SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. No CP-018S2 JOAN HANKINS RICKMAN

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. No CP-018S2 JOAN HANKINS RICKMAN"

Transcription

1 SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI No CP-018S2 FILED AUG \ DAVID H. VINCENT Vs. JOAN HANKINS RICKMAN APPELLANT APPELLEE ANSWER TO RESPONSE BRIEF OF THE APPELLEE David Vincent, Pro Se 5422 Peach Trail Dr. Southaven, MS Phone: ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED

2 SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI No CP-018S2 DAVID H. VINCENT APPELLANT Vs. JOAN HANKINS RICKMAN APPELLEE CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS The undersigned counsel of record certifies that the following listed persons have an interest in the outcome of this case. These representations are made in order that the Judges of this Court may evaluate possible disqualification or recusal: 1. David H. Vincent. Appellant; 2. Joan Rickman, Appellee; 3. Rusty Harlow, Attorney for Appellee; 4. Honorable Percy L. Lynchard, Jr., Chancery Court Judge, Trial Judge; 1 David H. Vincent Pro Se

3 TABLE OF CONTENTS STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES 3 STATEMENT OF THE CASE ANSWER TO RESPONSE 6 STATEMENT OF THE FACTS ANSWER TO RESPONSE 7 SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT ANSWER TO RESPONSE 9 ARGUMENT ANSWER TO RESPONSE 12 CONCLUSION ANSWER TO RESPONSE 14 ORAL ARGUMENTS REQUESTED 15 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 16 2

4 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES: Chapman v. Ward, 3 So. 3d 790, 799 (1129) (Miss. Ct. App. 2008) Lane v. Lane, 850 So. 2d 122, 126 (1111) (Miss. Ct. App. 2002) McKee v. McKee, 418 So. 2d 764, 767 (Miss. 1982) Lenoir v. Lenoir, 611 So.2d 200, 202 (Miss. 1992) 3

5 STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES On September 25 th, 2013, an Order entered in this cause by Desoto County Chancellor Percy Lynchard, denying the request of Movant David Vincent to be heard on the merits was in error, in that: I. The Chancellor erred when he dismissed David Vincent's assertion of Unclean Hands in his "ANSWER TO MOTION OF CONTEMPT" heard on 08/29/2012. (R. Page 01) David Vincent asserted that Joan Rickman was in violation of the previous order of the court by not supplying the appellant with the needed health insurance cards within the allotted 30 day period as ordered by the court and therefore came into the court with Unclean Hands. The Chancellor ruled against David Vincent, finding him in Contempt for a late medical bill payment without taking into account David Vincent's financial hardships and awarded Joan Rickman attorney fees in the amount of $ II. The Chancellor erred when he found David Vincent in Contempt on 06/26/13 and ordered additional excessive attorney fees in the amount of $ (R. Page 12) The Chancellor ruled that David Vincent paid a late child support payment nine months prior back in October The late child support payment in question had already previously been covered by a previous agreement and order and David Vincent had already previously been found in contempt and was assessed $1500 in attorney fees for this very same matter on 11/14/2012. (R. Page 10) This error resulted in double contempt findings and double attorney fees for the same issue that was covered in the 11/14/2012 order. 4

6 III. The Chancellor erred by placing David Vincent, a local pastor and director of an area ministry for the homeless under arrest on 06/26/13 for brand new attorney fees awarded that day without taking into account David Vincent's financial burdens or giving him anytime at all to pay the new attorney fees or an opportunity for a reasonable payment plan. {R. Page 12} IV. The Chancellor erred by dismissing both of David Vincent's "MOTIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION" {R. Page 14} that were finally heard on 09/25/2013 at the very end of the case and by awarding Joan Rickman and her attorney an additional $1000 for attorney fees. {R. Page 21} V. The Chancellor erred by awarding excessive attorney fees to Joan Rickman in the amount of $ on 09/04/12 {R. Page 001}, $ on 06/17/13 {R. Page 12} and $1000 on 09/20/13 {R. Page 21} for routine legal work. 5

7 STATEMENT OF THE CASE ANSWER TO RESPONSE The parties did agree to an additional attorney fees payment of $1500 for the necessity of filing the new petition for contempt. However, Appellee's attorney would not completely drop the case because he was stating in error that Appellant was still behind on child support. Appellee's Statement of Case even highlights the fact that "THE CASE WAS CONTINUED TO ALLOW THE APPELLANT TO BRING HIS PAYMENTS CURRENT". The case was then set for trial on June 1ih, 2013 because Appellee continued to state in error to Appellants attorney that Appellant was behind in child support. At the trial the Appellee's assertion was proven wrong and the Chancellor agreed that the Appellant was not in fact behind on child support. The Chancellor ruled that the Appellant was in fact up to date on his child support at that time. (R. Page 76 Line 28) Also at the hearing date, the balance of attorney fees that had been previously assessed was not past due. The Appellant had a payment of $ per month. The Chancellor allowed for that payment plan to stand and did not find that the Appellant was in contempt for late attorney fees. (R. Page 76 Line 16) The Chancellor found that the Appellant was in Contempt for a late child support payment back in September, This contempt was already covered in the previous agreement and the Appellant agreed to pay $1500 in attorney fees for this reason on November 14 th, The Chancellor erred by awarding an additional contempt finding and awarding $3, in additional attorney fees and ordering the Appellant be incarcerated until he pay all of the new attorney fees that day. 6

