TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING AGENDA March 16, 2017

Transcription

1 North Berkeley Senior Center TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING AGENDA March 16, 2017 Public Works Transportation Division 1947 Center Street, 4 th Floor, Berkeley, CA Tel: TDD: Fax: Thursday MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM March 16, Hearst Ave. (at MLK) 7:00 PM Berkeley, CA A. PRELIMINARY BUSINESS 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Public Comment on items not on the Agenda 4. Approval of Draft Action Minutes of February 16, 2017** 5. Approval and Order of Agenda 6. Update on Administration/Staff 7. Announcements B. DISCUSSION/ACTION ITEMS * Written material included in packet ** Written material to be delivered at meeting *** Written material previously mailed The public may speak at the beginning of any item. 1. Bicycle Plan** Update on and discussion of public comments, transit issues; Discussion and possible action: Proposed edits to Bike Plan for Council consideration; advise Commissioner Gerhardstein if there are additional recommendations to Council at March 28 meeting. Secretary Javandel 2. MLK / The Alameda Safe Routes to School Installations* Update on refinements to be included with paving of The Alameda in Summer Secretary Javandel 3. Sidewalk Maintenance Program Policies Pedestrian Subcommittee Report Bruzzone, Ghosh, Thomas 4. Adopt Commission Work Plan 2017* Review draft Work Plan; Discussion and action Chair Thomas Project Delivery Recommendations Project Delivery Subcommittee Report Discussion and possible recommendation: Strategies for Transportation Division budget and project delivery Bruzzone, Gerhardstein, Parolek 6. Subcommittee Assignments* Chair Thomas 7. Ashby/Hwy 13 Corridor Projects Verbal Update (Javandel) 8. T-1 Infrastructure Bond - Update Secretary Javandel C. INFORMATION ITEMS AND SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS Information items can be moved to Discussion or Action by majority vote of the TC.

2 Transportation Commission Agenda Thursday, March 16, Subcommittee Reports (Verbal reports from Bicycle, Pedestrian, T-1 Criteria, and Project Delivery Subcommittees, and Liaisons to PWC, COD, and goberkeley Advisory Group) 2. Council Summary Actions 2016* 3. Link to Council and Agenda Committee Agendas and Minutes 4. Link to T-1 Infrastructure Bond Public Meetings notice: 02_Parks,_Streets,_Buildings workshops_prioritizing_improvements_and_repairs.aspx D. COMMUNICATIONS Received at 2/16/17 meeting and posted in web packet: Transportation_Commission_Homepage.aspx : 1. Shattuck-Adeline- Bay Bridge Greenway/ Key Line Corridor Proposal 2. 5/19/2016 TC Work Plan 3. The Alameda and Hopkins Safe Routes to School- signage, striping, and truck turn layouts 4. 2/16/17 Transportation Division Projects status list E. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Ashby/Hwy 13 Corridor Projects (qtrly) Pedestrian Plan Update F. ADJOURNMENT Agenda Posted: March 9, 2017 A complete agenda packet is available for public review at the Main Branch Library and at the Transportation Division front desk. ADA Disclaimer This meeting is being held in a wheelchair accessible location. To request a disability-related accommodation(s) to participate in the meeting, including auxiliary aids or services, please contact the Disability Services specialist at (V) or (TDD) at least three business days before the meeting date. Please refrain from wearing scented products to this meeting. Communications Disclaimer Communications to Berkeley boards, commissions or committees are public record and will become part of the City s electronic records, which are accessible through the City s website. Please note: addresses, names, addresses, and other contact information are not required, but if included in any communication to a City board, commission or committee, will become part of the public record. If you do not want your address or any other contact information to be made public, you may deliver communications via U.S. Postal Service or in person to the secretary of the relevant board, commission or committee. If you do not want your contact information included in the public record, please do not include that information in your communication. Please contact the secretary to the relevant board, commission or committee for further information. Commission Secretary: Farid Javandel, Transportation Division Manager, 1947 Center St., 4th Floor, Berkeley, CA, 94704, Telephone (510) , Fax: (510) TDD: (510) Fjavandel@ci.berkeley.ca.us 2

