Risk Management. Section Locator. Fiscal Year 2007 Adopted Budget Risk Management Program, $898,349. Background

Transcription

1 Mission: The mission of Risk Management is twofold: to safeguard the county s property, financial, and human resources from the adverse impact of loss and, when responsible, to make whole in an expedient and fair manner those individuals who have suffered bodily injury, personal injury and / or property damage. Risk management activities include identifying and analyzing loss exposures, implementing appropriate loss prevention and reduction programs, obtaining appropriate insurance coverage, and reviewing and managing claims. Risk management activities for the Prince William County General Government are administered by the Finance Department s Risk Management Program with support from the Prince William Self-Insurance Group (PWSIG) Casualty Pool and Workers Compensation Pool and the County Attorney s Office. The PWSIG, which began operations July 1, 1989, provides coverage to the General County Government (excluding the Schools), Adult Detention Center, and Park Authority. In fiscal year 2004, a new program was created to manage the risk management service area. Prior to fiscal year 2004 Risk Management was an activity within the Finance Department s Financial Reporting and Control program. Resources: FY 2007 Adopted Risk Management Budget $898,349 FY 2007 Adopted Self-Insurance Support $6,177,296 FY 2007 Authorized Risk Management Program Staffing 8.00 FY 2007 County Attorney Staffing Supported By Risk Management 2.00 Fiscal Year 2007 Adopted Budget Risk Management Program, $898,349 Self-Insurance, $6,177,296 Projected FY 2007 : Employees Trained 550 Safety Inspections Made 52 Environmental Management Inspections 24 Claims Processed <750 Prince William County 2006 Service Efforts & Accomplishments Report 329

2 FY 2007 Targets for Key Goals: Accidents per 100,000 Employee Miles 3.45 Auto Claims per 100,000 Employee Miles $3,000 Injury Incident Rate per 100 Employees 6.78 Lost Workday Rate per 100 Employees 2.86 Average Cost per Property Claim $2,500 Risk Spending per $1,000 of Revenue $0.88 E-2 Certifications (facilities per year) Service Efforts & Accomplishments Report Prince William County

3 of Service Efforts and Accomplishments Fiscal Year 2001 through Fiscal Year 2006 Following is a listing of some notable program results for the Risk Management service area. A page reference to a more detailed discussion of each summarized item is also provided. Spending Efficiency Overall Risk Management Program spending per capita grew by 100% between 2001 and (page 333) The overall increase was driven by a 53% increase in spending per capita for risk management program expenditures excluding insurance and claims and a 130% increase in spending per capita for insurance and claims. (page 333) Authorized Risk Management Program employees per thousand residents grew by 112% between FY 2001 and FY (page 335) The average annual number of county employees per authorized risk management position declined 20 percent from 2002 through (pages 336 and 337) Property value at risk per Risk Management authorized position declined by 47 percent from FY 2001 through FY (page 336 and 337) Risk Management efforts to reduce risk and loss by training employees, conducting inspections, and improving environmental management practices has increased substantially. (page 337) In FY 2003 through FY 2006 Prince William spent less for liability claims per capita than the comparison jurisdictions. Also, the number of liability claims per 10,000 residents declined substantially from 2001 through (pages 343 and 344) The number of preventable light motor vehicle incidents per 100,000 miles rose from 0.87 in 2001 to 1.30 in 2004 and then declined to 1.06 in (page 347) Expenditures for workers compensation claims per $100 of payroll grew from $0.95 in FY 2002 to $2.53 in FY out of 234 claims were responsible for 94 percent of the FY 2006 workers compensation expenditures. (page 348) The lost workday rate per 100 employees rose from 25.7 days in FY 2001 to 34.8 days in FY The injury incident rate was about the same in 2006 as in (page 351) Communities Surveyed Surveys were sent to four jurisdictions: Arlington, Chesterfield, Fairfax, and Henrico Counties. Chesterfield County and Henrico County are the closest to Prince William in population size of any Virginia jurisdictions. These two counties are within the Richmond, VA metropolitan area. Arlington, Fairfax, and Prince William County are located in Northern Virginia within the Washington, DC metropolitan area. The first survey we issued, for 2003 and 2004, received a response from all four jurisdictions. The survey issued Prince William County 2006 Service Efforts & Accomplishments Report 331

