2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey"

Transcription

1 2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey Presentation Presented by: Jamie Duncan Vice President, Canada Ipsos Public Affairs Krista Ring Manager, Customer Experience & Research Customer Service & Communications 2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey

2 Methodology Telephone survey conducted with a randomly selected sample of 2,500 Calgarians aged 18 years and older between August 16 th and September 10 th, Both landline (70%) and cell phone (30%) sample were used. The average interview length was 31 minutes. Final data were weighted to ensure the overall sample s quadrant, ward, and age/gender composition reflects that of the actual Calgary population aged 18 or older according to 2016 Municipal and Federal Census data. The margin of error (MOE) for the total sample of 2,500 is ± 2.0 percentage points, 19 times out of 20. The margin of error by quadrant is as follows: Northeast: n=465 (MOE 4.6) Northwest: n=745 (MOE 3.6) Southeast: n=583 (MOE 4.1) Southwest: n=707 (MOE 3.7) The sample size per ward ranged from n=156 (MOE 7.9) to n=210 (MOE 6.8). Where possible, results are compared to previous iterations of the Citizen Satisfaction survey. indicates number is significantly higher than 2016 indicates number is significantly lower than Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 2

3 Quality of Life 2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 3

4 Overall Quality of Life in Calgary Very good 10 6% Good % 5% 2% 15% 24% 40% Good: 85% 2017: 85% 2016: 83% 2015: 86% 2014: 87% 2013: 88% 2012: 88% 2011: 83% 2010: 78% 2009: 76% 2008: 69% 2007: 67% 2006: 77% Late Fall % 3 2 1% 0% Poor: 3% Very poor 1 0% On a scale of 1 to 10 where 1 represents very poor and 10 represents very good, how would you rate the overall quality of life in the city of Calgary today? Base: Valid respondents (n=2,499) 2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 4

5 Perceived Change in the Quality of Life Worsened Stayed the same Improved Late Fall 2017 Stayed the same 43% Worsened 38% Improved 19% 45% 30% 51% 61% 27% 27% 58% 30% 47% 39% 41% 41% 48% 26% 52% 30% 47% 35% 49% 49% 31% 26% 45% 45% 37% 35% 26% 22% 12% 12% 14% 18% 26% 18% 17% 20% 25% 18% 20% 2005 (n=999) 2006 (n=971) 2007 (n=978) 2008 (n=987) 2009 (n=991) 2010 (n=988) 2011 (n=987) 2012 (n=987) 2013 (n=994) (n=2,419) (n=2,417) (n=2,479) (n=2,484) And, do you feel that the quality of life in the city of Calgary in the past three years has...? Base: Valid respondents 2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 5

6 Sustainability: Connectedness Completely Agree (10) Agree (9, 8 or 7) Neutral (6 or 5) Disagree (4, 3, 2 or 1) % Agree Late Fall 2017 I am proud to be a Calgarian % 45% 43% 46% 45% 47% 8% 7% 7% % 90% 90% 89% % 49% 6% 3 91% % 47% 6% 2 92% I am proud to live in my neighbourhood % 34% 31% 30% 53% 54% 55% 56% 10% 5% 9% 3 10% 4% 10% 4% 85% 88% 86% 86% 84% % 54% 10% 2 88% I am regularly involved in neighbourhood and local community events % 6% 6% 6% 25% 24% 24% 24% 28% 29% 28% 29% 42% 41% 42% 41% 30% 30% 30% 30% 28% % 27% 32% 36% 32% Next, I m going to read you a series of statements that some people have said about life in Calgary. Please indicate whether you agree or disagree with each statement using a scale from 1 to 10, where 1 is completely disagree and 10 is completely agree. Base: Valid respondents (Bases vary) 2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 6

7 Sustainability: Making a Life and Making a Living Completely Agree (10) Agree (9, 8 or 7) Neutral (6 or 5) Disagree (4, 3, 2 or 1) % Agree Late Fall % 61% 13% 5% 82% 81% % 62% 13% 5% 82% Calgary is a great place to make a life % 62% 12% 4% 84% % 60% 11% 4% 85% % 56% 9% 2 89% % 52% 22% 10% 68% 68% % 50% 23% 12% 65% Calgary is a great place to make a living % 59% 13% 7% 80% % 57% 9% 5% 86% % 55% 8% 2 90% Next, I m going to read you a series of statements that some people have said about life in Calgary. Please indicate whether you agree or disagree with each statement using a scale from 1 to 10, where 1 is completely disagree and 10 is completely agree. Base: Valid respondents (Bases vary) 2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 7

8 Sustainability: Inclusivity and Direction for the Future Completely Agree (10) Agree (9, 8 or 7) Neutral (6 or 5) Disagree (4, 3, 2 or 1) % Agree Late Fall % 61% 15% 6% 79% 76% The City of Calgary municipal government fosters a city that is inclusive and accepting of all % 19% 60% 61% 14% 14% 5% 6% 81% 80% % 62% 14% 5% 81% % 62% 15% 3 82% % 52% 26% 12% 62% 58% Calgary is moving in the right direction to ensure a high quality of life for future generations % 10% 11% 56% 56% 60% 22% 23% 20% 12% 11% 9% 66% 66% 71% % 64% 17% 5% 78% Next, I m going to read you a series of statements that some people have said about life in Calgary. Please indicate whether you agree or disagree with each statement using a scale from 1 to 10, where 1 is completely disagree and 10 is completely agree.. Base: Valid respondents (Bases vary) 2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 8

9 Calgary: On the Right Track to Being a Better City? Strongly agree Somewhat agree 28% 30% 33% 35% 41% 57% 57% 54% 54% 50% Agree: 84%* Agree 2017: 84% 2016: 86% 2015: 88% 2014: 89% 2013: 90% 2012: 89% 2011: 86% Late Fall % Somewhat disagree Strongly disagree 11% 9% 8% 8% 8% 5% 4% 4% 3% 2% 2017 (n=2,489) 2016 (n=2,485) 2015 (n=2,442) 2014 (n=2,433) 2013 (n=1,000) *Rounding There are a wide array of challenges facing The City of Calgary today, but also many success stories. Please indicate whether you agree or disagree with the following statement about Calgary s future: Calgary is on the right track to be a better city 10 years from now. Base: Valid respondents 2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 9

10 Tracking Perceived Safety in Own Neighbourhood Safe Unsafe 79% 77% 74% 70% 78% 77% 81% 83% 85% 84% 83% 84% 81% 21% 23% 26% 30% 22% 23% 19% 17% 15% 16% 17% 16% 19% 2005 (n=998) 2006 (n=998) 2007 (n=999) 2008 (n=998) 2009 (n=999) 2010 (n=993) 2011 (n=1,000) 2012 (n=999) 2013 (n=998) (n=2,446)(n=2,450)(n=2,494)(n=2,495) How safe do you feel or would you feel walking alone in your neighbourhood after dark? Base: Valid respondents 2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 10

11 Economic Perceptions 2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 11

12 Current Economic Situation (Citizens) Very good Somewhat good Somewhat bad Very bad Good Bad Jul7 12% 61% 21% 5% 73% 27%* Canada Apr7 Jan7 7% 8% 50% 46% 31% 36% 10% 10% 57% 53%* 41% 46% Aug6 8% 46% 36% 9% 53% 46% Nov5 3 42% 44% 10% 45% 54% Jul7 6% 48% 33% 11% 55%* 44% Apr7 3 31% 44% 21% 34% 65% Calgary Jan7 3 26% 44% 27% 29% 71% Aug6 5% 26% 43% 26% 30% 69% Nov5 6% 32% 44% 16% 38% 61% Jul7 8% 40% 38% 14% 48% 51%* Apr7 2 25% 45% 27% 28%* 71%* Alberta Jan7 Aug6 3 4% 20% 18% 45% 44% 31% 32% 23% 22% 76% 77% Nov5 5% 26% 43% 24% 31% 68% How would you describe the current economic situation in? Base: All respondents (n=500) Statistically higher than Apr 17 Statistically lower than Apr 17 *Rounding 2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 12

13 Current Economic Situation (Businesses) How would you rate the current economic situation in 31% 29% 8% 40% 45% 49% 47% 22% 20% 1% 1% 4% Calgary Alberta Canada Very good Somewhat good Somewhat bad Very bad Don't know Base: All respondents n= Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 13

14 Good or Bad Time for The City to Invest in New Projects (Citizens) Very good time Somewhat good time 39% 42% Good time: Jul 2017: 81% Apr 2017: 77% Jan 2017: 74% Aug 2016: 76% Nov 2015: 75% Somewhat bad time Very bad time 5% 13% Bad time: Jul 2017: 18% Apr 2017: 22% Jan 2017: 25% Aug 2016: 24% Nov 2015: 24% Don't know 1% Generally speaking, do you think that it is a good or a bad time for The City of Calgary to be investing in new projects like roads, public transportation, and local facilities? Base: All respondents (n=500) 2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 14

