Mississippi Supreme Court
|
|
- Chastity Owen
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 E-Filed Document Aug :38: CA SCT Pages: 15 IN THE Mississippi Supreme Court NO CA-1177 HENRY W. kinney, Appellant VERSUS SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, INC. AND MISSISSIPPI ASSOCIATION OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS Appellees PETITION FOR REHEARING MICHAEL ADELMAN, ESQUIRE MS State Bar No ADELMAN & STEEN, L.L.P. 224 Second Avenue Post Office Box 368 Hattiesburg, MS / ; 601/ (FAX) COUNSEL FOR HENRY W. KINNEY
2 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO.: 2015-CA-1177 HENRY W. KINNEY APPELLANT VS. SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, INC. AND MISSISSIPPI ASSOCIATION OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS APPELLEES CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS The undersigned counsel of record certifies that the following listed persons, have an interest in the outcome of this case. These representations are made in order that the Appellate Court may evaluate possible disqualification or recusal. 1. Henry Kinney APPELLANT 4395 Menge Avenue Pass Christian, MS Donald Rafferty, Esq. PRIOR ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT th Street Gulfport, MS Michael Adelman, Esq. ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT Adelman & Steen, L.L.P. Post Office Box 368 Hattiesburg, MS i-
3 4. Leonard Bentz EXECUTIVE, DIRECTOR c/o Southern Mississippi Planning & Development District, Inc HWY. 49 Gulfport, MS Hugh D. Keating, Esq. ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE, Dukes, Dukes, Keating & Faneca, P.A. SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI PLANNING & th th Street, 6 Floor DEVELOPMENT, INC. Gulfport, MS JeNell B. Blum, Esq. ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE, Dukes, Dukes, Keating & Faneca, P.A. SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI PLANNING & th th Street, 6 Floor DEVELOPMENT, INC. Gulfport, MS James Harold Herring, Esq. ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE, Herring, Long & Crews, P.C. MISSISSIPPI ASSOCIATION OF Post Office 344 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT Canton, MS DISTRICTS 8. Southern Mississippi Planning APPELLEE & Development District, Inc HWY. 49 Gulfport, MS Mississippi Association of Planning & APPELLEE Development Districts Post Office 4935 Jackson, MS ii-
4 TABLE OF CONTENTS CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS i TABLE OF CONTENTS iii INDEX OF AUTHORITIES iv PETITION FOR REHEARING STATEMENT OF ISSUE ON REHEARING ARGUMENT I. THE UNCONTROVERTED EVIDENCE PRODUCED BY APPELLANT IN OPPOSITION TO APPELLEES MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CLEARLY AND PLAINLY ESTABLISHES THAT SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, INC. IS A PUBLIC BODY CONCLUSION CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE iii-
5 INDEX OF AUTHORITIES CASES PAGE NO.: Brown v. Credit Center, Inc., 444 So. 2d 358, (Miss. 1983) , 7 Chapman v. State, 1673d 1170 (Miss. 2015) Gall v. U.S., 552 U.S. 28, 50 (2007) Heigle v. Heigle, 771 so. 2d 341 (Miss. 2000) Jamison v. Barnes, 8 So. 3d 238 (Miss. Ct. App. 2008) Leslie v. City of Biloxi, 758 So. 2d 430, 431 (Miss. 2000) Miller v. Provident Adver. & Mktg., 155 So. 3d 181 (Miss. Ct. App. 2014) Noxubee County School District v. United National Insurance Company, 883 So. 2d 1159, 1163 (Miss. 2004) Underwood v. State, 708 So. 2d 18, 38 (Miss. 1998) STATUTES Miss. Code Ann. Section (Rev. 2010) Miss. Code Ann. Section (Rev. 2010) Miss. Code Ann. Section (Rev. 2010) Miss. Code Ann. Section (Rev. 2010) Miss. Code Ann. Section (b) (Rev. 2010) RULES Rule 12(b)(6) of the Mississippi Rules of Civil Procedure iv-
6 OTHER AUTHORITIES Executive Order No. 81 (1971) Moore s Federal Practice Section 56.15[1-2] p (1982) v-
7 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO.: 2015-CA-1177 HENRY W. KINNEY APPELLANT VS. SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, INC. AND MISSISSIPPI ASSOCIATION OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS APPELLEES PETITION FOR REHEARING STATEMENT OF ISSUE ON REHEARING 1. Does the uncontroverted evidence produced by Appellant in opposition to Appellees Motion for Summary Judgment clearly and plainly establish that Southern Mississippi Planning and Development District is a public body. ARGUMENT I. THE UNCONTROVERTED EVIDENCE PRODUCED BY APPELLANT IN OPPOSITION TO APPELLEES MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CLEARLY AND PLAINLY ESTABLISHES THAT SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, INC. IS A PUBLIC BODY. 1 1 See Miller v. Provident Adver. & Mktg., 155 So. 3d 181 (Miss. Ct. App. 2014); Jamison v. Barnes, 8 So. 3d 238 (Miss. Ct. App. 2008) Page -1-
8 The fundamental issue in this case is whether or not Southern Mississippi Planning and Development District, Inc. is a public body subject to Mississippi statutes governing and regulating public and governmental bodies. On this issue, the majority discarded Appellant s position in less than two (2) pages. Appellant raised serious issues, both in uncontroverted factual assertions in his Affidavit and attachments and the introduced deposition of the Chairman of the Southern Mississippi Planning and Development District, Inc. Further, Appellant raised serious legal arguments concerning the public nature of Southern Mississippi Planning and Development District, Inc. Nevertheless, unlike the dissent, none of these issues were addressed by the present majority. Instead, the majority reached a conclusion without any supporting analysis of the arguments and facts presented by Appellant. In essence, the majority treated Appellees motions as Rule 12(b)(6) motions to dismiss rather than motions for summary judgment. 2 Contrary to the lack of analysis provided in the majority Opinion, Chief Justice Waller s dissent recognizes that under Mississippi s Open Meetings Law, a public body is defined as that which is supported wholly or in part by public funds or expends public funds. Miss. Code Ann. Section (Rev. 2010). Under Mississippi s Public Records Law, a public body is defined as any other entity created by... executive order... Miss. Code Ann. Section (Rev. 2010). As Chief Justice Waller also notes, Mississippi s Public Procurement Laws define governing authority as any political subdivision of the State supported wholly or in part by 2 Rule 12(b)(6), MRCP Page -2-
