Defining Intellectual Property The Tax Implications
|
|
- Godfrey Stanley
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Sutherland Tax Roundtable - Silicon Valley April 29, 2015 Robb Chase, Partner Michele Borens, Partner Defining Intellectual Property The Tax Implications 1
2 Overview The Irresistible Force and the Immovable Object The state, federal and international tax environment is in flux as tax authorities seek to curtail the use of perceived tax avoidance strategies, but also implement tax-related incentives designed to attract investment. Minimize Tax Avoidance Incentivize Investment 2
3 Overview Caught in the Middle Highly mobile income, such as IP profits, are a key target under the current reform proposals and investment initiatives. Minimize Tax Avoidance Incentivize Investment 3
4 Overview The Playing Field Tax authorities are taking a twoheaded approach to tax reform. Defense Tax Reforms Offense Transparency; tightening of IP profit allocation rules; GAAR Requiring other tax authorities to avoid harmful tax practices 4
5 Overview Prepping Your Team While tax authorities sort out their approach, companies need to be prepared for the potential changes on the horizon. Evaluate the longevity of any tax benefits on IP income. Identify modified or replacement IP structures expected to secure tax benefits after reforms. Quantify the short term and long term costs versus benefits of making any structure changes. Prepare or sensitize management to these analyses. 5
6 A Tortured Relationship: IP Development and Tax Incentives 6
7 IP Development Incentive Regimes U.S. R&D Credit Regime Benefit of tax credit equal to amount of qualifying R&D expenses Benefit inures to party performing R&D at its risk; 15 yr amortization for acquired IP Amount of tax credit determined w/o regard to value of profits created by R&D activity IP Box Regime Benefit of lower tax rate on IP profits Benefit inures to IP entrepreneur or group member performing R&D; may be amortization for acquired IP Amount of profit subject to benefit relies on TP analysis De facto Systems Benefits vary but could be a de facto low zero tax rate on profits earned outside country Benefit inures to IP entrepreneur performing R&D (directly or through contract R&D) Amount of profit subject to benefit relies on TP analysis 7
8 The Tipping Point Patent Boxes Recent years have seen the rise of patent or innovation boxes, particularly in the EU, bringing the question of permissible tax incentive versus harmful tax practice to a head. Permissible Tax Incentive Harmful Tax Practice 8
9 The Tipping Point Patent Boxes (cont d) Although they vary by country, the principal features of a patent box regime can be illustrated by UK Patent Box Regime: Phased in beginning April 1, 2013 and providing for 10% corporate tax rate on worldwide profits derived from qualifying patents and similar IP. Eligible companies include UK taxable entities that undertake qualifying development activities. Activities conducted by group companies can satisfy development requirement - accommodates CSAs and acquired IP. Qualifying IP must be owned or exclusively licensed. Portion of IP income eligible for benefit determined by applying transfer pricing rules. Pfizer cited this 10% rate as a motive for its proposed $100B takeover of AstraZeneca, which was subsequently abandoned. 9
10 Patent Box Permissible Incentive Regime or Harmful Tax Practice? EU EU Code of Conduct Group State Aid attacks EU measured reaction to UK Patent Box OECD BEPS Action Plan (July 2013) BEPS Action 5 Report (September 2014) BEPS Action 5 Agreement (February 2015) Various Countries Germany publicly reacts to UK Patent Box UK-German Statement (November 2014) UK-German Agreement (February 2015) 10
11 Consensus Building for IP Regimes 11
12 Consensus Building for IP Regimes? UK-Germany Agreement on UK Patent Box Germany responded strongly to the UK Patent Box Regime, arguing that it was a harmful tax practice, particularly because acquired IP could be imported into the UK regardless of where developed. Following discussions between the governments, the UK- German Agreement calls for agreement by June 2015 on a practical tracking and tracing approach to determine eligibility of IP for patent box regime. IP must be connected to the jurisdiction providing the benefit, although a limited uplift benefit is provided for related party outsourcing and third party acquisitions. UK agreed to closure of existing regime to new participants as of June 2016, and the elimination of the regime for grandfathered companies by June
13 Consensus Building for IP Regimes? The UK-Germany Approach reflects the OECD recommendations in its Action 5: Countering Harmful Tax Practices. Under Action 5, the OECD has proposed adoption of a modified nexus approach for purposes of determining whether an IP incentive regime, such as a patent box, is a permissible incentive or a harmful tax practice. This approach focuses on whether the taxpayer engages in substantial activities in the regime to warrant the tax incentive. Existence of substantial activities is determined on the basis of the location of qualified expenditures. Approach permits jurisdictions to provide benefits to income arising out of IP to the extent there is a direct nexus between the income receiving the benefits and the expenditures contributing to that income. 13
14 Consensus Building for IP Regimes? The OECD Modified Nexus Approach: The proportion of IP income that may benefit from an IP regime is the same proportion as that between qualifying expenditures and overall expenditures. Qualifying IP Expenditures Total IP Expenditures Overall IP Income Eligible IP Income So long as the amount of income receiving benefits under the IP regime does not exceed the amount determined under this nexus approach, the regime satisfies substantial activities and is permissible. 14
15 Consensus Building for IP Regimes Query the U.S. Approach - Comprehensive tax reform continues to fill the U.S. headlines, but with little or no specific action. Camp Option C (2011) Sought to reduce the incentives to locate intangibles in low- or no-tax jurisdictions by providing for neutral tax treatment of intangible income. Income of a CFC from use of intangible property would be subpart F income subject to US tax at 25% rate. 40% DRD available for income from use outside the US (yielding 15% rate). 40% deduction for domestic corporations for income from use of intangibles outside the US (yielding 15% rate). Camp Discussion Draft (2014) Similar to Option C, it purports to neutralize the incentive to shift income from intangibles, although mechanically there is no specific link to intangibles. 15
