Luxembourg Parliament adopts new IP regime

Transcription

1 26 April 2018 Global Tax Alert Luxembourg Parliament adopts new IP regime EY Global Tax Alert Library Access both online and pdf versions of all EY Global Tax Alerts. Copy into your web browser: Executive summary The Luxembourg Parliament recently adopted the draft law n on the new intellectual property (IP) regime (the Law). The text of the Law corresponds to the wording of the draft law as introduced before the Parliament 2 with one amendment on the definition of eligible expenses. The new wording clarifies that expenditures incurred by a permanent establishment (PE) located in a State party to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (EEA Agreement) qualify as eligible expenses, subject to all the other conditions being met, only insofar as the said expenditures are allocated to the taxpayer (i.e., to the head-office) pursuant to the double taxation treaty concluded with the country of location of the PE and are directly connected to the constitution, the development or the improvement of a qualifying IP asset. The above amendment aims to ensure, as foreseen by the final report on Action 5 of the Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) plan, on Countering Harmful Tax Practices More Effectively, Taking into Account Transparency and Substance established by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation (OECD), 3 that the same IP asset is not allocated to both the head office and the foreign PE. The provisions of the new IP regime are applicable as from fiscal year 2018.

2 2 Global Tax Alert Detailed discussion The new IP regime is in line with the so-called nexus approach, as established by the OECD in its final report on Action 5 of the BEPS plan. Under the nexus approach, the application of an IP regime should be dependent on the level of research and development (R&D) activities carried out by the taxpayer itself. The revised IP regime is introduced in the Income Tax Law through a new article 50ter which provides for an 80% tax exemption of the net income derived from qualifying IP. Based on the agreed nexus approach, the formula to be applied broadly corresponds to the proportion of qualifying expenditures compared to overall expenditures (nexus ratio) applied to the adjusted and compensated net eligible income from IP asset: Qualifying expenditures incurred to develop IP asset Adjusted and compensated Net income benefitting X = Overall expenditures incurred net eligible income from IP asset from tax exemption to develop IP asset Qualifying IP assets In line with the nexus approach, qualifying IP assets are patents and other IP assets that are functionally equivalent to patents if those IP assets are legally protected under national or international provisions. Functionally equivalent assets as listed by the Law comprise utility models, supplementary protection certificates on patents for pharmaceutical and plant protection products as well as extensions of supplementary protection certificates for products intended for pediatric use, plant breeders rights and orphan drug designations. The Law also includes copyrighted software in the list of qualifying IP assets, whereas marketing-related intangible assets such as trademarks or domain names no longer qualify under the new IP regime. Under the nexus approach, the aforementioned assets are however only eligible for the new IP regime if they result from an actual R&D activity undertaken by the taxpayer itself. Determination of the adjusted and compensated net eligible income from IP asset 1. Net eligible income from IP asset The net eligible income is defined as the gross eligible income minus (i) the overall expenditures and (ii) the expenditures that are indirectly linked to a qualifying IP asset. The determination of the latter must be made in line with the general rules applicable to the determination of taxable income, taking into account all relevant facts and circumstances for a given case. The gross eligible income includes income that is derived from the qualifying IP asset, being income received for the use or the right to use a qualifying IP asset, capital gains from the sale of a qualifying IP asset, embedded IP income from the sale of products or services and indemnities received in the framework of a judicial proceeding or an arbitration involving a qualifying IP asset. As a matter of principle, the net eligible income must be determined on an IP-asset-by-IP asset basis. However, in circumstances where a tracking by asset is not achievable, the taxpayer may use a product-based approach in which case the determination of the net eligible income is made by product or service (or families of products or services) (see below). Although the amount of the net eligible income realized during a given year constitutes the calculation basis of the amount that can benefit from the partial tax exemption, the said amount is still likely to be adjusted and compensated.