4 this year for 2005 and 2006, received a response from only Fairfax. Chesterfield and Henrico County Risk Management Programs have responsibility for both the General County Government and the Schools. In Prince William County and the other jurisdictions risk management is responsible for only the General County Government Service Efforts & Accomplishments Report Prince William County

5 Spending Per Capita Adjusted for Inflation Purpose: To provide an indicator of the relative level of resources the community expends on risk management services as the service area population changes. This is not an efficiency measure since it does not consider the output generated for the level of spending. Per capita spending is derived by dividing total service area operating expenditures by the total service area population. Risk Management operating expenditures are composed of Risk Management Program and Prince William Self-Insurance Group (PWSIG) expenditures used to administer the program, and PWSIG expenditures for deductibles, insurance premiums and claims. PWSIG administrative expenditures include accounting services, actuarial services, loss control, pool administration, and broker fees. $25 $20 $15 $10 $5 $0 Risk Mgmt Excl Insur & Claims Insurance and Claims Total $10.57 $6.46 $4.11 $3.93 $7.50 Risk Management Spending Per Capita Fiscal Year 2001 Through Fiscal Year 2006 $11.43 $15.12 $10.32 $11.24 $6.15 $4.80 $5.09 $13.55 $7.18 $6.37 $6.28 $21.14 $14.87 Expenditures (Adjusted for Inflation) Risk Management Program $336,145 $467,697 $545,213 $664,114 $687,957 $772,541 PWSIG Administrative $875,882 $748,058 $998,531 $1,051,146 $1,570,605 $1,557,997 Total Without Insurance and Claims $1,212,027 $1,215,754 $1,543,744 $1,715,261 $2,258,563 $2,330,538 Deductibles $1,166,093 $340,821 $446,306 $476,737 $544,436 $559,609 Claims $531,367 $1,595,825 $2,524,899 $1,082,814 $1,483,522 $4,484,360 Premiums $206,643 $383,410 $348,023 $512,020 $515,671 $473,669 Total Risk Management Expenditures $3,116,129 $3,535,811 $4,862,972 $3,786,832 $4,802,192 $7,848,176 PWSIG Dividend $0 $1,958,797 $0 $0 $857,034 $0 Trend: Overall Risk Management Program spending per capita grew by 100% between 2001 and The overall increase was driven by a 53% increase in spending per capita for risk management program expenditures, excluding insurance and claims, and a 130% increase in spending per capita for insurance and claims. Risk Management Program spending per capita reached its highest level in 2006 at $ This was largely attributable to unusually high claims expenditures in that year of $4,484,360. Comments: Prince William makes annual premium payments to the Prince William Self- Insurance Group based on conservatively estimated loss projections. To the extent that these premium payments result in an over funded situation, the PWSIG returns the overpayment in the form of a dividend. The PWSIG returned $1,958,797 in 2002 and $857,034 in 2005 to Prince William County. Prince William County 2006 Service Efforts & Accomplishments Report 333

6 PWSIG also provides funding to the County Attorney s office for services provided to the Risk Management program. The following table shows the amount of funding provided by year: Expenditures (Adjusted for Inflation) PWSIG Funding to County Attorney $83,845 $198,156 $194,158 $188,857 $183,228 $174, Service Efforts & Accomplishments Report Prince William County

7 Purpose: To provide an indicator of the relative level of Risk Management staffing provided per thousand residents over a six-year period and between selected jurisdictions. This is a service effort, not an efficiency measure. All permanent and permanent parttime employees are included. Permanent part-time employees are reported as full time equivalents (FTEs). Temporary and contractual employees are not included Authorized Risk Management Employees Per Fiscal Year 2001 Through Fiscal Year Authorized Employees per Risk Management Program FTEs Trend: Authorized Risk Management Program employees per thousand residents grew by 112% between FY 2001 and FY Prince William County 2006 Service Efforts & Accomplishments Report 335