16 Consensus Building for IP Regimes Query the U.S. Approach - Comprehensive tax reform continues to fill the U.S. headlines, but with little or no specific action. President s FY 2016 Budget International Proposals 19% minimum tax on foreign income; 14% tax on retained foreign earnings. Limit shifting of income through intangible property transfers. Close loopholes under subpart F. 16
17 Query the U.S. Approach? U.S. patent box regime? General discussion of traditional IP and patent box regimes has yet to meet with the introduction of specific proposals. Tension with R&D credit? Does it have to be either or? Relationship to reduced corporate rates generally? Practical Difficulties in Coalition Building Although taxpayers share common goals, the means of getting there impact each taxpayer differently. Issue seems to be not what you want, but what you are willing to give up to get it. 17
18 How will the States React? IP Holding Companies were once a common part of corporate structures. States have more closely scrutinized IP structures in the last 30 years. States have enacted various regimes and rules to limit the tax benefit from licensing IP Expense Disallowance or Addback Statues Combined Reporting Expanded nexus statutes Certain types of IP Holding Companies have survived some scrutiny in some states. IP licensing by insurance companies. IP licensing by robust operating companies. 18
19 Devil is in the Details: Defining IP Assets 19
20 Devil is in the Details: Defining IP Assets Current U.S. Rules Generally Broadly Defined Section 367(d) - Taxes outbound transfers of intangible property in nonrecognition transactions and defines IP broadly to include any of the following if it has a substantial value independent of the services of any individual: Patent, invention, formula, process, design, pattern, or know-how; Copyright, literary, musical, or artistic composition; Trademark, trade name, or brand name; Franchise, license, or contract; Method, program, system, procedure, campaign, survey, study, forecast, estimate, customer list, or technical data; or Any similar item, Foreign goodwill or going concern value is not included in the definition of intangible property for purposes of section 367(d). 20
21 Devil is in the Details: Defining IP Assets Current U.S. Rules Generally Broadly Defined Section 197 Also defines intangible broadly to include: Goodwill and going concern value, Workforce in place including its composition and terms and conditions (contractual or otherwise) of its employment, Business books and records, operating systems, or any other information base (including lists or other information with respect to current or prospective customers), Any patent, copyright, formula, process, design, pattern, knowhow, format, or other similar item, Any customer-based intangible or any supplier-based intangible,and any other similar item, 21
22 Devil is in the Details: Defining IP Assets Current U.S. Rules Generally Broadly Defined Section 197 Also defines intangible broadly to include: Any license, permit, or other right granted by a governmental unit or an agency or instrumentality thereof Any covenant not to compete (or other arrangement to the extent such arrangement has substantially the same effect as a covenant not to compete) entered into in connection with an acquisition (directly or indirectly) of an interest in a trade or business or substantial portion thereof, and any franchise, trademark, or trade name. Sections 1060 and In the case of an applicable asset acquisition (i.e., an acquisition of all of the assets of a business) sales proceeds and purchase price are allocated among the assets acquired in order by class, including Class VI intangible property described in section 197 other than goodwill and going concern, and Class VII, all other property including goodwill and going concern. 22
23 Devil is in the Details: Defining IP Assets OECD Modified Nexus Proposal IP Assets in contrast to existing U.S. definitions, the OECD modified nexus proposal narrowly defines IP Assets as patents and other functionally equivalent assets. Marketing-related IP assets such as trademarks would not qualify, setting up a significant valuation question. Where a product incorporates multiple IP assets, determining the income attributable to a specific IP asset may not be practicable. Defining the IP asset is also critical to determining the qualifying expenditures. Whither the existence of cost sharing arrangements? Where R&D activities give rise to IP assets in multiple jurisdictions, the implications on the qualifying expenditure definition are uncertain. The OECD has suggested that further guidance on the definition of IP will be forthcoming. 23
24 Devil is in the Details: Defining IP Assets OECD Modified Nexus Approach Qualifying Expenditures - must have been incurred by a qualifying taxpayer and must be directly connected to the IP asset. Qualifying Directly connected Incurred by the qualifying taxpayer Potential Uplift Acquisition costs Outsourcing to related parties Non - Qualifying Not directly connected Not incurred by qualifying taxpayer Outsourcing to related parties 24
25 Devil is in the Details: Defining IP Assets OECD Modified Nexus Approach Qualifying Expenditures - must have been incurred by a qualifying taxpayer and must be directly connected to the IP asset. Uplift may be provided to take into account certain non-qualifying expenditures. The OECD Agreement on Modified Nexus and Explanatory Paper builds on the UK-Germany Joint Proposal and permits a 30% uplift for expenditures for outsourcing to related parties and acquisitions from unrelated parties. Post-acquisition expenditures related to acquired IP can qualify as qualifying expenditures. 25
26 Devil is in the Details: Defining IP Assets OECD Modified Nexus Approach Uplift for non-qualifying expenditures, example 1: Unrelated Seller $10 Purchased IP MNC (Country A) $100 Q.E. Third Party $40 R&D (Country B) Maximum uplift amount = 100 * 30% = 30 Overall qualifying expenses including limited portion of outsourcing and acquisition costs =
27 Devil is in the Details: Defining IP Assets OECD Modified Nexus Approach Uplift for non-qualifying expenditures, example 2: Unrelated Seller $10 Purchased IP MNC (Country A) $100 Q.E. Third Party $15 R&D (Country B) Maximum uplift amount = 100 * 30% = 30 Overall qualifying expenses including limited portion of outsourcing and acquisition costs = 125 Uplift is capped by the amount of actual expenditures. 27