9 public funds of the State of political subdivision. Miss. Code Ann. Section (b) (Rev. 2010). The ethics in government laws define government as any... institution... created by... executive order including all units that expend public funds. Miss. Code Ann. Section (Rev. 2010). Each of these statutory definitions is consistent with a finding that Southern Mississippi Planning and Development District, Inc. is a public body. Southern Mississippi Planning and Development District is supported wholly by public funds and as a result of Executive Order No. 81 by Governor John Bell Williams, Southern Mississippi Planning and Development District is an official sub-state region. The statutory definition cited by the dissent leaves little doubt that the Southern Mississippi Planning and Development District is a public body and should be so considered upon rehearing. Appellees did not produce one (1) shred of evidence that the District receives any funds from any source other than the government. In other words, it is undisputed that Southern Mississippi Planning and Development District, Inc. is publicly funded. The dissent also recognizes the impact of Executive Order 81 entered five (5) years after the district was incorporated as a non-profit corporation in The impact of Governor Williams Executive Order cannot be overemphasized. Under Executive Order 81, all of Mississippi s Planning and Development Districts were officially designated as the regional clearinghouses for federal programs and coordination of federal grants. Further, as the dissent notes, the Directory of Mississippi Association of Planning and Development Districts itself, Appellee and Intervener in this case, states that Executive Order 81 designated the Planning and Page -3-
10 Development District as Mississippi s official sub-state regions. While the present majority opinion states that it disagrees with Kinney s logic, the majority opinion never explains why Governor Williams Executive Order did not bestow planning and development districts with the authority and responsibility of public bodies. Further, the present majority does not explain how a planning and development district is an official state sub-region, but not a public body. As noted supra, Appellee and Intervener Mississippi Association for Planning and Development Districts acknowledges in its own directory that planning and development districts are, in fact, public bodies. Appellant submits that it is insufficient for the majority opinion to simply state that it disagrees with Kinney s logic without providing a reason as to why the present majority comes to that conclusion. Appellate review must be meaningful and adequately explain the basis for the reviewing court s decision. Gall v. U.S., 552 U.S. 28, 50 (2007). See also Heigle v. Heigle, 771 so. 2d 341 (Miss. 2000); Chapman v. State, 1673d 1170 (Miss. 2015); Underwood v. State, 708 So. 2d 18, 38 (Miss. 1998). Unfortunately, the present majority opinion fails to meet this standard. The evidence and facts presented by Mr. Kinney in support of his position below are virtually ignored in the present majority opinion, despite the fact that all of these facts remain unrebutted on the record. Unlike the dissent, the present majority opinion does not discuss the actual structure of planning and development districts. In considering this Petition for Rehearing, Appellant would ask the Court to revisit the Affidavit of Mr. Kinney presented in opposition to Appellees Page -4-
11 Motions for Summary Judgment and, in particular, the deposition of Mr. Lynn Cartlidge. As the dissent notes, and as the deposition of Mr. Cartlidge affirms, the membership of the district is limited to fifteen (15) county governments and incorporated municipalities contained within those fifteen (15) counties. The districts are supported by public funds and only public funds. There are no non-governmental members of the district and there are no private or individual donors to the district. The following facts were established by Mr. Kinney s detailed Affidavit based on his personal knowledge and submitted in opposition to Appellees Motions for Summary Judgment (and remain unrebutted on the record): 1. SMPDD is composed of a limited number of members. 2. The closed membership of this entity is limited to fifteen (15) County governments and only the incorporated municipalities contained within those fifteen (15) counties. 3. There are no non-governmental members of SMPDD. 4. There are no private or individual donors to SMPDD. 5. Membership in SMPDD is closed. 6. Appellee Kinney pays taxes annually in each of the incorporated municipalities of Harrison County. 7. SMPDD assesses an annual tax on Harrison County which is paid by the County. 8. Kinney s tax payments to Harrison County partially contribute to the membership tax and to other payments made by Harrison County to SMPDD. 9. SMPDD does not pay any ad valorem taxes within Harrison County because the assessor Page -5-
12 treats as a unit of government. 10. SMPDD owns property within Harrison County that is untaxed by virtue of its status as a unit of government. 11. All of the money used to operate SMPDD is funded by either local, county, state or federal governments. 12. SMPDD does not allow the public access to its books and records in accordance with Miss. Code Ann. Section , et seq. 13. SMPDD s business consists of performing government functions exclusively. 14. SMPDD files its tax returns with the Internal Revenue Service in accordance with the Government Accounting Standards Board. Those standards are exclusively applicable by rule for accounting and financial statements for the United States government, State governments and local governments. 15. SMPDD is not now, nor was it ever, organized as a non-profit corporation since its original and continuing closed membership is solely that of governments. 16. The District s employees are all employees of a government entity and should be treated in exactly the same manner as all public employees. The majority was unwilling to address any of these facts.given the evidence presented by Appellant, it would be difficult to conclude that the present majority viewed this evidence in a light most favorable to Mr. Kinney as required by summary judgment jurisprudence. Noxubee County School District v. United National Insurance Company, 883 So. 2d 1159, 1163 (Miss. 2004); see also Leslie v. City of Biloxi, 758 So. 2d 430, 431 (Miss. 2000); Brown v. Credit Page -6-