3 Global Tax Alert 3 2. Adjustment of the net eligible income According to the commentaries of the draft Law, the adjustment aims at ensuring that the net eligible income benefits from the partial tax exemption only insofar as it exceeds the amount of (direct and indirect) expenses in relation with the qualifying IP asset. To prevent the expenditures accounting treatment from having an impact on the amount subject to exemption, the Law foresees two different methods to determine the adjusted net eligible income. The first method applies in the case of deduction of the expenses related to the constitution of the qualifying IP asset (i.e., eligible asset booked as an expense) whereas the second method applies in the case that the expenses have been activated (i.e., eligible asset is amortized). First method In the case that the expenses in relation with the constitution of the underlying qualifying IP asset have been deducted from the taxable income of the financial year during which they have been incurred, they must be recaptured, i.e., the amount of the net eligible income is adjusted by adding back the sum of such negative income of prior years, provided that they have not yet been compensated with a positive income derived from the same qualifying IP asset. As long as the net eligible income is still negative after the adjustment, the partial tax exemption is not granted. Example: Tax year N N+1 N+2 Eligible income 55,000 55,000./. Expenses (80,000) Net eligible income (80,000) 55,000 55,000 + Sum of expenses to be recaptured (80,000) (80,000) (25,000) Adjusted net eligible income (80,000) (25,000) 30,000 Positive adjusted net eligible income 30,000 Second method In the case that the expenses in relation with the constitution of the underlying qualifying IP asset have been activated, the same principle applies: the amount to be recaptured consists of the amortization expenses of the same financial year and of prior years (i.e., the amount of the net eligible income is adjusted by adding back the amortization relating to the qualifying IP deducted during the same fiscal year as well as the sum of such negative income of prior years), provided that they have not yet been compensated with positive income derived from the same qualifying IP asset, including the gross book value of the activated expenses. Again, only a positive net eligible income after adjustment can benefit from the partial tax exemption. Example: Tax year N N+1 N+2 Eligible income 55,000 55,000./. Expenses (including amortization) (20,000) (20,000) (20,000) Net eligible income (20,000) 35,000 35,000 + Amortization to be added back 20,000 20,000 20,000./. Gross book value of qualifying IP asset (80,000) + Sum of expenses to be recaptured (80,000) (25,000) Adjusted net eligible income (80,000) (25,000) 30,000 Positive adjusted net eligible income 30,000

4 4 Global Tax Alert 3. Compensation of the net eligible income The compensation aims at offsetting the losses incurred by one qualifying IP asset with the profits incurred by another qualifying IP asset. If the adjusted net eligible income, determined as described above, is negative, it must be compensated with any other positive adjusted net eligible income (and up to the amount of such positive income) derived from any other qualifying IP asset. In such case, the amount of the negative adjusted net eligible income (in relation with the qualifying IP asset that had such negative income) is reduced by the amount of the aforementioned compensation; i.e., the sum of expenses to be recaptured the following year is reduced by the amount that has been used to compensate the other positive adjusted net eligible income. 4. Specific situations Migration to Luxembourg In the case of transfer of the statutory seat or head office of a collective corporate company, or transfer of a foreign PE to Luxembourg which implies that Luxembourg has going forward the right to tax the income derived by the company the determination of the net and not yet compensated negative income of the qualifying IP asset is to be done as if there had been no migration, i.e., the aforementioned provisions apply. In addition, if there has been a step-up in value of the qualifying IP asset upon the migration, the difference between the carrying value and the net book value is included in the net negative income for purposes of determining the sum of expenses to be recaptured in relation to the qualifying IP assets. As a consequence, this difference will ultimately reduce the amount of the net income benefitting from the tax exemption. Eligible asset already qualifying under the old IP regime Where a qualifying IP asset has been an eligible IP asset under the old IP regime, the sum of expenses to be recaptured will be determined as follows: As long as the old IP regime still applies, the expenses to be recaptured according to the provisions of the former regime constitute the expenses to be recaptured under the new regime. When the old IP regime ceases to apply, the determination of the expenses to be recaptured is to be done as for any other qualifying IP asset for which the expenses in relation with the constitution of the underlying qualifying IP asset have been activated. However, the remaining net book value of the qualifying IP asset at the date of opening of the first tax year for which the new IP regime applies will be taken over and is treated as negative income in relation with the qualifying IP asset under the new regime. Eligible IP asset relocated in the context of a tax neutral transfer If a qualifying IP asset is transferred in the context of a tax neutral transfer (e.g., contribution of an enterprise or autonomous part of enterprise to another company, merger or demerger), the determination of the net adjusted eligible IP income at the level of the beneficiary company is to be made as if no transfer took place, i.e., the net eligible income must be adjusted and compensated in the same way as it would have been adjusted and compensated at the level of the transferor. Determination of the nexus ratio The adjusted and compensated net eligible income obtained by application of the above described rules must then be multiplied by the nexus ratio, which is determined by the proportion of: The qualifying expenditures incurred by the taxpayer over the lifetime of the qualifying IP asset or the product or service (or product or service family) derived from qualifying IP assets (i.e., the expenses incurred during the current financial year and prior financial years). In order not to penalize taxpayers having engaged costs for the acquisition of IP or having incurred subcontracted expenditures from a related party for the R&D activity of a qualifying IP asset, the amount of qualifying expenditures is increased by 30% as long as the increased amount of qualifying expenditures does not exceed the taxpayer s overall expenditures. Compared to: The amount of overall expenditures incurred by the taxpayer over the lifetime of the qualifying IP asset or the product or service (or product or service family) derived from qualifying IP assets (i.e., the expenses incurred during the current financial year and prior financial years). 1. Qualifying expenditures Qualifying expenses must have been incurred for the purpose of actual R&D activities undertaken by the taxpayer itself and directly connected to the constitution, the development or the improvement of a qualifying IP asset.

