IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
|
|
- Adrian Edwards
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 E-Filed Document Dec :57: WC COA Pages: 13 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI HOWARD INDUSTRIES, INC. Appellant Appcllant vs. VS. CAUSE NO WC COA 2014-WC-OI086-COA RUFUS ROBBINS Appellee Appcllee BRIEF OF APPELLEE API'ELLEE APPEAL FROM THE MISSISSIPPI MISSISSipPI WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION MWCC NO K-9861 Rogen K. Chhabra, MSB # B. Seth Thompson, MSB # Chhabra & Gibbs, P.A. PA Attorneys for Appellee 120 N Congress St., Suite 200 Jackson, MS rchhabra@cglawrns.com rchhabra@cglawms.com
2 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI HOW ARD INDUSTRIES, INC. Appellant VS. CAUSE NO WC COA RUFUS ROBBINS Appellee CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS Pursuant to Rule 28, M.R.A.P. (a)(l), undersigned does hereby certify that the fo llowing listed persons have an interest in the outcome of this case. These representations are made in order that this Court may evaluate potential disqualification or recusal. 1) Howard Industries, Self-Insured, Appellant 2) CCMSI, Third Party Administrator for Appellant 3) Mark Smith, Esquire, Attorney for Appellant 4) Rufus Robbins, Appellee 5) Seth Thompson, Esquire, Attorney for Appellee 6) Rogen K. Chhabra, Attorney for Appellant Respectfully submitted, Regen K. Chhabra, MSB #99131 B. Seth Thompson, MSB # Chhabra & Gibbs, P.A. Attorneys for Appel!ee 120 N Congress St., Suite 200 Jackson, MS rchhabra@cglawms.com Isl Seth Thompson Seth Thompson 11
3 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES iv.. STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE STATEMENT OF THE CASE STATEMENT OF THE FACTS SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT STANDARD OF REVIEW ARGUMENT The Full Commission correctly found that Mr. Robbins sustained a 90% loss of industrial use to his upper extremity CONCLUSION CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
4 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES Bill Williams Feed Service v. Mangum 183 So.2d 917 (Miss. 1966) Diane Gaston vs. Tyson Foods 122 So.3d 797 (Miss. 2013) ,8 McGowan v. Orleans Furniture, Inc. 586 So.2d 163 (Miss. 1991) Meridian Pro!'l Baseball Club v. Jensen 828 So.2d '740, (Miss. 2002) , 6 Mitchell BuiCk, Pontiac ~ Fi~e Equip. Co. v. Cash 592 So.2d 978, 980 (Miss. 1991) Montana 's Sea Kel//e Restaurant v. Jones 766 So.2d 100, 102 (Miss. Ct. App. 2000) Walker Mfg. Co. v. Butler 740 So.2d 315, 320 (Miss: Ct. App. 1998) iv
5 STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE I. WHETHER THE FULL COMMISSION CORRECTLY FOUND THAT THE CLAIMANT WHO, BECAUSE OF H[S WORK INJURY, [S UNABLE TO RETURN TO ANY TYPE OF PREVIOUS EMPLOYMENT, AND WHO NOW WORKS IN AN ACCOMMODATED POSmON, IS ENTITLED TO AN AWARD EXCEEDING THE MEDICAL IMPAIRMENT RATING. STATEMENT OF THE CASE On June 8, 2005, Mr. Rufus Robbins (hereinafter referred to as "Claimant" or "Mr. Robbins") seriously injured his shoulder when he fell to the floor while performing work arising out of the scope of his employment with Howard Industries, Inc. (hereinafter "Employer"). The accident was accepted as compensable by the Employer, and benefits - both medical and indenu1ity - were paid accordingly. On January 4, 2012, Mr. Robbins filed a Petition to Controvert with the Mississippi Workers' Compensation Commission. A hearing on the merits was held on October 10, 2013, after which, on November 18, 2013, the Administrative Judge issued an Order finding that Mr. Robbins had sustained 100% loss of industrial use to his left upper extremity, and awarded permanent partial benefits commensurate with that finding. The Employer appealed the Administrative Judge's Order to the Full Commission who, in turn, reduced the Administrative Judge's award by 10%, and, in so doing, found that because the Claimant had not suffered a loss of wage earning capacity, he would not be entitled to an award of 100% loss of industrial use. The Full Commission found, however, that Mr. Robbins was entitled to an award in excess of his medical impairment rating, and awarded permanent
6 partial disability benefits corresponding to a 90% loss of industrial use to the upper extremity. Sti ll aggrieved, the Employer filed its appeal with this Court. STATEMENT OF THE FACTS Claimant is currently employed with Howard Industries, Inc., and has been since March 31, (Transcript at 7). Prior to beginning work at Howard Industries, Claimant was in the Navy from , after which time he worked at a department store in Florida for a few weeks, and then later at Sears and Roebuck's cabinet plant for nine years. (Transcript at 5). In September of 1967, Claimant began working for Masonite in Laurel, Mississippi, ajob from which he retired in (Transcript at 6). Claimant was never given an administrative position or desk job while employed at Masonite. Instead, Claimant was a plate changer, batt helper, tractor driver, and crew leader. (Transcript at 6). After retiring from Masonite, Claimant worked briefly for Sanderson Farms as a quality control man, and then at South Central Regional Medical Center, performing general labor, maintenance, and landscaping work. (Transcript at 7). When Claimant first began working at Howard Industries, he held the position oflead press operator (Transcript at 7). This position required him to use his left arm to push, pull, perform overhead work, and lift as much as pounds. (Transcript at 9). On or about June 8, 2005, Claimant suffered a workplace injury to his left upper extremity. (Transcript at 10). I-Ie was transported to MEA, and then referred to Dr. Nowicki at Laurel Bone and Joint, who then recommended that Claimant undergo a round of physical therapy. (Transcript at 13). When therapy fai led, Dr. Nowicki performed two surgeries on Claimant's shoulder (Transcript at 14). He was then referred to Dr. Geissler who performed a left reverse total shoulder arthroplasy. (Transcript at 14; Ex. 2). Claimant was later released to 2