15 Good or Bad Time for The City to Invest in New Projects (Businesses) To what degree do you think that now is a good time or a bad time for The City of Calgary to be investing in new projects like roads, public transportation, and local facilities? 18% 5% 2% 31% 44% Good time: 75% Very good time Somewhat good time Somewhat bad time Very bad time Don't know Base: All respondents n= Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 15

16 Context Regarding City Investment in New Projects 2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 16

17 Issue Agenda 2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 17

18 Issue Agenda Multiple Responses First Mention Other Mentions Change Infrastructure, Traffic & Roads (NET) 26% 9% 35% Traffic congestion 7% 3 10% Infrastructure maintenance/ improvement/ development 4% 5% Road conditions 4% 3 7% 2 (Lack of) snow removal 3 4% +1 Transit (NET) 13% 6% 19% 2 Public Transportation [incl. buses/ Ctrain/ poor service] 8% 3 11% Transportation (unspecified) 4% 3 7% Crime, Safety & Policing (NET) 9% 4% 13% 2 Crime [incl. breaking and entering/ gangs/ drug dealers,etc.] 5% 7% Public safety 4% 6% Taxes (NET) 6% 8% Recreation (NET) 4% 3 7% 2 Environment & Waste Management (NET) 4% 3 7% +1 Economy (NET) 4% 6% 3 Budget & Spending (NET) 4% 6% +2 Total mentions <4% Education (NET) 4% 6% are not shown Homelessness, Poverty & Affordable Housing (NET) 3 5% +1 Growth & Planning (NET) 3 4% Note: A NET is a combination of 2 or more mentions that cover a Other 25% specific theme None 15% In your view, as a resident of the city of Calgary, what is the most important issue facing your community, that is, the one issue you feel should receive the greatest attention from your local leaders? Are there any other important local issues? Base: Valid respondents (n=2,441) 2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 18

19 Tracking Most Important Issue Facing Calgary First Mention Only Infrastructure, Traffic & Roads Transit Crime, Safety & Policing Economy 36% 34% 35% 28% 26% 29% 25% 26% 29% 27% 26% 25% 26% 12% 15% 15% 13% 20% 21% 11% 17% 16% 16% 15% 12% 19% 11% 18% 13% 18% 16% 14% 14% 8% 8% 8% 10% 13% 9% 0% 0% 0% 2% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 7% 4% (n=926) 2007 (n=924) 2008 (n=953) 2009 (n=919) 2010 (n=900) 2011 (n=908) 2012 (n=896) 2013 (n=878) 2014 (n=2,176) 2015 (n=2,395) 2016 (n=2,449) 2017 (n=2,431) In your view, as a resident of the city of Calgary, what is the most important issue facing your community, that is, the one issue you feel should receive the greatest attention from your local leaders? Base: Valid respondents 2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 19

20 City Programs and Services 2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 20

21 Overall Satisfaction with the Level and Quality of City Services and Programs Very satisfied % 8% 10% 10% 7% 32% 29% Satisfied: 79% Satisfied 2017: 79% 2016: 79% 2015: 80% 2014: 79% 2013: 84% 2012: 81% 2011: 75% 2010: 71% 2009: 68% 2008: 64% 2007: 64% 2006: 68% Late Fall % 3 2 1% 0% Not Satisfied: 4% Not at all satisfied 1 1% On a scale from 1 to 10 where 1 represents not at all satisfied and 10 represents very satisfied, how satisfied are you with the overall level and quality of services and programs provided by The City of Calgary? Base: Valid respondents (n=2,486) 2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 21

22 Importance of City Programs and Services Very important % Important Somewhat important Change % 3% 100% Calgary Fire Department 96% 4% 100% Calgary Police Service 94% 6% 100% +1 The quality of drinking water 95% 4% 99% Residential garbage collection service 84% 14% 98% City operated roads and infrastructure 82% 16% 98% Road maintenance including pothole repairs 74% 24% 98% Snow removal 78% 19% 97% Traffic flow management 78% 19% 97% Transportation planning 77% 20% 97% Calgary's parks, playgrounds and other open spaces 75% 22% 97% Disaster planning and response 73% 24% 97% +1 I am going to read a list of programs and services provided to you by The City of Calgary. Please tell me how important each one is to you. Base: Valid respondents (Bases vary) 2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 22

23 Importance of City Programs and Services (continued) Very important % Important Somewhat important Change Social services for individuals such as seniors or youth Calgary Transit including bus and CTrain service 77% 78% 19% 16% 96% 94% Affordable housing for lowincome families 67% 27% 94% Residential Blue Cart recycling 66% 27% 93% City growth management 58% 34% 92% City land use planning 55% 37% 92% +1 City operated recreation FACILITIES such as pools, leisure centres, and golf courses 55% 37% 92% +1 Property tax assessment 60% 32% 92% 2 Calgary's pathway system 57% 35% 92% Spring road cleaning 50% 42% 92% 311 service 54% 36% 90% I am going to read a list of programs and services provided to you by The City of Calgary. Please tell me how important each one is to you. Base: Valid respondents (Bases vary) 2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 23

24 Importance of City Programs and Services (continued) Very important % Important Somewhat important Change Development and building inspections and permits 55% 34% 89% Protection from river flooding 62% 25% 87% Community services such as support for community associations & not for profit groups City operated recreation PROGRAMS such as swimming lessons 41% 52% 46% 33% 87% 85% Business licenses and inspections 47% 38% 85% Bylaw services for things such as noise complaints, fire pits and weeds Animal control services for stray animals and pet licensing 40% 40% 44% 42% 84% 82% +3 Support for arts and culture including festivals 38% 42% 80% City of Calgary website 36% 41% 77% +1 Downtown revitalization 33% 44% 77% +2 Onstreet bikeways 25% 30% 55% I am going to read a list of programs and services provided to you by The City of Calgary. Please tell me how important each one is to you. Base: Valid respondents (Bases vary) 2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 24

25 Satisfaction with City Programs and Services Very satisfied % Satisfied Somewhat satisfied Change Calgary Fire Department 85% 15% 100% % 20% 98% The quality of drinking water 71% 23% 94% Calgary's parks, playgrounds and other open spaces 52% 42% 94% Calgary's pathway system 50% 44% 94% Disaster planning and response 44% 50% 94% Residential Blue Cart recycling 64% 29% 93% 311 service 53% 40% 93% City operated recreation FACILITIES such as pools, leisure centres, and golf courses 41% 52% 93% Spring road cleaning 46% 46% 92% 2 City operated recreation PROGRAMS such as swimming lessons Community services such as support for community associations & not for profit groups 38% 26% 54% 66% 92% 92% I am going to read a list of programs and services provided to you by The City of Calgary. Please tell me how satisfied you are with the job The City is doing in providing that program or service. Base: Valid respondents (Bases vary) 2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 25

26 Satisfaction with City Programs and Services (continued) Very satisfied % Satisfied Somewhat satisfied Change Residential garbage collection service 63% 28% 91% 5 Calgary Police Service 55% 36% 91% 3 Animal control services for stray animals and pet licensing 41% 50% 91% 2 Business licenses and inspections 29% 62% 91% Protection from river flooding 38% 51% 89% Development and building inspections and permits 27% 62% 89% City of Calgary website 33% 55% 88% Social services for individuals such as seniors or youth 23% 64% 87% Downtown revitalization 21% 65% 86% 2 City operated roads and infrastructure 24% 61% 85% Bylaw services for things such as noise complaints, fire pits and weeds 30% 54% 84% 3 I am going to read a list of programs and services provided to you by The City of Calgary. Please tell me how satisfied you are with the job The City is doing in providing that program or service. Base: Valid respondents (Bases vary) 2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 26

27 Satisfaction with City Programs and Services (continued) Very satisfied % Satisfied Somewhat satisfied Change City land use planning 19% 64% 83% Support for arts and culture including festivals 32% 51% 83% 6 Calgary Transit including bus and CTrain service 31% 51% 82% Transportation planning 20% 60% 80% +2 City growth management 18% 62% 80% Property tax assessment 21% 58% 79% +6 Snow removal 28% 47% 75% 4 Road maintenance including pothole repairs 22% 51% 73% 5 Affordable housing for lowincome families 13% 59% 72% +2 Traffic flow management 15% 53% 68% Onstreet bikeways 19% 45% 64% I am going to read a list of programs and services provided to you by The City of Calgary. Please tell me how satisfied you are with the job The City is doing in providing that program or service. Base: Valid respondents (Bases vary) 2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 27

28 Investment in City Programs and Services Invest More More Same Less Change Affordable housing for lowincome families 64% 31% 5% Calgary Transit including bus and CTrain service Social services for individuals such as seniors or youth 61% 60% 36% 37% 3% 3% 2 +2 Traffic flow management 59% 37% 4% +1 Road maintenance including pothole repairs 55% 43% 2% +3 Calgary Police Service 55% 42% 3% +3 Transportation planning 54% 43% 3% 2 Snow removal 52% 45% 3% +3 City operated roads and infrastructure 50% 47% 3% Calgary's parks, playgrounds and other open spaces 39% 58% 3% +3 Calgary Fire Department 38% 61% 1% +1 Protection from river flooding 37% 54% 9% I am going to read a list of programs and services provided to you by The City of Calgary. Please tell me if you think The City should invest more, less or the same amount on the program or service. Base: Valid respondents (Bases vary) 2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 28