8 SUMMARY OF THE FACTS ANSWER TO RESPONSE Appellant does not work at Warriors Center located at 5422 Peach Trail in Southaven, Mississippi. Appellant works at Warriors Center, a Tennessee Non Profit Corporation & Charity for the Homeless located at 642 Semmes in Memphis, Tennessee. Appellant did still owe $ in attorney's fees in June 2013, however they were not past due. The Chancellor did not find that Appellant was past due on attorney fees at that time. (R. Page 76 Line 17) The Chancellor did not find the Appellant in contempt for this reason. The Chancellor even allowed the Appellant to continue paying the previous attorney fees at $ per month after the trial. Appellant did not pay for expensive trips while being late on child support. Appellant testified that his wife's family paid for a Disney World trip for a large family group. Appellant testified that he did not pay for a German Shepherd puppy at any time when he was late on child support. The dog had been purchased in March 2013 and there were no late payments of child support or attorney fees at any time near this event. (R. Page 46) Appellant testified that he was late on the September 2013 Child Support payment because he had some extra medical bills, he had received his Ministry Payroll Check a few weeks late and he was paying the children's partial colleges expenses, college apartment, and private school tuition. 7

9 The Appellee's attorney made tremendous errors on the Orders that he has filed and the Chancellor has allowed this even when they were in error. The accounting got so bad even the Appellee's attorney has a hard time being able to tell what was going on and whether the Appellant was caught up on child support or not. In the Appellee's Statement of The Facts, they actually make the statement on page 5 - "He got credit for the $1000 paid in November whether it was applied to attorney fees or child support." No wonder the Attorney for Appellee continued to assert that Appellant was behind on child support when he was not. They did not know what was going on and their accounting system was completely off. Appellee was proven to be in error at the June 2013 trial; however Attorney Rusty Harlow was able to use his influence with the Chancellor to get an additional award of attorney fees and incarceration for the Appellant. Appellant stated a falsehood by stating on Page 6 that "He was not current until the morning of the hearing." R. at p. 63. This is completely false and is proven wrong by the receipts that was produced by the Appellant at the trial. The Appellee was shown all the child support payment receipts on the stand and all were entered into evidence. (R. Pages 67-69) Even the Chancellor accepted the Child Support Receipts and found the Appellant to not be behind on child support. (R. Page 76) The Appellee attempted to testify that Appellant was behind on child support but this assertion was proven to be an error. Appellee made the assertion that she had not received any child support payments until the morning of the trial. This assertion was proven to be wrong by the May and June Child Support receipts that were entered into court record. (R. Pages 67-69) The Chancellor disagreed with the Appellee and found the Appellant was up to date on his child support. (R. Page 76) 8

10 SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT ANSWER TO RESPONSE 1. The Chancellor did err in dismissing the Appellants defense of unclean hands. The Chancellor did not properly consider the Appellants financial hardship and made an error by asserting from the bench that there was nothing in the order that stated the Appellee was ordered to produce an insurance card. 2. The Chancellor did err when he found Appellant in Contempt on June 26 th, The whole reason for the trial that day was because the Appellee was falsely asserting that Appellant was still behind on Child Support. That assertion was proven false. However the Chancellor still granted an additional $ in more attorney fees and gave the Appellant no time to pay. The Chancellor erred when ordering excessive attorney fees. When taking into account the first $1500 agreed on November 14, 2012 that brings the total to $ for one late child support payment. In addition, it is amazing how the attorney for the Appellee can drag the Appellant to trial falsely asserting that he is late on child support. Then when he was proved wrong, he can still get an additional award of $ and also use his influence to get the Appellant arrested with no time to pay the new attorney fees. In addition the Chancellor stated from the bench that the Appellant was not late on child support at the time of trial as was being asserted (R. Page 76) or that the Appellant was not late on attorney fees as asserted (R. Page 76). 9

11 3. The Chancellor erred by placing David Vincent, a local church pastor and director of a homeless charity under arrest on 06/26/13 for brand new attorney fees awarded without giving him anytime to payor an opportunity for a payment plan. The Chancellor's ruling was prejudicial and showed the negative influence of Attorney Rusty Harlow on the court. The Chancellor did not take into account the financial hardship the Appellant was under. (R. Pages 49-51) The Chancellor did not take into account the financial hardship that incarceration of the Appellant, until he paid the new attorney award of $ would cause. The Chancellor didn't consider the fact that the Appellant was already paying $ per month and was up to date on those attorney fee payments. The Chancellor did not consider that the Appellant only had two more payments left. The Chancellor erred by stating that he would not accept a payment in the amount of $ for the new attorney fees without taking into account the financial hardship placed on the Appellant. The Chancellor did not allow the Appellant to make suitable payment arrangements. The Appellant was not behind on previous attorney fee payments and the Chancellor erred by having the Appellant incarcerated until the brand new fees could be paid. 10

12 4. The Chancellor did err by dismissing both of David Vincent's "MOTIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION" that were finally heard on 09/25/2013 and awarding Joan Rickman and her attorney an additional $1000 for attorney fees. The Chancellor did not give Appellant proper time to state his argument and in addition, three bailiffs' surrounded the Appellant in intimidating fashion from behind when he was called to the stand. The Appellant was not attempting to disrespect the Chancellor by filing the "Motion for Reconsideration" and only desired his appeal rights as allowed by the law. The Appellant believes this showed the prejudicial treatment that the Appellee and her attorney Rusty Harlow were allowed in this court case. 5. The Chancellor did err by charging excessive attorney fees awarding Joan Rickman fees in the amount of $ on 09/04/12, $ on 06/17/13 and $1000 on 09/20/13. The Chancellor erred when he awarded these attorney's fees to Joan Rickman when she had the ability to pay. The Chancellor erred especially by awarding the additional $ on 06/17/13 even though Appellee was found to be wrong on the whole reason we were in court. The Chancellor awarded $ because he found that the Appellant had been late on the September 2012 Child Support Payment. However that late payment was covered by the agreement on 11/14/12 and the parties had agreed that Appellant would pay. After that point, the Appellee continued to assert wrongly that Appellant was still late on child support payments. That was the reason for the later trial on 06/17/13. Appellee was proven wrong by the evidence and the child support payment receipts. (R. Pages 78) 11