3 B2 Department of Public Works Transportation Division MEMORANDUM Date: 3/9/17 To: From: Subject: Transportation Commission Farid Javandel, Transportation Division Manager Hopkins/The Alameda Protected Intersection Status Update In late 2016, the City of Berkeley Department of Public Works installed the first-ever Protected Intersection in the San Francisco Bay Area, at the intersection of Hopkins Street and The Alameda, with the goal of improving safety for people walking, biking, riding transit, and driving. The intersection improvements were funded with a Safe Routes to School grant from the State of California with the specific purpose of improving school access safety for nearby Martin Luther King, Jr. Middle School. The Protected Intersection configuration was chosen because of underground utility conflicts which made it infeasible to construct the corner bulbouts originally envisioned by Berkeley Pedestrian Master Plan High Priority Project #19, the basis for the SR2S grant. The intersection is located immediately above the Wildcat Aqueduct and other utilities which would be cost-prohibitive to relocate. Following installation of the intersection, the Transportation Division of Public Works has continued to conduct field observations to monitor the operations of the new intersection. Transportation has also received feedback from the public about operational, safety, and aesthetic concerns about the new design. In response to field observations and concerns of the public, Transportation has issued several Work Orders to adjust the striping, signs, and traffic devices to help the intersection operate in a more intuitive way. On March 4, 2017 Transportation Division staff attended a community meeting organized by Council Member Sophie Hahn to hear further concerns from the community. Transportation Division staff are continuing to monitor and collect further data about the intersection. Based on this data collection and input from the public, Transportation is considering various alterations to the design, which can be made permanent as part of a summer 2017 repaving project at this intersection. Proposed changes to the intersection will be developed by a volunteer committee drawn from residents of Council District 5, in partnership with Council Member Hahn s office, and will be vetted with the Transportation Commission in April Attachment: Revised Hopkins/The Alameda Striping Plan 1947 Center Street, 4 th Floor, Berkeley, CA Tel: TDD: Fax:

4

5 B4a City Clerk Department March 3, 2017 To: From: Commission Secretaries Mark Numainville, City Clerk Subject: Commission Work Plans Council Item from 2016 This is a reminder regarding the requirement for annual commission work plans. In 2016 the City Council approved an item that directs Berkeley Commissions, with the exception of the Board of Library Trustees, the Zoning Adjustments Board, and the Design Review Committee, to submit a workplan to the City Council at the beginning of each fiscal year. Some commissions currently produce a workplan on a regular or semi-regular basis. This is a best practice that aligns with the direction given in the Commissioners Manual. For more information, please see the attached agenda item and the relevant excerpt from Chapter V. Section A. of the Manual. Please agendize this topic for discussion by the commission and inform the members that they must take all steps needed to meet this direction. As stated in the Commissioners Manual, it is the responsibility of the commission members, not staff, to draft the content of reports to Council. This responsibility includes drafting the content of the work plan. This task cannot be delegated to the commission secretary or other city staff. Please contact me directly if you have any questions. Enc. cc: Department Heads

6 A. WORK PROGRAM CHAPTER V. COMMISSION PROCEDURES 1) Development of a Work Program Many commissions find it effective to establish a yearly work program or statement of goals. A work program is a planning document that specifies how and when the objectives (outcomes) which the commission expects to accomplish during the fiscal year will be achieved. Goal statements explain the nature and scope of the work to be performed and the time needed to accomplish the goal. The nature of the duties of specific commissions may determine which method is most suitable. Designing yearly work programs or goal statements may be done in conjunction with the development of the relevant departmental work plan so that the department and commission's work will complement each other throughout the year. When developing a workplan Commissions should take special care to ensure that they remain within their subject area purview and the constraints of their enabling legislation. B. MEETING PROCEDURES 1) Establishment of Meeting Rules Each commission may establish additional rules and limit debate. It is the responsibility of the chairperson to control the debate among commissioners so that everyone has a chance to speak before others speak for a second time, and to expedite the business at hand. To this end, commissions may establish rules to limit debate. 2) Processing of Motions When a motion is made and seconded, it should be stated by the maker of the motion and read by the Chair prior to debate. If the motion is adopted, the maker's written version of the motion, if any, should be given to the secretary for reference in preparation of Council reports and/or the minutes. A motion may not be withdrawn by the mover without the consent of the member seconding it. After discussion has ended and immediately prior to the vote, the secretary clearly states the full motion (with any amendments). If a roll call vote is used, the secretary then calls the roll (always calling the names in the same order). After all commissioners have voted, the secretary announces the vote totals and whether or not the motion passes. Commissioners' Manual 49 Chapter V. Commission Procedures

