Transmission System Expansion Cost Allocation Alternatives for Renewable Resources. Cost Allocation Working Group March 26, 2008 OG&E Ver 2 3/20/8
|
|
- Leslie Nickolas Franklin
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Transmission System Expansion Cost Allocation Alternatives for Renewable Resources Cost Allocation Working Group March 26, 2008 OG&E Ver 2 3/20/8 Page 1 Why Page 2 Page 1 of 11
2 Basic Principles Wind generation should be treated similar to any other generation in SPP. The SPP should remove the language in Attachment J that refers to the lesser of net dependable capacity or requested service, and simply refer to requested service. Page 3 Problems Who bears the costs once borne by the requestor. TOs with significant additions of wind generation in their zone are understandably reluctant to bear that additional cost. Page 4 Page 2 of 11
3 Discussion (1) Most of the costs of upgrades in source zones will fall into one of two categories; the transmission from the project to the grid; the grid. Miscellaneous costs, which in general are not significant. Page 5 Discussion (2) The project-to-grid costs are already borne by the generator. It is the grid costs that cause concern. The expensive transmission upgrades required by new service requests for wind will be 345kV or higher. Page 6 Page 3 of 11
4 Proposed Solution That we change the language in Attachment J as suggested; That we do not otherwise modify in any way the BPF language; and That we regionalize all new construction of transmission lines 300kV and above with a postage stamp allocation. Page 7 Solution Discussion (1) If the expensive grid costs are regionalized, then source zones have little or no issue with the requirement to build transmission for requestors not in their zone. Zones will pick up their load ratio share of all 300kV and above costs Page 8 Page 4 of 11
5 Solution Discussion (2) Small zones with lots of wind generation will not bear large costs. Transmission at 300kV and above provides regional benefits. Postage stamp allocation spreads costs across the region. KISS in action!!! Page 9 Conclusion This proposal has the benefit of: Treating all designated generation resources fairly and comparably which is not true of today s policy. Protecting the customers in pricing zones with new generation from potentially large costs for upgrades needed to transmit energy to other zones. While still recognizing that the local transmission customers still derive a benefit from having new transmission facilities built in its zone via the regional allocation. Page 10 Page 5 of 11
6 Transmission System Expansion Cost Allocation Alternative To Deliver Renewable Designated Resources Cost Allocation Working Group March 26, 2008 Page 1 Presenting Jurisdictional Utilities EDE, KCP&L, MWE, OGE, Sunflower, WR, XCEL Most endorsers are regulated by the following State Commissions and FERC: Arkansas Kansas Missouri New Mexico Oklahoma Texas Page 2 Page 6 of 11
7 Presentation Objectives Present generally acceptable views regarding cost allocation of transmission system expansion/upgrades to support firm transmission delivery of renewable generation resources as designated network resources within the SPP footprint. Review issues and concepts raised by the CAWG and discussed by these jurisdictional utilities. Each utility may have a different view on specific provisions or solutions, however i) given the need for an immediate decision and ii) understanding that a more comprehensive review of the Base Plan Funding policy will occur in the future, the following concepts are submitted for consideration. Page 3 Background At the CAWG meeting of February 27, 2008, members of the CAWG requested input from the Transmission Owners and Transmission Customers related to changes in the way the SPP OATT handles cost allocation for transmission service related to renewable resources, but especially Wind resources. Today, the SPP OATT handles the costs in the following manner: Interconnection Costs: Are covered in the recently approved LGIA (Attachment V). All facility costs are directly assigned to the generator, however, those upgrades that are classified as Network Upgrades are eligible for credits pursuant to Attachment Z. There is no fixed time frame for the customer to be reimbursed. For transmission service, the amount of the Network Upgrade costs eligible for Base Plan Funding is limited to: the lesser of a) the Accredited Capacity of the generator or b) the requested transmission service. For Wind generation, the Accredited Capacity is initially set at 10% of the name plate capacity, hence the majority of upgrades are directly assigned to the requestor. The current tariff shifts a great deal of the costs to the transmission customer (or requestor), although the customer would be eligible for credits pursuant to Attachment Z of the SPP OATT. This methodology could be seen as a deterrent to the promotion of Wind Generation in the SPP. To help address this problem, the CAWG has been looking at several proposals and then asked for input from other segments of the SPP. The following are concepts from the jurisdictional Transmission Owners for changes in the Base Plan Funding (BPF) policy for designated resources under the SPP OATT. Page 4 Page 7 of 11
8 Fundamental Beliefs & Guidelines 1) High Voltage (345kV and above) upgrades are most likely to benefit Transmission Customers on a regional level than upgrades at the lower voltages which are normally for local or zonal benefit. Therefore, there is some support to increase the current (1/3) regionalization cost allocation for upgrades related to transmission service requests for ALL designated resources within the SPP. 2) The long-term objective is for wind generation and all renewable generation to be treated comparably to other types of generation as far as allocation of the transmission service request costs. Short-term deviation from this principle is acceptable due to the urgency of addressing issues presented by the treatment of wind generation in the current cost allocation process. 3) The current policy in dealing with renewables should be improved upon in terms of calculating a Transmission Customer s initial Base Plan Funding eligibility based on the a) lesser of nameplate capacity or b) transmission service requested. Page 5 Fundamental Beliefs & Guidelines 4) A revision to the current Base Plan Funding policy, as stated in Guideline #2, to provide for similar Base Plan Funding eligibility for renewable generation sources creates a new concern related to the nonhost or sink zone allocations from the existing MW-Mile zonal allocation for the 2/3 Base Plan Funding component, especially when the supply zone does not sink/receive any of the renewable output as a Designated Resource. 