13 Center, Inc., 444 So. 2d 358, (Miss. 1983). Put in another way, it is submitted that in order for the majority to reach its conclusions, and view the evidence as required by summary judgment jurisprudence, it must address the facts in detail. In Brown, the Mississippi Supreme Court quoted the following admonition from 6 Moore s Federal Practice Section 56.15[1-2] p (1982): If there is to be error at the trial level it should be in denying summary judgment and in favor of a full live trial. And the problem of overcrowded calendars is not to be solved by summary disposition of issues of fact fairly presented in an action. Even assuming per arguendo, that the Court was correct in affirming the Chancery Court as to the recusal and the intervention issues, the Opinion of the present majority fails to make an accurate and detailed analysis of the facts involved in this case. In some ways, the recusal and intervention issues are red herrings. They do not constitute the main thrust of this case. Where the majority opinion fails is in its failure to acknowledge and analyze the statutes cited by both Appellant and the dissent; even discuss, let alone analyze, the membership structure and funding of planning and development districts; or acknowledge or discuss the manner in which Southern Mississippi Planning and Development District, Inc. maintains, accounts for and reports its income and spending. In that regard, perhaps the most salient omission by the majority is its failure to even discuss the fact that Southern Mississippi Planning and Development District, Inc., like all planning and development districts in the State of Mississippi, is subject to public audit. If nothing else, this fact alone overwhelmingly establishes that planning and development districts are, indeed, public bodies. Page -7-
14 CONCLUSION For the reasons set forth in this Petition, Appellant, Henry W. Kinney, respectfully requests that the Mississippi Supreme Court grant his Petition for Rehearing. Upon doing so, Appellant submits that the Mississippi Supreme Court should reverse the decision of the Harrison County Chancery Court in this matter and find that Southern Mississippi Planning and Development District, Inc. is a public body and subject to Mississippi s Open Meetings Law, Public Records Law, Public Procurement Laws and those laws pertaining to Ethics in Government. This case raises issues of public importance and the public is entitled to wellreasoned analysis of the facts and law. Unfortunately, contrary to the dissent, the majority Opinion does not provide such an analysis. Further, a full reasoned analysis of the factual issues is this case may also allow the Court itself to resolve the various issues raised by the dissent. Respectfully submitted, s/michael ADELMAN, ESQ. MICHAEL ADELMAN, ESQUIRE ADELMAN & STEEN, L.L.P. POST OFFICE BOX 368 HATTIESBURG, MS (601) ; (601) (FAX) MS BAR NO COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT, HENRY W. KINNEY Page -8-
15 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE This is to certify that I, Michael Adelman, attorney for Appellant, Henry W. Kinney, have served the above and foregoing PETITION FOR REHEARING via using this Court s MEC system, in which notification will automatically be provided to the following counsel of record: Hugh D. Keating, Esq. Je Nell Blum, Esq. Dukes, Dukes, Keating & Faneca, P.A. Post Office Drawer W Gulfport, MS James W. Herring, Esq. Herring, Long & Crews, P.C. Post Office Box 344 Canton, MS Further, I hereby certify that I have mailed via the United States Postal Service the document to the following: Honorable Sanford R. Steckler Post Office Box 659 Gulfport, MS th This, the 25 day of August, A.D., MICHAEL ADELMAN, ESQUIRE ADELMAN & STEEN, L.L.P. POST OFFICE BOX 368 HATTIESBURG, MS (601) ; (601) (FAX) adelst33@aol.com MS STATE BAR NO ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF, HENRY W. KINNEY s/michael ADELMAN, ESQ. Page -9-
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO CA APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ATTALA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI
E-Filed Document Jun 30 2016 11:18:49 2015-CA-01772 Pages: 11 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BROOKS V. MONAGHAN VERSUS ROBERT AUTRY APPELLANT CAUSE NO. 2015-CA-01772 APPELLEE APPEAL
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI 2013 CA STRIBLING INVESTMENTS, LLC. Appellant VS. MIKE ROZIER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
E-Filed Document Mar 22 2016 12:26:29 2013-CA-02145-SCT Pages: 8 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI 2013 CA 02145 STRIBLING INVESTMENTS, LLC Appellant VS. MIKE ROZIER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. Appellee
More informationAPPELLANT S RESPONSE TO APPELLEE S MOTION FOR REHEARING
E-Filed Document May 16 2017 15:18:32 2016-IA-00571-SCT Pages: 6 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI FAWAZ ABDRABBO, MD. APPELLANT VS. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2016-IA-00571-SCT AUDRAY (ANDRES) JOHNSON (PRO SE)
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY. v. No CA ALLSTATE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
E-Filed Document Sep 11 2017 10:34:38 2016-CA-00359-SCT Pages: 12 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY APPELLANT v. No. 2016-CA-00359 ALLSTATE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA-00062
E-Filed Document Jun 8 2016 17:38:15 2016-CA-00062 Pages: 24 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2016-CA-00062 GULFPORT PARTNERS V, L.P.; GULFPORT PARTNERS VI, L.P.; GULFPORT PARTNERS
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2011-CA-01274
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2011-CA-01274 COMMONWEALTH BRANDS, INC., THE CORR-WILLIAMS COMPANY AND VICKSBURG SPECIALTY COMPANY APPELLANTS vs. J. ED MORGAN, COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE OF THE DEPARTMENT
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI WILLIAM M. MILEY, JR.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI RITA FAYE MILEY VERSES WILLIAM M. MILEY, JR. APPELLANT CASE NO. 2008-TS-00677 APPELLEE BRIEF OF APPELLEE WILLIAM
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ELLIS TURNAGE APPELLANT V. NO CA COA ELLIS CHRISTOPHER BROOKS, ET. AL.