7 B4c Lori Droste, District 8 Susan Wengraf, District 6 CONSENT CALENDAR July 19, 2016 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Honorable Mayor and City Council Councilmembers Lori Droste, Susan Wengraf, Linda Maio, and Kriss Worthington Commission Work Plans RECOMMENDATION Commissions with the exception of the Board of Library Trustees, Design Review Committee, and the Zoning Adjustments Board will submit a work plan detailing its goals and objectives for the year. Plans will be submitted at the start of the fiscal year, annually. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS Although additional staff time will be needed to assist commissions in drafting work plans, staff time will be reduced overall if misaligned commission referrals are reduced. In addition, if boards and commissions do not direct city staff to perform research, gather information, or otherwise engage in activities involving projects or matters that are not aligned with the City s Strategic Plan, staff will be able to make more efficient use of their time. BACKGROUND The City of Berkeley is in the process of introducing its first strategic plan. To ensure that Berkeley s commissions are in alignment with the overall mission of the City, commissions should submit annual work plans. Each work plan should contain the following information: 1. Commission mission statement 2. What are the commission s goals? In order to achieve these objectives, please specify: a. Resources i. What specific resources are needed and available to achieve desired change? (i.e. staff time, $, time, materials, equipment) b. Program activities i. What will the commission do with its resources? ii. Processes, tools, events, technology, actions that are employed to bring about the intended objectives Milvia Street, Berkeley, CA TDD: (510) ldroste@cityofberkeley.info or mailto:swengraff@cityofberkeley.info

8 Commission Work Plans CONSENT CALENDAR July 19, 2016 c. Output(s) i. What will be the direct results of commission activities? ii. How much will be done? (i.e. Number of forums/meetings held, # of participants reached, etc.) d. Outcomes i. The specific changes desired/achieved in the short-term (1-3 years) and long-term (4-6 years) Outcomes should be measurable, action-oriented, and realistic (W. K Kellogg Foundation, 2004). ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY Not applicable CONTACT PERSON Lori Droste, City Councilmember District 8, Susan Wengraf, City Councilmember District 6, Attachments: 1: Logic Model Summary (W.K. Kellogg Foundation) Page 2

9 Attachment 1 Logic Model Summary A logic model brings program concepts and dreams to life. It lets stakeholders try an idea on for size and apply theories to a model or picture of how the program would function. The program logic model is defined as a picture of how your organization does its work the theory and assumptions underlying the program. A program logic model links outcomes (both short- and long-term) with program activities/processes and the theoretical assumptions/principles of the program. The Basic Logic Model components shown above are defined below. These components illustrate the connection between your planned work and your intended results. They are depicted numerically by steps 1 through 5. YOUR PLANNED WORK describes what resources you think you need to implement your program and what you intend to do.

10 Commission Work Plans CONSENT CALENDAR July 19, Resources include the human, financial, organizational, and community resources a program has available to direct toward doing the work. Sometimes this component is referred to as Inputs. 2. Program Activities are what the program does with the resources. Activities are the processes, tools, events, technology, and actions that are an intentional part of the program implementation. These interventions are used to bring about the intended program changes or results. YOUR INTENDED RESULTS include all of the program s desired results (outputs, outcomes, and impact). 3. Outputs are the direct products of program activities and may include types, levels and targets of services to be delivered by the program. 4. Outcomes are the specific changes in program participants behavior, knowledge, skills, status and level of functioning. Short-term outcomes should be attainable within 1 to 3 years, while longer-term outcomes should be achievable within a 4 to 6 year timeframe. The logical progression from short-term to long-term outcomes should be reflected in impact occurring within about 7 to 10 years. 5. Impact is the fundamental intended or unintended change occurring in organizations, communities or systems as a result of program activities within 7 to 10 years. In the current model of WKKF (W.K. Kellogg Foundation) grantmaking and evaluation, impact often occurs after the conclusion of project funding. Compiled from: W.K. Kellogg Foundation. Logic Model Development Guide. (2004) Page 4