5) The proposed revisions to the existing policy is limited to SPP designated resources which are renewable generation only and may need to be re-evaluated by the CAWG/RSC, as the development of federal and state policies related to the mandatory inclusion of renewable generation to supply energy to load in the SPP becomes more certain. 6) Since Wind Generation (as well as other renewable generation) is extremely sensitive to location, the pricing zone where the generator is located (supply zone) and pass through zones should receive some cost protection for the Transmission Customers in their zones, especially when all the load utilizing the output of the wind farm is outside the supply zone. Future consideration of similar protection for all non-supply zones should be addressed related to transmission service requests of ALL designated resources within the SPP. Page 6 Page 8 of 11
9 Fundamental Beliefs & Guidelines 7) Changes to the current Base Plan Funding procedures should be minimized at this time. However, a future comprehensive review to address funding treatment for ALL designated resources would be appropriate. 8) Since a complete review of the Base Plan Funding policy will take additional time, it is possible to proceed, at this time, with a modified transmission cost allocation policy that only affects renewable resources. Page 7 Alternative Proposal Provisions 1) Revise Attachment J s Safe Harbor Limit for BPF from accredited capacity to the lesser of a) the request for transmission service or b) the amount of generation capacity the Transmission Customer has under contract. 2) Except for the host(sink) zone MW-Mile allocations related to the renewable transmission service request, the MW-Mile costs allocated to all other zones (including the supply zone) related to upgrade(s) to support the renewable request for transmission service, should be allocated accordingly: 1) 50% (1/2) to the region/postage stamp and 2) 50% (1/2) directly assigned to the Transmission Customer or requestor 3) The proposed Zonal MW-Mile re-allocation (Provision #2) does not apply to: i) allocations where the supply zone renewable resources and the host(sink) load are located in the same zone (supply=host or sink), and ii) host(sink) zone allocations. All the standard BPF provisions (1/3 regional and 2/3 zonal MW-mile allocations) would apply. Page 8 Page 9 of 11
10 Alternative Proposal Provisions 4) Any direct assignments to the requestor of the costs above the Safe Harbor Limit and Zonal allocations from the MW-Mile analysis will be eligible for Attachment Z credits. 5) The maximum amount of Wind Generation that a Transmission Customer or load may receive and still qualify for BPF is capped at 20%. 20% = Transmission Customer s total name plate Wind Generation in resource portfolio Transmission Customer s total name plate of resource portfolio 6) Such initial cap would be re-evaluated after and subject to the results of a renewable saturation study for the SPP region. All costs related to the renewable resources that exceed this cap will be 100% assigned to the Transmission Customer/Requestor. Page 9 Alternative Proposal Provisions 8) No explicit tariff provisions are recommended to encourage waivers related to provisions #2 and #3 i.e. waivers of these provisions should be discouraged. Page 10 Page 10 of 11
11 Conclusion This proposal has the benefits of: Treating all designated generation resources in a more comparable cost allocation manner than today s policy. Protecting the customers not in the host (sink) zones from potentially large costs for upgrades needed to transmit energy from the renewable resources to the benefiting load especially when none of the energy is being utilized by the transmission customers in the non-host zones. Recognizing, via regional allocation, that the supply and other impacted zone s transmission customers still derive an import benefit from having new transmission facilities built in its zone for exporting the renewable energy to the host zone. Enabling the CAWG/RSC and SPP to move forward now with an improved/tweaked cost allocation policy for renewables, and then re-evaluate as part of the comprehensive review of the Base Plan Funding Policy for the SPP RTO. Page 11 Page 11 of 11
Southwest Power Pool s Balanced Portfolio Approach for Economic Upgrades
Southwest Power Pool s Balanced Portfolio Approach for Economic Upgrades Presentation by Michael Proctor Chief Economist, Missouri PSC Harvard Electricity Policy Group Chicago, Illinois October 2, 2008
New Member Cost Allocation Review Process. Prepared by: COST ALLOCATION WORKING GROUP
New Member Cost Allocation Review Process Prepared by: COST ALLOCATION WORKING GROUP TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. HISTORY AND BACKGROUND... 1 2. PURPOSE / GOAL STATEMENT... 3 3. OVERVIEW OF PROCESS... 3 4. NEW
TRANSMISSION OWNER ZONAL PLACEMENT PROCESS
TRANSMISSION OWNER ZONAL PLACEMENT PROCESS Published July 2017 CONTENTS Section 1: Introduction, Scope & Steps... 1 Subsection A: Introduction To Zonal Placement... 1 Subsection B: Scope... 1 Subsection
April 28, Southwest Power Pool, Inc., Docket No. ER11- Submission of Formula Rate Template
Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street NE Washington, DC 20426 Re: Southwest Power Pool, Inc., Docket No. ER11- Submission of Formula Rate Template Honorable Secretary Bose: Pursuant
Cost Allocation Principles for Seams Transmission Expansion Projects
Cost Allocation Principles for Seams Transmission Expansion Projects SPP s seams agreements currently contain requirements for SPP to develop coordinated system plans with its neighbors. The extent and
RR16 - Page 1 of
DOCKET NO. APPLICATION OF SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY FOR AUTHORITY TO CHANGE RATES PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS DIRECT TESTIMONY of ARTHUR P. FREITAS on behalf of SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE
SPP New Member Communication and Integration Process. Mountain West Transmission Group. Background Information October 2017
1 SPP New Member Communication and Integration Process Mountain West Transmission Group Background Information October 2017 Contents Introduction... 2 1. Westside Tariff Design... 2 2. Operational Provisions...
