures of agencies, organized under the following headings: unilateral and bilateral sources (country or territory and non-governmental organizations) and multilateral sources (United Nations system and non-united Nations system). Contributions received by agencies to fund "self-supporting" technical cooperation expenditures are presented in table 9. For the first time, contributions made to WFP are also shown (table 10). These, it should be noted, are essentially in-kind, food-aid contributions, appropriately valued. Finally, table 11 consolidates expenditures by agencies, including UNDP (central and administered funds), UNFPA, UNICEF, WFP and the World Bank/IDA so as to present quick view of "total" expenditures flowing through the United Nations system during "Total" indicates the fact that the table does not reflect the real magnitude of expenditure of the entire United Nations system since data on the expenditures (primarily operational) of some other agencies are not included. 7. There are four cautionary notes for the use of the data in the present document. The first is related to the budget period of agencies. All agencies operate on an annual budget except WHO and UNICEF, which have a biennial budgeting horizon. This, however, is not a problem with UNICEF, which continues to submit expenditures on an annual basis. On the other hand, WHO, with its current biennium running from , report= estimated expenditure for the first year of the biennium while the data for the following year include expenditure incurred in that year plus adjustments to expenditures in the previous year. In practice, it turns out that figures for the second year of the biennium are much higher than those for the first. To deal with this and thus to avoid huge jumps in WHO expenditure from year to year, the approach adopted is to approportion total expenditure equally over both years of the biennium. Such adjustments cannot be reflected in the detailed breakdown of expenditure in the first year of the biennium because (a) the report for that year has already been finalized (it is the report of the previous year) and (b) the statistical annex of the yearly reports, which contain disaggregatad data, has a coverage of only one year. In consequence, the detailed data in the report for the current year will not be updated. 8. The second point is that all expenditure data for the executing agencies, including IAEA and the World Bank/IDA, refer to technical cooperation expenditure net of administrative and support costs and not total expenditure (technical plus non-technical plus administrative and support costs, and other costs). The only exception is WHO since its technical cooperation expenditure is inclusive of support, but not administrative, costs.

8 DP/1995/56/Add. 1 English Page 8 9. The third point is that for the fourth straight year ECA has advised that its unilateral "selfsupporting" contributions constitute, in effect, a pooled fund, representing the United Nations Trust Fund for African Development (UNTFAD). In view of the pool-accounting nature of the resources, it is difficult to identify contributions of any specific country intended to fund projects only in that particular country. In this case, then, the term "self-supporting" contributions/expenditure deviates from its normal meaning. Finally, data reported by UNESCO under its regular budget expenditure represent expenditure incurred under that organization s participation programme, a practice which began in I1. UNITED NATIONS SYSTEM EXPENDITURE A. Non-UNDP-financed technical coooeration (NFTCE): AaarQgate IprOfilQ 10. Since a comprehensive review was undertaken last year, covering the period (see document DP/1994/40 and the two associated addenda DP/1994/40/Add. 1 and DP/1994/40/Add.2), this year s report aims for brevity and, as a consequence, is less analytic. In practice, this means that charts and tables will be presented and the main issues highlighted without discussion. The report focuses on so as to convey some idea of change in the variables concerned. 11. Total NFTCE amounted to $1,288.4 million in Other observations, based on table 1, include: (a) The decline of 9.2 per cent in NFTCE during 1994 was the steepest since 1982; (b) NFTCE is dominated by WHO and FAO, which together accounted for slightly such expenditures in 1994, much less than their historical average (57 per cent); under half (c) The major portion of NFTCE (70.6 per cent in 1993 and 65.7 per cent 1994) was invested in agriculture, health and population. B. Sources of NFTCE 12. NFTCE comprises expenditures from three sources: EBE, RBE and UNFPA, data on which are presented in table 2. Relevant observations on expenditures from each of these sources are given below. EBE 13. Historically comprised the largest segment. In addition, its share has risen considerably over time, standing at 58.9 per cent in 1994 (its historical average is 56 per cent). The following other observations are based on table 2 :

9 DP/1995Fa6/Add. 1 English Page 9 Table 1. Nominal NFT(~E: A 1;wo-war view NFTCE ($M) 1, ,170.2 Change (%) Agency share (percentage) Share of WHO (%) Share of FAO (%) All other agencies (%) Sectoral share (percentage) Health (%} Agriculture (%) Population (%) General development (%) Other social sectors (%)* Environment (%) All others (%) Includes human settlements, education, employment, social development, and culture. (a) EBE amounted to million in 1994, which represented a contraction of 14.8 per cent over 1993, probably the sharpest ever recorded; (b) EBE is more equitably distributed than RBE by agency: all agencies have EBE and, as in the past, no single agency overwhelmingly dominated; (c) Sectoral allocation has remained relatively stable, with a predominance of the health and agricultural sectors; (d) Excluding health, the share of EBE directed to other social sectors (comprising human settlements, education, employment, social development and culture) and environment, while small, recorded significant gains (14.9 per cent in 1994 as against 11.7 per cent in 1993). (f) Compared to RBE, a larger share of EBE was channelled into the environmental and other social sectors. ooo

10 DP/1995/56/Add. 1 English Page 10 RBE 14. The following observations may be made: (a) RBE continues to be an important source of funding although its relative importance has slipped; for example, in 1994 it accounted for 24 per cent of NFTCE, which is much less than its historical average ( 30.1 per cent between ); (b) RBE amounted to $280.3 million in 1994, which represented a severe contraction (18.9 cent) over the previous year and the steepest since 1988; (c) While WHO clearly provides the major share of RBE ($140.2 million in 1994), its dominance has been shrinking, declining to 50 per cent in 1994 compared to 58 per cent in the previous year. (d) Together, the four largest agencies (WHO, IAEA, FAO and UNESCO) were responsible 86 per cent of RBE in 1994; (e) Three sectors (health, agriculture, science and technology) consumed about three quarters of RBE in both years; (f) In both years, about 10 per cent was invested in the other social sectors and slightly over per cent in the environmental sector. Table 2. NFT~;E:Exo~nditure components EBE RBE UNFPA SM % Change $M % Change $M % Change UNFPA 15. The following observations may be made: (a) Historically, UNFPA accounted for 13 per cent of NFTCE, which makes expenditures by UNFPA the smallest component of NFTCE; (b) At $201.4 million in 1994, expenditures by UNFPA comprised 17.2 per cent of NFTCE, its biggest share since 1981 ; indeed, were it not for the 50 per cent growth of expenditures by UNFPA, the contraction in NFTCE would have been more pronounced;

11 DP/1995/56/Add. 1 English Page 11 (c) As in the past, all expenditures by UNFPA were invested in the population sector. C. Sources of extrabudoetarv exoenditures 16. EBE come from two sources: multilateral and bilateral. Mgltilateral Sources 17. The following observations may be made on expenditures from multilateral sources: (a) Expenditure from multilateral sources reached $67.9 million or 23 per cent more than the previous year; (b) At this level of expenditure, multilateral sources were responsible for 10.6 per cent of EBE during 1994, reversing the contraction of its relative share that began in the mid-1980s; (c) $42.8 million of total expenditure from multilateral sources originated from the UN system itself through the movement of resources from one agency to another; at this level of expenditure, the circular movement of resources within the United Nations system expanded in importance, which explains the reversal noted in (b) above. The rest ($25.1 million) was provided multilateral sources outside the United Nations system. Table 3. Comoonents of extrabudoetarv exoenditures Multilateral Bilateral $M % Change $M % Change Bilateral Sources 18. The following observations may be made: (a) Total expenditure from bilateral sources amounted to $620.1, representing a sharp contraction (17.6 per cent) over 1993; (b) Bilateral sources - representing sources external to the United Nation system - were responsible for 90 per cent of EBE during 1994, or 3 per cent less than in the previous year;

12 DP/1995/56/Add. 1 English Page 12 (c) Bilateral expenditures come from two sources (a) member states, NGOs and multi-bilateral sources and (b) recipient countries themselves ( self-supporting" sources). Source (a) responsible for 87.7 per cent of total bilateral expenditures in 1994, the lowest since D. The United Nations system: Total assistance delivered 19. The following observations, based on table 4, may be made: (a) Grant technical cooperation expenditure (agencies, UNFPA and UNDP) contracted by 3 cent (the steepest contraction since 1981) after growing by slightly over 1 per cent in the previous year, mainly as a result of a shortfall by the agencies; (b) When the small growth recorded by the World Bank Group is taken into consideration, total technical cooperation from the United Nations system (grant plus World Bank/IDA) declined by only 1.6 per cent, reversing the growth of 6.7 per cent in (c) Excluding the World Bank group, total (technical plus non-technical) assistance from United Nations system - as defined in the present report - fell by 3.6 per cent compared to an average growth of about 8 per cent during ; this expenditure category, it may be noted, had not contracted since 1983; Table 4. Nominal 88sistance delivered bv the United Nations system Technical cooperation m dstence ToteS asaietance GTC Growth TTC Growth GTAS Growth TTAS Growth Year ($M) (%) ($M) (%) ($M) (%) ($M) (%) , ,5 Memoitem- Non-technices cooperation expenditure (UNICEF plus WFP) Year SM Growth (%) Non-technices cooperation expenditure constitutes the difference between technices cooperation assistance and total assistance Note: GTC = grant technical cooperation, defined as the sum of assistance delivered by agencies, including UNFPA, and UNDP; TTC = totes technices cooperation, defined u GTC plus technical cooperation expenditures of the World Bank end IDA; GTAS = grant totes assistance, defined as GTC plus expenditures incurred by WFP end UNICEF; TTAS = totes assistance, defined u TTC plus expenditures incurred by WFP and UNICEF. All amounts ere in nominal terms and are net of administrative and support costs. See note on data (section I) for details. It is necessary to point out that GTAS and TTAS are likely to underestimate considerably the true vesue of totes assistance delivered by the entire United Nations system since expenditures by severes entities involved with non-technices cooperation (operationes) activities have been omitted; these fall outside the scope of the present report. ee s