8 Average Annual Number of Employees & Property Value at Risk per Risk Management County Employees and Property Value at Risk per Authorized Risk Management Purpose: These measures provide a rough indicator of changes in workload over time. The average annual number of county employees is the sum of the number of employees paid in each pay period divided by the number of pay periods. Property value at risk is the total value of facilities, assets, or other property that could be subject to a loss regardless of whether that property is insured. All permanent and permanent part-time employees are included. Permanent part-time employees are reported as full time equivalents (FTEs). Temporary and contractual employees are not included County Employees Per Authorized Risk Management Fiscal Year 2002 Through Fiscal Year $50,000,000 Property Value at Risk Per Risk Management Authorized Fiscal Year 2001 Through Fiscal Year 2006 $45,000,000 $40,000,000 $35,000,000 $30,000,000 $25,000,000 $20,000,000 $15,000,000 $10,000,000 $5,000,000 $0 Cty Employees Not Available 3,138 3,183 3,583 3,720 4,006 Property Value At Risk $136,397,762 $170,600,564 $150,978,682 $181,353,893 $179,860,478 $194,361,401 Authorized Risk Management FTEs Service Efforts & Accomplishments Report Prince William County

9 Trend: The average annual number of county employees per authorized risk management position declined 20 percent from 2002 through data are not available. Property value at risk per Risk Management authorized position declined 47 percent from FY 2001 through FY Comments: Risk Management efforts to reduce risk and loss by training employees, conducting inspections, and improving environmental management practices has increased substantially as shown in the following table. Environmental Employees Trained Safety Inspections Management Number of in Safety / Risk Made Inspections Facilities Fiscal Year Data Not Available Fiscal Year Data Not Available Fiscal Year Fiscal Year , Fiscal Year , Fiscal Year , Average Annual Number of Employees & Property Value at Risk per Risk Management Prince William County 2006 Service Efforts & Accomplishments Report 337

10 Employees and Property Value Authorized by Jurisdiction 1,200 1,000 Employees Per Risk Management Authorized 1, ,031.9 Henrico 1,134 Fairfax 1,079 Average Annual Number of Employees & Property Value at Risk per Risk Management Chesterfield Arlington Prince William $180,000,000 $160,000,000 $140,000,000 $120,000,000 Property Value at Risk Per Risk Management Authorized by Jurisdiction, Fiscal Year 2003 and Fiscal Year 2006 $151,351,399 $161,883,173 Henrico $131,680,837 $132,485,338 Arlington $132,923,077 Fairfax $139,071,429 $100,000,000 $80,000,000 $60,000,000 $40,000,000 $20,000,000 $0 $51,395,913 $51,395,913 Chesterfield $30,195,736 $30,225,649 $25,694,354 $24,295,175 Prince William Note: 2005 and 2006 data are not available for Arlington, Chesterfield, and Henrico and 2004 data are not available for Fairfax. Most Recently Available Fiscal Year Data by Jurisdiction Arlington Chesterfield Fairfax Henrico Prince William (FY 2004) (FY 2004) (FY 2006) (FY 2004) (FY 2006) Number of County Employees 3,377 10,502 14,741 9,287 3,720 Property Value at Risk $794,912,028 $925,126,439 $1,728,000,000 $1,456,948,553 $179,860,478 Authorized Risk Management FTEs Compared to Other Jurisdictions: Prince William had more employees per risk management authorized position than any of the comparison jurisdictions. Also, Prince William had the lowest property value at risk per risk management authorized position Service Efforts & Accomplishments Report Prince William County

11 Comments: Prince William County includes the General County Government only. Chesterfield and Henrico include both the General County Government and the Schools. Arlington includes the General County Government, Arlington County Parks and the Adult Detention Center. Average Annual Number of Employees & Property Value at Risk per Risk Management Prince William County 2006 Service Efforts & Accomplishments Report 339