MISO Planning Process. May 31, 2013
MISO Planning Process May 31, 2013 MISO Planning Objectives Fundamental Goal The development of a comprehensive expansion plan that meets reliability needs, policy needs, and economic needs MISO Board
BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY RUTH M. SAKYA. on behalf of.
BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY S INTERIM REPORT ON ITS PARTICIPATION IN THE SOUTHWEST POWER POOL REGIONAL TRANSMISSION ORGANIZATION,
History of Cost Allocation within MISO RECB TF. January 29, 2015
History of Cost Allocation within MISO RECB TF January 29, 2015 Cost Allocation FERC Orders, Filings, and Rulings Cost allocation for MISO began with Order 2003 which instituted a pro forma Generator Interconnection
Southwest Power Pool, Inc. Policy Recommendation for the SPP Board of Directors and Members Committee. March 6, 2018 Mountain West Transmission Group
Southwest Power Pool, Inc. Policy for the SPP Board of Directors and Members Committee Policy Area #1 DC Ties March 6, 2018 Mountain West Transmission Group SPP and MWTG anticipate that incorporating the
Mountain West Transmission Group (MWTG) Introduction and Process
Mountain West Transmission Group (MWTG) Introduction and Process October 13 Denver, CO October 16 Little Rock, AR 2 Agenda Overview of SPP Overview of the MWTG Members SPP Process New Member Integration
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. Southwest Power Pool, Inc. ) Docket No. ER
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Southwest Power Pool, Inc. ) Docket No. ER16- -000 PETITION OF SOUTHWEST POWER POOL, INC. FOR TARIFF WAIVER Pursuant to Rule 207(a)(5)
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF ) OKLAHOMA GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY ) FOR APPROVAL OF A GENERAL CHANGE IN ) DOCKET NO. 0-0-U RATES AND TARIFFS ) Direct
PROPOSAL FOR COST ESTIMATION REVIEW PROCESS FOR SPP TRANSMISSION
PROPOSAL FOR COST ESTIMATION REVIEW PROCESS FOR SPP REGIONALLY FUNDED TRANSMISSION Presented on behalf of SPP s Transmission Owners SPP Strategic Planning Committee Meeting December 3, 2010 REGIONALLY
FIRST QUARTERLY PROJECT TRACKING REPORT 2018 January 2018
FIRST QUARTERLY PROJECT TRACKING REPORT 2018 January 2018 CONTENTS Executive Summary... 3 NTC Project Summary... 5 NTC Issuance... 7 NTC Withdraw... 7 Completed Projects... 8 Project status summary...
September 30, 2016 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING
September 30, 2016 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING The Honorable Kimberly D. Bose Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20246 Re: Southwest Power Pool, Inc., Docket
RSC Regional. State Committee FOR THE SOUTHWEST POWER POOL
RSC Regional State Committee FOR THE SOUTHWEST POWER POOL April 28, 2014 TO PAST AND PRESENT RSC MEMBERS Congratulations on reaching this significant milestone! Your service has been invaluable to the
PJM/MISO Cost Allocation For Economic Upgrades
PJM/MISO Cost Allocation For Economic Upgrades Stakeholder Meeting Hilton Baltimore BWI, Baltimore MD May 19, 2008 1 Topics for Discussion Background FERC Order / Schedule (RTO Staffs) Review Internal
BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY WILLIAM A. GRANT. on behalf of
BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY S APPLICATION FOR REVISION OF ITS RETAIL RATES UNDER ADVICE NOTICE NO., SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE
CAWG MEETING July 25, 2007 Marriott Country Club Plaza Kansas City, MO 11:00 am 5:00 pm AGENDA
CAWG MEETING July 25, 2007 Marriott Country Club Plaza Kansas City, MO 11:00 am 5:00 pm AGENDA 1. Introductions 11:00-11:10 2. STEP Screen to Portfolio Transition 11:10 12:00 Discussion lead by Charles
Memo to the MOPC and Board of Directors Highway-Byway Cost Allocation
Memo to the MOPC and Board of Directors Highway-Byway Cost Allocation SPP believes that the proposed Highway-Byway cost allocation methodology will promote new transmission construction by allocating:
July 15, 2015 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING
July 15, 2015 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING The Honorable Kimberly D. Bose Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20246 Re: Southwest Power Pool, Inc., Docket No.