13 ARGUMENT ANSWER TO RESPONSE 1. The Chancellor did err in dismissing the Appellants defense of unclean hands. 2. The Chancellor did err when he found Appellant in Contempt again on June 26 th, After the Chancellor found the Appellant was not behind on child support or attorney fees as was being asserted by the Appellee there should have been no new contempt finding. In addition, the Chancellor erred by incarcerating the Appellant and denying a reasonable payment plan. 3. The Chancellor erred by placing David Vincent, a local pastor and director of a homeless charity under arrest on 06/26/13 for brand new attorney fees awarded without giving him a reasonable payment plan. The Appellant was willing to pay the court ordered attorney fees as evidenced by the fact that he was up to date on the previous fees of $ per month. The Appellant stated to the Chancellor that he was in a financial hardship and could not pay more. The Appellant stated to the Chancellor in testimony that day that if the Chancellor continued to add fees without giving him proper time to pay then he would be breaking his back. The Chancellor erred by deciding to give the Appellant no time to pay at all and ordered him incarcerated. (R. Pages 49-51) In addition, the Chancellor ordered both attorney's to take a few minutes to have a side bar to see if they could agree on a monthly amount. 12

14 During the meeting, Appellee Attorney Rusty Harlow would not even discuss any amount he would accept. He stated "The judge already knows what he is about to do so there is no reason to discuss this". Immediately thereafter, The Appellant was ordered by the Chancellor to be incarcerated. The Appellant believes that the facts show unfair treatment by the Chancellor and prove that the decision on what would be done that day was in fact already decided beforehand. The Appellant believes that this is a gross miscarriage of justice and should not be allowed to stand. 4. The Chancellor did err by dismissing both of David Vincent's "MOTIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION" that were finally heard on 09/25/13. The Chancellor did not properly here the facts on previous court dates and did not properly hear the facts on 09/25/ The Chancellor did err by awarding excessive attorney fees for the Appellee. The Appellant believes that the facts show that the fees were excessive and were part of a system unjustly used by Rusty Harlow, the attorney of the Appellee to financially benefit him. 13

15 CONCLUSION Appellant David Vincent has sought relief from this court after representing himself against a Petition for Contempt in Chancery court in Desoto County. David Vincent has suffered from unfair actions and the accounting mistakes of Attorney Rusty Harlow which continue to benefit him financially. Many rulings were made that were biased and erroneous. David Vincent has been assessed $ in attorney fees and has been the victim of unfair legal harassment and contempt filings. The rules of law and civil procedure, as well as case law, support the setting aside of the judgment of the chancery court and an entry of an order for a full hearing on the merits. Only then will justice be served for both of these parties. Appellant request that the Appellee be taxed with all of the cost for her own legal counsel. liy Submitted, David H. Vincent Pro Se David H. Vincent 5422 Peach Trail Dr. Southaven, MS

16 ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED APPELLANT, David Vincent request oral arguments to be heard in his case in order to aid the court in a thorough understanding and resolution of the ultimate issues. 15

17 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, David H. Vincent, Pro Se, do herby certify that I have personally hand delivered to the Supreme Court of Mississippi, 450 High Street, Jackson, MS and a first class mail, postage prepaid to Rusty Harlow, Attorney, 1360 Sunset Drive Suite 360, Grenada, MS and Honorable Percy L. Lynchard, Jr., Chancellor, P.o. Box 340, Hernando, MS a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing APPELLANT'S BREIF. so CERTIFIED, this the 22 nd day of August, David H. Vincent Pro Se 16

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI WILLIAM M. MILEY, JR.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI WILLIAM M. MILEY, JR. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI RITA FAYE MILEY VERSES WILLIAM M. MILEY, JR. APPELLANT CASE NO. 2008-TS-00677 APPELLEE BRIEF OF APPELLEE WILLIAM

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT, STEVE RUTH

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT, STEVE RUTH IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI STEVE RUTH VS. LONDON SUZETTE BURCHFIELD APPELLANT NO. 2007-CA-02066 APPELLEE REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT, STEVE RUTH APPEAL

More information

E-Filed Document Apr :32: TS Pages: 10 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI REGINA DIANE WEATHERS

E-Filed Document Apr :32: TS Pages: 10 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI REGINA DIANE WEATHERS E-Filed Document Apr 8 2014 10:32:44 2013-TS-01366 Pages: 10 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI REGINA DIANE WEATHERS APPELLANT V. NO. 2013-TS-01366 SCOTTY WADE GUIN APPELLEE BRIEF OF APPELLANT REGINA

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI FILED JUL OFFICE OF THE CLERK SUPREME COURT COURT OF APPEALS. BRIEF FOR Appellant BY:

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI FILED JUL OFFICE OF THE CLERK SUPREME COURT COURT OF APPEALS. BRIEF FOR Appellant BY: IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI No. 2013-CP-02023-COA COURTNEY ELKINS, vs. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI FILED JUL 2 2 2015 OFFICE OF THE CLERK SUPREME COURT COURT OF APPEALS Appellant APPELLEE

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO CA APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ATTALA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO CA APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ATTALA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI E-Filed Document Jun 30 2016 11:18:49 2015-CA-01772 Pages: 11 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BROOKS V. MONAGHAN VERSUS ROBERT AUTRY APPELLANT CAUSE NO. 2015-CA-01772 APPELLEE APPEAL

More information

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA. Present: Chief Judge Moon, Judges Benton and Elder Argued at Richmond, Virginia