12 Purpose: This measure provides an indicator of success in achieving the goal of minimizing the dollar amount of property claims. Property claims result from damage to property owned by the county. The dollar amount of property claims per $1,000 of property value is determined by dividing the total value of property claims during the fiscal year by the property value at risk divided by $1,000. The property value at risk is the assessed value of all buildings and other structures and capital equipment. $5.00 $4.50 $4.00 $3.50 $3.00 $2.50 $2.00 $1.50 $1.00 $0.50 $0.00 Dollar Amount of Property Claims Per $1,000 of Property Value at Risk Fiscal Year 2001 Through Fiscal Year 2006 $4.75 $0.03 $0.70 $0.34 $0.10 $0.28 Property Claims $648,403 $5,540 $105,539 $61,202 $17,325 $54,645 Value of Property at Risk $136,397,762 $170,600,564 $150,978,682 $181,353,893 $179,860,478 $194,361,401 Trend: The dollar amount of property claims per $1,000 of property value at risk ranged widely between a low of 3 cents in 2002 to a high of $4.75 in In five of the six years property claims per $1,000 of property value at risk was well below $1.00 Comments: In FY 2001, over $600,000 of the $648,403 in property claims was due to the Dale City Mini Library fire, which was determined to be arson Service Efforts & Accomplishments Report Prince William County

13 Claims by Jurisdiction $0.80 $0.70 $0.60 $0.50 $0.40 $0.30 $0.20 $0.10 $0.00 Dollar Amount of Property Claims Per $1,000 of Property Value at Risk by Jurisdiction, FY 2003 Through FY 2005 $0.14 $0.40 $0.30 $0.41 $0.70 $ Arlington Chesterfield Fairfax Henrico Prince William $0.10 Note: 2004 and 2006 data are not provided because a substantial number of open claims remained for those years at the time of our surveys. Fiscal Year 2003 Prince Arlington Chesterfield Fairfax Henrico William Property Claims $110,835 $372,846 $370,931 $559,911 $105,539 Value of Property at Risk $790,085,021 $925,126,439 $1,253,000,000 $1,362,162,591 $150,978,682 Fiscal Year 2005 Prince Arlington Chesterfield Fairfax Henrico William Property Claims Not Available Not Available $460,090 Not Available $17,325 Value of Property at Risk Not Available Not Available $1,728,000,000 Not Available $179,860,478 Compared to Other Jurisdictions In FY 2003, Prince William had the highest dollar amount of property claims per thousand dollars of property value of the comparison jurisdictions. In FY 2006, Prince William had a lower amount of property claims per thousand dollars of property value than Fairfax. Arlington, Chesterfield, and Henrico did not provide FY 2005 data. Comments The dollar amount of property claims can vary substantially between years. For instance, as shown on page 340, Prince William s property claims per thousand dollars of property value was only 3 cents in Prince William County 2006 Service Efforts & Accomplishments Report 341

14 Claims Purpose: These measures provide an indicator of success in achieving the goal of minimizing the dollar amount and frequency of liability claims. claims result from damage to third party individuals or their property such as an automobile accident in which the county is found responsible. Each indicator is adjusted for population to improve comparability across time and between jurisdictions. As population size increases, the number of interactions with the public increases and liability exposure increases. $0.080 $0.070 $0.060 $0.050 $0.040 $0.030 $0.020 $0.010 $0.000 $0.006 Expenditures for Claims Per Capita Fiscal Year 2001 Through Fiscal Year 2006 $0.068 $0.021 $0.036 $0.035 $0.022 Dollar Amount of Claims $1,772 $20,953 $6,861 $12,268 $12,330 $8,169 Trend: Expenditures for liability claims per capita were substantially higher in 2002 than other years. However, expenditures for liability claims were small in each year relative to other areas of loss (property, automobile, and workers compensation). Comments: Since 2001, the frequency of liability claims has declined experienced the lowest frequency of liability claims for the six year period Service Efforts & Accomplishments Report Prince William County