7 return to work, with restrictions of no overhead lifting, internal rotation to L5, and no lifting greater than 10 pounds, and did return to work in Octoberof2007 (Transcript at 17; Ex. 2)..... Upon returning to work for Howard Industries, Claimant began working as a horn press operator, a position that allows Claimant to perform his work primarily with his feet and right arm. (Transcript at 17-18). Contrary to what the Employer would have this Court believe, not only had the Claimant never worked as a horn press operator before the injury, the position did not even exist prior to Claimant's injury. (Transcript at 17). Claimant is currently unable to perform the job duties he had as a lead press operator prior to his injury. (Transcript at 19). Claimant is also physically unable to carry out the work of those other jobs in which he had been previously employed. (Transcript at 29-32). He is able to lift his left ann only to shoulder level height, and finds it difficult to perform many household, grooming, and recreational activities. (Transcript at 19). SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT The Full Commission did not err in finding that Mr. Robbins had suffered 90% loss of industrial use to his upper extremity. Mr. Robbins is an elderly gentleman with a limited education. His prior occupational history is replete with labor intensive jobs - jobs for which he is no longer qualified, nor can physically perform, because of the significant permanent restrictions he has as a result of his work-related injury. The Employer first appealed the Administrative Judge's decision wherein he awarded 100% loss of industrial use, and has now appealed the Full Commission's decision to award Mr. Robbins 90% loss of use, based solely on the fact that Mr. Robbins currently earns more money now than what he did prior to his injury. While loss of wage earning capacity is certainly a factor that can be considered by the Full Commission in determining loss of use for scheduled 3
8 member claims, it is but one factor among many that must be considered. See Meridian ProFI Baseball Club v. Jensen, 828 So.2d 740, (Miss. 2002)(emphasis added). Those other factors.... include age, education, work history, whether he could perform the substantial acts of his usual employment, as well as his medical impairment. See ld. These factors were considered by the Full Commission, and then applied to the undisputed facts pertaining to each, as was evidenced by the Full Commission's thorough and well-reasoned Order. (R. at ). Accordingly, the decision of the Full Commission should be affirmed. STANDARD OF REVIEW The appellate courts apply a substantial evidence standard of review for workers' compensation cases. "The findings and order of the Workers' Compensation Commission are binding on this Court so long as they are supported by substantial evidence." Mitchell Buick, Pontiac & Fire Equip. Co. v. Cash, 592 So.2d 978, 980 (Miss. 1991). This sentiment was reiterated by this Court in Montana's Sea Kettle Restaurant v. Jones, where it was noted, "[w]e are bound even though the 'evidence would convince the [Clourt otherwise if it were instead the ultimate fact-finder. ' We will overturn the Commission's decision only when there is an error of law or an unsupportable fmding of fact. " 766 So.2d 100, 102 (Miss. Ct. App. 2000) (internal citation omitted) (quoting Walker Mfg. Co. v. Butler, 740 So.2d 315, 320 (Miss. Ct. App. 1998». ARGUMENT I. The Full Commission correctly found that Mr. Robbins sustained a 90% loss of industrial use to his upper extremity. The Full Commission did not err in finding that Claimant has sustained a 90% loss of use to his left upper extremity, nor did they err in awarding permanent partial disability benefits commensurate with same. Its finding was in conformity with both the law governing scheduled member awards, as well as the greater weight of the credible evidence, and should be affirmed. 4
9 The test for whether a Claimant may receive loss of use to the affected scheduled member, over and above the medical impairment, hinges on whether the Claimant can perform the substantial.. acts of his usual employment in which he was engaged when injured. Bill Williams Feed Service v. Mangum, 183 So.2d 917 (Miss. 1966); see also McGowan v. Orleans Furnilure, Inc., 586 So.2d 163 (Miss. 1991). In McGowan, the Court affirmed the administrative judge's award of 100% industrial to the claimant's leg, although the claimant had received only a 40% impairment rating by his treating physician. ld. at 168. In reaching its decision, the Court considered the claimant's pre-injury job activities (standing for long periods, climbing ladders and stairs, and carrying heavy loads), as compared to the sedentary work the claimant could perform post-injury (operating a sander and table saw while sitting). ld. Upon finding that the claimant could not perform substantial acts of his usual employment, the Court affirmed the award of 100% loss of use. Id. Similarly, in Mangum, the Court awarded 100% loss of use, even where the claimant had returned to his pre-injw'y job, albeit with restrictions that were accommodated by his employer. Mangum at (emphasis added). Again, the Court's opinion turned on whether the claimant could perform the substantial acts of h.is usual employment, and it was determined that he could not. ld. In its brief, the Employer has argued that, because the Claimant has suffered no loss of wage earning capacity as a result of his injury, he is limited only to his medical impairment rating. This is simply incorrect. In 2002, the Mississippi Supreme Court spoke to how loss of wage earning capacity affects loss of use claims. Meridian Prof Baseball Club v. Jensen. 828 So.2d 740 (Miss. 2002). In determining that the claimant in Jensen was entitled to 25% loss of use, as opposed to 100% loss of use, the Court did look to whether the claimant had suffered a 5