13 EP/1995F~YAdd. 1 English Page 13 (e) But if the World Bank group is included, total assistance from the United Nations system shrank by a smaller margin (2.5 per cer~t). Nevertheless, this was the first time since 1981 that total assistance from the United Nation system - as defined by the present report - did not record a positive growth. (f) Non-technical cooperation expenditure (UNICEF and WFP) continued to perform below trend, declining by 4.2 per cent in Nevertheless, it still continue to account for 48 and 37 per cent of grant and total assistance, respectively. E. United Nations Fund for Population Activities 20. (a) The following observations, based on table 5, may be made: Field programmexpenditures by UNFPA exceeded $200 million for the first time in 1994; (b) The highest growth (50.1 per cent) of expenditures was recorded in 1994, which is more than double the record set in 1988 (21.5 per cent); Table 5. Exoenditures bv UNFPA SM % Change (c) The last two years registered unbroken growth, both of which were higher than the rate inflation. In other words, field programme expenditure increased in real terms in both 1993 and 1994; (d) Of all United Nations entities reviewed in this report, UNFPA recorded the highest growth during F. United Nations Children s Fund 21. There are three outstanding features about UNICEF: (a) it has the distinction of being the United Nations organization with the highest average annual rate of growth of expenditures since 1982; (b) of all United Nations organizations, it enjoyed the longest spell of positive growth (nine years from 1985); and (c) a considerable portion of its income is derived from private fund-raising efforts and non-government sources.

14 DP/1995/56/Add. 1 English Page The following additional observations, based on table 6, may also be made: (a) For the first time since 1984, field programmexpenditure by UNICEF contracted in 1994 albeit only marginally (0.4 per cent); (b) About two thirds of UNICEF income was furnished by governments in 1994; proceeds from non-governmental and private sources reached 28 per cent, or 1 per cent lower than last year; (c) The entire field programmexpenditure by UNICEF was invested in the welfare of the developing world s children. Table 6. Exoenditures bv UNICEF, SM % Change G. World Food Pro oramme 23. For the purposes of this report, assistance by WFP is classified as non-technical assistance, being primarily in the nature of food and commodity aid. The following observations, based on table 7, may be made: (a) Total field programme expenditure by WFP, while still over $1 billion, declined by 6.3 per cent, almost a full percentage point more than it did in 1993; (b) row; It is the first time in more than a decade that expenditure by WFP contracted two years in a Table 7. WFP: Contribution and Expenditure, Expenditure Contribution SM % Change SM % Change , , , , fooo

15 DP/1995Fo6/Add. 1 English Page 15 (c) WFP delivered assistance to 98 countries/area in 1994, three less than the previous year. Seven of these countries received more than $50 million, compared to nine in In both years, no other country/area received more assistance than the former Yugoslavia: over $150 million each year. In 1994, WFP also delivered more than $100 million assistance to Angola and the Sudan; (d) Contributions to WFP amounted to $1,515.9 million, up 6.7 per cent over Major donors in 1994 include: USA ($505.5 million); European Economic Committee ($219.7 million); Canada ($138.9 million); Japan ($123.7 million); Netherlands ($84.2 million); Germany million); Sweden ($61.5 million); United Kingdom ($56.8 million); Australia ($45.2 million); Denmark ($44.5 million); and Norway ($34.8 million). In other words, these 11 donors accounted for 92 per cent of all contributions made in H. United Nations Development PrQgr~mmQ 24. UNDP is the world s largest multilateral grant-giving organization, investing over $1 billion annually in developing countries since In 1994, field programme expenditures by UNDP (central resources and administered funds) totaled $1, Other observations, based on table include: (a) As in 1993, total expenditures by UNDP increased by 3.5 per cent, slightly of United States inflation; above the rate (b) Expenditures from central resources were basically at the same level as in 1993; (c) On the other hand, expenditures from the administered funds grew rapidly during the last two years, continuing on a path that began in 1991; (d) As a consequence, it can be said that the small growth recorded by total UNDP expenditures is attributable mainly to the growth of administered funds, as in Table 8. Exoenditures by UNDP and administered funds, Amount ($M) Change (%) Amount ($M) Change (%) Total UNDP Central resources Adm. funds

16 DP/1995/56/Add. 1 English Page 16 I. World Bank Grouo 25. Technical assistance is a major ingredient in the many instruments which the World Bank Group (World Bank and the International Development Association) utilizes to support the transfer of technology and to build capacity among its borrowing member countries. Most technical assistance is connected with its lending operations although a significant volume is provided through other financial instruments, mainly grants. 26. Most of the technical cooperation assistance by the World Bank Group are not in the form of outright grants as is the case with the rest of United Nations agencies covered in this report, but are given as loans and credits, with the latter being interest-free for a forty-year duration. For this reasons, such assistance by the World Bank Group are referred to in this report as "concessionar technical cooperation assistance. 27. During 1994, the World Bank committed loan-financed technical assistance (free-standing and components of loans) to the tune of 92.6 billion. Of this amount, 92.2 billion, or 85 per cent, funded components of investment projects (loans}. Slightly over one half of the technical assistance components and almost the entire amount of the technical assistance loans were intended for capacity-building, including training. The rest goes for implementation and policy support. 28. Complementing the lending instruments for technical assistance is the institutional Development Fund, a grant facility, that funds innovative ideas in institutional development/capacity-building. In 1994, the Bank approved 90 grants in 54 countries for a total of million. Trust funds added another billion of which $42 million were from UNDPfunded projects. 29. Actual technical cooperation expenditure disbursed (not committed) by the World Bank Group totaled 91,408.8 million, an increase of 1.13 per cent over 1993, thus continuing an unbroken growth since Other observations, based on table 9, include: (a) Of the total technical cooperation expenditure by the World Bank Group in 1994, IBRD delivered $883.0 million, or about 3 per cent less than 1993; (b) Of the total technical cooperation expenditure by the World Bank Group in 1994, the IDA delivered million, or 8.9 per cent more than Table 9. Technical coooeration exoenditure bv the World B0nk Grouo. 199~1-1 ~1~)4 World Bank IDA 9M % Change 9M % Change too

17 DP/1995Fo6/Add.1 English Page 17 Note: Figures for 1993 have been updated, as per data submitted by the World bank (February 13, 1995). The 1993 figures in this table l~herefore supersedes those contained in documents DP/1994/40, DP/1994/40/Add. 1 and DP/1994/40/Add.2 III. EXTRABUDGETARY CONTRIBUTIONS TO AGENCIES TO FINANCE TECHNICAL COOPERATION ACTIVITIES 30. Extrabudgetary contributions are intended to fund only the extrabudgetary expenditures of the usual United Nations executing agencies. Such contributions are made voluntarily by Member States, unlike contributions to regular budgets, which are based on assessment. Data on contributions for 1994 are contained in tables 8 and 9 of the present report, while a guide to the classification and definition of contributions and expenditures is given in the annex. The report does not review contributions to the regular budgets of agencies or contributions made to UNFPA, UNICEF, WFP and UNDP (central resources and administered funds). 31. Year-to-year comparison of extrabudgetary contributions and expenditure is not advisable since (a) there is a lag between the two variables and (b) the data is highly aggregated. consequence, the observed yearly discrepancy between the contributions and expenditures cannot be simply put down to administrative costs. 32. With this background, the following observations, based on table 10, may be made: (a) Extrabudgetary contribution to agencies declined by 2.5 per cent in In the previous year, such contributions expanded by 10 per cent, well above its long-run rate of growth (6.8 per cent); (b) Contributions from bilateral sources, which traditionally accounted for about two thirds total contributions, fell by 6 per cent. Multilateral contributions, on the other hand, increased by 4.2 per cent but this was insufficient to compensate for the contractionary impact of bilateral contributions; (c) The steep decline in total bilateral contributions derived from an equally steep decline of the principal component: countries/territories that are, on the average, responsible for about 77 per cent of the contributions. Contributions from NGOs, normally about 4 per cent of total bilateral contributions, grew by 12.1 per cent in 1994, while those from unilateral self-supporting sources remained unchanged from 1993; (d) Both components of multilateral contributions experienced growth, albeit modest rates compared to It is noteworthy, nevertheless, to observe that multilateral contributions for sources outside of the United Nations system (such as the African Development Bank and the European Economic Commission) achieved a robust growth of 18.2 per cent (25.6 per cent 1993). Contributions from the United Nations system - that is, resources provided to the traditional executing agencies from (mainly) funding agencies (UNFPA, UNCDF, the World Bank) moved up by 1.8 per cent over 1993;