29 Investment in City Programs and Services (continued) Invest More More Same Less Change City operated recreation FACILITIES such as pools, leisure centres, and golf courses 36% 57% 7% 9 35% 64% 1% City growth management 34% 55% 11% 2 The quality of drinking water 32% 67% 1% +1 Disaster planning and response 32% 64% 4% Community services such as support for community associations & not for profit groups City operated recreation PROGRAMS such as swimming lessons 30% 28% 59% 65% 11% 7% +1 2 Calgary's pathway system 27% 65% 8% Downtown revitalization 26% 56% 18% +2 City land use planning 25% 67% 8% 3 Spring road cleaning 23% 71% 6% +3 I am going to read a list of programs and services provided to you by The City of Calgary. Please tell me if you think The City should invest more, less or the same amount on the program or service. Base: Valid respondents (Bases vary) 2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 29

30 Investment in City Programs and Services (continued) Invest More More Same Less Change Bylaw services for things such as noise complaints, fire pits and weeds 23% 63% 14% +4 Support for arts and culture including festivals 23% 55% 22% 2 Development and building inspections and permits 22% 71% 7% Business licenses and inspections 20% 70% 10% +2 Onstreet bikeways 19% 37% 44% Animal control services for stray animals and pet licensing 18% 71% 11% +3 Residential garbage collection service 17% 76% 7% +2 City of Calgary website 17% 70% 13% service 16% 76% 8% Property tax assessment 15% 70% 15% 2 Residential Blue Cart recycling 13% 76% 11% 6 I am going to read a list of programs and services provided to you by The City of Calgary. Please tell me if you think The City should invest more, less or the same amount on the program or service. Base: Valid respondents (Bases vary) 2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 30

31 Importance Importance vs. Satisfaction Grid Traffic Flow Management 91% Road Maintenance Snow Removal Affordable Housing Primary Weakness Property Tax Assessment Calgary Transit Roads and Infrastructure Transportation Planning City Land Use Growth Planning Management Bylaw Services Residential Garbage Collection Social Services Protection from River Flooding Police Service Spring Road Cleaning Business Licenses & Inspection Primary Strength 9 Quality of Drinking Water Recreation Facilities 311 Service Development and Building Inspections & Permits Parks, Playgrounds & Open Spaces and Disaster Planning & Response Fire Department Blue Cart Recycling Calgary's Pathway System Community Services Recreation Programs Support for Arts & Culture Animal Control Services City of Calgary Website Downtown Revitalization 75% Secondary Weakness Secondary Strength 65% 86% Please note Onstreet bikeways is plotted at (64% satisfaction,55% importance) and not illustrated on this graph. Satisfaction 2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 31

32 Environmental Performance 2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 32

33 Tracking Perceptions About Overall State of Calgary s Environment 92% 9% 88% 12% 85% 15% 88% 12% 90% 10% 92% 93% 93% Good Poor 8% 7% 7% 95% 5% 97% 3% 94% 6% 97% Very Good 2017: 43% 2016: 48% 2015: 41% 2014: 41% 2013: 41% 2012: 35% 2011: 31% 2010: 29% 2009: 23% 2008: 24% 3% 94% 6% 2005 (n=998) 2006 (n=998) 2007 (n=999) 2008 (n=998) 2009 (n=998) 2010 (n=999) 2011 (n=996) 2012 (n=999) 2013 (n=1,001) 2014 (n=2,449) 2015 (n=2,448) 2016 (n=2,498) 2017 (n=2,492) Thinking about things such as air, water and land quality in the city, how would you rate the overall state of Calgary s environment today? Base: Valid respondents 2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 33

34 Satisfaction with The City s Environmental Programs and Services Very satisfied Somewhat satisfied Not very satisfied Not at all satisfied 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% 8% 11% 12% 11% 12% 35% 28% 25% 27% 27% 2017 (n=2,478) 2016 (n=2,472) 2015 (n=2,429) 2014 (n=2,405) 2013 (n=991) 54% 58% 61% 61% 60% Satisfied: 89% Satisfied 2017: 89% 2016: 86% 2015: 85% 2014: 87% 2013: 86% 2012: 83% 2011: 80% 2010: 78% 2009: 80% 2008: 61% 2007: 63% 2006: 68% How satisfied are you with The City of Calgary's programs and services aimed at helping Calgarians reduce their environmental impact? Base: Valid respondents 2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 34

35 Taxation 2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 35

36 Knowledge Levels of Tax Dollar Spending Very knowledgeable Somewhat knowledgeable Not very knowledgeable Not at all knowledgeable 9% 8% 9% 10% 9% 10% 10% 9% 9% 7% 31% 32% 34% 30% 31% 51% 49% 48% 52% 53% 2017 (n=2,494) 2016 (n=2,494) 2015 (n=2,442) 2014 (n=2,440) 2013 (n=999) Knowledgeable: 59%* Knowledgeable 2017: 59% 2016: 57% 2015: 57% 2014: 61% 2013: 62% 2012: 60% 2011: 59% 2010: 60% 2009: 63% 2008: 59% 2007: 60% 2006: 61% *Rounding Thinking about how The City of Calgary government is run, and what services it provides, would you say you are very, somewhat, not very, or not at all knowledgeable about how City tax dollars are spent? Base: Valid respondents 2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 36

37 Tracking Perceived Value of Property Taxes Good Value Neutral Poor Value Late Fall 2017 Good value 55% Neutral 29% Poor value 16% 60% 53% 53% 50% 49% 51% 58% 62% 65% 65% 64% 63% 60% 31% 37% 36% 36% 34% 36% 34% 29% 27% 27% 27% 27% 29% 10% 11% 11% 14% 17% 13% 9% 8% 9% 8% 9% 10% 11% 2005 (n=974) 2006 (n=969) 2007 (n=975) 2008 (n=976) 2009 (n=980) 2010 (n=986) 2011 (n=979) 2012 (n=978) 2013 (n=988) (n=2,417) (n=2,414) (n=2,466) (n=2,467) Your property tax dollars are divided between The City and the Province. In Calgary, approximately half of your property tax bill goes to The City to fund municipal services. Considering the services provided by The City, please rate the value you feel you receive from your municipal property tax dollars using a scale of 1 to 10 where 1 represents very poor value and 10 represents very good value. Base: Valid respondents 2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 37

38 Balancing Taxation and Service Delivery Levels Increase taxes to expand services 21% Increase taxes to maintain services at current levels 28% Increase Taxes: 50%* Late Fall % Cut services to maintain current tax level 29% Cut Services: 45%* Late Fall % Cut services to reduce taxes 17% None 5% *Rounding Municipal property taxes are the primary way to pay for services and programs provided by The City of Calgary. Due to the increased cost of maintaining current service levels and infrastructure, The City must balance taxation and service delivery levels. To deal with this situation, which of the following four options would you most like The City to pursue? Base: Valid respondents (n=2,459) 2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 38

39 Tracking Balancing Taxation and Service Delivery Levels: Increase Taxes versus Cut Services 60% 64% 65% 62% Increase taxes to maintain or expand services Cut services to maintain or reduce taxes 61% 59% 59% 60% 59% Late Fall 2017 Increase taxes 44% Cut services 48% 55% 48% 49% 50% 46% 45% 30% 27% 27% 31% 40% 37% 32% 34% 35% 33% 36% 2005 (n=975) 2006 (n=972) 2007 (n=962) 2008 (n=980) 2009 (n=967) 2010 (n=979) 2011 (n=981) 2012 (n=966) 2013 (n=986) (n=2,404) (n=2,406) (n=2,457) (n=2,459) Municipal property taxes are the primary way to pay for services and programs provided by The City of Calgary. Due to the increased cost of maintaining current service levels and infrastructure, The City must balance taxation and service delivery levels. To deal with this situation, which of the following four options would you most like The City to pursue? Base: Valid respondents 2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 39

40 Property Tax Dollar Investment I am interested in knowing how my property tax dollars are invested in various City services The City does a good job of providing citizens with information about how their property tax dollars are invested in various City services Strongly agree 50% Strongly agree 12% Agree: 92% Agree: 60%* Somewhat agree 42% Somewhat agree 49% Somewhat disagree 6% Agree 2017: 92% 2016: 93% 2015: 93% 2014: 93% Somewhat disagree 25% Agree 2017: 60% 2016: 63% 2015: 65% 2014: 67% Late Fall % Strongly disagree 2% Strongly disagree 14% *Rounding Please indicate if you strongly agree, somewhat agree, somewhat disagree or strongly disagree with each of the following statements. Base: Valid respondents (n=2,488 / n=2,464) 2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 40

41 Contact with The City 2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 41

42 Tracking Past 12 Months Contact with The City of Calgary % Yes 60% 63% 65% 69% 67% 67% 68% 66% 61% 69% 65% 66% 66% 2005 (n=998) 2006 (n=998) 2007 (n=999) 2008 (n=998) 2009 (n=992) 2010 (n=997) 2011 (n=998) 2012 (n=998) 2013 (n=998) 2014 (n=2,444) 2015 (n=2,447) 2016 (n=2,486) 2017 (n=2,494) Have you contacted or dealt with The City of Calgary or one of its employees in the last twelve months? Base: Valid respondents 2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 42