11 Transportation Commission Draft Work Plan 2017 Tracking Ongoing Projects/Periodic Staff Updates #1-15: Notes 1. Hearst Ave Complete streets project (lessons learned) Under construction 2. Downtown Projects Bundle: Center Street Garage, Downtown Plaza, Parking Apps, Shattuck Reconfiguration 3. goberkeley Program Next Steps, Update 4. I-80 Gilman and Ped Overcrossing Ongoing: EIR phase 5. Safe Routes to Schools Projects Ongoing 6. 4 th Bore Mitigations: Ashby/Hwy 13 projects Ongoing, Final year 7. Bike Share Program Launching Summer Adeline Corridor: grant planning Restarting; Extended deadline a. Key Line (Shattuck-Adeline- Bay Bridge) Greenway Advise when grant is received 9. Bike Plan Implementation (also Work item) 10. Grants- Annual Updates; Comprehensive discussion of all grant applications Meas. BB Grants are in this list 11. Traffic Calming Update w/ annual table 12. ACTC and Corridor grants 13. ACTC annual report showing Meas. BB fund distribution May 2016 and every January 14. Traffic Collision Reports and Annual Safety Goals ( Work: Vision Zero Policy Development) Periodic reports; Work-Vision Zero 15. Telegraph Avenue & Southside Ongoing Work Items A-M: Presentation/Work A. Coordinate with PWC on Annual Paving Plan and opportunities for developing Complete Streets Annual B. Bike Plan Implementation Refer Issues to Bike Subcom C. Sidewalk Repair and Accessibility +Disability concerns D. Utility Undergrounding- Coordination with PWC E. Milvia Lane Implementation Design process F. ActiveTransportation Priorities (Policy Bundle) for Staff report on existing policies Recommendations to Council B4

12 1. Update Complete Streets Policy/Transit, Bike, Ped First Policy development: how to apply policy on different streets 2. Prioritize Citywide access to schools policy (to coordinate with Bike & Ped Plans) 3. Simplify parking removal discussion and policy 4. Adopt Vision Zero Policy 5. Speed Cameras - CVC Change: Recommendation to Council to communicate to State G. Level of Service vs. Vehicle Miles Traveled Policy discussion on basis for intersection function Need info; Practiced in other cities? H. Project Delivery Strategy -Projects+ Funding + Staff Capacity; Develop recommendations to Council Underway I. Walking Distance Wayfinding Signs Refer to Pedestrian Sub J. Pedestrian Plan Update K. Sanctuary Transit Policy L. Autonomous Vehicles M. Telegraph Avenue Loading Zone Case Study