18 DP/1995/56/Add. 1 English Page 18 (e) In brief, as can be seen from table 10 below, the principal explanation for the shortfall contributions in 1994 derived from a shortfall of the principal contributors: countries/territories. Table 10. Extrabudaetarv contributions to aaencies, $M Growth (%) $M Growth (%) Total extrabudgetary contributions [] Total bilateral, of which o Countries/territories :7.61 o NGOs o Unilateral self-supporting [] Total multilateral, of which o United Nations system o Non-United Nations sources

19 DP/1995Fa6/Add. 1 English Page 19 Annex A guide to the terminology Technical cooperation assistance comprises activities that aim to promote increasing self-reliance in the developing countries with regard to managerial, technical, administrative and research capabilities required to formulate and implement development plans and policies, including the management and development of appropriate institutions and enterprises. In the present document, technical cooperation activities are those financed from: (a) the central resources of UNDP; (b) UNDP-administered funds; (c) the regular and extrabudgetary expenditures of agencies, including UNFPA; and (d) the technical assistance window of the World Bank/IDA. A further distinction made between grant technical assistance constituting (a), (b) and (c) and concessional technical assistance constituting (d). Non-technical coooeration assistance, for the purposes of the present report, comprises activities relating to food and commodiw aid, and the welfare of children. In other words, non-technical cooperation expenditures are expenditures by WFP and UNICEF. Clearly, the data on non-technical cooperation activities in the present document are incomplete in the sense that they omit activities relating to refugees, peace-keeping operations, humanitarian and special economic assistance, and disaster relief. For a complete picture, see the annual report of the Secretary General on operational activities for development of the United Nations system. Total assistance is the sum of technical and non-technical and cooperation assistance. Non-UNDP-financed technical coooeration expenditure (NFTCE) is defined as the sum of expenditures incurred against: (a) agency regular budgets, (b) agency extrabudgetary budgets (c) UNFPA. Expenditures from UNICEF, WFP and the World Bank/IDA and UNDP-administered funds are not in NFTCE. In table 1, for example, NFTCE for the last two years is shown by the column entitled "Total agencies and UNFPA." Note that in table 1 1 of the statistical tables, NFTCE is the sum of the columns entitled "agency regular budget, "agency extrabudgetary, "UNFPA" and "self-supporting expenditures." Regular bgdget exoenditures (RBEI refers to technical cooperation expenditures financed out of the assessed budgets (contributions) of agencies. Extrabudgetarv exoenditures (EBE) refers to expenditures financed from voluntary contributions; that is, financed from sources other than RBE, UNDP or UNFPA. Total extrabudgetarv exoenditures (TEBE) is a term covering: (a) agency extrabudgetary budgets and (b) expenditures incurred by UNFPA. In table 1 of the statistical tables, it is the sum of the columns entitled "Funded by extrabudgetary sources other than UNDP, UNFPA and UNDPadministered funds" and "Funded by UNFPA" whereas in table 1 1 it is the sum of the amounts in the columns entitled "agency extrabudgetary budgets, "UNFPA" and "self-supporting sources. Multilateral exoenditures are subdivided into: (a) United Nations system other than UNDP central resources and administered funds and (b) multilateral sources outside of the United Nations system. The former includes expenditures incurred in developing countries by the agencies of the United Nations system themselves, including governments and the World Bank. See tables 3, line B1, and

20 DP/1995/56/Add. 1 English Page 20 5 of the statistical tables. Multilateral sources outside of the United Nations system include regional development banks, the Commission of the European Communities, the various Arab development funds, etc. Expenditures from these sources are channelled through the agencies of the United Nations system for the financing of technical cooperation activities in developing countries. See tables 3, line B2, and 6 of the statistical tables. Bilateral exoenditures are divided into: (a) expenditures channelled through the United Nations system and (b) unilateral self-supporting expenditures. The former comprises expenditures incurred against resources provided directly to the agency by a Member State or an NGO to fund technical cooperation activities in any member country. It also includes expenditures against multibilateral contributions (e.g., contribution by one country for a specific project(s) in another) as well expenditures by the agency against special purpose funds managed by the agency itself. The term unilateral is rather confusing; it is used to emphasize the fact that expenditures are used to finance technical cooperation activities within the country that made the contribution to the United Nations system. The expenditure is thus passed from the given country to the United Nations system and back to the same country; the only difference is that it has acquired a dual character: unilateral since it returns to the contributing country, but because it is routed through the United Nations system it also acquires a bilateral character. Extrabudaetarv contributions are contributions to fund the extrabudgetary expenditures of agencies. Such contributions come from two sources: (a) Multilateral contributions - contributions from nonbilateral entities and subdivided into: (i) contributions from the United Nations system - in essence, such contributions represent an internal transfer of resources in the United Nations system from (mainly) funding to executing agencies and (ii) contributions originating outside of the United Nations system - contributions by multilateral organizations that are not part of the United Nations system. Examples of these organizations are the African Development Bank, the Arab Gulf Fund for United Nations Development Organizations and the European Economic Commission; and (b) Bilateral contributions - Ixokan down into: (i) contributions from countries/territories - representing funds donated to the United Nations system to support activities in developing countries; (ii) unilateral self-supporting contributions - contributions made by a country to finance technical cooperation activities in that country; and (ii) contributions from non-government organizations contributions from these sources to the United Nations system. fifo i

21 IDc~

22 Table 1. Non-UNDP and UNDP-financed technical cooperation expenditures, 1993 and NON-UNDP-FINANCED TECHNICAL COOPERATION UNDP-FINANCED TECHNICAL COOPERATION Funded by extrabudgetary sources Executing agency Total other than UNDP, agencies and Funded by regular UNFPA and UNDP- Funded by UNDP- Funded by UNDP UNFPA _a/ budgets administered funds b/ Funded by UNFPA administered funds central resources c/ UNITED NATIONS d/ UNCED -I - 52 UNCHS I O0 19O00 U NCTAD 89OO OOO 880O UNDP r e/ U N ESCO O8 18OOO UNFPA UNICEF O8 UNIDO U N ITA R 1400 UNRWA UNV OO ECA O OOO 1900 ECE O ECLAC O0 ESCAP O ESCWA FAO OO IAEA i ICAO O O4 2 18O0O IFC OO 590O ILO OO 34 l_nn IMF O IMO 8 5O ~ 183 1OO96 2 7OO 8OO ITC ITU O84 4O UPU O WHO WIPO OO 2OOO WMO i OO 2 7O0 WTO 1 70O 1900 World Bank/IDA OO 34 5OO AfDB AFESD 3900 AsDB NGOs GOVERNMENT O O f/ 7OOO Total ,

23 a/ This column is the sum of (a) regular budgets (b) extrabudgetary sources other than UNDP, UNFPA and UNDP-administered funds and (c) UNFPA. In keeping wtih the new definition of non-undp-financed cooperation expenditure, all expenditures incurred UNDP (central resources and administered funds) are excluded. b/ Note that this is in fact the sum total of B1 +B2+C1 +C2 in table 3 (as well as tables 5 through 7 and last column of table 10) minus UNFPA. For a summary by agency and sectors of the total in this column, see table 3; for a breakdown by country, see table 10. c/ Based on expenditures from IPFs, SPR, SMF/LDC, SIS, cost-sharing and trust funds established by the Administrator, where applicable. d/ Includes DDSMS, DESIPA and OPS. el Includes UNCDF, UNFNRE, UNIFEM, UNSO and others. f/ This amount represents GCCC, for which no agency breakdown is available.

24 Table 2. Non-UNDP and UNDP-financed technical cooperation expenditures by sector, 1993 and 1994 ACC programme classification categories NON-UNDP FINANCED TECHNICAL COOPERATION Funded by extrabudgetary sources other than UNDP, Total Funded by regular UNFPA and UNDPadministered expenditure _a/ budgets funds Funded by UNFPA UNDP-FINANCED TECHNICAL COOPERATION Funded by UNDPadministered funds Funded by UNDP central resources _b/ Political Affairs General Dev. Issues General Statistics Natural Resources Energy Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries I Industry i 08 Transport Communications and Information Trade and Development Population Human Settlements Health Education Employment Humanitarian Assistance Social Development Culture Science and Technology Environment Unspecified TOTAL ! ~, i ( (~ 28 90C 2960(; 2360(3 1720(} 3060G a_/ This column is the sum of (a) regular budgets (b) extrabudgetary sources other than UNDP, UNFPA and UNDP-administered funds and (c) UNFPA. keeping with the new definition on non-undp-flnanced technical cooperation expenditures, all expenditures incurred by UNDP (central resources and administered funds) are excluded. b_/ Data covering IPFs, SPR, SMF/LDC, SIS, cost-sharing and trust funds established by the Administrator, where applicable.