43 Satisfaction with the Overall Level and Quality of Customer Service Very satisfied 10 22% % 25% Satisfied: 78% Satisfied 2017: 78% 2016: 80% 2015: 80% 2014: 78% 7 16% 6 7% 5 5% 4 3% 3 2 2% 2% Not satisfied: 10% Not at all satisfied 1 3% On a scale of 1 10 where 1 represents not at all satisfied and 10 represents very satisfied, how satisfied are you with the overall level and quality of customer service provided by The City of Calgary? Base: Valid respondents who contacted or dealt with The City in the last twelve months (n=1,649) 2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 43

44 Tracking Type of Contact Calling 311 Phoning The City at another number By Internet (City website, mobile app) Visiting a City office or facility 52% 49% 43% 56% 57% 59% 65% 55% 46% 53% 54% 16% 18% 15% 2005 (n=484) 39% 29% 28% 23% 20% 20% 20% 17% 15% 18% 15% 16% 17% 15% 16% 13% 13% 14% 13% 13% 12% 10% 12% 11% 13% 7% 11% 11% 9% 8% 9% 9% 9% 10% 10% 7% 8% 6% 2006 (n=547) 2007 (n=553) 2008 (n=599) 2009 (n=572) 2010 (n=571) 2011 (n=577) 2012 (n=575) 2013 (n=552) 2014 (n=1,687) 2015 (n=1,597) 2016 (n=1,080) 2017 (n=1,084) When you contacted The City was it? Base: 2017 and 2016: Valid respondents who contacted The City of Calgary in the last twelve months / 2006 to 2015: Valid respondents who contacted or dealt with The City of Calgary in the last twelve months 2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 44

45 Satisfaction with Most Recent City Contact Very satisfied Somewhat satisfied Not very satisfied 9% 8% 8% 9% 8% 25% 27% 29% 30% 25% 2017 (n=1,085) 2016 (n=1,081) 2015 (n=1,602) 60% 59% 56% 55% 59% Satisfied: 84%* Satisfied 2017: 84% 2016: 86% 2015: 85% 2014: 85% 2013: 83% 2012: 84% 2011: 83% 2010: 81% 2009: 78% 2008: 81% 2007: 80% 2006: 81% Not at all satisfied 7% 7% 7% 6% 8% 2014 (n=1,702) 2013 (n=616) How satisfied were you with your most recent contact with The City? Base: 2017 and 2016: Valid respondents who contacted The City of Calgary in the last twelve months / 2006 to 2015: Valid respondents who contacted or dealt with The City of Calgary in the last twelve months *Rounding 2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 45

46 Tracking Attitudes Regarding City Service Delivery and Transparency % Agree City staff are courteous, helpful, and knowledgeable 92% 94% 93% 93% 93% Late Fall % The quality of customer service from the city is consistently high 84% 87% 85% 86% 85% Late Fall % The City of Calgary makes customer service a priority The City of Calgary practices open and accessible government 1 Prior to 2015: The City of Calgary makes customer service an important priority 82% 85% 84% 87% 87% 79% 83% 85% 84% 86% Late Fall % Thinking about your personal dealings with The City of Calgary, your general impressions and anything you may have read, seen or heard, please tell me whether you agree or disagree with each of the following statements about The City? Base: Valid respondents (Bases vary) 2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 46

47 Tracking Attitudes Regarding City Service Delivery and Transparency (continued) % Agree City staff are easy to get a hold of when I need them 77% 81% 78% 79% 82% Late Fall % The City responds quickly to requests and concerns 77% 79% 78% 79% 80% Late Fall % The City uses input from Calgarians in decisionmaking about City projects and services Not asked prior to % 74% 75% Late Fall % The City allows citizens to have meaningful input into decisionmaking Not asked prior to % 69% 72% Late Fall % Thinking about your personal dealings with The City of Calgary, your general impressions and anything you may have read, seen or heard, please tell me whether you agree or disagree with each of the following statements about The City? Base: Valid respondents (Bases vary) 2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 47

48 City Communications 2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 48

49 The Amount of Information Received Just the right amount Too little Too much Late Fall 2017 Just the right amount 50% Too little 48% Too much 2% 64% 61% 62% 59% 56% 57% 65% 65% 69% 57% 55% 54% 51% 32% 36% 36% 37% 40% 39% 33% 33% 30% 41% 43% 44% 47% 4% 3% 3% 3% 4% 3% 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2005 (n=995) 2006 (n=987) 2007 (n=990) 2008 (n=991) 2009 (n=985) 2010 (n=986) 2011 (n=992) 2012 (n=985) 2013 (n=990) 2014 (n=2,431) 2015 (n=2,440) 2016 (n=2,487) 2017 (n=2,474) In your opinion, do you currently receive too much, too little, or just the right amount of information from The City? Base: Valid respondents 2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 49

50 Multiple Responses Note: A NET is a combination of 2 or more mentions that cover a specific theme Top Areas for Information from The City Budget & Spending (Net) 36% +4 Taxes/ government spending 33% +5 Infrastructure, Traffic & Roads (Net) 32% +6 Roads 13% +4 Construction 6% +4 Infrastructure (unspecified) 5% Planning & Development (Net) 16% 3 Planning/ future growth 9% 2 Land use planning/ development 4% 2 Taxation (Net) 16% 2 Taxes/ taxation (unspecified) 10% Property taxes 5% Transit (Net) 15% +1 Transit 7% +1 Transportation (unspecified) 7% Government (Net) 12% +6 Recreation (Net) 9% Recreation/ leisure centres/ programs 7% +1 Community & Social Services (Net) 9% +3 City Services (Net) 8% Total mentions <3% Crime, Safety & Policing (Net) are not shown 8% +1 Media (Net) 6% +1 Environment & Waste Management (Net) 5% +2 City/ public art displays 5% +5 What are the top three areas where you would like The City to provide more information? Base: Valid respondents who say they receive too little or just the right amount of information from The City (n=2,172) Change Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 50

51 Satisfaction with the Overall Quality of City Information and Communications Very satisfied Somewhat satisfied 18% 20% 22% 24% 30% 65% 66% 60% 59% 57% Satisfied: 84%* Satisfied 2017: 84% 2016: 85% 2015: 82% 2014: 83% 2013: 87% 2012: 84% 2011: 83% 2010: 75% 2009: 76% Late Fall % Not very satisfied Not at all satisfied 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% 13% 12% 15% 15% 11% 2017 (n=2,482) 2016 (n=2,489) 2015 (n=2,441) 2014 (n=2,437) 2013 (n=999) *Rounding And how satisfied are you with the overall quality of City information and communications? Base: Valid respondents 2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 51

52 City Trust & Reputation 2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 52

53 Ipsos Reputation Model REPUTATION A GLOBAL MODEL REPUTATION A GLOBAL MODEL 2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 53

54 Familiarity Late Fall 2017 Very well 27% Somewhat well 54% Familiar: 94% Just a little 16% Heard of, but know almost nothing 2% Never heard of it 1% Taking into account all the ways you have learned about or had contact with THE CITY OF CALGARY, how well do you feel you know THE CITY? Base: Valid respondents (n=1,500) 2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 54

55 Favourability Late Fall 2017 Very favorable 20% Favourable: 64%* Mainly favorable 45% Neutral 28% Mainly unfavourable 6% Unfavourable: 8%* Very unfavourable 2% *Rounding Taking into account all of the things which you think are important, how favorable or unfavourable is your overall opinion or impression of The City of Calgary? Base: Valid respondents (n=1,500) 2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 55

56 Trust Late Fall 2017 Trust a great deal 28% Trust: 62% Trust a little 34% Neutral 23% Distrust a little 11% Distrust: 15% Distrust a great deal 4% Again, taking into account all of the things which you think are important, how much do you trust or distrust The City of Calgary? Base: Valid respondents (n=1,500) 2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 56

57 Advocacy Late Fall 2017 Speak highly without being asked Speak highly if someone asked me 7% 26% Advocates: 33% Neutral opinion seeing both positive and negatives 42% Critical if someone asked me 10% Critics: 13% Critical without being asked 3% Don't know enough to have a strong opinion 12% Again, taking into account all of the things which you think are important, how much do you trust or distrust The City of Calgary? Base: Valid respondents (n=1,500) 2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 57

58 Perceptions About City Performance Late Fall % Very satisfied 11% 16% 64% Satisfied: Admin and Council 77% Council Only 69% Administration Only 81% Somewhat satisfied 58% 65% Somewhat dissatisfied 15% 19% 22% Very dissatisfied 4% 10% Administration & Council Council Only 4% Administration Only Taking everything into account, how satisfied or dissatisfied are you with the way The City of Calgary including Council and City Administration as a whole is going about running our City? Are you...? Base: Valid respondents 2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 58