E-Filed Document Sep 6 2016 16:10:23 2014-CA-00966-COA Pages: 16 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ELLIS TURNAGE APPELLANT V. NO. 2014-CA-00966-COA ELLIS CHRISTOPHER BROOKS, ET. AL. APPELLEES
More informationAPPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF HARRISON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT, CAUSE NO.: A
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2009-CA-Ol723 BERTHA MADISON APPELLANT VERSUS GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY APPELLEE APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CA CITY OF JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI APPELLANT
E-Filed Document Feb 22 2016 15:38:11 2015-CA-00890 Pages: 8 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2015-CA-00890 CITY OF JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI APPELLANT VS WILLIE B. JORDAN APPELLEE
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON June 16, 2010 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON June 16, 2010 Session STEVEN ANDERSON v. ROY W. HENDRIX, JR. Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Shelby County No. CH-07-1317 Kenny W. Armstrong, Chancellor
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA-01555
E-Filed Document Aug 4 2016 17:24:06 2015-CA-01555-SCT Pages: 14 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI THE FORMER BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND MEMBERS OF MISSISSIPPI COMP CHOICE SELF-INSURERS FUND
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE V. NO CA HOTEL AND RESTAURANT SUPPLY MOTION FOR REHEARING
E-Filed Document Mar 24 2016 16:43:53 2014-CA-01685-SCT Pages: 6 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE APPELLANT V. NO. 2014-CA-01685 HOTEL AND RESTAURANT SUPPLY APPELLEE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT, STEVE RUTH
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI STEVE RUTH VS. LONDON SUZETTE BURCHFIELD APPELLANT NO. 2007-CA-02066 APPELLEE REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT, STEVE RUTH APPEAL
More informationREPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT
E-Filed Document Jul 15 2016 15:58:17 2015-CA-01280-COA Pages: 10 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI KAPPI SAGET JEFFERS VS. KORRI SAGET APPELLANT CAUSE NO. 2015-CA-1280 APPELLEE REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT
More informationBRIEF OF APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE DECISION OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MADISON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI No.2010-KM-01250-SCT WILLIAM BILBO APPELLANT v. CITY OF RIDGELAND APPELLEE BRIEF OF APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE DECISION OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MADISON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI
More informationE-Filed Document Apr :32: TS Pages: 10 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI REGINA DIANE WEATHERS
E-Filed Document Apr 8 2014 10:32:44 2013-TS-01366 Pages: 10 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI REGINA DIANE WEATHERS APPELLANT V. NO. 2013-TS-01366 SCOTTY WADE GUIN APPELLEE BRIEF OF APPELLANT REGINA
More informationBRIEF OF THE APPELLANT
E-Filed Document Mar 2 2016 17:00:55 2015-KA-00934-COA Pages: 11 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JASON BOZEMAN APPELLANT V. NO. 2015-KA-00934-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPEAL FROM THE CHANCERY COURT OF HINDS COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
E-Filed Document Sep 15 2015 16:38:13 2014-CA-00819-COA Pages: 12 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JAMES BRETT HOLMES APPELLANT V. NO. 2014-CA-00819-COA BECKY TURNER APPELLEE APPEAL
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO IA SCT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2008-IA-01191-SCT SHANNON HOLMES AND STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY APPELLANTS VS. LEE MCMILLAN APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT OF HINDS
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 94,135 (CI 98-CI 1137)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 94,135 (CI 98-CI 1137) STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant, vs. VALIDATION OF NOT EXCEEDING $35,000,000 OSCEOLA COUNTY, OSCEOLA COUNTY, FLORIDA, a FLORIDA TOURIST DEVELOPMENT
More informationAPPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF HARRISON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT, CAUSE NO.: A
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2009-CA-Ol723 BERTHA MADISON APPELLANT VERSUS GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY APPELLEE APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT
More informationAPPELLANT S REPLY BRIEF
E-Filed Document Aug 25 2014 11:44:56 2013-CA-01631 Pages: 8 SUPREME COURT AND COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2013-CA-01631 DRAKE L. LEWIS, APPELLANT VERSUS TONIA D. LEWIS, APPELLEE APPEAL FROM
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO IA PEGGY ANN THORNTON, as Widow of GREGORY THORNTON, DECEASED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO. 2011-IA-00682 TAN FIELD ENGINEERING SYSTEMS, INC. APPELLANT VS. PEGGY ANN THORNTON, as Widow of GREGORY THORNTON, DECEASED APPELLEE ON APPEAL
More informationNO CA-1441 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI PATRICIA RUSH APPELLANT R R&D & D PROPERTIES, LLC APPELLEE BRIEF OF APPELLEES
E-Filed Document May 31 2018 14:44:32 2017-CA-01441 Pages: 18 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI PATRICIA RUSH APPELLANT v. V. NO. 2017-CA-1441 R R&D & D PROPERTIES, LLC APPELLEE BRIEF OF APPELLEES R.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI SMITH COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT APPELLANT VS. CAUSE NO. 2008-CA-00830 LARRY CAMPBELL APPELLEE BRIEF OF APPELLANT APPEAL OF THE FINAL JUDGMENT OF THE SMITH COUNTY CHANCERY