25 Table 3. Reqular and extrabudqetary expenditures by cateqory of expenditure, t~4. Category of Agency expenditure b/ United A Nations B 1 B2 UNCHS subtotal ia C2 subtotal s o 7;! Sector _a/ _cj S TOTAL ? ~ B1 B2 C1 C2 subtotal ,~ 11; 1 56E 6 74~ 1 24~ 10 22,4 UNESCO d/ A B1 i _. B2 C1 subtotal : I i ~ E 9480"1 NF B UNICEF B NIOO A B1 B2 C1 C2 subtotal OO OO O ~ ,~

26 Table 3 (continued) Category of Agency expenditure b/ S 7 Sector _a/ TOTAL ECA A B1 B2 C1 C2 subtotal i O r~o EOE IA :B1 B2 C2 subtotal ~ i ECLAC A B1 C1 C2 subtotal l ~T75~4 ~ ESCAP ESCWA B1 C1 subtotal B _~ 14o FAO BI B2 C1 C2 subtotal : E 5 02~ 23 04~ ~ ( IAEA B1 B2 C1 C2 subtotal i ! -~ E ; c ~

27 DP/1995/56/Add. 1 English Page 27 /.. o

28 VHO _el A~ency Table 3 (continued) Category of S c t o r _a/ expenditure hi $ A B C1-2182O5+ C subtotal g t t t8 lg TOTAL , WIPO NMO A B C subtotal A C1-1 71( subtotal NGOs GOVERNMENTs B1 : I B TOTAL Grandtotal A B , B t C C g tl g g I _a/ For the sector represented by these numbers, see table 2. b./ A - Regular budget B1 - Funded by United Nations system sources other than UNDP but including UNFPA. B2 - Non-United Nations system multilateral sources. C1 - Bilateral resources channeled through the United Nations system. C2 - Unilaterally financed "self-supporting" expenditures. / Includes DDSMS, DESIPA and OPS. d/ The data provided by UNESCO under "Regular budget" represent expenditures incurred under that organization s participation programme. As a rule, UNESCO considers that no technical cooperation activities are financed from its regular budget. e/ Including support costs, Note to table 3: This is an overall summary table of non-undp financed technical cooperation expenditures. The right-hand column (labelled "Agency") shows the distribution of non-financed technical cooperation expenditure by budget source (A, B2, C1 and C2). The sectoral amounts corresponding to each agency and budget source can be located quickly by plotting the appropriate grid. Note, further, that "A" corresponds to "Funded by regular budgets" table 1 and 2, and BI+B2+CI+C2 correspond to "Funded by extrabudgetary sources other than UNDP, UNFPA and UNDP-administered funds" plus UNFPA. For a more detailed breakdown of each budget source, see tables 4 through 7. See notes at the end of these tables for further explanation.

29 Table 4. Regular budget expenditures of agencies by country or area, 1994 Country or area UN UNCHS UNIDO FAO ILO UNESCO_a/ WHO_bl ITU WMO IAEA UPU TOTAL Afghanistan Albania O Algeria Angola Antigua and Barbuda Armenia 71 6O Argentina O Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan O Bahamas O Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium 4O -i 4O Belize Benin Bhutan Bolivia _! Bosnia and Herzegovina -I I 25 -i 157 Botswana O Brazil O British Virgin Islands 1 1 Brunei Darussalam 7 2 _i 9 Bulgaria 122~ O Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia O

30 Table 4 (continued) Country or area UN UNCHS UNIDO FAO ILO UNESCO a/ WHO _hi ITU WMO IAEA UPU TOTAL Cameroon ICaribbean ,Cape Verde 5O OO Central African Republic Chad : Chile China Colombia O Comoros O Congo 138 2O Cook Islands 2O Costa Rica O COte d lvoire O Croatia Cuba 32 64O Cyprus Czech Republic Democratic People s Republic of Korea , 962 Denmark 2O 2O Djibouti Dominican Republic 7 7 Estonia Dominica 2~ [)ominican Republic Ecuador Egypt O 22O6 El Salvador Eritrea O2 Estonia Equatorial Guinea

31 Table 4 (continued) Country or area UN UNCHS UNIDO FAO ILO UNESCO a/ WHO _hi ITU WMO IAEA UPU TOTAL Ethiopia O :ederated States of Micronesia 97 -! 97 Fiji 41 20] i 911 French Guiana Gabon ! Gambia -! ~ Gaza Strip Georgia Ghana O Greece O Grenada Guam Guatemala 19 t Guinea 46 2o Guinea-Bissau Guyana 1 B Haiti -I Honduras Hungary 168 4O ! Iceland 5O 50 India Indonesia Ireland Iran, Islamic Republic of 13 28O Z Iraq Israel Jamaica i Japan Jordan , IKenya I Qrn~

32 Table 4 (continued) Country or area UN UNCHS UNIDO FAO ILO UNESCO_a/ WHO bl ITU WMO IAEA UPU TOTAL Kazakhstan Kiribati Kyrgyzstan O Kuwait Lao People s Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon O 1 O2O Lesotho Z Liberia Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Lithuania 112 2i Macau Macedonia Madagascar O 3O Malawi Malaysia Maldives.I Vlali O Malta Vlariana Islands Marshall Islands Viauritania Mauritius Mexico ~ Mongolia Morocco Mozambique Montserrat 1 1 Myanmar Namibia

33 Table 4 (conunued) Country or area UN UNCHS UNIDO FAO ILO UNESCO _a/ WHO bj ITU WMO IAEA UPU TOTAL National Liberation Movements Nepal Netherlands Antilles New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Oman Palau _ I Pakistan Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru = ~ i Philippines Poland Portugal Qatar Reunion ! O Republic of Moldova Republic of Korea Romania Russia Rwanda Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino II _ f "~ ~m~ o3 &

34 Table 4 (continued) Country or area UN UNCHS UN DO FAO ilo UNESCO _a/ WHO b._/ ITU WMO IAEA UPU TOTAL Sao Tome and Principe -i Saudi Arabia O3 Senegal 34 8O O Seychelles O Sierra Leone O Singapore O -i 211 Slovakia t Slovenia Solomon Islands ;I 14 4OO Soma a 334 -I isou~ Africa ~ Spain Sri Lanka O O5 Sudan O Suriname OO Swaziland Syrian Arab Republic O28 Tajikistan Territory of Hong Kong -i Thailand -i : Togo O Tokelau Islands 8 :1 8 Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine -{ O

35 w Table 4 (continued) Country or area UN UNCHS UNIDO FAO ILO UNESCO _a/ WHO bl ITU WMO IAEA upu TOTAL United Arab Emirates United Republic of Tanzania Uruguay :i Uzbekistan Vanuatu O O Venezuela Viet Nam ~-I - - Yemen Zaire ~ambia O Zimbabwe Other / Total all countries Regional Africa Regional Arab States Regional Europe Regional Asia and the Pacific Regional Latin Americand the Caribbean O! i ~ d/ _el f/ Global Interregional I , gl -o rn (3 (31 &

36 Table 4 (continued) Country or area UN UNCHS UNIDO FAO ILO UNESCO _a/ WHO_b/ ITU WMO IAEA UPU TOTAL Total intercountry O64 Footnotes c / through g/ GRAND TOTAL I , ] _ajthe data provided by UNESCO under "Regular Budget represent expenditures incurred under that organization s participation programme. As a rule, UNESCO considers that no technical cooperation activities are financed from its regular budget. _b/ Data include support costs. _c/ Excluding expenditures by WlPO of $8,259,000, for which no breakdown by country was provided. d/ Excluding expenditures by ECA of $2,992,038. ed Excluding expenditures by ECE of $1,013,900. f/ Excluding expenditures by ECLAC of $1,892,400. g/ Excluding expenditures by UNCTAD of $544,000 and IMO $2,079,000. Note: This table gives a detailed breakdown of total line A (regular budget) expenditures in table 3, pages 25 to 28.