59 2017 Highlights 2017 Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 59

60 2017 Highlights Perceptions about the quality of life in Calgary remain strong, and declining quality of life metrics have now stabilized. Infrastructure, traffic and roads remains in the top position on the 2017 issue agenda, while transit continues to hold second place, and crime, safety and policing remains third. Overall satisfaction with the level and quality of City services and programs is strong, although statistically significant decreases are observed for a number of specific services. Affordable housing, transportation related services, social services, and the Calgary Police Service surface as the top areas where the public would like to see increased investment. The perceived value of property tax dollars continues a downward trend this year, and Calgarians remain split in their preference for tax increases versus service cuts. The City of Calgary continues to perform well on the environmental front and sees a gain with regard to environmental programs and services. Overall perceptions about The City s customer service delivery holds strong, although perceptions of specific aspects of service delivery, transparency, and citizen input, are less positive than in Overall satisfaction with City communications remains strong, although more Calgarians close to onehalf say they receive too little information from The City Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 60

61 Contact Jamie Duncan Vice President Ipsos Public Affairs Sheela Das Director Ipsos Public Affairs Quality of Life and Citizen Satisfaction Survey 61

2016 Citizen Satisfaction Survey

2016 Citizen Satisfaction Survey 2016 Citizen Satisfaction Survey Final Report Prepared for The City of Calgary by: Contact: Jamie Duncan Vice President Ipsos 587.952.4863 jamie.duncan@ipsos.com 700 6 th Ave SW, Suite 1950 Calgary, AB

More information

2016 Citizen Satisfaction Survey

2016 Citizen Satisfaction Survey 2016 Citizen Satisfaction Survey Final Report Prepared for The City of Calgary by: Contact: Jamie Duncan Vice President Ipsos 587.952.4863 jamie.duncan@ipsos.com 700 6 th Ave SW, Suite 1950 Calgary, AB

More information

2018 Spring Pulse Survey Overview

2018 Spring Pulse Survey Overview 2018 Spring Pulse Survey Overview Strategic Meeting of Council July 4, 2018 Prepared for The City of Calgary by The Corporate Research Team Contact: Attachment 2 ISC: Unrestricted Krista Ring Manager,

More information

City of Lethbridge 2014 Community Satisfaction Survey. Key Findings August 2014

City of Lethbridge 2014 Community Satisfaction Survey. Key Findings August 2014 City of Lethbridge 2014 Community Satisfaction Survey Key Findings August 2014 Background and Methodology Ipsos Reid conducted a telephone survey with a randomly selected sample of 400 residents of Lethbridge

More information

09/03/2016 Communicating on Infrastructure Investments in Calgary

09/03/2016 Communicating on Infrastructure Investments in Calgary Communicating on Infrastructure Investments in Calgary Report: March 2016 Prepared for The City of Calgary by: Contact: Jamie Duncan Vice President Ipsos 587.952.4863 jamie.duncan@ipsos.com 700 6 th Ave

More information

CITIZEN PERSPECTIVE Citizen Survey. Survey conducted by Prairie Research Associates May 2017

CITIZEN PERSPECTIVE Citizen Survey. Survey conducted by Prairie Research Associates May 2017 CITIZEN PERSPECTIVE 217 Citizen Survey Survey conducted by Prairie Research Associates May 217 1 What is Market Research? The process of gathering information to learn more about how customers and potential

More information

Calgary Police Commission. Annual Citizen Satisfaction Survey Report

Calgary Police Commission. Annual Citizen Satisfaction Survey Report Calgary Police Commission Annual Citizen Satisfaction Survey Report 2016 CONTENTS I n t r o d u c t i o n C i t i z e n Perceptions of Crime & Safety C o n f i d e n c e i n t h e C PS C i t i z e n Perceptions

More information

City of Citrus Heights 2012 Community Survey

City of Citrus Heights 2012 Community Survey City of Citrus Heights 2012 Community Survey Survey Conducted July 11-17, 2012 320-520 Methodology 403 telephone interviews with adult residents in Citrus Heights Interviews conducted between July 11-17,

More information

City of Port Moody Citizen Survey. Presented by: Catherine Knaus, Ipsos Reid

City of Port Moody Citizen Survey. Presented by: Catherine Knaus, Ipsos Reid City of Port Moody Citizen Survey Presented by: Catherine Knaus, Ipsos Reid Objectives and Methodology 2 Objective Provide a comprehensive overview of citizens satisfaction levels, attitudes, needs, and

More information

Matching Science with Insight. Citizen Satisfaction Survey

Matching Science with Insight. Citizen Satisfaction Survey Matching Science with Insight Citizen Satisfaction Survey Final Results - November 25th, 2003 Agenda Objectives Methodology Key Findings Detailed Findings Life in Kamloops Needs and Priorities City Government

More information

May City of Yellowknife Citizen Survey

May City of Yellowknife Citizen Survey May 2014 City of Yellowknife 2014 Citizen Survey Table of Contents 2 Introduction 3 Key Findings 6 Detailed Results Quality of Life 12 Issue Agenda 20 City Services 27 City Performance 52 Finance 64 Customer

More information

2017 Citizen Survey. Prepared for the City of Kelowna by: Final Report October 31, 2017

2017 Citizen Survey. Prepared for the City of Kelowna by: Final Report October 31, 2017 2017 Citizen Survey Prepared for the City of Kelowna by: Final Report October 31, 2017 Content 02 Introduction 39 City Services and Infrastructure 07 Executive Summary 51 Financial Planning 14 Quality

More information

The City of Dallas, Texas

The City of Dallas, Texas City Hall Dallas, TX 75201 T: (214) 670-3302 www.dallscityhall.com The City of Dallas, Texas 2007 The National Citizen Survey National Research Center, Inc. 3005 30 th St. Boulder, CO 80301 T: (303) 444-7863

More information

The National Citizen Survey 2004

The National Citizen Survey 2004 The National Citizen Survey 2004 Presentation to City Council September 27, 2004 What is the National Citizen Survey Standardized, weighted, mailed, random sample survey of citizens Sponsored by ICMA (International

More information

Saanich Citizen and Business Surveys 2015 February 2015

Saanich Citizen and Business Surveys 2015 February 2015 Saanich Citizen and Business Surveys 2015 February 2015 1 Background and Methodology 2 Research Objectives The objectives of the 2015 Citizen and Business Survey are to: Determine overall impressions toward

More information

Thornton Annual Citizen survey

Thornton Annual Citizen survey Thornton Annual Citizen survey December 8-16, 2016 Background Methodology Stratified sample of 753 registered voters in the City of Thornton, including 381 interviews conducted by telephone and 372 online

More information

Charlottesville, VA. Supplemental Online Survey Results

Charlottesville, VA. Supplemental Online Survey Results Charlottesville, VA Supplemental Online Survey Results 2016 2955 Valmont Road Suite 300 777 North Capitol Street NE Suite 500 Boulder, Colorado 80301 Washington, DC 20002 n-r-c.com 303-444-7863 icma.org

More information

City of Sugar Land Community Survey. Prepared by:

City of Sugar Land Community Survey. Prepared by: City of Sugar Land Community Survey Prepared by: Creative Consumer Research www.ccrsurveys.com Table of Contents Snapshot of Result Trends 3 Objectives and Methodology 5 Key Findings 10 Research Findings

More information

2018 Budget Planning Survey General Population Survey Results

2018 Budget Planning Survey General Population Survey Results 2018 Budget Planning Survey General Population Survey Results Results weighted to ensure statistical validity to the Leduc Population Conducted by: Advanis Inc. Suite 1600, Sun Life Place 10123 99 Street

More information

CITY OF NAPA PARKS AND RECREATION SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT. John Coates, Parks and Recreation Services Director

CITY OF NAPA PARKS AND RECREATION SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT. John Coates, Parks and Recreation Services Director AGENDA ITEM 5A Page 1 of 1 CITY OF NAPA PARKS AND RECREATION SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT DATE: May 10, 2017 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission John Coates, Parks

More information

2015 Town of Oakville Citizen Survey Presentation of Findings. February 23, 2015

2015 Town of Oakville Citizen Survey Presentation of Findings. February 23, 2015 2015 Town of Oakville Citizen Survey Presentation of Findings February 23, 2015 S T R A T E G I C I N S I G H T S Objectives and Methodology In December of 2015, The Town of Oakville contacted Pollara

More information

Citizen s Perspective

Citizen s Perspective Citizen s Perspective 2015 Citizen Survey Survey conducted by Prairie Research Associates Presentation prepared for: The City of Winnipeg What is Market Research? The process of gathering information to

More information

New Braunfels, TX. Technical Appendices DRAFT 2017

New Braunfels, TX. Technical Appendices DRAFT 2017 New Braunfels, TX Technical Appendices DRAFT 2017 2955 Valmont Road Suite 300 777 North Capitol Street NE Suite 500 Boulder, Colorado 80301 Washington, DC 20002 n-r-c.com 303-444-7863 icma.org 800-745-8780

More information

City of San Rafael: 2011 City Satisfaction Survey Topline Report March 2011

City of San Rafael: 2011 City Satisfaction Survey Topline Report March 2011 Godbe Research City of San Rafael: 2011 City Satisfaction Survey Topline Report March 2011 The City of San Rafael commissioned Godbe Research to conduct a telephone survey of voters to assess overall perceptions