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI. No DP SCT SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF OF APPELLEE JIM HOOD ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
E-Filed Document Dec 17 2013 12:58:24 2011-DP-00410-SCT Pages: 13 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI TIMOTHY ROBERT RONK, Appellant versus No. 2011-DP-00410-SCT STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee SUPPLEMENTAL
More informationSUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2008-TS-01454
SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2008-TS-01454 DORIS A. ANDRES APPELLANT VERSUS PATRICK T. ANDRES APPELLEE APPEAL FROM THE CHANCERY COURT FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
More informationSUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. No CP-018S2 JOAN HANKINS RICKMAN
SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI No. 2013-CP-018S2 FILED AUG 2 2 2014 \ DAVID H. VINCENT Vs. JOAN HANKINS RICKMAN APPELLANT APPELLEE ANSWER TO RESPONSE BRIEF OF
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA. Petitioner, S.C. Case No.: SC DCA Case No.: 5D v. L.T. Case No.
Filing # 12738024 Electronically Filed 04/21/2014 04:09:09 PM RECEIVED, 4/21/2014 16:13:38, John A. Tomasino, Clerk, Supreme Court STATE FARM FLORIDA INSURANCE COMPANY, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
More informationBRIEF OF THE APPELLANT
E-Filed Document Mar 17 2014 15:39:22 2013-KM-01881-COA Pages: 10 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI STACY L. MILLER APPELLANT v. NO.2013-KM-01881-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF
More informationE-Filed Document Dec :47: CA Pages: 21 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI. No.2016-TS-00928
E-Filed Document Dec 15 2016 13:47:07 2016-CA-00928 Pages: 21 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI No.2016-TS-00928 CURTIS RAY MCCARTY, JR. VS. vs. ARTHUR E. WOOD, III, AND PAULA WOOD APPELLANT APPELLEES
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS DELAWARE COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
[Cite as Brammer v. Brammer, 2006-Ohio-3318.] COURT OF APPEALS DELAWARE COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT CELESTE E. BRAMMER JUDGES John W. Wise, P.J. Plaintiff-Appellant William B. Hoffman, J. Julie
More informationv No Wayne Circuit Court
S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N C O U R T O F A P P E A L S CITY OF DETROIT, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED March 15, 2018 v No. 337705 Wayne Circuit Court BAYLOR LTD, LC No. 16-010881-CZ Defendant-Appellee.
More informationNo. 47,320-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * Versus * * * * * * * * * *
Judgment rendered September 20, 2012. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, LSA-CCP. No. 47,320-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * RHONDA
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE September 8, 2008 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE September 8, 2008 Session NEWELL WINDOW FURNISHING, INC. v. RUTH E. JOHNSON, COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE, STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Chancery Court
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CA COA
E-Filed Document Jul 18 2017 16:12:13 2014-CT-01828-SCT Pages: 7 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2014-CA-01828-COA APPELLANT VS. CASE NO. 2014-CA-01828-COA BAPTIST HEALTH PLEX, BECKY VRIELAND
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE SEPTEMBER 8, 2010 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE SEPTEMBER 8, 2010 Session VALENTI MID-SOUTH MANAGEMENT, LLC v. REAGAN FARR, COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE, STATE OF TENNESSEE Direct Appeal from the Chancery
More informationNo. 47,320-CA ON REHEARING COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * versus * * * * *
Judgment rendered January 5, 013. No. 47,30-CA ON REHEARING COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA RHONDA PITTMAN Plaintiff-Appellee versus LAWRENCE E. METZ Defendant-Appellee Originally Appealed
More informationBy:!J.~ PILED. MOTIONt OCT 1 g 2016 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA APPELLANT WALTERPOOLE,JR.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2015-CP-00604-COA WALTERPOOLE,JR. v. WILLIAM WALTON PILED OCT 1 g 2016 OFFICE OF THE CLERK.SUPAEMECOUAT COURT OF APPEALS APPELLANT APPELLEE MOTION
More information101 Central Plaza South, Ste. 600 Tzangas, Plakas, Mannos, & Raies
[Cite as Kemp v. Kemp, 2011-Ohio-177.] COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JEANNE KEMP, NKA GAGE Plaintiff-Appellee -vs- MICHAEL KEMP Defendant-Appellant JUDGES Hon. Julie A. Edwards,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC THIRD DISTRICT CASE NO. 3D COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH CENTER, INC., a/a/o ERLA TELUSNOR,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC11-726 THIRD DISTRICT CASE NO. 3D09-3370 COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH CENTER, INC., a/a/o ERLA TELUSNOR, Petitioner, vs. UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, A Florida
More informationBRIEF OF THE APPELLANT
E-Filed Document Jul 30 2015 11:00:44 2015-KA-00218-COA Pages: 11 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JOE M. GILLESPIE APPELLANT V. NO. 2015-KA-00218-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs March 1, 2017
03/29/2017 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs March 1, 2017 GEORGE CAMPBELL, JR. v. TENNESSEE BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Appeal from the Chancery Court for Wayne County No.