Regulatory Status Report
FERC or State Jurisdiction: FERC AD10-13 Third-Party Provision of Ancillary Services; Accounting and Financial Reporting for New Electric Storage Technologies On July 18, 2013, FERC issued Order No. 784,
Regional Transmission Organization Frequently Asked Questions
1. The CRA analysis showed greater trade benefits to the Entergy region from joining SPP rather than joining MISO. Did Entergy re-do the CRA analysis? No. The CRA analysis was a key component of the Entergy
July 21, Southwest Power Pool, Inc., Docket No. ER Submission of Response to Request for Additional Information
July 21, 2016 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING Penny Murrell Director, Division of Electric Power Regulation-Central Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20426 Re: Southwest
153 FERC 61,249 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ORDER REJECTING TARIFF REVISIONS. (Issued November 30, 2015)
153 FERC 61,249 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Before Commissioners: Norman C. Bay, Chairman; Cheryl A. LaFleur, Tony Clark, and Colette D. Honorable. Southwest Power Pool,
Northern Tier Transmission Group Cost Allocation Principles Work Group. Straw Proposal. May 29, 2007
Northern Tier Transmission Group Cost Allocation Principles Work Group Straw Proposal May 29, 2007 NTTG Cost Allocation Principles and Process page 1 INTRODUCTION This paper makes a strawman proposal responsive
American Electric Power Service Corporation Docket No. ER10- -
American Electric Power 801 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W. Suite 320 Washington, DC 20004 AEP.com May 3, 2010 Honorable Kimberly D. Bose Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E.
BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY S UNOPPOSED RESPONSE TO STAFF S COMMENTS
BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF SOUTHWESTERN ) PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY S 2018 ) INTEGRATED RESOURCE PLAN FOR ) NEW MEXICO. ) CASE NO. 18-00215-UT ) SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC
PJM & MISO Assumptions and Criteria for Testing of New Resources
& Assumptions and Criteria for Testing of New Resources 1 Introduction These slides provide a description and comparison of the assumptions and criteria used by and during the study of customer proposed
FORMULA RATE TASK FORCE CONFERENCE CALL TO DISCUSS GOLDEN SPREAD RECOMMENDATIONS
FORMULA RATE TASK FORCE 12-15-05 CONFERENCE CALL TO DISCUSS GOLDEN SPREAD RECOMMENDATIONS PARTICIPATION: (v) Jay Toungate AEP (v) Bob Oakes Westar Alan Hientz SPP Formula Rate Consultant (v) Dave Grover
SPP s Operating Region
SPP s Operating Region Current 77,366 MW of generating capacity 46,136 MW of peak demand 48,930 miles transmission: 69 kv 12,569 miles 115 kv 10,239 miles 138 kv 9,691 miles 161 kv 5,049 miles 230 kv 3,889
83C Questions and Answers
83C Questions and Answers (1) Section 1.10 Could the Evaluation Team elaborate on what types of changes constitute a new project, including listing additional examples? For example, we have assumed that
Filed with the Iowa Utilities Board on May 31, 2017, E STATE OF IOWA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE UTILITIES BOARD
STATE OF IOWA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE UTILITIES BOARD IN RE: MIDAMERICAN ENERGY IN RE: DOCKET NOS. E-22269, E-22270, AND E-22271 DOCKET NO. E-22279 (consolidated) ITC MIDWEST LLC BRIEF BY THE MIDCONTINENT
SPP PLANNING AND COST ALLOCATION OVERVIEW
Benefit/Cost Ratio Primer 101 for the Regional Allocation Review Task Force August 4, 2011 1 SPP PLANNING AND COST ALLOCATION OVERVIEW 2 1 Transmission = 10% Retail Electricity Rates Transmission enables
Cost Allocation Reform Update
Cost Allocation Reform Update Regional Expansion Criteria and Benefits Working Group May 18, 2017 Conditions Precedent for Regional Transmission Investment 1. Increased consensus regarding the issue(s)
MVP Postage Stamp Cost Allocation and Portfolio Requirement Regional Expansion Criteria and Benefits Working Group. September 28, 2017
MVP Postage Stamp Cost Allocation and Portfolio Requirement Regional Expansion Criteria and Benefits Working Group September 28, 2017 What is a Multi Value Project? A Multi Value Project is one or more
Strategic Planning Committee Task Force Clean Power Plan Meeting No. 03 December 4, 2015
Strategic Planning Committee Task Force Clean Power Plan Meeting No. 03 December 4, 2015 Southwest Power Pool SPCTF CLEAN POWER PLAN Friday, December 4, 2015 AEP Office, Dallas, Texas MINUTES Agenda Item
TNUoS Tariffs in 10 minutes March 2018
TNUoS s in 10 minutes March 2018 An overview of TNUoS tariffs This information paper provides an overview of National Grid s Transmission Network Use of System (TNUoS) tariffs, applicable to transmission
AGENDA. 1. Call to Order and Administrative Items... Mike Wise. 2. Review of SPC s Policy Decision (4-Step Process)... Paul Suskie
Southwest Power Pool, Inc. STRATEGIC PLANNING COMMITTEE MEETING Friday, June 2, 2017 9:00 AM 3 PM AEP Office, 8 th Floor Renaissance Tower, Dallas, Texas AGENDA 1. Call to Order and Administrative Items...