13 Transportation Commission B-6 Subcommittees and Liaisons TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION- Ad Hoc Subcommittee Assignments Subcom Members* Staff Contact Date/Location Due TC Work Plan Bicycle Gerhardstein (Eric Humbert Anderson) ** Parolek Pedestrian Project Delivery T-1 Project Criteria Public Works Commission goberkeley Advisory Group Commission on Disability Ghosh Thomas Bruzzone Parolek Gerhardstein Bruzzone Gerhardstein Lathbury Parolek LIAISONS Bruzzone Gerhardstein (alt) Ghosh Bruzzone (alt) Humbert (Eric Anderson) ** As required by TC. Ad Hoc Subcommittees do not have regular meeting schedules As required by TC. Ad Hoc Subcommittees do not have regular meeting schedules Feb 2017 Review Bike Plan Projects and Complete streets implementation Sidewalk Maintenance Policies Meeting 2/23 N/A March 2017 Strategies for Transportation Division budget/ project delivery (Farid Javandel) Attend PWC meetings relating to assignment Attend goberkeley Advisory Group mtgs Attend COD meetings as needed Feb 2017 Prepare 1-2 pg. T-1 project selection criteria using BeST Plan as model Completed 2/16/17 Report to TC re Undergrounding Utility wires; Meas. M Updates Report to TC re Value-Priced Parking Program Report to TC on issues of common concern There are no Standing Subcommittees. There must be at least two commissioners present to hold a subcommittee meeting, but never a quorum of the total TC membership Ad Hoc Subcommittees must be reviewed annually by the commission to determine if a subcommittee is needed, specify work assignments, and clarify response times. (Reso. 60,504-N.S.) Subcommittees do not have officers or submit minutes, but may submit written summary meeting notes for inclusion in the TC Agenda Packet under Information or as Communications. may submit their recommendations to support an Action or Discussion item with written or verbal reports. The Commission Secretary needs to receive written material 10 days before the meeting date for inclusion in the Agenda Packet. *Subcommittee member(s) prepares agenda based on TC adopted Work Plan or specific assignment. **Staff maintains subscription lists, publishes and (e)mails agendas, reserves meeting room, and routes communications between public and Commissioners, Commissioners and staff; Staff attendance is optional. Updated February 2017

14 Transportation Commission Excerpts of Council Actions 2017 C2 March 14, 2017 (Action Pending) 7. Contract: Redgwick Construction for Tunnel Road Access Improvements and Ashby/Telegraph Intersection Improvements Project From: City Manager Recommendation: Adopt a Resolution approving plans and specifications for the Tunnel Road Access Improvements and Ashby/Telegraph Intersection Improvements Project; accepting the bid of Redgwick Construction Company as the lowest responsive and responsible bidder; and authorizing the City Manager to execute a contract and any amendments, extensions or other change orders until completion of the project in accordance with the approved plans and specifications in an amount not to exceed $951,649. Financial Implications: CalTrans Fund - $951,649 Contact: Phillip Harrington, Public Works, Referral to Consider Caregiver Parking in Residential Shared Parking Pilot From: Councilmembers Droste, Maio, Wengraf Recommendation: Refer to the City Manager and Transportation Commission to consider a pilot program for caregiver parking permits in RPP zones in the goberkeley Residential Shared Parking Pilot. Financial Implications: Staff time Contact: Lori Droste, Councilmember, District 8, a. Recommendations to Promote Sidewalk Safety for People with Disabilities in Berkeley From: Commission on Disability Recommendation: 1. Increase the public signage in Berkeley instructing bicyclists that a) riding on sidewalks; b) using curb cuts to access sidewalks; and c) riding in crosswalks is illegal (per BMC section ). Recommend that new signs include reference to a fine that will be enacted should they break that rule. (We would like to recommend that optional attendance at a bike safety class conducted by a local bike agency could waive the monetary fine.) These signs should be posted on blocks with high pedestrian traffic, including blocks with commercial business and also specifically at the site of any new city bike-share stations. No bikes stencils should be considered for all curb cuts to educate cyclists not to use those to access sidewalks. 2. Add signage to existing stop signs at certain dangerous intersections instructing bicyclists that all bikes must stop. 3. Work with stakeholders such as bicycle merchants, UC Berkeley, and any bicycle rental or bike-share programs to develop: a) posters about sidewalk safety that can be hung in their establishments; b) FAQs or instructional brochures given to all new bike owners outlining rights and illegal behavior; and c) forms for bike renters to sign indicating that they have read the City of Berkeley rules, understand what is legal and illegal in terms of bicycle behavior, and agree to comply.