37 Table 5, Extrabudqetary expenditures financed from United Nations system sources other than UNDP, by country or area, t994 _a/ Country or area UN ILO FAO UNESCO WHO UNDP UNICEF UNIDO ESCAP ECLAC NGO UNFPA Gv"r TOTAL Afghanistan Albania ;Algeria Angola iantigua and Barbuda ~ Azerbaijan Argentina Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belize Benin Bhutan Bolivia Botswana Brazil British Virgin Islands Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia I I ~ " (; Cameroon Caribbean Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad , _ " Chile 9 China ! Colombia Comoros Congo ~ Cook Islands Costa Rica C6te d Ivoire ~ Cuba Cyprus 9 Democratic People s Republic of Korea Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic 723 i Ecuador

38 Table 5 (continued) Country or area UN ILO FAO UNESCO WHO UNDP UNICEF UN~DO ESCAP ECLAC NGO UNFPA GVT TOTAL Egypt El Salvador I 9O Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia 3 i 3 Ethiopia Federated States of Micronesia F~ji O Gabon Gambia Ghana o Georgia -I Grenada O Guatemala Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana I 138 Haiti Honduras Hungary India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of O Iraq Jamaica Jordan 3O 6O 5 6O O65 Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Kyrgyzstan -I Lao People s Democratic Republic Lebanon " Lesotho Liberia -" Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Madagascar Malawi Malaysia " O6 Maldives -36 8O Mall

39 Table 5 (continued) Country or area UN ILO FAO UNESCO WHO UNDP UNICEF UNIDO ESCAP ECLAC NGO UNFPA GVT TOTAL Aarshall Islands _1 55 Mauritania 264 2,! : Mauritius 1! ~ Aexico Mongolia Montserrat 3 3 Morocco Mozambique I Myanmar 1 1 1o Namibia Nepal O Nicaragua o! Niger Nigeria I Niue 5 5 Oman I 83 Pacific Multi-Islands lo7 487 Pakistan Panama 3O Papua New Guinea 26~ 82 8 ~ F araguay -3 48O 843 Peru 58 33O Philippines O5 741! Poland 13 7O 83 Portugal 9 3O 39 Republic of Korea 4O4 7O 474 Republic of Moldova 5 5 Romania O 110 Rwanda O o38 Russian Federation Saint Lucia Saint Vincent and the Grenadines O 61 Samoa O Sao Tome and Principe 2 8 9O 9 -i Senegal - 8O Seychelles 6 -I Sierra Leone O3O Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa O

40 Table 5 (continued) Country or area UN ILO FAO UNESCO WHO UNDP UNICEF UNIDO ESCAP ECLAC NGO UNFPA GVT TOTAL Sri Lanka c/ Sudan ; Suriname Swaziland Syrian Arab Republic O Tajiskistan Thailand 3O 3O O 992 Togo J Tokelau Islands Tonga 15 11o Trinidad and Tobago 3 3 Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands - 2o 83.r 17 8o Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and the Caicos Islands 3 3 Tuvalu Uganda :United Republic of Tanzania 52 8O Uruguay O8 Uzbekistan Vanuatu :i Venezuela Viet Nam Yemen Yugoslavia Zaire Zambia 7O O Zimbabwe Other Total all countries O 4 079i OO i 29

41 Table 5 (continued) Country or area UN ILO FAO UNESCO WHO UNDP UNICEF UNIDO ESCAP ECLAC NGO UNFPA GVT TOTAL b Regional Africa Regional Arab States Regional Europe Regional Asia and the Pacific Regional Latin America and the Caribbean i ! 54! , d_/ _ej _f/ g/ h/ Global Interregional Total intercountry ! Footnotes b/through i/ GRAND TOTAL I 043 I _a/ Expenditures do not include overhead paid to executing agencies. b./ Excluding expenditures incurred by IAEA. c_/ Excluding expenditures incurred by ITU of $28,000. _d_/ Excluding expenditures incurred by ECA of $122,802 and by UNFPA of $1,486. e/ Excluding expenditures incurred by ESCWA of $1,020. f/ Excluding expenditures incurred by ECE of $22,300 and U NFPA by $820,089. g/ Excluding expenditures incurred by ESCAP of $2,094,000. h/ Excluding expenditures incurred by ECLAC of $105,200. i/ Excluding expenditures incurred by UNCTAD of $117,000; IMO of $494,000 and UPU of $28,000 for which no breakdown was provided. Note: This table gives a detailed breakdown of total B1 expenditures in table 3, pages 24 to 27. B1 expenditure is defined as expenditure from the United Nations system sources other than UNDP plus expenditure by UNFPA. Thus, to obtain B1 expenditures from agencies, it is necessary to deduct expenditures by UNFPA: $226,520-$201,438 = $25,082. This amount plus B2 plus C1 plus C2 now yields the total amount shown by the column entitled "Funded by extrabudgetary sources other than UNDP, UNFPA and UNDP-administered funds of tables 1 and 2 ($688,385).

42 DP/1995/56/Add. I English Page 42 Table G. Extrabudgethry expenditures financed from non-united Nations system multilateral sources, by country or area, 199~ (thousands for US dollars) Countries UN [ ILO FAO UNESCO ICAO IAEA IMO UNIDO UNCTAD TOTAL Afghanistan angladesh *i enin Bolivia -1 1 Brazil 2O 2O Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cape Verde Caribbean Central African Republic entral America Chad China Cuba 2 2 Eritrea Ethiopia Gambia 79 -i -t 79 Gaza Strip Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau 8 8 Haiti Hunga~ 8 8 India 85 _f 85 Tndonesia Iraq Lebanon 1 O :r -I Lesotho -1 i -1 Liberia Madagascar 28 -i 28 Mali -I Mauritania Morocco Mozambique 11 r 11 a/ Myanmar Namibia Niger Peru 1 1 Philippines 2 2 Romania Rwanda Senegal Sierra Leone Slovakia 7 7 Somalia Sudan Syrian Arab Republic Thailand 4~ Tunisia -I -! 10 -i -r 10 /. o.

43 DP/1 995/56/Add. 1 English Page 43 Table 6 (continued) (thousands for US dollars) Countries UN ILO FAO UNESCO ICAO IAEA IMO UNIDO UNCTAD TOTAL Uganda United Republic of Tanzania 119 m Uruguay Yemen Zimbabwe 4 4 Other 1 I _b/ 1-otal all countries ; !Regional Africa O 3303 C/ Regional Arab States 421 I "1 421 Regional Europe O d/ Regional Asia and the Pacific O Regionat Latin America and the Caribbean Global Interregional Total intercountry Other agencies ~ GRAND TOTAL ,8! ; $ _a/ Excluding expenditures incurred by ITU of $23,000 b/ Excluding expenditures incurred by WIPO of $759,000 for which no breakdown by country was provided / Excluding expenditures incurred by ECA of $460,032 d_/ Excluding expenditures incurred by ECE of $64,900. e_/ Total of footnotes a/through dl Note: This table gives a detailed breakdown of total B2 (expenditures from non-united Nations system multilateral sources) on table 3, pages 25 to 28 /.,.

44 Table 7. Extrabudqetary expenditures financed from bilateral resources channelled throuqh the United Nations system, by country or area Country or area UN UNCHS ECLAC UNCTAD UNIDO ILO FAO UNESCO WHO ITU WMO IMO ICAO IAEA ITC UPU TOTAL Afghanistan O Albania -i Algeria ~ola ~nd Barbuda -I -I 4 4 igi Azgentina j 262 Armenia 24 5~ 29 Aruba 2O 20 Azerbaiian 62 o Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh.i i I Barbados O5 Belarus Belize Benin Bhutan :] 429 Bolivia 6O ; I Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Brazil Brunei Darussalam Burkina Faso 46 :F , Burundi g Cambodia _ Cameroon Cape Verde Caribbean Islands -i Central African Republic Central American Region 220 _] 22O Chad Chile China 383 3O 1 545i i Colombia

45 Table 7 (continued) Country or area UN UNCHS ECLAC UNCTAD UNIDO ILO FAO UNESCO WHO ITU WMO IMO ICAO IAEA ITC UPU TOTAL Comoros ~Congo Cook Islands Costa Rica COte d lvoire Croatia Cuba C~s Czechoslovakia Democratic People s _Republic of Korea D j~uti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador " El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia , Gabon Gambia Gaza Strip 3eorgia = Ghana i Germany Guatemala Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guysna Haiti Honduras i -I I -I -~ 392 i 563~j -~ -, i -I -i " I -i 659 -I o "~ m E2 o i ob &

46 i Table 7 (continued) Country or area UN UNCHS ECLAC UNCTAD UNIDO ILO FAO UNESCO WHO ITU WMO IMO ICAO IAEA ITC UPU TOTAL J Hun~lary 9OO 162 India r O Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq 256 :i O srael 5 5 Jamaica Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya O O Kiribati Kuwait Ol 7., 7 Kyrgyzstan Leo People s Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Z O6 Liberia Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Lithuania ~ascar ~alawi Mala~ysia O 92 Maldives Mall -i Malta Marshall Islands 5i 5 Mauritania Mauritius -I Mexico 28 -I ~ 767 Micronesia Mo~olia 72 "i i 260! Morocco Mozambique!f o Myanmar 9oi s2~ ~5 3, 649 :i

47 Table 7 (continued) Country or area UN UNCHS ECLAC UNCTAD UNIDO ILO FAO UNESCO WHO ITU WMO IMO ICAO IAEA ITC UPU TOTAL. i. Namibia Nepal -, 16! , Netherlands Antilles -, I 7 27 New Caledonia "1 20 Nicaragua - 62 i Nigeria Norway -I 91 9 Oman Pakistan , Panama , -i 174 Pa_pua New Guinea "i 109 Peru 78 = ~ _~_~ Poland ~ic of Korea Republic of Moldova Romania I Rwanda Russian Federation Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ~ O ~! B46 -! 8-5 -, I0 5 Samoa Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Seychelles Sierra Leone Slovak Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia l 8O t I 12L : ~--~~--~-~1 1~) I -, 32 -I 61 -I "! ~-I -I 38 -~ -i -I om(3 01 Ob Q.