More informationBRIEF OF THE APPELLANT
E-Filed Document Apr 7 2017 15:21:24 2016-KA-01555-SCT Pages: 10 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI GARRETT EUGENE RAY APPELLANT V. NO. 2016-KA-01555-SCT STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF
More informationSUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA
REL: 04/28/2017 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate
More informationCite as 2017 Ark. App. 684 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION IV
Cite as 2017 Ark. App. 684 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION IV No. CV-17-48 JAN CHRISTOPHER SARNA APPELLANT V. ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION SEX OFFENDER COMMITTEE APPELLEE Opinion Delivered: December
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 92-CC SCT JAMES TRUITT PHILLIPS v. MISSISSIPPI VETERANS' HOME PURCHASE BOARD
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 92-CC-00708-SCT JAMES TRUITT PHILLIPS v. MISSISSIPPI VETERANS' HOME PURCHASE BOARD DATE OF JUDGMENT: 6/3/92 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. WILLIAM F. COLEMAN COURT FROM WHICH
More informationCourt judgment that denied a petition for postconviction relief. filed by Kavin Lee Peeples, defendant below and appellant herein.
[Cite as State v. Peeples, 2006-Ohio-218.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PICKAWAY COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : Case No. 05CA25 vs. : KAVIN LEE PEEPLES, : DECISION
More informationE-Filed Document Dec :46: CA Pages: 19 THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
E-Filed Document Dec 16 2015 14:46:13 2014-CA-01555 Pages: 19 THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI TOMMY L. EWING, JR. vs. VS. LISA YOUNGER NEESE AND ROY A. PERKINS
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLEE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI TERESA DARLENE JONES APPELLANT VERSUS NO.2009-TS-Ol131 GEORGE HERBERT MAYO, ill APPELLEE BRIEF OF APPELLEE Robert R. Marshall MSB_ Attorney for Appellee
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC THIRD DISTRICT CASE NO. 3D
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC11-726 THIRD DISTRICT CASE NO. 3D09-3370 COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH CENTER, INC. (a/a/o Erla Telusnor), vs. Petitioner, UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.
More informationRESPONSE BRIEF OF DEFENDANT/APPELLEE MISSISSIPPI WORKERS COMPENSATION GROUP SELF-INSURER GUARANTY ASSOCIATION
E-Filed Document Jun 17 2016 15:18:08 2015-CA-01555 Pages: 34 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI THE FORMER BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND MEMBERS OF MISSISSIPPI COMP CHOICE SELF-INSURERS FUND VS.
More informationNo. 47,333-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * Versus * * * * *
Judgment rendered August 1, 2012. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 47,333-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * WEST
More informationAppellant, Lower Court Case No.: CC O
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTO- MOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, CASE NO.: CVA1-06 - 19 vs. CARRIE CLARK, Appellant, Lower Court Case
More informationSTATE OF OHIO LASZLO KISS
[Cite as State v. Kiss, 2009-Ohio-739.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION Nos. 91353 and 91354 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. LASZLO
More informationCHRISTOPHER L. KINSLER Lawrenceville, GA Associate Assistant Attorney General 150 E. Gay St. 16 th Floor Columbus, Ohio 43215
[Cite as State v. Beem, 2015-Ohio-5587.] COURT OF APPEALS LICKING COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO Plaintiff-Appellee -vs- KIMBERLY BEEM Defendant-Appellant JUDGES: Hon. William B. Hoffman,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE WESTERN SECTION AT JACKSON
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE WESTERN SECTION AT JACKSON SUSAN KAY MALIK, Plaintiff/Appellee, Shelby Chancery No. 21988-1 R.D. VS. Appeal No. 02A01-9604-CH-00070 KAFAIT U. MALIK, Defendant/Appellant.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI JACKSON COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI JACKSON COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS VERSUS MISSISSIPPI EMPLOYMENT SECURITY COMMISSION and JUNE SEAMAN APPELLANT CAUSE NO. 2011-CC-00648 APPELLEES APPEALED FROM THE CIRCUIT
More informationCASE NO CR CASE NO CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS, TEXAS
CASE NO. 05-11-01170-CR CASE NO. 05-11-01171-CR IN THE 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 03/09/2012 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS, TEXAS ALFONSO
More informationBRIEF OF APPELLANT IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CA LESLIE DAYLE VOULTERS
E-Filed Document Dec 19 2014 13:19:57 2014-CA-00745 Pages: 22 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI LEE VOULTERS VS. LESLIE DAYLE VOULTERS APPELLANT CASE NO. 2014-CA-00745 APPELLEE APPEAL FROM
More informationIN THE MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS 2014-CA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MOTION FOR REHEARING
E-Filed Document Jul 12 2016 17:16:49 2014-CA-01654-COA Pages: 5 IN THE MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS 2014-CA-01654-COA DAVID SHANKLIN Appellant v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI Appellee MOTION FOR REHEARING Appellant
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI ~f:p 0 I PLAINTIFF APPELLAN]COURTOFAPP~S cpt APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ALCORN COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI
CARLA STUTTS, COpy FILED IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI ~f:p 0 I 2009 =C=OUR~=T~O=F_AP~=PEAL~==S_O=F=-T=H=E=-S~T=~~T=E=-O=F~M~I~S~S~I~S~S~I~P~P~I - OFFICE OF THIi CLERt( SUPREME COURT PLAINTIFF APPELLAN]COURTOFAPP~S
More informationARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of -- ) ) The Swanson Group, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 52109 ) Under Contract No. N68711-91-C-9509 ) APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT:
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ERIE COUNTY. Trial Court No CV-0525
[Cite as Fantozz v. Cordle, 2015-Ohio-4057.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ERIE COUNTY Jo Dee Fantozz, Erie Co. Treasurer Appellee Court of Appeals No. E-14-130 Trial Court No.