October 29, The Honorable Kimberly D. Bose Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C.
The Honorable Kimberly D. Bose Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C., 46 October 9, 5 Re: Southwest Power Pool, Inc., Docket No. ER6- - Submission of Tariff
October 8, SPP Regional Cost Allocation Review Report
Regional Cost Allocation Review October 8, 2013 SPP Regional Cost Allocation Review Report 1 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...5 BACKGROUND...7 SECTION 1: OVERVIEW OF THE RARTF AND RCAR REVIEW...8
Regulatory Status Report
FERC or State Jurisdiction: FERC AD10-12 AD12-12 Increasing Market and Planning Efficiency through Improved Software A technical conference was held on June 24-26, 2013 to discuss opportunities for increasing
Southwestern Public Service Company Attachment O SPS Transmission Formula Annual True-up for 2016 Material Accounting Changes since January 1, 2016
1 The Company has listed below any material changes that have taken effect since January 1, 2016. For additional information, please refer to the Southwestern Public Service Company FERC Form 1 for Q4
ITC Holdings Corp. Fourth Quarter & Year End 2013 Investor Call February 27, 2014
ITC Holdings Corp. Fourth Quarter & Year End 2013 Investor Call February 27, 2014 Safe Harbor Language & Legal Disclosure This presentation contains certain statements that describe our management s beliefs
RSC Workshop on the Integration of WAPA, Basin, Heartland. April 4, 2014
RSC Workshop on the Integration of WAPA, Basin, Heartland April 4, 2014 AGENDA I. Impact of IS Joining SPP II. Cost Allocation III. Potential Clarification to RSC Bylaws IV. SPP Bylaw and Membership Agreement
Coos County Transmission Action Plan & Cost Allocation Methodologies
Coos County Transmission Action Plan & Cost Allocation Methodologies Presentation to the NCTC KEMA, Inc. June 17, 2010 Experience you can trust. Agenda Introduction to KEMA Project Objectives Status of
Calculate Net Annual Transmission Revenue Requirements (ATRR) and Rates for SPP Tariff. Total Transmission A. Zonal Net ATRR 1 Gross ATRR $60,516,589
Page 1 Formula-based Rate Template Calculate Net Annual Transmission Revenue Requirements (ATRR) and Rates for SPP Tariff Line No. Acct Description Notes Total Transmission A. Zonal Net ATRR 1 Gross ATRR
First Revised Sheet No. 448 Canceling Original WN U-60 Sheet No. 448 PUGET SOUND ENERGY Electric Tariff G SCHEDULE 448 POWER SUPPLIER CHOICE
First Revised Sheet No. 448 Canceling Original WN U-60 Sheet No. 448 1. ELIGIBILITY FOR SERVICE POWER SUPPLIER CHOICE All Special Contract Customers, and all Schedule 48 Customers as of March 9, 2001,
Stakeholder Survey I Cross Border Cost Allocation for Economic Transmission Projects For Discussion September 24, 2008
PJM and the Midwest ISO are seeking input from stakeholders on various concepts that have been discussed during the PJM/Midwest ISO Cross-Border meetings for dealing with transmission projects constructed
Southwest Power Pool PROJECT COST WORKING GROUP MEETING August 13, 2013 Xcel (SPS) Office 600 South Tyler Street, Amarillo, TX MINUTES
Minutes No. [27] Southwest Power Pool PROJECT COST WORKING GROUP MEETING August 13, 2013 Xcel (SPS) Office 600 South Tyler Street, Amarillo, TX 791052 MINUTES Agenda Item 1 Administrative Items a. Call
Costs and Revenue Offsets Item # Description
Item # CUS-13 Costs and Description Total Cost Allocation - Total cost (PV of 40-year ATRR's ) are listed as $7,382M on ESWG slide 3. Could we get a breakdown (listing) of how this total was determined.