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA. Present: Chief Judge Moon, Judges Benton and Elder Argued at Richmond, Virginia COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Chief Judge Moon, Judges Benton and Elder Argued at Richmond, Virginia SHARONE DENI BOISSEAU MEMORANDUM OPINION * v. Record No. 2407-95-2 PER CURIAM OCTOBER 22, 1996

More information

SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2008-TS-01454

SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2008-TS-01454 SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2008-TS-01454 DORIS A. ANDRES APPELLANT VERSUS PATRICK T. ANDRES APPELLEE APPEAL FROM THE CHANCERY COURT FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No.12 0338 Filed December 20, 2013 IOWA MORTGAGE CENTER, L.L.C., Appellant, vs. LANA BACCAM and PHOUTHONE SYLAVONG, Appellees. On review from the Iowa Court of Appeals. Appeal

More information

ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED. IN TIIE SUPREME COURT OF TIlE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CA DAVID H. DOYLE APPELLANT. Vs.

ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED. IN TIIE SUPREME COURT OF TIlE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CA DAVID H. DOYLE APPELLANT. Vs. ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED CC~py IN TIIE SUPREME COURT OF TIlE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2007-CA-01925 DAVID H. DOYLE APPELLANT Vs. KAREN P. DOYLE APPELLEE ON APPEAL FROM TIlE CHANCERY COURT OF DESOTO

More information

BRIEF OF APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE DECISION OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MADISON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI

BRIEF OF APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE DECISION OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MADISON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI No.2010-KM-01250-SCT WILLIAM BILBO APPELLANT v. CITY OF RIDGELAND APPELLEE BRIEF OF APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE DECISION OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MADISON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI

More information

By:!J.~ PILED. MOTIONt OCT 1 g 2016 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA APPELLANT WALTERPOOLE,JR.

By:!J.~ PILED. MOTIONt OCT 1 g 2016 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA APPELLANT WALTERPOOLE,JR. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2015-CP-00604-COA WALTERPOOLE,JR. v. WILLIAM WALTON PILED OCT 1 g 2016 OFFICE OF THE CLERK.SUPAEMECOUAT COURT OF APPEALS APPELLANT APPELLEE MOTION

More information

v. CAUSE NUMBER: 2010-TS-00020

v. CAUSE NUMBER: 2010-TS-00020 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CHARITY HOHM-WHALEY PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT v. CAUSE NUMBER: 2010-TS-00020 FREDDIE PARSON DBA PARSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY DEFENDANT-APPELLEE

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE WESTERN SECTION AT JACKSON

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE WESTERN SECTION AT JACKSON IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE WESTERN SECTION AT JACKSON SUSAN KAY MALIK, Plaintiff/Appellee, Shelby Chancery No. 21988-1 R.D. VS. Appeal No. 02A01-9604-CH-00070 KAFAIT U. MALIK, Defendant/Appellant.

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI FILED MAY Of nee of the Clerk Suprorne Court Court of Appalll..

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI FILED MAY Of nee of the Clerk Suprorne Court Court of Appalll.. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI (\) DOUGLAS MILLER FILED APPELLANT VS. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MAY 2 1 2010 Of nee of the Clerk Suprorne Court Court of Appalll.. NO.2009-CP-1907-COA APPELLEE

More information

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT E-Filed Document Apr 6 2016 17:00:41 2015-KA-01300-COA Pages: 11 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI KUREN CORDELL KEYS APPELLANT V. NO. 2015-KA-01300-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI SMITH COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT APPELLANT VS. CAUSE NO. 2008-CA-00830 LARRY CAMPBELL APPELLEE BRIEF OF APPELLANT APPEAL OF THE FINAL JUDGMENT OF THE SMITH COUNTY CHANCERY

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2011-CA-01274

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2011-CA-01274 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2011-CA-01274 COMMONWEALTH BRANDS, INC., THE CORR-WILLIAMS COMPANY AND VICKSBURG SPECIALTY COMPANY APPELLANTS vs. J. ED MORGAN, COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE OF THE DEPARTMENT

More information

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT E-Filed Document Apr 7 2017 15:21:24 2016-KA-01555-SCT Pages: 10 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI GARRETT EUGENE RAY APPELLANT V. NO. 2016-KA-01555-SCT STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) [Cite as McIntyre v. McIntyre, 2005-Ohio-6940.] STATE OF OHIO, COLUMBIANA COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT JANE M. MCINTYRE N.K.A. JANE M. YOAKUM, VS. PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, ROBERT R. MCINTYRE,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CA COA MICHAEL CHADWICK SMITH, APPELLANT KIMBERLY MARIE MULL, APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CA COA MICHAEL CHADWICK SMITH, APPELLANT KIMBERLY MARIE MULL, APPELLEE E-Filed Document Apr 17 2017 16:56:22 2016-CA-00524-COA Pages: 9 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2016-CA-00524-COA MICHAEL CHADWICK SMITH, APPELLANT v. KIMBERLY MARIE MULL,

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLEE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLEE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI TERESA DARLENE JONES APPELLANT VERSUS NO.2009-TS-Ol131 GEORGE HERBERT MAYO, ill APPELLEE BRIEF OF APPELLEE Robert R. Marshall MSB_ Attorney for Appellee

More information

RAY CULLENS IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLANT NO KA-0854-COA APPELLEE BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

RAY CULLENS IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLANT NO KA-0854-COA APPELLEE BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI RAY CULLENS APPELLANT NO. 2007-KA-0854-COA APPELLEE BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT W. Daniel Hinchcliff, MS Bar NO.. 301 North Lamar Street, Suite 210 Jackson,

More information

COURT OF APPEALS GUERNSEY COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