28 Devil is in the Details: Defining IP Assets OECD Modified Nexus Approach Overall Expenditures the sum of all expenditures that would count as qualifying expenditures if they were undertaken by the taxpayer itself. IP acquisitions costs are included in overall expenditures but not in qualifying expenditures (though acquisition costs may be taken into account through uplift ). Overall Income limited to net overall income derived from the IP asset (after allocation of expenditures). May include royalties, capital gains and other income from the sale of an IP asset and embedded IP income from the sale of products directly related to the IP asset. 28
29 Devil is in the Details: Defining IP Assets OECD Modified Nexus Approach Grandfather Rules for Existing Regimes Taking a cue from the UK-Germany proposal, the OECD modified nexus approach suggests phased elimination of existing, nonqualifying regimes. Close old regimes to new entrants on the earlier of (i) new regime consistent with modified nexus approach taking effect or (ii) June 30, New entrants only include those that fully meet substantive requirements of regime application alone is not sufficient Abolish old regimes by June 30,
30 Devil is in the Details: Defining IP Assets OECD Modified Nexus Approach Transition Rules for New Regimes Little discussion has been devoted to how existing IP may be transitioned into new incentive regimes, if at all. Potentially could apply only to new expenditures, but consider whether that will give rise to section 197-type anti-churning rules. 30
31 Devil is in the Details: Defining IP Assets Most state tax definitions of intangible property are contained income tax provisions. States do not impose sales tax on intangible property. Many states impose sales tax on software (often considered IP), but their state definitions define tangible personal property to include software 31
32 Devil is in the Details: Defining IP Assets State Tax Definitions California Reg (b)(4) "Intangible property" includes, but is not limited to, patents, copyrights, trademarks, service marks, trade names, licenses, plans, specifications, blueprints, processes, techniques, formulas, designs, layouts, patterns, drawings, manuals, trade secrets, stock, contract rights including broadcasting rights, and other similar intangible assets. Also define marketing intangibles, mixed intangibles and manufacturing intangibles. Massachusetts Sec. 31I(a) "Intangible property", patents, patent applications, trade names, trademarks, service marks, copyrights, mask works, trade secrets and similar types of intangible assets. 32
33 IP Planning in the Face of Tax Reform Uncertainty 33
34 IP Planning in the Face of Uncertainty Recent EU and OECD actions are indicative that consensus may be forthcoming on IP incentive regimes, but in the absence of specific rules what should taxpayers do to prepare? Depends on the taxpayer BEPS and similar initiatives are focused on alignment of income and expenses (i.e., modified nexus approach). For taxpayers in existing regimes that are under attack, the need to transition may be more immediate. For other taxpayers, active participation in the worldwide legislative discussion may be appropriate. 34
35 IP Planning in the Face of Uncertainty In the absence of specific rules what should taxpayers do to prepare? In all cases, important to ensure that non-tax business and legal teams are aware that landscape may be changing, which may result in recommended operational or structural changes. 35
36 Questions? Michele Borens Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP Robb Chase Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP
37 Connect with us! The Sutherland SALT Shaker mobile app is now available. Download today from the: Windows Phone Store itunes App Store Google Play Amazon Appstore for Android Visit us at Sutherland SALT Group 37
The State of Debt Under the Proposed Section 385 Regulations
Todd A. Lard Daniel R.B. Nicholas May 5, 2016 The State of Debt Under the Proposed Section 385 Regulations Overview On April 4, proposed regulations were issued under IRC 385 (the Proposed Regulations)
More informationInformation Sheet No. 66. The New Intellectual Property (IP) Tax Regime in Cyprus
Information Sheet No. 66 The New Intellectual Property (IP) Tax Regime in Cyprus Introduction On 14 October 2016, the House of Representatives passed amendments to the Income Tax Law in order to align
More informationCyprus Tax News Amendments to Cyprus s IP regime
Cyprus Tax & Legal Services 27 October 2016 Issue 14/2016 Cyprus Tax News Amendments to Cyprus s IP regime INTRODUCTION On 14 October 2016, the House of Representatives enacted into law significant amendments
More informationTEI School - Houston. Intangible Property ( IP ) - Basics in IP Planning. May 3, 2017
TEI School - Houston Intangible Property ( IP ) - Basics in IP Planning May 3, 2017 Disclaimer EY refers to the global organization, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global
More informationGene Ferraro, Mazars USA LLP New York, NY William D. James, BKD, LLP St. Louis, MO
How to Plan for IP? Gene Ferraro, Mazars USA LLP New York, NY gene.ferarro@mazarsusa.com William D. James, BKD, LLP St. Louis, MO wdjames@bkd.com Cormac Kelleher, Mazars Dublin, Ireland ckelleher@mazars.ie
More informationThe State of Debt Under the Proposed Section 385 Regulations
Robb Chase Andrew Appleby TEI Denver May 11, 2016 The State of Debt Under the Proposed Section 385 Regulations All Rights Reserved. This communication is for general informational purposes only and is
More informationSales and Use Tax Audit Trends
TEI Audits and Appeals May 21, 2015 Michele Borens Todd Lard Sales and Use Tax Audit Trends Agenda Aggressive States and Auditors Locality Audits Third Party Auditors Class Action Concerns/Considerations
More informationState and Local Taxation Update: Information Sharing and Transparency
Jeffrey A. Friedman, Partner Michele Borens, Partner May 14, 2014 TEI Denver Chapter State and Local Taxation Update: Information Sharing and Transparency Agenda Transparency in State Taxation What Type
More informationIP BOX TAX REGIMES. Rod Donnelly Thursday, September 14, 2017
IP BOX TAX REGIMES Rod Donnelly Thursday, September 14, 2017 AGENDA 2 IP Box basics Tax sticks and carrots International landscape harmful tax practices OECD BEPS 2015 action final report topics OECD BEPS
More informationU.S. Tax Legislation Corporate and International Provisions. Corporate Law Provisions
U.S. Tax Legislation Corporate and International Provisions On December 20, 2017, Congress enacted comprehensive tax legislation (the Act ). This memorandum highlights some of the important provisions
More informationIntellectual property in the age of BEPS
Intellectual property in the age of BEPS Tax Executives Institute Michigan Chapter Detroit 28 October 2015 Disclaimer EY refers to the global organization, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms
More informationWhat Would Federal Tax Reform Mean for States?
