Generated for: ROCKY MOUNTAIN HOUSE

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "Generated for: ROCKY MOUNTAIN HOUSE"

Alexandrina Floyd
6 years ago
Views:

1 Generated for:

2 Introduction The financial indicator graphs are intended to serve as a tool that may assist council and administration with operational decisions. The comparative measures may be useful in assessing past performance and for budget planning. Each municipality is compared to a group of similar size urban municipalities, or to rural municipalities with similar tax base. The comparison group is shown on the last slide. New for 212 is the ability to create customized reports using additional tools in milenet. Custom graphs can be created comparing your municipality to other Alberta municipalities. Furthermore, you can create specific graphs for measures you are interested in. Financial Advisory Services is available to assist you in interpreting the information contained in the graphs. Please be aware that advisors will not have access to any of the custom graphs you create, but would still be able to assist with the underlying formulas and data used to create all graphs. It should be noted that that the financial indicator graphs are point-in-time documents. The system is updated daily as new information is added to the municipal financial database. As such graphs will reflect the current data set and the results will be subject to change as the database is updated and verified. However, most information from the previous reporting year will have been posted by the fall of the subsequent year. Other points to note are: - The range for most of the graphs is 26 to Equalized assessment is shown for the period 27 to Caution should be used when interpreting results as each municipality has unique characteristics affecting how it compares to the group. Also, circumstances may have changed since the December 31, 211 reporting date.

3 Introduction Financial Indicator Graphs include: o Equalized Tax Rates - Municipal/Residential/Non-Residential o Equalized Assessment Per Capita o Non-Residential Equalized Assessment as % of Total o Tax Collection Rate o Debt Debt Service as % of the Limits o Long Term Debt Per Capita o Major Revenue Sources Per Capita o Major Revenue Sources As % of Total Revenue (only 211) o Broad Function Expenses Per Capita (only 211) o Per Capita Expenses by Major Type: - Salaries, Wages Benefits - Contracted General Services - Materials, Goods, Supplies Utilities - Bank Charges Interest - Amortization o Net Book Value As % of Capital Costs o Accumulated Surplus Categories, As % (only 211) o Accumulated Surplus Categories, Per Capita (only 211) o Ratio of Current Assets to Current Liabilities

4 Equalized Tax Rates: Net Municipal % 9.8% % 8.4% % 6.8% % 6.8% % 7.2% % 7.2% Note: Municipal Equalized Tax Rate is calculated based on total equalized assessment and net municipal property tax. Page 1

5 Equalized Tax Rates: Residential % 12.7% % 1.6% % 8.% % 7.9% % 8.5% % 8.5% 5 Note: Residential Equalized Tax Rate is calculated based on gross residential property taxes and residential equalized assessment. Page 2

6 Equalized Tax Rates: Non-Residential % 16.7% % 15.% 28 1.% 12.8% % 11.7% % 12.4% % 12.3% Note: Non-Residential Equalized Tax Rate is calculated based on gross non-residential property taxes and non-residential equalized assessment Page 3

7 Total Equalized Assessment Per Capita 3, 26 64,282 59, ,13 65,242 2, 28 78,72 81, ,25 116, , , , ,31 112,25 118, ,994 1, 64,282 66,13 78,72 Note: Equalized Assessment Per Capita approximates a municipality's ability to generate property tax revenue in comparison to similar municipalities Page 4

8 Non-Residential Assessment as % of Total Equalized Assessment % 28.8% % 29.3% % 26.5% % 25.3% % 24.3% % 26.1% 2 1 Page 5

9 Tax Collection Rates % 97.9% % 98.4% % 97.4% % 96.9% % 96.6% % 97.1% 85 8 Note: This indicator reflects the percentage of taxes and grants in place of taxes which are collected by the municipality in the year in which they are levied. Page 6

10 Percent of Debt Limit Used % 2.6% % 18.4% % 19.2% % 23.1% % 25.7% % 32.2% Note: This graph shows, in percentage terms, the municipality's debt as a percentage of the regulated limit. This is compared to the median for the group of similar municipalities. Page 7