COURT OF APPEALS GUERNSEY COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT [Cite as State v. Glenn, 2009-Ohio-375.] COURT OF APPEALS GUERNSEY COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO JUDGES Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P.J. Plaintiff-Appellee Hon. John W. Wise, J. Hon. Patricia

More information

APPELLANT S RESPONSE TO APPELLEE S MOTION FOR REHEARING

APPELLANT S RESPONSE TO APPELLEE S MOTION FOR REHEARING E-Filed Document May 16 2017 15:18:32 2016-IA-00571-SCT Pages: 6 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI FAWAZ ABDRABBO, MD. APPELLANT VS. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2016-IA-00571-SCT AUDRAY (ANDRES) JOHNSON (PRO SE)

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ELLIS TURNAGE APPELLANT V. NO CA COA ELLIS CHRISTOPHER BROOKS, ET. AL.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ELLIS TURNAGE APPELLANT V. NO CA COA ELLIS CHRISTOPHER BROOKS, ET. AL. E-Filed Document Sep 6 2016 16:10:23 2014-CA-00966-COA Pages: 16 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ELLIS TURNAGE APPELLANT V. NO. 2014-CA-00966-COA ELLIS CHRISTOPHER BROOKS, ET. AL. APPELLEES

More information

THOMAS P. DORE, ET AL., SUBSTITUTE TRUSTEES. Wright, Arthur, Salmon, James P. (Retired, Specially Assigned),

THOMAS P. DORE, ET AL., SUBSTITUTE TRUSTEES. Wright, Arthur, Salmon, James P. (Retired, Specially Assigned), UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 0230 September Term, 2015 MARVIN A. VAN DEN HEUVEL, ET AL. v. THOMAS P. DORE, ET AL., SUBSTITUTE TRUSTEES Wright, Arthur, Salmon, James P. (Retired,

More information

Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County Case No. C-02-CR UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, 2017

Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County Case No. C-02-CR UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, 2017 Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County Case No. C-02-CR-16-002416 UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 772 September Term, 2017 TIMOTHY LEE STYLES, SR. v. STATE OF MARYLAND Woodward

More information

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT E-Filed Document Mar 20 2017 11:34:46 2016-KA-01101-COA Pages: 9 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BENJAMIN MCCADNEY APPELLANT V. NO. 2016-KA-01101-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

NO CA-1441 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI PATRICIA RUSH APPELLANT R R&D & D PROPERTIES, LLC APPELLEE BRIEF OF APPELLEES

NO CA-1441 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI PATRICIA RUSH APPELLANT R R&D & D PROPERTIES, LLC APPELLEE BRIEF OF APPELLEES E-Filed Document May 31 2018 14:44:32 2017-CA-01441 Pages: 18 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI PATRICIA RUSH APPELLANT v. V. NO. 2017-CA-1441 R R&D & D PROPERTIES, LLC APPELLEE BRIEF OF APPELLEES R.

More information

IN THE MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS 2014-CA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MOTION FOR REHEARING

IN THE MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS 2014-CA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MOTION FOR REHEARING E-Filed Document Jul 12 2016 17:16:49 2014-CA-01654-COA Pages: 5 IN THE MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS 2014-CA-01654-COA DAVID SHANKLIN Appellant v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI Appellee MOTION FOR REHEARING Appellant

More information

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR 09-318 Opinion Delivered March 17, 2011 LARRY DONNELL REED Appellant v. STATE OF ARKANSAS Appellee PRO SE APPEAL FROM PULASKI COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, CR 2006-1776, HON. BARRY

More information

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION III No. CV-13-457 KENT SMITH, D.V.M., Individually and d/b/a PERRY VET SERVICES APPELLANT V. KIMBERLY V. FREEMAN and ARMISTEAD COUNCIL FREEMAN, JR. APPELLEES Opinion

More information

UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, 2015 SABIR A. RAHMAN. JACOB GEESING et al.

UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, 2015 SABIR A. RAHMAN. JACOB GEESING et al. UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 2217 September Term, 2015 SABIR A. RAHMAN v. JACOB GEESING et al. Nazarian, Beachley, Davis, Arrie W. (Senior Judge, Specially Assigned), JJ.

More information

101 Central Plaza South, Ste. 600 Tzangas, Plakas, Mannos, & Raies

101 Central Plaza South, Ste. 600 Tzangas, Plakas, Mannos, & Raies [Cite as Kemp v. Kemp, 2011-Ohio-177.] COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JEANNE KEMP, NKA GAGE Plaintiff-Appellee -vs- MICHAEL KEMP Defendant-Appellant JUDGES Hon. Julie A. Edwards,

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI 2013 CA STRIBLING INVESTMENTS, LLC. Appellant VS. MIKE ROZIER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI 2013 CA STRIBLING INVESTMENTS, LLC. Appellant VS. MIKE ROZIER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. E-Filed Document Mar 22 2016 12:26:29 2013-CA-02145-SCT Pages: 8 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI 2013 CA 02145 STRIBLING INVESTMENTS, LLC Appellant VS. MIKE ROZIER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. Appellee

More information

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT **********

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT ********** NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 06-864 KIM MARIE MIER VERSUS RUSTON J. BOURQUE ********** APPEAL FROM THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF VERMILION,

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No EDA 2012

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No EDA 2012 J-S70010-13 NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. RICHARD JARMON Appellant No. 3275 EDA 2012 Appeal

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON June 16, 2010 Session

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON June 16, 2010 Session IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON June 16, 2010 Session STEVEN ANDERSON v. ROY W. HENDRIX, JR. Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Shelby County No. CH-07-1317 Kenny W. Armstrong, Chancellor