10 loss of wage earning capacity, but on ly as part of a larger analysis that contemplated the evidence as a whole, including his age, education, work history, whether he could perform the... - substantial acts of his usual employment, as well as his medical impairment. Id. at It is important to note that, even when taking into consideration the fact that the claimant could show no loss of wage earning capacity, the Comt in Jensen still affirmed an AU award of25% loss of use, where the medical impairment rating had been only 7%. Id. The Employer also points to the more recent case of Diane Gas/on vs. Tyson Foods to support its contention that the Claimant is not entitled to 100% loss of use. While the Court in Gas/on, did affirm a Full Commission ruling that the claimant was not entitled to industrial loss beyond her medical impairment, the issue the Court looked at was simply whether the AU and Full Commiss ion's decision was supported by substantial evidence, and determined that it was. 122 SO.3d 797 (Miss. 2013). There was little discussion of any loss of use analysis. Instead, the Court was concerned with whether the AU's finding, and the Full Commission's affirmation of that finding, had been suppoited by substantial evidence presented at hearing, and determined that it was. See Id. Examining the evidence as a whole in the case sub judice, it is overwhelmingly apparent that the Full Commission made a con'ect finding of fact based on the substantial evidence presented at the hearing. Mr. Robbins is 78-years-old. He does not have a high school degree. His past employment includes only manual labor jobs that, because of his injury, would now be impossible for him to perform. In fact, the uncontested testimony at hearing established that it would be impossible for Mr. Robbins to even work the same position he previously had at Howard's as a lead press operator. He cannot perform the substantial acts of his usual employment. He has trouble performing daily chores and grooming activities. His medical 6
11 impairment rating is significant (45% by Dr. Nowicki and 40% by Dr. Vohra), as are his restrictions that place him at sedentary duty..... The Employer has indicated that the Full Commission made no effort to examine the scope of Mr. Robbins's usual employment. Throughout its brief, the Employer references that Mr. Robbins returned to work in a position he had held prior to his work injury (horn press operator) - a "regular production job which other employees perform on a daily basis. (App. Brief at 10). This is untrue. The undisputed testimony is that prior to his work injury, the position of horn press operator did not even exist. (Transcript at 17). And there was certainly no testimony anywhere in the record concerning other employees working as horn press operators. No, Mr. Robbins worked as a lead press operator, a position that required him to use his left: arnl to push, pull, perform overhead work, and lift as much as pounds. The Full Commission accurately examined the full scope ofmr. Robbins's usual employment (not only as a lead press operator, but also the many manual labor jobs he had previously beld), and it is disingenuous for the Employer to suggest otherwise by making assertions that are incorrect, and by pointing to testimony that doesn't exist. It is true that the Claimant is presently earning a higher wage than he was pre-injury. It is also true that Claimant's left arm hangs uselessly while he presses a pedal with his foot and holds a press with his right arm in order to earn that higher wage. As discussed earlier, scheduled member cases do not, and should not, hinge on whether the Claimant experiences a loss of wage earning capacity post-injury. It is but one factor among many that may be considered by the Full Commission. There was testimony presented at hearing concerning the Claimant's pre and postinjury wages. That information was available to the Full Commission who, after hearing all the evidence, still found that the Claimant was entitled to 90% loss of use. Its finding was in 7
12 confonnity with the substantial evidence and, according to the standard of review discussed by this Court in Gaston, should not be disturbed. CONCLUSION The Full Commission did not err in finding that Mr. Robbins sustained a 90% loss of use to his arm, nor did they ell' in awarding permanent partial disability benefits commensurate with same. Its finding was in conformity with the law, and was supported by the substantial evidence that was presented at the hearing. For the reasons discussed herein, the Claimant respectfully requests that this Court affirm the decision of the Mississippi Workers' Compensation Commission. This the 30'h day of December, RUFUS ROBBINS, CLAIMANT ATTORNEY FOR CLAIMANT: Seth Thompson, MSB# CHHABRA & GIBBS, P.A. 120 North Congress Street, Suite 200 Jackson, Mississippi Telephone: (601) Facsimile: (601) sthompson@cglawms.com BY: /s/ Seth Thompson Seth Thompson 8
13 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Seth Thompson, attorney for the Claimant, Rufus Robbins, do hereby certify that I have.. this day electronically filed with MEC, an electronic copy of the foregoing document, Brief of Appellee, a copy of which will be forwarded to Mark Smith, Esq. Gilchrist Sumrall Yoder & Boone, PLLC Post Office Box 106 Laurel, MS This the 30th day of December, Isl Seth Thompson Seth Thompson 9
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPEAL FROM THE MISSISSIPPI WORKER'S COMPENSATION COMMISSION MWCC N0.12 NO.
E-Filed Document Jan 31 2015 12:57:08 2014-WC-01377-COA Pages: 9 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MJSSISSIPPI PERCY TATE Appellant vs. VS. CAUSE NO. 2014-WC-01377-COA 2014-WC-0I377-COA
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO WC COA
E-Filed Document Nov 29 2016 16:50:45 2015-WC-01760-COA Pages: 7 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2015-WC-01760-COA BETTYE LOGAN APPELLANT v. KLAUSSNER FURNITURE CORPORATION D/B/A
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI NO WC COA. SHANNON ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION, INC. and ASSOCIATED GENERAL CONTRACTORS OF MS, INC.