Regulatory Status Report
FERC or State Jurisdiction: FERC AD10-12 Increasing Market and Planning Efficiency through Improved Software On June 28, 2011, a Technical Conference was held to discuss opportunities for increasing real-time
Southwestern Public Service Company Attachment O SPS Transmission Formula 2017 Projection Material Accounting Changes since January 1, 2016
1 The Company has listed below any material changes that have taken effect since January 1, 2016. For additional information, please refer to the Southwestern Public Service Company FERC Form 1 for Q4
CONTEMPORARY TRANSMISSION ISSUES:
CONTEMPORARY TRANSMISSION ISSUES: COST ALLOCATION SESSION 1:00 PM Wisconsin Public Utility Institute May 26, 2010 Panelist: Greg Levesque, Manager - Regional Relations & Policy, ATC, Don Neumeyer, Engineer,
Cost Allocation for Transmission Infrastructure
USAID/NARUC East Africa Regional Regulatory Partnership Exchange: Cost Allocation for Transmission Infrastructure Andrew Greene Massachusetts Dept. of Public Utilities Energy Facilities Siting Board Dar
Regional Cost Allocation Review (RCAR II) July 11, 2016 SPP Regional Cost Allocation Review Report for RCAR II
Regional Cost Allocation Review (RCAR II) July 11, 2016 SPP Regional Cost Allocation Review Report for RCAR II 1 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...5 BACKGROUND...7 SECTION 1: OVERVIEW OF THE RARTF
10-YEAR COSTS AND BENEFITS TO SPP MEMBERS OF INTEGRATING MOUNTAIN WEST TRANSMISSION GROUP Quantitative Analysis of Costs and Benefits
10-YEAR COSTS AND BENEFITS TO SPP MEMBERS OF INTEGRATING MOUNTAIN WEST TRANSMISSION GROUP Quantitative Analysis of Costs and Benefits Published on March 19, 2018 By SPP Staff REVISION HISTORY DATE OR VERSION
EIPC Roll-Up Report & Scenarios
EIPC Roll-Up Report & Scenarios Zach Smith Director, Transmission Planning New York Independent System Operator IPTF/EGCWG/ESPWG Meeting January 6, 2014 2013 New York Independent System Operator, Inc.
MISO Cost Allocation Response. RECBWG February 15, 2018
MISO Cost Allocation Response RECBWG February 15, 2018 MISO Cost Allocation Response: February 2018 Context The overall objective of the MISO transmission cost allocation methodology is to align who pays
SPP s Regional Review of SPP-MISO Coordinated System Plan Recommended Interregional Projects
SPP s Regional Review of SPP-MISO Coordinated System Plan Recommended Interregional Projects January 4, 2016 SPP Interregional Relations Table of Contents Executive Summary... 2 Introduction... 5 Stakeholder
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Great Plains Energy Incorporated ) ) Westar Energy, Inc. ) Docket No. EC17- -000 JOINT APPLICATION FOR AUTHORIZATION OF DISPOSITION
Project Cost Review Process. SPP Project Cost Working Group
Project Cost Review Process SPP Project Cost Working Group Revision History Date or Version Number Author Change Description Comments PCWG Initial Draft 6/28/2012 PCWG Sub-group Edited by sub-group 7/31/2012
SPP Staff Proposal on TO Zonal Placement. April 20, 2017
SPP Staff Proposal on TO Zonal Placement April 20, 2017 Outline I. II. III. IV. V. VI. Background of the Staff s Proposal Paul Suskie Examples of New TO additions Carl Monroe SPC Motion & Updated Staff
Calculate Net Annual Transmission Revenue Requirements (ATRR) and Rates for SPP Tariff. Total Transmission A. Zonal Net ATRR 1 Gross ATRR $48,861,618
Page 1 Formula-based Rate Template Calculate Net Annual Transmission Revenue Requirements (ATRR) and Rates for SPP Tariff Line Acct Description Notes Total Transmission A. Zonal Net ATRR 1 Gross ATRR $48,861,618
Rate Formula Template Utilizing FERC Form 1 for the 12 months ended 12/31/2011. Oklahoma Gas and Electric Company. Index of Worksheets
Rate Formula Template Utilizing FERC Form 1 for the 12 months ended 12/31/2011 (Enter whether "Projected Data" or "Actual Data") Projected Data Attachment H Addendum 2A Oklahoma Gas and Electric Company
Wells Fargo Securities 11 th Annual Pipeline, MLP & Energy Symposium. New York December 5, 2012
Wells Fargo Securities 11 th Annual Pipeline, MLP & Energy Symposium New York December 5, 2012 1 Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 This presentation contains
RE: Notice of 2015 Annual Formula Rate Update Posting and Customer Meeting
September 2, 2014 TO: All Interested Parties RE: Notice of 2015 Annual Formula Rate Update Posting and Customer Meeting In accordance with Section 1.3(a) of the Oklahoma Gas and Electric Company ( OG&E