5 Global Tax Alert 5 The expenses are included in the determination of the ratio at the time they are incurred, regardless what the accounting or tax treatment is. In the case of outsourcing of such R&D activities, only expenditures paid to unrelated parties are treated as qualifying expenditures. Expenditures paid to related parties (within the meaning of article 56 of the Income Tax Law), independently from their location and from the type of contractual engagement (subcontract or other contractual form) are not comprised in the qualifying expenditures, unless the expenditures are paid through a related party to an unrelated party without any mark-up (i.e., pass through costs). It should be noted that expenditures incurred by a PE may be treated as qualifying expenditures, provided that: The expenses are allocated to the taxpayer (i.e., to the headoffice) pursuant to the double taxation treaty concluded with the country of location of the PE The PE is located in a State party to the EEA Agreement other than Luxembourg The PE is operational at the time of the realization of the eligible income The PE must not benefit from a similar IP regime in the State of its location The taxpayer must perform and control all the key functions related to the R&D activities (i.e., DEMPE functions development, enhancement, maintenance, protection and exploitation) made by the PE and having generated the expenses, and the taxpayer assumes all the risks related to these functions. Costs for the acquisition of an IP asset, for the acquisition of a right entitling to engage in research activities and for the use or the right to use an IP asset are defined as acquisition costs and do not constitute eligible expenditures. The same holds true for interest and financing expenses, property-related costs and other expenditures that are not directly linked to a qualifying asset (exceptions as regards expenditures for general and speculative R&D as well as R&D costs which have not directly led to the creation of eligible IP assets are however foreseen). 2. Overall expenditures The overall expenditures comprise, in addition to the qualifying expenditures, the acquisition costs and any payments made to a related party for R&D activities made by such party for the benefit of the taxpayer and which are directly linked to the constitution, the development or the improvement of a qualifying IP asset. Those expenditures are to be taken into account in the year where they were incurred, irrespective of their accounting or tax treatment. Determination of the net income benefitting from the partial tax exemption The net eligible income benefitting from the tax exemption of 80% will be determined by applying the nexus ratio to the adjusted and compensated net eligible income. The partial tax exemption is however subject to the following additional conditions: The taxpayer must be able to track the qualifying expenditures, the overall expenditures and the eligible income derived from each qualifying IP asset, in order to establish the link between such income and expenses. Where such tracking becomes unrealistic due to a plurality of qualifying IP assets, the taxpayer may track and trace products or services (or product or service family) arising from IP assets rather than applying an IP-asset-by-IPasset approach. Under such product-based approach, the taxpayer is required to include all qualifying expenditures linked to the development of all IP assets that contributed to the product in qualifying expenditures and to include all overall expenditures linked to the development of all IP assets that contributed to the product or service (or product or service family) in overall expenditures. The taxpayer must justify on the basis of objective and verifiable information that the product-based approach is appropriate and consistent with the organization of R&D research and development activities. Overall expenditures and eligible income must be determined in line with the arm s-length principles. The taxpayer must keep documentation at the disposal of the Luxembourg tax administration that demonstrates the compliance with the aforementioned provisions. For income related to IP legally protected, an exemption applies from the date of application for IP protection. If the application for IP protection is subsequently denied or withdrawn, the benefits of the partial exemption are clawed back. Net wealth tax As it was already the case under the old regime, qualifying IP assets are exempt from net wealth tax.