More information2018 PA Super 45. Appeal from the Order entered March 29, 2017 In the Court of Common Pleas of Chester County Civil Division at No: CT
2018 PA Super 45 WILLIAM SMITH SR. AND EVERGREEN MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. BRIAN HEMPHILL AND COMMERCIAL SNOW + ICE, LLC APPEAL OF BARRY M. ROTHMAN, ESQUIRE No. 1351
More informationREPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT
E-Filed Document Nov 15 2016 08:38:58 2016-CA-00310 Pages: 13 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI Case No. 2016-CA-00310 JOHN CALVIN HOWARD APPELLANT VS. ROLIN ENTERPRISES, LLC, LINDA WALKER, INDIVIDUALLY,
More informationARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS. Appeal of -- ) ) The Swanson Group, Inc. ) ASBCA No ) Under Contract No. N C-9509 )
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of -- ) ) The Swanson Group, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 54863 ) Under Contract No. N68711-91-C-9509 ) APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT:
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS DELAWARE COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT : : : : : : : : : : :
[Cite as Day v. Noah's Ark Learning Ctr., 2002-Ohio-4245.] COURT OF APPEALS DELAWARE COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DEBRA S. DAY -vs- Plaintiff-Appellant NOAH S ARK LEARNING CENTER, et al. Defendants-Appellees
More informationNOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES FOR REHEARING AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
County Civil Court: ATTORNEY S FEES. The trial court correctly found the relevant market required the possibility of a multiplier in order for Appellee to obtain representation in this matter. The trial
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA City of Philadelphia : : v. : No. 2178 C.D. 2013 : Submitted: October 6, 2014 John Hummel, Jr., : Appellant : BEFORE: HONORABLE BONNIE BRIGANCE LEADBETTER, Judge
More informationIN THE OREGON TAX COURT MAGISTRATE DIVISION Municipal Tax ) ) I. INTRODUCTION
IN THE OREGON TAX COURT MAGISTRATE DIVISION Municipal Tax JOHN A. BOGDANSKI, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF PORTLAND, State of Oregon, Defendant. TC-MD 130075C DECISION OF DISMISSAL I. INTRODUCTION This matter
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE October 14, 2005 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE October 14, 2005 Session TAMMY D. NORRIS, ADMINISTRATRIX OF ESTATE OF DAVID P. NORRIS, DECEASED, ET AL. v. JAMES MICHAEL STUART, ET AL. Appeal from the
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS, TEXAS
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS, TEXAS NORMAN LEHR, Appellant, NO. 05-09-00381-CR THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee ON APPEAL FROM THE 282ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF DALLAS
More informationCOURT OF APPEAL FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION [NUMBER] ) APPELLANT S MOTION TO Plaintiff and Respondent,
[ATTORNEY NAME, BAR #] [ATTORNEY FIRM] [FIRM ADDRESS] [TELEPHONE] Attorney for Defendant and Appellant COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION [NUMBER] In re [CHILD
More informationAPPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAN MIGUEL COUNTY Abigail Aragon, District Judge
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 1-0 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this
More informationPLED. ^u P'l-:;LK^ ^^^u R"I 0 F 0H10 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. Michael MINDLIN. and. Supreme Court Case No
; IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO Michael MINDLIN and Elizabeth KURILA, Plaintiff-Appellees, vs. Eileen ZELL, Defendant/Th ird-party Plaintiff-Appellant Supreme Court Case No. 13-0282 On Appeal from the Franklin
More informationCourt of Appeals of Ohio
[Cite as Lakhodar v. Madani, 2008-Ohio-6502.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 91564 SEBTI LAKHODAR PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. ADAM MADANI
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CARBON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL DIVISION
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CARBON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL DIVISION IN RE: COUNTY OF CARBON TAX : CLAIM BUREAU JUDICIAL SALE OF : LAND IN THE COUNTY OF CARBON : No. 16-0984 FREE AND DISCHARGE FROM
More informationILLINOIS FARMERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee, v. URSZULA MARCHWIANY et al., Appellants. Docket No SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS
Page 1 ILLINOIS FARMERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee, v. URSZULA MARCHWIANY et al., Appellants. Docket No. 101598. SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS 222 Ill. 2d 472; 856 N.E.2d 439; 2006 Ill. LEXIS 1116; 305 Ill.