15 Claims Per 10,000 Residents Fiscal Year 2001 Through Fiscal Year Number of Claims Prince William County 2006 Service Efforts & Accomplishments Report 343

16 Claims by Jurisdiction $1.20 Expenditures for Claims Per Capita by Jurisdiction Fiscal Year 2003 and Fiscal Year 2006 $1.00 $0.80 $0.60 $0.989 $0.916 Arlington Fairfax Prince William $0.697 $0.40 $0.20 $0.00 $0.021 $0.304 $0.036 $0.340 $0.191 $0.035 $ Total Dollar Amount of Claims Prince Arlington Fairfax William Fiscal Year 2006 Not Available $717,461 $8,169 Fiscal Year 2005 Not Available $195,631 $12,330 Fiscal Year 2004 $177,378 $343,830 $12,268 Fiscal Year 2003 $191,474 $304,667 $6,861 Trend: Prince William spent less for liability claims per capita than Arlington and Fairfax. Comments: Prince William had fewer liability claims per 10,000 residents than Arlington and Fairfax County Service Efforts & Accomplishments Report Prince William County

17 Claims Per 10,000 Residents by Jurisdiction Fiscal Year 2003 and Fiscal Year Arlington Fairfax Prince William Number of Actual Claims Prince Arlington Fairfax William Fiscal Year 2006 Not Available Fiscal Year 2005 Not Available Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Chesterfield and Henrico County Risk Management programs also serve the school system. Therefore, a comparison of liability claims on a per capita basis would not be appropriate. Prince William County 2006 Service Efforts & Accomplishments Report 345

18 Incident Cost and Number of Incidents Purpose: These measures provide an indicator of success in achieving the goal of minimizing the dollar cost and frequency of county government automobile incidents. Motor vehicle incidents and their associated injuries are the single greatest risk exposure to county employees. incident costs shown below are from damage to County owned vehicles as well as third party property damage and bodily injury. Each indicator is adjusted for mileage and dollars are adjusted for inflation to improve comparability across time and between jurisdictions. As miles driven increases the potential for an accident also increases. $7,000 $6,000 $5,000 $4,000 $3,000 $2,000 $1,000 Auto Incident Cost, Adjusted for Inflation, Per 100,000 Light Motor Vehicle Miles Fiscal Year 2001 Through Fiscal Year 2006 $5,553 $4,550 $3,808 $6,112 $4,917 $4,483 $ to 2006 % Change Auto Incident Cost $367,111 $331,988 $313,146 $528,358 $487,804 $489, % Auto Incident Cost, Inflation Adjusted $439,723 $386,973 $357,646 $586,964 $525,762 $503, % Light Motor Vehicle Miles 7,919,032 8,504,189 9,390,884 9,603,707 10,693,222 11,229, % Trend: Over the five year period, auto incident cost per 100,000 light motor vehicle miles varied between a low of $3,808 in FY 2003 and a high of $6,112 in FY Auto incident cost per 100,000 light motor vehicle miles was $4,483 in FY Comments: The number of preventable light motor vehicle incidents per 100,000 miles remained level from FY 2001 through FY 2002 at about 0.9 and then increased to 1.3 in FY 2004 before declining to 1.06 in The number of light motor vehicle incidents per 100,000 miles also increased from 3.32 in FY 2001 to 3.64 in FY 2005 before declining to 3.29 in Service Efforts & Accomplishments Report Prince William County

19 Light Motor Vehicle Incidents and Preventable Incidents Per 100,000 Light Motor Vehicle Miles, Fiscal Year 2001 Through Fiscal Year Incidents Preventable Incidents to 2006 % Change Light Motor Vehicle Incidents % Preventable Incidents % Light Motor Vehicle Miles 7,919,032 10,285,209 9,390,884 9,750,335 10,693,222 11,229, % The following table shows light motor vehicle incidents by year for each agency that had more than 10 incidents over the 2002 to 2006 period. Comparable data is not available prior to Light Motor Vehicle Incidents by Agency 2002 to Total % Change Agency on Aging % Community Services Board % Fire & Rescue % Police % Public Works % Sheriff % Social Services % Prince William County 2006 Service Efforts & Accomplishments Report 347