6 6 Global Tax Alert Interaction between the old and the new IP regime As foreseen by the 2016 Budget Law, the old IP regime continues to apply, subject to certain conditions, until 30 June 2021, while the new regime applies as from fiscal year As a consequence, both regimes will co-exist during a certain period. The Law leaves it to the taxpayer to choose to apply the provisions of one or the other regime. The option for the new IP regime will however apply to all qualifying IP assets; it is thus not possible to apply the provisions of the new regime to determined qualifying assets only, whereas the provisions of the old IP regime would continue to apply to other qualifying assets. There is however one exception: if a determined IP asset does not qualify for the new IP regime, the provisions of the old IP regime will continue to apply during the transitional period to the income generated from such IP asset, regardless of an option for the new IP regime to apply to other qualifying IP assets. Restriction as regards the rollover provision Subject to certain conditions, the taxation of capital gains derived from the sale of certain assets may be deferred if the sales proceed are reinvested in a replacement asset (i.e., the said rollover regime for capital gains). The Law specifies that a qualifying IP asset does not qualify as a replacement asset under the rollover regime for the tax deferral of capital gains, i.e., the aforementioned tax deferral on capital gains is not granted if the sales proceeds are reinvested in an IP asset that would qualify under the new IP regime. Implications The recently adopted legislation is complex and subject to some strict conditions. Therefore, companies have to be prepared for the new requirements they now have to meet in order to benefit from the new IP regime. Groups may want to review and reconsider their current business model, especially where R&D activities are split between group companies. Since the new IP regime requires accurate tracking of expenditures and income in relation to qualifying IP assets, it is important to review the existing systems and processes and, where required, to put into place appropriate mechanisms to be able to identify the various income streams and to collect data on R&D expenditures. Endnotes 1. Draft law n 7163 was adopted on 22 March See EY Global Tax Alert, Luxembourg introduces draft law on new IP regime, dated 25 August Footnote n 4 on Section 33 of Chapter 4: Jurisdictions with IP regimes should ensure that the same IP asset is not allocated to both the head office and the foreign PE (e.g., because they apply the authorized OECD approach (AOA)).

7 Global Tax Alert 7 For additional information with respect to this Alert, please contact the following: Ernst & Young Tax Advisory Services Sarl, Luxembourg City Marc Schmitz, Tax Leader marc.schmitz@lu.ey.com Dietmar Klos, Tax Leader, Financial Services dietmar.klos@lu.ey.com John Hames, Global Compliance and Reporting Leader john.hames@lu.ey.com Giuseppe Tuzze, Global Compliance and Reporting giuseppe.tuzze@lu.ey.com Bart Van Droogenbroek, International Tax Services Leader bart.van.droogenbroek@lu.ey.com Olivier Bertrand, Transaction Tax Leader olivier.bertrand@lu.ey.com Nicolas Gillet, Transfer Pricing nicolas.gillet@lu.ey.com Christian Schlesser, OME Transfer Pricing christian.schlesser@lu.ey.com Yannick Zeippen, Indirect Tax Services yannick.zeippen@lu.ey.com Olivier Lambert, Indirect Tax Services olivier.lambert@lu.ey.com Ernst & Young LLP, Luxembourg Tax Desk, New York Serge Huysmans Xavier Picha serge.huysmans@ey.com xavier.picha@ey.com Ernst & Young LLP, EMEIA Financial Services Luxembourg Tax Desk, New York Jurjan Wouda Kuipers jurjan.woudakuipers@ey.com Hicham Khoumsi hicham.khoumsi1@ey.com Michel Alves De Matos michel.alvesdematos@ey.com Ernst & Young LLP, Luxembourg Tax Desk, Chicago Alexandre J. Pouchard alexandre.pouchard@ey.com

8 EY Assurance Tax Transactions Advisory About EY EY is a global leader in assurance, tax, transaction and advisory services. The insights and quality services we deliver help build trust and confidence in the capital markets and in economies the world over. We develop outstanding leaders who team to deliver on our promises to all of our stakeholders. In so doing, we play a critical role in building a better working world for our people, for our clients and for our communities. EY refers to the global organization, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients. For more information about our organization, please visit ey.com EYGM Limited. All Rights Reserved. EYG no Gbl NY ED None This material has been prepared for general informational purposes only and is not intended to be relied upon as accounting, tax, or other professional advice. Please refer to your advisors for specific advice. ey.com