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA CRAIG MOORE, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Appeal No. A07A0316 ) MARY T. CRANFORD, Judge of the) Coweta County Probate Court, ) ) Appellee ) APPELLANT S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF
More informationARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS
ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION II No. CV-15-293 UNIFIRST CORPORATION APPELLANT V. LUDWIG PROPERTIES, INC. D/B/A 71 EXPRESS TRAVEL PLAZA APPELLEE Opinion Delivered December 2, 2015 APPEAL FROM THE SEBASTIAN
More informationv. CAUSE NUMBER: 2010-TS-00020
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CHARITY HOHM-WHALEY PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT v. CAUSE NUMBER: 2010-TS-00020 FREDDIE PARSON DBA PARSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA JOHN D. DUDLEY, Petitioner, CASE NO.: SC 07-1747 vs. DCA CASE NO.: 5D06-3821 ELLEN F. SCHMIDT, Respondent. / PETITIONER S AMENDED JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF Richard J. D
More informationDISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS. No. 95-CV-1354 DANIEL M. NEWTON, APPELLANT, CARL MICHAEL NEWTON, APPELLEE.
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2013 EMMETT B. HAGOOD, III, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAlS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. No CA-00292
IN THE COURT OF APPEAlS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI No. 2009-CA-00292 3545 MITCHELL ROAD, LLC d~/atupelotraceapartments and PINECREST/TUPELO, L.P. d~/a TUPELO SENIORS APARTMENTS PLAINTIFFS/APPELLANTS V.
More informationv. CASE NO.: CVA Lower Court Case No.: 2003-SC-598-O
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA REGIONAL MRI OF ORLANDO, INC., as assignee of Lorraine Gerena, Appellant, v. CASE NO.: CVA1 09-38 Lower Court Case
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE ABERCROMBIE & FITCH No. 282, 2005 CO. SHAREHOLDERS DERIVA- TIVE LITIGATION: JOHN O MALLEY, DERIVA- Court Below: Court of Chancery TIVELY ON BEHALF OF
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FOR THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FOR THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY RABRINDA CHOUDRY, and ) DEBJANI CHOUDRY, ) ) Defendants Below/Appellants, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. CPU4-12-000076 ) STATE OF
More informationCourt of Appeals of Ohio
[Cite as Scranton-Averell, Inc. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Fiscal Officer, 2013-Ohio-697.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION Nos. 98493 and 98494 SCRANTON-AVERELL,
More informationIn the Supreme Court of Florida
In the Supreme Court of Florida CASE NO.: SC11-258 STATE FARM FLORIDA INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. LLOYD BEVERLY and EDITH BEVERLY, Respondents. ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE SECOND DISTRICT COURT
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
[Cite as State v. Tyson, 2009-Ohio-374.] COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO Plaintiff-Appellee -vs- FRANK EUGENE TYSON Defendant-Appellant JUDGES Hon. W. Scott Gwin,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC SERVICE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, vs. OFFICE OF INSURANCE REGULATION AND
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC11-299 SERVICE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, vs. OFFICE OF INSURANCE REGULATION AND THE FINANCIAL SERVICES COMMISSION, Appellees. BRIEF ON JURISDICTION OF APPELLEES
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT RECEIVED, 6/14/2017 4:56 PM, Joanne P. Simmons, Fifth District Court of Appeal MICHAEL CONNOLLY, Plaintiff/Appellant, Case No.: 5D17-1172
More informationANTHONY J. RUSSO NO CA-0952 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL LIONEL BURNS, JR., AND THE HONORABLE ARTHUR A. MORRELL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA
ANTHONY J. RUSSO VERSUS LIONEL BURNS, JR., AND THE HONORABLE ARTHUR A. MORRELL * * * * * * * * * * * NO. 2014-CA-0952 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA APPEAL FROM CIVIL DISTRICT COURT,
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Supreme Court Case No.: District Court Case No.: 3D HACIENDA LOMA LINDA, Petitioner,
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Supreme Court Case No.: District Court Case No.: 3D05-1331 HACIENDA LOMA LINDA, Petitioner, v. THE SCOTTS COMPANY, SCOTTS-SIERRA HORTICULTURAL PRODUCTS COMPANY, and BOB SANTANA,
More informationBEFORE KUHN PETTIGREW AND KLINE JJ
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT 2010 CA 0907 CONAGRA FOODS INC VERSUS CYNTHIA BRIDGES SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE STATE OF LOUISIANA DATE OF JUDGMENT OCT 2 9 2010 ON APPEAL
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida CASE NO. BASIK EXPORTS & IMPORTS, INC., Petitioner, v. PREFERRED NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent. ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL,
More informationTEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-03-00516-CV Mary Patrick, Appellant v. Christopher M. Holland, Appellee FROM THE PROBATE COURT NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. 72628-A, HONORABLE SUSAN
More information