48 Table 7 (continued) Country or area UN UNCHS ECLAC UNCTAD UNIDO ILO I Sri Lanka Sudan 33 Suriname Swaziland S~an Arab Republic Tajikistan Thailand Tokelau Tonga FAO UNESCO WHO ITU WMO IMO ICAO IAEA ITC UPU TOTAL I 561 -~ , i ~ t ~ i ] 8 Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands 36 "L ~l _ i i ~anda Ukraine United Republic of Tanzania Uzbekistan ~ I Vanuatu Venezuela Viet Nam Yemen Zaire ~ ~ OO Zambia Zimbabwe 3 O Other Total all countries i _845~

49 Table 7 (continued) Country or area UN UNCHS ECLAC UNCTAD UNIDO ILO FAO UNESCO WHO ITU WMO IMO ICAO IAEA ITC UPU TOTAL Regional Africa 70 = O _a/ Regional Arab States I ~ Regional Europe , Regional Asia and the Pacific O b/ Regional Latin America and the Caribbean Global 3O Bgg Inter regional O Total Intercountry O O ~ Footnotes a/, _b/and cj GRAND TOTAL i c/ i , a/ Excluding expenditures incurred by ECA of $1,345,000. b/ Excluding expenditures incurred by ESCAP of $9,744,00. c_/ Excluding expenditures incurred by WIPO of $2,230,000. Note: This table gives a detailed breakdown of total C1 expenditures in table 3, pages 25 to 28. C1 expenditures are based on contributions from bilateral sources.

50 Table 8. Extrabodgetary contributions to aqencies: multilateral and bilateral, exc ud ng se f-supporum], sources Contributor UN UNCTAD UNCHS ECA ECLAG ESCAP UNIDO ILO FAO UNESCO WHO ITU WMO IMO ICAO IAEA ITC UPU WIPO TOTAL I. Unilateral and bilateral sources I (i) Country or area Algeria "1 1 1 Argentina Australia I I ~ustda ~ O Bangladesh [ I0 I ii 3e@ium 1 O razil O 3runei Oarussalam ul~aria 4 6i 10 Canada O , Chile China 5O 519 4O O ~oiombia osta Rica Ote d lvoire 1 1 Croatia 9 9 Cuba y_prus Czechoslovakia ; 7O De[nocratio People s Republic of Korea Denmark Dominican Republic [ 3 -I 3 Ecuador 2 2 Egypt Estonia Finland O France ! Sa~=on.i.I Germany Greece I 343 Honduras 66O 158 i 818 Hunga~ -i India O I Indonesia Iceland i 3 3 Ireland Ital O O X Japan o~ O Jordan Kuwait

51 Table 8 (conunued) Contributor UN UNCTAD UNCHS ECA ECLAC ESCAP UNIDO ILO FAO UNESCO WHO ITU WMO IMO ICAO IAEA ITC UPU WIPO TOTAL Lebanon.i Libyan Arab Jamahiriya.! Luxembou~ "1 79O Macau O Maidives -I 6 6 Malta -i ~aurltius 9 9 ~exico O ~orocco 1 M~yanmar 2 2 Namibia ~epa~ Nethedands O f New Zealand 190~ = Nigeria Norway ~,, O man "1 "1 Pakistan :{ Palau -I 4 _1 4 Panama Papua New Guinea 5 5 Peru 3 3 Philippines Poland Qatar Republic of Korea Romania 2 5 -I Russian Federation Saint Lucia 51 I 52 Samoa 3 3 Saudi Arabia Senegal 7 7 Singa_pore Slovak Republic 1 Solomon islands 41 "1 1 3 South Africa 2 Spain ~21 -I 427.i 4O 3 55C Sri Lanka 2O 3 23 Sudan 1 Sweden o8~! " l Switzerland = { 1 1 "om~ (D O1

52 Table 8 (continued) Contributor UN UNCTAD UNCHS ECA ECLAC ESCAP UNIDO ILO FAO UNESCO WHO ITU WMO IMO ICAO IAEA ITC UPU WIPO TOTAL Thailand Tonge Tunisia Turkey Trinidad and Tobago , Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States of America Uruguay 1 52O ~ 3 i " Venezuela Viet Nero Yemen Other Subtotal Contributor (li) Non-~lovemmsntal organizations ABV Leasing and Hateltnvest G.m.b.H., Austria Agence Wallonne ~ I Exportation, Brussels Ademe Paris A~gence de Cooperation Cu~turelle at Techni ueq~ Aen~r Cooperation in Int l Health, Japan ~tcoa Interamerica, Mexico A.M. Foundation ~merican Leprosy Missions, USA ~,rabian Cement, Et Khoms, Libya t~sociacion de Expectadores Manufactura, Chile I I, - t t i "1406 t ] J 61.I 61 a2 I 32 4c 315 -, 31~ ~ - ~ I ~,sociacibn Latinoamericana de tnstituciones Financieras de Desarrollo (ALIDE) AT&T France Banco de Sabadell, Spain Beni-Suef Cement, Cairo, Benue Cement, NJe~ Boehringer Manheim GmBH, Germany Bread for the World Borrow Dental Milk Foundation, UK and Northern Irelands Catholic Committee for FFHC, Spain C.A F Netherlands 25 5O y -I 14~ 52 7e - t -~- 2f

53 Table 8 (continued) Contributor UN UNCTAD UNCHS ECA ECLAC ESCAP UNIDO ILO FAO UNESCO WHO ITU WMO IMO ICAO IAEA ITC UPU WIPO TOTAL ~ambridge Scientific 3O 3C ~aritas Germany il 38 -I 38 ~arne~ie Corp New York Carl Duisberg Gessellschaft (Germany) b Canadian Public Health Assn, Canada central American Bank for Integration (BCIE) u Centro de Investigaci6n y Asistencia TL=cnica a la Industria, Argentina Chinese Ocean Shipping Corp 30 3O Qiba-Geigy Leprosy Fund, Switzerland CNEL Comsat Corp, USA 2O 20 Construotora Andrade Gutierrez S/A 1 1 Colgate-Palmolive, USA County Council of Oestergoetiand, Sweden C orporaclon Andina de Fomento Daimler Benz, Germany Damien Foundation, Belgium Communications Cultural Promotion, Japan 5 5 De Gamles BV, Copenhagen, Denmark il Diakonisches Werk, Germany -i 152 E_ast Asia Response 14., 14 Eastern and Southern African initiative in Debt and Reserves Management ESAIOARM 136 il -I 136 Ecola Nautica Infante D. Henrique 39 3 EDF, France l Edna McConnetl Clark Foundation, USA 75 -I 75 El Fataya Cement, Dema, Ubya I E!i Lilly & Co, USA 67 Eli Lilly Expert SA, Switzerland 2O 2C Ericsson, Sweden 2O 2C European Association for Cooper~ 26 2t European Community -I Farmindustria, Italy C FAO Money and Medals Programme 4 Ford Foundation, USA 3O 3 Fujirebio Inc. Japan 50 5( FUNDES :3O 3( Gaba International AG, Switzerland 58 5~ Gateway Ed l Products = General Co for Chemical Industries, Libya - 4OO - 4O( General Society of Authors in Soain (SGAE) ~

54 A Table 8 (continued) Contributor UN UNCTAD UNCHS ECA ECLAC ESCAP UNIDO ILO FAO UNESCO WHO ITU WMO IMO ICAO IAEA ITC UPU WIPO TOTAl German Pharma Health Fund Ev Germany Gesellschaft Deutscher Chemiker GFR ~P LC UK and Northern Ireland Global 2000 Inc USA H Neumann International, Austria Helwan Portland Cement Cairo-- Human Serum & Pharmaceutical, Hungary Iberia-Per ol bros Spain Idea Foundation IFO Institute for Economic Research Industr radet Kopenhavn Denmark INMARSAT Institute of Cardiolo y~t, Italy Instituto de Cooperacion Ibero-Americana Instituto Portuaro de Estudios y Cooperacion de Valence O ; 13~ 21 2, 11 Instituto Tecnolo J~o y de Estudios Superiores de Mexico Interchurch ~velopment Cooperation Int l Assn of L ons Club USA Int l Asthma Council United Kingdom Int l Consultation on Urological Diseases Belgium Int l Confederation of Societies of Authors and ~AC), Paris, France Int l Development Association Int l Dev Research Centre (IDRC) Canada Int l Fertilizer Industry Association Int l Federation of Pharmaceutical Manuracturers Int l Federation of PhonoQraphic Industry UK Intl Federation of Reproduction Rights Munich nt l Hilsfonds Germany Int l Life Sciences USA In t l Or@ of Good Templars, Sweden Int l ReadinQ Association International Transport Workers Union I PP Foundation Ipharmex Lyon Japan International Development Org, Japan Japan Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Assn Johann Jaocbs Foundation, Switzedand J_ohn Hopkins University, USA Korea PyenQwang Trading Corp., Dem. Korea Korean Shipowners Association O 555 7O 73 --L L 64 2O 262 5O O (7 90{ 19 2H u ~J O ~R