More information

The National Citizen Survey

The National Citizen Survey C I T Y O F E L K G R O V E, C A 2011 Supplemental Web Survey Results 3005 30th Street 777 North Capitol Street NE, Suite 500 Boulder, CO 80301 Washington, DC 20002 ww.n-r-c.com 303-444-7863 www.icma.org

More information

Budget 2015 Engagement. Nov. 24, 2014

Budget 2015 Engagement. Nov. 24, 2014 Budget 2015 Engagement Nov. 24, 2014 Objectives Improve public access to budget info Improve transparency & understanding Create opportunities for people to learn more, if desired Add opportunities for

More information

2016 Residents Survey Results Summary

2016 Residents Survey Results Summary 2016 Residents 1 1. Please indicate your employment or business status 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Full time Part time, but would prefer full time Part time and satisfied Retired Not employed 2 2. Please

More information

CITY OF DE PERE CITY SERVICES STUDY 2014 CONDUCTED BY THE ST. NORBERT COLLEGE STRATEGIC RESEARCH INSTITUTE

CITY OF DE PERE CITY SERVICES STUDY 2014 CONDUCTED BY THE ST. NORBERT COLLEGE STRATEGIC RESEARCH INSTITUTE CITY OF DE PERE CITY SERVICES STUDY 2014 CONDUCTED BY THE ST. NORBERT COLLEGE STRATEGIC RESEARCH INSTITUTE 1 RESEARCH OBJECTIVES q Primary Objective: q Better understand which city services hold a higher

More information

Citizen Satisfaction Survey Data

Citizen Satisfaction Survey Data Citizen Satisfaction Survey Data Did You Respond to Previous Surveys? 10 9 8 7 6 5 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Yes 49% 53% 26% 64% 48% No 51% 47% 74% 36% 52% Do You Believe That City Services Have Improved,

More information

2017 Citizen Satisfaction Survey Final Report

2017 Citizen Satisfaction Survey Final Report 2017 Citizen Satisfaction Survey Final Report Survey conducted for the City of Colwood by: DISCOVERY RESEARCH Purpose Apply scientific methods to public consultation. Hear from a broad range of citizens

More information

ROY CITY SURVEY PRESENTATION A COLLABORATION BETWEEN CENTER FOR COMMUNITY ENGAGED LEARNING AND ROY CITY.

ROY CITY SURVEY PRESENTATION A COLLABORATION BETWEEN CENTER FOR COMMUNITY ENGAGED LEARNING AND ROY CITY. ROY CITY SURVEY PRESENTATION A COLLABORATION BETWEEN CENTER FOR COMMUNITY ENGAGED LEARNING AND ROY CITY. INTRODUCTION How many people did we survey? Who did we survey? How did we survey? Limitations of

More information

Importance-Satisfaction Analysis

Importance-Satisfaction Analysis Section 3: Analysis ETC Institute (2014) Page 45 Overview Analysis Blue Springs, Missouri Today, city officials have limited resources which need to be targeted to activities that are of the most benefit

More information

RESIDENTS PERCEPTION SURVEY. Autumn 2016 HEADLINE SUMMARY

RESIDENTS PERCEPTION SURVEY. Autumn 2016 HEADLINE SUMMARY RESIDENTS PERCEPTION SURVEY Autumn 2016 HEADLINE SUMMARY Findings delivered by: 1 Contents 1. Introduction 2. Core reputation measures 3. Advocacy 4. Perceptions on key strands of the council s Corporate

More information

2018 Citizen Satisfaction Survey March 5, 2018

2018 Citizen Satisfaction Survey March 5, 2018 2018 Citizen Satisfaction Survey March 5, 2018 Study Background The findings from this survey provide insight into the perceptions opinions of Airdrie residents across a number of issues including: Overall

More information

Community Survey Results

Community Survey Results The Guilford Strategic Alliance: Building Tomorrow, Today Pursuing and Maximizing Our Potential Developing Our Road Map Community Survey Results Introduction Why a Survey? In 2007, a survey was conducted

More information

Morristown, TN Supplemental Online Survey Results

Morristown, TN Supplemental Online Survey Results Morristown, TN Supplemental Online Survey Results 2017 2955 Valmont Road Suite 300 777 North Capitol Street NE Suite 500 Boulder, Colorado 80301 Washington, DC 20002 n-r-c.com 303-444-7863 icma.org 800-745-8780

More information

City of Tacoma. Community Survey Key Findings. MDB Insight. February, Presented by

City of Tacoma. Community Survey Key Findings. MDB Insight. February, Presented by City of Tacoma Community Survey Key Findings Presented by MDB Insight February, 2018 Photo Credit: Travis Wise (Nov. 12, 2016)) Urban Planning with Permission CC: www.flickr.com. Contents Executive Summary

More information

Survey Conducted: November 28 - December 3,

Survey Conducted: November 28 - December 3, Survey Conducted: November 28 - December 3, 2017 220-4888 Survey Methodology Conducted a Dual Mode Survey online and by telephone between November 28 - December 3, 2017 Surveys were completed using a random

More information

Key Findings of a Survey Conducted among Alameda Voters January 29 February 1, 2018

Key Findings of a Survey Conducted among Alameda Voters January 29 February 1, 2018 Key Findings of a Survey Conducted among Alameda Voters January 29 February 1, 2018 220-4954 2 Methodology of February 2018 Survey 400 interviews with likely June 2018 Alameda voters Conducted January

More information

2008 Tax Supported Fund Balance. ($millions)

2008 Tax Supported Fund Balance. ($millions) Operating Fund The City of Edmonton s Operating Fund consists of the following: Tax supported operations Civic/Corporate Programs Boards, Authorities, and Commission Non-tax supported operations Mobile

More information

Methodology: Study Region Average Quarterly N-size Margin of error (19 times/20) Note

Methodology: Study Region Average Quarterly N-size Margin of error (19 times/20) Note Ontario Politics 1 Methodology: Study 2 The results reported in this deck are the combined results of 30 live-caller, land line and cell telephone surveys conducted on a monthly basis 600 randomly-selected

More information

Arvada, Colorado. Citizen Survey. Report of Results October Prepared by:

Arvada, Colorado. Citizen Survey. Report of Results October Prepared by: Arvada, Colorado Citizen Survey Prepared by: 2955 Valmont Road Suite 300 Boulder, Colorado 80301 t: 303-444-7863 f: 303-444-1145 www.n-r-c.com Prepared by National Research Center, Inc. Arvada Citizen

More information

City of Vancouver Budget Allocation Study Wave 6. January, Presented to: City of Vancouver. Vancouver, BC

City of Vancouver Budget Allocation Study Wave 6. January, Presented to: City of Vancouver. Vancouver, BC City of Vancouver Budget Allocation Study Wave 6 January, Presented to: City of Vancouver Vancouver, BC Contents Executive Overview...1 Introduction... 1 Key Findings... 1 Foreword...3 Background and

More information

City of Kelowna Citizen Survey

City of Kelowna Citizen Survey City of Kelowna 2015 Citizen Survey Table of Contents 2 Introduction 3 Executive Summary 8 Detailed Findings Quality of Life 15 Issue Agenda 24 Community Safety 29 City Services and Infrastructure 36 Financial

More information

1001 Lindsay Street Chattanooga, Tennessee (423) FAX: (423)

1001 Lindsay Street Chattanooga, Tennessee (423) FAX: (423) 1001 Lindsay Street Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402 (423) 643-6200 FAX: (423) 643-6204 E-MAIL: ssewell@chattanooga.gov City of Chattanooga 7th Annual Community Survey Results Transmittal Letter Page 2 Digitally

More information

Calgary Economic Development 2009 Business Survey. Report. Calgary Montreal Quebec Toronto Ottawa Edmonton Philadelphia Denver Tampa

Calgary Economic Development 2009 Business Survey. Report. Calgary Montreal Quebec Toronto Ottawa Edmonton Philadelphia Denver Tampa Calgary Montreal Quebec Toronto Ottawa Edmonton Philadelphia Denver Tampa Calgary Economic Development 2009 Business Survey Report www.legermarketing.com Agenda 1 2 3 4 5 6 Objectives Methodology Key Findings

More information

2015 Citizen Satisfaction Survey Draft Report February 20, 2015

2015 Citizen Satisfaction Survey Draft Report February 20, 2015 2015 Citizen Satisfaction Survey Draft Report February 20, 2015 2015 Citizen Satisfaction Survey Report TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY OF FINDINGS... 3 1.0 STUDY BACKGROUND... 7 2.0 METHODOLOGY... 7 2.1 SURVEY

More information

Where are your taxes going?