15 Transportation Commission Excerpts of Council Actions Review current legislation to investigate whether new legislation should be enacted to further protect pedestrians. 5. Work with Berkeley law enforcement to ensure that pedestrian safety laws (such as BMC section ) are enforced and that ticketing of individuals who endanger pedestrian safety are prioritized. Financial Implications: See report Contact: Kenneth Emeziem, Commission Secretary, b Companion Report: Recommendations to Promote Sidewalk Safety for People with Disabilities in Berkeley From: City Manager Recommendation: The City Manager concurs with the intent of the Commission on Disability report entitled Recommendations to Promote Sidewalk Safety for People with Disabilities in Berkeley, that the City should continue to improve sidewalk safety and accessibility. The City Manager, however, advises a gradual approach to implement the process in three phases. Phase I would ask the Transportation Commission to analyze the scope of work and budgetary implications recommended in the Commission report. Further, this phase would require staff support to assess the recommendation s consistency with the Berkeley Municipal Code (BMC) and State of California traffic regulations. Following this evaluation, in partnership with the Berkeley Police Department (BPD) and other agencies and organizations (including local business associations), Phase II would seek to educate the public about the dangers of bicycle riding on sidewalks, and prioritize enforcement of existing BMC Sections related to bicycle riding, specifically BMC Section Concurrent with this education and enforcement effort, the City should opt-in to the bicycle traffic ticket diversion program established by Bicycle Traffic School Bill, State Assembly Bill 902 (2015). The City Manager suggests other recommendations be addressed in a third, ongoing phase wherein the City would install and maintain additional signs and markings to support expanded education and prioritized enforcement. Financial Implications: Unknown Contact: Phillip Harrington, Public Works, February 28, Expansion of Downtown Berkeley goberkeley Program Area; Amending BMC Chapter From: City Manager Recommendation: Adopt second reading of Ordinance No. 7,533-N.S. revising Berkeley Municipal Code Chapter Parking Meters to authorize expanding the Downtown Berkeley goberkeley program area. First Reading Vote: All Ayes. Financial Implications: None Page 2 of 7

16 Transportation Commission Excerpts of Council Actions 2017 Contact: Phillip Harrington, Public Works, Action: Adopted second reading of Ordinance No. 7,533-N.S. 12. Contract No Amendment: C. Overaa & Co. for the Center Street Parking Garage From: City Manager Recommendation: Adopt a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to amend Contract No with C. Overaa & Co. for the Center Street Parking Garage Project, increasing the contract amount by $3,446,583 for a total amount not to exceed $36,970,983. Financial Implications: Off Street Parking Fund - $3,446,583 Contact: Phillip Harrington, Public Works, Action: Adopted Resolution No. 67,847 N.S. 14. Progress Report for the Development of a Comprehensive Plan for the Funding of Undergrounding Utility Wires in Berkeley From: Public Works Commission; Disaster and Fire Safety Commission; Transportation Commission Recommendation: 1. Approve the following work item: a. An updated work plan to develop a comprehensive plan (the Undergrounding Plan ) for the funding of undergrounding utility wires in Berkeley. 2. Accept the following informational items: a. A baseline study for the development of an undergrounding program, prepared by Harris and Associates, dated July 22, b. An application to U.C. Berkeley s Goldman School of Public Policy to conduct Phase 2 studies for the development of an undergrounding program. c. Hold a workshop with service providers, such as PG&E, AT&T, Comcast, in early 2017 to get their input on the development of an undergrounding program. Financial Implications: None Contact: Tracy Clay, Commission Secretary, ; David Brannigan, Commission Secretary, ; Farid Javandel, Commission Secretary, Action: Item held over to March 28, Increasing the Parking Permit Guidelines for Two BUSD Schools with Limited Access to Public Transit From: Councilmember Maio and Mayor Arreguin Recommendation: Request the City Manager to increase the guidelines used to grant residential permit parking to BUSD schools from 60% to 70% of the number of BUSD staff (includes teachers) for schools more than 1/2 mile from a BART Station, or 1/4 mile from a Rapid Transit Stop, or 1/4 mile from two (2) major transit lines. Financial Implications: None Contact: Linda Maio, Councilmember, District 1, Action: Councilmembers Davila and Droste added as co-sponsors. Approved recommendation. 17. Budget Referral: Funding to Create a Pedestrian-Activated Crosswalk Across Page 3 of 7