E-Filed Document Nov 16 2016 17:44:39 2016-WC-00842-COA Pages: 17 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2016-WC-00842-COA SHANNON ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION, INC. and ASSOCIATED GENERAL CONTRACTORS
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS BRIEF OF APPELLANT APPEALED FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CHOCTAW COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS JUAN LOPEZ v. ZACHARY CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION AND ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY APPELLANT NO.2009-WC-00123-COA APPELLEES BRIEF OF APPELLANT APPEALED
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2015-WC COA MWCC # K-9582
E-Filed Document Oct 12 2015 16:24:06 2015-WC-00946-COA Pages: 21 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2015-WC-00946-COA MWCC # 1111471-K-9582 CYNTHIA JOHNSON APPELLANT VS CITY OF JACKSON
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI WILLIAM M. MILEY, JR.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI RITA FAYE MILEY VERSES WILLIAM M. MILEY, JR. APPELLANT CASE NO. 2008-TS-00677 APPELLEE BRIEF OF APPELLEE WILLIAM
More informationE-Filed Document Apr :32: TS Pages: 10 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI REGINA DIANE WEATHERS
E-Filed Document Apr 8 2014 10:32:44 2013-TS-01366 Pages: 10 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI REGINA DIANE WEATHERS APPELLANT V. NO. 2013-TS-01366 SCOTTY WADE GUIN APPELLEE BRIEF OF APPELLANT REGINA
More informationBRIEF OF APPELLANT, LEE MANFREDI
E-Filed Document Sep 2 2015 16:34:35 2015-WC-00522-COA Pages: 17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO. 2015-WC-00522-COA LEE MANFREDI CLAIMANT/APPELLANT
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE V. NO CA HOTEL AND RESTAURANT SUPPLY MOTION FOR REHEARING
E-Filed Document Mar 24 2016 16:43:53 2014-CA-01685-SCT Pages: 6 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE APPELLANT V. NO. 2014-CA-01685 HOTEL AND RESTAURANT SUPPLY APPELLEE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA-01555
E-Filed Document Aug 4 2016 17:24:06 2015-CA-01555-SCT Pages: 14 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI THE FORMER BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND MEMBERS OF MISSISSIPPI COMP CHOICE SELF-INSURERS FUND
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI SMITH COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT APPELLANT VS. CAUSE NO. 2008-CA-00830 LARRY CAMPBELL APPELLEE BRIEF OF APPELLANT APPEAL OF THE FINAL JUDGMENT OF THE SMITH COUNTY CHANCERY
More informationREPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT
E-Filed Document Jul 15 2016 15:58:17 2015-CA-01280-COA Pages: 10 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI KAPPI SAGET JEFFERS VS. KORRI SAGET APPELLANT CAUSE NO. 2015-CA-1280 APPELLEE REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F JOHN HALL, III, EMPLOYEE SOUTHWEST STEEL PROCESSING, EMPLOYER
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F508009 JOHN HALL, III, EMPLOYEE SOUTHWEST STEEL PROCESSING, EMPLOYER CLAIMANT RESPONDENT LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, INSURANCE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI MOTION FOR REHEARING
E-Filed Document Apr 17 2016 13:43:46 2014-SA-01350-SCT Pages: 10 NO.2014-SA-01350 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI MARCIA F. HOWARD vs. VS. PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MISSISSIPPI Appellant
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CA COA
E-Filed Document Jul 18 2017 16:12:13 2014-CT-01828-SCT Pages: 7 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2014-CA-01828-COA APPELLANT VS. CASE NO. 2014-CA-01828-COA BAPTIST HEALTH PLEX, BECKY VRIELAND
More informationRESPONSE TO MOTION FOR REHEARING FILED ON BEHALF OF HOWARD INDUSTRIES, INC.
E-Filed Document Jul 8 2016 15:25:45 2014-CA-01790-COA Pages: 18 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI VINCE HARDAWAY VS. HOWARD INDUSTRIES, INC. and CORVEL ENTERPRISE COMP. INC. f/k/a SAFETY
More informationBy:!J.~ PILED. MOTIONt OCT 1 g 2016 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA APPELLANT WALTERPOOLE,JR.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2015-CP-00604-COA WALTERPOOLE,JR. v. WILLIAM WALTON PILED OCT 1 g 2016 OFFICE OF THE CLERK.SUPAEMECOUAT COURT OF APPEALS APPELLANT APPELLEE MOTION
More informationAppealed from the Office of Workers Compensation District 6. Livingston LA. Judgment Rendered February Attorney for.