Where are your taxes going? BUDGET HIGHLIGHTS Building for the Future The City s 2017 proposed Budget continues to build for the future, investing in community priorities essential to Regina s continued growth. The Budget goals were

More information

PENINSULAR MALAYSIA VOTERS OPINION POLL QUARTER 4 / Nov 11 Dec 2010

PENINSULAR MALAYSIA VOTERS OPINION POLL QUARTER 4 / Nov 11 Dec 2010 PENINSULAR MALAYSIA VOTERS OPINION POLL QUARTER 4 / 2010 30 Nov 11 Dec 2010 1 All rights reserved. This report is published by proprietary subscription. No parts of this publication may be distributed,

More information

Table 1. Q1. GENDER by BANNER GENDER AGE REGION. Column % Total Male Female Calgary Banff Canmore Cochrane

Table 1. Q1. GENDER by BANNER GENDER AGE REGION. Column % Total Male Female Calgary Banff Canmore Cochrane Table 1. Q1. GENDER by BANNER Female 50% 0% 100% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% Male 50% 100% 0% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% Total sample; Weight: TOTAL Weight; base n = 1949; total n = 2004; 55 missing;

More information

YEG CITY BUDGET

YEG CITY BUDGET 2016-2018 YEG CITY BUDGET UNDERSTANDING EDMONTON S BUDGET 2 C O N T E N T S WHO WE ARE AND HOW WE GOT HERE... 3 FINDING BALANCE IN THE BUDGET... 4 VALUE THROUGH IMPROVEMENT & INNOVATION.... 5 BREAKING

More information

Key Findings of a Survey Conducted: May 14 22, A- Attach 1- PPT Presentation Page 1 of 52

Key Findings of a Survey Conducted: May 14 22, A- Attach 1- PPT Presentation Page 1 of 52 Key Findings of a Survey Conducted: May 14 22, 2018 320 813 Page 1 of 52 Survey Methodology 445 interviews with Sausalito voters Interviews conducted May 14 22, 2018 Interviews conducted via telephone

More information

-Summary Report - January 6, 2011

-Summary Report - January 6, 2011 -Summary Report - January 6, 2011 Questions fielded in the City of Edmonton December 20- December 23, 2010 City-wide survey of 800 adult Edmontonians Data weighted to reflect accurate gender balance Random

More information

Job/Survey. City of Bellingham Client Service Name: Priorities and Customer Satisfaction Survey. Pamela Jull, PhD. October 2008

Job/Survey. City of Bellingham Client Service Name: Priorities and Customer Satisfaction Survey. Pamela Jull, PhD. October 2008 City of Bellingham Client Service Name: Priorities and Customer Satisfaction Survey Job/Survey October 2008 Pamela Jull, PhD www.arnorthwest.com 1-888-647-6067 Introduction Background Introduction Background

More information

City of Mercer Island. February First Avenue Suite 451 Seattle, WA (206)

City of Mercer Island. February First Avenue Suite 451 Seattle, WA (206) City of Mercer Island February 2010 Telephone Survey EMC Research Inc EMC Research, Inc. 811 First Avenue Suite 451 Seattle, WA 98104 (206) 652-2454 Methodology 2 This is the fourth survey, conducted every

More information

What we Heard (More Detailed Version) Budget Public Engagement

What we Heard (More Detailed Version) Budget Public Engagement What we Heard (More Detailed Version) Budget 2019-21 Public Engagement Level of Engagement At the start of the engagement process the city committed to involving stakeholders in the engagement process

More information

Public Opinion Survey Residents of Kyrgyzstan

Public Opinion Survey Residents of Kyrgyzstan Public Opinion Survey Residents of Kyrgyzstan November 19 December 2, 2017 Funded by the European Union Detailed Methodology The survey was conducted by Dr. Rasa Alisauskiene of the public and market research

More information

Washington County, Minnesota

Washington County, Minnesota Washington, Minnesota Resident Survey Report of Results 2016 2955 Valmont Rd. Suite 300 Boulder, CO 80301 t: 303.444.7863 f: 303.444.1145 www.n-r-c.com 2016 Washington Residential Survey Report of Results

More information

What does it mean to you?

What does it mean to you? What does it mean to you? The Life Evaluation Index combines the evaluation of one s present life situation with one s anticipated life situation five years from now. The Emotional Health Index is primarily

More information

Rothesay Citizen Satisfaction Study

Rothesay Citizen Satisfaction Study Rothesay Citizen Satisfaction Study Final Report Reproduction in whole or in part is not permitted without the express permission of Town of Rothesay Prepared for: June 2018 www.cra.ca 1-888-414-1336 Table

More information

Telephone Survey in the City of Mercer Island n=304, Margin of Error = ± 5.7 Points Conducted April 6 th - 9 th, 2014 EMC Research #

Telephone Survey in the City of Mercer Island n=304, Margin of Error = ± 5.7 Points Conducted April 6 th - 9 th, 2014 EMC Research # Telephone Survey in the City of Mercer Island n=304, Margin of Error = ± 5.7 Points Conducted April 6 th - 9 th, 2014 EMC Research #14-5209 When applicable, results are compared to previous Mercer Island

More information

Key Findings From Survey and Focus Group Research

Key Findings From Survey and Focus Group Research Key Findings From Survey and Focus Group Research 320-572 Survey Methodology Data Collection: 500 telephone interviews and five focus groups among residents One focus group with local business leaders

More information

Ontario Survey Summary submitted by Nanos to the Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO), July 2018 (Submission )

Ontario Survey Summary submitted by Nanos to the Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO), July 2018 (Submission ) A majority of Ontarians feel municipal governments should receive a greater share of taxes; feel infrastructure and transportation are the biggest problem facing their municipality Survey Summary submitted

More information

Council Budget Meeting Date: April 28 & 29, 2009 Agenda Item: #4.1

Council Budget Meeting Date: April 28 & 29, 2009 Agenda Item: #4.1 Council Budget Meeting Date: April 28 & 29, 2009 Agenda Item: #4.1 FINANCIAL PROJECTIONS AND 2009 SERVICE LEVEL REVIEWS Report Purpose To review the 2010 financial projections and the 2009 approved Service

More information

BUSINESS PLANS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

BUSINESS PLANS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BUSINESS PLANS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TABLE OF CONTENTS Message from the Treasurer Highlights Tax Bill Impact About Brampton Municipal Service Delivery Doing More with Less Strategic Plan Exec-3 Exec-4 Exec-6

More information

2018 Draft Operating and Capital Budgets Introduction

2018 Draft Operating and Capital Budgets Introduction 2018 Draft Operating and Capital Budgets Introduction 1 COUNCIL PRIORITIES IN 2018 OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGETS COUNCIL S PRIORITIES Council Priorities in 2018 Budget Create a smart economy 2017 2018

More information

Section 3: Importance-Satisfaction Analysis

Section 3: Importance-Satisfaction Analysis Section 3: Importance- Analysis Overview Importance Analysis The Town of Chapel Hill North Carolina Today community officials have limited resources which need to be targeted to activities that are of

More information

ONLINE FUNDHOLDER ENGAGEMENT SURVEY

ONLINE FUNDHOLDER ENGAGEMENT SURVEY ONLINE FUNDHOLDER ENGAGEMENT SURVEY The Oakville Community Foundation May 2016 Sponsor in partnership with & Contents 04 Background, Objectives & Methodology 6 Summary of Findings 9 Satisfaction with the

More information

Opinions and Attitudes on Privatization of Public Services in Ontario

Opinions and Attitudes on Privatization of Public Services in Ontario Opinions and Attitudes on Privatization of Public Services in Ontario Online Polling Results May 1 st, 2015 for Ontario Public Service Employees Union Poll Methods Fielded online from April 21 to 24, 2015

More information

Citizen Budget Budget Consultation Online Summary Report. November 25, Overview:

Citizen Budget Budget Consultation Online Summary Report. November 25, Overview: Citizen Budget 2014 Budget Consultation Online Summary Report November 25, 2013 Overview: An online interactive tool was available November 5 to November 22, 2013. The educational tool created by Open

More information

Littleton, CO 2016 Business Survey

Littleton, CO 2016 Business Survey Littleton, CO 2016 Business Survey June 2016 2955 Valmont Road Suite 300 Boulder, CO 80301 303-444-7863 www.n-r-c.com Contents Executive Summary... 1 Background and Methods... 3 Business Survey Results...

More information

2955 Valmont Road Suite North Capitol Street NE Suite 500 Boulder, Colorado Washington, DC n-r-c.com icma.

2955 Valmont Road Suite North Capitol Street NE Suite 500 Boulder, Colorado Washington, DC n-r-c.com icma. - Denver, CO Comparisons by Demographic Subgroups 2015 2955 Valmont Road Suite 300 777 North Capitol Street NE Suite 500 Boulder, Colorado 80301 Washington, DC 20002 n-r-c.com 303-444-7863 icma.org 800-745-8780

More information

Public Opinion Research. Ontario This Month. ENERGYCONFERENCE17 Toronto September 25, Copyright Innovative Research Group Inc.