17 Transportation Commission Excerpts of Council Actions 2017 Sacramento Street at the North Berkeley BART Station From: Councilmember Maio Recommendation: Refer to the budget process the funding of pedestrian-activated lights across Sacramento Street at the North Berkeley BART Station. Financial Implications: See report Contact: Linda Maio, Councilmember, District 1, Action: Approved recommendation. 26. ZAB Appeal: 2777 Shattuck Avenue/2747 Adeline Avenue (Continued from February 7, 2017) From: City Manager Recommendation: Adopt a Resolution dismissing the appeal and affirming the decision of the Zoning Adjustments Board to approve Use Permit No. ZP to establish a full service auto dealership, including auto sales, repair and maintenance, in an existing building; to construct a 4,427 square-foot addition to the building for auto access and service; and to use a portion of the existing 31-space surface parking lot at 2747 Adeline Street for project parking, car display, and inventory. Financial Implications: None Contact: Carol Johnson, Planning and Development, Action: M/S/C (Arreguin/Worthington) to suspend the rules and extend the meeting to 11:30 p.m. Vote: All Ayes. Action: 65 speakers. M/S/Failed (Bartlett/Davila) to re-open the public hearing, continue the item and re-notice the hearing for a future date. Vote: Ayes Davila, Bartlett, Hahn, Arreguin; Noes Maio, Wengraf, Worthington; Abstain Droste. Action: M/S/C (Arreguin/Davila) to suspend the rules and extend the meeting to 11:40 p.m. Vote: Ayes Davila, Bartlett, Hahn, Wengraf, Worthington, Droste, Arreguin; Noes - Maio. Action: M/S/Failed (Arreguin/Davila) to remand the project to the Zoning Adjustments Board and request that the project be evaluated as a sales location without auto repair services. Vote: Ayes Davila, Bartlett, Hahn, Arreguin; Noes Worthington, Droste; Abstain Maio, Wengraf. 30. Berkeley Bicycle Plan 2017 From: City Manager Recommendation: Adopt a Resolution approving the Berkeley Bicycle Plan 2017, and directing the City Manager to pursue implementation of the Plan as funding and staffing permit. Financial Implications: See report Contact: Phillip Harrington, Public Works, Page 4 of 7

18 Transportation Commission Excerpts of Council Actions 2017 Action: Item referred to the Agenda Committee for future scheduling. 38. goberkeley Parking Management Program - Recommended Adjustments for March 1, 2017 (Expansion Areas) From: City Manager Contact: Phillip Harrington, Public Works, Action: Item held over to March 14, February 14, Updated Information Report on Measure M From: Councilmember Wengraf Recommendation: Request that the City Manager return to the City Council in April with an Information Report on Measure M implementation, expenditures, projected expenses and plans. Financial Implications: Staff time Contact: Susan Wengraf, Councilmember, District 6, Action: Councilmember Hahn added as co-sponsor. Approved recommendation. 14. Expansion of Downtown Berkeley goberkeley Program Area; Amending BMC Chapter From: City Manager Recommendation: Conduct a public hearing, and upon conclusion, adopt first reading of an Ordinance amending Berkeley Municipal Code Chapter Parking Meters to authorize expanding the Downtown Berkeley goberkeley program area. Financial Implications: None Contact: Phillip Harrington, Public Works, Public Testimony: The Mayor opened the public hearing. 0 speakers. M/S/C (Worthington/Maio) to close the public hearing. Vote: All Ayes. Action: M/S/C (Worthington/Maio) to adopt first reading of Ordinance No. 7,533 N.S. Second reading scheduled for February 28, Vote: All Ayes. 22. Traffic Engineer Regulations for Objects on Sidewalks From: City Manager Contact: Phillip Harrington, Public Works, Action: Moved to Action Calendar. Item held over to March 14, February 7, 2017 Special Meeting 1. ZAB Appeal: 2777 Shattuck Avenue/2474 Adeline Avenue From: City Manager Page 5 of 7