Jeffrey A. Friedman March 31, 2016 What Would Federal Tax Reform Mean for States? Urban Institute Forum All Rights Reserved. This communication is for general informational purposes only and is not intended
More informationInternal Revenue Code Section 197 Amortization of goodwill and certain other intangibles
Internal Revenue Code Section 197 Amortization of goodwill and certain other intangibles CLICK HERE to return to the home page (a) General rule. A taxpayer shall be entitled to an amortization deduction
More informationTHE KNOWLEDGE DEVELOPMENT BOX Public Consultation JANUARY 2015
THE KNOWLEDGE DEVELOPMENT BOX Public Consultation JANUARY 2015 Public Consultation Paper: The Knowledge Development Box Department of Finance January 2015 Tax Policy Division Department of Finance Government
More informationWhirlwind Review of New State Tax Laws
Todd Lard, Partner Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP Carley Roberts, Partner Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP FTA Annual Conference June 10, 2014 Whirlwind Review of New State Tax Laws Agenda Factor Weighting
More informationTEI Los Angeles May 15, Michele Borens Andrew Appleby. Business in Bitcoins
TEI Los Angeles May 15, 2015 Michele Borens Andrew Appleby Business in Bitcoins 1 Agenda Objective Overview What is a Bitcoin? Types of Virtual Currency Advantages of using Virtual Currency Commercial
More informationFAIR VALUE & TRANSFER PRICING: And the twain shall never meet? Transfer Pricing Panel ABA Fall Conf., Denver Oct. 21, 2011
FAIR VALUE & TRANSFER PRICING: And the twain shall never meet? Transfer Pricing Panel ABA Fall Conf., Denver Oct. 21, 2011 Introduction Fair Value & Transfer Pricing Panel: David Ernick, Treasury Jason
More informationTHE FUTURE OF TAX PLANNING: TRANSPARENCY AND SUBSTANCE FOR ALL? Friday, 26 February AM PM Conrad Hotel, Hong Kong
THE FUTURE OF TAX PLANNING: TRANSPARENCY AND SUBSTANCE FOR ALL? Friday, 26 February 2016 9.00AM - 12.00PM Conrad Hotel, Hong Kong THE DRIVE TOWARDS TRANSPARENCY: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES IN INTERNATIONAL
More informationOur commentary focuses on five main issues. Supplementary comments relating to specific paragraphs or issues are provided in the appendix.
Comments on the Revised Discussion Draft on Transfer Pricing Aspects of Intangibles by the Confederation of Netherlands Industry and Employers (VNO-NCW) We are pleased to see the significant progress which
More informationWhich Cos. Are Most Likely To Benefit From Innovation Box?
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Which Cos. Are Most Likely To Benefit From Innovation
More informationSTEP Silicon Valley Ireland: Gateway to Accessing the EU Market
STEP Silicon Valley Ireland: Gateway to Accessing the EU Market Mark O Sullivan and Pat English August 17, 2016 Financial Times 2012-2015 Matheson is ranked in the FT s top 10 European law firms 2015.