20 Claims Purpose: This measure provides an indicator of variation in the cost of workers compensation claims. The indicator is adjusted for payroll to improve comparability across time and between jurisdictions. As the number of employees increase, the potential for on the job injuries and related workers compensation costs increase. Workers compensation provides 500 weeks of compensation for lost pay and medical benefits for life. If an injured employee finds another job before the maximum 500 week period, benefits stop with the new job if the new job wage meets or exceeds the same salary as the pre-injury wage. If the new wage is less than the pre-injury wage the employee receives two thirds of the difference not to exceed the State maximum benefit. $3.00 $2.50 Expenditures for Per $100 of Payroll Fiscal Year 2002 Through Fiscal Year 2006 As of October, 2006 $2.53 $2.00 $1.50 $1.00 $0.95 $1.64 $1.68 $0.88 $0.50 $ Note: Fiscal Year 2006 claim costs will continue to grow through FY Workers Comp Expenditures $1,269,826 $2,407,402 $2,678,256 $1,364,087 $4,355,644 Total Salaries $133,645,382 $146,920,860 $159,269,230 $155,654,891 $171,877,817 Workers Comp Claims Trend: Expenditures for workers compensation claims per $100 of payroll grew from $0.95 in FY 2002 to $2.53 in FY Comments: Sixteen out of 234 FY 2006 claims were responsible for 94 percent of the FY 2006 workers compensation expenditures. Risk Management provides training to reduce injury and workers compensation expense including: 15-Passenger Van, Aggressive Driving, BBP Designated Officer, Claims Training, Coaching for Safety, Confined Space, Defensive Driving for Government Employees, Driving: Back to Basics, Emergency Eye Wash, EMS-Phase II, Ergonomics for Computer Workstations, Ergonomics for Material Handling, Hand Hygiene & Avian Flu, Hazard Communication, Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response Refresher, Heat Stress, Identity Theft, NOAA All Hazards Service Efforts & Accomplishments Report Prince William County

21 Weather Radio Training, Organizational & Operational Risk Management, Personal Security, Pesticides 101, Pollution Prevention, Property Protection & Loss Control, Safety Orientation, Spill Prevention, Weight Loss Secrets, and Workplace Violence. Total salaries include General County Government and the Adult Detention Center. Prince William County 2006 Service Efforts & Accomplishments Report 349

22 Claim Expenditures by Jurisdiction $1.80 $1.60 $1.40 $1.20 $1.00 $0.80 $0.60 $0.40 Expenditures for Per $100 of Payroll by Jurisdiction Fiscal Year 2003 and Fiscal Year 2005 $1.61 $1.64 $0.97 $0.96 $0.88 $0.80 $0.50 Arlington Chesterfield Fairfax Henrico Prince William $0.20 $ Fiscal Year 2003 Prince Arlington Chesterfield Fairfax Henrico William Workers Comp Expenditures $3,147,900 $1,749,525 $4,913,861 $2,767,627 $2,407,402 Total Salaries $195,261,387 $352,774,217 $505,754,051 $346,220,654 $146,920,860 Workers Comp Claims , Fiscal Year 2005 Prince Arlington Chesterfield Fairfax Henrico William Workers Comp Expenditures Not Available Not Available $6,674,319 Not Available $1,364,087 Total Salaries Not Available Not Available $696,680,208 Not Available $155,654,891 Workers Comp Claims Not Available Not Available 1,198 Not Available 220 Trend: In FY 2005, Prince William s expenditures for workers compensation claims per $100 of payroll were slightly less than Fairfax s. In FY 2003, Prince William s expenditures for workers compensation claims per $100 of payroll were about the same as Arlington s, and more than Fairfax s, Henrico s, and Chesterfield s Service Efforts & Accomplishments Report Prince William County

