BIM for FM: Design for Maintenance Strategy. Birgitta Foster SSA/Sandia National Labs Atlanta October 15, 2010

Transcription

1 BIM for FM: Design for Maintenance Strategy Birgitta Foster SSA/Sandia National Labs Atlanta October 15, 2010

2 Located in : Albuquerque, NM 1945 : Sandia was created 1979 :Sandia was made a national laboratory employees Copyright 2010 by Birgitta Foster

3 Mission : Nuclear stockpile stewardship Oversee activities associated with Manufacturing Maintaining Refurbishing Surveilling Dismantling Homeland security Antiterrorism/Aviation security Tech Transfer Copyright 2010 by Birgitta Foster

4 Four sites ( ~ 1100 bldg, 7M GSF) NM (Albuquerque ) CA (Livermore) NV (Tonopah) HI (Kauai) Sandia NM 891 Bldgs 6M GSF 8700 acres Copyright 2010 by Birgitta Foster

5 NIST Survey (2004) Inefficiency Costs : $15B/yr 66% borne by Owners $0.23/ existing SFT Now 6 yrs later, now $90B spent OWNERS. How much more do we have to spend??? Copyright 2010 by Birgitta Foster

6 Sandia 6M $0.23/sf Wasting: $1.38 M/yr DOE Owns : 127M $o.23 Wasting : $29 M/yr Copyright 2010 by Birgitta Foster

7 All Federal Buildings Owns : 2.59B $o.23/sf Wasting : $0.595 B/yr Copyright 2010 by Birgitta Foster

8 Custodial Pest control/refuse collection Recycling costs Roads/Grounds Landscaping/snow-ice removal Utilities Plant operations and energy Reoccurring Maintenance and Repair Work orders (source : FRPC Real Property Inventory Users Guidance FY09) Copyright 2010 by Birgitta Foster

9 Energy, 26% Custodial, 6% Roads /Grounds, 13% O&M O&M admin, 14% Maintenance & Repairs (WO), 26% Restoration/ DM projects, 15% Copyright 2010 by Birgitta Foster

10 DOE achieved a 51 % reduction in energy consumption from 1985 levels, surpassing the E.O goal of a 35 percent reduction by Result: Saving over $100 million annually. Now.. What is the Strategy for reducing operations cost? Copyright 2010 by Birgitta Foster

11 Non-BIM enabled Owners require accompanying General Contractor or Sub- Contractor Copyright 2010 by Birgitta Foster

12

13

14

15

16 FM Impact : 2x PM time 4x CM time Over 30 years Copyright 2010 by Birgitta Foster

17 (FEMP: O&M Best Practice 3.0) Copyright 2010 by Birgitta Foster

18 (National Research Council 1998). Copyright 2010 by Birgitta Foster

19

20

21

22 Current 2D = 56 hrs A/E = 0 hrs Contractors Field design = 16 hrs Install =32 hrs O&M = 8 hrs BIM enabled = 36 hrs A/E = 8 hrs Contractor Field design = 0 hrs Prefab = 8 hrs Install = 16 hrs O&M = 4 hrs Reduces by 20 hrs.~35% time savings Copyright 2010 by Birgitta Foster

23

24 SELECT. your Maintenance Stratgey THEN. Share with your Design Teams! Copyright 2010 by Birgitta Foster

25 UNM BIM for FM Survey : "View of the Future for Facilities Management" Francisco Forns-Samso Graduate student Construction Program Civil Engineering Department Copyright 2010 by Birgitta Foster

26 NIST Survey (2004) Inefficiency Costs : $15B/yr 66% borne by Owners $0.23/ existing SF Sandia National Labs ( Albuquerque, NM) ~ 900 buildings ~ 6M GSF Wasting: ~ $1.4 M/year Copyright 2010 by Birgitta Foster

27 Sandia straw man survey Using BIM, if you could get all needed information in 5 minutes, how much time would that save? Response: up to 2 hours per work order (WO) 2 hrs x $50/hr = $100/hr WO/yr = ~ 24,000 Potential Savings : $2.4 M/year Copyright 2010 by Birgitta Foster

28

29

30

31 90% 80% 77% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 18% 10% 0% 6% Owners A/E's GC's/Specialty Contractors

32 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 3% 3% 4% 6% 6% 6% 14% 26% 33%

33 Type for Facility 60% 54% 50% 40% 30% 20% 18% 10% 12% 9% 6% 0% Campus with Individual multiple buildings buildings in multiple locations One building in a single location Multiple campuses with multiple buildings Other. Please specify

34 500,000-1 million sq. ft. 8% Don't know 9% Under 100,000.sq. ft. 14% 100, ,000 sq. ft. 14% 1 million - 5 million sq. ft. 21% Over 5 million sq.ft 34% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%

35 40% 35% 35% 30% 25% 20% 23% 21% 15% 10% 5% 8% 5% 8% 0% under 30 minutes 30 min - 1 hour hours 2 hours over 2 hours Don't Know

36 40% 35% 30% 25% How would you rate the accuracy of information on As-Built drawings? 30% 35% 23% 20% 15% 12% 10% 5% 0% Poor Rarely use, do Below Average Will not trust information use but do not fully trust information Copyright 2010 by Birgitta Foster Average - Occasionally use and trust information shown Above average - Often use and trust information shown, but incomplete 0% Perfect - Always use information as provided and can be trusted

37 50% 45% What best describes your current accessibility to O&M information? 43% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 24% 20% 15% 10% 5% 9% 4% 0% Poor Never can find what I needed Below Average Find some information, but takes time Average Most information is available, but not in one place Above Average Most information is easily accessible, but not in one place Perfect - All information is ready available in one location

38 > 25% respondents were either "unfamiliar" or "vaguely familiar" with BIM Better able to answer the questions on accessing information using a model interface If they could access info as shown in the video, how often would they use BIM : 63% said they use it often or all the time, 39% could see a possible savings between % per WO.

39 Unwillingness to Change Process Funding/Cost Lack of understanding Lack of personnel and resources Data Updating/Maintenance Seamless interfaces with current software Lack of proven benefits Time to produce model Lack of standards and processes Lack of contractual documentation BIM not ready for O&M

40 The key energy- and operational-efficiency-related provisions as follows: By FY 2015, reduce energy consumption per gross square foot by no less than 30% on average, relative energy use in FY By FY 2015, reduce potable water use by no less than 16%, relative to potable water use in FY Install advanced electric metering systems at all Department sites, that can be easily integrated into an advanced metering system. Use standardized operations and maintenance (O&M) and measurement and verification (M&V) protocols coupled with real-time information collection and centralized reporting capabilities.

41 Effective O&M is one of the most cost-effective methods for ensuring reliability, safety, and energy efficiency. Inadequate maintenance of energy-using systems is a major cause of energy waste in both the Federal Government and the private sector. Energy losses from steam, water and air leaks, uninsulated lines, maladjusted or inoperable controls, and other losses from poor maintenance are often considerable. Good maintenance practices can generate substantial energy savings and should be considered a resource. Moreover, improvements to facility maintenance programs can often be accomplished immediately and at a relatively low cost. Improvements can be achieved by.. applying a Design For Maintenance strategy

42 Building Information Model Model?? BIM Model Birgitta Foster BIMworkx.com