55 Table 8 (continued) Contributor UN UNCTAD UNCHS ECA ECLAC ESCAP UNIDO ILO FAO UNESCO WHO ITU WMO IMO ICAO IAEA ITC UPU WIPO TOTAL Kwang Hua Development and Investment, HK Labour Research Centre, Tokyo Laboratoires Groupil SA, France Latin American Federation of Producers of Phonograpms and Videograpms (FLAPF), Brazil Libya Cement, Benghazi, Libya Lfe Col ege School of Chiropractic, USA IMac Arthur Foundation -i Mentor Foundation Micronutrient Initiatiative, Canada Minnesota Medical Foundation, USA 3O I 30 ~fisceltaneous donors ~ultidonor Motorola, Switzerland NEC, Japan 2O [I 20 NFUAJ (National Federation of UNESCO :1 Associations in Japan 187 "1 187 Netherlands Central Employement Board New Sun Foundation Non-governmental Organizations International Air Transport Association, Montreal, Canada ~y for Development Cooperation Novo Nordisk A/S, Denmark Onassis AS C Organizacion Latinoamericana de Ener~ Pan-America1 Health & Education Fnd, USA IO0 10C Pathfinder International Pacific Leprosy Foundation, New Zealand 1 -I ~ Pfizer Inc. USA 35 )rema Handels esellchar m bh, Austria 115 Provincia Autonoma di Bolzano, Provincia Autonoma di Trento, Italy.! 831 Qatar Charitable Society, Pakistan 30 Italy t4;i i! 11~ 147 Queensland Dept of Health, Australia 50 5C Ravizza Farmaceutici-Spa, Italy E River Blindness Foundation, USA Robens Institute United King_dom 38 3~ Rockefeller Foundation, USA " Rotary international, USA Rotary of Japan ( Ro.Ro~ommonwealth Society for the Blind, UK 28 2~ RTL Germany 33C 33( Sasakawa Foundation -[ ( 3C

56 A Table 8 (continued) Contributor Sesakawa Health Trust Fund Sclavo Institute, Italy Servicio Nat l de AprendLzagem Industrial. Brazil Sibir Inc., USA. Mclean, Virginia, USA Solidadte Mondial, Brussels isoka GakkaL Japan Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases S~_~p_port Group of Zena Bill Sundry TIW Systems, USA TRT Philips, France TRW/ESL, USA Task Force "Sight& Life" Switzerland The Independent Newspaper, United Kin~om dnited States Committee for UNICEF, USA United States of America Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Assn., USA Valencia Port Authority W.K Kellogg Foundation, USA World Council of Churches World Food ~ramme World Federation of Neurosur ical Societies, UK Year of Oral Health (1994) Consortium, Ireland Miscellaneous Subtotal Contributor II. Multilateral sources (~ United Nations system FAO IDA ILO... IMO... WMO UN UNCTAD UNCHS ECA ECLAC ESCAP UNIDO I 3O ILO FAO UNESCO WHO ITU WMO " i., 21 2i 2i ~ "1 20i 71; i 9O ICAO IAEA ITC UPU WIPO TOTAL 4 44o! O O ? Int { Fund for A ricultural Development UNCDF UNIDO UN Assistance Programme for Afghanistan i... Y 1 893i 2

57 Table 8 (continued) Contributor UN UNCTAD UNCHS ECA ECLAC ESCAP UNIDO ILO FAO UNESCO WHO ITU WMO IMO ICAO IAEA ITC UPU WlPO TOTAL UN Centre for Social Dev. & Humanitarian I Affairs UN Trust Fund for Chemobyl (UNCTF).i i UN Division for Humanitarian Assistance JN Office for Emergency Operations in Africa -8 -I LIN Educational Programme for South Africa UN Environment Programme bl " UN Int l Drug Control Programme c/ O,4 178 UN InterrsQ Crime &Justice Research Inst UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East UN Trust Fund for Transport and Communication Decade for Africa 117.I 117 UNESCO 10 1( UNFPA d/ ~ UNHCR , = UNICEF " = United Nations ~ WFP _! ~ WHO 95 World Bank 2O O i Miscellaneous -4 2 Footnotes a/ io/and dl -I Subtotal O t O ; Contributor (ii) Non-United Nations state m African Development Bank O ; IArab Fund for Economic and Socia~ Development ~,rab Gulf Programme for UN Dev. Orgs. 2O , = ~rab Industrial Dev. & Mining O~g. 45.i 4. &rab Organization for Agricultural Development ; Ksian Development Bank ,= ~sian Institute of Technology 16 1( Benelux Trademark Office 19 1,( 3aribbean Develo_pment Bank 65 6, 3omisi6n Centroamericana de Transporte Madtimo (COCATRAM) 3 1 -~mg &

58 Table 8 (continued) Contributor UN UNCTAD UNCH$ ECA ECLAC ESCAP UNIDO ILO FAO UNESCO WHO ITU WMO IMO ICAO IAEA ITC UPU WIPO TOTAL Commission of the European Communities (CEEG_~ e/ Common Fund for Commodities Commonwealth Fund for Technical Cooperation Conference of Arab Ministers of Agriculture in the Gulf and Arabian Penin Council of Arab Ministers Fnd for Health 475 I 475 I m -1 -I DANIDA European Economic Comm. (EEC) ~ European Patent Of~ce "i ~an Union 59 5g FAO Money and Medals Programme 233 :1 233 Fertilizer Industry Advisory Comm (FAG) Indonesiah Farmers Association i Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee for a Convention to Combat Desertification "1 3~ Inter-American Development Bank ; [ntq~overnmental Forum on Chemical Safety tnt t Jute Organization ; Int l Tropical Timber Org. (ITTO) Islamic Development Bank E Liechienstein Special Fund ~ Mediterranean Zoones Control Centre Montreal Protocol Fund Miscellaneous Donors ~ Multi-donors Trust Fund ,4 and Development (OECD) 6 E OPEC Fund ] ~ Overseas Development Administration jr Pan American Health & Education Fnd. J tlc Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies ; Rockefeller Foundation 2 -I USAID z Wodd Maritime Universit: ,Miscellaneous -5 3O ( ~note e/ 6. = ISubt~ O ( G~ND TOTAL g O 12O6O 6O5 6 55O ~ Excluding contributions of $15,655,141 by Resident Representative; $17,888,784 by OPS; $318,233 by UNICEF and $4,495,750 by UNCDF b/ Excluding contributions of ECE by $22,300. c/ Excludes $3,802,704 received as reimbursement for projects implemented as Executing Agency of UNDCP. d./ Exctuding contributions of $796,985 by OPS: $820,089 by ECE; $29,345,000 by NGOs; $84,392,805 by UNFPA; $50,476,551 by Governments; $2,147,174 by UNICEF and $1,020 by ESCWA. e/ Excluding contributions of $64,900 by ECE.

59 Table 9. Extrabudqetary contributions to aqencies: unilateral self-supportino sources Country or area UN UNCHS ECLAC ECE ITC UNIDO ILO FAO WHO ITU IMO ICAO IAEA UNESCO UNCTAD WMO TOTAL Algeria Armenia Austria Argentina Bahamas , Bangladesh 3elarus Belize Belgium Benin Bhutan Botswana Brazil Bulgaria Burkina Faso O urundi Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Chad Chile China Colombia Comoros Congo O O icosta Rica Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark ! Ecuador Egypt Equatorial Guinea Ethiopia Fiii I I

60 Table 9 (continued) Country or area UN UNCHS ECLAC ECE ITC UNIDO ILO FAO WHO ITU IMO ICAO IAEA UNESCO UNCTAD WMO TOTAL Finland France 126 Greece 515 Gambia Georgia 6 5OO Germany Guatemala 534 Ghana 270 Guinea 384 Guinea-Bissau Honduras Hungary 17a/ India 22O Indonesia 29O4 bran, Islamic Republic of I raq Ireland 13 Italy I Jordan 942 Jamaica 32 2 Japan Kenya 149 Kuwait 12 Latvia 11 Lebanon I m Lesotho 9O9 Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Lieohestein uxembourg 2 4 Mada0~, ~r Malawi I Malaysia Maldives 3 Malta Mauritius

61 Table 9 (continued) Country or area UN UNCHS ECLAC ECE ITC UNIDO ILO FAO WHO ITU IMO ICAO IAEA UNESCO UNCTAD WMO TOTAL Mexico O4 Morocco Myanmar I Mozambique Nepal Nethedands Nethedands Antilles -I -I Norway 3O7 3O7 hlicaragua Nigeria Oman Panama Pakistan Papua New Guinea. 3O~ Peru ! 348 Philippines Poland ipo~ugal 8 8 jqatar Romania 26 -I 1 27 Republic of Korea 176 I 238 4o -I 454, Russian Federation isamoa 24 -I -I 24 Saudi Arabia O Senegal I Sierra Leone SIovak Republic 37, Slovenia Solomon Islands -I Somalia 20; 2O Spain 5 98 Sri Lanka Sudan.I Sweden 70 -j 1so -I 28o

62 Table g (continued) Country or area UN UNCHS ECLAC ECE ITC UNIDO ILO FAO WHO ITU IMO ICAO IAEA UNESCO UNCTAD WMO TOTAL Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Thailand Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Uganda United Arab Emirates United Kingdom I I b/ 247 United Republic of Tanzania United States of America Uruguay Venezuela Yemen I--~ I 1403 ss _ 1 4O Yugoslavia Zaire Zambia Zimbabwe Others t Total all countries ( , = I Other agencies 793 c/ GRAND TOTAL a/ Excluding contributions of $16,000 by UPU. b/ Excluding contributions of $51,000 by UPU. c/ This amount ($726,000) represents the UN Trust fund for African Development (UNTFAD), to which all African countries (ECA Member States) make voluntary pledges. The contributions are credited to a general fund. The amount covers projects not specifically related to any particular country s contribution.