23 Lost Workday Rate and Injury Incident Rate Purpose: These measures provide an indicator of success in achieving the goal of minimizing on the job injuries and workdays lost due to injuries. The injury incident rate is computed by dividing the number of recordable injuries by the total number of employees (based on hours worked) divided by 100. Recordable injuries include all injury / illness incidents reported to Risk Management. The lost workday rate is computed by dividing the total number of employee workdays lost as the result of work related injuries by the total number of employees (based on hours worked) divided by 100. Each indicator is adjusted by the number of employees to improve comparability across time and between jurisdictions. As the number of employees increase, the potential for on the job injuries and related workers compensation costs increase Lost Workday Rate and Injury Incident Rate Per 100 Employees Calendar Year 2001 Through Calendar Year Lost Workday Rate Injury Incident Rate Lost Workday & Injury Rate 0 Lost Workdays ,103 Recordable Injuries Total Employee Hours Worked 4,918,260 5,207,913 5,637,106 6,010,932 6,064,966 6,340,456 Trend: The lost workday rate per 100 employees declined from a high of 35.2 days in FY 2002 to a low of 18.7 days in FY 2004 before rising to 34.8 days in The highest injury incident rate per 100 employees for the six year period was 9.2 in 2001 and the lowest rate was 6.7 in The 2006 rate was 9.0. Comments: Risk Management reviews the "Provider Panel" of approved physicians and facilities that treat employees for occupational injuries or illnesses to determine that proper treatment is provided and that employees are returned to work as soon as they are physically capable of working in a light duty or full duty position. Risk Management works directly with the approved physicians in order to educate them on the County's light duty positions and the light duty program. Risk Management works closely with department management to determine what light duty positions are available and get the employees back to work as soon as they are released from the treating physicians. Prince William County 2006 Service Efforts & Accomplishments Report 351

24 Lost Workday Rate and Injury Incident Rate by Jurisdiction Lost Workday & Injury Rate 1,200 1, Lost Workday Rate Per 100 Employees by Jurisdiction Calendar Year 2003 and Calendar Year 2006 Chesterfield Fairfax Henrico Injury Incident Rate per 100 Employees by Jurisdiction Calendar Year 2003 and Calendar Year Prince William Chesterfield Fairfax Henrico Prince William Trend: For those years where data were available, Prince William s lost workday rate was the lowest of the comparison jurisdictions. For those years where data were available, Prince William s injury incident rate was lower than Henrico, but higher than Chesterfield and Fairfax. Comments: The following table provides lost workday and employee hours worked information by jurisdiction. Fairfax did not provide data for 2003 and Arlington did not provide employee hours worked for 2003 and Arlington, Chesterfield, and Henrico did not provide data for 2005 and Service Efforts & Accomplishments Report Prince William County

25 Calendar Year 2003 and 2004 Prince Arlington Chesterfield Fairfax Henrico William Lost Workdays ,642 2,312 Not Available 6, Lost Workdays ,452 2,718 Not Available 40, Employee Hours Worked 2004 Not Available 18,357,462 Not Available 8,674,763 6,010,932 Employee Hours Worked 2003 Not Available 18,231,606 Not Available 8,498,219 5,637,106 Calendar Years 2005 and 2006 Prince Arlington Chesterfield Fairfax Henrico William Lost Workdays 2006 Not Available Not Available 7,193 Not Available 1,103 Lost Workdays 2005 Not Available Not Available 6,796 Not Available 669 Employee Hours Worked 2006 Not Available Not Available 24,999,958 Not Available 6,340,456 Employee Hours Worked 2005 Not Available Not Available 24,419,986 Not Available 6,064,966 Lost Workday & Injury Rate Prince William County 2006 Service Efforts & Accomplishments Report 353

26 Service Efforts & Accomplishments Prince William County