More informationState Income Tax Litigation You Need to Know About
Michele Borens, Partner Amy Nogid, Counsel TEI New York State and Local Tax Seminar November 9, 2016 State Income Tax Litigation You Need to Know About All Rights Reserved. This communication is for general
More informationThe patent box and I.P. tax regime under Action 5
The patent box and I.P. tax regime under Action 5 Republic and Canton of Ticino Department of Finance and Economy Sharon Cina, Tax lawyer, Tax and legal consultant of the Tax management of the Ticino Tax
More informationState Tax Implications of New (and Pending) Federal Rules
Todd A. Lard Andrew D. Appleby NESTOA September 27, 2016 State Tax Implications of New (and Pending) Federal Rules All Rights Reserved. This communication is for general informational purposes only and
More informationThe OECD s 3 Major Tax Initiatives
The OECD s 3 Major Tax Initiatives 1. The Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes Peer review of ~ 100 countries International standard for transparency and exchange of
More informationRecent developments in international tax
Recent developments in international tax Disclaimer EY refers to the global organization, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate
More informationThe Section 367(d) Paradox: Peering into the Abyss from a Safe Distance
The University of Chicago Law School 67 th Annual Federal Tax Conference November 7, 2014 The Section 367(d) Paradox: Peering into the Abyss from a Safe Distance Presentation By: Eric B. Sensenbrenner
More informationU.S. Tax Reform Legislative Updates
U.S. Tax Reform Legislative Updates Fred Gander 12 May 2014 Notice ANY TAX ADVICE IN THIS COMMUNICATION IS NOT INTENDED OR WRITTEN BY KPMG TO BE USED, AND CANNOT BE USED, BY A CLIENT OR ANY OTHER PERSON
More informationInnovation Tax Incentives March 2017
www.pwc.ie Innovation Tax Incentives March 2017 1. R&D tax credit Regime Key Benefits Headline tax credit of 25% for expenditure on qualifying R&D activities Overall effective corporation tax credit of
More informationTHE OECD BEPS ACTION PLAN
THE OECD BEPS ACTION PLAN Intangibles and Services Seminar 28-03-2017 INTRODUCTION TO COPENHAGEN ECONOMICS IP Valuation & Transfer Pricing We help our clients by quantifying the economic value of various
More informationTEI Tax Summit Asia Pacific. Hong Kong 31 August Baker & McKenzie
TEI Tax Summit 2016 Asia Pacific Hong Kong 31 August 2016 2015 Baker & McKenzie Session 4: What Do You Mean? The Evolution of the Definitions of IP and Royalties in Asia Speakers: Allen Tan, Singapore
More informationThe Innovation Promotion Act of 2015: Not the New Ireland
The Innovation Promotion Act of 2015: Not the New Ireland by Lewis J. Greenwald, Lucas Giardelli, and Christopher Odell Reprinted from Tax Notes Int l, February 1, 2016, p. 439 Volume 81, Number 5 February
More informationComparison of Key Anti-Base Erosion Rules in the Tax Reform Act of 2017 and under UK Tax Law Calum Dewar, PwC Mike Williams, HM Treasury
Comparison of Key Anti-Base Erosion Rules in the Tax Reform Act of 2017 and under UK Tax Law Calum Dewar, PwC Mike Williams, HM Treasury International Tax Policy Forum and Institute of Economic Law Conference
More informationImpacts of U.S. International Tax Reform. October 23, 2018
Impacts of U.S. International Tax Reform October 23, 2018 Christopher Jentile (Verizon), Moderator William Crowley (PwC) Anthony Sileo (KPMG) Stephen Blough (KPMG) 2 Christopher Jentile Christopher is
More informationInternational Tax Update
International Tax Update AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION SECTION OF TAXATION 26TH ANNUAL PHILADELPHIA TAX CONFERENCE November 6, 2015 11:20 a.m. 12:35 p.m. International Tax Update The panel will discuss the
More informationInternational Tax Update. Friday, December 1, 2017 Grant Thornton's Year End taxguide Event Brandon Joseph Senior Manager, International Tax
International Tax Update Friday, December 1, 2017 Grant Thornton's Year End taxguide Event Brandon Joseph Senior Manager, International Tax Presenters Brandon Joseph Senior Manager International Tax Services
More informationIs it time for your country to consider the "patent box"?
Is it time for your country to consider the "patent box"? By Jim Shanahan PwC's Global R&D Tax Symposium on Designing a Blueprint for Reducing the After-Tax Cost of Global R&D Dublin, Ireland, May 23,
More informationPlanning for Intangible Property Migration in an Uncertain Environment. ABA Section of Taxation Mid Year Meeting January 25, 2013
Planning for Intangible Property Migration in an Uncertain Environment ABA Section of Taxation Mid Year Meeting January 25, 2013 1 Presenters Moderator Kenneth Christman, Ernst &Young Panelists Chris Bello,
More informationAUSTRALIAN BUDGET
MAY 2015 AUSTRALIAN TAX UPDATE AUSTRALIAN BUDGET 2015-2016 INTRODUCTION The Australian Government has released a measured but significant 2015-2016 Federal Budget. The three main tax changes include a
More informationReg. Section (f)(4)(i) Amortization of goodwill and certain other intangibles.