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NUMBER 2008 CA 1691 MARGARET A MADDEN VERSUS LEMLE AND KELLEHER LLP Judgment Rendered February 13 2009 ej Appealed from the Office of Workers Compensation
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO CA APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ATTALA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI
E-Filed Document Jun 30 2016 11:18:49 2015-CA-01772 Pages: 11 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BROOKS V. MONAGHAN VERSUS ROBERT AUTRY APPELLANT CAUSE NO. 2015-CA-01772 APPELLEE APPEAL
More informationAPPELLANT S MOTION FOR REHEARING
E-Filed Document Oct 13 2015 09:02:44 2014-WC-00696-COA Pages: 32 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF STATE OF MISSISSIPPI HOWARD INDUSTRIES, INC. VS. VINCE HARDAWAY APPELLANT NO. 2014-WC-00696-COA APPELLEE APPELLANT
More informationVOLUNTARY RETIREMENT CASES: AN EVOLVING BURDEN OF PROOF
Pennsylvania Self-Insurer's Association Professionals Sharing Workers' Compensation Information VOLUNTARY RETIREMENT CASES: AN EVOLVING BURDEN OF PROOF by Robin M. Romano, Esq.* Marshall, Dennehey, Warner,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO IA SCT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2008-IA-01191-SCT SHANNON HOLMES AND STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY APPELLANTS VS. LEE MCMILLAN APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT OF HINDS
More informationMONTRELL ROBERTS NO CA-1614 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF LOUISIANA/OFFICE OF FAMILY SUPPORT FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * *
MONTRELL ROBERTS VERSUS STATE OF LOUISIANA/OFFICE OF FAMILY SUPPORT * * * * * * * * * * * NO. 2011-CA-1614 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA APPEAL FROM THE OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F ALFRED L. BLAIR, EMPLOYEE ACME BRICK COMPANY, EMPLOYER
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F906857 ALFRED L. BLAIR, EMPLOYEE ACME BRICK COMPANY, EMPLOYER TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, INSURANCE CARRIER/TPA CLAIMANT RESPONDENT RESPONDENT
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY. Trial Court No. CI * * * * *
[Cite as Swiczkowski v. Senior Care Mgt., Inc., 2006-Ohio-1398.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY Janet L. Swiczkowski Appellant Court of Appeals No. L-05-1211 Trial
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F JACOB BOWMAN, Employee. HOLMES ERECTION, Employer
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F203651 JACOB BOWMAN, Employee HOLMES ERECTION, Employer SPECIALTY RISK SERVICES, Carrier CLAIMANT RESPONDENT RESPONDENT OPINION FILED JUNE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CA CITY OF JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI APPELLANT
E-Filed Document Feb 22 2016 15:38:11 2015-CA-00890 Pages: 8 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2015-CA-00890 CITY OF JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI APPELLANT VS WILLIE B. JORDAN APPELLEE
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI No.2016-wc-00143-cOA 2016-wc-00143-COA MELISSA LANGLEY, WIFE OF JOE (JOEY) LANGLEY, DECEASED, DAKOTA LANGLEY, COLTON LANGLEY, AND HARLEY LANGLEY APPELLANTS vs. VS.
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NOS. F & F OPINION FILED JULY 2, 2014
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NOS. STACY STRICKLAND, EMPLOYEE COOPER TIRE & RUBBER CO., SELF-INSURED EMPLOYER CENTRAL ADJUSTMENT CO., INC., THIRD PARTY ADMINISTRATOR CLAIMANT
More informationE-Filed Document Mar :32: WC COA Pages: 29 COURT OF APPEALS OF STATE OF MISSISSIPPI HOWARD INDUSTRIES, INC.
E-Filed Document Mar 4 2015 15:32:22 2014-WC-01750-COA Pages: 29 COURT OF APPEALS OF STATE OF MISSISSIPPI HOWARD INDUSTRIES, INC. VS. BENNIE SATCHER APPELLANT NO. 2014-WC-01750-COA APPELLEE BRIEF OF APPELLANT
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY. v. No CA ALLSTATE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
E-Filed Document Sep 11 2017 10:34:38 2016-CA-00359-SCT Pages: 12 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY APPELLANT v. No. 2016-CA-00359 ALLSTATE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE
More informationBRIEF OF THE APPELLANT
E-Filed Document Dec 15 2015 20:56:41 2014-KA-00539-COA Pages: 12 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRYMON A. HAMP VS. APPELLANT 2014-KA-00539-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF
More informationAPPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF HARRISON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT, CAUSE NO.: A
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2009-CA-Ol723 BERTHA MADISON APPELLANT VERSUS GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY APPELLEE APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F JAMES MCEUEN, Employee. PACKAGED ICE, INC., Employer RESPONDENT #1
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F101628 JAMES MCEUEN, Employee CLAIMANT PACKAGED ICE, INC., Employer RESPONDENT #1 RELIANCE NATIONAL INDEMNITY COMPANY, Carrier RESPONDENT #1
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS. The undersigned Counsel of Record certifies that the
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI TIMMY PRENTICE VS. SCHINDLER ELEVATOR COMPANY AND ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY APPELLANT NO. 2007-WC-00815 APPELLEES CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS
More informationREPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT
E-Filed Document Nov 15 2016 08:38:58 2016-CA-00310 Pages: 13 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI Case No. 2016-CA-00310 JOHN CALVIN HOWARD APPELLANT VS. ROLIN ENTERPRISES, LLC, LINDA WALKER, INDIVIDUALLY,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT KNOXVILLE January 27, 2015 Session
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT KNOXVILLE January 27, 2015 Session ARNOLD HARRIS v. MR. BULT S, INC. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Loudon County No.
More informationDavis, Carlotta v. GCA Services Group, Inc.