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA In Re: Petition of the Venango County : Tax Claim Bureau for Judicial : Sale of Lands Free and Clear : of all Taxes and Municipal Claims, : Mortgages, Liens, Charges

More information

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT E-Filed Document Mar 2 2016 17:00:55 2015-KA-00934-COA Pages: 11 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JASON BOZEMAN APPELLANT V. NO. 2015-KA-00934-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs March 22, 2005

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs March 22, 2005 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs March 22, 2005 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. EARL D. MILLS - July 5, 2005 Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No.78215

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. WILLIAM ERIC WEBB Appellant No. 540 EDA 2016 Appeal from the PCRA Order

More information

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT E-Filed Document Mar 17 2014 15:39:22 2013-KM-01881-COA Pages: 10 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI STACY L. MILLER APPELLANT v. NO.2013-KM-01881-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. KEVIN PLANKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DAYNA KOTT, Defendant-Respondent. Submitted

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No. 482 MDA 2013

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No. 482 MDA 2013 NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. TERRY SIMONTON, JR., Appellant No. 482 MDA 2013 Appeal from the

More information

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. 09-386 DESOTO GATHERING COMPANY, LLC, APPELLANT, VS. JANICE SMALLWOOD, APPELLEE, Opinion Delivered JANUARY 14, 2010 APPEAL FROM THE WHITE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, NO. CV-2008-165,

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI KGC PROPERTIES, INC. v. TRIANGLE MAINTENANCE SERVICES, LLC APPELLANT T CAUSE NO. 2011-TS-000717 APPELLEE CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS The undersigned

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. IRA NEAL GOLDBERG Appellant No. 732 MDA 2014 Appeal from the PCRA

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS VS. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS VS. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee NO. PD-0712-15 PD-0712-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 7/8/2015 1:19:53 PM Accepted 7/9/2015 4:28:04 PM ABEL ACOSTA CLERK IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS DYLAN JEZREEL

More information

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT E-Filed Document Jul 30 2015 11:00:44 2015-KA-00218-COA Pages: 11 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JOE M. GILLESPIE APPELLANT V. NO. 2015-KA-00218-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF HARRISON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT, CAUSE NO.: A

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF HARRISON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT, CAUSE NO.: A IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2009-CA-Ol723 BERTHA MADISON APPELLANT VERSUS GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY APPELLEE APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT

More information

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Petitioner Z Financial, LLC, appeals both the trial court s granting of equitable

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Petitioner Z Financial, LLC, appeals both the trial court s granting of equitable FOURTH DIVISION April 30, 2009 No. 1-08-1445 In re THE APPLICATION OF THE COUNTY TREASURER AND Ex Officio COUNTY COLLECTOR OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS, FOR JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF SALE AGAINST REAL ESTATE RETURNED

More information

REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT

REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT E-Filed Document Jul 15 2016 15:58:17 2015-CA-01280-COA Pages: 10 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI KAPPI SAGET JEFFERS VS. KORRI SAGET APPELLANT CAUSE NO. 2015-CA-1280 APPELLEE REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT

More information

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT E-Filed Document Dec 15 2015 20:56:41 2014-KA-00539-COA Pages: 12 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRYMON A. HAMP VS. APPELLANT 2014-KA-00539-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

ANTHONY J. RUSSO NO CA-0952 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL LIONEL BURNS, JR., AND THE HONORABLE ARTHUR A. MORRELL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA

ANTHONY J. RUSSO NO CA-0952 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL LIONEL BURNS, JR., AND THE HONORABLE ARTHUR A. MORRELL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ANTHONY J. RUSSO VERSUS LIONEL BURNS, JR., AND THE HONORABLE ARTHUR A. MORRELL * * * * * * * * * * * NO. 2014-CA-0952 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA APPEAL FROM CIVIL DISTRICT COURT,

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE V. NO CA HOTEL AND RESTAURANT SUPPLY MOTION FOR REHEARING

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE V. NO CA HOTEL AND RESTAURANT SUPPLY MOTION FOR REHEARING E-Filed Document Mar 24 2016 16:43:53 2014-CA-01685-SCT Pages: 6 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE APPELLANT V. NO. 2014-CA-01685 HOTEL AND RESTAURANT SUPPLY APPELLEE

More information

Circuit Court for Prince George s County Case No. CAD UNREPORTED

Circuit Court for Prince George s County Case No. CAD UNREPORTED Circuit Court for Prince George s County Case No. CAD16-38895 UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 2259 September Term, 2017 JEAN MEUS SR. v. LATASHA MEUS Reed, Friedman, Alpert,

More information

Circuit Court for Frederick County Case No.: 10-C IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS

Circuit Court for Frederick County Case No.: 10-C IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS Circuit Court for Frederick County Case No.: 10-C-01-000768 UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 00047 September Term, 2017 WILLIAM BENNISON v. DEBBIE BENNISON Leahy, Reed, Shaw Geter,

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA John H. Morley, Jr., : Appellant : : v. : No. 3056 C.D. 2002 : Submitted: January 2, 2004 City of Philadelphia : Licenses & Inspections Unit, : Philadelphia Police

More information

COURT OF APPEALS MUSKINGUM COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

COURT OF APPEALS MUSKINGUM COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT [Cite as State v. Deavers, 2007-Ohio-5464.] COURT OF APPEALS MUSKINGUM COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO -vs- Plaintiff-Appellee LANCE EDWARDS DEAVERS, AKA, TONY CARDELLO Defendant-Appellant

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CA CITY OF JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI APPELLANT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CA CITY OF JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI APPELLANT E-Filed Document Feb 22 2016 15:38:11 2015-CA-00890 Pages: 8 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2015-CA-00890 CITY OF JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI APPELLANT VS WILLIE B. JORDAN APPELLEE

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No WDA 2014

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No WDA 2014 NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 HELEN LEWANDOWSKI AND ROBERT A. LEWANDOWSKI, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF DECEASED HELEN LEWANDOWSKI, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT

More information

Court judgment that denied a petition for postconviction relief. filed by Kavin Lee Peeples, defendant below and appellant herein.