J.P.Morgan Energy Equity Conference June 27, 2017 FORTIS INC. WIRED FOR GROWTH
J.P.Morgan Energy Equity Conference June 27, 2017 Forward-Looking Information Fortis Inc. ( Fortis or, the Corporation ) includes forward-looking information in this presentation within the meaning of
COMMENTS OF TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP ON THE EUROPEAN REGULATORS GROUP FOR ELECTRICITY AND GAS DRAFT PROPOSAL ON GUIDELINES ON INTER-TSO COMPENSATION
DRAFT COMMENTS OF TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP ON THE EUROPEAN REGULATORS GROUP FOR ELECTRICITY AND GAS DRAFT PROPOSAL ON GUIDELINES ON INTER-TSO COMPENSATION In response to the ERGEG Draft Proposal on Guidelines
Regulatory Status Report
FERC or State Jurisdiction: FERC EL13-88 EL16-91 Northern Indiana Public Service Company's ("NIPSCO") Complaint Against the Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc. ("MISO") and PJM Interconnection,
9. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ISO AND PARTICIPATING TOs. Each Participating TO shall enter into a Transmission Control Agreement with the
First Revised Sheet No. 121 ORIGINAL VOLUME NO. I Replacing Original Sheet No. 121 9. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ISO AND PARTICIPATING TOs. 9.1 Nature of Relationship. Each Participating TO shall enter into
Smart Grid Small Generator Interconnection Procedures for New Distributed Resources 20 MW or Less Connected in Parallel with LIPA Distribution Systems
Smart Grid Small Generator Interconnection Procedures for New Distributed Resources 20 MW or Less Connected in Parallel with LIPA Distribution Systems -1- TABLE OF CONTENTS Section I. Application Process..
83C Questions and Answers
83C Questions and Answers (2) Section 1.7.4.1 Can the Evaluation Team provide guidance on the scope and amount of information that could be requested from ISO-NE, and the expected magnitude of any associated
Injection / Withdrawal CARP
Injection / Withdrawal CARP Decisions Note: To inform the RECB Stakeholders at their upcoming September 30 th meeting, this version of the Decision Tree contains the decisions made by CARP (in bold/italics)
COMMUNITY-BASED ENERGY DEVELOPMENT (C-BED) TARIFF
(CLOSED) Page 1 of 5 Fifth Revision COMMUNITY-BASED ENERGY DEVELOPMENT (C-BED) TARIFF DESCRIPTION RATE CODE C-BED CLOSED TO NEW INSTALLATIONS 32-990 C RULES AND REGULATIONS: Terms and conditions of this
Electricity (Development of Small Power Projects) GN. No. 77 (contd.) THE ELECTRICITY ACT (CAP.131) RULES. (Made under sections 18(5), 45 and 46))
GOVERNMENT NOTICE NO. 77 published on 02/03/2018 THE ELECTRICITY ACT (CAP.131) RULES (Made under sections 18(5), 45 and 46)) THE ELECTRICITY (DEVELOPMENT OF SMALL POWER PROJECTS) RULES, 2018 1. Citation
Applications for Participating Transmission Owner Status Attachment C - Transmission Revenue Requirement
Applications for Participating Transmission Owner Status Attachment C - Transmission Revenue Requirement The Transmission Revenue Requirement (TRR) for each Participating TO reflects the Participating
West Coast Seminar. Max Myers Managing Director, Finance and Business Development December 10, West Coast Seminar 1
Max Myers Managing Director, Finance and Business Development December 10, 2008 1 (A2, BBB+, AA-) Largest electric utility in Oklahoma Over 768,000 customers Rates 28% below the national average Partner
Midwest Energy, Inc. Transmission Formula Rate Protocols
Section 1 Annual Updates A. Definitions Annual Publication and Filing Date shall mean the date on which the last of the events listed in Section 1. C. occurs for each year. Annual Review Procedures shall
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON
ORDER NO. 10-132 ENTERED 04/07/10 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON UM 1401 In the Matter of PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON Investigation into Interconnection of PURPA Qualifying Facilities
SPP Reserve Sharing Group Operating Process
SPP Reserve Sharing Group Operating Process Effective: 1/1/2018 1.1 Reserve Sharing Group Purpose In the continuous operation of the electric power network, Operating Capacity is required to meet forecasted
Southwest Power Pool REGIONAL TARIFF WORKING GROUP January 20, 2005 DFW Airport Hyatt Dallas, TX 9:30 a.m. 4:00 p.m.