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims and Workers' Compensation Appeals Board Law 12-13-2017 Davis, Carlotta
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO WC COA SOUTHEASTERN AUTO BROKERS MISSISSIPPI WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALED:
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2014-WC-00974-COA SOUTHEASTERN AUTO BROKERS APPELLANT v. LUCIOUS GRAVES APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/11/2014 TRIBUNAL FROM WHICH MISSISSIPPI WORKERS
More informationCASE NO. 1D Kimberly J. Fernandes of Kelley Kronenberg, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellants.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA GREAT CLEANING CORPORATION/ ASCENDANT ETC., Appellants, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI FASESCA MONTGOMERY APPELLANT VS. Cause No. 2011-CA-00225 JEREMY HELVESTON AND SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF ILLINOIS APPELLEES APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Shanada Gilliard, : Petitioner : : No. 8 C.D. 2016 v. : : Submitted: August 5, 2016 Workers Compensation Appeal : Board (Protocall, Inc.), : Respondent : BEFORE:
More informationBRIEF OF THE APPELLANT
E-Filed Document Mar 17 2014 15:39:22 2013-KM-01881-COA Pages: 10 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI STACY L. MILLER APPELLANT v. NO.2013-KM-01881-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF
More informationE-Filed Document Apr :46: SA Pages: 12 NO.2016-SA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI
E-Filed Document Apr 26 2016 15:46:41 2016-SA-00037 Pages: 12 NO.2016-SA-00037 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI KRISTI DEARMAN vs. VS. PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MISSISSIPPI Appellant Appellee
More informationSFD HOLDINGS, INC. AND LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY BRIEF OF THE APPELLEES
E-Filed Document Feb 21 2018 16:06:32 2017-WC-01449-COA Pages: 20 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI Case No. 2017-WC-01449-COA MARY L. HARMON APPELLANT VS. SFD HOLDINGS, INC. AND LIBERTY
More informationMississippi Supreme Court
E-Filed Document Aug 30 2016 11:38:19 2015-CA-01177-SCT Pages: 15 IN THE Mississippi Supreme Court NO. 2015-CA-1177 HENRY W. kinney, Appellant VERSUS SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI 2013 CA STRIBLING INVESTMENTS, LLC. Appellant VS. MIKE ROZIER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
E-Filed Document Mar 22 2016 12:26:29 2013-CA-02145-SCT Pages: 8 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI 2013 CA 02145 STRIBLING INVESTMENTS, LLC Appellant VS. MIKE ROZIER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. Appellee
More informationAPPELLANT S RESPONSE TO APPELLEE S MOTION FOR REHEARING
E-Filed Document May 16 2017 15:18:32 2016-IA-00571-SCT Pages: 6 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI FAWAZ ABDRABBO, MD. APPELLANT VS. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2016-IA-00571-SCT AUDRAY (ANDRES) JOHNSON (PRO SE)
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Wegmans Food Markets, Inc., Petitioner v. No. 1343 C.D. 2017 Argued September 12, 2018 Workers Compensation Appeal Board (Tress), Respondent BEFORE HONORABLE P.
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY. Date Submitted: March 9, 2005 Date Decided: August 24, 2005
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS & CO., ) Employer-Below ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) ) GODWIN IGWE, ) Claimant-Below ) Appellee ) ) Date Submitted:
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F WHEELINGTON ROOFING CO., INC., EMPLOYER RESPONDENT NO. 1
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F700094 MICHAEL MOFFETT, EMPLOYEE CLAIMANT WHEELINGTON ROOFING CO., INC., EMPLOYER RESPONDENT NO. 1 COMMERCE & INDUSTRY INS. CO. C/O AIG CLAIMS
More informationNo. 105,787 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. LEO NILGES, Appellant, STATE OF KANSAS and STATE SELF INSURANCE FUND, Appellees.
No. 105,787 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS LEO NILGES, Appellant, v. STATE OF KANSAS and STATE SELF INSURANCE FUND, Appellees. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. An appellate court has unlimited
More informationBarlow, Troy J. v. The Car People, LLC
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims and Workers' Compensation Appeals Board Law 8-23-2017 Barlow, Troy J.
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F MICHAEL DRIGGERS, EMPLOYEE OPINION FILED JUNE 11, 2010
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F712083 MICHAEL DRIGGERS, EMPLOYEE MILAM CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, EMPLOYER CNA INSURANCE COMPANY, INSURANCE CARRIER/TPA ARKANSAS CHILDREN S HOSPITAL
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI V. CASE NO: 2015-WC COA
E-Filed Document Oct 16 2015 14:03:41 2015-WC-00850-COA Pages: 23 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JAMES W. BENNETT APPELLANT V. CASE NO: 2015-WC-00850-COA MS STATE DEPT OF HEALTH and
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT JACKSON January 12, 2009 Session
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT JACKSON January 12, 2009 Session TERRY WAYNE BYNUM v. ROBERTS PETROLEUM COMPANY, INC. ET AL. Direct Appeal from the Chancery
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI JACKSON COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI JACKSON COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS VERSUS MISSISSIPPI EMPLOYMENT SECURITY COMMISSION and JUNE SEAMAN APPELLANT CAUSE NO. 2011-CC-00648 APPELLEES APPEALED FROM THE CIRCUIT
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ELLIS TURNAGE APPELLANT V. NO CA COA ELLIS CHRISTOPHER BROOKS, ET. AL.