Court judgment that denied a petition for postconviction relief. filed by Kavin Lee Peeples, defendant below and appellant herein. [Cite as State v. Peeples, 2006-Ohio-218.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PICKAWAY COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : Case No. 05CA25 vs. : KAVIN LEE PEEPLES, : DECISION

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ERIE COUNTY. Trial Court No. CVI Appellant Decided: April 23, 2010 * * * * *

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ERIE COUNTY. Trial Court No. CVI Appellant Decided: April 23, 2010 * * * * * [Cite as Jackson v. Big O's Ltd., 2010-Ohio-1779.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ERIE COUNTY Clint Jackson dba Marvalous Eastwoodtainment Appellee Court of Appeals No. E-09-043

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE APRIL 4, 2002 Session

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE APRIL 4, 2002 Session IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE APRIL 4, 2002 Session TIMOTHY J. MIELE and wife, LINDA S. MIELE, Individually, and d/b/a MIELE HOMES v. ZURICH U.S. Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court

More information

This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014).

This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15-0224 State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. A. D.

More information

Krauser, C.J., Berger, Reed,

Krauser, C.J., Berger, Reed, UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 1634 September Term, 2014 TERENCE CRAWLEY v. STATE OF MARYLAND Krauser, C.J., Berger, Reed, JJ. Opinion by Reed, J. Filed: February 6, 2017 *This

More information

No CR No CR. FREDDY GONZALEZ, Appellant. vs. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee APPELLANT S BRIEF

No CR No CR. FREDDY GONZALEZ, Appellant. vs. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee APPELLANT S BRIEF No. 05-12-00071-CR No. 05-12-00072-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS, TEXAS 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 06/27/2012 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk FREDDY GONZALEZ, Appellant vs.

More information

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT E-Filed Document May 17 2016 22:41:51 2015-KA-01778-COA Pages: 14 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI LONNIE JORDAN APPELLANT V. NO. 2015-KA-01778-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 12, 2014 Session

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 12, 2014 Session IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 12, 2014 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CHARLES GODSPOWER Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Rutherford County No. F-67377 David Bragg,

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No. 389 WDA 2012

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No. 389 WDA 2012 NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. MARSHA SCAGGS Appellant No. 389 WDA 2012 Appeal from the Order

More information

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT Docket No. 2009-0307 In the Matter of Donna Malisos and Gregory Malisos Appeal From Order of the Derry Family Division BRIEF OF APPELLANT Gregory Malisos Jeanmarie

More information

No. 1D On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. Jan Shackelford, Judge. July 9, 2018

No. 1D On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. Jan Shackelford, Judge. July 9, 2018 FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA No. 1D17-711 FELICE JOHN VEACH, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. Jan Shackelford, Judge. July

More information

REPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, 1996 ROBERT EUGENE CASE STATE OF MARYLAND

REPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, 1996 ROBERT EUGENE CASE STATE OF MARYLAND REPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 1547 September Term, 1996 ROBERT EUGENE CASE v. STATE OF MARYLAND Murphy, C.J. Kenney, Byrnes, JJ. Opinion by Murphy, C.J. Filed: November 26, 1997

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI JACKSON COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI JACKSON COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI JACKSON COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS VERSUS MISSISSIPPI EMPLOYMENT SECURITY COMMISSION and JUNE SEAMAN APPELLANT CAUSE NO. 2011-CC-00648 APPELLEES APPEALED FROM THE CIRCUIT

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT [Cite as State v. Knowles, 2011-Ohio-4477.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : v. : No. 10AP-119 (C.P.C. No. 04CR-07-4891) Alawwal A. Knowles,

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 MARY BUSH Appellant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA THOMAS LAWRENCE v. Appellee No. 1713 EDA 2018 Appeal from the Order Entered April 26,

More information

CAUSE NOS CR and CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS, TEXAS

CAUSE NOS CR and CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS, TEXAS CAUSE NOS. 05-11-01408-CR and 05-11-01409-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS, TEXAS 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 02/07/2012 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk DANIEL LEE MORLEY

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI APPEAL NO CC PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MISSISSIPPI (PERS) BRIEF OF THE APPELLEE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI APPEAL NO CC PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MISSISSIPPI (PERS) BRIEF OF THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Mar 11 2014 13:27:21 2013-CC-01179 Pages: 24 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI KAYLA VAUGHN VERSUS PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MISSISSIPPI (PERS) APPELLANT APPEAL NO. 2013-CC-01179

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT WILLIAMS COUNTY. Court of Appeals No. WM Appellee Trial Court No.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT WILLIAMS COUNTY. Court of Appeals No. WM Appellee Trial Court No. [Cite as State v. Treesh, 2008-Ohio-5630.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT WILLIAMS COUNTY State of Ohio Court of Appeals No. WM-08-006 Appellee Trial Court No. 06 CR 141 v. James

More information

In re the Marriage of: CYNTHIA JEAN VAN LEEUWEN, Petitioner/Appellant, RICHARD ALLEN VAN LEEUWEN, Respondent/Appellee. No.

In re the Marriage of: CYNTHIA JEAN VAN LEEUWEN, Petitioner/Appellant, RICHARD ALLEN VAN LEEUWEN, Respondent/Appellee. No. NOTICE: NOT FOR PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION DOES NOT CREATE LEGAL PRECEDENT AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED. IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION

More information

Judgment Rendered October

Judgment Rendered October NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NUMBER 2008 CA 0450 IN THE MATIER OF THE MASHBURN MARITAL TRUSTS CONSOLIDATED WITH NUMBER 2008 CA 0451 IN THE MATTER OF THE

More information

RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR REHEARING FILED ON BEHALF OF HOWARD INDUSTRIES, INC.

RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR REHEARING FILED ON BEHALF OF HOWARD INDUSTRIES, INC. E-Filed Document Jul 8 2016 15:25:45 2014-CA-01790-COA Pages: 18 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI VINCE HARDAWAY VS. HOWARD INDUSTRIES, INC. and CORVEL ENTERPRISE COMP. INC. f/k/a SAFETY

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CA COA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CA COA E-Filed Document Jul 18 2017 16:12:13 2014-CT-01828-SCT Pages: 7 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2014-CA-01828-COA APPELLANT VS. CASE NO. 2014-CA-01828-COA BAPTIST HEALTH PLEX, BECKY VRIELAND

More information

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Willis, Annunziata and Bumgardner Argued at Alexandria, Virginia SAMMY D. SULEIMAN OPINION BY v. Record No. 3130-96-4 JUDGE ROSEMARIE ANNUNZIATA FEBRUARY 3,

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA-01555

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA-01555 E-Filed Document Aug 4 2016 17:24:06 2015-CA-01555-SCT Pages: 14 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI THE FORMER BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND MEMBERS OF MISSISSIPPI COMP CHOICE SELF-INSURERS FUND

More information

Circuit Court for Cecil County Case No. 07-K UNREPORTED

Circuit Court for Cecil County Case No. 07-K UNREPORTED Circuit Court for Cecil County Case No. 07-K-07-000161 UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 2115 September Term, 2017 DANIEL IAN FIELDS v. STATE OF MARYLAND Leahy, Shaw Geter, Thieme,

More information

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF SCOTT COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLANT

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF SCOTT COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLANT IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI SHERRY SCALES APPELLANT VS. LACKEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL APPELLEE APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF SCOTT COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLANT Michael P. Younger

More information

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT ROBERT CORNA : : JOURNAL ENTRY. For Plaintiff-Appellant: : and -vs- : : OPINION PATRICIA CORNA :

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT ROBERT CORNA : : JOURNAL ENTRY. For Plaintiff-Appellant: : and -vs- : : OPINION PATRICIA CORNA : [Cite as Corna v. Corna, 2001-Ohio-4223.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA NO. 77111 ROBERT CORNA : : JOURNAL ENTRY Plaintiff-Appellant : : and -vs- : : OPINION PATRICIA CORNA

More information

[Cite as Ohio Crime Victims Reparations Fund v. Dalton, 152 Ohio App.3d 618, 2003-Ohio-2313.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

[Cite as Ohio Crime Victims Reparations Fund v. Dalton, 152 Ohio App.3d 618, 2003-Ohio-2313.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT [Cite as Ohio Crime Victims Reparations Fund v. Dalton, 152 Ohio App.3d 618, 2003-Ohio-2313.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO CRIME VICTIMS REPARATIONS FUND, APPELLEE,

More information

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA JOHN D. DUDLEY, Petitioner, CASE NO.: SC 07-1747 vs. DCA CASE NO.: 5D06-3821 ELLEN F. SCHMIDT, Respondent. / PETITIONER S AMENDED JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF Richard J. D

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT. Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 11AP-266 v. : (C.P.C. No. 05CR )

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT. Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 11AP-266 v. : (C.P.C. No. 05CR ) [Cite as State v. Smiley, 2012-Ohio-4126.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 11AP-266 v. : (C.P.C. No. 05CR-01-436) John W. Smiley, : (REGULAR

More information

COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT [Cite as State v. DeSantis, 2004-Ohio-4607.] COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO JUDGES Sheila G. Farmer, P.J. Plaintiff-Appellee John W. Wise, J. Julie A. Edwards,

More information

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Court of Appeals of Ohio [Cite as State v. Nixon, 2007-Ohio-160.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 87847 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. LAKISHA NIXON DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

More information

BRIEF OF APPELLANT IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CA LESLIE DAYLE VOULTERS

BRIEF OF APPELLANT IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CA LESLIE DAYLE VOULTERS E-Filed Document Dec 19 2014 13:19:57 2014-CA-00745 Pages: 22 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI LEE VOULTERS VS. LESLIE DAYLE VOULTERS APPELLANT CASE NO. 2014-CA-00745 APPELLEE APPEAL FROM

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT SCIOTO COUNTY BRIEF OF APPELLANT C.D.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT SCIOTO COUNTY BRIEF OF APPELLANT C.D. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT SCIOTO COUNTY A.B., Inc., : Case No. Plaintiff-Appellee, : v. : On Appeal from the Scioto County Court of C.D., : Common Pleas, Case No. Defendant-Appellant.

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2015-WC COA MWCC # K-9582

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2015-WC COA MWCC # K-9582 E-Filed Document Oct 12 2015 16:24:06 2015-WC-00946-COA Pages: 21 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2015-WC-00946-COA MWCC # 1111471-K-9582 CYNTHIA JOHNSON APPELLANT VS CITY OF JACKSON

More information

REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT

REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT E-Filed Document Nov 15 2016 08:38:58 2016-CA-00310 Pages: 13 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI Case No. 2016-CA-00310 JOHN CALVIN HOWARD APPELLANT VS. ROLIN ENTERPRISES, LLC, LINDA WALKER, INDIVIDUALLY,

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No. 44 MDA 2013

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P Appellant No. 44 MDA 2013 NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. WAYNE EUGENE EBERSOLE, JR., Appellant No. 44 MDA 2013 Appeal

More information