Public Opinion Research. Ontario This Month. ENERGYCONFERENCE17 Toronto September 25, Copyright Innovative Research Group Inc. Public Opinion Research Ontario This Month ENERGYCONFERENCE17 Toronto September 25, 2017 2017 Copyright Innovative Research Group Inc. Polling Sponsorship 2 The Ontario Energy Association (OEA) commissioned

More information

Ann Arbor, MI Comparisons by Demographic Subgroups 2018

Ann Arbor, MI Comparisons by Demographic Subgroups 2018 nn rbor, MI omparisons by Demographic Subgroups 2018 2955 Valmont Road Suite 300 777 North apitol Street NE Suite 500 oulder, olorado 80301 Washington, D 20002 n-r-c.com 303-444-7863 icma.org 800-745-8780

More information

th 3 P ulse 2013 NatioNal and CommuNity opinions on PubliC-Private PartNershiPs in CaNada

th 3 P ulse 2013 NatioNal and CommuNity opinions on PubliC-Private PartNershiPs in CaNada The 2013 P3 Pulse National and Community Opinions on Public-Private Partnerships in Canada National and Community Opinions on Public-Private Partnerships in Canada THE P3 Pulse 2013 The P3 Pulse National

More information

The National Citizen Survey

The National Citizen Survey BOROUGH OF STATE COLLEGE, PA 2012 2955 Valmont Road, Suite 300 777 North Capitol Street NE, Suite 500 Boulder, CO 80301 Washington, DC 20002 www.n-r-c.com 303-444-7863 www.icma.org 202-289-ICMA by National

More information

City of Brighton City Survey Results for 2013

City of Brighton City Survey Results for 2013 City of Brighton City Survey Results for 2013 1. Please rank the IMPORTANCE of the following City Services, Programs and Activities Description Critical Very Important Important Not Important Unnecessary

More information

311 Call Centre Satisfaction Study

311 Call Centre Satisfaction Study 311 Call Centre Satisfaction Study Report January 2017 Context and Objectives The 311 Call Centre is a service provided by the City of Edmonton that allows citizens access to City of Edmonton information,

More information

Citizen Survey CRA Report. November North. Dundee City Council 21 City Square Dundee DD1 3BY

Citizen Survey CRA Report. November North. Dundee City Council 21 City Square Dundee DD1 3BY North Citizen Survey 2015 CRA Report November 2015 Prepared by: Prepared for: Research Resource 17b Main Street Cambuslang G72 7EX Dundee City Council 21 City Square Dundee DD1 3BY Contact: Lorna Shaw

More information

QUALITY OF LIFE AND COMMUNITY

QUALITY OF LIFE AND COMMUNITY QUALITY OF LIFE AND COMMUNITY 2013 City Citizen Of Southlake Survey QUALITY OF LIFE AND COMMUNITY The opening series of questions in the survey was designed to assess residents perceptions of the quality

More information

Municipal Poll Results (Calgary)

Municipal Poll Results (Calgary) Municipal Poll Results (Calgary) The Manning Foundation surveyed over 4,000 Calgarians in the fall of 2012 to understand where they stand on various municipal issues. Three themes, forming the basis of

More information

2014 Citizen Survey. Prepared for: Prince William County. Prepared by: ORC International, Inc. September, PRIVATE complies with ISO 20252

2014 Citizen Survey. Prepared for: Prince William County. Prepared by: ORC International, Inc. September, PRIVATE complies with ISO 20252 2014 Citizen Survey Prepared for: Prince William County Prepared by: ORC International, Inc. September, 2014 PRIVATE complies with ISO 20252 [Blank page inserted for pagination purposes when printing.]

More information

4. Please indicate whether you feel that there are too many, the right amount or not enough of each of the following in Littleton:

4. Please indicate whether you feel that there are too many, the right amount or not enough of each of the following in Littleton: Please complete this questionnaire if you are the person most knowledgeable about this business, typically the owner or manager. Please select the response (by circling the number or checking the box)

More information

2955 Valmont Road, Suite North Capitol Street NE, Suite 500 Boulder, CO Washington, DC 20002

2955 Valmont Road, Suite North Capitol Street NE, Suite 500 Boulder, CO Washington, DC 20002 ALBEMARLE COUNTY, VA 2013 2955 Valmont Road, Suite 300 777 North Capitol Street NE, Suite 500 Boulder, CO 80301 Washington, DC 20002 www.n-r-c.com 303-444-7863 www.icma.org 202-289-ICMA Contents Survey

More information

2018 Boise Citizen Survey

2018 Boise Citizen Survey 2018 Boise Citizen Survey Final Report DATE SUBMITTED: 05/08/2018 SUBMITTED TO: The City of Boise, ID Prepared by Northwest Research Group [Page intentionally left blank for pagination purposes] 2 P a

More information

City of Burleson, TX

City of Burleson, TX City of Burleson, TX 2015 Select Programs Survey Report of Results July 2015 Prepared by: 2955 Valmont Road, Suite 300 Boulder, CO 80531 n-r-c.com 303-444-7863 Contents Executive Summary... 3 Survey Background...

More information

2016 uarterly Customer Satisfaction Survey

2016 uarterly Customer Satisfaction Survey Q 2016 uarterly Customer Satisfaction Survey Submitted to WaterOne 3 rd Quarter Results ETC Institute 725 W Frontier Ln, Olathe, KS 66061 913.829.1215 September 2016 Contents Executive Summary... 1 Section

More information

2017 Provincial Budget Analysis by AUMA. March 16, 2017 (revised April 10, 2017)

2017 Provincial Budget Analysis by AUMA. March 16, 2017 (revised April 10, 2017) 2017 Provincial Budget Analysis by AUMA March 16, 2017 (revised April 10, 2017) Budget 2017 Working to Make Life Better The provincial budget was released on March 16 th, 2017. It has the following three

More information

City of Lawrence Page 1 Strategic Plan Performance Measures

City of Lawrence Page 1 Strategic Plan Performance Measures City of Lawrence Page 1 Strategic Plan s Strategic Plan s Performance measures are specific metrics for each aspect of performance to be monitored. In March 2017, the City of Lawrence s Critical Success

More information

PLANNING FOR SUSTAINABILITY:

PLANNING FOR SUSTAINABILITY: PLANNING FOR SUSTAINABILITY: People and Services 2017 OPERATING BUDGET This is administrations recommended 2017 Operating Budget to Red Deer City Council. Final decisions will be made as a part of Councils

More information

Minnesota Valley Prepaid Meter Study Consumer Survey

Minnesota Valley Prepaid Meter Study Consumer Survey Minnesota Valley Prepaid Meter Study Consumer Survey June, 2014 NRECA MARKET RESEARCH SERVICES Methodology A combination of telephone and on-line surveys were conducted with co-op members between June

More information

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY RESULTS. City of Madras 2016

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY RESULTS. City of Madras 2016 CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY RESULTS City of Madras 2016 Survey Background Initiated by Annual Strategic Plan FY 2015-16: analyze citizen feedback for opportunities to improve customer service satisfaction.

More information

Branch Community Standards

Branch Community Standards Introduction Community Standards enhances our great city by sustaining clean, livable communities that meet the expectations of citizens. This is achieved by supporting compliance to specific standards;

More information

AMO Presentation, London, August 2014

AMO Presentation, London, August 2014 AMO Presentation, London, August 2014 Nik Nanos Chairman Nanos Research Group of Companies Research Associate Professor, State University of New York Global Fellow, Woodrow Wilson International Center

More information

South Lakeland District Council - Quality of Life Survey 2014 Summary report

South Lakeland District Council - Quality of Life Survey 2014 Summary report South Lakeland District Council - Quality of Life Survey 2014 Summary report South Lakeland District Council's Quality of Life Survey 2014 was undertaken with residents from across the South Lakeland district.

More information

SANTA FE COMMUNITY SURVEY - PNM JANUARY 2015

SANTA FE COMMUNITY SURVEY - PNM JANUARY 2015 JANUARY 2015 JANUARY 2015 PAGE 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION... 3 METHODOLOGY... 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 5 II. SUMMARY OF RESULTS... 21 III. DEMOGRAPHICS... 47 IV. QUESTIONNAIRE... 49 JANUARY 2015

More information

The National Citizen Survey

The National Citizen Survey CITY OF POST FALLS, ID 2012 2955 Valmont Road, Suite 300 777 North Capitol Street NE, Suite 500 Boulder, CO 80301 Washington, DC 20002 www.n-r-c.com 303-444-7863 www.icma.org 202-289-ICMA Contents Survey

More information

The National Citizen Survey

The National Citizen Survey CITY OF CARTERSVILLE, GA 2013 2955 Valmont Road, Suite 300 777 North Capitol Street NE, Suite 500 Boulder, CO 80301 Washington, DC 20002 www.n-r-c.com 303-444-7863 www.icma.org 202-289-ICMA by National

More information

2016 Q4 CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY

2016 Q4 CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY 2016 Q4 CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY Quarterly Report PREPARED IN PARTNERSHIP WITH: TABLE OF CONTENTS Methodology 3 Executive Summary 4 Summary of Findings 6 Key Drivers by Mode 27 Individual Measures

More information

The National Citizen Survey

The National Citizen Survey CITY OF HOWELL, MI 2008 3005 30th Street 777 North Capitol Street NE, Suite 500 Boulder, CO 80301 Washington, DC 20002 www.n-r-c.com 303-444-7863 www.icma.org 202-289-ICMA by National Research Center,

More information