11 Percent of Debt Service Limit Used % 19.8% % 19.4% % 2.6% % 17.2% % 19.2% % 24.1% Note: This graph shows, in percentage terms, the municipality's current debt servicing requirement relative to the regulated limit. This is compared to the median for the group of similar municipalities. Page 8

12 Long Term Municipal Debt Per Capita 4, , ,61 1,34 2, ,152 1,61 Page 9

13 Revenue Sources Per Capita: Net Municipal Property Taxes 1, , Page 1

14 Revenue Sources Per Capita: Total Grants 2, , , Page 11

15 Revenue Sources Per Capita: Sales and User Charges 1, , Page 12

16 Major Revenue Sources As % of Total Revenue, Group Group Maximum Net Municipal Property Tax Total Grants Sales and User Charges Page 13

17 Major Expenditures Per Capita by Broad Function, 211 Group 6,721 Group Maximum 6, 4, 2,575 2, 2,13 1, General Government Protective Services Transportation Environment Recreation Total Page 14

18 Major Expenditures Per Capita by Type: Salaries, Wages and Benefits 1,2 1, Page 15

19 Major Expenditures Per Capita by Type: Contracted and General Services 1, Page 16

20 Major Expenditures Per Capita by Type: Materials, Goods, Supplies and Utilities 1, Page 17

21 Major Expenditures Per Capita by Type: Interest and Banking Page 18

22 Major Expenditures Per Capita by Type: Amortization of Tangible Capital Assets Page 19

23 Net Book Value as % of Total Capital Property Costs % 64.8% % 66.5% % 65.2% Page 2

24 Accumulated Surplus Categories as % of Total, Group Group Maximum Unrestricted Restricted Equity in TCA Page 21

25 Accumulated Surplus Per Capita, 211 Group 2, 2,559 21,24 Group Maximum 15, 1,714 1, 8,253 9,179 9,567 5, 2, Unrestricted Restricted Equity in TCA Total Page 22

26 Ratio of Current Assets to Liabilities Assets 15,, ,828, Liabilities Ratio 12,13,446 12,812,691 12,96,484 13,59,621 1,, 9,527, ,, 5,423,137 3,932,423 4,49,632 1,821,698 2,378,339 3,7,154 Note: The current ratio calculation measures ability to meet short-term obligations with existing liquid assets. "Current Assets" are those which are liquid in nature (cash or an asset which can be easily converted to cash). Inventory is excluded from the calculation. "Current Liabilities" are generally obligations coming due within the next fiscal year. The ratio is shown in the centre of the column. A ratio greater than one indicates the degree to which current assets exceed current liabilities; a ratio smaller Page 23

27 Equalized Assessment Per Capita WHITECOURT EDSON MORINVILLE BANFF OLDS TABER DRUMHELLER INNISFAIL COALDALE DRAYTON VALLEY BONNYVILLE SLAVE LAKE PONOKA BLACKFALDS PEACE RIVER DEVON WAINWRIGHT ST. PAUL 97,182 96, , ,344 17,698 19,62 124, , , ,31 113,293 19,56 126, ,66 11,955 11,52 16, ,82 218,755 1, 15, 2, Page 24

Group Population WHITECOURT EDSON MORINVILLE BANFF OLDS TABER DRUMHELLER INNISFAIL COALDALE DRAYTON VALLEY BONNYVILLE SLAVE LAKE PONOKA BLACKFALDS PEACE

28 Group Population WHITECOURT EDSON MORINVILLE BANFF OLDS TABER DRUMHELLER INNISFAIL COALDALE DRAYTON VALLEY BONNYVILLE SLAVE LAKE PONOKA BLACKFALDS PEACE RIVER DEVON WAINWRIGHT ST. PAUL 5,632 5,775 6,47 6,576 6,399 6,315 6,534 6,943 6,893 7,31 7,248 7,231 7,935 7,932 7,883 8,244 8,365 8,54 9,22 6, 7, 8, 9, Page 25

Generated for: FLAGSTAFF COUNTY

Generated for: FLAGSTAFF COUNTY Generated for: Introduction The financial indicator graphs are intended to serve as a tool that may assist council and administration with operational decisions. The comparative measures may be useful