Reg. Section 1.197-2(f)(4)(i) Amortization of goodwill and certain other intangibles. CLICK HERE to return to the home page (a) Overview -- (1) In general. Section 197 [26 USCS 197] allows an amortization
More informationKnowledge Development Box Utilising it for maximum benefit
Knowledge Development Box Utilising it for maximum benefit 10 February 2016 2016 Grant Thornton Ireland. All rights reserved #GTtax GRANT THORNTON WEDNESDAY, 10 TH FEBRUARY 2016 KNOWLEDGE DEVELOPMENT BOX
More informationOECD releases final BEPS package
6 October 2015 Tax Flash OECD releases final BEPS package On 5 October 2015, the OECD published the final reports of the OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting ( BEPS ) project, which consist of a package
More informationTransfer pricing and intangible planning
Transfer pricing and intangible planning Bob Ackerman Americas Director of Transfer Pricing Services Ernst & Young LLP Washington, DC USA Taxation Conference Mumbai 2008 Disclaimer The views reflected
More informationTax changes for 2018 disclosed in the new budget bill
Tax changes for 2018 disclosed in the new budget bill On 11 October 2017, and for the last time before next year s parliamentary elections, the Luxembourg Finance Minister presented the budget bill for
More informationOECD 2008 DISCUSSION DRAFT: TRANSFER PRICING ASPECTS OF BUSINESS RESTRUCTURINGS
OECD 2008 DISCUSSION DRAFT: TRANSFER PRICING ASPECTS OF BUSINESS RESTRUCTURINGS Business Restructuring As A Taxable Event: Causing Realization OECD Consultation June 9-10, 2009 Steven P. Hannes McDermott
More informationConsultation on modified UK patent box
Tax Services 26 October 2015 Consultation on modified UK patent box Executive summary A joint consultation document published by HMRC and HM Treasury on 22 October 2015 sets out the Government s proposals
More informationIntellectual property and the Patent Box
Intellectual property and the Patent Box Contents Background to the Patent Box regime 2 Qualifying companies 3 Qualifying IP rights 4 Qualifying development 5 Calculating qualifying profits 6 Patent Box
More informationIMPACT OF TAX ON M&A. Simon Fletcher 14 October 2016
IMPACT OF TAX ON M&A Simon Fletcher AGENDA 1. Tax environment 2. Recent developments 3. Impact on M&A 4. Questions Disclaimer: this presentation is intended to be for general guidance on matters of interest,
More informationA New Due Diligence Checklist: Let s Not Overlook Any New Tax Rules
A New Due Diligence Checklist: Let s Not Overlook Any New Tax Rules Wednesday, May 23, 2018 Presented by: P. Evan Stephens, CPA, MT and Bill Abel, EA, MST Sensiba San Filippo LLP www.ssfllp.com 1 Today
More informationTax Cuts & Jobs Act: Considerations for Funds
Tax Cuts & Jobs Act: Considerations for Funds December 22, 2017 On December 22, 2017, the President signed into law the 2017 U.S. tax reform bill formerly known as the Tax Cuts & Jobs Act (the TCJA ).
More informationIntra-Group Services & Intangibles
Intra-Group Services & Intangibles Mbiki Kamanjiri @ 2016 Grant Thornton All rights reserved. What is covered under Intangible Property Definition: Property with no physical existence but whose value depends
More informationLuxembourg Parliament adopts new IP regime
26 April 2018 Global Tax Alert Luxembourg Parliament adopts new IP regime EY Global Tax Alert Library Access both online and pdf versions of all EY Global Tax Alerts. Copy into your web browser: www.ey.com/taxalerts
More informationLB&I International Practice Service Process Unit Overview
LB&I International Practice Service Process Unit Overview IPS Level Number Title UIL Code Number Shelf N/A Business Outbound Volume 1 Income Shifting (Business Outbound) Level 1 UIL 9411 Part 1.7 Other
More informationResumption of Application of Substantial Activities Factor to No or only Nominal Tax Jurisdictions. Inclusive Framework on BEPS: Action 5
Resumption of Application of Substantial Activities Factor to No or only Nominal Tax Jurisdictions Inclusive Framework on BEPS: Action 5 INCLUSIVE FRAMEWORK ON BEPS ACTION 5 www.oecd.org/tax/beps/resumption-of-application-of-substantial-activities-factor.pdf
More informationInternational Tax Impact of Business Entity Selection for Foreign Operations of U.S. Companies
FOR LIVE PROGRAM ONLY International Tax Impact of Business Entity Selection for Foreign Operations of U.S. Companies TUESDAY, DECEMBER 12, 2017, 1:00-2:50 pm Eastern IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR THE LIVE
More informationCA T. P. OSTWAL. T. P. Ostwal & Associates LLP
CA T. P. OSTWAL BEPS strategies may not necessarily be illegal Increased globalisation enables companies to exploit gaps arising on interaction of domestic tax systems and treaty rules within the boundary
More informationTax Cuts & Jobs Act: Considerations for M&A
A LERT M EM OR A N D UM Tax Cuts & Jobs Act: Considerations for M&A January 12, 2018 On December 22, 2017, the President signed into law the 2017 U.S. tax reform bill formerly known as the Tax Cuts & Jobs
More informationDo we have the wrong tax system for the digital economy? Alf Capito, Tax Policy Leader, EY Asia Pacific July 2014
Do we have the wrong tax system for the digital economy? Alf Capito, Tax Policy Leader, EY Asia Pacific July 2014 Key features of the digital economy as seen by the OECD taskforce Mobility Reliance on
More informationSEMINAR ON TRANSFER PRICING 23rd September, Valuation Approaches and their applicability under Transfer Pricing. CA Siddharth Banwat
SEMINAR ON TRANSFER PRICING 23rd September, 2017 Valuation Approaches and their applicability under Transfer Pricing WHAT IS VALUATION? WHAT IS VALUE? A value in exchange is a hypothetical price and the
More informationRSM InterTax Tax Insights February Belgian corporate income tax reform
RSM InterTax Tax Insights February 2018 Belgian corporate income tax reform Most of the measures announced by the 2017 Belgian summer agreement were finally adopted in the Law of 25 December 2017 on the
More informationTransfer pricing of intangibles
32E30000 - Tax Planning of International Enterprises Transfer pricing of intangibles Aalto BIZ / May 2, 2016 Petteri Rapo Alder & Sound Mannerheimintie 16 A FI-00100 Helsinki firstname.lastname@aldersound.fi
More informationTax Cuts & Jobs Act: Considerations for Funds
A LERT M EM OR A N D UM Tax Cuts & Jobs Act: Considerations for Funds January 25, 2018 On December 22, 2017, the President signed into law the 2017 U.S. tax reform bill formerly known as the Tax Cuts &
More informationTaxing Intellectual Property: CFC rules and the Patent Box 3 March Group Finance Controllers Functions Insurance Taxation Treasury
Taxing Intellectual Property: CFC rules and the Patent Box 3 March 2011 Group Finance Controllers Functions Insurance Taxation Treasury Carrot and Stick Mobility of IP AZ has only 3% of revenues but around
More informationInternational Tax and Transfer Pricing Update December 2, 2016
International Tax and Transfer Pricing Update December 2, 2016 Circular 230 Disclaimer Any written advice contained in or attached to this document/presentation is not intended or written by WTP Advisors
More informationSoftware and innovation deduction: Belgium is the place to be! 23 November 2017
Software and innovation deduction: Belgium is the place to be! 23 1 Innovation income deduction (adopted by the Chamber of Representatives on 2 February 2017) R&D incentives Innovation income deduction
More informationPanama s Minister of Economy and Finance proposes bill for calculating income subject to preferential tax treatment under an IP regime
28 August 2018 Global Tax Alert News from Americas Tax Center Panama s Minister of Economy and Finance proposes bill for calculating income subject to preferential tax treatment under an IP regime NEW!
More informationFINANCIAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATES PRIVATE INVESTMENT FUND TAX MASTER CLASS
FINANCIAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATES PRIVATE INVESTMENT FUND TAX MASTER CLASS EFFECTIVELY MANAGING TAX IMPLICATIONS OF FOREIGN INVESTMENTS Steven D. Bortnick May 24, 2017 Princeton Club, New York City #43410091
More informationTransition Tax DEEMED REPATRIATION OVERVIEW
Transition Tax DEEMED REPATRIATION OVERVIEW Basic Framework A 10% U.S. shareholder (a US SH ) of a specified foreign corporation ( SFC ) must recognize its pro rata share of the SFC s post-1986 accumulated
More information62 ASSOCIATION OF CORPORATE COUNSEL
62 ASSOCIATION OF CORPORATE COUNSEL CHEAT SHEET Foreign corporate earnings. Under the recently created Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, taxation and participation exemption of foreign corporate earnings have significantly
More informationHot topics Treasury seminar
Hot topics Treasury seminar Treasury in a transparent and new tax world Discover and unlock your potential Program Introduction on BEPS Potential implications for treasury o Interest deduction o Treaty
More informationU.S. Tax Aspects of Technology Transfers between the United States and Canada
Canada-United States Law Journal Volume 11 Issue Article 23 January 1986 U.S. Tax Aspects of Technology Transfers between the United States and Canada George G. Goodrich Follow this and additional works
More informationAnalysis of New Law UK CORPORATE TAX REFORM. Nikol Davies *
70 Analysis of New Law UK CORPORATE TAX REFORM Nikol Davies * INTRODUCTION The long anticipated consultation document for corporate tax reform was published by the government on 29 November 2010. The document
More informationThe Recent Surge in State Tax Credits and Incentives Offerings
Madison Barnett Olga Goldberg Houston SALT Roundtable Houston, TX September 10, 2015 The Recent Surge in State Tax Credits and Incentives Offerings 1 Agenda Overview of State and Local Tax Credits and
More informationIRELAND GLOBAL GUIDE TO M&A TAX: 2017 EDITION
IRELAND 1 IRELAND INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENTS 1. WHAT ARE RECENT TAX DEVELOPMENTS IN YOUR COUNTRY WHICH ARE RELEVANT FOR M&A DEALS AND PRIVATE EQUITY? A reduced rate of capital gains tax ( CGT ) of 20%
More informationBEPS Beyond Fortune 1000 October Armanino LLP amllp.com Armanino LLP amllp.com
BEPS Beyond Fortune 1000 October 2016 1 Armanino LLP amllp.com Armanino LLP amllp.com 1 BEPS Overview Timeline Pre-2013 - Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) concern that existing
More informationThe International Tax Landscape
and EU Tax Reforms How will Ireland, Luxembourg, Netherlands and Switzerland Reform Their Tax Systems to Comply?, Loyens & Loeff NV, PricewatershouseCoopers, PricewaterhouseCoopers 67 th Annual Tax Conference
More informationTECHNICAL EXPLANATION OF THE INNOVATION PROMOTION ACT OF 2015
TECHNICAL EXPLANATION OF THE INNOVATION PROMOTION ACT OF 2015 July 28, 2015 CONTENTS Page A. Deduction for Innovation Box Profits... 1 B. Special Rules for Transfers of Intangible Property From Controlled
More informationBEPS AND BEYOND BEPS: A BRAVE NEW WORLD IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY TAXATION?
Shreyash Shah 1 In an increasingly interconnected world, national tax laws haven t always kept pace with global corporations, fluid movement of capital and the rise of the digital economy, leaving gaps
More informationA guide to intellectual property and intangible assets
A guide to intellectual property and intangible assets Identifying, protecting and valuing intellectual property within your business Corporate Finance PRECISE. PROVEN. PERFORMANCE. Not surprisingly intellectual
More informationTax Cuts & Jobs Act: Considerations for Multinationals
ALE R T MEM ORAN D UM Tax Cuts & Jobs Act: Considerations for Multinationals February 5, 2018 On December 22, 2017, the President signed into law the 2017 U.S. tax reform bill formerly known as the Tax
More informationNew tax regime for intellectual property rights
New tax regime for intellectual property rights On 4 th August 2017, the bill no. 7163 regarding the new tax regime for IP rights has been introduced in accordance with the previous announcement that had
More informationState Tax Implications of Commodities Transactions
Scott Wright Andrew Appleby State Tax Implications of Commodities Transactions Sutherland SALT Financial Services Roundtable January 21, 2016 All Rights Reserved. This communication is for general informational
More informationTransfer Pricing Forum
Transfer Pricing Forum Transfer Pricing for the International Practitioner Reproduced with permission from Transfer Pricing Forum, 09 TPTPFU 36, 7/1/18. Copyright 2018 by The Bureau of National Affairs,
More informationProposed Anti-Hybrid Regulations under Sections 267A, 245A, and 1503(d)
Proposed Anti-Hybrid Regulations under Sections 267A, 245A, and 1503(d) Friday, January 25, 2019 On December 20, 2018, the Internal Revenue Service (the IRS ) and the Department of the Treasury (the Treasury
More informationBusiness Tax Reform: Where Are We Now?