19 Transportation Commission Excerpts of Council Actions 2017 Recommendation: Conduct a public hearing and upon conclusion, adopt a Resolution dismissing appeal and affirming the decision of the Zoning Adjustments Board to approve Use Permit No. ZP to establish a full service auto dealership, including auto sales, repair and maintenance, in an existing building; to construct a 4,427 square-foot addition to the building for auto access and service; and to use a portion of the existing 31-space surface parking lot at 2747 Adeline Street for project parking, car display, and inventory. Financial Implications: None Contact: Carol Johnson, Planning and Development, Action: M/S/C (Bartlett/Hahn) to continue to hearing to a later date. Vote: Ayes Bartlett, Hahn; Noes Maio, Wengraf, Worthington, Droste; Abstain Davila, Arreguin. Public Testimony: The Mayor opened the public hearing. 119 speakers. M/S/C (Droste/Maio) to close the public hearing. Vote: All Ayes. Action: M/S/Failed (Hahn/Bartlett) to uphold the appeal and overturn the decision of the Zoning Adjustments Board to approve Use Permit No. ZP to establish a full service auto dealership, including auto sales, repair and maintenance, in an existing building; to construct a 4,427 square-foot addition to the building for auto access and service; and to use a portion of the existing 31- space surface parking lot at 2747 Adeline Street for project parking, car display, and inventory. Vote: Ayes Davila, Bartlett, Hahn, Arreguin; Noes Worthington; Abstain Maio, Wengraf, Droste. January 31, Public Process for Implementation of Measure T1 From: Mayor Arreguin Recommendation: Direct the City Manager to establish a delineated and robust public process for the implementation of Measure T1 that would include two (2) Lead Commissions (Public Works and Parks), affected commissions, and the public based on the following guidelines: 1. A minimum of three joint meetings for the general public and participating commissions to provide input on criteria and projects. Public meetings should be held in workshop format, to allow citizens to engage with commissions and staff to provide input on criteria and project priorities. Staff and commissions will engage in robust public outreach, including online forums to gather comments from residents. 2. An agreement from all participants of project ranking criteria that would include, but not be limited to: complexity ( shovel ready to master plan), safety, environmental impact, equity in outcomes and impact across all city neighborhoods, cost/matching fund/grant availability, and resiliency. 3. A program- based development approach to maximize the benefit of phasing larger projects or multiple project implementation. 4. Opportunity to review staff recommendations and suggest modifications based on matching criteria and public input. 5. Development of a long- Page 6 of 7

20 Transportation Commission Excerpts of Council Actions 2017 term plan for projects that will extend beyond the funding capacity of T1, including possible future funding mechanisms. 6. An ongoing oversight and reporting process including timelines for financial reassessment. The proposed public process would supplement the City Manager s proposed timeline for implementation of Measure T1. Financial Implications: Staff time Contact: Jesse Arreguin, Mayor, Action: Moved to Action Calendar. 1 speaker. M/S/C (Worthington/Wengraf) to approve the recommendation as revised in Supplemental Reports Packet #1. Vote: All Ayes. 9. Extend Residential Preferential Parking Program on Sections of Harper Street, Allston Street, Grant Street, and Claremont Avenue From: City Manager Recommendation: Conduct a public hearing and upon conclusion, adopt a Resolution amending Resolution No. 56,508-N.S. Sections 25M, 25C, and 25L by adding subsections to extend the Residential Preferential Parking Program on four city blocks. Financial Implications: General Fund - $2,079 Contact: Phillip Harrington, Public Works, Public Testimony: The Mayor opened the public hearing. 4 speakers. M/S/C (Maio/Wengraf) to close the public hearing. Vote: All Ayes. Action: M/S/C (Bartlett/Droste) to adopt Resolution No. 67,834 N.S. as revised in Supplemental Reports Packet #1. Vote: All Ayes. January 24, Special RPP Designation, Grant Street between Ohlone Park and Delaware Street From: Councilmember Maio Recommendation: Request the City Manager to designate a special no 2-hour parking grace period residential permit parking zone for the one cul-de-sac block of Grant Street between Ohlone Park and Delaware Street. Financial Implications: None Contact: Linda Maio, Councilmember, District 1, Action: Moved to Action Calendar. 2 speakers. Mayor Arreguin added as a cosponsor. M/S/C (Maio/Hahn) to approve the recommendation revised to include a request of the City Manager to provide the Council with information on the process for approving the RPP designation and a request for increased enforcement. Vote: All Ayes. Page 7 of 7

21

22

23

24

25

26

27