E-Filed Document Sep 6 2016 16:10:23 2014-CA-00966-COA Pages: 16 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ELLIS TURNAGE APPELLANT V. NO. 2014-CA-00966-COA ELLIS CHRISTOPHER BROOKS, ET. AL. APPELLEES
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G MOUNT MAGAZINE STATE PARK PUBLIC EMPLOYEE CLAIMS DIV CARRIER
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G207033 WILLIAM SHAMPINE MOUNT MAGAZINE STATE PARK PUBLIC EMPLOYEE CLAIMS DIV CARRIER CLAIMANT RESPONDENT RESPONDENT OPINION FILED JUNE 3,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLANT. An Appeal From The Circuit Court
E-Filed Document Jan 3 2014 10:25:04 2013-KM-00752-COA Pages: 17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DAVID CAMP PITTMAN vs. VS. APPELLANT CAUSE NO: 2013-KM-00752-COA
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
[Cite as Roberts v. Republic Storage Systems Co., 2005-Ohio-1953.] COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ROBERT D. ROBERTS -vs- Plaintiff-Appellant REPUBLIC STORAGE SYSTEMS, CO.,
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F CAROLYN JACKSON, EMPLOYEE
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F704526 CAROLYN JACKSON, EMPLOYEE CLAIMANT PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, EMPLOYER RESPONDENT NO. 1 ARKANSAS SCHOOL BOARDS ASSOCIATION,
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. G DAVID ROEBKE, Employee. CITY OF WEST FORK, Employer
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. G403283 DAVID ROEBKE, Employee CITY OF WEST FORK, Employer MUNICIPAL LEAGUE WCT, Carrier CLAIMANT RESPONDENT RESPONDENT OPINION FILED MARCH
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT NASHVILLE February 2003 Session
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT NASHVILLE February 2003 Session JANICE DARNELL v. ROYAL AND SUNALLIANCE, ET AL. Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for
More informationNOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F503483 WILLIAM RIES, EMPLOYEE WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC., EMPLOYER CLAIMS MANAGEMENT, INC., TPA CLAIMANT RESPONDENT
More informationAutomobile Injury Compensation Appeal Commission
Automobile Injury Compensation Appeal Commission IN THE MATTER OF an Appeal by [the Appellant] (formerly [text deleted]) AICAC File No.: AC-09-49 PANEL: Mr. Mel Myers, Q.C., Chairperson Dr. Patrick Doyle
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT NASHVILLE June 28, 2010 Session
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT NASHVILLE June 28, 2010 Session SANDRA JANE GARDNER v. RANDSTAD NORTH AMERICA, L.P. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lincoln
More informationWORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1870/15
WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1870/15 BEFORE: N. Perryman : Vice-Chair E. Tracey : Member Representative of Employers C. Salama : Member Representative of Workers HEARING:
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Sekou Thiams, : Petitioner : : v. : No. 1039 C.D. 2017 : SUBMITTED: January 5, 2018 Workers Compensation Appeal : Board (Canada Dry Delaware : Valley), : Respondent
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G MARION SEGARS, EMPLOYEE KISWIRE PINE BLUFF, INC., EMPLOYER
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G508545 MARION SEGARS, EMPLOYEE KISWIRE PINE BLUFF, INC., EMPLOYER TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, INSURANCE CARRIER CLAIMANT RESPONDENT RESPONDENT
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI FILED MAY Of nee of the Clerk Suprorne Court Court of Appalll..
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI (\) DOUGLAS MILLER FILED APPELLANT VS. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MAY 2 1 2010 Of nee of the Clerk Suprorne Court Court of Appalll.. NO.2009-CP-1907-COA APPELLEE
More informationIMPORTANT NOTICE NOT TO BE PUBLISHED OPINION
IMPORTANT NOTICE NOT TO BE PUBLISHED OPINION THIS OPINION IS DESIGNATED "NOT TO BE PUBLISHED." PURSUANT TO THE RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE PROMULGATED BY THE SUPREME COURT, CR 76.28(4)(C), THIS OPINION IS
More informationNO CA-1441 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI PATRICIA RUSH APPELLANT R R&D & D PROPERTIES, LLC APPELLEE BRIEF OF APPELLEES
E-Filed Document May 31 2018 14:44:32 2017-CA-01441 Pages: 18 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI PATRICIA RUSH APPELLANT v. V. NO. 2017-CA-1441 R R&D & D PROPERTIES, LLC APPELLEE BRIEF OF APPELLEES R.
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. G007596/G306766/G407852/G JOSEPH WORK, Employee CLAIMANT
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. G007596/G306766/G407852/G602717 JOSEPH WORK, Employee CLAIMANT ARKANSAS HIGHWAY & TRANSPORTATION DEPT., Employer RESPONDENT PUBLIC EMPLOYEE
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT **********
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 03-0548 CAJUN WELDING & MACHINE CO. VERSUS TRAVIS DEVILLE ********** APPEAL FROM THE OFFICE OF WORKERS COMPENSATION - #2 PARISH OF RAPIDES, NO. 02-08612
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F COOPER ENGINEERED PRODUCTS, SELF-INSURED EMPLOYER RESPONDENT NO.