63 DP/1995/56/Add.1 English Page 63 Table 10. Contributions to WFP, 19,93 and 1994 al Countries 1993 bl 1994 c/ Argentina Australia Austria Barbados 14 Belgium Bhutan 2 Botswana 43 Brazil Canada China Colombi~ Costa Rica 11 Cuba Denmark Egypt El Salvador IGermany Greece 198 G~Guyana 77 Honduras 10 Hungary Iceland 18 India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of 44 Ireland Italy Japan Jo~an Lebanon 46 Lesotho 32 Malaysia 4 Mauritius _ ~ / o.

64 DP/1995/56/Add. 1 English Page 64 Table 10 (continued) Countries 1993 b/ 1994 c/ Mali 2 Mexico 3O 53 Morocco Netherlands New Zeland Nigeria - 1C Norway !Pakistan Panama 1 Paraguay. 167 Philippines Portugal 5O 145 Qatar 51 1 Republic of Korea 120 Saudi Arabia Senegal 115 Spain Sweden Switzerland 22 i Syrian Arab Republic 40; Sudan 1 69,~ Tanzania 2 Thailand 51 1 Tunisia Turkey 154 United Kingdom United States Venezuela 26 Viet Nam Yeman Arab Republic 9,Others

65 DP/1995/56~Add. 1 English Page 65 Table 10 (continued) Countries 1993 Io/ 1994 c/ International/Non-governmental organizations Action Aid, UK 385 Canadian Foodgrains Bank Care International Catholic Relief Service 45 Concern (Ireland) 50 Croce Rossa Italiana 7O Danish Churchaid 172 Diakonissches Werkevan 26 Euronaid European Economic Communities Emmanuel Relief and Rehabilitation Int. 186 ~onal Church Coordination Committee for Development 152 International Committee for Red Cross 28O League of Red Cross Societies 103 OXFAM 11~ Relief and Development Service International 315 Relief Transport Save the Children Fund 185 SIM Canada 146 The Mothers Union 38 UN system Others Subtotal Grand total , a/ Includes both regular and extrabudgetary resources b/ Excludes contributions from the United Nations system, which amounted to $14 million in _c/ Includes contributions to both WFP general resources and special trust funds. /,..

66 A "orn~ Table 11. United Nations system: summary of technical and non-technical cooperation assistance delivered, 199 I (Thousands of US dollars) 01 Country or area Concessional technical Grant technical cooperation Agency Agency UNDP cooperation UNDPregular Total extra- central IDA adminis- Self- Grant budgets World Bank budgetary funds tered funds Technical supporting technical a/ technical b._/ cl cooperation d_/ expenditures UNFPA cooperation cooperation (gross) Non-technical cooperation WFP UNICEF e/ Grant TOTAL Grand O) Afghanistan Albania Algeria Angola Anguilla Antigua and Barbuda Armenia Argentina Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Brazil British Virgin Islands Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Caribbean Cape Verde Cayman Islands , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~5, 1~ ~ O i _ O O : , O o~ t ~ ~ ~ 178 lf~ ; " " " " ~ ~ ~ ~ 1900-~ I ~J , R~ ~R r.~

67 Table 11 (continued) (Thousands of US dollars) Country or area i Grant technical cooperation i Agency Agency UNDP UNDPregular extra- central adminis- Selfbudgets i budgetary funds tered funds supporting _a/ b_/ _.1 dl expenditures Total Grant technical UNFPA cooperation Concessional technical cooperation IDA World Bank Technical technical cooperation cooperation (gross) Non-technical cooperation UNICEF WFP _e/ Grant TOTAL Grand Central African Republic Central America Chad Chile China _ s.4! 18174j lo652 i 54 12~ Colombia Comoros Congo Cook Islands Costa Rica ~ ; I CSte d lvoire Croatia Cuba Cyprus iczech Republic O "l -, ~, ~ple s Republic of Korea Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic ~ Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Eritrea Estonia ~i 413o ~~ 1 o ~ ! e Equatorial Guinea Ethiopia Federated States of Micronesia French Guiana --~ ~ ~~3~ _ O ~ E ~ 10 1{ French Polynesia Gabon Gambia Gaza Strip Georaia ~~ ! ( ~ ~ / ;

68 Table 11 (continued) (Thousands of US dollars) Country or area Grant technical cooperation Agency Agency UNDP UNDPadminis- regular extra- central Self- budgets budgetary! funds tered funds supporting _a/ bj I cl dl expenditures UNFPA Concessional technical cooperation Total IDA Grant World Bank Technical technical technical cooperation cooperation cooperation (gross) Non-technical cooperation WFP UNICEF i Grant TOTAL Grand L Germany Ghana Greece Grenada Guam ~ i p j = Guatemala Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti O O I Honduras!Hungary Iceland India Indonesia O O ( O O Ireland Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jordan Kenya Kazakhstan " " t-- 22i ~ I O Kiribati Kyrgyzstan Kuwait Lao People s Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Lithuania L_ ~ i ~ I s93j "I O S !

69 Table 11 (continued) (Thousands of US dollars) Country or area Grant technical cooperation Agency Agency UNDP UNDPregular extra- central adminis- Selfbudgets budgetary funds tered funds supporting _a/ b/ c/ d/ expenditures UNFPA Concessional technical cooperation IDA Total Grant World Bank Technical technical technical cooperation cooperation cooperation (gross) Non-technical cooperation UNICEF WFP _e/ Grant TOTAL Grand Macau Macedonia Madagascar Malawi Malaysia O Maldives Mall Malta Mariana Islands Marshall Islands i " Mauritania Mauritius Mexico Mongolia Morocco , O O ~ Mozambique Montserrat Myanmar Namibia National Liberation Movements OO ~ ~ Nepal Netherlands Netherlands Antilles New Caledonia New Zealand s I ! ! =. 6~ 362 2c 2~ Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norway ~ 28 81E ~09C Oman Pacific Multi-islands Palau Pakistan Panama , 820! z ~ ;

70 Table 11 (continued) (Thousands of US dollars) Country or area m~m Agency regular budgets a/ extrabudgetary _b/ Grant technical cooperation UNDP UNDPcentral adminis- Selffunds tered funds supporting cl dl expenditures UNFPA Concessional technical cooperation Total Grant World Bank Technical technical technical cooperation cooperation cooperation (gross) l IDA Non-technical cooperation UNICEF WFP _e/ Gra~ TOTAL Grand Papua New Guinea Paraguay 753 Peru Philippines Poland O I O O - 7; I Portugal R~eatua nion r 10 Republic of Moldova 112 Republic of Korea O8 6O Romania Russian Federation 221 Rwanda Saint Kitts and Nevis 79 Saint Lucia I O i 27 -~ O Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 79 Samoa 875 San Marino 93 Sao Tome and Principe 918 Saudi Arabia O52 sos Senegal Seychelles 660 Sierra Leone Singapore 211 Slovakia ~ Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Pacific O o 2i : O9 49O9 9O 9O Spain 104 Sri Lanka Sudan suriname , Swaziland i ~

71 Table 11 (continued) (Thousands of US dollars) Country or area Grant technical cooperation Agency Agency UNDP UNDPregular extra- central adminis- Selfbudgets budgetary funds tered funds supporting _a/ bl _c/ dl expenditures UNFPA Total Grant technical cooperation Concessional technical cooperation IDA World Bank Technical technical cooperation cooperation (gross) Non-technical cooperation UNICEF WFP Gra~ TOTAL Grand Syrian Arab Republic Tajikistan Territory of Hong Kong Thailand Togo O ! Tokelau Islands Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Trust Territories of the Pacific Tunisia O Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and the Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates- United Kingdom United Republic of Tanzania Unspecified Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Viet Nam , ] ! O ! O " ! Yemen Yugoslavia Zaire Zambia Zimbabwe Other Total all countries t ()