Southwest Power Pool REGIONAL TARIFF WORKING GROUP January 20, 2005 DFW Airport Hyatt Dallas, TX 9:30 a.m. 4:00 p.m. Agenda Item 1 Call to Order, Introductions and Receipt of Proxies Ricky Bittle (Chair)
FERC Jurisdiction over Distribution Interconnections and Required PJM Involvement
FERC Jurisdiction over Distribution s and Required A. With NO Prior Use of Distribution System 1 1 Generator Interconnected Transmission Owner() or any entity market 2 Project goes into queue to obtain
LaCygne -Stilwell. Evolutionary Strategic Plan Becoming an RTO. Blue Canyon Wind Farm PHASE 1 COMPLETE. SPP Regional Planning Summit UPGRADE PROJECT
Southwest Power Pool, Inc. 2003 A NNUAL R EPORT Special Issue LaCygne -Stilwell UPGRADE PROJECT Evolutionary Strategic Plan Becoming an RTO SPP Regional Planning Summit Auditors Report and 03 / FINANCIALS
Deutsche Bank Clean Tech, Utilities & Power Conference. May 14, 2012
Deutsche Bank Clean Tech, Utilities & Power Conference May 14, 2012 Safe Harbor Some of the matters discussed in this presentation may contain forward-looking statements that are subject to certain risks,
Transmission Cost Allocation
Transmission Cost Allocation IPSAC February 2, 2010 John P. Buechler NYISO Executive Regulatory Policy Advisor Background FERC Policy has evolved Order 888 No Planning Requirement for ISOs Order 2000 Planning
Relationship-Based Member-Driven Independence Through Diversity Evolutionary vs. Revolutionary Reliability & Economics Inseparable
Southwest Power Pool, Inc. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE MEETING December 7, 2011 Teleconference AGENDA 1:00 p.m. 3:00 p.m. CST 1. Call to Order and Administrative Items... Nick Brown 2. Vacancies...
W rksh op on I vest est en t in i U.S.. Wi W n i d In I dustr st y r by Chin i ese Comp m anies B ijing, Ch C ina June 30, 2011 Inve v stme
Workshop on Investment in U.S. Wind Industry by Chinese Companies Beijing, China June 30, 2011 Investment in U.S. Renewable Energy Projects: Business and Legal Environments Presented by Edward D. Einowski
Appendix B-2. Term Sheet for Tolling Agreements. for For
Appendix B-2 Term Sheet for Tolling Agreements for For 2015 Request For Proposals For Long-Term Developmental Combined-Cycle Gas Turbineand Existing Capacity and Energy Resources in WOTAB DRAFT Entergy
ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE INTERCONNECTION AND PARALLEL OPERATION AGREEMENT FOR DISTRIBUTED GENERATION RATED 2 MW AND LESS
ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE INTERCONNECTION AND PARALLEL OPERATION AGREEMENT FOR DISTRIBUTED GENERATION RATED 2 MW AND LESS This Interconnection Agreement ( Agreement ) is made and entered into this day of, 20,
BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI
BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI In the Matter of the Application of The Empire District Electric Company for Approval of Its Customer Savings Plan. ) ) File No. EO-2018-0092
The following words and terms shall have the following meanings when used in this Tariff:
Sheet 1 1. Introduction This tariff ( Tariff ) describes the terms and conditions under which an Applicant for an eligible distributed generation project ( DG Project ) will receive funding pursuant to
ROCK ENERGY COOPERATIVE INTERCONNECTION POLICY Policy M Board Policy Interconnection and Parallel Operation of Distributed Generation
ROCK ENERGY COOPERATIVE INTERCONNECTION POLICY Policy M25-08 SUBJECT: Board Policy Interconnection and Parallel Operation of Distributed Generation OBJECTIVE: To establish safety, reliability and economic
THE NARRAGANSETT ELECTRIC COMPANY RENEWABLE ENERGY GROWTH PROGRAM FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMERS
Sheet 1 1. Introduction This tariff ( Tariff ) describes the terms and conditions under which an Applicant for an eligible distributed generation project ( DG Project ) will receive funding pursuant to
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) MOTION TO INTERVENE AND PROTEST OF ACCIONA WIND ENERGY USA LLC
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Southwest Power Pool, Inc. ) ) ) ) ) Docket No. ER14-781-000 MOTION TO INTERVENE AND PROTEST OF ACCIONA WIND ENERGY USA LLC In accordance
Participant Funding: The SeTrans Proposal. Bruce Edelston Director, Policy and Planning Southern Company
Participant Funding: The SeTrans Proposal Bruce Edelston Director, Policy and Planning Southern Company Presentation to HEPG December 11, 2003 Point Clear, AL 1 SeTrans Participants CLECO Dalton Utilities
Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
2016 Power & Gas Leaders Conference Bank of America Merrill Lynch Boston, MA September 15, 2016 1 Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 This presentation contains
Kind of Service: Electric Class of Service: All Docket No.: U Order No.: 19 Part III. Rate Schedule No. 35 Effective: 3/31/16
7 th Revised Sheet No. 35.1 Schedule Sheet 1 of 5 Replacing: 6 th Revised Sheet No. 35.1 35.0. LARGE COGENERATION RIDER 35.1. AVAILABILITY To any customer who takes service under the provisions of any