70 th Annual University of Chicago Law School Federal Tax Conference Nov. 3, 2017 Business Tax Reform: Where Are We Now? Rosanne Altshuler David Hariton David P. Lewis Nicholas J. DeNovio (Moderator) 0
More informationIreland Intellectual Property incentives
Ireland Intellectual Property incentives 25 November 2014 Peter Vale, Grant Thornton Topics to be covered Budget 2015 changes, including Double Irish Intangible Asset Regime post Budget 2015 R&D tax credit
More informationEUROPEAN COMMISSION PRESENTS ANTI-TAX AVOIDANCE PACKAGE
EUROPEAN COMMISSION PRESENTS ANTI-TAX AVOIDANCE PACKAGE tax.thomsonreuters.com On January 28, 2016, the European Commission presented its Communication on the Anti-Tax Avoidance Package (ATA Package).
More informationBUSINESS IN THE UK A ROUTE MAP
1 BUSINESS IN THE UK A ROUTE MAP 18 chapter 02 Anyone wishing to set up business operations in the UK for the first time has a number of options for structuring those operations. There are a number of
More informationAnnual International Bar Association Conference Sydney, Australia. Recent Developments in International Taxation. Republic of Cyprus
Annual International Bar Association Conference 2017 Sydney, Australia Recent Developments in International Taxation Republic of Cyprus Venetia Argyropoulou European University of Cyprus v.argyropoulou@euc.ac.cy
More informationCONFERENCE AGREEMENT PROPOSAL INTERNATIONAL
The following chart sets forth some of the international tax provisions in the Conference Agreement version of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, as made available on December 15, 2017. This chart highlights only
More informationNew United States-Japan Tax Treaty Enters Into Force: New Withholding Rates Take Effect on July 1, 2004
New United States-Japan Tax Treaty Enters Into Force: New Withholding Rates Take Effect on July 1, 2004 4/2/2004 Client Alert On March 30, 2004, the Governments of the United States and Japan exchanged
More informationB.E.P.S. ACTION 4: LIMIT BASE EROSION VIA INTEREST PAYMENTS AND OTHER FINANCIAL PAYMENTS
B.E.P.S. ACTION 4: LIMIT BASE EROSION VIA INTEREST PAYMENTS AND OTHER FINANCIAL PAYMENTS Authors Stanley C. Ruchelman Sheryl Shah Tags Action 4 Financial Payments Interest Equivalents Interest Expense
More informationKPMG report: Initial impressions, proposed regulations implementing anti-hybrid provisions of new tax law
KPMG report: Initial impressions, proposed regulations implementing anti-hybrid provisions of new tax law December 21, 2018 kpmg.com 1 The U.S. Treasury Department and IRS on December 20, 2018, released
More informationConformity Issues in SALT
Carley Roberts, Partner Zachary Atkins, Associate TEI Nashville 2014 Spring Seminar Franklin, TN May 14, 2014 Conformity Issues in SALT Agenda Conformity and the State Income Tax Base Capital Gains Conformity
More informationThe Knowledge Development Box ( KDB ) Public Consultation Paper. We are writing to respond to the above named document issued on 14 January 2015.
47 49 Pearse Street, Dublin 2, IRELAND The Knowledge Development Box Public Consultation Tax Policy Division Department of Finance Government Buildings Upper Merrion Street Dublin 2 by email to KDBconsultation@finance.gov.ie
More informationFinance Bill Finance Bill Draft legislation on modified UK patent box. Executive Summary. December 2015
Finance Bill 2016 December 2015 Finance Bill 2016 Draft legislation on modified UK patent box Executive Summary On 9 December 2015, draft legislation was published in relation to modifying the UK patent
More informationU.S. tax reforms prevention of base erosion. S. Krishnan
U.S. tax reforms prevention of base erosion S. Krishnan 2 U.S. tax regime prior to 2018 Amongst the large economies in the world, the United States had the highest statutory corporate income tax rate upwards
More informationInternational Fiscal Association 2017 Rio de Janeiro Congress. cahiers. de droit fiscal international. volume 102. B: The future of transfer pricing
International Fiscal Association 2017 Rio de Janeiro Congress cahiers de droit fiscal international volume 102 B: The future of transfer pricing 1938-2017 Luxembourg Branch Reporters Nicolas Gillet* Antonio
More informationINSIGHT: Transfer Pricing of Financial Transactions
INSIGHT: Transfer Pricing of Financial Transactions Stuck between a Rock and a Hard Place The EU earnings stripping rules are expected to come into force by January 1, 2019, and multinationals will be
More informationTax Cuts & Jobs Act: Considerations for M&A
A LERT M EM OR A N D UM Tax Cuts & Jobs Act: Considerations for M&A January 17, 2018 On December 22, 2017, the President signed into law the 2017 U.S. tax reform bill formerly known as the Tax Cuts & Jobs
More information