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F005412 MELANIE KELLEY, EMPLOYEE CLAIMANT COOPER ENGINEERED PRODUCTS, SELF-INSURED EMPLOYER RESPONDENT NO. 1 CROCKETT ADJUSTMENT, INC., INSURANCE
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON
No. 36 February 4, 2015 761 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON In the Matter of the Compensation of Tommy S. Arms, Claimant. Tommy S. ARMS, Petitioner, v. SAIF CORPORATION and Harrington Campbell,
More informationFINAL ORDER REVERSING TRIAL COURT. Franklin Chase ( Appellant ) appeals the denial of his Motion to Suppress 1. This court
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA APPELLATE CASE NO: 2014-AP-000027-A-O LOWER CASE NO.: 2014-CT-001011-A-O FRANKLIN W. CHASE, v. Appellant, STATE OF FLORIDA,
More informationAPPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF HARRISON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT, CAUSE NO.: A
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2009-CA-Ol723 BERTHA MADISON APPELLANT VERSUS GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY APPELLEE APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT
More informationSTATE BOARD OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION 270 Peachtree Street, NW Atlanta, Georgia (404)
2008033665 Trial 270 Peachtree Street, NW Atlanta, Georgia 30303-1299 (404) 656-7772 www.sbwc.georgia.gov STATEMENT OF THE CASE The above-styled case came before the Trial Division on July 27, 2012 pursuant
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS MIAMI DISTRICT OFFICE COMPENSATION ORDER
STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS MIAMI DISTRICT OFFICE Suky Ugarte, Employee /Claimant, vs. Vintro Hotel South Beac/Technology Insurance
More informationAppeal from the Judgment of Sentence in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Criminal Division, No. CC
2004 PA Super 473 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF Appellee : PENNSYLVANIA : : v. : : : RUTH ANN REDMAN, : Appellant : No. 174 WDA 2004 Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence in the
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G CARLOS GIVENS, EMPLOYEE SMITH FIBERCAST, EMPLOYER OPINION FILED DECEMBER 3, 2013
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G108143 CARLOS GIVENS, EMPLOYEE SMITH FIBERCAST, EMPLOYER NEW HAMPSHIRE INSURANCE CO./ GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES, INC., INSURANCE CARRIER/TPA
More informationCASE NO. 1D An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Mark H. Hofstad, Judge.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA ANITA CHANCE, v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D08-2235
More informationSUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. No CP-018S2 JOAN HANKINS RICKMAN
SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI No. 2013-CP-018S2 FILED AUG 2 2 2014 \ DAVID H. VINCENT Vs. JOAN HANKINS RICKMAN APPELLANT APPELLEE ANSWER TO RESPONSE BRIEF OF
More informationl? a--..>-a> s> 9 t)~
l -we.. 00,*3 -r I. CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS The undersigned counsel of record for the Appellant certifies that the following persons have an interest in the outcome of this case. This representation
More information?o(l,'" we,...' oool'l- 7
?o(l,'" we,...' oool'l- 7 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. MOORE'S FEED STORE; JOHNNY MOORE, PRESIDENT; SHERRIA WALDROP, SECRETARY rrreasurer APPELLANTS v. MICHAEL HURD APPELLEE CERTIFICATE
More informationREPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT
E-Filed Document Jun 1 2016 13:28:28 2015-CC-01287-COA Pages: 6 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI LINDA WINDHAM v. MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF
More informationREPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT
E-Filed Document Nov 2 2015 20:06:38 2015-WC-00850-COA Pages: 15 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2015-WC-00850-COA JAMES W. BENNETT Appellant v. MISSISSIPPI STATE DEPARTMENT
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F BOBBY A. CASH, EMPLOYEE NUCOR YAMATO STEEL COMPANY, EMPLOYER
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F411268 BOBBY A. CASH, EMPLOYEE NUCOR YAMATO STEEL COMPANY, EMPLOYER ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, INSURANCE CARRIER/TPA CLAIMANT RESPONDENT
More informationWORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1668/10
WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1668/10 BEFORE: K. Karimjee : Vice-Chair B. Wheeler : Member Representative of Employers R.J. Lebert : Member Representative of Workers HEARING:
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC THIRD DISTRICT CASE NO. 3D COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH CENTER, INC., a/a/o ERLA TELUSNOR,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC11-726 THIRD DISTRICT CASE NO. 3D09-3370 COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH CENTER, INC., a/a/o ERLA TELUSNOR, Petitioner, vs. UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, A Florida
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. E806691/E912648/E912649
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. E806691/E912648/ AARON JONES, EMPLOYEE CLAIMANT MEEKS LUMBER COMPANY/ SEDGWICK JAMES, EMPLOYER/TPA RESPONDENT NO. 1 MEEKS LUMBER COMPANY/ FIREMAN
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE May 5, 2004 Session
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE May 5, 2004 Session EVA MAE JEFFERIES v. MCKEE FOODS CORPORATION Appeal from the Chancery Court for Hamilton County No. 01-0004, Howell N. Peoples, Chancellor
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA John Podest, Petitioner v. No. 1785 C.D. 2016 Submitted May 26, 2017 Workers Compensation Appeal Board (General Dynamics), Respondent General Dynamics, Petitioner
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. vs. CASE NO. SC96659 REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLEE/ CROSS APPELLANT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ROBERT BEELER P0WER, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, vs. CASE NO. SC96659 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee/ Cross-Appellant. / REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLEE/ CROSS APPELLANT INTERLOCUTORY
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON AUGUST 1996 SESSION
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON AUGUST 1996 SESSION STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) No. 02C01-9510-CR-00304 ) Appellee ) ) SHELBY COUNTY V. ) ) HON. CHRIS CRAFT, ROBERT CHAPMAN, ) JUDGE
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR KENT COUNTY
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR KENT COUNTY CARL STANLEY, : : Appellant, : : v. : : KRAFT FOODS, INC., : : Appellee. : Submitted: December 21, 2007 Decided: ORDER Upon Appeal
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAlS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. No CA-00292
IN THE COURT OF APPEAlS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI No. 2009-CA-00292 3545 MITCHELL ROAD, LLC d~/atupelotraceapartments and PINECREST/TUPELO, L.P. d~/a TUPELO SENIORS APARTMENTS PLAINTIFFS/APPELLANTS V.
More informationCommonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals
RENDERED: JUNE 26, 2015; 10:00 A.M. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2014-CA-001504-WC MICHAEL EVANS APPELLANT PETITION FOR REVIEW OF A DECISION v. OF THE WORKERS COMPENSATION
More information